Knowledge

User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere/Archive 1

Source 📝

3466:
Knowledge should be reflective of, and reactive to, the names used in the real world. Not proactive in making up names for things itself. But that's the case here. Your argument that no one is calling them "self balancing two-wheel boards" is just as accurate as the fact that no one on the street is calling them "self-balancing scooters" either. For better or worse, as the article itself points out, people are uniformly calling them "hoverboards" now. That's an undeniable fact. And any folks who are wringing their hands unnecessarily to find an alternative moniker right now, are just in denial over this fact. I happen to hate that word for them myself, because it's really not what they are, or what they do. But just like you, I don't control that. So you can leave this closure in place, as you're clearly determined to do. But we'll just be right back here in a few months (if not sooner) doing this all over again. You also did not address my concern that you closed the discussion while people were still weighing in. The last comment being less than 24 hours before your closure.
3346:, since no real consensus has been established. The current !vote count of 4-2 is closer to 4-3 if you include the final comment, which notes that any new change, if there was going to be one, should incorporate the word "hoverboard" and not the word "scooter." That certainly is not in support of this move. Even without it, 4-2, with two agreeing without comment, is not consensus. More importantly, this has been debated for months now. Once it was even admin closed as no consensus. But it was reopened on request, for a question. After being left stagnant for a month. Since being reopened, there needs to be adequate time for people to respond to these newest comments. But in no way is the current vote conclusive. So please re-open it and leave it to an admin to close: when it appears everyone has had a chance to weigh in and no further comments can reasonably be expected. Thanks. 589:) and a consensus was formed against that behavior. So, while it was not a specific individual edit that caused the topic ban, it was the consensus of editors who have interacted with your editing style that accommodating your methodology was counterproductive. No one will be able to provide you with specific diffs, nor do they need to. I would recommend that you read their comments on the ANI noticeboards, and take them to heart. Edit in other areas of the Encyclopedia for six months to show that you have learned from the experience, and appeal the ban at that time. Otherwise, wait the year and request then. It is unfortunate when this happens; I wish you well in the upcoming months, and much success in contributing to other areas! 3362:(previously having been rejected), as well as the current title being obtusely awful, the logical choice is to move the article. If a new, better, term surfaces that refers to the topic, another RM can be opened to consider it. So far however, no such term has been suggested, and as "Self-balancing scooter" is better than the current title the logical choice is again, to move it. This is a case of the proposed title being better than the current one, and a perfect title perhaps not having surfaced yet. Edit: also, of the two 'oppose' !votes, one was objecting to the caps error in the move request, and the other gave no reason for objection. 3592:§ Proposed edits above, the vast majority of the reliable sources in this article do use the term "hoverboard", that would be an argument for Hoverboard (scooter), per WP:COMMONNAME. I see that the term "Scooter" is very ambiguous, and there are several different types of "ground scooters." It's pretty clear that comment had nothing to do with "cap issues." You also misunderstood my point. I'm not interested in changing the name to "Hoverboard." I'm simply stating the obvious, which that editor also noted: is if any name change had to occur at this time (which it doesn't), "Hoverboard" is the only name that could be justified. 386:
stepping on a nail. I think its better you throw in the towel and don't do anymore interrogatory things because they are not going to listen or care at this point. I have no interest in the article and have no dog in the show except connected with one over bearing person and knowing their way of operating. Cut your loss's I would say. If you are innocent then grin and bear it, but if you continue the argument after this it might be used against you somehow. Sound weird? Well it read weird also.
2186:
a member for The Recording Academy, you can't even do that unless you have been directly verified as a large contribution to the recording industry. There are multiply topics address Michael and his company, so thus, it provides everything needed. If you read through them, you will see nearly every sentence in the article has a source backing it up. I've been working on this article for months. What other information do you need? (frankly, it meets the standards. There's plenty of coverage. )
31: 3621:, once again you failed to accurately assess either my comments, or their context. I objected there as the RM was only reopened because someone decided they wanted to ask a question after the closure - when they had failed to ask that question in the OVER A MONTH prior when no new comments were made. But I object to your closure - in part - because it came JUST ONE DAY after the last comment. So try as you might, there is zero basis for comparison. Or conflating the two. 3588: 3509:
these things are called? The tenor of your responses in our discussion seem to suggest you really might be better suited expressing your opinions at the RM, rather than doing a supposedly impartial, non-admin close of it. You obviously have strong opinions and want to weigh in with them yourself. No harm in that. But given everything, I just don't see a compelling and/or objective rationale for this early close; and I believe policy and practices recommend against it.
1064: 2796: 1231: 1094: 216: 3142:
etc) are put into perspective. To me, 14/8 is not consensus, it isn't even two thirds, and in the absence of a clear policy reason for a move, or clear evidence of primary topic, this RM is going nowhere toward convincing people from either side. Disambiguation is not a bad thing and the status quo is just fine. The page view statistics themselves indicate that readers are getting to their desired destination just fine (the dabs page views are
885: 812: 665: 636:
ARB (which is also not appropriate for a novice like me) nor to write with a fixed account because my assumption was that he has friends if he acts that way. Just to clarify(because I have seen Arthur Rubins comment) - I work for a hydropower company and not for the Military-Industrial-Complex as Arthur - and are not associated with Rossi. Just a privat physics geek interested in CF and other interesting banned disciplines. rgds.
607:, and for the clarity it provides me. While I have read and considered the comments on the ANI, I do feel that I was unfairly misrepresented by Andy's friends on the ANI noticeboard, if I had known how much influence he had on there, or how many times that even more serious offences of his had been overlooked, I never would have made the complaint, as in hindsight, its no surprise that I got 1009: 3532:
and I don't see a good rationale for changing the verdict to "no consensus" (which is the only other option I would consider at this time). You can easily argue for your real point (the hoverboard name) with a new RM that isn't down at the bottom of the backlog (where editors are unlikely to find it). I would suggest opening a new RM if you are unsatisfied with the current title.
3194:. Consensus is about being able to persuade people to shift their viewpoint and/or compromise. As far as I'm seeing with this RM, no one is willing to change sides on this, they are either familiar with the city, or familiar with the grape/wine and aren't willing to consider that the other one is primary, the compromise is to leave it at the dab page. When both 3389: 2647:. Perhaps I should have left a message clarifying why I rejected the article for "not having enough reliable sources", although I thought that the automatic notice is rather clear about it. Am I missing something? I feel like my rejection was totally justified. The only other news sources I can find on him are a mention here: 3527:, like pretty much the definition of it. However, to get to the real point, I accepted the RM on the basis that all editors were in agreement (except you) that A: the move request had a caps issue that should be fixed, and B: that the new title was better than the old one. If you want to argue for changing the name to 1194: 443: 5016:
You don't seem very willing to listen to the most basic of criticism or suggestion. Despite the high level of technical knowledge present in your articles, they currently don't even attempt to make themselves understandable to non-programmers (as a non-programmer myself I am actually highly qualified
4143:
Hi before you nominate an article for speedy deletion again and without checking is it just one off please allow editors time to accumulate associated data and sources in order to connect all the articles together as I said all these events were connected and included both mens and womens tournaments
3881:
event and have been uncontactable. The two sources you have provided are useful for saying that Ian Page is performing Mozart 250, and would be considered high quality sources for a "Mozart 250" article. However, as they only give passing mentions of Ian Page, they are not "significant coverage", and
3508:
Given all this, are you really sure you can justify a non-admin closure less than a day after the last comment? On an RM that is as non-clear cut as this one is? Especially when the proposed new name, is one that everyone agrees, unanimously, isn't going to be either the best or final answer for what
3141:
I respectfully have to disagree, while I don't have a stake in this, little evidence listed in the move request enticed me either way. the page view statistics are a bit higher for the city, but the google statistics are not very clear, especially when additional searches (adding together wine+grapes
2757:
I agree with you that articles like this are unlikely to be deleted if taken to AfD, but as an AfD reviewer myself, it is IMO way better if articles have a few good sources before accepted at AfC, as they are then far less likely be nominated for deletion and end up wasting a bunch of peoples time at
2714:
Perhaps it is a matter of personal preference, but even if something demonstrably satisfies one of the notability criterion, I feel like having at least 2 (better 3) significant independent reliable sources is necessary before I will accept an article at AfC. The AfC notability message clearly states
2185:
It directly mentions his company, many of them are about his shows events, which provide evidence for Michael. There are passing of Michael's name, yes, such as in line-up listing or such, but in conjunction with the numerous other sources that were already there, it provides adequate information. He
3689:
is transparent nonsense. We clearly disagree. But only because you have been unable to offer any objectively defensible reasons or explanations for this closure. Likely because you seem more invested in being an advocate in this discussion, rather than being an objective and disinterested party. But
1938:
You are correct. Much of that material was copy-pasted, but that's because it was the material my office wrote for the adjutant general position. I'm the State Historian for the Nevada National Guard and I work out of the Public Affairs Office in the Office of the Adjutant General in Carson City. If
565:
I agreed to abide by Admin decision on this matter and I stand by that, however, I also requested that I be told why, specifically: what edits, are construed as misconduct so that I can improve my actions. since you did not cite any reason for the above topic ban except 'as per discussion' (where no
319:
But I suggest you stand down now. Just let them do what they want to do. Stop editing the article in question for a while. I think the AnI scene can be partisan according to people throwing in for their favorites like the comments indicate. You don't have to respond to the what I would call annoying
4944:
With regards to my editing style, and what a do here on wikipedia; yes, I do a lot of bureaucratic/organisational work along side quite a few others that help to insure that wikipedia does not descend into anarchy. I contribute to articles quite often, and have on occasion written a few articles as
4840:
The time limit generally refers to A1 and A3 criteria as stated above. In the first case, it was for G11 (advertisement), for the second it was not a speedy tag, but a BIO PROD on a biography with no refs, as is required, and for the third I waited longer than 10 minutes. Next time add some content
4066:
The notice was not meant to imply that the given citations were not useful. Just to suggest that additional sources are needed to expand the article, apologies if the article is still being written, many articles are abandoned by their creators shortly after moving to the article space, and I can't
2304:
It is a source for one off Michael's clients, providing a citation for him and his company and his client. What exactly do you need to satisfy the request for article creation? Michael literally attends the Grammy award shows. Like I'm not sure how you don't see nobility. He was over 300k followers
2213:
Well first, i see no mention to the New York Times in any of the references, please point it out to me as I must be missing it. Secondly, you repeatedly say things like "in conjunction with the numerous other sources that were already there" when this statement is useless. None of the other sources
635:
Otherwise - your contribution and the topic ban put some focus on this article - and the attempt to get rid of the unpleasent talk page ended up in merging e-cat into Andrea Rossi - which somewhat triggered the Streisand effect. So I would summarize it as heroic casualty. I did not dare to call for
4761:
The notifications are sent as a courtesy, to notify you that the articles in question have been proposed for deletion (as you started the articles). Each is for a separate article, so I'm not spamming (also the messages are automated when I use the twinkle tool to PROD an article) You have up to a
4461:
Yes, sorry, that was me, I should have removed the message at your talk page (I forgot that it was automated). I accidentally used the wrong criteria when declining the submission the first time. I reverted and corrected the review shortly afterward. I meant to say that it is improperly referenced
3531:
or something similar, simply open up a new RM and ping all the commenters from the previous RM, this will be far cleaner than reopening the current RM when it has caps issues and most of the comments are not about the hoverboard name at all. In summary, nothing is accomplished by reopening the RM,
3361:
This RM has been open for two months now, as you may or may not know, there is a significant backlog over at the RM page. The closure of an RM is not based on vote counts, but on the strength of the arguments, as there does not seem to be a very strong argument for "hoverboard" or some derivation
2568:
Hi, I'm just overwhelmed by all the things necessary to creat a simple album page here on Knowledge. I merely want to make a page for this most recent album that is comparable and similar to the previous album's Knowledge pages. Although I made a few very brief Knowledge pages last year, it seems
1404:
Because of the length of my sig i couldn't fit the (&nbsp) formatting, and copy pasting an nbsp in that location (or a normal space for that matter) results in one not being displayed as a weird quirk of HTML. The space you removed was actually a special character that has a nonstandard space
4936:
Because I am not an expert or very knowledgeable in the subject? I'm not entirely sure what the subject is, and that is the main problem. A wikipedia article should, at the very least, explain to the reader what the article is about (and any reader should be able to understand the context of the
3443:
be another name worth considering, eventually. In fact consensus seems to be that the current name of the article was very bad. Your argument seems to be that we shouldn't change the name because the proposed one is not good enough. However, everyone else (that wasn't objecting based on the caps
1517:
My sig hits the character limite as well :p Look at the code for mine, in your "span style" opening tag you can add a parameter "padding:0 3px;" that will add a few pixels of padding between the text and inside border (and tweak the numbers to see what works best for you). I'm far from an expert
3591:
But you also misstated and misinterpreted the actual discussion. Contrary to your characterization that "all editors were in agreement (except you) that A: the move request had a caps issue that should be fixed," the very last comment posted the day before your closure was: " If, as asserted in
3465:
The eBay link is simply evidence of a new and emerging product which will be competing for this same name. It's a warning that this name will not be unique and using it will only add even more confusion to an already muddled situation. A name which, by the way, even you agree is not definitive.
3387:
just a couple weeks ago. And as we're judging arguments, you yourself just made the case for not adopting this proposal. The proposed title is not definitive. That's exactly the opposition view. So in a few months, we'll just be looking to change this title again. Which only adds more confusion
1974:
Thanks for the review of the page. We will make a correction of the text by english native speaker, you have been right about translating from German language, so we will work again on the text. Third party references will be available within the next weeks when the movie world premiere will be
4883:
doesn't have a speedy banner, it has a BLP prod. This is very different, as editors have up to a week to add sources to the article in question, whereas speedy tagged articles are generally deleted very quickly. Much like the PRODs I just placed on several of the articles you created that give
2079:
I was told by the help desk to add 1 more source. I added several. I'm not sure what the problem is. The refrences clearly show notibility based on the guidelines of Wiki. Every source added was a new, reliable, verifiable, independent news sources, such as The New York Times. Did you read the
1641:
Hi, Insertcleverphrasehere. A helpee came to the IRC help channel today asking about that draft. Were you saying the page was all good except for the disambiguation? If so, you could have just accepted it and disambiguated it yourself, rather than expecting the article creator to fix such a
584:
Forgive the intrusion, but I hope to offer some clarity here. I have had no involvement in this, but I have learned a bit of the way that this works. Basically, it appears that your fellow editors have pointed out a pattern of behavior that they believe interferes with the maintenance of the
385:
But therein you are hooked. As Kafka once said something like, there is no worse thing than implying guilt where one can not defend oneself,,, or something like that. In other words I would say remove you plea from below and consider what happened a arbitrary act of nature or like accidentally
4456:
I submitted an article that had eight citations. They were reliable sources including magazines and books. The topic of the article is a deceased political figure in Israel. There is already a Hebrew wikipedia page published about this person, and it uses many of the same sources as the one I
3885:
As for the print article in Opera, it is perfectly acceptable to create a ref for a print only article, if you have a scan. Interview articles are generally considered sources only for direct quotes of the artist, and I am pretty sure they are otherwise considered a primary source (unless the
5042:, (in the category you linked above). The structure of this article, particularly the lede's layman explanations, are exactly what are lacking from the articles listed above. Without this information it simply becomes tables of technical information that is indecipherable to any non-expert. 611:
as a result (also I'll note that Andy warned me about the possibility of the boomerang in question, so this result rests on my shoulders not his). Anyway, thanks for your clarity on the subject, much appreciated. I withdraw any request for further information regarding my topic ban from
2569:
that the process is now more complicated/convuluted in comparison. I'm hoping there is just a simplified walkthrough or tutorial that I can use in order to creat a page for this individual album, of which there are plenty of valid online sources to choose from. Thank you for your time.
2449:
I am Ethanjkagan and you reviewed one of my articles, SpreadsheetWEB. I wanted to ask you a few questions about this article, whereas i'm rather new here. I've been looking at similar pages and to be honest, all other pages look A LOT worse than what I wrote in that article (e.g.
1495:
Not sure what that means... perhaps you know more than me after all. But in all seriousness, I've got like a couple extra characters available for my sig, thats why I couldn't use formatting. my damn name is just too long and I wanted links to contributions, talk, and user pages.
3557:
when the move request was previously reopened, you objected based on the fact that there had been plenty of discussion (now you argue that the discussion should continue based on one new comment?). The only difference is that I didn't make the same decision he did, and you
2162:"We need significant coverage. This helps show that a topic meets the notability guidelines. We need multiple sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. Not: passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the topic's name in it." 272:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 2857:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 1295:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 3102:, and given how long it has been open it doesn't seem that one is likely to develop. Given that the search numbers are not clear (especially when adding in 'muscat+wine'), I don't see how there is a strong policy argument that was put forth to support a move either. 906: 833: 714: 351:
I would edit out your comment below about asking for more information about 'what you did wrong'. Going plaintively as a supplicant is a nonstarter because,,,,,, not sure why, but obviously you made some good arguments and no one cared. Edit other articles.
4194:
with A1 seven minutes after creation. There is a broad consensus to wait at least 10-15 minutes before tagging with A1 and A3. Another thing in this case is, that the article was in Serbian, and the text makes sense if you translate it, it's just a copy of
2822:
to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is
1054: 2222:
Yup this isn't a RS or an independent source, nor does it mention the subject). I don't feel like wasting my day running through them all and explaining why but almost all of the references would not be accepted in an article. What more do I say? Refer to
3202:
are present this becomes rather apparent. The statistics are not clearcut enough to have merit alone, so in the absence of any evidence that consensus is likely to form (this RM was open for 17 days), I have to say that one is not likely to ever develop.
3491:- and your responses. Especially, since this individual was the admin who originally closed this RM, with no consensus - then reopened it only upon request. There you argued that 13-8 was not consensus. But here you're arguing that 4-2 (actually 4-3) is? 1166:, a German insider joke should be of interest for you. Its a scientific joke used as well on hot fusion. It goes like that: Oil will and always has been on the verge of being depleted in the upcoming 30 years, since modern oil drilling started 1858 in 2454:). This product doesn't have publicity all over the news, therefore I can't find too many sources. Most of what I wrote here, I wrote from personal experience from using this product for 3 years and my interactions with the developers. Please advise. 4242:
Hi. Just a quick heads up that I'm contesting this PROD since the school includes a high school division. These are routinely more or less automatically kept at AfD. You are welcome to bring the piece to AfD if you disagree with this analysis of
518:
If Insertcleverphrasehere edits appropriately for the next year, but continues the same disruptive behavior after the expiration of the topic ban, a formal request will be filed for an indefinite community ban against Insertcleverphrasehere at
2127:
Did you actually view the sources? How does the New York Times not quality? All the references are independent, and moreover, all are reputable. I can edit wording, I'm not worried about that. But it most definitely is significant coverage.
4457:
submitted. Yet, somebody declined my submission by claiming it did not have reliable sources. I feel the editor was discriminating against the subject of the article, since the stated reason of "lacking reliable sources" could not be true.
1223: 1146:
I just wanted to thank you for your input in the Peak Oil article GA review; and for the Barnstar! You had some very useful comments. I also want you to know that I will be updating the page as developments arise. Best of luck with your
3039:
Good work! I have accepted the article. One thing I would like to see though is a Ref to an obituary in the death section if you can find it, rather than relying on the guardian for this information. Other than that, top notch work!
91:, it would be wise for you to disclose any commonality of interest between you and Rossi, or any connection between you and other editors. Furthermore, if, by chance, you are working for someone paying you to edit Knowledge, you are 2305:(which, accordingly to wiki bypasses the need for extra sources as an "active fanbase" proves nobility. There are several articles that mention Michael, his company, and his accomplishments, and all the ones cited are independent. 2009: 2890:
article should also be listed with the Gamergate discretionary sanctions (they currently are not tagged as such but perhaps they should be). Gender-dispute related vandals and trolls show up all the time at both articles anyway.
2376: 722: 3865:
Would either of those be suitable as secondary sources? Another possibility is Opera magazine, who did an article in January 2015 on Ian Page and Mozart 250. Again, I have scans of the print but there is no online version.
2952: 914: 841: 3872:
And of course there are endless newspaper and maagzine reviews of the concerts Ian has conducted but reading the guidelines I understand these are not suitable. I would really appreciate any guidance you could give on this.
3143: 1689: 3123:
Well, I know I participated, but I'd regard 14-8 as a consensus to move, given the strength of the evidence. At least, it's not clear to me that there's a lack of consensus here. Respectfully, I ask that you reopen the
4884:
insufficient context to the reader. You have up to a week to fix the issues, or else remove the prod, though I recommend fixing the issues before removing the prod, or else it will be taken to Articles for Deletion.
4762:
week to fix the issues, or else remove the prod notifications, however, if you remove a prod without fixing the issue then the article will likely be taken to Articles for Deletion, so its not something I recommend.
4067:
be reasonably expected to know when an article is still being worked on, vs being considered complete enough by the content creator. I'll keep your suggestions in mind if I see other new SSSIs. No offence was meant.
4786: 4347:
and I have deleted it as such. It's important to choose the right tag, to help newbie authors understand what they are doing wrong, so that maybe they do better next time. There is good advice for speedy taggers at
2371: 4488: 3990:
Well AFD is often a last resort-don't ever put it up if the article is new either-just keep that in mind. (Unless if its a removed prod). Also the BLP prod was good enough for the article. Don't bite the newbies.
3690:
no need to respond further, as there's clearly no point in continuing here. I was required to bring my concerns to your attention on your talk page. I have explained them at length. So that has been accomplished.
2642:
He might very well meet the criteria for the reasons that you have put forward. However, note that the article only has one independent source (BBC), generally to be accepted for submission articles need multiple
1680: 994: 335:
I suspect what you did doesn't seem to matter, its all who you know... Andy really DOES seem to be immune from prosecution for personal attacks. This incident will only make him more bold, I've made things worse.
1911: 2252:, and that source you just listed is independent, and it DIRECTLY mentions Michael's debut event and provides a verified source for his show in Nashville. Are you reading the sources, or simply dismissing it? 1307: 1102: 3438:
In any case, as I said above, opposition seems to be only because of the caps issue, and no one in the entire discussion suggested that the current name was better than the proposed name, rather that there
2092: 797: 650: 2468: 1405:
width (the only way i could get it to display the space without the &nbsp formatting). Unfortunately, as you pointed out this space was not a non-breaking space. I have now replaced the space with a (
961:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the 951: 767:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the 757: 2617: 566:
one referenced a single diffs related to article edits against me), I am left confused as to what actions of mine resulted in my topic ban and unable to review my actions and improve them in the future.
4045:
The references are adaquate for the job being asked of them. I presume you have not followed any of the two refs or the two external links, nor explored the very comprehensive information they provide.
3252: 4681:
on the team's article. The info box is possibly out of date for the team's article, as it seems to indicate that they play in a much lower tier. apologies, I'll remove the prod from the two articles.
3031: 870: 4372:
Ok thanks, I remember being confused if i should G11 it or not, but it seemed like someone had accidentally published it as a section of something else, but i see where you are coming from, thanks.
2593: 1961: 4970: 4834: 4816: 3847:
Would an interview article be more appropriate as a secondary resource? Ian was interviewed for Limelight magazine last year. There is no online link to that article, though I have scans of it.
1162:
I just went here from the creation move request, a very enWP specific discussion, I like your remarks. We haven't met at Peakoil, but I introduced a variety of content there and in the deWP. The
4100:" (my emphasis). Beyond some contextual information on the Whin Sill, all of the information in the article is supported by its refs. It follows that the use of the template is inappropriate. -- 3902: 3413:
But the presence of these new, identically named devices, also represents significant additional information not discussed in the RM, and that warrants, if anything, a reopen to relist. Thanks.
3188:
Due to your very polite request, I thought very seriously of reopening the RM, to the point of having the edit ready to go, but really the thing that changed my mind at the last minute is this:
1739:
Hi There! Thanks for the message on the Fable page - I've added a couple of new high profile references - Rolling Stone and Popjustice. Hopefully it can be approved now. Thanks for helping out!
1082: 785: 4513: 2685: 2504: 4482: 744: 512:
If Insertcleverphrasehere violates the topic ban, he will be given escalating blocks, starting with 2 week blocks, with the one year topic ban being reset to the beginning of each such block.
865: 3392:
and it's nothing like these devices. Again, just adding more confusion. And with no consensus. Regardless of the RM backlog, there's no rush to close now - surely no more than there was on
1877: 982: 3704:
Ok, I've had enough aspersions against my personal integrity and judgement for one day, I'd appreciate it if you leave my talk page and keep the discussion on the move review page please.
1939:
you would like me to re-word the description of the adjutant general position, I can. However, it's the description that has been written by my office and approved by he adjutant general.
938: 3273: 3780: 367:
I have no problem with going elsewhere, however i would like to know what the admin who banned me thinks i did wrong, as, like you, I am unsure. and it hasn't been clearly pointed out.
4199:. Now, the question is more, is this a hoax or is there some other reason for why I can't find sources on this algorithm? :) Anyway, author blanked, so I'm going to G7 tag it. Cheers, 4655: 1987:
I'm not sure how long drafts are kept around, but I think a draft is only deleted if it hasn't been edited in 6 months or something, so for your purposes don't worry, take your time.
4726: 2476:
LaMona's comments were quite accurate, this submission reads like a brochure or advertisement meant to promote or advertise the product. Moreover it does not seem to be supported by
1787:
Yea sorry, forgot to untick the blank and speedy boxes... first copyright violation review, so I didn't realise that it did that, I do now. Anything I need to do to fix the mistake?
4498: 4394: 1767: 4922:
Do you think that deletions are priority than content expansion at Knowledge? Because based on your 2 year edit history I would assume you spread this bullshit just everywhere.
1717:
Please let me know how can I fix the page. All the content was supported by external articles published in various magazines of blogs. All these links are external to website.
3587:. That same name already exists currently. Not in the future. You would be incorrect if assuming that was the only place where the name is used to refer to this new device - 1824: 1803: 515:
If Insertcleverphrasehere socks to get around the topic ban (including clearly editing as an IP), he will be given escalating blocks, and the topic ban will become permanent.
2325: 2299: 2272: 2243: 2206: 2180: 2148: 2122: 413: 395: 376: 345: 4697: 4128: 4107: 4083: 2496: 625: 598: 4931: 4229: 4157: 3236: 3219: 3183: 3162: 3136: 3118: 2774: 2752: 2738: 2709: 2667: 1363: 532:
to obtain a mentor, ideally while the ban is still in place, so that Insertcleverphrasehere may be guided to editing that conforms with Knowledge policies and guidelines.
4098:
the material currently in the article. Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material, even if all the material is supported by a single citation.
3171:
are best reserved for cases where the consensus, or lack thereof, is clear. I think most of your closures have been spot on, but I don't think this one's as clear cut.--
2416: 2003: 1559: 1538: 1512: 1465: 1440: 1135: 5058: 5033: 5011: 4961: 4917: 4900: 4875: 4857: 4778: 4179: 3774: 3056: 1945:
It depends on whether you hold the copyright on the material or not, if you do you can release it to creative commons and its fine, if not it will need to be reworded.
1625: 1611: 4535: 4428: 4278: 4191: 2049: 1030: 4388: 3752: 3295: 2942: 2921: 2907: 575: 4633: 4138: 4021: 3983: 3948: 1872: 1375: 3720: 3699: 3578: 3548: 3518: 3460: 3422: 3378: 4992: 4324: 2992: 698:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
2155:
Yes these publications are reliable sources, but they do not provide significant coverage of Michael Weist, but rather only trivial passing mentions. Again, See:
1121: 4671: 2882:
I get you, I didn't realise that the Gamergate decision was so far broadened to include 'any gender related dispute or controversy'. I guess that means that the
2819: 1250: 226: 3444:
issue) seems to agree that it is a better descriptive term for the article to sit at until the market makes its mind up about a generic term for these devices.
5039: 2407: 1975:
announced - so far we can not provide any third party references. How long will the draft be safted for rework? Thank you very much for your patience and help
300:. Usernames cannot be merged; that would be too complicated. They can only be changed. In your case, I think that you should just leave well enough alone. 3646:
You were also incorrect when you said "now you argue that the discussion should continue based on one new comment?" Since reopening, there have actually been
3814: 3738: 3355: 2040: 1832: 963: 769: 5017:
to offer this critique). I have clearly stated what is needed to bring the articles to acceptable levels, if you would rather insult me, well thats on you.
1490: 4980: 3326: 2102:. None of the references qualify all of these criteria, therefore the article has no references that prove notability. Moreover, the draft shows pervasive 1883: 1178: 4284: 1661: 471: 4989: 4986: 4983: 1727: 1649: 4400: 2460: 2388: 1170:. The Fusionskonstante tells us, that making money with hot fusion always has been feasible the upcoming 30 years, for any given present since 1950 ;) 4974: 1325: 4977: 4547: 3317:. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. 1779: 537:
Please note that these sanctions may be lifted only by formal community proposal, or by emailing ArbCom. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.
4612: 4576: 4000: 3962: 2912:
Glad you get what I was saying. :) It would be great if you would note your understanding at the AfD and consider striking the "crowbar" comment.
4938: 4905:
Yes, thank you for reminding all of us what deletion normative and how quickly we should work while you placing labels just every 1/3 of your edit.
3331: 3088: 1262: 1098: 447: 238: 4256: 2629: 4825:
you seem to ignore common sense about interrupting other people edits with deletion requests. This may and will distract people from Knowledge.
4753: 3914: 3023: 2964: 286: 4059: 3758:
If you look above you'll see that this has been discussed already on this page. Please see the discussion above and my reasons for the close.
3301: 1742: 1341: 4365: 432: 361: 329: 4052:
major references for SSSIs are their citation and their designation of Defra's map. To suggest these are insufficient is incomprehensible. --
3261: 2824: 1148: 3967:
Ok sorry, I'm new to new page patrolling, but really it should go straight to AfD, I did a search and this guy doesn't seem notable at all.
1750: 1156: 5049: 5024: 4952: 4891: 4848: 4769: 4717: 4688: 4641: 4624: 4585: 4526: 4473: 4379: 4269: 4220: 4170: 4119: 4074: 4012: 3974: 3939: 3893: 3765: 3711: 3569: 3539: 3451: 3369: 3286: 3210: 3153: 3109: 3047: 2933: 2898: 2765: 2729: 2658: 2584: 2487: 2362: 2290: 2234: 2171: 2113: 1994: 1952: 1815: 1794: 1602: 1550: 1503: 1431: 1354: 645: 465: 117: 4207: 4163:
I am pretty sure that all I did was PROD it. Fairly certain I didn't speedy it. I was fine with your explanation over on your talk page.
309: 3745:
Um, I don't think 13:7 in favour of the move, with both reasonable and unreasonable arguments from both sides, count as "no consensus".
200: 3860: 3854: 3618: 3554: 1969: 79: 71: 66: 4112:
Fair enough mate, I am new to new page patrolling, so I'm bound to make some errors here and there, I'll take a look at the template.
3882:
so would not qualify as a high quality source on Ian Page. They can still be used in the article when talking about mozart 250 though.
4996: 4466:. The references are notable enough, the citations just are in an improper format. Fix this up and the article should be good to go. 4304: 4148:
that has 8 known tournaments and possibly more I have also added newspaper sources kindly don't just jump the gun next time thanks.--
3844:
Hi, many thanks for your feedback on my article about Ian Page. I wondered if you could give me some guidance on secondary sources.
2846: 1902: 1852: 1284: 261: 4597: 4559: 1589: 1114: 898:, which is not permitted on Knowledge. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. 825:, which is not permitted on Knowledge. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. 3926: 2218:
either. Most of the sources in this article wouldn't even be accepted as sources AT ALL, (for example ill just pick one at random:
1633: 559: 1398: 1215: 2573:
Indeed, there are probably enough sources to establish notability, but these need to be provided before it can be accepted. See
1705: 2869: 2829:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
2280: 1267:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
244:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
4617:
No worries mate, probably doesn't satisfy GNG. but ill wait a few days before taking to to AfD to see if some sources appear.
2098:
The references are not "Significant Coverage" nor mostly are they "reliable sources", and most are also not "independent" see
4300: 4297:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3254: 2520: 1848: 1845:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3657: 3653: 3650: 3647: 3397: 3384: 1693: 106: 779:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- 637: 489: 157: 1927: 1701: 1378:) in your signature, or replace it with a nbsp, otherwise your little border thingy can be word wrapped across two lines. 4866:
should be probably removed, nerveless, this page was edited for next 50 minutes after you placed speedy deletion banner.
2838: 2321: 2268: 2202: 2144: 2031: 1893: 1685: 1543:
Yeah figured it was something like that... no room for it though, and my 2 character solution works well enough i think.
1276: 253: 133: 1724: 973:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 4235: 3401: 3393: 1671: 621: 571: 477: 409: 372: 341: 2554: 1915: 495: 4410: 3796: 3388:
unnecessarily. In fact, as I pointed out (perhaps you missed it) the industry has already created something called a
2398: 1728:
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-05-23/news/50054952_1_venture-capitalists-ispirt-baby-care-products
4706:
article. Edit: I've fixed this by changing it form the 2015 list of clubs and stadiums to the 2016 version from the
3310: 1923: 1595:
Yes i realised this shortly afterward, but I can't revert until after the AfD ends, supposing the result is 'keep'.
483: 5052: 5027: 4955: 4894: 4851: 4772: 4734: 4720: 4691: 4627: 4529: 4476: 4382: 4272: 4223: 4173: 4122: 4077: 4015: 3977: 3942: 3896: 3768: 3714: 3572: 3542: 3454: 3372: 3343: 3332: 3289: 3231: 3213: 3178: 3156: 3131: 3112: 3083: 3064: 3050: 2936: 2901: 2830: 2768: 2732: 2661: 2587: 2538: 2490: 2365: 2293: 2237: 2174: 2116: 1997: 1955: 1907: 1818: 1797: 1605: 1553: 1506: 1434: 1357: 1132: 459: 400:
That which is made cannot be unmade. I have made no accusation, just a request for more information. I'll see what
47: 17: 3435:
Your link is to an eBay listing, hardly convincing evidence of a competing primary topic for the new article name.
4329: 3739: 2954: 2850: 2815: 2605: 2599: 2378: 2011: 1288: 1044: 996: 872: 799: 652: 265: 2347:
As I've said repeatedly, to satisfy the request for article creation we need multiple sources that each satisfy
900:
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Knowledge.
827:
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Knowledge.
2974: 2219: 1755: 1697: 924: 851: 732: 4289:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1837:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1141: 1040: 674:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:
147: 4973:. It takes decades for FULL TIME PAYED PROFESSIONALS to describe what you recently nominated for "deletion" 4802: 1718: 2574: 2355:, that is: Significant coverage, in reliable sources, that are independent. If you have them present them. 1732: 1312: 552: 152: 2542: 1374:
You should remove the space between the opening of the span class and the start of your username (as I've
5046: 5021: 4966:
Yes Knowledge was created so that non-experts can requests everyone to follow WP: guidelines. Keep going!
4949: 4888: 4845: 4766: 4714: 4685: 4621: 4523: 4470: 4376: 4266: 4217: 4196: 4167: 4116: 4071: 4029: 4009: 3971: 3936: 3890: 3762: 3708: 3566: 3536: 3448: 3366: 3283: 3207: 3150: 3106: 3044: 2930: 2895: 2762: 2726: 2655: 2581: 2529: 2484: 2359: 2287: 2231: 2168: 2110: 1991: 1949: 1919: 1812: 1791: 1599: 1547: 1500: 1428: 1351: 1125: 617: 567: 454: 405: 368: 337: 297: 2550: 314: 4236: 4145: 2842: 2534: 1280: 257: 38: 274:
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
120:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 4290: 2854: 2802:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
2514: 2432: 1292: 1237:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
305: 282: 269: 205: 196: 180: 4541: 4444: 3877:
Apologies for the very late reply, I have been in the wilderness taking part in running a week long
3861:
http://www.classicfm.com/composers/mozart/news/fancy-sponsoring-few-bars-mozart/#8JE1bf6H9sEwd4uB.97
3855:
http://www.classicfm.com/composers/mozart/news/250-project-anniversary-concerts/#MuXRXqlZD3RXB8bu.97
2065: 4744:
Basically, I'm ignoring notifications because you decided to spam my user page with notifications.
4603:
I had to remove the prod as that it cannot be prodded in that wording. Take it to AFD if you must.
4088:
No offence taken, or, at least, it passed quickly. You need to recheck the usage of the template: "
4042:
The article is clearly still being written. You need to leave a decent interval before defacing it.
3953:
Also-don't put up AFD's for articles that are only 14 minutes old, it also already had a BLP prod.
3869:
Stephen Roe, 'Mozart year by year', Opera: The Worlds leading opera magazine, January 2015, p31-35
3686: 3559: 2693: 2249: 1775: 1303: 693: 641: 3008: 1721: 2420: 2317: 2264: 2198: 2140: 2088: 2025: 1980: 1887: 428: 391: 357: 325: 4647: 4432: 4338:
was not the right tag there - that is for pages that were obviously not intended as articles. ("
2053: 4739: 4667: 4247:, but I hope that this was just an oversight by you and that you won't. Best regards, —Tim /// 4185: 3830: 3314: 3303: 2887: 2834: 2681: 2428: 1665: 1272: 423:
Ah saw the comment below and see you modified your stance. The other person summed it up well.
249: 175:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 138: 124: 103: 4440: 2996: 2833:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
2412: 2061: 1271:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
967:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 773:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 248:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
4424: 4404: 4104: 4056: 3908: 3790: 3524: 2546: 2464: 2392: 2045: 1175: 594: 168: 88: 3383:
It actually hasn't been opened for two months. As I said, it was originally admin closed as
3004: 2279:
Well, yeah that new york magazine ref doesn't mention Weist either. Note that notability is
1762: 4204: 3818: 3528: 3228: 3175: 3128: 3080: 2988: 2748: 2705: 2625: 2510: 2309: 2256: 2190: 2132: 1733: 1339: 1224:
Reminder - Energy Catalyzer and cold fusion articles are covered by discretionary sanctions
783: 742: 437: 301: 278: 192: 164: 128: 8: 4803:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Succinct_Data_Structure_Library&action=history
4797: 4707: 4651: 4419: 4294: 4035: 3826: 3224:
Well, I certainly appreciate your well reasoned and articulated responses here. Cheers,--
3190: 1771: 1575: 1532: 1484: 1459: 1392: 1299: 1110: 876: 803: 706: 656: 608: 586: 176: 4493:
Hello, I would like to know if a category grouping articles related to the secessionist
3810: 1580:
Please revert the page move. There was a recent RM that kept the current title. Thanks.
5007: 4927: 4913: 4871: 4830: 4812: 4749: 4244: 4153: 3746: 3660:
which the reopen was based up - and the RM was closed before the question was answered.
3027: 2968: 2313: 2260: 2194: 2136: 2084: 2021: 1976: 1621: 1585: 1268: 1087: 1078: 1026: 978: 969: 934: 861: 775: 424: 387: 353: 321: 245: 3076:? It seems to me like there's a consensus to move the article, be it a little rough.-- 4792: 4663: 4509: 4320: 4311:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4252: 3584: 2983: 2080:
sources? There are SEVERAL additions, bringing the article up to standards of wiki.
1868: 1859:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1746: 1725:
http://therodinhoods.com/forum/topics/meet-mridula-arora-the-nurturer-for-mompreneurs
1646: 1470:
However, why do you even need a space there? Why not add padding to your span style?
1211: 1184: 450:
Arbitration Committee decision, you are hereby sanctioned by the community as below:
291: 100: 2424: 4519:
Quite possibly, but it definitely needs to be expanded before it will be accepted.
4494: 4463: 4436: 4361: 4101: 4053: 3850:
Gavin Dixon, 'Mozart (The other masterpieces)', Limelight, September 2015, p50-53.
3786: 3269: 2917: 2865: 2788: 2057: 1635: 1369: 1152: 604: 590: 546: 111: 3279:
Thanks, looks like this will all get sorted out by JzG when he gets on next time.
4608: 4593: 4572: 4555: 4349: 4341: 4201: 3996: 3958: 3922: 3878: 3484: 3225: 3172: 3168: 3125: 3077: 3000: 2744: 2701: 2637: 2621: 2613: 1524: 1476: 1451: 1445:
You obviously know more about this that I do. I just saw weird word wrapping. :p
1384: 1333: 1063: 1043:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 780: 739: 500:
is topic-banned from making edits anywhere on Knowledge relating to cold fusion,
4462:
because the inline citations need to be linked using the guidelines laid out at
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4703: 4678: 3805: 3695: 3514: 3418: 3351: 3322: 2224: 2103: 1838: 1258: 1106: 689: 234: 3822: 5003: 4923: 4909: 4867: 4826: 4808: 4745: 4659: 4353: 4149: 2716: 2697: 2689: 2677: 2644: 2477: 2352: 2215: 2156: 2099: 1617: 1581: 1321: 1254: 1074: 1015: 1000: 974: 930: 894:
has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included
891: 857: 821:
has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included
818: 671: 520: 230: 96: 4740:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Ushkin_N&action=history
2686:
Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions#Main task
2220:
https://www.wannadolocal.com/nashville/events/party-with-the-viners-2-rgkBAA
1206:
Thank you for contributing to the discussion. Your voice is well received.
4880: 4863: 4505: 4316: 4312: 4248: 3886:
interviewer also comments on the subject outside the interview questions).
3488: 3073: 3066: 2673: 2651:] which are merely passing mentions and not really 'significant coverage'. 1864: 1860: 1643: 1421: 1412: 1207: 1193: 1163: 895: 822: 677: 143: 4787:
If you stop requesting deletions faster than 6-10 minutes it would be nice
3400:. In this case, I'm asking for a reopen because the last comment was just 585:
encyclopedia. What happened at ANI is that your complaint backfired (See
4489:
Project of new nategory grouping articles related to the State of Katanga
4357: 3265: 2913: 2877: 2861: 1808:
Indeed sorry for missing the ticket. I'll keep my eye out in the future.
1719:
http://therodinhoods.com/forum/topics/mybabycart-com-inviting-mompreneurs
685: 613: 540: 401: 206: 3859:
And this one talks about the start of the Mozart opera recording cycle:
3853:
This Classic FM articles talk about Ian Page and the Mozart250 project:
2795: 1347:
Apologies my friend, editing on an Iphone can make weird things happen.
1230: 1171: 1101:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
215: 4604: 4589: 4568: 4551: 3992: 3954: 3918: 3404:. So it shouldn't be closed while people are still discussing it again. 116:
Hello, Insertcleverphrasehere, and welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for
4798:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fauzia_Ilyas&action=history
3487:'s comments in the section above, regarding your non-admin closure on 1035:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
4090:
This template should be used only for articles where there are some,
3691: 3510: 3414: 3347: 3318: 1036: 950: 756: 4908:
Why don't you expand this article instead of suggesting deletions?
2883: 2688:, articles should be accepted if you think they'd probably pass an 2609: 1657:== 04:25:19, 15 March 2016 review of submission by Mridulaarora == 1062:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
884: 811: 664: 4793:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Phytorid&action=history
4646:
Hi, the bunch of articles I created was about players playing for
3260:
For your information, I started a sockpuppet investigation here -
3932:
Yeah sorry mate, that was an automated message sent via twinkle.
1018:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3619:
User_talk:Cuchullain#RM_at_Talk:Self-balancing_two-wheeled_board
3555:
User_talk:Cuchullain#RM_at_Talk:Self-balancing_two-wheeled_board
2250:
http://nymag.com/news/media/internet-fame/dem-white-boyz-2014-4/
2505:
01:09:09, 20 March 2016 review of submission by Matthewcasebier
1842: 1722:
http://www.theweek.in/features/startersbloc/Mommys-day-out.html
1167: 705:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
4937:
article, regardless of their level of expertise). Please read
4584:
Although interesting enough there seems to be a link to it on
2806:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
1241:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
1878:
15:25:37, 15 March 2016 review of submission by Emersonmarcus
1261:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 237:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is 172: 2608:, an article that you rejected at AfC. Adams has played for 1424:
space. Let me know if the problem persists. Also... thanks.
3781:
11:56:03, 26 April 2016 review of submission by EstherMusic
1103:
Interference with DRN case, possible violation of topic ban
1008: 4677:
I see that I missed the notice that they were promoted to
320:
stuff there. There is a lot of baiting going on. Thanks.
4395:
05:12:34, 15 May 2016 review of submission by Rayarainbow
2676:, and in general they shouldn't be accepted, as he fails 1120:
Link to archive (as above link was broken by archiving):
1051:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
4995:(for some reason you stopped here, but there more such " 904:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
831:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
712:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
4702:
The team also isn't listed in the list of clubs on the
4293:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1841:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 5040:
Comparison_of_programming_languages_(string_functions)
2451: 1039:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can 5002:
I don't think you are really adequate at this point.
4941:
as this should shed some light on this issue for you.
3146:). This is a good sign that nothing needs to change. 2953:
Request on 09:13:51, 29 March 2016 for assistance on
2758:
AfD (which always has a pretty big workload anyway).
2377:
Request on 15:07:33, 18 March 2016 for assistance on
2010:
Request on 12:42:50, 16 March 2016 for assistance on
709:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
4567:
Looking it up-it seems to be indeed a Youtube show.
3685:
So your accusation that my objections are because I
3583:
A current eBay ad has nothing whatsoever to do with
2106:. Sorry, not everyone deserves a wikipedia article. 3255:
Talk:Setting boundaries#Requested move 4 April 2016
2620:. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. 183:, or ask your question on this page and then place 4139:Dewar Cup circuit and associated Dewar Cup events 87:As an apparently new editor, so far only editing 4939:Knowledge:Make technical articles understandable 1420:)), which is another type of non-standard-width 688:. If you need help with referencing, please see 684:sources are required so that information can be 4501:and I wanted to know if it could be published. 1681:Draft:MyBabyCart - Mompreneurs Selling Platform 1099:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 676:This submission is not adequately supported by 616:, and I'll get on with editing in other areas. 4038:was misguided for at least two/three reasons: 3191:Consensus is not the result of a majority vote 2845:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 2692:, and I think if someone started an AfD about 1283:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 260:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 4144:I have created a navigational template here: 3740:Talk:Muscat,_Oman#Requested_move_3_March_2016 3262:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki-psyc 2618:notability guidelines for rugby union players 1833:Disambiguation link notification for March 15 508:. The following conditions are also applied: 4586:List of programs broadcast by ABC Television 4190:Hi Insertcleverphrasehere. I saw you tagged 925:real-time chat help from experienced editors 852:real-time chat help from experienced editors 733:real-time chat help from experienced editors 4340:Is this right?" etc.) That one was a clear 4285:Disambiguation link notification for May 12 3483:Finally, it was really interesting to read 4550:is real, but it might be a youtube short. 3523:"will be competing for this same name" is 3396:- when it was reopened upon request after 2684:still says they are presumed notable. Per 4048:Although there will be other references, 3072:Hey, might I ask you to reopen the RM at 1903:Draft:List of Adjutants General of Nevada 1249:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 1072:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 225:The Arbitration Committee has authorised 4334:Thanks for patrolling new pages, but G2 1033:to see how you can improve the article. 2810:Please carefully read this information: 1245:Please carefully read this information: 222:Please carefully read this information: 14: 4971:Make technical articles understandable 4034:Your insertion of a refimprove tag on 3342:I object to your non-admin closure of 3094:13-8 is not consensus especially with 191:before the question. Again, welcome! 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4504:Thanks in advance for your advice. -- 3553:Moreover, regarding your comments at 3167:Something I'm dancing around is that 2452:https://en.wikipedia.org/Resolver_One 1029:. You may like to take a look at the 1025:, which is recorded on the article's 95:by a recently-added provision in the 4841:to your article before creating it? 4642:Recently created soccer bio articles 3020:Done / resubmitted - please review? 2722:have multiple high quality sources. 2604:Just to let you know, I've accepted 2577:for a walkthrough. Hope this helps! 1766:, had you missed the OTRS ticket at 25: 4822: 2696:, it'd probably be kept because of 1097:There is currently a discussion at 23: 4005:I'll keep that in mind... thanks. 1970:Draft:The Promise Documentary 2016 1007: 890:Your recent article submission to 883: 817:Your recent article submission to 810: 670:Your recent article submission to 663: 24: 5082: 3344:Self-balancing two-wheeled board‎ 3333:Self-balancing two-wheeled board‎ 2214:satisfy all of the criteria of a 1021:The article has been assessed as 4213:I'll keep that in mind, thanks. 2794: 2715:that topics should both satisfy 2616:. As such, he meets Knowledge's 1229: 1192: 1092: 949: 755: 214: 153:How to create your first article 99:, to identify your employer. — 29: 18:User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere 4499:Draft:Category:State of Katanga 2792: 2606:Draft:Josh Adams (rugby player) 2248:New York Magazine, my mistake: 1768:Draft talk:Translation Pedagogy 1253:to be used for pages regarding 1227: 964:Articles for creation help desk 908:Articles for creation help desk 835:Articles for creation help desk 770:Articles for creation help desk 716:Articles for creation help desk 229:to be used for pages regarding 212: 1200:You dope, I sent a POTSTICKER! 1115:00:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 13: 1: 2743:Fair enough, seems sensible. 1983:) 10:45, 16 March 2016 (CET) 1157:22:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 1136:18:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1123:(this is a note for myself) 866:05:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 786:01:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 745:01:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 626:00:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 599:19:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 576:01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 560:19:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 433:09:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 414:11:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 396:11:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 377:03:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 362:03:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 346:11:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 330:11:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 139:The five pillars of Knowledge 4648:Kvarnsvedens IK Women's team 3398:a month with no new comments 2575:Knowledge:Your_first_article 1216:05:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 1179:21:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC) 700:when they have been resolved 7: 4497:could be viable. I created 4197:sr:Stoer-Vagnerov algoritam 2014:submission by Weist.michael 1642:comparatively minor issue. 1317:Hi Insertcleverphrasehere, 526:Insertcleverphrasehere is, 404:says and leave it at that. 10: 5087: 4658:. They are notable as per 4237:Government School, Bidhwan 4146:Template:Dewar Cup circuit 3721:12:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 3700:08:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 3589:as a simple search proves. 3579:01:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 3549:00:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 3519:20:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3461:09:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3423:09:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3379:08:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3356:08:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3327:08:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 3309:An editor has asked for a 3296:09:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3274:09:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 3237:20:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3220:19:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3184:14:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3163:08:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3137:03:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3119:02:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3089:02:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3057:20:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 3032:09:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2943:21:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2922:18:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2908:12:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2870:21:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC) 2775:12:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2753:12:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2739:12:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2710:09:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2668:02:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2630:00:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 2594:01:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC) 2497:19:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC) 2469:15:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC) 2372:13:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2326:13:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2300:13:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2273:13:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2244:13:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2207:13:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2181:12:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2149:12:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2123:12:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2093:12:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 2004:10:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 1962:21:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 1873:10:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 1825:10:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 1804:10:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 1780:09:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 1751:10:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 1650:23:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC) 1626:19:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC) 1612:22:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 1590:21:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 1560:00:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC) 1539:21:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC) 1513:21:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC) 1491:21:15, 11 March 2016 (UTC) 1466:21:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC) 1441:20:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC) 1399:15:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC) 1083:03:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 983:13:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC) 939:13:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC) 446:community discussion, and 158:Simplified Manual of Style 4656:fully professional league 4291:Life Flight (New Zealand) 3617:Regarding my comments at 2530:Draft:Emily's D+Evolution 2381:submission by Ethanjkagan 1364:11:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 1342:11:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC) 1308:17:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC) 1191: 690:Referencing for beginners 646:10:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC) 603:Thanks for your response 310:11:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC) 287:21:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 201:20:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 134:Contributing to Knowledge 107:00:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 5059:15:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 5034:15:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 5012:14:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4962:13:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4932:13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4918:13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4901:12:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4876:12:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4858:12:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4835:12:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4817:12:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4779:12:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4754:12:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 4735:Distracting notification 4727:23:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4698:23:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4672:23:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4634:03:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4613:02:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4598:02:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4577:02:49, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4560:02:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 4536:08:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC) 4514:20:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC) 4483:11:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 4389:20:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC) 4366:11:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC) 4325:10:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC) 4279:21:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4257:10:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4230:21:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4208:10:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4192:Stoer Vagnerov algoritam 4180:11:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4158:10:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4129:09:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4108:09:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4084:09:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4060:09:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4022:05:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 4001:05:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3984:04:28, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3963:01:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3949:01:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3927:00:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3390:"self-balancing scooter" 2694:Josh Adams (rugby union) 1065:leaving us some feedback 1041:create articles yourself 4330:Radical mastectomy etc. 3903:19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC) 3775:19:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC) 3753:11:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC) 2820:discretionary sanctions 2600:Accepted an AfC article 1322:think this was intended 1251:discretionary sanctions 896:copyrighted information 823:copyrighted information 227:discretionary sanctions 148:How to develop articles 4997:poorly explained pages 4650:, who competes in the 4546:From what I can tell, 3315:Self-balancing scooter 3304:Self-balancing scooter 2957:submission by Dsampele 2351:of the criteria for a 1756:Draft with OTRS ticket 1328:in my username in the 1128:InsertCleverPhraseHere 1012: 959:Insertcleverphrasehere 888: 815: 765:Insertcleverphrasehere 668: 618:Insertcleverphrasehere 568:Insertcleverphrasehere 535: 455:Insertcleverphrasehere 406:Insertcleverphrasehere 369:Insertcleverphrasehere 338:Insertcleverphrasehere 89:Talk:Energy Catalyzer 4345:blatant advertisement 3658:excludes the question 2888:Men's rights movement 2839:standards of behavior 2816:Arbitration Committee 2682:WP:NSPORT#Rugby union 1277:standards of behavior 1142:Thanks for your input 1045:Articles for Creation 1011: 997:Articles for creation 892:Articles for Creation 887: 873:Articles for creation 819:Articles for Creation 814: 800:Articles for creation 672:Articles for Creation 667: 653:Articles for creation 452: 254:standards of behavior 42:of past discussions. 4313:opt-out instructions 3529:Hoverboard (scooter) 2847:editing restrictions 2835:purpose of Knowledge 2672:Agree that it lacks 2408:Draft:SpreadsheetWEB 2353:very reliable source 2216:very reliable source 1861:opt-out instructions 1734:Draft:Fable (singer) 1313:Typo in my user name 1285:editing restrictions 1273:purpose of Knowledge 916:reviewer's talk page 843:reviewer's talk page 724:reviewer's talk page 298:WP:Changing Username 262:editing restrictions 250:purpose of Knowledge 4708:2016 Damallsvenskan 4652:2016 Damallsvenskan 4420:Draft:Gamliel Cohen 4295:Wellington Hospital 4094:, inline citations 4036:Allolee to Walltown 4030:Allolee to Walltown 2041:Draft:Michael Weist 995:Your submission at 871:Your submission at 798:Your submission at 707:Draft:Joseph Sledge 651:Your submission at 529:strongly encouraged 442:In accordance with 177:Knowledge:Questions 163:Please remember to 4303:• Join us at the 4262:Seems reasonable. 3169:non-admin closures 1851:• Join us at the 1324:, but you made an 1013: 889: 816: 669: 504:, for a period of 144:How to edit a page 118:your contributions 4821:As was stated in 4308: 3687:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT 3560:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT 3234: 3181: 3134: 3086: 2984:Draft:Tish Murtha 2329: 2312:comment added by 2276: 2259:comment added by 2210: 2193:comment added by 2152: 2135:comment added by 1856: 1332:move discussion. 1221: 1220: 1003:has been accepted 989: 988: 923:You can also get 850:You can also get 792: 791: 731:You can also get 558: 502:broadly construed 167:your messages on 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5078: 5057: 5032: 4960: 4899: 4856: 4777: 4725: 4696: 4632: 4534: 4495:State of Katanga 4481: 4449: 4448: 4387: 4298: 4277: 4228: 4178: 4127: 4092:but insufficient 4082: 4020: 3982: 3947: 3913:I didn't create 3901: 3835: 3834: 3773: 3750: 3719: 3656:. And that even 3577: 3547: 3459: 3377: 3302:Move review for 3294: 3253:Your comment on 3232: 3218: 3179: 3161: 3132: 3117: 3084: 3055: 3013: 3012: 2941: 2906: 2886:article and the 2881: 2798: 2773: 2737: 2674:reliable sources 2666: 2645:reliable sources 2641: 2592: 2559: 2558: 2495: 2478:reliable sources 2437: 2436: 2370: 2328: 2306: 2298: 2275: 2253: 2242: 2209: 2187: 2179: 2151: 2129: 2121: 2070: 2069: 2002: 1960: 1932: 1931: 1846: 1823: 1802: 1765: 1710: 1709: 1647:(Did I mess up?) 1636:Draft:Rob Fisher 1634:Your comment at 1610: 1558: 1537: 1535: 1529: 1528: 1511: 1489: 1487: 1481: 1480: 1464: 1462: 1456: 1455: 1439: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1409: 1397: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1362: 1336: 1233: 1196: 1189: 1188: 1134: 1096: 1095: 1067: 1057: 953: 946: 945: 919: 911: 846: 838: 759: 752: 751: 727: 719: 678:reliable sources 555: 549: 538: 499: 472:deleted contribs 315:I don't know you 218: 189: 188: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5086: 5085: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5043: 5038:Have a look at 5018: 4946: 4885: 4842: 4823:#Speedy tagging 4789: 4763: 4737: 4711: 4682: 4644: 4618: 4544: 4520: 4491: 4467: 4422: 4418: 4397: 4373: 4332: 4305:DPL WikiProject 4287: 4263: 4240: 4214: 4188: 4164: 4141: 4113: 4068: 4032: 4006: 3968: 3933: 3911: 3887: 3879:rite of passage 3808: 3804: 3783: 3759: 3748: 3743: 3705: 3563: 3533: 3445: 3363: 3337: 3307: 3280: 3258: 3204: 3147: 3103: 3070: 3041: 2986: 2982: 2959: 2927: 2892: 2875: 2859: 2858: 2818:has authorised 2799: 2791: 2759: 2723: 2652: 2635: 2614:Anglo-Welsh Cup 2602: 2578: 2532: 2528: 2511:Matthewcasebier 2507: 2481: 2410: 2406: 2383: 2356: 2307: 2284: 2254: 2228: 2188: 2165: 2130: 2107: 2043: 2039: 2016: 1988: 1972: 1946: 1905: 1901: 1880: 1853:DPL WikiProject 1835: 1809: 1788: 1761: 1758: 1737: 1683: 1679: 1639: 1596: 1578: 1544: 1533: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1497: 1485: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1460: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1425: 1417: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1393: 1386: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1372: 1348: 1334: 1326:accidental typo 1315: 1297: 1296: 1234: 1226: 1187: 1144: 1124: 1105:. Thank you. 1093: 1090: 1085: 1053: 1047:if you prefer. 1005: 985: 941: 913: 905: 881: 868: 840: 832: 808: 788: 747: 721: 713: 697: 661: 553: 547: 543: 457: 440: 317: 302:Robert McClenon 294: 279:Robert McClenon 276: 275: 219: 211: 193:Robert McClenon 186: 185: 171:by typing four 129:Getting started 114: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5084: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5036: 5000: 4967: 4942: 4920: 4906: 4806: 4805: 4800: 4795: 4788: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4736: 4733: 4732: 4731: 4730: 4729: 4704:Damallsvenskan 4679:Damallsvenskan 4643: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4548:I'm a dinosaur 4543: 4542:I'm a dinosaur 4540: 4539: 4538: 4490: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4455: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4416: 4396: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4331: 4328: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4239: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4187: 4186:Speedy tagging 4184: 4183: 4182: 4140: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4063: 4062: 4046: 4043: 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3951: 3910: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3883: 3841: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3806:Draft:Ian Page 3802: 3782: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3742: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3551: 3525:WP:Crystalball 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3436: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3336: 3330: 3306: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3257: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3200:strong support 3100:Strong support 3069: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3019: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 2980: 2958: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2841:, or relevant 2800: 2793: 2790: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2565: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2526: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2443: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2404: 2382: 2375: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2083: 2076: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2037: 2015: 2008: 2007: 2006: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1899: 1879: 1876: 1839:Evynne Hollens 1834: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1806: 1772:David Biddulph 1757: 1754: 1736: 1731: 1716: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1677: 1638: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1520: 1472: 1447: 1380: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1314: 1311: 1300:TenOfAllTrades 1279:, or relevant 1259:fringe science 1235: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1174:! Polentarion 1143: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1089: 1086: 1070: 1069: 1060: 1031:grading scheme 1020: 1006: 1004: 993: 991: 987: 986: 956: 954: 943: 929: 928: 921: 882: 880: 869: 856: 855: 848: 809: 807: 796: 794: 790: 789: 762: 760: 749: 737: 736: 729: 710: 694:Citing sources 675: 662: 660: 649: 638:143.161.248.25 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 579: 578: 541: 534: 533: 524: 516: 513: 439: 436: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 380: 379: 349: 348: 316: 313: 293: 290: 256:, or relevant 235:fringe science 220: 213: 210: 204: 161: 160: 155: 150: 141: 136: 131: 113: 110: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5083: 5060: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5051: 5048: 5041: 5037: 5035: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5026: 5023: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4998: 4994: 4991: 4988: 4985: 4982: 4979: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4959: 4958: 4957: 4954: 4951: 4943: 4940: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4893: 4890: 4882: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4865: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4850: 4847: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4819: 4818: 4814: 4810: 4804: 4801: 4799: 4796: 4794: 4791: 4790: 4780: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4771: 4768: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4751: 4747: 4742: 4741: 4728: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4719: 4716: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4690: 4687: 4680: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4654:, which is a 4653: 4649: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4626: 4623: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4610: 4606: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4578: 4574: 4570: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4549: 4537: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4528: 4525: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4511: 4507: 4502: 4500: 4496: 4484: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4475: 4472: 4465: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4421: 4417: 4415: 4414: 4412: 4409: 4406: 4402: 4399: 4398: 4390: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4381: 4378: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4344: 4343: 4337: 4327: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4309: 4306: 4302: 4296: 4292: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4271: 4268: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4254: 4250: 4246: 4238: 4231: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4222: 4219: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4206: 4205: 4203: 4198: 4193: 4181: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4172: 4169: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4130: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4121: 4118: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4106: 4103: 4099: 4097: 4093: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4076: 4073: 4065: 4064: 4061: 4058: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4044: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4037: 4023: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4014: 4011: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3976: 3973: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3950: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3941: 3938: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3915:Chakra khadka 3909:Chakra khadka 3904: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3895: 3892: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3870: 3867: 3863: 3862: 3857: 3856: 3851: 3848: 3845: 3842: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3807: 3803: 3801: 3800: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3788: 3785: 3784: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3767: 3764: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3751: 3741: 3722: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3713: 3710: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3688: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3659: 3655: 3652: 3649: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3620: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3571: 3568: 3561: 3556: 3552: 3550: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3541: 3538: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3453: 3450: 3442: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3371: 3368: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3340: 3334: 3329: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3305: 3297: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3288: 3285: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3256: 3238: 3235: 3229: 3227: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3201: 3197: 3196:strong oppose 3193: 3192: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3182: 3176: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3155: 3152: 3145: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3135: 3129: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3101: 3097: 3096:Strong oppose 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3087: 3081: 3079: 3075: 3068: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3046: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2985: 2981: 2979: 2978: 2976: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2956: 2944: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2935: 2932: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2900: 2897: 2889: 2885: 2879: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2826: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2805: 2797: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2721: 2718: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2650: 2648: 2646: 2639: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2586: 2583: 2576: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2531: 2527: 2525: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2489: 2486: 2479: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2455: 2453: 2447: 2444: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2409: 2405: 2403: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2380: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2354: 2350: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314:Weist.michael 2311: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2292: 2289: 2282: 2281:NOT INHERITED 2278: 2277: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2261:Weist.michael 2258: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2226: 2221: 2217: 2212: 2211: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195:Weist.michael 2192: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2173: 2170: 2164: 2163: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2137:Weist.michael 2134: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2115: 2112: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085:Weist.michael 2081: 2077: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2038: 2036: 2035: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2022:Weist.michael 2020: 2019: 2018: 2013: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1982: 1978: 1977:addictivefilm 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1904: 1900: 1898: 1897: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1884:Emersonmarcus 1882: 1881: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1844: 1840: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1807: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1793: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1753: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1729: 1726: 1723: 1720: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1682: 1678: 1676: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1637: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1530: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1482: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1457: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1423: 1414: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1390: 1377: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1356: 1353: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1318: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1255:pseudoscience 1252: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1240: 1232: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1190: 1180: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1137: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1066: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1017: 1016:Joseph Sledge 1010: 1002: 1001:Joseph Sledge 998: 992: 984: 980: 976: 972: 971: 966: 965: 960: 955: 952: 948: 947: 944: 940: 936: 932: 926: 922: 918: 917: 910: 909: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 886: 878: 877:Joseph Sledge 874: 867: 863: 859: 853: 849: 845: 844: 837: 836: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 813: 806:(February 27) 805: 804:Joseph Sledge 801: 795: 787: 784: 782: 778: 777: 772: 771: 766: 761: 758: 754: 753: 750: 746: 743: 741: 734: 730: 726: 725: 718: 717: 711: 708: 704: 703: 701: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 673: 666: 659:(February 20) 658: 657:Joseph Sledge 654: 648: 647: 643: 639: 627: 623: 619: 615: 610: 606: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 583: 582: 581: 580: 577: 573: 569: 564: 563: 562: 561: 556: 550: 544: 531: 530: 525: 522: 517: 514: 511: 510: 509: 507: 503: 497: 494: 491: 488: 485: 482: 479: 476: 473: 470: 467: 464: 461: 456: 451: 449: 445: 435: 434: 430: 426: 425:Earl King Jr. 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 388:Earl King Jr. 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 359: 355: 354:Earl King Jr. 347: 343: 339: 334: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 322:Earl King Jr. 312: 311: 307: 303: 299: 289: 288: 284: 280: 273: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 242: 240: 236: 232: 231:pseudoscience 228: 223: 217: 208: 203: 202: 198: 194: 190: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 126: 123: 122: 121: 119: 109: 108: 105: 102: 98: 94: 90: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5050:CleverPhrase 5045: 5044: 5025:CleverPhrase 5020: 5019: 4953:CleverPhrase 4948: 4947: 4892:CleverPhrase 4887: 4886: 4881:Fauzia Ilyas 4864:Fauzia Ilyas 4849:CleverPhrase 4844: 4843: 4820: 4807: 4770:CleverPhrase 4765: 4764: 4743: 4738: 4718:CleverPhrase 4713: 4712: 4689:CleverPhrase 4684: 4683: 4664:MbahGondrong 4645: 4625:CleverPhrase 4620: 4619: 4583: 4545: 4527:CleverPhrase 4522: 4521: 4503: 4492: 4474:CleverPhrase 4469: 4468: 4454: 4407: 4380:CleverPhrase 4375: 4374: 4346: 4339: 4335: 4333: 4310: 4288: 4270:CleverPhrase 4265: 4264: 4241: 4221:CleverPhrase 4216: 4215: 4200: 4189: 4171:CleverPhrase 4166: 4165: 4142: 4120:CleverPhrase 4115: 4114: 4095: 4091: 4089: 4075:CleverPhrase 4070: 4069: 4049: 4033: 4013:CleverPhrase 4008: 4007: 3975:CleverPhrase 3970: 3969: 3940:CleverPhrase 3935: 3934: 3912: 3894:CleverPhrase 3889: 3888: 3871: 3868: 3864: 3858: 3852: 3849: 3846: 3843: 3840: 3793: 3766:CleverPhrase 3761: 3760: 3744: 3712:CleverPhrase 3707: 3706: 3570:CleverPhrase 3565: 3564: 3540:CleverPhrase 3535: 3534: 3489:Muscat, Oman 3452:CleverPhrase 3447: 3446: 3440: 3385:no consensus 3370:CleverPhrase 3365: 3364: 3341: 3338: 3308: 3287:CleverPhrase 3282: 3281: 3259: 3211:CleverPhrase 3206: 3205: 3199: 3195: 3189: 3154:CleverPhrase 3149: 3148: 3110:CleverPhrase 3105: 3104: 3099: 3095: 3074:Muscat, Oman 3071: 3067:Muscat, Oman 3065:RM close at 3048:CleverPhrase 3043: 3042: 3022: 3018: 2971: 2960: 2934:CleverPhrase 2929: 2928: 2926:No problem. 2899:CleverPhrase 2894: 2893: 2860: 2813: 2809: 2808: 2803: 2801: 2766:CleverPhrase 2761: 2760: 2730:CleverPhrase 2725: 2724: 2719: 2659:CleverPhrase 2654: 2653: 2603: 2585:CleverPhrase 2580: 2579: 2567: 2564: 2517: 2488:CleverPhrase 2483: 2482: 2459: 2456: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2395: 2384: 2363:CleverPhrase 2358: 2357: 2348: 2346: 2308:— Preceding 2291:CleverPhrase 2286: 2285: 2255:— Preceding 2235:CleverPhrase 2230: 2229: 2189:— Preceding 2172:CleverPhrase 2167: 2166: 2161: 2160: 2131:— Preceding 2114:CleverPhrase 2109: 2108: 2082: 2078: 2075: 2028: 2017: 1995:CleverPhrase 1990: 1989: 1973: 1953:CleverPhrase 1948: 1947: 1937: 1890: 1858: 1836: 1816:CleverPhrase 1811: 1810: 1795:CleverPhrase 1790: 1789: 1759: 1741: 1738: 1715: 1668: 1662:Mridulaarora 1654: 1653: 1640: 1616:No worries! 1603:CleverPhrase 1598: 1597: 1579: 1551:CleverPhrase 1546: 1545: 1504:CleverPhrase 1499: 1498: 1432:CleverPhrase 1427: 1426: 1422:non-breaking 1413:FIGURE SPACE 1373: 1352:InsertClever 1350: 1349: 1329: 1319: 1316: 1298: 1248: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1236: 1199: 1164:Oil constant 1145: 1127: 1126: 1091: 1071: 1052: 1034: 1022: 1014: 990: 968: 962: 958: 942: 915: 907: 899: 842: 834: 826: 793: 774: 768: 764: 748: 723: 715: 699: 681: 634: 609:Boomerranged 587:WP:BOOMERANG 536: 528: 527: 505: 501: 492: 486: 480: 474: 468: 462: 453: 441: 438:Topic banned 422: 350: 318: 295: 277: 243: 224: 221: 184: 181:my talk page 179:, ask me on 162: 125:Introduction 115: 101:Arthur Rubin 92: 86: 60: 43: 37: 4401:Rayarainbow 4356:. Regards, 4245:WP:OUTCOMES 4102:Tagishsimon 4054:Tagishsimon 3787:EstherMusic 3311:Move review 3098:as well as 2680:. However, 2649:] and here: 2461:Ethanjkagan 2389:Ethanjkagan 1655:Italic text 1576:Misfortunes 1418:&numsp; 1023:Start-Class 605:ScrapIronIV 591:ScrapIronIV 207:Cold fusion 187:{{Help me}} 36:This is an 4969:Regarding 4342:WP:CSD#G11 4315:. Thanks, 4202:Sam Sailor 4096:to support 3585:WP:CRYSTAL 3485:Cúchullain 3226:Cúchullain 3173:Cúchullain 3126:Cúchullain 3078:Cúchullain 2831:uninvolved 2745:Joseph2302 2702:Joseph2302 2638:Joseph2302 2622:Joseph2302 2104:POV issues 1863:. Thanks, 1760:Regarding 1527:Salvidrim! 1479:Salvidrim! 1454:Salvidrim! 1387:Salvidrim! 1335:soetermans 1269:uninvolved 1088:ANI Notice 912:or on the 879:(March 14) 839:or on the 720:or on the 548:have a cup 490:block user 484:filter log 246:uninvolved 169:talk pages 4710:article. 4464:WP:INCITE 4336:test page 4299:Read the 3402:yesterday 2349:all three 2159:. Quote: 1847:Read the 1763:this edit 1376:done here 1185:You dope! 1107:Guy Macon 1055:help desk 1037:Knowledge 1027:talk page 496:block log 292:User Name 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 5004:Ushkin N 4924:Ushkin N 4910:Ushkin N 4868:Ushkin N 4827:Ushkin N 4809:Ushkin N 4746:Ushkin N 4411:contribs 4350:WP:10CSD 4150:Navops47 3797:contribs 3654:comments 3144:very low 3024:Dsampele 2975:contribs 2965:Dsampele 2884:Feminism 2843:policies 2789:DS alert 2610:Scarlets 2521:contribs 2446:Hello, 2399:contribs 2322:contribs 2310:unsigned 2269:contribs 2257:unsigned 2203:contribs 2191:unsigned 2145:contribs 2133:unsigned 2032:contribs 1894:contribs 1672:contribs 1618:Dohn joe 1582:Dohn joe 1518:though. 1370:Your sig 1320:I don't 1281:policies 1172:Glückauf 1075:Onel5969 975:Onel5969 970:Teahouse 931:Onel5969 858:Onel5969 776:Teahouse 686:verified 682:Reliable 506:one year 466:contribs 258:policies 112:Welcome! 93:required 4506:Jean Po 4433:history 4317:DPL bot 4249:Carrite 3819:history 3394:April 5 3339:Hello, 3335:closure 2997:history 2612:in the 2543:history 2421:history 2225:WP:SNOW 2054:history 1916:history 1865:DPL bot 1743:74music 1694:history 1644:Howicus 1208:Potguru 957:Hello! 763:Hello! 39:archive 5047:Insert 5022:Insert 4950:Insert 4945:well. 4889:Insert 4846:Insert 4767:Insert 4715:Insert 4686:Insert 4660:WP:FPL 4622:Insert 4524:Insert 4471:Insert 4377:Insert 4358:JohnCD 4354:WP:A7M 4267:Insert 4218:Insert 4168:Insert 4117:Insert 4105:(talk) 4072:Insert 4057:(talk) 4010:Insert 3972:Insert 3937:Insert 3891:Insert 3763:Insert 3709:Insert 3567:Insert 3537:Insert 3449:Insert 3367:Insert 3284:Insert 3266:Penbat 3208:Insert 3151:Insert 3107:Insert 3045:Insert 2931:Insert 2914:Jytdog 2896:Insert 2878:Jytdog 2862:Jytdog 2855:blocks 2837:, our 2763:Insert 2727:Insert 2717:WP:GNG 2698:WP:NRU 2678:WP:GNG 2656:Insert 2582:Insert 2485:Insert 2360:Insert 2288:Insert 2232:Insert 2169:Insert 2157:WP:VRS 2111:Insert 2100:WP:VRS 1992:Insert 1950:Insert 1843:Wicked 1813:Insert 1792:Insert 1600:Insert 1548:Insert 1501:Insert 1429:Insert 1408:U+2007 1355:Phrase 1330:Hitman 1293:blocks 1275:, our 1168:Wietze 1149:Blandx 614:Coffee 542:Coffee 521:WP:ANI 402:Coffee 270:blocks 252:, our 173:tildes 104:(talk) 97:WP:TOS 4605:Wgolf 4590:Wgolf 4569:Wgolf 4552:Wgolf 4441:watch 4437:links 3993:Wgolf 3955:Wgolf 3919:Wgolf 3827:watch 3823:links 3749:flyer 3648:three 3441:might 3124:RM.-- 3005:watch 3001:links 2853:, or 2551:watch 2547:links 2457:Best 2429:watch 2425:links 2062:watch 2058:links 1924:watch 1920:links 1702:watch 1698:links 1291:, or 1147:work. 554:beans 268:, or 209:alert 16:< 5053:Here 5028:Here 5008:talk 4956:Here 4928:talk 4914:talk 4895:Here 4872:talk 4862:Yes 4852:Here 4831:talk 4813:talk 4773:Here 4750:talk 4721:Here 4692:Here 4668:talk 4628:Here 4609:talk 4594:talk 4573:talk 4556:talk 4530:Here 4510:talk 4477:Here 4445:logs 4429:talk 4425:edit 4405:talk 4383:Here 4362:talk 4352:and 4321:talk 4273:Here 4253:talk 4224:Here 4174:Here 4154:talk 4123:Here 4078:Here 4016:Here 3997:talk 3978:Here 3959:talk 3943:Here 3923:talk 3897:Here 3831:logs 3815:talk 3811:edit 3791:talk 3769:Here 3715:Here 3696:talk 3692:X4n6 3573:Here 3543:Here 3515:talk 3511:X4n6 3455:Here 3419:talk 3415:X4n6 3373:Here 3352:talk 3348:X4n6 3323:talk 3319:X4n6 3290:Here 3270:talk 3214:Here 3198:and 3157:Here 3113:Here 3051:Here 3028:talk 3009:logs 2993:talk 2989:edit 2969:talk 2937:Here 2918:talk 2902:Here 2866:talk 2851:bans 2825:here 2814:The 2769:Here 2749:talk 2733:Here 2706:talk 2662:Here 2626:talk 2588:Here 2555:logs 2539:talk 2535:edit 2515:talk 2491:Here 2465:talk 2433:logs 2417:talk 2413:edit 2393:talk 2366:Here 2318:talk 2294:Here 2265:talk 2238:Here 2199:talk 2175:Here 2141:talk 2117:Here 2089:talk 2066:logs 2050:talk 2046:edit 2026:talk 1998:Here 1981:talk 1956:Here 1928:logs 1912:talk 1908:edit 1888:talk 1869:talk 1819:Here 1798:Here 1776:talk 1770:? -- 1747:talk 1706:logs 1690:talk 1686:edit 1666:talk 1622:talk 1606:Here 1586:talk 1554:Here 1507:Here 1435:Here 1358:Here 1304:talk 1289:bans 1263:here 1257:and 1212:talk 1176:Talk 1153:talk 1111:talk 1079:talk 979:talk 935:talk 862:talk 692:and 642:talk 622:talk 595:talk 572:talk 478:logs 460:talk 448:this 444:this 429:talk 410:talk 392:talk 373:talk 358:talk 342:talk 326:talk 306:talk 296:See 283:talk 266:bans 239:here 233:and 197:talk 165:sign 146:and 127:and 4999:"). 4301:FAQ 4050:the 3747:SST 3651:new 3313:of 2955:AfC 2804:not 2720:and 2690:AfD 2379:AfC 2012:AfC 1849:FAQ 1239:not 781:Sam 740:Sam 738:-- 557:// 551:// 545:// 5010:) 4930:) 4916:) 4874:) 4833:) 4815:) 4752:) 4670:) 4662:. 4611:) 4596:) 4588:. 4575:) 4558:) 4512:) 4443:| 4439:| 4435:| 4431:| 4427:| 4413:) 4364:) 4323:) 4255:) 4156:) 3999:) 3961:) 3925:) 3917:. 3829:| 3825:| 3821:| 3817:| 3813:| 3799:) 3698:) 3562:. 3517:) 3421:) 3354:) 3325:) 3272:) 3264:-- 3030:) 3007:| 3003:| 2999:| 2995:| 2991:| 2977:) 2920:) 2868:) 2849:, 2827:. 2751:) 2708:) 2700:. 2628:) 2553:| 2549:| 2545:| 2541:| 2537:| 2523:) 2480:. 2467:) 2431:| 2427:| 2423:| 2419:| 2415:| 2401:) 2324:) 2320:• 2283:. 2271:) 2267:• 2227:. 2205:) 2201:• 2147:) 2143:• 2091:) 2064:| 2060:| 2056:| 2052:| 2048:| 2034:) 1926:| 1922:| 1918:| 1914:| 1910:| 1896:) 1871:) 1778:) 1749:) 1704:| 1700:| 1696:| 1692:| 1688:| 1674:) 1624:) 1588:) 1531:· 1523:· 1483:· 1475:· 1458:· 1450:· 1391:· 1383:· 1338:. 1306:) 1287:, 1265:. 1214:) 1155:) 1113:) 1081:) 999:: 981:) 937:) 875:: 864:) 802:: 702:. 696:. 680:. 655:: 644:) 624:) 597:) 574:) 539:— 431:) 412:) 394:) 375:) 360:) 344:) 328:) 308:) 285:) 264:, 241:. 199:) 76:→ 5006:( 4993:7 4990:6 4987:5 4984:4 4981:3 4978:2 4975:1 4926:( 4912:( 4870:( 4829:( 4811:( 4748:( 4666:( 4607:( 4592:( 4571:( 4554:( 4508:( 4447:) 4423:( 4408:· 4403:( 4360:( 4319:( 4307:. 4251:( 4152:( 3995:( 3957:( 3921:( 3833:) 3809:( 3794:· 3789:( 3694:( 3513:( 3417:( 3350:( 3321:( 3268:( 3233:c 3230:/ 3180:c 3177:/ 3133:c 3130:/ 3085:c 3082:/ 3026:( 3011:) 2987:( 2972:· 2967:( 2916:( 2880:: 2876:@ 2864:( 2747:( 2704:( 2640:: 2636:@ 2624:( 2557:) 2533:( 2518:· 2513:( 2463:( 2435:) 2411:( 2396:· 2391:( 2316:( 2263:( 2197:( 2139:( 2087:( 2068:) 2044:( 2029:· 2024:( 1979:( 1930:) 1906:( 1891:· 1886:( 1867:( 1855:. 1774:( 1745:( 1708:) 1684:( 1669:· 1664:( 1620:( 1584:( 1534:✉ 1521:☺ 1486:✉ 1473:☺ 1461:✉ 1448:☺ 1416:( 1394:✉ 1381:☺ 1302:( 1210:( 1151:( 1109:( 1077:( 1068:. 1059:. 977:( 933:( 927:. 920:. 860:( 854:. 847:. 735:. 728:. 640:( 620:( 593:( 570:( 523:. 498:) 493:· 487:· 481:· 475:· 469:· 463:· 458:( 427:( 408:( 390:( 371:( 356:( 340:( 324:( 304:( 281:( 195:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 5
Talk:Energy Catalyzer
WP:TOS
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
00:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
your contributions
Introduction
Getting started
Contributing to Knowledge
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
sign
talk pages
tildes
Knowledge:Questions
my talk page
Robert McClenon
talk
20:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Cold fusion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.