132:
I can infer, trademarks and other restricted non-copyrighted materials are "non-free" because they do not satisfy rule #1 of the
Definition of Free Cultural Works: "freedom to use". Apparently we were making an exception for "trademarks". However in the way the current foundation resolution applies, such exceptions are only possible if defined in the "Exemption Doctrine Policy". They are not and as such the image falls in some sort of black hole of ambiguity. The same goes for insignia (flags and other national symbols). Basically, there is not much different here between saying images with trademarks are "non-free" or "free" and these definitions have nothing to do with their copyright status. Non-free is more appropriate since there are usage restrictions. Since you are not allowed to use the images arbitrarily, I think we should have some sort of "usage rationale" for each use if we are to follow the lines set out by the Foundation. (And yes, I am forcing the issue a bit, but that's usually how things get fixed). Ergo the changes are as much an "Appeal to authority" as your question :D --
810:
796:
817:
789:
376:{{imbox | type = license | image = ] | text = This work contains material which may be subject to ''']''' laws in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please ensure that it is used to identify the entity or organization that owns the trademark and that '''you have the right to use it under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use'''. ''You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's trademark.''<br: -->
979:
803:
749:
770:
951:
513:
345:
756:
763:
742:
920:
190:
21:
777:
155:
trademark, patent, unfair competition ...). As far as I can tell from first reading, the definition was intended to address copyright licensing and expiration, and not these other legal doctrines, but I am willing to be persuaded otherwise. (I don't read the mailing lists so I may have missed key background to the resolution.)
418:. Is this definitely uncontroversial? Given that at least three big free software organisations (Mozilla, GNOME and Debian) have had significant debate about how free content interacts with trademark law, I'm not sure that it can be dismissed so readily. Has this specific point been discussed anywhere? Disabling for now.
985:
In some districts, it may be unlawful to misrepresent the status of a trademark; while this template is intended to be used on both registered and common law trademarks, it uses an icon symbolizing a registered trademark. For the purposes of clarity (and, additionally, to match the Tango-styled icons
1009:
but not necessarily here. English
Knowledge adheres to U.S. federal laws and and the laws of Florida, where it is hosted but not the laws of the rest of the world. (Admittedly, the rest of the world cannot touch it.) So, unless Flordia has a law that says this icon should not be used anywhere in the
131:
I changed it because I think I'm correctly interpreting the resolution of the
Foundation. Indeed en.wikipedia has never had such restrictions apply and some will say we still don't. The problem however is that there is a lack of guidance on this by the Foundation. As interpreted literally, as far as
99:
Neither the definition nor the board resolution make explicit reference to trademarks, so it is left to the reader to infer what is meant. Such works, which would be otherwise be free if not for local trademark laws, have, up to now, been accepted, as long as the use is appropriate for the relevant
440:
having that debate, and because the FUR is specifically for files that are explicitly non-free. If
Knowledge changes its official stance on trademarks, we're going to have to mark them as non-free and give them FURs anyways, but in the meantime having a file with a free copyright template and a FUR
699:
I think the new image looks rather snazzy, and I would support changing it. I can see that it would be good to have a uniform appearance for all of these icons, but if we're going to choose a particular style I think we should go for the one with shading and shadow. Does anyone know how many other
154:
It is not entirely clear to me what the
Foundation board meant, nor what the Free Cultural Works definition means, when it comes to the myriad of non-copyright restrictions that can apply to cultural works (such as personality rights, slander and libel, flags and heraldry, currency, moral rights,
372:
Please swap out the current template with the one below (the only change is the message about non-free fair use rationales, in small text). There are a number of problems caused by this misunderstanding, and there's no harm in adding the message.
158:
In the meantime, our templates and policies should address the laws as they apply, rather than make appeals to a Board resolution whose interpretation may be challenged by inclusionist editors, so tying us up in endless debate.
150:
I don't think we necessarily need a specific written rationale for each usage, as long as an image is used in accordance with the applicable laws, so reducing the risk for the contributor, the project, and its
302:
715:
Hi. I actually inventoried them. There are zillions of icons but our relevant set is very small. The following is our relevant set. (If you don't believe me, of course, you are more than welcome to run
36:
379:
Please note that images that are trademarked ''but are not copyrighted'', such as logos that fall under {{tl|PD-textlogo}}, do not need and should not have a ].</small: -->
441:
gets it listed in both the all free files and the all non-free files megacateogries, which is, while not very harmful to anyone but the statisticians, an avoidable nuisance.
330:
1090:. I've updated the template so that it is in line with Commons, but I've no objection to it being changed to something else should that be judged more suitable. ā
267:
The issue is now resolved to my personal satisfaction. TheDJ's statement about the board resolution was removed from the template, which has moved back to
335:
1033:
408:
217:
1036:. Seems Commons did replace the icon after all and their choice of icon is more descent. Your suggestion is to elaborate, too crowded. Best regards,
1114:
1100:
890:
710:
486:
and surely in other countries too. Such use of the tag for files could assist the gathering of further information by researchers using
Knowledge.
209:
259:
1081:
1063:
1045:
1025:
545:
986:
we've been using on these templates lately), I would like the image to be replaced with the following, which uses both symbols for neutrality.
465:
427:
870:
Items with a green tick mark are already replaced. Items with watch mark have replacement request posted. Item X mark has no replacements yet.
176:
82:
911:
687:
636:
213:
183:
607:
936:
95:
These restrictions make such symbols non-free according to the
Definition of Free Cultural Works as adopted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
111:
717:
1087:
168:
145:
503:
549:
244:
could well be a trademark violation. Thus, it makes no sense to treat trademarks as "other restrictions" in the sense of the
564:
72:
296:
125:
613:
Declining, because a better comparison than those templates is our copyright templates, and at least some of them (e.g.
498:
999:
248:, since that would essentially mean that free content does not exist, or at least cannot be assumed to remain free. ā
478:
Is it worth including an optional parameter to link to the trademark filing? For example, in the UK, the result of a
284:, which documents what was already consensus among the more informed (not me.) Thanks for an informative debate.
63:
623:) use an image that's much more similar to File:Orange trademark.svg. Perhaps you could create a proposal at
574:
473:
655:
88:
51:
384:
Go to the edit window and copy everything inbetween the two nowiki tags as is and the template will work.
541:
141:
78:
Welcome to the quirky world of
Internet Explorer. I found a fix for that issue, and it should work now. ā
591:
415:
658:? (Or their sheer number?) My answer is: Improve this one, we will improve other stuff in due course.
225:
27:
254:
1110:
1077:
1057:
1041:
1021:
993:
957:
886:
683:
654:
comparison. In another word, why should you decline an obvious visual improvement simply because
603:
519:
456:
399:
351:
321:
cards. Should I leave edits ara they are and continue, or should I stop and revert my edits? --
58:
104:
1093:
932:
721:
703:
423:
79:
1069:
245:
292:
164:
121:
8:
941:
809:
326:
249:
1106:
1073:
1052:
1037:
1017:
988:
882:
795:
679:
599:
442:
385:
311:
271:
180:
1006:
907:
632:
555:
494:
237:
928:
816:
617:
419:
281:
205:
624:
580:). I'd like to propose to replace this template's image code with the following:
479:
179:, cause I did notice something in the definition which may swing something here.
137:
788:
288:
160:
117:
322:
700:
icons there are like this? How difficult would it be to make the full set? ā
198:
100:
jurisdiction. The NFC criteria don't address otherwise free trademarks, only
978:
903:
802:
724:. It would list a couple of false positive though, until its cache resets.)
628:
489:
377:
These restrictions are ''']'''. See also the
Knowledge ] and ].<br: -->
229:
68:
On my screen, the the top half of the Ā® doesn't appear. Am I the only one?
69:
50:
The language on this template differs somewhat from the language used at
236:
image can violate some trademark in some context: for example, using an
303:
Should I add this template in images of materials that have trademarks?
241:
220:. There may be others I've missed. In fact, I suspect the place this
194:
133:
317:
in video game covers and government works that contain logos, such as
748:
280:
The forest fire has died down, after forging a new guideline page at
55:
650:
Well, I am dumbfounded. I don't know how can you possibly call it a
769:
1034:
Commons:Template talk:Trademarked#Looks a bit like a copyright tag
755:
762:
741:
627:
and try to get all of our templates using one form or another?
483:
1010:
description page associated with the image, I say never mind.
93:
There is a puzzling statement in the middle of the template:
20:
540:
Hi. For the sake of consistency of style, I made an orange
318:
189:
945:
776:
507:
436:
I consider it uncontroversial because right now
Knowledge
339:
1072:
when I posted the P.S. What just happened? Best regards,
902:. It is the sensible thing to do. Keep up the good work.
667:
For the time being, I am calling an RfC on this one.
380:}}{{{category|{{file other| ]}}}}}<noinclude: -->
482:could be included. Similar online facilities exist
208:: I see related discussions at least here, at the
927:in the interests of consistency. Many thanks.
336:Please add to the template a line about fur
1050:They actually ended up switching to mine.
1005:Hi. Your request would have made sense in
232:made a good point about this at the Pump:
204:This seems to have become something of a
550:other copyright symbols currently in use
188:
381:{{Documentation}} </noinclude: -->
544:with the same appearance as that of
110:s. This confuses me, and, it seems,
15:
929:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward)
420:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward)
193:You should not use this image as a
13:
977:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
31:
26:This template was considered for
14:
1134:
949:
918:
821:
815:
808:
801:
794:
787:
775:
768:
761:
754:
747:
740:
511:
343:
224:should be discussed at would be
197:. Neither should you use it to
19:
504:Edit request on 8 December 2012
54:. Shouldn't they be similar? ā
226:freedomdefined:Talk:Definition
195:logo for your computer company
1:
912:06:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
891:16:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
855:
711:14:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
688:10:32, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
637:13:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
466:05:24, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
428:15:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
409:12:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
331:01:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
59:06:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
937:14:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
608:07:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
565:Non-free software screenshot
52:commons:Template:Trademarked
7:
972:to reactivate your request.
960:has been answered. Set the
542:registered trademark symbol
534:to reactivate your request.
522:has been answered. Set the
366:to reactivate your request.
354:has been answered. Set the
10:
1139:
592:Template:Trademark/sandbox
499:13:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
246:Definition of Free Content
546:the currently used symbol
297:05:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
260:14:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
184:20:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
169:11:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
146:10:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
126:02:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1115:09:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
1101:12:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
1082:10:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
1064:04:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
1046:20:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
1026:19:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
1000:19:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
83:23:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
73:22:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
656:other ugly stuff exists
64:R symbol is chopped off
1068:What? They were using
982:
218:Doctor Who WikiProject
202:
116:So, why the change? --
981:
722:Special:WhatLinksHere
552:. (For examples, see
474:Trademark filing link
192:
1070:File:Trademarked.svg
575:Microsoft screenshot
480:search at ipo.gov.uk
177:my Village Pump post
89:Appeal to authority?
34:. The result of the
983:
414:Code added to the
307:I must have added
203:
1032:P.S. Found this:
1007:Wikimedia Commons
976:
975:
861:
860:
590:For results, see
538:
537:
463:
406:
370:
369:
258:
238:image of an apple
48:
47:
1130:
1096:
1095:Mr. Stradivarius
1062:
1060:
1055:
998:
996:
991:
967:
963:
953:
952:
946:
926:
922:
921:
857:
852:
847:
842:
837:
832:
819:
812:
805:
798:
791:
779:
772:
765:
758:
751:
744:
734:
733:
706:
705:Mr. Stradivarius
622:
616:
579:
573:
569:
563:
559:
529:
525:
515:
514:
508:
492:
462:
457:
454:
405:
400:
397:
361:
357:
347:
346:
340:
316:
310:
276:
270:
252:
109:
103:
80:Remember the dot
33:
32:2018 December 13
23:
16:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1094:
1058:
1053:
1051:
994:
989:
987:
965:
961:
950:
944:
919:
917:
704:
620:
614:
586:
577:
571:
567:
561:
553:
527:
523:
512:
506:
487:
476:
458:
451:
447:
443:
401:
394:
390:
386:
359:
355:
344:
338:
314:
308:
305:
291:(or Hrothulf) (
274:
268:
163:(or Hrothulf) (
120:(or Hrothulf) (
113:other editors.
107:
101:
91:
66:
12:
11:
5:
1136:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1086:That would be
1029:
1028:
1016:
1012:
1011:
974:
973:
954:
943:
940:
915:
914:
896:
895:
894:
893:
880:
874:
873:
872:
871:
865:
864:
863:
862:
859:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
824:
823:
820:
813:
806:
799:
792:
785:
781:
780:
773:
766:
759:
752:
745:
738:
728:
727:
726:
725:
693:
692:
691:
690:
677:
671:
670:
669:
668:
662:
661:
660:
659:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:Hello, Nyttend
598:
588:
587:
584:
536:
535:
516:
505:
502:
475:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
449:
445:
431:
430:
392:
388:
378:<small: -->
368:
367:
348:
337:
334:
304:
301:
300:
265:
264:
263:
262:
250:Ilmari Karonen
242:sell computers
173:
172:
171:
156:
152:
90:
87:
86:
85:
65:
62:
46:
45:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1135:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:Codename Lisa
1104:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:Codename Lisa
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1054:ViperSnake151
1049:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:Codename Lisa
1035:
1031:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:Codename Lisa
1015:Best regards,
1014:
1013:
1008:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
992:
990:ViperSnake151
980:
971:
968:parameter to
959:
955:
948:
947:
939:
938:
934:
930:
925:
913:
909:
905:
901:
898:
897:
892:
888:
884:
883:Codename Lisa
881:
879:Best regards,
878:
877:
876:
875:
869:
868:
867:
866:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
826:
825:
818:
814:
811:
807:
804:
800:
797:
793:
790:
786:
783:
782:
778:
774:
771:
767:
764:
760:
757:
753:
750:
746:
743:
739:
736:
735:
732:
731:
730:
729:
723:
719:
714:
713:
712:
709:
708:
707:
698:
695:
694:
689:
685:
681:
680:Codename Lisa
678:
676:Best regards,
675:
674:
673:
672:
666:
665:
664:
663:
657:
653:
649:
648:
647:
646:
640:
639:
638:
634:
630:
626:
619:
612:
611:
610:
609:
605:
601:
600:Codename Lisa
597:Best regards,
595:
593:
583:
582:
581:
576:
566:
557:
551:
547:
543:
533:
530:parameter to
521:
517:
510:
509:
501:
500:
496:
491:
485:
481:
467:
464:
461:
455:
453:
439:
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
407:
404:
398:
396:
382:
374:
365:
362:parameter to
353:
349:
342:
341:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
313:
299:
298:
294:
290:
285:
283:
278:
273:
261:
256:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
200:
196:
191:
187:
186:
185:
182:
181:ViperSnake151
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
130:
129:
128:
127:
123:
119:
114:
112:
106:
105:non-free logo
97:
96:
84:
81:
77:
76:
75:
74:
71:
61:
60:
57:
53:
43:
39:
38:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1092:
1091:
984:
969:
958:edit request
923:
916:
899:
784:Replacement
718:these images
702:
701:
696:
651:
596:
589:
539:
531:
520:edit request
477:
459:
444:
437:
402:
387:
383:
375:
371:
363:
352:edit request
306:
286:
279:
266:
233:
221:
210:Village Pump
199:sell records
115:
98:
94:
92:
67:
49:
41:
35:
942:Change icon
228:. Anyway,
216:and at the
206:forest fire
962:|answered=
524:|answered=
356:|answered=
37:discussion
1088:this edit
737:Original
484:in France
323:George Ho
312:trademark
282:WP:SOSUMI
272:Trademark
151:re-users.
720:through
625:WP:VP/Pr
556:SVG-Logo
142:contribs
28:deletion
1105:Yikes!
904:Jschnur
900:Support
827:Status
697:Comment
629:Nyttend
618:PD-self
452:anguard
416:sandbox
395:anguard
289:HroĆ°ulf
230:Postdlf
161:HroĆ°ulf
118:HroĆ°ulf
652:better
222:really
214:WT:NFC
1059:Talk
995:Talk
966:|ans=
956:This
528:|ans=
518:This
490:Trevj
438:isn't
360:|ans=
350:This
212:, at
134:TheDJ
70:nadav
40:was "
1111:talk
1078:talk
1042:talk
1022:talk
933:talk
924:Done
908:talk
887:talk
684:talk
633:talk
604:talk
548:and
495:talk
460:Wha?
448:ven
424:talk
403:Wha?
391:ven
327:talk
319:CECB
293:Talk
255:talk
175:See
165:Talk
138:talk
122:Talk
56:RP88
42:keep
964:or
570:or
526:or
488:--
358:or
240:to
234:any
30:on
1113:)
1080:)
1044:)
1024:)
970:no
935:)
910:)
889:)
822:ā
686:)
635:)
621:}}
615:{{
606:)
594:.
578:}}
572:{{
568:}}
562:{{
560:,
558:}}
554:{{
532:no
497:)
426:)
364:no
329:)
315:}}
309:{{
295:)
287:--
277:.
275:}}
269:{{
167:)
159:--
144:)
140:ā¢
124:)
108:}}
102:{{
44:".
1109:(
1076:(
1040:(
1020:(
931:(
906:(
885:(
856:ā
851:ā
846:ā
841:ā
836:ā
831:ā
682:(
631:(
602:(
585:]
493:(
450:M
446:S
422:(
393:M
389:S
325:(
257:)
253:(
201:.
136:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
