2064:
mostly be modified exactly to the specific requirements of that country or wikiproject. Meaning that you can remove any empty paramters into a smaller neater template and you can also change many of the paramters to read exactly what you want. e.g the Nazim and Naib Nazim for
Pakistan means the Mayor and Vice Mayor. So in the government section you have the option to modify it to that country's particular requirements. I just think the TFD caused a bit of a panic and in seeing the reaction I tried to quickly end the TFD but strangely I had my own attempt to quickly end the debate (meaning keep) overurled and reported at ANI. I have to say that while the one size fits all approach may seem very generic or Americanized it isn't really given the flexibility of the template. Even the same template can differ greatly in terms of content from country to country. Unfortunately my work on the overall geography/cities project to try to add an infobox and map to every articles by country and try to get articles up to a consistant standard with a similar format and layout backfired in this circumstance but I know now you can see it was in good faith. I understand that every place is different and article text will be different but I do believe it is possible to maintain a regular pattern and consistancy with a bit of hard work.
2060:
across several Aussie city articles and I tried to add quality svg maps to them and replace the old beige dot maps!! However I simply couldn't add a map to them nor could I figure out what the documentation meant about x and y intergers or something!! So basically I saw a flaw that you could not simply add a decent map to them to try to improve understanding so I thought it might be best to merge. Not for vindictive reasons, just simply so I could try to help the project by adding svg maps to all of your templates! I made an example of the ALice
Springs template as an example and I don't think it was missing any info and was OK Ithought. I'm pretty sure the same sort of thing could be done with any specialized suburns articles too, but I respect your project decision..
1808:, instead, witnessed admiration for someone who isn't necessarily accustomed to how meeting flows, feeling comfortable enough and compelled enough, to take part. I didn't grow up in the progressive environment of the Pacific NW, I grew up in Wisconsin. I think that, while there may be a general assumption that only "insiders" (another pet term of mine :) ) will take part, the article gives an unrealistic impression that Sunday-morning meeting, while it might be boring-as-hell for many hapless people who wind up there, to others is a vibrant spiritual experience; participation by anyone, even if it's unexpected, is welcomed after the initial jarring is overcome. I think I'm up to 6¢ now... :-D
1213:
incidents involving the 'Christian
Conventions' clergy and also elsewhere within the group, not systemically, and probably no more than occurs in other denominations or the population in general. But with this group, the problem is compounded by the local/ decentralized nature of the membership and no formal church communication, which means that parents with young children are more vulnerable because of a lack of accurate information on the incidents that have occurred. So I personally feel the site is beneficial, informative and timely and also relevant to the article. The link and the WINGS site could very well save a child from a CSA attack which is why I think it should be there.
1764:
baptized in other churches. His response was that, in such cases, being re-baptized is a personal decisionâif the prospective baptizee felt their original baptism was valid, then they are not compelled to be re-baptized, although they are regarded as answerable for their lives since baptism (a belief that is more pertinent to the concept of "salvation" in 2x2ism). The article makes no mention of this view, and for all I really know it was
Clarence's view and his alone. Have you found anything in your research that mellows or counters the apparently very stringent view of "outside" baptism, from the position posited in the article at present?
686:
609:
840:
1276:
512:
419:
1627:
used for official purposes. I'm not sure why the article was given that title, as everyone else calls them âTwo by Twoâ or one of the other descriptive names used by people who don't know what else to call them. I can see not using "Cooneyite" (the other popular name given to them) because the followers of Cooney himself still exist as a separate fellowship. Ah well, was just hoping not to have to revisit the whole name/denomination mess.
1804:
again with the anecdotes, I have been in more than one Sunday-morning meeting or Bible study, where an "outsider" came along with a professing friend, and gave their testimony along with everyone else. While many people are initially shocked (it's beyond mere "surprise"...the expectation is that only "professors" (my term :-p) will speak), I have never witnessed any opposition expressed during their testimony, nor after meeting. I
327:
143:
1828:
of the CC's founding, early doctrine, etc. The copy the
British Library sent is huge (original size). I was wondering if it might make a good illustration if I could get it (or at least a portion) down to a manageable width? It has long passed into the public domain, and I'm asking simply because I don't recall seeing an illustration like that on a Knowledge article. Or would a newspaper clipping be too strange?
1642:
been gone over before, perhaps you'd recall that better than would I (since I wasn't involved in this topic at that point). There are some ironclad facts with which some members will refuse to agree, as I've learned in the interim while monitoring a couple of pro-CC discussion sites. Going back to an article which is self-contradictory and basically says nothing isn't an option, in my view.
1610:
group given it basically means "a class/society of individuals called by the same name/title/designation" (which brings us back to the opposition to being named). I can't really see a way to move ahead and demonstrate the reality one way or another. I guess, the least that could be done is to point new users to that old discussion section about the word 'denomination'.
1660:
last months. I'm not averse to changes, though restoring the material makes the article a mess as it now stands. I admit to having developed some intolerance towards this editor, based upon reading through the archives. Perhaps I'm reading too much of tmtsoj's attempt to muddy the waters into his arguments, so fresh input would be welcomed by me as well.
467:
further as it could be a very valuable resource, and it all comes down to which country he was a citizen of. If he was a citizen of USA, then it is public domain if he died before 1937. If he remained a citizen of the UK, it is copyright for 50 years after it is first published - if it hasnt been published yet, then it is still protected.
488:" license, that would be ideal. The other option is you could ask for a "cc-by-nd" (no derivatives) license, but that is not yet approved for use on Wikisource - we will have an uphill battle trying to ask the Wikisource community to accept cc-by-nd, but I for one will support the inclusion of this diary under "cc-by-nd".
2068:
Mattinbgn and Aussie Legend in particular could see that actually I'm not the bad person who makes masses of mistakes that they think I am and even now they continue with ill feeling towards me and at TFDs on unrelated templates. I've apologised to them, shame they can't do the same... Anyway, Best regards Donama!
2090:
but such is the nature of the BD template I am currently unable to add these more accurate and better quality district locators to the template. Hence my reason for deleting to improve the quality and accuracy of them which the old bangladesh district template didn't and it would have been too fiddly
1227:
Slofstra, I completely see your point here, but
Knowledge isn't intended as a place to warn vulnerable people about sexual predators. Generic support/information links, yes, but this one really smacks of a non-neutral point of view, whatever one's personal views are. I think there's almost certain to
1007:
Both the words has its two sided definition. The Lord is moving (for example in Ezk. "the wheels"), so are HIS servants. So moving with the L-O-R-D makes/causes a "movement". The movement should be dynamic and forward. Once we were in the age of Moses, then the Gospel came; and now we are in the book
928:
as an official chapter. In order to acknowledge this, and to appoint an interim committee, approve our statement of purpose and our rules, and appoint a Public
Officer, Wikimedia Australia will be having a meeting at Computerbank in Melbourne. For those of us who are located in other cities, we shall
2063:
Given that I work on every country in the world in adding infoboxes maps and references (and have done for years under my old account, I haven't only been here 17 days LOL) etc I have become accustomed to how the standard box works. Admittedly I hated it at first, but I gradually learned that it can
1923:
Since the atmosphere over at CC talk is a bit soured right now, and as you've been helping implement the reviewer suggestions, I was wondering what to do about the suggestion to cite the membership numbers. As I've slowly been making my way through the clutter on my table, I've come across yet other
1659:
as to whether the material which he recently restored would be an improvement on the previous edits to the article. Some of the unsourced material in the restored portions could be cited, while other material included in the restored portion has since been objected to and removed by editors over the
1626:
Yes, there seems to be resistance to just about any attempt to describe them, at least from their current editor. The official names at the top of the article seem still to be in use by their
Overseers (at least the stationery is still being used). And the âChristian Conventionsâ name itself only is
1928:
in the 1980's gave an estimate of 1-4 million, though it doesn't say on what that was based. The Keith Crow thesis paper from the 1970's also put it very high. Then there is a figure in the middle that I quoted (and which I'm hoping I still have somewhere). Daniel p. 14 puts it at 450,000-700,000),
1827:
Just a thanks for your input and notice, even though I know you've been busy (me also - summer is finally starting to appear in northern climes). Since you aren't embroiled in the current to-do, I thought I'd ask a quick question: I have a copy of a newspaper article from 1910 which gives the story
1791:
Again, anecdotally, in the "Ministry" section, it says that the workers cannot officiate at weddings. In
Wisconsin, at the very least, workers can, as recognized spiritual leaders, legally perform marriages. They may not be "registered marriage celebrants", but be that the case, it is not because
1719:
To follow up. I think we could use more depth on wiki policies. Nemonoman is doing his best to find middle ground on this article, but someone with more depth at the policy level might be helpful. I'm trying to arrive at a consensus on what kind of sources would be admitted into the article. I'm
1641:
from back in the archives is back. I see you had some discussions with him last year. I haven't yet thought through the edits he proposes, but I would really not like the article to go back to the mess it had become due to what looked like a minor edit war. So, if he is rehashing somthing which has
1609:
I think the reality may be that it doesn't have an official name, so the current section on that sounds okay to me. As to whether it's a denomination, well I think if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck then... you get the picture, but there seems to be some resistance to this label within the
1494:, and one of the conclusions was that there was more than just the CBD in the square mile, and conversely, the CBD wasn't a good description for the square mile. Hence, you may have noticed me changing some references to CBD to ]. If you feel strongly about it, I'm open to being convinced otherwise.
1486:
You're doing a good job with the street page creations. When I created the schematic, my reaction was "There's a lot of red links in that table", but I never got around to doing anything about it - thanks to your efforts, the number is steadily diminishing. And thanks to your "template", I now have
1018:
But then we have two fold responsibilities today (even on Wiki): Be like the Son of God in life and our conduct and nature, and also being righteous, patience, calm, quite, silence, and "to the point" in our writing and speaking. The facts should be told unhindered and without reservations. So be
1011:
The negative side seems(/points to) the organizational, humanly effort of trying to achieve something; trying to do something. But then it all depends upon how we look on something and what are we? Are we the children of our Father God, living in the Spirit or are we the natural man of this world!
2059:
Hi, thanks for your really pleasant message, it is very welcome!! See my posts to
Orderinchaos I'm sorry I didn't confront the Aussie project first, I was a little afraid of being turned away... My goal was certainly not to override anybody's hard work or cause a major conflict. Basically I came
1232:
guideline to just presume it. And I think it's unencyclopaedic too. The whole article completely lacks verifiability as it is. Btw I also agree with all you're saying about the WINGS website. It looks to be pretty dry and reasonable, no qualm there, but that still doesn't mean it's relevant. That
2067:
The reason why I changed my account was because I wanted to keep a much lower profile from now on and concentrate on quality above all. Looks as if staying away from TFDs and forums would work better from now on... Anyway, I'm very glad you contacted me, that does mean something... I really wish
1803:
Also, the gatherings section says that participation is restricted to "members" for Sunday-morning meeting, and "approved members" for union meetings... what, precisely, is an "approved member"? ("Approved by whom?", comes to mind, along with "What measurement is used in said 'approval'?") Once
1933:
updates Keith Crow's metrics and came out with an estimate range of 48,000-190,000 (U.S.A. only). So, I'm wondering if we should just drop the membership estimate, or put a note in the 'Explanatory notes' section you created to explain that estimates vary depending on the metrics used, and cite
1763:
Hey Donama, I have nothing but anecdotal testimony to offer on the subject, but I vividly recall a discussion with Clarence Arquette (a worker) before I was baptized, about the rĂ´le and purpose of baptism, and we specifically discussed whether or not baptism was required for people who had been
1592:
Thanks for continuing to monitor this article. I recall in the archives a great deal of space being given to the ridiculous (to me) subject as to whether or not the word âdenominationâ should be applied. I wasn't around the article during those discussions, but Tmtsoj has edited the article to,
1212:
Not really. The WINGS site is specifically about and for the members of 'Christian Conventions'. Many of the site authors have an anti- agenda but they have tried to keep this particular site ideologically neutral and focused on the issue of child sexual abuse. There have been a number of CSA
466:
Hi again, as this is just a single image on its own, I am going to delete it on Wikisource for the moment. However, if you are able to secure a better agreement with the copyright holder, or we can determine that it is in fact public domain, we can easily undelete it. I have looked into this
1863:
1959:
Thank you. I discovered that footnotes cannot be nested in the info boxes, or at least I couldn't get that to work. So, instead of using the short citation format as used elsewhere in the article, I went with parenthetical citations in that note. Hopefully, what I wrote makes some sense.
2017:
example: if voter wrote "Nick X 4 ever!" on the ballot paper below the line, then the voter's intentions are clear that they want to vote above the line for "Ind Nick Xenophon No Pokies" group. (Or at least, if I were one of Nick X's scrutineers, that's what I'd be saying to the SEO
1467:
on the same template so I thought you might be questioning that street's notability. Frankly I don't think Halifax or Carrington streets are major streets but they are part of the original city grid planned in the early 1800s. You can see that in the schematic someone has done in
1228:
be sexual abuse happening in any organisation/situation where kids are alone with adults who are blindly trusted so I certainly don't dispute that and definitely have no interest in defending any religious organisation against the charge... But it's still against WP's
1247:
Just to focus in on the point of NPOV. I personally don't see how NPOV is broken. Many of the religion articles have a related article about sexual abuse in the particular religion. And as you know I am a member of the organization so if anything my POV is pro-
1944:
Hi Astynax, was away from the Internet from July 15th and only just back today so sorry for the delay. I think the footnote you suggest sounds like a good idea. Please go ahead and we can change it based on feedback on the article talk page if needed. Cheers
1776:
Hi Tomer, I haven't heard anything like that anecdotally or seen such in any research I've done. Still, that doesn't mean it isn't the case. Without published ideals/rules/standards, it's hard to get everyone to think in accord let alone behave in accord.
1439:. I wouldn't class any of the east-west streets as "major" streets (except, perhaps Wakefield/Grote). Thus, I was asking you: "I don't think Halifax Street is a "major" street; what are your thoughts on whether or not it is a "major" street?"
1593:
seemingly, again reflect the PoV that it is somehow not a âdenominationâ or have a name(s). I thought that, as you seem to be the only person still about with a bit of experience with the article's history, you may have some input to offer:
1720:
reasonably well versed on the policies but one of the writers accuses me of wiki-lawyering. I'd rather get someone else to provide overall direction since I am in an adversary position on this. If you could just look at this one issue:
165:
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
451:
Hi, this is in regards to your contributions to Wikisource from January 2006. They intrigued me enough to do some digging around, but I havent been able to work out who this "John Long" is, so I started a discussion on
1374:
issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the
1053:
Hi Salil. You're not making any real point I'm afraid. Knowledge isn't about trying to keep people happy, but about trying to describe reality as closely as possibly providing as much backup evidence as possible (see
2085:
P.S the real reason I nminated the Bangladesh district template for deletion was because it is incorrect!! It currently displays districts as towns and this is wrong!! I made 64 accurate district locator maps
2013:
Whilst I was wandering around Bunnings looking for 10mm x 120mm coach bolts, it occurred to me that the answer must be something to do with that phrase in the legislation about "the voter's intentions being
1842:
sections. He put a link in the caption to the full article, which is a rather large file. Still, it seems to be strange for an illustration, so if you think it detracts, it is OK with me to bring that up.
1194:
Slofstra, I can't really remember, but I did make a comment in the edit summary which I can quote here: "remove wings link as it is not actually about this article (not to mention non-NPOV -- see
2027:(Thought: I guess that means writing 1 to n-1 is formal, because it's "clear"; though I expect if you are going to the trouble of writing 1 to n-1, you would probably put in the nth one ... )
1015:
The same goes with the word "church" too. Any non-Christians reading the article will not see any difference; and any hater of the "church" (The Truth/The Way) will still feel the same.
798:
Heya - yeah, we were trying to make a compromise between people who have Sundays free, and people who have church etc, but I guess it'll always be hard to find a date that's perfect for
1308:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any
652:
Hi Donama - we're planning a third meetup in Adelaide sometime in the coming weeks, and would love to have you there. If you can, please help decide a location, a date and a time
1084:
Humme, .. ya, that was right, that I am not "pin-pointing" anything here. I just thought of Christian fellowship. But anyhow, well, I thought of leaving a notice that when the "
1304:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
118:
I almost did too (ack, mornings!). It went well; I think we had a turnout of around 20. Jimmy had to run of early to a press conference though. There's always next time :)--
1738:
866:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also
1386:
434:
491:
Also, we have a much stronger team on Wikisource these days to support you while you learn the ropes; I will personally guarantee to give you any assistance you need.
1371:
543:
1687:
Dear Donama: I made a nasty comment directed at you on the CC talk page. I mistook you for a different editor. I apologize for that. I hope you can forgive me. --
1566:
1325:
576:
360:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
181:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
1365:
1269:
990:
197:
1188:
1297:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1281:
932:
The meeting will be held at 2:30PM on Sunday, 20th April 2008, Adelaide time. In order for us to organise this meeting, we need your help! Please drop by at
922:
126:
1293:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
946:
1547:
looking forward to seeing how you handle East Terrace. If you want any help, (though I can't imagine what), I'm happy to be "enlisted" - just ask! Cheers,
1148:
785:
Hi Donama - since Sunday is inconvenient for many people due to church, we are rescheduling for Saturday. I hope you will still be able to attend! Best, ~
233:
1305:
527:
2024:
Writing 1 to x below the line, where x-is-a-number-less-than-n would be informal, because the voter's intentions for preferences x+1 to n are not clear.
593:
1162:
1114:
1075:
936:
with suggestions as to venues, conference calling services, etc. It will be at 2:30 so we can meet up for lunch beforehand if anyone's open for that!
574:
publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter
541:
publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter
441:
1696:
1511:
I was aware of that naming debate, but never seemed to form a strong opinion about it. I'll try to remember to use city centre instead of CBD. Cheers
560:
261:
1847:
1814:
1798:
1786:
1664:
1631:
1257:
1242:
1222:
1207:
966:
908:
1964:
1954:
1912:
1721:
1619:
2045:
1750:
1732:
1578:
1556:
1520:
1506:
1481:
1458:
1427:
1174:
495:
471:
309:
113:
83:
1360:
1249:
1214:
1180:
933:
809:
581:
548:
456:. Someone has bugged me for more details, and I have just now realised you are still active here on Knowledge. so ... please come help us! :-)
397:. I'm not aware of any computer ticking at that rate, though several Linux implementations track time at that resolution. A careful reading of
729:
Hi Donama - after some planning we've decided to hold the third Adelaide Wikimeetup on Sunday, 17th February, 2008. The meeting will be held at
1343:
743:
375:
1313:
1742:
1724:
1705:
251:
218:
1408:
1088:" will be reviewed by the team of editors (in near future), it won't remain the same as it is now. Also, it might not present the things as
1047:
978:
820:
Just a gentle nudge towards the meetup page, hoping you can confirm your attendance before the day is out. We'd love you to be there. :) ~
426:
412:
1832:
1646:
1601:
775:
1713:
1679:
1652:
663:
247:
stand, per the right to vanish. But it is you whose comments have been refactored; I have no objection to you reverting. Its up to you.
2103:
2080:
1897:
1638:
1335:
Hi Lisa, I've made a comment at the discussion page. I'll wait for the discussion to run its course before any move. Hope all's well, â
566:
1770:
1885:
69:
1139:. Also, please don't bother yourself in replying to me each time. (I assume you are an older and matured Christian than I). Thanks.
1938:
1008:
of Revelation. Soon to the New Jerusalem. So there is a movement going on of God with man. This is the positive side of the term.
533:
213:
1330:
756:
460:
244:
93:
903:
874:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at
580:. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our
547:. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our
1127:
Hi Donama, Please don't take any of my comments in a negative aspect. I believe in the same church as mentioned in the article
134:
503:
370:
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
191:
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
2004:
712:
635:
453:
299:
827:
410:
792:
1758:
700:
623:
405:
1704:
Donama, could you have a look at the topic 'First Paragraph' and tell us what you think? (Note - I had to change my ID)
738:
653:
65:
272:
Hello Donama, good to see you're still contributing - your username was one of the first I ever saw, way-back-when :)
1399:
Second opinion sought: Is Halifax Street really a "major" street? (What is a "major" street?) Your thoughts? Cheers,
44:
2091:
to try to add new documentation to an old fashion designed template anyway from a programming perspective.. Anyway..
1101:
I took back all my gender based remarks. I apologize! The opposite of "condescending" is friendly, so I thought let
484:" is not an acceptable license on Wikisource. If you can negotiate with the copyright holder to give Wikisource a "
238:
1392:
706:
629:
39:
1656:
891:
867:
676:
350:
318:
1993:(i.e. I believe that, by definition, it's impossible, so I'm fascinated at the thought that it may be possible.)
1233:
said, I don't want to be dogmatic. Add the link back if you still feel it should go there after reading this :)
1285:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1534:
1298:
672:. If you do not live in Adelaide/South Australia and cannot make it to the meetup, please accept my apologies!
1822:
1587:
1562:
1469:
599:
276:
1594:
2092:
2069:
815:
21:
1432:
Sorry, I don't understand your reply, and I suspect I didn't make the point of my question clearly enough.
718:
641:
170:, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
1464:
995:
863:
780:
1986:
In an email from the SEO, I've been told "Ind Nick Xenophon No Pokies group polled ... 8 below the line.
685:
608:
1105:
it be so. Anyways, I have nothing much valuable to say. Happy editing! (Jesus is the L-O-R-D!) Thanks,
342:
158:
1839:
1541:
promising!! Much better than my pedestrian effort; I'm looking forward to seeing the result. And I'm
692:
615:
523:
430:
53:
1153:
For what it's worth, not older and not religious, but this has no bearing on the discussion anyway.
1853:
1393:
1382:
957:. If you think I've missed anyone out, please feel free to copy-paste this and send it to them too!
925:
526:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
519:
505:
433:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
194:
186:
150:
30:
This page is an archive (2007-03-24â2009-09-09). Please do not alter it in any way. Archived by â
1893:
Not to mention keeping them from becoming messes subject to deletion. Thanks for being watchful.
974:
968:
57:
1918:
226:
2087:
1878:
1136:
1128:
1085:
832:
446:
386:
123:
110:
80:
760:
669:
1978:
1491:
1415:
1218:
1144:
1110:
1043:
953:
You are receiving this message because you are an active Wikimedian in Adelaide and are on
918:
871:
171:
8:
1692:
1378:
954:
368:
if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
248:
189:
if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
1066:, etc). And please don't call me brother. It's the wrong gender and also condescending.
52:
Apologies if you're already aware of this, but I'd like to let you know that the second
1950:
1908:
1812:
1796:
1782:
1768:
1675:
1615:
1516:
1477:
1423:
1253:
1238:
1203:
1184:
1158:
986:
875:
589:
556:
438:
210:
167:
1972:
1838:
Thanks for responding. Neonoman helped in resizing it and it now spans the article's
1490:
A minor point, hopefully for your interest: There was a "debate" about the naming of
356:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
177:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
1179:
Why did you remove this reference? Just curious. Do agree with most of your edits.
2041:
2000:
1746:
1728:
1709:
1574:
1552:
1502:
1454:
1404:
1290:
1071:
1059:
401:
should explain the distinction. Accordingly, I've reverted your edits. Regards, â
398:
390:
293:
267:
178:
162:
154:
136:
119:
106:
76:
35:
17:
1567:
King William Street, Adelaide#Name changes on streets crossing King William Street
1435:
What I meant to say was: The opening sentence of the Halifax Street article says:
1131:. I see and find believers practicing, living, and enjoying the truth both in the
2054:
1321:
1140:
1106:
1039:
977:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
940:
899:
890:
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
821:
803:
786:
768:
657:
372:
365:
334:
202:
305:
It'll cost you 50 bucks! Just kidding. I think I could do that. To come soon...
1688:
1294:
1229:
1195:
1132:
1063:
1055:
839:
89:
1809:
1793:
1765:
982:
883:
859:
851:
833:
585:
571:
552:
538:
361:
280:
182:
97:
1446:. There haven't been any red links to Halifax street since December 2006 ...
751:
so that we can inform the restaurant about numbers. Hope to see you there!
1961:
1935:
1929:
and some of the websites have a similar figure or lower. Benton Johnson in
1894:
1882:
1844:
1829:
1739:
WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#One_topic_publishing_house_acceptable_as_RS
1661:
1643:
1628:
1598:
1357:
1340:
1286:
402:
380:
283:? I had a go, and totally failed, and your Burnside one looks fantastic :)
230:
345:
from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
161:
from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
2037:
1996:
1946:
1904:
1778:
1671:
1611:
1570:
1548:
1512:
1498:
1473:
1450:
1419:
1400:
1234:
1199:
1154:
1067:
734:
492:
468:
457:
394:
306:
288:
258:
31:
2030:
Just writing a 1 against Nick X below the line is probably also "clear".
1722:
Talk:Christian_Conventions#Is www.workersect.org a self-published site?
1317:
895:
511:
418:
349:
is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
61:
1877:
For your long-term work in editing and discussions that have kept the
749:
20:00UTC on 15th February 2008 (that's 6AM Saturday for our time zone)
203:
2033:(Such improbable scenarios explain why there were only 8 such votes.)
1275:
2010:
Thanks for your great reply. A real bit of South Australian history!
88:
NB: The above message is being delivered to users who are listed at
485:
481:
326:
142:
105:
Good to see you're still about Donama. I hope to see you there :)--
2021:
Writing 1 to n below the line explains the 23 263 + 32 + 61 votes.
1862:
730:
1353:
1336:
802:, regardless of how much you plan ahead! Hope you can make it! ~
737:
at 11:30AM. Further details and directions are available on the
60:. The meeting is at 7:30am for breakfast with Knowledge founder
894:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
763:. If this has been sent in error, please accept our apologies!
357:
346:
338:
320:
275:
I was wondering, would you be able to make a map similar to
172:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
435:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hugo Kelly (2nd nomination)
353:
for our minimum information standards for short articles.
56:
will take place on Monday 23rd of April at ZUMA Caffe, 56
668:
You are receiving this message because you are listed at
480:
Yes CC licenses are the way to go. The problem is that "
979:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
1198:) -- arguments on talk page pls)". Is it okay by you?
1561:(P.S. Again, hopefully for your interest: As well as
341:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be
157:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be
1463:Sorry I was in a hurry and got confused. I created
528:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Makedonsko Devoiche
518:An article that you have been involved in editing,
425:An article that you have been involved in editing,
1737:Further followup. I posted to the RS/Noticeboard:
1312:will be deleted after seven days, as described on
929:be holding conference calls to the main meeting.
917:Hi there Donama/archivelist! As you may know, the
755:You are receiving this message because you are in
862:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
1881:related articles moving forward over the years!
257:Thanks, I think I'll delete the whole comment.
1366:WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008
1270:Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pru Goward.jpg)
393:in the assumption that one computer tick is a
1991:How can you vote for a group below the line?
1092:one or few people want, see, or understands!
1472:. Completely agree to drop the word major.
1437:"Halifax Street is a major street in ... "
1860:
909:Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting
1175:WINGS reference on Christian Conventions
757:Category:Wikipedians in South Australia
94:Category:Wikipedians in South Australia
14:
1670:Thanks. I commented on the talk page.
1563:Adelaide city centre#Built Environment
1470:Adelaide city centre#Built Environment
219:Re:Location of reflected sunset image
2036:Thanks for making me think. Cheers,
1977:A long time ago (10 April 2006) on
27:
1487:little excuse to not do something.
838:
510:
417:
325:
141:
66:Knowledge:Meetup/Adelaide/Meetup 2
28:
2114:
1444:"There were red links to it ... "
1861:
1274:
684:
607:
567:WikiProject Australia newsletter
534:WikiProject Australia newsletter
1331:Re: Adelaide city centre rename
912:
892:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
868:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
209:i have unprotected the article
1449:Sorry to confuse you. Cheers,
1414:There were red links to it on
1377:This message was delivered by
406:02:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
333:Hello, this is a message from
149:Hello, this is a message from
13:
1:
2104:10:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
2081:10:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
1815:09:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1799:08:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1787:08:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1771:06:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
1387:07:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
1326:05:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
1299:our policy for non-free media
1030:friend, grace be multiplied:
904:04:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
846:Another editor has added the
828:18:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
561:21:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
454:Wikisource:Proposed_deletions
376:09:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
286:Eagerly awaiting a response,
277:commons:Image:Burnsidemap.png
1361:13:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
1344:13:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
1314:criteria for speedy deletion
1023:friend. Look to Jesus Only!
810:01:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
793:12:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
776:11:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
664:12:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
496:01:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
472:09:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
461:04:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
442:10:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
168:criteria for speedy deletion
40:07:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
7:
2046:05:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
2005:13:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
1637:I believe the person named
1465:Carrington Street, Adelaide
1289:. However, it is currently
939:Hoping to see you there! ~
670:Knowledge:ADEL#Participants
594:21:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
584:. This notice delivered by
551:. This notice delivered by
364:. Feel free to contact the
337:. A tag has been placed on
185:. Feel free to contact the
153:. A tag has been placed on
10:
2119:
1579:11:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1557:11:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1521:00:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
1507:07:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1482:00:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1459:09:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1428:06:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1409:13:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
1258:04:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
947:01:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
310:08:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
300:07:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
262:05:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
127:00:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
84:14:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
1965:09:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1955:04:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1939:21:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
1926:The Sydney Morning Herald
1867:
1848:02:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1840:Founding and Early Growth
1833:21:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
1751:16:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
1733:15:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
1714:13:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
1697:20:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
1243:08:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
1223:18:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
1208:06:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
1189:18:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
1163:03:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
1149:15:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
1115:06:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
1076:04:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
1048:19:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
252:11:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
234:04:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
214:04:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
114:15:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
45:Meetup on 23rd April 2007
1913:02:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
1898:15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
1886:15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
1792:of any legal obstacle.
1741:. That may do the trick.
1680:07:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
1665:19:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
1647:19:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
1632:02:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
1620:01:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
1602:20:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
1394:Halifax Street, Adelaide
991:08:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
858:template to the article
520:Zajdi, Zajdi Jasno Sonce
506:Zajdi, Zajdi Jasno Sonce
198:12:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
1565:, my "schematic" is at
975:Template:FootnotesSmall
969:Template:FootnotesSmall
58:Gouger Street, Adelaide
1931:Sex, Lies and Sanctity
843:
522:, has been listed for
515:
429:, has been listed for
422:
330:
239:You've been refactored
227:Swifts Creek, Victoria
146:
72:if you might attend.
1879:Christian Conventions
1823:Thanks and a question
1588:Christian Conventions
1279:Thanks for uploading
1129:Christian Conventions
1036:Your little brother,
842:
677:Adelaide Wikimeetup 3
600:Adelaide Wikimeetup 3
572:WikiProject Australia
539:WikiProject Australia
514:
421:
387:Tick (disambiguation)
329:
225:Sorry for the delay:
145:
68:for more details and
1979:Talk:Ann Bressington
1871:The Special Barnstar
1657:requested your input
1492:Adelaide city centre
1442:Your response says:
1416:Adelaide city centre
1282:Image:Pru Goward.jpg
919:Wikimedia Foundation
878:. If you remove the
872:Knowledge:Notability
761:WP:ADEL#Participants
385:I notice you edited
243:I'm prepared to let
90:WikiProject Adelaide
1295:You may add it back
996:Movement and church
926:Wikimedia Australia
195:Android Mouse Bot 2
967:TfD nomination of
960:
844:
577:has been published
544:has been published
516:
504:AfD nomination of
423:
411:AfD nomination of
331:
319:Little context in
147:
1891:
1890:
1389:
1287:claim of fair use
964:
963:
959:
950:
864:proposed deletion
764:
759:or are listed at
727:
726:
673:
650:
649:
582:subscription page
549:subscription page
101:
2110:
2101:
2100:
2078:
2077:
1934:Benton Johnson?
1903:Thanks Astynax!
1865:
1858:
1857:
1854:For perseverance
1759:Views on Baptism
1376:
1306:my contributions
1278:
1026:Peace be to you
951:
944:
934:our meta subpage
913:
889:
888:
882:
857:
856:
850:
825:
807:
790:
772:
754:
723:
721:
717:
711:
688:
681:
680:
667:
661:
646:
644:
640:
634:
611:
604:
603:
437:. Thank you. --
399:Time (computing)
391:Time (computing)
343:speedily deleted
335:an automated bot
296:
291:
179:Krystal Forscutt
163:Krystal Forscutt
159:speedily deleted
155:Krystal Forscutt
151:an automated bot
137:Krystal Forscutt
87:
18:User talk:Donama
2118:
2117:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2094:
2093:
2071:
2070:
2057:
1975:
1921:
1856:
1825:
1761:
1595:Discussion page
1590:
1397:
1368:
1333:
1272:
1177:
998:
981:. Thank you. â
972:
942:
911:
886:
880:
879:
854:
848:
847:
837:
823:
818:
805:
788:
783:
770:
719:
715:
709:
704:
693:Adelaide Meetup
679:
659:
642:
638:
632:
627:
616:Adelaide Meetup
602:
569:
536:
509:
493:John Vandenberg
469:John Vandenberg
458:John Vandenberg
449:
416:
383:
324:
294:
289:
270:
241:
221:
207:
140:
98:AutoWikiBrowser
54:Adelaide Meetup
47:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2116:
2056:
2053:
2051:
2049:
2048:
2034:
2031:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2015:
2011:
1994:
1992:
1989:
1988:
1974:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1920:
1919:Quick question
1917:
1916:
1915:
1889:
1888:
1874:
1873:
1868:
1866:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1824:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1801:
1760:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1668:
1667:
1635:
1634:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1589:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1495:
1488:
1447:
1440:
1433:
1396:
1391:
1379:TinucherianBot
1367:
1364:
1332:
1329:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1133:local churches
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1079:
1078:
997:
994:
971:
965:
962:
961:
910:
907:
836:
831:
817:
814:
813:
812:
782:
779:
741:. Please RSVP
731:Billy Baxter's
725:
724:
703:
698:
696:
689:
678:
675:
666:
648:
647:
626:
621:
619:
612:
601:
598:
568:
565:
535:
532:
530:. Thank you.
508:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
489:
475:
474:
448:
445:
415:
409:
382:
379:
355:
354:
351:Knowledge:Stub
323:
317:
315:
313:
312:
269:
266:
265:
264:
240:
237:
229:, Australia --
224:
220:
217:
206:
201:
176:
175:
139:
135:Notability of
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
86:
46:
43:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2115:
2106:
2105:
2102:
2099:
2098:
2089:
2083:
2082:
2079:
2076:
2075:
2065:
2061:
2052:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2026:
2023:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1987:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1980:
1966:
1963:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1887:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1875:
1872:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1849:
1846:
1841:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1831:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1807:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1723:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1666:
1663:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1640:
1633:
1630:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1569:too. Cheers,
1568:
1564:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1466:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1445:
1441:
1438:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1395:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1373:
1372:December 2008
1363:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1316:. Thank you.
1315:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:
1277:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1024:
1022:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1003:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
970:
958:
956:
949:
948:
945:
937:
935:
930:
927:
924:
921:has recently
920:
915:
914:
906:
905:
901:
897:
893:
885:
877:
876:its talk page
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:Michael McCoy
853:
841:
835:
834:Michael McCoy
830:
829:
826:
811:
808:
801:
797:
796:
795:
794:
791:
778:
777:
773:
767:On behalf of
765:
762:
758:
752:
750:
746:
745:
740:
736:
732:
722:
714:
708:
702:
695:
694:
690:
687:
683:
682:
674:
671:
665:
662:
655:
645:
637:
631:
625:
618:
617:
613:
610:
606:
605:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
578:
573:
564:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:
540:
531:
529:
525:
521:
513:
507:
497:
494:
490:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
470:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
455:
447:John Long who
444:
443:
440:
439:B. Wolterding
436:
432:
428:
420:
414:
408:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
378:
377:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
328:
322:
316:
311:
308:
304:
303:
302:
301:
298:
297:
292:
284:
282:
281:City of Unley
278:
273:
263:
260:
256:
255:
254:
253:
250:
246:
236:
235:
232:
228:
216:
215:
212:
211:Alex Bakharev
205:
200:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
173:
169:
164:
160:
156:
152:
144:
138:
128:
125:
121:
117:
116:
115:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
99:
95:
91:
85:
82:
78:
73:
71:
67:
64:. Please see
63:
59:
55:
50:
42:
41:
37:
33:
23:
19:
2096:
2095:
2084:
2073:
2072:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2050:
2018:supervisor!)
1990:
1985:
1976:
1930:
1925:
1922:
1892:
1870:
1826:
1805:
1762:
1703:
1669:
1636:
1591:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1443:
1436:
1398:
1369:
1349:
1347:
1334:
1309:
1303:
1280:
1273:
1178:
1102:
1089:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1027:
1025:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1001:
999:
973:
952:
938:
931:
916:
845:
819:
799:
784:
766:
753:
748:
742:
728:
701:6 March 2020
691:
656:. Thanks! ~
651:
624:6 March 2020
614:
575:
570:
542:
537:
517:
450:
424:
384:
369:
366:bot operator
332:
314:
287:
285:
274:
271:
242:
222:
208:
190:
187:bot operator
148:
74:
51:
48:
29:
739:meetup page
735:Rundle Mall
395:microsecond
62:Jimbo Wales
49:Hi Donama,
22:archivelist
1981:you said:
1348:P.S: It's
1141:HopeChrist
1107:HopeChrist
1103:your "pov"
1040:HopeChrist
705:This box:
628:This box:
427:Hugo Kelly
413:Hugo Kelly
373:CSDWarnBot
223:Hi Donama,
2097:Himalayan
2074:Himalayan
1973:LC puzzle
1962:⢠Astynax
1936:⢠Astynax
1924:figures.
1895:⢠Astynax
1883:⢠Astynax
1845:⢠Astynax
1830:⢠Astynax
1689:nemonoman
1662:⢠Astynax
1653:Sloftstra
1644:⢠Astynax
1629:⢠Astynax
1599:⢠Astynax
1060:WP:Weasel
955:this list
697:Next: TBA
620:Next: TBA
249:Hesperian
1995:Cheers,
1639:Slofstra
1497:Cheers,
1310:articles
1291:orphaned
1250:Slofstra
1215:Slofstra
1181:Slofstra
1033:In HIM,
1004:friend,
983:Rockfang
923:approved
816:Reminder
800:everyone
586:BrownBot
553:BrownBot
524:deletion
486:cc-by-sa
482:cc-by-nc
431:deletion
279:for the
268:Question
75:Thanks,â
70:indicate
20: |
2055:Hello!!
2014:clear".
1230:WP:NPOV
1196:WP:NPOV
1137:The Way
1086:article
1064:WP:NPOV
1056:WP:Cite
1028:brother
1021:brother
1002:brother
781:Revised
403:EncMstr
231:Fir0002
204:BaĹkale
2038:Pdfpdf
1997:Pdfpdf
1947:Donama
1905:Donama
1779:Donama
1743:RSuser
1725:RSuser
1706:RSuser
1672:Donama
1612:Donama
1571:Pdfpdf
1549:Pdfpdf
1544:really
1539:really
1537:looks
1513:Donama
1499:Pdfpdf
1474:Donama
1451:Pdfpdf
1420:Donama
1401:Pdfpdf
1235:Donama
1200:Donama
1155:Donama
1068:Donama
941:Riana
822:Riana
804:Riana
787:Riana
769:Riana
699:Last:
658:Riana
622:Last:
592:), at
559:), at
362:WP:WMD
307:Donama
290:Daniel
259:Donama
183:WP:WMD
92:or in
32:Donama
1810:Tomer
1794:Tomer
1766:Tomer
1533:Hey!
1375:link.
1318:BJBot
1019:calm
1000:Dear
896:BJBot
358:Wurly
347:Wurly
339:Wurly
321:Wurly
96:with
16:<
2088:here
2042:talk
2001:talk
1951:talk
1909:talk
1806:have
1783:talk
1747:talk
1729:talk
1710:talk
1693:talk
1676:talk
1655:has
1616:talk
1575:talk
1553:talk
1535:This
1517:talk
1503:talk
1478:talk
1455:talk
1424:talk
1405:talk
1383:talk
1370:The
1358:talk
1352:;-)â
1341:talk
1322:talk
1254:talk
1239:talk
1219:talk
1204:talk
1185:talk
1159:talk
1145:talk
1135:and
1111:talk
1072:talk
1044:talk
987:talk
900:talk
884:prod
870:and
852:prod
744:here
720:edit
713:talk
707:view
654:here
643:edit
636:talk
630:view
590:talk
557:talk
389:and
381:tick
245:this
124:talk
111:talk
81:talk
36:talk
1301:).
1090:you
747:by
733:in
2044:)
2003:)
1953:)
1911:)
1785:)
1749:)
1731:)
1712:)
1695:)
1678:)
1618:)
1597:.
1577:)
1555:)
1519:)
1505:)
1480:)
1457:)
1426:)
1418:.
1407:)
1385:)
1356:|
1354:cj
1350:he
1339:|
1337:cj
1324:)
1256:)
1241:)
1221:)
1206:)
1187:)
1161:)
1147:)
1113:)
1074:)
1062:,
1058:,
1046:)
989:)
902:)
887:}}
881:{{
855:}}
849:{{
774:,
596:.
563:.
295:ââŚ
193:--
174:.
122:|
120:cj
109:|
107:cj
79:|
77:cj
38:)
2040:(
1999:(
1949:(
1907:(
1781:(
1745:(
1727:(
1708:(
1691:(
1674:(
1614:(
1581:)
1573:(
1551:(
1515:(
1501:(
1476:(
1453:(
1422:(
1403:(
1381:(
1320:(
1252:(
1237:(
1217:(
1202:(
1183:(
1157:(
1143:(
1109:(
1070:(
1042:(
985:(
943:â
898:(
824:â
806:â
789:â
771:â
716:â˘
710:â˘
660:â
639:â˘
633:â˘
588:(
555:(
100:.
34:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
