84:
53:
148:
22:
168:
70:
271:
If this article should ever be nominated for deletion, it really needs the "non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself" to secure its place. It is a worthwhile effort for someone to find a review or article that has been published about it. Other arguments about
250:
First off, I didn't mean to imply that the download count in itself makes it notable, I merely contributed that factoid along with everything else. Secondly, the criteria laid out at the proposed policy page is far from inclusive. This program strikes me as notable because of several common-sense
237:. The current consensus is that download counts do not verify notability. Can "non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself" be found? Although FireFox itself is notable, as an add-on, FireFTP doesn't qualify as "core product", an alternate sign of notability.
255:(typical Windows FTP clients are boring and pointless to me, too). Firefox Add-ons site recommendation is basically a third-party reference (unless the same person maintains both FireFTP and that web site). The Firefox web site editors do have something of a vested interest in supporting
272:
notability aren't considered nearly as strong. An opponent might suggest that this article isn't notable in its own right but should be merged into the
Firefox article (or Firefox extensions article if there is one).
69:
290:
FireFTP is notable. It's part of the history of web development as it came along at a time when it was really needed. Use has declined but are you going to start deleting articles for
345:
251:
things: it has a user base, and its design as a
Firefox extension currently makes it far more peculiar and worthy of discussion compared to most of those at the
138:
355:
330:
233:
I don't think notability of this software has been addressed. The proposed policy and related discussion about software notability is found at
132:
176:
340:
325:
335:
308:
108:
279:
262:
360:
276:
241:
91:
58:
350:
157:
63:
33:
244:
252:
223:
107:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
104:
21:
39:
8:
209:
259:
Firefox extension, but this one still stands out among all other numerous extensions. --
303:
234:
228:
219:
188:
180:
319:
214:
FYI to the people regularly maintaining this page; version 1.0 is out :) --
215:
100:
299:
291:
260:
147:
96:
83:
52:
167:
295:
191:. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
95:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
346:Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
137:This article has not yet received a rating on the
317:
19:
356:Automatically assessed Computing articles
318:
331:Unknown-importance Computing articles
341:Unknown-importance software articles
89:This article is within the scope of
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
166:
146:
14:
372:
82:
68:
51:
20:
117:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
120:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
326:Stub-Class Computing articles
155:This article is supported by
111:and see a list of open tasks.
336:Stub-Class software articles
309:20:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
280:03:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
263:21:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
245:01:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
7:
10:
377:
139:project's importance scale
253:comparison of FTP clients
224:09:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
174:
154:
136:
77:
46:
361:All Computing articles
175:This article has been
171:
151:
105:information technology
28:This article is rated
351:All Software articles
170:
150:
92:WikiProject Computing
158:WikiProject Software
177:automatically rated
187:because it uses a
172:
152:
123:Computing articles
34:content assessment
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
183:or other tool as
368:
306:
275:
240:
194:
125:
124:
121:
118:
115:
86:
79:
78:
73:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
376:
375:
371:
370:
369:
367:
366:
365:
316:
315:
304:
273:
238:
231:
212:
192:
122:
119:
116:
113:
112:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
374:
364:
363:
358:
353:
348:
343:
338:
333:
328:
314:
313:
312:
311:
305:Jeffery Thomas
285:
284:
283:
282:
266:
265:
230:
227:
211:
208:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
173:
163:
162:
153:
143:
142:
135:
129:
128:
126:
109:the discussion
87:
75:
74:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
373:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
323:
321:
310:
307:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
287:
286:
281:
278:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
236:
226:
225:
221:
217:
190:
189:stub template
186:
182:
178:
169:
165:
164:
160:
159:
149:
145:
144:
140:
134:
131:
130:
127:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
256:
232:
213:
184:
156:
90:
40:WikiProjects
235:WP:SOFTWARE
210:Version 1.0
320:Categories
229:Notability
195:parameter.
185:Stub-class
30:Stub-class
277:JonHarder
242:JonHarder
114:Computing
101:computing
97:computers
59:Computing
300:Netscape
292:Homesite
64:Software
216:Limulus
302:next?
296:Hotbot
193:|auto=
103:, and
36:scale.
261:Joy
179:by a
220:talk
298:or
257:any
181:bot
133:???
322::
294:,
222:)
99:,
62::
274:✤
239:✤
218:(
161:.
141:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
