User talk:Ichthyovenator/Archive 1

4289: 4197: 6834:. There are a fair amount of people in modern Greece and Italy with some version of "Palaiologos" as their last name and it is possible that a fair number of them are "true" Palaiologoi as in descendants of old Nikephoros but not necessarily descendants of the emperors. This might apply to the Romanian Paleologu as well (or it's possible that they just made it up, though the connection with Lesbos in Greece certainly helps) but it is certainly interesting and I will definitely look into it and see what I can find! 3763:

of Tiaret, with members of our family in the whole sector, in Tiaret (the main city of the region), Frenda, etc, in the area where these kingdoms have emerged!), and my father from Bejaia, so these contributions affect me a lot, because it's part of the story of my ancestors. Hope you will appreciate this message. Sorry for my very bad english, my native language is French. Also, one more edit, i wanted to inform you that I am currently translating your excellent article on the kingdom of Moors and Romans (

250: 4223: 4218: 4213: 4208: 4203: 4191: 4186: 4181: 4176: 4171: 31: 4836: 1523: 640: 4494: 3921: 1367: 440: 3129: 2214: 6566: 6203: 5859: 5703: 5589: 5530: 5260: 5146: 4609: 3877: 3670: 3556: 3497: 3383: 3083: 3024: 2965: 2275: 2168: 2012: 1809: 1750: 1477: 1308: 1100: 6686:

Civil War and ended up retiring on Barbados you sort of want their claims of imperial descent to be true. It's just such an unexpected fate for the final imperial dynasty. My main focus this time around were on these two and I think, sadly, that sources are too scarce to write decent articles on their close relatives (such as Theodore's other sons who died in the war, his grandfather Prosperos and Ferdinand's son and grandchildren).

4991: 4934: 6144: 5973: 5471: 4728: 4065: 3996: 6515: 6093: 5922: 5808: 5652: 5420: 5365: 5209: 5095: 4443: 3826: 3733: 3619: 3446: 3332: 3277: 2914: 2859: 2338: 2075: 1961: 1699: 1644: 1426: 1257: 1049: 994: 4387:). It's a quite important article and I do believe major restructurings and rephrasings should be discussed on the talk page of the article before being implemented. You did shorten it, yes, but there was also a lot of information lost (and I'm not sure how the lost information was less important than the kept information) and the exposition became a bit muddled in my opinion. 2667:

On the topic of a good topic I think Slimonidae is a little too small of a topic (3 articles, not that good topics have to be large). If we were to attempt a good topic I think Pterygotioidea superfamily would be a good one to do. It includes the famous pterygotids (all except Necrogammarus are GA or

6451:

etc.) with the city that they ruled. I figured that since Akkadian titles cover most of what we consider to be Ancient Mesopotamian history and are both more common and more elaborate than previous Sumerian ones, "Mesopotamian royal titles" would be fine as a redirect to "Akkadian royal titulature",

3781:

Thank you for the kind words! It was odd to me that a line of kings claiming such a grand title as the "Kings of the Moors and Romans" had been overlooked so I did my best to write about them and their kingdom as comprehensively as I could. It was very interesting to learn more about the Mauro-Roman

2816:

It also comes down to the reviewers, and some reviewers simply don't know anything about the subjects they review. For example, I would not have passed Schinderhannes without some significant expansion, I really don't believe it is as comprehensive it can be in regard to the literature. A standalone

6791:

family. From what I've heard, they come from the island of Lesbos and settled in Wallachia at some point in history. Their connection with the Palaiologoi is not entirely safe but I think it's something very interesting and maybe you know something about them and their doubtful connection, it would

6616:

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only

6319:

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you

3762:

Hello, I would like to congratulate and thank you for your work concerning the very little recognized Berber-Roman kingdoms of the post and pre-vandal periods, and to revive this very vague period, I appreciate your work. I am a from France, of Berber origin, my maternal family is from the province

2394:

Hi, sorry for the late response. When I restore eurypterids I look for images of the most well preserved specimens available and make a pencil drawing based on that (and often based on other restorations to get a feel as to how they would have looked). I then take a photo of the drawing and edit it

6822:

and their stories seemed so strange to me that you almost want their claims of also being the heirs of the emperors to be true. I think their genealogy shows pretty well that even in cases where they are relatively near in time (Theodore's birth in around 1560 is just a little over a century after

6685:

The pleasure's all mine! I read about Ferdinand and Theodore some time ago and while there is uncertainty in regards to their claims, there is a real possibility that they were Manuel II's actual descendants. Learning of the somewhat shady Theodore and how Ferdinand avoided fighting in the English

2548:

Since I'm myself spread a bit thin on Knowledge at present, and since you both have eurypterid articles up, I was wondering if you should maybe try to review one of each other's current nominations? After all, you two are probably the most knowledgeable on the group, and it will also help practice

947:

Yes! I know the term 'eastern roman empire' isn't accurate after 480 and only Roman Empire/emperor, it's just that people here do not like to use the original name at all for the medieval empire and I think the term 'eastern roman' although not the best term, it doesn't deny the Roman-ness of the

906:

Since the Byzantine vs Roman naming discussion comes up quite a lot I thought it best to find some form of compromise in how the titles are used in the infoboxes. "Emperor of the Byzantine Empire" was by far the most commonly used one, so I ensured that it was used on all of them for the sake of

6434:

Since writing appeared in Mesopotamia ~3500 BC and the "Akkadian period" (as in civilizations using the Akkadian language etc.) begins in ~2300 BC and then more or less lasts throughout the rest of Ancient Mesopotamian history, most Mesopotamian royal titles we have written down will be in the

6023:

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Knowledge and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will

2729:

Necrogammarus does make Pterygotioidea as a Good topic problematic, yes. I have been meaning to edit the Slimonidae article itself for a while so we can see what to do after that. I do not believe a GA necessarily has to be very long (correct me if I'm wrong), just comprehensive and featuring

6786:

Hi, Ichthyovenator. I know this seems somewhat meddlesome on my part but I see that lately your contributions have focused on the Palaiologos family. I'm not really a fan of Byzantine history but I find it certainly interesting. That's why I was wondering if you have heard of the Romanian

6435:

Akkadian language and inspired by those created during the Akkadian and Neo-Sumerian empires. There just aren't as many Sumerian titles preserved as there are Akkadian ones and anything in Sumerian beyond the start of the Akkadian period is usually just translations of the Akkadian titles.

899:

is the 88th. Since Zeno (at the very least juridically) reunified the Empire into just one imperial court, the use of "Eastern Roman Emperor" and "Eastern Roman Empire" is actually historically inaccurate beyond the year 480, they were simply "Roman Emperors" of the "Roman Empire" at that

452:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3933:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

339:

be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Knowledge. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable,

862:

I think the use of 'medieval roman empire' or at least 'eastern roman empire' should be encouraged and the use of 'byzantine' should become obsolete, we are not in the 19th century anymore. But I fairly agree with you, it's quite good to add the official title, Emperor of the

6823:

Constantinople's fall) having the last name "Palaiologos" isn't a guarantee for being a relative of the emperors; even though Theodore's lineage really only has one uncertain link ("John", supposed son of Thomas), a lot of historians disregard him and his descendants today.

886:

I have already ensured that all the Eastern Roman Emperors are numbered as roman emperors but specified to be Emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire (just as the Western ones are specified as being Emperors of the Western Roman Empire) until the end of the Western Empire.

6438:

There are of course some earlier examples and some later sources giving title for historical kings and such but it is also worth noting that earlier Sumerian titles weren't as elaborate as those of the Akkadians, ususally just combining one of the titles for "king"

6672:. They are interesting little gems and a perfect example of the type of content that you really have trouble finding outside Knowledge because it is scattered here and there and often inaccessible. Well done. Do you intend to work on other Palaiologoi? 907:

consistency between the emperors. We can not change it to "Emperor of the Roman Empire" without clear consensus and the consensus is at the moment seemingly opposed to that. I think putting in the formal and official title ("Augustus" for emperors from

2785:

has can pass. It would probably take at least a brief description and some sentences about paleoecology. The latter is easy, as we have been doing in some articles, you can add its fossil site and faunas found in the same place. I did not think

510:

Hello, Ichthyovenator. I have been looking at your edits and have seen that some pages not cited without that reference you used to make the list of eurypterid have other references. What I wonder is where you find them, I would like to know.

3234:

I did find the review very odd and completely unlike ones I have been through before, especially the quick close of the review. Not sure if it anything would come from it but I think it could be worthwile to open a discussion, yes.

6689:

I do enjoy reading up on the Palaiologoi though so I might end up tackling some obscurer medieval figures in the family, or some of those with certain imperial descent (Thomas/Andreas), if I uncover something interesting.

398:

Also note that Knowledge articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Knowledge project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in

2371:

Hi once more, Ichthyovenator. I plan on doing several restorations of the body parts of some eurypterids, but I do not know how. I would like to ask you how you do it and what tools you use. Thanks in advance.

261:

from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Knowledge, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

1886:, which might be relevant for you), for free through my school. Not sure how you would go about getting access, but I know that there is some sort of collaboration between JSTOR and Knowledge that might help ( 2730:

everything we know about the subject at hand. Necrogammarus is almost certainly synonymous with either Erettopterus or Pterygotus but I think it is possible to expand its article a little bit more at least.

6262:

For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

1542: 3782:

Kingdom and the other Berber kingdoms that emerged in North Africa after the collapse of Rome when researching for the article, hopefully it does a good job at representing the history of the region.

3945:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 464:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3208:

Do you think it would be worthwhile to open a discussion on John at the GAN discussion page? It seems his style of asking for unspecified changes and closing when they weren't met was also found at

1919: 1869: 1547: 725:

Thank you for your understanding. In general, this Eastern Roman–Byzantine dichotomy is a contentious area, and large-scale changes should be avoided without discussion or consensus. Best regards.

4364:

because it has a labe caling for shortening and restructuring. I did some mistakes but I would like to help satisfy the label's instructions. COuld I ind help from someone on that effort?--

4645: 3961: 2622:

could help me to start. At the moment there is no other article that I have nominated. And speaking of GA, I think it would not be bad to also nominate Slimonidae to become the first

903:

I do agree that "Byzantine" should become obsolete, but it can not be denied that it is, at the moment, by far the most common way to refer to the Roman Empire during the middle ages.

480: 4764: 2781:

is practically everything known about it. But a GA of it will never happen. I am exaggerating in this case, but I do not think that an article with the current information that

4700: 1909: 1859: 1537: 4821: 536:

Thanks! I have made a lot of edits, so it would help if you could give me some examples of the pages in question. I normally search for relevant terms on Google Scholar (

5620: 5502: 4759: 5443: 4384: 4085: 3979: 2668:

GA-nominated), the hughmillerids (Herefordopterus needing work here) and the slimonids (both GA). The articles that would be in need of expansion are not that many.

498: 6421: 6843: 6792:

be pretty cool if they actually descended from them. I also want to congratulate you on the articles you have been expanding, they are very interesting! Good job!

5177: 2706: 2642: 2529: 2515: 2490: 2476: 2447: 2425: 2404: 1924: 1903: 1136: 621: 600: 578: 549: 6151:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 5980:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 5478:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 4735:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 4379:

First of all, I apologize if I in any way discouraged you from editing with my reverts of your contributions to the article. The major thing to consider with the

4155: 349: 6849: 6705: 6365: 5950: 5566: 5448: 5291: 5118: 3528: 744: 352:

copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See

3194: 1225: 6890: 6776: 6004: 5739: 5232: 4947: 4705: 3300: 936: 852: 190: 5890: 5776: 4335: 4273: 3791: 2677: 562:, which happens the same, but in ichthyosaur. But do not worry, I'll try to be the one looking for these references. Maybe the link you gave me serves me ;). 238: 6597: 5945: 5895: 5561: 5393: 3587: 2826: 2724: 2660: 2558: 1612: 1575: 6480: 6461: 5831: 4521: 4045: 1508: 1394: 6538: 6256: 5388: 5333: 4922: 4586: 4471: 4081: 3756: 3469: 2140: 1344: 1131: 6654: 5045:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

5036: 4640: 4466: 4396: 3701: 1449: 1017: 6826:

I had not heard of the Romanian Paleologu family! Even in medieval times, the Palaiologos family was large and the imperial line (descendants of Emperor

6699: 6299: 5296: 4870: 3908: 3706: 2647:

I would gladly help oversee such a review, it really isn't that hard. Just keep in mind what you have been told in reviews of your nominations, skim the

2306: 2103: 1072: 6360: 3642: 2739: 2682:

As far as I know, the number of articles does not matter, even if they are only three. Probably Pterygotioidea can never become a good topic because of

2613: 4562: 4416: 3849: 3776: 3244: 967: 6234: 6175: 3055: 5836: 4365: 2252: 1840: 736: 720: 6573:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

6210:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

6116: 5866:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

5710:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

5596:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

5537:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

5267:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

5153:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4616:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3884:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3677:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3563:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3504:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3390:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3090:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3031:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2972:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2882: 2282:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2199: 2175:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2019:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1816:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1757:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1484:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1315:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1175: 1107:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

961: 6255:

for October 26, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at

2810: 2388: 1781: 1722: 1339: 679: 5734: 3414: 2996: 2599: 2098: 6284: 5781: 5123: 4978: 3114: 2043: 1667: 1280: 1153: 5675: 3355: 2937: 1854:

contains a lot of information that does not appear in the abstract of those journals. Do you have the full text? How? I would need it to expand

879:

I would actually like to continue the counting from the previous roman emperors. The first Emperor labelled as Emperor of the Byzantine Empire,

6543: 4927: 4027: 3533: 3166: 3001: 2361: 1984: 1882:

Yes, much of the information was based on the full text of some of the journals. I have access to JSTOR, which has quite a few papers (such as

1167: 97: 6061: 4350: 872: 6602: 6180: 6121: 5507: 5237: 5068: 3474: 2648: 2145: 1077: 5063: 4501:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

2230:

articles in so little time! They will probably be the best (only?) sources of information about these animals for regular readers anywhere.

1374:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

411:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

6488: 4255: 3419: 2832: 1786: 1454: 678:

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Knowledge's

6305: 6066: 5338: 5182: 4857: 4317: 4018:

and for bringing it up to Good Article status. A lot of work and a lot of perseverance. You are a fine example of Knowledge at its best.

3647: 3250: 3228: 2817:

section called "significance" is also highly unorthodox, and would probably not be accepted in articles in general, regardless of topic.

2048: 1145: 1022: 2618:

Honestly, I do not see myself yet able to do a review. Maybe in the future, make one, and short. I have noticed some articles like this

1874: 6808: 3913: 3854: 3060: 2942: 1727: 1672: 1399: 1285: 432: 427: 530: 6798: 5680: 4902: 4140: 3592: 3360: 2800: 2696: 2632: 2505: 2466: 2415: 2395:

on my computer, doing stuff like increasing the contrast and editing how it looks to make the end result a quite clean line drawing.

2378: 1914: 1864: 764: 611: 568: 520: 258: 218: 172:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out

6637: 6343: 6044: 3179:

is going to be difficult to do anything major with as it is basically undiagnostic (for a dinosaur comparison, think something like

2239: 1171: 4242: 3799: 2887: 2311: 1989: 1617: 1230: 353: 4411: 1569: 6239: 5625: 4531:

I think from here I should just scratch the review and delete it all. Then you can get someone else and their may be no confusion

3305: 1149: 169: 6641: 6518:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

6347: 6096:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

6048: 5925:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5811:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5655:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5423:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5368:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5212:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5098:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4446:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4036:

Thank you for the kind words! Feels like forever since I began working on that article, here's to many more articles to come :)

3829:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3736:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3622:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3449:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3335:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3280:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2917:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2862:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2341:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2078:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1964:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1702:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1647:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1429:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1260:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1052:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

997:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1934: 143: 111: 6574: 6211: 5867: 5711: 5597: 5538: 5268: 5154: 4617: 3885: 3678: 3564: 3505: 3391: 3091: 3032: 2973: 2686:, only a redescription could give enough information for GA, and it does not seem like that will happen soon. I am working on 2481:

I think it looks pretty good. Do you have a link to the source/reference used so that I can compare them to the final result?

2283: 2176: 2020: 1817: 1758: 1485: 1316: 1108: 211:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6871: 6722: 6622: 6328: 6029: 4898: 4581: 4540: 2794:

would be quite an achievement that would open the possibility that Waeringopteridae would also be GA, so it is worth trying.

1197: 760: 672: 214: 4373: 6748: 6679: 4983: 4097: 3975: 942: 494: 4888: 705: 415:

from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —

185: 6819: 6669: 1593: 372: 663:

with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek

129:

on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

6560: 6197: 6138: 5967: 5853: 5697: 5583: 5524: 5465: 5254: 5140: 4722: 4603: 4488: 3986: 3871: 3664: 3550: 3491: 3377: 3077: 3018: 2959: 2269: 2162: 2006: 1803: 1744: 1471: 1361: 1302: 1094: 404: 79: 71: 66: 6009: 5042: 3767:). An ode of compliments for a contributor doing an excellent job in anonymity, and with a lot of humility. Goodbye. 3200: 2619: 824: 173: 5757: 4245:

with 14 articles which you managed to do in just the last year, an award I just made up right now. Keep paddling on

2496: 2121: 391:

confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see

6259:, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. 5314: 4998: 3971: 2366: 490: 243: 2434:), any decent image editing app could really replace Gimp here, Pixlr is easily accessible online for instance ( 749:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

5024: 4383:

article is that not only is it a featured article but it also has an average of almost 6,000 viewers each day (

3119: 857: 802: 314: 283: 780: 690:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in 400: 208: 6867: 6803: 6718: 5287: 5228: 5173: 5114: 4945:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

4736: 4569: 4346: 3524: 3296: 3223: 2805: 2701: 2637: 2510: 2471: 2420: 2383: 1193: 616: 573: 525: 195:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6744: 6405: 5981: 5593: 5479: 4804: 4685: 4161: 4136: 3954: 668: 648: 473: 302: 133: 105: 93: 4884: 2579:

are there other eurypterid GA nominations by you that I've missed? My only nominated one at the moment is

4826: 4071: 3966: 3772: 2204: 1589: 883:, would then be labelled as "89th Emperor of the Roman Empire", with the counting continuing on from him. 485: 6839: 6695: 6457: 6295: 6267: 5046: 5032: 4755: 4558: 4407: 4392: 4331: 4279: 4269: 4151: 4041: 3787: 3240: 3190: 3161: 2735: 2673: 2609: 2525: 2486: 2443: 2400: 1899: 1565: 932: 716: 687: 596: 545: 279: 38: 5015:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1535:

Congratulations on the approval of Pterygotidae! There are already 3 good articles about eurypterids!

952:

invention. Lets hope we can change it completely to Roman Empire/Emperors someday. Total support dude.

540:) which usually leads to some paper of relevancy, but some specific sources were found in other ways. 6644:

if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

6630: 6452:

though that might change if someone puts together a "Sumerian royal titulary" article at some point.

6371: 6350:

if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

6336: 6051:

if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

6037: 5616: 5557: 5498: 5439: 5384: 4875:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4613: 4498: 1504: 1445: 1371: 957: 868: 820: 691: 412: 5753: 2117: 6827: 6793: 6593: 6534: 5310: 5283: 5278: 5224: 5219: 5169: 5164: 5110: 5105: 4968: 4718: 4711: 4342: 4312: 4251: 3904: 3845: 3697: 3638: 3583: 3520: 3515: 3465: 3292: 3287: 2795: 2691: 2627: 2574: 2500: 2461: 2410: 2373: 2279: 1883: 750: 660: 606: 563: 515: 47: 17: 588: 6855: 6714: 6545: 6490: 6182: 6123: 6068: 5963: 5956: 5952: 5908: 5901: 5897: 5838: 5783: 5682: 5627: 5579: 5572: 5568: 5509: 5461: 5454: 5450: 5406: 5399: 5395: 5340: 5239: 5184: 5125: 5070: 4853: 4707: 4588: 4473: 4418: 4132: 4005: 3856: 3801: 3708: 3649: 3594: 3535: 3476: 3421: 3362: 3307: 3252: 3062: 3003: 2944: 2889: 2834: 2761: 2313: 2254: 2147: 2050: 1991: 1936: 1788: 1729: 1674: 1619: 1456: 1401: 1346: 1287: 1232: 1127: 1079: 1068: 1024: 969: 310: 5019: 5010: 6831: 5886: 5863: 5827: 4023: 3209: 1189: 798: 148: 6830:) was just one of many branches descended from the family's 11th-century founder, the general 776: 204: 6815: 6740: 6665: 5003: 4751: 4746: 4526: 4403: 4051: 3942: 3156: 3152: 1890:), depending on if you are at some kind of institution, some institutions have JSTOR access ( 461: 165: 2778: 6863: 6733: 5612: 5607: 5553: 5548: 5494: 5489: 5435: 5430: 5380: 5375: 5150: 4938: 4892: 4876: 4787:

Most of the content in the lead should be moved to new sections in the body of the article.

4696: 4651: 4599: 4592: 4484: 4477: 4429: 4422: 4369: 4288: 4015: 4014:

It gives me great pleasure to award you this hard earned barnstar for your amazing work on

3953:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3768: 1845: 1500: 1495: 1441: 1436: 1357: 1350: 980: 973: 953: 908: 880: 864: 754: 644: 633: 472:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 392: 325: 321: 8: 6835: 6781: 6710:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

6691: 6676: 6589: 6584: 6570: 6530: 6525: 6453: 6291: 6277: 4554: 4388: 4327: 4300: 4265: 4247: 4196: 4147: 4037: 3900: 3895: 3841: 3836: 3783: 3719: 3712: 3693: 3688: 3634: 3629: 3579: 3574: 3560: 3461: 3456: 3236: 3186: 3185:

but with less history and material behind it) but I will see what can be done with it :)

3028: 2731: 2715:

became a featured topic, even though it only contains two genera, so should be possible.

2669: 2605: 2521: 2482: 2439: 2396: 2265: 2258: 1895: 1581: 1561: 1513: 1141:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

928: 712: 711:

I'd hardly consider them disruptive, but sure I'll stay off similar stuff in the future.

664: 592: 541: 376: 309:.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to 257:

have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of

181: 4895:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 757:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 335:

own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you

6617:

takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

6230: 6207: 6171: 6152: 6112: 5730: 5671: 5534: 5264: 4849: 4108: 3501: 3410: 3351: 2822: 2720: 2656: 2595: 2554: 2460:). How about? Feel free to modify whatever, especially those points that look so ugly. 2235: 2172: 2039: 1980: 1836: 1777: 1718: 1663: 1335: 1276: 1123: 1118: 1104: 1064: 1059: 896: 505: 380: 158: 115:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type 2773:. But everything has a limit, and a minimum is needed to be a GA. Wyomingopteryx is a 270:

amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double

6886: 6772: 6659: 6651: 6471: 6429: 6412: 6377: 6357: 6058: 6000: 5941: 5882: 5877: 5849: 5842: 5823: 5818: 5794: 5787: 5772: 5329: 5059: 4942: 4918: 4909:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4770: 4577: 4536: 4517: 4462: 4355: 4019: 3929: 3752: 3218: 3051: 2992: 2933: 2878: 2790:

would pass with such a short paleoecology, but it did it, so it is possible. A GA of

2302: 2136: 1813: 1608: 1481: 1390: 1221: 1013: 924: 848: 839:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

448: 423: 306: 234: 225:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

5029:

You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page

4951:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2457: 6290:

Exciting stuff! I'll be eagerly checking through everything up until October 26th!

4380: 4361: 3938: 3764: 3674: 3110: 2568: 2357: 2195: 2094: 457: 253:

Hello Ichthyovenator, and welcome to Knowledge. All or some of your addition(s) to

121: 87: 6509: 6087: 5916: 5802: 5646: 5414: 5359: 5203: 5136: 5129: 5089: 5081: 5074: 4692: 4657: 4636: 4437: 4093: 3881: 3820: 3727: 3613: 3440: 3326: 3271: 3155:! So I give you this fossilized barnstar, and bid you good luck on your editing! 3087: 2969: 2908: 2853: 2332: 2069: 1955: 1887: 1754: 1693: 1638: 1420: 1312: 1251: 1043: 988: 816: 731: 700: 298: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6673: 6556: 6549: 6501: 6494: 6271: 6148: 5977: 5745: 5707: 5475: 4732: 3950: 3546: 3539: 3432: 3425: 3387: 3014: 3007: 2845: 2838: 2580: 2452:

I was looking for anything to do a test restoration and I made the holotype of

2409:

And what do you use to edit the images? That is what is most difficult for me.

2109: 888: 787: 652: 469: 271: 177: 4222: 4217: 4212: 4207: 4202: 4190: 4185: 4180: 4175: 4170: 2690:

and will soon be moving to Hughmilleriidae, so there is no problem with that.

6381: 6252: 6248: 6240: 6226: 6221: 6193: 6186: 6167: 6162: 6134: 6127: 6108: 6103: 6079: 6072: 5726: 5721: 5667: 5662: 5520: 5513: 5351: 5344: 5302: 5250: 5243: 5195: 5188: 4814: 4780: 4776: 4661: 4076: 4053: 3946: 3487: 3480: 3406: 3401: 3347: 3342: 3263: 3256: 3147: 2818: 2716: 2652: 2591: 2550: 2231: 2158: 2151: 2061: 2054: 2035: 2030: 2016: 1976: 1971: 1832: 1827: 1773: 1768: 1714: 1709: 1659: 1654: 1331: 1326: 1272: 1267: 1090: 1083: 1035: 1028: 465: 345: 200: 153: 138: 643:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did at

387:

be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you

6882: 6878: 6768: 6764: 6580: 6521: 6505: 6217: 6158: 6099: 6083: 5996: 5991: 5987: 5937: 5932: 5928: 5912: 5873: 5814: 5798: 5768: 5764: 5717: 5658: 5642: 5603: 5544: 5485: 5426: 5410: 5371: 5355: 5325: 5321: 5274: 5215: 5199: 5160: 5101: 5085: 5055: 4959: 4914: 4910: 4742: 4623: 4573: 4548: 4532: 4513: 4508: 4504: 4458: 4453: 4449: 4433: 3891: 3832: 3816: 3748: 3743: 3739: 3723: 3684: 3625: 3609: 3570: 3511: 3452: 3436: 3397: 3338: 3322: 3283: 3267: 3213: 3097: 3047: 3042: 3038: 2988: 2983: 2979: 2929: 2924: 2920: 2904: 2874: 2869: 2865: 2849: 2623: 2344: 2328: 2298: 2293: 2289: 2182: 2132: 2128: 2081: 2065: 2026: 1967: 1951: 1823: 1799: 1792: 1764: 1705: 1689: 1685: 1678: 1650: 1634: 1604: 1600: 1491: 1467: 1460: 1432: 1416: 1412: 1405: 1386: 1381: 1377: 1322: 1263: 1247: 1217: 1213: 1114: 1055: 1039: 1009: 1004: 1000: 984: 844: 840: 514:

Also, I want to congratulate you for the good editions you do. Good work!.

416: 275: 254: 230: 226: 6500: