User talk:Gleaman - Knowledge

2782:; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. Among the things that the public wants to know when they look for information about your center in a encyclopedia is not a complete list of the publications to which you provide access--they will naturally go to your web site for this. page, you should say whom you are working for. 3314:

support continuing commentary and criticism of scholarly material" kind of rang a few warning signals. I don't think it wouldn't have been so bad if not for the lack of sourcing. In any case, it's in your userspace so you can continue to work on it. I didn't offhand see enough sourcing out there to really show that it could be in the mainspace yet, but there's nothing that says that you can't keep it in your userspace. I should've thought of moving it there beforehand, so I apologize for that. Normally I'm better about remembering to do that.

3038:

indexing services that cover only a fraction of the existing literature. For example, my colleagues at CNRS/INIST have several times told me that the selectivity of their coverage is due in large part to the limits of their budgets. Same is true at Thompson/ISI, or even Scopus, much less them many specialized indexing services. They can't afford to cover everything they'd like to cover. Google can. So as a consequence it is not listed? I'm not talknig about Google Books - just Google Scholar.

2794:

much easier to defend, & I will try to defend it, though I cannot predict what the consensus will be. We also never include a list of monographs and miscellaneous [publications. Those portions of the list will need to be removed, with the exception of any that are particularly notable; I think a list of notable reference books might possibly be defensible, and I will try to defend this also, though I am quite unsure I would succeed. The principle here is

6401: 5925: 5064: 6135: 5777: 5637: 5585: 5533: 5481: 4911: 4632: 4576: 4520: 4464: 4353: 4234: 4178: 4122: 3742: 3686: 3630: 3402: 2840: 2630: 2523: 2416: 2356: 2206: 2146: 2086: 1851: 1791: 1675: 1619: 6037: 4069: 3907: 3577: 6276: 6309: 6189: 5833: 5693: 5397: 4965: 4840: 4767: 4691: 2895: 6093: 3958: 3796: 3462: 3004:

I meant fulltext indexing, which means access to the entire content. This is easy if a journal is open access but not easy if the journal has to rely on subscriptions or memberships to cover its costs. What makes it hard is the need to prevent fulltext display by programming a redirect on all hits to the same landing page. Not all subscription based electronic journals in philosophy are set up to do this, which is what makes it notable.

4288: 798: 700:, but not the images. For each cover, you should copy the contents of the G2B cover image and change the information given there, so that it matches the particular cover you are interested in (i.e., the journal name, the original website where you found the image, etc). For the license, you should use the "fair use" template that is used for G2B (and that I put on some of the images that you uploaded yesterday). Hope this helps. -- 3184: 1966: 542: 126: 3309:. It's pretty new, so it has that against it when it comes to finding sources. Academic journals related stuff usually takes a while to start gaining sources unless it's something particularly attention grabbing. The only source on the article was a primary source, as it was written by the people who started the journal. The thing to remember is that even though this journal reviews notable journals, that notability is 872: 839: 3332:

record, and Library of Congress control number. Should I only create listings for “notable” journals? If so I’d appreciate more info about this. In listings for other journals I’ve listed notable authors and these lists are generally (not always) deleted. I’ve now rewritten the entry and don’t know how to proceed. Should I post in my user space for your review and approval?

2759:, were written by you. They certainly seem as if substantial parts were taken from previously published material, though I have not checked yet to find out where. Please review them to make sure. If you wish to use such material, you must explicitly license the rights to the material according to our licensing, using the CC-BY-SA and the GNU licenses, as explained in 6152:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5794:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5654:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5602:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5550:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5498:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4928:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4651:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4595:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4539:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4483:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4372:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4253:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4197:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4141:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3761:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3705:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3649:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3421:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2859:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2375:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2225:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2165:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2105:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1810:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1694:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1638:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 64:(which ideally should be empty, all its entries having been categorized more exactly), so please don't add any journals to that category any more. When creating an article about a journal, if you omit the "language" field from an infobox, this will default to "English", with the correct wikilink. Do not link to 2689: 2582: 2475: 1914: 3021:

to have GS cover its journals (and there are reliable sources for this), that would perhaps worth mentioning in an article. But the fact that a journal has a website or is indexed in GS is absolutely trivial: Even though the programming effort behind it is not trivial, it's standard in modern journal

2971:

Hi, thanks for the feedback. It may be trivial for open access content, but I assure you that it is not trivial for content that is not open access. We listed Google Scholar because it shows that the programming work has been done to make this possible, which is relevant information about the journal

2788:

The PDC article contains a long list of journals and other publications. We very rarely include a list of publications in the article on a publisher: the proper place for this is their web site. Personally, I am inclined to be quite flexible when it comes to the traditional humanities, but the list

2063:

has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient,

681:

clarified that I am the author of the file (not the cover design), and since these are low res images indended to make the title and their contents more widely recognized this satisfies our understanding of fair use. Our intention is to facilitate sharing - tell me which license you find appropriate.

3313:

by that fact. Think of it this way: a newspaper can write about a famous actor, but they don't gain notability by that fact. As far as promotional content goes, it wasn't anything major- the big reason I deleted it was because it didn't show that it had any notability, but the phrase "established to

3003:

I understand what you're saying as a matter of Google Scholar policy - they'd like to cover all scholarly materials they can reach in electronic format. I explained that it was not trivial to allow Google Scholar to cover content that is not open access, in this case subscription based publications.

103:

a page, by clicking the "move" tab on top of a page. That way, the edit history is conserved (important for the open access license) and a redirect is automatically created. I will undo your changes in "for" and request speedy deletion of "of", so that this move can be made correctly. Happy editing!

3037:

I agree that it's trivial in STM journals but I think you are over generalizing. In philosophy, as in many other humanities fields, the development of online access has lagged because there is so much less money involved than in STM publishing. A related effect of this is evident in the traditional

3016:

I hear you, but doing this kind of things is what you may expect from any halfway serious publisher. Setting up a website with access restricted to subscribers only must involve some non-trivial programming, too, yet that is not something that we add to articles on publishers or journals either. If

2956:

Hi, I see that you have added "indexed by Google Scholar" to a bunch of journal articles. GS is trying very hard (and succeeding reasonably well) to be all-inclusive, so mentioning in an article that a journal is "indexed by Google Scholar" is absolutely trivial. That is why this is never mentioned

2807:

I see my colleague here Crusio, with whom I have long worked on academic journals, has given you similar advice a few months earlier. Everything he has said is quite correct, and you need to follow it. The files that have been deleted, can be restored with the correct licenses. We do include covers

2793:

include a list of the journals hosted by a particular site, in contrast to those published. Please remove from the list the ones that are published elsewhere, and change the text to indicate this. I can do this, but you can do this more easily. A list limited to the journals they publish will be

2322:

source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users

2277:

680:

Dear Crusio, thanks as always for your careful attention. I looked at the Genes, Brain and Behavior cover image files you referenced and I did not recognize information that would be sufficient to satisfy WP's legal requirement (with are not clear to us, but with which we want to cooperate). I have

664:

Could you please tell me why you are continuing to upload covers under Creative Commons licenses, despite my note above? Perhaps you can provide a link to a statement confirming that these covers are "a public domain journal cover image and not protected by copyright"? I have not been able to find

3331:

The speedy deletion caused confusion for me too. I didn’t have a copy of the final listing as submitted - my mistake. My understanding has been that Knowledge should be a complete reference source, and I created the listing with this in mind. The source I provided included an ISSN, OCLC cataloging

2815:

I look forward to cooperating with you for improving our content in this area. As a research librarian myself, I know the benefits of cooperative work--which, indeed, is why I am here, and why I have been working on academic material here for over four years now. Please feel free to enter into a

2803:

The information on Philosopher's Index in the encyclopedia is not consistent: is it published by the PDC, or by the PIC? What is the difference between the two organizations? The articles are totally unclear about this. And what is the difference between the PI and the PRI? Is the PrI expected to

63:

Hi, the same as the above goes for categories like "philosophical literature", which contains "philosophical journals". So an article tagged with "philosophical journals" therefore falls automatically under "philosophical literature". I am slowly cleaning up top categories like "academic journals"

2009:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

644:

were not made by "George Leaman", although the scans may have been. But even that is not enough on WP, because anybody can say they are a certain person, but that is not necessarily true (I'm not accusing you of lying, please don't get me wrong, just arguing from a -necessarily- legalese point of

3259:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

3297:

I mean that the only two sources on the article are from the journal itself. The problem is that primary sources can never show notability since they're written by the journal itself and/or hosted on their website. Primary sources can be used to back up small details, but not anything else. For

2020:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

734:

Yes, that's the one I'm talking about. Just click edit, copy everything and paste it to the cover you want to "regularize", changing the G2B info to the info pertaining to the cover you're dealing with. I have to leave now, if you still have trouble, I can do one for you as an example tomorrow.

5037:

Hi, this draft has been lingering in your user space since 2013. Are you planning to develop this into a full article? If so, please do so promptly, drafts are not supposed to hang around in userspace for years. If not, please add a {{db-author}} tag to it, so that it can be deleted. Thanks.

4852:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4977:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

774:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on 185:

and make it a subsection ("History") of an article on the journal under its current title. Unless there is enough material to justify two separate articles, I think that in general we should keep the information on a journal under its different titles together.

4319:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 2746:, is in large party also copyvio, copied from their website--it will need to be extensively rewritten. These two articles were submitted by the user Philindex -- as corporate user names are not acceptable, the user has been blocked by another administrator. 1756:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 6061:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3059:

say something meaningful about a journal, hence that is something worthy of note in an article about that journal. If we write a biography of an academic, we don't mention that their faculty page can be found on Google, either. But if they can be found in

2804:

replace the PI, or to be a more comprehensive index including less formal material, or a supplemental product including only less formal material? This also needs to be explained. I can undoubtedly find this out, but you can do it much more quickly.

4779:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4703:

571:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

155:

560:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 144:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 513:). I don't think there are any "list" type articles dedicated to the journals from one single publishers, but one thing you might do is create a category for "Journals published by..." and categorize all journals with that particular category (see 4095:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3933:

3603:

3054:

OA journals, so it is not selective and as a consequence, inclusion in it is almost automatic and doesn't say much about a journal. Same for GS. Other databases, for whatever reasons, are more selective and therefore being included in them

864:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

2064:

there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, -

1998:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 2957:

in any article on any academic journal. (I routinely remove this -like DOAJ or OCLC- from listings in journal articles). It's like saying that Barack Obama is included on Google... Perhaps you can self-revert these additions. Thanks. --

909:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

6420:

This article reads like self-promotion, especially the special issues section. There is also no indication on the page of why it is important enough to be on Knowledge. The primary source is the journal itself, which is heavily

44:. I imagine that such a redirect would keep you from getting the orange banner when you receive messages. I suspect that you actually have two accounts now (both the old and the new), and the redirect makes things confusing. 3216:, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: 6065:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4099:

3937:

3607:

4422:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 445: 418: 394: 294: 267: 243: 6104: 2022: 2808:

of periodicals, but they must be called fair use, not given a CC license unless you can prove you are the copyright holder of the image or authorized to do so, and do it according to the formal rules at

3239:), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See 489:

saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge. Happy editing! –

338:

4315:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1752:

6338:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 6218:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5860:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5720:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5424:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4989:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4864:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4791:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4715:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1954: 645:

view). In addition, this is not necessary, because there is something like "fair use". You may need to give some more justification for the use of these cover images, though. See the cover of

6444: 534: 6083: 3753: 3520: 3413: 3220:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See

3172: 3896: 3734: 3394: 6354: 6234: 5876: 5736: 5440: 5005: 4880: 4807: 4731: 6408: 6394: 3566: 6323: 6203: 5846: 5706: 5410: 3930: 3584: 3568: 3469: 3455: 3256: 3209: 3177: 2927:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2900: 2888: 600: 4245: 3600: 2923:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2043: 553: 535: 4226: 3790: 6115:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2851: 2326:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2281:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

387:

a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

236:

a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

200: 5542: 4920: 4587: 3450: 2265: 2258: 2038: 2800:

The list of organization for which you provide service is quite unsuitable by any standard: it would be considered purely promotional content, and I have removed it.

4012: 2832: 2734:

I'm an admin here very much concerned with improving our coverage on the traditional humanities. In the course of things, my attention was called to the article on

5527: 4905: 4568: 4531: 1274: 1266: 1157: 1149: 585: 6269: 3022:

publishing. Fifteen years ago it was noteworthy if a journal was available online; nowadays it is becoming noteworthy if a journal is available in print only... --

1313: 1305: 1118: 1110: 810:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 6389: 4512: 4058: 1586: 1578: 1278: 1196: 1188: 1161: 94: 1585:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1546:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1507:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1468:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1429:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1390:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1351:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1317: 1312:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1273:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1234:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1195:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1156:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1122: 1117:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1078:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1039:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1000:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

961:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

6144: 6129: 6124: 5786: 4475: 3379:

I’ve rewritten the entry and posted it in my user space for your review. Is this version OK? It explains the journal's purpose, which is notable in this field.

2749:

I assume you are George Leaman, the director of the center, according to its web site. Even should this not be the case, the problems below will be the same.

1590: 1547: 1539: 1391: 1383: 1200: 372:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our 221:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our 2657:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2550:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2443:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1878:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1551: 1395: 5594: 5490: 4282: 4076: 4060: 3965: 3947: 3785: 3697: 3641: 3445: 2916:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2641: 2622: 2534: 2515: 2427: 2303: 2097: 792: 3279: 2912:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2653:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2546:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2439:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1874:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1473: 1044: 966: 5771: 4825: 4643: 4456: 4133: 3617: 3119: 3065: 3023: 2989: 2988:

indexed by GS would perhaps be something worth mentioning, but being indexed by GS is nowadays about as trivial as saying that the editors are humans... --

2958: 2875: 1630: 1512: 1469: 1461: 1434: 1356: 1239: 1083: 1040: 1032: 962: 954: 2944: 1802: 1005: 331: 5579: 5475: 5166: 5030: 4749: 4364: 4189: 4092: 3678: 3622: 3298:

example, if the journal won an award you'd have to find something other than their website to back that up. That was the only big thing I saw for that.

2742:

and I accordingly had no choice but to delete it--although he is certainly eminent enough that there should be an article. The article on its publisher

2408: 2367: 2157: 2078: 2073: 1740: 1731: 1686: 1508: 1500: 1430: 1422: 1352: 1344: 1235: 1227: 1079: 1071: 434:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org

364:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from 283:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org

213:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from 3137: 2729: 715:

Dear Crusio, thanks. Your refernce to the "fair use template" for Genes, Brain and Behavior is not clear to me. Are you referring to info referenced at

5646: 4624: 4114: 3891: 2883: 2217: 1862: 1611: 1001: 993: 806: 5903: 5762: 4756: 4345: 4170: 3952: 3561: 2348: 2138: 1667: 5466: 5023: 4898: 4277: 3133: 5631: 2298: 2198: 1843: 1723: 449: 298: 346: 6025: 4680: 4109: 1783: 1260: 1143: 750: 4451: 5257: 3380: 3333: 3039: 3005: 2973: 2972:(particularly for authors). I understand and agree about DOAJ and OCLC, or any other service that makes no requirement of the journal itself. 1299: 1104: 943: 720: 682: 5574: 4952: 4619: 4320: 1757: 787: 5047: 3673: 2343: 2133: 1572: 1182: 113: 6497: 4563: 4340: 2724: 2617: 1662: 531:

Understood - we intend to reorganize this and provide more explanatory information this week. Thanks once again for your careful attention.

6381: 6261: 6176: 6058: 5270: 5221: 4396: 4053: 3167: 2403: 2193: 1718: 1533: 1377: 5265: 3729: 2510: 2253: 1777: 6482: 6112: 6096: 6085: 6078: 5823: 5818: 5683: 5052: 5031: 4507: 4165: 3302: 1838: 1294: 1177: 822: 401:

and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name,

250:

and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name,

6296: 5626: 5522: 4221: 1333: 1138: 846:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 482: 6280: 5387: 4957: 4832: 4675: 4309: 3284: 1949: 1744: 1606: 1455: 1216: 1026: 948: 899: 351: 1567: 1411: 6048: 5913: 5678: 5161: 4081: 3919: 3589: 3325: 3264:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 3147: 2932: 1494: 1416: 1338: 1221: 1065: 919: 408: 257: 1489: 1060: 982: 6020: 3388: 3341: 3290: 2827: 2764: 2012: 1528: 1450: 1372: 1255: 1099: 987: 565: 460: 309: 169: 149: 34: 6164: 5806: 5666: 5614: 5562: 5510: 4940: 4663: 4607: 4551: 4495: 4384: 4265: 4209: 4153: 3773: 3717: 3661: 3433: 2871: 2387: 2237: 2177: 2117: 1822: 1706: 1650: 1021: 5382: 5250: 514: 502: 497: 53: 29:. The articles you are tagging are already in a hierarchy of specialized categories that ultimately leads up to the same thing, 6465: 6301: 6181: 6000: 5141: 4401: 4033: 3871: 3541: 3213: 3173: 2026: 1955: 335: 303: 277: 247: 16: 3140:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 744: 709: 3850: 3143: 674: 526: 118: 4304:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 1739:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 6377: 6257: 5899: 5758: 5462: 5019: 4894: 4821: 4745: 4447: 813:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

174: 5190:

is not allowed on Knowledge, and that may lead to blocks. However, this is an easy thing to deal with, as outlined by the

195: 4328: 2331: 2286: 2052: 2045: 1991: 1959: 1765: 927: 775: 4434:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

767: 6148:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5790:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5650:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5598:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5546:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5494:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4924:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4647:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4591:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4535:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4479:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4368:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4249:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4193:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4137:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3757:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3701:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3645:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3417:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2855:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2645:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2538:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2431:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2371:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2221:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2161:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2101:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1866:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1806:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1690:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1634:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 895: 4324: 2743: 1761: 475: 324: 210: 182: 3079: 3914: 3898: 3803: 3073: 3031: 2997: 2966: 557: 6469: 6373: 6253: 6004: 5895: 5754: 5458: 5183: 5167: 5145: 5015: 4890: 4817: 4741: 4443: 4037: 3875: 3545: 3050:

Exactly. We list things that are of importance for the subject of the article in question. DOAJ tries to include

2909: 2756: 1582: 1543: 1504: 1465: 1426: 1387: 1348: 1309: 1270: 1231: 1192: 1153: 1114: 1075: 1036: 997: 958: 503: 6284: 5237: 5208: 2904:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2779: 760: 369: 218: 26: 6153: 5795: 5655: 5603: 5551: 5499: 5175: 4929: 4652: 4596: 4540: 4484: 4373: 4254: 4198: 4142: 3762: 3706: 3650: 3422: 2917: 2860: 2658: 2551: 2444: 2376: 2226: 2166: 2106: 1879: 1811: 1695: 1639: 564:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

214: 148:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

141: 4316: 3124:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3112: 2924: 1753: 903: 889: 728: 690: 627: 509:

Hi, this article is starting to look a bit like a catalog, which is something that is discouraged on WP (see

137: 119: 89: 6103:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 658: 6347: 6227: 5869: 5729: 5433: 5367: 4998: 4873: 4800: 4724: 3193: 1975: 357: 206: 175: 2775:

Normally it is better not to do so; the over-formal style of most such material is not appropriate here.

6457: 6412: 6390: 6359: 6239: 5992: 5936: 5914: 5881: 5741: 5445: 5292: 5271: 5133: 5075: 5053: 5010: 4885: 4812: 4736: 4439: 4025: 3969: 3863: 3807: 3533: 3473: 3451: 6461: 6149: 5996: 5137: 4029: 3867: 3537: 3261: 2034: 923: 883: 30: 22: 2327: 2282: 911: 6052: 4085: 3923: 3593: 3362:. Lists of authors who have published in a journal generally get deleted (and should be deleted) per 2752: 783: 646: 471: 377: 320: 226: 3200: 2674:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them 2567:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them 2460:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them 1982: 581: 165: 2681:

I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

2574:

I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

2467:

I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

3069: 3027: 2993: 2962: 2879: 376:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be 225:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be 58: 3260:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

5256:

Thanks, I had not seen these changes. I am not paid for this work but I understand the concern.

4305: 4296: 3494: 3367: 3310: 3229: 2949: 635: 623: 3994:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3832:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3502:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

3293:? As far as that article goes... offhand I'd suggest finding sources that aren't primary. By 759:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 6335: 6215: 5857: 5717: 5421: 4986: 4861: 4788: 4712: 3318: 2069: 2030: 854: 470:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

319:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

3212:, requesting that it be deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under two or more of the 33:. It would save work for some other people if you are willing to discuss your additions at 6493: 6346:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6226:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6120: 6074: 6016: 5868:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5728:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5432:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5340: 5157: 5043: 4997:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4872:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4799:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4723:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4430:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4392: 4327:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

4105: 4049: 3943: 3887: 3781: 3669: 3613: 3557: 3441: 3244: 2940: 2397: 2247: 2187: 2127: 2003: 1895:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a 1832: 1773: 1764:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

1714: 1658: 1600: 1561: 1522: 1483: 1444: 1405: 1366: 1327: 1288: 1249: 1210: 1171: 1132: 1093: 1054: 1015: 976: 937: 779: 561: 486: 454: 428: 398: 373: 222: 145: 77: 49: 41: 80:. Hope this helps. Do not hesitate to drop a note on my talk page if you need any help. -- 8: 6473: 6008: 5949: 5314: 5149: 5120: 5087: 4435: 4041: 3982: 3879: 3820: 3549: 3486: 3359: 2795: 2760: 2735: 2310: 771: 756: 615: 577: 549: 161: 133: 76:, as the case may be. Sometimes there are even more specific articles available, such as 916:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

5233: 5204: 3306: 3274: 2339: 2294: 818: 649:

for an example (I always use that as a template myself when I upload a cover image). --

73: 6481:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

5303:.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of 2318:

status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the

2273:

status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the

1999: 6440: 6317: 6197: 5979: 5975: 5840: 5700: 5404: 5191: 5116: 5095: 4973: 4848: 4775: 4757: 4699: 4681: 4411: 4402: 4336: 4273: 4217: 4161: 4008: 3846: 3725: 3516: 3482: 3294: 3163: 3154:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3125: 2720: 2613: 2506: 1945: 1932: 847: 619: 590: 6427: 5962: 5300: 5103: 3995: 3833: 3503: 3485:. No independent sources, not listed in any selective major database. Does not meet 3305:. Now as far as that goes, you have to show where it's considered to be notable per 1906:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

481:

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at

330:

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at

6366: 6331: 6246: 6211: 6099:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 5888: 5853: 5748: 5713: 5452: 5417: 5245: 5216: 4982: 4857: 4784: 4708: 4431: 4415: 3315: 3085: 3061: 2650: 2543: 2436: 2065: 1871: 740: 705: 670: 654: 522: 492: 341: 191: 109: 85: 69: 6489: 6292: 6172: 6116: 6070: 6012: 5814: 5674: 5622: 5570: 5518: 5378: 5304: 5296: 5275: 5153: 5039: 4948: 4671: 4615: 4559: 4503: 4388: 4101: 4045: 3939: 3883: 3777: 3665: 3609: 3553: 3437: 3221: 2936: 2707: 2600: 2493: 2391: 2241: 2181: 2121: 1928: 1898: 1826: 1769: 1710: 1654: 1594: 1555: 1516: 1477: 1438: 1399: 1360: 1321: 1282: 1243: 1204: 1165: 1126: 1087: 1048: 1009: 970: 931: 573: 510: 361: 157: 45: 6426:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

5961:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

5102:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

3240: 1995: 1994:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

558:

https://secure.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/journal?openform&journal=pdc_acpaproc

365: 25:

is causing the normal usage of our category system to be bypassed, for example,

6343: 6223: 5865: 5725: 5429: 5241: 5212: 5071: 5057: 4994: 4869: 4796: 4720: 4427: 4419: 4301: 3265: 3225: 3104: 2950: 2913: 2789:

there is likely to be challenged. And some things must be removed: First, we

2654: 2629: 2547: 2522: 2440: 2415: 1875: 1850: 1736: 902:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

5227:

I also note the guide probably has had a few updates since you last read it.

6339: 6219: 6108: 6105:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gleaman/Business Ethics Journal Review

6100: 5953: 5861: 5721: 5425: 5348: 5347:

the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by

5229: 5200: 5195: 5187: 5091: 4990: 4865: 4792: 4716: 4423: 4018:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3986: 3856:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3824: 3526:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3490: 3363: 3355: 3269: 2823: 2816:

discussion here, or on my web page, or by email to dgoodman at Princeton.

2809: 2675: 2671: 2568: 2564: 2461: 2457: 2335: 2290: 2060: 2056: 1892: 640:

I re-tagged the journal covers that you uploaded. As far as I can see, these

439: 288: 2314:. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the 2269:. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the 6043: 6027: 5932: 5918: 5791: 5651: 5599: 5547: 5495: 5354:

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with

4925: 4648: 4592: 4536: 4480: 4369: 4332: 4269: 4250: 4213: 4194: 4157: 4138: 3758: 3721: 3702: 3646: 3418: 3159: 3155: 2905: 2856: 2778:

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without

2716: 2703: 2646: 2609: 2596: 2539: 2502: 2489: 2432: 2372: 2222: 2162: 2102: 1941: 1867: 1807: 1691: 1635: 215:

https://secure.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/journal?openform&journal=pdc_ajs

142:

https://secure.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/journal?openform&journal=pdc_ajs

37:. Editors there will be able to advise whether your new edits make sense. 6450:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

5985:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

5126:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

832:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

3192:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1974:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

736: 701: 666: 650: 518: 187: 105: 81: 6350:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

6230:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5872:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5732:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5436:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5001:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4876:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4803:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4727:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

6327:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

6288: 6207:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

6168: 6092: 5850:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5810: 5710:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5670: 5618: 5566: 5514: 5414:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5374: 5285: 5179: 4944: 4667: 4611: 4555: 4499: 3129: 3251:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

6308: 6188: 5832: 5692: 5396: 4964: 4839: 4766: 4690: 4300:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 3092: 2315: 2270: 1735:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 393:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the

242:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the

3235:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,

541: 125: 2818: 99:

Hi again, in cases like this, the easiest way to handle this is to

599: 415:

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted

264:

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted

4418:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

3931:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Journal of Religion and Violence

65: 6363:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 6243:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5885:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5745:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5449:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3099:

try searching for secondary sources, for eg,: newspaper articles

68:, this is a disambiguation page. Instead, you should use either 40:

I took the liberty of undoing the redirect of your talk page to

6353:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

6321:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

6233:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

6201:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

5875:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

5735:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

5439:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

5004:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

4879:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

4806:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

4730:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

3601:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Business Ethics Journal Review

2688:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

2581:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

2474:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

1913:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

665:

anything like that on the website of these journals. Thanks. --

5844:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

5704:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2767:; be aware that these licenses give everyone in the world an 554:

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association

536:

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association

6111:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2739: 1927:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

1593:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1554:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1515:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1476:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1437:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1398:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1359:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1320:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1281:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1242:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1203:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1164:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1125:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1086:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1047:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1008:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

969:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

3245:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

2004:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

5284:

Welcome to Knowledge! I edit here too, under the username

3735:

Orphaned non-free image File:Philosophy doc center logo.gif

3395:

Orphaned non-free image File:BEJR cover image, Aug,2013.png

2059:

the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an

860:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

766:

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

716: 5082:

Non-notable, relatively-new, journal. Not indexed in any

1903:

template, along with your question, beneath this message.

6287:

incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

5408:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

2889:

Orphaned non-free media (File:Questions Nr.12, 2012.gif)

2016:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

360:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 209:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 6468:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

6334:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

6214:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

6041:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

6003:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

5856:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5716:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5420:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5182:

leads me to believe you have some affiliation with the

5144:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

4985:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4860:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4787:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4711:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4074:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4036:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3977:

Non-notable relatively new journal. Not indexed in any

3912:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3874:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3582:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3544:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3128:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 6433:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

5968:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

5109:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

4662: