User talk:Hughesdarren/Archive 8

1870:

not disagree that the person may be pass GNG (if reliable sources are identified), but in it's current form the article is full of undue glorification and reads more like a corporate website praising their leader: "Kiggundu is one of the Country's best-known entrepreneurs", "and leading revolutionist of life's importance", "He passionately talks about success", "Currently he is very popular in Ugandan Media", "His father Segawa was a very silent successful businessman", "Kiggundu is apparently a successful and prominent businessman" etc etc. All of which with dubious or no sources at all. Besides, there's an article in Draft that has been declined at AfC plenty of times. The probable COI/PAID of the author is another issue...

1181:

legal text on the matter. To reword here it would be a diservice to the article as it would employ words that are not legally or factually correct such as heraldry, which has a distinct legal meaning. I consider the statement from the Court of the Lord Lyon as well fair under copyright law use as it is a public statement by a public organisation and succinctly explains the law well. The law behind heraldry is ancient, and very few legal writings exist explaining it so the quote of the Lord Lyon is the best possible source. The only way I could obtain the actual law on this would be accessing Scottish University archive materials which is not so easily obtained.

420:. I discovered that I had NOT put up all (972) the Acacia maps, created so long ago (2010-12-08). I believe I have now uploaded them. I found out 59 were missing when using "Quick Statements" to add the maps to wikidata. However, now all my uploaded maps have also been uploaded to wikidata and the easiest way to find them is to use the wikidata item next to the article and copy the filename from there. Most need cropping and the croptool in wikimedia is nice in that one does not have to upload all the descriptive stuff again. One just replaces the file... Cheers, 3007: 4721: 2657: 1769: 95: 4114: 4654: 463: 4661: 5196: 5000: 216: 2668: 5846: 5296: 3971: 3703: 3595: 3487: 3072: 5150:

spreading disinformation. He even slandered you on his talk page: "And you should stop acting as a hired representative of dispruptive editors" I am a new user and dont know how to deal with his constant trolling -- as I try to make visible the atrocities suffered by a 'Dalit' at the hands of Sikh extremists. We need to do something to make sureVenkatTL does not do any more damage. Knowledge should not be used for spreading misinformation. Thanks

3014: 6109: 2496: 1464: 1366: 4315: 5628: 4183: 1692: 4555: 5795: 5245: 3920: 3632: 3524: 3416: 5999:, which you have reviewed. It did not have a talk page. Generally, while marking such articles as reviewed, we should notify the user. I generally send a message from the curation toolbar similar to "kindly add related wikiproject banners on the talkpage, see similar article's talkpage for reference". Thanks for reviewing the articles again. See you around. —usernamekiran • sign the 1169:

of law. I cannot accept the characterisation that it is a paraphrase if there is no other way to cover the issue comprehensively for Wiki users. To omit one section or the other, would be a grave omission which I personally cannot recommend. I had actually already started the structure before accessing the Journal article, such coincidences are not surprising in law.

5040:

Murders and Lynching of Single events. The page would get deleted unless you can take some action to revert the page back. This is a crucial incident widely reported in WP:RS sources in which a person from under-previleged protected class "Dalit" has been brutaly lynched and murdered. I hope you can revert this article back and save from deletion. Thanks a lot.

1078:) up for review and added it to a couple of projects in hopes of speeding that up. But the page is in pretty good shape now, and doesn't really need to languish for three months in draftspace purgatory, so perhaps you might give it another look and release it back into the wild if that isn't a problem. 3733:

I noticed you were a New Page Reviewer - I am a beginner to Knowledge and have just finished writing my first article, now the draft is pending for review. It'd be great if you could check it over! I am apprehensive that it will contain mistakes and I will need to wait another few weeks/months before

1883:

I had originally tagged it mostly for having no references which the editor had resolved, so I removed my tag. I agree that the subject was far from notable and that the article was heavy on praise and of dubious notability but once the references had been put in place I let it go. I take it has been

1711:

was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with

1168:

The structure of the article follows a distinction that has to be made when explaining souvenir plots: the heraldry aspect and the ownership aspect. I can appreciate the Journal article follows this format too but there is no other way to deal with it as the two matters are completely separate areas

972:

has done then you can't go far wrong. Don't be afraid to experiment a bit and like I said before if other editors are unhappy with it they will let you know. You could also cut and pate the article into your sandbox and experiment with it there (Click on the "sandbox" next to "talk" right up the top

560:= 0. Please help by when creating new biota articles for australia, to make sure the unassessed page stays the way it is adequately tagged, or please ask for help in doing so... More on the next stages of the Australian biota project soon... and thanks for whatever you have done for the project in 5039:

The page created by me and reviewed (& approved) by you, User:Hughesdarren: Singhu border lynching (2021) has been reverted to Draft by a User:Venkat TL giving a very vague reason that Knowledge is not News, and caanot be used for a single vent, while there are thousands of Wiki pages on Rapes,

4716:

If you are no longer very active on Knowledge or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or

4013:

thank you - I saw that you help delete the accidental creation of a page. I did not know if you had seen my contention of the 2008 indiana elections one - and I noted that the 2008 indiana elections were more broad than the 2008 presidential election in indiana - which have significant differences.

3030:

has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality

941:

I will say--the two notices at the top of the East Boston page were not very clear for me as a new editor. Yes, I could understand why they had been put there. Certainly there was "intricate detail" up on the page, as it stood when I first read it, and the organization was not great. But when those

917:

Hi, Piers Park was a good article - well done. If you can write more just like it on other East Boston topics that would be great too. Don't worry about starting an new article they all get curated at some point so long as you have some reliable source to back up what you are saying everything else

5722:

article. You'll see that the geology content has been there for some time. Further, roscimetosne.tk does NOT seem like a legit website. Seems like a Knowledge copycat or bot site (it is filled with ads). Again, this has to be a mistake. To add another thing, .tk is the ccTLD for Tokelau. Why would

4356:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1869:

Hi Hughesdarren, I appreciate double checking by CSD tag. I was wondering if you could share your thoughts on this article? The editor has since made smallish changes, however, I continue to believe that the article is far from encyclopedic and probably requires some TNT to get it on the way. I do

1786:

can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the

1176:

The matters relating to the creation of real rights in Scotland cannot be amended in any other way as each word such as registration or recording has a distinct legal meaning in Scots law so I cannot amend the text any further as this would become incorrect and would be a discredit to Knowledge. I

1172:

In law, as you can appreciate, there are some words and phrases you cannot express in any other form because they are the law as it stands in statute. This includes the words souvenir plot and the definition of it as they are contained in the statute. The Journal article was also written under the

649:

Hi, Thanks for your notice, I just want to let you know that article Meena Ally was created focusing WikiGap2020 in Tanzania project. Subject Meena Ally is influential Radio and TV Woman Presenter in Tanzania. Hence to promote women and awareness as the project description I decided to write about

113:

discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to

2277:

under references header (or any other template), all the section headers were === (they should have been ==) (but this is hard to spot), and the talkpage didn't exist. Whenever you see a non existing talkpage, kindly ask the author to see similar articles, and their talkpages; and to add relevant

1214:

Hi Kentigern1136, Checking for copyright violation is part of the page curation process and once I place a tag there another reviewer will check as well. In this case each section had a quotation so I had been fairly sure it was OK and as it turned out it was and when the next reviewer came along

1180:

However, above all I just want to empahasise the wording was mine alone. I did not copy any part of the Journal article but there are some words which cannot be avoided as they are the law. I also have explained further the matters relating to heraldry, having consulted and referenced the eminent

715:

Is there anyway you could help me with my article Draft:Deviant Horror (Hip Hop Duo)? I've had this account for a long time, but never really used it, so I'm a bit confused on something, but I spent a lot of time on that and would really like to be able to publish it properly. Any help would be

1164:

and was covering the legal requirements relating to registration of deeds of land in Scotland and had to cover souvenir plot as they are exempt from registration. However, I felt a separate page for a souvenir plot would serve the matter better as it is commonly sold item online and there is no

602:

Hey, I'm just wondering whats the reason for requesting deleting of my page Central Park Tours. I used to work for this company for 5years and I just decided to make a page in wikipedia about them, since they are one of the main companies in Central Park for Bike/Pedicab tours and they help the

1545:

Thanks for your creation of this cat. and for linking all those species (~800?) to it. Great work. Unfortunately, I have discovered that Euclid/CANBR has updated their pages, so that every link to it on the Eucalyptus pages is now either dead or goes to the home page! Ah well! Keeps me off the

353:

Oops must have missed your message amongst the other gripes etc... I'm keen to finish the biota tagging then get finish off the long list of Acacias that need attention before I'll be going back to Eucalypts. Geoff seemed pretty interested, once he's done upgrading all of the Corymbia articles

4218:

They don't have to be a sock or indefinitely banned. You have now edited this comment 10 times in five hours. Leave it alone. Page curation is a painful business at the best of times carried out by a dwindling list of participants while the rest of us feel unsupported as a result this sort of

5149:

VenkatTL has been doing deletions for vandalism. He is specifically deleting any articles or sections or properly sourced texts which talk about the acts of violence committed by Sikh extremists. From his contributions, it is pretty clear he is deleting, applying wrong templates etc which is

3998:

I used to be a hills vollie firey - it gives me bad memories about reading that (10 hour shifts in the middle of the night etc) - I also have quite a few acquaintances of the past with properties in the target area... suppose not much will stop things in conditions like tonight. yuck.

1177:

have gone further than the Journal article here too, explaining the concepts of legal ownership in Scots law and its key elements with references to the key legal texts. The Journal article did not do this as it is written for Scottish solicitors so it is common knowledge to them.

3045:

has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

1242:

Thanks for reviewing the stub articles I have been adding, the majority of the wonderful protected areas of Costa Rica weren't in Knowledge, so I started to add the initial information to slowly proceed adding more information over the years, it will be a long work ahead!

2391:, all new pages are reviewed (or patrolled) in order to better control the quality of new pages—to address common unwanted content such as spam, copyvios and nonsense, and also to encourage good faith new users, if you are interested in the process you can read more at 5591:

Hello again. I've created the page but this is a genus and species I am unfamiliar with. Could you please use the same style of referencing tha tI have and not use Bare urls. Well done on signing off correctly this time and good luck with the other species. Regards.

1823: 4727:

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described

1925:

There is nothing showing notability here. All we have is that there is a weather station by that name. Settled places are inherently notable. There is nothing whatsoever to indicate that this is anything other than a weather station, most of which are

4884:

hope all is well and you are keeping safe. I hope you could be of assistance if you are not to busy. I have created an article which has been sitting in the backlog for sometime now and I would like you to review it for me. The name of the article is

5907:

Hi HughesDarren Happy for you to delete Gold Coast Titans women's squad page I was attempting to create a template page (for tghe first time) and didn't initially realise that I had to prefix it with template: Have done that now Thank you, Nhoj1898

898:

As a young editor on WP, I don't know the form for doing this. Would it be possible for you to give it some attention, so I can see how it might be done? What is the process? Is any element automated? Does it have to go through a period of review?

5956:

article data and engine information table? It keeps saying, "Convert: Ignore invalid option." I don't know why it's saying that. I did everything right, but it just won't publish the engine infobox table. Your help would be very much appreciated.

3574: 933:

Excellent. I would like to (and I will) go after a few more topics for East Boston. "Any issues other editors will let you you know soon enough" You made me laugh. Very true! Happily, I do not (yet) have an egotistical investment in... the

3950: 3349:

but it's pretty easy. In a nutshell you select the "More" tab near the top right hand corner of the article and choose "Move" then put in the new title and reason. If you have troubles then message me back and I can do it for you. Regards.

4695:

are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection

3682: 5718:, because they are more relevant there). The website roscimetosne.tk, in actuality, has copied all content from that Knowledge article much later. In other words, the Knowledge entry is the ORIGINAL writing -- Please check the history of 3466: 5275: 1184:

Overall, I have only made three references to the Journal article so I would be grateful if you could be assist with highlighting what you think needs changed. I hope this is okay to clarify with you and apologies for the law lesson.

573:

will send an email in the next day or so with a few ideas about where next with the biota things - thank you so much for your disciplined regular and brilliant help with reducing the damned backlog !!! it is very much appreciated !!

5825: 5127:, another editor is moving the page around. Do you approve that type of behavior? Don't you think you should be posting this notice message on the talk page of the editor who is moving the page in the middle of the discussion? -- 5924:. However, it did not fall under that criterion (the title would have allowed for expansion, not to mention that there were revisions in the page history that did not fulfil the criterion). I've converted the nomination into a 1830: 4283:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: the 2019 content isn't on the parent page, and there's a discussion that decided that the parent list it too long and should be split. . Thank you. 5067:. If it doesn't then it could be deleted. The rest of the community will have opportunity to comment and review. If you want to proactive then read the policies, engage with the other user and find more references. Regards. 151: 5166:

I have only had dealings with this user on the one article (so far). If you are having problems as you describe and feel that action needs to be taken you can always contact an administrator, the user may be eligible for a

3509: 2720:

which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the

300:"Thanks for setting a new record in reverting my perfectly good edits. I hope you feel satisfied in erasing my years of hard work and research. Good f**king day."... You might want to remove it from your trophy cabinet... 4781:

Hello, Yes it can take a while. There are currently 5927 new pages some dating back to 2006. We need more reviewers, maybe you could help out. I will take a look at your page in a bit. Keep up the good work. Regards.

3905: 1884:

deleted now. Thank you if you took care of that. I try to avoid articles on Adfrican businesspeople and musicians as they all suffer similar problems. Anyway thanks for the message and keep up the good work. Regards.

3617: 3120: 2364:

I got a notification saying a page I created had been reviewed, and then said your name. BUt there's no link to explain what that means or where a review is. (Or any info at all.) Did you review it and if so where?

2414:

Hi Darren, is it possible to contest an article that was reviewed by one editor (and presumably found to be fine) and then reviewed by another editor and moved to draftspace? And, if so, how can I do that? Thanks

4705:

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

3401: 3136:

Please make possible to add Draft:Fiat Freemont to main articles Fiat Freemont separated from Dodge Journey since other generations that will be produced aren't related anymore to this American car manufacturer

5230: 4841:, where I got notification through my email. But accidentally when I worked on other side the page has been moved to draft but i recreated it. Can you reviewed it again? And i request you to delete this draft 4516: 4303: 4271: 1011:

It wasn't deleted, it was put in draftspace since it had no reliable sources. Next time maybe write new articles in your sandbox or put the sources in to begin with if you expect it to stay in the main space.

55:

I do have maps for all Australian acacias except those having fewer than 20? 8? georeferenced specimens. So let me know what ones you need, as I am only alerted when you create an article for an NT acacia...

5512:

Hello, thanks for reviewing and seeing me wiki pages, I might be working on more wikis on plants, but right now i am focusing on the part of daisies, and Thanks for always reviewing the wiki pages i made.

5780: 1103:- thank you for your effort for producing such excellent work, in improving the content of the project with good application of the all the categorisation and project tagging not requiring any extra work. 5480:. Luckily I'm fairly good with plants although I'm not familiar with this genus or species. Please remember to sign any posts you make with four tildes at the end (four of these: ~), you could also read 3847:. the more references you can provide will demonstrate notability and verifiability. Don't worry the articles are in draft space and not deleted and now other editors can help you work on them. Regards. 374:

Hi, based on your words, “ Artist doesn't have an article.” I’m sorry but please do your research before requesting for speedy deletions or jumping to random conclusions. Dazzle Dazzle is by the group

6136:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2523:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1799:

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

3121:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Fiat_Freemont&veswitched=0&preload=Template%3AAfC_submission%2FSubst&editintro=Template%3AAfC_submission%2FSubst%2FEditintro#/editor/new

1707: 5034: 3612: 4914:. No problems. Done. The page curation queue is ever growing, have you considered joining the ranks of page reviewers? We could certainly use the help. If you are interested please check out 3988: 4610: 3720: 3504: 2013:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: there's enough sources there for A7. Needs to go to AfD if you think it doens't meet the GNG etc. . Thank you. 6366: 6198: 5657: 2678:

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by

1752: 5313: 4606: 4572: 6152: 5917: 2539: 1685: 1074:

Hi Hughesdarren, thanks for the introduction to Draftspace, with which I was previously unacquainted. I think I'll incubate there again sometime in the future. I've now put the page (

5863: 2631:

Me either, I don't recall reviewing it although I did review through a few articles football players and others last night, must have messed it up. Thanks for picking it up. Regards

695:. Have made some edits, added a few citations, etc. based on the labels that you had put. Do let me know if it is better/ok now. Wouldn't want to take that call unilaterally. Thanks. 4547: 4542: 378:

which literally have an article and with the benefit of the doubt, let’s say you didn’t know them, however, this doesn’t justify your “artist doesn't have an article” as clearly in

4298: 4121: 976:

Anyone can remove a template if you feel you have made the necessary changes and if anyone posts it back up then at least you can ask for there opinion as to what is wrong. Cheers

479: 6122: 4083: 2509: 672:

intended to translate the Swahili page of Meena Ally to English and link the two pages, at least we should welcome fore more edition of few mistakes and addition of missing info.

4936:

much appreciated. I think I will request to become a reviewer cause the backlog is quite dreadful. Imagine having your article sitting there for years. Thanks for your support.

4372: 4256:

Linkrot tags are placed for references that have no details other than the URL, not because they don't work. Another use has since filled in a more complete reference. Regards.

2122: 1092: 6384:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

6216:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

5110: 5091: 5049: 4748: 918:

can be fixed as you go along. Any issues an other editors will let you you know soon enough. Keep up the good work and drop me a line or ping me if you need a hand. Regards

2141: 4689:

have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

3662: 3554: 3446: 2241: 1958: 1857: 1603:. All good thanks. I see someone is working on fixing the Euclid links. Huge job. If you're really keen to do that, I think it only fair that I start from the bottom ( 1173:

old 1979 law which has now been replaced by the 2012 one so I could not have paraphrased this element and the wording of the law is my own as far as I can phrase it.

1110: 949:

be removed. Could you recommend a well organized page on a similar topic that might serve as a model? Thanks (and thanks in any case, appreciate the work on your end.

484: 319:

Yes I did know, I keep it as a reminder that people motives are not always pure and, just like the real world, there are a fair percentage of assholes about. Regards.

4713:

New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

2306: 122:

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the

839: 386:

themselves. There is no need for a speedy deletion so thank you and please not only care about BTS or whatsoever and take a look around the world and other artist.

110: 6179: 2565: 1516:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1418:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1124: 4451: 4410: 3899: 1899: 1699: 902:

I'm going to say... I think that was the equivalent of article number 5 for me. If there are issues regarding conformity to WP policy, please let me know. Thanks.

843: 509: 4442:

Hello, I think I've done what you wanted. Please let me know if I misunderstood. If you look at the edit log hopefully you can make sense of what to do. Regards.

1816: 165: 5868: 5640: 4956: 4775: 610: 4901: 4672: 4875: 4179:). By the way, I have draftified all of these articles created by them now - and I plan to work some of them. Sorry for being not concise or stalking. Thanks. 622: 5368: 4729: 546: 444: 5897: 4985: 4246: 1996: 1027: 6007: 5433: 5351: 638: 328: 5669: 5390: 4738: 3054: 1842: 1724: 1455: 1064: 196: 80: 49:

1. using the crop tool in the commons to crop out all the white space, (you need to use the crop tool to preserve the descriptions, captions, categories)

5601: 5585: 5548: 5493: 4427:

rather than below the speciesbox, as I tried to copy it from an edit log of another article but it did not work. Could you help me with that also? Thanks.

4049: 1532: 429: 6026: 3086:

I ask you to investigate a bit about this neighbour (see map). It might be wishful thinking by the explorers or this river has disappeared since then. --

2609: 2452: 2116: 1893: 1489:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 1391:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 1352: 1315: 1224: 5734: 5532: 4095: 3856: 2640: 2626: 2471:

No worries. Well researched article that far surpassed my expectations when clicking on the link. You've done a great job putting the article together.

1649: 1310: 603:

community. Also this company have been around 17 years. If you can give me tip about how to make this page better for Knowledge I would appreciate it!

4948: 4927: 4842: 4228: 3844: 3790: 3738: 3065: 1715:

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

1434: 1357: 1273: 140: 5984: 4040:

no worries, sorry for the mix-up, if you should accidently create a page with the incorrect title again, let me know and I'll take care of it. Cheers

3175: 2480: 2236: 2179: 2082: 1587: 985: 927: 363: 6091: 6077: 5063:. The other user involved has stated his case. If there is more news coverage then you can put in more references, which means the event has greater 4886: 4265: 3883: 3389: 3359: 3325: 3297: 2194: 1616: 1555: 629:

Hi, The main problem is the notability of the company which would be established by the inclusion of some references from reliable sources. Regards.

5755: 3746: 3259: 1021: 774: 6068:

References checked out, no copyvio, no reason not to. Maybe you could step in and help out in the review process, we need all the help we can get.

5990: 5225: 5076: 4869: 4242: 2353: 1675: 1631: 1578: 1248: 1139: 895:

page, which has a template at the top suggesting that it might be appropriate to spin off articles from the rather cumbersome and overloaded page.

597: 274: 5180: 2439: 2043: 2028: 1449: 1157:

if you had a moment? I note you have put it down as paraphrasing so just wanted to check what parts you thought were paraphrased so I can amend?

789: 4816: 4791: 1537: 692: 293: 65: 4511: 2424: 1267: 5400: 5318: 4476: 4395: 2574: 2203: 2146: 2049: 1963: 1760: 4677:- there is increase in the abuse of Knowledge and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including 184:

type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of

5554: 5359:

Sorry about this notice (and the notice below); I meant to review the page, so I've undone my edits (the articles are now reviewed). Thanks.

5151: 4338: 4334: 4280: 4273: 3825: 2722: 2374: 2010: 2003: 2001: 1207: 697: 2092:

Many thanks for your so speedy review. You did not even given me time to insert wikilinks to avoid it being an orphan, which I will now do.

4033: 741: 681: 407: 5727: 4216:

This applies to pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, and that have no substantial edits by others.

4161: 2404: 659: 347: 6099: 6062: 5507: 5466: 5136: 4697: 4682: 4602: 4565: 4138: 2486: 2409: 2338: 1244: 592: 578: 568: 313: 5689: 3190: 4640: 4175:

criteria. As I posted this, they aren't blocked for being a sock of somebody and was not even indefinite (as I realized later when Iri

3725: 3146: 3131: 2101: 504: 4436: 705: 4353: 4322: 4308: 3837: 3376:

I appreciate much your help. Meantine, before receiving this message, I did it through layman method... Editing content of page into

2917: 1252: 1098: 586: 239: 5969: 5808:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

5258:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

5124: 5025: 4471: 3933:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3814: 3109: 2761: 4401:

No problems - done. If you check the edit log you should see what you need to do to duplicate a reference. Keep up the good work.

3645:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3537:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3429:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3095: 1877: 1485:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

1387:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

5775: 1101: 872:

Hi the page you reviewed has been marked for speedy deletion can you help me avoid it and please suggest changes. Thanks WikiNav

735: 343:

193 of the items, thinking we might find some way of accessing the list and doing something with those articles, just an idea...

5741: 5159: 4304: 4211: 3282: 2920: 618: 402: 3316:- in order to make sure, it refers to the Missouri one, since there is a Stream by the same name in the state of Iowa? Thanks. 3231: 2969: 1809: 86: 4204: 4029: 2764: 1087: 873: 859: 248: 4645: 2714:

who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by

846:

but while correcting the capitalization you just you spelled the last word wrong and H is missing in the last name. WikiNav

6175: 5528: 5462: 4763:

a few days ago, but I'm guessing its going to have to wait a bit since the waiting list is getting rather large right now?

4686: 4598: 4250: 4076: 3160: 2813: 2561: 2392: 1853: 1748: 958: 911: 158: 5668:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

5443:

Hello, Thanks for contacting me. I will let you know if I need assistance, But i do need help on creating this Wiki about

4210:

The user was banned at very close to the same time the articles were created but both were on the same date. According to

3775: 2891: 2839: 2787: 2615:

I’m not sure I understand why you would mark an article which clearly falls short of both GNG and ENT/NACTOR as reviewed.

2430:

No formal process, but once in draft at least other editors will take a look. Which article are you referring to? Regards

188:

for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

5701: 5607: 4342: 4003: 2943: 2865: 2311: 1291: 1203: 1106:

Also for the Australian Biota project your improvement of Western Australian Acacia articles is very much appreciated...

816: 26: 4807:

Thanks for reviewing. Maybe I'll try applying to be a reviewer based on your encouraging words. Guess its worth a shot.-

4625:

1. If I have coordinates of a mountain's location, what do I need to be able to measure the elevation of that mountain?

2995: 2972: 2465: 4330: 3217:

Thanks for all your contributions to Knowledge this past year, like this tree, you are a light shining in the darkness.

3114: 1230: 807:, I've started, and hope to fill it out a bit more (plant growth, habitat, uses). Thank you as well for your wiki-work 527: 1045: 6050: 6032: 5115: 4587:

There is currently a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

4432: 4391: 4198: 2816: 1145: 686: 334: 6360: 5766:

Sorry, it took me a long time to create the whole belloa species, I was very busy and I was improving my user page.

4854: 2894: 2842: 2790: 1333: 5937: 4421:

Hi again, I have one more thing to ask. I was wondering how to put images in the description section of my article

2946: 2868: 2667: 973:

of your screen and paste the text in there to fool around with it without anyone critiquing it until you are done).

965: 731: 551: 5649:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

2998: 1640:

Jeez not that you needed a hand looks like you're all finished now and you did all the rest of Cs for me. Legend.

1005: 265:. The ones which need cropping are generally those which have not yet been used in a wikipedia. Hope this helps. 6171: 5837: 5816: 5782: 5737: 5719: 5711: 5287: 5266: 5232: 4628:

2. Apart from Google maps, is there anyway I can measure the distance between two places having the coordinates?

4594: 4152:

so swiftly and especially for substantially improving the first few sentences. Your summary is so much better. --

4143: 3962: 3941: 3907: 3862: 3694: 3673: 3619: 3586: 3565: 3511: 3478: 3457: 3403: 2557: 2359: 1849: 1744: 1440:

The article has been in the mainspace for ages so I'm surprised the draft hasn't been deleted long ago. Regards.

6192: 2648: 5975:

No worries, All done. One of the fields was missing a bracket was all. Keep up the good work and best regards.

5221: 5056: 4617: 4101: 4008: 1720: 644: 6507: 6339: 5186: 4990: 3658: 3550: 3442: 2908: 2131: 2124: 891:

I just wanted to touch in about the Piers Park article you reviewed the other day. I had been working on the

261:. I have now put up all my Acacia occurrence data maps from f onwards, using Pattypan. You can find them at 5832:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

5282:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3957:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3890:

No worries - All done, if you sort of follow the format that I used you should be OK for next time. Cheers.

3689:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3581:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3473:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

6145: 6000: 5833: 5812: 5678: 5438: 5418: 5336: 5283: 5262: 5171:. I am well aware of the comments on his talk page, but I am pretty sure he has deleted them now. Regards. 4494: 4428: 4387: 3958: 3937: 3874: 3690: 3669: 3582: 3561: 3474: 3453: 2592: 2532: 2295: 2221: 2164: 2067: 1981: 1943: 759: 614: 450: 664:

Habari! According to my views the article does not deserve fast deletion label; The subject is notable in

6157: 5715: 5707: 5406: 5144: 4457: 4025: 2752: 2544: 2087: 1287: 206: 53:

3. if you are really enthusiastic, uploading them to wikidata using the property "taxon range map image".

710: 5942: 5733:

Yes that website does look bogus but the copyright software is also picking up close paraphrasing from

5524: 5458: 4358: 3819: 3288:

Yes, sure is. If you find any other sources they can be added into the year they support too. Regards.

2312: 1992: 1973: 1954: 1783: 523: 309: 279: 4860:

Hello, I curated the new version through and have left a comment for the draft to be deleted. Regards

3781:

No worries, my pleasure and thanks for your contribution. Best wishes from Albany, Western Australia.

1041: 968:. I'm more of a monkey see-monkey do kind of person so if you look at an article with no tags such as 6521: 6353: 6038: 5616: 5429: 5410: 5364: 5347: 5328: 5217: 4377: 4064: 3757: 3271: 2370: 2138: 1569:

Oh jeez, just great - That will keep us both busy for a bit, hows life out of lockdown treating you?

1199: 1069: 440: 425: 270: 61: 1329: 6073: 6022: 5980: 5859: 5771: 5751: 5723:

they create an article for a geological structure in Sydney? Please see into this, mate. Thanks. ~

5597: 5581: 5544: 5503:, Thanks for the help, i will need you assistance or other peoples when I am working on some sites. 5489: 5386: 5309: 5176: 5072: 4923: 4865: 4787: 4447: 4406: 4261: 4224: 4045: 3984: 3895: 3852: 3796: 3786: 3716: 3608: 3355: 3293: 3255: 3171: 3105: 3064: 2904: 2636: 2476: 2435: 2400: 2349: 2323: 2250: 2190: 2112: 2039: 1889: 1645: 1627: 1574: 1445: 1263: 1220: 1135: 1017: 981: 923: 855: 677: 634: 359: 324: 76: 1520:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 1422:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 6004: 5324: 4915: 4678: 4176: 4149: 3657:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they 3549:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they 3546: 3500: 3441:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they 3265: 3181: 2303: 2097: 1075: 655: 4462:

Thank you for taking time in reviewing some of the pages I created. Best wishes of good health!

1491: 1393: 4533:. Or maybe there are any number of plants with the common name "Alpine Woodruff" Pete AU aka -- 4157: 4134: 4091: 4072: 3833: 3810: 2960: 2748: 2622: 2605: 2584: 1862: 1479: 1457: 1381: 1359: 812: 727: 557: 500: 17: 6133: 4944: 4897: 4193: 3769: 3742: 3380:

meaning that incorporates both then created two separate proper pages/titles. Happy New year.

3091: 2684:

who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to

2520: 1988: 1950: 1914: 1037: 398: 390: 369: 305: 5746:. A administrator with more experience in copyright infringement will sort it out. Regards. 435:

I forgot to say: When there were fewer than 8 datapoints for a species, no map was created.

6394: 6389: 6226: 6221: 6144:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6014: 5965: 5761: 5516: 5481: 5477: 5450: 5444: 5425: 5360: 5343: 5064: 5055:

OK Firstly calm down. Secondly please don't place comments on a user page, put them on the

4636: 4021: 4017: 3879: 2531:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2461: 2382: 2366: 2135: 1517: 1419: 1191: 954: 907: 719: 606: 588:- please put it in your watch,so we have a central discussion point if we can - thanks... 436: 421: 266: 235: 123: 57: 1215:

they removed the tag and curated the article through. Thanks for all you efforts. Regards

942:

notices (should I call them templates?) could or should be removed was less clear to me.

71:

Thanks Margaret, will take a look when creating or updating more Acacia articles. Cheers.

8: 6515: 6347: 6087: 6058: 5767: 5577: 5520: 5473: 5454: 5132: 4622:

Hi sir, I know you to be an experienced Admin. Kindly respond this two questions for me.

4518: 4467: 4234: 4166: 3654: 3385: 3321: 3278: 3100:

Hello Bahnmoeller, I'm not finding anything online maybe it was just wishful thinking....

2804: 2267:

Hi. I hope you are doing well. When you marked this article as reviewed, it did not have

2232: 2213: 2175: 2156: 2078: 2059: 1969: 1908: 1486: 1388: 1279: 785: 770: 751: 673: 4386:, but I'm not sure how to do it. Could you help me with that when you have time? Thanks. 4382:

Hi, it's me again. I want to make references 5 and 8 the same as reference 2 on my page

6399: 6231: 5996: 5953: 5943: 3869: 3530: 3515: 3496: 3438: 3151: 2882: 2830: 2778: 2256: 2209: 2093: 1874: 1734: 1195: 969: 881: 826: 669: 651: 4756:

The backlog has increased while some of the active reviewers are no longer reviewing.

4609:. If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the 4279:

Hello Hughesdarren. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

2009:

Hello Hughesdarren. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

650:

the subject. Feel free to Visit Swahili Knowledge and references to justify my views.

6116: 6069: 6018: 5976: 5893: 5855: 5747: 5593: 5540: 5500: 5485: 5382: 5305: 5172: 5120: 5106: 5087: 5068: 5045: 5021: 4981: 4962: 4933: 4919: 4881: 4861: 4850: 4832: 4802: 4783: 4692: 4538: 4530: 4443: 4402: 4383: 4257: 4220: 4153: 4130: 4087: 4068: 4060: 4041: 3980: 3891: 3848: 3829: 3806: 3782: 3712: 3604: 3351: 3289: 3251: 3167: 3101: 2956: 2934: 2856: 2632: 2617: 2600: 2503: 2472: 2431: 2396: 2345: 2334: 2186: 2108: 2055: 2035: 1968:

Hi, I'm John from Idegon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

1885: 1671: 1641: 1623: 1612: 1583:

classic - very good we have an observant compatriot who sees that stuff... sheesh...

1570: 1551: 1528: 1441: 1348: 1306: 1259: 1237: 1216: 1131: 1130:

Cheers lads, Probably slow down a bit now that I'm out of lockdown and back at work.

1120: 1100:

and your edit history - you are the West Australian editor of the Month of May 2020

1060: 1013: 977: 919: 867: 851: 833: 808: 804: 800: 630: 542: 515: 496: 415: 355: 320: 287: 256: 177: 127: 72: 34: 5405:

Hi, I'm Stefka Bulgaria. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

5323:

Hi, I'm Stefka Bulgaria. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

5059:

where they belong. Thirdly, the page isn't being deleted, it has been placed in the

4720: 3006: 1719:

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all

6164: 6129: 5933: 5674: 5566: 5557: 5155: 5060: 4940: 4909: 4893: 4416: 4289: 4188: 4055: 3993: 3824:

Why move the Politburo articles to draft? They are lists. They are inspired by the

3802: 3764: 3751: 3142: 3127: 3087: 2986: 2583:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on 2551: 2516: 2420: 2388: 2271: 2212:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on 2155:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on 2152: 2058:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on 2019: 1972:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on 1788: 1475: 1430: 1377: 1033: 750:, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on 701: 394: 262: 44: 5409:, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on 5327:, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on 4485:, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on 1607:

I mean) and we meet somewhere in the middle - wherever that might turn out to be!

5961: 5845: 5295: 4837:, It's nice to talk with you. I recently to know that you had reviewed this page 4812: 4771: 4632: 4423: 4000: 3970: 3926: 3911: 3702: 3594: 3486: 3157: 2579:

Hi, I'm Celestina007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

2457: 2445: 1666:(~120) also have to be done. I'm happy to do them too. Beats arguing about Greek! 1598: 1584: 1107: 1083: 950: 903: 723: 589: 575: 565: 344: 231: 47:. I created them all some time ago and was hoping you might go the extra mile in 4357:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4326: 4325:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

4113: 2278:

wikiproject banners to the talkpage of newly created articles. See you around :)

1812:

on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.

945:

I would like to help get the article into good shape so those templates/notices

462: 6404: 6236: 6141: 6083: 6054: 6042: 5911: 5878: 5539:

No problems, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~). Regards.

5168: 5128: 4824: 4526: 4463: 3638: 3623: 3381: 3341: 3317: 3274: 2800: 2528: 2228: 2171: 2074: 1863: 1321: 795: 781: 766: 747: 185: 4653: 2656: 2208:

Hi, I'm John B123. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

2151:

Hi, I'm John B123. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

2054:

Hi, I'm John B123. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

2034:

No worries probably should have tagged it for A1, deleted now anyway. Cheers.

1768: 1662:

No worries, but unfortunately not finished. Angophoras (not many of them) and

746:

Hi, I'm John B123. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

558:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles

556:

Has got to a new stage of its progress in this confusing and chaotic world...

94: 6137: 5724: 4660: 4582:

the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

4507: 4486: 3422: 3407: 3245: 3221: 3083: 2878: 2826: 2774: 2524: 2260: 1918: 1471: 1373: 1001: 379: 181: 147: 5952:

Sorry to bother you again, but could you please help me with formatting the

5811:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

5261:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

5099: 3936:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3668:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3560:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3452:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

2107:

No worries, nice work on the article, hope to go to Lagos one day. Regards.

1258:

My pleasure, great little articles you are writing - keep up the good work.

143:

around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.

6046: 5925: 5921: 5889: 5885: 5102: 5083: 5041: 5017: 4977: 4973: 4846: 4534: 4172: 4171:

Hi! I think you shouldn't have tagged some of these articles for CSD under

2930: 2852: 2580: 2330: 1667: 1608: 1564: 1547: 1524: 1470:

Hello, Hughesdarren. It has been over six months since you last edited the

1372:

Hello, Hughesdarren. It has been over six months since you last edited the

1344: 1340: 1302: 1298: 1116: 1056: 1052: 538: 534: 519: 339:

looks like a range of wa eucalypts are up as being at risk in the wild: -

5381:

No problems, have done the same many times myself. Keep up the good work.

5195: 4999: 4345:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. 4329:, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a 292:. Do you realise that your 'Special Barnster' which was awarded to you by 215: 5929: 5683: 5251: 5236: 4284: 4235: 3346:, That means you need to move the page, for full story you can read this 3138: 3123: 2982: 2416: 2130:

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy tag for

2014: 1426: 991: 892: 6148:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5815:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

5265:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

4481:

Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

4241:

Why did you add the link rot tag to the page? All the links still work.

3940:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3843:

Each of the articles had no references and were originally redirects to

3672:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3564:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3456:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2535:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2134:

as the vast majority of the content was written by an unblocked user. --

6126:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4966: 4838: 4808: 4767: 4760: 4482: 3071: 2696:

who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to

2513:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1161: 1079: 882: 4348:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3250:! Hope you and yours had a happy Xmas and have a prosperous new year. 3013: 1165:

wikipedia page explaining it to the wider world outside of Scotland.

1000:. I was gonna find sources to this article, but you deleted it. smdh ( 964:

Most of the important manual of style stuff in general terms is here:

6108: 2495: 1283: 383: 375: 5646:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

3828:... Why are there certain rules for some articles and not others? -- 3166:

Haven't checked my mail for a while, just replied. Hope all is well

3119:

Please make an option to submit this draft for review on Knowledge:

2185:

Why uncurate it? There is no primary topic and both articles exist?

5874: 5844:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

5801: 5786: 5294:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

4502: 4363: 3969:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3701:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3593:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3485:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1154: 665: 6474: 6467: 6460: 6453: 6446: 6439: 6432: 6306: 6299: 6292: 6285: 6278: 6271: 6264: 3209:

Hi Hughesdarren, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas

126:. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at 5804:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 5254:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3929:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3641:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3533:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3425:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3347: 1819:

about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.

6161:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5873:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

4961:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3314: 2548:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1320:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1278:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1032:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

514:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

6151:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

5627: 5572: 5035:

Request to save reviewed article: Singhu border lynching (2021)

3273:

acceptable? Since I saw different opinions on its finish date.

2538:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

1698:

Hi Hughesdarren, you are receiving this notice because you are

1325: 997: 583:

further to this there are some draft items for discussion at -

40: 6120:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

5714:

article (which I later removed from that article and moved to

4585:

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

2507:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

5082:

Thanks. I greatly appreciate your guidance & assistance.

228:

I appreciate your message and admire your work on Knowledge.

5123:

While we are discussing this matter on the talk page of the

1837:

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

5794: 5244: 4554: 3919: 3631: 3523: 3415: 3311: 3156:

a few random emails recently - not sure if you got them...

3049:

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

2704: 1691: 340: 5710:. I copied/moved the contents from the geology section of 1686:

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

938:

of what I write! Just trying to improve what's up there.

191:

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

161:

with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.

6423: 6255: 5822: