Knowledge

Talk:Social media marketing/Archive 1

Source đź“ť

31: 143:
the article "social network marketing" should not be merged with the article "social media marketing". in fact the article "social media marketing" should be eliminated due to the following reasons: - all of this relates to only one media anyhow which is the "digital media" - "social media" is a term
195:
This article's first sentence defines "social media marketing" broadly enough to include channels other than electronic media. Therefore, in the article's second sentence, which provides several illustrations, consider adding a rum party in the Hamptons sponsored by a liquor company or a user group
360:
References 3 and 8 refer to articles found through ebscohost search done through Northeastern University library that is opaque to anyone without a NU password. Again, someone should either replace with the tag or Maybe a NU observer could follow the link and find the universal reference for the
393:
The Campaigns section should be rethought as a whole, but let's focus on this specific citation for now. Since the citation in question cannot be accessed and no one able to has researched the root sources, I propose these new sources/reworks for the above four points.
109:
Good catch, DreamGuy (per your note on your edit summary). The article has been deleted three times before (according to the history page's "see logs" section). From the current article, I don't see anything that establishes notability this time around either.
272:
Do you think mobile marketing should maybe get mentioned in this article or have a section? I read recently that for the first time in history mobile web browsing has surpassed desktop web browsing. I have noticed social media changing along with this trend.
124:
Just for information, the article that was deleted by prod was a different article about social media marketing which was horribly unencyclopaedic. This article appears to have been split off from the Marketing section of the social media
295:
I'm confused based on the discussion of next steps. Someone suggested the article be merged back into social media but the last comment was congrats to WPI for their edits and the banner says it needs to be made more encyclopedic?
375:
It looks like now the main citation that needs to be replaced is Citation 6, still pointing to an ebscohost search through Northeastern U. This Citation is used in 4 places, all under the Campaigns section:
319:
So far it mentions Twitter and Facebook. Should it also mention Google+? What is there to say about it? Perhaps that in spite of not facilitating business pages it's being used to promote businesses?
177:. If a reliable, third-party, independent, objective news article quotes the report, then cite that source, but please stop trying to add these white papers and Stelzer's websites to Knowledge. 173:
The white paper that keeps being added to this article is a promotion piece by Michael Stelzner sponsored by the non-notable online conference he runs. It's been removed because it doesn't meet
144:
that has been hijacked by the marketing community to describe "social network marketing" and "user generated content" - "social media" should be reserved for media with a social cause such as
346:
Citation 6 and 9 used a lot throughout the page does not link to anywhere. Someone should remove the citations and put the tag where appropriate or find the actual citations (if any)
128:
I think I'd go for trimming this article down and merging it back into the social media article myself. If nothing else, this article as it stands is an easy target for link spammers.
403: 210: 227: 304: 205: 190: 418:
Rewrite to reference more specific examples of how small businesses use social media marketing. Reference some small business social media marketing stats. Sources:
158: 324: 137: 251: 201: 427: 366: 185: 237:
I've removed a great deal of unsourced or badly sourced information concerning real people and companies. Please discuss any readditions here first.
162: 250:
I inlcuded a link to my blog where I discuss in greater detail how to use Google Analytics for social media marketing. How is that not related? --
197: 362: 168: 118: 308: 94: 285: 444: 370: 196:
conference sponsored by a computer manufacturer. Or else consider distinguishing "social media" from the latter types of networking.
259: 355: 419: 334: 104: 71: 66: 245: 399: 154: 320: 413: 290: 133: 79: 47: 17: 38: 408:
Rewrite to describe what was unique about the Obama campaign's use of social media marketing. Source:
341: 255: 380:
Social media had a "huge" impact on 2008 campaign with Obama leading the way on Facebook and Twitter
264: 129: 423: 281: 409: 330: 300: 150: 90: 389:
Small business social media marketing example “get a free drink with a copy of this tweet”
8: 440: 277: 242: 224: 219:. I removed a great deal of information and claims referenced only to primary sources. 182: 115: 232: 351: 314: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
436: 85: 238: 220: 178: 111: 386:
Small businesses use social media marketing to advertise specials and deals
216: 215:
Source study results to news reporting (not press releases) in independent
174: 347: 383:
Steadily updated accounts, gave access to voter emails for democrats
145: 420:
Small businesses use social media marketing but lack strategy
211:
Removing study results sourced only to its own websites
84:Great job! You guys really improved this entry. 404:A Visctory for Social Media Too, 2008 Election 400:How Obama's Internet Campaign Changed Politics 424:4 Small Businesses Marketing on Social Media 410:How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks’ Power 299:I'd like to help just need some direction. 428:Small Businesses use social media to grow 191:Expanding the concept of "social media": 169:Please stop adding Stelzner white paper 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 25: 23: 24: 455: 29: 146:http://www.participantmedia.com 414:Obama's Social Media Advantage 309:20:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 13: 1: 356:19:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC) 105:Recreation of deleted article 335:04:48, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 286:18:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 228:09:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 138:20:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 119:19:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 7: 246:06:36, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 18:Talk:Social media marketing 10: 460: 445:16:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 163:23:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 95:20:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 371:18:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC) 206:16:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC) 260:12:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 186:17:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 291:Where to go from here 80:Edits By WPI Students 42:of past discussions. 276:Anyone else agree? 130:Chris Neville-Smith 432:Same as #3 above. 342:Invalid citations 153:comment added by 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 451: 338: 311:MichaelProcopio 265:Mobile Marketing 165: 98: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 459: 458: 454: 453: 452: 450: 449: 448: 344: 328: 317: 301:Michaelprocopio 293: 267: 252:Smartatthestart 235: 213: 193: 171: 148: 107: 88: 82: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 457: 434: 433: 430: 416: 406: 391: 390: 387: 384: 381: 343: 340: 333:comment added 316: 313: 292: 289: 266: 263: 234: 231: 212: 209: 192: 189: 170: 167: 141: 140: 126: 106: 103: 101: 93:comment added 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 456: 447: 446: 442: 438: 431: 429: 425: 421: 417: 415: 411: 407: 405: 401: 398:New sources: 397: 396: 395: 388: 385: 382: 379: 378: 377: 373: 372: 368: 364: 358: 357: 353: 349: 339: 336: 332: 326: 322: 312: 310: 306: 302: 297: 288: 287: 283: 279: 274: 270: 262: 261: 257: 253: 248: 247: 244: 240: 230: 229: 226: 222: 218: 208: 207: 203: 199: 188: 187: 184: 180: 176: 166: 164: 160: 156: 152: 147: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 122: 121: 120: 117: 113: 102: 99: 96: 92: 87: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 435: 392: 374: 359: 345: 318: 298: 294: 275: 271: 268: 249: 236: 214: 194: 172: 155:68.165.57.69 142: 108: 100: 83: 60: 43: 37: 329:—Preceding 321:66.87.27.15 149:—Preceding 89:—Preceding 36:This is an 86:Eric Boggs 437:Prufrock4 361:article. 198:Jeff10706 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 363:Kneelpdx 239:Flowanda 233:Sourcing 221:Flowanda 179:Flowanda 151:unsigned 112:Flowanda 331:undated 315:Google+ 278:A. Ward 269:Hello: 91:undated 39:archive 426:, and 348:Xvani 217:WP:RS 175:WP:RS 125:page. 16:< 441:talk 412:and 402:and 367:talk 352:talk 325:talk 305:talk 282:talk 256:talk 243:Talk 225:Talk 202:talk 183:Talk 159:talk 134:talk 116:Talk 443:) 327:) 422:, 369:) 354:) 307:) 284:) 258:) 241:| 223:| 204:) 181:| 161:) 136:) 114:| 439:( 365:( 350:( 337:. 323:( 303:( 280:( 254:( 200:( 157:( 132:( 97:. 50:.

Index

Talk:Social media marketing
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Eric Boggs
undated
20:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Flowanda
Talk
19:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Chris Neville-Smith
talk
20:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
http://www.participantmedia.com
unsigned
68.165.57.69
talk
23:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
WP:RS
Flowanda
Talk
17:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Jeff10706
talk
16:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:RS
Flowanda
Talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑