User talk:AsceticRose

2854: 2872: 2412: 3476: 2909: 2502: 2470: 3912:, I again took a look at the article. I think it is not about source, rather it is about style, clear-cut presentation of the subject, completeness of the topic, good language, and punctuation. I see the article has enough sources though you can use some primary sources to support the content, but to not elaborate the existing content. The article is on an abstract issue, so elaborating content will only fool the readers. Rather you should focus on the following points: 1) The article should reasonably 2863: 557: 2827: 4935: 4334: 2188: 2012: 1950: 1888: 1826: 1769: 1628: 4651: 4599: 2670: 2818: 1245: 1193: 1581: 1381: 1344: 1292: 2250: 2136: 2074: 1685: 1539: 1423: 1089: 1027: 645: 975: 844: 1502: 1151: 891: 797: 3002: 1732: 938: 5241: 5168: 4172: 4132: 3405: 1465: 25: 4536: 4384: 5030: 3717: 2988: 2575: 2276: 2214: 2162: 2100: 2038: 1976: 1914: 1852: 1654: 1115: 1053: 2845: 2290: 2228: 2114: 2052: 1990: 1928: 1866: 1804: 1223: 1129: 1067: 2297: 2269: 2235: 2207: 2173: 2155: 2121: 2093: 2059: 2031: 1997: 1969: 1935: 1907: 1873: 1845: 1811: 1788: 1717: 1704: 1670: 1647: 1613: 1600: 1408: 1329: 1311: 1277: 1264: 1230: 1212: 1178: 1136: 1108: 1074: 1046: 1012: 994: 923: 910: 876: 863: 829: 2283: 2221: 2107: 2045: 1983: 1921: 1859: 1797: 1661: 1562: 1446: 1320: 1122: 1060: 1003: 820: 673: 2836: 4081: 3115: 286: 2439:, everyody is undoing your edits because you are making unconstructive edits. You have to understand this. From Knowledge's point of view, you are not complying with policies. And from Islamic theological point of view, you are inserting wrong information. Muslims consider the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) to be the greatest of all prophets. This is true. - 4668:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4616:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2689:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2323:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

4795:

and without quoting the text from the novel. I'm somewhat averse to quoting the text in the article because the reference to Humpty Dumpty in the novel is indirect and the quote will look unfamiliar to most modern readers, I believe. I fear that if you add it back, others may revert it. A good idea

4702:

Hello AsceticRose, I read that you just reverted a change I made on the Humpty Dumpty page showing its presence on the Finnegans Wake. I made this contribution because there was a specific section about Humpty Dumpty in "Through the Looking-Glass", so I thought it was analogous. Could you please let

3758:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons

4443:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3888:

Can I also ask you for some tips for improving the page? I think that it could use some more primary sources, as the weight right now is heavily in favor of secondary sources. More material details can be added from primary sources I think. Do you think that would help improve the rating? Thanks

3920:

way avoiding ambiguities or unclear content. 3) More wiki-links, proper punctuation, and good structure are important. It can also have a short 'Background' section having information on thinker and some background information on the topic. I think some little efforts can improve its rating.

4184:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2507:

Prophets of ALLAH have no distinction. i already add source. you search in internet, you ended up finding that all prophets of ALLAH have humble submit themselves to the will of ALLAH The God. the edit is not to mislead Muslims and Non Muslims too in the view in the prophets of ALLAH.

5253:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5180:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4887:, where you took names out of alpha order, etc. And where you failed -- though reverting an editor - to leave an edit summary, as you should, that explained why. If you were simply not familiar with why you should leave an edit summary when reverting an editor, please read this .. 400:

Hello AsceticRosé, I hope you are fine. Very happy that our efforts at Hijrah seem to have worked out. I discovered that there seem to be a lot of articles related to Karaism which have basically lifted word for word large chunks from the Encyclopedia Judaica. Is that allowed?

4831:

Thanks. I disagree with you - I believe that including the quote could spark the interest of readers through the unfamiliarity you mentioned - but I do agree with you that there's value in discussing this at the talk page. Thanks for your hard work as a Knowledge editor!

155:

Hi AsceticRose. In your culture of eating it may seem like that, but having been a vegetarian for over 30 years I (and many others) understand that it's more than just a portion of the plate like "the ethics of eating potatoes/or what have you..." but very related to the

5007:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 3313:, your point and edit both are unclear. Removing a section can be worse, because we will lose the data thus. However, it can be done anyway. A tagged section may not be appropriate for a good-class article. And your edit undid a legitimate edit. More care is needed. - 2588:

to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See

121:, the word "opinion" was referring to yours. The article deals with food issue in general, not in particular. It is not dealing with any specific food item like meat or vegetables or fruits. Rather, it is a generalized handling of human foodstuff. So you can't say 3517: 5140:

and I was going to add sources but like I have already said on talk page that your reverts are making it hard to contribute. Either you should self revert or reach to a compromise version soon. Describe on talk page if the information is hoax and which parts are

2311:

All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please

444:

Just looking for a project. I can hardly remember what brought my attention to it now. I think a link from an Islam related page. What is the correct thing to do if I find a page which has word for word chunks taken from other encyclopedias in future?

3417:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4906:

My revert was correct. I see your edit has again been partially reverted. In disambiguation page, we do not add so many details as you added. Again, your own edit summary was ambiguous and unclear. So, instead of teaching me, you take lesson first.

5131:

with your 4 reverts. But I think that you have made 4 reverts because of your misunderstanding that you can revert sock's edits as many times as you want, but its no more a case when someone else has reverted or restored edits of a sock.

202:

in general. It is not about my culture or your culture; it is solely about the subject-matter of the article. We have to add content to any article keeping in mind what the article is supposed to cover, not what your personal experience

471:. The best way to deal with such issue is to read the materials in those encyclopedias/sources and then paraphrase them in Knowledge articles e.g. rewording is needed. Then, you can cite those encyclopedias as references. You can use 3507: 4424:. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Knowledge. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 3527: 4752:

thank you for your feedback. Your concern is definitely valid, so I understand where you're coming from. Nevertheless, those bizarre lines are exactly how the book goes, you can check it out yourself here on this link:

4896: 3522: 3337:, you were wrong in suggesting to remove the section because it has a source attached to it. Without first being sure, we can't remove a section which has a reference. We still don't know how far they are correct. - 2628:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 420:, sorry for late response. I was not active on Knowledge. Word for word copy and pasting is not allowed. However, I am neither knowledgeable about Karaism nor interested in it. Why are you interested in it? - 2582:. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's 3512: 5265:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5192:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4196:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3429:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3470: 4414:. First, thank you for your contribution; Knowledge relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 262:

Firstly AsceticRose, I would prefer you preface your comments as your comments ie say "my main point" not "the main point" etc. We are discussing between equals; neither is the judge and jury.

4375: 3291:

Your edit is not good. We don't comment out sections. Either you tag them or you remove them. And you are not supposed to remove a tag as long as the issue is not resolved. Please also see

4458:. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the 4660: 5281: 5208: 4645: 4212: 3445: 3375:

okay is removing a tag without resolving the issue. And if that was done in order to keep the good-article status, then that is precisely the opposite of what should have been done.

3371:"A tagged section may not be appropriate for a good-class article." Then either the statement must be sourced, or the article can not be good-class. It is as simple as that. What is 4608: 4593: 2681: 3580:. I will look them up and send you the info as soon as possible after New Year. If you have not heard anything from me after Epiphany (Three Kings' Day), please remind me again. 2662: 4462:

and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Knowledge looks forward to your future contributions.

4892: 3710: 3053:, I still do not know how they assess articles and what criteria they follow (except Good and Featured articles). I never took any serious interest in it. My own article, 4471: 3565: 1898: 4919: 3817:

Though it's technically not required if you're the sole author, I usually do it for clarity's sake. I've already added the attribution for this particular instance. —

2537: 3534: 3241: 2357: 533:

complaint: you undid my last post to Chhuckmuck(Orphan) and I wish you to undo it. The acknowledgements will be simplified once the page comes out of Orphan category

3665:* Battle of Tabuk (setting out): Fazlur Rehman notes that the various dates mentioned are very confused and suggests 1 Jumada al-Ula 9 AH = 19 July 630 (Thursday) . 2763: 749: 4900: 3949:

Thanks for the detailed input AR, much appreciated =) I'll free up some time in the coming days/weeks to start fixing/improving the article using this guideline.

341:. Reverting an editor's edit does not mean the editor was a vandal. You misinterpreted it. If you ask me why I reverted it, the answer is you did not provide any 4958: 2718: 3196: 3147: 1893: 81: 5306: 3463: 4692: 3058: 345:

describing your change. So it would be hard for anyone to accept such ambiguous addition. Again, your content was not consistent with the existing content.

5299: 4640: 4036: 5323:. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at 5226: 4230: 2713: 4908: 4851: 4801: 4727: 4574: 4494: 4478: 4356: 4286: 4261: 3993: 3922: 3843: 3794: 3775: 3338: 3314: 3123: 3066: 2548: 2440: 615: 476: 421: 372: 242: 135: 2352: 4974: 4513: 4109: 5338: 4543:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4159: 3281: 2657: 2397: 1343: 217:

Again, the main point which I already clearly said above is that the article deals with food issue in general, not in particular. If you try to add

2803: 2313: 699: 508: 446: 417: 402: 4104: 2758: 1088: 271: 188: 111: 4054: 3394: 3236: 3191: 2073: 1684: 570: 386: 3365:

How will removing a section result in data loss? There is always the edit history. Moreover, if the data is not reliable, then it is not a loss.

1768: 507:

Thank you for the tips. I have started reading up on the subject but don't think I have a good enough picture of it to paraphrase anything yet.

4505: 4488: 2562: 744: 726: 4862: 4841: 4812: 4766: 4738: 4567: 4139:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

1291: 629: 591:

created new page for Chuckmuck acknowlements can you please post what you took out of Chuckmuck main page please and post it here. Thank you

5233: 3736:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

3352: 2460: 1354: 4007: 3695:

For details, you should perhaps try to get a copy of Fazlur Rehman's book. AFAIK it is still available and it is certainly not expensive.

5154: 3384: 3328: 2930: 2484: 2454: 1464: 1099: 516: 490: 454: 435: 4026:), relevant to topic and as per the policies of Knowledge. You removed it without clarifying the reason. Kindly point out the mistake. 371:

Your message came to me as a little bit confusing. If you have objection, you are not supposed to provide an WikiLove message. Thanks. -

256: 149: 5160: 5136:) Also that IP is not a sock like you may already know now. I had checked for the information around and I found the information to be 4585: 4429: 4367: 4164: 3857: 3829: 3808: 3704: 1695: 198:, I see you are still missing the main point. Please look, the article does not name any specific food item, rather treat the issue of 3959: 3936: 3137: 3099: 3080: 1887: 467:

If the word for word texts are copyrighted materials, they can be removed because Knowledge takes copyright issue very seriously. See

4996: 4448:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3261: 3216: 3171: 2783: 2738: 2377: 4791:

was already present in the article. I rather recommend that you elaborate the already-present text without adding a new section for

2959: 1026: 4757:

The garbled word is a representation of a thunder, which is by itself a reflection of the Fall of Man (and Humpty Dumpty himself!)

4349: 4327: 3976:

Hi, just letting you know that the Jerusalem page is under DS. You can't reinsert a reverted edit without seeking consensus first.

796: 4680: 4628: 2701: 2011: 1627: 4878: 3899: 3690:

In his reconstruction of the events during Muhammad's years in Medina, Fazlur Rehman assumes that 3, 6 and 9 AH were intercalary.

1475: 1349: 4084:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4048: 1538: 4979:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

4338: 2978: 2607: 1094: 4544: 2853: 2187: 1825: 1114: 691: 134:

On Knowledge, we only accommodate well-sourced information, not personal opinion. I hope this answers your question. Thanks. -

4800:

whether to include the quote or not. Thus, the actual decision I leave to you and the other editors of the article. Thanks. -

4425: 4416: 3257: 3254:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3212: 3209:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3167: 3164:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2779: 2776:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2734: 2731:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2517: 2373: 2370:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2099: 2084: 1690: 3043: 2249: 1244: 5295: 5222: 4712: 4440: 4410: 4377: 4226: 3459: 3062: 2899: 2653: 2590: 2533: 1302: 1192: 5045: 1731: 1501: 974: 5320: 4988: 3497: 1949: 1779: 2541: 2135: 1150: 890: 307: 4530: 4126: 4044: 3760: 3021: 2769: 2640:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2426: 1470: 578: 5319:

may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the

4664:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4612:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4322: 4308: 3589: 2685:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 714: 569:

I just stumbled upon your userpage. It reminded me of something that I distanced myself from. May peace be upon you.

3721: 3548: 600: 4980: 4013: 2532:

I think that this user could be a strawman sockpuppet. He is putting a Muslim mask and pushing un-Muslim beliefs.--

2492: 2079: 1580: 542: 4850:, it is true that as Knowledge editors, we do hard work. And it is pretty nice to get some recognition for that! - 4724:

The fall (bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntqnner-ronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthur-nuk!)

1128: 843: 5291: 5218: 5000: 4954: 4247: 4222: 3455: 2649: 2113: 1422: 1297: 807: 611: 51: 46: 41: 5121: 1380: 1135: 1107: 1052: 610:, such acknowledgement page is not within the scope of an encyclopedia. Knowledge can not have such a page. See 5081: 4450: 3982: 2871: 2417:

why you undo all my changes? if you are muslim, i am muslim too. we are brothers. Only ALLAH is the Greatest.

2120: 2092: 1774: 1716: 1703: 1121: 468: 102:

Could you please give something more substantive-I note the word "opinion"-is that referring to yours or mine?

5019: 4669: 4617: 3540:

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

2808: 2690: 2602: 2106: 3246:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3201:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3152:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2768:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2723:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2362:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1037: 937: 635: 410: 3554:(user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. 1913: 5274: 5201: 5111: 5093: 5049: 4393: 4205: 3438: 3030: 665: 1803: 129:, because if you argue about meat, what about thousand other food items, some of them being more critical? 5286: 5213: 5097: 4217: 3450: 3304: 2645: 1328: 1310: 547: 303: 4884: 3882: 2275: 2037: 1810: 1787: 1653: 1319: 87: 4992: 4697: 4445: 3916:

the topic, and should not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. 2) It should be well-written in a

3537:

that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

2402: 1796: 802: 3033:. As an experienced editor with the project, could you please take some time to assess it? Thank you. 5316: 5103: 5004: 4941:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

4783:, I checked the source. Yes, the strange line is in fact a part of the text. I also went through the 4467: 4155: 4100: 3763:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — 3571: 3295:

that you should not redo an edit that was reverted without first discussing and obtaining consensus.

1549: 715:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Islamic_views_on_slavery#Update_on_dispute_on_ISIS_and_jihadist_section

2213: 2161: 1851: 1066: 828: 4400: 4040: 1032: 819: 732: 708: 701: 1073: 1045: 325: 4837: 4762: 4708: 4515: 4111: 4056: 3793:, I've added my own content. I'm not sure if still I should attribute this to the copying page. - 1742: 1059: 5056:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

1927: 98:

the only explanation you give is "(Reverted 1 good faith edit by DadaNeem using STiki; opinion)"

5089: 5061: 5037: 4984: 4540: 4318: 4304: 4237: 4136: 2974: 2955: 2525: 1975: 1512: 596: 538: 317: 299: 4983:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

3748:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 1934: 1906: 91: 5262: 5189: 4193: 3426: 2260: 2022: 1920: 1561: 985: 586: 212:

indicates that you are trying to justify the article's content from your personal experience.

161: 124: 2584: 2289: 2051: 5273:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5200:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5150: 5117: 5015: 4463: 4204:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4151: 4146: 4096: 4091: 4032: 3980: 3733: 3437:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2724: 2636:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2568: 2411: 2348: 2332: 2317: 1638: 1544: 1161: 901: 740: 722: 3629:* Treaty of Hudaybiyyah (setting out): = 1 Dhu'l-Qa'dah 6 AH = 14 January 628 (Thursday) . 2296: 2268: 2058: 2030: 1669: 1646: 1011: 993: 179:

So, in conclusion, I stand by my edit with this "well-sourced information". What say you?

8: 5133: 5085: 5053: 3700: 3585: 3380: 3300: 2641: 2513: 2480: 2422: 2282: 2044: 1660: 1255: 1222: 1177: 1002: 922: 909: 528: 512: 450: 406: 276: 3518:"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages 3495:

message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the

2227: 1865: 1276: 1263: 5324: 5024: 4847: 4833: 4797: 4780: 4758: 4719: 4704: 3475: 3054: 2908: 1737: 1229: 1211: 1203: 679: 574: 267: 184: 107: 3638:* Preparations for Mecca (setting out): 6 Ramadan 8 AH = 29 November 629 (Wednesday) . 2234: 2206: 2172: 2154: 1872: 1844: 5249: 5176: 5041: 4563: 4526: 4519: 4346: 4314: 4300: 4180: 4122: 4115: 4067: 4060: 3969: 3825: 3790: 3771: 3737: 3729: 3559: 3413: 3395: 3277: 3268: