1244:
audience whose cultural background had as its closest pair the concept of "impermanence", very much discussed by christian thinkers. Even though, these concepts, in all their semantic scopes, are not equivalents: neither equivalents, nor the same. According to most eastern views I am acquainted to, anicca goes way beyond than the western concept of impermanence: anicca is not something restricted to the earthly life, it goes beyond this life, in all possible future worlds that a living being may incarnate, even in the highest "heavenly" abode and even in the deepest form of "hell", anicca is one of the most fundamental realities of those planes of existence. Anicca seems to be inherent in any form of the manifested existence, regardless of what type and where it may happen; and this comprehension, I think, is missing in most of our western thinkers, since they don't conceive in general anything like samsara or the constant cycle of incarnations. And I don't know if you see it as strikingly different, but for me this is a capital difference between anicca and impermanence as thought by most western thinkers, since, as far as we talk about most of the
Dharmic religions, anicca (pali) or anitya (sanskrit) posit the infinity of all possible manifestations within and beyond this world, with exception of what Hinduism calls Vaikuntha. So, I would ask the help of anyone more adept in this kind of knowledge, if they could solve this question that came to my mind regarding this article.
1248:
believe that "impermanence" is comprehended in a significantly different way if compared to the eastern concept of "anicca", because, firstly, they both are products of quite different countries, territories, histories, cultures, etc, and secondly, western philosophy never had any concept like reincarnation - this one at least not as eastern thinkers had - and samsara, or such a scope of other worldly planes, worlds and forms of existence, and such a categorical and irreducible definition of any form of manifested life as defined in its most fundamental root as founded on anicca or anitya and - according to many other eastern philosophical schools - as also being illusory. It is also worth noting the interplay between anicca and kamma (pali) or karma (sanskrit), to the extent that these two concepts influence deeply each others' semantic values. The relationship between these two concepts in the
Dharmic religions is really tight, to the extent that the idea of anicca does not work properly without the understanding of karma, and this later concept is completely missing in the western tradition of philosophy. Even though it might be agreed that some analogies are traced between kamma or karma and divine retribution, this kind of relationship is restricted to the field of analogy and can never go beyond it, and it can be considered a mistake to conceive these two ideas as the same. So, this is one more point against the equivalence between anicca and impermanence.
200:
467:
451:
254:
233:
516:
526:
495:
637:
616:
191:
647:
353:
322:
363:
1481:
As you've already said that you have no idea what "anicca" is, I don't see why your claim that "none of the discussions ... reached any sort of consensus" should be accepted as a reasonable conclusion as those discussions are about anicca. How can you say you understand those discussions when you say
1107:
You're the one who has a concern about how this has been handled and has changed it here. I don't have a concern about those pages. It appears that you do. Shouldn't you yourself be taking up the matter in their talk pages? Isn't that necessary for consistency? My argument is that the status quo ante
812:
The Buddha, pragmatist supreme, is concerned, by contrast - as would be anybody who's just taken a hit in the chest - to remove pronto the agonizing arrow, rather than speculating whence the arrow, identifying the archer, his or her possible motive, category of poison if any, etc, etc, etc. These all
1554:
template to these two sections as there are no inline citations to support the text in either of these sections to specifically call out these specific sections as needing attention. I was torn between using the OR template and
Citation needed but it is unclear to the casual reader is it is Original
1441:
You appear to still be trying to convince me without citing reliable sources. None of the discussions you linked reached any sort of consensus, and even if they had, what I'm looking for is reliable sources. Only a reliable source will change my mind here. If you don't have the bandwidth to add one,
1247:
As far as I know about translation, all sorts of translation work mostly with analogy and interpretation: very frequently, there isn't anything as a pure and perfect term rendition from a language to another, because linguistic terms are products of quite different world views and histories. So, I
1243:
I would like to point out something regarding anicca and impermanence: the translation "impermanence" is merely a western interpretation and an analogous word using for the eastern concept of anicca. It is a rendition and interpretation of an eastern concept by western scholars aiming at a western
1494:
demanding that reliable sources that use exactly the specific terms, applied in exactly the ways you require, be provided to you ASAP regardless of the common understandings of what "impermanence", "flux", "change", "everything flows," etc. happen to be talking about. You appear to further insist
1463:
In case it isn't clear, the section I'm talking about is this: "Impermanence first appears in Greek philosophy... In this way, Anaxagoras could assert that nowhere did any ingredient ever fully come into or go out of being. " - this entire section of the article only cites one academic paper (one
806:
The article even misrepresents what the Buddha pinpoints. In
English impermanence is little more than a concept and, as such, resides for everyday purposes almost entirely in the realm of the abstract. Impermanence in common parlance may, at best, be inferred from its visible epiphenomena (less
1485:
Now, sure, like lots of other articles in
Knowledge this one could stand some improvement and additional citations. But you are making claims beyond that. You are claiming that the topic of impermanence is not relevant to Western philosophy and that Heraclitus is not an important figure in that
1334:- if reliable secondary sources are added supporting the claims on the section on Western Influence, I would agree that the tags can be removed. i do not think the tag should be removed until then, but I would not object to moving it to be under that section if you feel that it is more clear.
848:
Those who succeed in dominating most of the articles on "Buddhism" need to get their heads out of the Pali
Dictionary, shake off its 19th century dust & address, to some personal practical purpose, why it may be that the Buddha says, "I teach but two things: the nature of
1545:
1570:
That makes sense to me - I think that's the better tag than citation need, just because I'm not sure that the eleatics are actually associated with the claims made in the article, according to most scholars. Generally any representation of the pre-Socratics that seems as
1398:
As for the new claim that “The text of
Impermanence#Western_philosophy is not supported by the cited tertiary source” – that’s an awfully vague claim. I suggest you familiarize yourself with the prior discussions here related to your topic of concern, most particularly
1374:
I agree that concerns about this page should be discussed here, but the issue raised on the other page, which you are also commenting on, was the same concern as it is here. You need to cite reliable sources for any factual claims made whatsoever. The text of
1023:
Dukkha is a Hindu concept, too. It is not exclusive to
Buddhism. And if one allows translation, dukkha appears in Western Philosophy, most notably in its negation, ataraxia. For that matter, anatta appears in Western philosophy too, as adiaphora.
794:
Reading this article as it stands at the moment, you would think that impermanence was a concept understood by
Buddhists and by no one else. It needs a much broader treatment than it is getting here. The Buddhism stuff is a good start though.
878:, please. And less of the heady empire building, of which the editor above quite rightly complains. His thoroughly justifiable request, once fulfilled, will result in Anicca's paradoxically appropriate colonization by mere Impermanence.
1599:
Hi, I was wondering which script was used for anicca in the 'Translations of
Impermanence' box; as I understand it there are lots of different scripts used depending on the region, I'm just curious, thanks for any help
153:
1564:
1178:
I removed it because it breaks that policy, therefore the issue is that policy. You can add that template to the section "Buddhism" if you think that it's helpful to having it in the article.
1659:
204:
1005:
Dukkha is a Buddhist concept, impermanece is not exclusive of Buddhism and the template at the bottom already has this link. Putting it on at the begining of the article fails
1649:
922:
It is not correct to say that 'everything is in flux' meaning that nothing is 'static'. There is static state = namely 'the static state of the lack of static state' KK (
1265:
870:: Brahma deliver us from the plague of concepts. And the pain of the conceptualists. Who take, I can well believe, great pains. Whatever happened to the article labeled
1664:
1620:
1605:
147:
1283:
Original research tag has been removed from whole page and replaced by OR templates on specific sections. Discussion and attempt for consensus will be discussed there
384:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1275:
1694:
1352:
Concerns about this page should be discussed on this page, not on some other page. Re the "claims on the section on Western Influence," I see no such claims.
1616:
1601:
1478:
You above talked about the problem being "claims on the section on Western Influence.” Where are these claims? What is this "western influence" you speak of?
421:
1709:
1699:
1179:
1147:
1094:
1057:
1010:
974:
957:
789:
1038:
That box has been there since 10 April 2004. I would imagine pursuit of this issue would involve many topics other than just impermanence and dukkha.
703:
598:
304:
1689:
1540:
1714:
1292:
1324:
799:
1464:
pyrrhonism and buddhism) and three SEP articles, without providing any indication on the text of what part of those articles is being cited.
762:
745:
1704:
1684:
774:
411:
892:
79:
1251:
If you judge me right in my positions, wouldn't it be wise if two articles were created? One for anicca and another for impermanence?
1206:
seems largely duplicative of what is in this article. Should the change page be eliminated and its contents merged into impermanence?
1739:
1724:
1674:
1644:
1070:
Then there are a bunch of other instances which would also need to be edited to uphold that standard. Just some ones I found quickly
768:
693:
588:
552:
458:
332:
294:
1187:
1173:
1155:
1117:
1102:
1088:
1065:
1047:
1033:
1018:
1000:
982:
474:
336:
1588:
1654:
912:
1508:
1473:
1420:
1388:
1361:
1343:
1309:
A user has flagged this article as follows, without raising a discussion here to substantiate why the flags have been inserted.
1729:
1197:
968:
1269:
1261:
1229:
1215:
386:
85:
838:, is the consequence of the failure to adapt to change. The Buddha shows us how to transcend stress by learning to adapt to
1679:
1304:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1143:
560:
168:
44:
1528:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1624:
1312:
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (April 2022) This article possibly contains original research. (April 2022)
923:
669:
135:
1734:
1719:
1669:
1551:
898:
30:
1379:
is not supported by the cited tertiary source, and many of the subsections of that section have no citations at all.
265:, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with
556:
376:
327:
1442:
that is certainly fine - but the tag should stay so that someone else can add the needed references in the future.
931:
903:
Can some one familiar with Buddhist texts more clearly identify the texts cited in the quotes section? Thanks! --
1639:
1234:
951:
830:. Impermanence sounds like one of the topics in relation to which the Buddha notoriously chose to remain silent.
99:
1609:
660:
621:
564:
540:
500:
270:
261:
238:
104:
20:
1393:
You above talked about the problem being "claims on the section on Western Influence.” Where are these claims?
129:
1550:
Whilst there was an Original Research template at the top of the page I have removed it and I have added the
813:
rank, like impermanence, as species of speculation not at all conducive to the immediate relief of suffering.
74:
213:
125:
65:
937:
908:
175:
668:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1594:
927:
109:
1376:
1331:
942:
The series on Buddhism box should be restored to parallel the treatment of dukkha and anatta.
1183:
1151:
1098:
1061:
1014:
978:
917:
219:
1575:
as that is written makes me think it may be original research based on ancient sources like
1411:
so that you come to understand how the article has come to address the topics it addresses.
1499:- be exclusively about the Eastern topic, known as "anicca", about which you know nothing?
1257:
904:
141:
8:
1560:
1546:
Added Original Research tag to the "The Eleatics" and "Response to the Eleatics" sections
1536:
1288:
888:
190:
55:
1584:
1469:
1384:
1339:
796:
70:
1576:
1504:
1491:
1416:
1357:
1320:
1225:
1211:
1169:
1113:
1084:
1043:
1029:
996:
964:
947:
368:
51:
1555:
Research or just lacking citations to others who have published articles saying it.
1093:
Sure, but this talk page is not for those articles, discuss it in their talk pages.
735:
Does anyone know what's up with this: jjmh,ok;lg,lg j,l g ., One of the conditioned
782:
161:
1161:
1139:
1053:
1006:
652:
531:
1108:
should be restored and that this article should be consistent with those others.
973:
It can be put in their section but there is a quotation template in that place.
842:, albeit via a panoply of available methods: in round figures, 40 and counting.
1556:
1532:
1284:
1164:. I have an issue with your removal of the series on Buddhism box on this page.
884:
1633:
1580:
1487:
1465:
1380:
1335:
740:
821:
is not a mere concept. It is here and now. It labels an every-moment painful
1500:
1496:
1412:
1353:
1316:
1221:
1207:
1165:
1109:
1080:
1039:
1025:
992:
987:
It was put in the top section previously. It is also in the top section of
960:
943:
24:
551:-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
1254:
I would be really thankful if you take my question into consideration.
466:
450:
835:
381:
380:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
743:
theory. In this case the term means disappearance. The first of the
1579:- scholarly reviews tend to be more equivocal from what I've read.
1071:
665:
547:
525:
266:
253:
232:
736:
515:
494:
1400:
859:
850:
831:
1203:
754:
750:
1401:
Talk:Impermanence#Impermanence_is_not_a_weird_technical_term
636:
615:
1660:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
352:
321:
991:
which similarly addresses both Buddhism and Hinduism.
269:. If you would like to participate, please visit the
160:
1077:
883:
Glad to get that - if not the arrow - off my chest.
664:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
642:
521:
358:
15:
1650:
Knowledge vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1408:
1074:
1072:https://en.wikipedia.org/Catu%E1%B9%A3ko%E1%B9%ADi
1665:C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1052:Doesn't matter how much was there, it is against
1631:
1409:Talk:Impermanence#Merge_Change_into_this_article
1276:Disputed Accuracy and Claim of Original Research
1056:to give prominence of placement to a viewpoint.
988:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
545:, a project to improve Knowledge's articles on
1695:Low-importance philosophy of religion articles
1239:Greetings to all Knowledge members and staff,
1615:Don't worry, I'm pretty sure it's Devanagari
1330:My concerns here are the same ones raised on
174:
1204:https://en.wikipedia.org/Change_(philosophy)
1486:topic. You are claiming that these are not
1710:Low-importance Eastern philosophy articles
1700:Philosophy of religion task force articles
790:Impermanence is not a weird technical term
720:
749:; that all things are impermanent, their
1690:C-Class philosophy of religion articles
259:This article falls within the scope of
188:
1715:Eastern philosophy task force articles
1632:
390:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
1300:The following discussion is closed.
1078:https://en.wikipedia.org/Anupalabdhi
658:This article is within the scope of
537:This article is within the scope of
374:This article is within the scope of
184:
1705:C-Class Eastern philosophy articles
218:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
1685:Low-importance Philosophy articles
1552:Template:Original research section
1404:
1075:https://en.wikipedia.org/Anavastha
465:
449:
14:
1751:
1482:you don't understand their topic?
1315:I propose that these be removed.
273:for more details on the projects.
1740:Low-importance Hinduism articles
1725:Low-importance Religion articles
1675:Top-importance Buddhism articles
1645:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1524:The discussion above is closed.
645:
635:
614:
524:
514:
493:
396:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
361:
351:
320:
252:
231:
198:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1405:Talk:Impermanence#Static_state.
1377:Impermanence#Western_philosophy
989:https://en.wikipedia.org/Dukkha
698:This article has been rated as
593:This article has been rated as
416:This article has been rated as
399:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
299:This article has been rated as
1655:C-Class level-5 vital articles
1198:Merge Change into this article
678:Knowledge:WikiProject Hinduism
573:Knowledge:WikiProject Religion
279:Knowledge:WikiProject Buddhism
1:
1730:WikiProject Religion articles
681:Template:WikiProject Hinduism
672:and see a list of open tasks.
576:Template:WikiProject Religion
282:Template:WikiProject Buddhism
42:Put new text under old text.
1332:Talk:Heraclitus#Impermanence
1160:I do not have an issue with
913:03:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
893:07:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
757:never resting for a moment.
739:not associated with mind in
7:
1680:C-Class Philosophy articles
1625:20:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
1610:20:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
1270:03:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1756:
1138:If you have an issue with
704:project's importance scale
599:project's importance scale
422:project's importance scale
305:project's importance scale
1735:C-Class Hinduism articles
1720:C-Class Religion articles
1670:C-Class Buddhism articles
1589:07:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
1565:06:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
1541:07:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
1509:00:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
1490:and you are, contrary to
1474:22:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1421:22:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1389:21:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1362:21:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1344:21:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1325:21:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1293:07:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
1230:13:30, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
753:, existence, change, and
697:
630:
592:
509:
473:
457:
432:
428:
415:
346:
298:
247:
226:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1526:Please do not modify it.
1302:Please do not modify it.
1216:19:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
1188:19:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1174:18:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1156:18:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1118:18:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1103:17:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1089:17:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1066:17:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1048:16:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1034:15:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1019:14:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1001:14:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
983:14:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
969:11:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
952:14:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
932:06:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
834:, in the formulation of
800:09:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
785:22:01, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
563:standards, or visit the
1235:Impermanence and Anicca
862:is labelled "a central
853:and its transcendence."
433:Associated task forces:
1640:C-Class vital articles
470:
459:Philosophy of religion
454:
377:WikiProject Philosophy
75:avoid personal attacks
1142:go and discuss it in
469:
453:
205:level-5 vital article
100:Neutral point of view
1595:Script used for Pali
661:WikiProject Hinduism
541:WikiProject Religion
262:WikiProject Buddhism
105:No original research
874:? Please change!
402:Philosophy articles
1303:
938:Series on Buddhism
807:common parlance:-)
553:assess and improve
475:Eastern philosophy
471:
455:
387:general discussion
214:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1577:Diogenes Laertius
1495:that this page -
1301:
1272:
1260:comment added by
718:
717:
714:
713:
710:
709:
684:Hinduism articles
609:
608:
605:
604:
579:Religion articles
567:for more details.
488:
487:
484:
483:
480:
479:
369:Philosophy portal
315:
314:
311:
310:
285:Buddhism articles
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1747:
1255:
1220:Merge effected.
899:"Quotes" section
732:
731:
727:
686:
685:
682:
679:
676:
655:
650:
649:
648:
639:
632:
631:
626:
618:
611:
610:
581:
580:
577:
574:
571:
565:wikiproject page
534:
529:
528:
518:
511:
510:
505:
497:
490:
489:
440:
430:
429:
404:
403:
400:
397:
394:
371:
366:
365:
364:
355:
348:
347:
342:
339:
324:
317:
316:
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
256:
249:
248:
243:
235:
228:
227:
211:
202:
201:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1755:
1754:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1630:
1629:
1597:
1548:
1530:
1529:
1306:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1278:
1262:186.206.242.199
1237:
1202:The content of
1200:
940:
920:
905:JosiahHenderson
901:
792:
779:
733:
729:
725:
723:
722:
683:
680:
677:
674:
673:
653:Hinduism portal
651:
646:
644:
624:
578:
575:
572:
569:
568:
532:Religion portal
530:
523:
503:
438:
401:
398:
395:
392:
391:
367:
362:
360:
340:
330:
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
241:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
199:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1753:
1743:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1628:
1627:
1617:Alexanderkowal
1602:Alexanderkowal
1596:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1547:
1544:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1483:
1479:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1396:
1394:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1347:
1346:
1307:
1298:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1242:
1236:
1233:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1036:
939:
936:
919:
916:
900:
897:
896:
895:
880:
879:
855:
854:
845:
844:
815:
814:
809:
808:
791:
788:
787:
786:
759:
721:
719:
716:
715:
712:
711:
708:
707:
700:Low-importance
696:
690:
689:
687:
670:the discussion
657:
656:
640:
628:
627:
625:Low‑importance
619:
607:
606:
603:
602:
595:Low-importance
591:
585:
584:
582:
536:
535:
519:
507:
506:
504:Low‑importance
498:
486:
485:
482:
481:
478:
477:
472:
462:
461:
456:
446:
445:
443:
441:
435:
434:
426:
425:
418:Low-importance
414:
408:
407:
405:
373:
372:
356:
344:
343:
341:Low‑importance
325:
313:
312:
309:
308:
301:Top-importance
297:
291:
290:
288:
257:
245:
244:
242:Top‑importance
236:
224:
223:
217:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1752:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1553:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1527:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1493:
1489:
1484:
1480:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1310:
1305:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1240:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:its talk page
1141:
1137:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1003:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
966:
962:
959:
956:
955:
954:
953:
949:
945:
935:
933:
929:
925:
924:178.43.139.54
918:Static state.
915:
914:
910:
906:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
856:
852:
847:
846:
843:
841:
837:
833:
829:
826:sensation of
823:
820:
817:
816:
811:
810:
805:
804:
803:
801:
798:
797:Ireneshusband
784:
781:
780:
777:
776:
771:
770:
765:
764:
758:
756:
752:
748:
747:
742:
738:
728:
705:
701:
695:
692:
691:
688:
671:
667:
663:
662:
654:
643:
641:
638:
634:
633:
629:
623:
620:
617:
613:
612:
600:
596:
590:
587:
586:
583:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
549:
544:
543:
542:
533:
527:
522:
520:
517:
513:
512:
508:
502:
499:
496:
492:
491:
476:
468:
464:
463:
460:
452:
448:
447:
444:
442:
437:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
413:
410:
409:
406:
389:
388:
383:
379:
378:
370:
359:
357:
354:
350:
349:
345:
338:
334:
329:
326:
323:
319:
318:
306:
302:
296:
293:
292:
289:
272:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
250:
246:
240:
237:
234:
230:
229:
225:
221:
215:
207:
206:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1598:
1572:
1549:
1531:
1525:
1497:Impermanence
1314:
1311:
1308:
1299:
1256:— Preceding
1253:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1238:
1219:
1201:
941:
921:
902:
875:
871:
867:
863:
839:
827:
825:
822:
818:
793:
773:
767:
761:
744:
734:
699:
659:
594:
555:articles to
546:
539:
538:
417:
385:
375:
300:
271:project page
260:
220:WikiProjects
203:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Impermanence
19:This is the
1581:- car chasm
1466:- car chasm
1381:- car chasm
1336:- car chasm
1180:Rupert Loup
1148:Rupert Loup
1095:Rupert Loup
1058:Rupert Loup
1011:Rupert Loup
975:Rupert Loup
958:Rupert loup
858:Gorblimey.
783:कुक्कुरोवाच
148:free images
31:not a forum
1634:Categories
1492:WP:BLUESKY
836:Hans Selye
393:Philosophy
382:philosophy
328:Philosophy
1573:confident
1557:Gusfriend
1533:Gusfriend
1285:Gusfriend
885:Wingspeed
775:anityatva
208:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1258:unsigned
1162:WP:UNDUE
1140:WP:UNDUE
1054:WP:UNDUE
1007:WP:UNDUE
868:Buddhism
763:anityatā
746:trividyā
741:Yogācāra
675:Hinduism
666:Hinduism
622:Hinduism
570:Religion
548:Religion
501:Religion
333:Religion
276:Buddhism
267:Buddhism
239:Buddhism
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1501:Teishin
1413:Teishin
1354:Teishin
1317:Teishin
1222:Teishin
1208:Teishin
1166:Teishin
1110:Teishin
1081:Teishin
1040:Teishin
1026:Teishin
993:Teishin
961:Teishin
944:Teishin
864:concept
769:adhruva
737:dharmas
702:on the
597:on the
420:on the
337:Eastern
303:on the
210:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1488:WP:OBV
876:Change
872:Anicca
860:Dukkha
851:dukkha
840:change
832:Stress
828:change
819:Anicca
760:(Skt.
724:": -->
216:scale.
126:Google
755:death
751:birth
197:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1621:talk
1606:talk
1585:talk
1561:talk
1537:talk
1505:talk
1470:talk
1417:talk
1407:and
1403:and
1385:talk
1358:talk
1340:talk
1321:talk
1289:talk
1266:talk
1226:talk
1212:talk
1184:talk
1170:talk
1152:talk
1114:talk
1099:talk
1085:talk
1062:talk
1044:talk
1030:talk
1015:talk
997:talk
979:talk
965:talk
948:talk
928:talk
909:talk
889:talk
824:felt
726:edit
559:and
557:good
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
866:in
694:Low
589:Low
561:1.0
412:Low
295:Top
176:TWL
1636::
1623:)
1608:)
1587:)
1563:)
1539:)
1507:)
1472:)
1419:)
1387:)
1360:)
1342:)
1323:)
1291:)
1268:)
1228:)
1214:)
1186:)
1172:)
1154:)
1146:.
1116:)
1101:)
1087:)
1064:)
1046:)
1032:)
1017:)
1009:.
999:)
981:)
967:)
950:)
934:)
930:)
911:)
891:)
802:.
778:)
772:,
766:;
439:/
335:/
331::
156:)
54:;
1619:(
1604:(
1583:(
1559:(
1535:(
1503:(
1468:(
1415:(
1383:(
1356:(
1338:(
1319:(
1287:(
1264:(
1224:(
1210:(
1182:(
1168:(
1150:(
1112:(
1097:(
1083:(
1060:(
1042:(
1028:(
1013:(
995:(
977:(
963:(
946:(
926:(
907:(
887:(
730:]
706:.
601:.
424:.
307:.
222::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}