17:
303:. And if the references contradict our cherished worldly views? Our opinions can't be verified because readers can't open up our skulls and check the content. Consequently, our opinions matter not a whit. That's why we are nebbishes. Only the reference can be checked and thereby have any material bearing at all. We should be happy that we've learned something new.
423:
disinvest egos from edits, and transform disputes among individuals with differing world views into exercises that discover differing world views among references, a fact that in itself is valuable to establish in articles. Note how this transformation also disengages the egos of participating editors. That is a good thing.
422:
nebbish followed this program, the rate of change to
Knowledge would drop way, way, down, but the few edits that would still be commissioned would be so much better, and so much less susceptible to reversion. The exercise of searching for, and, perhaps, failing to find supportable references would
81:
Coming off of a Wiki Break, just four days shy of eight years. Since August 24, 2008, got my graduate degree, did a lot of IT consulting, and non-profit volunteering. Presently working for the City of New York, Housing
Preservation & Development, a fascinating city agency. Been looking at
460:
The committed identity used up to 21-April-2018 12:11:44 EDT 2018, page oldid=791738862, references a GPG public key that has expired and has been replaced. I still have that file and can reproduce the message digest on page: oldid=791738862, and that serves as an additional identification
266:
may be in
Knowledge, one can still type that word into Knowledge's search box and get an answer that stumbles toward the truth, leaving the reader with at least a little clue. That small miracle still happens more often that not.
78:, I still participate, almost daily, in an early-morning dog-walking ritual with other canine lovers. Because of this, my most significant contributions to Knowledge concern Brooklyn in general and my neighborhood in particular.
454:
The committed identity used up to 20-August-2016 11:03 AM EDT, page oldid=735411679, is a message digest of a secret string no longer available to me, so herewith I revoke that digest, as it provides no help in confirming who I
160:
Composed mainly in 2009. Also got a DYK cite, and has since popped up two or three times on the front page in the "On This Day..." section for 5 December. Be thankful for better building materials and -yes - more stringent fire
402:, but as a first step in finding them. The reliable references will likely be printed on dead trees from well known publishers. Don't trust web pages. If Knowledge is mostly dreck, the World Wide Web is
392:
that only 0.16712 percent of
Knowledge editors ever get any enjoyment out of edit wars. It's true. Really. Why are you pissing yourself off, and pissing your life away at the same time?
247:
tertiary reference, including
Knowledge. Roughly, then, only about two tenths of one percent of Knowledge rises to the standards of a useful tertiary reference. When
223:
Mainly, I think
Knowledge is — putting it kindly — substandard. What might one call a reference with 6,887,905 articles, of which only about 1,370 have obtained
395:
Otherwise, if you decide that your reverted edit had merit, disengage your ego from the edit and ground its existence upon verifiable references instead:
406:
dreck. Rarely, a website might approach the standard of a published, printed source, and those few that do are mainly online versions of printed sources.
466:
The secret string that produces the current message digest, below, consists of instructions for applying some additional verification tests. See
554:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than
487:: fcab1200cc73f4fe24e36fa66fbcbecd37cef202ff823eeb27c6b4338e710ecc682a27b024da78ce6bf4aeff5b2cc2c30102c7e835a9ab118ff877ae70eefae9 is a
201:
636:
641:
369:
Spend at least a half day in some combination of these pursuits. Better yet, take the whole day. You will never fall afoul of the
540:
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than
442:
384:, as much a frame of mind as a Knowledge policy. Life is short. You are wasting it if you are not enjoying every minute of it.
646:
326:
It's radioactive, a cancer causing agent, and will remain radioactive for a day or two. Really. It's a feature of the latest
232:
106:
75:
651:
236:
346:
179:
256:
551:
483:
467:
376:
If you decide your edit wasn't that important after all, congratulate yourself. You are beginning to
43:
135:
412:
Maybe three, maybe four days later, you'll be ready to post. Post, and don't forget the citations.
619:
389:
470:
for details on how this mechanism can be used to help editors defend their
Knowledge identity.
399:
426:
Probably this is not going to happen in this or the next century, but hope springs infernal.
157:
71:
534:
96:
74:(he has recently passed away). Because of Olmsted, I spent an inordinate amount of time in
8:
197:
151:
656:
603:
32:
491:
475:
262:
So why bother editing at all? Because it's still the good fight. As overwhelming the
212:
185:
123:
292:
furnish significant edits only when quality, verifiable references go with the post.
609:
596:
385:
129:
92:
60:
587:
248:
141:
381:
352:
172:
630:
427:
370:
300:
102:
47:
36:
430:
had better follow this policy, however, if they hope to solicit my support.
358:
Get something to eat, perhaps with some fine wine or a nice pint of beer, or
327:
270:
Lately, however, I think that the encyclopedia might improve immensely if:
252:
228:
224:
16:
438:
409:
Take a trip to the library. Read. Find out if your edit is supportable.
239:
articles. They only establish base standards that I would require from
147:
67:
313:
503:
211:
If you need to discuss
Knowledge matters with me, please visit my
144:
A new article, created after I tripped over his name enough times.
488:
364:
Play cards. Bet liberally. Win some. Lose some. Laugh. Cry. Live.
82:
urban/building related articles to see where one might pitch in.
20:
Gosgood, with
Olmsted and Zeke, Prospect Park September 04, 2000
263:
377:
227:, and of which about an additional 2,040 are considered "
70:
until very recently with one dog, "Olmsted", named after
433:
565:
301:
out to schlep references and paraphrase the underlying
373:if, after a revert, you take a day-long Wikibreak.
314:What to do when another nebbish reverts your edit
628:
126:Managed a peer review and did follow-up rewrite
178:A number of Media Wikimedia Commons images of
299:We're not editors. We're actually nebbishes,
150:A new article, my first (and presently only)
138:Date checks, added references, some copyedits
132:Date checks, added references, some copyedits
355:concerning an entirely different subject, or
310:nebbish reverts our edits? Here is my take:
481:
295:cease editing the moment they feel stress.
274:editors never take themselves seriously,
15:
398:Use a search engine not as a source of
629:
502:Bits and pieces of me may be found on
448:
277:always fill out the edit summary box,
592:
582:
518:
434:So's yez wants to be a gooder writer
218:
563:. The original page is located at
494:to this user's real-life identity.
13:
14:
668:
497:
637:Wikipedians in the United States
259:, I'm hard pressed to disagree.
112:
642:Wikipedians in New York (state)
361:Play with a child or a pet, or
103:Good Article Nomination Review
1:
560:pedia
546:pedia
531:pedia
508:
441:'s observations on achieving
388:by a world-renowned panel of
321:Leave the edit link alone!!!'
206:
647:Wikipedians in New York City
478:) 16:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
231:"? Look at the criteria for
54:Saturday, December 18, 2004.
7:
342:Go work at your day job, or
336:, do one of the following:
284:a few times before hitting
202:Uncategorized good articles
10:
673:
85:
57:First main namespace Edit:
257:Jimbo's Big Bag of Trivia
101:Filled with some kind of
91:Filled with some kind of
59:03:41, 2 January 2005 to
136:Prospect Park (Brooklyn)
652:Wikipedians in Brooklyn
557:Wiki
543:Wiki
528:Wiki
484:Committed identity
428:Wannabe administrators
386:It has been determined
21:
620:Search user languages
610:English language
400:verifiable references
382:Neutral point of view
255:labels this web site
158:Brooklyn Theatre fire
107:/GA Nomination Review
72:Frederick Law Olmsted
52:Arrived at Knowledge:
19:
353:Read another article
347:Recent change patrol
550:you are viewing a
468:Committed identity
449:Committed identity
171:The image for the
22:
625:
624:
617:
616:
581:
580:
504:particularart.com
371:Three Revert Rule
219:Knowledge musings
186:Prospect Park Zoo
124:Prospect Park Zoo
664:
593:
583:
577:
574:
571:
568:
562:
561:
558:
549:
547:
544:
533:
532:
529:
519:
516:Knowledge editor
184:Some images for
130:Grand Army Plaza
93:Grand Army Plaza
61:Grand Army Plaza
37:City of New York
672:
671:
667:
666:
665:
663:
662:
661:
627:
626:
618:
601:This user is a
590:
588:Knowledge:Babel
573:ki/User:Gosgood
572:
569:
567:https://en.wiki
566:
564:
559:
556:
555:
545:
542:
541:
539:
530:
527:
526:
517:
513:
511:
500:
495:
451:
443:brilliant prose
436:
339:Take a walk, or
324:Don't touch it!
316:
306:And if another
249:Andrew Orlowski
225:featured status
221:
209:
142:Aymar Embury II
115:
88:
63:
55:
50:
39:
28:
12:
11:
5:
670:
660:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
623:
622:
615:
614:
604:native speaker
599:
591:
586:
579:
578:
522:
515:
510:
507:
499:
498:External Links
496:
480:
479:
463:
462:
457:
456:
450:
447:
435:
432:
416:
415:
414:
413:
410:
407:
393:
374:
367:
366:
365:
362:
359:
356:
350:
343:
340:
331:
315:
312:
297:
296:
293:
290:
278:
275:
220:
217:
208:
205:
196:Mainly, I'm a
189:
188:
182:
176:
173:Camperdown Elm
163:
162:
155:
145:
139:
133:
127:
114:
111:
110:
109:
99:
87:
84:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
669:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
634:
632:
621:
612:
611:
606:
605:
600:
598:
595:
594:
589:
585:
584:
575:
553:
538:
536:
523:
521:
520:
514:
506:
505:
493:
490:
486:
485:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
459:
458:
453:
452:
446:
444:
440:
431:
429:
424:
421:
411:
408:
405:
401:
397:
396:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
368:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
348:
344:
341:
338:
337:
335:
332:
329:
325:
322:
318:
317:
311:
309:
304:
302:
294:
291:
289:
288:
283:
279:
276:
273:
272:
271:
268:
265:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:good articles
226:
216:
214:
204:
203:
199:
194:
193:
187:
183:
181:
180:Prospect Park
177:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
113:Contributions
108:
104:
100:
98:
94:
90:
89:
83:
79:
77:
76:Prospect Park
73:
69:
64:
62:
58:
53:
49:
48:New Hampshire
45:
42:
38:
34:
31:
26:
18:
608:
602:
570:pedia.org/wi
524:
512:
501:
482:
471:
437:
425:
419:
417:
403:
333:
323:
320:
307:
305:
298:
286:
285:
282:Show preview
281:
269:
261:
253:The Register
244:
240:
222:
210:
195:
191:
190:
165:
164:
152:Did you know
117:
116:
80:
65:
56:
51:
40:
29:
27:Garry Osgood
24:
23:
552:mirror site
243:article in
192:Other Stuff
631:Categories
525:This is a
509:References
492:commitment
390:Wikiholics
207:Contact Me
148:Reid Stowe
68:Park Slope
66:I live in
44:Allenstown
657:User en-N
535:user page
418:If every
330:release.
328:MediaWiki
287:Save Page
213:Talk Page
198:WikiGnome
95:article.
30:Location:
345:Go on a
233:featured
175:article.
118:Articles
33:Brooklyn
607:of the
489:SHA-512
472:Gosgood
334:Instead
251:of the
97:Sandbox
86:Sandbox
41:Origin:
420:editor
404:mainly
308:editor
166:Images
461:text.
264:dreck
245:every
241:every
161:code.
154:post.
25:Name:
476:talk
439:Tony
380:the
378:grok
349:, or
280:hit
237:good
235:and
455:am.
633::
597:en
445:.
215:.
200:.
105::
46:,
35:,
613:.
576:.
548:,
537:.
474:(
319:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
