Talk:Thomas Kuhn - Knowledge

2162:

they were only speaking to one frame of mind, and they were only seeking the truth so long as they were seeking their frame of mind. give it up. Kuhn's contribution is just so easy. Your field might be interesting and you might think that it seeks the metaphysical imperatives that denote the truth, but Kuhn wants to argue that it is not so easy. this coming from someone trained in science in the academy. at any rate, this is opinion, and has nothing to do with the biography of the person. if you disagree with kuhn's ideas without citation, then you need to take it somewhere else. probably among other scientists who believe they and they only have access to the truth regardless of any other interceding context. but hey, who has ever lived their life not believing this at one point or time? however, the main point is, this is criticism, or maybe opinion, not anything to do with wiki. peace.

1078: 1057: 541: 510: 265: 31: 95: 644: 551: 482: 466: 450: 434: 85: 656: 64: 969: 753: 948: 732: 979: 763: 203: 1167: 179: 1146: 684: 1177: 864: 843: 696: 22: 2003:

individual "converts" (I saw one way, now I see another) but after they gain traction the full "shift" on the community level is less dramatic (textbooks said one thing, now they say another). But that's just my speculation. In any case, whether or not such an activity is actually a description of change in science, or only a heuristic for thinking about scientific change, is still rather contentious... --

874: 336: 297: 346: 1686:"While compelling, Kuhn's theory has an inherent flaw, for if it is in fact taken as "true," it is merely a product of its paradigm and nothing more, therefore rendering it meaningless as anything more than "just" a theory (the problem of reflexivity). Also, taking the theory as true would imply that truth exists in the universe, an idea against which Kuhn argued." 213: 3081:

chemistry certainly are, however, areas that rely on statistical time series and panel comparisons such as macroeconomics and climate change are doomed to end up in endless opinion debate, for one reason they rely on incomplete data, incomplete model specifications (almost by definition) and incomplete analysis for the preceding reasons.

1637:

philosophers were not satisfied with gestalt switch and demanded a philosophy of language. In the 1980's Kuhn attempted to formulate (and reformulate and re-reformulate) such a linguistic analysis. But in my view never succeeded, and I know of no one who wrote that he had succeeded. So, one may reasonably ask: Which Kuhn?

2554:— I propose that this article is moved (i.e. named changed) to just Thomas Kuhn. He is refered to as Kuhn, T. S. Kuhn and Thomas Kuhn, but not by his full name. Of course his full name would still appear in the first sentence in bold as per usual. I will make the move within a few days if not contested -- 2341:

The section of this article directed towards to Polanyi-Kuhn debate says that both individuals' work made science "relativistic". Kuhn himself objected to the idea that science is relativistic and widely refuted claims that his writing indicated it to be so. This is particularly evident in the 1969

2067:, who had developed independently a view of the history of scientific change similar to Kuhn's.) Thus, they do not consider science as isolated from society as they argue that Kuhn does. In contrast to Kuhn, Althusser's conception of science is that it is cumulative, even though this cumulativity is 2002:

It does both depending on how people use it. Kuhn was not very exacting in his use of terms or his explanation of them, hence the famous "he uses a million definitions of 'paradigm' and none of them are consistent" claim. I think he would probably say that it happens first at an individual level with

1837:

was considered quite radical because of the inter-related concepts of incommensurability and "world change". While the exact meaning of these terms as Kuhn uses them is subject to some debate, this article might better establish the relevance and importance of SSR by incorporating a brief description

3080:

I agree with comment on Kuhn v. Popper in the debate. where is the criticism of Kuhnian philosophy in this article. Where is the discussion of subjective v. objective science. Some areas of science are arguably not capable of being subjected to rigorous scientific classification; physics/physical

3044:

I often say that Kuhn and Popper were to Science what Einstein was to Physics. My impression is that they were revolutionary in theoretical scientific thinking, and by now; changed our way of looking at the world. Yet when I read the lead section I want to yawn. Do I over-value them? They are merely

2320:

I'm of the opinion if someone uses ranking words such as 'best', 'worst' and 'most' they need to cite sources for these claims. Although getting sales figures can be problematic (Bookscan is expensive) and measuring the importance of a fact by sheer number of references in literature and on the web

3103:

Do you actually read scientific literature? It is mind-boggling that you cite physics and physical chemistry and then come up with climate change as a contrast, which is essentially traceable directly to the laws of thermodynamics and a bunch of physical constants. Pretty much all proper scientific

2853:

I am a little confused by the assertion that "Kuhn believed that scientists' subjective experiences made science a relativistic discipline", against the preceding section's assertion that "Kuhn himself denied the accusation of relativism in the third edition of SSR". I don't know enough about Kuhn

1278:

I do not understand why Knowledge article on Kuhn shows the book of Alexander Bird (with Kuhn's photo on it) instead of Kuhn's photo alone? Such an approach is, first of all, highly biased towards one (for some philosophers, not very convincing) interpretation of Kuhn. Second, it promotes this very

2309:

is Kuhn's best-known work, but I still think it would be a good idea to cite sources regarding the relative importance of his books and essays. After all, if it's true that one of his books is obviously more important than the others, then there should be no shortage of references supporting that

2203:

You should know that criticism and opinion are answers to different questions and criticism has everything to do with a wiki. An encyclopedia page on an academic should ideally include a criticism section, especially if the person had widely discussed views on science and philosophy. Karl Popper's

2161:

give me a break. scientists all over will want to dispute his terms because they want to believe that what they're doing is not a matter of revolution but a matter of accretion. they want to believe that they are tending towards the truth. Kuhn's major contribution was to tell these people that

1955:

Yes, "paradigm shift" seems to describe what happens to the individual scientist (i.e., she experiences a paradigm shift) rather than what happens at a disciplinary level (e.g. Einsteinian paradigm replacing the Newtonian paradigm). Out of sensitivity to this distinction we might consider changing

1721:

among paradigms, meaning that science from one paradigm cannot have a greater or lesser truth-value than science from another. The act of science to Kuhn was no more than problem solving within a paradigm, and each successive paradigm led not to more verisimilitude ("truth-likeness"), but instead

1463:

Perhaps I'm wrong but I think wiki policy suggests that "without citation is probably true," is not sufficient for grounds for removal, nor its consideration. However this is not true should it be reasonably challenged. I am certain that is true for the lead section. I'm also certain about that

3215:

I dislike the photograph of Kuhn used in the article. There appears to be something wrong with it. Looking carefully, it appears that to the left of Kuhn's face there is a transparent outline of his face. I have no idea whether that was caused by a photography error or not, but in any case, that

1907:

the old (and often incommensurable) one. The idea that the old paradigm shifts over a bit to the right to become the new paradigm is contradicted by the incommensurability thesis. Paradigm change, yes. Gestalt switch, yes. Shift of perception, yes. But "paradigm shift" tends too much towards the

1748:

As I understand it, this is a mix of ideas actually found in Kuhn (incommensurability, epistemological rejection of a provable Truth), unfounded extrapolation (the implication that change of paradigm cannot represent progress), and a suggestive but insubstantial remark (yes, there is probably a

3128:

Hi, In the article it says: "Kuhn was an agnostic." but in the Infobox at the right it says he's a Judaist. Could you at least just add the fact that he was agnostic in his adultery times. I don't edit the articles because I'm not registered and don't know if I edit them, admins will get angry

2130:

Of course, there are/will be people who disagree with Kuhn and say that they don't see history in his way. But to put this into the article would be to point out another person's view, and not to point out anything about Kuhn (analogous to inserting a "Conservative" section into the "Liberal"

2101:

Shouldn't the piece mention that Kuhn's idea of scientific revolutions is far from being accepted by many working scientists? (Including me!) There is at least as much evidence that science progresses by evolution, not revolution, except for "the" scientific revolution of the 17th century.

1636:

including a footnote (P. 167) indicating personal correspondence between Hanson and Kuhn apparently before publication of SSR. But I think Hanson was an early influence. Kuhn revised his ideas over the years, including such central ideas as paradigm and incommensurability, because academic

1940:

As you say, it does seem a bit of an odd phrase, implying something quite different from Kuhn's actual theory. In context, it's about scientists with different paradigms not being able to even communicate until one group has converted, because they live in different worlds (i.e. the

1902:

Thank you very much! This is a minor annoyance of mine; the phrase is frequently attributed to Kuhn but I have yet to see an actual instance of him using it. I suspect he never does -- the whole idea behind the resolution of a period of extraordinary science is that the new paradigm

1778:

Again, this engages material that probably belongs in the article, but it belongs there better expressed and with appropriate citation, as views of scholars, not of the "narrator". As I said, it's 25 years since I read much of Kuhn, so I'm probably not the one to write it. --

35: 1590:

I found a reference to Hanson on page 113 of the 3rd edn: "N.R. Hanson, in particular, has used gestalt demonstrations to elaborate some of the same consequences of scientific belief that concern me here." But that's all he says on that page..

1892:

The closest I can find is "paradigm-induced gestalt shift" (p. 120, 3rd ed.). He frequently mentions perceptual shifts and paradigm changes, and gradually equates the latter with the former, but I couldn't find the actual phrase in a quick

1581:

So, I guess what I'm asking is -- are there grounds for highlighting Hanson above all these others? Is this an actor attribution or an analyst one? I think this should be made more clear if we're talking about his philosophical influences.

1722:

merely perpetuated the field of science. According to Kuhn, theories in in the next paradigm, whether it begins in five years or five-hundred years, will be no more truth-like than the theories we have now; they will, in fact, be

2113:

would be a great addition to the book article. There have been a lot of people who have criticized Kuhn's views on the basis that you can't see the discrete changes he claims exist when you look at the historical record closely.

2410:

I also noticed that "The Death of Truth: Thomas S. Kuhn and the Evolution of Ideas" from the same author - most probably the same book (?), supposedly published by Oxford University Press, USA (February 28, 2006) - compare

2244:

is Kuhn's best known and most influential work. This is like asking for citation that George Washington is best known for being a general and president, or that Lizzie Borden is best known for killing her parents. -

2321:

is something for when humans have digitized all known works and an AI has been evolved to be able to number all the references to an item. Until then I've been using Google hits, Alexa numbers and other sources.

2187:

Hear, hear! It would so refreshing to have a biography article that just limned the views of the prominent individuals, for a change. I could do without the usual puritannical "corrections" by the "wise"guys.

3016:

Using Google, "Thomas Kuhn" returns "about 1,670,000 results" while "Thomas S. Kuhn" returns "about 377,000 results". Thus "Thomas Kuhn" is his more common name, so the article currently has the proper title. •

1521:

though doesn't turn him up once. In the preface, Kuhn explicitly lists only the following people as his intellectual influences for the book (his lists a few other people for helping him edit drafts, including

1436:

There is no problem with adding material about his life; it just needs to be sourced from a written biography or newspapers or interviews. That anonymous user added it all without citing a single source.

2818:

Yes, agreed it is an interesting link. Please note that I reverted your first attempt to add it as I got a circular link to the Kuhn article and thought (wrongly) that it was vandalism. I've re-added it.

1341:

Good call. I've replaced the redirect with a stub. If no one else gets around to writing the article in the next month or so, I'll dig out my copy of Kuhn and try to write something useful. --

1367:

I imagine that the recently added material about family, added anonymously without citation, is probably true, but I'd be a lot more comfortable if it were verified by a registered user. --

2848: 1824:: that, in short, is why there are punctuations in paradigm change. Yet there is no mention of it here. Incommensurability is required before this article can be considered complete. -- 2439: 126: 2400:

Anyone knows what happened to the new biography "Reluctant Revolutionary: The Life and Ideas of Thomas S. Kuhn" by Keay Davidson that was supposed to come out 2005 (four years ago)?

1128: 3294: 279: 1655:

seems to me to be well-intentioned, but based on a poor reading of Kuhn. I read him mostly over 25 years ago, so I am not the best one to address this. I'm going to drop a note at

1773:, is probably closer to the point than the deconstructionists, although I think Foucault had a more pessimistic view of the possibility, or at least the likelihood, of progress.) 3166: 3151: 2444:

This article says "Kuhn interviewed and taped Danish physicist Niels Bohr the day before Bohr's death. The recording contains the last words of Niels Bohr caught on tape.."

161: 2865: 3289: 1817: 1604: 367:

on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the

3479: 3389: 2466: 2429: 2176: 1700: 1118: 3369: 3140: 3109: 2758: 1863: 1624:

I believe that (Norwood Russell) Hanson's influence is in Kuhn's use of the idea of gestalt switch as a basis for incommensurability. I found Hanson referenced in

2879: 1600: 1689:

is terrible and should be deleted. The main theory of one of the most influential philosophers of the last 50 years refuted in two sentences? I don't think so.

634: 3484: 3339: 2470: 581: 2476:

What reason do you have to believe that this wasn't the last interview? People don't do interviews that often, especially when they're on their deathbed...--

3374: 3354: 3274: 1305: 1284: 274: 189: 151: 2927:

If Barack Obama was publishing books under the style "Barack Hussein Obama II" your comparison would be relevant to what I'm suggesting. And if not, not.

2582:

No title question much matters; but we should get them right all the same. It is not useful to have readers wonder if they are reading the right article.

1039: 825: 404: 3259: 1575: 1279:

interpretation as the "standard" one - again highly unreflected approach. Thirdly, I am very surprised that this issue hasn't been brought up before :-/

1094: 2569:

There is a redirect, so it doesn't much matter. Just remember that if you do the move, clean up the other redirects so we don't get double redirects. -

3474: 3344: 3082: 598: 3364: 3299: 2083:, and to include the above in what should be a brief sketch of Kuhn's life and accomplishments assigns undue significance. I think it belongs in the 1386: 1233: 930: 3359: 3279: 2311: 1093:, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 3334: 3123: 2871: 1301: 1280: 3399: 3384: 2382: 1085: 1062: 674: 624: 1409:...But fortunately in their greater wisdom, the stewards of Knowledge do not harbor such discriminatory prejudice against unregistered users. 3349: 1917:

p150, 1996 3rd edition paperback - "...one group or the other must experience the conversion that we have been calling a paradigm shift". --

489: 441: 319: 307: 121: 3104:

research relies on "statistical time series and panel comparisons", because it's the only way to establish an observation is not a fluke. --

1735:

These ideas of a lack of an absolute truth to be gathered from the world via empirical observations spurred the thoughts of many postmodern

1517:

The article currently makes it sound like Norris Hanson was a huge and major influence on Kuhn's work. My skimming through the footnotes of

3324: 3269: 1263: 3144: 3464: 3434: 3424: 3404: 3314: 3249: 2155: 1029: 815: 588: 394: 3090: 2629: 2485: 3113: 2787: 2146:

be included, e.g. Primack in "The View from the Center of the Universe" (Riverhead 2006), as similar criticisms are in other articles.

3196:

I am surprised a Criticism section has not so far been introduced in this article. Popper's page has a fairly large one, for example.

3023: 3007: 2967: 2936: 2922: 2695: 2135: 1430: 3329: 3264: 3244: 1708:

OK, I've cut that, and also the rest of the addition. For the record, here is the rest of it. There may be something worth salvaging.

473: 315: 2843: 2812: 1475: 3494: 3469: 3449: 3439: 3053: 2778: 2649: 2237: 1821: 1446: 1223: 920: 593: 457: 311: 230:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 117: 108: 69: 1673:

I agree. It's a reading of Kuhn which speaks less about what he said than what about some people interpretted him to be saying. --

3394: 3379: 3304: 3254: 2828: 2110: 1973: 1960: 1950: 1935: 1926: 1677: 1382: 1259: 231: 2712: 2591: 2330: 2678: 2007: 1956:

the article. The "periodic revolutions" which science goes through are not "paradigm shifts", as the article claims. Thoughts?

2213: 3454: 3414: 3319: 2861: 2741:

The words of the introduction are very strongly positive and biased relative to people that think about science in general.

1005: 791: 714: 576: 369: 2998:. People citing his books often, perhaps usually, follow suit. It's fairly finely balanced, but I find his form preferable. 2577: 2299: 2278: 1912: 1897: 3459: 3429: 3309: 3205: 1001: 572:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

235: 3161:

on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

3071: 3284: 3063: 2462: 2425: 2197: 2172: 2084: 1696: 1467: 669: 564: 520: 515: 2902: 2854:

to clear up the apparent contradiction (or maybe there is no contradiction and I just fail reading comprehension :) ).

2314: 2180: 3419: 3136: 3105: 2754: 2730:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2509:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2375:“In response to these critics, Kuhn cited Polanyi in the second edition of "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,…" 2361: 1873: 1859: 1422: 1199: 896: 239: 2118: 116:

content on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the

3489: 3444: 2353: 2253: 1886: 3186: 2747:

Because of his great obscurity in the scientific world, neither a sufficient criticism nor rebuttal has been made.

1198:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 2762: 2390: 2232: 1811: 1394: 992: 953: 776: 737: 359: 302: 2433: 3239: 1828: 1787: 1667: 1652: 226: 184: 2958: 2703:. There's no DAB page, no other notable claimants to the name have emerged as of yet, so it's a no-brainer IMO. 1641: 1619: 1253: 3409: 3039: 1309: 2542: 2533:

Just to redate this for when it was actually listed. The discussion is stale, but in my opinion still valid.

1333:

should be started, or the link here should be removed and the term sufficiently explained in this article. --

3201: 2367: 2336: 2209: 2072: 1842: 1190: 1151: 887: 848: 2611: 1313: 1288: 3150: 2096: 1647: 44: 2527: 2412: 2033:

I removed the following paragraph from the "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" section of this article:

1806: 2884: 2563: 113: 3216:

image with that flaw certainly should not be in the article. Could someone find a better image of Kuhn?

3045:

theory spinners or "claim"-makers who deeply influenced some scientists back in the sixties? (...Kinda

2227: 2378:

But there seems to be no reference to Polanyi in the second edition of TSSR, nor indeed in the first.

1398: 1329:, but this in turn is a redirect right back to here. This should be fixed. Either an actual article on 709: 524: 3225: 2447:

This claim that the interview occurred the day before Bohr died is not consistent with other sources.

3191: 2625: 2056: 1512: 100: 3197: 3003: 2932: 2898: 2736: 2454:) that presents the transcript of the interview says the interview was given on 31 October 1962. 2205: 2151: 2091: 1799: 1656: 1090: 2404: 895:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

790:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3067: 2913: 2691: 1946: 1922: 1471: 3167:

Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion

1847: 2395: 1426: 2994:

In the case of Kuhn, he is primarily known for his books, and they consistently use the style

1379:

I suggest deletion. That sort of thing belongs in an obituary, not an encyclopaedia article.

3210: 3086: 2839: 2808: 2538: 2481: 2357: 1852:

How did Kuhn's ideas post 1970s relate to the quantitative revolution in physical geography?

1550: 1494: 1273: 50: 3132: 2977: 2857: 2799: 2750: 2642: 2621: 2600: 2587: 2491: 2421: 2349: 2168: 1855: 1692: 1390: 1297: 661: 556: 8: 3182: 3174: 2999: 2928: 2894: 2666: 2147: 1793: 1750: 1540: 21: 3021: 2965: 2920: 2875: 2687: 2547: 1942: 1918: 1736: 1718: 1077: 1056: 2686:"Thomas Kuhn" is the name he published under, and the name he is most often known by. 1530: 1497:" (which was wrong: that's specifically the Copernican Revolution), is now linked to " 3221: 2774: 2708: 2662: 2658: 2523: 2386: 2326: 2224: 1442: 1267: 984: 768: 351: 1258:

I shifted a lot of text - the bit that was just about the book - from this entry to

2835: 2824: 2804: 2674: 2574: 2559: 2534: 2477: 2296: 2275: 2250: 2193: 2132: 2115: 2064: 2028: 2004: 1784: 1758: 1739:, even though Kuhn himself never associated himself with that branch of philosophy. 1674: 1664: 1592: 1583: 1506: 1372: 218: 2646: 2583: 2451: 2260: 2052: 2038: 1766: 1749:

partial temperamental relationship to the deconstructionalists, but less than to

1723: 1545: 1523: 1416: 1493:

Recent change noted: The phrase "scientific revolutions", previously linked to "

540: 509: 264: 3178: 2995: 2988: 2954: 2953:. Anyway, for this article, Thomas Kuhn is his common name, so it follows that 2946: 2890: 2604: 2088: 1966: 1535: 1498: 1362: 1330: 1326: 1182: 879: 1833:

I completely agree. From a historical perspective, the philosophy laid out in

3233: 3158: 3018: 2962: 2917: 2218: 2068: 1908:

connotation of cumulativity and linear progression that Kuhn sought to deny.

1894: 1825: 1803: 1638: 1616: 569: 643: 3217: 2909: 2770: 2721: 2704: 2519: 2500: 2372:

The article currently claims in the alleged 'Polanyi-Kuhn Debate' section:

2322: 1608: 1570: 1565: 1438: 568:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 3060:, doesn't it appear to over-value subjectiveness? Yet I see no solution. 2984: 2950: 2942: 2820: 2744:

Most scietists have never heard of Thomas Kuhn, his work, or his ideas.

2670: 2603:; I believe there are bots that automatically sort the double redirects. 2570: 2555: 2551: 2305:

I'm the guy who requested the citation. I never had any doubt that that

2292: 2271: 2246: 2189: 1780: 1660: 1612: 1555: 1502: 1368: 1342: 1089:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to 701: 481: 465: 449: 433: 84: 63: 1820:(2000), Kuhn describes his "philosophical problematic" as focussing on 1560: 1353: 1334: 997: 786: 781: 364: 363:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 2413:

http://www.amazon.com/Death-Truth-Thomas-Evolution-Ideas/dp/0195144325

2287:

article on him simply begins "American historian of science noted for

1816:

In the autobiographical interview conducted in 1995, and published in

1320: 3046: 2769:

Kuhn's work is required reading of many Physics Bachelor programs --

2381:

Thus I flag the claim for provision of a quotation citing Polanyi. --

2060: 1970: 1957: 1932: 1909: 1883: 1839: 968: 947: 752: 731: 2974:

I think you can assume that we all understand how redirection works

2047: 891:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of 238:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 202: 178: 2142:

In the interest of NPOV, documented criticisms of Kuhn's position

2987:

is certainly similar, but not identical and not binding; to have

2957:

is a redirect. Either way they'll arrive to the article. I found

1765:; if we want to go to Continental Philosophy for our comparison, 1501:", which also fails to discuss the term, but probably should. -- 1195: 892: 1628:(SSR) on page 113, and found two references to Hanson in Kuhn's 1166: 1145: 2405:

http://www.johnemackinstitute.org/center/center_news.asp?id=241

1632:, Pp 34 and 293. And I found eight references in the index to 863: 842: 683: 2075:) whereas Kuhn considers various paradigms as incommensurable. 1838:

of these controversial concepts. I will perform an edit ASAP.

1526:, but I don't think that's likely the same thing meant here): 2620:

per Skomorokh. I was just about to propose the same thing. ~

2037:

In France, Kuhn's conception of science has been related to

2889:

The form of his name which he used on his publications was

2440:

Not true that Kuhn interviewed Bohr the day before he died?

2346:, which is now included in standard editions of the book. 335: 296: 2980:

is the more relevant policy, but inconclusive in this case

2109:

I think a section on published responses by scientists to

1464:

greater wisdom of the founders and stewards of Knowledge.

120:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 2270:

as "one of the most cited academic books of all time". -

1415:

named Khun other than his CV and work. Compare to say;

3295:

Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles

2800:

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/oct2011/kuhn-o28.shtml

2499:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

2204:

page, for example, has a fairly long Criticism section.

1599:

The two most consistently mentioned influences, through

780:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3049:?) So Kuhn's ideas really didn't change anything !? 2063:. (Foucault, in fact, was most directly influenced by 2720:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2055:, although both are more concerned by the historical 2959:

Mos:names#Pseudonyms.2C_stage names and common names

2458: 1411:

Meanwhile this article has almost nothing about the

1194:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1172: 974: 869: 758: 691: 651: 546: 341: 208: 90: 2893:, so that would seem to be a better article title. 2849:Relativism under the heading "Polanyi-Kuhn debate" 1798:I have added this section as per the tasks note at 1488: 3290:C-Class biography (science and academia) articles 2223:The "Kuhn hates Muslims" stuff really has to go. 2079:I did so because this article is about Kuhn, not 1941:"incommensurability of competing paradigms"). -- 3480:Low-importance University of California articles 3390:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 3231: 2991:as his article name would certainly not be wrong 2908:I disagree. One of our most popular articles is 2657:He was not generally known by three names, like 3370:Mid-importance Contemporary philosophy articles 3056:says the lead should be self-contained, while 2599:I support the proposal, as Thomas Kuhn is the 2452:http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4517_1.html 2266:should cite adequately for this. It refers to 1878:Could someone please point me to a passage in 1262:. So I've shifted the Talk: text from here to 1103:Knowledge:WikiProject University of California 3485:WikiProject University of California articles 3340:Mid-importance philosophy of science articles 2916:redirects to it, not the other way around. • 2792:Added an external link of interest on Kuhn's 2457:Bohr's date of death according to Knowledge ( 1882:where Kuhn uses the phrase "paradigm shift"? 1264:Talk: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1106:Template:WikiProject University of California 127:History of Science Collaboration of the Month 3375:Contemporary philosophy task force articles 3355:Mid-importance Analytic philosophy articles 3275:High-importance history of science articles 996:, an effort to create, expand, and improve 3260:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in People 3475:C-Class University of California articles 3345:Philosophy of science task force articles 2516:page moved per consensus, redirects fixed 112:, an attempt to improve and organize the 3365:C-Class Contemporary philosophy articles 3300:Science and academia work group articles 3054:Knowledge:Manual of Style (lead section) 136:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science 3360:Analytic philosophy task force articles 3280:WikiProject History of Science articles 3124:Editing Religion Section of The Infobox 2794:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2310:fact. The sources above look great. - 2289:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2242:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2111:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1260:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 139:Template:WikiProject History of Science 19: 3335:C-Class philosophy of science articles 3232: 1965:Maybe not. I just read the article on 373:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 3400:Low-importance Massachusetts articles 3385:Low-importance United States articles 1717:Kuhn also stressed the importance of 3350:C-Class Analytic philosophy articles 2514:The result of the move request was: 1188:This article is within the scope of 1086:WikiProject University of California 1083:This article is within the scope of 885:This article is within the scope of 774:This article is within the scope of 562:This article is within the scope of 357:This article is within the scope of 224:This article is within the scope of 15: 3325:Mid-importance philosopher articles 3270:C-Class history of science articles 2949:, which you'll notice redirects to 2263:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2085:Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1626:Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1254:Some article and talk content moved 609:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 275:the science and academia work group 49:It is of interest to the following 13: 3465:Low-importance New Jersey articles 3435:Low-importance California articles 3425:WikiProject United States articles 3405:WikiProject Massachusetts articles 3315:Mid-importance Philosophy articles 3250:Knowledge vital articles in People 2788:William Whitlow commentary on Kuhn 2459:http://en.wikipedia.org/Niels_Bohr 682: 642: 612:Template:WikiProject United States 480: 464: 448: 432: 263: 14: 3506: 1109:University of California articles 3330:Philosophers task force articles 3265:C-Class vital articles in People 3245:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 2461:) is given as 18 November 1962. 1325:Currently this article links to 1175: 1165: 1144: 1076: 1055: 1014:Knowledge:WikiProject New Jersey 977: 967: 946: 872: 862: 841: 800:Knowledge:WikiProject California 761: 751: 730: 694: 654: 549: 539: 508: 379:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 344: 334: 295: 211: 201: 177: 93: 83: 62: 29: 20: 3495:Low-importance Judaism articles 3470:WikiProject New Jersey articles 3450:Low-importance history articles 3440:WikiProject California articles 2834:My thanks for the restoration. 1228:This article has been rated as 1123:This article has been rated as 1034:This article has been rated as 1017:Template:WikiProject New Jersey 925:This article has been rated as 820:This article has been rated as 803:Template:WikiProject California 629:This article has been rated as 399:This article has been rated as 382:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 248:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 156:This article has been rated as 3395:C-Class Massachusetts articles 3380:C-Class United States articles 3305:WikiProject Biography articles 3255:C-Class level-5 vital articles 2362:00:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 251:Template:WikiProject Biography 124:. You can also help with the 109:History of Science WikiProject 1: 3226:09:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC) 2779:20:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 2486:18:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 2471:13:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 2331:12:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2315:22:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 2156:05:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC) 2131:article). Catch my meaning?-- 1447:20:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 1431:17:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1208:Knowledge:WikiProject Judaism 1202:and see a list of open tasks. 1097:and see a list of open tasks. 1004:standard. Please join in the 905:Knowledge:WikiProject History 899:and see a list of open tasks. 794:and see a list of open tasks. 707:This article is supported by 667:This article is supported by 272:This article is supported by 3455:WikiProject History articles 3415:Low-importance Ohio articles 3320:C-Class philosopher articles 3024:14:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 3008:13:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 2968:23:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 2937:21:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 2923:20:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 2903:17:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 2868:) 13:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 2844:21:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 2829:20:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 2813:20:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 2630:10:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 2612:12:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 2578:07:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 2564:06:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 2391:15:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2300:22:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2279:22:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2254:22:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2045:corresponding to Foucault's 1829:23:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1807:23:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1788:07:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC) 1755:Philosophical Investigations 1678:05:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 1668:23:58, 26 October 2005 (UTC) 1620:23:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1399:11:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1314:21:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1289:00:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 1211:Template:WikiProject Judaism 908:Template:WikiProject History 236:contribute to the discussion 106:This article is part of the 7: 3460:C-Class New Jersey articles 3430:C-Class California articles 3310:C-Class Philosophy articles 2870:The anon user was me, btw. 2763:16:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 2148:D A Patriarche, BSc (talk) 2119:15:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 1848:Kuhn and physical geography 1769:, especially in the era of 142:history of science articles 10: 3511: 3285:C-Class biography articles 3206:17:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 3187:05:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 3114:22:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 2880:13:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 2415:- never became available. 2214:17:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 2198:00:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 1509:15:50, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC) 1375:21:05, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC) 1270:22:14, Jan 19, 2004 (UTC) 1234:project's importance scale 1129:project's importance scale 1040:project's importance scale 931:project's importance scale 826:project's importance scale 635:project's importance scale 405:project's importance scale 162:project's importance scale 3420:WikiProject Ohio articles 3173:Please help us determine 3145:13:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 3072:04:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 2713:09:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 2696:04:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 2679:03:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 2650:02:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 2592:03:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 2543:22:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 2528:17:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC) 2261:The entry on Kuhn in the 2181:10:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 2105:Charlie T 20 August 2006 2092:19:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 2057:conditions of possibility 2008:20:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1974:16:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1961:15:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1951:15:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1936:15:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1927:15:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1913:15:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1898:14:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1887:13:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1843:16:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1586:19:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1476:03:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 1227: 1160: 1122: 1071: 1033: 1002:Knowledge feature-quality 962: 924: 857: 819: 746: 690: 670:WikiProject Massachusetts 650: 628: 565:WikiProject United States 534: 488: 472: 456: 440: 415: 411: 398: 329: 271: 196: 155: 101:History of science portal 78: 57: 3490:C-Class Judaism articles 3445:C-Class history articles 3129:because of me. Thanks! 2727:Please do not modify it. 2506:Please do not modify it. 2434:22:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 2233:Odd request for citation 2228:16:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2136:19:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1818:The Road Since Structure 1657:Template:PhilosophyTasks 1605:The Road Since Structure 1595:19:29, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1419:. ...see men, not gods. 1356:20:56, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1337:19:56, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1100:University of California 1091:University of California 1063:University of California 990:This article is part of 570:United States of America 3091:17:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC) 2914:Barack Hussein Obama II 2403:This was referenced at 2240:asks for citation that 2073:"epistemological break" 1642:01:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 1345:23:43, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC) 490:Contemporary philosophy 416:Associated task forces: 3240:C-Class vital articles 3040:I must Overvalue Kuhn? 993:WikiProject New Jersey 777:WikiProject California 687: 647: 615:United States articles 485: 469: 453: 437: 360:WikiProject Philosophy 268: 3410:C-Class Ohio articles 2368:So where is Polanyi ? 2337:Scientific Relativism 1683:I think the passage: 1601:The Essential Tension 1495:scientific revolution 1385:comment was added by 1000:–related articles to 686: 646: 484: 468: 458:Philosophy of science 452: 436: 267: 227:WikiProject Biography 36:level-5 vital article 3152:Request for Comments 2945:publishes papers as 2097:Not so revolutionary 2071:(see his concept of 1653:This recent addition 1648:Problematic addition 1630:Road Since Structure 662:Massachusetts portal 557:United States portal 190:Science and Academia 3198:Nidhishunnikrishnan 3058:technically correct 2885:Article move again? 2667:Ralph Waldo Emerson 2206:Nidhishunnikrishnan 1771:The Order of Things 1763:The Idea of History 1191:WikiProject Judaism 1020:New Jersey articles 888:WikiProject History 806:California articles 583:Articles Requested! 474:Analytic philosophy 385:Philosophy articles 3211:Article photograph 2961:on the subject. • 2641:appears to be the 2601:commonly-used name 2548:Thomas Samuel Kuhn 2059:of the scientific 1931:Oh, snap. Thanks! 1822:incommensurability 1812:Incommensurability 1737:deconstructionists 1719:incommensurability 688: 648: 486: 470: 454: 438: 370:general discussion 269: 254:biography articles 133:History of Science 114:history of science 70:History of Science 45:content assessment 3192:Criticism Section 3177:on this issue. -- 3135:comment added by 2860:comment added by 2753:comment added by 2663:Lee Harvey Oswald 2659:John Wilkes Booth 2590: 2450:The AIP website ( 2424:comment added by 2352:comment added by 2183: 2171:comment added by 1867: 1858:comment added by 1704: 1695:comment added by 1644:Thomas J. Hickey 1634:Essential Tension 1576:Francis X. Sutton 1513:Hanson influence? 1402: 1317: 1300:comment added by 1248: 1247: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1045: 985:New Jersey portal 941: 940: 937: 936: 836: 835: 832: 831: 769:California portal 725: 724: 721: 720: 503: 502: 499: 498: 495: 494: 352:Philosophy portal 290: 289: 286: 285: 172: 171: 168: 167: 3502: 3147: 3052:Also, since the 2869: 2765: 2737:the introduction 2729: 2609: 2608: 2586: 2508: 2436: 2364: 2166: 1874:"Paradigm Shift" 1853: 1759:R.G. Collingwood 1690: 1380: 1316: 1294: 1216: 1215: 1214:Judaism articles 1212: 1209: 1206: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1169: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1148: 1141: 1140: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1080: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1059: 1052: 1051: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 987: 982: 981: 980: 971: 964: 963: 958: 950: 943: 942: 913: 912: 911:history articles 909: 906: 903: 882: 877: 876: 875: 866: 859: 858: 853: 845: 838: 837: 808: 807: 804: 801: 798: 771: 766: 765: 764: 755: 748: 747: 742: 734: 727: 726: 710:WikiProject Ohio 704: 699: 698: 697: 664: 659: 658: 657: 617: 616: 613: 610: 607: 559: 554: 553: 552: 543: 536: 535: 530: 527: 512: 505: 504: 423: 413: 412: 387: 386: 383: 380: 377: 354: 349: 348: 347: 338: 331: 330: 325: 322: 299: 292: 291: 256: 255: 252: 249: 246: 232:join the project 221: 219:Biography portal 216: 215: 214: 205: 198: 197: 192: 181: 174: 173: 144: 143: 140: 137: 134: 103: 98: 97: 96: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 58: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3230: 3229: 3213: 3194: 3155: 3130: 3126: 3042: 2983:The example of 2912:. Observe that 2887: 2862:137.205.115.139 2855: 2851: 2790: 2748: 2739: 2734: 2725: 2622:trialsanderrors 2606: 2605: 2584:Septentrionalis 2504: 2494: 2442: 2419: 2398: 2370: 2347: 2342:post-script to 2339: 2235: 2221: 2099: 2053:Louis Althusser 2039:Michel Foucault 2031: 1876: 1850: 1814: 1800:PhilosophyTasks 1796: 1767:Michel Foucault 1724:incommensurable 1650: 1546:Anneliese Maier 1531:Alexandre Koyré 1515: 1491: 1417:Albert Einstein 1381:—The preceding 1365: 1323: 1318: 1295: 1276: 1256: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1181: 1176: 1174: 1154: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1065: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1009: 983: 978: 976: 956: 910: 907: 904: 901: 900: 878: 873: 871: 851: 805: 802: 799: 796: 795: 767: 762: 760: 740: 700: 695: 693: 660: 655: 653: 614: 611: 608: 605: 604: 603: 589:Become a Member 555: 550: 548: 528: 518: 421: 384: 381: 378: 375: 374: 350: 345: 343: 323: 305: 253: 250: 247: 244: 243: 217: 212: 210: 187: 158:High-importance 141: 138: 135: 132: 131: 99: 94: 92: 73:High‑importance 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 3508: 3498: 3497: 3492: 3487: 3482: 3477: 3472: 3467: 3462: 3457: 3452: 3447: 3442: 3437: 3432: 3427: 3422: 3417: 3412: 3407: 3402: 3397: 3392: 3387: 3382: 3377: 3372: 3367: 3362: 3357: 3352: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3332: 3327: 3322: 3317: 3312: 3307: 3302: 3297: 3292: 3287: 3282: 3277: 3272: 3267: 3262: 3257: 3252: 3247: 3242: 3212: 3209: 3193: 3190: 3164:The RfC is at 3154: 3149: 3125: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3074:Doug Bashford 3061: 3041: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3011: 3010: 3000:SamuelTheGhost 2996:Thomas S. Kuhn 2992: 2989:Vijay S. Pande 2981: 2975: 2955:Thomas S. Kuhn 2947:Vijay S. Pande 2929:SamuelTheGhost 2895:SamuelTheGhost 2891:Thomas S. Kuhn 2886: 2883: 2850: 2847: 2832: 2831: 2789: 2786: 2782: 2781: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2732: 2722:requested move 2716: 2715: 2698: 2681: 2652: 2632: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2531: 2512: 2511: 2501:requested move 2495: 2493: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2441: 2438: 2397: 2396:New Biography? 2394: 2369: 2366: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2303: 2302: 2281: 2234: 2231: 2220: 2217: 2201: 2200: 2159: 2158: 2139: 2138: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2098: 2095: 2077: 2076: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1967:Paradigm_shift 1963: 1875: 1872: 1870: 1849: 1846: 1813: 1810: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1775: 1774: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1740: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1681: 1680: 1649: 1646: 1597: 1596: 1579: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1541:Hélène Metzger 1538: 1536:Emile Meyerson 1533: 1514: 1511: 1499:paradigm shift 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1465: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1433:Doug Bashford 1420: 1410: 1404: 1403: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1352:Thanks! :-) — 1347: 1346: 1331:normal science 1327:normal science 1322: 1321:Normal science 1319: 1293: 1275: 1272: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1230:Low-importance 1226: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1200:the discussion 1187: 1186: 1183:Judaism portal 1170: 1158: 1157: 1155:Low‑importance 1149: 1137: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1125:Low-importance 1121: 1115: 1114: 1112: 1095:the discussion 1081: 1069: 1068: 1066:Low‑importance 1060: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1036:Low-importance 1032: 1026: 1025: 1023: 989: 988: 972: 960: 959: 957:Low‑importance 951: 939: 938: 935: 934: 927:Low-importance 923: 917: 916: 914: 897:the discussion 884: 883: 880:History portal 867: 855: 854: 852:Low‑importance 846: 834: 833: 830: 829: 822:Low-importance 818: 812: 811: 809: 792:the discussion 773: 772: 756: 744: 743: 741:Low‑importance 735: 723: 722: 719: 718: 715:Low-importance 706: 705: 689: 679: 678: 675:Low-importance 666: 665: 649: 639: 638: 631:Low-importance 627: 621: 620: 618: 602: 601: 596: 591: 586: 579: 577:Template Usage 573: 561: 560: 544: 532: 531: 529:Low‑importance 513: 501: 500: 497: 496: 493: 492: 487: 477: 476: 471: 461: 460: 455: 445: 444: 439: 429: 428: 426: 424: 418: 417: 409: 408: 401:Mid-importance 397: 391: 390: 388: 356: 355: 339: 327: 326: 324:Mid‑importance 300: 288: 287: 284: 283: 280:Mid-importance 270: 260: 259: 257: 223: 222: 206: 194: 193: 182: 170: 169: 166: 165: 154: 148: 147: 145: 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3507: 3496: 3493: 3491: 3488: 3486: 3483: 3481: 3478: 3476: 3473: 3471: 3468: 3466: 3463: 3461: 3458: 3456: 3453: 3451: 3448: 3446: 3443: 3441: 3438: 3436: 3433: 3431: 3428: 3426: 3423: 3421: 3418: 3416: 3413: 3411: 3408: 3406: 3403: 3401: 3398: 3396: 3393: 3391: 3388: 3386: 3383: 3381: 3378: 3376: 3373: 3371: 3368: 3366: 3363: 3361: 3358: 3356: 3353: 3351: 3348: 3346: 3343: 3341: 3338: 3336: 3333: 3331: 3328: 3326: 3323: 3321: 3318: 3316: 3313: 3311: 3308: 3306: 3303: 3301: 3298: 3296: 3293: 3291: 3288: 3286: 3283: 3281: 3278: 3276: 3273: 3271: 3268: 3266: 3263: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3251: 3248: 3246: 3243: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3235: 3228: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3171: 3169: 3168: 3162: 3160: 3153: 3148: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3064:71.137.156.36 3059: 3055: 3050: 3048: 3025: 3022: 3020: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2979: 2978:WP:COMMONNAME 2976: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2966: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2795: 2785: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2745: 2742: 2731: 2728: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2688:Beyond My Ken 2685: 2682: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2653: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2602: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2510: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463:149.43.218.10 2460: 2455: 2453: 2448: 2445: 2437: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2426:84.174.67.234 2423: 2416: 2414: 2408: 2406: 2401: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2365: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2345: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2313: 2308: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2280: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2243: 2239: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2173:76.98.161.156 2170: 2163: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2103: 2094: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2074: 2070: 2069:discontinuous 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2044: 2041:(with Kuhn's 2040: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2026: 2009: 2006: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1962: 1959: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1885: 1881: 1871: 1868: 1866:) 21 Jan 2006 1865: 1861: 1857: 1845: 1844: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1747: 1746: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1725: 1720: 1716: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1703:) 27 Oct 2005 1702: 1698: 1697:69.86.231.227 1694: 1687: 1684: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1594: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1585: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1525: 1520: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1478:Doug Bashford 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468:71.137.156.36 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1434: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1418: 1414: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1374: 1370: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1292: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1274:Cover Picture 1271: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1251: 1235: 1231: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1184: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1153: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1130: 1126: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 994: 986: 975: 973: 970: 966: 965: 961: 955: 952: 949: 945: 944: 932: 928: 922: 919: 918: 915: 898: 894: 890: 889: 881: 870: 868: 865: 861: 860: 856: 850: 847: 844: 840: 839: 827: 823: 817: 814: 813: 810: 793: 789: 788: 783: 779: 778: 770: 759: 757: 754: 750: 749: 745: 739: 736: 733: 729: 728: 716: 713:(assessed as 712: 711: 703: 692: 685: 681: 680: 676: 673:(assessed as 672: 671: 663: 652: 645: 641: 640: 636: 632: 626: 623: 622: 619: 606:United States 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 587: 585: 584: 580: 578: 575: 574: 571: 567: 566: 558: 547: 545: 542: 538: 537: 533: 526: 522: 521:Massachusetts 517: 516:United States 514: 511: 507: 506: 491: 483: 479: 478: 475: 467: 463: 462: 459: 451: 447: 446: 443: 435: 431: 430: 427: 425: 420: 419: 414: 410: 406: 402: 396: 393: 392: 389: 372: 371: 366: 362: 361: 353: 342: 340: 337: 333: 332: 328: 321: 317: 313: 309: 304: 301: 298: 294: 293: 281: 278:(assessed as 277: 276: 266: 262: 261: 258: 241: 240:documentation 237: 233: 229: 228: 220: 209: 207: 204: 200: 199: 195: 191: 186: 183: 180: 176: 175: 163: 159: 153: 150: 149: 146: 129: 128: 123: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 60: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 3214: 3195: 3172: 3165: 3163: 3157:There is an 3156: 3137:5.202.141.29 3131:— Preceding 3127: 3106:91.67.245.87 3057: 3051: 3043: 2910:Barack Obama 2888: 2856:— Preceding 2852: 2833: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2791: 2783: 2755:78.33.219.37 2746: 2743: 2740: 2726: 2719: 2700: 2683: 2654: 2638: 2634: 2617: 2598: 2546: 2532: 2515: 2513: 2505: 2498: 2492:Article move 2456: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2418:Any ideas? 2417: 2409: 2402: 2399: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2343: 2340: 2306: 2304: 2288: 2285:Britannica's 2284: 2267: 2262: 2241: 2236: 2225:Agent Cooper 2222: 2202: 2164: 2160: 2143: 2104: 2100: 2080: 2078: 2046: 2042: 2032: 2024: 1904: 1879: 1877: 1869: 1860:82.1.150.181 1851: 1834: 1832: 1815: 1797: 1770: 1762: 1754: 1751:Wittgenstein 1688: 1685: 1682: 1651: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1623: 1609:Ludwik Fleck 1598: 1580: 1571:Ludwik Fleck 1566:W.V.O. Quine 1551:A.O. Lovejoy 1518: 1516: 1492: 1423:69.110.91.50 1412: 1366: 1324: 1277: 1268:David Gerard 1257: 1249: 1229: 1189: 1124: 1084: 1035: 991: 926: 886: 821: 785: 775: 708: 668: 630: 594:Project Talk 582: 563: 442:Philosophers 400: 368: 358: 320:Contemporary 308:Philosophers 273: 225: 157: 125: 118:project page 107: 51:WikiProjects 34: 3083:Danleywolfe 2985:Vijay Pande 2951:Vijay Pande 2943:Vijay Pande 2836:36hourblock 2805:36hourblock 2749:—Preceding 2643:common name 2639:Thomas Kuhn 2552:Thomas Kuhn 2535:Vegaswikian 2478:Heyitspeter 2420:—Preceding 2354:148.61.13.4 2348:—Preceding 2259:Presumably 2167:—Preceding 2133:Heyitspeter 2116:Fastfission 2005:Fastfission 1854:—Preceding 1794:Peer Review 1691:—Preceding 1675:Fastfission 1613:Jean Piaget 1593:Fastfission 1584:Fastfission 1556:Jean Piaget 1296:—Preceding 702:Ohio portal 3234:Categories 2647:TorriTorri 2607:Skomorokh 2588:PMAnderson 2291:(1962)" - 1561:B.L. Whorf 1524:Feyerabend 1387:Paulromney 1011:New Jersey 1006:discussion 998:New Jersey 954:New Jersey 797:California 787:California 782:U.S. state 738:California 376:Philosophy 365:philosophy 303:Philosophy 122:discussion 3179:Guy Macon 3175:consensus 3047:Tim Leary 2312:Sushi Tax 2238:This edit 2165:-justin 2087:article. 2065:Bachelard 2061:discourse 1519:Structure 245:Biography 185:Biography 39:is rated 3133:unsigned 3019:Jesse V. 2963:Jesse V. 2918:Jesse V. 2872:Jobriath 2858:unsigned 2751:unsigned 2422:unsigned 2350:unsigned 2283:Oh, and 2169:unsigned 2048:episteme 2043:paradigm 2029:Foucault 1905:replaces 1895:ragesoss 1856:unsigned 1826:JTBurman 1804:JTBurman 1693:unsigned 1639:Thickey3 1617:JTBurman 1395:contribs 1383:unsigned 1310:contribs 1302:RenuRenu 1298:unsigned 1281:RenuRenu 316:Analytic 3218:Zarenon 2771:Alatari 2705:Andrewa 2701:Support 2684:Support 2655:Support 2635:Support 2618:Support 2520:ukexpat 2383:Logicus 2323:Alatari 1893:skim.-- 1761:in his 1753:in his 1439:Alatari 1266:too. - 1232:on the 1205:Judaism 1196:Judaism 1152:Judaism 1127:on the 1038:on the 929:on the 902:History 893:History 849:History 824:on the 633:on the 403:on the 312:Science 160:on the 41:C-class 2821:Sunray 2671:Edison 2571:Jmabel 2556:Tom dl 2293:Jmabel 2272:Jmabel 2247:Jmabel 2190:NaySay 2144:should 2051:) and 1781:Jmabel 1661:Jmabel 1607:, are 1503:Jmabel 1369:Jmabel 1363:family 1343:Jmabel 599:Alerts 47:scale. 2665:, or 2219:Islam 2125:Eh... 1659:. -- 1354:Timwi 1335:Timwi 1291:Renu 28:This 3222:talk 3202:talk 3183:talk 3141:talk 3110:talk 3087:talk 3068:talk 3004:talk 2941:OK. 2933:talk 2899:talk 2876:talk 2866:talk 2840:talk 2825:talk 2809:talk 2775:talk 2759:talk 2709:talk 2692:talk 2675:talk 2645:. -- 2626:talk 2575:Talk 2560:talk 2539:talk 2524:talk 2482:talk 2467:talk 2430:talk 2407:. 2387:talk 2358:talk 2327:talk 2297:Talk 2276:Talk 2251:Talk 2210:talk 2194:talk 2177:talk 2152:talk 2089:BFD1 1971:BFD1 1958:BFD1 1947:talk 1933:BFD1 1923:talk 1910:BFD1 1884:BFD1 1864:talk 1840:BFD1 1802:. -- 1785:Talk 1701:talk 1665:Talk 1615:. -- 1611:and 1603:and 1507:Talk 1489:Link 1472:talk 1443:talk 1427:talk 1391:talk 1373:Talk 1306:talk 1285:talk 525:Ohio 234:and 152:High 3170:. 3159:RfC 2796:. 2724:. 2344:SSR 2307:SSR 2268:SSR 2081:SSR 1943:ajn 1919:ajn 1880:SSR 1835:SSR 1413:man 1224:Low 1119:Low 1030:Low 921:Low 816:Low 784:of 625:Low 395:Mid 3236:: 3224:) 3204:) 3185:) 3143:) 3112:) 3089:) 3070:) 3062:-- 3006:) 2935:) 2901:) 2878:) 2842:) 2827:) 2811:) 2784:. 2777:) 2761:) 2711:) 2694:) 2677:) 2669:. 2661:, 2637:, 2628:) 2573:| 2562:) 2550:→ 2541:) 2526:) 2518:. 2503:. 2484:) 2469:) 2432:) 2389:) 2360:) 2329:) 2295:| 2274:| 2249:| 2212:) 2196:) 2179:) 2154:) 2114:-- 1969:. 1949:) 1925:) 1783:| 1757:, 1663:| 1591:-- 1582:-- 1505:| 1474:) 1466:-- 1445:) 1437:-- 1429:) 1421:-- 1397:) 1393:• 1371:| 1312:) 1308:• 1287:) 717:). 677:). 523:/ 519:: 422:/ 318:/ 314:/ 310:/ 306:: 282:). 188:: 3220:( 3200:( 3181:( 3139:( 3108:( 3085:( 3066:( 3002:( 2931:( 2897:( 2874:( 2864:( 2838:( 2823:( 2807:( 2773:( 2757:( 2707:( 2690:( 2673:( 2624:( 2558:( 2537:( 2522:( 2480:( 2465:( 2428:( 2385:( 2356:( 2325:( 2208:( 2192:( 2175:( 2150:( 1945:( 1921:( 1862:( 1726:. 1699:( 1470:( 1441:( 1425:( 1401:. 1389:( 1304:( 1283:( 1236:. 1131:. 1042:. 1008:. 933:. 828:. 637:. 407:. 242:. 164:. 130:. 53::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index