162:'s transparent and egalitarian model does not prevent the most active contributors from obtaining significant and disproportionate control over those projects. In particular, the study found that as wiki communities grow 1) they are less likely to add new administrators; 2) the number of edits made by administrators to administrative “project” pages will increase and 3) the number of edits made by experienced contributors that are reverted by administrators also grows. The authors also note that while there are some interesting exceptions to this rule, proving that wikis can, on occasion, function as egalitarian, democratic public spaces, on average "as wikis become larger and more complex, a small group – present at the beginning – will restrict entry into positions of formal authority in the community and account for more administrative activity while using their authority to restrict contributions from experienced community members".
173:: "Declaring the notion of an administrative cabal is laughable on the surface.. but there is a grain of truth to it – admins talk to one another, including privately, "secretly" and off wiki, and they act, more or less consciously, as a part of a group that holds power over regular editors. Jemielniak argues that the notion of editor equality is a subconscious, invisible and unrealistic pillar of Knowledge, one that when confronted with the reality of editors not being equal leads to problems and growing divisions within the community. Thus the inequality between editors, which in the "ideal Knowledge" would not exist, subconsciously annoys editors, and is significantly responsible for the problems with retention of editors, electing new administrators, and cohesion of the community, of whom a significant portion entertains some notions of the existence of a "real cabal" (see
64:
245:
117:
40:
255:
93:
107:
267:
210:) - a terribly encouraging article. Knowledge is emerging as a model of what works for Internet discourse on controversial topics. Might our guidelines and policies be enshrined someday into a broader generic set that could be applied for any website who wished to adopt them in a Constitutional manner?
126:
I have ever witnessed, with editors and administrators giving conflicting and confusing advice, complaints getting “boomeranged” onto complainants who then face disciplinary action for complaining, and very little consistency in the standards applied. In my short time there, I repeatedly observed
223:"The longer a person has lived the less he gains by reading, and the more likely he is to forget what he has read and learnt of old; and the only remedy that I know of is to write upon every subject that he wishes to understand, even if he burns what he has written." --
200:, a study finds that after the creation of a Knowledge article about a publicly traded company, its stock price drops. Apparently, insiders and institutional investors see an article (ie. transparency) as signifying they no longer have an edge on investing information.
187:, a class of elitist editors who get away with incivility because they make good contributions. As Wales said, "it's a shame that some in the community think that it's worthwhile putting up with nasty people if they make good contributions."
177:). In this, his research fits into the wider paradigm of scholarly literature concerned with social inequality, and with its common conclusion that inequality is the major cause of the vast majority of problems in human society.
128:
310:
203:
300:
127:
editors lawyering an issue with acronyms, only to turn around and declare “Ignore all rules!” when faced with the same rules used against them. -- David
Auerbach,
305:
234:
230:
197:
17:
274:
214:
71:
77:
147:
224:
286:
163:
282:
178:
155:
63:
8:
281:
for his contributions to
Knowledge. This funding is for the ongoing development of
278:
174:
294:
184:
116:
244:
122:
120:"I am not exaggerating when I say it is the closest thing to Kafka's
106:
97:
254:
92:
151:
159:
204:"Knowledge is fixing one of the Internet’s biggest flaws"
311:
Members of the Twenty Year
Society of Knowledge editors
215:"Persistent Bias on Knowledge: Methods and Responses"
233:- these are among my favorite essays. For example,
301:Wikipedians interested in environmental protection
292:
273:, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's
48:21 years, 3 months and 15 days
235:Knowledge:The problem with elegant variation
154:wikis found support for the claims that the
169:From a book review of Dariusz Jemielniak's
306:Knowledge Articles for Creation reviewers
253:
243:
115:
105:
91:
14:
293:
277:, discloses that he has been paid by
231:Category:Knowledge essays about style
227:, polymath, deciphered Rosetta Stone
58:
46:This user has been on Knowledge for
34:
26:
24:
25:
322:
265:
62:
38:
219:Social Science Computer Review
158:holds in wikis; i.e. that the
13:
1:
285:and working with aspects of
7:
10:
327:
78:Sustainability Initiative
287:User:InternetArchiveBot
261:
251:
213:Martin, Brian (2017).
136:
113:
103:
257:
247:
156:iron law of oligarchy
144:Iron Law of Oligarchy
119:
109:
95:
259:Article for Creation
249:Article for Deletion
192:On different notes..
129:"Encyclopedia Frown"
18:User:Green Cardamom
262:
260:
252:
250:
198:"Crowd Governance"
137:
114:
112:
104:
102:
258:
248:
111:Ignored all rules
110:
101:Knowledge Patriot
96:
89:
88:
84:
83:
55:
54:
16:(Redirected from
318:
279:Internet Archive
269:
268:
185:The Unblockables
171:Common Knowledge
66:
59:
51:
42:
41:
35:
27:
21:
326:
325:
321:
320:
319:
317:
316:
315:
291:
290:
266:
263:
241:
208:Washington Post
148:empirical study
139:
135:, December 2014
100:
90:
85:
75:the Wikimedia
56:
45:
39:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
324:
314:
313:
308:
303:
239:
238:
228:
221:
211:
201:
194:
193:
189:
188:
181:
180:
166:
165:
98:Sam Eagle, Sr.
87:
86:
82:
81:
67:
57:
53:
52:
43:
33:
30:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
323:
312:
309:
307:
304:
302:
299:
298:
296:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
256:
246:
242:
236:
232:
229:
226:
222:
220:
216:
212:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
195:
191:
190:
186:
183:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
167:
164:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
141:
140:
134:
130:
125:
124:
118:
108:
99:
94:
80:
79:
74:
73:
68:
65:
61:
60:
49:
44:
37:
36:
29:
28:
19:
283:WaybackMedic
275:Terms of Use
270:
264:
240:
225:Thomas Young
218:
207:
170:
143:
138:
132:
121:
76:
70:
47:
295:Categories
69:This user
123:The Trial
31:Userboxes
175:WP:CABAL
72:supports
150:of 683
271:GreenC
152:Wikia
146:: An
133:Slate
160:wiki
297::
217:.
131:,
237:.
206:(
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.