188:
170:
489:
102:
81:
50:
21:
388:"Plunderphonics" is like "first person shooter". On the face of it the definition is anything which uses sampling (especially self conscious sampling). Yet, like fps games, what is usually made is much much more limited. Almost all the artists mentioned share very similar stylistic traits, such as loving to sample cartoony classical music and including old 1950's announcer voices.
198:
432:
in its early incarnations and a hundred more did albums and 12-inches that were tapestries of blatantly prominent samples over some regular or changing house beat. The samples didn't actually build a unified track, the intended effect was more like gliding across radio bands. I remember an interview
318:
plunderphonia (in a broad sense) whether he considers it so or not. I think to say that "much" of this article is in the wrong place is overdoing it a bit - OK, there are bits which are arguably not plunderphonia, but most of the article is describing plunderphonics, I think. Anyway, if you don't
408:
Yeah I'm sorry I shouldn't have said all artists mentioned since many artists mentioned in this article are just mentioned for their heavy use of sampleing. But almost all modern self described plunderphonics artists who were inspired by Oswald and
Negativland use the thrift store recording/50's
538:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
395:
Well, I dunno (again), John Oswald himself doesn't have a particular love for either of those things. But you're right, of course, that it's a common trait, which perhaps should be mentioned. Again, the article is there for the editing...
289:
Plunderphonics can be also applied in music criticism to describe music which the entire melody and chorus is one giant sample, such as some songs of Fatboy Slim, regardless if fatboy slim himself would call his music plunderhphonics.
285:
This article is absolutely perfect. Anyone who disputes it should look up the topic, it is definately a distinct genre different then just the concept of sampling. Oswald, Negativeland, and many underground labels all use the genre.
329:
Unless there are good refs saying why this concept differs from sampling, the whole article should be merged into the sampling one. At the moment the whole thing is just original research it seems to me.
376:
I dunno. I do think it's interesting to relate plunderphonics to other related and similar areas, and I do see journalists and so on using the word "plunderphonics" nowadays to refer to more or less
568:
THere's very little mention of other main protagonists of plunderhphonics here... it's almost like a bio page for Oswald. For instance, the
Avalanches are famous for plunderphonics, as is
451:
The trick is to only include text with a source that explicitly identifies as 'plunderphonics'. That way, we do not have to worry about how broad or narrow we personally define the genre.
535:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
380:
kind of self-conscious sampling. But do feel free to edit the article, I wrote much of it fairly quickly, more or less off the top of my head, and it's not sacred or anything. --
229:
225:
563:
471:
What exactly is the factual dispute mentioned in the header? This should be explicitly mentioned here on the talk page, or the dispute tag should be removed.
524:
496:
276:
483:
216:
175:
516:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
642:
142:
601:
558:
352:
I believe that this article expands the definition of the topic far too broadly; most of the material can be added to various articles, including
152:
647:
31:
540:
118:
637:
479:
I second
Tempshill -- I don't see any factual disagreement sufficient to merit that this page be listed as "disputed." --Monty Cantsin
657:
513:
433:
with Tim
Simenon where he said "Every DJ wants to be a producer now" but the input of new-recorded material was often minimal. /
532:
528:
505:
109:
86:
652:
420:
Many of the collage track albums that were all the rage in
England around 1987/88 are close to plunderphonics - people like
544:
460:
320:
233:
279:
442:
572:. The three main albums I understand for plunderphonics aren't even Oswald albums, they are The Avalanches
61:
339:
314:, but I don't see what the harm is in giving him a mention him here as well. I mean, what he does is
27:
500:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
611:
Dariacore has a lot of roots in this genre but the genre itself doesnt have a page just the album.
597:
554:
117:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
623:
361:
67:
438:
20:
8:
593:
550:
369:
49:
619:
501:
335:
421:
347:
456:
353:
311:
299:
266:
114:
434:
365:
472:
397:
381:
324:
293:
272:
210:
631:
615:
331:
606:
517:
203:
452:
357:
221:
488:
306:
considers what he does as "plunderphonics", he considers it sampling.
577:
569:
425:
303:
187:
169:
585:
429:
101:
80:
228:
page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us
512:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
466:
564:
Other artists - The
Avalanches, J Dilla, DJ Shadow etc.
220:, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize
193:
113:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
543:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
242:
Knowledge:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force
224:articles on Knowledge. Please visit the task force
245:Template:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force
310:Well of course, DJ Shadow should be mentioned on
629:
484:Fair use rationale for Image:MsJacko,dab.jpg
217:Music genres task force of the Music project
643:High-importance electronic music articles
298:Much of this article should be placed on
30:on 20 December 2012 (UTC). The result of
47:
630:
533:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
368:who is back from his paid vacation to
127:Knowledge:WikiProject Electronic music
648:WikiProject Electronic music articles
130:Template:WikiProject Electronic music
107:This article is within the scope of
43:
15:
66:It is of interest to the following
13:
487:
14:
669:
638:C-Class electronic music articles
658:Music genres task force articles
531:. Using one of the templates at
196:
186:
168:
100:
79:
48:
19:
147:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
624:15:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
545:Media copyright questions page
443:13:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
514:boilerplate fair use template
239:Music/Music genres task force
176:Music/Music genres task force
121:and see a list of open tasks.
653:C-Class music genre articles
541:criteria for speedy deletion
110:WikiProject Electronic music
7:
559:17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
280:10:53, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
214:is within the scope of the
10:
674:
525:the image description page
461:14:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
153:project's importance scale
527:and edit it to include a
340:09:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
181:
146:
133:electronic music articles
95:
74:
506:explanation or rationale
475:23:41, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
602:13:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
492:
409:announcer voice style.
56:This article is rated
508:as to why its use in
497:Image:MsJacko,dab.jpg
491:
364:. My small change,
248:music genre articles
370:Compton, California
234:good article status
529:fair use rationale
493:
422:Eric B & Rakim
302:... I don't think
232:genre articles to
230:assess and improve
62:content assessment
264:
263:
260:
259:
256:
255:
163:
162:
159:
158:
42:
41:
665:
574:Since I left you
504:but there is no
354:Sampling (music)
312:Sampling (music)
300:Sampling (music)
275:have a mention?
250:
249:
246:
243:
240:
206:
201:
200:
199:
190:
183:
182:
172:
165:
164:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
124:Electronic music
115:Electronic music
104:
97:
96:
91:
87:Electronic music
83:
76:
75:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
673:
672:
668:
667:
666:
664:
663:
662:
628:
627:
609:
566:
486:
469:
350:
296:
269:
247:
244:
241:
238:
237:
202:
197:
195:
149:High-importance
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:
90:High‑importance
89:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
671:
661:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
608:
605:
594:Deathlibrarian
584:in 1996, and
565:
562:
551:BetacommandBot
485:
482:
481:
480:
468:
465:
464:
463:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
413:
412:
411:
410:
403:
402:
401:
400:
390:
389:
385:
384:
349:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
295:
292:
283:
277:81.156.193.148
273:the Avalanches
268:
265:
262:
261:
258:
257:
254:
253:
251:
211:Plunderphonics
208:
207:
191:
179:
178:
173:
161:
160:
157:
156:
145:
139:
138:
136:
119:the discussion
105:
93:
92:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
670:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
635:
633:
626:
625:
621:
617:
614:thats all :)
612:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:. Thank you.
546:
542:
536:
534:
530:
526:
523:Please go to
521:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
490:
478:
477:
476:
474:
462:
458:
454:
450:
444:
440:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
407:
406:
405:
404:
399:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
341:
337:
333:
328:
327:
326:
322:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
305:
301:
291:
287:
282:
281:
278:
274:
252:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
213:
212:
205:
194:
192:
189:
185:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
166:
154:
150:
144:
141:
140:
137:
120:
116:
112:
111:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
613:
610:
589:
582:Endtroducing
581:
573:
567:
549:
537:
522:
509:
495:
494:
470:
377:
351:
315:
297:
288:
284:
270:
215:
209:
204:Music portal
148:
108:
68:WikiProjects
35:
362:John Oswald
358:Negativland
222:music genre
632:Categories
435:Strausszek
366:Two Halves
271:Shouldn't
226:guidelines
607:Dariacore
592:in 2006
578:DJ Shadow
570:DJ Shadow
473:Tempshill
426:M.A.R.R.S
398:Camembert
382:Camembert
348:Too broad
325:Camembert
319:like it,
304:DJ Shadow
616:Maxi0902
518:fair use
502:fair use
467:Dispute?
332:Malick78
316:de facto
267:Untitled
28:deletion
586:J Dilla
430:The KLF
321:fix it!
151:on the
58:C-class
590:Donuts
453:Ashmoo
294:Merge?
64:scale.
620:talk
598:talk
555:talk
510:this
457:talk
439:talk
372:!!!
360:and
336:talk
323:. --
143:High
36:keep
34:was
588:’s
580:’s
576:,
378:any
634::
622:)
600:)
557:)
520:.
459:)
441:)
428:,
424:,
396:--
356:,
338:)
618:(
596:(
553:(
455:(
437:(
334:(
236:.
155:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
