1044:
sympathetic to the concerns of those editors who felt that the template took up too much space on the page. But I think there are numerous ways to solve that problem. The first is the one that was already tried: putting it in collapsed form at the bottom of the page. I found the argument, made above, that it was still too spacious once one un-collapsed it, a rather poor argument, because all one has to do in such a situation is to re-collapse it. I think the revert of that version was rather unhelpful. But another option is to discuss in this talk ways of making the template smaller. One way would be to remove some links within it, or some sections of it (I don't have anything in mind). Another approach, not mutually exclusive, is to incorporate the collapsed structure within the template itself. The default display of the template could then be to show each of its section headings, but the sections themselves would display as collapsed. Interested readers could then un-collapse each section one-by-one as they wish. That way, the default display would be quite compact, and could even fit adequately at the top of the page (although I think these things are about equally useful at either the top or the bottom). --
282:
unelected "mob". It shpould be removed from the template box because it is not a prescribed form of capital punishment only a method of killing. In choosing to include this article, it begs the question what other forms of killing are therefore valid? Burial up to the neck in sand, walking the plank, pushed off cliffs, pulled aprt from wild horses etc. By allowing this entry there is a case to include every kind of nasty manner to kill someone and say that this is a form of execution. It's bad form and that is also why this entry should be removed.
22:
712:
you're going to discuss whether or not navigation templates such as this one are required on all pages - then you need to have it in a more centralized location than this - perhaps village pump? Or we could discuss on that article talk page alternate placements not at the beginning of the article ... is there not a version of this template that goes at the bottom of the page? That would be much less intrusive and allow the illustrations of the article to be close to the text that discusses them.
71:
53:
766:: "The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article. Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." That seems clear enough - we don't have a general consensus policy one way or another, but instead it is decided on a per-article basis. Nothing decided on this talk page can override local article consensus.
857:. I think this question is a less controversial one than infoboxes, because it allows a selected image to remain at the top, and it does not prevent the hurried reader from reading the article by allowing them a quick summary (a critique which has been leveled at infoboxes.) I note that the template is fairly slender and not "huge" or "ungainly" as said by Parrot of Doom in a reversion edit summary.
924:. So, the Despenser picture is definitely highly relevant, but precisely because it concerns the nowadays least known middle ritual (causing some confusion), I'm inclined to think mulling over an improved caption text is an alternative to swapping the picture with another one. I guess that is Article Talk Page stuff, though, but wanted to give a brief mention of it here.
161:. I don't know where the previous discussion is located that you mention nor do I know what the name of the template used to be, and that would be quite helpful. Meanwhile, I'm going to put Israel back on the list. If anyone has an issue with this, feel free to undo my edit, but if you do please justify your reason for doing so on this talk page. Thanks
389:'Capital Punishment' is not a universally understood term. When it appears next to a section in an article some people get confused. I think that a more universally understood name, such as 'Death Penalty' or 'Death Punishment' or 'Death Sentence' should be utillised as the header for the Sidebar to help with reader comprehension.
585:. The two first users only proffers their personal sentiments, that the template is "huge" and "ungainly". The last user, Nev1, has by far a much more constructive attitude, in particular, I value Nev1's willingness to see if a collapsed version of the template, or a horizantal version of it should be considered.
474:
execution. As for "inert gas asphyxiation", as it's a proposed method, I don't see how it merits inclusion as "current", especially as I don't see any evidence that's it's under serious consideration by any legislative body. I'm not sure if they should be removed completely, or moved elsewhere within
915:
I tend to agree with you that loading problems on substandard screens (such as mobile phone) is can only go a bit as criticism, but Nev1 appreciated the move where I moved the template from the TOP of the lead to the bottom of the lead. It is a practically invisible edit change on a wide screen, but
1082:
I agree that the proposed format is much better than the sickly green, which was the one I was familiar with. Having, in an image/text-heavy article as HDQ is, a vertical strip, also is more problematic here than in articles with a lesser ratio image/text. A horizontally placed box on the bottom of
1038:
I came here because I was pinged, so here is my personal opinion about use of the template, and I'd rather not get involved in the discussion about personal attacks and such. In general, I think these kinds of templates are useful to our readers, because they are a way of saying, in effect, "if you
970:
You inserted a green line which, when clicked, opens a huge white space with a template running down the right side. It's ugly. And frankly, I'm not particularly thrilled to see anyone claim that HD&Q is "part of a series" when almost every article in that series is a mess (like most articles
875:
1. Sorry, you're such a veteran that I thought you were administrator! Mea culpa. 2. Essentially, your suggestion is the one opposed to and reverted; Nev1 had a rather better founded criticism in saying it clogs up the view on the mobile. I'm not too sure, though, how other editors judge the weight
895:
If there is a problem with such templates as displayed on mobile devices then it is a problem that would be Wiki-wide, not solely about the HDQ article. Such a problem would best be addressed by looking at mobile device operating systems, or the way wiki markup is sent to them. We should not stop
711:
No template is "standard" - the placement of that template was totally overwhelming to the beginning of the article and pushed down illustrations out of connection with their discussion in the text. There is no requirement that navigation templates go on pages - at least I'm not aware of such. If
880:
of Hugh
Despenser, one of the features attested in some HDQ-procedures (some have even meant "drawing" refers to drawing out intestines, rather than drawing on a hurdle. Drawing a criminal to the execution site in an ignominous manner is a VERY common pre-execution ritual, whether they are to be
814:
too huge or ungainly, then the disputing editor should create a horizontal template or break it up into sub-categories, though really I think the size and depth covered by the present template is acceptable. If it pushes relevant images too far down the page, then it should be modified so it's
281:
I agree it is a "method of killing" but it misleading to include it as a capital punishment because that suggests it has been legally sanctioned by legitimate bodies in power for the purposes of execution. But this is not the case because necklacing is a method of killing only associated with
186:
There've been a lot of edits the past couple weeks, generally by anonymous IP editors, that seem to misunderstand this template. At various times in the last week or so, Iraq, Iran and India have been deleted on the ground that there is some particular form of capital punishment that is not
1043:
page, then here are links to help you easily find other pages that may, perhaps, also interest you". Consequently, I tend to be rather inclusionist with respect to such templates. And I think it would be an improvement to include the template at the HDQ page in question. At the same time, I
618:
There are quite a few editors involved on different execution sites, and a call upon them for their input to develop a general policy and consensus here, and also sound out if the present "capital punishment" template might be improved. (I'm specifically thinking of a collapsed version of
809:
and most any other execution topic, especially if listed in the template. Not sure what the problem is. One editor described the template as "huge ungainly and completely unnecessary", and I don't find it to be any of those. I've certainly seen larger and more ungainly templates. If it
695:
template is standardized or not, but how to regard refusal to include templates that consensus has deemed standard for a particular topic). I hope the involved editors at HDQ, and those among the now mentioned users can generate a fruitful discussion in order to reach consensus for
1133:, such as PoD, who have pushed this article into FA status. Having reached FA status, aesthetics concerns, even though only really in the "eye of the beholder", DO, I think, gain a certain weight. However, my primary aim by adding this template to other capital punishments was to
1101:
If one goes with the narrow, top-of-the-page format, there are alternatives to that green color. But I think a horizontal, bottom-of-the-page format works just fine, and is just as useful to our readers. As for being "hideous", I guess that's in the eye of the beholder.
881:
hanged, decapitated, burnt on a pyre or so on). So I see your point about the picture being somewhat confusing, but I'm not altogether sure if another picture will represent an improvement. Possibly, the caption text should say it shows the disembowelment of
Despenser??
860:
Unrelated to the template question, I think the top image which has been selected by article contributors is confusing since it does not depict hanging, nor drawing, nor quartering. I think it should be swapped with another more exemplary image from the article body.
558:, notifying editors that are generally involved on Execution sites. However, it dawned upon me that maybe THIS Talk Page is the best to discuss whether the template to have become sufficiently standardized that single editors can't revert the template's inclusion.
205:
These edits misunderstand the navbox. The navbox is included on a variety of pages that deal with capital punishment, and is an aid to navigate among other articles dealing with capital punishment. The fact that someone comes across this navbox in the articles
277:
but it has never been used for any "legal execution". Unlike the other more barbarous methods listed in the infobox, these have all been used by "official" organs of the state even if by our standards they are horrific today. Whereas
Necklacing has not.
152:
I don't think I agree with the first criterion. There are some countries in which the death penalty is quite notable even if it isn't one of the biggest countries in the world. I'm thinking particularly of Israel where they've only executed one person,
971:
on
Knowledge. Perhaps if you focussed your efforts more on article improvement you wouldn't get so frustrated. And I note you're another editor who doesn't know the difference between stewardship and ownership. Don't worry though, you're not alone.
1191:, widespread consensus that HDQ "must" have this navbox. Perhaps most simply do not care, one way or the other, and therefore refrain from commenting? Unless other commentators therefore join in, I'll leave the article as it stands by the edits from
1165:
Thus, if PoD thinks a calm blue box at the bottom (that doesn't interfere with the article layout further up) is an acceptable compromise, I'm happy with that (I am thereby foregoing my preference for the standard vertical strip, going for a second
1214:
I removed the decorative image, due to the tall aspect ratio, which was creating quite a bit of blank space. however, my changes were reverted, so I am now attempting a compromise with an image with a better aspect ratio. please discuss here.
916:
on the mobile screen, it means that the template does NOT upload before the lead, but after it. That's the type of constructive aid to improve readability of
Knowledge on other reading formats, I think! Just short on the Despenser picture: The
545:
466:" should be removed from this section. "Forced disappearance" does not exclusively imply execution, and when it does, it's an extrajudicial killing rather than a legislated punishment. In any case, a forced disappearance is a means
272:
and as as I know and from the reading the article, it has clearly never never been used by a legitimate legislative power. It is well known that necklacing has been used to kill people who have been found guilty of crimes by
739:(ec) Yes, of course other editors have input - but that also means that non-capital punishment active editors get input also. It's all input - it's not "ownership" if its one group but "input" from another. All are "input".
1128:
template that won't be automatically updated when the "classical" vertical template becomes updated. I hardly think this "defect" is a sufficiently weighty argument to overturn the aesthetic concerns voiced by those
417:
I appreciate your raising this in talk. I think I disagree with your suggestion though; if they are in doubt they need only click on the link to find out. This is one of the main purposes of this template after all.
600:
policy. The editors in question do not seem that standardized templates is not something a few editors should dispense with, since when something is standardized, then an implicit consensus has been reached.
157:, and though they've sentenced others to death, they've overturned them all. It is an interesting situation when religious aversion to the death penalty creeps its way into politics. There also is an article
725:
Well, if other editors on other execution pages thinks the template ought to be included also on HDQ, then they are not disqualified from saying so, are they? Neither you or Parrot of Doom owns that article.
690:
might provide some input on general policies on fairly standardized templates in general, if reverts of such inclusions are to be treated as any other types of reverts (i.e, not whether
Binksternet thinks
367:
Ok, I'm going to go ahead and remove it. If anyone disagrees, please make a comment here. Also, if there is another image that's appropriate and encyclopedic maybe it could be added instead. --
1204:
1032:
964:
705:
853:
I'm not an administrator; my voice is but one voice among many. I think the template should be placed near the upper right corner of the HDQ page, under one selected image, in the manner shown
1315:
Agree, with a preference for it being collapsed - I don't think we can assume that many readers of individual articles will be eager to navigate around this otherwise quite overwhelming list.
409:
384:
1083:
the page (above
Categories), in the calm blue proposed by PoD is definitely preferable, unless some other editors feel strongly that the Navbox to other related themes
605:
Or is it? The dispute question is: Is the capital punishment template so standardized by now that it ought to effectively obligatory on in-depth articles on execution?
780:
Consensuses can change. Many editors might not be aware of the HDQ article in question, but think it ought to include the template. So, I don't see your point at all
293:
297:
125:
In order to address the concerns expressed by the old "by country" section, I've made a new one which is not biased towards
English language speaking countries.
920:
is also relevant, and indeed, the ladder. Because the middle part of this gruesome ritual was not just that the person was to be disembowelled but be forced to
443:
427:
260:
524:(added in the same edit) also seems inappropriate to me as it is not a method, but a justification. Because these changes seem uncontroversial, I will be
980:
533:
503:
175:
1071:
789:
775:
933:
908:
890:
870:
218:
does not mean that any particular country listed in the navbox practices that particular form of capital punishment. It means only that the articles
1175:
1111:
1096:
1053:
844:
824:
405:
319:
537:
747:
734:
720:
368:
331:
1442:
1378:
1243:
1296:
529:
1310:
951:
responds in hysterical ownership modus in the following manner: " "it's still an ugly template which has no place here." I would like to hear
484:
376:
358:
1348:
1324:
146:
246:. It is inappropriate to remove an entry for a particular country because it does not practice every possible form of capital punishment.
555:
835:
FYI. I've just added a tiny, unobtrusive inclusion of the template at the bottom. Maybe TOO unobtrusive and practically invisible?
255:
231:
1516:
1224:
137:
1017:
1011:
1005:
999:
993:
1521:
439:
401:
346:
200:
197:
194:
191:
339:
1502:
453:
289:
1163:
Some (but not complete) leeway, out of respect for the principally aesthetic concerns of these editors should be given!!
1471:
1413:
1275:
985:
Your personal attacks are noted. For other editors, Parrot of Doom's style of debating can be viewed for example, by:
1231:
435:
397:
87:
1058:
Or perhaps something that doesn't impose itself on everyone, something that doesn't look hideous. Something like
1463:
1434:
1405:
1370:
1267:
1145:
reader would feel a quality reduction (of different reasons!) by the addition of the vertical strip, whereas the
132:
1254:
This should be converted to a navbar and placed at the bottom of the article IMO. It would format better their.
314:
181:
120:
1329:
okay, as a first step, I have switched it over to collapsed lists. I would still support changing it to a
1287:
1018:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hanged%2C_drawn_and_quartered&diff=516784919&oldid=516782810
1012:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hanged%2C_drawn_and_quartered&diff=529254217&oldid=529217529
1006:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hanged%2C_drawn_and_quartered&diff=563512435&oldid=563508667
1000:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hanged%2C_drawn_and_quartered&diff=563491752&oldid=563458247
994:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hanged%2C_drawn_and_quartered&diff=589844047&oldid=589843972
158:
33:
622:
The users I have seen, and known to be fairly active recently on various execution sites are, as follows:
1467:
1438:
1409:
1374:
1271:
854:
806:
626:
582:
551:
227:
78:
58:
223:
219:
494:
in the list. It talks about amputation as punishment, but as a means of applying the death penalty. --
680:
1209:
1067:
976:
646:
614:, relevant to MANY pages, and cannot as I see it, profitably be discussed at an isolated Talk Page!
349:, but thought I was in the minority. Does anyone except the editor who added it want it to stay?
86:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
499:
771:
480:
463:
1200:
1171:
1092:
1028:
960:
929:
904:
886:
866:
840:
785:
730:
701:
665:
168:
39:
1187:
Although those who have commented generally favour inclusion of a navbox, I do not find any
899:
The "drawing" of bowels is a definition I had not considered. Thanks for the historic view.
1107:
1049:
896:
using templates that work perfectly well on the great majority of regular computer screens.
820:
459:
393:
285:
546:
Is this a more appropriate place to discuss whether the template has become standardized??
8:
1459:
1430:
1401:
1366:
1263:
1192:
1121:
1064:
973:
948:
566:
372:
335:
325:
268:
Should that be included as a capital punishment? It is has only been used as a method of
143:
1344:
1306:
1239:
1220:
744:
717:
528:
and make the changes. If anyone disagrees, please let us know here what we're missing.
513:
495:
310:
1490:
767:
476:
136:(2) They have a page specific to capital punishment in that country, as listed here:
1291:
1196:
1167:
1088:
1024:
956:
952:
925:
900:
882:
862:
836:
781:
726:
697:
687:
675:
660:
239:
211:
162:
1476:
1333:
1103:
1045:
816:
696:
inclusion/optionality of the "capital punishment" template for in-depth articles!
655:
641:
520:
article, there is no suggestion that death is intended in this context. Further,
1451:
1422:
1393:
1358:
1320:
1255:
1249:
636:
596:
on every in-depth article on execution, and that these editors seem to violate
525:
521:
423:
354:
274:
251:
154:
1510:
1354:
1340:
1302:
1235:
1216:
740:
713:
597:
570:
305:
131:(1) They are in the top 60 populated countries in the world, as listed here:
763:
650:
516:
page and although there is discussion of amputation as a punishment in the
190:
We've seen Iran removed because it does not practice death by crucifixion (
1282:
592:
principal point is that this template (whatever present flaws it has) is
235:
207:
142:
I hope this new method assuages any concerns the previous list made. --
70:
52:
670:
517:
491:
261:
561:
Therefore, I append what I wrote wrote on DRN, re-mentioning editors:
1392:
Unless someone beats me to it I will try to switch this to a navbox.
1316:
1138:
631:
574:
419:
350:
247:
128:
The countries that are listed in the new section are there because:
269:
554:
some editors do not wish this template included. I brought to the
234:, are subjects related to capital punishment; as are the articles
1482:
1421:
IP attempting to add this template to a bunch of articles again.
243:
215:
1004:"As I said, go away and bother someone else with this nonsense"
193:); Iran removed because it does not practice death by boiling (
1489:" too) be added to the template? i am surprised they aren't.--
619:
templates-within-templates, but I don't know how to make it!)
1059:
83:
1161:
article with a navigation box at the bottom of the article.
196:); and India because it does not practice death by stoning (
1486:
1450:
Okay covered to a navbox and moved it on all the articles.
955:'s opinion here. Is it time to bring this user to ANI soon?
330:
It strikes me as unprofessional. Could it be removed? --
1124:
of a horizontal box has the "ideal" defect of being a
876:
of that argument. 3. As for the picture, it shows the
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1339:, but at least this reduces the visible footprint.
385:
Not everybody knows what 'Capital
Punishment' means
1010:"most people have greater lung capacity than this"
815:collapsible. There are viable compromises here. -
512:I agree. There is no mention of amputation in the
1508:
947:Unfortunately, rather than responding calmly
1135:add opportunities for the interested reader
1023:These are edit summaries on HDQ made by PoD
345:I agree. I almost reverted it when it was
1357:agree a collapsed navbox is a good idea.
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
556:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
1137:, but I have been convinced by PoD and
232:Capital punishment in the United States
1509:
1016:"maybe one of our editors is an idiot"
686:I also hope experienced administrator
138:Category:Capital punishment by country
1120:constructive proposed alternative by
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
490:I don't understand the inclusion of
15:
1234:, which seems more broad in focus.
1087:look the same. I'm not one of them.
922:watch his own guts burnt to cinders
434:Actually, that makes sense. Thanks.
304:I agree...and am removing it now. ~
264:should be removed from the template
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
805:inclusion of template on the page
14:
1533:
1485:(and maybe it's islamic version "
998:"go away and bother someone else"
581:"capital punishment" at the page
470:an execution, rather than a form
1232:File:Death Penalty World Map.svg
69:
51:
20:
992:"oh don't be so bloody stupid"
577:have reverted inclusion of the
133:List of countries by population
485:20:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
1517:Template-Class Death articles
1503:03:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
1472:02:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
1443:01:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
1414:04:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
1379:01:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
1349:20:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1325:19:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1311:16:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1297:16:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1276:11:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1244:00:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1225:23:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
538:08:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
504:22:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
256:21:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
176:22:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
90:and see a list of open tasks.
1522:NA-importance Death articles
444:22:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
428:14:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
410:14:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
298:15:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
159:Capital punishment in Israel
7:
1301:yes, that would be better.
807:Hanged, Drawn and Quartered
583:Hanged, Drawn and Quartered
579:perfectly standard template
552:Hanged, Drawn and Quartered
436:Jorjjdjsjiejejejjsjsjajqoak
398:Jorjjdjsjiejejejjsjsjajqoak
228:Capital punishment in India
187:practiced in that country.
96:Knowledge:WikiProject Death
10:
1538:
377:09:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
359:17:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
340:07:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
320:05:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
224:Capital punishment in Iran
220:Capital punishment in Iraq
147:06:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
99:Template:WikiProject Death
1205:16:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
1176:20:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1112:20:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1097:22:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
1072:22:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
1054:20:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
1033:20:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
981:19:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
965:19:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
934:18:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
909:18:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
891:16:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
871:16:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
845:16:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
825:16:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
790:15:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
776:15:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
748:15:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
735:15:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
721:15:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
706:14:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
64:
46:
347:added a couple weeks ago
230:, and for that matter,
1230:I will replace it with
627:You Can Act Like A Man
464:inert gas asphyxiation
182:By country explanation
121:By country methodology
681:Piledhigheranddeeper
460:forced disappearance
514:Capital punishment
34:content assessment
1295:
1131:principal editors
454:"Current methods"
413:
396:comment added by
318:
288:comment added by
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
79:WikiProject Death
1529:
1499:
1496:
1493:
1456:
1427:
1398:
1363:
1338:
1332:
1285:
1260:
1210:decorative image
1153:regard it as an
1070:
979:
666:Adrian J. Hunter
612:general question
412:
390:
308:
300:
240:Death by boiling
212:Death by boiling
172:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1507:
1506:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1479:
1452:
1423:
1394:
1359:
1336:
1330:
1256:
1252:
1212:
1116:Obviously, the
1063:
972:
548:
456:
391:
387:
328:
283:
275:kangaroo courts
266:
184:
170:
123:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
12:
11:
5:
1535:
1525:
1524:
1519:
1478:
1475:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1211:
1208:
1193:Parrot of Doom
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1122:Parrot of Doom
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1021:
1020:
1014:
1008:
1002:
996:
989:
988:
987:
986:
949:Parrot of Doom
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
897:
878:disembowelment
858:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
828:
827:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
684:
683:
678:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
644:
639:
634:
629:
594:standard usage
567:Parrot of Doom
563:
547:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
522:Eye for an eye
507:
506:
475:the template.
455:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
386:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
362:
361:
327:
324:
323:
322:
265:
259:
183:
180:
179:
178:
155:Adolf Eichmann
144:Shadowlink1014
135:
122:
119:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
102:Death articles
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1534:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1514:
1512:
1505:
1504:
1500:
1488:
1484:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1455:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1426:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1397:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1362:
1356:
1355:User:Frietjes
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1335:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1293:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1259:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1019:
1015:
1013:
1009:
1007:
1003:
1001:
997:
995:
991:
990:
984:
983:
982:
978:
975:
969:
968:
967:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
879:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
859:
856:
852:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
826:
822:
818:
813:
808:
804:
801:
800:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
749:
746:
742:
738:
737:
736:
732:
728:
724:
723:
722:
719:
715:
710:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
694:
689:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
624:
623:
620:
616:
615:
613:
607:
606:
602:
599:
595:
591:
586:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
562:
559:
557:
553:
550:Hi there! On
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
501:
497:
496:Derek Andrews
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
473:
469:
465:
461:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
416:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
321:
316:
312:
307:
303:
302:
301:
299:
295:
291:
290:109.155.72.87
287:
279:
276:
271:
263:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
203:
201:
198:
195:
192:
188:
177:
174:
173:
166:
165:
160:
156:
151:
150:
149:
148:
145:
140:
139:
134:
129:
126:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1480:
1453:
1449:
1424:
1395:
1391:
1360:
1257:
1253:
1213:
1188:
1186:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1149:reader will
1146:
1142:
1134:
1130:
1125:
1117:
1084:
1040:
1039:are reading
1022:
946:
921:
917:
877:
811:
802:
768:AndyTheGrump
764:Help:Infobox
692:
685:
621:
617:
611:
609:
608:
604:
603:
593:
589:
587:
578:
564:
560:
549:
477:Joefromrandb
471:
467:
457:
392:— Preceding
388:
329:
280:
267:
204:
189:
185:
169:
163:
141:
130:
127:
124:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1197:Arildnordby
1168:Arildnordby
1155:improvement
1089:Arildnordby
1025:Arildnordby
957:Arildnordby
953:Binksternet
926:Arildnordby
901:Binksternet
883:Arildnordby
863:Binksternet
837:Arildnordby
782:Arildnordby
727:Arildnordby
698:Arildnordby
688:Binksternet
676:Paul Barlow
661:XXzoonamiXX
326:Skull image
284:—Preceding
236:Crucifixion
208:Crucifixion
1511:Categories
1495:IBYAĐRA☪OO
1147:interested
1104:Tryptofish
1046:Tryptofish
817:Boneyard90
656:Tryptofish
642:Boneyard90
610:This is a
518:Amputation
492:amputation
262:Necklacing
1454:Doc James
1425:Doc James
1396:Doc James
1361:Doc James
1281:Agree. --
1258:Doc James
1141:that the
637:North8000
588:However,
458:I think "
369:Quasipalm
332:Quasipalm
1464:contribs
1435:contribs
1406:contribs
1371:contribs
1341:Frietjes
1303:Frietjes
1288:contribs
1268:contribs
1236:Frietjes
1217:Frietjes
1195:for now.
741:Ealdgyth
714:Ealdgyth
571:Ealdgyth
406:contribs
394:unsigned
315:contribs
306:Araignee
286:unsigned
270:lynching
30:template
1483:Stoning
1481:Should
1477:Stoning
1353:Thanks
1159:present
1157:to the
1143:general
1068:of Doom
977:of Doom
803:Support
651:Esoglou
530:GraemeC
462:" and "
244:Stoning
216:Stoning
1334:navbox
1283:IJBall
1250:Navbar
1189:strong
1166:best).
1065:Parrot
974:Parrot
598:WP:OWN
565:Users
164:Valley
36:scale.
1468:email
1439:email
1410:email
1375:email
1272:email
1151:still
762:From
671:Ceoil
93:Death
84:Death
59:Death
28:This
1487:Rajm
1460:talk
1431:talk
1402:talk
1367:talk
1345:talk
1321:talk
1317:NebY
1307:talk
1292:talk
1264:talk
1240:talk
1221:talk
1201:talk
1172:talk
1139:Nev1
1118:very
1108:talk
1093:talk
1085:must
1060:this
1050:talk
1041:this
1029:talk
961:talk
930:talk
918:fire
905:talk
887:talk
867:talk
855:here
841:talk
821:talk
786:talk
772:talk
745:Talk
731:talk
718:Talk
702:talk
693:this
632:TJRC
575:Nev1
573:and
534:talk
526:bold
500:talk
481:talk
440:talk
424:talk
420:John
402:talk
373:talk
355:talk
351:TJRC
336:talk
311:talk
294:talk
252:talk
248:TJRC
242:and
171:city
1126:new
226:,
214:or
202:).
1513::
1501::
1470:)
1466:·
1462:·
1441:)
1437:·
1433:·
1412:)
1408:·
1404:·
1377:)
1373:·
1369:·
1347:)
1337:}}
1331:{{
1323:)
1309:)
1290:•
1274:)
1270:·
1266:·
1242:)
1223:)
1203:)
1174:)
1110:)
1102:--
1095:)
1062:.
1052:)
1031:)
963:)
932:)
907:)
889:)
869:)
843:)
823:)
812:is
788:)
774:)
743:-
733:)
716:-
704:)
590:my
569:,
536:)
502:)
483:)
472:of
468:to
442:)
426:)
418:--
408:)
404:•
375:)
357:)
338:)
313:•
296:)
254:)
238:,
222:,
210:,
199:,
1498:N
1492:L
1458:(
1429:(
1400:(
1365:(
1343:(
1319:(
1305:(
1294:)
1286:(
1262:(
1238:(
1219:(
1199:(
1170:(
1106:(
1091:(
1048:(
1027:(
959:(
928:(
903:(
885:(
865:(
839:(
819:(
784:(
770:(
729:(
700:(
532:(
498:(
479:(
438:(
422:(
400:(
371:(
353:(
334:(
317:)
309:(
292:(
250:(
167:2
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
