165:
438:. This is a completely analogous template. Its links go to the articles for the pages of the individuals who won the event, not the "team" (meaning the country). The difference is that there is no article for the set of individuals who won the relay race, while for an individual event there is an article for the winning individual. Isn't the link to the appropriate row in the relay event article much more like the link to the individual's article for an individual event? The "country" won the event in both cases. Why should a link from a template for a relay event be so different from a link for an individual event? To be analogous to individual events, the links here should be to an article about the "<year: -->
377:. I open up the template. I see the US won in 1992. Who was on the winning relay team that year? Your method is I realize the title bar of the template is a link to an article about the event, which I click (ignoring the link right next to the year I'm interested in), and then scanning down the event article I eventually see a table which I have to scan through to find the year I'm interested in. My method is I click the link and get to the right row in the table immediately. The links happen to be to the same article, but they are distinctly different. The point of a navbox is to be useful. I think the probability that I want to see
155:
137:
22:
336:
in other years. What is the rationale for linking to the generic "country at the yyyy
Olympics" article? Is the assumption is that the reader is interested in how the country did at other events during that year's Olympics? If so, this is achievable with 2 clicks (the row in the event article has this link). If the reader is actually interested in the event (say, the other members of the winning team), how do they get there if the link is the country article? --
71:
53:
408:). I think that a good change to just show the team mates of that year which improves link relevance and reduce the amount of space used. I do understand your point about relevance of the team articles – maybe these would be better linked to the main "Country at the Olympics" pages so the navbox would show all the winning teams for that nation on that page? I still think linking 24 times to the same article is missing
81:
546:, all of which list the individual team members for all years rather than relying on a subpage and an extra parameter to trigger such a list for a single year. I find those much more handy, and they answer Rick Block's question of "who was on the winning relay team in year X?" with no extra clicks at all.
335:
IMO, the event specific link is WAY more on point. If someone is clicking this link they're currently on the page of one of the individuals on a winning 4x100m relay team, so my assumption is they're probably interested in either the other members of that team or other individuals from winning teams
560:
I guess I'm coming around to this viewpoint as well. The original idea (in 2006) was to create a footer template that wasn't a huge navbox (that would grow even huger every 4 years). I still think these are monstrosities - but they're extremely common now and show/hide seems to be better supported
363:
template instead, which is specifically designed for that purpose. This template already provides links to the athlete's team mates as standard. The medals are won by the national teams, so it makes sense to link them as the winning entity. I don't see much advantage in having a navigation template
577:
My preference is for
Sideway's suggestion of inclusion of the individual names that make up a team. The trace through method is too cumbersome to find information, particularly quickly. And really, the purpose of footers is they are supposed to be an aid to finding information.
440:
4x100m men's relay team". The issue is that these articles don't exist. Would you prefer linking to these as if they were articles (and creating redirects to the specific row in the event article)? How about linking the year, rather than the country name? --
472:. I agree the perfect target does not exist, but I think linking the country's Olympic performance is a more value-adding link that a link to a section of an article that we've already prominently linked.
364:
that has 23 section links to the article that is already prominently linked in the box title. The point of a navbox is that it should link to other articles, not repeatedly to the same article.
416:
629:
609:
501:
492:
476:
452:
392:
368:
572:
555:
587:
409:
255:
280:
404:
The nub of the issue you raise suggests a preference of returning to the previous format for this template you removed in 2006 where all the champions were listed (
264:
347:
540:
530:
381:
when clicking this link is nearly 0. The context is clearly 4x100m champions. Linking to the country article completely loses the context. --
520:
497:
I was thinking the same, as there is merit to both arguments but it's an impasse between just two of us. I've notified the tagged projects.
310:
246:
432:
661:
666:
646:
378:
329:
651:
325:
671:
656:
469:
321:
187:
405:
238:, the Whatlinkshere page still has all the pages containing this template listed, and they don't have any other links to
103:
465:
328:. This change was reverted so the link is to the "country at the yyyy Olympics" article, e.g. for 1912 the link is
178:
142:
94:
58:
357:
33:
605:
I'll take this as a rough consensus to return to the "all links shown" format for relay champion footers.
170:
102:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
231:
606:
498:
473:
413:
365:
551:
39:
624:
567:
487:
447:
387:
342:
275:
186:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the
86:
8:
583:
481:
It would appear we're not going to agree here. Can we get comments from anyone else? --
315:
306:
183:
423:
297:
Why are the year links directed to one athlete only? (For example, "1996" points to
547:
251:
Its fine now, either wikipedia or I was having a funny five minutes, no worries..
619:
600:
562:
482:
459:
442:
399:
382:
374:
337:
270:
579:
640:
302:
292:
252:
243:
239:
235:
227:
220:
154:
136:
298:
464:
We do have one article for the national relay team entity in the form of
261:
99:
468:, but that is a real outlier. We do have a couple of targets like
70:
52:
320:
I changed the year links so they link to the appropriate row in
182:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
269:
Looks OK to me. What is the problem you're seeing? --
260:
This template obviously doesn't work as it should now.
160:
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
76:
242:outside the template. Anyone know whats going on?
638:
516:I see no reason why this footer shouldn't mimic
301:.) This doesn't seem to make any sense! --
373:Walk me through this. I'm looking at, say
379:United States at the 1992 Summer Olympics
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
410:the very purpose of navigation templates
639:
541:Footer Olympic Champions 4x400 m Women
531:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Women
324:. For example, for 1912 the link was
470:United States national athletics team
176:This template is within the scope of
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
521:Footer Olympic Champions 4x400 m Men
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
433:Footer Olympic Champions 100 m Men
322:4×100 metres relay at the Olympics
14:
683:
662:Template-Class Athletics articles
466:Italian national track relay team
667:NA-importance Athletics articles
647:Template-Class Olympics articles
234:instead of the dab page, but on
163:
153:
135:
79:
69:
51:
20:
652:NA-importance Olympics articles
196:Knowledge:WikiProject Athletics
672:WikiProject Athletics articles
199:Template:WikiProject Athletics
112:Knowledge:WikiProject Olympics
1:
657:WikiProject Olympics articles
630:14:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
610:20:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
115:Template:WikiProject Olympics
106:and see a list of open tasks.
428:So, let's compare this with
353:They get there by using the
247:04:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
7:
588:20:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
573:23:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
556:16:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
502:13:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
311:01:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
10:
688:
493:15:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
477:06:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
453:05:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
417:18:26, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
393:02:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
369:21:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
348:18:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
256:17:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
171:Sport of athletics portal
148:
64:
46:
281:19:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
265:18:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
232:Henry Russell (athlete)
226:I dabbed the link to
179:WikiProject Athletics
561:across browsers. --
95:WikiProject Olympics
87:Olympic Games portal
358:Olympics4x100metres
202:Athletics articles
184:sport of athletics
34:content assessment
628:
571:
491:
451:
391:
346:
279:
218:
217:
214:
213:
210:
209:
130:
129:
126:
125:
118:Olympics articles
679:
622:
604:
565:
545:
539:
535:
529:
525:
519:
485:
463:
445:
439:<country: -->
437:
431:
427:
403:
385:
362:
356:
340:
273:
230:so it points to
204:
203:
200:
197:
194:
173:
168:
167:
166:
157:
150:
149:
139:
132:
131:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
637:
636:
598:
543:
537:
533:
527:
523:
517:
457:
435:
429:
421:
397:
375:Vladimir Krylov
360:
354:
318:
295:
223:
201:
198:
195:
192:
191:
169:
164:
162:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
685:
675:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
635:
634:
633:
632:
613:
612:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
395:
317:
314:
294:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
222:
219:
216:
215:
212:
211:
208:
207:
205:
175:
174:
158:
146:
145:
140:
128:
127:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
644:
642:
631:
626:
621:
617:
616:
615:
614:
611:
608:
602:
597:
596:
589:
585:
581:
576:
575:
574:
569:
564:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
542:
532:
522:
515:
503:
500:
496:
495:
494:
489:
484:
480:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
461:
456:
455:
454:
449:
444:
434:
425:
420:
419:
418:
415:
411:
407:
401:
396:
394:
389:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
367:
359:
352:
351:
350:
349:
344:
339:
333:
331:
330:Great Britain
327:
326:Great Britain
323:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
282:
277:
272:
268:
267:
266:
263:
259:
258:
257:
254:
250:
249:
248:
245:
241:
240:Henry Russell
237:
236:Henry Russell
233:
229:
228:Henry Russell
225:
224:
206:
189:
185:
181:
180:
172:
161:
159:
156:
152:
151:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
133:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
424:Sillyfolkboy
334:
319:
299:Robert Esmie
296:
177:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
548:Sideways713
641:Categories
620:Rick Block
618:Agree. --
601:Rick Block
563:Rick Block
483:Rick Block
460:Rick Block
443:Rick Block
400:Rick Block
383:Rick Block
338:Rick Block
316:Year links
271:Rick Block
188:discussion
580:Trackinfo
193:Athletics
143:Athletics
406:see here
303:RFBailey
253:Jdcooper
244:Jdcooper
109:Olympics
100:Olympics
59:Olympics
30:template
36:scale.
293:Links
262:Guaca
221:Help!
28:This
625:talk
584:talk
568:talk
552:talk
536:and
488:talk
448:talk
388:talk
343:talk
307:talk
276:talk
607:SFB
499:SFB
474:SFB
414:SFB
366:SFB
643::
586:)
554:)
544:}}
538:{{
534:}}
528:{{
526:,
524:}}
518:{{
436:}}
430:{{
412:.
361:}}
355:{{
332:.
309:)
627:)
623:(
603::
599:@
582:(
570:)
566:(
550:(
490:)
486:(
462::
458:@
450:)
446:(
426::
422:@
402::
398:@
390:)
386:(
345:)
341:(
305:(
278:)
274:(
190:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.jpg){kind=small}