679:
requirement for the patients to actively move the neglected limb, which may not be possible for many patients. Constraint-Induced
Therapy (CIT), appears to be an effective, long-term treatment for improving neglect in various studies. However, the use of CIT is limited to patients who have active control of wrist and hand extension. Prism Glasses, Hemispatial Glasses, and Eye-Patching have all appeared to be effective in improving performance on neglect tests. Caloric Stimulation treatment appears to be effective in improving neglect; however, the effects are generally short-term. The review also suggests that Optokinetic Stimulation is effective in improving position sense, motor skills, body orientation, and perceptual neglect on a short-term basis. As with Caloric Stimulation treatment, long-term studies will be necessary to show its effectiveness. A few Trunk Rotation Therapy studies suggest its effectiveness in improving performance on neglect tests as well as the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Some less studied treatment possibilities include treatments that target Dorsal Stream of visual processing, Mental Imagery Training, and Neck Vibration Therapy. Trunk rotation therapies aimed at improving postural disorders and balance deficits in patients with unilateral neglect, have demonstrated optimistic results in regaining voluntary trunk control when using specific postural rehabilitative devices. One such device is the Bon Saint Côme apparatus, which uses spatial exploratory tasks in combination with auditory and visual feedback mechanisms to develop trunk control. The Bon Saint Côme device has been shown to be effective with hemiplegic subjects due to the combination of trunk stability exercises, along with the cognitive requirements needed to perform the postural tasks.
583:
In the SE-NW configuration, the gap in the triangle fell on the allocentric left of the object-centered axis. Furthermore, varying the position of the arrays with respect to the participant's trunk midline was used to test egocentric neglect. The arrays were therefore presented at 0° (i.e. in line with the participant's trunk midline), at −40° left, and at +40° right. Ultimately, varying the position of the array within the testing visual field allowed for the simultaneous measurement of egocentric neglect and allocentric neglect. The results of this experimental design showed that the spatial neglect patients performed more poorly for the allocentric left side of the triangle, as well as for objects presented on the egocentric left side of the body. Furthermore, the poor accuracy for detecting features of the object on the left side of the object's axis was more severe when the objects were presented on the contralesional side of the body. Thus, these findings illustrate that both allocentric and egocentric biases are present simultaneously, and that egocentric information can influence the severity of allocentric neglect.
587:
was utilized, during which the patients were touched lightly and simultaneously on the left and right side of the wrist of one hand. The patients were tested both with their palms facing down and with their palms facing up. This experimental condition allowed the scientists to determine whether neglect in the somatosensory system occurs with respect to the sensory receptor surface (egocentric) or with respect to a higher-order spatial frame of reference (allocentric). The results of this experiment showed the hemispatial neglect patients neglected somatosensory stimuli on the contralesional side of space, regardless of hand orientation. These findings suggest that, within the somatosensory system, stimuli are neglected with respect to the allocentric, spatial frame of reference, in addition to an egocentric, sensory frame of reference. Ultimately, the discoveries made by these experiments indicate that hemispatial neglect occurs with respect to multiple, simultaneously derived frames of reference, which dictate the nature and extent of neglect within the visual, auditory, and tactile fields.
575:
inverted object and then neglect the side then interpreted as being on the left. So, for example, if patients are presented with an upside-down photograph of a face, they may mentally flip the object right side up and then neglect the left side of the adjusted image. In another example, if patients are presented with a barbell, patients will more significantly neglect the left side of the barbell, as expected with right temporal lobe lesion. If the barbell is rotated such that the left side is now on the right side, patients will more significantly neglect the left side of the object, even though it is now on the right side of space. This also occurs with slanted or mirror-image presentations. A patient looking at a mirror image of a map of the World may neglect to see the
Western Hemisphere despite their inverted placement onto the right side of the map.
579:
allocentric neglect varies with egocentric position. This experimental design consisted of testing eleven right hemispheric stroke patients. Five of these patients showed spatial neglect on their contralesional side, while the remaining six patients showed no spatial neglect. During the study, the patients were presented with two arrays of seven triangles. The first array ran from southwest to northeast (SW-NE) and the second array ran from southeast to northwest (SE-NW). In a portion of the experimental trials, the middle triangle in the array contained a gap along one side. Participants were tested on their ability to perceive the presence of this gap, and were instructed to press one response button if the gap was present and a second response button if the gap was absent.
192:, causing a patient with neglect to behave as if the left side of sensory space is nonexistent (although they can still turn left). In an extreme case, a patient with neglect might fail to eat the food on the left half of their plate, even though they complain of being hungry. If someone with neglect is asked to draw a clock, their drawing might show only the numbers 12 to 6, or all 12 numbers might be on one half of the clock face with the other half distorted or blank. Neglect patients may also ignore the contralesional side of their body; for instance, they might only shave, or apply make-up to, the non-neglected side. These patients may frequently collide with objects or structures such as door frames on the side being neglected.
352:
map. The image was then rotated 180 degrees, both mentally and physically. With the mental image, the neglect stayed consistent with the image; that is, when the map was in its original orientation, the patient named towns mostly on the East side of France, and when they mentally rotated the map they named towns mostly on the West side of France because the West coast was now on the right side of the represented field. However, with the physical copy of the map, the patient's focus was on the East side of France with either orientation. This leads researchers to believe that neglect for images in memory may be disassociated from the neglect of stimuli in extrapersonal space. In this case patients have no loss of
348:
asked to describe different landmarks around the square, such as stores. At each separate vantage point, patients consistently only described landmarks on the right side, ignoring the left side of the representation. However, the results of their multiple descriptions at the different vantage points showed that they knew information around the entire square, but could only identify the right side of the represented field at any given vantage point. When asked to switch vantage points so that the scene that was on the contralesional side is now on the ipsilesional side the patient was able to describe with details the scene they had earlier neglected.
421:
397:
173:, with rates in the critical stage of up to 80% causing visual neglect of the left-hand side of space. Neglect is often produced by massive strokes in the middle cerebral artery region and is variegated, so that most sufferers do not exhibit all of the syndrome's traits. Right-sided spatial neglect is rare because there is redundant processing of the right space by both the left and right cerebral hemispheres, whereas in most left-dominant brains the left space is only processed by the right cerebral hemisphere. Although it most strikingly affects
409:
449:
385:
433:
651:
muscles to induce diversion of gaze from the subjective straight ahead. Subjects received 15 consecutive treatment sessions and were evaluated on different aspects of the neglect disorder including perception of midline, and scanning deficits. The study found that there is evidence that neck muscle stimulation may work, especially if combined with visual scanning techniques. The improvement was evident 2 months after the completion of treatment.
541:, which may be caused by personal neglect, patients deny ownership of contralesional limbs. Sacks (1985) described a patient who fell out of bed after pushing out what he perceived to be the severed leg of a cadaver that the staff had hidden under his blanket. Patients may say things like, "I don't know whose hand that is, but they'd better get my ring off!" or, "This is a fake arm someone put on me. I sent my daughter to find my real one."
253:, verbal memory, and visuoconstructional ability. Neglect is probably among the reasons patients with right hemisphere damage are twice as likely to fall as those with left-side brain damage. Patients with neglect take longer to rehabilitate and make less daily progress than other patients with similar functional status. Patients with neglect are also less likely to live independently than patients who have both severe
530:
or reaching ability. Patients with allocentric neglect tend to neglect the contralesional side of individual items, regardless of where they appear with respect to the viewer. For example, In the same gap detection test mentioned above, subjects with allocentric hemispatial neglect on the right side will make errors on all areas of the page, specifically neglecting the right side of each individual item.
481:
attention alone—just one of several mechanisms that may interact—has generated multiple competing hypothetical explanations of neglect. So it is not surprising that it has proven difficult to assign particular presentations of neglect to specific neuroanatomical loci. Despite such limitations, we may loosely describe unilateral neglect with four overlapping variables: type, range, axis, and orientation.
89:
634:, where a prism lens is worn to pull the vision of the patient towards the left, constrained movement therapy where the "good" limb is constrained in a sling to encourage use of the contralesional limb. Eye-patching has similarly been used, placing a patch over the "good" eye. Pharmaceutical treatments have mostly focused on dopaminergic therapies such as
674:
and there is evidence of relatively long-term functional gains from comparatively short-term usage. However, all of these treatment interventions (particularly the stimulation techniques) are relatively new and randomised, controlled trial evidence is still limited. Further research is mandatory in
582:
To test the neglect frame of reference, the two different arrays were carefully situated so that gap in the triangle fell on opposite sides of the allocentric field. In the SW-NE array, the gap in the triangle fell on the allocentric right of the object-centered axis along which the triangle pointed.
549:
Most tests for neglect look for rightward or leftward errors. But patients may also neglect stimuli on one side of a horizontal or radial axis. For example, when asked to circle all the stars on a printed page, they may locate targets on both the left and right sides of the page while ignoring those
533:
This differentiation is significant because the majority of assessment measures test only for neglect within the reaching, or peri-personal, range. But a patient who passes a standard paper-and-pencil test of neglect may nonetheless ignore a left arm or not notice distant objects on the left side of
220:
where competition from the ipsilesional stimulus impedes perception of the contralesional stimulus. These patients, when asked to fixate on the examiner's nose, can detect fingers being wiggled on the affected side. If the examiner were to wiggle his or her fingers on both the affected and unaffected
574:
These two broad categories may be further subdivided. Patients with egocentric neglect may ignore the stimuli leftward of their trunks, their heads, or their retinae. Those with allocentric neglect may neglect the true left of a presented object, or may first correct in their mind's eye a slanted or
570:
An important question in studies of neglect has been: "left of what?" That is to say, what frame of reference does a subject adopt when neglecting the left half of his or her visual, auditory, or tactile field? The answer has proven complex. It turns out that subjects may neglect objects to the left
351:
The same patterns can be found with comparing actual visual stimuli to imaging in the brain (Rossetti et al., 2010). A neglect patient who was very familiar with the map of France was asked to name French towns on a map of the country, both by a mental image of the map and by a physical image of the
210:
Neglect not only affects present sensation but memory and recall perception as well. A patient suffering from neglect may also, when asked to recall a memory of a certain object and then draw said object, draw only half of the object. It is unclear, however, if this is due to a perceptive deficit of
586:
A second study, conducted by
Moscovitch and Behrmann, investigated the reference frame of neglect with respect to the somatosensory system. Eleven patients with parietal lobe lesions and subsequent hemispatial neglect were analyzed during this experiment. A double simultaneous stimulation procedure
529:
The next range of neglect is "allocentric" neglect, where individuals neglect either their peri-personal or extrapersonal space. Peri-personal space refers to the space within the patient's normal reach, whereas extrapersonal space refers to the objects/environment beyond the body's current contact
489:
Types of hemispatial neglect are broadly divided into disorders of input and disorders of output. The neglect of input, or "inattention", includes ignoring contralesional sights, sounds, smells, or tactile stimuli. Surprisingly, this inattention can even apply to imagined stimuli. In what's termed
296:
damage (resulting in the neglect of the right side of space), it is most common after damage to the right hemisphere. This disparity is thought to reflect the fact that the right hemisphere of the brain is specialized for spatial perception and memory, whereas the left hemisphere is specialized for
459:
In order to assess not only the type but also the severity of neglect, doctors employ a variety of tests, most of which are carried out at the patient's bedside. Perhaps one of the most-used and quickest is the line bisection. In this test, a line a few inches long is drawn on a piece of paper and
364:
Another example would be a left neglect patient failing to describe left turns while describing a familiar route. This shows that the failure to describe things in the contralesional side can also affect verbal items. These findings show that space representation is more topological than symbolic.
360:
This theory can also be supported by neglect in dreams (Figliozzi et al., 2007). The study was run on a neglect patient by tracking his eye movements while he slept, during the REM cycle. Results showed that the majority of the eye movements were aimed to his right side, indicating that the images
347:
can be considered. For the study, patients with hemispatial neglect, that were also familiar with the layout of the Piazza del Duomo square, were observed. The patients were asked to imagine themselves at various vantage points in the square, without physically being in the square. They were then
335:
Spatial representation is the way space is represented in the brain. In this theory, it is believed that the underlying cause of neglect is the inability to form contralateral representations of space. In this theory, neglect patients demonstrate a failure to describe the contralesional side of a
678:
In a review article by Pierce & Buxbaum (2002), they concluded that the evidence for
Hemispheric Activation Approaches, which focuses on moving the limb on the side of the neglect, has conflicting evidence in the literature. The authors note that a possible limitation in this approach is the
467:
Visual neglect can also be assessed by having the patient draw a copy of a picture with which they are presented. If the patient is asked to draw a complex picture they may neglect the entire contralesional side of the picture. If asked to draw an individual object, the patient will not draw the
650:
has been shown to bring about a brief remission in some cases. however this technique has been known to elicit unpleasant side-effects such as nystagmus, vertigo and vomiting. A study done by
Schindler and colleagues examined the use of neck muscle vibration on the contralesional posterior neck
471:
A patient may also be asked to read a page out of a book. The patient will be unable to orient their eyes to the left margin and will begin reading the page from the center. Presenting a single word to a patient will result in the patient either reading only the ipsilesional part of the word or
326:
In this theory, neglect is seen as disorder of attention and orientation caused by disruption of the visual cortex. Patients with this disorder will direct attention and movements to the ipsilesional side and neglect stimuli in the contralesional side despite having preserved visual fields. The
318:
Spatial attention is the process where objects in one location are chosen for processing over objects in another location. This would imply that neglect is more intentional. The patient has an affinity to direct attention to the unaffected side. Neglect is caused by a decrease in stimuli in the
480:
Neglect is a heterogenous disorder that manifests itself radically differently in different patients. No single mechanism can account for these different manifestations. A vast array of impaired mechanisms are found in neglect. These mechanisms alone would not cause neglect. The complexity of
463:
Another widely used test is the line cancellation test. Here, a patient is presented with a piece of paper that has various lines scattered across it and is asked to mark each of the lines. Patients who exhibit left-sided neglect will completely ignore all lines on the left side of the paper.
578:
Various neuropsychological research studies have considered the role of frame of reference in hemispatial neglect, offering new evidence to support both allocentric and egocentric neglect. To begin, one study conducted by
Dongyun Li, Hans-Otto Karnath, and Christopher Rorden examined whether
301:. Hemianopsia arises from damage to the primary visual pathways cutting off the input to the cerebral hemispheres from the retinas. Neglect is damage to the processing areas. The cerebral hemispheres receive the input, but there is an error in the processing that is not well understood.
356:
making their neglect a disorder of spatial representation which is the ability to reconstruct spatial frames in which the spatial relationship of objects, that may be perceived, imagined or remembered, with respect to the subject and each other are organized to be correctly acted on.
509:
Hemispatial neglect can have a wide range in terms of what the patient neglects. The first range of neglect, commonly referred to as "egocentric" neglect, is found in patients who neglect their own body or personal space. These patients tend to neglect the opposite side of their
775:
211:
the memory (to the patient having lost pieces of spatial information of the memory) or whether the information within the memory is whole and intact but simply being ignored, the same way portions of a physical object in the patient's presence would be ignored.
561:
glasses, which shift left visual space toward the right. By shifting visual input, they seem to correct the mind's sense of midline. The result is not only the amelioration of visual neglect, but also of tactile, motor, and even representational neglect.
501:, can move unaffected limbs ably in ipsilateral space but have difficulty directing them into contralesional space. Thus a patient with pre-motor neglect may struggle to grasp an object on the left side even when using the unaffected right arm.
365:
Patients show a contralesional loss of space representation with a deviation of spatial reference to the ipsilesional side. In these cases we see a left-right dissimilarity of representation rather than a decline of representational competence.
297:
language - there is redundant processing of the right visual fields by both hemispheres. Hence the right hemisphere is able to compensate for the loss of left hemisphere function, but not vice versa. Neglect is not to be confused with
309:
Researchers have debated about whether neglect is a disorder of spatial attention or spatial representation, or even non-spatial deficits of attention combined with a directional bias that results from unilateral brain injury.
779:
285:. The lack of attention to the left side of space can manifest in the visual, auditory, proprioceptive, and olfactory domains. Although hemispatial neglect often manifests as a sensory deficit (and is frequently
3712:
522:. For example, in a gap detection test, subjects with egocentric hemispatial neglect on the right side often make errors on the far right side of the page, as they are neglecting the space in their right
327:
result of all of this is an increased sensitivity of visual performance in the unaffected side. The patient shows an affinity to the ipsilesional side being unable to disengage attention from that side.
1469:
Doricchi, F.; Iaria, G.; Silvetti, M.; Figliozzi, F.; Siegler, I. (2007). "The "ways" we look at dreams: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect (with an evolutionary account of dream bizarreness".
3278:
145:), a deficit in attention and awareness towards the side of space opposite brain damage (contralesional space) is observed. It is defined by the inability of a person to process and perceive
765:
Unsworth, C. A. (2007). Cognitive and
Perceptual Dysfunction. In T. J. Schmitz & S. B. O'Sullivan (Eds.), Physical Rehabilitation (pp. 1149-1185). Philadelphia, F.A: Davis Company.
595:
Treatment consists of finding ways to bring the patient's attention toward the left, usually done incrementally, by going just a few degrees past midline, and progressing from there.
460:
the patient is then asked to dissect the line at the midpoint. Patients exhibiting, for example, left-sided neglect will exhibit a rightward deviation of the line's true midpoint.
2519:
1063:
Iachini, Tina; Ruggiero, Gennaro; Conson, Massimiliano; Trojano, Luigi (2009). "Lateralization of egocentric and allocentric spatial processing after parietal brain lesions".
2403:
1908:
Miller S. M.; Ngo. T. T. (2007). "Studies of caloric vestibular stimulation: implications for the cognitive neurosciences, the clinical neurosciences and neurophilosophy".
1569:
3271:
1836:
Moscovitch, M; Behrmann, M (1994). "Coding of spatial information in the somatosensory system: evidence from patients with neglect following parietal lobe damage".
229:
Though it is frequently underappreciated, unilateral neglect can have dramatic consequences. It has more negative effect on functional ability, as measured by the
571:
of their own midline (egocentric neglect) or may instead see all the objects in a room but neglect the left half of each individual object (allocentric neglect).
3264:
472:
replacing the part they cannot see with a logical substitute. For example, if they are presented with the word "peanut", they may read "nut" or say "walnut".
557:
and found that they tended to point it straight ahead but position it rightward of their true midline. This shift may account for the success of therapeutic
203:
of a limb or an entire side of the body. Since this delusion often occurs alone, without the accompaniment of other delusions, it is often labeled as a
2512:
432:
1456:
1328:
Brandt, Thomas; Dieterich, Marianne; Strupp, Michael; Glasauer, Stefan (2012). "Model
Approach to Neurological Variants of Visuo-spatial Neglect".
2000:
Luaute J, Halligan P, Rode G, Jacquin-Courtois S, Boisson D (2006). "Prism adaptation first among equals in alleviating left neglect: A review".
2505:
3767:
3256:
420:
448:
1413:
Rode G., Cotton F., Jacquin-Courtois S., Rossetti Y., Bartolomeo P. (2010). "Representation and disconnection in imaginal neglect".
2334:
1487:
667:
177:('visual neglect'), neglect in other forms of perception can also be found, either alone or in combination with visual neglect.
2059:"Rehabilitation of postural disturbances of hemiplegic patients by using trunk control retraining during exploratory exercises"
396:
150:
2115:
1892:
3517:
497:
does not use a contralesional limb despite the neuromuscular ability to do so. One with pre-motor neglect, or directional
3556:
1014:
Kleinman, Jonathan; Newhart, Melissa; Davis, Cameron; Heidler-Gary, Jeniffer; Gottesman, Rebecca; Hillis, Argyie (2007).
408:
3323:
1309:
1267:
1115:
955:
17:
153:
to the damaged hemisphere, but instances of ipsilesional neglect (on the same side as the lesion) have been reported.
3313:
663:
2232:
2455:
Kleinman, Jonathan; Melissa
Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca Gottesman; Argye Hillis (2007).
2402:
Kleinman, Jonathan; Melissa
Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca Gottesman; Argye Hillis (2007).
1630:
Kleinman, Jonathan; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca Gottesman; Argye Hillis (2007).
646:, though these tests have had mixed results, helping in some cases and accentuating hemispatial neglect in others.
596:
293:
3318:
3115:
659:
899:
384:
3547:
1782:"Egocentric representations of space co-exist with allocentric representations: Evidence from spatial neglect"
3585:
3163:
241:
is a stronger predictor of poor functional recovery after one year than several other variables, including
2457:"Right hemispatial neglect: Frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke (Fig.2)"
1632:"Right hemispatial neglect: Frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke (Fig.2)"
3566:
3286:
3512:
3454:
490:"representational neglect", patients may ignore the left side of memories, dreams, and hallucinations.
3683:
3625:
3612:
3524:
3497:
3015:
3010:
2135:
Husain, Masud; Rorden, Chris (2003). "Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms i n hemispatial neglect".
608:
282:
2354:
1507:
3552:
2497:
2189:
1412:
1301:
612:
2404:"Right hemispatial neglect: Frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke"
2057:
de Seze M.; Wiart L.; Bon-Saint-Come A.; Debelleix X.; de Seze M.; Joseph P.; et al. (2001).
1570:"Right hemispatial neglect: Frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke"
1016:"Right Hemispatial Neglect: Frequency and Characterization Following Acute Left Hemisphere Stroke"
3590:
3562:
3110:
2906:
344:
289:
with sensory deficit), it is essentially a failure to pay sufficient attention to sensory input.
149:
towards the contralesional side of the body or environment. Hemispatial neglect is very commonly
3376:
553:
In a recent study, researchers asked patients with left neglect to project their midline with a
3658:
3632:
3529:
3437:
3100:
2698:
2349:
1502:
274:
216:
1880:
1259:
658:, visual scanning training, mental imagery training, video feedback training, trunk rotation,
3570:
3122:
1450:
734:
221:
sides of the patient, the patient will report seeing movement only on the ipsilesional side.
204:
166:
146:
2579:
3642:
3193:
2661:
2284:
1426:
714:
604:
8:
3716:
3678:
3606:
3225:
3127:
3050:
2454:
2401:
1629:
1563:
1378:
Bisiach, Edoardo (1996). "Unilateral Neglect and the Structure of Space Representation".
1294:
647:
170:
134:
2383:
1881:"The Role of Spontaneous Eye Movements in Orienting Attention and in Ulinateral Neglect"
1536:
3772:
3580:
3470:
3381:
3361:
3336:
3287:
2962:
2952:
2947:
2856:
2721:
2619:
2528:
2481:
2456:
2431:
2375:
2316:
2291:
2220:
2160:
1977:
1952:
1933:
1861:
1806:
1781:
1708:
1683:
1656:
1631:
1597:
1528:
1438:
1395:
1353:
1225:
1168:
1088:
1040:
1015:
996:
919:
875:
850:
826:
801:
281:
space. Neglect is most closely related to damage to the temporo-parietal junction and
126:
3721:
2924:
984:
3619:
3485:
3444:
3401:
3351:
2942:
2753:
2711:
2569:
2559:
2486:
2436:
2367:
2321:
2280:
2212:
2152:
2111:
2104:
2080:
2039:
1982:
1925:
1921:
1888:
1853:
1811:
1751:
1734:
Tipper, S.P.; Behrmann, M. (1996). "Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect".
1713:
1661:
1602:
1565:
1520:
1430:
1345:
1305:
1263:
1252:
1217:
1209:
1160:
1152:
1111:
1080:
1045:
988:
951:
880:
831:
729:
538:
494:
230:
200:
174:
105:
3745:
2224:
2164:
1937:
1865:
1442:
1357:
1229:
1172:
1092:
1000:
923:
866:
675:
this field of research in order to provide more support in evidence-based practice.
3475:
3078:
2957:
2916:
2604:
2546:
2476:
2468:
2426:
2418:
2379:
2359:
2311:
2303:
2258:
2204:
2144:
2070:
2031:
1972:
1964:
1917:
1845:
1801:
1793:
1743:
1703:
1695:
1651:
1643:
1592:
1584:
1532:
1512:
1422:
1399:
1387:
1337:
1199:
1144:
1072:
1035:
1027:
980:
911:
870:
862:
821:
813:
671:
655:
631:
616:
2022:
Pierce S. R.; Buxbaum L. J. (2002). "Treatments of unilateral neglect: A review".
630:
Forms of treatment that have been tested with variable reports of success include
237:, cognition, and premorbid ADL status. Its presence within the first 10 days of a
3220:
3153:
3090:
3065:
3055:
3045:
3032:
3022:
2584:
2208:
1797:
1391:
600:
27:
Asymmetrically-impaired spatial awareness due to a brain hemisphere being damaged
2472:
2422:
1747:
1647:
1588:
1076:
1031:
915:
3574:
3386:
3210:
3173:
2738:
2726:
2614:
2599:
2131:
Heilman, K.M and Valenstein, E. (2003) Clinical Neuropsychology: Fourth Edition
2101:
2056:
670:(tDCS). Of these emerging treatment options, the most studied intervention is
558:
234:
214:
Some forms of neglect may also be very mild—for example, in a condition called
2263:
2244:
2075:
2058:
1849:
1341:
1204:
1187:
3761:
3406:
3366:
3245:
3188:
2786:
2676:
2636:
2589:
2574:
2272:
1213:
1156:
739:
635:
320:
278:
266:
250:
185:
97:
96:
Hemispatial neglect is most frequently associated with a lesion of the right
2363:
2035:
1516:
1132:
3183:
3000:
2876:
2869:
2864:
2806:
2791:
2594:
2554:
2490:
2440:
2371:
2335:"Binding Personal and Peripersonal Space: Evidence from Tactile Extinction"
2325:
2249:
2216:
2156:
2084:
2043:
1986:
1929:
1857:
1815:
1665:
1606:
1564:
Kleinman, Jonathan; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary;
1524:
1488:"Binding Personal and Peripersonal Space: Evidence from Tactile Extinction"
1434:
1349:
1221:
1164:
1084:
1049:
992:
884:
835:
709:
523:
270:
189:
130:
2307:
1968:
1755:
1717:
1699:
3391:
3230:
3205:
3105:
3073:
3040:
2996:
2810:
2731:
2666:
2641:
2624:
2276:
817:
699:
643:
498:
319:
contralesional side because of a lack of ipsilesional stimulation of the
298:
286:
246:
242:
138:
2179:
273:
are associated with the deployment of attention (internally, or through
3168:
2986:
2981:
2972:
2901:
2835:
2825:
2763:
2686:
704:
694:
624:
439:
110:
3704:
2332:
2290:
Schindler, l; Kerkhoff G; Karnath HO; Keller I; Goldenberg G. (2002).
1485:
800:
Kim, M; Na, D L; Kim, G M; Adair, J C; Lee, K H; Heilman, K M (1999).
343:
To support this theory, evidence from Bisiach and Luzzatti's study of
3740:
3465:
3299:
3240:
3200:
3178:
3158:
3132:
3095:
3083:
2991:
2934:
2911:
2840:
2830:
2820:
2801:
2771:
2743:
2716:
2651:
2631:
2333:
Vaishnavi, Sandeep; Jesse Calhoun; Anjan Chatterjee (February 2001).
2289:
2184:
London : Springer, 2014. (the content is removed from the link.)
2181:
Attention disorders after right brain damage: Living in halved worlds
1486:
Vaishnavi, Sandeep; Jesse Calhoun; Anjan Chatterjee (February 2001).
724:
620:
554:
493:
Output neglect includes motor and pre-motor deficits. A patient with
361:
represented in his dreams were also affected by hemispatial neglect.
114:
2527:
2148:
1951:
Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath HO, Keller I, Goldenberg G (2002).
1736:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
1148:
3432:
3291:
3137:
2977:
2815:
2796:
2292:"Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect"
1953:"Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect"
719:
639:
196:
1999:
3328:
3215:
2886:
2126:
Spatial neglect: A clinical handbook for diagnosis and treatment.
971:
Vallar, Giusepppe (March 1998). "Spatial hemineglect in humans".
688:
515:
254:
162:
1013:
3427:
3341:
3235:
2896:
2781:
2776:
2748:
2706:
2564:
519:
511:
353:
337:
238:
181:
142:
1950:
3295:
2891:
2881:
1684:"Left of What? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect"
1327:
1133:"Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect"
654:
Other areas of emerging treatment options include the use of
2102:
Hans-Otto Karnath; A. David Milner; Giuseppe Vallar (2002).
1681:
1188:"Visual Attention: What Inattention Reveals about the Brain"
1108:
Clinical neuropsychology : behavioral and brain science
1062:
848:
442:
phenomenon might be revealed by the request to draw a clock.
2671:
2532:
802:"Ipsilesional neglect: behavioural and anatomical features"
292:
Although hemispatial neglect has been identified following
88:
1682:
Beschin, N; Cubelli, R; Sala, S.D.; Spinazzola, L (1997).
188:
of the brain can lead to neglect for the left side of the
2021:
950:(Repr. ed.). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. p. 208.
323:
and an increased inhibition of the contralesional side.
1110:. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press. pp. 125–174.
1907:
3548:
Upper dorsal pontine syndrome/Raymond–Céstan syndrome
2273:
Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies
1885:
Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies
1300:(2. ed.). Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press. pp.
3694:
2296:
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
1957:
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
1688:
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
904:
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
897:
806:
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
2103:
1883:. In Robertson, Ian H.; Marshall, John C. (eds.).
1835:
1293:
1254:Neurological foundations of cognitive neuroscience
1251:
1105:
2106:The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect
1245:
1243:
1241:
1239:
233:, than age, sex, power, side of stroke, balance,
3759:
2063:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2024:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
1296:Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology
1106:Bradshaw, John L.; Mattingley, Jason B. (1995).
1779:
161:Hemispatial neglect results most commonly from
2124:Robertson, I.H., & Halligan, P.W. (1999).
1733:
1625:
1623:
1559:
1557:
1481:
1479:
1249:
1236:
454:The patients has to mark the half of the line.
3272:
2513:
1831:
1829:
1827:
1825:
1258:( ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. pp.
1131:Husain, Masud; Rorden, Chris (January 2003).
799:
2242:
2233:The man whose brain ignores half of his life
2134:
1455:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1130:
1620:
1554:
1476:
1380:Current Directions in Psychological Science
3279:
3265:
2520:
2506:
2187:
1822:
1677:
1675:
1373:
1371:
1369:
1367:
1287:
1285:
1283:
1281:
1279:
761:
759:
757:
755:
2480:
2430:
2353:
2315:
2262:
2074:
2017:
2015:
1976:
1944:
1805:
1729:
1727:
1707:
1655:
1596:
1506:
1323:
1321:
1203:
1039:
874:
825:
336:familiar scene, from a given point, from
330:
1878:
1099:
304:
1672:
1377:
1364:
1291:
1276:
1007:
941:
939:
937:
935:
933:
849:Li, Korina; Paresh A. Malhotra (2015).
752:
668:transcranial direct-current stimulation
14:
3760:
2012:
2002:Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience
1993:
1724:
1427:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.032
1318:
1185:
1056:
970:
3513:Lateral medullary syndrome/Wallenberg
3260:
2501:
1887:. Psychology Press. pp. 107–22.
1780:Li, D; Karnath, H; Rorden, C (2014).
1775:
1773:
1771:
1769:
1767:
1765:
945:
426:Line cancellation neglect test result
2110:. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
948:The cognitive neuroscience of vision
930:
648:Caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS)
468:contralesional side of that object.
313:
2239:. Friday 23 November 2012 08.27 EST
599:of neglect is often carried out by
277:, head turns or limb reaches) into
24:
3768:Symptoms and signs: Nervous system
3525:Medial medullary syndrome/Dejerine
2570:Festinating gait/Parkinsonian gait
2172:
1762:
25:
3784:
2342:Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
1838:Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
1495:Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
664:transcranial magnetic stimulation
402:Letter search neglect test result
3164:Overpronation/Flexible flat feet
1922:10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00208.x
447:
431:
419:
407:
395:
383:
87:
81:contralateral hemispatialagnosia
3294:associated with lesions of the
2050:
1901:
1872:
1463:
1406:
1179:
1124:
867:10.1136/practneurol-2015-001115
660:galvanic vestibular stimulation
373:
156:
1250:D'Esposito, Mark, ed. (2003).
964:
891:
842:
793:
768:
565:
414:Line cancellation neglect test
195:Neglect may also present as a
13:
1:
985:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01145-0
745:
691:(particularly mirror agnosia)
65:unilateral visual inattention
3586:Internuclear ophthalmoplegia
2615:Myopathic gait/Waddling gait
2209:10.1097/WCO.0b013e32816aa3a3
2197:Current Opinion in Neurology
1798:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.06.012
1392:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772737
1292:Mesulam, M.-Marsel (2000).
1186:Husain, Masud (2019-04-01).
1137:Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
973:Trends in Cognitive Sciences
898:Giuseppe, Vallar M. (2015).
609:speech-language pathologists
590:
475:
368:
7:
2473:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.005
2423:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.005
2137:Nature Reviews Neuroscience
1748:10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1261
1648:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.005
1589:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.005
1471:Experimental Brain Research
1077:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.11.001
1032:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.005
916:10.1136/jnnp-2015-311750.12
682:
613:neurologic music therapists
378:Some of the neglect tests.
10:
3789:
2188:Bartolomeo, Paolo (2007).
2178:Bartolomeo, Paolo (2014).
2128:Hove, East Sussex:Erlbaum.
550:across the top or bottom.
390:Letter search neglect test
224:
129:condition in which, after
3731:
3698:
3684:Upper motor neuron lesion
3671:
3651:
3599:
3540:
3505:
3496:
3453:
3417:
3306:
3146:
3064:
3031:
3016:Lower motor neuron lesion
3011:Upper motor neuron lesion
2933:
2849:
2816:Myotonia / Pseudomyotonia
2762:
2697:
2539:
2531:relating to movement and
2264:10.4249/scholarpedia.3681
2076:10.1053/apmr.2001.0820793
1850:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.2.151
1342:10.1007/s00422-012-0517-3
1205:10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.026
946:Farah, Martha J. (2004).
851:"Review: Spatial neglect"
283:posterior parietal cortex
260:
104:
95:
86:
40:
35:
3553:Lateral pontine syndrome
1879:Gainotti, Guido (1993).
504:
199:form, where the patient
3591:One and a half syndrome
3567:Millard–Gubler syndrome
3563:Medial pontine syndrome
2364:10.1162/089892901564243
2036:10.1053/apmr.2002.27333
1568:; Argye Hillis (2007).
1517:10.1162/089892901564243
605:occupational therapists
544:
484:
257:and right hemiparesis.
167:brain unilateral injury
3659:Alternating hemiplegia
1910:Acta Neuropsychiatrica
1330:Biological Cybernetics
518:of the body, head, or
331:Spatial representation
3123:Boutonniere deformity
2308:10.1136/jnnp.73.4.412
2243:Husain Masud (2008).
1969:10.1136/jnnp.73.4.412
1700:10.1136/jnnp.63.4.483
735:Monothematic delusion
305:Theories of mechanism
205:monothematic delusion
61:contralateral neglect
3194:Clasp-knife response
2285:University of Durham
818:10.1136/jnnp.67.1.35
715:Crossmodal attention
632:prismatic adaptation
184:affecting the right
100:(in yellow, at top).
3679:Pseudobulbar affect
3633:Parinaud's syndrome
3624:ventral tegmentum,
3438:Parkinson's disease
3357:Hemispatial neglect
3226:Conversion disorder
3128:Swan neck deformity
3051:Locomotive syndrome
2461:Brain and Cognition
2411:Brain and Cognition
1636:Brain and Cognition
1577:Brain and Cognition
1065:Brain and Cognition
1020:Brain and Cognition
855:Practical Neurology
776:"One-Sided Neglect"
617:physical therapists
265:Brain areas in the
171:cerebral hemisphere
123:Hemispatial neglect
36:Hemispatial neglect
3732:External resources
3611:ventral peduncle,
3581:Locked-in syndrome
3571:Foville's syndrome
3471:Dysdiadochokinesia
3382:Cortical blindness
3362:Gerstmann syndrome
3337:Expressive aphasia
3288:Signs and symptoms
2963:Spastic paraplegia
2953:Spastic paraplegia
2948:Periodic paralysis
2857:Abnormal posturing
2722:Dysdiadochokinesia
2658:Asynchronous gait
2620:Trendelenburg gait
2580:Marche à petit pas
2529:Signs and symptoms
601:neuropsychologists
127:neuropsychological
53:unilateral neglect
18:Unilateral neglect
3755:
3754:
3692:
3691:
3667:
3666:
3643:Claude's syndrome
3620:Benedikt syndrome
3486:Cerebellar ataxia
3445:Thalamic syndrome
3402:Cortical deafness
3377:Bálint's syndrome
3352:Receptive aphasia
3254:
3253:
2943:Flaccid paralysis
2764:Abnormal movement
2754:Hemimotor neglect
2712:Cerebellar ataxia
2662:Gunslinger's gait
2560:Cerebellar ataxia
2281:Monash University
2117:978-0-19-850833-5
1894:978-0-86377-208-5
1566:Rebecca Gottesman
1421:(10): 2903–2911.
1336:(11–12): 681–90.
900:"Spatial Neglect"
730:Hemimotor neglect
539:somatoparaphrenia
314:Spatial attention
231:Barthel ADL index
175:visual perception
120:
119:
30:Medical condition
16:(Redirected from
3780:
3696:
3695:
3607:Weber's syndrome
3503:
3502:
3476:Intention tremor
3281:
3274:
3267:
3258:
3257:
2958:Spastic diplegia
2925:Tonic immobility
2917:Waxy flexibility
2861:Stooped posture
2667:Hemiparetic gait
2648:Asymmetric gait
2547:Gait abnormality
2522:
2515:
2508:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2484:
2451:
2449:
2447:
2434:
2408:
2398:
2396:
2394:
2388:
2382:. Archived from
2357:
2339:
2329:
2319:
2268:
2266:
2231:Thomas Hoffman,
2228:
2194:
2190:"Visual neglect"
2168:
2121:
2109:
2089:
2088:
2078:
2054:
2048:
2047:
2019:
2010:
2009:
1997:
1991:
1990:
1980:
1948:
1942:
1941:
1905:
1899:
1898:
1876:
1870:
1869:
1833:
1820:
1819:
1809:
1777:
1760:
1759:
1742:(5): 1261–1278.
1731:
1722:
1721:
1711:
1679:
1670:
1669:
1659:
1627:
1618:
1617:
1615:
1613:
1600:
1574:
1561:
1552:
1551:
1549:
1547:
1541:
1535:. Archived from
1510:
1492:
1483:
1474:
1467:
1461:
1460:
1454:
1446:
1415:Neuropsychologia
1410:
1404:
1403:
1375:
1362:
1361:
1325:
1316:
1315:
1299:
1289:
1274:
1273:
1257:
1247:
1234:
1233:
1207:
1198:(7): R262–R264.
1183:
1177:
1176:
1128:
1122:
1121:
1103:
1097:
1096:
1060:
1054:
1053:
1043:
1011:
1005:
1004:
968:
962:
961:
943:
928:
927:
895:
889:
888:
878:
846:
840:
839:
829:
797:
791:
790:
788:
787:
778:. Archived from
772:
766:
763:
672:prism adaptation
451:
435:
423:
411:
399:
387:
345:Piazza del Duomo
201:denies ownership
91:
77:one-side neglect
73:neglect syndrome
69:hemi-inattention
33:
32:
21:
3788:
3787:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3758:
3757:
3756:
3751:
3750:
3727:
3726:
3707:
3693:
3688:
3663:
3647:
3595:
3536:
3492:
3449:
3413:
3373:Occipital lobe
3307:Cerebral cortex
3302:
3285:
3255:
3250:
3221:Motion sickness
3154:Rachitic rosary
3142:
3091:Joint stiffness
3066:Range of motion
3060:
3027:
3023:Sleep paralysis
3007:General causes
2929:
2845:
2758:
2693:
2605:Vestibular gait
2585:Propulsive gait
2535:
2526:
2445:
2443:
2406:
2392:
2390:
2389:on 14 June 2010
2386:
2355:10.1.1.483.6296
2337:
2192:
2175:
2173:Further reading
2149:10.1038/nrn1005
2118:
2093:
2092:
2055:
2051:
2020:
2013:
2008:(4–6): 409–418.
1998:
1994:
1949:
1945:
1906:
1902:
1895:
1877:
1873:
1834:
1823:
1778:
1763:
1732:
1725:
1680:
1673:
1628:
1621:
1611:
1609:
1572:
1562:
1555:
1545:
1543:
1542:on 14 June 2010
1539:
1508:10.1.1.483.6296
1490:
1484:
1477:
1468:
1464:
1448:
1447:
1411:
1407:
1376:
1365:
1326:
1319:
1312:
1290:
1277:
1270:
1248:
1237:
1192:Current Biology
1184:
1180:
1149:10.1038/nrn1005
1129:
1125:
1118:
1104:
1100:
1061:
1057:
1012:
1008:
969:
965:
958:
944:
931:
896:
892:
847:
843:
798:
794:
785:
783:
774:
773:
769:
764:
753:
748:
685:
593:
568:
547:
514:, based on the
507:
487:
478:
455:
452:
443:
436:
427:
424:
415:
412:
403:
400:
391:
388:
376:
371:
333:
316:
307:
294:left hemisphere
263:
227:
180:For example, a
159:
57:spatial neglect
31:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3786:
3776:
3775:
3770:
3753:
3752:
3749:
3748:
3736:
3735:
3733:
3729:
3728:
3725:
3724:
3708:
3703:
3702:
3700:
3699:Classification
3690:
3689:
3687:
3686:
3681:
3675:
3673:
3669:
3668:
3665:
3664:
3662:
3661:
3655:
3653:
3649:
3648:
3646:
3645:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3630:
3629:
3628:
3617:
3616:
3615:
3603:
3601:
3597:
3596:
3594:
3593:
3588:
3583:
3578:
3560:
3550:
3544:
3542:
3538:
3537:
3535:
3534:
3533:
3532:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3509:
3507:
3500:
3494:
3493:
3491:
3490:
3489:
3488:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3473:
3468:
3459:
3457:
3451:
3450:
3448:
3447:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3435:
3430:
3424:Basal ganglia
3421:
3419:
3415:
3414:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3404:
3398:Temporal lobe
3396:
3395:
3394:
3389:
3387:Anton syndrome
3384:
3379:
3371:
3370:
3369:
3364:
3359:
3354:
3348:Parietal lobe
3346:
3345:
3344:
3339:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3310:
3308:
3304:
3303:
3284:
3283:
3276:
3269:
3261:
3252:
3251:
3249:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3211:Astasia-abasia
3208:
3203:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3174:Bow-leggedness
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3150:
3148:
3144:
3143:
3141:
3140:
3135:
3130:
3125:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3081:
3070:
3068:
3062:
3061:
3059:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3037:
3035:
3029:
3028:
3026:
3025:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3013:
3005:
3004:
3003:
2994:
2989:
2984:
2975:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2960:
2950:
2945:
2939:
2937:
2931:
2930:
2928:
2927:
2922:
2919:
2914:
2909:
2904:
2899:
2894:
2889:
2884:
2879:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2867:
2859:
2853:
2851:
2847:
2846:
2844:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2804:
2799:
2794:
2789:
2784:
2779:
2774:
2768:
2766:
2760:
2759:
2757:
2756:
2751:
2746:
2741:
2739:Sensory ataxia
2736:
2735:
2734:
2729:
2727:Pronator drift
2724:
2719:
2709:
2703:
2701:
2695:
2694:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2674:
2669:
2664:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2639:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2622:
2617:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2602:
2600:Truncal ataxia
2597:
2592:
2587:
2582:
2577:
2572:
2567:
2562:
2557:
2549:
2543:
2541:
2537:
2536:
2525:
2524:
2517:
2510:
2502:
2496:
2495:
2452:
2399:
2348:(2): 181–189.
2330:
2287:
2269:
2240:
2229:
2185:
2174:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2132:
2129:
2122:
2116:
2098:
2097:
2091:
2090:
2069:(6): 793–800.
2049:
2030:(2): 256–268.
2011:
1992:
1943:
1916:(3): 183–203.
1900:
1893:
1871:
1844:(2): 151–155.
1821:
1761:
1723:
1694:(4): 483–489.
1671:
1619:
1553:
1501:(2): 181–189.
1475:
1462:
1405:
1363:
1317:
1311:978-0195134759
1310:
1275:
1269:978-0262042093
1268:
1235:
1178:
1123:
1117:978-0121245450
1116:
1098:
1055:
1006:
963:
957:978-0631214038
956:
929:
910:(9): e3.4–e3.
890:
861:(5): 333–339.
841:
792:
767:
750:
749:
747:
744:
743:
742:
737:
732:
727:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
684:
681:
597:Rehabilitation
592:
589:
567:
564:
546:
543:
506:
503:
486:
483:
477:
474:
457:
456:
453:
446:
444:
437:
430:
428:
425:
418:
416:
413:
406:
404:
401:
394:
392:
389:
382:
375:
372:
370:
367:
332:
329:
315:
312:
306:
303:
262:
259:
235:proprioception
226:
223:
158:
155:
141:(e.g. after a
118:
117:
108:
102:
101:
93:
92:
84:
83:
42:
38:
37:
29:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3785:
3774:
3771:
3769:
3766:
3765:
3763:
3747:
3743:
3742:
3738:
3737:
3734:
3730:
3723:
3719:
3718:
3714:
3710:
3709:
3706:
3701:
3697:
3685:
3682:
3680:
3677:
3676:
3674:
3670:
3660:
3657:
3656:
3654:
3650:
3644:
3641:
3637:dorsal, tumor
3636:
3635:
3634:
3631:
3627:
3623:
3622:
3621:
3618:
3614:
3610:
3609:
3608:
3605:
3604:
3602:
3598:
3592:
3589:
3587:
3584:
3582:
3579:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3561:
3558:
3554:
3551:
3549:
3546:
3545:
3543:
3539:
3531:
3528:
3527:
3526:
3523:
3519:
3516:
3515:
3514:
3511:
3510:
3508:
3504:
3501:
3499:
3495:
3487:
3484:
3483:
3481:
3477:
3474:
3472:
3469:
3467:
3464:
3463:
3461:
3460:
3458:
3456:
3452:
3446:
3443:
3439:
3436:
3434:
3431:
3429:
3426:
3425:
3423:
3422:
3420:
3416:
3408:
3407:Prosopagnosia
3405:
3403:
3400:
3399:
3397:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3378:
3375:
3374:
3372:
3368:
3367:Astereognosis
3365:
3363:
3360:
3358:
3355:
3353:
3350:
3349:
3347:
3343:
3340:
3338:
3335:
3334:
3333:Frontal lobe
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3311:
3309:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3289:
3282:
3277:
3275:
3270:
3268:
3263:
3262:
3259:
3247:
3246:Dancing mania
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3209:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3195:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3189:Hyperreflexia
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3151:
3149:
3145:
3139:
3136:
3134:
3131:
3129:
3126:
3124:
3121:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3101:Hypermobility
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3085:
3082:
3080:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3072:
3071:
3069:
3067:
3063:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3038:
3036:
3034:
3030:
3024:
3021:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3008:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2995:
2993:
2990:
2988:
2985:
2983:
2979:
2976:
2974:
2971:
2970:
2968:
2964:
2961:
2959:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2951:
2949:
2946:
2944:
2941:
2940:
2938:
2936:
2932:
2926:
2923:
2920:
2918:
2915:
2913:
2910:
2908:
2907:Joint locking
2905:
2903:
2900:
2898:
2895:
2893:
2890:
2888:
2885:
2883:
2880:
2878:
2875:
2871:
2868:
2866:
2863:
2862:
2860:
2858:
2855:
2854:
2852:
2848:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2808:
2805:
2803:
2800:
2798:
2795:
2793:
2790:
2788:
2787:Fasciculation
2785:
2783:
2780:
2778:
2775:
2773:
2770:
2769:
2767:
2765:
2761:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2747:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2737:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2723:
2720:
2718:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2710:
2708:
2705:
2704:
2702:
2700:
2696:
2688:
2685:
2684:
2682:
2678:
2677:Antalgic gait
2675:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2665:
2663:
2660:
2659:
2657:
2653:
2650:
2649:
2647:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2637:Steppage gait
2635:
2634:
2633:
2630:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2618:
2616:
2613:
2612:
2610:
2606:
2603:
2601:
2598:
2596:
2593:
2591:
2590:Stomping gait
2588:
2586:
2583:
2581:
2578:
2576:
2575:Magnetic gait
2573:
2571:
2568:
2566:
2563:
2561:
2558:
2556:
2553:
2552:
2550:
2548:
2545:
2544:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2523:
2518:
2516:
2511:
2509:
2504:
2503:
2500:
2492:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2453:
2442:
2438:
2433:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2405:
2400:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2356:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2336:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2318:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2288:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2271:Robin Walker
2270:
2265:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2246:
2241:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2191:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2177:
2176:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2133:
2130:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2113:
2108:
2107:
2100:
2099:
2095:
2094:
2086:
2082:
2077:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2053:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2018:
2016:
2007:
2003:
1996:
1988:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1947:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1904:
1896:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1875:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1832:
1830:
1828:
1826:
1817:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1776:
1774:
1772:
1770:
1768:
1766:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1730:
1728:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1678:
1676:
1667:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1626:
1624:
1608:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1571:
1567:
1560:
1558:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1489:
1482:
1480:
1472:
1466:
1458:
1452:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1409:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1374:
1372:
1370:
1368:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1324:
1322:
1313:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1297:
1288:
1286:
1284:
1282:
1280:
1271:
1265:
1261:
1256:
1255:
1246:
1244:
1242:
1240:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1127:
1119:
1113:
1109:
1102:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1071:(3): 514–20.
1070:
1066:
1059:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1010:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
967:
959:
953:
949:
942:
940:
938:
936:
934:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
894:
886:
882:
877:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
845:
837:
833:
828:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
796:
782:on 2018-10-24
781:
777:
771:
762:
760:
758:
756:
751:
741:
740:Pseudoneglect
738:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
690:
687:
686:
680:
676:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
652:
649:
645:
641:
637:
636:bromocriptine
633:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
563:
560:
556:
551:
542:
540:
535:
531:
527:
525:
521:
517:
513:
502:
500:
496:
495:motor neglect
491:
482:
473:
469:
465:
461:
450:
445:
441:
434:
429:
422:
417:
410:
405:
398:
393:
386:
381:
380:
379:
366:
362:
358:
355:
349:
346:
341:
339:
328:
324:
322:
321:visual cortex
311:
302:
300:
295:
290:
288:
284:
280:
279:contralateral
276:
275:eye movements
272:
271:frontal lobes
268:
258:
256:
252:
251:visual memory
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
222:
219:
218:
212:
208:
206:
202:
198:
193:
191:
187:
186:parietal lobe
183:
178:
176:
172:
169:to the right
168:
164:
154:
152:
151:contralateral
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
116:
112:
109:
107:
103:
99:
98:parietal lobe
94:
90:
85:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
43:
39:
34:
19:
3739:
3711:
3356:
3324:PCA syndrome
3319:MCA syndrome
3314:ACA syndrome
3184:Hyporeflexia
3079:Bethlem sign
3046:Gowers' sign
3001:Quadruplegia
2877:Opisthotonus
2870:Osteoporosis
2865:Camptocormia
2807:Hyperkinesia
2792:Fibrillation
2699:Coordination
2652:Leaping gait
2595:Spastic gait
2565:Choreic gait
2555:Scissor gait
2467:(1): 50–59.
2464:
2460:
2444:. Retrieved
2417:(1): 50–59.
2414:
2410:
2391:. Retrieved
2384:the original
2345:
2341:
2302:(4): 412–9.
2299:
2295:
2254:
2250:Scholarpedia
2248:
2237:The Guardian
2236:
2203:(4): 381–6.
2200:
2196:
2180:
2143:(1): 26–36.
2140:
2136:
2125:
2105:
2066:
2062:
2052:
2027:
2023:
2005:
2001:
1995:
1963:(4): 412–9.
1960:
1956:
1946:
1913:
1909:
1903:
1884:
1874:
1841:
1837:
1789:
1785:
1739:
1735:
1691:
1687:
1642:(1): 50–59.
1639:
1635:
1610:. Retrieved
1583:(1): 50–59.
1580:
1576:
1544:. Retrieved
1537:the original
1498:
1494:
1470:
1465:
1451:cite journal
1418:
1414:
1408:
1386:(2): 62–65.
1383:
1379:
1333:
1329:
1295:
1253:
1195:
1191:
1181:
1143:(1): 26–36.
1140:
1136:
1126:
1107:
1101:
1068:
1064:
1058:
1026:(1): 50–59.
1023:
1019:
1009:
979:(3): 87–95.
976:
972:
966:
947:
907:
903:
893:
858:
854:
844:
812:(1): 35–38.
809:
805:
795:
784:. Retrieved
780:the original
770:
710:Brain damage
677:
653:
644:amphetamines
629:
621:optometrists
594:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
552:
548:
537:In cases of
536:
532:
528:
524:visual field
508:
492:
488:
479:
470:
466:
462:
458:
377:
374:Neglect test
363:
359:
350:
342:
334:
325:
317:
308:
291:
264:
228:
215:
213:
209:
194:
190:visual field
179:
160:
157:Presentation
122:
121:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
3559:) (lateral)
3392:Pure alexia
3231:Shell shock
3206:Hypnic jerk
3106:Gorlin sign
3074:Contracture
3041:Hemiparesis
2997:Tetraplegia
2811:Hypokinesia
2732:Dyssynergia
2642:Toe walking
2625:Pigeon gait
2277:book review
2257:(2): 3681.
1792:: 161–169.
700:Anosognosia
625:orthoptists
566:Orientation
499:hypokinesia
299:hemianopsia
247:hemianopsia
243:hemiparesis
49:hemineglect
45:Hemiagnosia
41:Other names
3762:Categories
3455:Cerebellum
3169:Knock-knee
2987:Hemiplegia
2982:Paraplegia
2973:Monoplegia
2969:Syndromes
2902:Hypertonia
2836:Echopraxia
2826:Stereotypy
2687:Lotus gait
2683:Deformity
1473:: 450-461.
786:2018-08-22
746:References
705:Blindsight
695:Allochiria
666:(TMS) and
534:the room.
440:Allochiria
217:extinction
197:delusional
135:hemisphere
111:Psychiatry
3773:Syndromes
3746:neuro/719
3741:eMedicine
3498:Brainstem
3466:Dysmetria
3418:Subcortex
3300:brainstem
3292:syndromes
3241:Catatonia
3201:Shivering
3179:Back knee
3159:Flat feet
3133:Scoliosis
3096:Ankylosis
3084:Club foot
2992:Triplegia
2935:Paralysis
2921:Grimacing
2912:Catalepsy
2850:Posturing
2841:Echolalia
2831:Akathisia
2821:Hypotonia
2802:Myoclonus
2772:Athetosis
2744:Asterixis
2717:Dysmetria
2632:Foot drop
2611:Muscular
2350:CiteSeerX
2275:detailed
1503:CiteSeerX
1214:1879-0445
1157:1471-003X
725:Dyschiria
591:Treatment
555:neon bulb
476:Varieties
369:Diagnosis
287:co-morbid
115:Neurology
106:Specialty
3600:Midbrain
3462:Lateral
3433:Dystonia
3138:Kyphosis
3033:Weakness
2978:Diplegia
2797:Myokymia
2491:17174459
2441:17174459
2372:11244544
2326:12235310
2225:18332604
2217:17620870
2165:11450338
2157:12511859
2085:11387585
2044:11833032
1987:12235310
1938:26119745
1930:26952856
1866:26156232
1858:23962367
1816:25038308
1666:17174459
1607:17174459
1525:11244544
1443:25650432
1435:20621588
1358:17077259
1350:22941239
1230:89617355
1222:30939313
1173:11450338
1165:12511859
1093:22773671
1085:19070951
1050:17174459
1001:15366153
993:21227084
924:23426250
885:26023203
836:10369819
720:Delusion
683:See also
640:levodopa
267:parietal
3575:basilar
3506:Medulla
3482:Medial
3329:Aphasia
3216:Vertigo
2887:Trismus
2482:1949495
2432:1949495
2380:9438503
2317:1738082
1978:1738082
1807:4130897
1756:8865621
1718:9343128
1709:2169750
1657:1949495
1598:1949495
1533:9438503
1400:7971943
1041:1949495
876:4602245
827:1736416
689:Agnosia
662:(GVS),
516:midline
255:aphasia
249:, age,
225:Effects
163:strokes
147:stimuli
137:of the
133:to one
3428:Chorea
3342:Abulia
3290:, and
3236:Stupor
3056:Ptosis
2897:Tetany
2782:Tremor
2777:Chorea
2749:Abasia
2707:Ataxia
2489:
2479:
2439:
2429:
2378:
2370:
2352:
2324:
2314:
2223:
2215:
2163:
2155:
2114:
2083:
2042:
1985:
1975:
1936:
1928:
1891:
1864:
1856:
1814:
1804:
1786:Cortex
1754:
1716:
1706:
1664:
1654:
1605:
1595:
1531:
1523:
1505:
1441:
1433:
1398:
1356:
1348:
1308:
1304:–239.
1266:
1228:
1220:
1212:
1171:
1163:
1155:
1114:
1091:
1083:
1048:
1038:
999:
991:
954:
922:
883:
873:
834:
824:
656:prisms
642:, and
623:, and
520:retina
512:lesion
354:memory
338:memory
261:Causes
239:stroke
182:stroke
143:stroke
131:damage
3722:781.8
3672:Other
3652:Other
3296:brain
3147:Other
2892:Cramp
2882:Spasm
2446:8 May
2407:(PDF)
2393:6 May
2387:(PDF)
2376:S2CID
2338:(PDF)
2245:"PDF"
2221:S2CID
2193:(PDF)
2161:S2CID
2096:Notes
1934:S2CID
1862:S2CID
1612:8 May
1573:(PDF)
1546:6 May
1540:(PDF)
1529:S2CID
1491:(PDF)
1439:S2CID
1396:S2CID
1354:S2CID
1262:–19.
1226:S2CID
1169:S2CID
1089:S2CID
997:S2CID
920:S2CID
559:prism
505:Range
139:brain
125:is a
79:, or
3717:9-CM
3557:AICA
3541:Pons
3518:PICA
3298:and
2672:Limp
2551:CNS
2540:Gait
2533:gait
2487:PMID
2448:2012
2437:PMID
2395:2012
2368:PMID
2322:PMID
2283:and
2213:PMID
2153:PMID
2112:ISBN
2081:PMID
2040:PMID
1983:PMID
1926:PMID
1889:ISBN
1854:PMID
1812:PMID
1752:PMID
1714:PMID
1662:PMID
1614:2012
1603:PMID
1548:2012
1521:PMID
1457:link
1431:PMID
1346:PMID
1306:ISBN
1264:ISBN
1218:PMID
1210:ISSN
1161:PMID
1153:ISSN
1112:ISBN
1081:PMID
1046:PMID
989:PMID
952:ISBN
881:PMID
832:PMID
545:Axis
485:Type
438:The
269:and
165:and
3713:ICD
3626:PCA
3613:PCA
3530:ASA
3116:HSD
3111:EDS
2477:PMC
2469:doi
2427:PMC
2419:doi
2360:doi
2312:PMC
2304:doi
2279:at
2259:doi
2205:doi
2145:doi
2071:doi
2032:doi
1973:PMC
1965:doi
1918:doi
1846:doi
1802:PMC
1794:doi
1744:doi
1704:PMC
1696:doi
1652:PMC
1644:doi
1593:PMC
1585:doi
1513:doi
1423:doi
1388:doi
1338:doi
1334:106
1302:174
1200:doi
1145:doi
1073:doi
1036:PMC
1028:doi
981:doi
912:doi
871:PMC
863:doi
822:PMC
814:doi
3764::
3744::
3720::
2999:/
2980:/
2809:/
2485:.
2475:.
2465:64
2463:.
2459:.
2435:.
2425:.
2415:64
2413:.
2409:.
2374:.
2366:.
2358:.
2346:13
2344:.
2340:.
2320:.
2310:.
2300:73
2298:.
2294:.
2253:.
2247:.
2235:,
2219:.
2211:.
2201:20
2199:.
2195:.
2159:.
2151:.
2139:.
2079:.
2067:82
2065:.
2061:.
2038:.
2028:83
2026:.
2014:^
2006:24
2004:.
1981:.
1971:.
1961:73
1959:.
1955:.
1932:.
1924:.
1914:19
1912:.
1860:.
1852:.
1840:.
1824:^
1810:.
1800:.
1790:58
1788:.
1784:.
1764:^
1750:.
1740:22
1738:.
1726:^
1712:.
1702:.
1692:63
1690:.
1686:.
1674:^
1660:.
1650:.
1640:64
1638:.
1634:.
1622:^
1601:.
1591:.
1581:64
1579:.
1575:.
1556:^
1527:.
1519:.
1511:.
1499:13
1497:.
1493:.
1478:^
1453:}}
1449:{{
1437:.
1429:.
1419:48
1417:.
1394:.
1382:.
1366:^
1352:.
1344:.
1332:.
1320:^
1278:^
1238:^
1224:.
1216:.
1208:.
1196:29
1194:.
1190:.
1167:.
1159:.
1151:.
1139:.
1135:.
1087:.
1079:.
1069:69
1067:.
1044:.
1034:.
1024:64
1022:.
1018:.
995:.
987:.
975:.
932:^
918:.
908:86
906:.
902:.
879:.
869:.
859:15
857:.
853:.
830:.
820:.
810:67
808:.
804:.
754:^
638:,
627:.
619:,
615:,
611:,
607:,
603:,
526:.
340:.
245:,
207:.
113:,
75:,
71:,
67:,
63:,
59:,
55:,
51:,
47:,
3715:-
3705:D
3577:)
3573:(
3569:/
3565:/
3555:(
3280:e
3273:t
3266:v
2521:e
2514:t
2507:v
2493:.
2471::
2450:.
2421::
2397:.
2362::
2328:.
2306::
2267:.
2261::
2255:3
2227:.
2207::
2167:.
2147::
2141:4
2120:.
2087:.
2073::
2046:.
2034::
1989:.
1967::
1940:.
1920::
1897:.
1868:.
1848::
1842:6
1818:.
1796::
1758:.
1746::
1720:.
1698::
1668:.
1646::
1616:.
1587::
1550:.
1515::
1459:)
1445:.
1425::
1402:.
1390::
1384:5
1360:.
1340::
1314:.
1272:.
1260:1
1232:.
1202::
1175:.
1147::
1141:4
1120:.
1095:.
1075::
1052:.
1030::
1003:.
983::
977:2
960:.
926:.
914::
887:.
865::
838:.
816::
789:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.