886:
a page, and then using a sockpuppet account to edit it, so that it does not get listed as created by that sockpuppet. However, looking through the past history, including deleted history, of the sockpuppets of this editor, I have not seen any occasions where they have done this (though please tell me if you know of cases that I have missed) and also the draft is not on the editor's usual topic. Neither of those proves anything, as the editor does also edit on other topics, but they cast enough doubt to make me think we have to give the benefit of the doubt, and leave it. Nevertheless, if any future editing of the draft gives further grounds for suspicion, I will reconsider it. I have watchlisted the page, but my watchlist has grown so long that I don't always follow up everything, so feel welcome to contact me again if you see anything there that seems worth considering.
484:. Personally I'm against having a policy about it, because the more policies we have the more confusing things get, especially for good faith new editors; the more things there are for editors to wikilawyer about the detailed wording of the policies; the more difficult it becomes to deal with things which without a specific policy would be obviously not OK but which clearly aren't covered by the policy because the editors who made the policy didn't anticipate them, and so on. (See my comment above beginning "Depressingly often I find...") I long for the days when the whole corpus of Knowledge policies was on one page, which would fit on about two screens full. ...
480:
criteria. The draft has been edited, making it less blatantly promotional than when it was first created, and it avoided any of the blatantly promotional language which one sees in many self-promotional articles, but I still think it had enough of an overall promotional character to justify speedy deletion. I don't think there's any policy about AI generated content, but there's certainly a guideline or essay or something discouraging it. Unfortunately I can't find it now; it isn't
35:
963:
978:
935:. I work directly for the chief Warrant Officer of the Army and would like to know how to make sure the page is restored or how you recommend me going forward in creating a page that will not be deleted. I took out the link to the page that was said to be copyrighted. This was an article my boss did and was given a PDF to share. I uploaded it to the link provided. I understand this was not liked by Wiki and removed that article. Thank you.
885:
There's no clear answer in this situation, and it's a matter of looking at the evidence and making a judgement. Here are my observations. It certainly looks suspicious. As you may know, there are some long-term persistent sockpuppeteers who regularly use the trick of first using IP editing to create
861:
by an IP user, it was submitted as an AfC submission by a globally locked sockpuppet. Since there's only a few minutes between the creation and submitting, I'm thinking they're probably the same person. Is the draft eligible to be deleted under G5 or should the IP be confirmed as a sock first? Since
744:
I think you are mistaken, as putting triple brackets is not something one would be at all likely to do without a reason; nevertheless I will give the benefit of the doubt. However, you may like to consider whether, if you disagree with another administrator's decision, there might be a more friendly
502:
Knowledge's ever expanding policies are evidence that we appear to love tying ourselves up in red tape! We even named a level in our hierarchy 'bureaucrats'! I predict we will become ever more rule and regulation bound until all we do is discuss rules and regulations... until a rule is made against
479:
This is a difficult type of situation, because it sort of skirts around various policies without crashing straight into any of them. Depressingly often I find myself obliged to decline speedy deletion requests for pages which obviously should be deleted, because they just don't fit any of the
428:
I have just come across a self publicist using AI (0.9 probability) to generate their draft autobiograohy, rejected the draft and tagged it for CSD. I have to use a custom rationale, because I am not sure we cover it. See
669:
Now that we've cleared the permaban hurdle, do you think I should decline and recomend trying again so as not to waste the community's time with a futile effort? I need a consensus at UTRS to do so. Or not. Thanks
488:... (That was before my time on Knowledge, but even when I started out, the body of policies and guidelines was substantially smaller than it is now, and I really don't think we are any better off for the change.)
928:
919:
595:
isn't policy but there is some desire for it to become a guideline. This being a reason to draftify, it also functions as a reason to keep something as a draft until the problem is solved. —
830:
Oops... silly me. That's what comes of allowing my self to get distracted into silly things such as remembering ancient user signatures, instead of keeping my mind on the job. Done now.
745:
way of expressing your different opinion than "That was a bad block and you should reverse it". How about "I think you were mistaken, and I suggest you might revert it", for example?
523:"I don't think there's any policy about AI generated content, but there's certainly a guideline or essay or something discouraging it. Unfortunately I can't find it now; it isn't
762:
605:
763:
717:
430:
936:
794:
631:
918:
22:
of the page. If you don't, there is a risk that your message may never be noticed, if other edits follow it before I get here.
770:
713:
423:
945:
611:
932:
784:
449:
679:
659:
588:
790:
707:
990:
599:
701:
467:
410:
653:
568:
543:
773:. Would you mind fulfilling this request and then restore the record of deletion nomination? Thanks, ‑‑
729:
518:
497:
986:
862:
IPs aren't linked to named accounts, I'm not sure how to proceed with this. Please advise. Thanks.
804:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
872:
910:
895:
839:
675:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
754:
506:
As a side note I have no idea how anyone can choose to put themselves through today's RFA! 🇺🇦
953:
847:
627:
539:
778:
584:
433:. Do you know if we have formulated a policy about this, both for the article/draft and the
8:
982:
858:
848:
596:
687:
671:
512:
461:
443:
639:
623:
615:
550:
535:
815:
774:
619:
592:
587:#2: "The article consists of machine-generated text, such as ... the output of a
725:
389:
769:
Hi JBW. I requested the deletion of this page for the reasons I explained at
580:
554:
531:
507:
474:
456:
438:
34:
661:
524:
481:
962:
395:
901:
880:
863:
825:
808:
739:
721:
393:
887:
831:
799:
746:
693:
645:
560:
489:
391:
396:
764:
Talk:Premiership of Robert
Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool
931:, I created this page as an update and name change to the
606:
Inclusion of school shooting threat in school's article?
28:
437:editors! using it to generate such things? 🇺🇦
404:This page has archives. Sections older than
618:and, considering the length of the article,
559:Yes, that's the one I had in mind. Thanks.
929:Draft:Chief Warrant Officer of the Army
920:Draft:Chief Warrant Officer of the Army
714:Special:Contributions/124.169.141.129
969:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
455:G11 is certainly pragmatic 👍 🇺🇦
13:
614:did happen but I believe it fails
14:
1004:
933:Army Staff Senior Warrant Officer
408:may be automatically archived by
976:
961:
33:
18:Please post new sections at the
991:20:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
946:14:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
911:15:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
896:15:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
873:14:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
840:22:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
816:22:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
795:21:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
755:20:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
730:20:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
702:19:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
680:18:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
654:20:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
644:Yes, I agree, on both counts.
632:19:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
600:15:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
569:15:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
544:13:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
519:22:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
498:22:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
468:22:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
450:21:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
692:I've posted a comment there.
7:
10:
1009:
857:Following the creation of
960:
891:
835:
805:User:Nwonwu Uchechukwu P
750:
697:
649:
564:
493:
424:What do "we" do about AI
807:is still blocked....--
718:my now-vanished comment
708:124.169.141.129's block
411:Lowercase sigmabot III
925:Good Afternoon, JBW.
589:large language model
975:Thank you Sir! JBW
954:A barnstar for you!
859:Draft:Dainik Kalyan
849:Draft:Dainik Kalyan
662:UTRS appeal #92922
610:I've verified that
431:Draft:Thierry Rayer
996:
995:
900:Will do, thanks.
672:-- Deepfriedokra
583:: You could cite
418:
417:
1000:
980:
979:
965:
958:
957:
943:
908:
884:
870:
829:
813:
743:
691:
664:
643:
558:
515:
510:
478:
464:
459:
446:
441:
413:
397:
37:
29:
1008:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
999:
998:
997:
977:
956:
937:
923:
902:
878:
864:
852:
823:
809:
802:
767:
737:
712:Please unblock
710:
685:
667:
660:
637:
608:
548:
513:
508:
472:
462:
457:
444:
439:
426:
409:
398:
392:
42:
24:
23:
12:
11:
5:
1006:
994:
993:
983:SilverBullet X
972:
971:
966:
955:
952:
950:
922:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
801:
798:
766:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
709:
706:
705:
704:
666:
658:
657:
656:
607:
604:
603:
602:
585:WP:DRAFTREASON
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
528:
521:
504:
425:
422:
420:
416:
415:
403:
400:
399:
394:
390:
388:
385:
384:
367:
327:
287:
247:
207:
167:
127:
87:
44:
43:
38:
32:
17:
16:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1005:
992:
988:
984:
974:
973:
970:
967:
964:
959:
951:
948:
947:
944:
942:
941:
934:
930:
926:
921:
912:
909:
907:
906:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
882:
877:
876:
875:
874:
871:
869:
868:
860:
855:
850:
841:
837:
833:
827:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
814:
812:
806:
797:
796:
792:
789:
786:
783:
780:
776:
772:
765:
756:
752:
748:
741:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
703:
699:
695:
689:
688:Deepfriedokra
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
663:
655:
651:
647:
641:
636:
635:
634:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
601:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
570:
566:
562:
556:
552:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
522:
520:
516:
511:
505:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
476:
471:
470:
469:
465:
460:
454:
453:
452:
451:
447:
442:
436:
432:
421:
412:
407:
402:
401:
387:
386:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
45:
41:
36:
31:
30:
27:
25:
21:
968:
949:
939:
938:
927:
924:
904:
903:
866:
865:
856:
853:
810:
803:
787:
781:
768:
711:
668:
640:Skywatcher68
624:Skywatcher68
609:
551:Skywatcher68
536:Skywatcher68
530:Do you mean
485:
434:
427:
419:
405:
47:
39:
26:
19:
15:
940:Goldengeoai
775:Neveselbert
612:this threat
503:doing that.
616:WP:NOTNEWS
854:Hi, JBW.
665:revisted.
597:Alalch E.
785:contribs
620:WP:UNDUE
593:WP:DRAFT
581:Timtrent
555:Timtrent
475:Timtrent
40:Archives
435:dieters
406:10 days
771:WP:RFU
532:WP:LLM
514:Faddle
509:Fiddle
463:Faddle
458:Fiddle
445:Faddle
440:Fiddle
20:bottom
981:- -
905:Frost
881:Frost
867:Frost
826:Ponyo
811:Ponyo
800:Pssst
791:email
622:. –
525:WP:AI
517:🇺🇦
482:WP:AI
466:🇺🇦
448:🇺🇦
987:talk
892:talk
836:talk
779:talk
751:talk
740:Izno
726:talk
722:Izno
716:per
698:talk
676:talk
650:talk
628:talk
565:talk
553:and
540:talk
494:talk
486:sigh
888:JBW
832:JBW
747:JBW
694:JBW
646:JBW
591:".
561:JBW
490:JBW
989:)
894:)
838:)
793:)
753:)
728:)
720:.
700:)
678:)
652:)
630:)
567:)
542:)
534:?
527:."
496:)
381:84
379:,
377:83
375:,
373:82
371:,
369:81
365:80
363:,
361:79
359:,
357:78
355:,
353:77
351:,
349:76
347:,
345:75
343:,
341:74
339:,
337:73
335:,
333:72
331:,
329:71
325:70
323:,
321:69
319:,
317:68
315:,
313:67
311:,
309:66
307:,
305:65
303:,
301:64
299:,
297:63
295:,
293:62
291:,
289:61
285:60
283:,
281:59
279:,
277:58
275:,
273:57
271:,
269:56
267:,
265:55
263:,
261:54
259:,
257:53
255:,
253:52
251:,
249:51
245:50
243:,
241:49
239:,
237:48
235:,
233:47
231:,
229:46
227:,
225:45
223:,
221:44
219:,
217:43
215:,
213:42
211:,
209:41
205:40
203:,
201:39
199:,
197:38
195:,
193:37
191:,
189:36
187:,
185:35
183:,
181:34
179:,
177:33
175:,
173:32
171:,
169:31
165:30
163:,
161:29
159:,
157:28
155:,
153:27
151:,
149:26
147:,
145:25
143:,
141:24
139:,
137:23
135:,
133:22
131:,
129:21
125:20
123:,
121:19
119:,
117:18
115:,
113:17
111:,
109:16
107:,
105:15
103:,
101:14
99:,
97:13
95:,
93:12
91:,
89:11
85:10
83:,
79:,
75:,
71:,
67:,
63:,
59:,
55:,
51:,
985:(
890:(
883::
879:@
834:(
828::
824:@
788:·
782:·
777:(
749:(
742::
738:@
724:(
696:(
690::
686:@
674:(
648:(
642::
638:@
626:(
579:@
563:(
557::
549:@
538:(
492:(
477::
473:@
414:.
81:9
77:8
73:7
69:6
65:5
61:4
57:3
53:2
49:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
