User talk:JBW/Archive 6

3394:

note on the user talk page of the person who created the article warning them of the nomination, but I have not placed any such notice on your talk page. I therefore do not understand why you associate me with this deletion. However, now that you have called the matter to my attention, I have looked not only at the history of this article, but also at your other editing history, and I will let you know what I found, in the hope that it may help to clarify things for you.. I see that all of your editing consists of adding information about one company. Much of this has been expressed in unambiguously promotional terms. Some of it has been a direct copy of material on the company's web site. Much of it is the sort of commercial detail which would appear in a company's sales literature, rather than the sort of detached description to be found in an encyclopedia article. It is very difficult indeed to see your editing in any terms other than as trying to promote the company. In addition there are other issue with your editing, including repeated re-creation of deleted material, writing several separate articles to cover material which might at the most warrant one article, lack of any independent sources for the material you have written, etc. Although you are mistaken in thinking that I have deleted the article you refer to, it seems to me that much if not all of the material you have written is likely to be deleted. If you wish to avoid wholesale deletion of your work I strongly suggest reading Knowledge's policies and guidelines on

3135:

rewording it, or by saying that they have copyright permission, etc etc. It is also worth mentioning that there is nothing to stop you adding a new speedy deletion tag without removing the old one. It seems to be widely believed that this is forbidden, but it isn't, and sometimes I think there are good reasons for doing so. For example, if an article looks to me like both promotional and a copyvio I usually first tag only for promotion, warn the author, and then come back and tag for copyvio. The reason for this is: (1) I have found from experience that if it is tagged only for copyvio the author often wastes a lot of time and effort rewriting it, only to find that it is deleted anyway, which is frustrating for them, and I think it unfair to mislead them this way; (2) If, on the other hand, it is tagged only for promotion, that is a more subjective judgment than a copyvio, and there is a greater chance it will be declined, whereas if it is a clear copyvio then it should definitely be deleted. One more reason for tagging this one under A10 rather than G12 is that the author already had the other copy of the article tagged under G12, and this way they also get a talk page warning indicating that multiple copies of the same article are not acceptable, so it may help them to learn for the future. However, all this is a matter of judgment, and I am not going to quarrel with what you did. Thanks anyway for having the courtesy to explaini to me what you did: not everyone does that.

2247:" is relevant, as well as the general notability guideline. Mention in Knowledge articles is no evidence of notability, as Knowledge is not a reliable source. If you think about it, accepting Knowledge articles as reliable sources would make no sense: I could put a mention of myself in article A, use that as a source to justify putting myself in article B, and use that as a source to justify the inclusion in article A. Of the other two sources you mention, one is a sales page for a business selling Annelies Strba's work, and the other is a promotional site. (Its own web site says "The Institutional Membership enables you to actively support your artists' careers and market your sales".) Sites which sell a subject's work, or promote a subjects career and market their sales are not independent sources, and are no indication at all of notability. Any artist wishing to sell their work is likely to seek to get publicity on the internet, whether they are notable or not. I have searched myself, as well as checking the links you have provided, and seen no evidence at all that she comes anywhere remotely approaching either the general notability guidelines or the guidelines on creative professionals. 1213:

really make any difference: if there is no notability in Knowledge's sense for a subject then the article is likely to be deleted anyway. Recently there were numerous "references" added, but unfortunately most of them were not references at all in the sense which is relevant to establishing notability. For example, several of them were links to web pages about people or organisations mentioned in the article, but those web pages did not even mention you, so they were not directly relevant. I have tried, as I hope you appreciate, to help by explaining what sort of thing required, and also giving a link to the general notability guidelines. However, since suitable sources have still not been found despite considerable efforts, it looks rather as though there may simply not be notability in Knowledge's sense. As well as the general notability guidelines there are additional guidelines for notability of people. None of these guidelines refers specifically to dancers, the nearest being those for

727:, and Knowledge strongly discourages any editing of an article in which you have a conflict of interest. Thirdly, if the material was copied from www.subexworld.com then it is a breach of copyright, unless you have evidence that the owner of the copyright has given permission for free use of the material under the terms of Knowledge's licensing arrangements. Since www.subexworld.com displays the notice "© 2009 Subex Limited. All Rights Reserved" on every page I think it unlikely that they are willing to give permission for its free use, but in any case the onus is on you to show that this has been done. I shall post on your talk page a welcome notice, containing links to various Knowledge policies, guidelines, etc: you may find some of them useful in understanding how Knowledge works. Please feel welcome to ask me if there is any other help I can give. 1316:

If the necessary sources will include material I have no access to, I leave the job for others. I know I have made mistakes in deleting articles that actually did have some sources--a few have been pointed out to me from time to time, but I am sure there are others. The way we decrease error is by having people check each others' work--If you make 10% errors, and I make 10% errors, checking results in only 1%, which is probably about as good as we can get in a system like ours. Since people sometimes get careless without realizing it, I like to let people know if it's more than sporadic, or they seem to be making a systematic error, & I am glad that people do just the same to me. And there have even been times when someone has told me I ought to stop for the day, and they;'ve been perfectly right.

598:

thing one reads in an advertising brochure than in an encyclopedia article. A good deal of it is completely unsourced, and much of it, although given sources, is no more than the personal opinion of a not particularly notable individual. It is perfectly clear that your aim in editing this article is promotion of its subject. At least one other editor has suggested that you are in fact Lichtenstein, and it is quite clear that if you are not then you are someone with close connection to him. It is very difficult indeed to avoid the conclusion that when you protest about "a private person", and about "invading his privacy" what you are really objecting to is publishing information which you (and Lichtenstein, if that is not you) do not want to be prominent.

958:

people residing within the United States. Specifically, this creates a pattern, which justifies much of the content related to his interest and working with abused and neglected children cited on his wiki page. Did you also miss an entire news segment committed to his work,on the highest rated news network in Philadelphia - ABC 6, which is cited on his page? Also, not everybody has the opportunity to testify before legislative committees. Typically, staffs of these committees identify people who are considered, "notable" to participate. Lastly, most “notable” comments, found in articles, are merely a few lines. If you’d like, I could provide millions of examples. So, your comments to that end are also a bit off the mark.

264:. I am not sure what you mean by "how treat people": I have tried to explain as courteously as I can to an inexperienced editor why his editing is not consistent with Knowledge policy. It is also far from clear to me how he has "tried to help": all I see is repeated attempts to use Knowledge to publish promotional material about himself. However, perhaps I am missing something: if so please explain what. I have known new Knowledge editors before who have started out falling foul of Knowledge policies and guidelines, but whom I have been able to help, and I am certainly willing to do the same again for anyone who is willing to learn, so please let me know if there is any more help I can give. 433:

set up everything including season schedule game log and transactions, which is not easy to locate on the web concerning ECHL teams. I will take blame for the copyright of written material since, because I was still working on the page and forgot to show proper references and it is really dumb on my part since Knowledge follows certain rules concerning that. But I don't feel that deleting the entire page is acceptable, since this information will not be available after this season on the internet considering the ECHL will remove any important information from its website after this season.

1122:

copies of pictures of your awards, diplomas, competitions etc. Certainly this would serve as verification that you have received the awards, and if anyone questions the fact then that may be a useful thing to do. However, verification of facts is a quite different matter from establishing notability. No matter how much proof you can offer that the statements in the article are true, if you have not received substantial attention in independent published sources then you do not satisfy Knowledge's notability criteria.

3242: 3181: 3448: 31: 2306: 2986: 1148:

shall be very pleased, and you will no doubt be even more pleased. However, I think it is only fair to make it clear to you that when you asked "what is your suggestion to make my article valid" it is possible that you were asking the wrong question: if you have really not received substantial independent coverage then the article can never satisfy Knowledge's inclusion criteria, no matter how much it is rewritten.

1673: 629:

with the fact that you have repeatedly placed a statement about where he lives into the article. Furthermore, your question "why is it important to have david lichtenstein's residence location posted on his wikpedia page?" could just as well be addressed to you, since, as I have already reminded you, you have more than once posted a statement about where he lives in the article.

1128:

mentioning you, but most of them did not really fit the needs, for one reason or another. Many of them just about mentioned you, rather than giving significant coverage. Others appeared to be written by you, or on your behalf, or by or for some person or organisation that had an interest in promoting you. While page of this sort may be fine for verifying facts, they are not

594:

changed your mind on the existence of an article about Lichtenstein. You will recall that you said that he "is a private person", and did not want information about him to be made public, despite the fact that you have been a major contributor to the article, and the fact that Lichtenstein's company's web site publishes a very large amount of personal information about him.

3068:

are given the less likely will be deletion. Most of the references do not give significant coverage. Sometime I shall waste my time and everyone else's by taking this spam (which has been deleted 15 times) back to yet another AfD. However, as I said above, thanks for the courtesy of letting me know, and giving your reason: not everyone does that.

1873:

novels, not individual comics. I hope the changes will let Ministry comic stay on the site. If not, could you please tell me what additional changes need to be made and I will redo the article in my sandbox and submit it through the correct channels for approval and editing to bring it up to standard. Your help is much appreciated. Thank you.

1288:(unless there are some others somewhere I have forgotten: if so please give me links). The first of these you have deprodded and referenced. For the second, because of your post above, I have made further searches of several kinds, including GBooks as you suggested, and after a fair amount of time I found evidence of existence ( 1978:

do a rushed job. If you can bear to wait one more day I will try to make sure I look at it tomorrow. Unfortunately posting a request on an article's talk page depends on someone happening to see it there, and can be very much a hit and miss business. If you post such a request again you may find it helps to also post a note at

2471:

there are special reasons a discussion can be closed sooner, but generally it is considered better to let it run the full time. At the worst this means that an article which will eventually be deleted lasts a few days longer than would otherwise have have been the case, and at best it allows others to join in the discussion.

303:

be eventually deleted if it continues to look as though its main purpose is to promote the organisation. I shall also put a welcome message on your user talk page, which will include links to various pages which may be of help. You cannot be expected to read them all before starting, but you should at least be aware of "

3364:

I've noticed that you have deleted the page that i created called TIME Ethernet LAN due to G11 procedure or something. I apologize if it reads like advertising or promotion but i have no intention on promoting or advertising it is just for everyone to read as a knowledge and gain information on this.

1977:

Hello Norene. You followed perfectly correct procedure in requesting the edit, and I can imagine there is a certain degree of frustration in seeing no response. I will be perfectly happy to look at it myself, but at the moment I don't think I have the time to do the job properly, and I do not wish to

1473:

Yes, I see. That could happen, though it's not likely, as I thought it was not suitable as a Knowledge article anyway, for other reasons. Thanks for telling me, even so. Incidentally I make no apology for not noticing that the page I linked to was a Knowledge mirror: there is a limited amount of time

1358:

I fully accept every word of that, and, as for taking it in a negative way, there was no question of that. There are more than enough obstructive editors on Knowledge: I certainly don't want to start feeling negative towards constructive editors, even when I sometimes disagree with them, as I have in

1329:

Additionally, a good number of article on Philippines subjects have in the past been shown to be totally fallacious, after in some cases being in Knowledge for long periods--I recall particularly an extensive and elaborate hoax involving a fictitious broadcast network. I was aware that these were

1275:

Yes, you are right, at least up to a point. I did do some checking. Evidently I didn't look in the right places, but in my defense I will say that I don't spend the time to look everywhere I could: I genuinely think that on balance my time on Knowledge is spent more usefully by looking in a sample of

1257:

I have so far been able to all I have tried pretty trivially in GBooks. Please try the others you have nominated for deletion. Yes, the original author should have done it, and I left him a note to that effect, but if he does not, it's everyone;s responsibility. Per WP:BEFORE, it is in particular

302:

Well, the start made so far consists only of providing contact information. I will delete that, and also for the moment I will remove the speedy deletion tag to give you a chance to write an article. I wish you every success in improving the article, but you should realise that the article will still

3393:

First of all, I have not deleted it: I am not an administrator, and do not delete articles. I do nominate articles for deletion, and sometimes they then get deleted by an administrator. However, I have no memory of nominating this article, and anyway when I nominate an article for deletion I place a

3067:

Well, thanks for letting me know. However, I have checked the "references" and I don't agree. Several of the references are not in reliable sources. Several of the references do not mention the facts stated in the article, and look as though they have been added on the basis that the more references

2861:

I have had a look, and you are absolutely right: thanks for drawing my attention to this. The person who put that description there is normally a constructive editor, and I can't think why he wrote that. I don't know much about corpsmen, but I have put what I hope is an accurate description into the

2829:

He is a Marine, He has trained with the marines, He lives breaths and fights with the marines. Where they go, he goes. Oh and the bonus too he is there to give immediate medical attention in case one of his buddies gets hurt. (A TRAINED MEDIC) He carries medical supplies, and a gun! Someone needs

1315:

I appreciate your comment, and I'm glad you did not take it in a negative way, for it was not meant as such. Frankly, I too regard BEFORE as to some extent overambitious, and use my judgement in deciding how hard to look. If the material appears on its face exceedingly improbable, I tend not to try.

1031:

You put the note that the article doesn't have enough notability. I have to say that this is very difficult for me to find on-line articles and proofs of my article more than i already have at least for now. I have however the pictures of my awards, diplomas, competitions etc.. I have the break down

925:

promotional language in early versions of the article has gone, it still does not read as an objective view. If you cannot see that, then it seems to me that this is strong confirmation of a well-established fact: someone closely involved in a topic is likely to be unable to see things on that topic

647:

I realise now that in the above message I didn't actually answer your question. Sorry about that, and now here is an answer: it is not important to have Lichtenstein's residence location in the article, but if it is to be there it must be accurate. Putting misinformation in Knowledge articles is not

484:

sent me the following message that "The rules are complicated but I hope you will understand that I don't have the option to restore the page for you." on 12:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC). I would like that page to be restored with the exception of the season summary text or to gain permission to input

1961:

for a product line of the company I work for. I have not been able to find a guideline about how long to wait for someone else to make the edit or for feedback re: consensus/dissent before going ahead with the edit myself (working toward consensus before editing if there is dissent). Is there any

1212:

base notability essentially on coverage in published sources. No matter what private materials you can produce, unless there is substantial coverage in reliable independent sources the conclusion will be that you are not notable enough for an article. Adding or deleting particular sections will not

957:

Your comments about Charles A. Williams, III PhD are often nitpicky and short sighted. Given that he has been quoted, three times, within the past month, on a single subject, by newspapers in one of America's largest media markets, makes it notable; this does not happen for most of the 300 million

628:

You will recall that what prompted me to write this was your claim that including information about where Lichtenstein lives was "invading his privacy". Since the information is publicly available I do not see that as the case, quite apart from the fact that this view, as I have indicated, sits ill

432:

Hi is it possible that this page be reinstated. If the the actual written article is copyright infringement that is fine to erase, but the entire page is not acceptable, since the majority of the information are done in the same manner as the other professional team season pages. I worked hard to

2470:

It is usual to let an Articles for deletion discussion remain open for at least 7 days, to allow time for anyone who might wish to take part to do so. Sometimes there is active discussion for all of that time, but quite often all of what is to be said has been said within a much shorter period. If

1121:

essentially says that to qualify for an article a subject has to have received significant coverage in independent sources. There is no requirement for this coverage to be online: printed sources are perfectly acceptable, but obviously on-line coverage is usually easier to check. You offer to send

624:

Knowledge is not for promotion. People who are subjects of Knowledge articles cannot control what the articles contain: they do not own the articles, and cannot ensure that the articles contain only information which they want promulgated. You clearly have a conflict of interest, and should not be

597:

Your own editing of the article has consisted almost entirely of two elements: removing information about him which shows him in a negative light, frequently well-sourced, and inserting material which is highly promotional of him. Much of the material you have added looks far more like the sort of

284:

Hello I am trying to put up a page for Alliance for Animals, a non profit organization, that is a no kill animal shelter. I know that many are interested in its content, and I was planning on building the site to have history of the organization, its mission, etc. Please put the tag down. Thank

1172:

I will be happy to send you the print out from my classification dance book-those are public records but those are Russian date base and I do not know where I can have an access to this. I also have O1 visa in United States which means alien of extraordinary abilities because of my dancing. I can

593:

asked for sources confirming that the location other editors had substituted was correct, and so I provided them. Only after that has been done, in response to your request, have you changed your line to "publishing where he lives is an invasion of privacy". This is exactly similar to the way you

1872:

I have tried to add additional independent sources to my Ministry comic article in the external links. I have also removed elements that I can't back-up (i.e. my own interpretation of the comic.) Unfortunately I cannot give an ISBN for the comics as Indyplanet only applies those to their graphic

1147:

If you can offer sources confirming notability then that will be really good. If you would like to let me look at anything which you think may be suitable and let you know what I think then I will be happy to help. If we can give sufficient evidence of notability to justify keeping the article I

1141:

The result of the above is that there does not seem to be enough online coverage to establish notability, but there still remains the question of whether there is sufficient coverage in print. You mentionthe "break down from classification Book of Dance sport". What exactly is that? Is this an

569:

why is it important to have david lichtenstein's residence location posted on his wikpedia page. i think that would come under the category of invading his privacy. just because one of his addresses is listed on the loan documents doesn't mean that anyone looking on wikpedia has to know where he

346:

As far as I am concerned I am willing to leave the article for quite a while, say a month or so. However, there is no way I can promise that another editor may not find the article and decide it needs deletion at any time. I will put a note on the article's talk page asking for sympathy. I think

3134:

Yes, I see your edit summary says "copyvio's more important, I reckon", which is absolutely true. However, I tend to tag for A10 because that is usually immediately clear and unambiguous, and it avoids various problems such as an inexperienced editor thinking that they can save an article by

1709:

While I am aware that it is usual to avoid editing another user's user page, there are situations in which it is reasonable to make an exception. I judged that this was such a situation. If you disagree then you are welcome to explain why. However, to suggest that my edit "may be considered

1127:

The question, therefore, is whether you have received substantial coverage in independent sources. I understand what you say about difficulty in finding on-line sources, but even so I have spent quite a while searching, to see if I could find anything suitable. I found a good many web pages

1688:

may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to

830:

I do not know what you mean by "objective prose", but the material you have added is entirely promotional in nature. Since you wrote it yourself I find it hard to understand how you can be unaware of that fact, but here are a few quotations to illustrate the promotional nature of your

722:

On the contrary, you were acting against several Knowledge guidelines and policies. Firstly, the material you added was quite unambiguously of a promotional nature, and Knowledge does not accept promotion or advertising. Secondly, the fact that you work for Subex means that you have a

858:

And so it goes on. If you really cannot see that this is the sort of writing that appears in advertising copy, not in encyclopedia articles, then you may possibly not be suited to the task of writing encyclopedia articles on ahything, whether you have a conflict of interest or not.

1176:

I would rather delete everything which is not provable and have a very short article than having works on the top that this is not true. Please see my changed article and let me know if you want me delete 2 last paragraphs as well and will it be valid enough in this matter.

3428:

Hi there,oops,i thought that you are the administrator.It seems that the link i've clicked directed me to your page.Must be a miscommunication. Sorry about that.Anyway, i've detected the administrator who deleted my page. Sorry again for the trouble I've caused you.Thanks

1136:. Assuming this is an independent review service (which is what it looks like) and not an advertising service then it is a perfectly good source. However, even if it is a perfectly good source one brief online review may possibly not be regarded as "substantial" coverage. 1168:

Hi James, thank you for your reply. I have deleted all my titles since they are hardly "Provable", I have a lot of press on print materials as New York time Out, Go and Artist magazine, Dance Beat newspaper, American Dancer Magazine and others. Can I use it as a proof?

826:

There is no way that your editing could reasonably be described as "updating" information. You have added substantial amounts of new text, far longer than the entire length of the article before you edited it, and including material on topics not mentioned

3341: 1280:, I tend to regard it as somewhat of a counsel of perfection: it would be wrong to ignore its advice completely, but I am not convinced that it is realistic to expect everyone to always put a huge amount of time into checking. I prodded two such articles; 3114:

Um... I've changed your speedy tag to G12, because it's also a copyvio. Did you take a look at the article you linked to? It's by the same author. Just a heads up. Revert me if I did something wrong, I'm not very familiar with speedies. Thanks.

2757:

How sad that nobody likes me. How sad that numerous Knowledge editors keep persecuting you, despite the fact that you never do anything wrong. I never thought I was your boss, just that I was trying to help stop your disruptive editing.

110:

The other editor insists on the article the way it is. It is not NPOV. I added a section, as it was suggested I do, that presents the other side, with cites. He still removes it. I don't understand how this is allowed to continue.

2810: 3082:

Well I'd agree that not all the references are in reliable sources, but to my mind the relevant thing is that this time some are reliable. Lets hope the fan or whatever who writes this has learned a bit more about editing here.

2446: 3318: 2527:

Hi sorry to bother you but i felt it was important to point out my edit to the world cup video game was because of someone had deleted it all and just placed sssssssss repeateldy so i felt the need to delete it thank you x

2958:

was a very gracious thing to do, thank you. I also appreciate your keeping your cool in the face of some rather overlong responses to your original concerns... both at the article talk page and the AFD. Best reagrds,

2056:

Fine. From my quick look over your suggestion I thought it would probably be OK for you to do it too, but I didn't want to commit myself without checking more carefully. Thanks for letting me know it's dealt with now.

237:

Thanks james, So the $ 1000.00 I donated to Knowledge will be refunded .Yes? Or do stop payment on it ? you must make lots of money in donates if this is how you treat people that try to help. MaryAnn Smith(Steele)

1142:

independent published book? Or is it a personal, unpublished, record of yours? If it is a published source then it may be good enough for the purpose, but of course I cannot say so definitely without having seen it.

693:

I was updating the information from www.subexworld.com to subex wikipedia. As I work Subex, Bangalore I was updating the information on wikipedia. So I was not violating the guidelines. So it is an OBJECTIVE PROSE.

847:

Vector is a complete catalog-driven service fulfillment solution that enables service providers to ... better serve customers with on-demand offerings and support; drive costs out of their business through greater

2455:, but the articles entry there has not been edited for 2 days, and there has been no decision on weather or not these articles should be kept or deleted. Please explain the current status of these pages. Regards. 2611: 1710:

vandalism" seems to me absurd, and to describe it as "offensive" seems to be to use unnecessarily aggressive language under the circumstances. If you really do consider that my edit falls under the provisions of

1330:

people who ought to have left obvious records, and I would not have been totally surprised if I had found nothing--but if I did find nothing, a good deal would need to be double checked for similar problems.

1822:

I undid your revision on this page. The statement you restored is based on 3 really poor sources: An unsourced oppinion in a campus newspaper, a linkpage and a page that have a copyright-violation problem.

851:

By ensuring quick, reliable service fulfillment, NetProvision accelerates time-to-market for new offerings and facilitates mass-market efficiencies, while supporting crucial network transformation projects.

1292:), but still no evidence of coming anywhere near to satisfying the notability guidelines. This has, on the whole, confirmed my belief that my time would have been more constructively employed elsewhere. 2818:

Hello James, My son is a Corpsman for the marines currently stationed in Afghainstan. He is part of the Weapons Company CATT II. I take offense to the description of corpsman on the following page;

1714:

then I should be grateful if you could explain why. If, on the other hand, you do not think so, then perhaps you may like to consider whether use of this template message was appropriate in this case.

913:. I should have thought that the question would have been better addressed to the editor who placed that template there. I should also have thought that most of it was self-explanatory. For example " 3365:

However, I will try to change the text of the article as not to look like a promoting or advertising. I would highly appreciate if you can recreate or undelete the page that i have created.Thanks.

2192:

article. You removed this stating there is/was no evidence of notability of Annelies Štrba, the photographer I added. There is lots of proof of her notability. Her name is mentioned in the articles

212:

Have you edited under any other user name, or anonymously? I see the above message is the only edit from this account, and it seems a surprising query with no context in relation to other editing.

3336: 347:

there is a Knowledge template to put at the top of an article for this sort of situation, but I have never used it and don't remember what it is called. If I can find it I'll put that there too.

2730: 2955: 1117:

Here at last is a proper attempt at a reply: sorry it has taken so long. I don't know whether you have read any of the Knowledge notability guidelines, but if you do so you will find that the

458:, who deleted the article. I expect Deb will userfy the article so that you can work on it. If this has not been done within a couple of days contact me again here and I will follow it up. 132:

There is still no consensus although the addition is neutral. An admin put an edit block on the page. It seems to me your involvement before was NPOV. Can you please have a look again?

1732:

I was quite busy at the time, so I apoligize. I didn't know what was on that warning because I was going a little too quickly, and I realize that that warning was not appropriate. Sorry.

2130: 3298: 933:

This thread was started by a post from you on my talk page. However, it has now grown considerably, and, since it is really more to do with your editing than mine, I am copying it to

229: 197: 189: 2495: 2464: 3351: 2277:

according to the rules and guidelines of Knowledge. Only after the Štrba article is accepted by the Knowledge community I will put her into the Zug article again. Thanks again.

1929: 2563:

Yes, I saw an edit that seemed to replace the page with rubbish, and did not check back and see that what was there before was even worse. However, it has been put right now.

1550: 193: 185: 2750: 3327: 3320: 1962:

kind of generally accepted timeframe? My requested edit is verifiable, and I believe it is neutral and well cited. Any help you can provide is greatly appreciated.

1101:

Yes, I'm afraid I had forgotten about it, Natalia. Thanks for reminding me. I will make a note to deal with it within the next 24 hours: I hope much sooner than that.

952: 1035:

Please advise what is your suggestion to make my article valid? Should i e-mail you photocopy of all the proof maybe? or should i shorten it and change the wording?

891:

I think I have made necessary changes what you wanted and you also edited the document, then why the message is appearing at the top of the subex encyclopedia page.

253: 3108: 2898: 2853: 3038: 3031: 3029: 1421: 397:

That will do the job. I vaguely thought there was a different template which fitted the circumstances more precisely, but probably I had just misremembered what

261: 1646: 926:

from an impartial perspective, and is likely to be blind to the fact that coverage is from a limited point of view. This is one of the reasons why Knowledge's

841:

Learn how our suite of revenue maximization products offer you the ability to manage and reduce risks to the revenue chain and maximize operational efficiency.

3061: 2833:

If you are not that person that can help me with this, could you please direct me to someone that can? I appreciate your help. Thank you, Christie Pagano

970: 1570: 1551: 977:

Although my usual practice, as described above, is to answer talk page comments on the same page, this time I have thought it more appropriate to respond at

2084: 571: 2572: 2554: 1905: 1582: 999: 895: 874: 785: 762: 743: 702: 260:

I would not have the remotest idea what you were talking about were it not for the fact that your edit history shows that you have made several edits to

221: 1011: 3430: 3373: 2716: 2665: 1923: 1881: 1854: 1824: 2800: 2786: 1441: 1038:

By the way, i am not a very strong user of wikipedia, so i am not sure how to go back and read the answer, so if you could kindly send me response at

148: 2886: 2841: 2680: 2354: 201: 3099: 3077: 3166: 3144: 1658: 2501:

Well, I have no more information to go on than you. However, glancing over the discussion I should say it looks like a broad consensus to delete.

2087:, and I just want to let you know that GFDL-only text can no longer be used on Knowledge since the switch to dual licensing on June 16, 2009 (see 1754:

OK, no harm done. It seems that you used Twinkle to "rollback (vandal)", but I think it's better to use just "rollback" except in cases of really

2585:

m sorry sir .... i was just trying to add some new information to that article but accidently it got deleted. thanx 4 regenerating it again....

1600: 1422: 1402: 1081: 1048: 991: 2767: 2693:

Your thanks are appreciated. We both wasted a good deal of time and effort that could have been spent on better things, but it was worth doing.

1595:

Hello James. I've removed the prod template and I added reliable citations. Robert Nebřenský is a notable musician and actor, well known in the

638: 331:

Hello thank you for the time. Can you let me know how much time I have, since I am working on a few major projects at the moment? Thank you.

273: 2600: 2173: 2159: 2124: 2115:

Yes, thank you. I knew that really, but didn't think. Do you have a suggestion for better wording for similar advice I may give in the future?

1633: 946: 751: 736: 657: 332: 288: 160: 3422: 2580: 1947: 1847: 1627: 2871: 2712: 2702: 2661: 1893: 1574: 1542: 1524: 1483: 550: 511:

I've left a comment on Deb's page regarding this - if she doesn't mind then I'm happy to restore the non-prose parts of the article for you.

416: 384: 1455:. Just letting you know in case you realise your mistake and are tempted to replace the material in the impression that it's not a copyvio. 3313: 2510: 2480: 2408: 2313: 2299: 2286: 2256: 1952: 1867: 1162: 1110: 426: 2543: 2066: 2013: 1991: 1464: 467: 356: 324: 2720: 2220:

I would like to add her again as being a notable person born in Zug, this time with references. Is that ok by you? Thanks for your time.

1971: 1767: 1741: 1723: 446: 3153:

Okay, thanks. I didn't know you could add more than one speedy tag to the same article. Thanks for explaining it, I think I get it now.

921:". Then we have "It is written like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view": although some of the most 2688: 2626: 1247: 1230: 1201: 978: 1982:, in the hope that that will accelerate the process. If you like you can do so now, if you don't want to wait for me to deal with it. 1569:

has now been nominated for deletion due to notability concerns. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at

1368: 1341: 1301: 494: 2419: 2201: 2039: 180: 3128: 2401: 520: 3297: 3259: 3198: 2550:

I took some time to clean up the article and it should be okay now. Things can get messy when multiple users vandalize an article.

2522: 1258:

your responsibility before proposing deletion. I wouldn;t ask you if I weren't doing my share also, but I can;'t do it all. `

1093: 1056: 2294: 1618:

Good. I am glad that there is evidence to justify keeping the article, which was not clear before. Thanks for clearing this up.

1500:

tool? I'm confident from your anti-vandal contributions that you'd use it sensibly, so let me know if youd like me to grant it.

3413:

If you have any questions about his please feel very welcome to post again on my talk page. I will try to be helpful if I can.

2381: 1612: 683: 2441: 1913: 1812: 1789:. However, it was written that way to conform to the standard format for entries which have a "primary" meaning (in this case 1414: 340: 296: 141: 126: 2943: 2654: 2425: 1862: 1832: 1654: 1558: 1017: 802:

It is difficult to see how I can make this any clearer than I have done above. However, I shall try to clarify a few points.

579: 2109: 2640: 2592: 2229: 2027: 2001: 1979: 3438: 3385: 2971: 1428:

Hi, I removed most of the article that violated copyright rules. Please let me know if it is still problematic. Thanks, --

1269: 1039: 3305: 3248: 3241: 3187: 3180: 2742: 1153:

Please feel welcome to contact me again with any more questions. I hope in future I shall be able to reply more quickly.

245: 844:

Moneta is highly effective in both traditional circuit-switched and Next Generation packet-switched service environment.

3285: 3223: 3163: 3125: 2927: 2535: 1777: 1239: 1193: 710: 133: 118: 3292: 3381: 2905: 1889: 1285: 1252: 279: 3255: 3230: 1067:

This is Natalia Sosnina. As you have sugested to send you a reminder-i am doing so. Looking forward to your answer.

2894: 2849: 2551: 1380: 754:

I was not violating the guidelines, I was pasting the contents from subex website(www.subexworld.com) to wikipedia.

3194: 930:

editing by anyone with a conflict of interest, as I have pointed out before, but which you have decided to ignore.

2781: 2452: 2385: 1786: 1702: 1509: 917:" means just what it says: there are no sources given apart from the company's own press releases etc. Likewise " 793: 3107: 2620: 1587: 1410: 1089: 903: 882: 770: 714: 1797: 2913: 2612:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Z_Victor_Alpha_reported_by_User:Tadija_.28Result:_.29

2183: 1515:

Interestingly enough I had been wondering about asking for rollback rights. Yes, I think it might be useful.

1007: 777:

As Subex is my company, We have to update information about Subex on wikipedia. So it is an OBJECTIVE PROSE.

589:

repeatedly posted a statement as to where Lichtenstein lived, and did not regard it as invasion of privacy.

2451:

The dismabiguation pages that I created were nominated for deletion, and there was a discussion ongoing at

1900: 1817: 678: 105: 3021: 3090: 3052: 2373: 2317: 2295: 1388:

Thank you for your message regarding the references. I will get the exact links and add them, and more.

1132:

coverage, and so are no use for establishing notability. Of the pages I looked at the most promising was

2669: 3455: 2377: 2266: 2240: 2088: 2078: 1608: 564: 401: 369: 231: 38: 3356: 3001: 2968: 2906: 2648: 2616: 2217: 1650: 934: 3514: 3418: 3140: 3073: 2867: 2796: 2773: 2763: 2698: 2634: 2596: 2568: 2506: 2476: 2252: 2169: 2120: 2062: 1987: 1843: 1763: 1719: 1623: 1520: 1479: 1364: 1297: 1226: 1158: 1106: 1003: 987: 966: 942: 864: 732: 653: 634: 546: 463: 412: 352: 320: 269: 217: 156: 97: 3506: 3501: 3489: 3484: 3476: 3309: 2746: 1448: 1289: 1208:

Firstly, apologies for taking so long to reply to your latest message. Unfortunately Knowledge's

675: 665: 575: 312: 249: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1676:

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the

3279: 3217: 3085: 3047: 2934:

I have restored it. I am notifying you in case you wish to consider taking it to AfD. Regards,

2931: 2921: 2826:

Corpsman - The platoon's corpsman take up a seat in the vehicle. (THEY HAVE TO BE KIDDING ME)

2539: 2149: 2134: 2131:

Knowledge:Donating_copyrighted_materials#Granting_us_permission_to_copy_material_already_online

2099: 1909: 1838:

Yes, I think you are right: I should have checked more carefully. Thanks for putting me right.

1638:

He really helps for fertility patient in UK. Because of him, I am a mum now. (Chank Hong Lui)

1243: 1197: 899: 878: 789: 766: 747: 706: 137: 122: 3434: 3377: 3155: 3117: 2948: 2862:

article. Please let me know if it is still not OK, or if there is any other help I can give.

1885: 1858: 1828: 1665: 1604: 1589: 1566: 1562: 1218: 773:

So can I continue with editing of Subex Knowledge from my company website www.subexworld.com.

1133: 3395: 3369: 2961: 2890: 2882: 2845: 2837: 2738: 2684: 2644: 2588: 2531: 2236: 1877: 1642: 1538: 1505: 1460: 1398: 1281: 1209: 1189: 1118: 1077: 1032:

from my classification Book of Dance sport, but unfortunately those are not on-line links.

698: 671: 610: 516: 380: 308: 241: 114: 2205: 8: 3403: 2676: 2630: 2389: 2365: 2342: 2213: 1711: 1690: 1681: 1677: 1435: 962: 961:

By the way, we will be adding more press citations, which will only contain a few lines.

674:

where DASHbot listed some 80 biographies, many of which appear to be Go players. Thanks,

618: 3235: 2491: 2460: 2282: 2225: 2193: 1497: 1406: 1214: 1085: 1052: 809:

true that because you work for Subex you have to edit the article about Subex. In fact

3037:

Hello JamesBWatson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

2878:

PERFECT! Thank you so much! :) I appreciate your help. Your the best! Christine

2091:). The content has to be released under the CC-By-SA license to be used here. Cheers, 3414: 3268: 3206: 3136: 3069: 2917: 2863: 2792: 2759: 2694: 2564: 2502: 2472: 2415: 2397: 2350: 2248: 2165: 2144: 2116: 2094: 2085:

User_talk:Pencubitt#Problems_with_copyright_permission.2C_conflict_of_interest.2C_etc

2058: 2035: 2009: 1983: 1967: 1958: 1839: 1759: 1715: 1619: 1516: 1491: 1475: 1360: 1293: 1222: 1154: 1102: 983: 938: 860: 728: 649: 630: 542: 490: 459: 442: 408: 348: 336: 316: 292: 265: 213: 173: 152: 3342:

Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

2331: 2274: 2026:

PS--Thanks for your generous offer to take a look. I was advised by two editors at

3174: 2976: 2939: 2270: 2244: 1938: 1808: 1737: 1698: 1685: 1578: 1277: 2447:

Proposed deletion of meningitis (dismabiguation) and related disambiguation pages

2330:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1916:

Finally you have edited the subex wikipedia, so have not added anything to that.

1534: 1501: 1456: 512: 376: 3463:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

166: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3013: 2486:

In this particular case, do you expect the disambiguation pages to be deleted?

1790: 1596: 1430: 1221:; both of these place quite high standards, as you will see if you read them. 3464: 3407: 3304:

Sounds good to me. The other two entries in the trilogy are now in oblivion.

2949: 2487: 2456: 2437: 2360:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2278: 2221: 1337: 1265: 1173:

send it to you as well; this is of course a public record in the immigration

937:. I suggest that any further discussion on this should be on your talk page. 820: 819:

you from editing an article about a company you work for, as you will have a

724: 688: 614: 602: 455: 304: 47: 17: 1451:) is in fact a mirror of a previously deleted version which was copied from 3399: 3041:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 2708: 2606: 2411: 2393: 2138: 2031: 2005: 1963: 1957:

Hello JamesBWatson. Two days ago, I posted a Request Edit template to the

909:

I assume you mean the "multiple issues" template at the top of the article

606: 486: 438: 2735:

Nobody likes you. I didn't do anything wrong. You're not the boss of me.

2935: 2830:

to research the true meaning of a corpsman and change this immediatly.

1933: 1804: 1733: 1694: 1235:

OK, thank you. please give me some time i will see what i can do. Best,

2305: 2197: 2325:

Not speedy deletable, but it may not be notable and is poorly sourced.

1028:

My name is Natalia Sosnina and you have revised my page on Knowledge.

915:

It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications

3348: 3005: 885:

So we understand the Knowledge guidelines, so we will abide by that.

2430:

Thanks; I've salted it, and blocked the user as promotional-only.

1561:, a discussion in which you participated, was closed as redirect to 3043:

Doesn't meet G4 as this version has references in reliable sources.

2985: 2432: 1332: 1260: 838:

Learn about our suite of breakthrough service fulfillment products.

481: 2821: 2812: 2218:

http://www.artfacts.net/en/artist/annelies-strba-1515/profile.html

670:

Since you seem to know a fair bit about this area, please look at

2912:

You PRODded this article and it was deleted: undeletion has been

2137:(this one is good if you've blanked the article and listed it at 1452: 454:

I see you have also posted this message to the user talk page of

149:

Talk:Fairfax_County_Public_Schools#Response_to_a_request_for_help

315:. If you have any questions please feel welcome to ask me here. 2731:

Message from sockpuppet of HorseGirl070605 (aka ChristianGirl2)

2209: 541:

Thanks, Olaf, that's exactly what I hoped some admin would do.

3332:

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

2188:

Hello, I recently added the "notable people" paragraph in the

1672: 1290:

http://www.philembassy-uk.org/philemb_previousAmbassadors.html

981:, on the talk page of the puppet master for the above account. 910: 601:

I strongly recommend that you read Knowledge's guidelines on

3326:

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of

3262:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3201:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

919:

It may contain improper references to self-published sources

3328:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

3321:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

979:

User_talk:Drchuckwilliams#Your message on my user talk page

617:, particularly the section relating to using Knowledge for 1447:

By the way James, the page you tagged it as a copyvio of (

2407:

Sorry for the template. Here are some possible sources:

2204:

and she has her own article on the German Knowledge (see

2189: 1693:

for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.

2004:, but now I've gone ahead and posted my request there. 2337:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2214:

http://www.artnet.com/artist/16201/annelies-strba.html

2000:

Thank you for your quick reply. I did not know about

2273:. I will do my best to put together an article about 1571:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler

1552:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler

1533:

Well, clearly you're fated to have them then. Enjoy.

2235:

I suggest that you read the Knowledge guidelines on

2711:vandals must be stopped immediately. Good work! -- 953:Your Comments Regarding Chales A. Williams III PhD 2675:Thank you both for your help in reverting all of 2822:http://en.wikipedia.org/Combined_Anti-Armor_Team 2813:http://en.wikipedia.org/Combined_Anti-Armor_Team 2129:Well, you could probably just reuse the text at 1276:places and then moving on to other work. As for 758:I work for subex so I was updating the content. 585:Frankly I find this message quite disingenuous. 3004:and was very impressed. Keep up the good work. 2384:can result in deletion without discussion, and 1423:Ramakrishna Mission Sri Koneswara Hindu College 192:) 11:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)where do u live? 2772:Ooh, don't be sad James - I like you :-) -- 2030:to make the edit myself and I've done so. 1924:Speedy deletion criteria G5 - A discussion 2983: 2811:The following page needs to be edited... 1796:There's more information on the subject 2349:notice, but please explain why in your 2202:Metronome (artists' and writers' organ) 1928:Hi there. I've started a discussion at 485:the information all over again. Thanks 151:. I hope my response has been helpful. 14: 3461:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3247:Hello, JBW. You have new messages at 3186:Hello, JBW. You have new messages at 2930:), who says he will expand it, so per 1932:that I'd value your input on. Thanks. 1634:Regarding the article of Chak hong Lui 570:lives! can't you just leave it alone? 176:|Mlaffs|Proposed deletion of WCSD-LP}} 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1559:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/JWASM 1044:I am looking forward your feed back. 3442: 2083:Hi JamesBWatson. I saw your post at 2028:Knowledge:Editor assistance/Requests 2002:Knowledge:Editor assistance/Requests 1980:Knowledge:Editor assistance/Requests 1953:How long to wait for Requested Edit? 1868:Re: Ministry comic proposed deletion 1496:Hi James. Are you interested in the 1474:that's worth spending on searching. 427:2006-07 Victoria Salmon Kings season 25: 2581:Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy 2212:and Artfacts.net. See the websites 23: 3240: 3179: 2332:deleted for any of several reasons 2320:because of the following concern: 2304: 1680:of another user may be considered 24: 3528: 3347:Your opinion on this is welcome. 2208:). Her work is also mentioned on 1286:Jose Manuel Estela Stilianopoulos 375:? I've added one to the article. 181:Query from Sreenikethaathreya1998 3446: 3299:Pocos Pero Locos: The Soundtrack 2984: 2523:FIFA World Cup 2010 (video game) 1671: 230:Anonymous post apparently about 29: 2453:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 2243:. The notability guideline on " 1787:Fantasy Island (disambiguation) 1041:i would greatly appreciate it! 13: 1: 3439:09:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 3423:09:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 3386:07:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 3352:02:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 3314:20:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 3293:21:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 3256:21:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 3231:21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 3195:21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 3167:21:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3145:21:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3129:21:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3100:10:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3078:10:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3062:10:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3022:12:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 2972:19:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 2944:17:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 2899:04:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 2872:10:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 2854:05:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 2801:19:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 2791:Wow! Somebody does! Woo hoo! 2787:11:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 2768:10:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 2751:09:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 2721:23:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2703:22:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2689:22:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2670:22:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2601:20:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2573:20:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2555:20:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2544:19:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2511:17:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2496:16:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2481:16:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2465:16:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2442:22:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2426:NaturalInformation conference 2287:19:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 2265:Thank you for pointing me to 1684:. Specifically, your edit to 1599:, as well as his former band 1210:general notability guidelines 1180:Looking forward your advise, 1134:this metropolitan report page 1018:Question from Natalia Sosnina 2420:21:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2402:21:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2257:07:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2230:20:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 2174:15:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 2160:15:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 2125:15:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 2110:23:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 2067:07:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 2040:22:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 2014:20:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1992:20:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1972:20:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1948:10:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1914:09:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1894:05:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1863:11:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 1848:19:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1833:18:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1813:14:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1768:13:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1742:13:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1724:13:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1703:13:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1659:16:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1628:12:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1613:12:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1583:09:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1543:19:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 1525:18:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 1510:18:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 1484:17:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 1465:17:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 1442:17:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 1415:22:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 1369:20:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 1342:20:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 1302:20:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 1270:01:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 1248:20:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 1231:13:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 1202:18:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1163:11:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 1119:general notability guideline 1111:21:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1094:21:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1057:03:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1012:18:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 992:08:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 971:17:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 947:11:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 904:03:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 883:11:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 794:04:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 771:04:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 752:12:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 737:12:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 715:11:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 684:19:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 658:08:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 639:20:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 580:19:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 551:09:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 521:21:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 495:10:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 468:08:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 447:16:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 417:08:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 385:22:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 357:20:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 341:17:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 325:17:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 311:. Also you should check the 297:16:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 274:13:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 254:13:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 222:12:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 202:11:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 161:11:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 142:18:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 127:06:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 7: 2388:allows discussion to reach 307:" and of the guidelines on 10: 3533: 3337:Proposal to Close This RfC 3030:Speedy deletion declined: 2267:Knowledge:Reliable sources 2089:Knowledge:Licensing update 1785:I note that you tidied up 1778:Disambiguation Page Format 813:is true: Knowledge policy 232:User:David Steele Searacer 2990: 2907:Euro Ice Hockey Challenge 2374:proposed deletion process 1253:Philippine administrators 365:Maybe you're thinking of 280:Alliance for Animals page 3410:before writing any more. 3249:Kirachinmoku's talk page 3188:Kirachinmoku's talk page 2932:WP:DEL#Proposed deletion 1381:Jon Johanson, references 1000:sockpuppet investigation 2382:speedy deletion process 2355:the article's talk page 3245: 3184: 3109:Lamont Johnson Bassist 2552:Reach Out to the Truth 2309: 2245:Creative professionals 2135:User:Moonriddengirl/vp 1215:creative professionals 194:Sreenikethaathreya1998 186:Sreenikethaathreya1998 3459:of past discussions. 3319:Final discussion for 3244: 3183: 3039:Joel William Gonzales 3032:Joel William Gonzales 2994:The Guidance Barnstar 2386:articles for deletion 2318:proposed for deletion 2308: 2184:Notable people of Zug 1567:Open Watcom Assembler 1563:Open Watcom Assembler 625:editing this article. 615:what Knowledge is not 407:said. Thanks anyway. 305:What Knowledge is not 262:David Steele Searacer 42:of past discussions. 3408:conflict of interest 2617:Neutral Solution 100 1901:WIKIPEDIA CORRECTION 1818:Diamond Way Buddhism 1800:, hope it's useful. 1282:Mariano Garchitorena 928:strongly discourages 821:conflict of interest 816:strongly discourages 725:conflict of interest 672:User talk:CanbekEsen 619:promotional purposes 613:, and the policy on 603:conflict of interest 147:I have responded at 106:FCPS No Contact Rule 2677:User:Z Victor Alpha 1691:Knowledge:User page 1359:the past with you. 1004:Steamroller Assault 805:It is emphatically 167:Talkback January 18 3260:remove this notice 3246: 3199:remove this notice 3185: 2378:deletion processes 2310: 2194:Galerie Rudolfinum 2079:GFDL and Knowledge 1557:Hi, JamesBWatson. 1025:Hope all is well, 811:the exact opposite 565:David Lichtenstein 3520: 3519: 3471: 3470: 3465:current talk page 3389: 3372:comment added by 3357:TIME Ethernet LAN 3027: 3026: 2902: 2885:comment added by 2857: 2840:comment added by 2741:comment added by 2591:comment added by 2534:comment added by 2296:Proposed deletion 2206:de:Annelies Štrba 1897: 1880:comment added by 1662: 1645:comment added by 1418: 1401:comment added by 1192:comment added by 1097: 1080:comment added by 998:I have created a 888:Regards AbhayHi, 718: 701:comment added by 681: 402:Underconstruction 370:Underconstruction 244:comment added by 117:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3524: 3498: 3473: 3472: 3450: 3449: 3443: 3400:reliable sources 3388: 3366: 3288: 3282: 3274: 3271: 3266:extended reply 3263: 3226: 3220: 3212: 3209: 3202: 3162: 3160: 3124: 3122: 3097: 3093: 3088: 3059: 3055: 3050: 3017: 3010: 2988: 2981: 2980: 2964: 2901: 2879: 2856: 2834: 2784: 2779: 2753: 2603: 2546: 2371: 2370: 2364: 2348: 2347: 2341: 2241:reliable sources 2155: 2152: 2147: 2105: 2102: 2097: 1945: 1936: 1896: 1874: 1686:User:Snowboard27 1675: 1661: 1639: 1590:Robert Nebřenský 1438: 1433: 1417: 1395: 1204: 1096: 1074: 717: 695: 679: 607:reliable sources 406: 400: 374: 368: 256: 177: 129: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3494: 3447: 3367: 3359: 3324: 3302: 3291: 3286: 3280: 3272: 3269: 3264: 3253: 3238: 3229: 3224: 3218: 3210: 3207: 3203: 3192: 3177: 3156: 3154: 3118: 3116: 3112: 3095: 3091: 3086: 3057: 3053: 3048: 3035: 3020: 3015: 3006: 2979: 2962: 2953: 2910: 2880: 2835: 2816: 2782: 2774: 2736: 2733: 2645:Warcrimesexpert 2609: 2586: 2583: 2529: 2525: 2449: 2428: 2368: 2362: 2361: 2345: 2339: 2338: 2303: 2186: 2153: 2150: 2145: 2103: 2100: 2095: 2081: 1955: 1939: 1934: 1926: 1903: 1875: 1870: 1853:You're welcome 1820: 1780: 1668: 1647:Fertilitylondon 1640: 1636: 1593: 1555: 1494: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1396: 1383: 1255: 1187: 1075: 1020: 1002:for this user. 955: 696: 691: 668: 666:More Go players 567: 429: 404: 398: 372: 366: 282: 239: 235: 209:Why do you ask? 183: 171: 169: 112: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3530: 3518: 3517: 3512: 3509: 3504: 3499: 3492: 3487: 3482: 3479: 3469: 3468: 3451: 3426: 3425: 3411: 3358: 3355: 3345: 3344: 3339: 3323: 3317: 3301: 3296: 3277: 3254:Message added 3252: 3239: 3237: 3234: 3215: 3193:Message added 3191: 3178: 3176: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3148: 3147: 3111: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3034: 3028: 3025: 3024: 3012: 2997: 2996: 2991: 2989: 2978: 2975: 2952: 2947: 2909: 2904: 2877: 2875: 2874: 2815: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2679:'s vandalism! 2631:Z Victor Alpha 2608: 2605: 2593:119.111.109.88 2582: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2558: 2557: 2524: 2521: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2513: 2484: 2483: 2448: 2445: 2427: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2392:for deletion. 2372:will stop the 2328: 2327: 2302: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2275:Annelies Štrba 2260: 2259: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2080: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 1995: 1994: 1954: 1951: 1925: 1922: 1920:Regards Abhay 1919: 1902: 1899: 1869: 1866: 1851: 1850: 1819: 1816: 1803:All the best, 1791:Fantasy Island 1779: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1727: 1726: 1667: 1664: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1597:Czech Republic 1592: 1586: 1554: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1528: 1527: 1493: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1468: 1467: 1425: 1420: 1391:Thanks again, 1382: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1307: 1305: 1304: 1254: 1251: 1207: 1166: 1165: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1143: 1138: 1137: 1124: 1123: 1114: 1113: 1061: 1047:Best. Natalia 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 995: 994: 963:JamesBeeWatson 954: 951: 950: 949: 935:your talk page 931: 894:Regards Abhay 873: 871: 870: 869: 868: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 849: 845: 842: 839: 833: 832: 828: 824: 797: 796: 780: 775: 774: 756: 755: 740: 739: 690: 687: 667: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 642: 641: 626: 622: 599: 595: 566: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 473: 472: 471: 470: 435: 434: 428: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 390: 389: 388: 387: 360: 359: 330: 328: 327: 281: 278: 277: 276: 234: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 210: 182: 179: 168: 165: 164: 163: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3529: 3516: 3513: 3510: 3508: 3505: 3503: 3500: 3497: 3493: 3491: 3488: 3486: 3483: 3480: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3452: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3362: 3361:Hello there, 3354: 3353: 3350: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3330: 3329: 3322: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3306:147.70.242.54 3300: 3295: 3294: 3289: 3283: 3276: 3275: 3261: 3257: 3250: 3243: 3233: 3232: 3227: 3221: 3214: 3213: 3200: 3196: 3189: 3182: 3168: 3165: 3161: 3159: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3127: 3123: 3121: 3110: 3101: 3098: 3094: 3089: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3060: 3056: 3051: 3044: 3040: 3033: 3023: 3019: 3018: 3011: 3009: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2995: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2974: 2973: 2970: 2969: 2966: 2965: 2957: 2951: 2950:Money as Debt 2946: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2908: 2903: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2831: 2827: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2785: 2780: 2778: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743:71.68.211.187 2740: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2658: 2656: 2653: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2613: 2604: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2520: 2517: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2434: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2367: 2358: 2356: 2352: 2344: 2335: 2333: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2319: 2315: 2307: 2301: 2297: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2148: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2098: 2090: 2086: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1960: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1943: 1937: 1931: 1921: 1917: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1898: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1799: 1794: 1792: 1788: 1783: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1674: 1666:February 2010 1663: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1553: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1434: 1424: 1419: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1211: 1205: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1045: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1022:Hello James, 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 996: 993: 989: 985: 982: 980: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 959: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 929: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 906: 905: 901: 897: 892: 889: 886: 884: 880: 876: 866: 862: 857: 850: 846: 843: 840: 837: 836: 835: 834: 829: 825: 822: 818: 817: 812: 808: 804: 803: 801: 800: 799: 798: 795: 791: 787: 784: 783: 782: 778: 772: 768: 764: 761: 760: 759: 753: 749: 745: 742: 741: 738: 734: 730: 726: 721: 720: 719: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 686: 685: 682: 677: 673: 659: 655: 651: 646: 645: 644: 643: 640: 636: 632: 627: 623: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583: 582: 581: 577: 573: 572:Thetrueword88 552: 548: 544: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 496: 492: 488: 483: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 444: 440: 431: 430: 418: 414: 410: 403: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 386: 382: 378: 371: 364: 363: 362: 361: 358: 354: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313:copyright FAQ 310: 306: 301: 300: 299: 298: 294: 290: 286: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258: 257: 255: 251: 247: 246:67.177.84.227 243: 233: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 178: 175: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 130: 128: 124: 120: 116: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 18:User talk:JBW 3495: 3460: 3454: 3427: 3415:JamesBWatson 3363: 3360: 3346: 3331: 3325: 3303: 3267: 3265: 3205: 3204: 3157: 3137:JamesBWatson 3119: 3113: 3084: 3070:JamesBWatson 3046: 3045:Thank you. 3042: 3036: 3014: 3007: 2993: 2967: 2960: 2954: 2924: 2918:Place Clichy 2911: 2876: 2864:JamesBWatson 2832: 2828: 2825: 2820: 2817: 2793:JamesBWatson 2783:said Zebedee 2776: 2760:JamesBWatson 2734: 2695:JamesBWatson 2659: 2651: 2637: 2623: 2615: 2610: 2584: 2565:JamesBWatson 2536:92.21.50.132 2526: 2518: 2515: 2503:JamesBWatson 2485: 2473:JamesBWatson 2450: 2431: 2429: 2380:exist. The 2376:, but other 2359: 2351:edit summary 2336: 2329: 2324: 2312:The article 2311: 2249:JamesBWatson 2187: 2166:JamesBWatson 2143: 2142: 2117:JamesBWatson 2093: 2092: 2082: 2059:JamesBWatson 1984:JamesBWatson 1956: 1941: 1940: 1927: 1918: 1906:Abhay.kolhar 1904: 1871: 1852: 1840:JamesBWatson 1821: 1802: 1795: 1784: 1781: 1760:JamesBWatson 1755: 1716:JamesBWatson 1712:WP:Vandalism 1670: 1669: 1637: 1620:JamesBWatson 1594: 1556: 1517:JamesBWatson 1495: 1476:JamesBWatson 1429: 1427: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1361:JamesBWatson 1331: 1306: 1294:JamesBWatson 1259: 1256: 1240:38.112.7.254 1237: 1234: 1223:JamesBWatson 1219:entertainers 1206: 1194:38.112.7.254 1185: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1155:JamesBWatson 1129: 1103:JamesBWatson 1072: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1046: 1043: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 984:JamesBWatson 976: 960: 956: 939:JamesBWatson 927: 922: 918: 914: 896:Abhay.kolhar 893: 890: 887: 875:Abhay.kolhar 872: 861:JamesBWatson 815: 814: 810: 806: 786:Abhay.kolhar 779: 776: 763:Abhay.kolhar 757: 744:Abhay.kolhar 729:JamesBWatson 703:Abhay.kolhar 692: 669: 650:JamesBWatson 648:acceptable. 631:JamesBWatson 590: 586: 568: 543:JamesBWatson 460:JamesBWatson 436: 409:JamesBWatson 349:JamesBWatson 329: 317:JamesBWatson 287: 283: 266:JamesBWatson 236: 214:JamesBWatson 184: 170: 153:JamesBWatson 134:71.91.18.218 131: 119:71.91.18.218 109: 78: 43: 37: 3453:This is an 3431:Alanhenry14 3374:Alanhenry14 3368:—Preceding 2881:—Preceding 2836:—Preceding 2737:—Preceding 2587:—Preceding 2530:—Preceding 1930:WT:CSD - G5 1882:Jason Bleud 1876:—Preceding 1855:Pink Python 1825:Pink Python 1758:vandalism. 1756:unambiguous 1641:—Preceding 1605:Vejvančický 1397:—Preceding 1188:—Preceding 1130:independent 1076:—Preceding 848:automation. 781:Rgds Abhay 697:—Preceding 240:—Preceding 113:—Preceding 36:This is an 3515:Archive 10 3396:notability 3258:. You can 3197:. You can 2887:Cpagano291 2842:Cpagano291 2681:Uncle Dick 2366:dated prod 2343:dated prod 2314:Skullptura 2300:Skullptura 2237:notability 2198:Rudolfinum 1782:Hi there, 1573:. Thanks, 1535:Olaf Davis 1502:Olaf Davis 1457:Olaf Davis 1186:Natalia. 1073:Natalia. 1064:Hi James. 611:notability 513:Olaf Davis 480:Hi James, 377:Olaf Davis 309:notability 98:Archive 10 3507:Archive 8 3502:Archive 7 3496:Archive 6 3490:Archive 5 3485:Archive 4 3477:Archive 1 3404:promotion 3002:this edit 2914:requested 2390:consensus 2316:has been 2271:WP:ARTIST 1959:talk page 1682:vandalism 1492:Rollback? 1278:WP:BEFORE 1238:Natalial 923:blatantly 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 3429:again.-- 3382:contribs 3370:unsigned 3273:Chinmoku 3236:Talkback 3211:Chinmoku 3175:Talkback 3096:Chequers 3058:Chequers 2977:Barnstar 2963:Schmidt, 2928:contribs 2895:contribs 2883:unsigned 2850:contribs 2838:unsigned 2739:unsigned 2655:contribs 2641:contribs 2627:contribs 2589:unsigned 2532:unsigned 2488:Immunize 2457:Immunize 2279:ILuvLilG 2222:ILuvLilG 2164:Thanks. 1890:contribs 1878:unsigned 1678:userpage 1655:contribs 1643:unsigned 1498:rollback 1411:contribs 1403:Abiwelch 1399:unsigned 1217:and for 1190:unsigned 1090:contribs 1082:Nsosnina 1078:unsigned 1049:Nsosnina 831:editing: 711:contribs 699:unsigned 437:Thanks-- 242:unsigned 174:Talkback 115:unsigned 3456:archive 2412:Bearian 2394:Bearian 2032:Nwiesen 2006:Nwiesen 1964:Nwiesen 827:before. 487:Waseemg 439:Waseemg 333:Sunshfp 289:Sunshfp 39:archive 3000:I saw 2936:JohnCD 2713:Tadija 2662:Tadija 2353:or on 2210:Artnet 1805:Ubcule 1734:DaL33T 1695:DaL33T 1601:Vltava 1588:prod: 1575:Cunard 1394:Abby 1183:Best, 1070:Best. 609:, and 3349:Okip 3092:Spiel 3054:Spiel 2775:Boing 2709:WP:DE 2438:talk 2154:orium 2139:WP:CP 2104:orium 1338:talk 1266:talk 911:Subex 689:Subex 285:you. 16:< 3435:talk 3419:talk 3406:and 3378:talk 3310:talk 3270:Kira 3208:Kira 3141:talk 3087:Ϣere 3074:talk 3049:Ϣere 3008:Reyk 2956:THIS 2940:talk 2922:talk 2891:talk 2868:talk 2846:talk 2797:talk 2764:talk 2747:talk 2717:talk 2707:All 2699:talk 2685:talk 2666:talk 2649:talk 2643:) = 2635:talk 2629:) = 2621:talk 2607:Sock 2597:talk 2569:talk 2540:talk 2507:talk 2492:talk 2477:talk 2461:talk 2416:talk 2398:talk 2283:talk 2269:and 2253:talk 2239:and 2226:talk 2216:and 2200:and 2170:talk 2151:left 2121:talk 2101:left 2063:talk 2036:talk 2010:talk 1988:talk 1968:talk 1910:talk 1886:talk 1859:talk 1844:talk 1829:talk 1809:talk 1798:here 1764:talk 1738:talk 1720:talk 1699:talk 1651:talk 1624:talk 1609:talk 1603:. -- 1579:talk 1539:talk 1521:talk 1506:talk 1480:talk 1461:talk 1453:here 1449:here 1437:Bull 1432:Pink 1407:talk 1385:Hi, 1365:talk 1298:talk 1284:and 1244:talk 1227:talk 1198:talk 1159:talk 1107:talk 1086:talk 1053:talk 1008:talk 988:talk 967:talk 943:talk 900:talk 879:talk 865:talk 790:talk 767:talk 748:talk 733:talk 707:talk 680:ping 676:Pcap 654:talk 635:talk 576:talk 547:talk 517:talk 491:talk 464:talk 443:talk 413:talk 381:talk 353:talk 337:talk 321:talk 293:talk 270:talk 250:talk 218:talk 198:talk 190:talk 157:talk 138:talk 123:talk 3016:YO! 2916:by 2433:DGG 2298:of 2190:Zug 2146:The 2141:). 2133:or 2096:The 1935:Ged 1793:). 1333:DGG 1261:DGG 807:not 591:You 587:You 482:Deb 456:Deb 3511:→ 3481:← 3437:) 3421:) 3402:, 3398:, 3384:) 3380:• 3312:) 3284:, 3222:, 3158:SS 3143:) 3120:SS 3076:) 2942:) 2897:) 2893:• 2870:) 2852:) 2848:• 2799:) 2766:) 2749:) 2719:) 2701:) 2687:) 2668:) 2660:-- 2657:) 2599:) 2571:) 2542:) 2509:) 2494:) 2479:) 2463:) 2440:) 2418:) 2410:. 2400:) 2369:}} 2363:{{ 2357:. 2346:}} 2340:{{ 2334:. 2285:) 2255:) 2228:) 2196:, 2172:) 2123:) 2065:) 2038:) 2012:) 1990:) 1970:) 1942:UK 1912:) 1892:) 1888:• 1861:) 1846:) 1831:) 1811:) 1766:) 1740:) 1722:) 1701:) 1657:) 1653:• 1626:) 1611:) 1581:) 1565:. 1541:) 1523:) 1508:) 1482:) 1463:) 1413:) 1409:• 1367:) 1340:) 1300:) 1268:) 1246:) 1229:) 1200:) 1161:) 1109:) 1092:) 1088:• 1055:) 1010:) 990:) 969:) 945:) 902:) 881:) 792:) 769:) 750:) 735:) 713:) 709:• 656:) 637:) 605:, 578:) 549:) 519:) 493:) 466:) 445:) 415:) 405:}} 399:{{ 383:) 373:}} 367:{{ 355:) 339:) 323:) 295:) 272:) 252:) 220:) 200:) 172:{{ 159:) 140:) 125:) 94:→ 64:← 3467:. 3433:( 3417:( 3376:( 3308:( 3290:) 3287:¤ 3281:T 3278:( 3251:. 3228:) 3225:¤ 3219:T 3216:( 3190:. 3164:✞ 3139:( 3126:✞ 3072:( 2938:( 2925:· 2920:( 2889:( 2866:( 2844:( 2795:( 2777:! 2762:( 2745:( 2715:( 2697:( 2683:( 2664:( 2652:· 2647:( 2638:· 2633:( 2624:· 2619:( 2595:( 2567:( 2538:( 2505:( 2490:( 2475:( 2459:( 2436:( 2414:( 2396:( 2281:( 2251:( 2224:( 2168:( 2119:( 2061:( 2034:( 2008:( 1986:( 1966:( 1908:( 1884:( 1857:( 1842:( 1827:( 1807:( 1762:( 1736:( 1718:( 1697:( 1649:( 1622:( 1607:( 1577:( 1537:( 1519:( 1504:( 1478:( 1459:( 1405:( 1363:( 1336:( 1296:( 1264:( 1242:( 1225:( 1196:( 1157:( 1105:( 1084:( 1051:( 1006:( 986:( 965:( 941:( 898:( 877:( 867:) 863:( 823:. 788:( 765:( 746:( 731:( 705:( 652:( 633:( 621:. 574:( 545:( 515:( 489:( 462:( 441:( 411:( 379:( 351:( 335:( 319:( 291:( 268:( 248:( 216:( 196:( 188:( 155:( 136:( 121:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index