484:, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by
163:
74:
53:
22:
445:
and this could reflect particulars of their education, intelligence, or breadth of interests. Furthermore, general knowledge, as indicated by the current article, has been the subject of detailed academic investigation, whereas it is not clear that this is the case for "common knowledge". Therefore, merging the two articles would seem to serve no purpose and would be misleading.--
84:
1031:). To reiterate what I wrote in my edit note: This section is currently cursory, incomplete, lopsided, uninformative, and poorly sourced (in the sense of "reliable sources"). Consequently, no section on sex (gender) differences is better than this poor section. Please discuss on Talk page before reverting. Thank you.
435:
is defined in the article on the subject as information known to everyone or nearly everyone within a community, implying little variability in how much of it most people have. This is quite distinct from general knowledge as defined here, which involves substantial individual differences in how much
228:
I believe that this is an excellent start, and meets most of the GA criteria, however, because the article is not very accessible, I believe that the article, as it stands right now, is probably C-class material (since "accessibility" is a specific criterion in B-class). My recommendation is for the
1072:
I added it to address what I thought might be the elephant in the room... since the article came to my attention when I learned that a professor was using it as a reason to argue for sex differences in intelligence. But I'm not a psychologist and reading a lot of the literature isn't easy since I'm
444:
the same thing. The difference has important implications. For example, the fact that someone possesses common knowledge says very little about the person because everyone is presumed to have it, whereas someone who possesses extensive general knowledge would be considered unusually well-informed,
800:
I was led here by the same article, with the foolish reference to this article as that qualified as academic impact, and note it crassly used for non-controversial statements to elevate the citation's apparent status. Should be removed from this article altogether, with prejudice. ~
1006:
and move the logic one in order to preserve the more relevant history.) It's almost totally uncited, and I'm not sure we could find enough sources discussing it concretely as its own distinct topic. Though that conversation should perhaps be held on those articles.
911:
from Lynn. That's pretty bad. And the rest of the section is not good either, basically just regurgitating details from Lynn's claims (in a way that wouldn't be appropriate for an overview section called "Scope" even if the source were reliable).
217:
says "Always consider whether it is better to simply write a word or phrase out in full, thus avoiding potential confusion for those not familiar with its abbreviation. Remember that
Knowledge does not have the same space constraints as paper."
979:
I had a mind to propose this for deletion, then gave some thought to how to that might play out. Nevertheless, it would seem sensible for a document on general knowledge, under construction, to omit an article on that topic. ~
861:
Easily forgiven, it is dog latin and I am the only one gets the spelling. And agree, I've seen
Intelligence cited in dubious circumstances elsewhere and it will reveal more "general knowledge" inserted at wikipedia. ~
1121:
475:
209:
I came across this article browsing through the GA nominations page. This is not a review, but just general observations. Personally, I believe this article needs some work before it can pass a GA review.
559:
893:
source throughout the entire article. While the article as a whole isn't as bad as this one, the paper doesn't even seem to be on the topic of the article, so it's just cited for an aside. --
436:
people know, even if the information concerned is publicly available. This distinction is clearly stated in the common knowledge article, and has previously been discussed on the article's
683:
573:
311:
for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
549:
505:
701:
697:
591:
587:
763:
who seems to support racial and gender differences in intelligence, and whose views appear to be way outside the mainstream. A very poor and questionable choice of source. --
1117:
353:
560:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100614042321/http://www.biz.colostate.edu/MPPCWorkshop/Documents/Readings/Campbell/Campbell_DijksterhuisVanKnippenbergJPSP1998.pdf
359:
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
543:
140:
669:
1028:
563:
1073:
not very familiar with the terminology or concepts. But I agree that it's better to have no section at all if I didn't do a good job addressing it! :)
880:
866:
856:
834:
550:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120430061911/http://www.mendeley.com:80/research/sex-differences-in-general-knowledge-in-german-high-school-students/
485:
754:
1101:
805:
1082:
952:
772:
1016:
902:
1125:
419:
795:
1144:
1060:
130:
454:
349:
246:
Here are some suggestions from an automated tool I use at the beginning of all of my GA reviews. Perhaps you can find some of them useful:
1045:
939:
921:
481:
871:
I'm going to go ahead and remove the information from
Richard Lynn. But the article is really going to need some help being rebuilt. :(
749:
553:
397:
411:
639:
469:
1022:
782:
as evidence to support her superiority of Anglo-Protestants view - for which read white supremicism - according to the New Yorker -
679:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
569:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1149:
1139:
783:
381:
984:
488:
through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the
106:
240:
544:
http://www.mendeley.com/research/some-evidence-for-the-existence-of-a-general-factor-of-semantic-memory-and-its-components/
330:
315:
670:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120426065554/http://jupiter.gold.ac.uk/media/ChamorroPremuzicFunrhamAckerman2006PAID.pdf
236:
Please let me know on my talk page if you have further questions, and thank you for your contributions to
Knowledge.--
644:
564:
http://www.biz.colostate.edu/MPPCWorkshop/Documents/Readings/Campbell/Campbell_DijksterhuisVanKnippenbergJPSP1998.pdf
661:
527:
251:
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
180:
97:
58:
990:
I feel like there's enough sourcing from a psych standpoint to support an article, but that we might want to move
510:
700:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
590:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
278:
204:
673:
501:
318:, headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called
744:
634:
33:
719:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
609:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
660:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
526:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
497:
274:
376:
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
1078:
981:
974:
949:
876:
863:
852:
830:
802:
554:
http://www.mendeley.com/research/sex-differences-in-general-knowledge-in-german-high-school-students/
821:
I completely agree: remove
Richard Lynn and we should also look critically at anything published by
999:
991:
930:
of studies done with different lists of subject areas, inaccurately reporting the numbers thereof.
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
735:
625:
352:
that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
333:, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was
21:
704:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
594:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1111:
822:
720:
610:
390:
294:
1093:
1056:
1037:
935:
917:
791:
784:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/a-penn-law-professor-wants-to-make-america-white-again
768:
707:
597:
493:
437:
213:
In particular, I noticed that the article uses the abbreviation "GK" pretty excessively. The
39:
402:
Thanks for the feedback, that's very useful. I'll see what I can do to make improvements. --
1074:
872:
848:
842:
826:
816:
727:
617:
8:
1012:
898:
686:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
576:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
537:
480:
You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of
465:
450:
407:
334:
726:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
616:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
948:
in preview drop-down, roared with laughter, but clicking on it may me give canker ~
653:
519:
308:
290:
89:
1088:
1067:
1052:
1032:
1003:
995:
945:
931:
913:
886:
812:
787:
764:
432:
421:
233:
instead. The backlog on Peer Review is generally shorter than the backlog on GAN.
927:
657:
523:
489:
377:
304:
image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.
266:
229:
nominator of this article to withdraw the nomination for now, and perhaps seek a
1051:
I am wondering if those concerns might indeed apply to the article as a whole.
1008:
894:
394:
282:
259:
255:
237:
692:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
582:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
189:
1133:
461:
446:
403:
258:. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on
193:
162:
760:
674:
http://jupiter.gold.ac.uk/media/ChamorroPremuzicFunrhamAckerman2006PAID.pdf
301:
286:
270:
230:
492:, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. --
693:
583:
759:
Much of this article, as at late August 2019, relies on the opinions of
476:
Intelligence citations bibliography for updating this and other articles
195:
998:(I'd suggest a merge, but most of the usable content and history is in
222:
102:
490:
Knowledge standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles
73:
52:
214:
191:
779:
196:
460:
I removed the template, I hope no-one has any objections.--
281:
that can be uploaded. To upload images on
Knowledge, go to
664:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
530:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
221:
Additionally, the article isn't very clear, concise, and
1099:(I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.)
1043:(I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.)
254:
Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
156:
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
79:
696:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
586:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
440:where an editor has argued strongly that they are
778:Not least, the article seems to be being used by
1131:
307:You may wish to consider adding an appropriate
682:This message was posted before February 2018.
572:This message was posted before February 2018.
262:, and should adequately summarize the article.
889:, which cites a single paper by Lynn as its
19:
652:I have just modified one external link on
518:I have just modified 2 external links on
1118:2A01:5EC0:1800:C973:99D9:1C4E:68DE:3049
1027:I deleted the Sex differences section (
755:Reliance on a controversial main source
1132:
1116:pagal noobra par na nahi aata hai kia
382:User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a
331:Knowledge:Manual of Style (headings)
316:Knowledge:Manual of Style (headings)
95:This article is within the scope of
15:
1145:High-importance psychology articles
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
1161:
1023:Sex differences section - deleted
656:. Please take a moment to review
522:. Please take a moment to review
365:pigs are pink, so we thought of
161:
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology
82:
72:
51:
20:
1150:WikiProject Psychology articles
1140:Start-Class psychology articles
907:Wow. The "Scope" section takes
389:You may wish to browse through
337:, instead of using the heading
135:This article has been rated as
118:Template:WikiProject Psychology
1002:, so it makes sense to delete
279:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
269:. Please see if there are any
1:
909:the definition of the subject
885:You may also want to look at
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1126:18:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
750:15:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
7:
1102:01:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
1083:22:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
1061:18:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
1046:17:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
1017:20:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
985:17:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
953:17:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
940:19:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
922:18:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
903:17:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
881:16:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
867:23:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
857:22:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
835:22:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
806:22:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
796:20:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
773:20:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
640:04:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
506:22:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
273:images that fall under the
265:This article has no or few
10:
1166:
713:(last update: 5 June 2024)
649:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
603:(last update: 5 June 2024)
515:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
412:06:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
398:01:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
322:, it should be changed to
275:Knowledge:Image use policy
141:project's importance scale
371:ways to turn them green.”
277:and fit under one of the
241:21:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
1000:Common knowledge (logic)
992:Common knowledge (logic)
470:06:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
455:04:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
926:And it turns out to be
645:External links modified
511:External links modified
823:Intelligence (journal)
486:suggesting new sources
482:Intelligence Citations
391:User:AndyZ/Suggestions
339:==Magellan's journey==
295:commons:special:upload
205:Manual of Style Issues
98:WikiProject Psychology
28:This article is rated
1090:- Mark D Worthen PsyD
1034:- Mark D Worthen PsyD
420:Proposed merger with
378:Knowledge's best work
825:, as well, I think.
694:regular verification
584:regular verification
393:for further ideas.--
354:redundancy exercises
1112:Washroom of mankind
684:After February 2018
574:After February 2018
121:psychology articles
946:commons kownl-edge
738:InternetArchiveBot
689:InternetArchiveBot
628:InternetArchiveBot
579:InternetArchiveBot
431:to this proposal.
335:Ferdinand Magellan
300:If there is not a
34:content assessment
1100:
1044:
975:Proposed deletion
714:
654:General knowledge
604:
520:General knowledge
320:==The Biography==
291:Wikimedia Commons
202:
201:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
90:Psychology portal
1157:
1098:
1096:
1091:
1071:
1042:
1040:
1035:
1004:Common knowledge
996:Common Knowledge
887:Common knowledge
846:
820:
748:
739:
712:
711:
690:
638:
629:
602:
601:
580:
541:
494:WeijiBaikeBianji
433:Common knowledge
429:strongly opposed
422:common knowledge
370:
364:
285:; to upload non-
197:
165:
157:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1130:
1129:
1114:
1094:
1089:
1075:Megalibrarygirl
1065:
1038:
1033:
1025:
982:cygnis insignis
977:
950:cygnis insignis
873:Megalibrarygirl
864:cygnis insignis
849:Megalibrarygirl
843:Cygnis insignis
840:
827:Megalibrarygirl
817:Cygnis insignis
810:
803:cygnis insignis
757:
742:
737:
705:
698:have permission
688:
662:this simple FaQ
647:
632:
627:
595:
588:have permission
578:
535:
528:this simple FaQ
513:
478:
425:
366:
360:
215:manual of style
207:
198:
192:
170:
137:High-importance
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
62:High‑importance
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1163:
1153:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
976:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
924:
756:
753:
732:
731:
724:
677:
676:
668:Added archive
646:
643:
622:
621:
614:
567:
566:
558:Added archive
556:
548:Added archive
546:
512:
509:
477:
474:
473:
472:
424:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
387:
386:
385:
374:
373:
372:
346:
327:
312:
305:
298:
289:images on the
283:Special:Upload
263:
256:Knowledge:Lead
248:
247:
206:
203:
200:
199:
194:
190:
188:
185:
184:
176:
175:
172:
171:
166:
160:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1162:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1103:
1097:
1092:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1069:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1041:
1036:
1030:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
988:
987:
986:
983:
954:
951:
947:
943:
942:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
923:
919:
915:
910:
906:
905:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
868:
865:
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
844:
838:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
818:
814:
809:
808:
807:
804:
799:
798:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
762:
752:
751:
746:
741:
740:
729:
725:
722:
718:
717:
716:
709:
703:
699:
695:
691:
685:
680:
675:
671:
667:
666:
665:
663:
659:
655:
650:
642:
641:
636:
631:
630:
619:
615:
612:
608:
607:
606:
599:
593:
589:
585:
581:
575:
570:
565:
561:
557:
555:
551:
547:
545:
539:
533:
532:
531:
529:
525:
521:
516:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
443:
439:
434:
430:
423:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
396:
392:
388:
383:
379:
375:
369:
363:
358:
357:
355:
351:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
324:==Biography==
321:
317:
313:
310:
306:
303:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
257:
253:
252:
250:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
234:
232:
226:
224:
219:
216:
211:
187:
186:
183:
182:
178:
177:
174:
173:
169:
164:
159:
158:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1115:
1026:
978:
908:
890:
761:Richard Lynn
758:
736:
733:
708:source check
687:
681:
678:
651:
648:
626:
623:
598:source check
577:
571:
568:
517:
514:
479:
441:
428:
426:
367:
361:
350:redundancies
342:
338:
323:
319:
235:
227:
220:
212:
208:
179:
167:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1068:Markworthen
813:Tagishsimon
788:Tagishsimon
765:Tagishsimon
380:. See also
368:a number of
343:==Journey==
231:peer review
30:Start-class
1134:Categories
1053:XOR'easter
932:XOR'easter
914:XOR'easter
745:Report bug
635:Report bug
502:how I edit
348:Watch for
223:accessible
181:/Archive 1
112:Psychology
103:Psychology
59:Psychology
1009:Aquillion
895:Aquillion
839:Sorry, re
728:this tool
721:this tool
618:this tool
611:this tool
538:dead link
438:talk page
395:Unionhawk
238:Unionhawk
1087:Thanks!
928:WP:SYNTH
734:Cheers.—
624:Cheers.—
462:Smcg8374
447:Smcg8374
404:Smcg8374
302:free use
293:, go to
287:fair use
271:free use
168:Archives
780:Amy Wax
658:my edit
542:tag to
524:my edit
309:infobox
260:WP:LEAD
139:on the
1095:(talk)
1039:(talk)
944:I lik
534:Added
341:, use
267:images
36:scale.
994:over
427:I am
1122:talk
1079:talk
1057:talk
1029:diff
1013:talk
936:talk
918:talk
899:talk
891:only
877:talk
853:talk
831:talk
815:and
792:talk
769:talk
498:talk
466:talk
451:talk
408:talk
329:Per
314:Per
131:High
702:RfC
672:to
592:RfC
562:to
552:to
442:not
362:All
356:.)
1136::
1124:)
1081:)
1059:)
1015:)
1007:--
938:)
920:)
901:)
879:)
855:)
847:.
833:)
794:)
786:--
771:)
715:.
710:}}
706:{{
605:.
600:}}
596:{{
540:}}
536:{{
504:)
500:,
468:)
453:)
410:)
225:.
1120:(
1077:(
1070::
1066:@
1055:(
1011:(
934:(
916:(
897:(
875:(
851:(
845::
841:@
829:(
819::
811:@
790:(
767:(
747:)
743:(
730:.
723:.
637:)
633:(
620:.
613:.
496:(
464:(
449:(
406:(
384:.
345:.
326:.
297:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
