Knowledge

Template talk:Electromagnetic spectrum

Source 📝

163: 22: 71: 53: 153: 135: 412:
The "seven colours of the rainbow" have been known to generations of school kids and are widely accepted throughout education and elsewhere. Knowledge should not try to modify current thinking - it should report it. I suggest we re-instate the ROYGBIV listing until a fuller debate has taken place. Alternatively we could set up an article for the "traditional spectrum", but that doesn't get over the problem of the template.
477: 502:
You know, the rods (and/or cones) in our eyes are only sensitive to the electromagnetic-wave frequencies of what we call red, green, and blue. All other colors are merely varying combinations of these three. That's why color monitors can emulate pretty much any color that we can see while having
456:
I'm surprised that ROYGBIV is the standard, actually. In most of east europe (where I grew up), the standard is ROYGCBV (the cyan version). There's even a chant: "Каждый Охотник Желает Знать Где Сидит Фазан". Perhaps wikipedia just has non-standard definitions for colors "blue" and "violet," so it
411:
I didn't know this debate was going on, so let's perhaps take a step back? The division of the optical spectrum is arbitrary. We have to use something, and Newton's seven colours are as good a division as any (if we were to select colours based on the examples above then we might eliminate blue!).
503:
only red, green, and blue phosphors. Believe it or not, these three are the only true primary colors. Though it doesn't seem as intuitive, yellow is a combination of red and green, and violet looks reddish blue because it's between the blue frequency and the doubled frequency of red.
480:
Excuse me, but cyan is not a monochromatic color (it's a mix of green and blue), so it shouldn't be listed in a list of EM spectrum, in my opinion! Only monochromatic colors (meaning existing of only 1 specific frequency in the spectrum) should be listed here.
293:
is known almost exclusively for its inclusion in ROYGBIV, which is because Newton wanted 7 colors instead of just 6. I don't think it is really talked about practically in anyway independent of its inclusion in ROYGBIV. I say
664:
should also be included as spectrum colors, but they are not included solely because it is not traditional to do so; it is only traditional to depict the spectrum as having the seven colors originally assigned to it by
387:
Which one looks like a more accurate representation of the color spectrum to you? In my oppinion, the bottom one (with cyan). Let's hope we can get someone other then us two involved in this discussion too.
577:
I've added a sub-table for the radio spectrum. I think it's a useful addition to a template that claims to describe the EM spectrum, but I'm not entirely satisfied with it for two reasons:
669:. If chartreuse, spring green, and cyan were included, that would make ten spectrum colors. How one divides up the spectrum is somewhat arbitrary because it is a continuum of color. 345: 989: 683: 627: 618: 447: 434: 392: 469: 227: 635:
It's necessary to use the right tone of indigo which approximates spectrum indigo. The tone of indigo that approximates spectrum indigo is called
287:
Has there been enough talk about the inclusion of indigo for there to be a poll on whether indigo should actually be included?? Here is my answer:
223:
I added a category so the articles are automatically mutually accessible. After the article's next edit which reloads the template, that is. (
302: 416: 406: 282: 494: 594: 567: 218: 979: 581:
It overlaps but doesn't completely replace the functioning of the existing "radio_spectrum" template (no frequency chart here), and
984: 462: 443:
If Matveims is interested in the debate he should be watching this page. I'll put a comment on his talk page to direct him here.
964: 89: 608: 969: 974: 712: 678: 648: 97: 185: 93: 162: 233: 176: 140: 572: 514:
If anyone thinks that the "a" and "u" in the K-band links should be subscripted, here's the code to do it.
490: 33: 604:
Indigo should be put back onto the template as it is recognized as being a part of the em spectrum. --
561:
I tried it and found it ugly, so I haven't put that stuff in, but others may think differently about it.
101: 78: 58: 509: 878: 723: 705: 184:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
918: 465:
article? Sorry id I'm making too big of a deal about this. I would like to get the colors right.
239: 39: 588:
I'll try to continue improving this, but if anyone else wants to jump in, please feel free!
886: 882: 657: 8: 914: 910: 890: 759: 698: 906: 674: 653: 644: 427: 898: 774: 751: 624: 615: 605: 486: 431: 299: 805: 767: 894: 872: 780: 636: 599: 168: 623:
Besides one or two objections, that section does not show any consensus. --
958: 902: 670: 640: 466: 444: 413: 403: 389: 279: 666: 224: 747: 591: 564: 482: 939: 925: 344: 935: 931: 819: 763: 739: 70: 52: 152: 134: 943: 755: 426:. Do you think Matveims will be aware of that?? Please put that on 845: 837: 535: 527: 181: 865: 861: 857: 853: 833: 829: 825: 799: 555: 551: 547: 543: 523: 519: 271: 792: 743: 476: 461:
the standard, I'd go along. But then, why not to correct the
457:
desn't resemble therainbow as closely. OF course, if ROYGBIV
84: 786: 661: 399: 275: 684:
What about adding some color ? Request for votes/comments
584:
Its EHF and SHF catagories overlap the Microwave category.
811: 688:
Proposal as below nextto "Visible (optical) spectrum:":
242:
article describes the visible spectrum as consisting of
614:
See further up this talk page for info about indigo.
180:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 158: 990:Template-Class physics articles of NA-importance 956: 82:, a project that provides a central approach to 706: 713: 699: 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 88:-related subjects on Knowledge. Help us 957: 731:(Sorted by wavelength, short to long) 174:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 15: 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 14: 1001: 219:Category Electromagnetic spectrum 475: 352: 343: 308: 161: 151: 133: 69: 51: 20: 980:Template-Class physics articles 691: 422:That was the first response in 985:NA-importance physics articles 76:This template is supported by 1: 965:Template-Class color articles 393:03:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 303:00:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 283:00:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 194:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics 188:and see a list of open tasks. 970:NA-importance color articles 724:The Electromagnetic Spectrum 628:01:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 619:00:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 609:00:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 470:01:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 448:23:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 435:23:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 417:23:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 407:01:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 197:Template:WikiProject Physics 7: 975:All WikiProject Color pages 952:] ] ] ] </noinclude: --> 110:Knowledge:WikiProject Color 10: 1006: 775:Visible (optical) spectrum 689: 679:21:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 649:21:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 595:13:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 568:17:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 495:12:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 113:Template:WikiProject Color 738: 694: 146: 64: 46: 463:Electromagnetic spectrum 274:come from? And where is 228:06:26, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 234:Indigo? Where is Cyan? 398:So, shall we include 298:it. Any objections?? 100:standards; visit the 573:Radio spectrum added 518:Microwave spectrum: 760:Terahertz radiation 177:WikiProject Physics 951:<noinclude: --> 510:Subscript Ka, Ku ? 428:User talk:Matveims 34:content assessment 949: 948: 733: 402:in the spectrum? 382: 381: 338: 337: 216: 215: 212: 211: 208: 207: 128: 127: 124: 123: 104:for more details. 79:WikiProject Color 997: 814: 808: 802: 795: 789: 783: 752:Visible spectrum 729: 715: 708: 701: 692: 654:Chartreuse green 479: 353: 347: 309: 202: 201: 200:physics articles 198: 195: 192: 171: 166: 165: 155: 148: 147: 137: 130: 129: 118: 117: 114: 111: 108: 102:wikiproject page 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 47: 25: 24: 23: 16: 1005: 1004: 1000: 999: 998: 996: 995: 994: 955: 954: 953: 849: 841: 810: 804: 798: 793: 787: 781: 734: 727: 719: 686: 637:electric indigo 602: 575: 539: 531: 512: 236: 221: 199: 196: 193: 190: 189: 167: 160: 115: 112: 109: 106: 105: 12: 11: 5: 1003: 993: 992: 987: 982: 977: 972: 967: 950: 947: 946: 929: 928:designations: 922: 921: 876: 873:Radio spectrum 869: 868: 847: 839: 823: 816: 815: 778: 771: 770: 736: 735: 728: 721: 720: 718: 717: 710: 703: 695: 685: 682: 633: 632: 631: 630: 601: 598: 586: 585: 582: 574: 571: 559: 558: 537: 529: 511: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 473: 472: 453: 452: 451: 450: 438: 437: 396: 395: 384: 383: 380: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 360: 357: 349: 348: 340: 339: 336: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 313: 235: 232: 220: 217: 214: 213: 210: 209: 206: 205: 203: 186:the discussion 173: 172: 169:Physics portal 156: 144: 143: 138: 126: 125: 122: 121: 119: 116:color articles 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1002: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 962: 960: 945: 941: 937: 933: 930: 927: 924: 923: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 877: 874: 871: 870: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 843: 835: 831: 827: 824: 821: 818: 817: 813: 807: 801: 796: 790: 784: 779: 776: 773: 772: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 732: 726: 725: 716: 711: 709: 704: 702: 697: 696: 693: 690: 681: 680: 676: 672: 668: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650: 646: 642: 638: 629: 626: 622: 621: 620: 617: 613: 612: 611: 610: 607: 597: 596: 593: 589: 583: 580: 579: 578: 570: 569: 566: 562: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 533: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 484: 478: 471: 468: 464: 460: 455: 454: 449: 446: 442: 441: 440: 439: 436: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 418: 415: 409: 408: 405: 404:User:Matveims 401: 394: 391: 386: 385: 377: 374: 371: 368: 366: 365: 361: 358: 355: 354: 351: 350: 346: 342: 341: 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 319: 318: 314: 311: 310: 307: 306: 305: 304: 301: 297: 292: 288: 285: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 231: 229: 226: 204: 187: 183: 179: 178: 170: 164: 159: 157: 154: 150: 149: 145: 142: 139: 136: 132: 131: 120: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 730: 722: 687: 667:Isaac Newton 658:spring green 652: 634: 603: 590: 587: 576: 563: 560: 513: 474: 458: 423: 410: 397: 363: 362: 316: 315: 295: 290: 289: 286: 270:. Where did 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 237: 222: 175: 92:articles to 83: 77: 40:WikiProjects 29: 768:Radio waves 748:Ultraviolet 625:Wikipedical 616:Georgia guy 606:Wikipedical 432:Georgia guy 300:Georgia guy 959:Categories 940:Mediumwave 926:Wavelength 822:spectrum: 936:Shortwave 932:Microwave 820:Microwave 764:Microwave 740:Gamma ray 944:Longwave 782:Violet 756:Infrared 671:Keraunos 641:Keraunos 467:Matveims 445:Arcturus 414:Arcturus 390:Matveims 280:Matveims 30:template 491:contrib 424:12 days 375:Orange 372:Yellow 356:Violet 331:Orange 328:Yellow 312:Violet 238:In the 225:SEWilco 191:Physics 182:Physics 141:Physics 90:improve 866:L band 862:S band 858:C band 854:X band 834:K band 830:V band 826:W band 806:Orange 800:Yellow 794:Green 660:, and 600:Indigo 592:Atlant 565:Atlant 556:L band 552:S band 548:C band 544:X band 524:K band 520:V band 483:R U Bn 369:Green 325:Green 317:Indigo 296:remove 291:Indigo 272:indigo 264:orange 260:yellow 244:violet 36:scale. 788:Blue 744:X-ray 359:Blue 322:Blue 256:green 107:Color 85:color 59:Color 28:This 850:band 842:band 675:talk 662:cyan 645:talk 540:band 532:band 487:Talk 400:cyan 378:Red 364:Cyan 334:Red 276:cyan 266:and 252:cyan 248:blue 96:and 94:good 919:ELF 915:SLF 911:ULF 907:VLF 891:VHF 887:UHF 883:SHF 879:EHF 812:Red 546:| 268:red 240:EMS 98:1.0 961:: 942:• 938:• 934:• 917:• 913:• 909:• 905:• 903:LF 901:• 899:MF 897:• 895:HF 893:• 889:• 885:• 881:• 875:: 864:• 860:• 856:• 852:• 844:, 836:: 832:• 828:• 791:• 785:• 777:: 766:• 762:• 758:• 754:• 750:• 746:• 742:• 677:) 656:, 647:) 639:. 554:| 550:| 542:| 534:, 526:: 522:| 493:) 489:• 459:is 430:. 278:? 262:, 258:, 254:, 250:, 246:, 230:) 848:u 846:K 840:a 838:K 809:• 803:• 797:• 714:e 707:t 700:v 673:( 643:( 538:u 536:K 530:a 528:K 485:( 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Color
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Color
color
improve
good
1.0
wikiproject page
WikiProject icon
Physics
WikiProject icon
icon
Physics portal
WikiProject Physics
Physics
the discussion
SEWilco
06:26, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
EMS
indigo
cyan
Matveims
00:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Georgia guy
00:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Matveims

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.