173:
21:
287:
269:
452:
297:
442:
424:
378:
353:
76:
201:
513:
some of the early security related standards in
Australia, even though on the periphery, the emphasis was on having people follow the standard and use it. The idea that you cannot print the symbol out from a PDF on the web and thus use it instantly, when the need arises is absurd. I, for one, certainly hope that the International Standards Organisation has a rethink about the way they are currently handling standards.
131:
107:
219:
923:
Based on usage in the real world, they are probably looking for incentive stock options. People's interest in ISO xxxx are in the standards themselves, not the organization that makes them. People's interest in ISO security instruments is more likely driven by a desire to know what the term "ISO"
971:
I think it's a matter of localization and specialization. American businesspeople are likely to be looking for stock options. Europeans and engineers are more likely thinking of standards. I tried this and got a small fraction of the way through it, before deciding I had better things to do. I
512:
I find it quite odd that a
Standards Organisation would copyright a warning symbol. The idea of having a standard is to guide and mentor others. Setting unrealistic obstacles in the way, such as limiting the use of the sign, in itself, leaves one speachless to say the least. When I was involved in
671:. I think most people talking about ISO mean either the organization or one of their standards, but these two seem (to me) to be so closely related that linking to a disambiguation page that contains a lot of other stuff is somewhat misleading. Would it make sense/be sufficient to try link to
557:: all of the 328 incoming links want to go there, as far as I can see (mostly because they are talking about ISO standards, which are set by the International Organization for Standardization). Of course all those links could be changed to point to
877:
you'll see how prevalent it is. Standard disambiguation rules should apply. This isn't something up for case-by-case consensus. If
Knowledge articles have linked to the wrong place because a the article lacked a disambiguation we can fix that.
743:
I want to move Iso, the current page for all of the I-S-O acronyms, to ISO. It makes more sense for this to be the page for ISO acronyms than to be a redirect to just one of those organizations. How would I go about doing this? Thanks,
924:
itself means. Considering we have the same term used with approximately equal frequency in the real world it is simply not reasonable to say there shouldn't be a disambiguation page.
996:
754:
As the
International Organization for Standardization and its standards are by far the most common meaning of ISO, I don't think this is such a good idea. But anyway, as a move from
914:
goes like this: "Ask yourself: When a reader enters a given term in the
Knowledge search box and pushes "Go", what article would they most likely be expecting to view as a result?"
874:
625:
in the fields of business, computing, engineering, and science. People who do want something else have to click through just one extra link. What meaning were you looking for?
950:, right? Unless it's obvious they're trying to link to something else. So the link in these articles would be ], right? Not sure what I'm getting myself into but I'm game.
766:, which should have all the information you need on how to proceed. After five days of discussion time, the page will then be moved or not moved by an admin. Happy editing,
524:
618:
610:
602:
594:
1017:
1022:
1042:
892:
839:
is a relatively uncommon usage. Of 200,000,000+ google hits for ISO, only 2 million (approximately) are for that organization. Another 2 million are for
826:
730:
61:
147:
539:
I've never even heard of the
International Organization for Standardization for today, and I was changing the redirect to a disambiguation link.--
1027:
951:
925:
888:
879:
1032:
947:
849:
836:
793:
785:
726:
676:
668:
558:
550:
37:
1047:
138:
112:
1052:
1037:
813:
1077:
1057:
1082:
725:
The incoming links should be disambiguated. I came to this page looking for the film speed, and it wasn't mentioned anywhere on the
1062:
235:
1067:
577:, this seems to be the most important meaning, and so the people that search for it should not go through a disambiguation link.
1072:
975:
I concur with
Ewlyahoocom's analysis above, that if we don't fix all the links it creates a massive disambiguation problem. -
474:
984:
973:
647:
520:
911:
954:
941:
928:
918:
900:
868:
182:
117:
632:
614:
606:
598:
590:
226:
206:
773:
319:
605:) 01:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)---------K WEBADA DE PAGINA SI ESTAS EN AKI ERES UN GILIPOLLAS------------------------------
707:
695:
686:
584:
465:
429:
384:
358:
990:
896:
310:
274:
829:
748:
87:
999:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
873:
Reverting back. ISO, pronounced "EYE-so" is the accepted term for an
Incentive Stock Option. If you do
1003:
528:
934:
853:
763:
738:
554:
907:
816:
803:
473:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
318:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
234:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
146:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
792:. It definitely should not be a separate disambiguation page. Isn't the headnote I just added at
779:
143:
47:
733:
75:
672:
664:
93:
884:
516:
389:
363:
808:
I think this should be a disambiguation page, at least until there is a decent article on
543:
8:
980:
457:
31:
172:
20:
507:
938:
915:
865:
745:
800:
770:
704:
683:
629:
581:
976:
302:
42:
27:
1011:
1000:
908:
Restore disambig link as per style guidelines; this is not a consensus matter
809:
692:
644:
540:
231:
946:
Sounds fair but - *ugh* - a little tedious. They should all be linking to
53:
286:
268:
534:
470:
451:
856:) that intend that meaning. While some of the other items on this list
797:
767:
701:
680:
626:
578:
296:
822:
657:
218:
200:
653:
441:
423:
377:
352:
852:, simply based on the number of links (basically all of them, see
561:, but it seems most people want to link to that went they link to
315:
640:
937:, and then you can redirect it to wherever you want. Deal?
789:
759:
755:
622:
566:
562:
130:
106:
910:". Which exact style guidelines are you talking about?
860:
be referred to as "ISO", no one appears to actually be
762:
can only be done by an admin, you should propose it at
574:
570:
469:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
447:
314:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
292:
230:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
142:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
997:
Talk:International Organization for Standardization
62:
Talk:International Organization for Standardization
1009:
825:. It's the most common usage, in my experience.
639:CD images. I was writing up a reference to the
387:, a project which is currently considered to be
1018:Redirect-Class International relations articles
1023:NA-importance International relations articles
948:International Organization for Standardization
933:Here's my proposal: you go through and fix up
850:International Organization for Standardization
837:International Organization for Standardization
794:International Organization for Standardization
786:International Organization for Standardization
727:International Organization for Standardization
677:International Organization for Standardization
669:International Organization for Standardization
559:International Organization for Standardization
551:International Organization for Standardization
38:International Organization for Standardization
156:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
1043:WikiProject International relations articles
159:Template:WikiProject International relations
835:Redirecting to disambiguation page because
995:There is a move discussion in progress on
549:Part of the reason why I redirected it to
86:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1028:Redirect-Class United Nations articles
1010:
621:) 01:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC) meaning of
1033:NA-importance United Nations articles
463:This redirect is within the scope of
383:This redirect is within the scope of
308:This redirect is within the scope of
224:This redirect is within the scope of
136:This redirect is within the scope of
73:
1048:Redirect-Class organization articles
69:
41:Because this page is not frequently
15:
1053:NA-importance organization articles
1038:WikiProject United Nations articles
700:I put a link in the lead sentence.
244:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations
139:WikiProject International relations
92:It is of interest to the following
13:
1078:NA-importance Engineering articles
1058:WikiProject Organizations articles
247:Template:WikiProject Organizations
171:
45:, present and future discussions,
14:
1094:
483:Knowledge:WikiProject Engineering
399:Knowledge:WikiProject Measurement
1083:WikiProject Engineering articles
821:I think this should redirect to
784:I think this should redirect to
486:Template:WikiProject Engineering
450:
440:
422:
402:Template:WikiProject Measurement
376:
351:
295:
285:
267:
217:
199:
162:International relations articles
129:
105:
74:
19:
1063:Redirect-Class science articles
652:I see. So you were looking for
1068:NA-importance science articles
180:This redirect is supported by
1:
1073:NA-Class Engineering articles
955:05:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
942:05:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
929:05:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
919:05:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
901:04:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
869:03:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
529:11:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
477:and see a list of open tasks.
328:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
322:and see a list of open tasks.
238:and see a list of open tasks.
150:and see a list of open tasks.
1004:14:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
972:see someone has tried again.
875:an appropriate google search
830:22:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
613:) 01:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)--
597:) 01:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)--
331:Template:WikiProject Science
7:
991:Move discussion in progress
817:00:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
804:13:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
774:06:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
749:04:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
734:13:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
10:
1099:
985:19:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
848:Sorry, I reverted back to
691:Probably not a bad idea.--
183:WikiProject United Nations
854:Special:Whatlinkshere/ISO
764:Knowledge:Requested moves
708:07:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
696:07:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
687:07:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
648:06:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
633:04:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
589:International Organ K --
585:03:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
555:Special:Whatlinkshere/ISO
544:23:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
435:
371:
280:
227:WikiProject Organizations
212:
179:
124:
100:
675:more prominently on the
912:The one I'm thinking of
466:WikiProject Engineering
385:WikiProject Measurement
153:International relations
144:International relations
113:International relations
34:that targets the page:
176:
673:List of ISO standards
250:organization articles
175:
57:should take place at:
489:Engineering articles
405:Measurement articles
311:WikiProject Science
458:Engineering portal
177:
88:content assessment
56:
50:
903:
887:comment added by
739:Moving Iso to ISO
519:comment added by
505:
504:
501:
500:
497:
496:
417:
416:
413:
412:
346:
345:
342:
341:
262:
261:
258:
257:
194:
193:
190:
189:
68:
67:
52:
46:
1090:
882:
841:
840:
531:
491:
490:
487:
484:
481:
460:
455:
454:
444:
437:
436:
426:
419:
418:
407:
406:
403:
400:
397:
380:
373:
372:
367:
355:
348:
347:
336:
335:
334:science articles
332:
329:
326:
305:
300:
299:
289:
282:
281:
271:
264:
263:
252:
251:
248:
245:
242:
221:
214:
213:
203:
196:
195:
164:
163:
160:
157:
154:
133:
126:
125:
120:
109:
102:
101:
79:
78:
70:
23:
16:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1008:
1007:
993:
782:
780:Redirect target
741:
667:defined by the
537:
521:121.223.177.172
514:
510:
488:
485:
482:
479:
478:
456:
449:
404:
401:
398:
395:
394:
361:
333:
330:
327:
324:
323:
301:
294:
249:
246:
243:
240:
239:
161:
158:
155:
152:
151:
115:
54:requested moves
12:
11:
5:
1096:
1086:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
992:
989:
988:
987:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
843:
842:
781:
778:
777:
776:
740:
737:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
536:
533:
509:
506:
503:
502:
499:
498:
495:
494:
492:
475:the discussion
462:
461:
445:
433:
432:
427:
415:
414:
411:
410:
408:
381:
369:
368:
356:
344:
343:
340:
339:
337:
320:the discussion
307:
306:
303:Science portal
290:
278:
277:
272:
260:
259:
256:
255:
253:
236:the discussion
222:
210:
209:
204:
192:
191:
188:
187:
178:
168:
167:
165:
148:the discussion
134:
122:
121:
118:United Nations
110:
98:
97:
91:
80:
66:
65:
58:
40:
35:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1095:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1013:
1006:
1005:
1002:
998:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
956:
953:
949:
945:
944:
943:
940:
936:
935:all the links
932:
931:
930:
927:
922:
921:
920:
917:
913:
909:
905:
904:
902:
898:
894:
890:
886:
881:
876:
872:
871:
870:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
846:
845:
844:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
828:
827:76.178.95.219
824:
819:
818:
815:
811:
810:ISO standards
806:
805:
802:
799:
795:
791:
787:
775:
772:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
750:
747:
736:
735:
732:
731:75.203.163.23
728:
709:
706:
703:
699:
698:
697:
694:
690:
689:
688:
685:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
665:ISO standards
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
628:
624:
620:
616:
615:190.42.98.196
612:
608:
607:190.42.98.196
604:
600:
599:190.42.98.196
596:
592:
591:190.42.98.196
588:
587:
586:
583:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:. Similar to
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
545:
542:
532:
530:
526:
522:
518:
493:
476:
472:
468:
467:
459:
453:
448:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
431:
428:
425:
421:
420:
409:
392:
391:
386:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
365:
360:
357:
354:
350:
349:
338:
321:
317:
313:
312:
304:
298:
293:
291:
288:
284:
283:
279:
276:
273:
270:
266:
265:
254:
241:Organizations
237:
233:
232:Organizations
229:
228:
223:
220:
216:
215:
211:
208:
207:Organizations
205:
202:
198:
197:
185:
184:
174:
170:
169:
166:
149:
145:
141:
140:
135:
132:
128:
127:
123:
119:
114:
111:
108:
104:
103:
99:
95:
89:
85:
81:
77:
72:
71:
64:
63:
55:
49:
48:edit requests
44:
39:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
994:
906:You wrote: "
861:
857:
820:
807:
796:sufficient?
783:
742:
724:
661:
660:, but these
553:is given by
538:
511:
464:
388:
309:
225:
181:
137:
94:WikiProjects
83:
60:
26:This is the
939:Ewlyahoocom
916:Ewlyahoocom
883:—Preceding
866:Ewlyahoocom
746:Valley2city
515:—Preceding
480:Engineering
471:engineering
430:Engineering
396:Measurement
359:Measurement
1012:Categories
643:article.--
977:Wikidemon
823:ISO image
788:, not to
658:ISO image
508:Quite odd
28:talk page
1001:RMCD bot
952:Wikidemo
926:Wikidemo
897:contribs
889:Wikidemo
885:unsigned
880:Wikidemo
693:Vercalos
654:ISO 9660
645:Vercalos
541:Vercalos
517:unsigned
84:redirect
32:redirect
390:defunct
364:defunct
325:Science
316:Science
275:Science
43:watched
864:that.
729:page.
679:page?
90:scale.
862:doing
858:could
814:K-car
798:Kusma
768:Kusma
702:Kusma
681:Kusma
641:Warez
627:Kusma
579:Kusma
82:This
30:of a
981:talk
893:talk
801:(討論)
771:(討論)
705:(討論)
684:(討論)
630:(討論)
619:talk
611:talk
603:talk
595:talk
582:(討論)
525:talk
51:and
790:Iso
760:ISO
758:to
756:Iso
662:are
623:ISO
573:or
567:IOC
563:ISO
535:ISO
59:•
36:•
1014::
983:)
899:)
895:•
812:.
575:EU
571:UN
569:,
527:)
116::
979:(
891:(
656:/
617:(
609:(
601:(
593:(
523:(
393:.
366:)
362:(
186:.
96::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}
