User talk:CaroleHenson/Archive 2

3729:. A reviewer might wonder (a) why you did not simply expand that article and (b) why you have copied a fairly long section (the Silverman quote) from it without - as far as I can see - any changes. I also note that nearly all your images are in that article too. I therefore suggest you enlarge on the section you have copied, for example by providing a more complete introduction to Silverman's work, possibly along with comparable sources, and replacing the bullet points (which are not always welcome in WP articles) by a paraphrase in running prose. In regard to the images, I suggest (especially in connection with the drawings) you add an appropriate introduction. Perhaps you could go even further with the section on drawings, explaining more of the background and the relationship between the drawings and the paintings. There might be some indications 8545:

deal. Refactoring was an admitted mistake based on ignorance of the systems. We all learn by osmosis/example as well as by reading rule books; some of us learn better from one or other of those methods. Generally I have agreed with your points but you seem unwilling to acknowledge this. CH is not stopping you from editing pages - just do it. Beyond that, I'll just say what I've said previously: it might be best if you just avoid each other except when there is a clear policy/guideline issue. I see no new such issues in this recent thread: it merely covers old ground. You will note that with one brief, exceptional and conciliatory message some weeks ago, I have never strayed on to the talk page of either you (TK) or Ceoil. If I can manage this, with a temper such as I have, then hopefully others can also. -

3324:

word about how significant the olive tree paintings are to VG's work as a whole and how they have been received (if you think this is important). The aspect I found most difficult to follow was the section on the spiritual significance. You provide a very general introduction to VG's interest in spirituality going right back to 1876. Perhaps it would be more useful to concentrate on his more immediate concerns around 1889 and the effects, if any, of his illness on his spirituality. GA articles on art also usually include a bibliography or further reading section. I see you have several pertinent references to literature - so some of these could be used in the bibliography. If you think I am being too demanding (as I probably am), please let me know.

8530:

the post with the examples, deleted the offers of explanation and didn't respond to them, and brought in another person who accused me of assuming bad faith. You have a lot of edits and have created many articles; at some point you need to stop referring to yourself as a newbie, because you aren't. There's a point at which familiarizing yourself with policy is a good idea and that is my goal. We use talkpages here to work out issues, and when I've brought up an issue with you, twice now, and quite politely, you've become very defensive. The reality is that this is an encyclcopedia anyone can edit, and I can change any of your pages without first giving you the courtesy of discussing. From this I too have learned a lesson.

2848: 720:

be helpful as I move forward. I had no problem whatsoever with the comments that were direct and gave me something to work with. You know that I went and made fixes based upon clear direction, so anything that I made fixes to is absolutely not only not questioned but as I've said all along, valuable. Something I probably should have been clearer about I have learned to be much more careful to keep the references in-line rather than at the end of a paragraph, to attribute opinions to individuals rather than just show the reference, to not have inline references in the intro... and reading between the lines, to remove content that does not further the story. For all of that, I am very greatful.

1475: 1457: 1566:

a stack of paintings - when the frames alone where expensive. I read this in a number of places, so I'd say that the information is reliable. Van Gogh considered this a travesty and was incredibly upset at the loss of his work in this manner. I'm tired tonight, but I'll try to think of a way to reword it - or possibly get a direct quote that more accurately reflects: 1) what a financial and emotional travesty this was, 2) that neither Agostina or van Gogh gained anything from this. There was no work that anyone made any money at the time on the buddles - I'm guessing not since his work was not yet appreciated and he couldn't sell them.--

543:"dump and run" kind of comment: "and the fixes still needed are too in-depth for now". And then when they followed up to better understand give further dump and run comments. It's unfathonable to me. I think that I've just been really lucky in my professional career to work with people and promote through consulting and change management how to give collaborative, considerate, and constructive criticism -- that these type of comments kind of shock the system. Most of the editors here are VERY good at giving feedback and I really appreciate their guidance, shepharding me along the way!!! 2833: 2863: 7958:

up by incorporating several sources, sometimes even in a single sentence. In the ideal world, yes, you read up, walk away, cogitate, come back and write without looking at the source material. In practice, especially if you have the sort of memory that I have, even doing that may not avoid close paraphrasing because entire phrases stick in my head. You'll have to bear in mind with these specific VvG examples, I know nowt about VvG and am not about to start reading umpteen sources, but I'll do what I can. It is particularly awkward when working with short snippets. -

1439: 1484: 1466: 8452:

haven't a clue where you're at, though did notice that you posted something for Moonriddengirl about writing a page. Haven't looked at it though. I'm assuming your writing a how-to for these situations, or something like that. Anyway, everyone is very upset, and I apologize for becoming involved with Vincent van Gogh. I did make some headway today on the page I linked above (and there are problems to be resolved) but everyone is so angry with me that I decided to revert. I'll let you guys figure out whatever needs to be done.

672:, and the fixes still needed are too in-depth for now. I have verified the hook and the date, but I need someone to help with the character count". You describe this as "hit and run", but you don't seem to be familiar with the fact that DYK self-nominations require reviewing another submission - I had another article up for DYK, and I only fulfilled a minimal job that was required of me, and tried to point out (since you asked!) what more is needed. If it helps, I think the article as it is now is in pretty good shape. 6306:

I was feeling it from all sides. It wasn't at all meant to target you specifically at all!!! You are incredible, did an incredible job on the summary and should be commended for that!!!! You all of done such incredible work on the article - and it's to be commended, as well as the incredible work by TK to develop the summary of really going perspectives to use for improving articles. I'm getting that it's harder to accept constuctive criticism from a newbie, Ceoil, and I'll accept that.--

485:

terms. I now look back on the the edits that I did in my first year with considerable embarrassment, and it took me years of editing before the idea of contributing to DYK was even suggested to me. So, don't be discouraged, take your time to learn the ropes over MOS things like putting citations in the lead (which is something that many very experienced editors often don't worry about much), enjoy it at your own pace, and treat any criticisms that come your way as a learning experience.

4936: 4217: 3700: 1949: 8594: 31: 3807:

to see that VG said in one of his letters that he started experimenting with the drawings before going on to the paintings. This seems to have been a fairly common practice of his. The technique used might also be of interest. Your "Drawing" gallery also looks as if it needs a word of introduction, the way it is displayed. But don't worry too much about this. Once you are through with the GA, I may edit in some additional content myself but I don't want to interfere too much now.

1648:

there - but the paintings I looked up came through a friend of van Gogh or Johanna van Gogh. I bet some van Gogh expert has an idea what might have happened to the works - it would be interesting to find out! I haven't been able to find the source that mentioned that a 2nd hand dealer burned some of the confiscated canvases (I guess just keeping the frames which he could make some money on). It's a mystery what happened to the bundles, with likely an interesting story.--

8288:

swarming in response. Please understand that I am truly done with any work with you, it's just too hard and painful. I feel bad about how upset I got at the end, shouting to be left alone to work the issue - I should have just stepped away, let things cool down, when I realized that you just weren't ready for me to work on it. I apologize for that - stepping away, although would not have changed my ultimate decision would have at least cooled down some of the drama.--

436:, and particularly since you already showed your interest in following the MOS in the long run; c) because of the web of citations in the lead, and the fact that they verify info which should eventually be summarized there and sourced lower in the article (that is, effectively written twice), I also think it is better to suggest this to the contributing editor, most familiar with what source cites which info, than to risk botching it up by attempting to do so myself. 8467:

supported your points. The only exception I can think of is use of reference templates. Clearly on the "close paraphrasing" items he's totally, and rightly, supported your points that the close paraphrasing concerns needed to be resolved. I think he's stepped in sometimes as a gentleman who felt that there were calmer, more productive ways to communicate to one of his "duckling" contributors, something he's only done for me on contentious VvG discussions.--

3401:

understanding of the divine." And I think the lead needs some kind of conclusion such as "Van Gogh's olive tree paintings, some of which are among his finest works, were completed in 1888–89, the year before his death." Please don't just copy my wording though. I'm sure you can contribute something more appropriate. You did a great job on the biography section. I wonder if External links should not be a separate section? They are not necessarily references. -

679:, I have to comment on the issues as I see them, with as much time as I am ready to allocate them. And my time too is finite. Did I say something that was out of line or uncivil? No? Than please don't make me responsible for how it "made you feel". Is anything I mentioned really worth you telling me and others that you can't stop laughing? Because it has become quite demeaning. (So is Ghmyrtle's comment about "frustrations", which is also uncalled for.) 2712: 1124: 3665: 1448: 7286:(2) Text from source: Vincent (1729-1802), was a sculptor by profession, and was said to have been in Paris in his youth; in 1749 he was one of the Cent Suisses. With him the practice of art seems to have come into the family, together with fortune... He married Johanna van der Vin of Malines, and their son Vincent (1789 -1874) was enabled, by the legacy of his great-uncle Vincent, to study theology at the University of Leiden. 4001: 4395:

journal and book templates very helpful for ensuring that the references are always formatted correctly, so I'd like to go ahead using them on articles when there is no bibliography. In that case, there won't be as much info to sort through so hopefully that templates will be much less of a distraction. What do you think? The web citations don't go in the bibliography, do they? Thanks, you've all been a tremendous help!!--

363:

constructive than "and the fixes still needed are too in-depth for now", "laborious", "counter-intuitive", and "needlessly complicated" -- I'm not looking to have any other non-constructive comments. I'll look at the material you mentioned tonight. I do agree, though, that the article is better - and I have learned somethings to carry forward. So, thank you for that - and thanks for approving the article for DYK!

196: 6647: 7328:

minor but if TK feels strongly about it then I would like to see how it could be better worded - short, factual statements are difficult to reword other than by changing the actual order of the words. But maybe, eg: he went to the University of Leiden, where he was able to study theology as a consequence of a legacy left to the family by his great-uncle Vincent,a sculptor who had never married." -

3391:

is his use of color, especially in relation to blue for the divine. Maybe it's in H. Suh's book but I could not find it in Erikson's though I did find the "radient gold light" there. I'm sure it is not difficult to find a more specific reference for this, perhaps to be inserted after "the intense blue of the sky to symbolize the "divine and infinite presence" of Jesus" in the following passage:

2254:) "something funny.. I will not create every day." is probably the best quote. They may say the rest of the sentence about Theo makes it too long for a DYK item. Also it probably needed a non-web reference, so I added that from Hulsker's book. I think that will probably work fine, but you could make the quote even longer, without bringing Theo into it. Then it would be ready to go I think. 4724:, specifically reference 1 and 8, that relate to the bibliography item for Wallace? Sitush did a version that links the reference to it's Bibliography item, which I think would be very helpful when there are multiple books by one author (Mancoff, Fell, etc.) that I run across from time to time. The previous version I did a simple short inline ref that does not link to it's bibliography.-- 1891: 7401: 4669: 2601: 6392:

trivial non substantive matters, including puncuation, and can than be tough, but it will happen. That kind of thing doesn't bother me, around long enough, but it bothers some, and from the first reactions to TK's review last night, I got a sence, rightly or wrongly, that it might bother you. Probably wrongly. But I've had some bitter experiences in the past with defensive co-noms

4246:. And, and this is important, try and avoid citation templates, hand code the refs. This is for many reasons, but mainly because thoes templates take up a lot of space, are hard to follow, and make edit mode a rough place for other editors. The are almost never used in art pages. Now, that said, LORD GOD are you doing great work here, and this is not a critism, just tips. Best. 1311:. This is a new user who is becoming a bit daunted by it all, rather as you were a couple of months back. Since you are now doing great I thought perhaps you might care to offer your thoughts to the newcomer and spread the load a bit. If it all comes from me then I think we might lose the person from the project, which would be a shame. Thanks, and no obligation! - 6544:. You've made it very clear that you're hurt. I'm hurt too - not so much for myself, but for my dear friends Modernist and Ceoil. As editors, I have the highest regard for them; they've helped me immensely during my wiki-career; and I consider them wiki-friends. I'm particularly upset that Ceoil apologized multiple times and his apologies were summarily dismissed. 5759:

I'll sort out what I'm feeling with an overnight sleep. I'm just surprised that rather than reading what I wrote in response, there was an assumption that I was fighting. That doesn't say great things about the way I was viewed in the VvG work - and I had thought I already was part of the team. It's been a sad day. I truly appreciate your attempts at recovery!!

330:

comments, but it may be better if you do read the MOS page first, and compare it to your article (which is good, but could be better, and I'm glad you take an interest in improvement). Please note however that I'm alo caught up in many other things, and may not be around at all times. Incidentally, I'm not watchlisting this talk page, so could you reply on mine?

7663:

Grande Valley of New Mexico and the Mogollon Rim in central Arizona, where related people had already been living for centuries... Modern Pueblo people dislike the name "Anasazi" which they consider an ethnic slur. This Navajo word means ancient enemy (or old-time stranger, alien, foreigner, outsider) although it has been in common use for about about 70 years.

2542:, and it seems like that's the case - but I've had a hard time finding reliable information / news articles in English about it. Since it's a fairly recent find (October 2010), it's not in the books I'd look for information. What list do you have going (e.g., article on face Van Goghs)? Do you think that should be added to your list? Good to hear from you!-- 7652:

central Arizona. Anasazi is a term commonly used since its publication in the 1930s. The Navajo word does not represent specific tribes but means enemy or outsider. It is therefore disliked by the modern Pueblo people who have oral histories about the ancient people, make pilgrimages to ancient sites and maintain shrines in the Four Corners region.

5796:

citation templates." Look I've taken it on the chin with citation templates - had to remove 200 of them from a page & so I was just saying, use the refs tags with author & page number. I was being very brusque and for that I apologize. Ceoil, I know, is tired. It's all cool. Nothing to worry about.

1603:

of the article. Somewhere I read that he was upset about not at least getting the frames - since they were very costly - so there's more I can add to it. My heads a little fuzzy so it will come together later. Night! Thanks, by the way for doing the va tag updates on articles I wrote about earlier!!!--

1026:. I'm happy to move ahead either way (adding the written articles to the template - possibly by period (Holland, Paris, Arles), or selecting just notable works). I defer to the two of you, more seasoned at this. If we're going forward with notable works - what would be the definition of notable works? 3748:. You should be able to find the equivalent passages from VG's letters in English. You may well have other sources or access to libraries. And while I'm here, I'm glad to see the problem with the redirect has been sorted out. Look forward to your reactions. Maybe once again I'm pushing you too hard! - 8544:

I am not CH's mentor in the formal WP sense of that word, but she might consider me to be in the wider, worldly sense. Mind you, if I were merely a friend, as you keep saying, then there would be no harm in that: you specifically said that Ceoil jumped in recently to "protect you" as a friend. No big

8481:

I ONLY added this point to help you understand that sometimes taking a deep breath, you might understand that you have more support than you realize. It's like the lady waiting on the top of her house in a flood turning away every manned boats attempts to rescue her - as she calls out to God asking,

8276:

to manage this as a project, and 4) Have since spent about 98% of my WP time since working on close paraphrasing, including additions to the close paraphrasing article to help other newbies in the future -- if none of that shows how seriously your concerns were taken, I'm really not sure what would.

8107:

Carole getting upset and rushing is not the solution. First you need to understand the issue, and I'm not seeing that you are. In fact I spent a great deal of time showing you what you were doing wrong, and honestly you haven't a clue how big of a favor I'm doing here, so don't say Sitush is the only

7181:

No hurry. I did read the policies - and I don't think that I do verbatim copying - that's why I'm looking for examples. It's just a surprise because it's never come up before, even in reviews for DYKs or Good articles. But I'm not saying it's not the case, I'm just looking for some examples. From

6989:

Carole, can you do something with the Flowering Orchards section of the bio? I'm going to concetrate on early life, and general sources and prose for a bit, but this is one of my favourite of his series, and is underdeveloped on the page. Developing the 'works' section will be challenging, to keep it

6937:

Hi, yes very interesting article - and how much better to depict his shift than from his early peasant paintings to Starry Night. I think Van Gogh was well-read of Whitman - it seems to me I read that when I was working on the "Undergrowth" paintings, especially "blade of grass" - but don't remember

6894:

That's a very gracious invitation, Ceoil! Let me think about it a bit; I've been enjoying writing articles about early Colorado history and Frank Benson that I have several in various stages of completion to wrap up. Either way, I won't be hurt in the least if you work with Modernist, TK and others

6747:

It's funny, I'm not an artist - but I've been thinking about getting a watercolor set again. Any time I've tried it I haven't liked the results but after reading about the dry brush approach and starting with a sketch, I'm becoming inspired by Van Gogh and Frank Weston Benson (the bearer of my first

6391:

You were asking for a reason why I reacted the way I did, and I'll tell you in a round about way. FAC is a tough business; you get so involved in the article, hours, weeks, months invested, that your hugely proud of. You nominate at FAC, and despite thoes hours, weeks months, you can be slipped up on

5874:

Carole I think it's a good idea for you to start up your own work page. It's also a good idea to pay attention to real life concerns first; before doing anything here, what we do here is volunteer our valuable time, knowledge, energy and experience for all of which we should be royally paid, but most

5821:

Has anyone gotten that my question was NOT about templates, what was confusing to me was "this page". I was trying to figure out how to execute that? Put the edits in the talk page of a sandbox? So, I was suggesting that I make the changes in my sandbox and move them over. This is why I'm upset.

5762:

Carole, firstly make no mistake - you've been greatly appreciated - certainly by me. What happens during the FA process though can be rather difficult; and one needs to be able to deal with criticism fairly well, I know that I need your help there and I know that you will benefit from the process and

5163:

Hi Carole, Why don't you hold off for a little bit until I have a chance to finish my notes. I haven't read all the way through the article yet and will be adding to the notes, and then consolidating & cleaning them up. That's just stuff that jumped out at me if I were to review the page and will

4784:

I'm laughing because I think you're joking with me! You could say I'm giving you credit for being able to link a reference to a bibliography!!! It's very slick! It's all in what's going to best serve the work. Ceoil and Modernist have a better idea of who other writers are that come to the visual

4716:

Thanks, that's nice cross-linkage to the Bibliography! At this point I'd like to have Ceoil and Modernist weigh in because I've written "series" articles that include from a small group up to 30 or 40 paintings that I'm hoping someone may want to come explore and create articles for individual pieces

4491:

that subsequent contributors understand it. The basic cite templates are fairly easy to follow, but the anchor stuff used with bibs seems to confuse. If they do not understand it then the time spent monitoring and fixing can be a pain. Just my experience, that's all. There is an article here about a

4333:

Your opinions are fine but they appeared to be worded in a way that is somewhat commanding, even though I acknowledge that you introduce with the phrase "a suggestion or two". You've since clarified that it was just advice. Anyway, I think that Carole can make up her own mind unless you can produce a

3826:

I'm also following all your other efforts to enhance coverage of Van Gogh. Great work. Keep it up. And don't get too bogged down in further improvements just to the Langlois articles. But as your friend Sitush suggests, you'll soon be aiming for a Feature Article. And for that you really have to have

3806:

Maybe I went a bit far on the drawings but that's probably because I hadn't realized the article began as an account of a single painting. It now looks more like the "Langois Bridge series". Anyway, it's entirely up to you whether you want to add anything on the drawings. I found it quite interesting

3578:

There are no other one line articles that I'm aware of right now, so I think we're safe there. It just seems so dishonoring to me to have one line articles with just the painting name, who painted it and year. I didn't realize that there was a rule about redirection of stub articles. I'm guessing in

3526:

The whole article looks pretty good to me now. I'll try to find time to do the GA review tomorrow. Thanks for following up on so many of my suggestions. Perhaps you could now also apply this approach to the Langlois Bridge. It's great to work with someone who's so responsive and obviously keen on the

3400:

Another minor suggestion is about the lead. It now ends "His paintings of olive pickers demonstrate the relationship between man and nature." Perhaps that could be reworded as "His paintings of olive pickers emphasize the importance Van Gogh ascribed to the relationship between man and nature in his

3262:

There's hundreds of images in the List of Works, with just a couple dozen without images (find on ?), which I'm happy to pick away at. Just 'cause I'm a curious kind of gal, do you have a particular intention for the images that you're finding right now? Did it all come about because of my question

2950:

provides a pretty good overview and states in particular: "The "v" is written in lower case, except if the first name or initials are omitted, in which case it is capitalised, as in "de schilder Van Gogh" ("the painter Van Gogh") or "de heer Van Teylingen" ("Mister Van Teylingen")." These conventions

2556:

That's something about "Beer and Fruit"; I had indeed considered beginning a "Fakes" page at some point on WP, but given the sheer lack of evidence behind the topic, I decided against it. Really, other than the proven cases (such as you mentioned earlier), and those which may be obvious to the viewer

2502:

Yes, when I read of the potential forgery of Daubigny's Garden there was an art historian or art critic who blasted (ok, my word/interprettation) van Gogh for making paintings that were so easy to forge - and it seemed to me that there was also discussion of forgeries coming about after the confusion

2077:

I'm not sure yet, the only thing that I've found interesting so far is that in many ways Arles / southern France was like a new land for van Gogh, like Japan that he very much wanted to visit, yet he found a sense of the homeland in this bridges. It was "something funny" he said (Van Gogh Museum)...

1747:

Very weird, I think I'm totally missing something. I haven't had anything come through my personal email (where I received one email from you. Two questions: Did you get the email reply from me? Should I be looking for an email box here on wikipedia (I've been looking around and just not coming to

1565:

There's probably a better way to word this. Basically the scenario was that: van Gogh had traded paintings for meals at the Tambourin. When Agostina went into severe debt/equiv. of bankruptcy her debtors came to make whatever money they could on the contents of the restaurant. They got pennies for

8529:

No, I did not know Sitush was your mentor. If you want to see me as a screaming lady, fine. My goal was to bring attention to problems in your editing that are serious. You asked for examples, I provided them. You then quickly moved things around on the page, making it extremely difficult to follow

8361:

Carole, you're confusing me. I'm politely asking if you'd mind if I work on an article you started. What I'm hearing from you is it that I can't see that you took my suggestions seriously, it's unproductive for us to work together, you emailed a response instead of putting it in a talkpage so no one

8332:

May 22) before any of the dramatic events transpired with you and Ceoil. And, never had an intention to spend "months" on the VvG biography - I was just going to help out with some of the items as a minor way to pay back Modernist for all his help along the way, never as a commitment to become back

7973:

I seriously cannot believe that Moonriddengirl told you to follow the source and gave you permission for close paraphrasing. I follow the ideal you've defined above and I've spent about 8 months cleaning/scrubbing close paraphrasing / copyvio / plagiarism issues. Sweeping it under the table is not a

7957:

once told me, just go for it. An example would be where you a presenting a potted history. Since histories only ever work as in themed or chronological order, and since themed is a rare case, it is next to impossible to avoid following the overall structure of a source. However, you can break things

7760:

article - and I'm sure if you thought it was important to add Cent Suisse there was a reason for it (e.g., showed a bit more about his make-up, prestige to become part of that group, etc.) We come from two different perspectives some times, and I thought we got to a good end result. If you're happy

7618:

While institutionalized, van Gogh read a great deal and particularly admired a poem written by Walt Whitman about the beauty in a blade of grass. He started painting grasses in Paris, notably wheat fields, their swaying leaf blades expressing movement and energy. At Saint-Remy he painted close-ups

7524:

The problem here is that you are pretty much following the order that things are written in the source. "His family, and others who were well acquainted with van Gogh, had much admiration for him. His abilities as a preacher were limited and his career consisted of placements only to small villages,

7233:

Johannes was at first a gold-wire drawer like his father, but he later became a Bible teacher and a clerk in the Cloister Church at The Hague. He married Johanna van der Vin of Malines, and their son Vincent (1789 -1874) was enabled, by the legacy of his great-uncle Vincent, to study theology at the

6305:

I have always seen this as a project by the three of you - so the whole wild understanding yesterday should have no impact on your plans - at least I would hope not. I was talking to you TK because you seemed to be the lead - and seemed to be willing to listen to what was really going on - and that

6094:

and getting articles out there as a reference point of a great number of his paintings -- very much for the same reason as you want to make the biography even better. It may just be that for the moment I've given all I can give to Vincent. We'll see what comes - you do great work - as to Modernist

6075:

Basically the way these things work is that people pop in and out. I'll walk away for a few days and think about how to restructure the biography - it need the most work. See what I've just posted in the sandbox. Anyway, sorry about the firestorm today - welcome to the wacky world of wiki. It gets a

3386:

You've certainly done an excellent job on all this and seem to have invested a considerable amount of time. I also see you now have a total of 18 olive tree works. Some of your additions and references provide much more insight into VG's motivations, especially in regard to spirituality. The overall

3163:

Ok, I think I followed the process correctly for nominating the article. I looked through the criteria for a good article, and then how one would review an article, and I think the article is in good shape for the review. I am hoping, though, that this process will help me better understand how to

2917:

Well aren't you clever!!!. Yes, that sure seems to be the F555 - in the same place, too, in the first triptych. It's just a hazier version where the colors are a bit off. The version currently in the article is most like the museum's image. A cool thing is that they used the same intro picture!!

1647:

I added what I could find, which seems to indicate that most of the confiscated works were still life of flowers. It seems that there are about 45 paintings made in Paris that would fall into this category. I tried checking a few museums that provide provenance info to see if there might be a hint

1602:

I was curious so I went and looked at the reference for the bit further down in the article... the paintings that were taken were of flowers. For the moment I reworded the intro to say that the paintings were confiscated (which was true as well) and will work on updating the information in the body

8282:

that I feel truly sorry, not that I'm responsible for it - but how hard that must be for you to think people are ignoring your concern when it is totally the reverse. I felt hurt for you when you felt that you needed to explain your background and what you had to offer - that was NEVER in question.

8281:

That's why I think it's so unproductive for us to work together. The cavalry arrived, we circled, and efforts diverted to address your very valid concern. It must be so hard for you to not see when there is not only agreement but a significant rallying of effort to address what you bring up. For

8245:

Hi Carole, responding to your email here. I don't always check my wiki email and didn't find it until the next day - at that point wanted to let the dust settle. I'm a little confused in that you think I my comments were appreciated, which is not how I perceived it here, but thanks anyway. I'd like

8208:

As I contemplate the days events what comes up for me is most of your VvG work (which I gave you barnstars for) should be viewed by you as starts - as most of them are. My best advice to you now is please don't start anything new, but go back over your work and improve those articles as much as you

7952:

TK, definitely a "he" - that's why my temper sometimes gets the better of me, sorry ;) Carole, this is tricky stuff and I think that everyone gets it wrong from time to time. There are indeed some circumstances, particularly regarding the order of wording, where it is nigh on impossible to approach

7651:

The Four Corners region of the Colorado Plateau, which consists of southern Utah, northern Arizona, northwest New Mexico, and southwest Colorado, was the homeland of ancient Pueblo, or villager, people. By 1300 AD there had been a shift to the Rio Grande Valley of New Mexico and the Mogollon Rim in

7422:

Calm down, everyone. The refactoring didn't help but we'll live with it & CH knows for next time. It is too far down the road to rollback. Jiggling about with a sentence is one thing, Carole, but the wider point that TK is making is that these are just examples. The concern is that there may be

7356:

He knows that. Were you going to take a break so we can work on this. You likely saw that I changed the way we approach working this to suit your preference. We'll get there with calm heads - just give us a bit of time to work on it please! I was just about to make an edit when I got interupted

7166:

Either the wiki servers are slow where I live, or I'm having internet problems. Pages are loading very slowly at the moment. I will provide diffs; had hoped that Carole would read the policies and understand that verbatim copying, or changing only a few words constitutes copyvio, but will spend the

6516:

WOW, LORD GOD (a spot of humor hopefully for you), surprised once again, Ceoil since my perception is that this all grew out of a huge misunderstanding! I'm guessing that we see this situation very differently, just like politics, religion, etc. - I'll agree to disagree. Sure, ready to stick a fork

6238:

You're quite right; I was rude, overbearing and insensitive. I apologize. The review is there and it's similar to any FAC review I'd do. If it came to FAC as is, I'd oppose. At least you guys have a sense of the issues. I've done two difficult biographies and have had a 50 per cent success/failure

6179:

Listen, there's been something going on for awhile where reactions don't seem to be in synch with what I'm writing. Yesterday I had a feeling that there's something going on besides the "templates" or there wouldn't have been such a wild, ongoing misunderstanding and reaction. It seems clear that

6144:

Sure, it makes sense. The thing to remember is to know when to step away and how to pace yourself. The reason Ceoil and I think four months is that it will be a slow three or four months. We're not saying we'll be working non-stop for four months on a single article - that would be madness. We all

6113:

We'll see. I got calm and reflective this afternoon when I asked myself "what was that all about?" A calmness came over me that this was just a step on the path. I've been backing off time-wise and getting more active in my life - and I felt it was kind of like life bonking me on the head saying:

6098:

Well, whatever you think is best. You do have the knowledge and it will take me a while to get up to speed, so it'd be nice if you wanted to pick at it. I have to step away because I promised a copyedit to someone else for a Featured List and that will take me a few days. So I won't be back on this

6051:

I should have stuck to my word to think about it after an overnight's sleep - I was just so excited to feel like we were having the same conversation that I commited to getting back into VvG work. These kinds of conversations are difficult for everyone - and it might not seem so, but I know that

5941:

edit conflict: Modernist is right - and speaking of all of that, I have to cook dinner now, but will finish reviewing later. Glad we cleared that up! Post edit conflict: Honestly I haven't totally looked over the family stuff you posted because I'm still in trying-to-get-through-the-page-mode. But

5795:

Carole, firstly Modernist is right about the FAC process. I just re-read the section in the sandbox that I've blanked to see what happened. I was hungry, I had a lot coming at me at once, I wanted to get the sandbox page up, and when you asked if you could start I meant "sure, but we won't be using

5654:

the sad fact is that I collected and read all those sources. As for getting started - I need a break & won't finish reading the page until later, so go ahead. A warning though, a page like this will go through many changes before we decided it's good enough, so content added often gets deleted

4865:

I am not sure, either. I'm guessing the conversation thread may just have been confusing to track - it got kind of long. For the moment, I'm moving ahead with using bibliographies for longer articles and continuing to use the templates. Two articles I'm working on right now will probably need to

4738:

By the way, the two examples are in the current version of the article. Wallace is Sitush's example, Mancoff has does not cross-link to the bibliography. And, by saying I hoped someday someone might want to dig deeper into one or more paintings, I didn't mean you, but another newcomer like me who

4444:

I definitely see the issue where there are long articles with lots of inline citations - and using a bibliography and short inline ref will clear up those situations significantly. I recognize that if there's an entire community that does not use the templates coming into an article (especially a

4122:

Me, too! I have been asking my cat (who keeps coming to visit and get loving) to refill my ice-water. No go, unfortunately - not in her job description. And, I hear my clothes in the dryer calling my name. I want Woody Allen's world (Sleeper?) where a robot will come and take care of things for

3816:

In regard to the Silverman quote, it's the fact that it is repeated that causes the problem. Some Wikipedians would fault you on redundancy - so we need to avoid that. Your suggestions about how to resolve the problem seem fine. The only danger is that someone, sooner or later, is likely to suggest

3390:

One of the jobs of a GA reviewer is to examine whether the facts presented in the article are properly referenced. You have certainly provided far more refs than most editors but there is just one, for me important, aspect of his painting which does not seem to be covered by the reference given. It

3323:

The article is certainly a good candidate for GA. I think you have covered all the essentials. It might be useful to be more consistent in maintaing a single format throughout (use of galleries, etc.). Maybe it would also be an idea to explain the general context in a bit more detail and also add a

2945:

Hi Carole. As you seem to becoming something of a specialist in describing Van Gogh's paintings, I though I would bring to your attention the conventions for capitalizing Dutch names with "van". I had trouble sorting out things myself so I certainly understand the usage you have chosen. The article

798:

Ghmyrtle, thank you for your comments! I really do appreciate it, and really did get the impression from the feedback on the DYK page that I was doing a very poor job writing articles. I now realize it's much more about polish and style (like info from MOS) as well as the learnings I mentioned to

719:

Dahn, thank you for all the effort you provided. I do understand that you are busy with other efforts and that it is absolutely a requirement to have articles reviewed before they are posted as DYK. I admire the intention to put out quality work. You absolutely gave me a number of tips that will

542:

Ghmyrtle, Time gives the opportunity for a bit more reflection. It's my job to facilitate fixing problems and my success is due nearly entirely with communication style - and I cannot imagine a circumstance where I would tell someone who has spent hours taking my feedback and making corrections a

484:

Hi Carole. Can I just make a general point? It seems to me that you are doing fantastically well for someone who is a new(ish) editor - in fact, you're doing so well that some other editors are almost thinking that you are as experienced as they are, and so are judging your contributions on those

235:

Not at all!!!! I've been typing my way around here for a bit, but haven't quite felt the work was as polished as it could be. But, I wasn't exactly sure what was needed. So, I've gotten a lot of guidance since the DYK, which I value as much as your kind nomination! In addition, your faith in me

8466:

I'm not sure that you understand that my relationship with Sitush is that he's more of a mentor to me - something I believe he's tried to explain as well - and that he has a strong goal, like you do to make Knowledge be the best that it can be. Nor, do I think you realize the number of times he's

8432:

It's such a shame that you continually assume that we have different goals and that I don't want good end products or am in opposition to the higher guidelines and strategy of Knowledge. I now know I shouldn't, but in the past I took it as a personal slam everytime you make a comment like that.

7685:

First the "great fire" swept through Denver's business district on April 19, 1863 and did serious damage to his Denver store. Then a fire in Central City destroyed the Wisebart store, hitting the owners with a $ 50,000 loss. Within a year, the Jacobs family moved to Denver where Abraham also owned

7662:

The ancestral Puebloan homeland was centered in the Four Corners region of the Colorado Plateau-- southern Utah, northern Arizona, northwest New Mexico, and a lesser section of Colorado-- where their occupation lasted until 1280 or so. By 1300 AD the population centers had shifted south to the Rio

7327:

I have just worked out the refactoring non-issue. It confused me at first. I now see that you have left TK's original message above. As far as this second "slice"goes, which you have number as "2", the only obvious issue is using the exact same words "to study theology at the UofL". This is pretty

6881:

cropped up on my watchlist today, and my gut reaction was I really want to work on the bio. Our friendship started well, then became a disaster, and likely we will always put each other at the far end of a untrusted stick. But we have have the same interests, and a shared goal, so its pragmatic to

6432:

How about if we just try and respect one another, and don't respond to messages if there isn't time to really understand what is being said. Rather than assuming the worst, for instance, can you just state the request\direction rather than assuming I'm going to fight about it (e.g., let's not use

6365:

I really hope so, and if you would take me at face value, as somebody who said something stupid, instantly regretted it, felt bad and appologised, then saw reams of text and lost his patience, that would mean a lot. TK mentioned earlier that I have a short fuse, and its true. I'm often a crank old

6216:

If instead I was told - hey, Carole we'd like to have your help on VvG article, but a couple of things to discuss are: 1) we aren't using Google Book references (here's the link with more information) and 2) we're not using templates for citations in this article, as you'll see if you go into edit

2333:

Sounds good. By the way, everything should be referenced in the article. It just may be that the reference covers several sentences. For instance, "something funny" was on the VGM reference on a space below the painting and description (as I added to the post-script for the VGM ref). Thanks so

667:

Carole, here's my final attempt at explaining something you keep misrepresenting: what I have said is exactly what you keep hearing from other users and liking it, namely that the article's DYK problems had been fixed, which is frankly all of what I could be expected to address in detail. My exact

511:

Ghmyrtle, thank you for your very thoughtful comments! I truly appreciate it! I think we all have different styles. I think I learned a lot from the recent exchanges and I'll absolutely take the learnings with me. And, I choose for my own piece of mind to let the portions of conversations with

329:

Carole, relax. My comments were about the article in the long-run, how it should eventually look. As I noted, it passes DYK requirements, so that base is covered. For the rest, it's a follow-through issue that may help you in that article and future ones. If you want, I'm willing to clarify all my

7922:

TK, I think that sounds like a great idea - let me work with this with Sitush for awhile. I've got to now figure out where edits were made to what I put in there. I don't remember reading in the policy anything about order -- I think it's working through examples that really helps me the most -

7673:

On April 19, 1863 a fire swept through their Denver store, causing significant damage. The Wisebart Central City store also succumbed to fire with $ 50,000 in damages. The Jacobs then moved to Denver and Abraham Jacobs ran his O.K. Clothing store on Larimer Street until it went out of business in

6555:

prefer not to, because they frustrate me. I'd rather have hardback volumes without disappearing pages. The comment about the refs was a throw-away aside (I've explained and apologized for this multiple times), without realizing it was any kind of an issue. And honestly, it should not be an issue.

5758:

Thanks, Ceoil. I'm not looking to get involved in several months work for VvG articles (you may or may not remember that I posted something several weeks or maybe a month ago about dialing down on VvG) - but I was . I'm hurt and I'm reading between the lines that I stepped on toes by diving in.

5595:

For featured articles, and particularly a biography such as this, it's better to use books instead of gbooks. Gbooks are fine for searches and for verification but the problem is that the pages disappear, page views are limited, and page views differ by region. Since we have an international crew

4390:

3) Don't use the cite web, journal or book templates. The templates (which are provided by WP) make it very easy to format the information, especially when additional bits of information need to be added. I read, too, that it doesn't matter what method is chosen, just as long as it's consistent

4382:

1) Use a bibliography when there are several references for the same book or journal source. I think the key point is that for articles with a number of total references or even in a shorter article if there are just a few sources but used many times, it's best to use a bibliography. That makes

4364:

Ceoil's advise should be heeded because he is a veteran at writing some of the best articles on wikipedia in the visual arts and he is trying to simplify and clarify for Carole the best way to reference so that editing those sections that she references are easier to navigate. Spelling is not his

2198:

I think as of now this looks better than many Knowledge articles, so I am not sure what else you would want to add. You just need to decide on a DYK fact with a good reference today and then we can set it up for July 29. That way, eventually July 29 will become a national holiday in the Benelux -

8451:

I've never said that you shouldn't be scrubbing the VvG articles. I said Sitush is involved - in other words he's your friend - and sometimes it's good to have another set of eyes look at things. That's what I meant. I also didn't say you were ignoring me. I haven't been following your edits so

8287:

No, I didn't see your comment on Modernist's page - nor will I. I really don't have anything more to say, TK, because there's some sort of personal issue with me and it's very clear that our ongoing communication is not productive or profitable. I put this in email because I didn't want people

8130:

TK, I'm not upset, I'm done. You don't like that it reallly helps me to work through examples, you don't seem to like that I've said I've been reading the info but not getting it, and it seems you want to circumvent someone who's trying to help me understand, and you don't seem to like that I'm

7872:

is an issue. The thing to do is to read the policies I posted above and to follow the advice I gave earlier - either delete, rephrase (very difficult), attribute and add quotation marks. The policy of copyvio is particularly helpful. Do you still have it? I'm having difficulty following the many

6691:

I made the changes to the article - good catches! I've only done one other GA article and I don't remember the process for updates/review, but I put comments regarding the updates to the article in the talk page. Please let me know when you have a chance if I have further tweaking I need to do

6470:

For historical info about me, I've written manuals, communication materials that had to be run by 10 different deparments, then a communications department before the work could be published. Department D rewriting the edits Department A made to the original text -- then legal or communications

5027:

I totally agree that the article is deserving of FA status and the two of you definitely are worthy of the praise!!! Why would you include me, because the article links to articles that I wrote about VvG? (i.e., thanks for thinking of me, but I'm very cool with the two of you receiving your due

4850:

I'm not sure what has happened here. I'd hate to think that I have dissuaded others from contributing to this thread. Still a little bemused about developments elsewhere a couple of days ago, which briefly touched on this particular subject. However, I am always open to suggestions and debate. -

4539:

for the others is fine & does remove a lot of the weighty markup/template in the edit area. I do it all the time. However, that is not in itself the bib style, although it is a part of it. The Churchill article shows the bib style. It is, like most things, easy when you get the hang of it. -

3472:

Van Gogh employed the intense blue of the sky as a symbol of the divine and infinite presence, particularly in his masterpiece, Starry Night, as well as the olive tree, which symbolized the presence of Jesus Christ in the many paintings depicting groves of olive trees from his Saint-Remy period.

3395:

He began to use the color blue to represent the divine. In both The Starry Night and MoMA's Olive Trees in a Mountainous Landscape, Van Gogh used the intense blue of the sky to symbolize the "divine and infinite presence" of Jesus. Seeking a "modern artistic language" to represent the divine, he

3256:

Sounds great, thanks! If you don't mind parking them at the "Discussion" tab, that would be great! I will say that I think that the oil paintings are well represented in rows in the List of Works, it's just whether the images may be better or not than something already out there, or for a spot

512:

rude, general, unsubstantiated comments go by the wayside and have a bit of a chuckle. I won't forget that the passionate editors have a lot to teach me. I just have enough difficult things in my life right now that I'd like to stop "hitting my head" against the wall, if you know what I mean.--

427:

Carole, I'm sorry you're reacting like this. Let me clarify a couple of things in my perspective: a) the comments I made at T:TDYK were addressing the point in question, that is DYK submission, and I gave it a positive review after you addressed those concerns; b) I believe did make constructive

362:

Just a note here on my quick lunch break now that I'm back to work. Rather than starting yet another thread (DYK, my user page, your user page) about the same topic, let's just call it a day on this topic. It's now gotten to the point of being funny. Without having anything more definitive or

8420:

I'm confused myself. I didn't realize that you needed a response from me about working on the VvG articles I wrote. You didn't want Sitush and I to work on them. As mentioned on Moonriddengirl's page, since that was an issue with you, we started with non-VvG issues. I never said that working

7451:

Quite honestly, yes, it does have to be this hard. I tried to fix an article earlier and you reverted the edits, but these issues are a pet peeve for me, and considering the prominence of the artist and the number of readers to the page, very worrying. I will make a few edits to show you how it

7106:

I'm a little confused about what you mean about "friendly manner" (or more to the point unfriendly manner). If I understand you correctly, you're asking me to go and rewrite about 40 articles. I'm just trying to get clarity on what the issue is - and what the problem is. I read the info, but

7014:

I will keep watch for edits made to VvG articles I've written to see if I can carry over some of the edits to other VvG articles I've written (like those from Khazar on Flowering Orchards). And, if you have some questions I might be able to help out with, I'll do what I can. Great work you're

6774:

No, go for it. What ever makes you feel good. Honestly, I cannot do artistic stuff for toffee & cannot sketch a straight line with a ruler. As for looking at it, well, I guess I sort of know what I like but please don't expect me to explain why I like it ... or even ask what it is! Artistic

6471:

making tons of changes that then had to be run back through all 10 departments again. Then, it goes to the client who makes changes - you guessed it - that all had to be run by all 10 departments, legal and finally communications for final polish. This takes months -- just the review process.--

4429:

Do what you want, Carole, as long as it complies with the guidelines. You can achieved Featured Article status if you follow them, so which ever if most comfortable for you is ok. Sorry, but I didn't see any irony in the original comment. I'm English, not American, and so I usually do recognise

3969:

A very funny summary of how one might go from Outriggr to Riggr Mortis - and an enjoyable one at that! No, worries I didn't make a connection to the heavy metal band... I just figured you were either slowing down in life - or just wanted a funny handle. And, it seems it's not really either of

753:

It's the verbiage also direct quotes that I felt were not definitive or constructive "and the fixes still needed are too in-depth for now" (DYK page), "laborious", "counter-intuitive", and "needlessly complicated" (these above in this section of this page). Is it possible that I overreacted? I

628:

to see if the points you make have been addressed before! Obviously, editors here come from all sorts of backgrounds - and you may need to bear in mind that some use their involvement here as way of expressing or overcoming their frustrations over their real world life, sometimes because, in a

7907:

Carole, I'm saying this one more time, and then logging out of Knowledge. It's very important to take this slowly and to familiarize yourself with the policies. I've taken a single example from only a few articles (2 examples for one article). This is called spot-checking. In other words, each

4992:, too. And, I've recieved input from Ipigott and Panderoona that I've started implementing - and already implemented your comments. I wasn't sure if they'd find it ok to look at a work-in-progress effort, but then it seems to make most sense to ask know before I spend too much time on them.-- 4394:

Using a bibliography and short in-line references will organize the source information and eliminate the need to use templates in the article. So, for the longer articles, this will have a significant change in how the inline references look in edit mode. I must say that I find the cite web,

2959:

but would like to give you the chance to respond before making similar changes to the other articles you have written on Van Gogh. And by the way, I was wondering if you would be interested in aiming for GA (good article) status for the Langlois Bridge at Arles. I think you are almost there. -

1083:

van Gogh did 15 paintings about Olive trees, the topic for the next painting from NGA that I wanted to work on. I'm also wondering if it might make sense to write one article about Olive Tree/Orchard, have a gallery of the paintings, and then right about the subject as a whole. What are your

265:

for what is intended. I wanted to correct that myself, but the format you used is quite laborious, but you may consider having a second look - when you're okay with that, of course, and provided you agree. The citation format, I have to say, looks a bit counter-intuitive to me (it's needlessly

7736:

which we avoid because of copyvio issues. What specifically didn't you understand in the links I posted above? I am more than happy to clarify. The choices are to delete, to reword in such a way to avoid a close paraphrase (often exceedingly difficult), or to add attribution to the author and

7182:

what you've said, it seems like you're stumbling upon them as you're working on the biography. So, if when you're working on the VvG biography you stumble upon them you'd give me some examples, then hopefully that won't be too much work for you - and we'll get some examples I can work with.--

6952:

Found one place: Wheat Fields (Van Gogh series)#Nuenen and Paris, 3rd paragraph. But know that I read it about the undergrowth paintings, too - and when discussions of the types of books that he read. (Was one of Whitman's books in the stack of novels in one of his paintings, hmmmm. I don't

6366:

bastard, though I tend to cool quickly. You took a hit on that, for sure, and undeservedly, totally. Thats it. It was not intended to devalue all the work you have done as a volunteer for our project. We all in this together, were on the same side, and we have obviously shared taste. Friends?

443:

I asked you to at least have a look over it before, or as we engage in this conversation. I did not mean to seem pedantic or arrogant, but there really are no other ways to improve one's editing style - my own writing improved as the MOS evolved (given that I was here already as it was being

5980:

with: 1) comments about what needed to be worked, 2) original text (to make it easier to find where to paste new text) and new text. It sounds like this approach (working the Vincent and family movement items in a sandbox) works, so I'll move ahead tomorrow. I'm not making a several month

7133:

If someone is going to be accused of close paraphrasing/copyvios then it does make sense to provide some diffs. Making a CCI report is not obligatory when you find an example of such practices. Your wording, TK, does sound a little threatening here, although I doubt that was the intent. In

564:

For those that aren't it does make it a diffcult experience and something that isn't constructive is never helpful. Would it be helpful if I wrote a short article on how to give criticism in a way that: 1) helps the person understand what needs to be done 2) without feeling slammed in the

444:

created). I actually think you're already a good editor, but your style just happens not to be entirely compatible with the guidelines. Yet. And, in fact, I was actually quite glad to see somebody writing about Symbolist painting, which is both a favorite of mine and one of the subjects of

6497:. Really, you just confirmed what I was worried about, beautifully actually, so we'll let it at that. Anything beyond this would be circular game playing, and I've no interest, should have gone with my gut instinct from the start. Archive this sorry mess please, I have other things to do. 314:

I am quite sure that all you're wanting is the production of the best possible articles, and that's why I feel like I have a lot to learn from you. Your help in keeping me from getting too discouraged would be very much appreciated. I have other writing to do, but I have liked it here at

6221:

was that there was a lot more going on underneath the surface and that I wasn't really a desired team member. That's just not a dynamic I'm happy to be part of - I'm looking to increase joy in my life. These are rhetorical questions and I don't need an answer back - just trying to be

8272::Hi TK. Again, I'm not sure what I can do to help. If you cannot see that it was taken very seriously: 1) I stopped the work I was doing on another article, 2) Was working on addressing the examples to learn specifically what was wrong and what I needed to do to fix it, 3) Created a 6748:

artwork crush). I think I'm going to start on some of my mandelas, which are a meditative, spiritual practice for me. (I know you're saying right now, "she's not catching the humor and taking me at my word again", but it just triggered a decision I came to today that's fun to share.--

451:

I don't have the power to impose anything on you, nor do I imagine I could have that power, and we're all equals here. But it doesn't help if you ask for clarifications and then get upset when you read them. And please, if you reply to this message, at least notify me on my talk page.

7134:

particular, the procedure for dealing with copyvios etc includes attempting to rescue the situation where possible. Are you saying that in these instances it is not possible? In the context that you use it, "scrubbed" has two meanings over here in the UK: "clean up" or "delete". -

3423:

The "External Links" is under a grouping of "Resources" which I've seen before and seems to make sense to me from that context. I'll pick up with the rest of the suggestions and if you still disagree about the External Links, it's fine with me to change it, I'm just giving you my

4022:, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 7499:

Theodorus van Gogh was a man of prepossessing appearance (“the handsome dominie” he was called by some), with a loving nature and fine spiritual qualities; but he was not a gifted preacher ... But in his small circle he was warmly loved and respected, and his children idolized

7988:

She did. It was a particularly awkward situation, though. It may even have been an alphabetised list of some sort, but I honestly cannot recall the detail and am not about to go hunting for it. Generally, you and I agree on the method etc. We are in a very small minority. -

7167:

time making spotchecks & giving specific examples. Scrubbed = clean up. Though CCI often deletes. Depends on the severity & honestly I haven't looked that carefully. This will take time & can't be done until the slow internet connection/ server issue is resolved.

261:, the lead section does not contain citations, because it summarizes facts that are supposed to be cited, and discussed more in-depth, in the article itself. This also means that the lead should preferable not contain info that is not discussed and cited in the article. See 6271:? No your weren't, you were helpful, constructive and insightful, and you brough some much needed experience and guidance. I apologied myself, but it had to become a bigger thing than that, and rooted in pride in other articles, which are unreviewed, and not the article we 5655:

or moved. I do that to my own stuff all the time. But I would like to see more details added at this point and then we can decide later where things belong and what to keep and what to dump. I'll be back soonish. Oh, before I leave, I'll be adding a link here about gbooks.

3636:

Excellent, thanks! Looks good! And tonight I finished putting in all the paintings I could find from the Commons, whew (the end of two months of work on the List of Works)!!! Chimino has been adding some that I wasn't able to find in the Commons. Things are sure coming

1801:

Very strange! I still don't have it. I tried sending myself a test email to see if it's a server issue, but it popped right in and I checked spam and the email didn't go there. To be safe, I'll go add your email address to my address book, which couldn't hurt. Sure try

7221:

Johannes van Gogh, who was a gold-wire drawer, a Bible teacher and a clerk in the Cloister Church at The Hague. His great-uncle Vincent, an accomplished sculptor who died a single man, left money to the family which allowed Vincent to study theology at the University of

6021:

Yeah, just found it. Multitasking as usual. It looks good and I've added to my watch. Really have to get into the kitchen now, and then will be back at finishing reading the article tonight. Tomorrow will be less busy for me - unfortunately this was a very busy weekend.

5845:

OMG - I totally misunderstood! By "this page" I meant the main van Gogh article. You thought I was talking about the sandbox page. Who ever said communication in this manner is easy. And I didn't understand what you meant by execute. So, a misunderstanding all around.

5649:

Basically they're frowned on at FAC. Because only snippet views or selected pages are available, often content is taken out of context, so for a biography like this, it's better to use the actual books, though some gbooks can be added to the mix. If you have a look at

7525:

but he was nonetheless a devout man." I would have to look up "prepossessing" as I cannot for the life of me think of its precise meaning right now; however, as it appears to be a compliment then I can safely assure you that I, too, have a prepossessing appearance! -

3335:. I'm not suggesting you should cover all the sections and the amount of detail presented there but it might provide a few ideas. Let me know if you need further help. Once you are satisfied with the article, I'll start the review - if no one else gets there first! - 388:

If one of the other editors sees this, though, and would like to point out ways to improve, I continue to welcome that feedback! Thanks to those of you who may see this who have been incredibly helpful and constructive along the way!!! It's what has made this hobby

3607:

from those articles that you have identified as being about Van Gogh's early works. You might want to put it under a “See also” heading or add the Main Template as you have suggested. However you wish to handle it is fine by me, but the redirect was not appropriate.

4492:

blind woman who composed many hymns etc - I forget the title right now, but Fanny somebody IIRC - where the citation method has created a phenomenally long list of refs unnecessarily. As I recall, there were nearly 900 footnotes & many of them were redundant! -

4015:, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space. 6990:

tight enough that we can cover all the themes and series without weighing down the page is going to be tough and will need restraint, but as a team we can do it I'm sure. These are in my head at the moment so I'll help you in any way I can, if you are up for it.

3350:

No, I don't think you're being too demanding, I think you've made some very interesting and helpful points! I'll take a look at the article you mentioned and with your comments work on integrating them into the article. Thanks for taking the time to review the

2302:

Ok, let us try that. There were a couple of other items that could be added I thought after I started to look for the last ref and I will play with those later, but it is pretty much done, unless they all turn to be fakes, and that would make a good new article.

4310:

show me where it says that cite templates should not be used, whether on art pages or elsewhere. There are numerous citation styles and the primary requirement is that they are consistent within an article. To the best of my knowledge, all styles are ok except

2885:

Cool!!! I think the first, the Flowering Garden is F555, but the image I used seemed to me to look the closest to the museum's image. Do you think this is something in addition to F555? Love the other two you found!!! I'll hunt around to get the F#s and add

1662:

Yeah, it seems there might be an interesting story and 'bundles' of undiscovered van Gogh flower paintings out there......somewhere. I think it is definitely a compelling mystery; with interesting art historical potential. Carole you are stirring the pot; good

7629:

If you're going to take a direct quote (which makes sense), should it say "particularly admired a poem written by Walt Whitman about the beauty in a blade of grass" to be exact? That seems a no-brainer, I'll go make that fix. Thanks for catching it to begin

3584:

As a compromise, how about I 1) revert the articles and bring back the one sentence articles + 2) add the Main template to go to the Early Works page. If your concern was just about future redirects (i.e., I don't need to do the extra work) that's fine, too.

5577:

They are mostly books that I read on books.google.com. Two things: 1) If I start with Vincent's and his family's movements, most of my information would come from Wallace, The World of Vincent van Gogh, which I have on hand (and have several others on hand,

7493:

Theodorus van Gogh was a handsome man with a loving nature and spiritually devout. He was not a great speaker and throughout his career he was placed only in small villages, but was cared for and respected by the communities he served and "idolized" by his

5614:

I put a note on the talk page of the sandbox, when you'd like me to help out, let me know. For the moment, it sounds like you're asking for time to collect your notes, etc. so I'll honor that an await a nod on this page or response on the talk page for the

7037:

Carole, there's not good way of doing this, so I'll just spit it out. As I've been trying to work my way through the main van Gogh biography, I've been linking into some of the subarticles, which you seem to have written. It's important to for you to read

8144:

I'm sorry that you're upset about reversion of edits - I can't remember a time I've done a complete reversion, but something obviously stung with you. I always put in a reason and I never re-edit edits that are accurate and clear.--21:53, 26 June 2011

3562:

Please stop redirecting articles about Van Gogh's paintings to your newly created article. Stub articles about notable subjects should be expanded, not redirected, and by consensus, every one of the paintings of a famous artist is individually notable.

8003:

Yes, alphabetized lists are different. Because so many sources exist on VvG, having a Knowledge page essentially mirror the material on the Van Gogh musuem is extremely problematic. This is a case where synthesis is not only desireable, but necessary.

4032:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the 5610:

Ah, so if I'm understanding: it's not the content that is unreliable, it's the pagination - and that a link provided to a page in the references wouldn't necessarily work for everyone. I can get access to books where needed to verify page numbers,

8362:

else could respond but myself, you're done working with me, I think you're saying you feel sorry for me, and that I and Ceoil cause drama. So let me try again before I decided to go to the library: do you mind if I work on the article you started?

7814:

Instead of separating my comments, in other words, editing them, leave as they were & respond in a separate edit. Otherwise it's impossible to see the original edit. I posted in a single edit which has now been separated into multiple pieces.

8131:

taking a stab at rewording items for you to look at when you're a little calmer. I've brought this issue up to the Visual Arts Wikiproject and will await a response, because I would like to get it resolved with someone who can keep a cool head.

6792:

I have a 6 inch brush and a very large can of white paint here. I need advice. And if it is watercolor then I am in trouble because it is intended for exterior display. On a house. That gets a pounding from the wind & rain & airborne sea

2078:

and I don't yet have a ref for the likely reason, the bridge was engineered by a Dutch engineer (read in Langlois Bridge article, but need a ref before I'll add it to this article). I may uncover more. Can we do the DYK after/on the weekend?--

4562:. It needs a special maintenance tag all of its own: the "long article" one doesn't do the situation justice! Several people, including myself, have mentioned the point to the (almost sole) contributor but s/he says that it will be sorted 3494:

His goal in the religious painting (of olive groves) at Saint-Remy was to develop a modern artistic language that would subtly suggest a numinous presence: hence his frequent painting of olive groves, often bathed in radiant golden light.

209: 700:

My comments - including the one about "frustrations" - were not aimed at you, personally, at all. Carole is a relatively new editor, and I was simply passing on some of my wider experience here. My apologies for any misunderstanding.

3951:. After that, it became an in-joke (or, I wanted it to be one). Since my current account signifies the limited degree to which I am a participant any more, "Riggr Mortis" seemed fitting... although I'd hate to be confused for a fan of 7079:

It was meant to be done in a friendly manner. If you'd like diffs, I'll can easily get them, but I don't know how productive that would be for you. The better thing to do would be to read the policies. Once I have diffs I can make a

6335:

It never had to be this way, indeed I apologised last night, an apology now deleted I notice. If you could let it go, it being a non issue, as far as we, who have aoplogied enough are concerned. It was a small thing, can we move on?

6406:

I'm kind of confused by what your saying and how it's relevant to this situation, but sure fair enough. Rather than prolonging this, I hear your spirit of cooperation and pulling me into that spirit of cooperation, which I greatly

3817:

that the two articles should be merged into one. Another problem (for me) is that the languages in the other articles about the Langlis Bridge all have quite a lot to say about the VG painting(s). But let's just see how it goes.

2918:

And, have identified the components of the second triptych (which I wasn't able to do except that it included the pear tree). Do you think I can create the second triptych in our article based upon what's in the French article?

2168:

I'm going to be around the rest of the day afterall and have completed the draft of the article. Thankfully Modernist went through and caught some edits. That said, if you'd like to talk about the article today, let me know.

8429:. I said I'm done with VvG because there seems to be such a huge communication issue between the two of us and with Ceoil - and have removed my VvG articles from my watchlist. Whatever you'd like to do there is fine with me. 6882:

put it aside, roll up our sleeves and work together. No way would I approach the article if you were not there, that would just be wrong. I'll give it a try if you will. This not an apology or explanation, its a path forward.

5234:

Here are the sources I primarily use: For the information about Vincent or his families movement, I'd use Wallace, "The World of Vincent van Gogh". And I have three books from the library and another three to pick up today.

4989: 4350:

God, I didn't mean to be commanding, it was just advice! The wording was deliberatly ironic and friendly. To be met with bulletted 'show mes' is ug, not the way I work. And I wasnt even talking to you. O whatever, forget it.

5912:

Ok, sounds good. Do you mind oking the use of the sandbox page, too TK for the family movement items: 1) that you're ok with the items I said I could help with and 2) that you're ok with using the sandbox? Then I'll start

4094:

I just wish that I had a bot to do my housekeeping. Running out of clean plates here & I need to get out that peculiar thingy that sucks up dust etc. Mind, I'll have to clean the dust of it before it can be used. <g:

8250:

to set up for the main biography, but I'm sure you've seen my message on Modernist's page. If he prefers I stay away from VvG and if I'm perceived as creating unnecessary drama, then it's best I find something else to do.

7265:

Ok, I now see that part of this might be order, which is a little tricky cause it's a chron order. Does it help to reword the titles of his vocation - and break them into three sentences (they were in two sentences in the

5977: 4805:

I would imagine that there is a art project, perhaps even a VG project. These projects set certain standards etc and it is often wise to follow those standards. However, it can backfire: one recent example I can recall was

8045:

Oh, my are you kidding? He's the only one that's really told me what's wrong. Can we please stop this - go take a break and let me make some headway? Or do you really prefer that I not succeed in trying to work through

7799:

I don't know what refactoring means, but I pasted your response in it's entirety, while keeping the breakdown for review (just like eating an elephant, it's helpful to do it a bite at a time - way too much to deal with at

7251:. I can see that this might be a problem. Do you have a solution for rewording that might not cause any copyright issues (so that I can better understand how to approach cases were info is extrapolated from a sentence)?-- 4053:

Nothing to be concerned about with the above msg, Carole. It is a housekeeping exercise. When you move a page, a redirect is created & this bot is just requesting deletion of the redirect. Keep up the good work. -

1550:(even if he didn't profit from the sales) - which paintings? - who bought them? - how many? - what happened to them? - did the buyers profit? - is the source accurate? so many unanswered questions. What do you think?.. 8421:

through the examples would solve the entire problem - I'm not sure what gave you that idea that anyone thought working through the examples would solve the whole situation - which you'd see if you noticed the work on

7107:

there's a lot there and I'm not sure 1) what specificially you think needs done and 2) where you see examples. I'm not in any way trying to force you to do anything - as I'm sure you're not intending to do with me.--

4386:

2) When using a bibliography, shorten the information for the in-line references. Yes, very good point! I'm guessing, then, that rather than having the link to individual pages, I put the link to the source on the

8273: 5165: 4785:

arts project and how people are guided. That's all!!! (Not all of us are have been able to benefit from the hard work to get the Cambridge degrees!!) You're amazing, some of us (me) are just trying to keep up.--

5218:

Just so we're all on the same page - what are you using for sources? I'm trying to determine what to order from through ILL. Also, so you know, I tend to do most of my work in sandboxes, so I'll be there mostly.

2446:

page, there is an uncited claim of the second version being a forgery. I was planning on expanding this article in the near future, but in the meantime was wondering if you've ever come across this claim in your

7837:

I didn't edit what you typed and pasted back in from history your response before I put it into sections. To help keep track, I numbered the items. If we could get Van Gogh squared away first, that would be

6076:

little crazy here sometimes and then calms down. One thing I have to say, this is the most beautiful page I've ever seen on this project. It's well worth getting the finest text we can to match Vincent's art.

3785:

Must be telepathy! Anyway, thank's for all your comments. You may not have started the articles but you've certainly contributed a great deal to both. Be careful not to add the same passages to both though. -

298:

to summarize points from the article (but maybe not what you'd consider key points??) and does not contain information not previously in the article. Maybe the articles will help me understand what is missing.

4242:

Hi, a suggestion or two on refeferences....if your using a book source as an inline more than once, put in the bib. or sources section, and trim down the actual inline to the author, year and page number, as

3084:

Uh, I think you've misunderstood the capitalization rule. The spelling is "Vincent van Gogh" or "Van Gogh"; the "v" is lower case if a portion of the name precedes it. I've reverted several changes you made.

2993:

I'll go along with the two of you on the capitalization of "van". Is there an automated edit in WP to change "van" to "Van"? If not, I can work on it as I go back and check each article which I listed on

7974:

good idea. If I easily found an example from every single article I looked and Carole herself admits to creating 40 articles, then the problem is widespread and needs to be dealt with. Or reported to CCI.

6591: 5455: 5200: 4191:

Hi Carole, I just saw that your article about Van Gogh's Olive Trees was promoted to GA Class. I think you are doing wonderful work here and are a great asset to Knowledge! Once again, congratulations!--

971:

May I weigh in? It's getting huge, and will only expand as more articles are written on his paintings. I wonder if the list of paintings on the template shouldn't be for major works (i.e. Tanguy) only?--

7379:

link that I provided and you deleted then it's impossible to understand the issues, particularly about order. But this has reached the point of splitting hairs, when the issue is really much bigger.

8018:

Sitush my impression is that you would forgive anything of Carloe, are biased, and not creditable. I'm not basing that openion on this conversation, revealing as it is, but its a general impression.

5060:

Hi Carole, thanks, I'm ok for now although you are always welcome to work there. However I do want your help especially when we nominate the article - which will be soon. I'm gonna send you a note...

3877:. Thanks everyone who has been following along on the developments. It's a good thing. It's just starting to hit critical mass and it's probably good to sort some things out for standards, etc.-- 2470:. In addition, two men are identified as being involved in forgeries or the sale of forgeries: collector Emile Schuffenecker and Otto Wacker. Good luck, I'll look forward to reading the article!-- 2063:

Ok, no problem. But if DYK has minor questions and I can not answer, you can probbaly answer in 10 minutes. What do you think will be a good DYK fact from this article? Needs a ref too, of course.

1390:

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Knowledge. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Knowledge contributors." I would like to invite you to

6624: 2220:

painting "something funny.. I will not create every day." While the climate was very different than his homeland, there was something about the setting for this painting that reminded him of the

4445:

long one) where they are used makes it difficult to sort through the info. Like I said, I'd like to go ahead using the templates for the cases where the info doesn't go into the bibliography.--

1841:

I just gone one of the attempts with the other email to which I replied. I also tried a test send. And so you now have several from me. Very weird, must have been some sort of server issue.--

7679: 4025: 754:

concede that I am a sensitive, especially when I'm trying hard to do a good job - and may have overreacted. Is it possible that you may have something to learn from this experience as well?--

6253:

Thank you for listening with openness, that helps. I am sure that you have to offer - and that you have a thorough approach, if that's not come across, I apologize, too. Much appreciated!--

6239:

rate depending on how you look at it. Both were in my discipline (literature) so I think it's best I leave the art articles to the art people. Sorry again. I'll let Ceoil and Modernist know.

2688:

I too was about to award you this barnstar but someone else got there first. Well done. Excellent work - and you've done so much is such a short time. Trying to emulate Van Gogh, no doubt! -

586:

If there's no response to this, I'll let it drop - but I'm happy to work on it, because I think it could make the experience here even better for others. And, in the meantime, I'll take the

6055:

I'm going to heed Modernist's advice for the moment and concentrate on some things I need to take care of. It sounds like you all will be working on this for awhile, so I may pop back in.--

5563:

Thanks. Have you been using these online, or do you have access? We need to determine the best scholarly sources that each of us has. Gbooks are great but not always reliable unfortunately.

3868: 125:

Thank you, that was nice of you! I've just recently started working on paintings and am just getting my feet wet, but LOVE working on van Gogh. Thanks so much for the nomination! And, if

6180:

no one was really reading what I was saying - but reacting and then giving me unfounded lectures. What girl (used loosely, I'm a grandmother, albeit a young one) wants that in her life?--

304:

3) I am not quite sure what you mean by the "citation method is counter-intuitive and needlessly complicated". If you mean using the cite web, cite book and cite journal templates (e.g.,

6541: 3418:

Great ideas for the intro!!! And, I kept running across the "blue" "divine" quotes yesterday so I'll work on correcting the ref. Thanks for your input!!! I think it's really coming along.

3026:

Yes, I would love to have a review for Good Article status!! It would help me better understand what would bring an article to higher status. Thanks for offering that as a suggestion!--

7864:

It's pointless to argue whether you edited or not; it's not the same as it was and examples I haven't added have been. So, whatever. In terms of whether it's an issue or not - I would

629:

sense, everyone (regardless of age, experience, background, knowledge, native language, etc.) is seen (at least initially) as equal here. That has both advantages and disadvantages!

7701: 4618:

It is not the way I would do it, but you are not far off. Would you like me to edit it to follow my scheme? You will be able to compare the diffs & revert if you want to do so. -

5454:

van Gogh&fp=1&dd1=0&dd2=0&vw=1&collID=0&OID=110000969&vT=1&hi=0&ov=0 "Flowering Orchard". Collection. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 2000-2011.

4965:

The timing of my intro of you to Moonriddengirl may, it seems, have been a little unfortunate. I think that she'll still assist & you should certainly have a word, but she does

4072:

Ok, thanks so much, Sitush! I was afraid when I realized that I accidentally started the article as a main page it might cross some wires somewhere. I hope all is well with you!--

682:

I suggest that if you take a long good second look at what happened and was said, you'll see just how much you're overreacting. Have a good day or whatever it is where you are at.

675:

That you "feel slammed" by my observations is really not my intention, my doing, nor, at this point in time, my concern. Since I don't want a process such as DYK reviewing to take

8482:

God why won't you help me? God yells back, "Lady would you just get in one of the boats?" (I'm a Buddhist, albiet a little tightly wound on occassion, but still like the story)--

7908:

article has to be looked at slowly and rewritten if necessary. Sitush is right in his/her answer above - using the order of the source constitutes close paraphrasing and copyvio.

6667: 8392:

Also I had wanted to offer help in the copyvio cleanup, but... Anyway, you should know the examples I gave were only spotchecks, so each article needs to be thoroughly checked.

4149:

Hi Carole I wanted to tell you about this book - Rosenblum, Robert (1975), Modern Painting and the Northern Romantic Tradition: Friedrich to Rothko, New York: Harper & Row,

2832: 1259: 836:

You might want to add something (anything) to your userpage. This will get the red out of your name in edit histories. It's your choice, but I recommend it. Happy editing.

3886: 1250: 6775:

ability is clearly not a genetic thing, given that one of my (recent) ancestors was Sydney ... you know my last name. And, dang!, he does not appear to have an article on WP!

3148:. Once it comes up, I would be happy to help with the review. You can also immediately see the criteria you need to follow and you may like to make some adjustments first. - 1719:

I did a search and sort and only came up with one, unless one of them went into spam. Do you mind resending the first one (or whatever one I didn't respond to)? Thanks!!--

6547:

Regarding your complaints about me and the specific topic of the thread on Sitush's page: I simply asked for sources which you linked. I said gbooks aren't reliable. I did

7005:

It's very good to know that you all are moving ahead with the featured article status for the biography! I'm not interested right now in working on the biography article.

5503:

Galbally, A (2008). A remarkable friendship: Vincent van Gogh and John Peter Russell. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Publishing. p. 145. ISBN 978-0-5228-5376--6.

3874: 3202:

Thanks for making that article; the original redirect from the List went to the Cairo painting, and I was told to make an article for it if I wanted it to link properly.--

1762:

Carole - I got your reply to my second email. Then I sent you a copy of the first one (that you didn't get twice) to the address of your email to me, shall I try again?...

5456:

http://www.metmuseum.org/works_of_art/collection_database/all/the_flowering_orchard_vincent_van_gogh/objectview.aspx?page=1&sort=6&sortdir=asc&keyword=Vincent

2112:

Yes, DYK check says: "Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 18 edits ago on April 28, 2011" Last edit was February in fact, so anytime by Monday should be fine.

1508:

Wonderful!!! Thanks! Nearly each one of these I had been looking for but didn't find! Great! I'm doing a little work on the Roulin Family and then I'll plug them in!--

907:

If I can help in any way, feel free to ask. I have friendly editors who monitor my talk page, and if I can't help, I am reasonably sure that one of them will step in.

4291:

Sorry. Carole will know what I mean, I think. She may even be aware of the famous telegraphic conversation between Victor Hugo and his publisher upon the publication of

2539: 1271: 1099:

Aww, thanks Carol, although I'm still pretty much a newbie myself. I think it's a great idea, similar to the articles on VG's self-portraits, or Monet's Water Lillies.--

7723: 1691:

I just saw one that got transferred to my yahoo account and responded to it. It seems I've seen email here, but I don't remember where. Sorry I missed the first one.--

1283:

added the initial lion share of the Vincent van Gogh articles that we have. You might leave him a note. He comes and goes, although I haven't seen him around lately...

236:

meant a lot to me - much more than having the DYK finally published or not. (But, getting it published as a DYK would be nice!) Thanks so much! You're very sweet! --

6654:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See 4521:

Outdenting.... Is there a MOS or VAMOS issue with using refname in a short ref for a bibliography to avoid having a lot of lines for the same page number reference?--

7245:(1) Text from source: Johannes was at first a gold-wire drawer like his father, but he later became a Bible teacher and a clerk in the Cloister Church at The Hague. 5942:

sounds as though you know what you're doing, so be bold and go ahead and start. We'll all work at different paces on different things and it will all come together.

2862: 8496:

I don't know if you'll find this helpful - it's likely something you already know, but I thought I'd put it out there in the event something here might be helpful:

5747:

Wont happen again. And seems well be working together a fair bit in coming months. Big challenge, but we have a good team. Looking forward to it, welcome on board.

5112:

Sure, I'd be happy to help. I couldn't quite follow the discussion in the first link, but the 2nd (sandbox) link appears to be a to-do list. I'm assuming for the

4966: 6434:

in the captions of images for "xxx" article, we're not using google books as references, whatever the case may be.) A pledge I am making, too. Would that work?--

3960: 1366:

Congratulations!! Until I get a featured article and am doing things in a more polished way, I am very must still trying to catch up to YOU! Take care! Carole--

266:

complicated), but you're of course entitled to dismiss that. Btw, the article as we stand has a "citation needed" tag that you may wish to address at some point.

2377: 2308: 2259: 2204: 2117: 2068: 2020: 1987: 1039:

For now, I'll hold off adding paintings to the template since I was just doing it in chunks and just part way through the template (just partway through 1882).--

5374:

Maurer, N (1999) . The Pursuit of Spiritual Wisdom: The Thought and Art of Vincent van Gogh and Paul Gauguin. Cranbury: Associated University Presses. pp. 200.

5199:

Sure. When you're ready, I would be happy to tackle, as a starting point, the movements of Vincent and his family (why, etc.) I think that's 4-5 items on the

4592:, specifically reference 1 and 8, that relate to the bibliography item for Wallace. Both 1 and 8 have two uses in the article. Does that look right? Thanks!-- 1262:. One thought might be there's too many images - but it's far less than the number of images in the List of works by Vincent van Gogh. Any ideas? Thanks!!!-- 6395:

as an eg. That was a rough one, and took a lot out of me at the time. That was were I was coming from, for about five minutes, two apolpgies ago! Fair enough?

5483: 5475:

Van Gogh, V and Leeuw, R (1997) . van Crimpen, H, Berends-Albert, M. ed. The Letters of Vincent van Gogh. London and other locations: Penquin Books. p. PP385.

4034: 3849:

I guess it must be telepathy! I made comments back at the thread you started on your article, since that's where I had the list of response items. Thanks!--

4942: 4935: 3989: 7551: 3933:

Thanks, Riggr! (funny name - I hope it hasn't set in so much it's hard for you to get about.) I went ahead and and did the redirecting. Thanks everyone!--

3507:

Thanks again for all your pointers! You've made a lot of great suggestions for a polished article and it's very much appreciated!!! How does it look now?--

2847: 1535: 952: 922: 6231: 4047: 8401: 8387: 8176: 7696:

Bent provided gifts to everyone in the village, which included horses, saddles and bridles; blankets and cloth; guns, kettles, beads and silver ornaments.

6108: 5682: 4487:

One issue which I hit quite often is needing to cite umpteen different pages from one source. The bib + shortened cite format certainly does assist there

8539: 8491: 8476: 8461: 8371: 8342: 8315: 7932: 7917: 7900: 7882: 7847: 7832: 7809: 7461: 7388: 7366: 7191: 7116: 7093: 7070: 6618: 6262: 6248: 6189: 6154: 6123: 6031: 5990: 5951: 5869: 5855: 5696: 5664: 5624: 5605: 5590: 5228: 3956: 868: 8520: 7417: 7301: 7275: 6701: 5922: 5055: 4748: 3979: 3964: 3737:. There also seem to be a number of books on the subject including the one from the Rijksmuseum (Sjraar van Heugten, Vincent van Gogh drawings, Vol 4 - 3516: 3378: 2463: 2178: 1405: 599: 6682: 2520:; after reading up on everything, the Orsay's scientific evidence is convincing, but I do believe others of the Auvers period were forged (such as the 2419: 2381: 2373: 2343: 2312: 2304: 2285: 2263: 2255: 2237: 2200: 2135: 2121: 2113: 2087: 2072: 2064: 2046: 2024: 2016: 2006: 1983: 1978:

Hi, good additions there. If you manage to expand 5 fold in the next 5 days (not hard given that there was little text there before), we can get it on

5805: 5177: 8232: 6976: 6962: 6947: 6855: 5884: 5107: 5083: 5069: 5037: 4953: 4923: 4404: 4230: 4180: 4008: 3994: 3923: 3713: 3692: 3646: 3308: 3286: 3272: 3063: 3049: 3035: 3013: 2930: 2912: 2895: 2666: 1966: 1936: 1864: 1850: 1828: 1771: 1757: 1742: 1728: 1714: 1700: 1672: 1657: 1626: 1612: 1589: 1575: 1517: 1421: 1292: 1048: 890: 311:

4) I guess I'm still not clear what is so wrong about the article that on the DYK page you said "and the fixes still needed are too in-depth for now"

8161: 4988:

No worries, through one of the links that RHaworth provided me I found the Welcoming Committee site and left a message and links with them on their

2975:

Firstly - I take responsibility for suggesting using the small 'v' Carole initially used the capital 'V' so if we decide to go with Van Gogh it was

2680: 2126:

Sounds good, I've got to run for the moment, but it's a fun article and whatever I don't finish tonight I will over the weekend. Thanks, History!--

638: 521: 494: 8554: 8013: 7998: 7983: 7351: 7176: 3858: 3836: 3795: 3776: 3617: 3594: 3551: 3433: 3360: 3226: 3173: 2800: 2572: 2551: 2533: 2512: 2497: 2479: 1385: 1242: 1108: 1066: 245: 152: 138: 8568: 8218: 8117: 8024: 7887:

That's ok, I just needed to make some headway. I'm done with my edits to the Van Gogh diffs now. The only Van Gogh one I am sure is an issue is

7869: 7534: 7446: 7432: 7337: 7315: 7143: 6833: 6819: 6810:

Whatever you take up artistically, don't stop doing your stuff here. Hopefully some photos for you from Abergavenny when my situation improves. -

6757: 6721: 5581:

Why would the information on books.google.com be unreliable, if it's an extract of verbiage from the book? It's the first time I've heard that.--

5128: 5001: 4875: 4860: 4837: 4823: 4762: 4733: 4687: 4641: 4627: 4601: 4549: 4501: 4454: 4439: 4132: 4105: 4081: 1686: 1375: 1353: 1335: 8102: 8055: 7024: 6915: 6904: 6655: 6526: 6480: 6443: 6401: 6386: 6372: 6360: 6342: 6281: 5753: 5742: 5388:

Ross, B (208). Venturing Upon Dizzy Heights: Lectures and Essays on Philosophy, Literature and the Arts. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. p. 55.

3948: 3504:

I have since changed the information in the reference to open up on the first of two pages cited (82) which was probably the source of confusion.

283:

Hello. Thanks for your feedback, I am trying not to get discouraged here, so I appreciate you're helping me understand what your comments mean.

4632:

Yes, please. Then I'll take a hand at making changes to that article (since it's current in progress) so Ceoil and Modernist can take a peak.--

3631: 3128: 3094: 2988: 1009: 808: 763: 461: 398: 339: 324: 166: 7707:

William's task as groom was to distribute gifts ... He gave horses, guns, kettles, silver ornaments, beads, cloth blankets, saddles and bridles

7081: 4374: 181: 8329: 7686:

the OK Clothing Store on Larimer Street. But in 1885, this store went out of business. In a final blow, one of Abraham and Frances' sons died.

6932: 5772: 668:

words: "The article is not exactly up to WP:MOS standards (for instance, see WP:LEAD on how the opening paragraph should relate to the text),

4063: 2638:

Thanks, Daniel!! And a continued thanks to Modernist who has greatly supported me, edited the articles and ensure that I've aligned with the

2503:

of the war (WWII and possibly WWI). It's a very interesting topic to explore, so I'll be definitely looking forward to see what you find!--

1224: 5395:

Zemel, C (1997). Van Gogh's Progress: Utopia, Modernity, and Late-Nineteenth-Century Art. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 225.

5287:

Shoham, S (2002). Art, crime, and madness: Gesualdo, Caravaggio, Genet, Van Gogh, Artaud. Brighton, England: Sussex Academic Press. p. 150.

4575: 3396:

sought a numinous quality in many of his olive tree paintings, such as by bathing olive trees, an emblem for Jesus, in "radiant gold light".

1209: 710: 691: 7375:

Sitush is making assumptions about me about things he thinks I've added that I haven't, because of the refactoring. If you don't read the

4357: 4343: 4278: 4267: 3542:

Great, thanks for your help getting there. I will absolutely apply the same concepts to the Langlois Bridge article and future articles!--

2651: 432:(read the guideline, please) - I can't be expected to spend my entire editing time pointing those things out bit by bit, particularly when 6996: 6503: 5203:. I added a few comments on the sandbox page, but I'll add more where I know I have info. Let me know when and I'd be happy to dig in.-- 4721: 4589: 2630: 2208: 1991: 7306:

There isn't an issue. But I am not sure that TK thought that there was. This is where the refactoring has made things a trifle tricky. -

4800:

Yep, now we're back at an earlier point. I put the smiley on the end because I know that a lot of you Yanks just do not understand irony.

3757: 1093: 5440:

van Gogh, V; Suh, H (2006). Vincent van Gogh: A Self-portrait in Art and Letters. New York: Black Dog and Leventhal Publishers. p. 271.

4244: 3192: 3157: 2969: 851: 6637: 6630: 4982: 4717:

of works (or smaller groupings) - so it would be nice to have it set up so that it's easy for someone to take the info and run with it.

1022:

I just got part way through 1882, there's a lot more I was going to move over. That's why I wondered if we wanted in in periods, like

3942: 2824: 2815:

however here are three that haven't been included in the List here, that I found along the way, although there are others out there...

2697: 7718:

Each of the Benson children was given a weekly allowance, allowing them to independently explore activities of an educational nature.

4200: 3947:(reply) Since you brought it up, I feel the need to explain! I had previous accounts with "riggr" in the name, such as my first one, 1057:

as well; my main concern was the template growing larger than/overshadowing the articles themselves. Anyway, keep up the good work.--

226: 119: 5423:

Hansen, Nichols, Sund, Knudsen, Bremen (2003). Van Gogh: Fields. Hatje Cantz Publishers for Toledo Museum of Art Exhibition. p. 13.

5301:

Strieter, T (1999). Nineteenth-century European Art: A Topical Dictionary. Westport: Greenwood Press. pp. 53—54. ISBN -313-29898-X.

3369:

Ipigott, I've made changes based upon your comments. Do you mind having a second look to see what you think now? Thanks so much!--

2456: 253:

Hello again. What I meant was that the article, which now reads very well, might have a couple of format issues. Having a look over

5346:

Fell, D (2005) . Van Gogh's Women: Vincent's Love Affairs and Journey Into Madness. New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers. p. 228.

5074:

Ok, sounds good. My VvG books came in - so I'm going to pick them up shortly and pick away at the Still Life paintings of Paris.--

3908: 3211: 2702: 1307:

Hi CArole, hope you're doing ok - it looks like it from your recent contributions. I'm just wondering whether you could drop by on

8069:

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE STOP and let me make some headway - and no personal attacks or I am totally done with this conversation!!!

6923:, TK was wondering if VvG was aware of Ralph Waldo Emerson's essay 'Nature' and his other work as well as Walt Whitman's poetry... 4678:

bibliography entry. You can use the authorlink field of the bib citation to link to a WP article on that author, if one exists. -

4314:

show me where it says that a bib should be used when a source is used more than once (I would agree if it is used frequently, eg:

3536: 3410: 3344: 1326:

Sure, I'd be happy to reach out. Hope you're doing well - I'll get back to history later, but having a lot of fun Van Gogh-ing.--

275: 7770: 5382: 4911: 1320: 1114: 6145:

have other priorities in our lives and stop in here when we have time. Anyway, whatever feels right for you is fine. Take care.

3572: 2369: 7793: 7746: 7055: 5458:

van Gogh&fp=1&dd1=0&dd2=0&vw=1&collID=0&OID=110000969&vT=1&hi=0&ov=0. Retrieved 2011-04-27.

3952: 3677: 3277:

Well, I figured that if I come across a few we might as well add them in. Ya do seem to be a curious kind of gal, by the way...

3250: 2538:

Wow, that's interesting! I heard today that "Still Life with Beer and Fruit" is considered a fake - conversation is posted at

2462:

Yes, I went to three books were I found discussion of forgeries of van Gogh's work and one of them discusses forgery of Gachet

1500: 107: 8167:

and obviously made a mistake, but I indicated that it had been fixed in my now refactored post. Anyway, I'll leave you to it.

8090: 7639: 7519: 7260: 5572: 143:

NP, you seem to have a natural talent for encyclopedic writing, keep up the good work! Cheers, from a fellow van Gogh lover,--

6603: 6560: 6085: 5822:

I'm not feeling criticized, I'm feeling totally and utterly unheard. I have no idea why this blew up the way it did! None!--

5549: 5315: 5263: 5212: 4794: 4530: 2770:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

1186:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

6329: 6315: 5484:

http://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/collections/works-in-focus/search/commentaire/commentaire_id/fritillaires-17256.html?no_cache=1

5164:

need fixing. I think the first thing we need to do is determine who has which sources and what to use. Also, we can use the

3144:

I suggest the best way for you to go about the good article process is to nominate it yourself using the procedure shown at

1811: 5525: 4904: 3725:

On looking more thoroughly at the article, I find I have some additional concerns. The first is in relation to the article

2560:), it's all purely speculation in the end. The VG Gallery website has some interesting articles regarding the fakes debate 1084:

thoughts Modernist or Chimino (or anyone else) on that? Thanks so much! It's great to be able to bounce ideas by you!! --

8202: 8165: 6064: 5839: 5409:

Lubin, A (1996) . Stranger on the Earth: A Psychological Biography of Vincent van Gogh.. New York: De Capo Press. p. 228.

5354: 5021: 3873:

For folks who have been watch the Vincent van Gogh articles and helping them move along, would you please take a look at:

980: 207:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

8260: 7569: 5899:

YEAH, we have connection!!! I thought that the short refs had something to do with a problem having refs on a talk page.

3720: 1559: 8445: 8297: 8108:

one to help. That's not at all true. But I'm thinking the best thing is to make a CCI report and let them deal with it.

7967: 1918: 6641: 4960: 4949: 3145: 2940: 445: 4252: 4206:

Hi Jeanne, It's nice to hear from you again - and especially with great news! Thank you! You are a great asset, too!

8716: 8660: 8081:) 21:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC) PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE STOP and let me make some headway. This is the last time I ask.-- 6888: 6091: 5465: 5444: 5427: 5413: 5378: 5364: 5350: 5336: 5277: 5243: 4153: 1962: 1130: 5417: 5403: 5012:

Carole in a few weeks or less Ceoil and I will nominate the VvG article for FA status and I'd like you to join us...

4165: 3730: 8644: 8639: 8634: 8622: 7574:

Van Gogh ... particularly admired a poem about the beauty in a blade of grass. He started painting grasses in Paris

6587: 5727: 5340: 2588: 1973: 81: 76: 71: 59: 8559:

Agreed. I'm moving this to archive. It's non-productive and there's obviously nothing here that is of benefit.--

7820: 7816: 7728:

Each of them had a toolbox and a weekly allowance, to be spent on "things of an educational or experimental nature

6559:

I did not intend to take charge or to lead the effort - I made a review. Typically before articles are brought to

2718: 257:

might help. What caught my eye in the Tanguy section is the lead section, and how it relates to the body of text.

8685: 3241:

without seeing whether or not you'd seen it; I'll run the next ones by you if I find some more orphaned images...

3040:

I think we need to change v to V ourselves, I will do as many as I can today and from here out we'll use the V...

89: 7342:

I did not add the piece Carole has labeled number 2. This is the reason I've asked for the refactoring to stop.

2921:

Swapped out the caravan image for the one in the list F445. Going to work on the road workers next. Thanks!!!--

8689: 7547: 7376: 7043: 5535: 5514: 5399: 5291: 4315: 3763:

That's funny! While you put this into my talk page I was answering in a fairly lengthy response on your page:

3741: 2806: 2437: 1078: 8377:

Actually nevermind. I'll return the books. I'm sure wikipedia doesn't really need a good van Gogh page anyway.

6590:

reaction. Time to move on and let it go. I'd suggest you and Modernist give this a shot. Feel free to use the

4272:

Hi please explain your indignation and bafflement with words rather than puncation. Was just friendly advice.

8247: 7757: 7487: 7215: 5461:

Garrett, M (2006). Provence: a cultural history. Oxford and other locations: Oxford University Press. p. 67.

4318:), but I think it actually can confuse people, and especially new contributors, if there are only 2 or 3 uses 3197: 7733: 7039: 5981:

commitment, nor do I want to get immersed, but I'd like to help out where I can to help in the short run.--

5239:

Silverman, D (2000). Van Gogh and Gauguin: The Search for Sacred Art. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

4828:

Yep, I thought you were joking. It's just the mother-hen in me comes out, too (even while I'm laughing).--

3318: 1391: 1300: 4810:, which took an absolute pasting when it was quoted at AfD with regard to one of the forked articles from 4379:

Good morning everyone, it seems like there's several things being suggested here, so if I may take a stab:

1580:

No rush Carole, I'd be interested in learning more about which paintings - or which works were involved...

6320:

There's one of us whose become very de-motivated to continue this work, I truly hope two don't go down.--

3891: 3332: 8417:

I haven't been ignoring you, I had some daily life issues to work on and haven't read this until now.

1474: 1456: 8601: 8328:

Whatever you think is right for you. Just to be clear, though, I intended to back away from Van Gogh (

6393: 3557: 2771: 2757: 2225: 1258:

For anyone that may see this. I'm wondering why images sometimes appear as a white box with an "x" in

1187: 1173: 915: 844: 38: 6575:

fairly frequently and know how to do a review - this was a way to save time rather than submitting to

6217:

mode. Wouldn't that have saved a lot of heartache? That might not be all the underlying issues, but

4038:

to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

1427: 1152: 1142: 200: 95: 4811: 4186: 3990: 3457:

I found the information about blue, divine, radiant color in the two pages of the reference provided:

1255:

First of all, thanks to all the editors that help me out along the way!!! It's greatly appreciated!

828: 7657: 5721:

Ever open your mouth and be dismayed at the words that come out? Happened to me tonight. Apologies.

5259:

Helvey, J (2009). Irises: Vincent van Gogh in the garden. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum. p. 50.

1344:

Thanks. Tea and biscuits, I think? Had a DYK at the weekend, so am catching up with you (slowly!) -

8564: 8516: 8487: 8472: 8441: 8338: 8293: 8228: 8086: 8078: 8051: 7928: 7896: 7843: 7805: 7766: 7635: 7515: 7442: 7413: 7362: 7297: 7271: 7256: 7187: 7112: 7066: 7020: 6958: 6943: 6900: 6851: 6829: 6753: 6697: 6678: 6614: 6522: 6476: 6439: 6382: 6356: 6325: 6311: 6258: 6227: 6185: 6119: 6060: 5986: 5918: 5865: 5835: 5827: 5738: 5692: 5620: 5586: 5208: 5079: 5051: 5033: 4997: 4919: 4871: 4833: 4790: 4744: 4729: 4637: 4597: 4526: 4450: 4400: 4223: 4216: 4176: 4128: 4077: 4019: 3975: 3919: 3882: 3854: 3772: 3688: 3642: 3590: 3547: 3512: 3429: 3374: 3356: 3304: 3268: 3222: 3169: 3124: 3059: 3031: 3009: 2956: 2926: 2891: 2796: 2744: 2730: 2647: 2617: 2547: 2508: 2484:

Thanks; I was aware of the Wacker scandal, but was surprised to hear a painting as high-profile as

2475: 2415: 2339: 2281: 2247: 2233: 2216: 2174: 2131: 2083: 2042: 2002: 1932: 1846: 1807: 1753: 1724: 1696: 1653: 1608: 1571: 1513: 1417: 1371: 1331: 1267: 1238: 1089: 1044: 948: 886: 804: 799:

Dahn. Sorry that you got pulled into this. Your comments did help a lot, though!!!! Thank you!--

759: 595: 517: 394: 320: 241: 134: 5596:

here, there's no guarantee what you can see is seen by others. In that sense, they're unreliable.

5524:

Nordenfalk, C (1953). The Life and Work of Van Gogh. New York: Philosophical Library. p. 191—192.

5325:

Leaf, A; Lebain, F (2001). Van Gogh's Table: At the Auberge Ravoux. New York: Artisan. pp. 11—12.

8535: 8457: 8426: 8397: 8383: 8367: 8311: 8256: 8172: 8113: 8009: 7979: 7913: 7878: 7828: 7789: 7742: 7667: 7645: 7457: 7384: 7347: 7172: 7089: 7051: 6599: 6583: 6244: 6150: 6104: 6081: 6027: 5947: 5851: 5801: 5678: 5660: 5601: 5568: 5224: 5173: 4196: 3658: 3232: 2872: 7586:'s poem about beauty to be found in a blade of grass, began painting swaying stalks of wheat in 7560:'s poem about beauty to be found in a blade of grass, began painting swaying stalks of wheat in 7510:

I don't see how this is an issue. Can you help me out? Is it that I put "idolized" in quotes?--

6895:

on Vincent's biography to make it a featured article. You and Modernist did great work on it!--

5273:

Edwards, C (1989). Van Gogh and God: A Creative Spiritual Quest. Chicago: Loyola Press. p. 112.

5119:

Check out TK's sandbox. Dig in if you can, I've been making some minor changes at VvG as well...

8610: 7780:

Carole, I spent two hours putting together the examples you requested and formatting them. Per

7751: 7239: 7227: 6824:

It seems you're always good for a laugh for me! I would love to see photos from Abergavenny!--

4969:. I'm really pleased for her but simultaneously would not wish that one on anybody. If anybody 3938: 3001: 2955:. You will see I made what I considered to be the necessary edits to your wonderful article on 2780: 2517: 2443: 103: 47: 17: 6537: 5830:) 22:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC) I don't mean to be disrespectful, I'm just really realy confused.-- 5531:

Meier-Graefe, J (2006) . Vincent van Gogh: A Biography. Kessinger Publishing, LLC. pp. 86–90.

5504: 5476: 5448: 5295: 5281: 5247: 5046:

I see there's a lot of activity on the article. If you'd like help in any way, let me know.--

3496: 2995: 2711: 1177: 1123: 8707: 8508:

Is there movement towards the goal (whether it's taking a path I envisioned or another path)?

6877: 6663: 6579:. I am also hurt that you and Sitush believe I've steamrolled you - that's not all my style. 6099:

until midweek at the earliest. Lots of little jobs to be done as well, if you're interested.

5553: 5539: 5518: 5510:

Barr, A (1966) . Vincent Van Gogh. New York: Arno Press for The Museum of Modern Art. p. 70.

5497: 5469: 5389: 5383:

http://books.google.com/books?id=wf_PoXKhggkC&pg=PA200&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false

5368: 5326: 5302: 5267: 3474: 3164:

identify and take a mediocre article to the next level. Thanks so much for the suggestion!--

2723: 2676: 2626: 1135: 909: 838: 308:), it's something that I learned from an editer than I respect here and the related articles. 5976:

Ok, sounds good. Here's the link to my sandbox if you'd like to check in from time to time

3683:

Thank you, what fun! Your support, guiding and input has been a big part of getting there!--

1881: 3745: 3604: 3180: 1308: 1301: 966: 859:

By the way you can add images to your user page - provided they are in the public domain...

625: 590:

in bites (like how you'd eat an elephant) because it's too much to absorb in one sitting.--

294:

tonight. In the meantime, I removed the citations in the intro, reread the article, which

2761: 8: 8214: 8198: 7954: 7775: 7711: 7604:

about beauty to be found in a blade of grass", began painting swaying stalks of wheat in

7032: 6972: 6928: 6843: 5880: 5768: 5124: 5103: 5065: 5017: 4900: 4887: 4370: 4161: 3904: 3673: 3627: 3282: 3246: 3045: 2984: 2908: 2820: 2662: 1914: 1860: 1824: 1767: 1738: 1710: 1682: 1668: 1622: 1585: 1555: 1496: 1401: 1288: 1005: 864: 830: 162: 6114:

Carole, stay true to your priorities - get back on the path. I hope that makes sense.--

1438: 8531: 8453: 8393: 8379: 8363: 8307: 8267: 8252: 8188: 8168: 8109: 8070: 8005: 7975: 7909: 7874: 7824: 7785: 7738: 7453: 7380: 7343: 7322: 7168: 7085: 7047: 6595: 6240: 6146: 6100: 6077: 6023: 5943: 5847: 5797: 5674: 5656: 5651: 5597: 5564: 5526:

http://books.google.com/books?id=5PjiAwxTTwgC&pg=PA191&dq#v=onepage&f=false

5220: 5169: 5007: 4929: 4807: 4237: 4192: 4012: 2876: 2767: 1532:

Vincent's paintings were sold in bundles at an incredibly low rate to pay off creditors

1183: 706: 634: 490: 305: 5670: 5355:

http://books.google.com/books?id=lqSjxGgvVMMC&pg=PA228#v=onepage&q&f=false

4893: 4011:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under the 1483: 8713: 8679: 8560: 8512: 8483: 8468: 8437: 8334: 8289: 8224: 8082: 8074: 8047: 7924: 7892: 7839: 7801: 7762: 7631: 7511: 7438: 7423:

more in the articles than have been picked up. Got to take my dog for his walkies. -

7409: 7358: 7293: 7267: 7252: 7183: 7108: 7062: 7016: 6954: 6939: 6896: 6871: 6847: 6825: 6749: 6693: 6674: 6610: 6518: 6495:

don't respond to messages if there isn't time to really understand what is being said

6472: 6435: 6378: 6352: 6321: 6307: 6254: 6223: 6181: 6115: 6069: 6056: 5982: 5914: 5861: 5831: 5823: 5734: 5688: 5616: 5582: 5546: 5532: 5511: 5462: 5441: 5424: 5410: 5396: 5375: 5361: 5347: 5333: 5312: 5288: 5274: 5260: 5240: 5204: 5092: 5075: 5047: 5029: 4993: 4915: 4867: 4829: 4786: 4740: 4725: 4633: 4593: 4522: 4446: 4396: 4172: 4156:; I highly recommend it - it's an interesting read especially the Van Gogh section... 4150: 4124: 4073: 4043: 3971: 3934: 3915: 3878: 3850: 3832: 3791: 3768: 3764: 3753: 3738: 3684: 3638: 3613: 3586: 3568: 3543: 3532: 3508: 3425: 3406: 3370: 3352: 3340: 3300: 3264: 3218: 3207: 3188: 3165: 3153: 3120: 3055: 3027: 3005: 2965: 2922: 2887: 2792: 2693: 2643: 2568: 2543: 2529: 2504: 2493: 2471: 2452: 2411: 2335: 2277: 2229: 2170: 2127: 2079: 2038: 1998: 1928: 1842: 1803: 1749: 1720: 1692: 1649: 1604: 1567: 1525: 1509: 1413: 1367: 1327: 1279:

Don't worry about the images; sometimes it's a glitch that fixes itself. This editor

1263: 1234: 1220: 1104: 1085: 1062: 1040: 976: 944: 882: 800: 755: 591: 513: 390: 316: 237: 222: 204: 148: 130: 115: 4391:

throughout. I'm wondering, though, if we can net-net where the three things get us:

1465: 213:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

8550: 7994: 7963: 7530: 7428: 7333: 7311: 7139: 6921: 6815: 6717: 6659: 5360:

Fell, D (1997) . The Impressionist Garden. London: Frances Lincoln Limited. p. 30.

5256:"VGM painting or topic articles". Permanent Collection. Van Gogh Museum. 2005-2011. 5113: 4978: 4856: 4819: 4758: 4683: 4623: 4571: 4545: 4497: 4435: 4339: 4263: 4101: 4059: 3706: 3699: 2952: 2738: 2672: 2622: 1955: 1948: 1942: 1876: 1543: 1349: 1316: 1280: 1202: 177: 7784:

can you please not refactor my comments, so it's easy to see what's what. Thanks.

1538:. The mythology is that Vincent only sold one painting in his sweet short life to 8097: 8019: 6991: 6910: 6883: 6498: 6396: 6367: 6337: 6276: 5748: 5722: 5716: 5332:

Fell, D (2001). Van Gogh's Gardens. United Kingdom: Simon & Schuster. p. 25.

5319: 4914:

article about milky film of wax, going through restoration. Very cool! Thanks!--

4352: 4273: 4247: 3726: 2467: 8609:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8193:

Review your VvG articles as well, at your own pace, and re-write what you can...

8096:

Its your problem not ours, and your now trying to shoot the messanger. In CAPS.

5545:

Art and history of Paris and Versailles. Florence: Casa Editrice Bonechi. 1996.

5418:

http://books.google.com/books?id=BHVwceHVI5cC&pg=PA228#v=onepage&f=false

5404:

http://books.google.com/books?id=n2gWfmFn0_QC&pg=PP225#v=onepage&f=false

439:

The MOS is subtle, complicated, and gets some time to get adjusted to, which is

129:

see this, thanks so much for your help shepharding me in the right direction! --

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8210: 8194: 6968: 6924: 6839: 6651: 5876: 5764: 5482:"Imperial Fritillaries in a Copper Vase". Works in Focus. Musee d'Orsay. 2006. 5341:

http://books.google.com/books?id=QssD77mFRkkC&pg=PA25#v=onepage&f=false

5120: 5099: 5061: 5013: 4896: 4366: 4157: 3900: 3669: 3623: 3278: 3242: 3090: 3041: 2980: 2904: 2816: 2754:

You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page

2658: 2561: 1910: 1856: 1820: 1763: 1734: 1706: 1678: 1664: 1618: 1581: 1551: 1492: 1397: 1284: 1170:

You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page

1001: 860: 687: 457: 335: 291: 271: 262: 158: 126: 8674:" See 'Ropes' and 'Something Funny' sections of the page for more information. 7209:

Examples. These are only spot-checks, a single example from only a few pages:

6712:

Seen the outcome. Woo-hoo! Good work. Now, if you can teach me to paint ... -

2558: 1165: 8240: 6572: 6564: 6493:

What I said was not exactly obtuse, Carole, and your reply is dissapointing.

5432: 2639: 1979: 1161: 997: 702: 630: 587: 486: 287: 254: 7601: 7583: 7557: 6626: 6576: 6568: 6351:

Yes. (Your apology wasn't deleted, it just got moved to the VvG archive.)--

6090:

What you express is similar to what drove me to long nights working on the

4559: 4144: 4039: 3897: 3828: 3787: 3749: 3609: 3564: 3528: 3402: 3336: 3203: 3184: 3149: 2961: 2689: 2564: 2525: 2489: 2448: 1216: 1100: 1058: 972: 218: 144: 111: 7781: 7046:. The issue needs to be addressed and all the articles scrubbed. Thanks. 5253:

Harrison, R, ed (2011). "Van Gogh letters". Van Gogh Letters. WebExhibits.

4334:

policy or guideline to assert your suggestions. Just my 2 c. No biggie. -

3970:

those, but a better background story. It's put a good smile on my face!--

3734: 217:

Ehh, seems this nomination may have been more trouble than it's worth :/--

8546: 7990: 7959: 7526: 7424: 7329: 7307: 7135: 6811: 6713: 4974: 4852: 4815: 4754: 4679: 4619: 4567: 4541: 4493: 4431: 4335: 4259: 4097: 4055: 3387:

display and the gallery presentations have also improved significantly.

2951:

also seem to be used pretty widely in English, as in the main article on

2947: 2841:, 1888, Van Gogh Museum - (I added this to the Flowering Orchard article) 2221: 1345: 1312: 1197: 301:

2) I don't know what you mean by "the format you used is quite laborious"

173: 8502:

What can I do to help someone understand the issue and what is required?

8306:

In that case, I'll step away from anything to do with Vincent van Gogh.

6967:

I remember that you mentioned Whitman too, but not sure where or when...

6536:

Hi Carole, I'm putting this here so all involved can read it. Regarding

5311:

Mancoff, D (2008). Van Gogh's Flowers. London: Frances Lincoln Limited.

5733:

Thanks for the note, Ceoil. Yes, I absolutely know how that feels!!--

8422: 7690: 3086: 1539: 1054: 683: 453: 331: 267: 99: 6838:

Congratulations on another GA. I responded to you on my talk page...

5496:

Crispino, E (2008). Van Gogh. Minneapolis: The Oliver Press. p. 20.

1997:

Great! I'll see what I can do (before I return to work tomorrow).--

1447: 624:

Good idea to write an essay - though you may want to take a look at

7084:, and honestly, I prefer not to go that route. But will if forced. 5490: 5489:"Factories at Clichy". Search Collections. Saint Louis Art Museum. 3325: 2276:

I think the quote the way that you revised it looks good! Thanks!--

1927:

Thank you! I absolutely would not have done as well without you!--

7891:- the first sentence. Do you mind helping me out with that out?-- 5089: 195: 5308:"Van Gogh paintings". Van Gogh Paintings. Van Gogh Gallery. 2011. 2979:

mistake. I think at this point we should change to capital 'V'...

2901: 2600: 1023: 8436:

What specifically do you need from me so that you can move on?--

7888: 7868:

be posting anything that's not an issue. Everything I posted in

6938:

if I mentioned Whitman in the article. I might search and see.--

3004:

has "van Gogh", should I do a move with the capitalized "Van"?--

2784: 98:, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the 6692:

and/or I didn't document the updates correctly. Thanks much!--

6646: 6095:

and Ceoili - and I'm sure that the biography will be stellar!

4210: 3869:

Vincent van Gogh works: Forum for changes / standards / etc.?

3744:). I also see there's quite a lot on the drawings (in French) 7605: 7587: 7561: 7452:

should be done, but then each page will have to be scrubbed.

6609:

Wow! I don't think it's helpful or healthy to say any more.--

1982:

and I will suggest it should go on there on 29 July. Cheers.

7674:

1885. The same year, one of Frances and Abrahams' sons died.

4956:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4233:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3716:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2735:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1969:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1890: 1147:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 7061:

That's a wide, sweeping statement. Do you have examples?--

1233:

Thank you, that's really nice! And a fun DYK sound bite!--

5505:

http://books.google.com/books?id=OXpgapo52p8C&pg=PA145

5477:

http://books.google.com/books?id=l4gbXITFl-gC&pg=PP385

5449:

http://books.google.com/books?id=VwcHLRuIzkAC&pg=PA271

5296:

http://books.google.com/books?id=E7F8eSRKBFMC&pg=PA150

5282:

http://books.google.com/books?id=fYA9QzwvsekC&pg=PA112

5248:

http://books.google.com/books?id=8c9jt9AToD0C&pg=PA326

2563:; I suppose in the end, we'll never know the full story.-- 1394:. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5554:

http://books.google.com/books?id=ucHxBnbIVtwC&pg=PA53

5540:

http://books.google.com/books?id=Jf9hjSaCqAoC&pg=PA86

5519:

http://books.google.com/books?id=fdCzDt666RMC&pg=PA70

5498:

http://books.google.com/books?id=G5gPqjJ9Ws4C&pg=PA20

5470:

http://books.google.com/books?id=4Ljkr1MkYVoC&pg=PA67

5390:

http://books.google.com/books?id=_HvvB-xrxxUC&pg=PA55

5369:

http://books.google.com/books?id=95ydh8dDth8C&pg=PA30

5327:

http://books.google.com/books?id=MBxJtWUz-CoC&pg=PA11

5303:

http://books.google.com/books?id=lDr7Tbk__1kC&pg=PA53

5268:

http://books.google.com/books?id=LUZ-dHerY3sC&pg=PA46

5094:

the challenge will be to greatly improve the writing and

4676:- my way means that click on footnote superscript --: --> 3875:

New section: Forum for standards, changes, prioritization

3331:

One of the articles about paintings to have GA status is

4910:

Thanks, that is interesting. I'll add something to the

4677:

footnote & click on linked name in footnote --: -->

3444:

Ok, I made the changes to the intro, great suggestions!

3183:

in the stack. I'll have a good look at that one now. -

7923:

which Sitush has graciously stepped in to help with.--

3896:

Hi Carole, sign up and join the visual arts project -

8330:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Visual arts#Van Gogh steam

2488:

could also have been forged. Appreciate the info...--

2199:

they just need an excuse if one gives them the idea.

1819:

LOL its getting funny - I sent you a third time :)...

5978:

User:CaroleHenson/Vincent van Gogh article workspace

2621:, an article on a key painting by a major artist. — 1905:

Excellent work Carole, on all articles related to -

988:

We might have to make a separate template - of just

4538:

for one occurrence and then <ref name=xyz /: -->

4720:Ceoil and Modernist, do you mind taking a look at 4558:The 800-odd citation article I mentioned above is 2752:"something funny ... I will not create every day"? 1536:Agostina Segatori Sitting in the Café du Tambourin 7761:with reverting back, though, I'll roll with it.-- 4722:Still life by Vincent van Gogh (Paris)#References 4590:Still life by Vincent van Gogh (Paris)#References 2466:OR if the full link doesn't work here's the book 7756:I was happy with where the edits got to for the 6052:you all were trying to get to a better place. 3263:about the watercolor painting a day or so ago?-- 2468:and the query was: "forgery OR forged "van Gogh" 8712:. United Kingdom: Simon & Schuster. p. 40. 6656:Talk:Langlois Bridge at Arles (Van Gogh series) 5116:article. Is that right? Should I just dig in? 4941:Hello, CaroleHenson. You have new messages at 4222:Hello, CaroleHenson. You have new messages at 3705:Hello, CaroleHenson. You have new messages at 3603:I suggest that you might want to add a link to 1954:Hello, CaroleHenson. You have new messages at 7600:Van Gogh, who "particularly admired a poem by 4430:irony. Still can't see it, for that matter. - 7732:I'm happy to explain why these are considere 6563:, they go through multiple stages of review: 5320:http://books.google.com/books?id=KRbgR7QtwvgC 4028:which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( 8164:. I had fixed the Wheat field page days ago 7889:#Review VVG1: Van Gogh's family in his art 1 2214:What do you think of: Van Gogh called the 1251:Images sometimes appear as a box with an "x" 943:Thanks, I will likely take you up on that!-- 8511:Is my interaction helping ensure success?-- 7953:things from another angle. In these cases, 2410:Thanks, History, that was nice of you!!!!-- 110:, where you can improve it if you see fit. 6638:Langlois Bridge at Arles (Van Gogh series) 6631:Langlois Bridge at Arles (Van Gogh series) 4018:If you can fix the redirect to point to a 1530:Hi Carole I'm wondering about this line - 8333:involved in VvG in any significant way.-- 7292:I'm not sure how there's an issue here.-- 2727:was updated with a fact from the article 2598: 1139:was updated with a fact from the article 8701: 8699: 7823:changes the original edit considerably. 2657:Congratulations, well deserved Carole... 1386:Invitation to take part in a pilot study 996:, along the lines of what was done with 157:Good job Carole. Keep doing your best... 8705: 6658:for things which need to be addressed. 6582:Clearly we've written more than enough 5168:to discuss whatever needs discussing. 4912:Trees and Undergrowth (Van Gogh series) 3668:Your first good article, nicely done... 106:. You can see the hook for the article 14: 8607:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6650:. The article is close to meeting the 1888: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 8696: 8499:What's my goal or desired end result? 6551:say you cannot use them. Personally, 5088:Carole your input will be invaluable 2246:I think the .... Van Gogh called his 2228:to offer it to an art-dealer there.-- 2015:Will you be off line after tomorrow? 1705:I sent them both to the same place... 8588: 7437:This doesn't have to be this hard!-- 4973:do it then she can ... but, geez. - 3664: 2854:The Caravans - Gypsy Camp near Arles 2706: 1617:G'night Carole. Really great work... 1118: 25: 7582:Van Gogh, who particularly enjoyed 7556:van Gogh, who particularly enjoyed 23: 8653: 7597:In the article on June 22, 12:31: 7579:In the article on June 22, 10:51: 6909:You have a lot to offer the page. 5763:you will do fine, hang in there... 4934: 4215: 3999: 3698: 3497:page 149, in second full paragraph 3146:Knowledge:Good article nominations 1947: 1548:bundles of his paintings were sold 1432:Hi Carole here's a few more kids: 24: 8734: 6269:rude, overbearing and insensitive 6092:List of works by Vincent van Gogh 8592: 8425:and my self-review and edits to 8246:to start working my way through 7399: 6645: 5491:http://www.slam.org/Collections/ 4667: 4295:. For your edification, however: 4035:the article's talk page directly 4023: 3663: 3237:Sorry about adding the image of 2861: 2846: 2831: 2710: 2703:DYK for Langlois Bridge at Arles 2599: 2334:much! It's fun getting a DYK!-- 1889: 1482: 1473: 1464: 1455: 1446: 1437: 1122: 194: 29: 7619:of wild sedges and oat grasses… 6377:Yes, friends. Thanks, Ceoil.-- 2557:(such as the Oslo self-portrait 1115:DYK for Portrait of Pére Tanguy 7548:Wheat Fields (Van Gogh series) 4316:Churchill Machine Tool Company 3579:the Manual of Style somewhere? 1160:was purchased by the sculptor 13: 1: 6846:) 03:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC) -- 6267:TK, if your out I'm out too. 4753:Yeah, blame me. Why not? :-) 4566:everything has been added. - 3475:page 82, first full paragraph 1260:User:CaroleHenson/Olive Trees 434:they are not relevant for DYK 205:Did You Know nominations page 8667:. Van Gogh Museum. 2005–2011 8248:Van Gogh's family in his art 7758:Van Gogh's family in his art 7488:Van Gogh's family in his art 7216:Van Gogh's family in his art 7040:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing 6673:Thanks, I'll check it out!-- 4739:has the interest to do so.-- 4171:Thanks, I'll check it out.-- 4013:criteria for speedy deletion 2615:For a bang-up job expanding 2524:I just added to the List).-- 1899:The Barnstar of High Culture 286:1) Intro: I will look over 7: 8684:: CS1 maint: date format ( 6920:Here's an interesting link 3721:More on the Langlois Bridge 3333:Bonaparte Crossing the Alps 3328:may be of some assistance. 3119:Yikes! Ok, thanks, Glrx!-- 2900:I found the first one here 2813:Gate in the Paris Ramp 1886 10: 8739: 4961:Starstruck with Moonridden 4866:be converted to Biblios.-- 4224:Anna Frodesiak's talk page 2996:User:CaroleHenson#Van_Gogh 2941:Capitalization of Van Gogh 2811:Hi Carole, I haven't seen 2787:) 12:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 2522:Blossoming Acacia Branches 2420:20:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2382:20:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2344:18:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2313:18:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2286:18:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2264:18:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2238:16:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2209:15:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 2179:16:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 2136:21:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 2122:20:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 2088:20:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 2073:20:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 2047:20:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 2025:20:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 2007:19:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1992:19:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1963:03:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1937:16:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC) 1919:16:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC) 1865:04:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1851:04:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1829:04:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1812:04:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1772:04:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1758:04:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1743:04:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1729:04:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1715:04:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1701:03:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1687:03:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 1673:21:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 1658:19:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 1627:05:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1613:05:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1590:05:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1576:05:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1560:05:07, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 1518:19:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1501:18:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1422:18:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1406:18:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 1376:16:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 1354:16:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 1336:15:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 1321:15:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 1293:16:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 1272:15:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC) 1243:00:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC) 1225:17:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1210:16:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1109:20:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1094:20:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1067:20:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1049:20:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1010:18:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1000:; for now it's still ok... 981:18:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 953:00:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 923:00:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 891:23:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 869:23:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 852:23:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 809:15:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 764:15:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 711:15:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 692:12:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 639:12:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 600:11:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 522:20:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 495:20:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 462:19:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 399:19:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 340:18:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 325:15:42, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 276:15:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 246:01:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 227:01:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 199:Hello! Your submission of 182:02:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 167:01:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 153:00:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 139:00:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 120:00:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 8688:) CS1 maint: postscript ( 8569:14:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 8555:11:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 8540:11:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 8521:08:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 8505:How can I encourage them? 8492:03:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 8477:03:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 8462:23:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8446:19:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8402:18:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8388:17:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8372:17:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8343:17:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8316:16:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8298:16:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8261:16:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 8233:02:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 8219:02:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 8203:02:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 8177:22:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 8118:21:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 8103:21:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 8091:21:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 8056:21:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 8025:21:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 8014:21:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7999:21:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7984:21:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7968:20:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7933:20:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7918:20:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7901:20:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7883:20:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7848:20:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7833:19:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7810:19:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7794:19:36, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7771:17:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7747:19:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7640:20:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7550:. Note, I fixed this one 7535:20:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7520:19:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7462:21:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7447:21:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7433:21:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7418:20:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7389:21:01, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7367:20:53, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7352:20:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7338:20:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7316:20:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7302:19:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7276:20:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7261:19:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7192:17:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7177:17:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7144:17:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7117:17:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7094:16:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7071:16:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7056:16:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 7025:22:43, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 6997:21:37, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 6977:20:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 6963:20:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 6948:20:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 6933:20:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 6916:22:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 6905:21:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 6889:20:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 6856:14:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 4812:University of East London 4537:{{citation}}</ref: --> 4536:No. <ref name=xyz: --> 4007:A tag has been placed on 2741:called his 1888 painting 2609:The Barnstar of Fine Arts 2605: 2540:Talk:Van Gogh Early Works 2224:and he asked his brother 1895: 994:works by Vincent van Gogh 8223:I responded via email.-- 6834:00:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 6820:00:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 6758:23:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 6722:23:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 6702:21:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 6683:19:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 6668:19:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 6644:has been placed on hold 6619:16:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 6604:15:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 6588:WP:Too long; didn't read 6527:22:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6504:22:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6481:22:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6444:22:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6402:21:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6387:20:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6373:20:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6361:20:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6343:20:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6330:20:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6316:20:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6282:19:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6275:thinking of working on. 6263:19:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6249:18:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6232:17:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6190:17:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6155:15:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6124:04:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6109:01:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6086:01:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6065:00:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 6032:22:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5991:22:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5952:22:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5923:22:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5885:22:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5870:22:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5856:22:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5840:22:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5806:22:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5773:21:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5754:19:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5743:18:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5728:18:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5697:17:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5683:17:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5665:17:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5625:16:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5606:16:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5591:16:35, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5573:16:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5229:16:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5213:16:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5178:15:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5129:15:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5108:14:53, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 5084:16:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 5070:16:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 5056:13:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 5038:22:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 5022:20:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 5002:01:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 4983:23:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 4950:14:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 4924:14:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC) 4905:11:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC) 4876:02:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 4861:00:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 4838:17:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4824:17:41, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4795:17:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4763:17:26, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4749:17:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4734:16:48, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4688:16:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4642:16:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4628:16:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4602:16:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4576:15:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4550:15:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4531:14:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4502:14:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4455:14:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4440:14:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4405:14:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4375:13:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4358:13:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4344:13:26, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4279:13:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4268:13:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4253:13:02, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4201:06:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC) 4181:22:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 4166:20:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 4133:23:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 4106:23:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 4082:23:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 4064:23:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 4048:23:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 3980:00:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 3965:23:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 3953:Scandinavian death metal 3943:19:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 3924:21:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 3909:20:15, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 3887:18:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3859:16:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3837:16:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3796:15:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3777:15:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3758:15:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3693:22:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 3678:21:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 3647:03:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3632:02:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3618:01:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 3595:19:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 3573:03:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 3552:00:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 3537:21:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 3517:14:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 3434:14:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 3411:09:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 3379:03:56, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 2957:Langlois Bridge at Arles 2745:Langlois Bridge at Arles 2731:Langlois Bridge at Arles 2618:Langlois Bridge at Arles 2573:05:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 2552:04:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 2534:04:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 2248:Langlois Bridge at Arles 2217:Langlois Bridge at Arles 1974:Langlois Bridge at Arles 670:but it is up to DYK ones 430:no citations in the lead 8427:Anasazi Heritage Center 7668:Frances Wisebart Jacobs 7646:Anasazi Heritage Center 6540:, I think it's time to 5486:. Retrieved 2011-05-20. 4588:Do you mind looking at 4365:long suit however :)... 3361:12:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3345:10:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3309:02:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3287:01:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3273:01:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3257:where there's no image. 3251:00:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3227:16:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3212:16:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3193:07:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 3179:I see you already have 3174:18:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3158:16:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3129:19:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3095:18:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3064:14:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3050:14:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3036:14:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 3014:15:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2989:13:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2970:09:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2931:02:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2913:02:04, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2896:01:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2873:Cleveland Museum of Art 2825:01:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2801:15:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 2772:Did you know? talk page 2698:08:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 2681:20:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2667:16:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2652:16:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2642:and other guidelines!-- 2631:16:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2513:14:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2498:14:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2480:14:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 2457:07:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 1188:Did you know? talk page 1153:Portrait of Père Tanguy 1143:Portrait of Pére Tanguy 210:your nomination's entry 201:Portrait of Pére Tanguy 96:Portrait of Pére Tanguy 90:Portrait of Pére Tanguy 7873:changes on the pages. 7730: 7720: 7709: 7698: 7688: 7676: 7665: 7654: 7576: 7566: 7502: 7496: 7236: 7224: 4939: 4220: 4004: 3929:You wrote on VA talk, 3703: 3002:Butterflies (van Gogh) 2807:Gate in the Paris Ramp 2518:Portrait of Dr. Gachet 2444:Portrait of Dr. Gachet 2438:Portrait of Dr. Gachet 2037:Yes, during the day.-- 1952: 1677:I sent you 2 emails... 1534:that's in the lede at 1079:van Gogh Olive Orchard 446:my most recent project 104:Knowledge:Did you know 18:User talk:CaroleHenson 8661:"The Langlois Bridge" 8605:of past discussions. 7726: 7716: 7705: 7694: 7683: 7671: 7660: 7649: 7572: 7554: 7497: 7491: 7231: 7219: 6878:Wheatfield with Crows 6652:good article criteria 6594:as a starting point. 5431:Parameter error in {{ 4938: 4219: 4003: 3702: 3198:Vase with Red Poppies 1951: 42:of past discussions. 8665:Permanent Collection 8162:for a second opinion 7234:University of Leiden 3605:Van Gogh Early Works 3319:Olive Trees (series) 3181:Olive Trees (series) 1309:User_talk:Panderoona 1302:User_talk:Panderoona 626:Category:User essays 171:Boo, hiss <g: --> 7782:talkpage guidelines 7712:Frank Weston Benson 7397:Sitush, I like it! 6640:you nominated as a 6517:in it, it's done.-- 3892:Visual Arts Project 1215:Congrats, Carole!-- 1164:and now resides in 1149:... that the final 94:Hi. I've nominated 8709:Van Gogh's Gardens 7737:quotation marks. 6734:Hi, thanks Sitush! 5652:The Sun Also Rises 4967:now have a new job 4954:remove this notice 4943:Sitush's talk page 4940: 4231:remove this notice 4221: 4005: 3955:or something. :-) 3714:remove this notice 3707:Sitush's talk page 3704: 3558:Van Gogh redirects 3527:subject matter. - 3054:Ok, sounds good.-- 2877:Post-Impressionism 2464:full link to query 2442:Hi Carole, On the 1967:remove this notice 1956:Sitush's talk page 1953: 1748:it.)? Thanks!!!-- 990:Van Gogh paintings 428:comments, such as 306:Template:Cite_book 8650: 8649: 8617: 8616: 8611:current talk page 8271: 7734:close paraphrases 7326: 6538:this conversation 5687:Gotcha! Thanks.-- 5550:978-88-8029-651-5 5493:. Retrieved 2011. 5316:978-0-7112-2908-2 5264:978-0-89236-226-4 3827:full coverage! - 3765:User talk:Ipigott 2839:Flowering Orchard 2778: 2777: 2765: 2636: 2635: 1924: 1923: 1206: 1194: 1193: 1181: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 8730: 8723: 8722: 8706:Fell, D (2001). 8703: 8694: 8693: 8683: 8675: 8673: 8672: 8657: 8631: 8619: 8618: 8596: 8595: 8589: 8265: 8100: 8022: 7870:my original edit 7407: 7403: 7402: 7320: 6994: 6913: 6886: 6649: 6501: 6399: 6370: 6340: 6279: 5875:of us are not... 5751: 5725: 5436: 5166:sandbox talkpage 5114:Vincent van Gogh 5098:the paintings... 4957: 4892:On Yahoo today: 4675: 4671: 4670: 4355: 4276: 4250: 4234: 4031: 4027: 4026: 4002: 3717: 3667: 3666: 2953:Vincent van Gogh 2875:- This is in - ( 2865: 2850: 2835: 2755: 2739:Vincent van Gogh 2714: 2707: 2671:You're welcome! 2603: 2596: 2595: 1970: 1907:Vincent van Gogh 1893: 1886: 1885: 1544:The Red Vineyard 1486: 1477: 1468: 1459: 1450: 1441: 1281:User talk:RogoPD 1207: 1204: 1200: 1171: 1126: 1119: 921: 911:7&6=thirteen 850: 840:7&6=thirteen 198: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 8738: 8737: 8733: 8732: 8731: 8729: 8728: 8727: 8726: 8719: 8704: 8697: 8677: 8676: 8670: 8668: 8659: 8658: 8654: 8627: 8593: 8243: 8191: 8098: 8020: 7778: 7754: 7615:In the source: 7400: 7398: 7035: 6992: 6911: 6884: 6874: 6634: 6499: 6397: 6368: 6338: 6277: 6072: 5749: 5723: 5719: 5430: 5028:recognition).-- 5010: 4990:discussion page 4963: 4958: 4947: 4932: 4890: 4668: 4666: 4353: 4274: 4248: 4240: 4235: 4228: 4213: 4189: 4187:Congratulations 4147: 4029: 4024: 4009:Sien (Van Gogh) 4000: 3998: 3995:Sien (Van Gogh) 3991:Speedy deletion 3914:Thanks, done!-- 3894: 3871: 3727:Langlois Bridge 3723: 3718: 3711: 3661: 3659:Congratulations 3560: 3321: 3299:You're funny!-- 3235: 3233:Backs of Houses 3200: 2943: 2880: 2866: 2857: 2851: 2842: 2836: 2809: 2781:The DYK project 2705: 2594: 2590:Bridge at Arles 2440: 1976: 1971: 1960: 1945: 1884: 1879: 1528: 1487: 1478: 1469: 1460: 1451: 1442: 1430: 1428:Van Gogh's kids 1388: 1305: 1253: 1203: 1198: 1117: 1081: 969: 908: 881:Cool, thanks!-- 837: 834: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 8736: 8725: 8724: 8717: 8695: 8651: 8648: 8647: 8642: 8637: 8632: 8625: 8615: 8614: 8597: 8586: 8584: 8583: 8582: 8581: 8580: 8579: 8578: 8577: 8576: 8575: 8574: 8573: 8572: 8571: 8524: 8523: 8509: 8506: 8503: 8500: 8479: 8415: 8414: 8413: 8412: 8411: 8410: 8409: 8408: 8407: 8406: 8405: 8404: 8390: 8350: 8349: 8348: 8347: 8346: 8345: 8321: 8320: 8319: 8318: 8301: 8300: 8284: 8283: 8242: 8239: 8238: 8237: 8236: 8235: 8190: 8187: 8186: 8185: 8184: 8183: 8182: 8181: 8180: 8179: 8151: 8150: 8149: 8148: 8147: 8146: 8137: 8136: 8135: 8134: 8133: 8132: 8123: 8122: 8121: 8120: 8067: 8066: 8065: 8064: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8060: 8059: 8058: 8034: 8033: 8032: 8031: 8030: 8029: 8028: 8027: 7955:Moonriddengirl 7950: 7949: 7948: 7947: 7946: 7945: 7944: 7943: 7942: 7941: 7940: 7939: 7938: 7937: 7936: 7935: 7855: 7854: 7853: 7852: 7851: 7850: 7777: 7774: 7753: 7752:VvG Family art 7750: 7643: 7642: 7623: 7622: 7621: 7620: 7612: 7611: 7610: 7609: 7594: 7593: 7592: 7591: 7542: 7541: 7540: 7539: 7538: 7537: 7481: 7480: 7479: 7478: 7477: 7476: 7475: 7474: 7473: 7472: 7471: 7470: 7469: 7468: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7464: 7395: 7394: 7393: 7392: 7391: 7318: 7283: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7279: 7278: 7207: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7203: 7202: 7201: 7200: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7195: 7194: 7153: 7152: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7146: 7124: 7123: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7119: 7099: 7098: 7097: 7096: 7074: 7073: 7034: 7031: 7030: 7029: 7028: 7027: 7009: 7008: 7007: 7006: 7000: 6999: 6987: 6986: 6985: 6984: 6983: 6982: 6981: 6980: 6979: 6950: 6873: 6870: 6869: 6868: 6867: 6866: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6862: 6861: 6860: 6859: 6858: 6801: 6800: 6799: 6798: 6797: 6796: 6795: 6794: 6783: 6782: 6781: 6780: 6779: 6778: 6777: 6776: 6765: 6764: 6763: 6762: 6761: 6760: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6737: 6736: 6735: 6727: 6726: 6725: 6724: 6707: 6706: 6705: 6704: 6686: 6685: 6633: 6629:nomination of 6623: 6622: 6621: 6586:that causes a 6571:. I review at 6534: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6530: 6529: 6509: 6508: 6507: 6506: 6491: 6490: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6486: 6485: 6484: 6483: 6457: 6456: 6455: 6454: 6453: 6452: 6451: 6450: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6419: 6418: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6409: 6408: 6346: 6345: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6300: 6299: 6298: 6297: 6296: 6295: 6294: 6293: 6292: 6291: 6290: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6203: 6202: 6201: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6133: 6132: 6131: 6130: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6071: 6068: 6049: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6044: 6043: 6042: 6041: 6040: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6036: 6035: 6034: 6004: 6003: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5930: 5929: 5928: 5927: 5926: 5925: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5808: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5718: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5673:about gbooks. 5636: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5612: 5579: 5558: 5557: 5543: 5529: 5522: 5508: 5501: 5494: 5487: 5480: 5473: 5459: 5452: 5438: 5421: 5407: 5393: 5386: 5372: 5358: 5344: 5330: 5323: 5309: 5306: 5299: 5285: 5271: 5257: 5254: 5251: 5232: 5231: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5041: 5040: 5009: 5006: 5005: 5004: 4962: 4959: 4948:Message added 4946: 4933: 4931: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4889: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4802: 4801: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4718: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4553: 4552: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4312: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4293:Les Miserables 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4239: 4236: 4227: 4214: 4212: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4188: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4067: 4066: 4020:mainspace page 3997: 3993:nomination of 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3927: 3926: 3893: 3890: 3870: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3780: 3779: 3722: 3719: 3710: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3660: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3598: 3597: 3581: 3580: 3559: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3437: 3436: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3398: 3397: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3364: 3363: 3320: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3259: 3258: 3239:back of houses 3234: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3217:My pleasure.-- 3199: 3196: 3177: 3176: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 2942: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2919: 2882: 2881: 2867: 2860: 2858: 2852: 2845: 2843: 2837: 2830: 2808: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2776: 2775: 2766:and add it to 2715: 2704: 2701: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2634: 2633: 2612: 2611: 2606: 2604: 2593: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2241: 2240: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2010: 2009: 1975: 1972: 1961:Message added 1959: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1922: 1921: 1902: 1901: 1896: 1894: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1527: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1489: 1488: 1481: 1479: 1472: 1470: 1463: 1461: 1454: 1452: 1445: 1443: 1436: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1396:5 minutes’’’. 1392:a short survey 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1339: 1338: 1304: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1228: 1227: 1192: 1191: 1182:and add it to 1127: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1053:I'll defer to 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 968: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 874: 873: 872: 871: 833: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 680: 673: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 449: 437: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 312: 309: 302: 299: 251: 250: 249: 248: 230: 229: 193: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 8735: 8720: 8718:0-7432-0233-3 8715: 8711: 8710: 8702: 8700: 8691: 8687: 8681: 8666: 8662: 8656: 8652: 8646: 8643: 8641: 8638: 8636: 8633: 8630: 8626: 8624: 8621: 8620: 8612: 8608: 8604: 8603: 8598: 8591: 8590: 8587: 8570: 8566: 8562: 8558: 8557: 8556: 8552: 8548: 8543: 8542: 8541: 8537: 8533: 8532:Truthkeeper88 8528: 8527: 8526: 8525: 8522: 8518: 8514: 8510: 8507: 8504: 8501: 8498: 8497: 8495: 8494: 8493: 8489: 8485: 8480: 8478: 8474: 8470: 8465: 8464: 8463: 8459: 8455: 8454:Truthkeeper88 8450: 8449: 8448: 8447: 8443: 8439: 8434: 8430: 8428: 8424: 8418: 8403: 8399: 8395: 8394:Truthkeeper88 8391: 8389: 8385: 8381: 8380:Truthkeeper88 8378: 8375: 8374: 8373: 8369: 8365: 8364:Truthkeeper88 8360: 8359: 8358: 8357: 8356: 8355: 8354: 8353: 8352: 8351: 8344: 8340: 8336: 8331: 8327: 8326: 8325: 8324: 8323: 8322: 8317: 8313: 8309: 8308:Truthkeeper88 8305: 8304: 8303: 8302: 8299: 8295: 8291: 8286: 8285: 8280: 8279: 8278: 8275: 8269: 8268:edit conflict 8263: 8262: 8258: 8254: 8253:Truthkeeper88 8249: 8234: 8230: 8226: 8222: 8221: 8220: 8216: 8212: 8207: 8206: 8205: 8204: 8200: 8196: 8178: 8174: 8170: 8169:Truthkeeper88 8166: 8163: 8159: 8158: 8157: 8156: 8155: 8154: 8153: 8152: 8143: 8142: 8141: 8140: 8139: 8138: 8129: 8128: 8127: 8126: 8125: 8124: 8119: 8115: 8111: 8110:Truthkeeper88 8106: 8105: 8104: 8101: 8095: 8094: 8093: 8092: 8088: 8084: 8080: 8076: 8072: 8057: 8053: 8049: 8044: 8043: 8042: 8041: 8040: 8039: 8038: 8037: 8036: 8035: 8026: 8023: 8017: 8016: 8015: 8011: 8007: 8006:Truthkeeper88 8002: 8001: 8000: 7996: 7992: 7987: 7986: 7985: 7981: 7977: 7976:Truthkeeper88 7972: 7971: 7970: 7969: 7965: 7961: 7956: 7934: 7930: 7926: 7921: 7920: 7919: 7915: 7911: 7910:Truthkeeper88 7906: 7905: 7904: 7903: 7902: 7898: 7894: 7890: 7886: 7885: 7884: 7880: 7876: 7875:Truthkeeper88 7871: 7867: 7863: 7862: 7861: 7860: 7859: 7858: 7857: 7856: 7849: 7845: 7841: 7836: 7835: 7834: 7830: 7826: 7825:Truthkeeper88 7822: 7818: 7813: 7812: 7811: 7807: 7803: 7798: 7797: 7796: 7795: 7791: 7787: 7786:Truthkeeper88 7783: 7773: 7772: 7768: 7764: 7759: 7749: 7748: 7744: 7740: 7739:Truthkeeper88 7735: 7729: 7725: 7724: 7719: 7715: 7713: 7708: 7704: 7703: 7702:page 165- 166 7697: 7693: 7692: 7687: 7682: 7681: 7675: 7670: 7669: 7664: 7659: 7658: 7653: 7648: 7647: 7641: 7637: 7633: 7628: 7625: 7624: 7617: 7616: 7614: 7613: 7607: 7603: 7599: 7598: 7596: 7595: 7589: 7585: 7581: 7580: 7578: 7577: 7575: 7571: 7570: 7565: 7563: 7559: 7553: 7552: 7549: 7546: 7536: 7532: 7528: 7523: 7522: 7521: 7517: 7513: 7509: 7506: 7505: 7504: 7503: 7501: 7495: 7490: 7489: 7485: 7463: 7459: 7455: 7454:Truthkeeper88 7450: 7449: 7448: 7444: 7440: 7436: 7435: 7434: 7430: 7426: 7421: 7420: 7419: 7415: 7411: 7406: 7396: 7390: 7386: 7382: 7381:Truthkeeper88 7378: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7364: 7360: 7355: 7354: 7353: 7349: 7345: 7344:Truthkeeper88 7341: 7340: 7339: 7335: 7331: 7324: 7323:edit conflict 7319: 7317: 7313: 7309: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7299: 7295: 7291: 7288: 7287: 7285: 7284: 7277: 7273: 7269: 7264: 7263: 7262: 7258: 7254: 7250: 7247: 7246: 7244: 7243: 7242: 7240: 7235: 7230: 7228: 7223: 7218: 7217: 7214: 7210: 7193: 7189: 7185: 7180: 7179: 7178: 7174: 7170: 7169:Truthkeeper88 7165: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7158: 7157: 7156: 7155: 7154: 7145: 7141: 7137: 7132: 7131: 7130: 7129: 7128: 7127: 7126: 7125: 7118: 7114: 7110: 7105: 7104: 7103: 7102: 7101: 7100: 7095: 7091: 7087: 7086:Truthkeeper88 7083: 7078: 7077: 7076: 7075: 7072: 7068: 7064: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7057: 7053: 7049: 7048:Truthkeeper88 7045: 7041: 7026: 7022: 7018: 7013: 7012: 7011: 7010: 7004: 7003: 7002: 7001: 6998: 6995: 6988: 6978: 6974: 6970: 6966: 6965: 6964: 6960: 6956: 6951: 6949: 6945: 6941: 6936: 6935: 6934: 6930: 6926: 6922: 6919: 6918: 6917: 6914: 6908: 6907: 6906: 6902: 6898: 6893: 6892: 6891: 6890: 6887: 6880: 6879: 6857: 6853: 6849: 6845: 6841: 6837: 6836: 6835: 6831: 6827: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6817: 6813: 6809: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6791: 6790: 6789: 6788: 6787: 6786: 6785: 6784: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6770: 6769: 6768: 6767: 6766: 6759: 6755: 6751: 6746: 6745: 6744: 6743: 6742: 6741: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6730: 6729: 6728: 6723: 6719: 6715: 6711: 6710: 6709: 6708: 6703: 6699: 6695: 6690: 6689: 6688: 6687: 6684: 6680: 6676: 6672: 6671: 6670: 6669: 6665: 6661: 6657: 6653: 6648: 6643: 6639: 6632: 6628: 6620: 6616: 6612: 6608: 6607: 6606: 6605: 6601: 6597: 6596:Truthkeeper88 6593: 6589: 6585: 6584:walls of text 6580: 6578: 6574: 6570: 6566: 6562: 6557: 6554: 6550: 6545: 6543: 6539: 6528: 6524: 6520: 6515: 6514: 6513: 6512: 6511: 6510: 6505: 6502: 6496: 6492: 6482: 6478: 6474: 6469: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6461: 6460: 6459: 6458: 6445: 6441: 6437: 6431: 6430: 6429: 6428: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6421: 6420: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6400: 6394: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6384: 6380: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6371: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6344: 6341: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6327: 6323: 6318: 6317: 6313: 6309: 6283: 6280: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6265: 6264: 6260: 6256: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6246: 6242: 6241:Truthkeeper88 6237: 6236: 6235: 6234: 6233: 6229: 6225: 6220: 6219:my perception 6215: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6191: 6187: 6183: 6178: 6177: 6176: 6175: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6156: 6152: 6148: 6147:Truthkeeper88 6143: 6142: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6136: 6135: 6134: 6125: 6121: 6117: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6106: 6102: 6101:Truthkeeper88 6097: 6096: 6093: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6083: 6079: 6078:Truthkeeper88 6074: 6073: 6067: 6066: 6062: 6058: 6053: 6033: 6029: 6025: 6024:Truthkeeper88 6020: 6019: 6018: 6017: 6016: 6015: 6014: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6005: 5992: 5988: 5984: 5979: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5969: 5968: 5967: 5966: 5965: 5964: 5953: 5949: 5945: 5944:Truthkeeper88 5940: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5931: 5924: 5920: 5916: 5911: 5910: 5909: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5894: 5893: 5886: 5882: 5878: 5873: 5872: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5859: 5858: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5848:Truthkeeper88 5844: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5837: 5833: 5829: 5825: 5807: 5803: 5799: 5798:Truthkeeper88 5794: 5793: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5761: 5760: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5752: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5740: 5736: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5726: 5698: 5694: 5690: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5680: 5676: 5675:Truthkeeper88 5672: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5662: 5658: 5657:Truthkeeper88 5653: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5626: 5622: 5618: 5613: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5603: 5599: 5598:Truthkeeper88 5594: 5593: 5592: 5588: 5584: 5580: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5565:Truthkeeper88 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5555: 5551: 5548: 5544: 5541: 5537: 5534: 5530: 5527: 5523: 5520: 5516: 5513: 5509: 5506: 5502: 5499: 5495: 5492: 5488: 5485: 5481: 5478: 5474: 5471: 5467: 5466:0-19-530957-X 5464: 5460: 5457: 5453: 5450: 5446: 5445:1-57912-586-7 5443: 5439: 5434: 5429: 5428:3-7757-1131-5 5426: 5422: 5419: 5415: 5414:0-306-80726-2 5412: 5408: 5405: 5401: 5398: 5394: 5391: 5387: 5384: 5380: 5379:0-8386-3749-3 5377: 5373: 5370: 5366: 5365:0-7112-1148-5 5363: 5359: 5356: 5352: 5351:0-7432-0233-3 5349: 5345: 5342: 5338: 5337:0-7432-0233-3 5335: 5331: 5328: 5324: 5321: 5317: 5314: 5310: 5307: 5304: 5300: 5297: 5293: 5290: 5286: 5283: 5279: 5278:0-8294-0621-2 5276: 5272: 5269: 5265: 5262: 5258: 5255: 5252: 5249: 5245: 5244:0-374-28243-9 5242: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5230: 5226: 5222: 5221:Truthkeeper88 5217: 5216: 5215: 5214: 5210: 5206: 5202: 5179: 5175: 5171: 5170:Truthkeeper88 5167: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5117: 5115: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5090: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5081: 5077: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5067: 5063: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5053: 5049: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5042: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5003: 4999: 4995: 4991: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4955: 4951: 4944: 4937: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4894: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4858: 4854: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4821: 4817: 4813: 4809: 4804: 4803: 4799: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4723: 4719: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4674: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4643: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4603: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4577: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4528: 4524: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4490: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4456: 4452: 4448: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4393: 4389: 4387:bibliography. 4385: 4381: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4363: 4359: 4356: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4294: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4280: 4277: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4251: 4245: 4232: 4225: 4218: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4193:Jeanne Boleyn 4182: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4154:0-06-430057-9 4152: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4036: 4021: 4016: 4014: 4010: 3996: 3992: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3949:User:Outriggr 3946: 3945: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3889: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3715: 3708: 3701: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3606: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3583: 3582: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3503: 3498: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3476: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3422: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3329: 3327: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3261: 3260: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2997: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2884: 2883: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2864: 2859: 2855: 2849: 2844: 2840: 2834: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2786: 2782: 2773: 2769: 2763: 2759: 2753: 2749: 2747: 2746: 2742: 2740: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2726: 2725: 2724:Did you know? 2720: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2591: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1968: 1964: 1957: 1950: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1925: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1892: 1887: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1467: 1462: 1458: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1393: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1303: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1201: 1189: 1185: 1179: 1175: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1162:Auguste Rodin 1157: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1138: 1137: 1136:Did you know? 1132: 1131:28 March 2011 1128: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 998:William Blake 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 978: 974: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 924: 919: 918: 913: 912: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 892: 888: 884: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 870: 866: 862: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 848: 847: 842: 841: 832: 810: 806: 802: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 765: 761: 757: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 718: 712: 708: 704: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 689: 685: 681: 678: 674: 671: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 640: 636: 632: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 523: 519: 515: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 496: 492: 488: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 463: 459: 455: 450: 447: 442: 438: 435: 431: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 400: 396: 392: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 341: 337: 333: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 313: 310: 307: 303: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 284: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 269: 264: 260: 256: 247: 243: 239: 234: 233: 232: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 212: 211: 206: 202: 197: 183: 179: 175: 170: 169: 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 123: 122: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 8708: 8669:. Retrieved 8664: 8655: 8628: 8606: 8600: 8585: 8561:CaroleHenson 8513:CaroleHenson 8484:CaroleHenson 8469:CaroleHenson 8438:CaroleHenson 8435: 8431: 8419: 8416: 8376: 8335:CaroleHenson 8290:CaroleHenson 8264: 8244: 8225:CaroleHenson 8192: 8083:CaroleHenson 8075:CaroleHenson 8068: 8048:CaroleHenson 7951: 7925:CaroleHenson 7893:CaroleHenson 7865: 7840:CaroleHenson 7802:CaroleHenson 7779: 7763:CaroleHenson 7755: 7731: 7727: 7721: 7717: 7710: 7706: 7699: 7695: 7689: 7684: 7677: 7672: 7666: 7661: 7655: 7650: 7644: 7632:CaroleHenson 7626: 7602:Walt Whitman 7584:Walt Whitman 7573: 7567: 7558:Walt Whitman 7555: 7544: 7543: 7512:CaroleHenson 7507: 7498: 7492: 7483: 7482: 7439:CaroleHenson 7410:CaroleHenson 7404: 7359:CaroleHenson 7294:CaroleHenson 7289: 7268:CaroleHenson 7266:original)?-- 7253:CaroleHenson 7248: 7237: 7232: 7225: 7220: 7212: 7211: 7208: 7184:CaroleHenson 7109:CaroleHenson 7063:CaroleHenson 7036: 7017:CaroleHenson 6955:CaroleHenson 6953:remember.)-- 6940:CaroleHenson 6897:CaroleHenson 6876: 6875: 6848:CaroleHenson 6826:CaroleHenson 6750:CaroleHenson 6694:CaroleHenson 6675:CaroleHenson 6642:good article 6636:The article 6635: 6611:CaroleHenson 6581: 6558: 6552: 6548: 6546: 6535: 6519:CaroleHenson 6494: 6473:CaroleHenson 6436:CaroleHenson 6379:CaroleHenson 6353:CaroleHenson 6322:CaroleHenson 6319: 6308:CaroleHenson 6304: 6272: 6268: 6255:CaroleHenson 6224:CaroleHenson 6218: 6182:CaroleHenson 6116:CaroleHenson 6057:CaroleHenson 6054: 6050: 5983:CaroleHenson 5915:CaroleHenson 5862:CaroleHenson 5832:CaroleHenson 5824:CaroleHenson 5820: 5735:CaroleHenson 5720: 5689:CaroleHenson 5617:CaroleHenson 5583:CaroleHenson 5435:}}: checksum 5233: 5205:CaroleHenson 5198: 5095: 5076:CaroleHenson 5048:CaroleHenson 5030:CaroleHenson 5011: 4994:CaroleHenson 4970: 4964: 4916:CaroleHenson 4891: 4868:CaroleHenson 4830:CaroleHenson 4787:CaroleHenson 4783: 4741:CaroleHenson 4726:CaroleHenson 4672: 4634:CaroleHenson 4594:CaroleHenson 4563: 4560:Fanny Crosby 4523:CaroleHenson 4520: 4488: 4447:CaroleHenson 4397:CaroleHenson 4383:sense to me. 4292: 4241: 4190: 4173:CaroleHenson 4148: 4125:CaroleHenson 4074:CaroleHenson 4033: 4017: 4006: 3972:CaroleHenson 3957:Riggr Mortis 3935:CaroleHenson 3928: 3916:CaroleHenson 3895: 3879:CaroleHenson 3872: 3851:CaroleHenson 3769:CaroleHenson 3724: 3685:CaroleHenson 3662: 3639:CaroleHenson 3587:CaroleHenson 3561: 3544:CaroleHenson 3525: 3509:CaroleHenson 3426:CaroleHenson 3424:rationale.-- 3399: 3389: 3385: 3371:CaroleHenson 3353:CaroleHenson 3330: 3322: 3301:CaroleHenson 3265:CaroleHenson 3238: 3236: 3219:CaroleHenson 3201: 3178: 3166:CaroleHenson 3143: 3121:CaroleHenson 3056:CaroleHenson 3028:CaroleHenson 3006:CaroleHenson 2976: 2944: 2923:CaroleHenson 2888:CaroleHenson 2868: 2853: 2838: 2812: 2810: 2793:CaroleHenson 2791:Thank you!-- 2779: 2751: 2748: 2743: 2736: 2729: 2728: 2722: 2687: 2644:CaroleHenson 2637: 2616: 2608: 2589: 2544:CaroleHenson 2521: 2505:CaroleHenson 2485: 2472:CaroleHenson 2441: 2412:CaroleHenson 2336:CaroleHenson 2278:CaroleHenson 2251: 2230:CaroleHenson 2215: 2197: 2171:CaroleHenson 2128:CaroleHenson 2080:CaroleHenson 2039:CaroleHenson 1999:CaroleHenson 1977: 1929:CaroleHenson 1906: 1898: 1843:CaroleHenson 1804:CaroleHenson 1800: 1750:CaroleHenson 1721:CaroleHenson 1693:CaroleHenson 1650:CaroleHenson 1605:CaroleHenson 1568:CaroleHenson 1547: 1531: 1529: 1510:CaroleHenson 1490: 1431: 1414:CaroleHenson 1395: 1389: 1368:CaroleHenson 1328:CaroleHenson 1306: 1264:CaroleHenson 1257: 1254: 1235:CaroleHenson 1195: 1159: 1156: 1151: 1148: 1141: 1140: 1134: 1086:CaroleHenson 1082: 1041:CaroleHenson 993: 989: 970: 967:vgv template 945:CaroleHenson 916: 910: 883:CaroleHenson 845: 839: 835: 831:WP:user page 801:CaroleHenson 756:CaroleHenson 676: 669: 592:CaroleHenson 514:CaroleHenson 440: 433: 429: 391:CaroleHenson 317:CaroleHenson 295: 258: 252: 238:CaroleHenson 208: 192: 131:CaroleHenson 93: 65: 43: 37: 8599:This is an 8071:WP:Civility 7776:Refactoring 7033:Some advice 6660:Jezhotwells 6577:peer review 6569:peer review 6433:<br: --> 6407:appreciate. 5913:tomorrow.-- 4888:In the news 4808:WP:UNIGUIDE 3326:This source 2948:Van (Dutch) 2869:Roadworkers 2762:quick check 2673:Daniel Case 2623:Daniel Case 2447:research?-- 2374:History2007 2305:History2007 2256:History2007 2222:Netherlands 2201:History2007 2114:History2007 2065:History2007 2017:History2007 1984:History2007 1491:Good job... 1178:quick check 296:seems to me 102:as part of 36:This is an 8671:2011-04-28 8189:Suggestion 7680:page 38-39 7508:Non Issue? 7486:Also from 7290:Non-Issue? 7082:CCI report 5860:YEAH!!!!-- 5615:sandbox.-- 5536:1428654003 5515:0714620394 5400:0520088492 5292:1903900050 5008:In a while 4952:. You can 4311:barelinks. 4238:References 4030:{{db-...}} 3742:0853317410 3351:article.-- 2758:here's how 2750:(pictured) 2719:7 May 2011 2250:painting ( 1965:. You can 1855:Success... 1174:here's how 1166:his museum 1158:(pictured) 8645:Archive 5 8640:Archive 4 8635:Archive 3 8629:Archive 2 8623:Archive 1 8423:Owl Woman 8211:Modernist 8195:Modernist 7691:Owl Woman 7494:children. 7042:to avoid 6969:Modernist 6925:Modernist 6840:Modernist 6542:move away 5877:Modernist 5765:Modernist 5669:Also see 5121:Modernist 5100:Modernist 5062:Modernist 5014:Modernist 4897:Modernist 4367:Modernist 4158:Modernist 3901:Modernist 3670:Modernist 3624:Modernist 3279:Modernist 3243:Modernist 3042:Modernist 2981:Modernist 2905:Modernist 2817:Modernist 2737:... that 2659:Modernist 2169:Thanks!-- 1911:Modernist 1857:Modernist 1821:Modernist 1764:Modernist 1735:Modernist 1707:Modernist 1679:Modernist 1665:Modernist 1619:Modernist 1582:Modernist 1552:Modernist 1540:Anna Boch 1526:Wondering 1493:Modernist 1398:cooldenny 1285:Modernist 1168:in Paris? 1055:Modernist 1002:Modernist 861:Modernist 159:Modernist 127:Modernist 100:Main Page 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 8680:cite web 8274:workpage 8160:I asked 7838:great.-- 7800:once.)-- 7722:Source: 7700:Source: 7678:Source: 7656:Source: 7627:Question 7357:again.-- 7238:source: 7226:Source: 7015:doing!-- 6222:clear.-- 4930:Talkback 4489:provided 4258:!! ?? - 4229:You can 4211:Talkback 3712:You can 3637:along!-- 2871:, 1889, 2785:nominate 2768:DYKSTATS 2592:barnstar 2252:pictured 1943:Talkback 1882:Barnstar 1877:Van Gogh 1802:again.-- 1196:Cheers, 1184:DYKSTATS 703:Ghmyrtle 631:Ghmyrtle 565:process? 487:Ghmyrtle 8602:archive 8046:this?-- 7630:with.-- 7568:Source 7377:copyvio 7222:Leiden. 7044:copyvio 6872:Vincent 6070:Vincent 5717:Vincent 4040:DASHBot 3829:Ipigott 3788:Ipigott 3750:Ipigott 3622:Done... 3610:Dolovis 3565:Dolovis 3529:Ipigott 3403:Ipigott 3337:Ipigott 3204:Chimino 3185:Ipigott 3150:Ipigott 2962:Ipigott 2886:them.-- 2690:Ipigott 2565:Chimino 2526:Chimino 2490:Chimino 2449:Chimino 1733:Done... 1663:show... 1412:Done.-- 1217:Chimino 1101:Chimino 1059:Chimino 1024:Raphael 973:Chimino 677:forever 292:WP:LEAD 263:WP:LEAD 259:Ideally 219:Chimino 203:at the 145:Chimino 112:Chimino 39:archive 8547:Sitush 8209:can... 7991:Sitush 7960:Sitush 7819:, and 7527:Sitush 7425:Sitush 7330:Sitush 7308:Sitush 7136:Sitush 6812:Sitush 6714:Sitush 6592:review 6565:WP:GAN 4975:Sitush 4853:Sitush 4816:Sitush 4755:Sitush 4680:Sitush 4620:Sitush 4568:Sitush 4542:Sitush 4494:Sitush 4432:Sitush 4336:Sitush 4260:Sitush 4098:Sitush 4056:Sitush 2856:, 1888 2640:WP:MOS 2486:Gachet 2368:It is 1980:WP:DYK 1346:Sitush 1313:Sitush 588:WP:MOS 389:fun.-- 288:WP:MOS 255:WP:MOS 174:Sitush 8241:Email 8145:(UTC) 8099:Ceoil 8021:Ceoil 7606:Paris 7588:Paris 7562:Paris 7249:Issue 6993:Ceoil 6912:Ceoil 6885:Ceoil 6793:salt. 6625:Your 6500:Ceoil 6398:Ceoil 6369:Ceoil 6339:Ceoil 6278:Ceoil 5750:Ceoil 5724:Ceoil 5578:too). 4814:. - 4564:after 4354:Ceoil 4275:Ceoil 4249:Ceoil 4123:me.-- 2372:now. 1546:. If 829:Your 315:WP.-- 16:< 8714:ISBN 8690:link 8686:link 8565:talk 8551:talk 8536:talk 8517:talk 8488:talk 8473:talk 8458:talk 8442:talk 8398:talk 8384:talk 8368:talk 8339:talk 8312:talk 8294:talk 8257:talk 8229:talk 8215:talk 8199:talk 8173:talk 8114:talk 8087:talk 8079:talk 8052:talk 8010:talk 7995:talk 7980:talk 7964:talk 7929:talk 7914:talk 7897:talk 7879:talk 7844:talk 7829:talk 7821:this 7817:This 7806:talk 7790:talk 7767:talk 7743:talk 7636:talk 7545:VVG3 7531:talk 7516:talk 7500:him. 7484:VVG2 7458:talk 7443:talk 7429:talk 7414:talk 7405:Done 7385:talk 7363:talk 7348:talk 7334:talk 7312:talk 7298:talk 7272:talk 7257:talk 7213:VVG1 7188:talk 7173:talk 7140:talk 7113:talk 7090:talk 7067:talk 7052:talk 7021:talk 6973:talk 6959:talk 6944:talk 6929:talk 6901:talk 6852:talk 6844:talk 6830:talk 6816:talk 6754:talk 6718:talk 6698:talk 6679:talk 6664:talk 6615:talk 6600:talk 6567:and 6523:talk 6477:talk 6440:talk 6383:talk 6357:talk 6326:talk 6312:talk 6273:were 6259:talk 6245:talk 6228:talk 6186:talk 6151:talk 6120:talk 6105:talk 6082:talk 6061:talk 6028:talk 5987:talk 5948:talk 5919:talk 5881:talk 5866:talk 5852:talk 5836:talk 5828:talk 5802:talk 5769:talk 5739:talk 5693:talk 5679:talk 5671:this 5661:talk 5621:talk 5611:etc. 5602:talk 5587:talk 5569:talk 5547:ISBN 5533:ISBN 5512:ISBN 5463:ISBN 5442:ISBN 5433:ISBN 5425:ISBN 5411:ISBN 5397:ISBN 5376:ISBN 5362:ISBN 5348:ISBN 5334:ISBN 5313:ISBN 5289:ISBN 5275:ISBN 5261:ISBN 5241:ISBN 5225:talk 5209:talk 5201:list 5174:talk 5125:talk 5104:talk 5096:keep 5080:talk 5066:talk 5052:talk 5034:talk 5018:talk 4998:talk 4979:talk 4920:talk 4901:talk 4872:talk 4857:talk 4834:talk 4820:talk 4791:talk 4759:talk 4745:talk 4730:talk 4684:talk 4673:Done 4638:talk 4624:talk 4598:talk 4572:talk 4546:talk 4527:talk 4498:talk 4451:talk 4436:talk 4401:talk 4371:talk 4340:talk 4264:talk 4243:here 4197:talk 4177:talk 4162:talk 4151:ISBN 4145:Book 4129:talk 4102:talk 4078:talk 4060:talk 4044:talk 3976:talk 3961:talk 3939:talk 3920:talk 3905:talk 3883:talk 3855:talk 3833:talk 3792:talk 3773:talk 3754:talk 3746:here 3739:ISBN 3735:here 3731:here 3689:talk 3674:talk 3643:talk 3628:talk 3614:talk 3591:talk 3569:talk 3548:talk 3533:talk 3513:talk 3430:talk 3407:talk 3375:talk 3357:talk 3341:talk 3305:talk 3283:talk 3269:talk 3247:talk 3223:talk 3208:talk 3189:talk 3170:talk 3154:talk 3125:talk 3091:talk 3087:Glrx 3060:talk 3046:talk 3032:talk 3010:talk 2985:talk 2966:talk 2927:talk 2909:talk 2892:talk 2821:talk 2797:talk 2694:talk 2677:talk 2663:talk 2648:talk 2627:talk 2569:talk 2548:talk 2530:talk 2509:talk 2494:talk 2476:talk 2453:talk 2416:talk 2378:talk 2370:here 2340:talk 2309:talk 2282:talk 2260:talk 2234:talk 2226:Theo 2205:talk 2175:talk 2132:talk 2118:talk 2084:talk 2069:talk 2043:talk 2021:talk 2003:talk 1988:talk 1933:talk 1915:talk 1861:talk 1847:talk 1825:talk 1808:talk 1768:talk 1754:talk 1739:talk 1725:talk 1711:talk 1697:talk 1683:talk 1669:talk 1654:talk 1623:talk 1609:talk 1586:talk 1572:talk 1556:talk 1514:talk 1497:talk 1418:talk 1402:talk 1372:talk 1350:talk 1332:talk 1317:talk 1289:talk 1268:talk 1239:talk 1221:talk 1105:talk 1090:talk 1063:talk 1045:talk 1006:talk 977:talk 949:talk 887:talk 865:talk 805:talk 760:talk 707:talk 688:talk 684:Dahn 635:talk 596:talk 518:talk 491:talk 458:talk 454:Dahn 395:talk 336:talk 332:Dahn 321:talk 290:and 272:talk 268:Dahn 242:talk 223:talk 178:talk 163:talk 149:talk 135:talk 116:talk 108:here 7866:not 6573:FAC 6561:FAC 6549:not 4971:can 4895:... 4095:--> 3899:... 3733:or 2903:... 2717:On 1205:Dom 1199:Big 1129:On 992:or 441:why 8698:^ 8682:}} 8678:{{ 8663:. 8567:) 8553:) 8538:) 8519:) 8490:) 8475:) 8460:) 8444:) 8400:) 8386:) 8370:) 8341:) 8314:) 8296:) 8259:) 8231:) 8217:) 8201:) 8175:) 8116:) 8089:) 8073:-- 8054:) 8012:) 7997:) 7982:) 7966:) 7931:) 7916:) 7899:) 7881:) 7846:) 7831:) 7808:) 7792:) 7769:) 7745:) 7714:: 7638:) 7533:) 7518:) 7460:) 7445:) 7431:) 7416:) 7408:-- 7387:) 7365:) 7350:) 7336:) 7314:) 7300:) 7274:) 7259:) 7241:: 7229:: 7190:) 7175:) 7142:) 7115:) 7092:) 7069:) 7054:) 7023:) 6975:) 6961:) 6946:) 6931:) 6903:) 6854:) 6832:) 6818:) 6756:) 6720:) 6700:) 6681:) 6666:) 6627:GA 6617:) 6602:) 6525:) 6479:) 6442:) 6385:) 6359:) 6328:) 6314:) 6261:) 6247:) 6230:) 6188:) 6153:) 6122:) 6107:) 6084:) 6063:) 6030:) 5989:) 5950:) 5921:) 5883:) 5868:) 5854:) 5838:) 5804:) 5771:) 5741:) 5695:) 5681:) 5663:) 5623:) 5604:) 5589:) 5571:) 5552:. 5538:. 5517:. 5468:. 5447:. 5416:. 5402:. 5381:. 5367:. 5353:. 5339:. 5318:. 5294:. 5280:. 5266:. 5246:. 5227:) 5211:) 5176:) 5127:) 5106:) 5091:, 5082:) 5068:) 5054:) 5036:) 5020:) 5000:) 4981:) 4922:) 4903:) 4874:) 4859:) 4836:) 4822:) 4793:) 4761:) 4747:) 4732:) 4686:) 4640:) 4626:) 4600:) 4574:) 4548:) 4529:) 4500:) 4453:) 4438:) 4403:) 4373:) 4342:) 4266:) 4199:) 4179:) 4164:) 4131:) 4104:) 4096:- 4080:) 4062:) 4046:) 3978:) 3963:) 3941:) 3922:) 3907:) 3885:) 3857:) 3835:) 3794:) 3775:) 3767:-- 3756:) 3691:) 3676:) 3645:) 3630:) 3616:) 3593:) 3585:-- 3571:) 3550:) 3535:) 3515:) 3432:) 3409:) 3377:) 3359:) 3343:) 3307:) 3285:) 3271:) 3249:) 3225:) 3210:) 3191:) 3172:) 3156:) 3127:) 3093:) 3062:) 3048:) 3034:) 3012:) 2998:. 2987:) 2977:my 2968:) 2929:) 2911:) 2894:) 2823:) 2799:) 2760:, 2721:, 2696:) 2679:) 2665:) 2650:) 2629:) 2571:) 2550:) 2532:) 2511:) 2496:) 2478:) 2455:) 2418:) 2380:) 2342:) 2311:) 2284:) 2262:) 2236:) 2207:) 2177:) 2134:) 2120:) 2086:) 2071:) 2045:) 2023:) 2005:) 1990:) 1935:) 1917:) 1909:. 1863:) 1849:) 1827:) 1810:) 1770:) 1756:) 1741:) 1727:) 1713:) 1699:) 1685:) 1671:) 1656:) 1625:) 1611:) 1588:) 1574:) 1558:) 1542:- 1516:) 1499:) 1420:) 1404:) 1374:) 1352:) 1334:) 1319:) 1291:) 1270:) 1241:) 1223:) 1176:, 1133:, 1107:) 1092:) 1065:) 1047:) 1008:) 979:) 951:) 889:) 867:) 807:) 762:) 709:) 690:) 637:) 598:) 520:) 493:) 460:) 397:) 338:) 323:) 274:) 244:) 225:) 180:) 172:- 165:) 151:) 137:) 118:) 8721:. 8692:) 8613:. 8563:( 8549:( 8534:( 8515:( 8486:( 8471:( 8456:( 8440:( 8396:( 8382:( 8366:( 8337:( 8310:( 8292:( 8270:) 8266:( 8255:( 8227:( 8213:( 8197:( 8171:( 8112:( 8085:( 8077:( 8050:( 8008:( 7993:( 7978:( 7962:( 7927:( 7912:( 7895:( 7877:( 7842:( 7827:( 7804:( 7788:( 7765:( 7741:( 7634:( 7608:. 7590:. 7564:. 7529:( 7514:( 7456:( 7441:( 7427:( 7412:( 7383:( 7361:( 7346:( 7332:( 7325:) 7321:( 7310:( 7296:( 7270:( 7255:( 7186:( 7171:( 7138:( 7111:( 7088:( 7065:( 7050:( 7019:( 6971:( 6957:( 6942:( 6927:( 6899:( 6850:( 6842:( 6828:( 6814:( 6752:( 6716:( 6696:( 6677:( 6662:( 6613:( 6598:( 6553:I 6521:( 6475:( 6438:( 6381:( 6355:( 6324:( 6310:( 6257:( 6243:( 6226:( 6184:( 6149:( 6118:( 6103:( 6080:( 6059:( 6026:( 5985:( 5946:( 5917:( 5879:( 5864:( 5850:( 5834:( 5826:( 5800:( 5767:( 5737:( 5691:( 5677:( 5659:( 5619:( 5600:( 5585:( 5567:( 5556:. 5542:. 5528:. 5521:. 5507:. 5500:. 5479:. 5472:. 5451:. 5437:. 5420:. 5406:. 5392:. 5385:. 5371:. 5357:. 5343:. 5329:. 5322:. 5305:. 5298:. 5284:. 5270:. 5250:. 5223:( 5207:( 5172:( 5123:( 5102:( 5078:( 5064:( 5050:( 5032:( 5016:( 4996:( 4977:( 4945:. 4918:( 4899:( 4870:( 4855:( 4832:( 4818:( 4789:( 4757:( 4743:( 4728:( 4682:( 4636:( 4622:( 4596:( 4570:( 4544:( 4525:( 4496:( 4449:( 4434:( 4399:( 4369:( 4338:( 4262:( 4226:. 4195:( 4175:( 4160:( 4127:( 4100:( 4076:( 4058:( 4042:( 3974:( 3959:( 3937:( 3918:( 3903:( 3881:( 3853:( 3831:( 3790:( 3771:( 3752:( 3709:. 3687:( 3672:( 3641:( 3626:( 3612:( 3589:( 3567:( 3546:( 3531:( 3511:( 3499:) 3495:( 3477:) 3473:( 3428:( 3405:( 3373:( 3355:( 3339:( 3303:( 3281:( 3267:( 3245:( 3221:( 3206:( 3187:( 3168:( 3152:( 3123:( 3089:( 3058:( 3044:( 3030:( 3008:( 2983:( 2964:( 2925:( 2907:( 2890:( 2879:) 2819:( 2795:( 2783:( 2774:. 2764:) 2756:( 2692:( 2675:( 2661:( 2646:( 2625:( 2567:( 2546:( 2528:( 2507:( 2492:( 2474:( 2451:( 2414:( 2376:( 2338:( 2307:( 2280:( 2258:( 2232:( 2203:( 2173:( 2130:( 2116:( 2082:( 2067:( 2041:( 2019:( 2001:( 1986:( 1958:. 1931:( 1913:( 1859:( 1845:( 1823:( 1806:( 1766:( 1752:( 1737:( 1723:( 1709:( 1695:( 1681:( 1667:( 1652:( 1621:( 1607:( 1584:( 1570:( 1554:( 1512:( 1495:( 1416:( 1400:( 1370:( 1348:( 1330:( 1315:( 1287:( 1266:( 1237:( 1219:( 1190:. 1180:) 1172:( 1103:( 1088:( 1061:( 1043:( 1004:( 975:( 947:( 920:) 917:☎ 914:( 885:( 863:( 849:) 846:☎ 843:( 803:( 758:( 705:( 686:( 633:( 594:( 516:( 489:( 456:( 448:. 393:( 334:( 319:( 270:( 240:( 221:( 176:( 161:( 147:( 133:( 114:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index