263:
215:
142:
296:
348:
324:
807:
785:
205:
173:
111:
829:
818:
851:
796:
840:
450:
362:
744:... and none of them have line-coloured background, so I guess we should change it. I think I just find the purple so... blah. Maybe we could increase the width of the right colour bar to spruce it up a bit? The TTC and Muni use the coloured logos of the lines to add some visual distinction but I guess we don't have that. Oh wait...
907:
does make a good point that on official TransLink maps and signage, those six stations are still yellow highlighted with green, though, so while I'm against showing them as separate in this template, I think for maps we should leave the colouring as is. I'm sure in a few years, TransLink will quietly
898:
But anyway, I definitely think the branch backgrounds should match the main lines' ones... otherwise the branches will stand out more than the main lines, which would send the wrong message. So light purple for everything. The branches are subsections of the row for the main lines so they don't need
498:
states that "links should be clearly identifiable as a link". Without the blue links, readers might not notice that the links aren't there, because "Lougheed branch", "Airport branch" and "General" aren't linked to anything. There could also be issues with colour contrast for colourblind people, and
902:
As for the
Evergreen Extension as a separate thing in this template, I am of the "Evergreen? What's that?" camp, as in: it's not a separate line anymore, so if I had my way, everything mentioning the Evergreen Extension would just be a subsection of the Millennium Line articles and it would have no
1523:
yesterday and took out any discontinued or otherwise unmentioned loops/park and rides. I think that the bus routes
Exchanges section needs to match with the article (excluding major stations/interchanges that are on other lines above). And I'm also in favour of the changes
1623:, "towards Vancouver" seems to be what "inbound" means in the Greater Vancouver context of TransLink. Previously Lafarge Lake–Douglas to VCC–Clark was inbound; that hasn't changed simply now that there are future stations as we move farther in that same direction. —
554:
Readers might not know to hover over them, and those with touchscreen inputs (mainly tablet users on the desktop site) cannot mouseover. I assumed this change would be uncontroversial, but I apologize for adding this to the template without obtaining consensus
715:
I would like to argue that they still call those stations as "Evergreen extension" over at
Lougheed, but sure. It is Millennium Line regardless. (They are probably too busy to figure out how to solve the crowding on the skytrain for the next year or two)
1221:, too... I prefer using the actual character en-dash (–) rather than the HTML entity. Also made the second line of the main title small. We can't unbold it as the title being bolded is apparently part of template, which is fine. I like it smaller. —
1469:
727:
I prefer the way it is currently... the links are still underlined despite their not being the standard
Knowledge link colour(s), and in well-designed webpages, underlining is only used for links. However, I did take a look at the
674:
I don't think it is necessary as it is an extension of a line and that it does not split/branch away from any portion of the
Millennium Line. A little off topic, but I also think that the green outline should be removed from
1408:, em-dashes aren't supposed to be spaced, so I think we should move to "History – Lines and stations – Rolling stock" (spaced en-dashes) or "History—Lines and stations—Rolling stock" (unspaced em-dashes). Any thoughts? —
1170:
I placed the icons as we normally would, with just a space between the text and the wikicode. Any other spacing modifications would be really kludgey/possibly overkill and I would rather keep things simple.
1196:. Not much changed from yours other than the added icons and the extra space between the text and icons (also left the entire template uncollapsed for quicker viewing – not intended for actual template).
1024:
I'm on Chrome on a Mac but apparently I do, because I tried with a clean profile and there's no underlining; how hideous! Can't believe people surf the web not knowing what's clearly a link or not. 😀 —
532:
If you hover over the titles it shows that they are linked and there are no colour contrast problem. You are doing a drive-by change without any interaction. Raise the question here to get a consensus.
1569:
How is
Arbutus no longer inbound? If you are at Lafarge Lake–Douglas and heading towards Arbutus, you are inbound. If you are at Arbutus heading towards Lafarge Lake–Douglas, you are outbound. —
1491:
1124:
Agreed, I like the alternate version better as well. Could a colour bar be added to the branches as well? I don't think it would deter from the main lines as it would not use the line icons.
876:
It's interesting the label for the T icon is "translink" because, to the best of my knowledge, the T they are using on signs is meant to be short for "transit", not the authority itself. —
1637:
Because until now, inbound has been obvious: trains travelling into the downtown core are inbound. No need to shift the goalposts, we simply need to correctly define them otherwise it's
1619:
to "officially" define outbound and inbound until now, so you implying we require one now seems to shifting the goalposts considerably. Until something contradicts what's established
1641:(at best) or a lie (at worst). I have been watching SkyTrain articles for several years and have seen a lot of assumptions be blown to pieces by decisions at the corporate level.
102:
1193:
1305:
I support your preference, otherwise the debate could go on forever. Thanks for doing this, because it stirred up a lot more than the simple question of colour.
1074:: a reversed icon with the background to serve as a label rather than just a spot of colour. Although to be fair, I haven't seen a version with the icons. Okay,
1417:
1703:
1479:
1320:
1276:
1218:
1139:
1096:
I love the second version (the alternate), though what about the icons for the WCE, SeaBus, and B-Lines? An easy fix of course, just thought I'd mention it.
1079:
1610:
1708:
1358:
1075:
1383:
1650:
1632:
1592:
1578:
1091:
618:
I'm okay with the proposed changes, but since the
Airport and Lougheed branch have no links shouldn't they remain coloured with their respected line(s)?
39:
627:
1432:
1230:
1205:
1180:
1165:
1119:
1105:
1683:
1314:
1061:
692:
669:
613:
542:
1537:
1514:
1350:
1151:
1133:
921:
885:
867:
776:
706:
645:
1688:
564:
1461:
1398:
1033:
1012:
980:
954:
1718:
1673:
1583:
Downtown is inbound. Once you reach Main (well, Ontario), you're outbound again. Direction of travel is no longer a binary inbound or outbound.
1332:
1728:
1723:
1678:
1563:
1520:
1733:
908:
update stuff so that
Evergreen ceases to be coloured differently. (It's also still highlighted green in the Interactive SkyTrain System map
1423:
I would go with the spaced en-dashes. Not having spaces between them looks very odd to me and may be confusing considering some are links.
1299:
519:
1738:
992:
Do you have a browser extension installed or a gadget enabled? Underlines don't normally display for me (Firefox/Safari on macOS 10.12).
1478:? I am not a fan of the extreme amount of redlinks and the hard-on-the-eyes strikethroughs, so I mocked up what that might look like at
1693:
1475:
305:
191:
98:
74:
1698:
1052:
I'm coming around to thinking that the change by User:Jc86035 was correct. Get rid of the background colour and use icons if needed.
1404:
Actually I have a related point... currently those are spaced em-dashes between
History, Lines and stations, Rolling stock. Per
272:
183:
1743:
1713:
850:
483:
80:
1501:
is also a plus. It has come to my attention that there is no longer a Walnut Grove Park and Ride as it is no longer listed
110:
697:
That may be true but the green outline is present at the extension's platform maps and on the maps inside SkyTrain cars.
459:
334:
752:). We could use something like that (I guess an open-source version) enclosed within the light purple table background.
1551:
1545:
1482:(this also now has the spaced en-dashes for History/Lines and stations/Rolling stock, which is also in smaller text) —
400:
396:
237:
1502:
1389:
I suspect it is because it's in the "title box" for the table, even though it's the second line. I would leave it. —
909:
749:
729:
285:
187:
20:
1552:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:TransLink_Services&oldid=prev&diff=908347604 this edit
1497:
It looks much better not having former exchanges/B-Lines mixed in with active ones, the smaller text for the
737:
733:
636:
in that the branches should remain coloured or alternatively be outlined with their respective line colours.
69:
784:
392:
383:
329:
228:
178:
153:
1474:
What do people think about adding a "Historical" or "Former" section to the "Bus routes" section, as per
60:
24:
1646:
1606:
1588:
1559:
93:
1470:
creating a historical section and getting rid of the strikethrough and redlinks for the buses section
1310:
1057:
538:
236:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
721:
665:
590:
1642:
1602:
1584:
1555:
1628:
1574:
1533:
1487:
1428:
1413:
1394:
1346:
1226:
1201:
1176:
1161:
1147:
1115:
1101:
1087:
1029:
976:
917:
881:
772:
756:
702:
641:
159:
1156:
Maybe just a tad bit more space between the icons and the text? They look a bit too close.
795:
8:
1620:
1510:
1328:
1306:
1254:
1129:
1053:
863:
688:
657:
623:
549:
534:
490:
50:
1505:
on TransLink's website. I'm assuming it closed when Carvolth Exchanged opened in 2012.
839:
125:
65:
971:
There are clearly underlines happening for Expo Line, Millennium Line, Canada Line. —
1453:
1446:
1375:
1368:
1341:'s extra space (as a {{nbsp}}) before the service icon since no one seemed to mind. —
1291:
1284:
1270:
1004:
997:
946:
939:
717:
661:
605:
598:
568:
511:
504:
46:
1624:
1570:
1529:
1525:
1483:
1424:
1409:
1390:
1342:
1338:
1262:
1258:
1222:
1212:
1197:
1187:
1172:
1157:
1143:
1111:
1097:
1083:
1025:
987:
972:
929:
913:
904:
877:
768:
698:
637:
580:
572:
560:
1363:
As an aside, should "History — Lines and stations — Rolling stock" be emboldened?
806:
760:
676:
584:
495:
1506:
1324:
1266:
1125:
859:
684:
653:
633:
619:
576:
388:
262:
121:
1667:
741:
404:
371:
220:
1638:
1616:
1598:
1442:
1364:
1280:
1019:
993:
962:
935:
594:
527:
500:
295:
1554:
is meaningless. We either need to change the wording or change the order.
1110:
I was just trying to be quick, so I didn't do the other services' icons. —
817:
764:
1601:
we should not assume what "inbound" means in relation to the extension.
347:
323:
126:
1275:
Should we pick one of the sandboxes, or use my initial edit? I prefer
1405:
123:
755:
There are the ones used in the info boxes (and route maps) of the
391:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
204:
172:
1071:
968:
745:
828:
233:
127:
1070:
I think we need more than just the icon, something more like
449:
387:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
740:(which has a separate template for each line... ugh!), and
680:
395:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
361:
934:
Where are the links underlined, aside from on mouseover?
1437:
I'd prefer spaced en dashes. Maybe enclose the line in
1480:
User:Joeyconnick/sandbox/Template:TransLink Services2
232:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
210:
15:
1337:Okay, I have made the changes... I also included
899:further off-setting by the use of more colouring.
1665:
1521:List of transit exchanges in Greater Vancouver
967:This is what it currently looks like for me:
903:separate articles, categories, or templates.
1704:Template-Class Canadian communities articles
1359:History — Lines and stations — Rolling stock
1279:, although any of the others would be fine.
1709:NA-importance Canadian communities articles
1476:Template:Hammersmith & City line navbox
152:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1684:Template-Class British Columbia articles
1499:History/Lines and stations/Rolling stock
1689:NA-importance British Columbia articles
499:general overuse of background colours.
1719:Template-Class rail transport articles
1674:Template-Class Canada-related articles
1666:
1729:Template-Class Rapid transit articles
1724:NA-importance rail transport articles
1679:NA-importance Canada-related articles
381:This template is within the scope of
226:This template is within the scope of
141:
139:
1734:NA-importance Rapid transit articles
1550:Since Arbutus is no longer inbound,
135:
1615:Well we've worked fine without any
432:Associated projects or task forces:
158:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
1739:WikiProject Rapid transit articles
448:
294:
261:
14:
1755:
1694:Template-Class Vancouver articles
1699:NA-importance Vancouver articles
849:
838:
827:
816:
805:
794:
783:
656:. On a side note, shoudl we add
360:
346:
322:
306:WikiProject Canadian communities
213:
203:
171:
140:
109:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
677:File:Vancouver SkyTrain Map.svg
457:This template is supported by
303:This template is supported by
283:This template is supported by
270:This template is supported by
1:
812:{{rint|vancouver|millennium}}
484:Table cell background colours
401:WikiProject Trains to do list
240:and see a list of open tasks.
37:Put new text under old text.
1744:All WikiProject Trains pages
1714:All WikiProject Canada pages
1538:20:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
1515:12:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
1492:06:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
1462:01:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
1433:22:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
1418:21:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
1399:21:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
1384:05:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
1351:01:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
1333:22:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
1321:Joeyconnick's second sandbox
1315:14:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
1300:07:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
1277:Joeyconnick's second sandbox
1231:02:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
1206:02:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
1181:06:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
1166:00:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
1152:23:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1134:22:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1120:20:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1106:20:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1092:19:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1062:18:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1034:06:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
1013:01:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
981:19:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
955:15:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
922:21:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
886:19:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
868:01:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
790:{{rint|vancouver|translink}}
777:22:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
707:08:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
693:04:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
670:00:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
646:00:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
628:00:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
614:15:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
543:14:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
520:13:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
413:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains
273:WikiProject British Columbia
246:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
7:
416:Template:WikiProject Trains
249:Template:WikiProject Canada
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1760:
1651:05:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
1546:Inbound is now meaningless
1528:has made on his template.
1633:04:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
1611:04:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
1593:03:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
1579:17:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
1564:14:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
834:{{rint|vancouver|seabus}}
823:{{rint|vancouver|canada}}
460:WikiProject Rapid transit
456:
431:
427:
341:
302:
282:
269:
198:
166:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
1519:I just went through the
1319:I'm in favour of using
801:{{rint|vancouver|expo}}
419:rail transport articles
252:Canada-related articles
1192:please have a look at
856:{{rint|vancouver|bus}}
845:{{rint|vancouver|wce}}
632:I'm in agreement with
453:
299:
266:
70:avoid personal attacks
681:current platform maps
452:
298:
286:WikiProject Vancouver
265:
103:Auto-archiving period
1080:here's an alternate
658:Evergreen Extension
1194:my updated version
454:
384:WikiProject Trains
300:
267:
229:WikiProject Canada
154:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
25:TransLink services
1460:
1382:
1298:
1011:
957:
953:
660:to the template?
612:
518:
479:
478:
475:
474:
471:
470:
467:
466:
379:
378:
317:
316:
313:
312:
134:
133:
61:Assume good faith
38:
1751:
1459:
1450:
1440:
1381:
1372:
1297:
1288:
1274:
1216:
1191:
1023:
1010:
1001:
991:
966:
952:
943:
933:
926:
858:
857:
853:
847:
846:
842:
836:
835:
831:
825:
824:
820:
814:
813:
809:
803:
802:
798:
792:
791:
787:
683:do not show it.
611:
602:
588:
553:
531:
517:
508:
494:
439:
429:
428:
421:
420:
417:
414:
411:
364:
355:
354:
350:
343:
342:
337:
326:
319:
318:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
223:
218:
217:
216:
207:
200:
199:
194:
184:British Columbia
175:
168:
167:
145:
144:
143:
136:
128:
114:
113:
104:
16:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1664:
1663:
1548:
1472:
1451:
1438:
1373:
1361:
1289:
1252:
1210:
1185:
1017:
1002:
985:
960:
944:
927:
855:
854:
844:
843:
833:
832:
822:
821:
811:
810:
800:
799:
789:
788:
761:Millennium Line
738:the Underground
603:
558:
547:
525:
509:
488:
486:
437:
418:
415:
412:
409:
408:
380:
366:
365:
332:
251:
248:
245:
242:
241:
219:
214:
212:
181:
130:
129:
124:
101:
87:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
1757:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1643:Walter Görlitz
1603:Walter Görlitz
1597:And without a
1585:Walter Görlitz
1556:Walter Görlitz
1547:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1471:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1458:to reply to me
1457:
1439:<small: -->
1402:
1401:
1380:to reply to me
1379:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1317:
1307:Secondarywaltz
1296:to reply to me
1295:
1255:Secondarywaltz
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1122:
1065:
1064:
1054:Secondarywaltz
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1009:to reply to me
1008:
951:to reply to me
950:
900:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
871:
870:
725:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
650:
649:
648:
610:to reply to me
609:
556:
550:Secondarywaltz
535:Secondarywaltz
516:to reply to me
515:
491:Secondarywaltz
485:
482:
477:
476:
473:
472:
469:
468:
465:
464:
455:
445:
444:
442:
440:
434:
433:
425:
424:
422:
389:rail transport
377:
376:
367:
359:
358:
353:
351:
339:
338:
327:
315:
314:
311:
310:
301:
291:
290:
281:
278:
277:
268:
258:
257:
255:
238:the discussion
225:
224:
208:
196:
195:
176:
164:
163:
157:
146:
132:
131:
122:
120:
119:
116:
115:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1756:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1669:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1522:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1463:
1455:
1448:
1444:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1377:
1370:
1366:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1293:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1021:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1006:
999:
995:
989:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
970:
964:
959:
958:
956:
948:
941:
937:
931:
925:
924:
923:
919:
915:
911:
906:
901:
897:
887:
883:
879:
875:
874:
873:
872:
869:
865:
861:
852:
841:
830:
819:
808:
797:
786:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
754:
753:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
726:
723:
719:
714:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
673:
672:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
615:
607:
600:
596:
592:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
551:
546:
545:
544:
540:
536:
529:
524:
523:
522:
521:
513:
506:
502:
497:
492:
481:
462:
461:
451:
447:
446:
443:
441:
436:
435:
430:
426:
423:
406:
405:Trains Portal
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
375:
374:
373:
372:Trains Portal
368:
363:
357:
356:
352:
349:
345:
344:
340:
336:
335:Rapid transit
331:
328:
325:
321:
320:
308:
307:
297:
293:
292:
288:
287:
280:
279:
275:
274:
264:
260:
259:
256:
239:
235:
231:
230:
222:
221:Canada portal
211:
209:
206:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
180:
177:
174:
170:
169:
165:
161:
155:
151:
147:
138:
137:
118:
117:
112:
108:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1621:WP:STATUSQUO
1549:
1498:
1473:
1403:
1362:
1271:George Leung
1251:
1219:updated mine
1142:, I'd say. —
718:George Leung
662:George Leung
569:George Leung
487:
480:
458:
399:. See also:
393:project page
382:
370:
369:
304:
284:
271:
227:
160:WikiProjects
149:
106:
92:
19:This is the
1625:Joeyconnick
1571:Joeyconnick
1530:Sweetnhappy
1526:Joeyconnick
1484:Joeyconnick
1425:Sweetnhappy
1410:Joeyconnick
1391:Joeyconnick
1343:Joeyconnick
1339:Sweetnhappy
1263:Sweetnhappy
1259:Joeyconnick
1223:Joeyconnick
1213:Sweetnhappy
1198:Sweetnhappy
1188:Joeyconnick
1173:Joeyconnick
1158:Sweetnhappy
1144:Joeyconnick
1140:pretty good
1112:Joeyconnick
1098:Sweetnhappy
1084:Joeyconnick
1072:these three
1026:Joeyconnick
988:Joeyconnick
973:Joeyconnick
930:Joeyconnick
914:Joeyconnick
905:Sweetnhappy
878:Joeyconnick
769:Sweetnhappy
765:Canada Line
746:we kinda do
699:Sweetnhappy
652:Agree with
638:Sweetnhappy
581:Mryoungcc35
573:Sweetnhappy
561:Joeyconnick
192:Communities
1668:Categories
1456:|Jc86035}}
1378:|Jc86035}}
1294:|Jc86035}}
1076:here's one
1007:|Jc86035}}
969:screenshot
949:|Jc86035}}
767:articles.
608:|Jc86035}}
591:the change
585:Briguychau
514:|Jc86035}}
397:discussion
1507:Northwest
1325:Northwest
1267:Northwest
1138:It looks
1126:Northwest
860:Northwest
757:Expo Line
685:Northwest
654:Northwest
634:Northwest
620:Northwest
577:Northwest
565:Snowystar
188:Vancouver
83:if needed
66:Be polite
27:template.
21:talk page
1406:MOS:DASH
734:New York
496:WP:COLOR
403:and the
150:template
107:180 days
94:Archives
51:get help
1443:Jc86035
1365:Jc86035
1281:Jc86035
1269:, and
1020:Jc86035
994:Jc86035
963:Jc86035
936:Jc86035
679:as the
595:Jc86035
583:, and
528:Jc86035
501:Jc86035
1452:Use {{
1441:tags?
1374:Use {{
1290:Use {{
1003:Use {{
945:Use {{
763:, and
748:(from
604:Use {{
593:okay?
555:first.
510:Use {{
410:Trains
330:Trains
243:Canada
234:Canada
179:Canada
156:scale.
1639:WP:OR
1617:WP:RS
1599:WP:RS
148:This
79:Seek
1647:talk
1629:talk
1607:talk
1589:talk
1575:talk
1560:talk
1534:talk
1511:talk
1503:here
1488:talk
1447:talk
1429:talk
1414:talk
1395:talk
1369:talk
1347:talk
1329:talk
1311:talk
1285:talk
1227:talk
1202:talk
1177:talk
1162:talk
1148:talk
1130:talk
1116:talk
1102:talk
1088:talk
1078:and
1058:talk
1030:talk
998:talk
977:talk
940:talk
918:talk
910:here
882:talk
864:talk
773:talk
750:here
742:Muni
722:talk
703:talk
689:talk
666:talk
642:talk
624:talk
599:talk
539:talk
505:talk
68:and
1082:. —
912:) —
730:TTC
589:Is
1670::
1649:)
1631:)
1609:)
1591:)
1577:)
1562:)
1536:)
1513:)
1490:)
1454:re
1449:)
1431:)
1416:)
1397:)
1376:re
1371:)
1349:)
1331:)
1323:.
1313:)
1292:re
1287:)
1265:,
1261:,
1257:,
1229:)
1217:I
1204:)
1179:)
1164:)
1150:)
1132:)
1118:)
1104:)
1090:)
1060:)
1032:)
1005:re
1000:)
979:)
947:re
942:)
920:)
884:)
866:)
848:,
837:,
826:,
815:,
804:,
793:,
775:)
759:,
736:,
732:,
705:)
691:)
668:)
644:)
626:)
606:re
601:)
579:,
575:,
571:,
567:,
563:,
541:)
512:re
507:)
438:/
333::
190:/
186:/
182::
105::
49:;
1645:(
1627:(
1605:(
1587:(
1573:(
1558:(
1532:(
1509:(
1486:(
1445:(
1427:(
1412:(
1393:(
1367:(
1345:(
1327:(
1309:(
1283:(
1273::
1253:@
1225:(
1215::
1211:@
1200:(
1190::
1186:@
1175:(
1171:—
1160:(
1146:(
1128:(
1114:(
1100:(
1086:(
1056:(
1028:(
1022::
1018:@
996:(
990::
986:@
975:(
965::
961:@
938:(
932::
928:@
916:(
880:(
862:(
771:(
724:)
720:(
701:(
687:(
664:(
640:(
622:(
597:(
587::
559:@
552::
548:@
537:(
530::
526:@
503:(
493::
489:@
463:.
407:.
309:.
289:.
276:.
162::
99:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
