Knowledge

User talk:Dirtlawyer1/Archives/2010/October

Source 📝

457: 416: 39: 319:
symmetry, and the Gators soccer program has been outstanding under Becky Burleigh and is probably deserving of greater WP exposure. The Florida Gators football article is too long, and a lot of the "listy" type stuff should probably either be deleted as redundant or shifted into stand-alone lists. My biggest problem is every article and list needs work, and there is only so much of me.
248:
DL - did you get a chance to put these in for renaming? I ask because now some genius has created a new basketball category with the apostrophe to "fix" matters - with the result being two highly confusing categories out there. Would you mind putting the 2 boys' basketball categories in as a merge
362:
I understand where you're coming from, Eagles. Give me a couple of days over the weekend, and I'll expand and enhance to make it a respectable stand-alone list. Frankly, all of these Gator athletes lists need work, and the golfers and tennis players lists aren't in substantially better shape than
160:
uses a grammatically incorrect construction? LOL One more corruption of the English language for which we may thank the American journalism "profession." What do you think about simply spelling it using the correct plural possessive noun, just like we do for men's and women's college basketball
91:
Art, it's not that I don't understand the purpose of the "no wrap" coding. I do. It's just completely unnecessary to use it in every instance of month-date in text or footnotes. Moreover, there is absolutely no reason to be concerned with the wrapped-split of month and date when it does occur.
318:
Well, Eagles, I could go either way. I was thinking about expanding the soccer list with another two dozen first-team All-Americans who didn't go pro. We have six other stand-alone Florida Gators players lists (baseball, basketball, football, golf, tennis and Olympians), and I sort of like the
140:
DL - Saw your note on renaming the Parade cats. I think its a fine idea IF we can just get a ref that this is correct. Parade doesn't use an apostrophe so I followed suit with the boys basketball, girls basketball and boys soccer categories. If you want, just put the categories in for speedy
197:
Please do submit the categories for renaming - I wasn't sure which was correct so I defaulted to Parade's format. Most of the Parade lists are searchable online through Google News archive searches - you can usually get a scan of the actual Parade article. When this doesn't work, I have a
198:
subscription to a site called newspaperarchive.com which has a bunch of other papers. Between the two I have been able to piece together all of the basketball honorees from 1957 (the first team) to present.
220:
Impressive. You clearly spent some time compiling that basketball list. I use Google News Archive quite a bit, but for whatever reason it didn't dawn on me to use it for the
470: 429: 127: 101: 312: 397: 372: 357: 328: 273: 233: 207: 188: 179:
BTW, I recently incorporated your hoops stats for Rick Casares into the article. Thanks again for your thoughtfulness in providing the stats and citation.
150: 161:
teams (and other sports)? After all, we don't say "men basketball," do we? If you have no objection, I'll make the request through CfD, as suggested.
174:
website, plus whatever additional names I could glean from recent articles. Clearly incomplete. I'm hoping you have found all-time lists somewhere.
463: 456: 422: 415: 115: 279: 337:. However, when the list is expanded like the other Florida Gators sports athletes articles, it should be moved to its own article again. 264:
Nice. I have not done so, but I will do so in the morning, Rikster, before we have multiple categories with dueling apostrophes. LOL
258: 485: 444: 85: 74: 135: 285: 490:
Yes, I can fully understand your frustration, and sorry for my part in causing it. However, I hope it's all sorted out now.
141:
renaming in CfD. They definitely should be correct, I just think some definitive "grammar rules" should be referenced.
25: 333:
I still think that because the list is so small, it should not have its own article and should be moved to a section at
392: 352: 307: 334: 289: 170:
All-Americans? When I created the football category, I included the names from an all-time top-50 list on the
21: 292:. The list is too short to have its own page and the main article is not very long. What are your thoughts? 249:
request? I'd do it myself but am on vacation and have limited "Wikibility" on my smartphone. Many thanks!
72: 46: 368: 324: 269: 229: 184: 97: 495: 481: 440: 243: 123: 81: 55: 17: 224:
articles. Makes perfect sense because the "magazine" is really a Sunday newspaper insert.
8: 386: 346: 301: 254: 203: 146: 491: 477: 436: 409: 364: 320: 265: 225: 180: 119: 93: 77: 54:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
379: 339: 294: 111: 67: 250: 199: 142: 363:
the soccer players list, but I will prioritize work on this one. Thanks.
118:
to a lawyer. But anyway I'm not a revert warrior, so I've said my piece.
166:
Related, but different question: what are you using for your lists of
473:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
432:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
114:
is a Knowledge guideline, so I'm puzzled why I'm explaining
110:
It's automated, so it's free work along with other edits.
75:User:Art LaPella/AWB explanation#Nowrap and nbsp 462:Hello, Dirtlawyer1. You have new messages at 421:Hello, Dirtlawyer1. You have new messages at 116:User:Art LaPella/Because the guideline says so 14: 52:Do not edit the contents of this page. 377:Okay, thanks. Keep up the good work. 286:List of Florida Gators soccer players 280:List of Florida Gators soccer players 33: 31: 455: 414: 32: 507: 288:would be better as a section at 37: 136:Parade All-American categories 13: 1: 335:Florida Gators women's soccer 290:Florida Gators women's soccer 486:20:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 445:20:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 398:20:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 373:19:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 358:19:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 329:04:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 313:20:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 274:04:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 259:18:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 234:14:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 208:13:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 189:13:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 151:13:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC) 128:05:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 102:04:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 86:03:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 7: 10: 512: 464:JamesBWatson's talk page 423:JamesBWatson's talk page 460: 419: 92:This is "make work." 459: 418: 50:of past discussions. 18:User talk:Dirtlawyer1 471:remove this notice 461: 430:remove this notice 420: 62: 61: 56:current talk page 503: 474: 433: 395: 389: 382: 355: 349: 342: 310: 304: 297: 41: 40: 34: 511: 510: 506: 505: 504: 502: 501: 500: 475: 468: 434: 427: 412: 393: 387: 380: 353: 347: 340: 308: 302: 295: 282: 246: 138: 70: 38: 30: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 509: 467: 454: 449: 426: 413: 411: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 281: 278: 277: 276: 245: 244:Parade part II 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 213: 212: 211: 210: 192: 191: 176: 175: 163: 162: 137: 134: 133: 132: 131: 130: 105: 104: 69: 66: 64: 60: 59: 42: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 508: 499: 497: 493: 488: 487: 483: 479: 472: 465: 458: 453: 452:...and again 450: 447: 446: 442: 438: 431: 424: 417: 399: 396: 391: 390: 384: 383: 376: 375: 374: 370: 366: 361: 360: 359: 356: 351: 350: 344: 343: 336: 332: 331: 330: 326: 322: 317: 316: 315: 314: 311: 306: 305: 299: 298: 291: 287: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 209: 205: 201: 196: 195: 194: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 159: 155: 154: 153: 152: 148: 144: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 103: 99: 95: 90: 89: 88: 87: 83: 79: 76: 73: 65: 57: 53: 49: 48: 43: 36: 35: 27: 23: 19: 492:JamesBWatson 489: 478:JamesBWatson 476: 451: 448: 437:JamesBWatson 435: 385: 378: 345: 338: 300: 293: 283: 247: 221: 171: 167: 157: 139: 71: 63: 51: 45: 365:Dirtlawyer1 321:Dirtlawyer1 266:Dirtlawyer1 226:Dirtlawyer1 181:Dirtlawyer1 120:Art LaPella 94:Dirtlawyer1 78:Art LaPella 44:This is an 469:You can 428:You can 410:Talkback 284:I think 251:Rikster2 200:Rikster2 143:Rikster2 24:‎ | 22:Archives 20:‎ | 156:Nice. 112:WP:NBSP 47:archive 381:Eagles 341:Eagles 296:Eagles 222:Parade 172:Parade 168:Parade 158:Parade 68:Nowrap 16:< 496:talk 482:talk 441:talk 388:24/7 369:talk 348:24/7 325:talk 303:24/7 270:talk 255:talk 230:talk 204:talk 185:talk 147:talk 124:talk 98:talk 82:talk 26:2010 394:(C) 354:(C) 309:(C) 498:) 484:) 443:) 371:) 327:) 272:) 257:) 232:) 206:) 187:) 149:) 126:) 100:) 84:) 494:( 480:( 466:. 439:( 425:. 367:( 323:( 268:( 253:( 228:( 202:( 183:( 145:( 122:( 96:( 80:( 58:.

Index

User talk:Dirtlawyer1
Archives
2010
archive
current talk page

User:Art LaPella/AWB explanation#Nowrap and nbsp
Art LaPella
talk
03:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Dirtlawyer1
talk
04:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
WP:NBSP
User:Art LaPella/Because the guideline says so
Art LaPella
talk
05:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Rikster2
talk
13:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Dirtlawyer1
talk
13:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Rikster2
talk
13:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Dirtlawyer1
talk
14:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.