Knowledge

Talk:Internet of things/Archive 1

Source 📝

1240: 1544:, thank you for your input. I appreciate your opinion. When I first started editing, the tags above this article suggested that it needed to be completely revamped hence the reason for my decision to attempt a soft restructure. I have tried to keep as much of the original content in as possible. I am glad that you have found my contribution useful. With reference to the deleted paragraphs, although I do not feel that the deleted paragraphs were complete gibberish (as suggested by a wiki user) I did feel that there may have been a slight lack in clarity or context (as suggested by another wiki user when taking about the original article). 786:, perhaps due to there being little or no security partly as people focus on jokes over the thing the IOT computer is attached to and then on threats still about that thing, instead of focusing on the threat that adding many millions of unsecured computers form to everything else or that increasingly cyber threats will also be physical threats. Some of the effects will be simply change, such as dealing with more computers than humans on Earth, or simply how it will be different, whether as much as having a tablet instead laptop or an internet from not having one is TBD. For darker side you might watch 179:
internet, the meaning of an event will not necessary be based on, either a deterministic or syntactic model but will be based on the context of the event", etc etc. To have a tag on one section saying "This section may require cleanup to meet Knowledge's quality standards" is an absurd understatement. The whole article needs either completely rewriting from scratch or deleting. I may be prepared to have a go at rewriting it, but I would have to do a considerable amount of research in order to do so properly, and I am not sure when I shall be prepared to dedicate the necessary time to the job.
31: 702:
soon as you start with the physical (sw/hw) you're going too deep. Yes this buzzword is being tapped into like big data, cloud, etc. With the potential rise of connected/smart devices in the home and businesses it is not too feasible to have 'n' applications...a dashboard is more appropriate which abstracts these "things" into their common 'features': monitoring, control and configuration. Not everyone will want an all-in-one solution as is offered by the bigger players.
1013:"The EPC network is run by an organisation called the Auto ID Centre: a global consortium of retailers and academics based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Boston. Founded in 1999 by Gillette, Proctor & Gamble and Unilever, the consortium now boasts 100 global companies and five of the world's leading research centres, including the University of Cambridge and MIT. 1305:, as suggested by the Wiki Note above the article before my edits, the article did not flow in its original form. I am of the opinion, however, that some of the content was quite good which is why I did not delete much from the article. My changes simply involved restructuring the existing content it in order for it to flow and come across in a clearer manner. 1355:
not use WiFi, or well established Cellular Network technologies, and remain an actively developing research area. However, the IoT will not be composed only of embedded devices, since higher order computing devices will be needed to perform heavier duty tasks (routing, switching, data processing, etc.). Companies such as
645:"The Industrial Internet. The Internet of Things. What does it all mean? In a nutshell, it’s internet-connected devices collecting data and communicating to make industries smarter. This data is then used to anticipate and avoid problems, instead of fixing things after the fact." from a General Electric web page: 1224:
Certain theorists including Dr Richard Barbrook (Uni Westminster) have attributed the McNamara Line as the first example of the Internet of Things, which was essentially an automated sensor network with built in Machine-to-Machine communications - used to defend South Vietnam from the North - but was
628:
As to whether it's "wireless" or mixed "wired/wireless", then ubiquitous connectivity down to the commodity grocery level is generally agreed to require a predominantly wireless network, as no-one is going to plug their "tubs of yoghurt" into a 10baseT connector when the "install" them in the fridge!
701:
It is my belief that this IS a valid term, however it is being used to describe web-enabled hardware and protocols which are nothing new and have as much in common with IoT as any other sw or hw term. My view is that "Thing" is a logical concept (user, mobile, building, cameras, window, door) and as
607:
The last part of the sentence is delightfully ambiguous. I presume it is intended to mean that computers can identify and manage X in the same way that humans can identify and manage X. But can it not be read that "humans can" be identified and managed by computers in the same way? This is certainly
178:
Furthermore much of the language used in the article is highly non-communicative. For example: "autonomous and intelligent entities or virtual objects will act in full interoperability and will be able to auto-organize themselves depending on the context, circumstances or environments", and "In this
103:
Well, proposals are not facts! I have waited to see if anyone else would do something about the section title. It looks bad, precisely because it is a "proposal" and not a fact. Hence I will rename the section as "Characteristics" and hope that other editors will come along and fill in details, with
1354:
The embedded computing nature of many IoT devices means that low-cost computing platforms are likely to be used. In fact, to minimize the impact of such devices on the environment and energy consumption, low-power radios are likely to be used for connection to the Internet. Such low-power radios do
1201:
This article implies that many technologies are called Internet of Things. Yet they exist separately from Internet of Things. The introduction needs to identify what is unique to the Internet of Things. My guess is that there is absolutely nothing unique to it, it is just a term people are using to
957:
The concept of "Internet of Things" is not relevant to individual passive RFID tags, since a passive device is not connected to the Internet (and thus cannot be contacted from the Internet -- proof -- if the device does not have an IP address, its not on the Internet). To be relevant, there is some
874:
Why is this whole article written as though the Internet of Things is this vague, semi-realistic concept from the future that we will all "be doing" one day? Let's talk about what it is now, not what one guy at a TED talk or some marketer working for GE once said the Internet of Things will someday
260:
Let us be realistic about this. RFID tags will not prevent theft, they can be detected hence they can be located and can be subsequently removed. Kidnapping works in the same way, detect where it is, then use a scalpel to remove it. Obviously there is also lined bags which block the weak signal and
174:
At best this is highly speculative, and at worst complete fantasy. I have read a number of articles on "the internet of things", which vary considerably in how far they go in speculative prediction, but this Knowledge article in its present form goes further than anything I have seen elsewhere. The
1092:
fix the article so that it actually says something. Anything will do. Or just delete the bloody thing. Really, what were people must have been way too easily impressed to think that this was anything but a joke. If this is actually trying to express a quantifiable idea then please express it.
937:
A short text is needed to try to fix the origins of the concept to which the phrase "internet of things" is applicable. I have added a reference to an article with the title "The internet of things" from The Guardian (UK) newspaper, dated 2003-10-09. From the text at the time, it is clear that the
1366:
Diverse applications call for different deployment scenarios and requirement, which have usually been handled in a proprietary implementation. However, since the IoT is connected to the Internet, most of the devices comprising IoT services will need to operate utilizing standardized technologies.
220:
I agree that that section is the only one with a real clarity problem, and I am also doubtful whether what it is trying to say is worth saying, so if nobody wishes to defend it, maybe it would be best to just delete it. However, I also think the rest of the article is poorly written, and could do
264:
Certainly tagging stock's may well assist in stock replenishment but could never ever prevent the possibility of running out, and I personally don't agree that somebody on the other side of the world should have the right to know what I am consuming without my permission, even if it is just for
854:
We currently have 'Cisco created a dynamic "connections counter" to track the estimated number of connected things from July 2013 until July 2020 (methodology included).'. A look at the reference indicates that the counter is . . . umm . . . fantasyware. It counts hypothetical connections. --
581:
What is described is what has already been going on. To use it as a sort of description of the Internet of Things would be misleading. What is described (household appliances) is indeed an example of a local configuration of things; but this is already in place. Said things have often been
322:
I am surprised there is not more mention of the networking side and the existing protocols like Zigbee, Jennet etc. Surely this, along with the RF transceivers form the bedrock upon which we can build and IoT environment. Any comments about how this might also link into Augmented Reality?
1276:. I see that you are a new user, so you may not realize that changes on Knowledge are reviewed by other people. You did not complete the "edit summary" above the save button when you changed things, and it is not apparent to me what you changed or why. I am particularly concerned to see that 1181:
This article is really terrible agreed, the intro section is the worst. It takes 8 long rambling paragraphs to basically explain the concept: we will use more internet connected devices in the future. Thats all this is. It shouldn't even have a name. It's what we would assume to happen.
290:
Since this topic encompasses such a range of ideas and a definition encompassing all of them is nearly impossible I thought it would be appropriate to include a list of Alternative Definitions that have been used be funded research reports (The EU Casagras for example) in the past.
1508:
What is your opinion on these paragraphs? At first look, this seems like a substantial amount of information which was backed by citations and ::deleted without explanation. Could you please say something more about why you thought this content should not remain in the
747:"Theft will be a thing of the past as we will know where a product is at all times." - This reads more like a sales pitch or the belief in a vision than a statement of fact. Can this article be modified to be less of a sales pitch and more of a factual report? -- 79:
I have created a formal reference section which is used in general for citations of books, published papers, and so on. In addition, there is now also a Notes section which has already proved useful in clarification of sources — the origin of the concept of the
363: 1225:
ultimately destroyed/nullified as it was dependent on sensing human excretions, sweat, urine etc - Vietcong simply covered the line in human urine and herded buffallo through the network causing it to light up and fail before launching their assault...
268:
There should also be a discussion of the effect of electro-magnetic pulses and how devastating that it would be upon a society which has sole or heavy reliance upon the use of these things, and whether a large EMP will cause the RFID's to stop working.
916:
I edited the "basket of remotes" section to clear out peacock language, weasel words, detailed descriptions of company products, and name-dropping of companies. (Nothing I hate more than Knowledge articles that turn into poorly-written commercials.)
249:
also, inb4 "I just finished up attaching RFID tags to all my cups, clothes, every part of my car, car keys, unused cans of coke, food, used cans of coke, pets, clock, shower head, water tap, drain, cleaning bottles, fridge, and my wife.'Sup bro?"
1038:
Here is a PDF of a slide presentation with a historical perspective by a researcher at ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich): "The Internet of Things: How it has started and what to expect" Dr. Florian Michahelles
1434:
Ishaq, Isam; Carels, David; Teklemariam, Girum; Hoebeke, Jeroen; Van den Abeele, Floris; De Poorter, Eli; Moerman, Ingrid; Demeester, Piet (25 April 2013). "IETF Standardization in the Field of the Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey".
1087:
Yo dawg! This article is even worse then the idea it's trying to explain. This is nothing but a bunch of marketing terms and technobabble which ultimately means nothing. If anyone ever reads this page then please feel encouraged to
720: 978:
Is there any particular date/period when the IoT began to be a serious possibility? Was it, for example, tied up originally with the development of IPv6? Or did it emerge from the "Smart Building" initiatives? when did the concept
705:
Just so you know where I'm coming from I have been in software development for past 30+ years and focus on embedded and mobile solutions. I developed the "MASH IoT Platform" which is a pure thing-based approach to this space.
922: 880: 480:"An alternative view, from the world of the Semantic Web focusses instead on making all "things" (not just those electronic, smart, or RFID-enabled) addressable by the existing naming protocols, such as URI" 466: 663: 737: 1512:
Also in the future, if you move and delete content at the same time, could you perform these actions as separate edits? It is difficult for me to find what is deleted when content is also moved.
498:
On the home front, most new computer printers are Wi-Fi enabled. Beyond the computer printer, the next home device to be Wi-Fi enabled, might be the thermostat, such as the Nest(tm) thermostat.
994:
To my knowledge most of the IoT concepts began with work at the US Naval Postgraduate School (NPS). IIRC, the US military deserves a lot of credit for recognizing and creating IoT solutions.
958:
device tracking the passive RFID tags and that device or a device that summarizes the data is connected to the Internet. The device tracking the passive RFID tags can be fixed or mobile (see
680:
or whatever, go for it... but WOULD ONE OF YOU BUSYBODY ADMINS FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE DELETE THIS CRAP PLEASE! You know you want to. Everyone wants you to. It'll feel good. Just do it. Thanks!
715: 253:
also, inb4 "Our government just decided to legislate the compulsory injection of all citizens and food products with RFID Model B (The ones with remotely activated cyanide release)" (
695: 782:
The IOT topic is about the environment becoming ubiquitous computing as comms and compute continue to become smaller and cheaper, and what the effects will be. As with everything,
484:
We don't need an alternative view; we need a complementary and supportive view that helps to build up the bigger picture! Hence I propose to change "alternative" to complementary".--
926: 1246:
This report was released yesterday. I am talking about some recent content changes with someone above, and after that is sorted, then I will put this report into the article.
787: 195: 349:
I added a subsection called "companies and products" to begin splitting out the commercial interests from the open standards and nonprofit organizations involved in IOT. --
1074: 918: 876: 600:"If all objects of daily life, from yogurt to an airplane, are equipped with radio tags, they can be identified and managed by computers in the same way humans can." 905: 733: 725:
Just a heads up, will follow existing conventions. If I don't hear back in a few days will make the edit. I am an independent developer and product is NOT for sale.
711: 545: 529: 563: 511: 276: 1009:
Now that I have more time to read carefully the Guardian Article by Sean Dodson I see that he claims that it was the Auto ID Center which come up with the name.
909: 691: 306: 1422: 1229: 1052: 971: 1187: 889: 729: 707: 1532: 493: 230: 215: 1003: 884: 658: 638: 1219: 1141:
making foolish changes to the article does not help. I do agree that the article could use a careful rewrite making use of a great variety of sources.
815: 302: 254: 1183: 1152: 577:"In computing, the Internet of Things refers to a, usually wireless and self-configuring, network between objects, such as household appliances." 471: 338: 314: 246:
inb4 "Wouldn't it be more feasible to carry your RFID in a bracelet rather than injecting it into your skin or blood stream? Also less cancer?"
836: 775: 617: 591: 668:
I agree wholeheartedly that this article is pure embarrassing rubbish. Defacing this doesn't help in the slightest. If somebody wants to help
113: 748: 151: 811: 1175: 1132: 93: 766:, anyone can modify the article! You're right that this is ridiculous hyperbole - I've dialled back the "wills" to "could" and "might". -- 188: 170:"...time will no more be used as a common and linear dimension but will depend on each entity (object, process, information system, etc.)" 1259: 1029: 988: 951: 1296: 844: 280: 1191: 175:
article also fails to distinguish clearly among current fact, reasonable predictions about future developments, and pure speculation.
1476:
Bandyopadhyay, Debasis; Sen, Jaydip (May 2011). "Internet of Things: Applications and Challenges in Technology and Standardization".
864: 756: 623:
Please don't edit the quote, as here on the talk: page it's literally a quote from the article and that's what we ought to discuss.
371:
Also rather than just a satirical link to a Coffee Machine Protocol -- might want the real story of the Cambridge Coffee Machine
358: 1239: 294:
Please add any additional referenced definitions so we can help this article better describe the concepts and scope of the IOT.
1214: 1462: 1062: 285: 1167: 1124: 568: 98: 1359:
have developed and manufactured low power wireless data radios (both embedded and standalone) for over 20 years to enable
1205:
The term seems to be a marketing term. Marketing people prefer non-specific confusing terms that are intended to impress.
807: 901: 118: 330: 272: 1040: 499: 826: 687: 310: 66: 1605: 1513: 1277: 1273: 199: 147: 74: 1409: 1368: 255:
http://beforeitsnews.com/news/79/982/Saudi_Killer_Chip_RFID_Implant_Would_Track,_Eliminate_Kill_Undesirables.html
131:
It is speculative, not factual. I am pleased to leave it where it is; but then we now need balance! Any ideas?
1070: 1048: 967: 932: 654: 559: 541: 525: 507: 462: 364:
Pioneering Applications -- Coke Machine on Internet at Carnegie-Mellon University (CMU) and Coffee at Cambridge
158: 1234: 1082: 742: 516:
Beyond, the thermostat, the Bluetooth standard has been modified in anticipation of personal health devices.
1560: 1321: 1264: 849: 1582:, these two technologies/topics/protocols are now developing, one of the early adopters is Swisscom, see: 84:. Since the Dodson Guardian articles are formally citeable I will move them into the References section.-- 1601: 1202:
impress people and results in confusion. This article should eliminate confusion but instead adds to it.
812:
http://letstalk.globalservices.bt.com/en/security/2013/12/threats-internet-things-dont-disturb-breakfast/
238: 938:
RFID tagging is proposed to replace barcodes in the Retail Business. The promoting organization is the
344: 38: 368:
Might need a stub article on the Coke Machine and the Coffee Pot, with a link from Internet of Things
1110: 1066: 1044: 963: 650: 555: 537: 521: 503: 458: 1171: 1128: 939: 803: 551: 47: 17: 1379:, are working on developing protocols, systems, architectures and frameworks to enable the IoT. 1020:
This is historically important. I will add the information to the main article, with citation.--
1527: 1291: 1254: 1196: 999: 634: 334: 226: 211: 184: 1516:
and see; it takes some effort to see the changes when multiple changes happen simultaneously.
1456: 1356: 1025: 984: 947: 819: 613: 587: 89: 1061:
Interesting perspective on Bloomberg, but it is COPYRIGHTED by the Harvard Business Review:
1589: 1548: 1309: 1210: 1163: 1120: 1063:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-07/how-the-internet-of-things-changes-everything.html
897: 869: 683: 517: 489: 326: 298: 143: 135: 109: 1394:
Bormann, C; Ersue, M; Keranen, A (May 2014). "Terminology for Constrained-Node Networks".
447: 408: 8: 1519:
As for the other things you did to make it flow, thanks for that. The article needed it.
1226: 203: 1360: 1098: 860: 808:
http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/21189/hacking/internet-of-things-cyber-threats.html
771: 354: 721:
Wishing to add a subsection on MASH IoT platform presented at 2013 IEEE IoT conference
1541: 1520: 1302: 1284: 1247: 995: 840: 630: 534: 434: 395: 222: 207: 180: 604:
This literally implies that the yogurt (not the yogurt container) is so equipped...
167:"Theft will be a thing of the past as we will know where a product is at all times". 1556: 1485: 1444: 1317: 1041:
http://www.im.ethz.ch/people/fmichahelles/talks/iotexpo_iothistory_fmichahelles.pdf
1021: 980: 943: 894:
someone needs to rewrite this article objectively and put semi-protections on it.
752: 609: 583: 500:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/HA895LL/A/nest-learning-thermostat-2nd-generation
85: 1597: 1206: 485: 422: 139: 105: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1569: 1106: 763: 383: 1489: 1113:; then things will really get going. I mean, really people, really? Yarrgh ( 1093:"Universal addressability of dumb things." REALLY? Oh, goody, it references 243:
We need a new section describing criticisms against this utterly absurd idea.
1372: 1148: 856: 832: 795: 767: 669: 350: 1283:
Can you explain what you did and why, particularly when you deleted things?
1094: 1552: 1333: 1313: 1269: 959: 518:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Bluetooth_profile#Health_Device_Profile_.28HDP.29
1448: 596:
A Knowledge article needs balance, not polemic. Consider the following:
1593: 799: 123:
I have watched and enjoyed the video clip given in the External Links:
476:
The first sentence of the lead in paragraph gives a bad impression:
664:
Does every marketing cliche buzzword need its own Wiki page, really?
1143: 791: 1579: 673: 1016:
The centre came up with the concept of the internet of things."
1114: 677: 552:
http://www.pettracker.com/pet-gps/tagg-dog-tracking-mobile-app
1583: 1575: 1433: 608:
true today in certain societies with respect to prisoners. --
198:" section is the one with the real clarity problem. This was 1376: 1102: 646: 423:"The Trojan Room Coffee Pot A (non-technical) biography" 1160:
I fully agree, this article makes no sense whatsoever!
127:"Kevin Kelly: Predicting the next 5,000 days of the web" 1363:
applications for the industrial internet of things.
206:, so it might be worth asking for their assistance. 1427: 1393: 1097:, which should be ready in time for me to download 1469: 535:http://www.bluetooth.com/Pages/health-fitness.aspx 1475: 1367:Prominent standardization bodies, such as the 582:described in the context of smart buildings.-- 890:hopeless corporate influence on this article 1220:Include the McNamara Line to Early History 831:Could this article be merged somehow with 550:Another home application is tracking pets 384:"The "Only" Coke Machine on the Internet" 1408:Francis daCosta, Intel Technical Books, 1238: 1437:Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 1423:Brittany Walters-Bearden, M2M Evolution 1336:Here is some content which you deleted: 573:The introductory text is not accurate: 472:Universal addressability of dumb things 14: 1389: 1387: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 163:A couple of quotes from the article: 962:). Same for bar codes and QR codes. 919:2601:9:7B80:10CE:70C8:EE59:9831:24C3 877:2601:9:7B80:10CE:70C8:EE59:9831:24C3 784:some of the effects will be negative 25: 1384: 23: 1461:: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI ( 24: 1618: 1411:Rethinking the Internet of Things 1274:moved and changed a lot of things 1478:Wireless Personal Communications 104:citations as soon as possible.-- 29: 1416: 1402: 1176:12:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 415: 376: 13: 1: 1230:15:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC) 1215:19:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC) 776:13:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 286:Added Alternative Definitions 1533:13:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC) 1297:21:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 1278:you deleted a lot of content 1260:22:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 1192:20:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC) 1030:19:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 1004:22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC) 989:17:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 952:14:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 806:, or look for websites like 788:List of cyber attack threats 738:22:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 716:21:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 696:06:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 618:18:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 592:13:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 569:leading text needs rewriting 494:17:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 386:. Carnegie Mellon University 152:17:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 114:17:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 99:Proposed expanded definition 94:20:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 7: 261:hence can assist in theft. 119:the Kevin Kelly Talk on TED 10: 1623: 1606:07:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1584:http://lpn.swisscom.com/E/ 1324:) 00:59, 29 January 2015‎ 639:09:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 194:I would suggest that the " 1563:) 14:13, 29 January 2015‎ 1490:10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5 1153:02:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1133:23:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1111:Technological_singularity 1075:21:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 1053:21:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 972:22:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 940:"electronic product code" 927:06:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 885:06:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 827:Merge with Web of Things? 814:15:49, 5 March 2014 (UTC) 757:11:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 659:22:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 564:21:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 546:21:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 530:21:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 512:21:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 467:20:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 359:19:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC) 339:02:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 315:06:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 281:14:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 231:11:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 216:11:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 189:11:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1514:Look at the edit history 910:02:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 865:12:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC) 845:21:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 75:Footnotes and references 804:Silk Road (marketplace) 647:http://www.gequest.com/ 18:Talk:Internet of things 1243: 1105:. Just wait until we 1018: 933:origins of the concept 602: 579: 442:Check date values in: 425:. Cambridge University 403:Check date values in: 265:anonymous statistics. 221:with a major rewrite. 159:Quality of the article 1357:FreeWave Technologies 1280:without explanation. 1242: 1235:2015 report by US FTC 1083:Defaced on 06-17-2009 1011: 743:Hopelessly optimistic 598: 575: 427:. Retrieved 7/22/2013 388:. Retrieved 7/22/2013 42:of past discussions. 1265:Unexplained deletion 1067:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 1045:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 964:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 850:Footnoted but unreal 651:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 556:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 538:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 522:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 504:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 459:Jim.Callahan,Orlando 1449:10.3390/jsan2020235 239:Limited Feasibility 1361:Machine-to-Machine 1244: 1099:Duke_Nukem_Forever 345:Added a subsection 82:internet of things 1609: 1592:comment added by 1565: 1551:comment added by 1502: 1501: 1326: 1312:comment added by 1166:comment added by 1123:comment added by 900:comment added by 686:comment added by 329:comment added by 318: 301:comment added by 155: 138:comment added by 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1614: 1608: 1586: 1574:How to link to: 1564: 1545: 1530: 1525: 1494: 1493: 1473: 1467: 1466: 1460: 1452: 1431: 1425: 1420: 1414: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1391: 1347:Extended content 1343: 1342: 1325: 1306: 1294: 1289: 1257: 1252: 1178: 1135: 942:(EPC) network.-- 912: 698: 452: 451: 445: 440: 438: 430: 428: 419: 413: 412: 406: 401: 399: 391: 389: 380: 341: 317: 295: 154: 132: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1587: 1572: 1546: 1528: 1521: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1474: 1470: 1454: 1453: 1432: 1428: 1421: 1417: 1407: 1403: 1392: 1385: 1348: 1307: 1292: 1285: 1272:, you recently 1267: 1255: 1248: 1237: 1222: 1199: 1161: 1118: 1117:)-- Draco Red 1085: 935: 895: 892: 872: 852: 829: 745: 723: 681: 666: 571: 474: 456: 455: 443: 441: 432: 431: 426: 421: 420: 416: 404: 402: 393: 392: 387: 382: 381: 377: 366: 347: 324: 296: 288: 241: 202:by one editor, 196:Characteristics 161: 133: 121: 101: 77: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1620: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1523:Blue Rasberry 1517: 1510: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1468: 1443:(2): 235–287. 1426: 1415: 1401: 1382: 1381: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1328: 1327: 1287:Blue Rasberry 1266: 1263: 1250:Blue Rasberry 1236: 1233: 1227:James Moulding 1221: 1218: 1198: 1197:What is unique 1195: 1168:212.137.36.237 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1125:208.238.204.90 1107:Paradigm_shift 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1056: 1055: 1034: 1007: 1006: 979:crystallize?-- 977: 975: 974: 934: 931: 930: 929: 891: 888: 871: 868: 851: 848: 828: 825: 824: 823: 802:and Netcrime, 779: 778: 744: 741: 722: 719: 665: 662: 644: 642: 641: 625: 624: 570: 567: 482: 481: 473: 470: 454: 453: 414: 374: 373: 365: 362: 346: 343: 321: 287: 284: 240: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 204:Pgautier-neuze 172: 171: 168: 160: 157: 129: 128: 120: 117: 100: 97: 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1619: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1524: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1472: 1464: 1458: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1424: 1419: 1413: 1412: 1405: 1397: 1396:IETF RFC 7228 1390: 1388: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1374: 1373:IPSO Alliance 1370: 1364: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1351: 1345: 1344: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1290: 1288: 1281: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1262: 1261: 1258: 1253: 1251: 1241: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1179: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 973: 969: 965: 961: 956: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 941: 928: 924: 920: 915: 914: 913: 911: 907: 903: 902:68.100.161.79 899: 887: 886: 882: 878: 867: 866: 862: 858: 847: 846: 842: 838: 834: 833:Web of Things 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 796:Dark internet 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 740: 739: 735: 731: 730:Mikedeanklein 726: 718: 717: 713: 709: 708:Mikedeanklein 703: 699: 697: 693: 689: 685: 679: 675: 671: 670:IPSO_Alliance 661: 660: 656: 652: 648: 640: 636: 632: 627: 626: 622: 621: 620: 619: 615: 611: 605: 601: 597: 594: 593: 589: 585: 578: 574: 566: 565: 561: 557: 553: 548: 547: 543: 539: 536: 532: 531: 527: 523: 519: 514: 513: 509: 505: 501: 496: 495: 491: 487: 479: 478: 477: 469: 468: 464: 460: 449: 436: 424: 418: 410: 397: 385: 379: 375: 372: 369: 361: 360: 356: 352: 342: 340: 336: 332: 328: 319: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 292: 283: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 256: 251: 247: 244: 232: 228: 224: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 186: 182: 176: 169: 166: 165: 164: 156: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 126: 125: 124: 116: 115: 111: 107: 96: 95: 91: 87: 83: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1588:— Preceding 1573: 1547:— Preceding 1542:Bluerasberry 1522: 1484:(1): 49–69. 1481: 1477: 1471: 1457:cite journal 1440: 1436: 1429: 1418: 1410: 1404: 1395: 1365: 1353: 1308:— Preceding 1303:Bluerasberry 1286: 1282: 1268: 1249: 1245: 1223: 1204: 1200: 1180: 1162:— Preceding 1159: 1142: 1095:Semantic_Web 1089: 1086: 1033: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1008: 996:Jasonfrankel 976: 936: 896:— Preceding 893: 873: 870:Future Tense 853: 830: 783: 746: 727: 724: 704: 700: 667: 643: 631:Andy Dingley 606: 603: 599: 595: 580: 576: 572: 549: 533: 515: 497: 483: 475: 457: 444:|accessdate= 417: 405:|accessdate= 378: 370: 367: 348: 331:57.73.25.167 325:— Preceding 320: 297:— Preceding 293: 289: 273:120.18.92.18 271: 267: 263: 259: 252: 248: 245: 242: 223:JamesBWatson 208:Andy Dingley 181:JamesBWatson 177: 173: 162: 130: 122: 102: 81: 78: 60: 43: 37: 1119:—Preceding 1022:Михал Орела 981:Михал Орела 960:Mobile_RFID 944:Михал Орела 816:Markbassett 688:98.246.4.58 682:—Preceding 610:Михал Орела 584:Михал Орела 486:Михал Орела 303:Texperience 134:—Preceding 106:Михал Орела 86:Михал Орела 36:This is an 1207:Sam Tomato 800:Cybercrime 140:MihalOrela 1184:Djairhorn 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 1602:contribs 1590:unsigned 1561:contribs 1549:unsigned 1509:article? 1322:contribs 1310:unsigned 1164:unsigned 1121:unsigned 1101:for the 898:unsigned 857:Jo3sampl 792:Deep web 768:McGeddon 684:unsigned 435:cite web 396:cite web 351:Wurtis65 327:unsigned 311:contribs 299:unsigned 148:contribs 136:unsigned 1580:Lorawan 1109:to the 837:Pdxuser 674:Contiki 39:archive 1570:Future 1553:Jugdev 1529:(talk) 1334:Jugdev 1314:Jugdev 1293:(talk) 1270:Jugdev 1256:(talk) 1115:Piracy 1090:revert 749:mgaved 678:Zigbee 1594:Huggi 1576:Lpwan 200:added 16:< 1598:talk 1578:and 1557:talk 1463:link 1377:ETSI 1375:and 1369:IETF 1318:talk 1211:talk 1188:talk 1172:talk 1149:talk 1129:talk 1103:L600 1071:talk 1049:talk 1026:talk 1000:talk 985:talk 968:talk 948:talk 923:talk 906:talk 881:talk 875:be. 861:talk 841:talk 820:talk 810:and 772:talk 764:bold 753:talk 734:talk 712:talk 692:talk 655:talk 649:-- 635:talk 614:talk 588:talk 560:talk 554:-- 542:talk 526:talk 520:-- 508:talk 490:talk 463:talk 448:help 409:help 355:talk 335:talk 307:talk 277:talk 227:talk 212:talk 185:talk 144:talk 110:talk 90:talk 1486:doi 1445:doi 1144:DGG 1065:-- 1043:-- 762:Be 676:or 672:or 502:-- 257:). 1604:) 1600:• 1559:• 1482:58 1480:. 1459:}} 1455:{{ 1439:. 1386:^ 1371:, 1320:• 1213:) 1190:) 1174:) 1151:) 1131:) 1073:) 1051:) 1028:) 1002:) 987:) 970:) 950:) 925:) 908:) 883:) 863:) 843:) 835:? 798:, 794:, 790:, 774:) 755:) 736:) 728:-- 714:) 706:-- 694:) 657:) 637:) 616:) 590:) 562:) 544:) 528:) 510:) 492:) 465:) 439:: 437:}} 433:{{ 400:: 398:}} 394:{{ 357:) 337:) 313:) 309:• 279:) 229:) 214:) 187:) 150:) 146:• 112:) 92:) 1596:( 1555:( 1492:. 1488:: 1465:) 1451:. 1447:: 1441:2 1398:. 1316:( 1209:( 1186:( 1170:( 1147:( 1127:( 1069:( 1047:( 1024:( 998:( 983:( 966:( 946:( 921:( 904:( 879:( 859:( 839:( 822:) 818:( 770:( 751:( 732:( 710:( 690:( 653:( 633:( 612:( 586:( 558:( 540:( 524:( 506:( 488:( 461:( 450:) 446:( 429:. 411:) 407:( 390:. 353:( 333:( 305:( 275:( 225:( 210:( 183:( 142:( 108:( 88:( 50:.

Index

Talk:Internet of things
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Михал Орела
talk
20:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Михал Орела
talk
17:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
MihalOrela
talk
contribs
17:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
JamesBWatson
talk
11:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Characteristics
added
Pgautier-neuze
Andy Dingley
talk
11:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
JamesBWatson
talk
11:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
http://beforeitsnews.com/news/79/982/Saudi_Killer_Chip_RFID_Implant_Would_Track,_Eliminate_Kill_Undesirables.html
120.18.92.18

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.