Knowledge

User talk:AKR619

Source 📝

117:
owner's decision to put down their beloved animal (we had to use themes that were used in science fiction, they couldn't be used in any other genre, they had to appear in more then one franchise and we couldn't use several dozen tv shows as citations). Although what you did to the Home and Away character articles you'd probably agree with him. It's obvious that user who found a citation to Willow being produced by Imagine Entertainment is a sockpuppet of GabrielKat, and his/her edit to my discussion page really annoyed me. Anyhoo, yes I do agree to behave in a more civilised manner, like I was before, but even civilised people react so uncivilised if they are constantly annoyed by someone. --
106:, which is clearly just a continuation of the same behaviour which led to your block in the first place. I would have been open to reducing your block if you had undertaken to actually start behaving in a mature and civil manner and politely requested a reconsideration of your block (in fact, I am still open to that). You make some good edits and it would be preferable to have you continue to contribute to Knowledge, but I do not believe that should occur unless you agree to behave like an adult in future, and to engage people in discussion rather than perpetuating revert wars. - 22: 450: 403: 264: 656: 600: 559: 518: 148: 237:, released in 1988). I made my revisions to the article based on what the IMdB listed (I know IMdB isn't the Gospel). Yet my revisions ended up being deleted twice by you and YOUR SOCKPUPPETS! More than two weeks ago, all five films I mentioned disappeared off of the Imagine profile (sort of like when your so-called "Amblin movies" appeared on IMdB's Amblin profile). That's why I added that 75:
Well I was saving this until I was unblocked, when the original block expired in 3 days, but no the mod went crazy and extended it to 2 weeks, then 4 weeks, and now indefinite just because I said something. This block started when I edited the Australia page saying Nicole Kidman hated her performance
136:
in relation to people's edits in future: calling good-faith edits/content disputes "vandalism" doesn't calm the situation. As for the Nicole Kidman edit of yours which I reverted, I was looking at the wrong article when I said it didn't say what you said it said. But someone added a clearer blurb of
88:
I have only blocked you for 4 weeks, then increased it to indefinite. I don't know what those other, shorter, blocks are to which you refer. The edit to the Australia movie article didn't play any part in my decision to block you; the block was brought on by you continuing to use edit summaries to
116:
When I said "Yobmod came, he saw, he fucked up this article" this was because I was extremely pissed off at Yobmod's constant deletion of links to actual themes used in science fiction and giving rules for the page which makes finding themes that can be used on the article more harder then a pet
83:
Nicole Kidman in Australia, last time I checked hated means...well, hated. I bet Mark didn't even bother to click on the link, because it's right there right For the record I loved Australia, it was for a couple of weeks my pick to win the Best Picture Academy Award this year. Now Mark if you're
418:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
643: 506:
The above block was instated upon further review of the situation and your violations of 3RR and general civility policy. You've been blocked in the past for this behavior, as well, hence the 3-month block.
662: 648: 670: 376:
are unlikely to calm anything or anyone down, and usually don't help to resolve anything. If you're that upset, it may be a good idea to take a breather for a moment? –
673:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 617:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 573: 691: 102:. I increased it to indefinite when instead of requesting an unblock, as is your right and is explained by the block notifications, you implied I like to wear 552: 132:
Fair enough. Please make an extra effort to be civil in future. I am going to shorten your block back down; it will expire in a couple of days. Please
89:
attack other editors ("Yobmod came, he saw, he fucked up this article", "this is vandalisim", "oh shut up sockpuppet of GabrielKat") despite
588: 361: 333: 294: 614: 638: 272: 152: 373: 302: 182: 100: 98: 96: 93: 90: 141: 343: 246: 199:
2. I think it's safe to assume that your additions to the Amblin Entertainment page was a misunderstanding on your part.
593: 391: 644: 431:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 213:
4. Are you an IMdB member? The Imagine Entertainment website and the Wiki article starts the list of films with
478: 474: 411: 349: 339: 309: 241:
citation. As for the other four movies, I will add citations on the Imagine page as soon as I can find proof.
76:
in this movie, and Mark (the uptight mod who deleted me) claimed that the citation I gave said no such thing
254: 208:
on that article, because you obviously wouldn't have believed me otherwise. I will continue on this subject.
669:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 613:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 436: 217:. Yet on one point the Imagine Entertainment profile on IMdB mentioned five other movies made before 1989 ( 536: 490: 420: 415: 367: 357: 329: 632: 43: 38: 547: 511: 501: 443: 666: 610: 569: 528: 466: 457: 426: 276: 126: 572:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 565: 110: 308:
Please discuss changes that you plan to make. Many of the links which you keep putting back into
250: 194:
1. Don't put GabrielKat into my edit changes. You and I were at odds long before GK was involved.
353: 325: 84:
still uptight about the whole nickers comment, you damn well deserved it for being so stupid.
621: 386: 396: 8: 432: 268: 156: 584: 407: 287: 175: 470: 164: 77: 342:, or I or someone may in the end feel forced to block you. Please put complaints in 378: 70: 684: 160: 372:
Woah, there. Please do strive to remain civil, when you can -- edit summaries
55: 580: 321: 282: 170: 133: 21: 151:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did to
486: 482: 449: 118: 402: 263: 61: 313: 59: 677: 317: 138: 107: 676:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
671:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of items in Dave the Barbarian
655: 620:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
606: 599: 579:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
558: 544: 508: 498: 440: 103: 57: 533:
You escalated to further personal attacks after you were blocked.
517: 324:) which often occurs in any fiction, not only science-fiction. 147: 62: 204:
3. About the Imagine page, I had to add that citation to
574:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Johnny Bravo (character)
267:
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
535:. If you believe this block is unjustified you may 489:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may 15: 564:An article that you have been involved in editing, 338:Please stop your campaign of undiscussed edits in 163:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 79:, now it says Afternoon Fix: Even Nicole Kidman 137:her comments after I reverted you anyway. - 553:AfD nomination of Johnny Bravo (character) 410:according to the reverts you have made on 245:I hope I cleared some things up for you.-- 406:You currently appear to be engaged in an 190:I have four things to talk to you about. 615:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Udrogoth 273:List of members of the WWE Hall of Fame 153:List of members of the WWE Hall of Fame 435:among editors. If necessary, pursue 665:, an article that you created, for 663:List of items in Dave the Barbarian 649:List of items in Dave the Barbarian 609:, an article that you created, for 344:Talk:List of science fiction themes 13: 516: 448: 155:. Your edits appear to constitute 14: 702: 654: 598: 557: 527:from editing in accordance with 401: 262: 146: 20: 475:List of science fiction themes 412:List of science fiction themes 350:List of science fiction themes 340:List of science fiction themes 310:List of science fiction themes 303:List of science fiction themes 1: 589:14:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 539:by adding the text {{unblock| 493:by adding the text {{unblock| 479:discuss controversial changes 461:from editing for a period of 548:10:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 512:10:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 502:10:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 477:. Please be more careful to 444:10:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 392:09:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 362:07:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 334:10:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 295:04:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 255:20:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 183:03:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 142:08:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 127:07:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 111:02:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 7: 529:Knowledge's blocking policy 485:rather than engaging in an 467:Knowledge's blocking policy 10: 707: 692:22:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 594:AfD nomination of Udrogoth 639:19:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 271:Knowledge, as you did at 566:Johnny Bravo (character) 229:, released in 1987, and 122: 568:, has been listed for 521: 453: 645:Articles for deletion 520: 452: 346:, not as <ref: --> 223:Like Father, Like Son 525:blocked indefinitely 469:for engaging in an 465:in accordance with 423:. If you continue, 368:Please remain civil 537:contest this block 522: 483:dispute resolution 454: 437:dispute resolution 661:I have nominated 605:I have nominated 491:contest the block 421:three-revert rule 416:three-revert rule 354:Anthony Appleyard 326:Anthony Appleyard 312:are themes (e.g. 134:assume good faith 68: 67: 49: 48: 698: 682: 658: 635: 629: 625: 602: 561: 541:your reason here 495:your reason here 414:. Note that the 405: 390: 383: 292: 290: 285: 266: 180: 178: 173: 150: 63: 35: 34: 24: 16: 706: 705: 701: 700: 699: 697: 696: 695: 688: 678: 659: 652: 633: 627: 623: 603: 596: 562: 555: 550: 504: 399: 379: 377: 370: 347:--</ref: --> 305: 288: 283: 281: 279:from editing. 219:End of the Line 176: 171: 169: 73: 64: 58: 29: 12: 11: 5: 704: 686: 653: 651: 647:nomination of 642: 597: 595: 592: 556: 554: 551: 523:You have been 515: 455:You have been 447: 398: 395: 369: 366: 365: 364: 336: 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 275:, you will be 243: 242: 210: 209: 201: 200: 196: 195: 188: 187: 186: 185: 159:and have been 114: 113: 72: 69: 66: 65: 60: 56: 54: 51: 50: 47: 46: 41: 31: 30: 25: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 703: 694: 693: 690: 689: 683: 681: 674: 672: 668: 664: 657: 650: 646: 641: 640: 636: 630: 626: 618: 616: 612: 608: 601: 591: 590: 586: 582: 577: 576:. Thank you. 575: 571: 567: 560: 549: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 519: 514: 513: 510: 503: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459: 451: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 430: 428: 422: 417: 413: 409: 404: 394: 393: 388: 384: 382: 375: 374:like this one 363: 359: 355: 351: 345: 341: 337: 335: 331: 327: 323: 322:assassination 319: 315: 311: 307: 306: 296: 293: 291: 286: 278: 274: 270: 265: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252: 248: 247:67.149.21.173 240: 236: 232: 228: 227:No Man's Land 224: 220: 216: 212: 211: 207: 203: 202: 198: 197: 193: 192: 191: 184: 181: 179: 174: 167:. Thank you. 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 144: 143: 140: 135: 131: 130: 129: 128: 124: 120: 112: 109: 105: 101: 99: 97: 95: 92: 87: 86: 85: 82: 78: 53: 52: 45: 42: 40: 37: 36: 33: 32: 28: 23: 18: 17: 685: 679: 675: 660: 622: 619: 604: 578: 563: 540: 532: 524: 505: 494: 462: 456: 429:from editing 424: 400: 397:January 2009 380: 371: 280: 244: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 205: 189: 168: 115: 80: 74: 26: 624:Master& 425:you may be 381:Luna Santin 543:}} below. 497:}} below. 314:capitalism 215:the 'Burbs 433:consensus 318:anarchism 269:vandalize 157:vandalism 104:"nickers" 44:Archive 2 39:Archive 1 667:deletion 611:deletion 607:Udrogoth 581:Enco1984 570:deletion 487:edit war 481:or seek 471:edit war 463:3 months 408:edit war 348:tags in 161:reverted 94:warnings 71:Blocking 27:Archives 458:blocked 427:blocked 277:blocked 165:sandbox 91:several 628:Expert 239:Willow 231:Willow 225:, and 206:Willow 119:AKR619 289:Spyke 235:Vibes 177:Spyke 81:Hated 680:Reyk 634:Talk 585:talk 531:for 387:talk 358:talk 330:talk 251:talk 233:and 139:Mark 123:talk 108:Mark 687:YO! 545:Mo0 509:Mo0 499:Mo0 473:at 441:Mo0 439:. 637:) 587:) 360:) 352:. 332:) 320:, 316:, 284:TJ 253:) 221:, 172:TJ 125:) 631:( 583:( 389:) 385:( 356:( 328:( 249:( 121:(

Index


Archive 1
Archive 2

several
warnings



"nickers"
Mark
02:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
AKR619
talk
07:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
assume good faith
Mark
08:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

List of members of the WWE Hall of Fame
vandalism
reverted
sandbox
TJ
Spyke
03:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
67.149.21.173
talk
20:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.