User talk:Berean Hunter/Archive 6

10028: 9180: 9922:

credentials, his profession should not be considered a negative factor on his scholarship. His publisher, Savas Beatie, is a well-known and respected military history publisher. Sam's conclusions are definitely controversial, but his work not being vetted is a condition that could be applied to most authors who publish in non-peer reviewed books, which would include Wiley Sword, Thomas Connelly, and other well-known historians in this area. Now I do agree that the form of the material you deleted was inappropriate, so I do not object to the result you achieved, but I hope you will give more deference to someone we should consider a reliable secondary source.

6015:@Berean Hunter It seems to me for you it is not important what value of the editions can be, if an IP provided new resources and improves Knowledge. For you it is important to block somebody whom you do not like. It is easy to do so, as it is easy to make a mistake - you can make wrong to innocent person more often than not. I have one advice for such "Sheriffs" like you, try to make real edition and study problem 10 times before you use your power. Be editor and knowledgeable person instead nasty cop.207.112.105.233 (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5002: 842:...whether we have a serious problem with User:Donaldecoho which we can no longer ignore. Check his recent talk page edits to get a picture, if you haven't been following. I've largely stayed out of the personal dispute, but the user is continuing to attack and belittle those with whom he disagrees. The battlefield mentality, incivility, and even competence of the user has made me feel we need to escalate this in some way. Per edits to Talk:Battle of Gettysburg I know you're an involved admin, so I'm not asking for direct action, but with 5301: 4416: 9558: 613: 3666: 31: 8935: 3806: 4699:

attained. I thought I was doing the same thing? (Oops, I just realized that LivingDirect.com links to their Knowledge page), but is there any chance you could elaborate on what is or is not allowed in terms of external linking? I'm aware that all links are no follow, and I want to cite the source of the information provided. This page could use a lot of help, and I have a lot of information to provide, but I do not want to violate any of Knowledge's terms or guidelines.

5176: 9446: 9683: 5977: 2578: 4658: 3039: 12104: 11973: 11864: 11744: 11597: 11488: 11330: 9764: 9058: 8354: 7451: 7185: 7068: 6857: 6694: 6430: 5870: 5058: 4107: 2001: 742: 4773: 4855:, and I'm not entirely certain that this is actually Tirgil. The IP range he's editing from is very dynamic, and I don't think that his admission to requesting unblock on a sock-blocked IP is enough evidence to block him. I checked that IP, and there are a large number of accounts there, but none are blocked, none appear related to one another, and none are Riversides. On the other hand, I can't prove that Riversides is 8638: 2417: 6181:

me drooling though. Slow cook the fat out of it, leaving it lean and smokey. Didn't even think about doing that until I posted here, but that does sound interesting. Wonder if I could reverse the order, slow cook a shoulder in the oven for several hours and finish it in the smoker for two hours with the bacon over it. Something to think about. Need to check that book out for applewood when I get the time.

659: 9627: 11165: 9251: 6966: 2830: 2805: 10306: 11116: 10734: 8972: 9871: 8094: 3304: 3190: 9007: 5586:, because I have an issue with which I need some assistance. I believe I am being wikihounded by a sock, and I have dozens of diffs to provide. My questions here are, 1) are you willing to help, and 2) should I post these diffs on-wiki (your talk I presume) or would you prefer I e-mailed them to you privately so as to not tip-off the sockmaster/troll? Thanks for your time. 4424:

away. omg. Even better than the first time. Baked the wings with Frank's sauce for an hour in the oven afterwards, amazingly good and tender. The bacon freezes really well too since it has more fat and less water, so the texture doesn't get messed up. Had the nephew over this weekend, but hoping to get with you this weekend or next if you have the time.

4040:

woman and her slaver" ? Other than the extra R. The former humanizes the slaveholder and objectifies the enslaved woman - a practice upon which slavery itself was predicated upon. The latter humanizes the enslaved woman and is blunt about the slaveholder. Why shouldn't we, in 2012, consider a shift in language to reflect that these were events that happened to

11048: 698:. These bacon rolls were hickory-smoked but I imagine smoking in apple wood would give a good flavor too. Those in the photo are whole slices rolled but Dennis suggested cutting them in half before rolling and I agree this would be better for allowing the heat through to smoke more crisply. Bacon goes with everything...you could even make 6348:...for the recent input on my talk page. Who knows why they come to my page? Maybe because I rarely do any sock issues - I see you are much more an expert in that, so I know where to come in future! I'll get back to my image copyrights... double the load since they made me a commons admin as well... Why do I agree to these things... :-) 114:? Did a CU do a check to see what kind of collateral damage that may cause? I have what appears to be an unrelated account who cannot log in to edit and is requesting an unblock at UTRS. If logged in editing (as opposed to just account creation) does indeed need to be disabled for the range I'll see about getting them IPBE. -- 621:

little garlic. I would imagine soaking it in traditional barbecue sauce would also be good. Or teriyaki. Or oregano/rosemary/thyme. Or leave a gap in the center and put in a chunk of sharp cheddar after smoking. We could probably fill the smoker up with nothing but variations of the the bacon if we were so inclined.

866:

Talk:Battle of Gettysburg. It is because he is mentioning Hal in the Amazon link that I would recuse from any admin role here and will encourage any other admins that see this thread to look into the situation. Here is a bit of a file that I had started on him including stale socking for behavioral considerations:

8164:

TheMetallican. The IPs that were rangeblocked are not TheMetallican. The SPIs in total (all of them on the current page that's not yet closed) are currently labeled to belong to TheMetallican but they need to be separated. The last one for TheMetallican, the ones previous ones for Gunmetal. Make sense? --

1234:

industries. I was worried about getting it right when I realize that these are industry terms and I'm not qualified in that industry. I have field-dressed before but usually let a butcher finish the processing for me. It has been quite a while, too. :) I'm not sure about the merge and I'm not sure if this

10887:

as a compromised account. This user is a frequent IRC user with a confirmed wikipedia cloak. On IRC he indicated that the account was indeed compromised, and he has re-gained control over it. I'm fully convinced from earlier interactions on IRC that this is indeed this user on IRC. Through an edit to

10397:

I should point out that it's actually an established editor editing whilst logged out. I'm wary of making the connection explicit though, because it involves the editor's identity in the real world (name, workplace &c), and there's nothing to be gained from outing in this case. Anyway; thanks for

10230:

Hello. It's not a content dispute, it's a repeated deliberate attempt by Russian IPs to add an image with a fake claim that the tanks in the image were destroyed by RPG-7s, a claim that is not supported by the book the IP is referring to. Even going as far as changing the image description on Commons

9278:

This was from over 2 years ago, where you removed the whole US Census template because one of the sources was not sufficiently reliable. In the future, especially if there is a good reference as well, either merely remove the unreliable reference or check the data for yourself to verify. What you did

8508:

I don't think he has a dedicated article on Knowledge yet. I've just been editing the pages of certain albums ("Heroes" by David Bowie, "Debut by Bjork for example) in the critical reception section so that more than just Allmusic.com's criticisms were represented, but these have since been removed.

7006:

I smoked some bacon out on the patio the other weekend with just salt and pepper, along with some ribs in my usual style. You would have been proud, and full. I de-boned and froze some for a rainy day. I find that with all that fat, they freeze well in portioned ziplock bags. As soon as practical,

6038:

Been busy, but taking the time to do up some ribs for dinner. Ginger, garlic, sugar, paprika and several secret ingredients. Too bad you aren't around. Trying something completely different, will let you know how it turns out. Got company next weekend, family I haven't seen in ages, but we need to

4423:

Smoked a three pound block of bacon along with a bunch of ribs and some chicken wings. All of it came out awesome. All I added on the bacon was a light dusting of salt, I swear it is best that way. Smoked it a little longer including a half hour to finish on the top rack, with the fat down to drip

3548:

Didn't want to drag on but I have seen them specifically say "this isn't a cu block" when indeffing someone. Hadn't examined them to have any stats so just assumed there were other times they didn't as well as I just remembered seeing several. Maybe it is more rare than I knew. Glad you like him, he

3057:

Hmmm. This may be something due to differences in OSs because I can't see what you mean either way. I'm using Firefox on Ubuntu. If I remove the header (along with the one you have here), it doesn't change anything in the page layout that I'm seeing when using preview. Only a few things at the top of

2969:

Berean Hunter---I wasn't aware of these restrictions on Knowledge, and given them I certainly overposted. But there are two pages---William Alexander Morgan and Gerry Patrick Hemming---when a link to my documentary is appropriate. I have video interviews with these men that are not available anywhere

480:

This probably isn't relevant to a decision on the unblock request, but I was curious. The 24. IP address is apparently assigned by Charter Communications in Madison, Wisconsin. There apparently is no geolocate function for an IPv6 address, but the address appears to be owned by Verizon in Bedminster,

6564:

I haven't looked but I fully trust your judgment. If this is still an issue, I'll look into it further if you have any questions for me. Actually, a hardblock on a /16 would most likely be unintentional unless a CU checked that range or I was putting out a fire from an IP hopper. Again, if needed, I

6180:

Haven't drank any wine. Don't think I've even had a beer since then. I have some hickory, but think I could pick up some applewood if they have it in stock. Wonder what else we could smoke with applewood? Maybe some chicken. Not sure about applewood and ribs, never heard of that. The bacon has

4568:

Hey Berean Hunter-- thanks for your help at The Teahouse. Just wanted to remind you to leave a reminder on the talk pages of user's questions that you've answered, so they know you've responded. Some new users have a hard time navigating back to the Teahouse questions page, and this makes it a bit

4039:

Try not to revert edits without discussion, simply dismissing a point as nonsense. Goes against the Knowledge policy of good faith editing, doesn't it? In any case, rather than argue with you, I'll just give you something to ponder: What's the difference between saying "A woman and her slave" and "A

2800:

Yes, that's fine. If it happens again, I will ask if it is still visible or not to others rather than reapplying revdel. I should clarify that the reason that I applied the second revdel was because I thought I had done something wrong on the first go around such that it didn't take and assumed that

1233:

Oh, I don't have a preference over the terms; I was mentioning the carcass weight issue because it looks to be the industry term (it is further sub-divided into Hot Carcass Weight and Cold Carcass Weight) and those may have different legal definitions in different nations as well as animal dependent

11220:

upon threat of blocking, I know that you are being intentionally difficult. The time for debating the matter is over as you ignored those requests. If you post anywhere on Knowledge again including this talk page without having your signature corrected, you will be blocked indefinitely. If you want

10838:

no matter what other job duties you end up with in the advanced MOS. Watering down the meaning by adding police and civilians gets away from the design history as these weapons were strictly designed for the infantry. They weren't designed for naval and air support services and I disagree with your

8967:

Cheers. That occasionally happens when I get off my leash. Too many hanging around there and I could tell that they were getting too frayed and starting to unravel. Many seem so tied up in knots that they really ought to consider loosening up and not being so stiff. Ah well, I don't want to get too

8459:

I have recently added critic Lachlan J.'s scores to some albums, and these have been removed. I have been told that I have been self-promoting and soapboxing, but I don't believe this to be the case. All I have done is added and referenced the scores given to certain albums by Lachlan J. I have not

8221:

The IP originated from a T-Mobile cellphone. Which makes sense since the rangeblock has forced him to find other ways to edit that are not from his regular ISP. The ones you listed above look like they could belong to either GMA or TM, especially since they are genre changes. Using an IP outside

6325:

I vaguely recall seeing something about Blackgaia02 and multiple accounts, but now I can't remember where I saw it. I understand that the other user has made no contributions, but Blackgaia02 still has no right to create a user page for that user unless they own both accounts. I'll wait the outcome

6306:

It looks like the user is trying incorrectly for a renaming possibly out of frustration. Since there are no contribs on that account, I don't see any illegitimate use; it would be interesting to see if they actually have control of that account since it was created on 26 October 2005 but I see that

5363:

Bacon crisps up nicely in the microwave if you unroll it. Met a couple of fellow NC'ers who may join us next time, Dank and a friend. Dank said he would bring German beer, so I'm sure that will bring a smile to you. Oh, and after I baked the country style ribs in the oven for an hour and a half,

4879:

I went and unblocked him. That IP is a very heavily used legitimate proxy, and the editor hadn't made any article edits yet, so I did what what I thought Berean Hunter would do had he reviewed the situation. I know BH isn't likely to be online for a few days, and wanted to be fair to the editor.

3909: 3768:

Why have you blocked me when I am adding in new information to the wiki pages of Hong Kong TVB actors which was only made known today? Many of them have been nominated for the TVB Anniversary awards due to take place next month and their fans would certainly like to know this info. What "disruptive

1741:

Been a hell of week, sick parents and the like. We need to do some Q before Tgiving. I'm still eating on some of that last batch. Obviously not the bacon, that didn't last a day. Might need to do one full smoke of nothing but bacon variations. 10 pounds of smoked bacon should make a nice photo

284:

Meh. Seems pretty molehill to me, given that there was clearly no intent to deceive, as the first IP stated quite openly that he was the one removing the content. And as for edit warring; removing content from one's own talk page is considered exempt. I think this is a pretty shaky block extension.

11281:

Hi, I am a relatively new contributor (though I scored 2,229 points and 1 eliteness in the wikipediholisim test), I visited Jhilton6969 after he vandalized the list of American civil war battles, and I noticed that cluebotNG, someoneelse and you issued him warnings, I issued a final warning on his

9921:

article. Your stated reason "Rm fringe theory by isolated author that is qualified as "retired industrial construction company owner". Work not vetted by scholars." is quite arguable. I know the author personally (and in fact did the maps for his book) and although he does not have formal academic

9489:

My statement: "Despite the fact that Louis XIV's generals subjected the German Palatine to a "scorched earth" policy more than a century earlier" is not a matter of historical debate. Just because some British historian publishes something, doesn't make it correct, however "famously" he might have

8119:

Problem. And this has happened before (you're not the first to get them confused). The IPs definitely belong to Gunmetal Angel, the accounts that were blocked for socking belong to TheMetallican. This needs to be corrected on the SPI page. I was only commenting on how similar they are, but the

5307:

I can't believe we got out butts kicked by two girls. ;-) That was mainly my fault for egging Mrs. Brown on. She does shoot a pretty good game, particularly when riled. Thanks for bringing the beer and bacon, which makes you a champion among men. I'm glad you made the journey. Once summer gets

4666:

as something different. Would the masking of TLAs as I have done in the thread below be better? When I started WP some years ago, I found those to be helpful as I could remember them easily and they became intuitive but I suppose to some, it may look like alphabet soup. I'll try to be more mindful

4299:

Hi Beran - Thank you. It's my lot to give sysops work. My take was to follow the link in Reference 1, where there's a pdf for the citation that explicitly gives the date of the name change. And since that's the US Marine history site, and Truesdell was a Marine... Those Navy sites are nothing

3141:

I didn't think that semi-protection would solve this. There is at least one account that is already autoconfirmed and the others would be/could be in short order. Additionally, I believe that the sock(s) are reaping what they sow here...let them learn the consequences and now have to deal with the

1798:

Don't think I've tried SC style. By the way, the tenderloin is excellent smoked. You make a bowl out of foil, and smoke it with the fat side up on the top rack. It makes a ton of juice, but you keep it with the loin. Very, very tasty stuff. Might have to do one of those next time. You need to

1140:

I've replied on the talk page there, but the carcass weight means something different in the sources than we are using it here at wikipedia. Carcass weight is the weight of the entire carcass, undressed. Then you have dressed weight, then you have retail cut weight. The last source I just added

9722:

I did that for propriety's sake as I see that it appears you may be involved. I am not involved and remain neutral for admin purposes. My action is not because I hold opposition to you but rather that it appears the most appropriate and proper thing to do. I would not object to an impartial admin

4859:

Tirgil, particularly since he has no actual content edits yet. Either way, would you mind taking a look at this again, and possibly some of the IP blocks against this sockpuppeteer? As dynamic as this range is, I don't think they'll be terribly effective, and there's an awful lot of traffic to be

1355:

I had noticed what you are talking about and hope to begin discouraging them with increasing levels of protection. Permanent would be rare and would likely need a consensus but I am willing to increase protection times if they return to the same behavior again after protection expires..1 month, 3

1107:

No problem. Don't hesitate to be bold. My concern was just getting the basic concept covered. I've added a little on field dressing as a comparison. Again, it might even change names with a redirect, but the idea of this as a mid stage of butchering is notable. Even a section on what they do

9978:

of the material you deleted was inappropriate ...." It should have been included in the appropriate parts of the main article, balanced against other secondary sources, and properly cited. I presume you would not have had a problem with that. This, of course, is one of the problems with having a

8163:

The IPs I'm referring to are those that were blocked yesterday before I opened the last SPI request that ended up being TheMetallican. The IPs were Gunmetal, the accounts (not IPs) were TheMetallican. What you did was combine all the SPIs together with the end result being they all belonged to

654:

Oh yes! They are quite savory and delicious. I think they would also work well as one of several items on kabob skewers too...hmmm, bacon, onion, shrimp, sweet red bell pepper chunks, tenderloin and pineapple; that combination cries out for teriyaki sauce. I wonder if minced garlic would hold if

620:

Had some of that red hot sausage with eggs for breakfast, looking forward to ribs for dinner. All that stuff came out pretty good, but I still can't believe how insanely good the smoked bacon came out. That was a very good idea. I like your idea of adding a chunk of onion in the center and a

10122:

As soon as I saw "after seeing this face," I knew exactly where that link was linking to. It's been removed from its original home online but Google still has its own copy. Grr. Maybe one day it will be un-archived or un-stored or un-whatevered. Hey, we were all kids at one time, though, right?

9946:

was encapsulated by "...has recently been challenged by the work of authors such as Stephen M. Hood." which implies that he must be someone of outstanding significance. His Amazon page states that he is a "retired industrial construction company owner" as well as being a distant relative of the

7636:

I've left the report open for now but only the top two IPs were blocked...there appears to be another user who is also using these same IPs but in any event, none of the other IPs have been used by Mathematician 11 on the Iglesias matter in over a week. Unless you find where they have been used

2180:

Admins and non-admin patrollers alike are needed to investigate, supply further evidence and advance the cases. You may want to to watchlist several cases and just follow along for now until such time that you are comfortable helping out. You will also find that your new ability to see a user's

10804:

with a hasty reverting as I am running out the door, so I wanted to drop you a quick note about the use of infantryman/person in the Automatic Rifles section. You had a good point on the way "single person" sounds like no married people qualify, but historical context shows that the staggering

10678:

Hi, Berean. Thanks for the advice, and the tact (I liked the "In the Darwinbish account", that was a nice way of putting it :-)). It turns out Darwinbish can't change anything by clicking on "Manage your global account", but it doesn't really matter, because her account is already active on 19

4985:

I was only hoping you would participate and make your own judgment. Dr. Blofeld's achievement stands on its own unique merit. But it doesn't matter anyway that I can see. I would say something disparaging, but it would only create rancour, and wouldn't change a thing. Best to you. 17:26, 20

3864:

Disruptive editing? You disrupting me on improving the article or just me disrupting the article, I wondered. Feel free to look at my User Talk Page. You're also welcomed to make a request to have a photo of my name on a Golden Village name tag. I am working tomorrow, I can always take a photo

5260:

article should include a list of notable Kentucky colonels. I am leaving this message for you because you previously took an interest in that issue, and I would welcome your participation in that discussion (as well as the participation of anyone else who may have an interest in that topic).

4698:

My apologies for not understanding the guidelines correctly. I actually just copied the format of the other citations on the Icemaker page and noticed that livingdirect.com and buzzle.com both cited their websites as sources, and linked directly to the articles from which the information was

3981:

Are you some kind of Wiki Watchdog?? If you think my addition was not constructive, I beg you to consider removing the entire passage speculating on Buchanan's sexuality. I think it is ludicrous for someone to draw conclusions about a man's behavior based on his appearance in a 19th Century

865:

Yes, I started following this a few weeks ago and then saw some of this earlier today (still have open tabs). I saw the Amazon link this morning and I do find that disconcerting...until then, I wouldn't have considered myself involved because I was watching talk page behavior not related to

7900:

I randomly noticed that you made a good copy-editing-related correction to an article that I had also edited. This gave me the idea that you might be a good person to weigh in on a rather fierce debate I've been involved in. There's no hurry, but if you ever get the time, here is the link:

8069:

Such similar ways of editing, protesting, and articles in common. The only difference I can see is that Metallican doesn't use profanity and become a hot head like Gunmetal. My guess is they are either the same guy playing an elaborate game or they know each other. Found it pretty weirldy

2721:

If you are only 10 years old you might possibly not be quite ready yet to contribute to to Knowledge in a mature manner and using grown up comments. Knowledge is a serious encyclopedia and is not a place for having childish fun. You'll get 'picked on' at your own peril. Please read

4619:

Hi Berean Hunter, often when experienced editors are around the Teahouse for a while they become hosts. When you become a host, you learn about a few of the things about the Teahouse that are a little different from the rest of Knowledge. You can find some of this information in the

1799:

bring more dishes, some of this stuff is sloppy. I still need to do a brisket the night before you come down, let it slow cook in the oven overnight after smoking. Then we can just do ribs and bacon and the loin when you get here. I still drool when I think of that bacon. omg.

3605:"that big heep checkuser voodoo", ok that was funny, even if very un-PC :) I wont' be around next week, going to visit family half a country away for the holiday. We will have to do some q and beer time after Tgiving though. I want to have you try some good Texas style brisket. 1195:

I will look at that latter and see about merging, since the other article was just a stub. Which term do you personally think is the better term? I see "dressed weight" more than "carcass weight", but my searching has likely been more limited than yours. On an unrelated note,

10316:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is

7952:

However, as everybody else involved in the debate is a tech person, and not a journalist, they believe that we should disregard the manual of style, and simply follow the most common title usage (in accordance with the hundreds of cheap tech blogs writing about the subject).

6102:

Heh, I'm finally around but not getting around. Messed my leg up but hope that is short-lived because I need to get back up. I've been staying productive but not on Wiki. I'm supposed to cook for family this weekend but that may have to change depending whether the infection

1779:

I'm up for it. I started down the path of making the SC style mustard-based golden sauce this weekend. I didn't keep it very authentic but ended up with a excellent variation. I will be tweaking that recipe for future use. I slow-cooked tenderloin in it and now there are no

12065:

Hey, I received your message and I am not the one who did the edit. I always leave articles alone unless I see a grammatical error of some sort or some other obvious mistake. Thank you for spending time making sure useless and off-topic details don't show up in articles.

6527:

Hi Berean, in reviewing a request for an account, I came across 168.9.0.0/16, which you school blocked but you left it as a hardblock. Was this the intention, and if so, can you give me any indication of what the issue was? (Feel free to email if it's more appropriate) --

1335:

I see you put this in place until 21 October. Do you think there is any chance of it being made permanent? The vast majority of IP or red-linked editor edits are either not constructive (blanking etc) or typically relate to the old chestnuts of adding "Allah" into the

7556:

When I am adding links to the external links section of people I have interviewed, why are they being removed? These interviews are official and have been cleared by the press of each artist I work with. Please further clarify how I am to add these to the wiki pages.

1200:

is something I've been considering for a while, and now just started. Very rough, but the whole IPs are human thing is a bit too much and not accurate, needing some balance. Your input would be highly desired, and arguably you are more qualified to write it anyway.

5716:

Blocked one for one month and the other for three. I'm basing these times on how long I believe he has used them and therefore has persistence at these addresses. If he keeps up then it may be a good idea to file an SPI so we can track his IPs and be able to consider

10805:

majority of these weapons are issued to non-infantrymen. All naval and air services are considered non-infantry, and depending on the era and nation, the infantry makes up less than a majority of the army (support troops are numerous). Plus, police, civilians, etc.

1644:

has (finally!) posted a sound-looking unblock request, which I'm inclined to grant. However, you and a number of other admins have been involved with his block in the past, so I'd like to get your take on it too; if you have a moment, please could you have a look at

11446:

One of my friend had contributed in several articles and had also created some useful articles. But because of some communication gap his account was blocked indefinitely. So I would request you to help him out in un-blocking his account.... With Pleasure.... He is

9490:

said it. Incidentally, you might like to delete all references to what Louis XIV's generals did in the Palatine, which appear in other Knowledge articles, from other sources. I like truth and accuracy, not rubbish, even if the rubbish has been published somewhere.

7592:

from linking to any website that you own or are a part of as this is considered to be a form of self-promotion. By linking in the EL sections, you are hoping to steer readers toward your site. Even linking to your own articles published by other sources is still a

5477:

I hope you don't mind ... you had hatted the sock's comments, I deleted. I don't usually, but since this one is listed at CENT, I didn't want potential voters to be confused by all the crap at the end of the discussion. Look forward to meeting up soon, btw. - Dank

3587:) b.) Leave it alone (that big heap checkuser voodoo...don't touch with ten foot pole) <== This was the acceptable one chosen. The only wrong answer was c.) Sure, AGF the guy and unblock him. Basalisk's logic was sound and it is good to see the thought process. 481:

NJ. Does that mean that the IPv6 address is assigned to a user in New Jersey, or am I interpreting this incorrectly? Assuming 24. and the IPv6 address are the same person, I would've expected to see another dynamic IP address in the same range as the 24. address.--

8905:

to the archiving to help keep things straight. I knew that unless Manning reversed the identity change that it would be the status quo with the name Chelsea. Sheesh! There have been some exhaustive discussions over this...what a time sink. Thanks for letting me

6161:

I'll look and see...Sam's may have it. I imagine hickory or apple wood might give best flavors. Was the wine decent? (Thinks about it and remembers that Berean got some for self but had put it up and forgot about it...just moved into the fridge for later in the

4624:. The most important thing (at least to me) is the idea of greeting people at the Teahouse and giving thorough friendly answers without using abbreviations (even when the asker seems not-so-new so that new users can understand the discussion). There are even 565:

Feel free...just let me know where it goes so I can make sure to watch/participate. I haven't addressed it but that has been mostly owing to lack of time and I wondered if the community had its hands full when the issue didn't gain traction at the pump.

11240:

I didn't ignore them. I rarely read the messages left. 01:15, 23 September 2012 Global account status: All in order! Your account is active on 20 project sites. Look – see - all in order so why I have to listen to your old tripe is utterly beyond me.

11196:

No one should have to go through page history to find the link to your talk page. Experienced editors may know how to find you but you have made it harder and particularly so for new editors. I'm the second admin that has asked you to comply with

7912:), irrespective of what the majority of sources present (given that the majority of sources are technical blogs with little regard for copy editing). And in fact, the more reputable publications use the correct capitalisation (Big.little) anyway: 10935:

I'll go through the motions with him right away (new password, possibly a committed identity). It was a school computer he left unlocked - if you look at the compromised edits, I'm sure you can get an idea behind the unfortunate situation there.

4207: 9947:

general. My natural question here is why do we care what he thinks? No disrespect intended to him. Calling attention to the fact that he was a company owner isn't meant to be negative but it is meant to illustrate that his opinion is certainly

1447:

sock. I used the same script to block the other socks which is why I know that my tagging was an accident since I didn't block you by mistake. I have reverted that tagging and I apologize for my error and any inconvenience that may have caused

3162: 3161: 3582:

Usually when they do that they are making a judgment call as an admin and their purpose in signifying "this isn't a cu block" is that they didn't use the CU tool at all. Possible correct answers would be a.) Decline per (some logic found in

4249:

was the birthname, so Truesdell redirects to Truesdale. The facts are the opposite, and Truesdell is the name at time of death, according to the Marines. I've corrected Truesdale, but it would seem right that the extant article should be

5395:

Sehr gut. I look forward to meeting them. Were our current weather to persist, it would be perfect...I did a doubletake today as I saw three kids in cutoff shorts playing with a sprinkler in their yard (I think they may be a bit eager for

133:

Hi Ponyo, I've changed the block settings to allow accounts to edit so they shouldn't have a problem now. I started to block the latest IP they were using and converted to a rangeblock after looking at it further. Thank you for letting me

2110:. There has been an ongoing discussion at my talk page about the article, and I need editors more familiar with the article to review his comments, his source and the article in general for inaccuracies. Thanks for your help. Regards, — 463:

Hi. This user raises what I think are good points in her/his unblock request, but I wanted to check with you before I unblocked. The "sock"'s only edits were to the user's Talk page, which isn't off-limits during a block. Any thoughts?

10506:

If you feel it's necessary to remove links from one reputable news source about a subject, then you should remove ALL links from news sources, unless you have a vested interest in supporting one over another ... is that the case? Ie:

6131:

What we NEED is a whole slab of uncut bacon, then smoke it whole. Don't cut it until it is done smoking for about 2 hours. And beer. We always need beer. I would imagine you have to go to a butcher to get a slab of uncut bacon.

5489:

That's fine. Initially, I had left it instead of denying because it served to show how ridiculous he is to those who might not be familiar with him. I'm also looking forward to meeting up with you; we've had a good time at Dennis'

4526:

Looks good for 22nd, can't see anything in the way. We can get together next week and determine what we want to throw in the smoker. Obviously, bacon will be on that list. Talk page stalker: be jealous....very, very jealous. ;-)

9994:

Oh no, I wouldn't have a problem with that. It would probably be better if you did it rather than him as I imagine you would be able to present it in a more neutral way and I know that you have a good library for counterbalancing

1108:

with the parts that are undesirable (hot dogs, chorizo and bologna I assume) might fit. I dunno, not married into it. Seems like a lot of cattle links exist, mainly govt. types. I think I have enough to escape CSD for now.

8779:

We have a lovely IP editor dropping by and replacing all the geological formation stuff with Genesis; we're already up to about five times in fifteen hours. I'm wondering if that might be grounds for partial page protection?

3865:

showing myself in front of Golden Village City Square Mall, and show you. I guess you like to accuse the innocents of committing something that they did not participate, huh? Busy in real life or busy blocking the innocents?

2964: 4209: 252:) to two weeks because he used another IP. Did the user do something abusive with that other IP that I missed? Because I can only see it being used on the original IP's talk page, which is a place the IP can edit, anyway. 2538:

Thanks for the Reviews in the 30-in-1 DYK nomination. With your addition, perhaps other Reviewers will see the trend that 3 Reviews is all that is needed from each Reviewer and then it won't be such a strain to finalize

2032: 8667:, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the 2768:

After doing the initial revdel, it was still showing up after refreshing the page and purging the cache so I went back and applied the tighter level. I don't know why it was still there as I hovered over the diff

2289:

Thank you. That is correct so you would want to cite this work when copying sections and it would be okay. There is another matter, however, as you are copying his references incompletely. Cites such as "<ref:

1235: 265:

He was using it to edit war over the messages being left on the previous IP talk page. Where it might be questionable using the same IP on one's talk while responding, using a different IP for such behavior isn't

6112:

I'm wondering if the bacon shouldn't be somewhat flat and on its side in the smoker (like ribs turned on their sides in a rack). It would curl but would probably produce better end results. Another experiment to

9727:

by NE ENT may be worthwhile. Remember that the thread was opened by Demiurge1000 and not Mbz1. (after edit conflict) Sure, I won't be reverting anyone there. Discussion is fine. Looking for email but not in box

7707:

While the attempt is appreciated, there was no vandalism of the page and all info reflected valid information regarding the lake and its dynamic. This info is supported by the JACKS LAKE COTTAGERS ASSOCIATION.

4475:

That sat would be the 22nd, not sure if the kids will be here or not, but that won't matter. I have great nephews and nieces, teenagers. As far as I can tell, I'm available. Cook some Q, shoot some pool....

10567:

Why do you refuse to remove the Guardian's link to their news coverage on the subject? Clearly you have a vested interest in supporting one source over another. You are a disservice to the Wiki community.

10255:

Hello Thomas, Either way, it prevents repeated edit warring by the IP. If he refuses to discuss then we'll handle it differently. I didn't know that it had been discussed previously; thank you for letting me

9941:

of a non-scholar whose work hasn't been vetted. Lead section's do not look good even when they have highly-credentialed historians mentioned by name let alone someone that doesn't hold those credentials. The

2292:

are his references but they have not been carried forward such as to have context in the current article. Who is Seir? He hasn't been mentioned anywhere. These references would need to be cited more properly.

2697:

Just shut up okay?Im only 10 years old. I just wanted to have a little fun, captain buzz kill. I guess you never had a life when you were young. that was probably like, 100000000000000000 years old. LOL!!!!

7343:

Welcome. You're probably right but I don't mind extending the good faith to him. If he doesn't discuss but continues as he has been then it gives us a clearer direction of how he should be handled the next

4254:. So how do I unscrew it so that Truesdale redirects to Truesdell? Unscrewing the internet MOH records as a whole is a bigger job. ☺ OTOH if you're OK with it as it is, I'll just color it done. ...best, 11075:

Thanks for stopping my runaway account and AFG about getting it unblocked I've taken steps to prevent this again and the fools who Hijacked my account are going to face some Retribution for there actions

8732:

I sent you an email today prior to noticing that you haven't edited in a couple of weeks. Note that I have undone the blocks myself, so no further clerking is needed (unless you want to update the SPI).

4326:

if you have the time. It was to be just a list of TC recipients, but it grew ☺ Master plan is to make it a "Tiffany Cross Medal of Honor" article, with "main article" mention on the MOH page. ...best,

2168: 499:

on the IP talk page. The switching of IP addresses is not legit. (Bbb23, no, it just means that the company that owns the IPv6 allocation is located in NJ but the user can be anywhere in their network.)

195: 3921:

Given to members of the community who take SPI seriously and show constant dedication and uphold clerk and community standards. This medal represents the honour to be serving with you on this team. --

11071:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

10119:

Thanks for helping me out and taking the time over on 7&6=thirteen's talk page regarding my questions. I sure had a bunch of questions and both 7&6=thirteen and you were very helpful. Thanks!

8141:

Hmmm. Since I'm not privy to the checkuser's info and I presume that it could have played a role in his results, I would be reluctant to make changes myself. He cannot discuss the IPs publicly either.

5338:

I had a good time despite the whipping. :) I tried finishing out the bacon in the oven at 400 degrees for half an hour and it still wasn't as crisp as I was shooting for but it definitely improved it.

1263:

Sure, I will look at the essay but not sure when...I'm still trying to get part of a design worked out this evening but wanted to stick my head in and check on a few things which I still haven't done.

8070:

conincidental that their socks edited the same article in the same day, not long after one of the socks was IP rangeblocked. I will do it better if there's a next time (with diffs and so forth). --

4597:

How is this a reminder? Where are these instructions written such that I would have known? Also, you've been with us for a year...I'm not leaving talkbacks all over the place for experienced editors.

11143: 3228: 3181: 2653:

Thank you for pointing it out. In my view, this is vandalism and not anything that could be damaging because no one would take it seriously enough to lend credibility. Too silly to be insulting. :)

4457:

This weekend is supposed to be a busy one for me but the following would be good if weather is permitting. I've been thinking about this recently and look forward to it. Ready for some R&R. :)

2172: 8631: 4228: 2979: 7973:

I don't have an opinion on this article title but would tend to defer to achieving talk page consensus. It looks like the matter has been receiving a fair bit of attention from several editors.

773: 757: 7621:

Hello and thanks for the quick response plus the link to the tool. What shall I do with the IPs when I find them? The list is pretty massive. Do you want me to add them all to the SPI report?

11361: 11345: 9089: 9073: 6461: 6445: 5089: 5073: 4138: 4122: 2970:

else, and they add to their respective histories in relation to Cuba. I will repost the documetnary link to those two pages, but will otherwise follow the guidelines. Thanks for the heads-up.

2127:

Looks like Mike made a good summary response. If the discussion continues, it would be a candidate for moving to the article talk page where it would likely get more input from other editors.

9865:

has received an appeal by this user, who you blocked based on behavioural evidence at SPI. As the appeal was submitted by e-mail, I am unable to provide a copy here. Could you contact me at

7875:

I saw that after the fact, yeah. In any case the article the socks have been focusing on has been protected, so hopefully that will solve the primary problem. Thanks for getting back to me!

2751: 1056:

as a form of butchering and then renamed, but we need an article on this concept and figured you could help me with this. I don't expect it to get large, but it needs covering nonetheless.

9795: 9779: 6240:

After I get through the next few months of OT, I am wanting to spend more time writing anyway. I still need to work on my companion article for the 1950s auto article I have in userspace.

5901: 5885: 2016: 4044:, perpetrated by other people, rather than defending the rights of slaveholders to be seen as human while the enslaved remain mere property. THIS is the discussion. And it's not nonsense. 8385: 8369: 1424:. However, my account is not mentioned in the relevant investigation. I am one of the users involved in reverting the hoax added by this user. Could you elaborate on this matter please? 10888:

his talk linked to IRC I can also confirm that he has re-gained control over the account. With all that together I would like to unblock the account. Do you have any objections to that?

10679:

project sites (how on earth did that happen? — she has edited and even created an account on Commons, but nowhere else), which seems plenty for such a naughty little user. Thanks again.

11628: 11612: 11519: 11503: 9097: 6888: 6872: 6725: 6709: 5097: 765: 9321: 12135: 12119: 12004: 11988: 11895: 11879: 11353: 9081: 8617: 7482: 7466: 7216: 7200: 6453: 5081: 4723:

require books, periodicals, journals, newspapers etc. but do not allow linking to assertions made at websites unless those sites are the official sites of published, vetted material.

4130: 1089:

Looking into this...may find something on the bookshelf. I also want to get some block time in clerking at SPI this afternoon after getting a few more things done (no pun intended :).

11775: 11759: 9787: 7099: 7083: 5893: 4650:

Hi Heather, thank you for the explanation which is helpful. I had answered a question or two at the Teahouse before but was unaware of the talkback expectation. Am I using too many

2024: 8654: 847: 11639: 10300: 9381:

I just want to let you know i am the director of this film on Simo Hayha nlmade out if legos so its not fake. Its real. I'm still in production so it won't finish until next Mon.

8377: 6733: 781: 11620: 11511: 9105: 7490: 6880: 6717: 5105: 4146: 3503:

Oh sorry, it was pissant, not asshole, but same thing to an extent. Plus your message had an overall aggressive tone. I'm not sure how to put diffs as links, but here's the url:

12127: 11996: 11887: 7656: 7474: 7208: 5909: 2040: 4963:

Wow, just a cursory glance and I see that this is a lively one. I'll have to read on it more when I get a chance but I'll go ahead and refrain from taking part as I see that

3420: 3366:

Thanks, got it, now I understand the extra attention. I suppose I can manage two diffs of trivial edits, particularly if I keep two from prior socks sitting around to use.

599: 579: 11767: 8393: 7091: 548:. Not sure if you want to do anything with it; if you do, great, and if not I'd be more than happy to pick it up (once I figure out where the best place for it would be). 4740:. Ice Machines Plus will not be acceptable for linking or as a ref just as some of the other sites you mentioned are not suitable. You should also read this about having a 10917:

Some explanation from the user would be good. Little brother? Also, have they changed their password? That kind of thing can't happen again with that account if unblocked.

6896: 6741: 893: 887: 10327: 3351:

I added a comment while you were responding to my additional info. We can pursue my issues there or elsewhere, it's up to you. Thanks for attending to it in any case.

1875:

I have tentative plans this Saturday but will know how solid that is on Thursday. I think they are also calling for rain on Saturday. :/ I will know more in a few days.

12143: 9317: 7224: 7674: 11786: 10826:

also works. Think like you were the designer; who are you designing for? I actually do have plenty of sources if you want me to look for synonyms. You do realize that

9392: 8626: 7107: 1532: 6962:

Hi! I've moved you to the "temporarily inactive section" of the clerks listing as you've been away for a month, but feel free to reactivate yourself when you return.

10420: 10201: 8603: 5238: 8856: 8789: 3937:

I've seen you put a lot of effort in as a clerk over the past few months, and want to thank you for your contributions, especially as I have seen them recently. --

8590: 901: 7916: 11436: 10618:

This is equally about you, too. Refusing to acknowledge or answer the questions clearly shows that you are supporting one source over the other, end of story.

9433: 8771: 7967: 7377: 5744: 5706: 5546:

It was great a few days ago...my forecast for tomorrow is high of 56 with 50% chance of rain. The 10 day forcast looks really ugly with lows going down to 18. :(

4727:

has different standards but are only permitted in the External links section; linking externally within the body of the article is not permitted. See this about

11427:

You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. We last contacted you on 3/4/14. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. --

367: 11192:

No one seems to have difficulty finding me as you've just proved... And are you in charge? If so, who appointed you? --The Totter 01:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

10817: 8861: 8598: 7850: 7417: 4610: 4071:...there is no slaver in the photo. If you want to discuss edits, go make a proposal on the talk page and see if you can get a consensus to make such a change. 2787:

Hmm, well, I've now undeleted the names (only), and the diffs/revision text still require Sysop access as far as I can tell. Does it all still look OK to you?

1440: 324: 11027: 11013: 10991: 10977: 10959: 10945: 10105: 9267: 4980: 3155: 10872: 9363: 9311: 7892: 1626: 1527: 8895: 8556: 8502: 3107: 3089: 1039: 559: 11181: 10414: 9341: 8685: 7322: 5409: 4680: 4637: 4084: 4045: 3893: 3866: 3762: 3253: 3209: 3071: 2939: 2841: 2835: 2821: 2795: 2789: 2782: 2756: 2562: 2527: 2351: 2305: 1020: 531: 522: 512: 465: 449: 9288: 7986: 7956:

At any rate, I've given up on them, as none of them have any interest in proper copy-editing or the MoS guidelines. They refuse to even read my comments.

7843: 7041: 7023: 6632: 6288: 6264: 6235: 6205: 6175: 6156: 6126: 5388: 5356: 4926: 4838: 4551: 4521: 4503: 4470: 4028: 3650: 3632: 3600: 3531: 3498: 3476: 3462: 3126:

Hi -- given that the problem here is edit-warring by socks, was it perhaps your intention to apply semi-protection instead of full protection? thanks --

2707: 1970: 1938: 1920: 1888: 1826: 1793: 1730: 1711: 1312: 1276: 1228: 1190: 1135: 1102: 675: 10964:

You can unblock him as it sounds like you are taking responsibility for him. :) I reserve the right to indef him if things go that erratic again. Agreed?

10392: 8642: 8613: 7822: 6093: 5748: 5730: 5289: 3700: 2998: 2401: 2209: 2194: 2140: 1866: 1168: 1008: 182:. Is it appropriate for the admin who blocks the socks (me in this instance) to formally close like you did, or should that be reserved for SPI clerks? 10786: 10350: 8702: 7693: 7001: 2684: 2666: 1461: 831: 386: 11422: 10835: 10667: 10612: 10561: 10473: 10407: 10157: 9542: 8185: 7816: 7650: 7610: 6672: 6578: 6381: 5740: 5702: 3967: 2151:

Hey, BH, I did say I'd be willing to help out at SPI, so I'll take you up on your offer. I guess I need a trainer? Would you want to do this for me?

314: 292: 279: 12081: 11720: 10750: 10292: 10269: 10217: 9937:

Happy New Year, Hal. Considering the context of the edit, I respectfully disagree. I don't believe that any article's lead section should feature the

8835: 8821: 8693:

is have the same sock puppetry problem has before. I dont see us being able to block ever IP the user has. Perhaps best to lock up the page again. --

8255: 8237: 8201: 8179: 8154: 8113: 8031: 7795: 5774: 5227: 2316:

Im bored in my web mastering class, what the hell are you doing at 10 in the morning patrolling wikipedia? Don't grown men have better things to do?

474: 458: 225: 11269: 10801: 8988: 7884: 7870: 7764: 6656: 6516: 4904: 4757: 4309: 4290: 3338: 3324: 2739: 2366: 1662: 1510: 1405: 1387: 1369: 993: 945: 8919: 8222:

the US is called using a proxy (I think). That would also fit as a way to edit since the rangeblock, which would lead me to believe it is GMA. --

7405: 5651: 5640: 5622: 5611: 3401: 2095: 1632: 10795: 10626: 10576: 10520: 10447: 10373: 9498: 9160: 8765: 7568: 6559: 6335: 6320: 5964: 5464: 5432:, the block form says: "The IP address 128.68.97.56 is blocked as a Tor exit node." What does that mean (I know a little about Tor purely based on 5270: 5160: 4880:

By all means, if either of you have questions or think I goofed, ping me, but it looked like a coincidence here and blocks are cheap if it isn't.

4391: 725: 490: 165: 147: 10930: 10487: 9662: 9476: 8721: 8524: 8478: 8448: 7545: 5559: 5541: 5531: 5513: 5503: 4201: 2466: 715: 689: 11416: 10318: 10008: 9968: 9906: 9850: 8331: 7357: 7279: 6796: 6638: 6413: 4819: 4269:

Well, the references aren't helping any. :) The SC State House site returns an error and the mil site is coming back as an untrusted connection.

3777: 3375: 3367: 3352: 1285:

simply because I know a little about them and can find the sources. Surprising how bad the condition is on some of these common term articles.

358:. Does a new sock case need to be opened (I'm unfamiliar with the previous) or can this be dealt with in another, perhaps quicker way? Thanks, -- 12059: 11694: 10086: 6951: 12168: 12029: 11920: 11841: 11811: 11664: 11574: 11544: 11386: 9820: 9130: 8873: 8862: 8562: 8418: 7515: 7249: 7162: 7132: 6921: 6766: 6486: 5934: 5130: 5033: 4704: 4368: 4336: 4171: 3745:

I'm not sure which one you mean as there were several different versions which someone else deleted. The pages were being recreated by several

2161: 2065: 1667: 806: 11950: 10452:

Thanks for letting me know. If he begins to get disruptive again we can block him. Depending on how persistent he is, you may want to file at

9887: 9237: 9404: 9041: 8869: 7770: 5853: 5674: 5041: 2692: 999: 9619: 5483: 12198: 8486: 8337: 7434: 5592: 4090: 4053: 1984: 1433: 1421: 1349: 544:

On the off-chance you hadn't noticed, your proposal regarding MOS:IDENTITY (which I ended up being in favor of) has since been archived to

6069:

Meh, they came out better the old way. Have family coming in this weekend, think I will do up some ribs the old fashioned way for them.

4591: 3833: 3407:

I plan to take part in the discussion but am busy this evening. I'll check in tomorrow when I get a chance. Thank you for letting me know.

2916: 12103: 11972: 11863: 11743: 11596: 11487: 11329: 11313: 9856: 9763: 9747: 9457: 9273: 9057: 8353: 7832: 7450: 7184: 7168: 7067: 6856: 6693: 6677: 6429: 5869: 5057: 4957: 4782: 4625: 4106: 2107: 2000: 1544: 741: 415: 10687: 9724: 8307: 8287: 8135: 8085: 8064: 3135: 11956: 11580: 6840: 4277:

more. I've made some spelling corrections but left the quoted material as originally spelled and moved the article to the correct name.

3874: 3854: 3681: 3431: 3395: 2543: 593: 553: 179: 7429: 11727: 11471: 11465: 9741: 9400: 7630: 7051: 4263: 3948: 859: 392: 11307: 7662: 7303: 5242: 4873: 3360: 3295: 2382: 2121: 11847: 11286: 10356: 10313: 10194: 8571:

just did three edits , one is 90 something percent the Exact changes that this recently blocked sock puppet page made at metalcore

7580: 6982: 5470: 5247: 3387: 1174: 648: 298: 10235:, where you can find a discussion about it on the talk page. Also see the customised text I added to the warning I gave the IP on 8958: 6307:

their own account goes back to 2006 so it is possible. I will be taking a closer look later...I see that things are a bit erratic.

4000: 2495: 1607: 1392:

It would be good to see what happens. The increase in protection time is to deter potential damage so we would need to justify it.

1083: 11155: 9676: 6407: 2671:

Okay, then we leave it this way. It was an extra bit tricky, because I know Marty Morrissey personally (although not that well).

2647: 2283: 2231: 875: 211: 10897: 7386: 5536:

Yeah, but in the sixties tomorrow in most of the state. I think I'll go sip a mint julip on the veranda ... in January. - Dank (

2440: 2146: 1443:

and when I used a script which gathered your name from that report I accidentally tagged you...I had confused the closely-named

127: 12164: 12025: 11916: 11807: 11660: 11540: 11382: 9816: 9126: 8609: 8414: 7511: 7245: 7128: 7018: 6917: 6762: 6605: 6482: 6259: 6200: 6151: 6088: 6058: 5930: 5710: 5383: 5327: 5204: 5126: 4899: 4814: 4546: 4498: 4451: 4446: 4167: 3627: 3571: 2723: 2061: 1965: 1915: 1861: 1821: 1768: 1307: 1223: 1163: 1130: 1078: 802: 643: 259: 3052: 2754:, why hide the username/IP? I take it that is only for when the username involved in some action is itself offensive/whatnot. 12172: 12087: 12033: 11924: 11815: 11668: 11548: 11390: 11132: 9824: 9548: 9439: 9134: 8422: 8012: 7937:

I even provided two links to tech-related articles that follow correct English capitalisation irrespective of the trademark:

7731: 7519: 7253: 7136: 6925: 6770: 6668: 6652: 6539: 6490: 5938: 5844: 5825: 5573: 5200: 5134: 4763: 4175: 3391: 2959: 2069: 1491: 810: 589: 549: 10638: 10588: 10532: 8616:

election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the

5332: 4964: 4712: 2331: 1773: 879: 11457: 11299: 11217: 11213: 11205: 11202: 10364:) before I even read it. I don't like it, and I kindly ask you not to remove posts from my talk page any more. Thank you. 8516: 8470: 8454: 7909: 5445: 3738: 2762: 2620: 1562: 1538: 1330: 974: 917: 409: 249: 7337: 6362: 4403: 11234: 10426: 10334: 9606:

Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Knowledge's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable

8046:

talk page, but since you were previously involved with the other SPI today, was wondering if you would take a look here?

6399: 5848: 5829: 5762: 5234: 3730: 3263: 3080:

your header template since the unclosed HTML tags were making the usable width of this page about 300 pixels. Good luck!

2912: 2699: 2487: 2323: 527: 496: 470: 454: 11104: 10231:

a week ago, adding the fake claim to the description there. Attempts to add the image have previously been made also on

9510: 8578:

this page made them , more than likely worth looking into or being aware of, thanks for your time , this one here....

7931: 6835: 6063: 545: 12073: 11716: 10138: 10129:

Anyway, again, thanks for taking the time to reply. I now have to carefully check out all the stuff you both provided.

8746: 6601: 6252: 6210:

You mean you still have the wine that I gave you? That's a surprise. I would have thought that gone long ago. I've had

6193: 6144: 6081: 6051: 5376: 5320: 4892: 4807: 4539: 4491: 4439: 4059:

It is sheer nonsense that you are trying to start something which goes against the reliable sources. We aren't here to

3992: 3620: 3564: 1958: 1908: 1854: 1814: 1761: 1693: 1300: 1216: 1156: 1123: 1071: 912: 636: 97: 8813:. In this case there is just a single IP so a block will work just fine (I went ahead and gave the IP a 48 hour one). 8680: 6300: 3789: 3637:

Like minds think alike. I just sent you email talking about barbecue and yes, we should get together...like that idea.

3576: 3467:

Oh yeah, I remember you. You're the guy who got away with calling me an asshole. How's immunity working out for you?--

3443: 1378:. Is that enough for a further semi period or does it need to be unprotected for a longer period to see what happens? 356: 353: 346: 11282:

talk page. I should post the problem to the admin's notice board after a fourth time right?Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa

10249: 6815:. It's a close IP that frequents the same topics with nonsense edits. Should I be raising this in a different venue? 6609: 3077: 2971: 2922:

This is confirmed as a class project from an educational IP. I can see why you had your doubts...I did to when I saw

2206: 2158: 1943:

If you come down, we can roam around the festival, then go eat some good Mexican food at Don Juans, con cerveza. :D

1415: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 10911: 10651: 9672:

There's more here than meets the eye. Please don't revert me. Email me any questions you like and I will explain.

9526: 9518: 8877: 7309:

You're welcome. Hopefully, this will lead to a discussion rather than the slow edit warring which has been going on.

5813: 5424:

Hey, Berean, it looks like you're more back than not, so I'll hope you can answer a question for me. Take a look at

3032: 585: 11250: 10776: 10673: 10204:(the IP is now stale anyway) and a block already made in the one you filed. Thank you for letting me know about it. 10064:}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. 10014: 9216:}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. 8671:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 8037: 7294:; I was literally just about to file a 3RR/edit-war complaint against the IP hopper when you saved me the trouble. 6978: 6022: 5809: 5191:

Best wishes for joy and happiness. Also, keep up the good work as an administrator. All the best for the new year,

3249: 1444: 11109: 8218:

I came across an edit today that was exactly the same as one done a few days ago by one of the Gunmetal Angel IPs:

7328:

Thanks from me as well. I very much doubt that a real discussion will occur, however, based on the events so far.

3233: 1596: 10634: 10584: 10528: 10362: 9506: 8219: 7791: 7576: 5801: 5627:

Got it...it may take me a bit to sort through and I have limited time this evening so I appreciate your patience.

4992: 4786: 4628:

to make the Teahouse talkback that Bonkers is talking about really easy. Thanks for helping around the Teahouse!

4399: 2877: 2872: 924: 843: 10457: 8902: 7921: 7902: 7831:. Please be advised that one of the IPs that was a part of that case just made the same edits once more today - 2407: 1697: 1685: 1684:, with his block ending on late October 16. By October 17, he had already right away broken his topic ban, with 1593: 10840: 10190: 9988: 9931: 9166: 8327: 8303: 8283: 8233: 8175: 8131: 8120:

IPs do distinguish them. TheMetallican's IPs come out of Studio City, CA, Gunmetal Angel's come out of LA. --

8081: 8060: 8008: 7411: 4913:

Yes, this is fine especially as I've been away longer than expected. Thank you for taking care of this, Dennis.

4621: 4233: 4034: 3785: 2881: 1688:. Now, the edit was non-controversial, but he's already been warned that he's not supposed to edit music genre 837: 10163: 1586: 439: 9396: 8314: 7727: 7392:

Thank you. I'll look after some coffee and the world begins to make sense...well, as much as it ever does. ;)

6291:

make any sense to you? (In case the list changes before you see this, it's the one at 9:30 on 13 February.)--

2923: 2853: 2222:

Why you deleted my edits in article Mughal weapons. Many of the articles copied from public domain sources.--

1658: 1375: 3279: 3275: 3267: 1550: 427: 9693: 9638: 7616: 5987: 5343:

Between my to-do list and continued social functions, I've not been on wiki and need to get back into gear.

4844: 4779:

I thought that you deserved something a bit extra for all of the amazing work you've done for the project.

4356: 3899: 3660: 3346: 2864: 2631: 2588: 2477:

Berean, There is an actual story that Buffalo Wings started in College Station, Texas in the early 1920's.

1580: 1374:

Hi, the semi-protection expired yesterday and the only IP edit since then has been a typical blanking edit

680:

I love bacon, and I know that everything is better with bacon, but what is that, bacon-wrapped bacon? :D —

539: 433: 9943: 12005:

Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

11896:

Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

10540:

No, I'm not supporting one source over the other. I have removed your additions because you seem to be a

8925: 8797: 8594: 4588: 4508:

If it does turn out that it isn't convenient just let me know next week. No holiday pressure, no worries.

3028: 2886: 2716: 2171:

which is what I was referring to. Only clerk trainees need a trainer; there is a wait list for that role

1836: 1197: 105: 655:

wrapped up in and throughout the bacon. An extra dusting of garlic and onion powders for good measure...

11023: 10987: 10955: 10941: 10893: 10079: 10040: 10027: 9373: 9230: 9192: 9179: 7551: 7363: 6829: 5026: 4950: 3859: 3826: 3796: 3131: 3024: 2826:

Cool – well, if there are no further technical issues, let's aim to maximize transparency where we can

2533: 421: 38: 11084:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ 8460:

posted any kind of opinion at all and I have not been promoting any kind of opinion or external site.

6659:

first. You are receiving this message because you were previously involved in dealing with this user.

5471: 4719:

Hello AGRSIMP, I've tried to clean out some non-refs that link to company websites. Our standards for

1681: 11432: 10813: 10279: 9701: 9359: 9284: 6957: 6615:

Intelligent conversation seems to be a commodity that is in decline these days...I'm starting to see

6219: 5995: 4934: 4563: 2596: 2357: 2101: 1700:.) So, I wanted to point out that he knowingly broke his topic ban as soon as his his block expired. 1646: 1599: 1052:

Just started, unreferenced after I redlinked it in Pig pickin'. Likely, it can be expanded to cover

11146:

to your User Page, for your approval. A little humor! If you don't like, you can of course remove.--

2898: 111: 11461: 11303: 9691:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

9667: 9483: 8809:

Pages are only protected when there is severe vandalism that cannot be dealt with trough a regular

8520: 8474: 7854: 6591:

Not sure when, but I'm really needing some intelligent conversation, cold beer and barbecue soon.

5985:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

3119: 3085: 2586:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2549:

You're welcome. I'm glad someone discovered the reason my post wasn't showing up and fixed it, too.

2269: 1238:

tells us anything or not. They may well be candidates to remain as separate articles based on that.

1016: 403: 243: 5645:

No hurry, thanks much for being willing to take a look, I really appreciate your efforts to help.

932:

I see that things aren't improving and agree that it would be good if another admin could review..

874:

was blocked 1 week on Oct. 3, 2011 for abusing multiple accounts. He immediately evaded his block

11448: 11441: 11283: 11264: 11229: 11176: 11151: 11127: 11008: 10972: 10925: 10867: 10745: 10662: 10607: 10556: 10468: 10387: 10345: 10264: 10212: 10152: 10100: 10003: 9963: 9901: 9736: 9657: 9537: 9471: 9428: 9336: 9306: 9262: 8983: 8914: 8901:(After scratching head) I'm guessing that my involvement in the August discussion must have been 8851: 8831: 8785: 8760: 8716: 8551: 8497: 8250: 8196: 8149: 8108: 8026: 7981: 7865: 7811: 7759: 7688: 7645: 7605: 7400: 7352: 7317: 7299: 7285: 7036: 6996: 6627: 6573: 6403: 6376: 6315: 6230: 6170: 6121: 5725: 5635: 5606: 5554: 5526: 5498: 5459: 5433: 5404: 5351: 5284: 5222: 5166: 4975: 4921: 4833: 4752: 4675: 4633: 4605: 4516: 4465: 4285: 4079: 4049: 4023: 3962: 3888: 3870: 3849: 3757: 3734: 3695: 3645: 3595: 3493: 3457: 3415: 3319: 3257: 3224: 3204: 3177: 3150: 3102: 3066: 3020: 2993: 2955: 2934: 2908: 2858:

I am approaching you as an editor who works on SPI's. Can you take a look at the recent edits to

2816: 2777: 2703: 2661: 2625: 2557: 2522: 2491: 2461: 2396: 2346: 2327: 2300: 2279: 2227: 2189: 2135: 1933: 1883: 1788: 1725: 1621: 1505: 1456: 1400: 1364: 1271: 1185: 1097: 1034: 1001: 988: 956:

Hi, can you re-add its move-protection (indef, sysop)? There is no reason to move it. Thank you.

940: 710: 670: 607: 574: 507: 381: 309: 274: 206: 142: 47: 17: 3163:

Template:Did you know nominations/Apollo 11 lunar sample display, Apollo 17 lunar sample display

2801:

I had made a newbie mistake. I see now that by doing the second revdel, I made certain of that.

2106:

You seem to frequent the talk page of the 9x19 Parabellum talk page, so I'll let you know about

1556: 12178: 12077: 12039: 11930: 11821: 11712: 11674: 11554: 11396: 11275: 10950:

If you like that on-wiki I'm happy to ask him - but he's understandably somewhat shaken by it.

10808:

Just a suggestion, but how about "marksman," "shooter" or "operator" instead of "infantryman?"

10432: 10236: 9830: 9140: 8668: 8650: 8428: 7963: 7699: 7525: 7259: 7142: 7014: 6931: 6776: 6598: 6496: 6247: 6188: 6139: 6076: 6046: 5944: 5419: 5371: 5364:

it was perfect. Live and learn. I need to check out that smoking book for some fresh ideas.

5315: 5140: 4887: 4802: 4578: 4534: 4486: 4434: 4274: 4242: 4181: 3996: 3973: 3615: 3559: 3527: 3472: 3439: 2075: 1953: 1903: 1849: 1809: 1756: 1706: 1467: 1295: 1211: 1151: 1118: 1066: 1045: 816: 631: 233: 11242: 11019: 10983: 10951: 10937: 10889: 10369: 10073: 10034: 9224: 9186: 8676: 7992: 7291: 5266: 5253: 5020: 4944: 4690: 3820: 3677: 3127: 2975: 2472: 2431:

For all your hard work, contributions and administration of the Knowledge project. Cheers. --

2378: 2203: 2155: 2116: 1717:

I see Metalvayne has been indeffed now and note the ANI thread. I support Beeblebrox's block.

342: 10177: 8270: 8047: 12069: 11704: 11453: 11428: 11295: 11137: 10809: 10771: 10622: 10572: 10516: 10061: 9494: 9388: 9355: 9280: 9213: 9090:

Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II

8512: 8466: 7779: 7715: 7670: 7564: 7369: 6975: 6802: 6522: 6395: 6387: 6211: 6026: 6018: 5770: 5680: 5665: 4845: 4387: 4221: 3988: 3954:

Thank you DeltaQuad, I appreciate this. It is indeed an honor to work with everyone at SPI.

3773: 3726: 3381: 3243: 3216: 3169: 2677: 2640: 2483: 2319: 2217: 1641: 1633: 1522: 1429: 951: 363: 334: 173: 3717:

i wish to know what happened to international association of multidisciplinary research?

2894: 2514:

to explain the changes you would like to make since I believe that would be controversial.

1487: 8: 11000:

for security reasons...perhaps left field-stripped of tools like Twinkle to limit damage.

10839:

statement "that the staggering majority of these weapons are issued to non-infantrymen".

10723: 10630: 10580: 10524: 10501: 10443: 10403: 10169: 10134: 9502: 9325: 8623: 7787: 7626: 7572: 6554: 6534: 5795: 4410: 4395: 3943: 3927: 3081: 1925:

I'd certainly consider that a plus although I doubt the organizers and vendors would. :)

1676:

because he used a sockpuppet to get around his topic ban, where he's not allowed to edit

1516: 1479: 1012: 695: 398: 289: 256: 239: 10544:

account which is spamming strictly CBS links. You will need to stop that as well as the

7828: 5508:

He said you had a long drive ... are you in NC (if that's not classified info)? - Dank (

5436:)? The IP doesn't appear to be actually blocked as they can edit. Thanks for any help.-- 5295: 4851:

Hey, Berean. This user is requesting unblock (you'd blocked them as a suspected sock of

4573:{{WP:Teahouse/Teahouse_talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|question title goes here|ts=~~~~}} 2239: 1568: 12186: 12047: 11938: 11829: 11682: 11562: 11404: 11259: 11224: 11171: 11147: 11122: 11100: 11068: 11003: 10967: 10920: 10862: 10740: 10684: 10657: 10602: 10551: 10463: 10456:

or if you are concerned that this may put too much information in public view, you can

10382: 10340: 10290: 10259: 10247: 10207: 10187: 10173: 10147: 10095: 10057: 9998: 9958: 9896: 9838: 9731: 9652: 9532: 9466: 9423: 9331: 9301: 9257: 9209: 9148: 8978: 8909: 8846: 8827: 8804: 8781: 8755: 8727: 8711: 8546: 8492: 8436: 8324: 8300: 8280: 8245: 8230: 8191: 8172: 8144: 8128: 8103: 8078: 8057: 8021: 8005: 7976: 7946: 7860: 7806: 7754: 7683: 7640: 7600: 7533: 7425: 7395: 7376:

test enough to justify a CU, but I am fairly certain that they are yet another sock of

7347: 7312: 7295: 7267: 7150: 7031: 6991: 6939: 6784: 6664: 6622: 6568: 6504: 6371: 6310: 6225: 6165: 6116: 5952: 5840: 5821: 5720: 5630: 5601: 5549: 5521: 5493: 5454: 5399: 5346: 5279: 5217: 5196: 5148: 5001: 4970: 4939: 4916: 4828: 4747: 4670: 4663: 4629: 4600: 4511: 4460: 4280: 4189: 4074: 4018: 3957: 3883: 3844: 3781: 3752: 3746: 3690: 3640: 3590: 3488: 3452: 3410: 3371: 3356: 3314: 3220: 3199: 3173: 3145: 3097: 3061: 3049: 3016: 2988: 2951: 2929: 2904: 2811: 2772: 2656: 2617: 2552: 2540: 2517: 2456: 2391: 2341: 2295: 2275: 2256: 2223: 2184: 2130: 2091: 1928: 1878: 1783: 1720: 1616: 1500: 1451: 1395: 1359: 1266: 1180: 1092: 1029: 983: 935: 705: 665: 569: 502: 376: 349: 337:

involving the above user. While I never had any direct dealings with the above user, a

326: 304: 269: 221: 201: 187: 137: 6988:

No problem. I'm going to take it slow for a bit but then head that way to look around.

5701:

eating up time again, doing the same edits. He does not seem to want to stop. Thanks.

4210:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/WLM-US 2013 discussion

2890: 338: 12177: