163:
22:
71:
53:
153:
135:
412:
The "seven colours of the rainbow" have been known to generations of school kids and are widely accepted throughout education and elsewhere. Knowledge should not try to modify current thinking - it should report it. I suggest we re-instate the ROYGBIV listing until a fuller debate has taken place. Alternatively we could set up an article for the "traditional spectrum", but that doesn't get over the problem of the template.
477:
502:
You know, the rods (and/or cones) in our eyes are only sensitive to the electromagnetic-wave frequencies of what we call red, green, and blue. All other colors are merely varying combinations of these three. That's why color monitors can emulate pretty much any color that we can see while having
456:
I'm surprised that ROYGBIV is the standard, actually. In most of east europe (where I grew up), the standard is ROYGCBV (the cyan version). There's even a chant: "Каждый Охотник Желает Знать Где Сидит Фазан". Perhaps wikipedia just has non-standard definitions for colors "blue" and "violet," so it
411:
I didn't know this debate was going on, so let's perhaps take a step back? The division of the optical spectrum is arbitrary. We have to use something, and Newton's seven colours are as good a division as any (if we were to select colours based on the examples above then we might eliminate blue!).
503:
only red, green, and blue phosphors. Believe it or not, these three are the only true primary colors. Though it doesn't seem as intuitive, yellow is a combination of red and green, and violet looks reddish blue because it's between the blue frequency and the doubled frequency of red.
480:
Excuse me, but cyan is not a monochromatic color (it's a mix of green and blue), so it shouldn't be listed in a list of EM spectrum, in my opinion! Only monochromatic colors (meaning existing of only 1 specific frequency in the spectrum) should be listed here.
293:
is known almost exclusively for its inclusion in ROYGBIV, which is because Newton wanted 7 colors instead of just 6. I don't think it is really talked about practically in anyway independent of its inclusion in ROYGBIV. I say
664:
should also be included as spectrum colors, but they are not included solely because it is not traditional to do so; it is only traditional to depict the spectrum as having the seven colors originally assigned to it by
387:
Which one looks like a more accurate representation of the color spectrum to you? In my oppinion, the bottom one (with cyan). Let's hope we can get someone other then us two involved in this discussion too.
577:
I've added a sub-table for the radio spectrum. I think it's a useful addition to a template that claims to describe the EM spectrum, but I'm not entirely satisfied with it for two reasons:
669:. If chartreuse, spring green, and cyan were included, that would make ten spectrum colors. How one divides up the spectrum is somewhat arbitrary because it is a continuum of color.
345:
989:
683:
627:
618:
447:
434:
392:
469:
227:
635:
It's necessary to use the right tone of indigo which approximates spectrum indigo. The tone of indigo that approximates spectrum indigo is called
287:
Has there been enough talk about the inclusion of indigo for there to be a poll on whether indigo should actually be included?? Here is my answer:
223:
I added a category so the articles are automatically mutually accessible. After the article's next edit which reloads the template, that is. (
302:
416:
406:
282:
494:
594:
567:
218:
979:
581:
It overlaps but doesn't completely replace the functioning of the existing "radio_spectrum" template (no frequency chart here), and
984:
462:
443:
If
Matveims is interested in the debate he should be watching this page. I'll put a comment on his talk page to direct him here.
964:
89:
608:
969:
974:
712:
678:
648:
97:
185:
93:
162:
233:
176:
140:
572:
514:
If anyone thinks that the "a" and "u" in the K-band links should be subscripted, here's the code to do it.
490:
33:
604:
Indigo should be put back onto the template as it is recognized as being a part of the em spectrum. --
561:
I tried it and found it ugly, so I haven't put that stuff in, but others may think differently about it.
101:
78:
58:
509:
878:
723:
705:
184:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
918:
465:
article? Sorry id I'm making too big of a deal about this. I would like to get the colors right.
239:
39:
588:
I'll try to continue improving this, but if anyone else wants to jump in, please feel free!
886:
882:
657:
8:
914:
910:
890:
759:
698:
906:
674:
653:
644:
427:
898:
774:
751:
624:
615:
605:
486:
431:
299:
805:
767:
894:
872:
780:
636:
599:
168:
623:
Besides one or two objections, that section does not show any consensus. --
958:
902:
670:
640:
466:
444:
413:
403:
389:
279:
666:
224:
747:
591:
564:
482:
939:
925:
344:
935:
931:
819:
763:
739:
70:
52:
152:
134:
943:
755:
426:. Do you think Matveims will be aware of that?? Please put that on
845:
837:
535:
527:
181:
865:
861:
857:
853:
833:
829:
825:
799:
555:
551:
547:
543:
523:
519:
271:
792:
743:
476:
461:
the standard, I'd go along. But then, why not to correct the
457:
desn't resemble therainbow as closely. OF course, if ROYGBIV
84:
786:
661:
399:
275:
684:
What about adding some color ? Request for votes/comments
584:
Its EHF and SHF catagories overlap the
Microwave category.
811:
688:
Proposal as below nextto "Visible (optical) spectrum:":
242:
article describes the visible spectrum as consisting of
614:
See further up this talk page for info about indigo.
180:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
158:
990:Template-Class physics articles of NA-importance
956:
82:, a project that provides a central approach to
706:
713:
699:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
88:-related subjects on Knowledge. Help us
957:
731:(Sorted by wavelength, short to long)
174:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
1001:
219:Category Electromagnetic spectrum
475:
352:
343:
308:
161:
151:
133:
69:
51:
20:
980:Template-Class physics articles
691:
422:That was the first response in
985:NA-importance physics articles
76:This template is supported by
1:
965:Template-Class color articles
393:03:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
303:00:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
283:00:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
194:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
188:and see a list of open tasks.
970:NA-importance color articles
724:The Electromagnetic Spectrum
628:01:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
619:00:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
609:00:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
470:01:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
448:23:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
435:23:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
417:23:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
407:01:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
197:Template:WikiProject Physics
7:
975:All WikiProject Color pages
952:] ] ] ] </noinclude: -->
110:Knowledge:WikiProject Color
10:
1006:
775:Visible (optical) spectrum
689:
679:21:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
649:21:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
595:13:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
568:17:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
495:12:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
113:Template:WikiProject Color
738:
694:
146:
64:
46:
463:Electromagnetic spectrum
274:come from? And where is
228:06:26, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
234:Indigo? Where is Cyan?
398:So, shall we include
298:it. Any objections??
100:standards; visit the
573:Radio spectrum added
518:Microwave spectrum:
760:Terahertz radiation
177:WikiProject Physics
951:<noinclude: -->
510:Subscript Ka, Ku ?
428:User talk:Matveims
34:content assessment
949:
948:
733:
402:in the spectrum?
382:
381:
338:
337:
216:
215:
212:
211:
208:
207:
128:
127:
124:
123:
104:for more details.
79:WikiProject Color
997:
814:
808:
802:
795:
789:
783:
752:Visible spectrum
729:
715:
708:
701:
692:
654:Chartreuse green
479:
353:
347:
309:
202:
201:
200:physics articles
198:
195:
192:
171:
166:
165:
155:
148:
147:
137:
130:
129:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
102:wikiproject page
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1005:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
996:
995:
994:
955:
954:
953:
849:
841:
810:
804:
798:
793:
787:
781:
734:
727:
719:
686:
637:electric indigo
602:
575:
539:
531:
512:
236:
221:
199:
196:
193:
190:
189:
167:
160:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
12:
11:
5:
1003:
993:
992:
987:
982:
977:
972:
967:
950:
947:
946:
929:
928:designations:
922:
921:
876:
873:Radio spectrum
869:
868:
847:
839:
823:
816:
815:
778:
771:
770:
736:
735:
728:
721:
720:
718:
717:
710:
703:
695:
685:
682:
633:
632:
631:
630:
601:
598:
586:
585:
582:
574:
571:
559:
558:
537:
529:
511:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
473:
472:
453:
452:
451:
450:
438:
437:
396:
395:
384:
383:
380:
379:
376:
373:
370:
367:
360:
357:
349:
348:
340:
339:
336:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
313:
235:
232:
220:
217:
214:
213:
210:
209:
206:
205:
203:
186:the discussion
173:
172:
169:Physics portal
156:
144:
143:
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
119:
116:color articles
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1002:
991:
988:
986:
983:
981:
978:
976:
973:
971:
968:
966:
963:
962:
960:
945:
941:
937:
933:
930:
927:
924:
923:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
877:
874:
871:
870:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
843:
835:
831:
827:
824:
821:
818:
817:
813:
807:
801:
796:
790:
784:
779:
776:
773:
772:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
732:
726:
725:
716:
711:
709:
704:
702:
697:
696:
693:
690:
681:
680:
676:
672:
668:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
629:
626:
622:
621:
620:
617:
613:
612:
611:
610:
607:
597:
596:
593:
589:
583:
580:
579:
578:
570:
569:
566:
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
533:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
478:
471:
468:
464:
460:
455:
454:
449:
446:
442:
441:
440:
439:
436:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
409:
408:
405:
404:User:Matveims
401:
394:
391:
386:
385:
377:
374:
371:
368:
366:
365:
361:
358:
355:
354:
351:
350:
346:
342:
341:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
319:
318:
314:
311:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
297:
292:
288:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
231:
229:
226:
204:
187:
183:
179:
178:
170:
164:
159:
157:
154:
150:
149:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
131:
120:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
730:
722:
687:
667:Isaac Newton
658:spring green
652:
634:
603:
590:
587:
576:
563:
560:
513:
474:
458:
423:
410:
397:
363:
362:
316:
315:
295:
290:
289:
286:
270:. Where did
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
237:
222:
175:
92:articles to
83:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
768:Radio waves
748:Ultraviolet
625:Wikipedical
616:Georgia guy
606:Wikipedical
432:Georgia guy
300:Georgia guy
959:Categories
940:Mediumwave
926:Wavelength
822:spectrum:
936:Shortwave
932:Microwave
820:Microwave
764:Microwave
740:Gamma ray
944:Longwave
782:Violet
756:Infrared
671:Keraunos
641:Keraunos
467:Matveims
445:Arcturus
414:Arcturus
390:Matveims
280:Matveims
30:template
491:contrib
424:12 days
375:Orange
372:Yellow
356:Violet
331:Orange
328:Yellow
312:Violet
238:In the
225:SEWilco
191:Physics
182:Physics
141:Physics
90:improve
866:L band
862:S band
858:C band
854:X band
834:K band
830:V band
826:W band
806:Orange
800:Yellow
794:Green
660:, and
600:Indigo
592:Atlant
565:Atlant
556:L band
552:S band
548:C band
544:X band
524:K band
520:V band
483:R U Bn
369:Green
325:Green
317:Indigo
296:remove
291:Indigo
272:indigo
264:orange
260:yellow
244:violet
36:scale.
788:Blue
744:X-ray
359:Blue
322:Blue
256:green
107:Color
85:color
59:Color
28:This
850:band
842:band
675:talk
662:cyan
645:talk
540:band
532:band
487:Talk
400:cyan
378:Red
364:Cyan
334:Red
276:cyan
266:and
252:cyan
248:blue
96:and
94:good
919:ELF
915:SLF
911:ULF
907:VLF
891:VHF
887:UHF
883:SHF
879:EHF
812:Red
546:|
268:red
240:EMS
98:1.0
961::
942:•
938:•
934:•
917:•
913:•
909:•
905:•
903:LF
901:•
899:MF
897:•
895:HF
893:•
889:•
885:•
881:•
875::
864:•
860:•
856:•
852:•
844:,
836::
832:•
828:•
791:•
785:•
777::
766:•
762:•
758:•
754:•
750:•
746:•
742:•
677:)
656:,
647:)
639:.
554:|
550:|
542:|
534:,
526::
522:|
493:)
489:•
459:is
430:.
278:?
262:,
258:,
254:,
250:,
246:,
230:)
848:u
846:K
840:a
838:K
809:•
803:•
797:•
714:e
707:t
700:v
673:(
643:(
538:u
536:K
530:a
528:K
485:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.