Template talk:Db-meta/Archive 1

6052: 5811:

plain db template but I'm not sure everyone else does and most would probably just tag it as vandalism (I regularly look at speedy requests to make sure none are inappropiate). If this parameter was avaliable on the db-vandalism (db-g3) template I'd imagine it might lead to some better reasons and so make it easier for admins and anyone else that reviews speedys. I could probably make the change myself but wanted to make sure that I hadn't missed a prior consensus not to have such a parameter and also that there were no disagreements first.

720:, where the named parameter "url" is an option, not a requirement. A named parameter in use can standarize usage and denote its functionality more explicitly than an unnamed empty parameter. The old edit fixed the limitation just as the new one does, but it's good to have standarized templates that work and are intuitive to use. If a parameter such as "displayonly"/"nocat" exists somewhere, it should be standarized across the related templates (as done previously), otherwise it becomes an ad hoc usage. 5736: 31: 2350:

the United States article doesn't need to do anything to "fix" the article vis-a-vis the CSD. Joe Average, on the other hand, should have that Nascar information added to his article, so future editors will know. That's really all I was trying to do, because the wording that's been there doesn't say anything about what to do with the Joe Average article. In your last paragraph there, you're arguing that any tag removal should impose an additional burden on the nominator, which I

859:), which was built into {{db-reason}} itself; the "nocat" tag merely documents that modification. That is, even if the "nocat" tag was not used, {{db-reason|blah| }} can still be used to override categorization (which is even easier to type accidentally than {{db-reason|blah|nocat=}}) Actually, {{db-reason|blah|CATEGORY}} can be used, such that {{db-reason|this article is nonsense|]}} will mark an article as featured content material as opposed to speedy deletion material. 8016:. If I understand correctly, it just has to run maybe once every three or four days, and dummy edit (?) all the non-redirect (there's a few redirects which are used) template pages nominated under T3. I'm afraid I don't understand why it needs to do the dummy edit? Should it only do it if the page has been nominated for more then a week? Let me know if I'm wrong about what you want the bot to do, it's likely that I'd be able to get it to do something else to do with CSD. - 2284:". I'm confused because my edit didn't do that. The instructions already direct the author to explain themselves, so I was trying to treat other editors the same, not differently. Furthermore, no reason was given for restoring the word "obviously", which I removed as incorrect - a page not meeting the criteria should not be speedied whether or not it's obvious. I'm going to re-delete that word, and seek Gene's input regarding the other part. - 7274:

sockpuppets blocked, but I have also repeatedly had to explain this banned user's history to other Wikipedians (including admins) who appear to distrust my motives and who need to be individually convinced that the ban was justified and that the articles and edits created by new sockpuppets truly deserve to be reverted on sight. As it happens, I don't propose deletion for every new Jvolkblum article I see (just two days ago, I rewrote

4959: 1560:

metatemplate added any page it was included in to the CSD category; with the templates displayed, this added all the speedy delete templates and example pages to the category. By separating the commonly used {{db-reason}} from the meta-template, it was no longer necessary to add the category tag to both the templates and the meta-template. This resolved the problem while simultaneously allowing the unprotection of db-reason.

4513:). Neither of the second two would be possible with your proposed 'improvement'. Have you considered the possibility of just using an HTML space or non-breaking space rather than complaining that the template code "eats" a normal space? That system is used on about twenty of the templates. All in all, this is a "solution" to a "problem" which does not, in fact, exist. It is, however, true that the 3303: 6986: 5411: 4923: 4699: 4099: 3465: 3001: 6165: 4470: 1544:

but please discuss this here first. one of the benefits of the previous scheme was the assurance of db-reason and the other CSD templates having very simialr language. I am not clear what problem this mov is tring to solve -- indeed IMO the tempaltes were workign fine earlier this month before the large amount of editing. I wish this had been discussed a bit more before implemtation.

3192: 3914:". I don't personally find the 100% version any uglier than the 92% version, and I rather suspect that any significant difference in their appearance is due to peculiarities in Titoxd's browser and font choice. Therefore I've set up a comparison below. Please indicate which of these two lines looks better to you, or whether they look just about equally good or bad: 1564:

several days. Since the split solves the problem, is non-disruptive, and is easily reversible, I did not see the need for extensive discussion before at least temporarily doing it. I apologize if I appeared to be acting too unilaterally; the problem is now fixed, with all the time in the world to discuss making the move permanent or using a different solution. //

1643:

change that to a clumsy copy-and-paste method now. One way to get rid of the metatemplate, if you feel that it is absolutely necessary, would be to have a single template that displays a different message depending on the parameter; such that {{sd|G1}} or {{sd|nonsense}} would display the appropriate message for that criteria.

8447:(outdent) I was just reviewing this discussion and wondering how this was working now. Is there a bot making regular null edits to these pages? (Obviously we can't tell if this is happening or not as their is no entry in the history!) Is this documented anywhere? Was there a BRFA that I missed? Just curious ... — Martin 1647:

and so forth, but these templates are simply tools to help enforce those policies. Further, changing from a meta-template to a copy-and-paste method would not make any difference to this editability. That would simply make them much less standardised. If I misinterpret your response, feel free to clarify. //

700:

Hopefully we can come up with a consistent and extenable scheme (so that any template can have sub-templates like db-band / db-club from db-bio).... and hopefully we can document it in a way that future editors who wish to make new templates or tweak the exisitng ones can do so without breaking anything.

8077:. Those pages would benefit from regular null edits as well. An idea would then be to place all pages that need regular updates into a new category, and your bot could then perform a null edit on each page every couple days (possibly skipping those where the last revision is younger then one or two days). 2317:

process; the biggest problem is that it gives reviewers something misinterpret as they latch onto it say that the tag was improperly removed, and it will still be speedied, but it really isn't worded clearly enough so that various editors will interpret it in anything remotely resembling a consistent way.

8405:

Okay, I think I understand this now. So I'll do another BRFA in a while (I've got a bit on my plate in regards to the 'pedia just now, so it'll be about five days). I also have a few other ideas for the bot, and other task have been suggested by other users. If you have any more a ideas rearding this

8054:

The reason it needs a dummy edit is a bit complicated. Categorization of a page is only written to the database in two cases: If a page is edited directly, or if a page which is transcluded onto other pages is changed then jobs are spawned to reparse all those pages (immediately or queued) and update

7422:

Deprecated means its use is discouraged. The only reason it can't be removed is it would break articles whose edit histories included copyvio-tags but where the article was not deleted or where it was restored on review, such as where it was on the web in a GFDL-compatible license. Deprecated means

7308:

If the banned editor is the only contributor to the page or its talk page, speedy deletion is invariably correct. If other editors have unwittingly made good-faith contributions to the page or its talk page, it is courteous to inform them that the page was created by a banned user, and then decide on

6642:

still has the warning about not deleting a missing image due to a server issue and being able to recover them... has this issue not yet been resolved? I'm not an admin but I have tagged a number of pages with it over the last while and wonder when the issue will be resolved and the template returned

6374:

I edited template:db-a9 and was going to edit template:db-album, but realized I didn't understand what you were talking about, so I reverted my edit. I think that currently, when you try to delete a page by clicking delete on the db-album template, it will put in the block log summary "Article about

5960:

I realize there're good reasons for leaving all the speedy templates open to editing (though likely semi-ing them wouldn't hurt too much), but is there any reason any of them would be moved? That sort of thing could kinda' screw things up with the creation of a lot of double redirects. Anyway, just

5866:

template? In all my time on Knowledge, I've never seen someone actually use the free-form speedy template with a valid reason. We have specific speedy templates for all the criteria, and so this one seems redundant and prone to misuse (i.e. unintentional wrong use, not abuse). So why keep it? I'd

5805:

There are often pages which at first glance may not be vandalism. For example the other day I speedy requested a page on an apparent cricketer. This was obviously a hoax as it stated he'd played in some games that it was very easy to prove he didn't with a link or two. Additionally there were some

4550:

Oh, I see. Damn, you are right, I have been a fool, I should have noticed that I could do this with a simple fix, and I didn't investigate the matter enough before proposing the change, or I would have found this. I'll take your exhaustive advice into account when I see problems into other templates.

3215:

I've added some code (after several tries) that will require users wishing to have their user talk pages deleted to provide a rationale. I've seen a lot of cases where people simply want to delete a history of warnings, so the template has been modified to either provide a rationale or the request is

2438:

will cause the text at the bottom to be trimmed down. Currently this means it will say simply, "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice." I have also made the corresponding changes to the templates also mentioned at the talk page linked above that should

2337:

I think I understand your argument, Gene, but maybe I don't, because I don't see how the above amounts to my edit being a bad one. In the version before I edited it, the instructions were vague and subjective by using the word "obviously"; after I edited it, they were vague and subjective because of

1393:

To resolve the issues above, I'll move the speedy-delete category tag to the subsidiary templates. I'll also implement a 'category' parameter across all the templates to allow the optional modification of the category tag. Barring anything unexpected, the transition should be completed within an hour

8249:

It really depends on what you want to do: Just take care of the SD tagged pages, or build some general-purpose null-edit mechanism for all kinds of problems. If the former, then I guess you won't need a category since you're already tracking SD tags and can easily find all pages where a C1 or T3 tag

8190:

Sorry, I'm being really slow. If I understand, the proposal is to create a new category which every 1/3/5/7 day(s) the bot goes through and does a null edit. By doing this null edit the bot forces Knowledge to update the categories for that page. As well as all the admin backlogs, the Db-t3 template

8145:

Imagine a stupid categorization like ]. With the MediaWiki system, it's very very hard to keep this categorized correctly all the time. The underlying problem is that pages that are shown as part of a category are explicit entries in a database table. Database write actions are expensive since there

7804:

on a page that was deleted or does not exist..."). If it might be useful though, one should consider whether the abandoned rewrite-attempt can serve as a draft for a new article instead. If the article exists, G8 cannot be applied because then the page it depends on exists. One might want to ask the

7778:(and cause a very large error message when a prod is attempted on them), but they are (at least technically) "talk page of a page which does not exist". This would appear to be using a technicality-for-inclusion to overcome a technicality-for-exclusion, but might be considered wikilawyering by some. 7704:

Is there a template for user talk pages that says "If you came here to tell me an article will not be deleted, don't bother telling me"? I patrol the new pages a lot and when I speedy them, there are some that will not be deleted because they meet the criteria for being here. So when they do stay, I

7412:

Well, that sounds reasonable enough, I'd imagine, although if it's not an online source it might be hard to verify it for speedy (unless it's a really, really blatant offline copyvio). So I'm not entirely sure what you mean when you say URL would be deprecated, you aren't talking about disabling the

7151:

I've just tagged a couple of articles with db-g12, both of which infringe copyright from multiple URLs -- one from two different web sites, the other from multiple pages on the same site. For both articles, I gave the most obvious example as the url parameter of the template. It might be a good idea

5666:

the name, things like history merges should not go into this combined category. Indeed, they should stay about as far away from "ordinary" speedy deletions as possible. The few admins that regularly handle history merges and know how to do them properly already know where to find them, while those

5069:

The justification for putting only what is different in each instance in the subtemplates is just that: it minimises duplication. I can see some advantages to your proposal, but also some disadvantages. First of all, it substantially increases the length of most of the templates, and bullet points

4170:

Since nobody gave any reason for this to remain, I reworded it for the self=yes case to "Administrators: check history (last) before deletion (See also links and logs).". I kept the links and logs since some people may want to check them. My point was merely that we shouldn't command people to check

2360:

I understand that "may be necessary" requires interpretation, but ultimately, we have to assume that well meaning editors who disagree with each other will talk with one another and work this out. We don't need a piece of red tape to cover every conceivable situation; but it's a good idea to phrase

2308:

those other than the author to make some explanation, and it probably had as much do do with your edit summary on the other page as the one here. Reverting is often a "hangon" procedure in editing, saying let's go back to what was there because the change wasn't really an improvement, even if parts

1681:

which, not being a recognised namespace, would just appear as a normal article. A relatively inexperienced user, or one in a hurry, may not notice the fact that they are creating a new page in the wrong place. This is especially likely since articles tagged with speedy delete templates don't usually

1241:

Reading the discussion above, I agree that a named parameter is better, since it prevents accidental removal from the speedy-delete category. Intentional removal from a category is not a pressing issue; the user who placed the tag is likely to watch it for vandalism, and besides which the same could

699:

By the way, I'm glad to see a central discussion of these templates. It seems there have been too many ad-hoc changes to them by too many people. And I don't think everyone who's tried editing understands the templates and their dependencies completely, and the consequences of their code choices.

8130:

Uh... you're trying to confuse me now ;)... Seems very complex, shame that it can't just categorise first time. Anyway, one thing I don't get is; you sugest a category of pages which the bot runs through and does a null edits on every few days, but if the reason for this is because the pages aren't

7267:

for speedy deletion earlier today (the tagging that apparently precipitated this note), I did check to see if the template would let me enter more information about the reason, but I couldn't find a way to do so. I used the edit summary to indicate that checkuser had confirmed this particular sock,

7262:

does not even point out that the name of the banned user can be included as a parameter in the template (as in {{db-banned|Jvolkblum}}). I don't remember how I learned that, but I learned it after an admin asked which banned user I was concerned about when I tagged an article without including that

5886:

prone to misuse, I'd argue that it's really no more prone to it than the numbered ones. Off the top of my head, when I'm doing speedy deletions, I'd estimate I pick the same criterion as the original tagger maybe 60% of the time. Most of the time, as you say, the confusion is well-intentioned and

4801:

The choice of reasons offered by the drop-down menu is somewhat limited (necessarily, since the menu is already long enough as it is) compared to the full selection of db-* templates, though. But yes, for those templates that exactly match an entry in the menu, the wording should be identical, and

1666:

A small problem with the way these templates appear has just been brought to my attention. If someone places a deletion template on a talk page (as they should do under, for example, CSD G8), anyone who tries to contest/comment on the deletion by clicking on the words "its talk page", as instructed

1646:

I fail to see what relevance the discussion above has, however. You seem to be arguing that the templates should never be changed, or at least changed only with community consensus. I fully disagree with that; few parts of Knowledge should ever be beyond initiative. Exceptions are made for policies

6710:

I just wanted to mention that I was on a public computer the other day (logged out) and tagged a page for CSD. Due to the external link (to Google, I assume is the issue) it requires you to enter a captcha to save your edit. This really should be removed, you shouldn't need to enter a captcha when

5683:

I'm fine with leaving history merges with their own special category that already exists. Db-g6 is a bit of a strange bird, it does require some analysis. It's not a "delete-on-sight" like U1 is, but when used appropriately and in good faith it's something that can usually be done without a lot of

5523:

speedy deletions should be non-controversial, but it's true that, in practice, they aren't always so. It's also true that, controversial or not, some speedy deletions are more obvious than others, though often there's as much variation on this within individual criteria as between them. I guess,

3702:

template: there are dozens of speedy deletion templates that use this metatemplate, plus a couple that don't. In fact, having an ambox type for the "speedy" color scheme might encourage people to change more of the less typical speedy templates to use ambox directly rather than via this template,

2349:

on one hand, where the tag can simply be removed, as the article is clearly not a speedy candidate; and on the other hand, an article about Joe Q. Average, which looks like a speedy candidate, but wouldn't be if we knew about Joe's renown in the Nascar community. Anyone removing a speedy tag from

2293:

Ah, I just realized I misunderstood the edit summary. Somehow I mentally inserted the word 'no'. My bad. Now my question is - what is the good reason for not asking people removing the speedy tag to either fix the article, or at least explain what's going on if "if necessary"? What on earth is

1543:

I am inclined to think that this is a bad idea, and in any case should not have been put into practice without additional discussion, particualrly during the holiday season when fewer people are looking at this issue. I willnot simply revernt these changes, although i am strongly tempted to do so,

7273:

There clearly is much divergence of opinion about the treatment of banned users. I have been following Jvolkblum sockpuppets for almost a year. I have been repeatedly advised that this user is so notorious by now that it is unnecessary to expend my time going through standard procedure to get new

5810:

In both cases a rationalle parameter would a) allow an admin not knowledgable in the subject area to see it as vandalism and b) even if an admin still wasn't happy deleting it would at least make it less likely they'd remove the tag as inappropiate. I delt with both of the above by just using the

5801:

There are many cases where an already existing page is copied (rather than moved) in it's an entirity to a new (and obviously incorrect) name, often changing all instances of the name in the text as well, and this is obviously vandalism. A rationale parameter would allow the nominator to explain

5715:

I don't think it matters much as long as histmerges and "delete to make way for move" (which can be quite controversial) aren't lumped in with the rest. As the speedy deletion category is rarely backlogged these days (haven't seen more than 200 items in quite a long time), not much categorization

4430:

Db-g6 and similars than can be reworded as "deletion because it needs" instead of "deletion. It needs". I can do that myself once db-meta is changed (yeah, I know that it's 400+ templates, but many don't allow for custom reason so the only change needed is touching the start of one sentence, and

2896:

Thankfully, Picaroon was able to help me make the edit (with his uber-admin powers) over IRC. In the process I totally obliterated the need for the "reasonlink" parameter, which is still passed along from all of the templates with preset messages. (The parameter {{{reasonlink}}} was replaced with

684:

db-reason), and generally cleaning up a hodge-podge of messy code and different template schemes. I just propagated his work to all of the dependent templates, and fixed some bugs. I would be inclined not to change things if they work... But if someone would like to re-do the templates using a

165:

I think that it would be a bit easier if we had an additional speedy delete template, for when the reason for an article's deletion might not be so blatantly obvious. I know that the talk page is there for that purpose, but it's rather time-wasting to first edit the page, insert the speedy delete

2552:

Obviously, the link doesn't work correctly here, but I believe I've got the variables right. It can be said that we already have a link to the talk page at the top of each article, but adding the link in line with the rest (we also have direct links to page history and Whatlinkshere in monobook)

2327:

But also, once an objection is raised, I think that should impose at least a little burden on the nominator to go forward; even if the objector hasn't made it clear what the objection is based on, then the nominator should more precisely specify what the nomination was based on. Maybe not as an

1534:

another dependant template. This would fit very well into the standard scheme that's now in use on the 28 other speedy-delete templates, and allow users to edit this one. For obvious reasons, allowing users to edit the metatemplate is a rather bad idea. I'm willing to makes the changes myself if

756:

the category spec, instead of remove it. :) Of course that would be gross, counterituitive and a Bad Idea, when the caller can just categorize itself in the usual way. I think when we're done we need to document what's going on inside these templates, and write a "how to clone/modify" so that

8177:

This would immediately stick it into the bot category since, when the tag is added, the age switch template evaluates to 0. Once the seven days have passed, the template would evaluate to 1, so it only takes a (null) edit to actually place it in the category by triggering the update to the link

5053:

Right now the template's pretty disorienting, which is a problem since new users are usually the focus of it. I think something like the above would be an improvement because it says exactly who should do what. It also puts the reasoning on its own line, which makes it fit the other message box

2323:

And it wouldn't hurt to reword it so that that "hangon" rather than removing the notice is available, even if you weren't the original author. Nor would it hurt to have that template include an optional parameter to specify whether the objection is based on not meeting the criteria for speedy

1642:

The Knowledge stylesheets are inaccessible to the average user, and any changes are highly bureaucratic and would need to be applied to the seven different stylesheets. Not only do the usual reasons against metatemplates not apply, it's been in use for somewhat over a year; there's no reason to

1227:

I've been busy moving to a temporary new home over the last couple days and had no access to the Internet. Unfortunately, I ran out of time before I could finish troubleshooting the templates I had already modified. I apologize for the mess that resulted, and intend on addressing all the issues

7079:

The reasons offered by the db templates should be changed to the heavily discussed and agreed upon Deletereason-dropdown reasons. Maybe a more prominent delete link would also be useful, because the script automatically selecting the delete reason is broken since the 'content was:...' has been

6356:

I'm not sure, but I think I know how to do this. I don't know what you mean by dropdown and I don't understand why you say the summary is blanked. (I'm not an admin.) But I'm guessing what you want is to have the summary in the block log filled in automatically for you. That's the "summary"

6310:

This is something only other admins will care about, but usually when a certain tag is on a page and you click "delete", the dropdown selects the relevant reason automatically and the summary is blanked. I have no idea how that works but if someone does, could we get the same functionality for

5181:

actually places the page under "Nonsense pages for speedy deletion", which is problematic since that's not actually the criteria we're looking at under that category. Given that we lack a "Vandalism pages for speedy deletion" category, I'm not sure how to remedy the problem, or even if it is a

2615:

so that it more explicitly informs you to add hangon to the article page, then explain on the talk page. I've seen far too many people add the hangon tag to the talk page, so the deleting admin never sees it. If possible, could we also add a note saying admins should check the talk page before

1563:

I had invited discussion concerning the split, but an editor added the category tag to the meta-template. This fixed the non-categorisation issue with db-reason, but added all the templates to the CSD template. Due to the holiday season, as you point out, further discussion might have required

2316:

of the "that may be necessary" part. I'm not sure that your removal of "obviously" was necessary in any case, but what added in the other part suffers from the same kind of interpretation problems. The biggest problem isn't so much that it will mislead those intending to object to the speedy

3986:

Just a guess, but have you enabled font smoothing on your XP box? Unlike IE, Firefox on Windows won't smooth fonts unless this is enabled by default in the control panel. (I might be wrong, I'm just guessing since this is a common source of "some fonts look ugly on Firefox/Win" problems.)

456:

The usual argument about server performance and possible widespread vandalism used to oppose meta-templates don't, IMO, apply here, since none of the speedy delete templates are (I should hope) likely to be on a large number of articles at once, nor are those articles likely to be frequently

657:

has adapted a "nocat" parameter which is basically the same as the old "displayonly" parameter, even though the named parameter approach has been abandoned by this template. So, should we use the named or unnamed approach? Personally I prefer named (as before) because it is more consistent.

7101:

I assume you mean the criteria preloaded into the deletion summary? Yes, those should indeed be harmonised. I think the best solution to the autofill issue is new javascript that works with the new settings, but as an interim measure making the delete link more prominent wouldn't go amiss.

1559:

The primary benefits of the recent changes are much simplified code and the ability to display them on example and template pages. (These changes, and the split, do not in any way affect the wording; indeed, the wording is now even more standardised.) A problem arose with the fact that the

2354:, but that's not what this particular edit was about. If you want to modify the instructions to allow for that, then be bold, but I don't understand what's wrong with saying that someone who sees that the article needs improvements should improve it! That seems like an independent issue. 8354:

I don't think that extra logic is necessary, almost all of the pages will have a template causing the need for the frequent null edits anyway, so the categorization of all of them can be rather easily done there, without a real need to register them all through a preexisting category.

1575:

Why exactly does this need a meta-template in the first place? Other than the recent rush, those templates are rarely modified. It would be easier to simply copy/paste the same (simple) code into each CSD template, and this would also solve the "noinclude" problem mentioned above.

8106:

Stupid null edits don't leave an audit trail. From everything I can tell though, they don't just recategorize themselves. At least no one in the know (and I don't know the intrinsics of the job queue myself) ever told of a mechanism that would help with this problem. For example,

577:

Can someone please change "articles that you have created yourself" to "pages that you have created yourself"? I just applied this tag to a template (a recreation of a deleted one), and its author removed it. I'd like to eliminate any unintentional namespace loophole. Thanks!

3814:

supposed to jump up and scream at your face (since, if all goes well, nothing serious is actually going to happen to the article). That's why I felt it would be best to redesign it not to look like an ordinary speedy tag at all. But we're going rather off on a tangent here...

2261:

This suggests that (for someone who isn't the author) simply removing the speedy tag while "intending" to fix it is enough to keep the article from being deleted. In practice, however, if the article really does meet some CSD, then there really has to be some reason given to

794:

the templates easier (but anybody who doesn't know who templates work has no business working with speedy deletions); and if this parameter is used improperly it will mess up the category system, by listing speedy-deletable articles in the wrong category, or nowhere at all.

4152:

How is that wise? Even in the rare worst case that a user absentmindedly writes that request on the wrong page, it still can be restored quickly. By checking each of the items for each request, we're spending hours in order to save minutes. That doesn't seem wise to me. —

5078:

the page is up for CSD and towards the 'actions-on', which is not really a good idea: we want newbies to see clearly why the page is unacceptable so they can take productive steps to fix it. With some reformatting, however, it might be possible to minimise that effect.

1327:

the templates. That will save a lot of work. It will also allow all of us to understand what we're doing as well as the advantages, disadvantages and side-effects of each prposed implementation $ mdsdh; before we foist the changes off on the rest of Knowledge. :)

241:

It won't be more work for anybody, since it'll be completely optional whether you use Template:Delete or Template:Deletebecause (I like that name). Also, I inserted the reason using {{User talk:Mike Storm/sandbox2|reason=Reason goes here.}}, and putting <nowiki:

2046:. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can check back later to see if you have received a response to your message. 1923:. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can check back later to see if you have received a response to your message. 3452:

I don't think the current template jumps out enough... to new users or veterans (I'm not sure I'd notice this over the layers of nagging templates people like to add to articles). The fact that an article has been nominated for CSD should be very, very prominent.

6684:

IIRC this issue is now largely resolved: all the images that were corrupted have been tagged as such, which should preclude deletion. The majority have now been fixed. I've removed the notice; feel free to readd it if the I am mistaken and it is still needed.

5346:

Agree with Asher196, and reverted the change. Please feel free to revert again if it really does hamper the CSD work so much, but this is the second time I've had to save and then re-save because this template expects a parameter that is not strictly needed.

3663:

Third, and I suspect this will be the controversial part, I'd suggest getting rid of the {{{bgcolor}}} parameter entirely. The alternative would be to retain it as an optional override. I just don't see any particular need for it that would justify the added

1118:

4) I would hate to see the issue resolved either by subst-ing or by not showing the template. Subst'ing decreases the editability and maintainability of the templates. Not showng the template content decreases the usability of the templates, as people expect

629:. For example, {{db-reason|blah}} will transclude the category tag, but it can be omitted by using {{db-reason|blah| }} (space for second parameter). There is absolutely no difference in usage, merely a new hidden feature used on non-speedy-deletable pages. // 620:

Besides a few very minor changes (removed a double-space, for example), I surrounded the category tag with an optional parameter. This fixes the "technical limitation" that prevents it from being displayed on non-speedy-deletable pages by making the category

1079:

Well it may be done as a cunning joke: create a horrible article, then tag it with a fake speedy-delete tag, hoping that casual editors won't notice that the categorization did not actually occur, and the article could remain on Knowledge for a long time).

504:

Very well, I am easily swayed and I guess this makes more sense. Just following the standard procedure on templates within templates but since I don't really use these any more and it would be convenient ( I guess) I will undo my changes. =) Happy editing.

4116:

with the parameter self=yes. Currently, the logic disregards this parameter for the to do actions. This results in the full list "Administrators: check links, history (last), and logs before deletion" being displayed, which is inappropriate in the case of

7423:

either references to it would be removed from the documentation or it would be explicitly marked as deprecated in the documentation with a recommendation to use "source" instead. If this had been a subst'd template I'd just say remove URL altogether.

4489:"problem". The wordings were selected on their own merits, and technical methods were used to ensure that they could be implemented on the templates. We have examples of a variety of junctions in the db- series, including "deletion as an article..." ( 358:

Lots of templates have that feature written in. It is a hidden link back to the template so it can be edited later. It may also be useful in case anyone does a Subst: on template on a page, because it will still show in the templates Whatlinkshere. --

1755:. Extreme newbies invariably click the link and edit the template directly to provide their reason for not having the page speedy deleted. There's also no reason for someone to go and view or edit the template directly, so a link here is unnecessary. — 4629:). The permanent protection is really good for this sort of stuff. Don't worry, melon, I'm sure that I'll find some spectacular way to get myself blocked for something worse than making a good faith change to a template that breaks lots of stuff :D -- 3707:

would look if it was built on db-meta.) Also, a CSS class would allow people to customize the background color via their user CSS. (Who knows, maybe some speedy patrollers hate pink...) Anyway, there seems to be some related discussion going on at

5935:

Seconding the above. I'd also like to note that there are things which unquestionably should be speedily deleted but aren't covered by the existing CSD (can't think of one off the top of my head, I'll come back after I find/think of one). Cheers.

5455: 8250:

was added eight days ago. If you want to tackle the larger problem, then I think a category is best to track those pages for the bot. The next question would then be whether it's necessary to categorize pages by the desired frequency of null edits.

1716:

Along that line I've replaced NAMESPACE:PAGENAME by SUBJECTPAGENAME for the admin links (see above for the effect). Clearly this and your modification (incl. a later #ifeq: replacing your switch) won't work as expected for the speedy deletion of a

2978:

Thanks for the explanation. I am not sure that the need to speedy delete a talk page is large enough to need an explanation on all the other db-* templates. The need to speedy delete talk pages for nonexistent articles can't be that large, right?

1816:

Not possible, unless the calling template adds a parameter like called-by=db-author. But why do you need this, your proposed wording is fine, simply use it, if folks don't see db-author while looking for db-reason it's a hopeless case. Admittedly

2404:

The problem is, db-meta includes a statement telling the article's original author not to remove the tag, which is clearly inappropriate for db-author. Discussion is getting underway on how to fix this problem; if you're interested, please visit

6827:

Also, it always display the link under the AfD name even if it's a link to a MfD or TfD discussion, and AfD gets blue automatically anyways if the article had the same name, in which case you don't need to add a custom link on the first place.

452:

that has no reason specified). This would mean that any change in this template's wording would be automatically reflected in all the other speedy deletion templates, and thus the wording would been consistent, except for the specific reason.

441:

Several of the other speedy deletion templates are currently implemented as a call to (transclusion of) this template, with the reason parameter filled in. IMO all the speedy deletion templates should be so implemented (with the exception of

346:

Is there a reason we link to template:delete with a comma? (]. I was about to remove the comma from the link, because I thought it was included in the link accidentally, but apparently this was intentional. Seems quite counter-intuitive.

1618:

a reason against using meta-templates here, as demonstrated by the discussion above. These templates are supposed to not be modified (indeed, they should be vprotected). And note that significant changes can be done in the CSS class.

8061:. A page might display that it is in a category, but isn't really. Performing a null edit however does trigger a complete reparsing, with updates to the link tables, even if the page was unchanged and no entry to the history is made. 8269:, etc. And then every now and then (mebbes twice a day) the bot runs through all the pages in each category, and if the last edit to the page was longer ago then the frequency, then the bot performs a null edit. Wadda you think? - 685:

consitent approach across the board I would not object. Just please make sure when we're done that the templates all work (with both named, unnamed, and missing end-user parameters) and put the articles (but not themselves) into

8244: 8228:

So is the current template changing the categories as Amalthea suggested? If they are/were made to it would be a simple task to go through that category and null edit all the pages which have been nommed for longer then 4 days -

8149: 5298:

to make the URL parameter mandatory. This is because I regularly come upon images tagged with this template and no URL, and also no other comment explaining why the image is a copyvio. An example of what it might look like is at

5978:

In general we only protect pages in response to actual unwanted activity, so there's no justification for implementing this sort of protection pre-emptively. I did once try to fully-protect the whole series, but was overruled.

483:

makes a point of saying they should be avoided on "pages that are at all popular". Speedyable pages, typically being very new and very poorly-linked, are only rarely viewed. Replication lag shouldn't be an issue either, since

3609:

Violetriga's latest red-and-pink ambox-based compromise looks good to me, but I started to wonder about the {{{bgcolor}}} parameter to this template. If we could get rid of it, we could move the background color entirely to

2945:

It seems to me that the name of this template is not very descriptive about how to use it, so I would like to add a usage section here. Is there a table somewhere that tells what all these speedy deletion templates are for?

3954: 6865:. Obviously some of these are going to have nothing of value, but some do, and this will save people digging through histories to find that out. I won't get very far today, but I don't think it's very pressing. Cheers. ~ 7283:

Bottom line: this template is not particularly effective as a communication tool, and experiences like mine are likely to inspire contributors to say "Scr*w it; let Knowledge find someone else to combat this vandalism."

3792:

An important thing to remember about these templates is that they are Project Specific, not simply Article Messages, anything with a pale blue background is going to fade in to the background on all non-article pages. —

2939:

Just one editprotected tag, beside your request, is plenty. The only circumstance I can think of where this might happen is if the article was already deleted and the talk page was not. Is that what you were thinking

2205:

Someone else tagged an article with the db-meta tag directly, and for whatever reason the template was hidden unless I created a standard db tag below it. It also didn't add the article to the speedy deletion category.

8951:

This page may meet Knowledge’s criteria for speedy deletion because a consensus has been reached at Templates for deletion or Stub types for deletion to delete, but this page has not yet been deleted.See Templates for

7384:

put the book's name and the page in the URL field but it's just awkward. By changing to "source" it makes the template match what I think is its intended use. "Sources" would be used if there were multiple sources.

6264:

I've changed this to a half-way compromise — it puts in a big red warning if the URL parameter is omitted, requesting its inclusion or an explanation why it is not included, while still tagging the image for deletion.

4420:}} template, the first word is right next to "deletion". Same problem appears on g-5, g-4, etc. The default wording for first parameter on all those templates has the string ". " at the start to address this, which is 653:(this has been fixed) 2) Some templates have a different number of parameters, leading to different usage, eg. {{db-test}} become just {{db-test|}} ie. using the first as opposed to the second parameter to override 3) 7917:

requires that a category have been empty for four days, but it is virtually impossible for an administrator patrolling CSD to determine whether this condition has been met. I suggest adding a conditional expression

1787:, does anyone have any suggestions on how it can be made clear that the editor shouldn't remove the original db tag while adding hangon? I've noticed that a lot of new editors will remove the original speedy tag and 7264: 5469: 8311: 8266: 8262: 5667:

who don't really shouldn't ever need to stumble across them. Yes, that's probably a special and extreme case, but I'm not sure offhand if there might not be other such not-so-simple cases also lumped under G6. —

1028:. However, I don't mind that the shortcut tag is removed not because it is incorrect, but because most people who use the template redirects do so because they have them memorized, and don't need to be reminded. 8131:

getting added to a category properly, then how do they get added to that one properly? And a null edit to a page which is supposedly in the category (but does't yet show) is enough to update the category page? -

5525: 3562:

template wasn't sufficiently discussed, and it should be undone and then discussed. The template needs to stand out more, and is not in the same group as most other kinds of templates, like AfD or citations. --

8700:. (I haven't looked at the rest.) These parameters should be rationalised so that they are consistent. Each template should allow either, but the Usage statements should emphasize (the same) one parameter. 8486:

that allows for an optional (unnamed) parameter to supply the location of the transwikied text. The idea is to make it a little easier for the admin handling the request to find the transwikied article.

667:

I mildly prefer the named parameter approach, as long as it's only the override that needs to be named, and not all parameters. (End users rarely bother using named params even when they need to, like in

636:

The non-mandatory categorization was already implemented earlier this month using a named-parameter approach (parameter "displayonly") which worked for both this template and its dependent templates (from

2088: 1965: 5567: 166:

message, save it, open the talk page, post the reason for deletion, and save it. It's more convenient if you only have to insert the message {{del reason|reason=Reason goes here.}}, which would produce:

730:

Support for "nocat" has been added for the templates. It is optional and does not have to be specified (the empty parameter will still work). To be consistent, I suggest that we also implement it here.

9098: 7850:

But it demonstrates how the template will function on real pages. The "check links, history, etc" links are "not terribly interesting" either. Content should only be includeonly'd when it's actually

4482: 3010:. The only sensible place to contest a talkpage deletion is on the talkpage itself, so it seems unlikely that the deleting admin won't notice the hangon reason, even if the template doesn't appear. -- 7928: 7205: 6915: 5465: 3648:" class with a red bar and pink background, and changing the ambox type of this template from "serious" to "speedy". This would have the added advantage of simplifying the styling of the few non-{{ 2638:

What's the point of this: "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." if you replace the article. Why? If the page just said "test", but then I decided to replace it with

6375:

an an album, which does not indicate importance". Is that what it does? Other than apparently duplicating the word "an", is that not what you want it to do? Are you talking about something else?

8394:

and claims to be per the page rendering, but isn't. Make a null edit, and it will be listed in the category. Pages ... I can currently only think of the four templates mentioned in this section.

7854:

to have it display, like categories or code that explodes without parameters. Besides, wrapping it in includeonly tags here will only hide it on db-meta, not on all the other db- template pages.

182:; it would simply be a convenience. Please note that "del reason" is just a temporary name; I haven't thought of a really good one yet. I'm just looking for some feedback. The test version is at 6482:

I think that we should create a redirect of db-g3 at Template:db-sandbox as it seems pretty ideal for this speedy deletion criteria. Just a way to ease the memorization of all these db's. :) -

8283:

Sounds OK. But I'd really suggest calling them something like "Knowledge pages ...", I think that's the standard naming convention for self-referential maintainance categories. All should be

5806:

obvious mistakes (test playing cricketer at a stupidly yound age, age and date of birth not matching). At first glance this page seemed OK but a closer look made it obvious it was vandalism.

5489: 4075:

is authors blanking pages after a speedy-deletion tag has been placed on them. Can we have some sort of verbiage added to this template explaining that this isn't what's meant by "deletion"?

8366:

Cool with me... also, are you sure null edits work? I just did one in the sandbox... nothing happens. I know it's not meant to but still ;). Anyway, what pages should be included in this? -

7235:

When one uses this template, is there some way to state the reasons why the article ought to be deleted? Merely saying it's created by a banned user in violation of the ban is not enough.

9058:

this tag, and then explain why you believe this template talk page should not be deleted on this talk page. This will alert administrators to permit you the time to write your explanation.

8052:. FWIW, from what I can tell it's enough to use an empty appendtext parameter, you don't have to fetch the text and timestamp first; but you're the bot builder, you'll probably know better. 1806:

This, however, would require the template to refer to the name of the template which included it. This is probably possible; I just don't know how offhand. Any better ideas on the wording?

2320:

The mere fact that it is someone other than the original author making the removal is a pretty good indication that the speedy process should be foregone or at least suspended temporarily.

7123:

to preview the changes. In Deletereason-dropdown, the criterion number is prior to the reason, this can be handled by db-meta. Then the summary of each template will have to be changed.

8490:

I would like to update the documentation to explain the parameter, but the documentation file is pretty complex and I'm not quite source how to do it, so some help would be appreciated.

2935:

if a person contests the page deletion. This won't work with talk pages, as the hangon template is coded not to work unless you use the tp=1 parameter. Can we update the instructions?

884:

to link to the templates rather than including them, thus keeping it out of categories. But nobody in their right mind would speedily delete that anyway, so it's hardly that big a deal.

9270:

the talk page could already be created with banners or whatnot even if there's no hangon rationale...but still I bet this would cover 90% of cases); if the talk page isn't created, the

3414:

No one disputed the change, which was explicitly mentioned at least one section. Seems like the definition of (wiki-)consensus to me. We could always do some revert-discuss, though. :)

7579:"This page may meet Knowledge’s criteria for speedy deletion, as a page dependent on a page which does not exist, has been deleted, or is itself currently tagged for speedy deletion." 4004: 1462:. I'm going to hold of on fixing it until we can discuss what to do about it. One possibility is to use "category=" everywhere, but that just puts us were we were a few days ago. 6968:, so it indicates the "This template places the page in..." extra category? I tried to look at the docs page, but again, it uses very complex syntax so I'm reluctant to touch it. -- 5130:

are posted to an article. Please join us for the central discussion there. "Template Experts" are encouraged to join as the main conversation is between process an policy editors.

3404:

didn't really touch on templates like this, and I don't think there was support for changing something that wasn't a typical "banner" message. This needs to be discussed further. --

2062:

Note that this talk page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation added below this notice is found to be insufficient.

1939:

Note that this talk page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation added below this notice is found to be insufficient.

7268:

but neither an edit summary nor a template provides enough space to tell the whole story of why this banned user was banned and why his/her contributions should be deleted on sight.

4342:{{db-copyvio|url=http://wikipedia.org}} gives {{subst:sd-copyvio|Db-meta|header=1http://wikipedia.org}} ~~~~ instead of {{subst:sd-copyvio|Db-meta|url=http://wikipedia.org}} ~~~~ 3685:

Pushing more and more of this in to the css makes it harder for it to be updated in the future, why make an entire class that will be effectively used by just this one template? —

5851: 4452:

P.D.:notice that adding a space to the start of my reason for deletion won't work. You actually have to use ". " because the template eats the space at the start of the string. --

4286: 4189:

You have to check the history with every deletion request. This helps guard against someone moving articles (or user talk pages) to their userspace and have them deleted. Nobody

6120:

says that a hoax that's even remotely plausible (which this one was) shouldn't be speedied. Should advice against speedying suspected hoaxes be added to the template, like with

5797:

I think the db-g3 template should have a rationale parameter to help admins when the vandalism isn't immediately obvious. My point is probably best illistrated by two exampes:

5018:, and this article does not meet this criteria, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice. An administrator will delete this article shortly if there are no objections. 373: 351: 7575:"This page may meet Knowledge’s criteria for speedy deletion, as talk page of a page which does not exist, has been deleted, or is itself currently tagged for speedy deletion." 6241:

The reason I9 requires a URL parameter is because if a source image cannot be indicated, there is no evidence that an image is in use in violation of a copyright. Images that

8089:

I don't know if anyone has been around doing null edits, but I've deleted several categories which were tagged 4 days ago, so the new code seems to be working well. — Martin

7059:

Because not all former T1 deletions are valid G10 deletions, as in the pedophile userbox example - it requires human judgement to determine the appropriate course of action.

8193:

So, this means that the bot will have to edit just once after the T3 pages have been tagged for more then a week, yeah? And the admin backlogs maybe once every few days. -

3141:

Agreed. Or add "without removing the existing template". Or make it a parameter. Anything to make it as clear as possible that the speedy deletion tag is to stay in place.

1415:

All the templates seem to be working as expected in my sandbox tests. I'll monitor the CSD category and correct the no-category usage on any non-CSD pages that show up. //

1678: 5054:

templates better, and is much easier to read. I think having each sub-template contain half a sentence is kind of a weird hack and makes things unnecessarily difficult. —

1372:

I'll do that, then. If anyone can list some of the pages on which the templates need to be without the speedy-delete category, it would much simplify troubleshooting. //

7480: 6808: 5332:

I have an objection. What if the copyright violation doesn't come from a web site. How do I use this template if, for example, someone scanned a page from a magazine?

5876: 4761:

IIRC, standardising these was on our (long) list of things to do after overhauling the CSD templates a few months ago. Very few of the items on the list ever got done

2357:

Regarding: "it probably had as much do do with your edit summary on the other page as the one here," what are you talking about? Which other page? Which edit summary?

7071: 6446:

Ah, thanks David, that's the place I was looking for. I'll head over and see what can be done (maybe I can do it myself with copy+paste scripting^^). Thanks again :-)

638: 246:

You're right that its being optional pretty much negates the instruction creep issue. Some people are confused by having more than one option, though (<tangent: -->

183: 169: 7805:

author whether they want to keep it (so it can be userfied) or deleted (then use G7). If the author cannot be contacted/does not respond, go for MFD instead. Regards

327:

As this idea has gained nothing but support (excepting several accidental deletions), I went ahead and re-implemented it in the Template namespace. I've also created

8641: 8630: 6426: 2294:

the harm in that? The wording that Gene restored is mysteriously silent on what to do if you disagree with the tag for non-obvious reasons, but aren't the author. -

6837: 1682:

have talk pages, so the link usually takes you to a new page (in the Talk namespace) anyway. The only clue is the extra "talk" in the title, which is easy to miss.

6757:

This needs to be changed back, or fixed somehow, now, when you use it to check any article more than one word, it adds _ between them, which fuggs up the results--

6569: 6079: 2155: 682:

did some good work on the templates, making them all consistent, allowing them all to display correctly on the template page, allowing inheritance (db-band -: -->

5617: 5495:

Sounds like a good idea to me. If these are applied correctly, there should is no practical difference between them from the standpoint of how they are handled.

370: 348: 7095: 4896:

documentation says "This template is NOT ready for use yet. Thus don't use this meta-template for real message boxes yet, but feel free to use it for testing."

4596:! This is at least partly what permanent protection for templates is for - to force people to think twice before committing a change which might be suboptimal. 7184: 1005:

About shortcuts... I don't care too much about this issue, but the shortcut tag was there to document the other templates that redirect there. So in a sense,

7643:

I often add this myself by hand, in bold, out of concern that an inexperienced author will follow the copyright release steps only to have his text rejected.

3618:}}, where it was used to make it look like an old-style non-speedy deletion template, and which now frankly looks awful with the red bar and blue background. 7749: 6599: 6555: 6527: 5915:. But still, I'd actually kind of prefer if people who found a page they believe to be speediable but were not sure of the exact criterion would just use {{ 3848:

don't understand what you're saying. :/ Could you at least try to clarify which of the three numbered suggestions I made above you support and/or oppose? —

2068: 1945: 1603:

apply in this case, and being forced to copy and paste every single change across thirty pages is a significant incentive never to improve the templates. //

8881:

and changed the documentation accordingly. The old parameters still work, though I suppose we could phase them out in a few months if necessary. Cheers.

5586:

Right, so I don't think "simple" works either... "Candidates for speedy deletion asserted to be non-controversial" ? The wording is difficult to pin down. –

4438:

The change would leave some templates with an akward wording until they were edited. Note, maybe there is a way to tweak db-g6 so that it doesn't do this --

1872: 8384: 7755: 7328: 6487: 6422: 6418: 6221: 4729: 3787: 2985: 2952: 2643: 2233: 1685:

I don't have sufficient experience with templates to know whether there is any way of avoiding this; I just thought it would be best to mention it here --

1192:

without resorting to an abuseable category-override parameter. And these templates aren't usually used for deleting templates, as those usually go to TfD.

8261:

That seems like an okay idea. Here's my thoughts: we have the categories, with different ones for different frequency (as you suggest), so something like

3709: 3553: 8108: 7365: 5300: 4813: 4175: 3454: 3172: 2328:

necessary part of the process, and maybe not something that needs any great detail in the template, but as a suggestion that could reduce the wrangling.

2240: 1695:

I've used the {{switch}} template to correct this problem. Any problems, queries or suggestions, please report them to me; as I say, it should now work.

917:

want to see that done as it would make those templates unreadable and harder to edit. Like I said above, we really should have a centralized discussion

6006: 5103: 2679:

Sometimes non-articles qualify for CSD, and this template is transcluded to the appropriate deletion templates that we would use for them. (ex. images)

7892: 7875: 7866: 7794: 6879:

Are you working from a list somewhere? If so, could you link it, so that I (and others) can check over it to make sure it's got everything? Cheers.

5930: 4574:. I noticed I was a bigger fool that I thought, because most "db-" templates don't have a "reason=" parameter, so they didn't need my proposed fix. -- 4272: 4258: 4129: 1276:

adding un-named parameter to accompilsh the same thing, and also cleaning up templates to allow the content to appeat, un-subst'ed on the template page

7931:

will not appear until the template has been in place for the required four days. If there are no objections, I will make this change in a few days. --

6441: 5704: 5678: 5603: 5581: 5539: 4796: 4777: 8834: 7515: 7343:

so instead of "url" it takes any of the following: "url=", "source=", or "sources=". URL would be kept but depricated. Is this okay with everyone?

6873: 6851: 5947: 4638: 4608: 4583: 4560: 4541: 4157: 4143: 3859: 3839: 3826: 3801: 3723: 3693: 2194: 1756: 8913:

Like I said, the old parameter should still work, unless I screwed up. If I have, my edits should be reverted back to a working version. Cheers.

7622: 7464: 7445: 7417: 7407: 7375: 6890: 6617: 6541: 6517: 4939: 4717: 4656: 3152: 2368: 2332: 8955: 8871: 8848: 8798: 8766: 8570: 8524: 8480: 8166: 8034: 7950: 7676: 7616: 7024: 6083: 5820: 5792: 5655: 5632: 5524:

all in all, that such a combined category for the more straightforward criteria might be useful, though maybe the title could be better: how about

5277: 5237: 4331: 4038: 4014: 3998: 3981: 3351: 2521: 2484: 609: 8892: 8746: 8591: 7652: 7293: 7138: 7114: 6752: 6738: 6020: 5996: 3585: 3444: 3435: 3426: 3247: 2461: 2448: 8140: 6483: 6459: 6097: 5512: 5461: 4202: 3567: 2980: 2947: 9307: 9233: 9180: 8924: 8619: 8605: 8415: 8400: 8375: 8361: 8323: 8299: 8278: 8256: 8202: 8185: 8084: 7844: 7631:

Please note that even if the copyright issue were resolved, the promotional tone of a company or personal website may well be unsuitable for an

7320: 7239:

does not REQUIRE deletion in such cases; rather, it only says an administrator MAY speedily delete in such a circumstance if there are reasons.

7063: 7054: 6182:

template as it already says that it only covers "blatant and obvious misinformation" (which applies to blatant hoaxes as well, but only those).

5091: 3592: 3580: 2909: 2867: 2852: 2835: 2818: 2801: 2787: 1072:

1) Yes, the use of a named parameter, especially an obscure one decreases the probability of this. But as someone actually posted that hack to

913:. To get around that without an category override would require subst'ing this template into all the dependent templates... and I emphatically 8979: 7627:

I would like to suggest adding the following words at the end of the author's db-copyvio warning template, just before the final "Thank you":

6766: 6697: 6679: 6387: 6369: 6336: 5359: 5141: 4865: 3382: 3318: 3135: 2769: 1842: 1829: 1633: 1590: 847: 9202: 7542: 7506: 5447: 5433: 2597: 495: 9368: 9333: 8545:: "... and there is no assertion that the file is public domain, fair-use, or available under a free license" because most of the time there 7004: 6978: 6953: 6291: 5725: 5341: 5171:, which is fine - and usually fits, as the G3 criteria handles hoaxes and blatant misinformation as well - no problem. However, the template 4950:

I can see the wording has been changed a thousand times and people are getting sick of it, but how would you feel about something like this?

2989: 2973: 2891: 2882: 2739: 2227: 1158: 1149: 994: 951: 898: 809: 8238: 8223: 8025: 7978: 6794: 6780: 6117: 4838:

of the author" in the template and change it to "on the talk page of the author". The link is misleading readers who constantly clutter the

4220: 457:

accessed. Therefore, i suggest that all speedy deletion templates be retained in the form of a call to this template (with the exception of

133:. It is parameterized, allowing users to add a brief reason as to why the target article is a candidate for speedy deletion. Sample usages: 8121: 8101: 7995: 7161: 6299: 6274: 6157: 5327: 4588:

Not to worry - we all jump to conclusions at times, and go for the first apparent solution rather than trying to find a more elegant one.

4091: 3511:

but they all look white to me. It needs to stand out more than it does so people recognise that the page will most likely be deleted soon.

3202: 2717: 1493: 1466: 1332: 1214: 1201: 1167: 1032: 928: 783: 744: 735: 704: 7724: 6351: 6195: 5845: 4298: 2394:|This page was mistakenly created, no one other than its original author has made substantial edits, and he or she requests its deletion ( 1725: 9266:

to check and see if the talk page is created (granted, there are other ways to post a hangon rationale than by posting to the talk page,

9082: 8813: 8709: 8208: 7818: 7028: 7020: 6993:, and also for A1 and A3. It should show the next time you view one of the templates, but if it doesn't try purging the page. Cheers. 5972: 7770:

to nominate a long-abandoned 'proposed rewrite' of an existing article for deletion? Such pages are generally subpages of the article's

7278:, the original of which was a total copyvio, instead of requesting deletion), but life is too short to do that kind of thing real often. 6357:

parameter which must be passed to db-meta. Maybe I'll just be bold and go ahead and do that, and you can see if it does what you want.

5192: 4122: 2646: 2142: 1059:

These issues would not exist if we choose not to display the templates inside themselves, but instead point out what the template does.

8907: 6857: 6720: 6502: 5097: 4851: 3103: 2747: 1689: 855:

I understand the concern. The focus, though, should not be on the "nocat" tag but the whole "no categorization" implementation (eg. by

488:

doesn't often grow past 200 articles, many of which will be tagged {{delete}} instead of one of the {{db-reason}} descendants anyway. —

8969: 8657: 3810:

use elsewhere as well. In any case, the big difference between history merge and ordinary speedy deletion notices is that the former

3367:

I've speedy closed the nom as invalid: all those templates transclude this one as a general template, so this one cannot be deleted. —

8502: 8146:

is only one master database, so it's impossible with huge MediaWikis like Knowledge to attempt recategorization with every page view.

7450:

Ah, well, in that case I don't see a good reason to mandate a change. Expanded functionality is one thing. But URL is what's used on

6958:

Ah, thanks for that, I was wondering what that extra syntax meant! Also, can you figure out how to change the documentation page at

4393: 4381: 4361: 4349: 1262:

revisions this month to try to address the categorization vs. display vs. accidental non-categorization vs. maintainability issue...

272: 8115:, and it claims that it is, but it isn't really. Purging it doesn't help. If someone were to perform a null edit, it would show up. 6069: 4755: 4086: 3361: 2753: 2270: 8307: 2956: 2758:

Unless we're going to require people to use ugly URL code when they want a space, automatic deletion summary is going to have to go

6133: 4061: 3968: 3220: 7924: 3896: 3758: 3679: 3546: 757:

well-intentioned editors don't inadvertenly break them. At its worst, template programming feels like an evil cross between the

650: 485: 422: 103: 7840:

tags as the last editor of the template itself e.g. "Happy-melon (contribs | logs) 1 months ago" is not terribly interesting. —

7175:}}. The end result provides links to both urls. Perhaps this should be explained in the usage documentation for this template. 6863: 6231: 4244: 2222: 689:. I just spend a couple of hours fixing these templates and null-editing articles, and I'd hate to have to do it again... :) 9120: 9027: 7940: 7035: 6403:

SoWhy: I see what you mean, you mean when clicking the tab on top of the page, not when clicking the "delete" link inside the

5402: 4975: 4968: 4389: 4357: 3974:

It looks ok on Firefox for Mac, but it looks really ugly in Firefox for WinXP. I'll provide a screenshot when I get back home.

3943: 3931: 3919: 3069: 2625: 2252:

If this page obviously does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but

2023: 1903: 582: 562: 534: 8459: 7591: 6820:. Please make the AfD/MfD/TfD links more visible before making that sort of change, thanks (at that font size, does any admin 6495: 6258: 5070:

sometimes screw up when bits of the final product are located in different sub-templates. I think the layout draws attention

3535: 8040:

template (or one of its redirects). It's theoretically enough to do so eight days or so after the template was placed, and a

7972:, and it's OK for those CSD categories that have only a moderate number of pages, but automatic categorization won't happen. 7965: 7824: 6429:. The guys watching that page probably know how to code it. I myself don't know enough javascript to code the thing you want. 2563: 8558: 7983:

Yes, this is inconvenient. Well done for fixing these manually. I wonder if a bot could be employed to run weekly? — Martin

6005:, I believe, since all the templates are currently fully protected, so this is sorta' pointless right now. You can find it 3408: 1810: 1550: 1130: 1063: 874: 769: 724: 693: 662: 7694: 7259: 7248: 6939: 5063: 3111: 2121: 1661: 1600: 646: 480: 369:

It's not a link back to the template though, it's a link to a different template. Anyway, if there's precedent, whatever.

9000:

without ever leaving a hangon rationale, thinking the hangon template alone will save the article. Could we add text like

6928: 6726:

I converted it to use an interwiki prefix, so it shouldn't now trigger the captcha. Can you confirm if this is the case?

3491: 3457: 2148:

Since you're not supposed to call this directly, and all the callers use the form 1=, it doesn't seem to be a problem....

2042:

If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but

1919:

If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but

473: 7225: 6817: 5955: 3765: 3295: 1998: 9322:

also takes a parameter for the reason. Using that parameter should also prevent the display of the red text. Cheers.

5312: 2298: 2288: 6075: 5188: 5107: 4461: 4447: 4280: 3653: 3401: 6652: 5260:. But since it's not generally designed to handle hoaxes since April, might just be better to leave it out, then. -- 4690: 4023:

don't see much difference between the two font sizes in your screenshot, and if anything, the bold-italic text in the

3120:

of the speedy tag rather than with it. Why not add "below this tag" after "the top of the page" in the template text?

2699: 1767: 9408: 9187:

s/posting a rationale/explaining it/ or some such. Omit unnecessary words and use simpler ones in place of jargon. {{

9157: 9040:

If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but

8964: 6705: 3953:(Ps. Titoxd: I'm somewhat curious as to how these look to you? Is there any chance you could provide a screenshot? 3116:

It seems a lot of people contesting the speedy tags think the proper course of action is to place the {{hangon}} tag

2705:

Then perhaps change "article" to {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}||article|{{lc:{{NAMESPACE}}}} page}}? This sounds good to me.

4857:

Done. Seems reasonable. I would think that anybody using this template would know what a talk page is. In any case,

2577: 2418: 1088:

2) Maybe I should have kept my nouth shut and not drawn attention to that side effect earlier in this discussion :)

823:"This creates the possibility of articles being tagged with a speedy deletion tag and remaining tagged indefinitely" 431: 8662: 7964:. I'm looking through those pages from time to time, and just performed a number of null edits on all templates in 7146: 4914: 4825: 1764: 1045:(The chance of this happening accidentally is decreased by requiring the use of a named parameter such as "nocat=") 421:

as a redirect, for consistancy in anming all the speedy deletion templates, and so they will all group together in

111: 6172:. Mistaggings happen frequently, that's why admins review before deleting. There is no need for any change in the 4677:

Please do a null edit with edit summary giving attribution to conform to GFDL and as courtesy. Suggested wording

3089: 2054: 1931: 222:

Some sysops may take the reason blurb at face value, not fully investigating it to make sure the deletion is valid

97: 9198: 8930: 8648:), but the deletion template can be used on any page, so the notification template should probably be rewritten. 8629: 7705:

get messages on my talk page telling me that, but I really couldn't care less, so I'd rather not get messages. --

7587: 7073: 6554:

Oops, I forgot to say this. I agree with Lifebaka, if you (LelandRB or anyone else) want to make a redirect from

6414: 6413:

template. The drop down list of delete reasons on the page that we admins see when deleting a page is handled by

5784: 5776: 5771: 5507: 4789: 4733: 4571: 4181: 3288: 2609: 2110: 1987: 1188:

and don't categorize if we're in the Template namespace? This would allow dependent templates to be kept out of

642: 554: 525: 516: 386: 79: 71: 66: 4626: 4525:

often appears awkwardly. However, why is a modification to the entire template system required when a fix like

4180:(I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and 2897:{{{1|}}}{{{reason|}}}, which is wrapped in urlencode. So that's one deprecated parameter, but who will miss it? 2178: 740:

Cool. I agree that "nocat" support should be added here is well, for consistency. Tread carefully, though...

211:

unilaterally deleted for reasons unstated. I suppose the deleter thought it wasn't such a hot idea. That's okay;

8464: 8057:

A simple visit is not enough, since typically, no information is written to the DB on a visit, not even with a

6843:

The template really needs re-thought. I'll see if I can come up with an alternate layout which satisfies this.

6814: 6491: 6107: 6028: 5272: 5232: 5146: 4121:. The only thing that needs to be checked is that it was really the user with whom it is associated. (See also 4066: 3431:

I think that the only way you're going to have Template standardisation is by standardising templates. : - ) --

2621: 4321: 3831:

Sorry for my indefinite article, by these I meant speedy-templates as a whole, not just history merge ones. —

2425: 2084: 1961: 8329: 8074: 7699: 7532: 7435: 7397: 7355: 7180: 6228: 5369: 3324: 2917: 2630: 2245: 2218: 1479:. Beucase the most elegant solution would be something like {{iff|{{Namespace}}|Template|then=]|else=]}} in 436: 7303: 5558:}} is often anything by simple, and indeed that template deliberately doesn't put pages tagged with it into 4883: 2076: 1953: 110:

a candidate for speedy deletion! Please do not speedily delete it. (If you really don't like it, list it at

9403: 9363: 9302: 9152: 9124: 7902: 7781:

If this isn't legitimate, is there (should there be) any means of having such pages deleted, short of MfD?

6975: 6925: 3558:

I'm getting a bit annoyed at this point, considering having been apart of the TS discussion. The change to

3021: 2275: 1884: 1798:

If you intend to explain why you disagree with the speedy deletion, you may add the text "hangon" with two

1772: 5637:

Sure... though I don't think that uncontroversial is significantly different than non-controversial ;: -->

5199: 4842:, mistaking it for an actual user talk page. Are you aware for any other templates with the same issue? -- 4526: 2775:

I second that. Sadly, there's not a magic word to convert "t h is" into "t_h_is", otherwise we'd be fine.

2125: 2002: 1042:

1) The possibility of articles being tagged with a speedy deletion tag and remaining tagged indefinitely.

296: 8644:

template. The notification template only refers to articles (and it looks like it was only intended for

7788: 7511:

If url works and source works and people can use what's appropriate/comfortable, that sounds ideal. :D --

4427:"This page may meet Knowledge’s criteria for speedy deletion because {{{1}}}. See [[Knowledge:Criteria". 4232: 3541:

The background color should not be white, it should be a light blueish tint. If it is white, you need to

3208: 3038:. The current instructions produce an error, and sends people looking for help. Is it possible to have 2603: 2533: 2496: 1394:

or two. Any changes afterwards should be much easier to implement without possible collateral damage. //

1100: 906: 881: 863: 776: 4974:

It is a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify its subject. According to Knowledge's

4337: 7027:

will be deleted as a misrepresentation of policy, unless there is disagreement here. Please discuss at

6236: 5743: 5456:

Re-jig db-u1, db-empty, db-g7 and db-g6 into category: Candidates for non-controversial speedy deletion

4723: 3882: 2525: 2488: 2152: 1869: 1163:

But it looks to me like it also hides the template appearance from the end user. That is sub-optimal.

38: 6043: 2541: 2500: 2100: 1977: 7746: 7721: 7657: 7536: 7439: 7401: 7359: 7014: 4385: 4353: 3704: 3657: 2639: 243:{{{reason}}} in the actual template. How did you do it without "reason="? ] 23:09, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 149: 87: 9094: 4765:. I do agree that they should be standardised, but I can't decide which style is better. Thoughts? 4728:

I don't know if any admin is using the «deletion» link in the template, they seem obsolete now that

2080: 1957: 124: 9078: 8314:) I could make the bot edit all the pages in the category, rather then the category page itself - 7221: 7176: 7120: 6471: 6225: 5925: 5673: 5576: 5534: 4858: 4839: 4835: 4808: 4214: 4056: 4033: 3993: 3963: 3891: 3854: 3821: 3782: 3753: 3718: 3674: 3633:}}; either the bgcolor parameter should be removed, or it should be changed to match the default {{ 2517: 2480: 2444: 2214: 2139: 1349:

syntax. There should be no problem if the category tags are placed in the individual templates and

1297:

to remove the "notcat" and the un-named parameter, but as a side effect forcing the templates into

615: 9262:@Luna Santin: Another good idea; why not do both? One thing that would be easy would be to add an 9086: 8839:

Sure, all of them sound just as good as each other, but we should try and be consistent I guess -

5716:

beyond the separate treatment of attack pages (the only ones that are truly urgent) is necessary.

4345:

The url does not appear in the user notification. The user notification then looks like this: ...

2092: 1969: 790:

I think that 'nocat' is a very bad idea. It's only reason for existence seems to be that it makes

7872: 7841: 7550: 7244: 7157: 6771:

I added a "urlencode", which should turn the underscores into plus signs. Does that work better?

6613: 6513: 6437: 6347: 6270: 6254: 6093: 5841: 5323: 5308: 4945: 4416:

I propose to change the wording because, when you use the "wording" paramater (parameter 1) on {{

3512: 3170: 3133: 2469: 2406: 2175: 396: 9130: 7152:

for someone to modify the template to allow multiple sources to be listed for cases like these.

4646:?! I guess I have further to go than I thought in learning to be diplomatic! (Note smiley--: --> 4485:

settled on this formatting as the most flexible and useful system. There is in fact absolutely

4376:

without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

3912:

returning previous font size, as the reasoning look really ugly in bold at the current font size

3058:

template in question is used on a talk page? This would solve all occurances of this problem.

574: 8936: 7831: 6896: 6142: 6036: 4934: 4878: 4831: 4672: 4409: 4219:

In order to assist new users who experience speedy deletion of their first article, there is a

3901: 3395: 3332: 3259: 3181: 2659: 2651: 2529: 2492: 2181: 1509: 831:"I worry that this implementation may break something unforeseen, either now or in the future." 641:). Some feedback about the new edit: 1) The dependent templates and pages were not updated, so 415: 253: 191: 1242:

be done with previous implementations of speedy delete templates by subst'ing and editing. //

1076:, there is the possibility that someone might do it intentionally, though I can't fathom why. 9228: 9175: 9164: 9114: 8829: 8809: 8705: 8530: 8519: 8336: 8156: 8067: 7887: 7861: 7611: 7316: 7119:

Exactly. We could use a more prominent link in the templates as a temporary fix. I created a

7109: 6848: 6833: 6733: 6692: 6648: 5991: 5980: 5752: 5627: 5555: 5428: 5383:

For categories that are misnamed by accident, can a reason or new name parameter be added to

5165: 5086: 4772: 4712: 4634: 4603: 4579: 4556: 4536: 4457: 4443: 3874: 3769: 3732: 3630: 3615: 3604: 3388: 2114: 1991: 1859: 341: 47: 17: 9110: 8954:

I noticed that their should simply be a space after the period between "deleted" and "See".

7871:

Okay, can you please come up with something that does hide it on all of the db templates? —

6400:

Coppertwig: I have corrected the "an an album" to instead say "an album" in the edit reason.

3806:

Well, I suppose the histmerge tag does mostly get used on articles, though it probably sees

2806:

Oops, I just checked the formatting section, not the URL section. That sounds fine with me.

2172: 216: 9242:@Nihiltres: that's a good point; how about something like this (change marked in italics): 9044:. If you created this page and you disagree with its proposed speedy deletion, please add: 8063:

Now, we were thinking once that other pages could profit from periodic null edits as well.

7732: 7707: 6383: 6365: 6279:

Yes, this is much better than before, thanks. It no longer breaks Twinkle, for one thing.

5872: 5283: 4686: 4652: 4294: 4268: 4240: 3641: 3611: 3253: 3244: 3234: 2906: 2849: 2832: 2815: 2784: 2714: 2689:

is the speedy deletion template for redundant images, yet it mentions the word "article".--

1760: 288: 157: 9090: 4396:

has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

4364:

has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

2052: 1929: 921:

editing these templates, as the consequences of changing them are subtle and far-reaching.

8: 9194: 8960: 8903: 8844: 8653: 8615: 8601: 8554: 8498: 8411: 8371: 8319: 8274: 8234: 8198: 8136: 8021: 7512: 7461: 7414: 7372: 7217: 7050: 5920: 5697: 5668: 5648: 5596: 5571: 5529: 5505: 5482: 4907: 4847: 4803: 4328: 4309: 4255: 4110: 4051: 4050:

MZMcBride just changed the font size to 95%, so I've added it to the comparison above. —

4028: 3988: 3958: 3886: 3849: 3816: 3777: 3748: 3713: 3669: 3356: 3285: 3209: 2792:

Actually, I just found one. {{urlencode:whatever}}. So could an admin add that instead? -

2559: 2440: 2237: 2136: 1348:) I propose we go with the 'nocat' parameter combined with the usual <includeonly: --> 1197:

Unless it's a Wikimedia software-based "if", I suggest we don't mention that word. ;: -->

714: 672: 549: 512: 363: 4792:, because they've been discussed a lot more, and they are used much more often anyway. — 924:

Now how likely is it that someone will tag an article as {{nn-bio|nocat=}} by mistake?

589: 9328: 8919: 8887: 8741: 8586: 8580: 8395: 8356: 8294: 8287: 8251: 8180: 8116: 8079: 7973: 7559:

has been deprecated and the preferred rationale for deleting bad obsolete redirects is

7501: 7240: 7153: 7131: 7088: 6999: 6948: 6885: 6867: 6790: 6762: 6748: 6716: 6609: 6536: 6509: 6433: 6305: 6280: 6064: 6015: 5967: 5942: 5348: 5337: 5268: 5228: 4172: 4154: 4126: 4081: 3837: 3799: 3691: 3578: 3340:

I've nominated this template for deletion, however, it's protected, so I can't add the

3164: 3159: 3147: 3127: 3122: 2544: 2503: 2383: 2166: 2049: 2027: 1926: 1820: 1648: 1623: 1604: 1580: 1565: 1548: 1536: 1528: 1483: 1442: 1416: 1395: 1373: 1354: 1273: 1243: 1182: 1146: 1022: 984: 970: 941: 888: 856: 837: 799: 679: 630: 599: 471: 429: 405: 6918:. This will make them faster and easier to clear out, as non-controversial cleanup. -- 4679:"Contributors to new version of March 24 were Happy-melon, Coppertwig and Od Mishehu." 4139:

speedy deletion, it's wise to take a moment and look around, even for a user page. --

2051: 1928: 586: 322: 9282:

If you have left a message at the talkpage but this message is still showing up, try

8985: 8191:

will add pages which are tagged more recently then seven days to the category. Right?

7936: 7528: 7460:, people are familiar with it, consistency is good, and it seems functional as is. -- 7431: 7393: 7351: 6407: 6315: 5183: 5136: 4931: 4793: 4752: 3484: 3377: 2863: 2797: 2765: 2592: 2376: 2329: 2324:

deletion or on plans to add to the article so that it no longer meets those criteria.

1107: 833:). Unless there's a very good reason for the added complexity, it should be dropped. 579: 492: 383: 8715:

Sounds like a plan to me. Unless anyone objects, I'll make the relevant changes to

8640:

or any of its redirects, the link in the template suggests notifying users with the

5110:

for putting in a function to automatically hide copyvio content when the either the

2057: 1934: 1489:, and no category tags in the dependent templates, and no hidden parameters needed. 1123:, and editors want to know what a template does before they attach it to an article. 9222: 9169: 9034:%5B%5BWP%3ACSD%23%7B%7B%7BCRITERION%7D%7D%7D%7C%7B%7B%7BCRITERION%7D%7D%7D%5D%5D%3A 8823: 8805: 8701: 8566: 8513: 8346: 8009: 7881: 7855: 7800:

If the page the rewrite is for does not exist anymore, then G8 can be applied ("...

7764: 7648: 7605: 7454: 7312: 7289: 7230: 7103: 6972: 6922: 6844: 6829: 6727: 6686: 6644: 6579: 6153: 6129: 5985: 5621: 5422: 5246: 5208: 5124: 5080: 5059: 4766: 4706: 4630: 4597: 4575: 4552: 4530: 4453: 4439: 4317: 4072: 3878: 3773: 3744: 3649: 3542: 3042: 3032: 3018: 2970: 2961:

It isn't meant to be used, particularly. It's part of the magic that makes all the

2391: 2058: 2036:%5B%5BWP%3ACSD%23%7B%7B%7BCRITERION%7D%7D%7D%7C%7B%7B%7BCRITERION%7D%7D%7D%5D%5D%3A 1935: 1913:%5B%5BWP%3ACSD%23%7B%7B%7BCRITERION%7D%7D%7D%7C%7B%7B%7BCRITERION%7D%7D%7D%5D%5D%3A 1705: 1671: 1518: 960: 531: 307: 6058:

I don't see how this is necessary or useful. I'm open to be convinced, however.

5919:}} and write out the reason rather than picking a numbered db-* tag at random. — 9384: 9380:

No one has really objected, so I implemented both of the changes (to this and to

9316: 9214: 9071: 8994: 8943: 8058: 8045: 7812: 7337: 7042: 6776: 6673: 6453: 6379: 6361: 6330: 6203: 6189: 5888: 5868: 5816: 5721: 5114: 4682: 4648: 4508: 4290: 4264: 4236: 4228: 4198: 4019:

I'm guessing the upper box is 100% and the lower 92%? That's interesting, since

3640:

Second, the background color of speedy deletion templates should be specified in

3415: 3400:

Please revert the template to the previous style. The discussions leading to the

3241: 3082: 2929: 2898: 2841: 2824: 2807: 2776: 2706: 2612: 2200: 1781: 1749: 758: 654: 540:

Instead of risking reputation, you could have just done this on your userpage or

461: 446: 284: 179: 130: 8645: 8576: 8174:{{#switch:{{age switch|d={{{1}}}}}|0=]|1={{{category|]]}}}|-1={{{category|]}}}}} 7560: 7556: 5912: 5908: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5751:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5551: 4980: 4746: 4738: 4118: 2840:

Nevermind, after testing it, the magic word that Amarkov suggested was correct.

2396: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

9188: 8899: 8861: 8840: 8788: 8756: 8729: 8719: 8690: 8676: 8649: 8611: 8597: 8550: 8539: 8494: 8473: 8454: 8407: 8367: 8315: 8270: 8230: 8218: 8194: 8132: 8096: 8041: 8017: 8013: 7990: 7961: 7911: 7775: 7689: 7666: 7636: 7581: 7567: 7255: 7198: 7046: 6962: 6904: 6636: 6589: 6559: 6176: 6121: 6113: 5830: 5689: 5640: 5588: 5496: 5474: 5443: 5398: 5387: 5374: 5292: 5175: 5155: 4898: 4843: 4520: 4500: 4492: 4432: 4417: 4402: 4140: 3740: 3703:

which might not be a bad thing at all. (Just consider how much more cluttered

3634: 3589: 3564: 3550: 3505: 3496: 3441: 3432: 3405: 3313: 3281: 3227: 3217: 3199: 3100: 3075: 3066: 2732: 2568: 2555: 2365: 2295: 2285: 2267: 2104: 1981: 1730: 826: 545: 506: 360: 335: 260: 231: 118: 247:

which is the only minor quibble I have with your substubs :-)</tangent: -->

9323: 8914: 8882: 8736: 7632: 7496: 7236: 7190: 7126: 7083: 7060: 7032: 6994: 6943: 6880: 6786: 6758: 6744: 6712: 6659: 6627: 6531: 6246: 6217: 6059: 6010: 5962: 5937: 5333: 5261: 5221: 4890: 4251: 4224: 4190: 4076: 3832: 3794: 3686: 3614:

where it belongs. As far as I can tell, the only template that uses it is {{

3573: 3142: 2574: 2346: 2191: 1839: 1826: 1807: 1722: 1620: 1577: 1545: 1304: 1142: 1073: 938: 885: 834: 796: 596: 468: 426: 9280:

at the talkpage explaining why you think the article should not be deleted.

9104: 5826:

This could be done — it's already implemented with the wording paramater on

5005:

directly below this tag, and then explain why you disagree on the article's

3501:

Is there any way we can change the colour back to pink? Had a quick look at

8976: 8596:

I endorse that change, and don't think anything beyond that need be done -

7932: 7521: 7424: 7386: 7344: 6663: 6207: 6002: 5687:

delete. db-move also fairly non/uncontroversial when used appropriately. –

5257: 5131: 4871: 4862: 3747:}} at all; it's a pretty different case from the other speedy templates. — 3477: 3369: 3344: 3291: 2888: 2879: 2859: 2793: 2761: 2754:

having any spaces or punctuation is breaking the automatic deletion summary

2683: 2585: 1626: 1583: 1294: 1099:

3) Add the issue of the depedent templates, and "illustrative" pages like

944: 891: 840: 818: 802: 602: 541: 489: 380: 280: 248:). Still, I think this is worth a try. Anyway, for unnamed parameters: use 8564:

Perhaps "... and there is no plausible assertion that the file is ..."? --

8508:

I agree that the documentation is a bit of a bitch; it probably needs its

8073:

for example is placed on some pages that aren't edited regularly, like on

5468:, adding pages tagged with db-move or db-g6 into a single category called 4751:». It's inconsistent and makes it more difficult to read deletion logs. — 4529:

will do the job much more easily and without breaking 42 other templates?

1312:, and as a side effect hiding the template appearance on the template page 9392: 9352: 9291: 9141: 8637: 8549:

assertions that the file is free. However those claims are simply bogus.

7644: 7285: 6969: 6919: 6343: 6304:

Lifebaka suggested, I should ask here. So, to copy from what I posted to

6266: 6250: 6149: 6125: 6089: 5916: 5860: 5837: 5319: 5304: 5055: 4313: 4235:

which is where the suggestion is made (somewhere in that long thread). --

4008: 3975: 3052: 3015: 3011: 2966: 2617: 2361:

our instructions to provide a procedure, but then leave huge holes in it.

2282:

there's good reason for treating others than original authors differently

1739: 1696: 1667:

by the template, will be sent to a new article. For example, if I placed

1490: 1463: 1452: 1329: 1287: 1280: 1266: 1211: 1198: 1164: 1155: 1127: 1111: 1092: 1081: 1060: 1029: 1009: 991: 925: 871: 780: 766: 741: 732: 721: 701: 690: 659: 328: 314: 302: 299: 4627:

that a similar change was summarily shot down on db-meta/new a month ago

4250:

You've had no further feedback on it, here or there. It may be time for

639:

Category_talk:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion#Fixing_a_categorization_bug

8306:

Oh, and if you add a category to one of the categories (e.g. you added

7807: 7784: 6772: 6668: 6448: 6325: 6184: 5812: 5717: 4732:

can guess most reasons, but I wonder why the wording is different from

4303: 4194: 3572:

Agree with Ryan above, fades in the background on non-article pages. —

2727: 2458: 2415: 1791:

it with {{hangon}}, which may potentially derail the deletion process.

1686: 3440:

I've disabled the editprotected request while discussion continues. --

2266:

speedy it, right? Should the wording of this tag reflect that fact? -

1599:

There's no reason not to use a metatemplate in this case. None of the

9274:

template would display some big ugly red text saying something like "

8450: 8214: 8092: 7986: 7685: 5439: 5394: 3712:; it might be better to wait and see what comes out of that first. — 3096: 3062: 1154:

If that works, great. Let's see what the implmentation looks like.

332: 257: 228: 190:

Oddly enough, I came up with the exact same idea several days ago at

115: 8293:

s, and they should be placed in a parent category of the same name.

5393:

so people know where the category is being moved/renamed? Thanks, --

4348:

without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation,

9042:

do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself

3710:

Knowledge talk:Article message boxes#Alerts to external discussions

2345:

I was just trying to distinguish two cases: someone speedy tagging

2254:

do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself

2044:

do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself

1921:

do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself

909:. Now all the dependant speedy deletion templates are included in 762: 8784:, I suggest we standardize on that. If that is the plan then only 7208:. I don't think this is appropriate, because these articles lack 6042:

Hello, sir. I would like to add a live search link to the page at

5151:

I've notice recently that quite a few pages are being tagged with

8898:

Things like this are a fantastic way to break user scripts.... --

8391: 8112: 8049: 7969: 7957: 6911: 6342:

I have no idea how to do this, but think it would be worthwhile.

5559: 5001:, and you disagree with its proposed speedy deletion, please add 4995:

on the User Talk page of the main contributor(s) to this article.

2692: 2338:

the phrase "that may be necessary". Why was the earlier version

1459: 1308: 1298: 1269:

adding displayonly= to prevent miscategorization of the templates

1189: 1140:

without using the nocat trick, just by using <includeonly: -->

1137: 1120: 910: 867: 686: 4263:

Yes, please! I was just about to ask you if you would! :-) --

4193:

pages in their own userspace anyway. I have reverted your edit.

1438:

This doesn't work right, because if someone tags an article wih

1319:

Let's discuss proposed changes here, and try to reach consensus

1290:

to standardize on "nocat=" in addiotion to the unnamed parameter

1283:

to fix error in above edit that prevented article categorization

8575:

I've added "credible" since that it also the qualifier used in

8406:

one, please do let me know. Thanks for your help Amalthea :) -

7019:

Hi all. Following the repeal of CSD T1 following discussion at

5182:

problem at all - but I thought I'd bring it up for discussion.

3743:}}. I'm wondering whether that template really ought to use {{ 3473: 2424:

I've gone ahead and added the "self" parameter as discussed at

870:

is a minor nuisance, so feel free to revert all these changes.

752:

An interesting property of "nocat" is that it could be used to

5011:

Do not remove this notice if you are the creator of this page.

3157:

Well I'd do it, but I can't edit fully protected pages...yet.

6421:. As I understand it the addition you want would be added in 6222:

Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G12 wording again

6046:

just where google is listed, giving live seach hits, please.

5460:

Anyone think it would be a good idea to merge the categories

4123:

Template talk:Db-userreq#does this really need to be checked?

3088:

allowing usage on talk pages without warnings or parameters,

283:

is a redirect. Can we shorten it to avoid typing "because"?

9139:

Or is that too off-putting? Feel free to tweak the wording.

4978:, such articles are eligible to be removed immediately (see 3191: 1677:

on this page and then followed the link, I would be sent to

937:

Hm, interesting. Shouldn't "includeonly" take care of that?

331:

as a redirect to this template for those fond of shorthand.

8048:

edit. You could even check first if the page is already in

7275: 6148:

can an admin please add to Db-g3 content similar to Db-g1?

4741:: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page 3240:

is obvious - assuming this is the correct template to use.

2540:, and any revisions of the speedy deletion criteria before 2190:

is documented here below the example for some days now. --

1178:

A new suggestion: can we use an "if" template to check the

1053:(This is always a possibility in the implementation so far) 595:

Done, and please whack that rules lawyer with a wet trout.

6942:) can be made not to include into the category. Cheers. 6818:

rejection of speedy because admin didn't spot the AfD link

6816:. The new location of the AfD link was way too small. See 6216:

The wording on the template does not match the wording at

3906:

Titoxd recently edited the template to wrap the text in a

2667:

I'm concerned about this particular line in the template:

2573:

I edited the wrong window's wiki. I'm sorry about that. --

2056: 2050: 1933: 1927: 563: 198:{{deletebecause|this page may qualify as patent nonsense}} 9338:

Ah, I see... so the code would have to be something like

9283: 9277: 7968:

which is why there are suddenly a couple of templates in

6074:

Please remove Google or add other searchengines as well.

4784:

I would simply make all the reasons in db-... templates (

3545:. Regarding a color change, you'll have to take it up on 3280:

This makes it clearer when speedying user pages. Thanks!

2857:

That's good. Now why won't an admin come and do it? : -->

1865:

for awhile now. Should probably remove all/any old tags.

530:

From a friend and myself to help relieve the wikistress.

8579:. Anything beyond that will probably need discussion at 8207:

Yes, ones which have tagged less than 4 days ago are in

6938:, so that non-deletion uses of the template (such as at 3586:

Knowledge talk:Template standardization#Speedy templates

3028:

This seems worth fixing, particularly in the context of

129:

This template is an alternative (not a replacement!) to

8245:

Category:Knowledge pages in need of frequent null edits

8150:

Category:Knowledge pages in need of frequent null edits

7380:

If something is a copyright violation from a book, you

6914:, but I tweaked it so that it's also putting them into 5618:

Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion

3739:; this makes it look like a standard "serious"-level {{ 2409:

to read existing discussion and put your two cents in.

569:

_pages-Older_discussions-2005-12-17T12:50:00.000Z": -->

564:

_pages-Older_discussions-2005-12-17T12:50:00.000Z": -->

379:

The self-referential link was corrected on 22 Aug 05.

9276:

you have not edited the article talk page yet, please

8162:, to place every page using it into the category. The 7730:

Never mind that, I found a solution to the problem. --

5214:

would be a good way to handle it? It'd take a little

4431:

it's the sort of task I enjoy). I also noticed that {{

3621:

I'd therefore like to make the following suggestions:

279:

A good idea, (get rid of all those substubs) but e.g.

8857:

Since there's been no objections, I've added code to

7413:

URL function, but adding alternatives. Am I right? --

6862:

I have begun archiving old discussions under Db-meta

5554:

belong in this category: in particular, handling a {{

5041: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5006: 4027:(100%) box feels a little bit more readable to me. — 2553:

couldn't hurt. And avoiding acronyms never hurts. --

1889:

This template breaks when a link is used in {{{1}}}:

295:

I like the idea, this type of idea makes me wish for

8535:

I think this part needs to be removed/replaced from

7923:

etc.) to the template so that the category links to

5867:be one to support deleting the free-form template. 5318:

As there are no objections I have made this change.

4481:

been completely overhauled, during which exhaustive

1106:

It was recently suggested that we should be "making

6809:

new position for AfD link at Db-g4 was not visiblel

6118:

Knowledge:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Non-criteria

6116:for a suspected hoax (Men's White League), whereas 4285:A modification to this template is being discussed 2280:

Hmmm. Gene Nygaard reverted me with the summary: "

1136:Note that it's easy to keep these templates out of 1050:2) The possibility of the category being replaced. 203:{{deletebecause|I no longer use this user subpage}} 9064:without posting a rationale at the talk page will 9016:or something, making the template look like this: 9008:without posting a rationale at the talk page will 8772:. (I have now looked at the lot.) The former uses 8030:Yes, I'd like that, all pages that transclude the 7946:I don't mind, but this will have the same problem 2211:{{db-meta|1=Don't believe they're notable per ].}} 1802:into the article, following the {{db-reason}} tag. 568: 8152:could be simply added to the includeonly area of 7265:Rochelle-Park-Rochelle-Heights Historic District‎ 4802:the rest should at least have a similar style. — 2823:Wait, wouldn't {{anchorencode:stuff}} be better? 2186:, no idea what all the other db-whatever do. The 779:can be done even without "nocat", meh heh) :: --> 209:The template has since been accidentally deleted 9342:{{#ifexist:Talk:{{PAGENAME}}| |{{#if:{{{1|}}}| | 8328:How then do I register the actual category page 7573:be updated to reflect this. It currently reads 6743:Yes, it no longer triggers the captcha. Thanks! 6526:G2 does fit better, yes. If you want to do it, 5470:Candidates for non-controversial speedy deletion 9220:itself might make that text more noticeable. – 8312:Category:Page requiring null edits every 2 days 8267:Category:Page requiring null edits every 2 days 8263:Category:Page requiring null edits every 1 days 7921:= {{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}} + 4 days }}| 7836:This part of the template should be wrapped by 5519:I'm a bit of two minds about this. In theory, 5462:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion by user 4745:Author requested deletion or blanked the page ( 2234:Knowledge:Administrators%27_noticeboard#CAT:CSD 1345:Wait, what? removed nonsensical own text. : --> 219:: we don't want to create more work for anybody 7662:Could we put an automatic 4-day time delay on 6503:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion#General 5852:The main "db" template - do we really need it? 5526:Category:Candidates for simple speedy deletion 5242:Nevermind, I could've sworn there was still a 4989:If you nominated this page for speedy deletion 4551:(note: I wasn't aware of that overhauling). -- 1206:You're right. But it would have been such an 138:{{deletebecause|this page is patent nonsense}} 7956:has, meaning that they will not be placed in 4625:(Looking at the linked discussion, I noticed 3423: 3350:template to it. Could this be added, please? 2309:of it might be headed in the right direction. 145:(db is a shorthand redirect to this template) 93:Discussions about an old very different state 8380:Yes, and yes. You can currently try it with 7756:Would this be a legitimate usage of Db-talk? 7329:Suggested change of url parameter for db-g12 7304:Knowledge:BAN#Enforcement_by_reverting_edits 4834:}} Please remove the link from text "on the 2439:undoubtedly have this different wording. -- 821:has expressed some worries on my talk page ( 8512:documentation! I've added the new syntax. 8209:Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion 7254:Interesting question. The documentation at 7029:Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion 7021:Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion 4254:. Would you like me to go ahead with it? -- 3230:incident, I decided that the rationale for 880:Okay, done. If necessary, people could fix 8352:are sitting on a number of category pages. 6595:, but that doesn't hinder a redirect from 5961:throwing the thought out there. Cheers. 5568:Category:History merge for speedy deletion 4435:}} addresses this on a different manner. 4071:Something I'm starting to see a lot of on 2726:Done, also changed the "the" to a "this". 213:I have some reservations about it myself: 9251:explaining why the article should be kept 7495:works (checked in that order). Cheers. 4377: 4171:them; that would be instruction creep. — 2611:the order of the instructions for adding 2304:I don't have any big problem with merely 1601:reasons against the use of meta-templates 1258:: These templates have alll been through 8308:Category:Knowledge behavioral guidelines 8243:Well, except that it's not adding it to 7929:Category:Empty pages for speedy deletion 7206:Category:Empty pages for speedy deletion 7204:was recently changed to put articles in 7041:Why delete? Why not just redirect it to 6916:Category:Empty pages for speedy deletion 5793:Should db-g3 have a rationale parameter? 5466:Category:Empty pages for speedy deletion 2675:should not be deleted on its talk page." 2364:I remain confused why you reverted me. - 1514:An easy solution would be to move it to 1141:appropriately. I'll go do that now ... 7925:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion 7672:in a similar way to the 7-day delay of 7597:Er, that's pretty much exactly what it 5016:If you are not the creator of this page 3547:Knowledge talk:Template standardisation 651:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion 486:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion 423:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion 104:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion 14: 7623:Addition for author's warning template 7167:I have had success using {{db-g12|url= 5749:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5616:Yuck!! Less is always more: how about 4788:parameter) the same as the reasons in 4572:Fixed Db-g6, same wording as db-reason 4477:The CSD templates have literally only 2671:"and then explain why you believe the 2432:{{db-meta|Deletion tag text|self=yes}} 271:I think this is a fantastic idea. -- 227:Still, it might be worth a trial run. 102:This template should not appear under 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 9036: 6501:Don't you mean the G2 criterion? See 6425:. Thus you should ask for it over at 5684:deliberation. i.e. UBX migration: --> 3776:}}, neatly sidestepping the issue. — 2228:Need for stronger request for reasons 2038: 2022:This talk page may meet Knowledge's 1915: 1902:This talk page may meet Knowledge's 980:as a candidate article would include 9257:keep the article from being deleted. 9068:keep the article from being deleted. 9012:keep the article from being deleted. 7966:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:db-t3 7260:Knowledge:Template messages/Deletion 6940:Knowledge:Template messages/Deletion 6300:Link db-album to A9 in the dropdown? 5856:Do we honestly really need the main 5730: 4952: 4233:Knowledge talk:CSD#Speed of speedies 4227:to put a link from this template to 4092:Please adjust the logic for self=yes 4007:. 92% and 95% look identical to me. 3908:<div style="font-size: 92%;": --> 2887:Actually, it seems done already. -- 2426:Template talk:Db-author#Poor_wording 2014: 1894: 1307:to prevent the templates going into 1091:Alas, the Pandora's Box was opened! 647:Knowledge:Template messages/Deletion 481:Knowledge:Avoid using meta-templates 25: 8780:. As two of the four templates use 8012:do this, although it may require a 7960:automatically, but that it needs a 5802:this and link to the relevant page. 4999:If you are the creator of this page 4993:{{subst:empty-warn|Title|header=1}} 3264:Please replace the following line: 1721:page. At least it's consistent. -- 23: 9210:As an alternative, some tweaks to 9033: 8044:edit is enough, it doesn't need a 7031:if you disagree with this repeal. 6858:Archiving old template discussions 6245:copyright violations should go to 5108:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) 5098:Auto hide text on post of template 4967:This page is being considered for 3588:, it looks like they're on it. -- 2748:Please remove the reasonlink stuff 2499:, and any revisions of CSD before 2035: 1912: 1825:doesn't match any db-whatever. -- 1458:, the article does not wind up in 1353:in the db-reason metatemplate. // 24: 9419: 8172:template could do something like: 6910:was only putting categories into 6658:I suggest you rather ask this at 6643:to normal operations. Thanks. -- 6001:There's an ongoing discussion at 5104:Knowledge talk:Copyright problems 5102:A discussion has been ongoing at 710:We can use the approach found in 9026:This page may meet Knowledge’s 7309:a case-by-case basis what to do. 6984: 6163: 6050: 5734: 5409: 4957: 4921: 4697: 4468: 4231:. I suggest discussing this at 4135:That's not necessarily true. In 4097: 4003:Sorry for the delay. Here's the 3463: 3301: 3190: 2999: 112:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 29: 9072:help writing your first article 7774:page, so are impermissible for 7371:Hi. :) What's the rationale? -- 7074:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown 6415:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown 5472:(or something of the sorts) ? – 5198:I've removed it. It was added 4790:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown 4734:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown 4338:Wrong parameter on user message 3942:This page may meet Knowledge’s 3930:This page may meet Knowledge’s 3918:This page may meet Knowledge’s 3644:. I'd suggest creating a new " 2428:; using this template like so: 1323:doing another round of editing 1103:being incorrectly categorized. 643:Knowledge:Template messages/All 9264:{{#ifexist:Talk:{{PAGENAME}}}} 7880:Why? It's not doing any harm. 7760:Would it be legitimate to use 6845:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 6134:10:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 6070:18:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 6021:14:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5997:07:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5973:15:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 5948:19:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 5931:18:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 5877:16:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 5821:10:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 4087:03:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 4062:20:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 4039:23:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4015:23:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 3999:18:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3982:15:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3969:13:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3897:22:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 3860:13:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 3840:00:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 3827:13:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3802:03:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3788:02:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3759:00:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3731:I've gone ahead and changed {{ 3724:18:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3694:22:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3680:21:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3593:05:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3581:03:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3568:23:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3554:18:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3536:17:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3492:15:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3458:05:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3445:16:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3436:15:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3427:13:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3409:08:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3048:show {{hangon|tp=1}} when the 2369:17:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 2333:13:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 2299:23:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2289:22:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 2271:20:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1539:23:24, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 633:18:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 13: 1: 8460:08:22, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 8390:, which is supposed to be in 8330:Category:Requests for unblock 8075:Category:Requests for unblock 7825:This page was last edited by… 7617:20:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 7592:15:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 7226:15:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 7162:00:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 7139:21:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 7115:19:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 7096:19:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 7064:05:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 7055:01:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 7036:01:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 7005:19:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 6979:16:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 6954:06:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 6929:05:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 6891:22:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 6874:21:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 6813:I reverted a change at Db-g4 6795:13:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 6781:07:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 6767:00:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 6753:23:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 6739:08:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 6721:04:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 6698:23:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 6680:23:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 6653:23:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 6460:15:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 6442:04:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 6388:01:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 6370:01:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 6352:00:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 5342:03:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 4332:17:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 4322:17:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 4299:01:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 4176:04:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 2647:21:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC) 2626:22:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 1651:02:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1634:22:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 1607:14:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 1591:10:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 1568:22:13, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1551:21:30, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1494:22:24, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1467:22:14, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1419:21:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1398:21:05, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1376:19:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1357:09:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1333:05:50, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1246:05:24, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1215:05:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1202:05:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1168:04:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1159:04:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1150:04:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1131:04:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1064:04:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1033:03:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 995:03:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 952:03:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 929:03:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 899:03:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 875:22:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 848:18:32, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 810:18:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 784:03:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 770:02:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 745:02:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 736:02:14, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 725:23:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 705:13:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 694:12:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 663:12:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 610:01:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 584:12:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 186:. ] 21:25, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 9028:criteria for speedy deletion 7920:{{ #ifexpr:{{#time:U}} : --> 7543:16:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 7520:Yeah, something like that. 7516:15:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 7507:15:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 7465:02:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 7446:01:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 7418:00:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 7408:22:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 7376:22:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 7366:21:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 7321:22:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 7294:03:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 7249:01:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 7185:07:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 6852:09:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 6838:21:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 6618:21:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 6542:18:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 6518:04:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 6496:00:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 6337:09:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 6292:15:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 6275:13:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 6259:11:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 6232:06:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 6098:13:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 5887:mostly harmless: tagging an 5846:13:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 5360:03:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 4976:criteria for speedy deletion 4592:haven't been blocked for it 4505:) and "deletion, as it..." ( 4380:. As a copyright violation, 4273:00:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC) 4259:15:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 4245:00:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 4203:15:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 4158:03:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 4144:02:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 4130:02:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 3944:criteria for speedy deletion 3932:criteria for speedy deletion 3920:criteria for speedy deletion 2598:02:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 2578:01:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 2564:19:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 2122:07:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 2024:criteria for speedy deletion 1999:07:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 1904:criteria for speedy deletion 1690:09:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 1662:Problem with these templates 1038:Some remaining issues are: 7: 9289:". Or something like that. 8735:in a day or two. Cheers. 6196:08:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 6158:05:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 6084:15:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 5956:Move-protect the templates? 5726:08:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 5705:23:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5679:22:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5656:22:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5633:21:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5604:18:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5582:18:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5540:17:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5513:15:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5490:15:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 5328:14:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 5106:as well as being posted at 5024:, please remember to check 5022:If you are an administrator 3873:As of a few minutes ago, {{ 3216:not categorized. Cheers. -- 2520:, please remember to check 2462:13:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2449:05:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2419:04:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 2388:is currently equivalent to 2241:22:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1101:Knowledge:Template messages 907:Knowledge:Template messages 905:This not just an issue for 882:Knowledge:Template messages 864:Knowledge:Template messages 862:The unwanted appearance of 535:03:56, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 519:20:40, August 9, 2005 (UTC) 387:13:29, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 106:-- this template itself is 98:Do not delete this template 10: 9424: 9409:04:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 7819:16:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 7795:16:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 7750:03:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 7725:02:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 7635:article, which requires a 6711:tagging pages for speedy. 6562:, then feel free to do so. 5448:18:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 5434:13:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 5204:Perhaps adding it to just 4497:), "deletion. It was..." ( 4281:Proposal to update db-meta 4095: 3883:Template talk:Db-histmerge 3383:20:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 3362:19:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 2990:03:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 2974:21:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 2957:13:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 2910:19:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2892:05:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2883:05:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2868:23:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2853:19:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2836:18:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2819:18:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2802:17:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2788:06:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2770:05:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 1768:06:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 1679:Template talk talk:Db-meta 1108:MediaWiki feature requests 956:No, because (for example) 775:(Ah yes, but such an evil 496:18:50, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 474:17:23, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 432:22:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 319:05:53, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC) 297:m:Extended template syntax 254:m:Help:Template#Parameters 9369:11:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 9334:05:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 9308:03:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 9234:06:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 9203:04:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 9181:13:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 9158:22:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 8980:03:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 8975:Should be fixed now. --- 8970:01:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 8925:04:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC) 8908:19:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 8893:15:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 8620:18:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 8606:12:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 8592:12:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 8571:04:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 8559:04:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 8416:16:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8401:16:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8376:14:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8362:14:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8324:14:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8300:14:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8279:14:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8257:13:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 8239:19:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8224:18:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8203:18:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8186:17:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8141:16:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8122:17:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8102:14:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 8085:11:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 7695:14:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 7653:22:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 7263:parameter. When I tagged 6706:External link in template 5403:23:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 5313:19:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 5278:18:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 5238:18:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 5193:18:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 5092:18:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 5064:17:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 4940:08:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 4915:07:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 4886:should be undone because 4866:16:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 4852:16:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 4718:15:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 4691:15:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 4657:15:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 4639:17:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 4609:16:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 4584:16:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 4561:15:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 4542:14:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 4462:15:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 4448:15:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 4106:This template is used in 3910:, with the edit summary " 3768:a complete redesign of {{ 3705:User:ProtectionBot/Delete 3658:User:ProtectionBot/Delete 3654:speedy deletion templates 3319:20:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 3296:23:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 3248:15:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 3104:07:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 2925:Db-meta suggests putting 2740:12:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2718:02:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 2700:02:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2250:The tag currently says: " 2195:07:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 2156:05:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 2143:01:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 1830:00:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1726:00:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1535:everyone else agrees. // 1471:It really is a pity that 1110:rather than kludging" :) 401:I moved this template to 338:01:52, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) 275:22:59, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 121:01:35, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) 8849:16:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 8835:11:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 8814:06:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 8747:22:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 8710:22:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 8658:23:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 8525:10:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 8503:00:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 8026:09:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 7996:17:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 7979:16:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 7941:15:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 7893:15:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 7876:10:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 7867:15:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 7845:14:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 7577:It should probably read 7212:, but often do not lack 7147:db-g12 and multiple URLs 5685:check transclusions: --> 5202:and stuck around since. 5142:20:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 4859:Knowledge:User talk page 4840:Knowledge:User talk page 4826:unlink WP:User talk page 4814:22:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 4797:20:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 4778:20:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 4756:16:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 4424:, to be fucking honest. 4390:speedy deletion criteria 4358:speedy deletion criteria 3402:template standardisation 3221:22:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 3203:03:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 3173:02:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 3153:00:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 3136:19:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 3070:00:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 2223:07:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 1873:14:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 1843:08:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 1811:23:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 1311:using <noinclude: --> 376:12:30, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) 366:02:37, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC) 354:22:33, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC) 291:23:20, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 263:23:32, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 234:22:08, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 184:User:Mike Storm/sandbox2 170:User:Mike Storm/sandbox2 8642:Template:nn-warn-reason 8631:Template:Nn-warn-reason 8111:should currently be in 6427:MediaWiki talk:Sysop.js 4861:isn't too helpful. --- 4384:appears to qualify for 4352:appears to qualify for 3946:. The given reason is: 3934:. The given reason is: 3922:. The given reason is: 2878:Where should it go? -- 2407:Template_talk:Db-author 1855:Thanks! And it's been 143:{{db|unused user page}} 9349: 9259: 9014: 8465:updating documentation 6112:Someone recently used 6108:Content of G3 template 6029:Edit protected request 5147:Nonsense Vs. Vandalism 4370:instead of like this: 4067:Authors blanking pages 3772:}} that doesn't use {{ 3629:needs to be done to {{ 3014:13:52, 24 April 2007 ( 2642:, what's the point??? 2435: 2164:I've only fixed it in 2067:Administrators: check 1944:Administrators: check 192:Template:deletebecause 9339: 9243: 9002: 8931:Editprotected request 8877:to allow them to use 7700:Notification template 7637:neutral point of view 6934:I stuck it inside of 6785:Much better, cheers-- 6585:already redirects to 5897:blanked by its author 5893:non-notable biography 5747:of past discussions. 5200:back in February 2007 4644:"Summarily shot down" 3325:Editprotected request 3074:Resolved. Thanks to 2918:Hangon and talk pages 2631:Why does it say this? 2622:Now on editor review! 2616:deleting the page? -- 2429: 2246:Removing a speedy tag 2153:William Allen Simpson 1870:William Allen Simpson 178:be a replacement for 42:of past discussions. 18:Template talk:Db-meta 8804:need to be changed. 8014:request for approval 7903:Suggestion for Db-c1 7838:<includeonly: --> 6824:look at them? :D ). 5546:Also, I don't think 5303:. Comments, please. 5288:I propose to change 4378:http://wikipedia.org 3877:}} no longer uses {{ 3844:Okay, sorry, then I 2483:, remember to check 2474:I'd like to change: 1885:Usage broken w/links 1711:18:17, 10 March 2006 978:exactly the same way 467:as mentioned above. 158:Template talk:Delete 125:Why this page exists 8822:sounds good to me. 8610:That works for me. 7479:So, something like 7333:I'd like to change 7177:Steamroller Assault 7072:Harmonization with 6556:Template:Db-sandbox 6226:CambridgeBayWeather 5662:My point was that, 4310:km:Template:Db-meta 3210:Template:Db-userreq 2922:{{editprotected}} 2604:Minor wording tweak 2352:don't disagree with 2312:One problem is the 2215:Consumed Crustacean 217:m:Instruction creep 150:Original discussion 9163:Looks good to me. 9103:Consider checking 7137: 7094: 6423:MediaWiki:Sysop.js 6419:MediaWiki:Sysop.js 6237:I9 requiring a URL 5882:While it probably 4730:MediaWiki:Sysop.js 4724:Prefilled wpReason 3112:Regarding "Hangon" 2965:speedy templates. 2167:Template:Db-reason 1735:Please do not use 194:. Example usages: 9407: 9367: 9312:Just noting, but 9306: 9287: 9284:purging this page 9232: 9167: 9156: 9137: 9136: 9133: 9129: 8990:People often add 8968: 8458: 8222: 8109:Template:BAB-A-NL 8100: 7994: 7693: 7658:Suggestion for C1 7541: 7540: 7444: 7443: 7406: 7405: 7364: 7363: 7124: 7081: 7015:Deletion of db-t1 5983: 5929: 5790: 5789: 5759: 5758: 5753:current talk page 5677: 5580: 5538: 5301:User:Stifle/Db-i9 5276: 5236: 5191: 5140: 5051: 5050: 4937: 4812: 4312:to the bottom. -- 4186: 4060: 4037: 3997: 3967: 3895: 3858: 3825: 3786: 3757: 3722: 3678: 3543:bypass your cache 3373: 3360: 3294: 2988: 2955: 2866: 2800: 2768: 2736: 2624: 2589: 2399: 2133: 2132: 2129: 2119: 2010: 2009: 2006: 1996: 1794:I'm considering: 1477:considered harmul 1347: 649:reappeared under 88:Older discussions 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 9415: 9400: 9396: 9389: 9383: 9360: 9356: 9347: 9345: 9321: 9315: 9299: 9295: 9288: 9281: 9273: 9265: 9248: 9225: 9221: 9219: 9213: 9191: 9165: 9149: 9145: 9128: 9117: 9115:Also-Happy-melon 9076: 9063: 9050: 9038: 9035: 9019: 9018: 9007: 8999: 8993: 8958: 8948: 8942: 8880: 8876: 8870: 8866: 8860: 8821: 8803: 8797: 8793: 8787: 8783: 8779: 8775: 8771: 8765: 8761: 8755: 8734: 8728: 8724: 8718: 8699: 8695: 8689: 8685: 8681: 8675: 8669: 8665: 8589: 8544: 8538: 8485: 8479: 8448: 8398: 8389: 8383: 8359: 8351: 8345: 8341: 8335: 8332:for null edits? 8297: 8292: 8286: 8254: 8212: 8183: 8175: 8171: 8165: 8161: 8155: 8148:A category like 8119: 8090: 8082: 8072: 8066: 8055:the link tables. 8039: 8033: 7984: 7976: 7955: 7949: 7922: 7916: 7910: 7839: 7835: 7815: 7810: 7793: 7769: 7763: 7748: 7744: 7741: 7738: 7735: 7723: 7719: 7716: 7713: 7710: 7683: 7681: 7675: 7671: 7665: 7604: 7584: 7572: 7566: 7526: 7525: 7494: 7490: 7486: 7459: 7453: 7429: 7428: 7391: 7390: 7349: 7348: 7342: 7336: 7203: 7197: 7136: 7134: 7129: 7093: 7091: 7086: 6992: 6988: 6987: 6967: 6961: 6937: 6909: 6903: 6870: 6676: 6671: 6641: 6635: 6604: 6598: 6594: 6588: 6584: 6578: 6574: 6568: 6456: 6451: 6412: 6406: 6378: 6360: 6333: 6328: 6320: 6314: 6288: 6283: 6212: 6206: 6192: 6187: 6181: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6166: 6147: 6141: 6054: 6053: 6041: 6035: 5981: 5923: 5865: 5859: 5835: 5829: 5768: 5761: 5760: 5738: 5737: 5731: 5703: 5700: 5694: 5671: 5654: 5651: 5645: 5602: 5599: 5593: 5574: 5532: 5503: 5488: 5485: 5479: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5412: 5392: 5386: 5379: 5373: 5356: 5351: 5297: 5291: 5266: 5251: 5245: 5226: 5213: 5207: 5187: 5180: 5174: 5170: 5164: 5160: 5154: 5134: 5129: 5123: 5119: 5113: 5004: 4994: 4961: 4960: 4953: 4935: 4929: 4925: 4924: 4913: 4910: 4901: 4895: 4889: 4882: 4806: 4787: 4764: 4736:. For example, « 4705: 4701: 4700: 4676: 4595: 4524: 4516: 4512: 4504: 4496: 4476: 4472: 4471: 4413: 4215:Link to WP:FIRST 4178: 4115: 4109: 4101: 4100: 4073:Special:Newpages 4054: 4031: 4012: 3991: 3979: 3961: 3948:font-size: 100%; 3909: 3889: 3852: 3835: 3819: 3797: 3780: 3751: 3738: 3716: 3689: 3672: 3647: 3576: 3532: 3530: 3528: 3526: 3524: 3510: 3504: 3489: 3482: 3471: 3467: 3466: 3425: 3421: 3418: 3399: 3381: 3371: 3354: 3349: 3343: 3337: 3331: 3316: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3284: 3239: 3233: 3194: 3186: 3180: 3169: 3167: 3162: 3132: 3130: 3125: 3087: 3081: 3057: 3051: 3047: 3041: 3037: 3031: 3006: 3003: 3002: 2984: 2951: 2934: 2928: 2904: 2901: 2862: 2847: 2844: 2830: 2827: 2813: 2810: 2796: 2782: 2779: 2764: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2712: 2709: 2695: 2688: 2682: 2664: 2658: 2620: 2596: 2587: 2583:No problem :-) — 2548: 2507: 2433: 2401: 2395: 2387: 2185: 2169: 2118: 2107: 2098: 2064: 2059: 2040: 2037: 2015: 1995: 1984: 1975: 1941: 1936: 1917: 1914: 1895: 1864: 1858: 1824: 1786: 1780: 1754: 1748: 1744: 1738: 1700: 1676: 1670: 1631: 1588: 1533: 1527: 1523: 1517: 1488: 1482: 1457: 1451: 1447: 1441: 1344: 1187: 1181: 1027: 1021: 1014: 1008: 989: 983: 975: 969: 965: 959: 949: 896: 845: 807: 719: 713: 677: 671: 616:Tweaked template 607: 591: 588: 576: 570: 566:articles --: --> 565: 557: 552: 509: 466: 460: 451: 445: 420: 414: 410: 404: 317: 312: 305: 251: 204: 199: 144: 139: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 9423: 9422: 9418: 9417: 9416: 9414: 9413: 9412: 9406: 9394: 9387: 9381: 9366: 9354: 9343: 9341: 9319: 9313: 9305: 9293: 9278:leave a message 9275: 9271: 9263: 9246: 9223: 9217: 9211: 9189: 9155: 9143: 9131:0 seconds' time 9118: 9061: 9048: 9037:{{{CRITERION}}} 9031:{{{1}}}. See ]. 9005: 8997: 8991: 8988: 8946: 8940: 8933: 8878: 8874: 8868: 8864: 8858: 8819: 8801: 8795: 8791: 8785: 8781: 8777: 8776:and the latter 8773: 8769: 8763: 8759: 8753: 8732: 8726: 8722: 8716: 8697: 8693: 8687: 8683: 8679: 8673: 8671: 8667: 8663: 8634: 8587: 8542: 8536: 8533: 8483: 8477: 8467: 8396: 8387: 8381: 8357: 8349: 8343: 8339: 8333: 8295: 8290: 8284: 8252: 8181: 8173: 8169: 8163: 8159: 8153: 8117: 8080: 8070: 8064: 8037: 8031: 7974: 7953: 7947: 7919: 7914: 7908: 7907:Deletion under 7905: 7837: 7829: 7827: 7813: 7808: 7791: 7782: 7767: 7761: 7758: 7742: 7739: 7736: 7733: 7731: 7717: 7714: 7711: 7708: 7706: 7702: 7679: 7673: 7669: 7663: 7660: 7625: 7602: 7590: 7582: 7570: 7564: 7553: 7551:Update to db-g8 7492: 7488: 7484: 7457: 7451: 7340: 7334: 7331: 7233: 7201: 7195: 7193: 7149: 7132: 7127: 7125: 7089: 7084: 7082: 7077: 7043:Template:Db-g10 7023:, the template 7017: 6985: 6983: 6965: 6959: 6935: 6907: 6901: 6899: 6868: 6860: 6811: 6708: 6674: 6669: 6639: 6633: 6630: 6602: 6596: 6592: 6586: 6582: 6576: 6572: 6566: 6480: 6454: 6449: 6410: 6404: 6376: 6358: 6331: 6326: 6318: 6312: 6302: 6284: 6281: 6239: 6214: 6210: 6204: 6190: 6185: 6179: 6173: 6164: 6162: 6145: 6139: 6110: 6051: 6039: 6033: 6031: 5958: 5901:lacking content 5863: 5857: 5854: 5833: 5827: 5795: 5764: 5735: 5698: 5690: 5688: 5649: 5641: 5639: 5597: 5589: 5587: 5510: 5497: 5483: 5475: 5473: 5458: 5419: 5410: 5408: 5390: 5384: 5381: 5377: 5371: 5352: 5349: 5295: 5289: 5286: 5249: 5243: 5211: 5205: 5178: 5172: 5168: 5162: 5158: 5152: 5149: 5127: 5121: 5117: 5111: 5100: 5047: 5002: 4992: 4969:speedy deletion 4962: 4958: 4948: 4946:Clearer wording 4922: 4920: 4908: 4899: 4897: 4893: 4887: 4876: 4874: 4828: 4785: 4762: 4726: 4698: 4696: 4670: 4593: 4518: 4514: 4506: 4498: 4490: 4469: 4467: 4407: 4405: 4340: 4306: 4289:. Thank you, -- 4283: 4217: 4113: 4107: 4104: 4103: 4098: 4094: 4085: 4069: 4010: 3977: 3951: 3939: 3936:font-size: 95%; 3927: 3924:font-size: 92%; 3907: 3904: 3885:for details. — 3833: 3795: 3737:bgcolor=#f8fcff 3736: 3687: 3645: 3607: 3574: 3522: 3520: 3518: 3516: 3514: 3508: 3502: 3499: 3485: 3478: 3464: 3462: 3419: 3416: 3393: 3391: 3368: 3347: 3341: 3335: 3329: 3327: 3314: 3306: 3302: 3256: 3237: 3231: 3213: 3184: 3178: 3165: 3160: 3158: 3151: 3128: 3123: 3121: 3114: 3085: 3079: 3055: 3049: 3045: 3039: 3035: 3029: 3004: 3000: 2932: 2926: 2920: 2902: 2899: 2845: 2842: 2828: 2825: 2811: 2808: 2780: 2777: 2750: 2733: 2728: 2710: 2707: 2693: 2686: 2680: 2662: 2656: 2654: 2640:brilliant prose 2633: 2613:Template:Hangon 2608:I have changed 2606: 2584: 2571: 2522:what links here 2515: 2485:what links here 2478: 2472: 2470:last line edits 2431: 2389: 2381: 2379: 2278: 2248: 2230: 2209:It was simply: 2203: 2189: 2170: 2165: 2108: 2093:checking Google 2065: 2060: 2055: 2039:{{{CRITERION}}} 2013: 1985: 1970:checking Google 1942: 1937: 1932: 1916:{{{CRITERION}}} 1893: 1887: 1862: 1856: 1818: 1784: 1778: 1775: 1752: 1746: 1742: 1736: 1733: 1709: 1698: 1674: 1668: 1664: 1628: 1585: 1531: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1512: 1486: 1480: 1455: 1449: 1445: 1439: 1185: 1179: 1025: 1019: 1012: 1006: 987: 981: 973: 967: 963: 957: 946: 893: 866:articles under 842: 804: 759:Lambda Calculus 717: 711: 675: 669: 655:Template:Db-bio 618: 604: 572: 555: 550: 528: 507: 464: 458: 449: 443: 439: 418: 412: 408: 402: 399: 344: 325: 315: 308: 303: 256:for more info. 249: 202: 197: 180:Template:Delete 152: 142: 137: 131:Template:Delete 127: 100: 90: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 9421: 9402: 9378: 9377: 9376: 9375: 9374: 9373: 9372: 9371: 9362: 9301: 9260: 9237: 9236: 9207: 9206: 9184: 9183: 9151: 9135: 9134: 9109:This page was 9108: 9079:Administrators 9056:directly below 9053: 9052: 9051: 9022: 8987: 8984: 8983: 8982: 8932: 8929: 8928: 8927: 8896: 8895: 8854: 8853: 8852: 8851: 8750: 8749: 8670: 8661: 8633: 8628: 8627: 8626: 8625: 8624: 8623: 8622: 8608: 8584: 8532: 8529: 8528: 8527: 8466: 8463: 8445: 8444: 8443: 8442: 8441: 8440: 8439: 8438: 8437: 8436: 8435: 8434: 8433: 8432: 8431: 8430: 8429: 8428: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8424: 8423: 8422: 8421: 8420: 8419: 8418: 8353: 8304: 8303: 8302: 8248: 8192: 8179: 8176: 8147: 8128: 8127: 8126: 8125: 8124: 8078: 8062: 8056: 8053: 8001: 8000: 7999: 7998: 7904: 7901: 7900: 7899: 7898: 7897: 7896: 7895: 7826: 7823: 7822: 7821: 7787: 7757: 7754: 7753: 7752: 7701: 7698: 7659: 7656: 7641: 7640: 7624: 7621: 7620: 7619: 7586: 7552: 7549: 7548: 7547: 7546: 7545: 7518: 7513:Moonriddengirl 7483:? Any one of 7476: 7475: 7474: 7473: 7472: 7471: 7470: 7469: 7468: 7467: 7462:Moonriddengirl 7415:Moonriddengirl 7373:Moonriddengirl 7330: 7327: 7326: 7325: 7324: 7323: 7297: 7296: 7280: 7279: 7270: 7269: 7256:Template:Db-g5 7232: 7229: 7218:Gnome de plume 7192: 7189: 7188: 7187: 7148: 7145: 7144: 7143: 7142: 7141: 7076: 7070: 7069: 7068: 7067: 7066: 7025:Template:Db-t1 7016: 7013: 7012: 7011: 7010: 7009: 7008: 7007: 6898: 6897:Categorization 6895: 6894: 6893: 6859: 6856: 6855: 6854: 6810: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6801: 6800: 6799: 6798: 6797: 6707: 6704: 6703: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6629: 6626: 6625: 6624: 6623: 6622: 6621: 6620: 6610:David Göthberg 6606: 6563: 6560:Template:Db-g2 6547: 6546: 6545: 6544: 6521: 6520: 6510:David Göthberg 6506: 6479: 6470: 6469: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6434:David Göthberg 6430: 6401: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6390: 6372: 6301: 6298: 6297: 6296: 6295: 6294: 6238: 6235: 6229:Have a gorilla 6213: 6202: 6201: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6122:Template:Db-g1 6114:Template:Db-g3 6109: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6103: 6102: 6101: 6100: 6030: 6027: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6023: 5957: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5921:Ilmari Karonen 5853: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5808: 5807: 5803: 5794: 5791: 5788: 5787: 5782: 5779: 5774: 5769: 5757: 5756: 5739: 5729: 5728: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5669:Ilmari Karonen 5660: 5659: 5658: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5572:Ilmari Karonen 5543: 5542: 5530:Ilmari Karonen 5516: 5515: 5508: 5457: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5380: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5285: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5240: 5148: 5145: 5099: 5096: 5095: 5094: 5049: 5048: 5046: 5045: 5019: 5013: 4996: 4965: 4963: 4956: 4947: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4873: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4827: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4804:Ilmari Karonen 4725: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4545: 4544: 4404: 4401: 4339: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4329:Moonriddengirl 4305: 4302: 4282: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4256:Moonriddengirl 4216: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4147: 4146: 4096: 4093: 4090: 4079: 4068: 4065: 4052:Ilmari Karonen 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4029:Ilmari Karonen 3989:Ilmari Karonen 3959:Ilmari Karonen 3940: 3928: 3916: 3903: 3902:font-size: 92% 3900: 3887:Ilmari Karonen 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3850:Ilmari Karonen 3817:Ilmari Karonen 3778:Ilmari Karonen 3749:Ilmari Karonen 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3714:Ilmari Karonen 3698:It's not just 3670:Ilmari Karonen 3666: 3665: 3661: 3638: 3637:}} background. 3606: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3498: 3495: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3438: 3390: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3326: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3282:Matt/TheFearow 3278: 3277: 3270: 3269: 3263: 3255: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3212: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3176: 3175: 3155: 3145: 3113: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2942: 2941: 2919: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2885: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2838: 2821: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2721: 2720: 2677: 2676: 2653: 2652:Change wording 2650: 2632: 2629: 2605: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2570: 2567: 2550: 2549: 2518:Administrators 2509: 2508: 2481:Administrators 2471: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2452: 2451: 2441:Omicronpersei8 2436: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2343: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2310: 2277: 2274: 2247: 2244: 2238:Dragons flight 2229: 2226: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2187: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2131: 2130: 2099:This page was 2097: 2053: 2048: 2018: 2012:{{db-meta|1=}} 2011: 2008: 2007: 1976:This page was 1974: 1930: 1925: 1898: 1891: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1833: 1832: 1804: 1803: 1800:brace brackets 1774: 1773:Hangon, cont'd 1771: 1732: 1729: 1714: 1713: 1703: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1645: 1644: 1637: 1636: 1609: 1608: 1594: 1593: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1562: 1561: 1554: 1553: 1511: 1510:Move and Split 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1336: 1335: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1301: 1291: 1284: 1277: 1270: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1210:kludge. ;) 1194: 1193: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1125: 1124: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1036: 1035: 1018:a shortcut to 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 932: 931: 922: 902: 901: 853: 852: 851: 850: 827:User:Netoholic 813: 812: 787: 786: 750: 749: 748: 747: 708: 707: 617: 614: 613: 612: 571: 561: 560: 559: 527: 526:A little laugh 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 499: 498: 438: 435: 398: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 343: 340: 324: 321: 293: 292: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 236: 235: 225: 224: 223: 220: 207: 206: 205: 200: 163: 162: 151: 148: 147: 146: 140: 126: 123: 99: 96: 89: 86: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 9420: 9411: 9410: 9405: 9399: 9398: 9386: 9370: 9365: 9359: 9358: 9348: 9337: 9336: 9335: 9332: 9331: 9327: 9326: 9318: 9311: 9310: 9309: 9304: 9298: 9297: 9285: 9279: 9269: 9261: 9258: 9256: 9252: 9241: 9240: 9239: 9238: 9235: 9230: 9226: 9216: 9209: 9208: 9204: 9200: 9196: 9192: 9186: 9185: 9182: 9179: 9178: 9173: 9172: 9168: 9162: 9161: 9160: 9159: 9154: 9148: 9147: 9132: 9126: 9122: 9116: 9112: 9106: 9102: 9100: 9096: 9092: 9088: 9084: 9080: 9075: 9073: 9069: 9067: 9057: 9047: 9046: 9045: 9043: 9032: 9030: 9029: 9023: 9021: 9020: 9017: 9013: 9011: 9001: 8996: 8981: 8978: 8974: 8973: 8972: 8971: 8966: 8962: 8957: 8953: 8945: 8938: 8937:editprotected 8926: 8923: 8922: 8918: 8917: 8912: 8911: 8910: 8909: 8905: 8901: 8894: 8891: 8890: 8886: 8885: 8873: 8863: 8856: 8855: 8850: 8846: 8842: 8838: 8837: 8836: 8833: 8832: 8827: 8826: 8818: 8817: 8816: 8815: 8811: 8807: 8800: 8790: 8768: 8758: 8748: 8745: 8744: 8740: 8739: 8731: 8721: 8714: 8713: 8712: 8711: 8707: 8703: 8692: 8678: 8660: 8659: 8655: 8651: 8647: 8643: 8639: 8632: 8621: 8617: 8613: 8609: 8607: 8603: 8599: 8595: 8594: 8593: 8590: 8582: 8578: 8574: 8573: 8572: 8569: 8568: 8563: 8562: 8561: 8560: 8556: 8552: 8548: 8541: 8531:Db-f9 wording 8526: 8523: 8522: 8517: 8516: 8511: 8507: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8500: 8496: 8491: 8488: 8482: 8475: 8470: 8462: 8461: 8456: 8452: 8417: 8413: 8409: 8404: 8403: 8402: 8399: 8393: 8386: 8379: 8378: 8377: 8373: 8369: 8365: 8364: 8363: 8360: 8348: 8338: 8331: 8327: 8326: 8325: 8321: 8317: 8313: 8309: 8305: 8301: 8298: 8289: 8282: 8281: 8280: 8276: 8272: 8268: 8264: 8260: 8259: 8258: 8255: 8246: 8242: 8241: 8240: 8236: 8232: 8227: 8226: 8225: 8220: 8216: 8210: 8206: 8205: 8204: 8200: 8196: 8189: 8188: 8187: 8184: 8168: 8158: 8151: 8144: 8143: 8142: 8138: 8134: 8129: 8123: 8120: 8114: 8110: 8105: 8104: 8103: 8098: 8094: 8088: 8087: 8086: 8083: 8076: 8069: 8060: 8051: 8047: 8043: 8036: 8029: 8028: 8027: 8023: 8019: 8015: 8011: 8007: 8006: 8005: 8004: 8003: 8002: 7997: 7992: 7988: 7982: 7981: 7980: 7977: 7971: 7967: 7963: 7959: 7952: 7945: 7944: 7943: 7942: 7938: 7934: 7930: 7926: 7913: 7894: 7891: 7890: 7885: 7884: 7879: 7878: 7877: 7874: 7873:CharlotteWebb 7870: 7869: 7868: 7865: 7864: 7859: 7858: 7853: 7849: 7848: 7847: 7846: 7843: 7842:CharlotteWebb 7833: 7832:editprotected 7820: 7817: 7816: 7811: 7803: 7799: 7798: 7797: 7796: 7792: 7790: 7786: 7779: 7777: 7773: 7766: 7751: 7747: 7745: 7729: 7728: 7727: 7726: 7722: 7720: 7697: 7696: 7691: 7687: 7678: 7668: 7655: 7654: 7650: 7646: 7638: 7634: 7630: 7629: 7628: 7618: 7615: 7614: 7609: 7608: 7600: 7596: 7595: 7594: 7593: 7589: 7585: 7580: 7576: 7569: 7562: 7558: 7544: 7538: 7534: 7530: 7523: 7519: 7517: 7514: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7505: 7504: 7500: 7499: 7482: 7478: 7477: 7466: 7463: 7456: 7449: 7448: 7447: 7441: 7437: 7433: 7426: 7421: 7420: 7419: 7416: 7411: 7410: 7409: 7403: 7399: 7395: 7388: 7383: 7379: 7378: 7377: 7374: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7361: 7357: 7353: 7346: 7339: 7322: 7318: 7314: 7310: 7305: 7301: 7300: 7299: 7298: 7295: 7291: 7287: 7282: 7281: 7277: 7272: 7271: 7266: 7261: 7257: 7253: 7252: 7251: 7250: 7246: 7242: 7241:Michael Hardy 7238: 7228: 7227: 7223: 7219: 7215: 7211: 7207: 7200: 7186: 7182: 7178: 7174: 7170: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7163: 7159: 7155: 7154:Adam McMaster 7140: 7135: 7130: 7122: 7118: 7117: 7116: 7113: 7112: 7107: 7106: 7100: 7099: 7098: 7097: 7092: 7087: 7075: 7065: 7062: 7058: 7057: 7056: 7052: 7048: 7044: 7040: 7039: 7038: 7037: 7034: 7030: 7026: 7022: 7006: 7003: 7002: 6998: 6997: 6991: 6982: 6981: 6980: 6977: 6974: 6971: 6964: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6952: 6951: 6947: 6946: 6941: 6933: 6932: 6931: 6930: 6927: 6924: 6921: 6917: 6913: 6906: 6892: 6889: 6888: 6884: 6883: 6878: 6877: 6876: 6875: 6872: 6871: 6869:JohnnyMrNinja 6864: 6853: 6850: 6846: 6842: 6841: 6840: 6839: 6835: 6831: 6825: 6823: 6819: 6815: 6796: 6792: 6788: 6784: 6783: 6782: 6778: 6774: 6770: 6769: 6768: 6764: 6760: 6756: 6755: 6754: 6750: 6746: 6742: 6741: 6740: 6737: 6736: 6731: 6730: 6725: 6724: 6723: 6722: 6718: 6714: 6699: 6696: 6695: 6690: 6689: 6683: 6682: 6681: 6678: 6677: 6672: 6665: 6661: 6657: 6656: 6655: 6654: 6650: 6646: 6638: 6632:The template 6619: 6615: 6611: 6607: 6601: 6591: 6581: 6571: 6570:db-experiment 6564: 6561: 6557: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6549: 6548: 6543: 6540: 6539: 6535: 6534: 6529: 6525: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6519: 6515: 6511: 6507: 6504: 6500: 6499: 6498: 6497: 6493: 6489: 6485: 6477: 6474: 6461: 6458: 6457: 6452: 6445: 6444: 6443: 6439: 6435: 6431: 6428: 6424: 6420: 6416: 6409: 6402: 6399: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6389: 6385: 6381: 6373: 6371: 6367: 6363: 6355: 6354: 6353: 6349: 6345: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6338: 6335: 6334: 6329: 6322: 6317: 6307: 6293: 6289: 6287: 6278: 6277: 6276: 6272: 6268: 6263: 6262: 6261: 6260: 6256: 6252: 6248: 6244: 6234: 6233: 6230: 6227: 6223: 6219: 6209: 6197: 6194: 6193: 6188: 6178: 6170: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6155: 6151: 6144: 6143:editprotected 6138: 6137: 6136: 6135: 6131: 6127: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6099: 6095: 6091: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6081: 6077: 6073: 6072: 6071: 6068: 6067: 6063: 6062: 6057: 6049: 6048: 6047: 6045: 6038: 6037:editprotected 6022: 6019: 6018: 6014: 6013: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5995: 5994: 5989: 5988: 5984: 5977: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5971: 5970: 5966: 5965: 5949: 5946: 5945: 5941: 5940: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5927: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5910: 5906: 5902: 5898: 5894: 5890: 5885: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5874: 5870: 5862: 5847: 5843: 5839: 5832: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5818: 5814: 5804: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5786: 5783: 5780: 5778: 5775: 5773: 5770: 5767: 5763: 5762: 5754: 5750: 5746: 5745: 5740: 5733: 5732: 5727: 5723: 5719: 5714: 5706: 5701: 5695: 5693: 5682: 5681: 5680: 5675: 5670: 5665: 5661: 5657: 5652: 5646: 5644: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5631: 5630: 5625: 5624: 5619: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5605: 5600: 5594: 5592: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5578: 5573: 5569: 5566:into its own 5565: 5561: 5557: 5553: 5549: 5545: 5544: 5541: 5536: 5531: 5527: 5522: 5518: 5517: 5514: 5511: 5506: 5504: 5501: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5486: 5480: 5478: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5449: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5436: 5435: 5432: 5431: 5426: 5425: 5416: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5389: 5376: 5361: 5357: 5355: 5345: 5344: 5343: 5339: 5335: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5294: 5279: 5274: 5270: 5265: 5264: 5259: 5256:-early-onset 5255: 5252:... Must be 5248: 5241: 5239: 5234: 5230: 5225: 5224: 5219: 5217: 5210: 5201: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5190: 5185: 5177: 5167: 5157: 5144: 5143: 5138: 5133: 5126: 5116: 5109: 5105: 5093: 5090: 5089: 5084: 5083: 5077: 5073: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5020: 5017: 5014: 5012: 5008: 5000: 4997: 4991:, please add 4990: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4983: 4982: 4977: 4972: 4970: 4964: 4955: 4954: 4951: 4941: 4938: 4933: 4928: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4911: 4905: 4904: 4892: 4885: 4880: 4879:editprotected 4867: 4864: 4860: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4832:editprotected 4815: 4810: 4805: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4795: 4791: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4776: 4775: 4770: 4769: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4754: 4750: 4748: 4742: 4740: 4735: 4731: 4719: 4716: 4715: 4710: 4709: 4704: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4674: 4673:editprotected 4658: 4654: 4650: 4645: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4610: 4607: 4606: 4601: 4600: 4591: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4543: 4540: 4539: 4534: 4533: 4528: 4522: 4517:parameter in 4510: 4502: 4494: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4475: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4450: 4449: 4445: 4441: 4436: 4434: 4428: 4425: 4423: 4419: 4414: 4411: 4410:editprotected 4400: 4397: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4374: 4371: 4368: 4365: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4346: 4343: 4333: 4330: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4301: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4257: 4253: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4192: 4188: 4187: 4185: 4183: 4177: 4174: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4159: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4145: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4112: 4089: 4088: 4083: 4078: 4074: 4064: 4063: 4058: 4053: 4040: 4035: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4013: 4006: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3995: 3990: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3980: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3965: 3960: 3956: 3950: 3949: 3945: 3938: 3937: 3933: 3926: 3925: 3921: 3915: 3913: 3899: 3898: 3893: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3861: 3856: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3838: 3836: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3823: 3818: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3800: 3798: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3784: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3755: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3734: 3725: 3720: 3715: 3711: 3706: 3701: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3692: 3690: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3676: 3671: 3662: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3643: 3639: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3625:In any case, 3624: 3623: 3622: 3619: 3617: 3613: 3605:{{{bgcolor}}} 3594: 3591: 3587: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3579: 3577: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3566: 3561: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3534: 3533: 3507: 3494: 3493: 3490: 3488: 3483: 3481: 3475: 3470: 3460: 3459: 3456: 3446: 3443: 3439: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3422: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3407: 3403: 3397: 3396:editprotected 3389:format change 3384: 3379: 3375: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3358: 3353: 3346: 3338: 3334: 3333:editprotected 3320: 3317: 3311: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3290: 3287: 3283: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3261: 3260:editprotected 3249: 3246: 3243: 3236: 3229: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3219: 3211: 3204: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3182:editprotected 3174: 3171: 3168: 3163: 3156: 3154: 3149: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3131: 3126: 3119: 3105: 3102: 3098: 3095: 3091: 3084: 3077: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3068: 3064: 3061: 3054: 3044: 3034: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3023: 3020: 3017: 3013: 3009: 2991: 2987: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2944: 2943: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2931: 2923: 2911: 2907: 2905: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2890: 2886: 2884: 2881: 2877: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2848: 2839: 2837: 2833: 2831: 2822: 2820: 2816: 2814: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2785: 2783: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2741: 2738: 2735:(not Proto ►) 2731: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2713: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2685: 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2660:editprotected 2649: 2648: 2645: 2644:170.215.83.83 2641: 2636: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2614: 2610: 2599: 2594: 2590: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2566: 2565: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2506: 2505: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2463: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2437: 2434: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2385: 2370: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2348: 2347:United States 2344: 2341: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2331: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2297: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2265: 2259: 2257: 2255: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2196: 2193: 2183: 2180: 2177: 2174: 2168: 2163: 2162: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2127: 2126:23 months ago 2123: 2116: 2112: 2106: 2102: 2096: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2063: 2047: 2045: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2019: 2017: 2016: 2004: 2003:23 months ago 2000: 1993: 1989: 1983: 1979: 1973: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1940: 1924: 1922: 1911: 1908: 1906: 1905: 1899: 1897: 1896: 1890: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1844: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1822: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1783: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1751: 1741: 1728: 1727: 1724: 1720: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1701: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1683: 1680: 1673: 1650: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1625: 1622: 1617: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1582: 1579: 1574: 1573: 1567: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1530: 1520: 1495: 1492: 1485: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1454: 1444: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1397: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1356: 1352: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1310: 1306: 1305:User:Dbenbenn 1302: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1245: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1228:raised above. 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1184: 1177: 1176: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1122: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068:My comments: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1052: 1051: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1031: 1024: 1017: 1011: 1004: 1003: 996: 993: 986: 979: 972: 962: 955: 954: 953: 950: 943: 940: 936: 935: 934: 933: 930: 927: 923: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 900: 897: 890: 887: 883: 879: 878: 877: 876: 873: 869: 865: 860: 858: 849: 846: 839: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 817: 816: 815: 814: 811: 808: 801: 798: 793: 789: 788: 785: 782: 778: 774: 773: 772: 771: 768: 764: 760: 755: 746: 743: 739: 738: 737: 734: 729: 728: 727: 726: 723: 716: 706: 703: 698: 697: 696: 695: 692: 688: 683:db-bio -: --> 681: 674: 665: 664: 661: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 634: 632: 628: 624: 611: 608: 601: 598: 594: 593: 592: 585: 581: 558: 553: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 518: 514: 510: 503: 502: 501: 500: 497: 494: 491: 487: 482: 478: 477: 476: 475: 472: 470: 463: 454: 448: 434: 433: 430: 428: 424: 417: 416:deletebecause 407: 388: 385: 382: 378: 377: 375: 372: 368: 367: 365: 362: 357: 356: 355: 353: 350: 339: 337: 334: 330: 323:Page creation 320: 318: 313: 311: 306: 300: 298: 290: 286: 282: 278: 277: 276: 274: 262: 259: 255: 245: 244: 240: 239: 238: 237: 233: 230: 226: 221: 218: 215: 214: 212: 208: 201: 196: 195: 193: 189: 188: 187: 185: 181: 177: 172: 171: 167: 161: 159: 154: 153: 141: 136: 135: 134: 132: 122: 120: 117: 113: 109: 105: 95: 94: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 9391: 9379: 9351: 9340: 9329: 9324: 9290: 9267: 9254: 9250: 9244: 9176: 9170: 9140: 9138: 9077: 9065: 9059: 9055: 9054: 9041: 9039: 9025: 9024: 9015: 9009: 9003: 8989: 8950: 8934: 8920: 8915: 8897: 8888: 8883: 8830: 8824: 8751: 8742: 8737: 8672: 8635: 8565: 8546: 8534: 8520: 8514: 8509: 8492: 8489: 8471: 8468: 8446: 8337:adminbacklog 8157:adminbacklog 8068:Adminbacklog 7906: 7888: 7882: 7862: 7856: 7851: 7828: 7806: 7801: 7783: 7780: 7771: 7759: 7703: 7661: 7642: 7633:encyclopedia 7626: 7612: 7606: 7598: 7578: 7574: 7554: 7502: 7497: 7381: 7332: 7307: 7234: 7213: 7209: 7194: 7172: 7168: 7150: 7110: 7104: 7078: 7018: 7000: 6995: 6989: 6949: 6944: 6900: 6886: 6881: 6866: 6861: 6826: 6821: 6812: 6734: 6728: 6709: 6693: 6687: 6667: 6631: 6565:By the way, 6537: 6532: 6530:. Cheers. 6481: 6478:: Db-sandbox 6475: 6472: 6447: 6324: 6309: 6303: 6285: 6242: 6240: 6215: 6183: 6168: 6111: 6076:87.78.21.135 6065: 6060: 6055: 6032: 6016: 6011: 6009:. Cheers. 5992: 5986: 5968: 5963: 5959: 5943: 5938: 5883: 5855: 5809: 5796: 5765: 5748: 5742: 5691: 5686:if none: --> 5663: 5642: 5628: 5622: 5590: 5563: 5556:db-histmerge 5550:subtypes of 5547: 5520: 5499: 5476: 5459: 5429: 5423: 5414: 5382: 5370:Addition to 5353: 5287: 5284:Change to I9 5262: 5253: 5222: 5215: 5203: 5184:UltraExactZZ 5166:db-vandalism 5150: 5101: 5087: 5081: 5075: 5071: 5052: 5021: 5015: 5010: 4998: 4988: 4979: 4973: 4966: 4949: 4932:PeterSymonds 4926: 4902: 4875: 4829: 4773: 4767: 4744: 4737: 4727: 4713: 4707: 4702: 4678: 4669: 4643: 4604: 4598: 4589: 4537: 4531: 4486: 4478: 4473: 4451: 4437: 4429: 4426: 4421: 4415: 4406: 4398: 4375: 4372: 4369: 4366: 4347: 4344: 4341: 4307: 4284: 4218: 4179: 4136: 4105: 4070: 4049: 4024: 4020: 3952: 3947: 3941: 3935: 3929: 3923: 3917: 3911: 3905: 3875:db-histmerge 3872: 3845: 3811: 3807: 3770:db-histmerge 3733:db-histmerge 3730: 3699: 3667: 3646:ambox-speedy 3631:db-histmerge 3626: 3620: 3616:db-histmerge 3608: 3559: 3549:. Cheers. -- 3513: 3500: 3486: 3479: 3468: 3461: 3451: 3392: 3339: 3328: 3309: 3279: 3271: 3257: 3254:Edit Request 3214: 3198:. Cheers. -- 3195: 3177: 3117: 3115: 3093: 3059: 3007: 2998: 2962: 2924: 2921: 2757: 2751: 2691: 2690: 2678: 2672: 2666: 2655: 2637: 2634: 2607: 2572: 2554: 2551: 2537: 2526:page history 2516: 2510: 2489:page history 2479: 2473: 2457:Thanks! :-) 2430: 2414: 2411: 2403: 2380: 2351: 2339: 2330:Gene Nygaard 2313: 2305: 2292: 2281: 2279: 2263: 2260: 2253: 2251: 2249: 2231: 2210: 2208: 2204: 2134: 2072: 2066: 2061: 2043: 2041: 2032: 2021: 2020: 1949: 1943: 1938: 1920: 1918: 1909: 1901: 1900: 1892:{{db-meta|}} 1888: 1860:db-vandalism 1805: 1799: 1793: 1788: 1777:Speaking of 1776: 1734: 1718: 1715: 1710: 1697: 1684: 1665: 1615: 1513: 1476: 1472: 1350: 1324: 1320: 1303:December 23 1295:User:Radiant 1293:December 23 1286:December 22 1279:December 21 1272:December 21 1259: 1255: 1207: 1126: 1067: 1058: 1037: 1015: 977: 918: 914: 861: 854: 830: 822: 819:User:Uncle G 791: 753: 751: 709: 666: 635: 626: 622: 619: 590:_pages": --> 587:_pages": --> 583:_pages": --> 580:Lifeisunfair 575:_pages": --> 573: 542:Uncyclopedia 529: 455: 440: 437:Transclusion 400: 345: 326: 309: 294: 281:template:del 270: 210: 175: 173: 168: 164: 155: 128: 107: 101: 92: 91: 60: 43: 37: 9224:Luna Santin 9205:(iPod edit) 9111:last edited 8879:|rationale= 8820:|rationale= 8806:HairyWombat 8782:|rationale= 8774:|rationale= 8702:HairyWombat 8698:|rationale= 8668:|rationale= 8638:Template:db 8636:When using 8567:Philosopher 8211:. — Martin 8010:SDPatrolBot 8008:I can have 7682:? — Martin 7313:Enric Naval 6830:Enric Naval 6645:Jordan 1972 6044:live search 5889:attack page 5741:This is an 5562:at all but 5258:Alzheimer's 5218:, though... 4631:Enric Naval 4576:Enric Naval 4553:Enric Naval 4454:Enric Naval 4440:Enric Naval 4327:Okay. :) -- 4182:let me know 3955:Here's mine 3664:complexity. 3235:db-pagemove 3078:'s mods to 2752:Right now, 2232:Please see 2101:last edited 2091:. Consider 2028:google hits 1978:last edited 1968:. Consider 1745:to link to 1649:Pathoschild 1605:Pathoschild 1566:Pathoschild 1537:Pathoschild 1417:Pathoschild 1396:Pathoschild 1374:Pathoschild 1355:Pathoschild 1288:User:Shawnc 1281:User:Segv11 1274:Pathoschild 1267:User:Shawnc 1265:December 9 1244:Pathoschild 857:Pathoschild 680:Pathoschild 631:Pathoschild 532:Agriculture 329:Template:db 285:Dunc_Harris 174:This would 156:Moved from 114:.) Thanks, 36:This is an 9272:{{hangon}} 9247:{{hangon}} 9062:{{hangon}} 9049:{{hangon}} 9006:{{hangon}} 8476:change to 7852:disruptive 7173:sourceurl2 7169:sourceurl1 6936:|category= 6666:. Regards 6600:db-sandbox 6380:Coppertwig 6362:Coppertwig 5869:SchuminWeb 5438:Thanks! -- 5003:{{hangon}} 4683:Coppertwig 4649:Coppertwig 4483:discussion 4388:under the 4356:under the 4291:Coppertwig 4265:Coppertwig 4237:Coppertwig 4221:suggestion 4111:Db-userreq 4005:screenshot 3735:}} to use 3642:Common.css 3612:Common.css 3289:(Contribs) 3226:After the 2135:Weird. -- 1757:Locke Cole 715:db-copyvio 673:db-copyvio 625:, but not 479:I agree. 411:, leaving 9245:Adding a 9190:Nihiltres 9060:Adding a 9004:Adding a 8986:Addition? 8956:GrooveDog 8952:deletion. 8900:MZMcBride 8684:|wording= 8664:|wording= 8650:snigbrook 8612:Rocket000 8577:WP:CSD#F9 8551:Rocket000 8495:ThaddeusB 8493:Thanks -- 8472:I made a 8385:WP:NAMCON 8288:Hiddencat 8247:just yet. 7962:null edit 7802:dependent 7583:WikiDan61 7563:, should 7561:WP:CSD#G8 7557:WP:CSD#R1 7485:|sources= 7080:removed. 7047:MZMcBride 6528:have a go 6056:Not done: 5909:vandalism 5905:test page 5895:, a page 5785:Archive 5 5777:Archive 3 5772:Archive 2 5766:Archive 1 5074:from the 5007:talk page 4844:Kubanczyk 4836:talk page 4647:) :-) -- 4515:|wording= 4173:Sebastian 4155:Sebastian 4141:Ned Scott 4127:Sebastian 3881:}}. See 3764:I've now 3652:}}-based 3627:something 3590:Ned Scott 3565:Ned Scott 3551:MZMcBride 3442:MZMcBride 3433:MZMcBride 3406:Ned Scott 3352:GrooveDog 3315:Nihiltres 3228:Sev Snape 3218:MZMcBride 3200:MZMcBride 3161:Goodnight 3124:Goodnight 3076:MZMcBride 2538:talk page 2530:last edit 2493:last edit 2384:db-author 2377:db-author 2366:GTBacchus 2314:vagueness 2296:GTBacchus 2286:GTBacchus 2276:Reversion 2268:GTBacchus 2105:Zinnober9 1982:Zinnober9 1821:vandalism 1706:user talk 1529:db-reason 1524:and make 1484:db-reason 1443:db-reason 1183:Namespace 1023:db-reason 985:db-reason 971:db-reason 966:includes 825:) as has 627:mandatory 546:Kookykman 508:Sasquatch 406:Db-reason 361:Netoholic 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 9404:contribs 9364:contribs 9344:RED TEXT 9325:lifebaka 9303:contribs 9249:without 9153:contribs 9121:contribs 9099:deletion 9081:: check 8916:lifebaka 8884:lifebaka 8778:|reason= 8738:lifebaka 8686:, while 8588:Amalthea 8585:Thanks, 8397:Amalthea 8358:Amalthea 8296:Amalthea 8253:Amalthea 8182:Amalthea 8118:Amalthea 8081:Amalthea 8059:WP:PURGE 8046:WP:DUMMY 7975:Amalthea 7588:ReadMe!! 7533:contribs 7498:lifebaka 7489:|source= 7436:contribs 7398:contribs 7356:contribs 7231:Reasons? 7128:Cenarium 7085:Cenarium 7061:Dcoetzee 7033:Dcoetzee 6996:lifebaka 6945:lifebaka 6882:lifebaka 6787:Jac16888 6759:Jac16888 6745:VegaDark 6713:VegaDark 6533:lifebaka 6492:contribs 6484:LelandRB 6408:db-album 6323:Regards 6316:db-album 6169:Not done 6061:lifebaka 6012:lifebaka 5964:lifebaka 5939:lifebaka 5913:nonsense 5664:whatever 5418:I added 5334:Asher196 5273:contribs 5263:lifebaka 5233:contribs 5223:lifebaka 5189:Evidence 5042:deletion 4930:Cheers, 4474:Not done 4386:deletion 4354:deletion 4229:WP:FIRST 4225:Jayron32 4102:Resolved 4077:Zetawoof 3834:xaosflux 3796:xaosflux 3766:proposed 3688:xaosflux 3656:such as 3575:xaosflux 3143:Zetawoof 3118:in place 3008:Not done 2981:CMummert 2948:CMummert 2575:AOL Alex 2542:deletion 2534:page log 2501:deletion 2497:page log 2412:Thanks! 2192:Omniplex 2111:contribs 2089:deletion 1988:contribs 1966:deletion 1907:{{{1}}}. 1840:Zetawoof 1827:Omniplex 1808:Zetawoof 1723:Omniplex 1143:dbenbenn 765:. :) 763:INTERCAL 9097:before 9093:), and 9087:history 8977:RockMFR 8841:Kingpin 8598:Kingpin 8469:Hello, 8408:Kingpin 8392:CAT:CSD 8368:Kingpin 8347:backlog 8316:Kingpin 8271:Kingpin 8231:Kingpin 8195:Kingpin 8178:tables. 8133:Kingpin 8113:CAT:CSD 8050:CAT:CSD 8042:WP:NULL 8018:Kingpin 7970:CAT:CSD 7958:CAT:CSD 7937:call me 7927:and to 7776:WP:PROD 7765:Db-talk 7601:say... 7522:davidwr 7455:copyvio 7425:davidwr 7387:davidwr 7345:davidwr 7214:content 7210:context 7121:sandbox 6912:CAT:CSD 6580:db-test 6417:and by 5744:archive 5560:CAT:CSD 5502:delanoy 5247:db-hoax 5209:db-hoax 5132:Jeepday 5125:copyvio 5040:before 5036:), and 5030:history 4863:RockMFR 4786:summary 4394:Db-meta 4382:Db-meta 4362:Db-meta 4350:Db-meta 4191:WP:OWNs 3879:db-meta 3774:db-meta 3745:db-meta 3650:db-meta 3455:W.marsh 3245:Mishehu 3043:db-meta 3033:db-talk 2860:Amarkov 2858:.< - 2794:Amarkov 2762:Amarkov 2673:article 2532:), the 2495:), the 2392:db-meta 2201:oddness 2182:history 2087:before 2083:), and 2077:history 1964:before 1960:), and 1954:history 1789:replace 1672:db-meta 1519:db-meta 1460:CAT:CSD 1309:CAT:CSD 1299:CAT:CSD 1208:elegant 1190:CAT:CSD 1138:CAT:CSD 1121:WYSIWYG 961:db-vand 911:CAT:CSD 868:CAT:CSD 792:testing 754:replace 687:CAT:CSD 623:default 490:Cryptic 381:Rossami 371:anthony 349:anthony 250:{{{1}}} 39:archive 9385:hangon 9317:hangon 9215:hangon 9166:(also) 9105:Google 8995:hangon 8965:Review 8949:reads 8944:db-xfd 8646:CSD A7 8581:WT:CSD 7939:Russ) 7645:JohnCD 7555:Since 7537:e-mail 7440:e-mail 7402:e-mail 7360:e-mail 7338:db-g12 7286:Orlady 7237:WP:CSD 7133:(Talk) 7090:(Talk) 6660:WP:VPT 6344:Stifle 6306:WT:CSD 6286:DrNick 6267:Stifle 6251:Stifle 6247:WP:PUI 6243:may be 6220:. See 6218:WP:G12 6150:Andjam 6126:Andjam 6090:Stifle 5982:(also) 5838:Stifle 5464:& 5420:|name= 5354:DrNick 5320:Stifle 5305:Stifle 5115:Db-g12 5076:reason 5056:Werson 4981:CSD A1 4936:(talk) 4794:AlexSm 4753:AlexSm 4747:CSD G7 4743:» vs « 4509:db-g10 4403:reword 4314:123Pie 4252:WP:BRD 4119:CSD U1 3846:really 3812:aren't 3497:Colour 3474:User:Y 3286:(Talk) 3083:hangon 3012:ais523 2967:Splash 2930:hangon 2618:tjstrf 2569:My bad 2536:, the 2524:, the 2487:, the 2397:CSD G7 2340:better 2306:asking 2140:(talk) 2033:See ]. 1910:See ]. 1838:Done. 1782:hangon 1750:hangon 1731:Hangon 1624:adiant 1614:There 1581:adiant 1346:_: --> 1321:before 1199:Shawnc 1112:Shawnc 1093:Shawnc 1082:Shawnc 1074:WP:CSD 1061:Shawnc 942:adiant 919:before 889:adiant 872:Shawnc 838:adiant 800:adiant 781:Shawnc 777:scheme 733:Shawnc 722:Shawnc 678:...) 660:Shawnc 600:adiant 493:(talk) 462:delete 447:delete 397:rename 384:(talk) 333:• Benc 258:• Benc 252:. See 229:• Benc 116:• Benc 9253:will 9199:edits 9177:melon 9171:Happy 9083:links 8872:db-t3 8862:db-g6 8831:melon 8825:Happy 8799:db-t3 8789:db-g6 8767:db-t3 8757:db-g7 8752:Also 8730:db-g8 8720:db-g6 8691:db-g8 8677:db-g6 8540:db-f9 8521:melon 8515:Happy 8481:db-a5 8167:db-t3 8035:db-t3 7951:db-t3 7933:R'n'B 7912:db-c1 7889:melon 7883:Happy 7863:melon 7857:Happy 7789:Stalk 7785:Hrafn 7677:db-t3 7667:db-c1 7613:melon 7607:Happy 7568:db-g8 7493:|url= 7491:, or 7199:Db-a1 7191:Db-a1 7111:melon 7105:Happy 6963:db-c1 6905:db-c1 6773:Kusma 6735:melon 6729:Happy 6694:melon 6688:Happy 6664:WP:AN 6637:db-i2 6628:DB-i2 6590:db-g2 6177:db-g3 6088:Why? 6003:WP:AN 5993:melon 5987:Happy 5903:or a 5891:as a 5831:db-g6 5813:Dpmuk 5718:Kusma 5629:melon 5623:Happy 5430:melon 5424:Happy 5388:Db-c2 5375:Db-c2 5293:db-i9 5176:db-g3 5156:db-g3 5088:melon 5082:Happy 5026:links 4774:melon 4768:Happy 4714:melon 4708:Happy 4605:melon 4599:Happy 4538:melon 4532:Happy 4521:db-g6 4501:db-g4 4493:db-g1 4433:Db-g3 4418:Db-g6 4195:Kusma 4125:.) — 4025:upper 3957:.) — 3741:ambox 3635:ambox 3506:ambox 3420:notes 3417:Grace 3292:(Bot) 3272:with 2963:other 2903:notes 2900:Grace 2846:notes 2843:Grace 2829:notes 2826:Grace 2812:notes 2809:Grace 2781:notes 2778:Grace 2711:notes 2708:Grace 2459:Ruakh 2416:Ruakh 2179:links 2137:Chris 2069:links 1946:links 1687:Gurch 1630:|< 1629:: --> 1587:|< 1586:: --> 1491:Jamie 1464:Jamie 1330:Jamie 1212:Jamie 1165:Jamie 1156:Jamie 1128:Jamie 1030:Jamie 992:Jamie 948:|< 947:: --> 926:Jamie 915:don't 895:|< 894:: --> 844:|< 843:: --> 806:|< 805:: --> 767:Jamie 742:Jamie 702:Jamie 691:Jamie 606:|< 605:: --> 567:pages 16:< 9397:anaɢ 9357:anaɢ 9346:}}}} 9296:anaɢ 9229:talk 9195:talk 9146:anaɢ 9125:logs 9095:logs 9091:last 9070:See 8961:talk 8904:talk 8867:and 8845:talk 8810:talk 8794:and 8762:and 8725:and 8706:talk 8696:has 8682:has 8654:talk 8616:talk 8602:talk 8555:talk 8499:talk 8474:BOLD 8455:talk 8451:MSGJ 8412:talk 8372:talk 8342:and 8320:talk 8275:talk 8235:talk 8219:talk 8215:MSGJ 8199:talk 8137:talk 8097:talk 8093:MSGJ 8022:talk 7991:talk 7987:MSGJ 7772:talk 7690:talk 7686:MSGJ 7649:talk 7599:does 7529:talk 7481:this 7432:talk 7394:talk 7352:talk 7317:talk 7311:" -- 7302:See 7290:talk 7276:WVOX 7258:and 7245:talk 7222:talk 7181:talk 7171:and 7158:talk 7051:talk 7045:? -- 6990:Done 6849:talk 6834:talk 6822:ever 6791:talk 6777:talk 6763:talk 6749:talk 6717:talk 6649:talk 6614:talk 6575:and 6514:talk 6488:Chat 6438:talk 6384:talk 6366:talk 6348:talk 6271:talk 6255:talk 6154:talk 6130:talk 6094:talk 6080:talk 6007:here 5926:talk 5873:Talk 5842:talk 5817:talk 5722:talk 5699:talk 5692:xeno 5674:talk 5650:talk 5643:xeno 5598:talk 5591:xeno 5577:talk 5570:. — 5564:only 5535:talk 5528:? — 5509:adds 5484:talk 5477:xeno 5444:talk 5440:Jh12 5415:Done 5399:talk 5395:Jh12 5338:talk 5324:talk 5309:talk 5269:talk 5254:very 5229:talk 5216:work 5137:talk 5072:away 5060:talk 5038:logs 5034:last 4927:Done 4909:talk 4903:King 4900:Gary 4891:mbox 4884:This 4872:Undo 4848:talk 4809:talk 4703:Done 4687:talk 4653:talk 4635:talk 4580:talk 4557:talk 4527:this 4479:just 4458:talk 4444:talk 4422:lame 4399:... 4373:... 4367:... 4318:talk 4308:Add 4295:talk 4287:here 4269:talk 4241:talk 4199:talk 4057:talk 4034:talk 4009:Tito 3994:talk 3976:Tito 3964:talk 3892:talk 3855:talk 3822:talk 3808:some 3783:talk 3754:talk 3719:talk 3675:talk 3560:this 3487:Pika 3469:Done 3378:talk 3357:talk 3310:Done 3196:Done 3166:mush 3129:mush 3097:here 3090:diff 3063:here 2986:talk 2953:talk 2864:moo! 2798:moo! 2766:moo! 2729:Neil 2635:Hi. 2593:talk 2586:Mets 2560:blis 2445:talk 2400:).}} 2219:Talk 2176:talk 2173:edit 2115:logs 2085:logs 2081:last 2073:talk 1992:logs 1962:logs 1958:last 1950:talk 1719:talk 1260:five 1256:NOTE 1147:talk 761:and 645:and 544:. - 342:Link 304:siro 9390:). 9268:and 9255:not 9201:}} 9113:by 9066:not 9010:not 8963:) ( 8939:}} 8666:or 8547:are 8510:own 8310:to 7814:Why 7535:)/( 7531:)/( 7438:)/( 7434:)/( 7400:)/( 7396:)/( 7382:can 7358:)/( 7354:)/( 7216:. 6675:Why 6662:or 6558:to 6455:Why 6332:Why 6208:g12 6191:Why 5911:or 5907:as 5899:as 5620:?? 5548:all 5521:all 5161:or 5120:or 4984:). 4590:You 4223:by 4137:any 3700:one 3480:Fun 3472:by 3374:501 3372:ETS 3345:tfd 2940:of? 2889:Avi 2880:Avi 2760:. - 2684:isd 2588:501 2556:nae 2511:to 2264:not 2236:. 2213:-- 2120:at 2103:by 1997:at 1980:by 1699:haz 1546:DES 1475:is 1448:or 1351:not 1325:all 990:. 976:in 556:(c) 551:(t) 469:DES 427:DES 242:--> 176:not 108:not 9388:}} 9382:{{ 9350:? 9330:++ 9320:}} 9314:{{ 9218:}} 9212:{{ 9123:| 9085:, 9074:. 8998:}} 8992:{{ 8947:}} 8941:{{ 8935:{{ 8921:++ 8906:) 8889:++ 8875:}} 8869:{{ 8865:}} 8859:{{ 8847:) 8812:) 8802:}} 8796:{{ 8792:}} 8786:{{ 8770:}} 8764:{{ 8760:}} 8754:{{ 8743:++ 8733:}} 8727:{{ 8723:}} 8717:{{ 8708:) 8694:}} 8688:{{ 8680:}} 8674:{{ 8656:) 8618:) 8604:) 8557:) 8543:}} 8537:{{ 8501:) 8484:}} 8478:{{ 8453:· 8414:) 8388:}} 8382:{{ 8374:) 8350:}} 8344:{{ 8340:}} 8334:{{ 8322:) 8291:}} 8285:{{ 8277:) 8265:, 8237:) 8217:· 8201:) 8170:}} 8164:{{ 8160:}} 8154:{{ 8139:) 8095:· 8071:}} 8065:{{ 8038:}} 8032:{{ 8024:) 7989:· 7954:}} 7948:{{ 7915:}} 7909:{{ 7834:}} 7830:{{ 7809:So 7768:}} 7762:{{ 7740:it 7737:ip 7734:Wh 7715:it 7712:ip 7709:Wh 7688:· 7680:}} 7674:{{ 7670:}} 7664:{{ 7651:) 7603::D 7571:}} 7565:{{ 7503:++ 7487:, 7458:}} 7452:{{ 7341:}} 7335:{{ 7319:) 7292:) 7284:-- 7247:) 7224:) 7202:}} 7196:{{ 7183:) 7160:) 7053:) 7001:++ 6976:ka 6973:on 6970:El 6966:}} 6960:{{ 6950:++ 6926:ka 6923:on 6920:El 6908:}} 6902:{{ 6887:++ 6847:- 6836:) 6828:-- 6793:) 6779:) 6765:) 6751:) 6719:) 6670:So 6651:) 6640:}} 6634:{{ 6616:) 6608:-- 6603:}} 6597:{{ 6593:}} 6587:{{ 6583:}} 6577:{{ 6573:}} 6567:{{ 6538:++ 6516:) 6508:-- 6494:) 6490:· 6476:G2 6473:G3 6450:So 6440:) 6432:-- 6411:}} 6405:{{ 6386:) 6368:) 6350:) 6327:So 6319:}} 6313:{{ 6308:: 6290:! 6282:Hi 6273:) 6257:) 6249:. 6224:. 6211:}} 6205:{{ 6186:So 6180:}} 6174:{{ 6156:) 6146:}} 6140:{{ 6132:) 6124:? 6096:) 6082:) 6066:++ 6040:}} 6034:{{ 6017:++ 5969:++ 5944:++ 5917:db 5884:is 5875:) 5864:}} 5861:db 5858:{{ 5844:) 5836:. 5834:}} 5828:{{ 5819:) 5781:→ 5724:) 5552:G6 5446:) 5401:) 5391:}} 5385:{{ 5378:}} 5372:{{ 5358:! 5350:Hi 5340:) 5326:) 5311:) 5296:}} 5290:{{ 5271:- 5250:}} 5244:{{ 5231:- 5220:-- 5212:}} 5206:{{ 5179:}} 5173:{{ 5169:}} 5163:{{ 5159:}} 5153:{{ 5128:}} 5122:{{ 5118:}} 5112:{{ 5062:) 5028:, 5009:. 4894:}} 4888:{{ 4881:}} 4877:{{ 4850:) 4830:{{ 4763::S 4739:G7 4689:) 4681:-- 4675:}} 4671:{{ 4655:) 4637:) 4594::D 4582:) 4559:) 4523:}} 4519:{{ 4511:}} 4507:{{ 4503:}} 4499:{{ 4495:}} 4491:{{ 4487:no 4460:) 4446:) 4412:}} 4408:{{ 4392:. 4360:. 4320:) 4304:km 4297:) 4271:) 4243:) 4201:) 4184:.) 4114:}} 4108:{{ 4011:xd 3978:xd 3531:te 3529:ai 3527:hw 3525:et 3523:tl 3521:os 3517:an 3515:Ry 3509:}} 3503:{{ 3476:. 3453:-- 3398:}} 3394:{{ 3348:}} 3342:{{ 3336:}} 3330:{{ 3312:- 3276:|] 3268:|] 3262:}} 3258:{{ 3242:Od 3238:}} 3232:{{ 3185:}} 3179:{{ 3092:. 3086:}} 3080:{{ 3056:}} 3053:db 3050:{{ 3046:}} 3040:{{ 3036:}} 3030:{{ 3024:) 2983:· 2971:tk 2969:- 2950:· 2933:}} 2927:{{ 2908:§ 2851:§ 2834:§ 2817:§ 2786:§ 2756:. 2716:§ 2694:Ed 2687:}} 2681:{{ 2663:}} 2657:{{ 2447:) 2390:{{ 2386:}} 2382:{{ 2258:" 2221:| 2217:| 2188:1= 2151:-- 2113:| 2075:, 2071:, 1990:| 1952:, 1948:, 1868:-- 1863:}} 1857:{{ 1823:}} 1819:{{ 1785:}} 1779:{{ 1763:• 1759:• 1753:}} 1747:{{ 1743:}} 1740:tl 1737:{{ 1675:}} 1669:{{ 1616:is 1532:}} 1526:{{ 1522:}} 1516:{{ 1487:}} 1481:{{ 1473:if 1456:}} 1453:db 1450:{{ 1446:}} 1440:{{ 1186:}} 1180:{{ 1145:| 1026:}} 1020:{{ 1016:is 1013:}} 1010:db 1007:{{ 988:}} 982:{{ 974:}} 968:{{ 964:}} 958:{{ 718:}} 712:{{ 676:}} 670:{{ 465:}} 459:{{ 450:}} 444:{{ 425:. 419:}} 413:{{ 409:}} 403:{{ 374:警告 352:警告 273:SS 76:→ 9401:/ 9395:ʨ 9393:r 9361:/ 9355:ʨ 9353:r 9300:/ 9294:ʨ 9292:r 9286:. 9231:) 9227:( 9197:| 9193:| 9174:‑ 9150:/ 9144:ʨ 9142:r 9127:) 9119:( 9107:. 9101:. 9089:( 8967:) 8959:( 8902:( 8843:( 8828:‑ 8808:( 8704:( 8652:( 8614:( 8600:( 8583:. 8553:( 8518:‑ 8497:( 8457:) 8449:( 8410:( 8370:( 8318:( 8273:( 8233:( 8221:) 8213:( 8197:( 8135:( 8099:) 8091:( 8020:( 7993:) 7985:( 7935:( 7918:( 7886:‑ 7860:‑ 7743:! 7718:! 7692:) 7684:( 7647:( 7639:. 7610:‑ 7539:) 7527:( 7524:/ 7442:) 7430:( 7427:/ 7404:) 7392:( 7389:/ 7362:) 7350:( 7347:/ 7315:( 7306:" 7288:( 7243:( 7220:( 7179:( 7156:( 7108:‑ 7049:( 6832:( 6789:( 6775:( 6761:( 6747:( 6732:‑ 6715:( 6691:‑ 6647:( 6612:( 6605:. 6512:( 6505:. 6486:( 6436:( 6382:( 6377:☺ 6364:( 6359:☺ 6346:( 6321:? 6269:( 6253:( 6152:( 6128:( 6092:( 6078:( 5990:‑ 5928:) 5924:( 5871:( 5840:( 5815:( 5755:. 5720:( 5702:) 5696:( 5676:) 5672:( 5653:) 5647:( 5638:– 5626:‑ 5601:) 5595:( 5579:) 5575:( 5537:) 5533:( 5500:. 5498:J 5487:) 5481:( 5442:( 5427:‑ 5397:( 5336:( 5322:( 5307:( 5275:) 5267:( 5235:) 5227:( 5186:~ 5139:) 5135:( 5085:‑ 5058:( 5044:. 5032:( 4971:. 4912:) 4906:( 4846:( 4811:) 4807:( 4771:‑ 4749:) 4711:‑ 4685:( 4651:( 4633:( 4602:‑ 4578:( 4555:( 4535:‑ 4456:( 4442:( 4316:( 4293:( 4267:( 4239:( 4197:( 4084:) 4082:ζ 4080:( 4059:) 4055:( 4036:) 4032:( 4021:I 3996:) 3992:( 3987:— 3966:) 3962:( 3894:) 3890:( 3857:) 3853:( 3824:) 3820:( 3815:— 3785:) 3781:( 3756:) 3752:( 3721:) 3717:( 3677:) 3673:( 3668:— 3660:. 3519:P 3424:§ 3380:) 3376:( 3370:M 3359:) 3355:( 3307:Y 3150:) 3148:ζ 3146:( 3101:♠ 3099:… 3094:∴ 3067:♠ 3065:… 3060:∴ 3022:C 3019:T 3016:U 3005:N 2595:) 2591:( 2558:' 2545:. 2528:( 2504:. 2491:( 2443:( 2342:? 2256:. 2184:) 2171:( 2128:) 2124:( 2117:) 2109:( 2095:. 2079:( 2030:. 2005:) 2001:( 1994:) 1986:( 1972:. 1956:( 1765:c 1761:t 1708:) 1704:( 1627:_ 1621:R 1584:_ 1578:R 1343:( 945:_ 939:R 892:_ 886:R 841:_ 835:R 829:( 803:_ 797:R 603:_ 597:R 578:— 548:| 517:看 515:↔ 513:讲 511:↔ 364:@ 336:• 316:o 310:χ 301:— 289:☺ 287:| 261:• 232:• 160:. 119:• 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index