Talk:David Miscavige/Archive 2

1681:

renewal.) However, prior to the copyright law of changes 1976, anything "published" without a copyright notice was thereby put into the public domain, and subsequent registration or renewal would not cure this. If the affidavit quoted above is accurate, it would appear that some people in the Scientology organization at the time did not properly understand copyright. In any case, sending in delayed copyright registrations is neither illegal nor unethical. Attempting to conceal facts (such as publication without notice) that put a work into the PD might well be considered unethical, and even illegal if attempts are later made to profit by copyright protection thus improperly retained, but what constitutes "publication" is a bit tricky. A good case could be made that distribution of an administrative document within an organization, not intended for the general public, is not "publication" and so omission of a copyright notice has no effect. Thus is is not clear that, even assuming the above affidavit sections are accurate and truthful, they do not (standing alone) support a statement or implication that Miscavige or anyone else had taken any illegal or unethical action. Note that prior to the copyright law revisions (which started in 1976, and were mostly finished in 1988) copyright in the US lasted for a fixed term, or rather for an initial term of 28 years, and a longer renewal term granted if renewal papers were filed (the length of the renewal term changed several times). Under current law, copyright is mostly for life of the author plus 70 years.

3590:. I know it is very popular now to have narrative biographies where authors take the liberty to describe the emotions and even suggest dialogue they could not possibly have heard,in a sort of "fly on the wall" projection of what the events must have been like. There is nothing in this book that infers, suggests or states that there were any witnesses in the room when David Miscavige met with Mary Sue Hubbard and convinced her to step down. Mary Sue Hubbard herself never made any public statement, issued any correspondence, recorded any tapes criticizing Miscavige or stating that she wrote to her husband about Miscavige's actions that day. But as you can see, Piece of Blue Sky is prone to this kind of imaginative narrative, to wit in that same section, Atack projects what he thinks Miscavige's facial expressions and emotions were during hypothetical, undocumented events in the course of that meeting. In what I prefer to call "novelized biographies" of this nature, the author is free to project his hypothetical commentary as long as he states that's what it is, which is what Atack did in this section of his book. Reviewing Atack's footnotes for this (seen at the same link I included above) he is equivocal as to what sources were used to substantiate what information, as opposed to a scholarly work where the footnote follows immediately on the statement as evidence for that given point. I have brought this point up before, but I feel compelled to bring it up again. The inclusion of this sentence violates 11290:

public identity is linked to acting in movies. Thus, in my view, a brief description of this history and some specific examples should be featured in the lede. Of course, we want to avoid turning the encyclopedia article into a hatchet job that dwells on every negative claim we can find. As of this writing, the lede contains a reference to one example of criticism, recent allegations that Miscavige was abusive toward his staff. I think that's misleading... it makes it seem as though we're reporting an isolated current event, rather than a pattern that has held true for most of Miscavige's career. High-profile press criticism of Miscavige, both in terms of his personal behavior and in terms of the practices of the organization he runs, goes back at least to the 1990 five-part series in the LA Times and the 1991 Time magazine cover story that described Miscavige as "ringleader" of a "Mafia-like" organization. Multiple reputable press sources have run articles alleging fraud, extortion, deceptive financial practices, harrassment of critics, destruction of members' families, coerced abortions for staff members and more, including the recent claims that he physically beats up executives. Do we agree that this notoriety is a conspicuous aspect of Miscavige's public identity? If so, how do we summarize this history of allegations in the lede, avoiding both whitewashing their significance or over-emphasizing the criticism?

4704:. I still maintain (and you will still object to my views, I am sure) that with Atack having sourced unknown critics and apostates for these statements on a living person that even if Atack DID say Mary Sue was upset with Miscavige it would not be correct to include. But ATACK DID NOT SAY THAT. It is written in the passive, not in the active tense. In the English language it is very clear that a statement written as he wrote it gives no subject. One can "assume" that Miscavige is the subject. But that is an assumption. You cannot prove that is what he meant. So this statement goes, as it is a projection and not based on any reference. Period. On the mission holders' conference, Streissguth completely alters the information given in his sources. He attributes to Miscavige complete fabrications that are not covered in the sources he cites, and he claims Miscavige took actions at the mission holder conference that other people, not Miscavige, took. The only thing his sources state is that Miscavige was the MC of the conference. Simply because someone has published a book does NOT make it factual. I have the book. It is a simplistic children's book that dumbs down the information found in the sources cited, not just on the subject of Scientology. Fine. Steissbuth is entitled to his freedom of speech for what it's worth. But this is NOT adequate for a 3710:

checks if they failed to comply with the orders. But even more importantly, he never said or inferred that David Miscavige ordered any of these actions. Rather, he quoted statements made by various other members of Church managment. The only thing Atack attributed to Miscavige is that he was the MC of the conference and that he stated "The corporate structure assures Scientology being around for eternity." Additionally, Streissguth's use of a source who is patently biased on the subject is poor scholarship, a fact Streissguth would have been hard pressed to have missed since Atack clearly states that he has deliberately and successfully pulled Scientologists out of the Church based on his own upset over the mission holders' conference (stated on the very page that Streissguth used in his research -- the only place the mission holders' conference is mentioned in the book). In summary: Steissguth did minimal research, and relied solely on information from a partisan source which he misquoted, ascribing to David Miscavige actions or statements that were done by others, and/or which were simply invented. On May 6th of this year at 07:50

1823:) and a violation of Knowledge policy. This is supposedly a biographic article about the leader of Scientology. Biographical articles include some basics, some doings, etc. Now you want to give 2-3% of that article space to an allegation which a) is 24 years old, b) has never resulted in any consequences even though it was checked by the courts, c) was part of a legal - get money out of Scientology - campaign, d) uttered by someone who can only be seen active when he gets paid for it and finally e) might not even be true. This is my viewpoint about it. I have spent a long time looking into what former Scientologists, Freezoners and others have to say, had friendly talks to them, read their materials, checked their accusations and at the end of that all I realized what scam this anti-campaign is and what disgusting motives at least some of the key campaigners have. What a waste of time and energy for everybody and very sad in parts, seeing those making a lot of efforts to do themselves in. I don't know what your motives are, but your behavior will tell. 1605:

was "in trouble" concerning the copyright status of the many published materials of founder L Ron Hubbard. Concern was expressed that many of Mr. Hubbard's published materials had become 'public domain"because the materials had not been registered with the United States Copyright office for many years. David Miscavige stated that Scientology had failed to register copyrights for thousands of pages of Scientology material written by Mr. Hubbard. These records included the numerous policy letters and bulletins published by Mr. Hubbard. In particular, Mr. Hubbard published "Policy Letters" (always published in green ink on white paper and intended as administrative directives) LRH ED's (Executive Directives) which are used for various topics, (always issued as blue ink on white paper) and "Technical Bulletins" published with red ink on white paper covering technical aspect of Scientology such as Auditing techniques, Policy and Ethics.

11399:

violations I would support it, however I think that this page has been constructivly active in the last 4 days. granted some of the edits needed to be undone while other editors learn what reliable sources are, but those are mistakes I had to learn as a new editor as well and I don't assume any malicious agenda. to do a blanket revert of between 19-28 different versions (I don't know what version from the 5th you used) seems to be a little excessive, and if you just reverted contributions by specific editors (your edit summery reads as if that may be the case) then that would be against what I consider the spirit of Knowledge. My solution would be to reestablish the former page, and tackle the content that I find questionable point by point...but I am just one editorWikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard(

12113:

website? I'm not sure whether any third party articles in reputable publications have described each installment of his series in detail, but I should think there's some way to treat material produced by a reputable broadcast news source as equivalent to a print article. As to my removal of sourced material, do you really think that any sensationalistic lawsuit that is brought against someone is suitable for inclusion in an article about them? Though "sourced," that one struck me as below the threshold of responsible editing, particularly, as you say, in this fraught topic area. (If lawsuits are to brought up, they should probably be treated as a group, and more fairly characterized: Miscavige is being accused of human trafficking, not "slavery": those are close, but not identical.)

1758:

copyright registration filings", and I don't think such an imputation drawn without more than conjecture (unless it is stated elsewhere in the affidavit) is well sourced. In short, it is unclear what improper or illegal action the maker of the affidavit is claiming Miscavige made. Taking the affidavit as literally as possible, it seems as if neither Miscavige nor the author were correctly informed on the requirements of copyright law, and that the materials were either already in the PD (in which case the copyright office filings would have no effect) or still under copyright (in which case registration would slightly increase their protection, but not much, and would be in no way illegal or improper, and quite possibly a waste of time and money by those filing).

1693:

no copyright notice at all, or a fatally defective notice (bUt not all distribution would be "publication" for this purpose); or 3) for them to be published outside the US without being published in the US or registered promptly. It is ahrd to see how any of these would apply to Hubbard's writings as of 1983, except perhaps failure to renew (for works published prior to 1955) or ommission of notice. But the 1976 act had already made the notice optional on anything published after that date, and the 1988 act removed ommision of notice as a reason for public domain status on anythign published in 1964 or later. One suspects that someone involved did not understand copyright any too well, or else that the affidavit is not entirely accurate on what was said.

2413:"Black PR"? Do you say things like that just to bait people or are you incapable of conceiving that the CoS could ever, ever, in a skillion years, be right about anything? Regardless of anyone's feelings about the CoS, a lot of what they say in their own self-defense in that "Fact Vs. Fiction" booklet is actually true: the CoS were never proved to have any responsibility for Lottick's death. Interviewing the old CAN about the CoS is obviously seeking a foregone conclusion, as is eliciting quotes from disgruntled ex-employees. And unlike sleazy groups like Narconon which could indeed qualify as a scam, calling the CCHR a "financial scam" without proof isn't journalism, it's editorializing. Etc., etc., etc. One can be extremely critical of Scientology and 4687:

that it's all in one well referenced and well written, almost scholarly book. Atack's book is, technically, a secondary source. That other books have referenced him, shows that they consider him to be a reliable source. That Atack is a disgruntled member doesn't mean the book is to be discarded - or should we also discard every book on the Holocaust written by a jew? As I've explained several times, his book survived many court challenges (including at least two by the organisation chaired by DM), except for one single paragraph, which is not related to DM. As I've also told before - if you think it didn't happen like explained by Atack, find a source that tells it differently. --

8229:"Another of Miscavige's claims was: "Look at the studies that brought about the Holocaust of the Jews, that the Nazis justified killing the Jews, they were done at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Leipzig, Germany." However, the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry has only existed since 1966 (in Munich and not Leipzig); it was the Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie that joined the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatric Research in 1924, that was later incorporated into the Max Planck Society in 1954. This association of psychiatry with Nazism remains prominent in the church's materials, including its exhibit Psychiatry: An Industry of Death." 12630:"Biographies of living persons (BLPs) must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives, and the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. This policy applies to BLPs, including any living person mentioned in a BLP even if not the subject of the article, and to material about living persons on other pages. The burden of evidence for any edit on Knowledge rests with the person who adds or restores material." ( 9928:

the camera. Copyvio images lifted from the Internet tend to be deficient in metadata, and although that isn't proof of copyvio in itself, when combined with other evidence it can be convincing. Cirt and Banjeboi are both right that WP often uses low quality photos of living persons for licensing reasons (surprisingly, very few public figures release low resolution professional portraits copyleft), but that issue is secondary to the copyvio issue, which Jayen presents well. Thank you very much, Jayen, for your research in bringing this to light. Now I'll recuse from any other comment or action on this matter; feel free to quote as needed. Best regards,

5656:, #8, the rationale is that the non-free image could be replaced by someone just grabbing a camera and taking a picture. I don't think that's too likely. DM controls his access and only appears at Scientology events (tightly controlled) or rare interviews (tightly controlled). He has appeared (rarely) at major court cases, but I don't know of any of those in the pipeline and it would still depend on the general public being allowed to take pictures in court. Probably the only chance in the open would be at Org opening, but that would probably require professional equipment from a distance and so not likely to result in a free image either. 1152:

grown more in the last five years than the previous 50 years combined" and to whine about "an utterly fabricated story ... propagated in an effort to marginalize Scientology or make Scientology, its leaders or its members seem strange". Okay, the first report I can find of the "Miscavige called Cruise the Christ of Scientology" story is January 24. The first report I can find of the Church of Scientology denying the story, however, isn't until February 2. ... Are we supposed to believe that the Church of Scientology, image-conscious as it is, couldn't get a rebuttal to a story it didn't like printed until

11692:

were only allegations, and inflammatory ones at that. How is my splicing the article to retain its legal integrity considered vandalism? Or is the Knowledge editorial board actively gunning for a lawsuit? Any explanation beyond vague threats of being banned is welcome, but I must say that the multiple (and seemingly automatic) negative responses that were generated, without apparent reflection or legal justification, reflect poorly on the site and make it appear less credible. The reliability of Knowledge is already actively criticized; why provoke the issue?

1147:, a film described so as to make it sound like an equal mixture of Scientology doctrine and popcorn action flick cliches, supposedly starring Tom Cruise and Posh Spice -- once again published, quickly spreading everywhere for about a week in which the notoriously publicity-conscious Church of Scientology stayed curiously silent -- and then stepped forward to declare the rumors to be ludicrous. Now it's this "Cruise is the Christ of Scientology" thing. Once again, the rumor gets published, spreads quickly, and receives a curiously 2426:"Proven to be responsible for someones death" is a matter of opinion, unless scientology physically pushed him out of the window. The Lottick parents are entitled to their opinion. I met them and I believe them, and I met scientologists and I don't believe them. And considering the record of scientology (e.g. the suicide conviction in France, or the personality test evaluators who often tell people that they would suicide), it is highly likely that they DID contribute to his death. Sadly, this is not a crime in the US. -- 304:"And speaking of the Main Building at the Complex in Hollywood. Dave could not stand that place and how DB it was. ASI had bought a huge housing complex up the street from where they worked and were going to live there. Dave heard about this and it was set-up for him and his staff instead. It is a luxurious set-up that makes the complex look like the concentration camp that it is. This is where he actually lives for the most part. He hates the Int Base and the staff there and prefers to live up the street from . . . " 467:. (There is no Warren McShane page yet.) True, you can go to scientology's own page and see they are no longer there, but you have to rely on postings or personal recolection, or the Wayback Machine (unreliable since scientology forces so many pages off there) to see that they ever were there. And for reasons I don't understand, the "unpersoning" of these two has never made it into any news story, though it would be major news for top executives to vanish without a trace from any other entity of such a size. 11518:

discussed in the article--it's what led to his doing that interview with Ted Koppel--so I think it's fair to see that Time piece as a prominent part of Miscavige's bio. In addition to the TV interview, there was a years-long lawsuit (ultimately unsuccessful) against Time and a huge anti-Time ad campaign by Scientology, including a magazine that was inserted into copies of USA today. Their argument was that Time smeared Scientology because of their financial ties to Eli Lilly, maker of Prozac.

7640:"BlogTalkRadio is the social radio network that allows users to connect quickly and directly with their audience. Using an ordinary telephone and computer hosts can create free, live, call-in talk shows with unlimited participants that are automatically archived and made available as podcasts. No software download is required. Listeners can subscribe to shows via RSS into iTunes and other feed readers. Our network has produced tens of thousands of episodes since it launched in August of 2006." 952: 31: 6359:"I and others were told by (Scientology executive) Marty Rathburn that on the orders of David Miscavige, the successor of L. Ron Hubbard as the head of the cult, that the medical records of O'Reilly were to be stolen from the Betty Ford Center, and another location in Santa Barbara, to show that he was using cocaine, discredit him, and possibly blackmail him into easing off on his $ 30-million verdict now on appeal," Yanny said last summer when questioned by Scientology lawyers. 1744:

had been published more than 28 years previously (that is prior to 1955, since the affidavit describes events in 1983) and had not been renewed, filing a late renewal would have no effect unless the renewal papers falsely stated the publication to be 28 years prior to the filing. If the materials had been published without a copyright notice (prior to 1978), filing a registration would have no effect unless the registration falsely claimed that the material had been published

4522:. From that, I started reading policies regarding editing wikipedia, and eventually signed up as one. Now, I could get upset with you for making a baseless accusation, but I'm not going to, because I really don't care. Besides, I'll let my actions here speak for me. While I readily admit I agree with Su-Jada's assessment of the situation, I did not "take up the cause" as it were. Instead I suggested that the both of you engage in dispute resolution to resolve the matter. 3543:

Brooks affidavit of April 29th, 2002, Brooks describes how she and Prince wrote affidavits and testified based on hypothetical scenarios of which they had no knowledge solely as a legal strategy of making unfounded allegations about Miscavige to pressure the Church into paying large sums of money and settling cases. In his affidavit of April 24th, 2002, Robert Minton described Prince affidavits as based on speculation, allegation and innuendo. In the case of a

5560:... were all coordinated" in a five-year campaign against Scientology that included the murder of one of Scientology's executive directors (unnamed): "They literally murdered- the Food and Drug Administration hired an informant to go into our organization in Seattle, Washington, his wife was there Several weeks later, murdered the head of our organization." This may or may not be a reference to a similar-sounding incident reported in 1971 in the book " 9996:

problem you raised, you followed up with trout slapping him for not being quite to your expectations. It is interesting that you added the bit about intentions to 'impugn' as an afterthought, not in your original reply. I had refrained from mentioning this before now, but this is exactly the sort of situation where arbitrators normally recuse to avoid the appearance of impropriety. You may wish to consider where the lines ought to be drawn, Luke.

1160:

and ridiculing exposure." The target is now the press, a much easier target because it no longer requires the same illegal break-ins. Pick a channel with plausible deniability, and inject your disinformation. Wait until the disinformation has spread and then capitalize on the publicity it generated with a denial and a self-pitying statements about "how low the press has gotten to in order to come up with a story" and how many people are spreading

3136:

those who hold Scientology courses. But that's now what Mission Holders do. Seriously, how could anyone take a statement with such a glaring error as a serious scholarly work? I have, nonetheless, kept the basic concept of what Streissguth describes, removing the pejorative spin he gives it, and for which he presents no citation in his book. I would be perfectly happy to remove the entire section if other editors agree that is a better solution.

4729:

unauthorized "tell-all exposé" book is also not specifically about the subject (Miscavige himself) which further weakens its already shaky reliability as a source. If someone has a properly sourced book about David Miscavige that can fastidiously back up any allegations, let them come forward and write it and publish it. But till then, let's keep the "Scientology exposed!" tabloidy stuff to a minimum on Miscavige's own article, shall we?

4712:. You keep trying to throw this back at me as my "opinion." Yes. I think this is crap. But I do not edit based on my feelings. I edit based on Knowledge policy. And by studying the sources being used. These sources are faulty, lack any factual basis, have been misquoted. I "feel" that it has been done intentionally, as I have followed your animus against the Scientology religion for years, and I "feel" you are too limited by your 1749:

filing any registration or renewal papers with the copyright office in 1983 would either 1) have had no legal effect at all, if the matériel was already PD and the papers filed were truthful and accurate; or 2) legally and properly have established and preserved copyright (if it was a renewal of material from circa 1955, or a registration of material published without notice after 1977, or an optional registration of material that was

12765:(outdent) it does appear like we are missing each other. personally I don't think this violates BLP because this story is being actively reported on by reliable sources and the length and detail is appropriate compared to similar topics in this section. Which sources do you believe are not reliable, and what do you believe should be deleted since the source you gave for the most part collaborates everything that is in the section? 12374:"(New York Times), "Diana author names Tom Cruise as 'World Number Two in Scientology'" ("Naturally the work was regularly inspected by David and Shelley Miscavige , who would ride over to the site on his motorbike" in Daily Mail - Jan 7, 2008), "Growth of Scientology gets big boost from Cruise" ("Shelly Britt, who joined Scientology at 17, said she was at the base for 20" in San Francisco Chronicle - Dec 25, 2005), and " 1728:. But late renewal is no cure, unless the original publication date is falsified. Note also that "publication" is a term of art in this connection. Filing renewals on content already in the PD would have had no effect (although i suppose people might have thought that it would), unless the renewal documents falsely state a publication date of 28 years prior when the actual pub date was longer ago (Note also that an 8962:

necessarily of the highest levels of reputability. I remember having similar discussions about the reliability of boxofficeindia.com elsewhere. What was decided then was basically if the source were cited as a source by another publication which is considered reliable, then it would probably qualify as reliable. That is in fact how boxofficeindia.com was eventually qualified as reliable. Maybe someone at

5124:

this have to do with building an encyclopedia? Nothing, it is just pure anti-Scientology propaganda. F451 knows that, otherwise he would not try to make this a big thing here, something that read like David F451 vs. Goliath OSA, or some such dreams of moral superiority. I don't know why "debates" with F451 always end in a dead end street. F'ing time consuming. F451, let's be flexible here, ok?

3534:: "Be very firm about high quality references, particularly about details of personal lives. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Knowledge articles...." There has been a fair bit of discussion on the use of Prince as a source in this article. 13251:, there is mention of the relationship he had with his mother: "He was rarely visited by his mother (then known as Lady Randolph Churchill), and wrote letters begging her to either come to the school or to allow him to come home," as well as non-cited mentions of his performance in school: "He earned high marks in English and History and was also the school's fencing champion." 1849:

good if this was made clear in the article. (Note: If a family immigrated to America only the children born in the USA would be second-generation Americans. Miscavige wasn't born into Scientology. This is one thing that makes the sentence unclear to me. Is the Scientology definition of "second-generation" different, or was a mistake made in using this expression?) Thanks.

1143:

the placenta when Katie gave birth, waiting long enough for the report to be published and quickly spread everywhere, and then publicly laughing it off as 'just a joke' -- which the news media should have known was too bizarre to be true, obviously, unlike a silent birth or a private citizen with no medical training buying his own ultrasound machine. Then came the rumors of

10055:

faiths. But you would have a very difficult time determining which religion I'm referring to, on the basis of my contributions to this or any other WMF site. If your contributions took a similar diversity we wouldn't be having this conversation. I ask again, where would you draw the lines? Recusal is not about one's inner sense of fairness, but the appearance thereof.

1834:

this is not their forum. I think you will find that most "anti" campaigners get no financial compensation for their speaking out. I think your analysis of the motives of those who disagree with you is rather colored by your association with the Office of Special Affairs. If behavior betrays motives, you have already made yours clear in your vandalism of my user page. --

5538:... were all coordinated" in a five-year campaign against Scientology that included the murder of one of Scientology's executive directors (unnamed): "They literally murdered- the Food and Drug Administration hired an informant to go into our organization in Seattle, Washington, his wife was there Several weeks later, murdered the head of our organization." (Author 7994:"In biographies of living people, material available solely in questionable sources or sources of dubious value should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all, either as sources or via external links. External links in biographies of living persons must be of high quality and in full compliance with Knowledge official policies." - 5406:". Now noting that P. Cooper refers in her book to a September 1963 event, in which an irate husband killed a Scientologist having an affair with his wife in the same org D. Miscavige is referring is not a wild claim. The date and location match. It simply informing the reader what is possibly another account of the event D. Miscavige is talking about. 7807:

What make a reliable source "reliable" is that they fact-check their material or put themselves at substantial legal risk; they do not publish unsupported allegations of this sort. What is also unfortunate is that experienced editors that should know better are willing, nay eager, to throw out the basic protection of Knowledge that careful sourcing on

13232:

to Domenic’s Capri Italian Restaurant on Clearwater Beach. He goes to movies, enjoys trail biking in Hillsborough County, and has been known to ride a water scooter. He said he also plays piano, takes underwater photographs, reads several books a week, exercises daily and keeps a casual eye on his hometown sports teams from Philadelphia."

3070:

Britannica as biographies where "materials are freely invented, scenes and conversations are imagined," and which the Britannica also warns, "often depends almost entirely upon secondary sources and cursory research." The fact of fictionalizing biographies being a common practice in the genre is covered in the Knowledge article on

11427:

well-known sanctions imposed by the Arbitration Committee (itself an historic act which made news headlines earlier this year) - that these recent edits are an attempt to piece by piece, word by word, blunt the reality of the ongoing well-documented reports of executive violence and other authoritarian abuses as much as possible.

5628:!). I suppose technically I did "edit war", but I have put in the diligence to try and work things out. RookZERO, on the other hand, doesn't like to play nice, as is evidenced by his lengthy history of editing Scn-related articles. Basically, I'm trying to work things out, Rook is acting like an ass and just reverting away. 11443:

I do, however, wonder about the degree of walking-on-eggshells here--how much dust has actually been stirred up? If the issue is a suspicion that the anonymous IP editor is a pro-scientology warrior, we should confront that directly, but it needn't halt progress on the article. If it is something else, please specify.

9444: 2382:

Greed and Power) had advocated the kidnapping and deprogramming of Scientologists, and that Vicki Aznaran (Chairman of the Board of the Religious Technology Center, previous to Miscavige) had been "kicked out for trying to bring criminals into the church": "She wanted to bring bad boys into Scientology, her words."'

9742: 6319: 2655:- not true. If you do not check "remember me" and if you close the browser then you have to log in each time you open the browser. Personally, my general policy is to not leave lingering cookies and I have to log in every time I open the browser. A bit less "detective work" would probably be a good idea. -- 13239:"Some entries may be speculative or factually incorrect, and should be removed; some may fall outside the scope of the article and should be moved to other articles; and others, such as "how-to" material or tangential/irrelevant facts, may fall outside Knowledge's scope and should be removed altogether." 3594:: "Be very firm about high quality references, particularly about details of personal lives. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Knowledge articles...." 13231:

The cited paragraph I was pulling from is: "During frequent visits to Clearwater, where his mother lives, Miscavige said he spends his nights in Scientology’s staff dormitory, a converted apartment complex on Saturn Avenue. He said he eats in Scientology’s communal dining halls and sometimes gets out

12229:

You did a wholesale revert of my edit as if it were vandalism. You addressed me as if I were a naughty child. You refused to engage my attempts to address your issues, instead issuing patronizing directives about the form in which I must present my questions before you will deign to consider them.

11517:

To avoid any confusion: Miscavige wasn't literally pictured on the cover of Time. The cover feature was "Scientology: the Cult of Greed." (The cover image is a Dianetics-style exploding volcano with octopus tentacles at its base.) Miscavige was in charge of the organization at the time, and he was

11442:

I shared Coffeepusher's concerns when I saw that Justdafax had reverted to an Aug 5 version, but it turns out the problem is limited to the talk-page headline and not his or her edit itself, which does a good job of reconciling the recent edits, and turns out not to be a wholesale reversion at all.

11382:

I've gone back to where we were 4 days ago, more or less. I want the dust to settle a bit before edits by editors of dubious neutrality become established. I strongly suggest anyone who disagrees with this revert talk it over. Again, I refuse to get into an edit war, which is unseemly... I'll just

11223:

I invite, welcome and strongly urge further discussion here on the talk page, but undoing my undo will not lead to an edit war, but to an admin who will rule on the situation. Let's not go there. Please assume good faith, and talk over your reasoning for these changes to what is currently one of the

10527:

Good revert yesterday Cirt; the attempt seemed to be to remove some material and add other, giving the edit plausibility. This article on Miscavige will be cutting edge for some time to come, needless to say. It's interesting how Knowledge, which now almost always comes up in the first few listings

9964:

Are you attempting to bait me with leading questions, Luke? I stated very clearly that I am recusing from further involvement, and you follow up with a query that appears to assume very bad faith. Commons has plenty of other administrators. I do as little as possible that relates to Scientology on

7667:

That is quite a stretch to equate blogtalkradio with YouTube or MySpace, the former being a community of media contributions and the latter being nothing more than a social networking website. I cannot blame Justallofthem/Justanother for not knowing this living in an environment where information is

6162:

I will throw another idea. The article is about D. Miscavige, so I agree that throwing in J. Prince in there looks awkward. On the other hand, the fact that the copyrights might have not been valid at the time is relevant. How about making the J. Prince passage as a foot note? The information will be

6113:

to J. Prince, but also mention that the validity of these copyrights was challenged in court, and the Church of Scientology eventually settled if I understand correctly. AndroidCat provided references above for that. Also, mentioning that Jesse Prince was a high ranking officer would make the passage

5312:

Misou and Wikipediatrix seem to think that a witness ruling in one case applies to life in general. Prince worked with miscavige and is qualified to comment on his first hand experiences. The "extreme bias and lack of credibility" arguments can be used against testimony by those in the employ of the

4699:

you continue to disregard my earlier discussions on this, but I will repeat them here. Perhaps you can read this and understand what I am saying. There is nothing in the Atack book that says Mary Sue thought Miscavige tricked her -- just that "she was tricked" no source given. So putting this on the

4686:

With this logic of yours, wikipedia must also remove every autobiography. But Atack's book isn't an autobiography, since much of what he tells has already been told before (e.g. by Miller, Cooper, Kaufmann) and elsewhere. What Atack did is to compile many documents, reference them and arrange them so

4565:

Now that the article is blocked in the Miscavige-rewriting-history-version (aka "the wrong version"), I'd wait to have others bring their arguments and suggestions. I can't do much more than show sources that confirm the text, even if someone else argues the opposite. And if we can't use Jon Atack as

4443:

to be able to see this, since he has shown a complete intransigence in this so far, I am reiterating the reasoning I expressed above. The sources used have been misquoted, events ascribed to David Miscavige that the sources do not state are his actions, and the Streissguth book is a very simplistic,

3939:

I am not "wikilawyering" - I did not even mention a policy. I just explain that this book survived many lawsuits, and no lawsuit was ever filed against the topic you claim isn't true. If you say that sources that are "being pissed" are not reliable - then I assume you'd agree that www.cchr.org is not

3728:

We've been through this before already. The segments are properly sourced, and you have not given any sources that contradict them in several weeks/months. Your allegations about the research by Streissguth are your own speculation. He is a source who has used other sources, which is what research is

3157:

So, you reverted to your own version again (which you, misleadingly, called "the earlier version"), but didn't bother to correct the "teachers" part (I wouldn't mind the "course supervisor" word, although "teacher" is also correct - Delphi "teachers" are also just "course supervisors"). Why? --16:15,

3130:

I have reverted to the earlier version of the details of Miscavige's handling of Mission Holders. That Streissguth would refer to "Scientology teachers" in the same section where he describes this action shows his research to be very faulty and highly suspect. It is, after all, simply a vingette in

2621:

Done. I've however made a slight change, put "source" instead of "sources", since it one book only. However it is a pretty good source; scientology sued him, but never about that, despite that MSH was alive and has sued an ex-scientologist in the past for invading her "privacy". (She lost, of course)

1775:

I am impressed with the logical trail in your argumentation. It makes very much sense. Thanks also for the documentation. I just uncovered a set of falsified quotes which were "tweaked" to push some anti-Scientology notion. This quote here might be accurate but the content has been "tweaked" to smear

1159:

This is just the modern-day Operation Cat. The original Operation Cat was targeted at "the computer, the security services and authority" but the intent is still the same: to "make a mockery and hold up to ridicule", the means being "to plant grossly false information ... for later public retrieval

1151:

rebuttal from the CoS, which incidentally uses the opportunity to publicize all its dubious claims such as "the largest non-governmental anti-drug governmental program in the world, the largest human rights education program, the largest global emergency response force with over 95,000 strong and has

893:

Sorry, Fahrenheit451. With all due respect to your experience in Knowledge, and acknowledging that I'm a "newby," I don't see that there is consensus on the image you decided to use or its placement on the page. Although I don't expect to reach complete agreement on this, I don't think it's right to

13238:

says of trivia: "lists of miscellaneous information can be useful for developing a new article, as they represent an easy way for novice contributors to add information without having to keep in mind article organization or presentation; they can just add a new fact to the list." It goes on to say:

12112:

What do you consider adequate verification for the existence of the Anderson Cooper series about Miscavige and the specifics about it that I cited? News articles that tout that he will be doing the series? Cooper's own CNN blog posts about the series? Videos of the series on youtube or on the CNN

10872:

Here again we see a notable, seemingly cross-referenced article with multiple sources on the topic of Mr. Miscavige's violence and long-term abuse of his power. I again strongly urge the St. Petersburg Times articles be summed up and made into a separate chapter heading, or at least be expounded on

10066:

Let's make this interesting: have a look at my 50,000+ edits to multiple WMF sites and see if you can guess. The two obvious possibilities would be Judaism and Catholicism; both can be ruled out. I have probably made fewer than 30 edits, ever, that pertain to my own religion. And exactly one edit

9585:

and Entheta, who chose his user name to express his stance on Scientology. While some of the other pictures you link may not be the most flattering, none of them gives the appearance of having been selected to make the subject look bad. Btw, as for Entheta's argument in that deletion discussion, the

9524:

has some of these protest pictures with garbage descriptions like "It basically means the current cult leader, David Miscavige (DM) is 'altering' scientology, which is supposed to be a big time no-no in the cult." Could ask the Church of Scientology for a better image, but I doubt they would release

8889:

This raises serious doubts as to whether the reference in question is a podcast or a recorded broadcast. I listened to a bit of it and no call letters or reference to Hawk Radio was mentioned early on as would be expected in a broadcast. I may or may not listen to it all but I think that if one does

7869:

Please keep things civil, chaps. 'Unspoken' accusations are still accusations. For what it's worth, I think we shouldn't be making this claim. However, perhaps a line that 'Critics have accused him of unscrupulous activites, and in some cases physical assault, however no-one has pressed charges, and

7806:

There is an important difference and that difference speaks to why this is not acceptable in this project: Anyone can stand on a street corner and say anything about anyone. That such non-notable and non-reliable material is then "published" in a blog makes the material neither notable nor reliable.

7788:

Blogtalkradio is just a name, perhaps a misnomer, but it is not a weblog, or blog for short. It is a reliable source. The interview meets verifiability and it like a television interview or newspaper article. It is unfortunate that corporate scientology wants to conceal David Miscavige's criminal

5726:

Not a public event. I couldn't find any pictures of David Miscavige even though he was mentioned in a number of the stories. Professional shots wouldn't be free images either. (I suspect, but can't prove, that the only photographers allowed into that event probably had to sign some sort of agreement

5228:

There is simply no relation between whatever Jesse allegedly said and Miscavige. Mind you, this is a bio article about David Miscavige, not a "Scientology and Copyrights", "Scientology and drugged ex-members" or the like. Jesse talks about something he says he did. It had no consequences for anyone.

3511:

This is completely neutral article. We cannot help it that they do stupid and rediculus things to incriminate themselves. In my line of reasoning they cannot even be considered a religion. To have a religion you have to have a god or gods. Not aliens. Plus basically there form of the christian Bible

3468:

So what can be done? You might change some wordings, e.g. "teams of spies" isn't really NPOV. Maybe use "investigators", or just "teams", and replace the word "teachers" with "staff" or "course supervisors". You could also find a reliable source that has a different view of what's currently written.

3464:

Biographies don't have to be "scholarly", I'd say that 99% aren't, since writing a biography is not a science - it is about 1) researching and 2) good writing. Speaking about footnotes, the book by Jon Atack does have them. And finally, the segment has three sources: Atack (ex-scientologist), Lamont

3086:

from Knowledge articles." Therefore, as my suggestion of including that Mary Sue never issued any statement to the effect that she complained about Miscavige to her husband was not acceptable to other editors, the entire section needs to be removed. I am perfectly happy, however, to simply include

2716:

Oh bollox! I see these comments as off-the-wall, unfounded, undocumented and specious accusations leveled at a fairly new editor; the use of inuendo in an attempt to discredit perfectly legitimate edits for lack of any legitimate way to call them into question. Sorry if you find this rude, but I am

1920:

As I explained in the edit summaries, the other sites had the complete articles, while the official sites had not. People should be able to read the complete article, when available, so that they can verify that the edits are not misleading. The NYT site had only an abstract and not the article; the

1743:

Let me clarify my point a bit. The cited affidavit appears to imply that Miscavige and others were doing something illegal and/or unethical that would result in writings of Howard that were legally PD improperly receiving copyright protection. But how could this have been the case? If the materials

1604:

31. In early 1983 I attended a meeting at Scientology's ASI office in Los Angeles. In attendance at this meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki Aznaran, Patricia Brice and Edith Buchele. The meeting concerned Scientology copyrights. In particular, David Miscavige stated that Scientology

177:

is attempting to present into this Miscavige artile, every bit of controversy possible in every area possible, as a sort of erudite attack against Miscavige. Of course, we understand that motivation, but nonetheless, there are many examples of articles about noteable peope who are alive today. Let

12780:

Yes, the exact same story is being reported by several online news and taking the same story in four languages is redundant. Take your pick. All of them report the same story. The one I proposed is a little longer, has more aspects of the story and does not violate the guidelines for biographies of

12645:

I hope this is not the case here but it is obvious that that none of these articles (if my Google translation does not fail me) says anything else than that this is a rumor or accusation by a former member of the church of scientology who is still making "a career" with scientology methods now, the

9927:

Normally I avoid content that relates to Scientology, but this is a matter of copyright. Jayen's points came to my attention today and he may indeed be right: the image metadata lists only the image processing software used; in most cases original digital photography would also include metadata on

7940:

There is no way "editorial control" can be exercised over a person being interviewed. That person makes statements on record. That is true with ANY interview of ANY kind, ANY where. Notability has NOTHING to do with the credibility of a person being interviewed. Statements do not necessarily have

7925:

It doesn't seem that this interview could be considered a reliable source for information about third parties such as Miscavige. It looks like BlogTalkRadio does not exercise editorial control over the podcast that hosted this interview, so just being on BTR cannot make a program a reliable source.

7614:

What we have here is a non-notable person making claims to a blogger. No-one is arguing that the person did not make the claims. That is irrelevant. The claims do not go in here until they have appeared in reliable secondary sources. It does not matter if the claims are made in blog "radio" or blog

5431:

The text you removed wasn't saying it was the same event, it was just noting that a similar event — the shooting of a Scientology officer in the Seattle Org in 1963 — which could be associated with D. Miscavige's claim given the date and location (1963, Seattle Org). How many Scientology executives

4865:

that's used in this article. The headline used on the article in the website is not the headline the New York Times uses! The actual article title is "Scientology's Puzzling Journey From Tax Rebel to Tax Exempt". I'm trying to buy the article in question so I can confirm the veracity of the article

3817:

Neither of you are being particularly lucid in your arguments. That said, I think Knowledge articles lean too heavily on "tell-all exposé" books like Atack's, and people like Tilman are far too quick to imbue such critics with a weight they don't deserve (comparing him to AA is ridiculous). Just as

3064:

is not cited. Additionally, in the same section of the book the way one event is described casts suspicion on the factual authenticity of the information. Specifically, just above this section, the confrontation between Mary Sue Hubbard and David Miscavige over her resignation is presented from a

1692:

Note also that (in the 1970s and 1980s) the only ways for things to "fall into the public domain" is 1) for the copyright to expire, either through failure to renew (after 28 years) or complete lapse of time (I think this would have been after 56 years in 1983); or 2) for thm to be "publsiehd" wiht

422:

The stories about physical abuse have been confirmed by so many people, a good number of them in places where they would know, that it seems hard not to include it. After all, a Knowledge page about Jim Jones pre Jonestown would be amiss not to indicate that there were stories of abuse from people

13227:

As a result of our lack of interaction and few reasons for arbitrary removal, I wanted to engage in discussion on this TALK page. I am trying to integrate information about DM's interests and hobbies. What would be the best way to do this? Was my entry too extensive? Do I need to integrate the

12741:

There is something strange about this conversation. Please look at the reference that I recommended. It covers the proposed text in full and it is a reliable source (as I understand the guidelines on the subject). No need to have gossip papers or personal blogs as reference. Taking a very critical

11980:

In a special series beginning Monday, March 29th, CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360° takes a close and revealing look at the leadership of the worldwide church of Scientology. The week-long series, Scientology: A History of Violence, will examine allegations that Scientology leader David Miscavige has for

11691:

I've been trying to remove the actionable statements from the bio of a subject who is known to be litigious, and somehow as a result keep getting accused of vandalism, with said article automatically reverting. Please keep in mind that there has never been any proof of the deleted statements; they

11462:

Again, the IP-named editor seems to be unwilling to discuss the issues around his edits here on this page, and the issue of editors with multiple accounts editing Scientology and Scientology-related topics like David Miscavige, himself much in the news of late, lends extreme importance to each and

11426:

I feel that the preponderance of the evidence shows that this IP-named editor is operating from an agenda, and rightly or wrongly, given the historical record which shows how focused some Scientologists are on muting, changing, deleting and deflecting all and any "bad press" - which has led to the

10139:

I think that there are probably things of Scientology that are valuable and that can help people - my main issue is not with Scientology per se, it is with Scientology the organization - it is a corrupt I believe and probably a criminal endeavor, and that has to do with people who are in charge of

9109:

The Daily Mail managed to correctly reported a flat denial that Tom Cruise has any leadership in the Church. The statement fails in this regard—the excerpt quoted in the article just says "The only person who runs the Church and makes policy decisions is David Miscavige," implying that Tom Cruise

8961:

bo, which I think would clearly at least meet RS standards, and have to assume that this community college wouldn't run anything which might get itself in trouble without verifying it first. Maybe not the best source out there, but I would tend to think that it would be counted as reliable, if not

5774:

Please see the discussion near the top of this page (if it is not already archived). There was nothing illegal in what Miscavige is said to have done. Just putting the statement that someone said he did something creates the impression that something was. I am not a fan of Miscavige, but still

5123:

BPL applies to talk pages? Jesse got a talk page, where? Anyway, Jesse did not testify on copyright stuff. The whole deal here is that F451 wants to spread this guys name and some links, and to spread the insinuation of illegal acts done by Jesse (as Church staff) on behalf of Miscavige. What does

4754:

If you're done with the hyperbole now, please explain yourself. "Libel" is a legal term, Tilman. It has a very specific meaning. Are you making or inferring a legal threat? Please explain how you think I have "libeled" Jon Atack by stating that I find his book to be gossipy and tabloidy. I've used

3901:

Stop wikilawyering, please. APOBS is a rant of a former member who has to be right by all means. He says that he is pissed - in the book - and he says he is/was active to get people out of the Church of Scientology. You might think this is a good thing, I don't care. But it shows what APOBS is for

3585:

I have to bring up again this whole section that quotes "A Piece of Blue Sky" as its source and which states "However, another source wrote Mary Sue later decided she had been tricked by Miscavige and wrote to her husband in complaint, getting no reply." Have you actually read the section of this

3332:

This is the same person we are discussing now. So 5 days ago, that was adequate to revert the edit stating the Miscavige purged the church of crims, but now it doesn't count when we are talking about Prince's lack of credibility as the source for a derrogatory allegation in a biography of a living

3135:

reference in Scientology literature, tapes, policies or books (at least not in the past 40 years--the time period of which I have personal knowledge) of "Scientology teachers." The mission holders certainly were not classed as "teachers." Perhaps he meant "supervisors," the term used to describe

1848:

This expression is used to describe him but it is not clear, to me anyway, what it means. Was he in the second group that joined after Hubbard? Or, I guess this is more likely, does that fact that his parents joined Scientology when he was a child make him "second-generation? I think it would be

1833:

And the same accusations that you make can be leveled at the public remarks of spokesmen for the cofs. Which freezoners have you had friendly talks with? I don't believe that statement. Prince's affidavit is verifiable information. OSA may not like it as it goes against their pr line, but again,

1610:

32. At the same meeting in early 1983 David Miscavige specifically ordered Patricia Brice (who at the time was L. Ron Hubbard's personal secretary and an employee of ASI) to begin the process of mass copyright registration filings for all of L. Ron Hubbard's materials. This order was given despite

1142:

to be here, anyways. But frankly, I see no reason to spread this story any further and so assist the Church of Scientology, which is probably the one that leaked it to The Sun in the first place. Seriously -- look at the pattern and compare it to history. Tom Cruise announcing his intent to eat

139:

Second, please remember that when writing for Knowledge, you cannot make assumptions that your audience already knows or is involved in the debate. Both sides have been arguing, on the talk page and in the article itself, about whether or not patter drills constitute a clear violation of "Chinese

13283:

first off, how other pages choose to weigh the merits of particular information about a person depends entirely upon that pages community and does not necessarily create a standard for Knowledge as a whole. I personally believe inserting a bullet point list of his hobbies, Hobbies shared by many

12706:

in 4 languages and no statements referenced directly by a blog or tabloid. the reason "this is a rumor or accusation by a former member of the church of scientology who is still making "a career" with scientology methods now" is left out is that it is an enthymeme completed by an ad hominim, and

11305:

Agree that these are dangerous waters: a lot of edgy issues here. As I say below, I want the dust to settle a bit. I'm curious to see what established Wikipedians think about your comments BT, and the ongoing situation here with this topic, which has been in the news quite a bit of late. I also

10570:

Is the back and forth between Miscavige and St Petersburg Times regarding his availability for an interview in connection with the June 2009 exposé really notable? This seems like a much subordinate sidetrack from the main issue. I suggest we remove. Alternatively, it should be reduced to a brief

10491:

Agree. For what it's worth, it is my view that the St. Petersburg Times article itself is notable, and deserves a chapter both here and in the Knowledge 'Scientology' main article. The four ex-members quoted in the article appear to be authentic insider witnesses, and confirm activity previously

7886:

No offense taken. However, inclusion of unsupported claims by a non-notable individual and reported only in blog are far from the standard of inclusion required of any article here, let alone BLP. I could really care less what goes in the articles here provided that it is consistent with reliable

7760:

You say that because it conforms with your POV. I am very familiar with talk radio and there is no way ANY interviewer can control the statements of those who are interviewed. The hosts of Blogtalkradio programs do not have commercial interests sponsoring them. Any person with some interview and

4759:

libel here. I know you're far more concerned about Atack's reputation than Miscavige's, but I'd hoped you might eventually manage to use Knowledge without bringing your own passionate opinions and grudges to the discussion. This has nothing to do with supporting Miscavige or opposing him, this is

3214:

The exact quote is: "One of the estate's key witnesses, Jesse Prince, has extreme bias and, in her opinion, lacks credibility." That is the opinion of One judge in One particular case. Justanother, it seems you are tendentiously editing this article by presuming that a former cofs member must be

3069:

perspective, describing a private meeting which was not recorded and in which there were no observers with details of the moods of the participants, the "probable" facial expressions, etc. This would tend to classify at least this section of the book as “fictionalized biography,” described in the

1748:

a notice. If the materials had been published without a notice in or after 1978 (the effective date of the 1976 copyright act) then registration would have preserved copyright protection, and this would be a perfectly legal and proper thing to do. Considering all of this, I can only conclude that

1615:

My understanding of copyright law, I am not a lawyer however, is that copyrights do not have to be renewed at all. Anything Hubbard had published would have certainly be under copyright in 1983. I suspect that the real issue was trademarks, not copyrights. But whatever, this is still just the

427:

There are rules about what sources Knowledge draws upon. If these accusations were described in an article published in, say, The New York Times, we could mntion it, citing the article. But when the best sources are newsgroup or message board posts and anecdotal reports on personal websites, it

13258:: "Trivia sections should not simply be removed from articles in all cases. It may be possible to integrate some items into the article text. Some facts may belong in existing sections, while others may warrant a new section. Integrate trivia items into the body of the article if appropriate. " 12144:

I think I just did put forward the info I wanted to remove and why. It isn't the source I want to remove, it's the content: somebody files a lawsuit saying Miscavige is guilty of slavery. And I did outline the types of sources that are avaialble for the Anderson Cooper thing, why not answer my

11398:

I do disagree. even on a Scientology page, which has more restrictions than any other page that I know of, I don't believe that an editor has to be fully established before they can contribute to the page itself. If this edit was due to subversive content, a continuing edit war, or a series of

11289:

I know these are dangerous waters, so I'm writing here in search of consensus before editing the article further. It seems to me that David Miscavige's identity as a public figure is linked to a pattern of serious allegations of unethical and even illegal practices as surely as Clint Eastwood's

9165:

The Daily Mail, for all its faults, is only a tabloid in size - it is not one in the US "National Enquirer" sense, and is considered RS as a rule. The issue of weight to be given an article which has such a quote is discussable, but I suspect that it is pretty much a fact as to operations of the

8015:

If the person being interviewed is identifiable and making statements, that person is responsible for those statements. That material is an interview. The source is definitely not questionable in that case. It looks to me that the value of this particular interview is significant and has been

6258:

The page has been protected at least once before due to edit-warring. I put out a request for comment, but I just do not see that having an effect on the major and perpetual edit-warring and the cascading animosity that the involved editors have been exhibiting. I started editing election method

6206:

To me it seems that what Mr. Prince is saying is too trivial to be mentioned in the article. If I am wrong and it is evidence of some serious wrongdoing by Mr. Miscavige then it also doesn't belong in the article. It would be better to go to the police or the FBI with the evidence. Then if they

5401:

a "major claim", and really, the major claim here would be D. Miscavige's assertion that the APA, AMA, and FDA killed a Scientology officer. Here are the facts: In the Nightline interview, D. Miscavige mentions that the APA, AMA, FDA raided the Church: that would be January 1963. He then went on

4204:

Miscavige is the leader of scientology. He led this purge. Thus it is relevant. He should be proud of it, after all, he took all the profits that the franchise holders were making. After the smoke had cleared, no mission holder would ever make big profits again. This is a neutral fact. Miscavige

3709:

book. Atack never claimed that "teachers," or "supervisors" for that matter, had anything to do with the mission holders' conference, as they didn't. It involved mission holders exclusively. Atack also never said spies were sent to the missions, and he never said anyone was ordered to security

2475:

What you didn't wasn't just grammar. You added long disproven scientology PR, e.g. that the GO was independent, Miscavige the hero, etc. You also deleted stuff from the well sourced "mission holders" segment (which has been tried for weeks now). Someone also shuffled paragraphs around to make it

2460:

I went through the David Miscavige article yesterday to clean it up. I started at the top, made quite a few edits explaining each one as I went. By and large, the edits were to improve clarity (such as deleting undefined Scientology jargon that did not contribute to an improved understanding.

2381:

Most of the controversial statements are well-presented, with both sides. But what about this? 'Miscavige made accusations against specific individuals as well, saying that Time magazine reporter Richard Behar (author of several articles highly critical of Scientology, e.g. The Thriving Cult of

1049:

Tilman is correct on all counts, additionally the article does not even posit a source at all for the statements allegedly by DM. If you read it carefully it cites a friend close to cruise and this "friend" in fact says nothing at all about what DM might or might not have said. The article is an

9995:

You understand what an SPA is, presumably? At Commons you are one, and your contributions there pertain to a religion which has come under some of the same criticism as Scientology. This is the second time during this case that, when Cirt has responded cooperatively toward remedying a content

7852:

I think this comes down to whether "Glosslip.com"--an online "celebrity gossip" site--satisfies the Reliable Source requirements, including the slightly stricter interpretation of those requirements called for w/r/t potentially inflammatory claims in bios of the living. If Glosslip is judged a

5467:

I feel strongly about this. We shouldn't remove this important comment from a rare interview of the top representative of the Scientology religion. As complementary information, we need to mention the killing of a Scientology officer in 1963 in the Seattle Org. Since visibly we won't come to an

3542:

tries to obviate a judge deciding that Prince "has extreme bias" and "lacks credibility," as an expert witness by saying it was only one judge who said this and only about one case, and only about him being an expert. This is a very serious statement and can't simply be discarded. In the Stacy

3450:

I finally got a copy of the Streissguth book. It is far from a scholarly book. It's part of a series called "Profiles" published by Oliver Press, which specializes in books for young-adult readers. It lacks adequate footnoting. And we use this as a source for a biography of a living person?

3091:

and point out that this is one case where care not to include poorly sourced information supersedes the Knowledge ethic of first achieving editor agreement. Based on this policy, please do not revert this edit unless you can first present viable evidence that Ms. Hubbard did in fact make these

1757:

the papers filed with the copyright office were materially false, either misstating the dates of publication, or concealing publication without a proper notice. But the affidavit sections quoted above do not state or even clearly imply that false statements of fact were to be included in "mass

1062:

In a battle between OR and a British publication, the British publication wins. I realize that it's primarily a tabloid, but who else is going to give a crap about what Tom Cruise thinks? Are there any published articles which contradict the claim made by the Sun? Restoring deleted paragraph. -

12844:

Currently the article says this: "Rathbun wrote that Miscavige would read out information from the reports about Cruise's auditing sessions, "While sipping scotch whiskey at the end of the night, Miscavige would read Tom’s overts and withholds ... joking and laughing about the content of Tom’s

11569:

Fine by me. I do think that chunk of the first paragraph could be removed from the intro section in the interest of keeping it concise. Most of it belongs in the article, but in the intro it seems unnecessary to spend several sentences elaborating on the specifics of his job description, the

10054:

It is not merely what your religion is. I, too, belong to a small religion that sometimes gets marginalized. A few centuries ago people lost careers and even their lives for adhering to it, and it has never been accepted as 'mainstream' or even valid by some individuals who adhere to related

9473:

the existence of that source earlier, at RS/N. It obviously corroborates that Hawkins made the comments. Being hosted on the network's website, its RS status is iron cast. If there is agreement that the allegations are notable enough to deserve their place in the article, we should add it as a

6868:

Jenna Hill Miscavige, a niece of church leader David Miscavige who left the fold in 2005, this week came out in support of Morton and slammed the organization for, among other things, its practice of "disconnection--essentially severing contact with family members seen as hostile to the group.

3102:

Your statements about sources not being peer-reviewed and scholarly is specious at best. As you know, Knowledge does not solely use academic publications for sources of information. Knowledge uses verifiability from reliable sources. Please stop making up policy on the fly to suit your POV.

8076:

as a source within the article text itself, and most certainly not consensus for it. There was also not consensus to use it as an external link. Pending further discussion, it should not be used in this article text for controversial claims about the subject of the article, and as there is no

5078:

F451, knock it off. I was typing. You got a cosy agreement party here, haven't you? Anyway, if a judge does think that Jesse is not reliable to be heard as a witness, if Jesse got himself paid for "expert" statements which followed the money trail but not the truth and if all Jesse learned in

4728:

I have to agree with Su-Jada. If this were an article about soup or lawnmowers, it wouldn't matter, but this is an article about a living person and should be treated extremely sensitively. This should be taken up on the BLP Noticeboard if Tilman continues to push the matter. Atack's gossipy

4517:

Allow me to clarify. While I am a newbie in regards to editing, I have been lurking and reading articles on wikipedia for a couple of years. I was through reading some of the Scientology-related websites that I became aware of the editing environment, and specifically the arbitration case on

1680:

a copyright. Until the copyright law changes in 1988, US copyrights needed to be renewed if they were to extend more than 28 years. (copyrights no longer need to be renewed, or more technically, they are now renewed automatically. Anything published in 1964 or later now gets/got an automatic

1449:

An internal link from the same site goes to A.r.s. and its post of all case information. For the record, the statement -is- true, since a request send to the relevant court office will produce copies of the document under freedom of info. Either way, wouldn't it be simplest to cite the court

5214:

The paragraph that was removed was saying "Jesse Prince stated...", so I don't see what is the problem in this paragraph. Isn't Jesse Prince a reliable source for Jesse Prince's views? Given that he was a high-ranking officer in the Church of Scientology organization, his affidavit is worth

3718:. Unless you can prove that what I am stating about Streissguth is incorrect, don't revert this edit as I will continue to delete it, and the 3 reverts rule does not apply when removing defamatory and poorly sourced information in a biography of a living person, which this most certainly is. 3789:

So good "input" on the talk page, so bad revert behavior on the article. Tilman, please find some balance between the two, thanks. You know what a "supervisor" is in Scientology (a trainer) and how wrong it read to use the term in the article context (a controller). Why are you doing that?

12406:

My attempt to add a description of this was unceremoniously reverted for lack of proper sourcing. You might wanty to look back at my edit, add a couple of your sources if they cover that material, and see whether you have better luck than I did adding this important story to the article.

1818:

Thank you. I have no doubts that Jesse was making that claims even though I never saw the actual legal document but some allegedly OCRed version of it. But it is used to "hint" to "possibly illegal" activities of Miscavige. This is intentionally smearing the reputation of a living person

5485:

the two events are one and the same, and say something like "Paulette Cooper described a similar sounding incident, blah blah blah". It's still going to be OR no matter what, but at least make it more transparent that a synthesis of two discrete pieces of information is being made here.

5691:

here). Are there any completely free images of David Miscavige existing? That aren't owned by CoS/RTC or a media organization? What are my chances if I strolled up to the gates of Int Base with a camera and asked security if I could "plz cn I takes a picture of DM for Knowledge, tkxs"?

5088:

Misou, KNOCK IT OFF! You deliberately pervert the facts as stated by AndroidCat. Your "apostate" characterization is simply absurd as the cofs is not a religion, but a business posing as one. The corrupt individual is the criminal running the rtc named David Miscavige. Jesse Prince is

1611:

the fact that Mr. Miscavige was already aware that many of the materials in question were already in the public domain. Thus, I know from personal knowledge that in mid 1983 Scientology began a massive program to register Mr. Hubbard's material with the United State's Copyright office.

7941:

to be "supported" by police reports or civil suits. A court of law or a jounalist cares not if a person is notable or not. Supporting evidence does lend greater credibility to statements, but in any interview, a person's statements are just that. Editorial control is not feasible.--

2943:

in charge as COB, he had no need to "kinda take over".) The paragraph confines itself to a simple statement of verifiable fact and has no speculation about why two key officials were suddenly "unpersons", and the failure to announce replacements as part of standard hatting procedure.

2534:

A "clarification" must be sourced. And obviously, the fact that MSH did write something is sourced. And, a source can't say that "MSH herself never stated this", unless he observed MSG 24/7 and found out, that she never did write (while in jail) that letter to her husband-in-hiding.

5583:

R. Hill does not seem to understand this. Here is the same logic: Let's assume there is a WP article on Raymond Hill. Here we add the line "A Raymond man charged with his wife in a bizarre torture-slaying case has pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and agreed to cooperate with

3056:-- the reference for the statement that Mary Sue Hubbard complained to LRH about being removed by Miscavige and never hearing back from LRH on this. There are several references listed for other statements in the same section of the book in which this statement is found, however 13303:. To ensure that I am understanding you correctly, are you saying that, according to you, I would be okay to create a new section for DM's hobbies? I, of course, realize that I would need the rest of this pages' community to jump in and confirm a given strategy. Thanks again. 310:

This information is not of the class the Knowledge normally requires, but the other infomation on where DM lives is no better than rumor either. (ASI is Author Services, Inc., and as I recall, they worked out of a building a mile or two to the West of Hwy 101 on Hollywood Blvd.)

6665:

has something that is text-based, whether it be a transcript of their programs or a report on past programs, which will be citable as a secondary source? If not, does anyone know if their tapes/transcripts of past programs are available upon request? If so, that would satisfy

1445:

Three trivial sources satisfies the reliability requirement for that single sentence, but to prevent an edit war, I'll wait until you confirm that this is satisfactory to restore it. If not, I'll dig for the actual buried court affidavit on some sites about the McPherson trial.

212:. Let me assure you, my reference is to a neutral point of view of an article's topic. Widely published to be presented as widely published, while narrowly published (small newspaper, etc.) be presented in like manner; while personal opinion on personal websites does not meet 7853:"questionable" source, it can't be used. Unless there's a good case that Glosslip meets the journalistic standards for reliability--comparable to "mainstream" TV stations or newspapers--I'd say it belongs in the questionable category in this context, and shouldn't be cited. -- 13102:

Rathbun was part of the scheme. He taped and delivered the material to Miscavige (so he says). He was actually doing the auditing interviews that were taped and is still doing these things now. Apart from that this borders to original research. Why not just quoting what the

11553:

Thanks again & noted again. I vote to leave the lede as is for now. The portion you suggest moving (I assume not deleting) is accurate, I believe, and describes some of the scope of Mr. Miscavige's involvement with various the organizations under the Scientology tent.

5785:

I don't think that a quick review by DES that it usually wouldn't be anything illegal is exactly decisive. If the situation were that clear, Judge Kane would have given summary judgment to Bridge Publications and wouldn't have had to appoint a special master to untangle the

2200:

Why would anyone be interested in the married names of his sisters and what his brother does for a living? These facts have nothing to do with his notability and could cause problems for them. Oh, and to answer Tilman's question: I am trying to point out how mean-spirited

5323:

Why can't it? You'd bolster your rebuttal much better if you could point to another judge in another case (particularly in one that has to do with the issue)deciding that Prince's allegations have legitimacy. But it also seems to be a moot point when you take WP:BLP into

5457:

of original research, synthesis, wannabe-detective work. I'm sure it IS the same event, but we don't have anything airtight to prove it. I'm fine with leaving both Miscavige and Cooper's comments out since they bring nothing of any great value to the article either way.

5637:

HubcapD, As long as I have edited scientology-related articles, "playing nice" has been as rare as polished diamonds laying in a Skid Row gutter. I think we are going to see many more temporary protections put on such articles until in the remote future when this jihad

4741:

I am SO tired of all this libel of a reliable source. Do whatever you want. If nobody else will stop this libel, I won't bother anymore. I'm now deleting this article from my watch list - for now. Put in an edit that Miscavige is the saviour of scientology or whatever.

11306:

refer to the big yellow box at the top of this page, which was also in the news when the policy was established here. Knowledge precedent is being established, day by critical day, and the issue has actually moved beyond Mr. Miscavige or Scientology in my opinion.

10140:

Scientology mainly David Miscavige who I think is probably a psychopath. I'll give you just an example. I know of people who were very very high up in the Church, and there's countless people corroborating this, countless - that David Miscavige regularly beat them.

1807:

I acknowledge your opinion COFS, but you are the one making the allegation of "listing unfounded and paid allegations" in reference to Jesse Prince's affidavit. It is verifiable material, thus can be used in the article. OSA may not like it, but this is not their

13326:

to explain those hobbies in an encyclopedic yet non-trivial way (show how those hobbies are necessary to understanding Davie) and we can discuss that then...as it stands no, you don't have nearly enough information to create that section from the source you have

11463:

every word change made to these articles. Not to put too fine a point on it, but I feel Knowledge policy itself is being put in a spotlight by the totality of these events. I think it is highly important to get this right, for the sake of Knowledge as a whole.

2524:

analogy aside, A statement is made that someone who knew Mary Sue Hubbard made a claim about how she felt about something. MSH herself never stated this. I'd be happy to remove the entire section as I don't think it is needed, but if it is left in it needs this

8890:

it will bear our my doubt that there are any of the expected indications of a college radio broadcast such as station identification breaks. For this reason and seeing as it is presenting extremely contentious material in a BLP article, it should be removed. --

5215:

mentioning I would think. Note that the paragraph was not implying that what Jesse Prince said was fact, it just noted that a former high ranking officer attempted to demonstrate, with exhibits, that many copyrights had expired (then the settlement kicked-in).

3370:

I have not said that Prince has a criminal history. I say that scientology claims so. Yes, the same scientology hired him as RTC #2 - long after the purge. So either Su-Jada came up with this policy from nowhere, or this policy isn't followed, or RFW is lying.

13149:

how does him offering auditing services now have anything to do with statements that David took those files and violating confidentiality with them? As I already said, I don't think the length is a problem, since it offers detailed cometary supported by many

5289:

Extreme bias and lack of credibility are what they are. They don't vanish when one walks out of the courtroom. This is all beside the point anyway, because as I said, "such a serious assertion about Miscavige needs more sources than this guy's hearsay, as per

525:

My sense is that the majority of editors here would say "no," that we can't even report that these rumors exist unless the rumors have already been reported by a credible publisher. (If you are curious about the reasoning behind such a policy, take a look at

5587:. Obviously the murder and Raymond Hill are connected as there are similarities available, namely the word Raymond. How far off can you get? I don't know if this 1963 ref is connected to what David Miscavige says in the 1992 show. Neither does Raymond Hill. 4620:

I've extended protection for another 24 hours, since there doesn't seem to be any relevant discussion taking place here. If no effort is put forth to settle this now, there's going to be more edit warring after the protection ends. I'll check back tomorrow.

9965:

this project, and endeavor to avoid it entirely on others. It is very proper and reasonable to recuse in light of the mentorship, and I resent your question. There are plenty of other people you could ask; please respect my wish to wash my hands of this.

3114:

It doesn't have to be "peer-reviewed" or "scholarly". Scholars don't write about MSH whining, because this isn't a science topic. "Blue Sky" is a secondary source. It has survived lawsuits. It is cited by others (among them, scholars). This is pretty good.

13242:

My information was regarding DM's interests and hobbies. Listing an individuals' hobbies or interests is not irrelevant and most certainly does not "fall outside Knowledge's scope." As you can see in the Education section of Thomas Jefferson's Knowledge

9502:

that her most strident political opponents used to use in the 1980s to express their disgust with her, usually a still image showing her lips contorted in mid-word. If we haven't got anything better, I'd be in favour of going without picture until we do.

7926:

Furthermore, it does not appear that the host is generally known as a reliable journalist (she may in fact be one, but I don't know how that could be established), nor has the interviewee been established as a reliable source on the topic of Miscavige. --

11102:

Deleted paragraph about Jenny Miscavige. The reference source links to an article about the practice of disconnection, which is not relevant to the context of the subheading "Allegations of violence" and does not fit into any other category on the page.

1714:

See the line on the chart that says "1923 through 1963 Published with notice but copyright was not renewed7 In the public domain". It has been established in court that a number of Hubbard works like the "Manual of Justice" are now in the public domain.

12127:

Perhaps you could suggest some sources, and we could go from there. As far as your removal of sourced material, perhaps you could put forth on the talk page the sources you feel you wish to remove from the article, and this could also be discussed. --

362:

His living at Gold has been reported by the LA Times and other reputable publishers--hence we can include it. If there's good reason for doubting that it is current, though, the language might be changed to reflect that: "as of 2004..." or whatever.

10759:

I think that "semi-protected" means that anonymous IP's can't edit, but named accounts can. In other words, you can edit freely (so long as you don't otherwise violate policy, of course). I'm sure someone will jump in to correct me if I'm mistaken.

6054: 2963:

Cat, do you not think that holding something up for the reader to think about constitutes original research when no reliable source has held up that same issue. Do you not think that we are creating something there if it does not first appear in RS?

1356:

I respectfully disagree - all this is still based on the SUN article, although some mention no source at all. It is deplorable that so many papers, even reputable ones, have repeated the story without bothering to research this - just because it is

1191:

I think the fact that Micavige and the Church don't keep an eye on their own WP articles is an indication of how lame they really are. Hence the week delay in responding to a news story is probably not an indication of a clever plot on their part.

651:

Does anybody know if the lad has had all those extraterrestrial-originated "spirits" removed or does he still bear the burden of hauling arounf multi-million-year-old "creatures" deposited upon Earth by that nefarious nogoodnik whose name I can not

771:

The other picture from What Is Scientology has no fair use rationale and will likely be up for deletion the next time the bots sweep through. It certainly is surprising to see all the new editors popping up at the same time for this obscure issue.

3087:

a balanced statement that this was never corroborated by Ms. Hubbard. I would also like to point out that I have been criticized of late in the talk page of this article for removing points without consensus. I would again like to cite the same

10795: 4388:

Your "uncanny ability to read things" might of course be a reason that as a "newbie", you know so much about policy. However, it seems that you didn't use this "uncanny ability to read things" re: Jon Atack's book, since you write about "if...".

1426:

Even a simple google search reveals a few more sources, most usefully cited among them I think would be these, which corroberate the above link, and represent multiple trivial sources about the same information, each independently confirming it:

11136:

The information about disconnection does touch on possible family-life problems which are relevant on this biog, however we should have more neutral sources before going into details about private matters like that. This information is used on

8300:

This sentence: "Miscavige said that extraterrestrial beliefs (see Space opera in Scientology doctrine) are not as important as people believe or not important at all." I think that part is kind of misleading, since David Miscavige actually made

4837:

Notwithstanding my personal doubts as to the veracity of Jesse Prince's allegations, it seems to me that it belongs in the "Criticisms and Controversies" Section, and not the "Scientology Career" section. If no one objects, I would like to move

11220:, who has made very few previous edits, yet cites a number of wikipedia rules. With all due respect, this topic is so hot-button on Knowledge that I feel we need to go slow on deletions of this type by an editor who has little track record. 5909:

Please include cited information to the article on its being unethical and grounds for lawsuits. I personally don't understand the problem with the CoS wanting to hold the copyrights to Hubbard's writings. Wasn't that Hubbard's intention?

9839:

Yes, that is a good point, over at Commons admin Túrelio is helping me clean up those image pages - some of them are imported from Flickr using an automated tool, and the tool uses the description page originally given by the image's author.

8138:

Until a court of law finds Miscavige guilty of this, I would be highly hesitant to put anything that could be interpreted as libelous in a biography. Charges of kidnapping would definitely count, and should definitely not be in this article.

4876:

I have seen cases of papers running the same story with title changes between print editions. However, only the "Scientology's Puzzling Journey From Tax Rebel to Tax Exempt" title is listed in the NYT archive (which is pay-only, as you say).

441:

This is not a statement that DM actually abuses people, just that there are reports. That there *are* reports is both true and easy to verify. Would it be more acceptable to say "postings?" It could also be changed to "abusing" instead of

7223:"Scientology - Cult Friction: After an embarrassing string of high-profile defection and leaked videos, Scientology is under attack from a faceless cabal of online activists. Has America's most controversial religion finally met its match?" 10506:

Fully agree. Combine the recent statements from former high-ranking executives, plus the statements from other former members previously that have said the exact same things, and we begin to see a pattern of corroboration made in multiple

3515:

Scientology is definitely not a religion per the dictionary definition. There is no worship of any kind. Hubbard used the loopholes in U.S. law to incorporate it as a religion to acquire certain legal protections and get tax-exemption.

5749:. What Prince states Miscavige did is verifiable, but personally commenting on it in the article is OR. I hope that this settles the revert war, but I doubt it will because many of the editors of this article refuse to pay attention.-- 5229:

He could say that he jay-walked because he thought Miscavige wanted him to. Same significance. Jesse is not a reliable source for information regarding Miscavige. He might be a reliable source for something else, like growing marijuana.

4414:

agrees or not (very unlikely in light of his POV on this subject and his self-assumed status as a Scientology-basher, which, unfortunately is preventing his even reading much less understanding the reasoning I have taken care to present

680:

Fahrenheit, I see your point on the size of the image, but the one you've selected just doesn't look like him. Plus it's really unflattering and gives almost as much emphasis to an unnamed man to the right of him, who looks really odd.

11458:

Thanks BT. I said "more or less" it's a revert to Aug. 5, and thank you for taking the time to notice my work, which considered all edits carefully; indeed, I did in fact attempt to 'reconcile' them, as you are kind enough to observe.

9622:'s comparably bad photo. This was a 11kb upload that really does look like a screen capture. Might as well keep it up until it's deemed a copyrightvio or until a better is available—that vote doesn't instill me with confidence though. 4473:

You are not "required to delete" something. And the 3RR rule does apply. This is a content dispute - you simply don't like the segment, despite that it is based on three sources (and more are coming if you continue to make trouble!).

1646:

Thanks. I checked out these sources and it seems that a copyright lasts for at least 50 years after the death of the author. Was there any reason to renew copyrights for his works in 1983? Were they really talking about trademarks?

3663:. The Atack book has citations in various places throughout. There is NO citation to this claim. Stating, as Atack did, that some unnamed "source" had some kind of inside intelligence on how Mary Sue felt although Mary Sue herself 2568:

use the edit page to explain my edits in this article, I logged in to explain them, although I explained each edit in the edit summary as I went along. You have now posted 3 snide and combative comments, in violation of Knowledge's

4336:

that books written by disaffected members are not very reliable sources. I am a newbie, however, so I can't say for certian if I am interpreting the policy correctly. If wikipedia is built on consenus, then us the right tool to get

2461:

There were also grammar and punctuation errors, and certain sections including that were questionable and/or sounded pejorative where no such tenor was necessary, particularly in light of the living persons biography guidelines.

10528:

in a google search on a given topic, is now itself Ground Zero in 'Perception Wars.' And with an extremely hot-button topic like this, the new 3-part article in the St. Petersburg Time ratchets the pressure. Again, bravo Cirt!

9120:

article, let alone the lead of a BLP who isn't even the subject of the question. Imagine if someone asked a Republican spokesman if Rush Limbaugh was the #2 Republican. Would it make sense to put the subsequent denial into the

1091:

If this get reverted again to include the Sun statement I will solicit rapid admin intervention to lock the page, excluding the statement, which they will surely grant because the inclusion is simply on the wrong side of policy.

10237: 5017:, in the Bridge v. FactNet case, not only did federal judge John Kane allow Jesse Prince's testimony to things he had personally witnessed, but ruled that FACTNet successfully had cast doubt on the legal status of the documents. 8098:

I read that this guy has the board of Scientology as hostages at some compound, what's the story behind that and why is it all over news websites but not on his page on Wiki? I'd say it's notable? And I'd like to know more.

11160:

Revised and edited the paragraph to include the response about the allegations of violence and included a reference source that leads to another article from the St. Petersburg Times. This is the old version of the paragraph:

818:

Just how is it inappropriate? And the quality is fine, and voiced so above by other editors. Why not simply have both photos present in the article? Perhaps you would rather have their locations switched, as a compromise?

640:

Is it known whether Miscavige has completed any or all of the OT levels? Is there reason to believe he may have experienced some of the unreleased teachings (e.g., OT IX)? Is this info available for other Scientology execs?

551:

Well, this information is certainly "not original research" and it sure is as verifiable as apple pie, i.e., any person can follow the links and see it is there. But I see your point. Perhaps there should be a WP:F policy.

11609:

No problem, plus my title was misleading. By the way, to gain some perspective I've been looking at other controversial articles to see how edgy topics are handled in Knowledge. The answer so far, some better than others.

10731:, and I will make no attempts to edit or revert until I understand what policy is. Again, the record shows I reverted once, and tried to discuss it with the editor here. If possible, please clarify where we go from here. 2027:"He has a brother, Ronnie Jr., a twin sister, Denise Gentile (formerly Denise Covington, then Denise Licciardi) and a younger sister, Lori Miscavige Vernuelle. His brother Ronnie Miscavige now sells real estate in Virginia." 1020:

I would, however, delete the "Christ" paragraph. Reason: 1) the SUN is not exactly a reliable source 2) it doesn't sound plausible - it's not the sort of language that scientology uses 3) it has been denied by scientology.

9753: 7961:

It has been over a week since I started this RFC. (7) users have commented, and it appears that consensus is leaning towards not utilizing the above-listed source as a reference in this article, or either treating it as a

7510:

This was a senior official within the organization, talking on record about his experiences in recorded audio. Doesn't get more of an adequate source than that, IMO. Would be interesting to see what others think though.

3282:

witness, which is a very narrow and specific ruling in that one case. As an expert witness, Jesse Prince would have testified about things that he had not personally witnessed (notification of the upper management about

11497:

Noted, thanks. I think your changes to the intro or lede today are in the main well-resourced and referenced, though I'm concerned that it is getting a bit long. Still, the fact that Mr. Miscavige was on the cover of

9072:- yes it is a direct interview with a Scientology attorney, but generally even direct interviews in questionable sources should not be used. Feel free to discuss. I would not be opposed to further input from folks from 10583:

Disagree. My view is that it is highly notable, and as I have previously noted I feel strongly that the 3-part article and circumstances of its publishing are notable indeed, and worthy of their own expanded section.

8239:

Is contradicted by the end of the sentence: “(in Munich and not Leipzig); it was the Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie that joined the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatric Research in 1924, that was later

6216:

I see nothing wrong with that, but it is not prosecutable at this time due to the statute of limitations. It does have a great deal of bearing on the assertion of copyrights by the cst or rtc as it would be copyfraud.

11410:

Nope, it wasn't a blanket reversion. And my solution is like yours, except 4 days earlier. Nor do I think an editor has to 'fully established'. But let's look at what happened after my edits were effected: exactly

11186:

This is the new version. No sources have been deleted, only added to include more information regarding the "Allegations of violence" topic. Combined two sentences into one so that the paragraph is easier to read:

3429:

Your argument does say anything about my argument. And you had the opportunity to come up with that mysterious policy of not hiring people with a criminal record. Or to show that RFW is telling the truth. Or not.

268:

But the part about Miscavige visiting the IRS in 1993 is just wrong. The visit was in 1991, October I think, and the IRS commissioner he visited resigned by January of 1992, many think as a result of the visit.

11132:

It appears that we have very little information about his family, other than the details in "Early life". His wife Michelle is not mentioned in the body of the article. Maybe those details can become a "Family"

8921:

Thanks, I am listening to it now and about 1/2 through. OK, then. If someone else wants to raise the question of the suitability of a college station for this sort of material in BLP then they can but I will not.

5079:

Scientology is how to get sober fast, then, ladies, this guy is just an irresponsible, corrupt individual, who cannot be cited as reliable. Publicly active apostates are often this way, and Jesse is no exemption.

5005:, which is a very narrow and specific ruling in that one case. As an expert witness, Jesse Prince would have testified about things that he had not personally witnessed (notification of the upper management about 1921:

TIME site didn't have the part "Mining money in Vancouver" etc. Your term "POV-site" is misleading. I linked to the article, that is all. Btw, one of your changes was from one "POV-site" (your term) to another. --

4378:

Well, I have this uncanny ability to read things and actually understand what they say. If Atack was at this conference, and it is the prime reason for his upset (and hence his book), then his book is a primary

3560:

Su-Jada, you have misquoted me in your own extreme bias. Your own statements here lack credibility. I see no reason why the Prince affidavit is not well-sourced and am restoring that material to the article.--

9129:? Would it even make sense to put it anywhere in Steel's article? One can perform similar thought experiments with other leaders and controversial members. I think the rational answer is an unambiguous "no." 8954:

runs a reputable station, otherwise its license might be rescinded. Have some doubts about the programming coming from the local community college, "Hawk Radio", but have seen some college newspapers, like the

5927:

I don't think that is the point of the affidavit, but rather it shows that d.m. will willfully and knowingly engage in copyfraud. This is not a discussion of the validity of Hubbard's copyrights on "religious

3701:(described by the publisher as intended for 5th to 12th grade students' school libraries) cites Atack and Miller as the only sources for his entire chapter on Scientology. Russel Miller's book does not make 714:

I disagree. It does look like him. I have seen d.m. up close, thus I can verify that. It is interesting that Borbo's only edit is the d.m. image and Entheta was the editor who uploaded the original image.--

3742:

I notice that you have been argueing without reading the article: the word "spies" isn't even there. While it is true, it isn't NPOV so I removed it some time ago, also in an effort to cool things down here.

3613:

That is it irresponsible to keep this sentence in the article: "However, another source wrote Mary Sue later decided she had been tricked by Miscavige and wrote to her husband in complaint, getting no reply."

830:

Isn't it interesting that the nicks Borbo, Boredwiththehype, Hypermellow12, and Grrrilla come out of nowhere with no user pages to voice opinion about a photo of david miscavige. Coincidence or correlation?--

6904: 867:

That is my feeling as well, but I switched the positions to the way they are currently, as an offering of compromise to the "interesting" editors that you mentioned above. You can switch them if you like.

4631:

Although its blocked in "the wrong version", I don't mind a longer block. It seems that many people with an opinion are on vacation. And sadly, the best researcher of all (Smee), is on a long Wikibreak :-(

2330:

Here's more about Ronnie Miscavige notability: A police report about that he was caught for reckless driving. He asked the police officer not to fine him, but to beat him up instead of giving him a ticket.

1859:

No, there is no Scientology definition of "second-generation". But I think he was Generation 2 of Scientologists in his family (Generation 1 would be his parents). So you could call this second-generation.

10656:

The record shows that I reverted once, the other, IP-named person twice. Other party refuses to discuss on talk page. Since the recent events around this topic, seems obvious to me what's up. Just sayin'.

9976:

No, I'm not sure if it's a leading question (not one I know the answer to, anyway); I assure you it's in good faith. I have no idea what the norms on Commons are. A lot of users here have complained about

5568:. In it, Cooper alleges a murder in the Seattle Org committed by the jealous husband of a female Scientologist, who was enraged that the victim, a Scientology Reverend, was having an affair with his wife). 3291:

happened according to his expertise on the subject. Obviously judges have to hold expert witnesses (even hostile ones) to a very high standard for what would otherwise by hearsay evidence at best. (IANAL)

1372:

Should still be mentioned, put it as a direct quote if you wish along with the source and then you can leave it up to the reader to decide how reputable the source is or is not. 14:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

8326:

We should find a way to make that clear in the article, and not cherry pick one particular statement he made. Actually, I can't even find that he said "extraterrestrial beliefs ... are not as important."

7870:

the claims remain unproven'. Perhaps? And no offence, Justallofthem, but you're bound to oppose any inclusion of this site - the last thing you want is your organisation's leader being accused of things!

1873:

Thanks. That's the impression I had from the sentence. I might add a note to make the meaning more clear. Except that I couldn't think of any way to put it that wouldn't be a distraction to the readers.

3640:

You mischaracterize what I said. However, I should add that scientology lost against Atack, except for one single paragraph about Ms Hodkin, which he lost not on the merits, but for a procedural reason.

451:

Your argument makes sense, but it is a controversial position--since we can't use newsgroup postings as a source of fact, can we simply allow that these posts exist, without making any claim as to their

5373: 2492:. Hey, scientology itself shows Jesse Prince "criminal history" on RFW, and before his scientology career. Yet he became Nr.2 at the RTC. And L. Ron Hubbard himself has a long criminal record, so...? -- 10724:

Yes, I got that, and I appreciate your effort to make that clear. As you can see above, I also attempted to have a discussion here on the talk page with the IP-named editor yesterday, but to no avail.

4921:

Please recall that in that particular case, Bridge Publications lost its bid for summary judgment and were going to have prove ownership and copyright for some 1,900 documents. Instead Bridge settled.

3488:

back and forth lately. Note that accusing another editor of deliberate bad faith editing is serious stuff and shouldn't be used lightly for just edits that you disagree with (no matter how annoying).

3465:(journalist) and Streissguth (writer). When the dispute first came up, I searched for other books by Streissguth to see what kind of guy he is. He has written 102 books, including several biographies. 894:

simply disregard my views on this or those of others who have participated in this disucssion. To repeat my objection to the photo you have chosen, the colors are strange and the faces are distorted.

12781:

living persons. As noted earlier. That is subject #1. Subject #2 of my proposal is that the added paragraphs are undue in size, repetitive and with their many quotes might belong in an article about

11653:

personally I think it has the same credibility as a blog. I can't find out who is keeping the website, or even who are the authors of its contents. I'm not comfortable at all leaving this on a BLP.

6273:

who has not been exactly communicative about anything, I guess not to give a hint about his identity. His choice, and he might do that. But we will need him for the mediation. One for you to summon.

12652:

In all, I think the above rule for biographies was seriously violated with the addition of those paragraphs. I propose to change it to the following text as part of the Allegations of Abuse section:

8295: 5443:

I agree with Raymond Hill. Recording the other incideng provides additional context with which the reader can do what he may. Nothing about the statement seems particularly misleading or drawing.(

5393:". I strongly disagree. There maybe a case of rephrasing, but certainly not removing this piece of information that provides further insight into D. Miscavige's statement. Wikipediatrix, you claim " 4660:

I agree. There is a legitimate question of whether such "tell-all" books (and, perforce, other books that rely exclusively on these books for content) reliable secondary sources, or primary sources.

11919: 5013:

happened according to his expertise on the subject. Obviously judges have to hold expert witnesses (even hostile ones) to a very high standard for what would otherwise by hearsay evidence at best.

12968:"By order of Miscavige many of those sessions were secretly recorded by a well-concealed video camera and voice recorder system built into the VIP auditing room at Celebrity Center International." 10687:

Agree, but not what I mean. My fault for not being clear: I refer to the recent Knowledge actions taken against those editors with an agenda using multiple accounts to mask their identities, etc.

4576:

In the external links section there is a blog marked as "Miscavige's blog". However, it is run by someone called Jenny. I think it should be removed, since it is a private website not fitting the

1360:

Both Cruise and Miscavige are control freaks. They wouldn't let anyone near them who would call the SUN the next day. And Miscavige doesn't go to parties (to afraid of being served with a lawsuit

858:

Frankly, I would switch the positions. The gameshow style image of him wearing stage makeup would go in the career section, and the one where he is sitting in court without makeup at the top. --

9498:

The more often I see this pic of Miscavige we use here, the more I'm becoming convinced that we shouldn't be using such an extremely unflattering image in a BLP. It reminds me of the pictures of

259:

Not that I know about. As a non profit I believe they are required to do so, but for some reason they are immune to investigation. (Source Eric Pham, an FBI agent I didn't believe at the time.)

12987:

Thank you. This does not contradict my proposal that says: "According to an anonymous former member of the Church of Scientology revealed in a blog statement in May 2010 by former scientologist

10901: 7903:

Good Suggestion Mr RN, and a I agree, until this is in newspapers etc it shouldn't be included 'verbatim', but given the ammount of first hand accounts your suggested line makes a lot of sense.

6177: 6156: 6147: 6081: 6063: 3714:

added a section the the David Miscavige article which simply quoted the Streisguth reference calling it a "reputable secondary sourced citation". It is not. I am deleting this section based on

3078:

is not a peer reviewed scholarly work. Including this paragraph, which impugns Miscavige, with no more proof than an undocumented paragraph from such a book therefore fits under the following

3525: 2591:

does not mean that disagreement is not allowed. And there's also no AGF when you try to delete something that has been explained weeks before with many sources (the mission holders segment). --

1910:. With the argument that yours POV-sites are "better" and that the new York Times "has changed" their headline/article. Are you somehow joking? Please stop disrupting here without proper talk. 8250:

I wasn't sure if this reference should be removed, or this inconsistency should be pointed out in some way. I guess I will remove it, but I am leaving this note here so that it is clear why.

2398:

As a person who worked on two of the rebuttals (the Seattle murder, and the Max Planck thing), the problem with all that is that is too unspecific. Any speculation would be original research.

242:

Since non-profits by law have some minimum number of directors (more than one), this amounts to an accusation. It would seem to require more verification, though I don't personnally object.

12637:

The use of several tabloids with the exact same content in different languages does not change this. The same guideline refers to a resolution of the Wikimedia Foundation that clearly notes:

5542:

mentions a murder in the Seattle Org committed by the jealous husband of a female Scientologist, who was enraged that the victim, a Scientology Reverend, was having an affair with his wife).

5432:

have been shot in the Seattle Org in 1963? I think it is appropriate to point the reader what is possibly an alternative reporting of the event, he is free to make his own mind beyond that.

10896: 10882: 5792:(This doesn't mean Prince's allegation was proven in any way by the settlement, just that Scientology weighed the odds and gave up a chance to grind FACTNet and Wollersheim into the dirt.) 4499:

I suspect that the Hubcap user is a sock puppet. He claims to be a newbie, but the very first day, he was already in the dispute resulotion page! The only question is - which user is it? --

2835:

So you are just going to point out, in a somewhat accusatory tone, that Su-Jada appears to be an SPA without telling us what means in this context? Why bother mentioning it at all then? --

1972:

I how do you know that the "unofficial" - a.k.a. POV-pushing - do not have "transcription errors" or are otherwise slanted? The sites you are linking to are obvious anti-Scientology sites.

13088:

attack which outside those venues is not tied to David's personal use of confessional files. If he left the church and became Joe the Plummer would David Miscavage have acted differently?

8179:. i dont know about any hostages, the more appropriate description would be: slaves. but they do not use them for purposes of blackmail, so the word hostage doesnt really seem to fit here. 6072: 3261:

Justanother, BLP is a policy, but it is not for fixation. I am not going to discount a person just because one judge excluded his testimony in one case, AND the cofs does not like him. --

12468:

Under "Allegations of abuse" a few sentences about the AC360 and the church's response should be added. His wife's name and other details cited above should be added to "Personal life."

12370:

Also why is there no discussion of his wife Michelle Miscavige? She was mentioned in articles such as "IRS examined Scientology dollars, not dogma" (St. Petersburg Times; Oct 24, 1993), "

2973:

You're stretching WP:OR quite a bit. The paragraph states no claims and advances no argument. It's not as obvious as stating the sky is blue, but it's a self-evident and verifiable fact.

10867: 10485: 10359: 6023:

I am often referred to as F451 and I do not take that personally. Trixi is much easier to type than Wikipediatrix. Sorry if it bothers you. Please suggest an acceptable abbreviation.--

4755:

Atack's book as a source countless times myself in articles, but not in instances where it makes less-than-ironclad allegations about a living person. So you see, Tilman, I'm trying to

2205:

of the Scientology coverage here on WP is. This seemed like a good example; uninvolved people's names were dragged in with seemingly no concern for any effect that might have on them.

1073:

This isn't just "a" tabloid. The SUN is one of the worst. (On the other hand, the New York Post and the New York Daily News have been pretty reliable). Plus, the story has been denied.

12826:

Quote 2 from the source: "Since defecting from the Church in 2004, Mr Rathbun has made a career out of providing counselling and auditing services to other former Scientology members."

12342: 11423:

instead of any attempt whatsoever to talk it over here, despite repeated and varied requests to do so. In my view, that should indicate where this particular editor is coming from.

9147:

In my view, this material is not even debatable for the lead. I can imagine discussing his relationship to Tom Cruise in the article, but not in such a misleading and UNDUE manner.

9237:

The RSN seems to have a different read on this altogether pegging this as reliable and the issue more centered on how to treat the content in a BLP in context with others sources.

8810:-affiliated websites, but the majority are to news media sources - might provide some fresh info to find some additional sources from books not currently utilized in the article. 8221: 5577: 12546:

Miscavige is married to Michele "Shelley" Miscavige. According to IRS documents made public in 1993, David earned $ 62,683 and his wife was paid $ 31,359 as his assistant by the

7285:

It would be best to avoid usage of primary sources and self-referential sources, in describing the history of an organization specifically from those sources. Better to rely on

5977:

There is presently no law AGAINST it. Fraud is the use of false representations to gain an unjust advantage. Copyfraud is not legally protected and can be civilly prosecuted. --

5410: 1528:

The information was from a sworn affidavit. The information should be reinserted back into the article, but with correct clear attribution given to the source of the statement.

3564: 3330:

in keeping with Church policy on not employing persons with a history of criminal acts or criminal records. Hey, scientology itself shows Jesse Prince "criminal history" on RFW.

566:"Since October of 2005 there have been persistant reports on alt.religion.scientology and Operation Clambake of Miscavige beating high level officials, particularly Mike Rinder. 12823:

Quote from the source: "Mr Rathbun wrote that a "very reliable witness" told him that Miscavige held meetings where he brought transcripts of the tapes and read them out loud."

8336: 6459: 3839:

I wouldn't know what to add to Su-Jadas well-founded and sound argument. She/He's right, the APOBS book is biased and open about it. What's more to say. We wouldn't allow the "

12040: 11981:

years beaten, kicked and choked top members of the church. These are allegations the church aggressively denies, saying violence from inside came from those making the claim.

11667:

Okay thanks for the input. I am glad that I took the appropriate actions by removing the link from the article page and then bringing it here to the talk page for discussion.

9539:

This is a situation that affects many articles, and Miscavige is no different from many other famous people in that regard. Here are some other "unflattering" images in BLPs:

7202: 7127: 7055: 6977: 4962:

I can't have a discussion with men who call me condescending and sexist nicknames, sorry. You've disqualified yourself from being able to sit at the table with the grown-ups.

1518:

I've put a notice on the living persons noticeboard. I will continue removing the sentence since negative material about living persons is not limited by the 3 revert rule.

12809:

The source (ninemsn.com, one of Australia's biggest news networks) does include that Mark Rathbun is some kind of a competitor to the church of scientology so I added it in.

9219:

Appears to be a promotional interview or press release for a book. Neither RS nor non-RS as far as I can tell. Likely citable at most as opinion of the author of the book?

2954:

Nice try. What significance has this section other than random data of the order of "there are 17 people with the name David Miscavige in the Los Angeles County phone book"?

89:

Deleted the nonsense about David Miscavige accompanying Cruise and Holmes to the Maldives. Unless anyone can show that this actually happened and wasn't paparazzi drivle...

11927: 5892:

There are no laws against it, but it is highly unethical and is grounds for lawsuits. Including any commentary in the article is original research. That is not happening. --

11211: 4298:

You are misunderstanding something: it isn't important to just cite policies. You must make an argument, and explain how the policies you mention apply to your argument. --

3008:

According to that guy who recently defected, the people around DM are RPFed very often. This could explain why the RTC doesn't bother to put their names on the web page. --

7896: 7879: 6182: 5647: 4240:

However, I wouldn't mind at all using more "positive" sources on Miscavige for the article too, like himself on ABC, in the SPT, etc., if this hasn't already been done. --

3555: 148:

does no good, since that links to an article on actual Chinese schools, and not whatever Hubbard thought Chinese schools were like or what he used them as a metaphor for.

11958: 9103:, as pointed out, is a tabloid. Moreover, it's a tabloid that later serialized the book in question, suggesting that they had an incentive to emphasize the book's claims. 7912: 5104:

As I said, the federal judge in this particular case involved for the cited statement thought Jesse Prince was credible, and I remind you that BLP applies to talk pages.

3826:'s tell-all exposé, neither should Scientology articles place so much gravitas on the many tell-all books attacking it. Whether the information in such books is actually 2989:"The original motivation for the "No original research" policy was to prevent people with personal theories attempting to use Knowledge to draw attention to their ideas." 2359: 1398: 1798:

If we start listing unfounded and paid allegations on this page, it will be even more trashed up than it already is. What sense has it to quote disrelated allegations?

1010:

A unregistered user at ip address 69.12.131.206 removed a paragraph that was properly cited, thus verifiable, stating that it was "untrue". I restored that paragraph.--

9822: 7440: 6235: 5346:, which is different than the trial itself. all you have to do to defeat a summary judgement is show that a dispute exists, regardless of the strength of the evidence. 4931:

Wikipediatrix's comment that Jesse Prince is not reliable is very much Her Opinion. She has no survey results and seems to be POV pushing against Prnce's statements.--

4781:"Miscavige was observed at a July 2007 party held by Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes as silently scanning the crowd and not speaking with anyone except Cruise's mother." 12230:

You really need to consider your manners and your tone: if this is typical of you, it makes for poorer articles and a dismal environment in which to collaborate. --

6191: 5727:

like the Pat Kingsley-era Cruise interview contracts.) He was Tom Cruise's best man, have any pictures of him from the wedding surfaced (other than the stolen ones)?

5720: 1997:

What I do know is that the official sites are incomplete - you could have noticed this yourself, e.g. with the NYT site. See also my suggestion above, to put up both.

10998: 10304:"Scientology: The Truth Rundown - High-ranking defectors provide an unprecedented inside look at the Church of Scientology and its mercurial leader, David Miscavige" 7592:

and should be able to be used as a source in the article. I am interested to hear comments from others on this and so opening it up to the community for discussion.

3400:. There are far too many reasons to doubt the veracity of this source (including the affidavit at www.whyaretheydead.net/lisa_mcpherson/bob/affi_stacy2_04_29.htm). 2637:

Why did you have to log in? Did you work under another account? Knowledge doesn't require login after its done once. Only every few weeks when the server crashes. --

1838: 1812: 1790: 1584:

state that. I suggest you read statements #31-32. I'm putting it back in, with the addition of "according to former Scientologist Jesse Prince" to alert the reader.

1506:

Sorry Smee. This is a charge brought by one person. It may be true, however it can not be added to the article as a fact. Please read your own references. Thanks.

292:

In the context of a discussion about a private elevator for DM being added to the super power building in Clearwater, this was posted to the msg board of xenu.net.

13154:

on what has been described as "some of the most damning statements" against Miscavige, even more significant than the abuse allegations which have a similar length.

12848:

Contradictory? I think so. But more to the point it does not even hide that it is gossip and needs to be toned down appropriately to fit biographical requirements.

7505: 3125: 1620: 1522: 1421: 795:

Both images are valid. The ABC image is fair use, low res, screen shot. Why not have both, I have put the Celebrity Center/convention pic in the career section.

10412: 9520:

I looked online for a free photo, but couldn't find one. Lots of photos of Anonymous with Miscavige in the description, though. The Wikimedia Commons category for

8292:

What does it mean that "This information is sourced" ?? It is a contradiction to have these two different dates. Just trying to understand since I am a wiki noob.

6604: 5688: 5660: 12338: 9825:

I was giving you a subtle hint above, but I should be more direct; I don't know enough about the terminology or Wikimedia Commons to adequately translate these.

8286: 7311: 2236:

Third, these people aren't "dragged in". They are part of his family, nothing more, nothing less. There's nothing wrong in being a part of lil' Dave's family. --

724: 3228: 3219: 2161:

David Miscavige is not the "President" of the Church of Scientology. The "president" is Heber Jentzsch. David Miscavige is the leader of scientology, the Nr. 1.

501:

Currently the WayBack Machine at archive.org maintains a version of the RTC.org webpage that lists Rathbun. Of course CoS could have this deleted at any time.

12317: 12062: 4076:

I find it amusing that when people can't really atack a source, they use the "undue weight" argument as the ultimate joker to remove something they don't like.

761:

I'd have to disagree with Fahrenheit. I've also had dealings with D.M. and the photo of him was pretty distorted, to say nothing of being copyrighted by ABC.

12364: 3170: 13268:

Please help me understand how I might be able to make logical and reasonable edits to this page without preemptive removals. Thank you for your assistance.

13247:, Jefferson's interests of "his violin" and "love for wines" are clearly cited in the first part of the article. And, as you can see in Winston Churchill's 7728:. This is just as reliable a source as 'self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, knols, forum postings, and similar sources' 6655:

Exclusive...for the first time on TV...she was a member of Scientology's royal family. She says she knows first hand what it's like growing up Scientologist.

6538: 3334: 3162:

The two books can stay in as sources provided that the statements here are accurate representations of what the books say. The Prince affy does not meet the

1454: 635: 626: 151:

In summary, if you want to describe why one particular faction has claimed that patter drills violate "Chinese school" (or that they don't) then 1) do it in

13111:

and still find them violated (as said earlier). On the other hand I am still learning so we might want to invite a professional editor in to give advice.

13008: 12857: 12685: 12398: 11027: 7530: 3973:

It relies on three sources. And I just presented a fourth one this morning. Btw I would certainly also rely on Kitty Kelley, from all I have read about her.

2939:, and "the connotation that miscavige kinda took over is WP:OR" is a personal opinion of COFS, and is beyond the scope of this article to adjust. (Since DM 2369: 1802: 7477: 3191:

In this case, we have two sources. The book of Jon Atack, and the affidavit of Jesse Prince. As far as I know, scientology has not sued him for perjury. --

2992:

The fact that a number of people on ARS like to speculate about everything Scientology-related does not elevate this above the level of personal theory. --

762: 13336: 13293: 10787: 10716: 10049: 9675: 7007:"Scientology taking hits online: A growing number of critics and disgruntled ex-members are using the Web to attack the church's tightly controlled image" 5818:

Steve, your comment is factual, but it is original research. Not allowed here and you know that. Being "fair" is irrelevant in this case as it violates

3455: 3140: 1672:. it is and was common practice to register some works many years after they are first published, often only when legal action is contemplated. Note that 1196: 645: 480:

Incidentally, I don't doubt your addition "(Even historical news stories were altered to remove any mention of them.)" but I wonder where this source is?

265:

The IRS investigation and suicide of his mother in law you removed don't really contributed that much--even though she is the worlds only 5 shot suicide.

13163: 13120: 13097: 12818: 12751: 12720: 12640:"People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent." 12195:. I an not inclined to waste my time wrangling with an uncooperative collaborator, so you win: I will make no further attempts to improve the article. 11868: 11700: 11420: 7933: 6814:"The Passion of 'Anonymous': A shadowy, loose-knit consortium of activists and hackers called 'Anonymous' is just the latest thorn in Scientology's side" 4895:, but that seems to be down until tomorrow morning.) And editorials aren't always useful as references. Too tired to sift my archive for more right now. 8945: 8783: 7950: 7824: 7770: 7717: 7701: 7677: 7434: 6046: 6027: 6010: 6001: 5990: 5981: 5932: 5896: 5404:

the following takes place... they killed one of our directors... the FDA hired an informant... his wife was there, he wasn't for Scientology, she was...

5368: 5317: 5071: 4991: 4979: 4966: 4957: 4948: 3538:

tries to apply the standard that the Church of Scientology hasn't sued Prince to assert that the information in his affidavit is valid. That's silly.

3265: 2936: 2353: 1168: 343:

Sorry, with "BT" (body thetan) in your name I figured you were up on scientology jargon. DB is "degraded being," short hand here for "low class slum."

12707:

hasn't found it's way into any reliable sources because any reliable source publication's editor worth his weight would recognize that. do you have a

12441: 12089: 11724: 8931: 8916: 7845: 7751: 7737: 6221: 6211: 6167: 6118: 5914: 5877: 5856: 5839: 5826: 5503: 5490: 5476: 5436: 5426: 5219: 2317: 2209: 2187: 2152: 2076: 2041:

It is factual information on a notable individual. They are simply noted here, no other information is even really given about them in great detail.

656: 8983: 4892:"Intimidating the IRS Series: EDITORIALS" which seems to be echoing that NY Times story. (The text is available for free through their archive service 3350: 3248: 401:

Notable people that have multiple residences should have all their primary residences listed in the article (assuming the information is Verifiable).

8258: 8131: 6420: 6411: 6396: 6379: 6290: 6277: 6252: 6201: 6087:

How about putting it in a completely neutral tone, like you're supposed to. "Horse-hooey" was the nicest way I could fine to put what I was thinking.

5731: 5709: 5591: 5298: 5284: 5054: 5045: 5032: 4935: 4925: 4798: 3296: 1348: 776: 693: 182: 11974: 11889: 11299: 9919: 9787: 9767: 9736: 9669: 9655: 9534: 8188: 8148: 6135: 5809: 5796: 5753: 4612: 4599: 3183: 2138:

I see no reason why family members shouldn't be mentioned if sources exist. This IS a bio, and real bios in real encyclopedias mention such things.

1719: 1651: 1637: 1588: 1082: 872: 862: 848: 12952:

It says he did the recording after he was ordered to do so. Would you mind to add a link or reference or point out what is wrong with my proposal?

12476: 12421: 12386: 11416: 11217: 10215:

is only partially sourced. The source does not say anything about David Miscavige accompanying the Cruises on their honeymoon and does not mention

9175: 9055: 7862: 5779: 5462: 2996: 2977: 1345: 908: 898: 869: 845: 820: 796: 11599: 11404: 11248: 11216:

On Aug. 5, 2009 I undid an edit to the David Miscavige article made this same day. A whole paragraph of sourced material is removed by an editor,

11208:

denied these claims and provided witnesses to rebut them. However, Rinder and Rathburn said that violence is a standard occurrence in the church.

11182:

denied these claims and provided witnesses to rebut them. However, Rinder and Rathburn said that violence is a standard occurrence in the church.

10681: 10061: 10027: 10016: 10002: 9990: 9971: 9959: 9773: 6100: 6091: 5947: 5696: 5678: 5603: 5447: 5328: 4822:

Knock it off, knock it off, knock it off, knock it off, knockediknock. Leave a comment on Rookieboys page, I don't think he bothers to read here.

4788: 4733: 4526: 4167: 4107: 3375: 3337: 3150: 3107: 2873:

No, I didn't know this. I edit a wide variety of topics, not just scientology. Most are cult related, but not all. I also edit in other topics. --

2748:. You're either a really quick learner, or you did have an account before. But I'm waiting for other opinions before doing a checkuser request. -- 2072:

I can see no justification for mentioning any personal information like this, which is unsourced. I have removed mention of brothers and sisters.

2031:

To me it seems like it might be an invasion of privacy for these people. Is there any reason that readers would want to know about them? Thanks.

1890: 1699: 1687: 1481: 1367: 787: 224: 195: 13053: 13024: 12982: 12961: 12947: 12913: 12899: 12838: 12622: 11284: 10651: 8212: 8166: 6302: 6270: 6263: 6242: 5964: 5444: 4768: 4649: 4512: 4503: 4487: 4244: 3705:

mention of the mission holders' conference. So this interpretation of the events is simply Streisguth's misunderstanding of what Atack wrote in

3311: 2443: 2430: 2421: 2338: 1955: 1938: 1853: 1212: 1121: 1054: 1025: 799: 9851: 9834: 9642: 9631: 9611: 9582: 9576: 9156: 8077:

consensus about adding it in the external links section, it should not be added there either without further discussion and consensus to do so.

5271: 5177: 5160: 5093: 5083: 4826: 4816: 4004: 3855: 3834: 3574: 2813:

Tilman, I know what the policy is and I know how I would apply it. You brought it up so I am asking how you would apply it. How would you apply

2294: 2265: 2240: 2168: 1780: 1764: 1738: 556: 13300: 12416: 11862: 11536:

RE: the lede getting too long--I think it could stand to lose the second half of the opening paragraph, starting with "RTC is a separate..."

11278: 10959: 8062: 8009: 7628: 7522: 6438: 5763: 5350: 5337: 5233: 4998: 4916: 4908: 4899: 4881: 3275: 3204: 3195: 3082:: "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable — about living persons should be 3031:

I removed the "bona fide" wording. This is an expression from scientology PR. Plus, I removed the word "full". According to the IRS agreement:

2900: 2891: 2877: 2868: 2852: 2839: 2830: 2821: 2808: 2780: 2672: 2659: 2465:

is now asking to "explain your "PR" changes (or rather, those by SuJada) on the talk page." Every change I made was explained as I went along.

2408: 1827: 1563: 1466: 1067: 911: 823: 221: 179: 167: 152: 121: 105: 13194: 12774: 12346: 11678: 11662: 11579: 11545: 11527: 11491: 11452: 11333: 11315: 10769: 3505: 2091: 2059: 2045: 1878: 1864: 1532: 1510: 1403:

Although this sentence might very well be true it seems to be uncited, only a statement by a third person on a website, unless there is more:

538: 484: 384: 367: 347: 296: 283: 9859:

I brought this to the attention of a Commons admin and recused myself as I had previously participated in a deletion discussion of the image

9308: 9275: 9253: 9007: 8852: 8836: 8576: 8407: 7274: 6392:

Careful. There was a whole series of law suits that involved Yanny, and I haven't been able to find anything so far that sums up the result.

5805:

Please add more information to the article that explains the importance of the issue. As it is Mr. Prince's statement is just hanging there.

5248: 5203: 5194: 5137: 5128: 5108: 4373: 3747: 2968: 2686: 2641: 2595: 2365:

Only has 23 citations at present? I bet with a little nifty research we can find double that in reputable sourced material. Here we go...

1096: 1038: 510: 410: 128:

to quote the exact name and date and letter of the various policies cited by various sides as being relevant; here, it's not, because all we

10182: 6624: 6059:

There is a revert war occuring on this point with the cofs editors wanted to exclude it and the many non-cofs editors wanting it included.--

2958: 1914: 1014: 12506: 12488: 12010: 11844: 11239:

I agree that the IP should identify themselves, especially on a Scientology page, it is obvious that they have previous editing experience.

11153: 9470: 9352: 8716: 8672: 8624: 8588: 8541: 8447: 8403: 8355: 7207: 6554: 6550: 6315: 4889: 4677: 4664: 4636: 4560: 4535: 4478: 4433: 4393: 4383: 4364: 4302: 4293: 4045: 3737: 3626: 3617: 3608: 3473: 3434: 3404: 3119: 3033:

the taxpayers shall be entitled to an allowance of 80 percent of his or her fixed donations in connection with qualified religious services

2752: 2721: 2539: 2529: 2480: 2164:

Btw, you didn't answer my question. Is there some specific reason (unrelated to Knowledge policies) that you started this activity here? --

2142: 689: 12455: 12289: 12273: 12259: 12239: 12224: 12204: 12186: 12154: 12139: 12122: 12107: 12077: 10623: 10553: 10537: 10522: 10501: 10073: 9816: 9597: 9485: 9366: 3773: 2626: 2608: 2035: 12580: 11947:

Hugh B. Urban is a professor of religious studies at Ohio State University. This article is a good source of info on multiple topics. --

10119: 9228: 9200: 7875: 6899: 6790: 6679: 6367: 4645:

An edit block is not going to force parties to discuss anything. I think it will take a RfC. The block justs puts off the inevitable.--

4209: 3944: 3906: 3872: 3812: 3803: 3794: 3645: 3635: 2004: 1976: 1925: 11619: 11563: 11511: 11472: 11436: 11392: 10113: 5642: 5617: 2711: 2693: 2556: 2512: 2118: 1109:

I think that there is enough of a consensus that six sentences in a tabloid sourced to some unnamed "source close to the actor" isn't a

13032:"According to an anonymous former member of the Church of Scientology revealed in a blog statement in May 2010 by former scientologist 12788:"According to an anonymous former member of the Church of Scientology revealed in a blog statement in May 2010 by former scientologist 12655:"According to an anonymous former member of the Church of Scientology revealed in a blog statement in May 2010 by former scientologist 11964: 9166:

Scientology cirporate decisions. Saying "the only person" actually says that there is not "number two" so that bot does not compute.

5737: 3021: 2682: 2581: 2476:

harder to notice the changes. No way. I'll revert it again later or tomorrow, but wait first what the others think about this issue. --

2469: 1895: 1546: 1496: 1076: 432: 12608: 12573: 12034: 10704:

I don't want to seem like i'm blaming anyone who was discussing here - there was plenty of discussion above, but it wasn't both sides.

10374: 9879: 9410: 7222: 7076: 6698: 5613:

You and your comrade Misou have been quite active in the revert war as well. You point one finger at RookZERO and three at yourself.--

3520: 3096: 2496: 12444:. Thank you very much for doing that, and recommending them here on the talk page. This was a most constructive course of action. -- 10751: 10696: 10666: 10593: 8025: 7798: 7662: 4720: 4625: 3868:. His book survived several court cases - only one single paragraph was removed! Pretty good for someone you claim isn't reliable. -- 578: 315: 250: 11900: 10398: 7328:"Scientology's First Celebrity Defector Reveals Church Secrets: 'I was Miscavige's favorite boy,' says veteran TV actor Jason Beghe" 6777:

SCIENTOLOGISTS are at war with a member of their own family - the outspoken niece of the church's powerful leader, David Miscavige.

5133:

Sorry, I had missed F451's "entheta" burst. F, you got a COI there. Better prove what you scream around here. Ey, and knock it off.

4746: 4691: 4570: 2948: 2133: 2108: 1302: 596: 10037: 10033: 9981:, and I don't know what stance Commons takes. I'll ask someone else then, but this wasn't intended to impugn you or your mentoree. 7569: 7448: 6630: 4851: 4842: 4776: 4464: 4419: 4354: 4341: 3722: 3495: 3346:

CSI editors in LA. It would be helpful to the rest of us if the people at PAC Base could be sure to login before posting comments.

2389: 2179:

Steve, it doesn't matter whether the Pope is more popular or not. Anyone worthy of having a Knowledge article is obviously popular

1843: 12560: 10918:

was a current practice within the Church. Hill was responding to recent official statements denying this and other claims made in

9345: 7006: 5632: 5608: 3783: 3779:

Your argument that Jon Atack isn't a good source is the same logic as alleging that AA isn't a good source about alcohol abuse. --

3760: 6229: 6006:

You can't even post without calling me insulting names like "Trixi". And I still don't think you know what you're talking about.

5240:(From the results of the trial where Jesse Prince was found not guilty, that method would seem to be to allow a covert CoS PI to 928: 743:

I don't think the "game show host" shot is very good. It's flat and most of the detail of his face is lost (even when enlarged).

727: 11759: 3012: 723:

I prefer the other photo too, Fehrenheit451, and I don't see any reason to use the one you selected which looks wierd to me too.

670: 11118: 11007: 10440: 10433: 7871: 7327: 4870: 4804: 4593: 4566:

a source (who has again and again been proven to be reliable), we could as well give up and let Davie write everything here. --

3830:

or not isn't the point - it's a matter of undue weight placed on sources that are openly negative and self-confessedly biased.

2664:

That would even confirm my theory - closing the browser everytime is something for an office environment. Makes me think about

666:

I think that the previous image had his face too small in the picture so that it was indistinct. This image is a closer shot.--

13312: 13277: 10887:

For balance in writing up this topic, here is the official Scientology response to the St. Petersburg Times: www.xenutv.com

6454: 6363:

I'm not sure where the various Yanny cases ended up. Were these statements by lawyer Joseph Yanny ever dismissed or recanted?

4470:

The sources have not been "misquoted". To argue this, you'd need to show what, exactly, was misquoted, and how. You never did.

4444:

badly researched children's book that misquotes the material he cites as having used. Once again, this article is covered by

4041:

I did. Maybe you missed a link. It is right in this discussion, around 10 cm above this spot. Press reload on your browser. --

3622:

Well, the fact is high-quality sourced. Plus, as I said before, scientology sued him about all sort of stuff, but not this. --

887: 834: 765: 718: 13204:

I was flagged for attempting to add information from the #1 referenced article for this page, the Tobin St. Petersburg Times

12929: 12877: 12594: 12554: 12348: 11742: 10923: 8899: 8821: 8533: 7615:"print" - either way, not a reliable source and far far below the threshold for including such claims of physical abuse in a 5333:

Another judge in another case that has to do with the issue... That's a toughie! Oh, how about Judge Kane in BPI v. FactNet?

1627: 12336: 11760:"Former Scientologists Level Accusations: Ex-Members Say Leader David Miscavige Hit Subordinates; Church Denies Accusations" 10228: 9903:' is astonishingly bad as she takes photos and looks amazing in all of them but we have one of the worst images imaginable. 8088: 7977: 7708:

Not silly and not a slur, Justanother/Justallofthem. You seem to a have fixed view on any of my statements. I wonder why.--

7603: 6718: 6077:

Will refactor. We have no evidence of WPD's affiliations or gender. Also your "horse-hooey" adjective is rather uncivil.--

4904:

I found a reference that uses the same title of the article that the NY Times website does and changed it to that reference.

3687: 3598: 3551:

the removal of the poorly sourced contentious material I am removing the statements that use Prince affidavits as citations.

737: 12333: 11819: 10405: 10393: 10105: 9093:

This statement is, in fact, worse than tabloid. Here is a short list of reasons that it was POV and UNDUE in this article:

8108: 940: 747: 629: 567: 13040:

from 1978 to 2004 and is now delivering scientology services outside the church, Miscavige would discuss information from

12804: 12671: 12647: 12538:. The allegations were also reported Associated Press, The New York Times, ABC's Nightline, NBC's Today and other outlets. 12358: 4987:

Misou, please explain why Jesse Prince is NOT a reliable source. If you cannot demonstrate that, I am reverting. Start.--

2587:

You have not explained them. You used generalities. I, however, explained in detail what was wrong. I did not harass you.

2521: 1471:

Filing a coipyright registration, even a celarly incorrect one, is not a crime in general. In an extreme case it might be

11836: 11377: 11263: 11233: 9805:) raises some cogent points that I was previously unaware of. I agree with his assessment of the image and its uploader. 8100: 6163:

available to the reader who might wish to look further, but at least it won't look awkward in the middle of the article.

5653: 2455: 932: 812: 756: 13496: 12371: 11372: 9565:- but we would love to accept a better portrait if David Miscavige or the Church of Scientology chooses to release one. 9563: 7306: 3756:. One might include it and add the stuff about the "finance police" trying to get the money from the mission holders. -- 2742:

Sorry for your upsets, but there is more. The very first talk edit did not have the common newbie error of not signing:

709: 12742:

perspective we might want to take the word "still" out of my proposal. But otherwise I am not sure what your point is?

11708: 10727:

In the meantime the edits made yesterday stand, and new edits are being made to this article by at least two parties.

9860: 8881:

a radio program broadcast on WXYB AM in Tampa, Florida out of Hillsborough Community College. My program will shortly

6307: 6131:

is the result of the case. Does not look like a settlement or as if Prince's statement had impressed the judge at all.

5716:

What about DM's appearance at the L.A. Museum of Contemporary Art with Tom Cruise? Didn't any paparazzi snap any pics?

3044: 1005: 92: 12354: 7421:

Good sources for some interesting info on David Miscavige, as revealed by celebrity actor and (former) Scientologist,

5622:

I've invited him to discuss the problem he perceives with my edit, as I can see none (particularly since my edit says

2129:

on the BLP board. Someone dared to include his mother and sister, both named Maria Ratzinger, and both not notable. --

12613:

It should say that this is a rumor. At least in biographies involving celebrities, right? I'll look a little deeper.

11873: 11824: 11647: 11502:

was something I didn't know myself, and it should be in there in my view. You don't get any more notable than that.

11003: 8865:

Although the original uploader presented that podcast as having been broadcast on Hawk Radio (a college station, see

8049: 7152: 4547: 3799:

If you argument is only about the word, then why did you remove the entire section? You made no argument about it. --

3215:

lying about what he knows because he is an ex-member. Do you see something very illogical in that belief of yours?--

2018: 620: 12967: 12344: 12340: 10195: 9746: 9039: 7588:

Since the above interview is not simply text but an actual recorded audio file with the interviewee, this satisfies

6259:

articles on wikipedia and those were contentious, but nothing like scientology articles and particularly this one.--

5190:

The statement cited was used in Bridge Publications International v. FactNet, which was completely about copyright.

4483:

Looks to me like Su-Jada is making up wikipedia policy on the fly to suit POV and engaging in tendentious editing.--

3092:

complaints, such as verbal or written statement by Ms. Hubbard to that effect or any other verifiable documentation.

3039: 2385:

This only presents one side. Did Behar ever respond to this accusation? Did Aznaran ever deny his accusations? --

1322: 380:

How does the Knowledge report where they live for people such as John Travolta who are known to have several homes?

116:

description of what they are, the fact that some Scientologists view them as a change to Hubbard's practices, and a

10636:

It appears there's a moderate edit war going on right now - I have semi-protected the article for the next 24 hrs.

10631: 10565: 9863: 9396: 9087: 8266: 8204: 4452:

continues to try hold onto, and I will continue to delete them as per my reasoning here and above, notwithstanding

234: 12264:

You don't seem to understand what I'm saying... I'm not talking about sources, I'm talking about rudeness. Sigh.

9637: 9514: 2930: 239:"As a result, it appears that MIscavige is now not merely Chairman of the RTC Board, but the sole RTC director. " 12484: 12431: 12394: 12356: 11914: 7539:

a sufficient source for controversial claims made about the subject of this article? 11:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

5041:

Thanks, AndroidCat, so it looks like we have some OSA POV whitewashing going on with this item. I am reverting.--

4997:

Usually the rulings by the judge in the Lisa McPherson civil suit are taken out of context. The judge ruled that

4832: 4716:

to edit analytically on this subject. But my "feelings" have nothing to do with Knowledge. And these are facts.

3692: 2746: 1050:

utter fabrication and it seems content to be a blatantly unclever one at that. Re removing the Christ paragraph.

246:

I have modified the language to avaoid making an unfounded accusation. Does RTC publish a list of its officers?

12785:

as he is the main subject of these paragraphs. Look at my proposal and tell me what you think. Here is is again:

12278:

Let us focus on a discussion of content and sources, and avoid discussion of individual contributors please. --

12045: 11634: 11347: 10146: 9934: 9866: 9618:

Those pictures are of technically better quality too—they have better resolution with the possible exception of

9556: 9461: 9026: 6434: 5496: 5382: 4810: 3188:

Yeah, and a similar example of this logic would be: "the holocaust needs better witnesses than a bunch of jews".

1439: 907:, I am glad to see that we can discuss this amiably on the talk page, and have reached a compromise/consensus. 570: 144:

It's possible to glean from context that it's a policy authored by Hubbard, but that's it. Providing a link to

12518:

I tried to add some wording in but the artikle is locked. This what i tried to include from the above sources:

12209:

All I am asking is that we discuss individual sources, one-at-a-time. And also not add unsourced material to a

10783: 10747: 10712: 10647: 10609: 10187: 9802: 9382: 6068:

Well, that is a horse-hooey way of putting it, if for no other reason than wikipediatrix isn't a Scientologist!

5597: 3224:

I intend to restore the Prince affidavit as an article citation. I guess we will go into another revert war.--

1886:

Could it not be worded that his parents became scientologists and he later joined? That makes it very clear.--

997: 992: 980: 705:

I agree too. And those who want to see the face better can click on the image to get the bigger sized version.

76: 71: 59: 9821:

Incidentally, can you clean up the image descriptions for photos you had uploaded? I found some of them to be

8772: 5766:

testified that Miscavige had ordered that various materials authored by L. Ron Hubbard be registered with the

4492:

Unlike him, I am following wikipedia policy, so I will have to revert what he deleted again, at a later time.

1262: 13224:

in this discussion, I went ahead and added this information again yesterday only to find it removed this AM.

12047:= this edit removed sources, and added unsourced material. Let's avoid this behavior please, especially on a 10447: 10234:(Maybe someone wants to look into that specific passage right now - it appears vandalized. -sk, July 12 2009 10093: 9320: 9194: 8989: 8963: 8796: 8761:

One or two of the above are existing in the article as already used references - moving here to sort it out.

8045: 6234:

I have requested an informal mediation as the edit-warring and resulting issues have gotten far out of hand.

5547:

And what I am now suggesting, as the weakest and lamest of all possible compromises, is something like this:

2743: 2490:...in keeping with Church policy on not employing persons with a history of criminal acts or criminal records 2000:

Yes, these are anti-scientology sites. There are also some scientology sites used as sources on Miscavige. --

844:. What are your thoughts/comments on the locations/formatting of the two images at present in the article? 13265:, but this does not mean that every edit to a Scientology-related page is made by a "drone" of Scientology. 12352: 10419: 9718: 9213: 4794:

Shouldn't that be "and not speaking with anyone except the mother of Scientology's Jesus Christ"? Gone now.

12350: 12021: 11800: 11686: 10841: 10340: 10287: 8993: 8967: 8801: 8500: 8176: 6768: 6442: 5557: 5553: 5535: 5531: 4136:

The mission holders conference is an important turning point in scientology, it led to an incredible purge.

3547:, based on this evidence, a Prince affidavit simply does not qualify as adequate reference. As the policy 3479: 2857: 1559:

Besides, the fact that it is in a sworn affidavit does not mean we can repeat it as if that made it true.

1388: 1282: 5263:

In any event, such a serious assertion about Miscavige needs more sources than this guy's hearsay, as per

4360:

No, these are already secondary sources, unless they are about something that they observed themselves. --

3307:

Indeed. The judge did not say that he's a liar. Plus, this was in another case, not in the Erlich case. --

3179:. The main point being that such a derog needs a better source than an affy by a disgruntled ex-member. -- 1732:

renewal, if early by more than one year, was ineffective and was simply ignored by the copyright office.)

1407:

In early 1983, Miscavige ordered that various materials authored by L. Ron Hubbard be registered with the

13037: 12992: 12793: 12660: 12435: 12083: 11718: 9707: 9703: 9699: 9687: 9679: 8807: 8514: 4856: 3177: 3071: 2376: 697: 13284:

people in the US, came without earlier contextualization and is not referenced or elaborated upon later.

13220:

page, I have attempted to address this removal and how I disagree with it. As I did not hear back from

12995:

from 1978 to 2004 and is now delivering scientology services outside the church, Miscavige ordered that

12796:

from 1978 to 2004 and is now delivering scientology services outside the church, Miscavige ordered that

8118:

they could be used as cites. Without cites, editors can't just drop in unreferenced text, especially in

6925: 4862: 3659:

When an article has to resort to saying "another source wrote..." we are treading on very thin ice in a

428:

doesn't meet the standard for a "reliable source," especially for an inflammatory claim like that one.

13308: 13273: 13217: 12438: 12086: 11748: 11728: 11721: 11114: 9723: 9721: 9602:

Jayen466, you're rather pushing it with that bad faith link in an action that I'm not even a party to.

7157: 6055:

We need a Request for Comment on inclusion of the Prince affidavit about copyfraud from david miscavige

5873:

Not if it was legal and no harm was done. If otherwise please include that information in the article.

5561: 5067:

refers to discussion of reverts to the talk page, but does not participate in any discussion himself?--

5024:

04:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC) P.S. There might be additional statements on copyrights in cases involving

4587: 2313:

Indeed, Tilman, Steve Dufour's statement is irrelevant. I just added brother Ronnie with a citation.--

1292: 1272: 959: 38: 10849:

Additional source for use in article. Corroborated with additional accounts from other individuals at

2860:

then and we will leave it at that. (But you already knew where I was going with this one, didn't you,

1332: 733:

I think the photo with the blue backgrounds was better - the screen capture from ABC looks distorted.

13116: 13049: 13004: 12957: 12923: 12909: 12871: 12853: 12834: 12814: 12747: 12681: 12618: 12588: 10804:"Strength in their numbers: More Church of Scientology defectors step forward with accounts of abuse" 10779: 10708: 10643: 8394: 6859: 6520: 6428: 1631: 272:

Perhaps the story of the IRS and scientology deserves its own web page and just a pointer from here.

11075: 9525:

it under something permissive enough. Knowledge doesn't seem to allow no derivative works licenses.

8720: 6475: 1243: 10796:

Strength in their numbers: More Church of Scientology defectors step forward with accounts of abuse

10672:

its not just a recent news story either, claims of miscavige's violence have been around for years.

10109: 10045: 10012: 9986: 9955: 9830: 9665: 9627: 9530: 9152: 8451: 7930: 3580: 1725: 1411:, even though he knew that the materials in question had long since fallen into the public domain. 1218:

It looks like there are now lots and lots and lots of secondary sources reporting on this incident:

9715: 8157:

Until we can see what these "news websites" are, and exactly what they say, it's all pretty moot.

8051:, so presumably it is likely that not that many new people will be commenting in this discussion. 1312: 12375: 11840: 11341: 11011: 10387: 8941: 8927: 8907:

In the last 30 seconds, it says: "You're listening to WXYB Indian Rocks Beach, Tampa, 1520 AM" --

8895: 8806:

Could anyone suggest additional sources to use in the article? I note there are several cites to

8104: 8021: 8005: 7946: 7892: 7820: 7794: 7766: 7747: 7713: 7697: 7682:

Your silly personal slur notwithstanding, how about you do a bit of research. You might see this:

7673: 7658: 7624: 7501: 7280: 5835:

Then why not remove the whole item? I don't see how it gives the reader any useful information.

936: 12936:, it was Rathbun that conducted the secret videotaping operation, not some other individual. -- 11269:

I have been an occasional IP editor for several years and there was never a reason to register.

4410:

and I will continue to remove poorly sources clearly biased statements in this article, whether

13332: 13289: 13205: 13190: 13159: 13093: 12770: 12716: 11704: 11658: 11595: 11400: 11244: 10677: 10212:

and accompanied the couple on their honeymoon. David Miscavige's wife Shelley did not attend.

9266:

The reporter seems to only report what the subject said - how can we use it as more than that?

8912: 8676: 8332: 7908: 7841: 7733: 3698: 3631:

So we can find truth by looking what is being sued by Scientology (false) and what not (true)?

1786:

I have restated the sentence as an allegation. This is not the forum to debate legal merits.--

1233: 661: 13409: 13383: 10803: 10492:

discussed. Additionally of interest in Knowledge due to the recent Wiki-ban on some writers.

10454: 10251:"Scientology: The Truth Rundown, Part 1 of 3 in a special report on the Church of Scientology" 9978: 8827:

The RS I know of are already used in the article. Good job on working to improve the article.

7692:

Anyone, repeat, anyone. Now how does that make BTR more of a reliable source than YouTube?? --

6128: 6038:

After reading the copyright statute, I have found two sections that make it illegal to commit

5960:

I also don't know why you call it "fraud" when what he was said to have done was not illegal.

5852:

Steve, is it not useful information that someone would order copyfraud done on a wide scale?--

5418:

Even though we both know it's in all likelihood the same event, we don't know that for a 100%

1074: 13434: 13304: 13269: 13080:

as I already stated Rathbun's profession does not merit inclusion. it is simply setting up a

12547: 12326: 11970: 11110: 9062:

stated: "The only person who runs the Church and makes policy decisions is David Miscavige."

9059: 8979: 8832: 8369: 7545:

RFC closed - ran from 30 August 2008 - 16 September 2008. Seven users weighed in at the RFC.

6615:

section in list format looks bad, it should be converted to prose/paragraph format instead.

5767: 4582: 3754: 3200:

And if was only one Jew? (Not a very PC example but that is what you gave me to work with) --

3146:

Again, stop interjecting your own policy on citable sources. Please stop your POV editing.--

1408: 1165: 1064: 608: 164: 10986: 10974: 8966:

could provide more direct information regarding the specific source, and maybe someone from

6286:

There are no summons, mediation is a voluntary process. All the editors will be notified.--

4406:

continues to undo my edits and dismisses my reasoning. The 3 Reverts rule does not apply to

1542:

VSmee, it would be helpful, if you would READ the affidavit. the statement is not in there.

275:

There is also recent information that is probably accurate that DM no longer lives at Gold.

13462: 13112: 13045: 13000: 12953: 12919: 12905: 12904:

I only saw that he stopped it. Where did you see that he was the instigator of the action?

12867: 12849: 12830: 12810: 12743: 12677: 12614: 12584: 12472: 12382: 11832: 11696: 11624: 11149: 11142: 11126: 11106: 11080: 10907: 10808: 10735: 10308: 10255: 10224: 10151: 10101: 9607: 9540: 9390: 9189: 8680: 8636: 8628: 8584: 8537: 8411: 8262: 8254: 8208: 8200: 8162: 8127: 7784:

It is irrelevant that Headley is non-notable as we are not discussing an article about him.

6600: 6559: 6480: 6323: 3587: 2574: 2435:

There you go again. I'm talking about what can be proven as facts and you're talking about

2332: 1376: 968: 685: 675: 47: 17: 12244:

Well, the edit removed sourced material, and simultaneously added uncited material - to a

11204:

and two other witnesses said Miscavige beats and demoralizes staff. Scientology spokesman

11178:

and two other witnesses said Miscavige beats and demoralizes staff. Scientology spokesman

8751: 8707: 8663: 8615: 8568: 8484: 8438: 8382: 7412: 7361: 7257: 7185: 7111: 7039: 6960: 6847: 6752: 6591: 6508: 6350: 3679:

I am removing this section based on the following: Atack never claimed that Mary Sue felt

191:

Terryeo is notified to stop his personal attacks. He is on a personal attack probation.--

8: 13413: 13387: 13362: 13013:

Again incorrect. Rathbun is stating this himself, not some "anonymous former member". --

12480: 12425: 12390: 11991: 11479: 11274: 11192: 11166: 10850: 10365:

This story is getting picked up all over. Check google news for more supporting sources.

10303: 10041: 10008: 9982: 9951: 9826: 9711: 9661: 9660:

According to deleted contribs, this was the one and only photo he uploaded on Knowledge.

9623: 9526: 9326: 9148: 8860: 8184: 8145: 7927: 5585: 3485: 2604:

If no one else restores the NPOV version, I'll revert as soon as I am "safe from 3RR". --

2148:

The Pope is a little bit more important than the President of the Church of Scientology.

1412: 1252: 13182: 11254:

The IP-named editor was invited to talk it over and instead is back at it. Admin time.

9639: 6445:. Rather than revert the revert, I'm just posting the information on this talk page. -- 612: 12412: 12269: 12235: 12200: 12150: 12118: 12073: 11783: 11615: 11575: 11559: 11541: 11523: 11507: 11487: 11468: 11448: 11432: 11388: 11329: 11311: 11295: 11259: 11229: 11053: 10892: 10878: 10824: 10765: 10743: 10692: 10662: 10603: 10589: 10533: 10497: 10323: 10270: 9904: 9796: 9782: 9762: 9731: 9674:

I think the editor who made the CU request actually had it right. The Tazchook account

9650: 9592: 9509: 9480: 9376: 9330: 9293: 9238: 9044: 8937: 8923: 8891: 8694: 8017: 8001: 7942: 7888: 7858: 7816: 7790: 7762: 7743: 7709: 7693: 7669: 7654: 7620: 7497: 7244: 7172: 7098: 7026: 6947: 6834: 6739: 6495: 6450: 6408: 6376: 6337: 6299: 6287: 6260: 6239: 6218: 6188: 6174: 6153: 6144: 6097: 6078: 6060: 6043: 6024: 6007: 5998: 5987: 5978: 5929: 5893: 5853: 5823: 5750: 5717: 5706: 5639: 5614: 5574: 5487: 5459: 5423: 5374: 5365: 5314: 5295: 5268: 5157: 5090: 5068: 5042: 4988: 4976: 4963: 4954: 4945: 4932: 4813: 4785: 4765: 4730: 4646: 4557: 4496:

is not a joker argument to remove what I don't like. It is for poorly sourced material.

4484: 4425:

You are mistaken. The segments are based on three reliable sources. I suggest you read

3831: 3561: 3539: 3517: 3489: 3262: 3225: 3216: 3147: 3104: 3018: 2440: 2418: 2350: 2314: 2184: 2139: 2073: 1935: 1887: 1835: 1809: 1787: 1762: 1736: 1697: 1685: 1616:

statement of one person. It is still uncited negative material about a living person.

1479: 1051: 1011: 884: 859: 841: 831: 715: 667: 209: 192: 174: 9946:

like a screenshot (in both composition and metadata) on the basis that it hasn't been

9694:. All three accounts collaborated in inserting a "funny" story about Black Bears into 6686: 6375:

I have no details, but looks like information that could be included in the article.--

5481:

I suppose so. Or, we could at least rewrite it in such a way that the article doesn't

4944:

opinion, just as I have stated mine. We can take the matter further anytime you want.

2776:- And?? Can you please expound on what the consequences of that condition might be? -- 1475:

I suppose, but the statement above does not come clsoe to an accusation of fruad. IMO

1361: 13328: 13285: 13248: 13199: 13186: 13155: 13089: 12766: 12712: 11654: 11591: 11240: 10673: 10426: 10216: 10156: 10132: 10121: 9619: 9560: 9548: 9499: 9271: 9224: 9171: 8908: 8738: 8650: 8602: 8555: 8471: 8456: 8425: 8328: 8232:

The beginning of this sentence: “However, the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry has

8093: 8039: 7904: 7837: 7729: 7399: 7378: 7348: 7140: 7011: 6933: 6578: 6208: 6164: 6115: 5961: 5911: 5874: 5836: 5806: 5776: 5500: 5473: 5433: 5407: 5360:

POV template has been added back to the section under discussion that was removed by

5343: 5216: 4577: 4553: 3865: 3861: 3844: 3840: 3026: 2552:

The "new" para does not even mention that scientology got the tax exemption 1993 ! --

2262: 2261:

I wouldn't like it if one of my brothers had a WP article and I was mentioned in it.

2206: 2149: 2126: 2056: 2055:

They are not notable. I put a notice on the living persons notice board about this.

2032: 1875: 1850: 1648: 1617: 1560: 1519: 1507: 1463: 1432: 1418: 1193: 920: 592: 506: 406: 7887:

sourcing and complies with our policies. This does not and that is my only point. --

6416:

I know. I didn't want someone else just grabbing it and throwing it in the article.

3461:

The Streissguth book is online at google print, so you didn't have to search for it.

2098:

About Denise Licciardi - she is quite notable for her involvement in the DIGL scam,

1223: 13255: 13244: 13235: 13213: 12888:

stated that it was he, himself, who carried out the secret videotape operation. --

12330: 11894: 9025:

seems to be to remove this particular radio source, so I went ahead and removed it

8975: 8866: 8828: 8509: 7484:

Sorry, not an adequate source by a long shot for an accusation of that nature in a

7230: 7084: 4286: 4282: 3245: 3201: 3180: 3167: 2993: 2965: 2888: 2865: 2836: 2818: 2777: 2656: 2386: 2099: 1384: 734: 602: 140:

school" and no one seems to have considered that the average reader of the article

13458: 13358: 12649:. This is not made clear at all and I don't understand why this would be left out. 12530:, Tom DeVocht and Amy Scobee again confirmed allegations of abuse by Miscavige to 10639:

Please discuss on the talk page more, and edit the main page back and forth less.

10250: 9749: 9426: 8309:"pulled out of context items" (further drawing a parallel with the Virgin Mary, a 7761:

broadcast skills can do a talk radio program. It is naive to believe otherwise. --

4893: 4163:

So what. This is an article about Miscavige. Not "turning points in Scientology".

3767: 178:

us work toward a presentation as good as any other noteable person, still alive.

120:

description of why they think that. All the gory details should be saved for the

13323: 12017: 11205: 11179: 10238:

Mark Rathbun and Mike Rinder in special report on Scientology and David Miscavige

10220: 9603: 9418: 9386: 8158: 8123: 6596: 6417: 6393: 6364: 6274: 6249: 6198: 6132: 5793: 5728: 5693: 5675: 5657: 5588: 5565: 5539: 5388: 5334: 5281: 5245: 5191: 5105: 5051: 5029: 5021: 4922: 4896: 4878: 4795: 3848: 3492: 3347: 3293: 2974: 2945: 2861: 2402: 2227: 2087:

I have commented this out, pending addition of forthcoming sourced citations...

1716: 1634: 1626:

Your understanding is not correct for works prior to 1988, which is complex. See

1585: 1139: 1118: 784: 783:(Sorry, I meant the "This Is Scientology"—game show host image was missing info. 773: 744: 156: 6441:

does not have a proper rationale as of this post. My change was later reverted

5770:

though the materials in question might have had fallen into the public domain.."

4556:

and the Jesse Prince affidavit citation should be included in the bio content.--

967:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

13500: 13020: 12978: 12943: 12895: 12604: 12569: 12502: 12451: 12285: 12255: 12220: 12182: 12135: 12103: 12093: 12058: 12030: 12006: 11954: 11910: 11885: 11858: 11815: 11738: 11674: 11643: 11368: 11270: 10863: 10619: 10576: 10549: 10518: 10481: 10370: 10355: 10178: 9875: 9847: 9812: 9572: 9457: 9406: 9362: 9209: 9133: 9083: 9035: 9003: 8848: 8817: 8792: 8768: 8282: 8180: 8140: 8084: 8058: 7973: 7966:, or perhaps an inclusion in the external links section. What do others think? 7599: 7518: 7473: 7430: 7302: 7270: 7198: 7123: 7051: 6973: 6895: 6886: 6786: 6694: 6675: 6661: 6641: 6620: 6534: 5261: 5006: 4347: 4278: 3284: 2665: 1093: 1035: 217: 145: 5790: 4866:

as used in the reference. I'm not sure what to do for the time being.thoughts?

4608:

Yes, remove it. This is just a SEO related site. There are many like these. --

752:

It's a lot better than the screen capture of the ABC show. I agree with Joel.

13108: 12631: 12523: 12408: 12265: 12245: 12231: 12210: 12196: 12192: 12146: 12114: 12069: 12048: 11755: 11611: 11571: 11555: 11537: 11519: 11503: 11499: 11483: 11464: 11444: 11428: 11384: 11358: 11325: 11307: 11291: 11255: 11225: 11138: 10919: 10915: 10888: 10874: 10761: 10739: 10729:

I'm unclear as to what "semi-protected" means exactly under the circumstances

10688: 10658: 10599: 10585: 10529: 10493: 9792: 9777: 9757: 9726: 9695: 9691: 9683: 9645: 9587: 9544: 9504: 9493: 9475: 9372: 9197: 9073: 9022: 8785:, to try to get some additional attention from other editors on the article. 8341: 8119: 8016:

corroborated. I think that it should be minimally added as External Links.--

7984: 7963: 7854: 7834: 7808: 7725: 7616: 7485: 7332: 6880: 6723: 6446: 5469: 5342:

No need for sarcasm, I am trying to be straight with you on this. That was a

5291: 5264: 5153: 4761: 4705: 4701: 4670: 4493: 4457: 4445: 4426: 4407: 4333: 4329: 4000:...sources, what sources. None of those give the data you claim is in there. 3819: 3730: 3715: 3676: 3660: 3591: 3544: 3531: 3241: 3163: 3088: 3079: 2883: 2845: 2814: 2801: 2588: 2570: 2114:

Added info on Licciardi, backed up by reputable secondary sourced citation.

1820: 1759: 1733: 1694: 1682: 1669: 1668:

works with the copyright office, and failure to do so does not make the work

1476: 1164:

false information about Scientology. Wait another month and do it again. --

1114: 904: 895: 809: 753: 642: 617: 575: 553: 535: 527: 481: 429: 381: 364: 344: 312: 293: 280: 247: 10462:

There are probably others as well. These sources seem would seem to satisfy

5787: 5705:

You would be told to go away. Security may even deny that d.m. was there.--

5018: 2104:

Steve, is there some specific reason that you started this activity here? --

1462:

I don't think three websites are enough to accuse someone of a crime on WP.

1440:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/123249b5cdd90b0c

625:

Whats with the Category thing? does he fit the defintition of an autodidact

84: 13319: 13151: 13104: 13033: 13029:

Oh. There was something missing in my sentence. Thanks for pointing it out!

12988: 12933: 12885: 12881: 12789: 12782: 12708: 12703: 12656: 12627:

Here is what I understand as appropriate per the guidelines on biographies:

12527: 12160: 11996: 11630: 11419:

came back, reverted an "external link", and then registered a complaint to

11350: 11201: 11175: 10853: 10508: 10467: 10463: 10209: 9267: 9220: 9167: 8957: 8777: 8115: 8035: 7995: 7988: 7641: 7493: 7290: 6988: 6143:

Raymond Hill, would you care to do the edit according to your suggestion?--

6088: 6069: 5944: 5819: 5746: 5629: 5605: 5347: 5325: 4905: 4867: 4848: 4839: 4717: 4674: 4661: 4622: 4523: 4461: 4416: 4380: 4369:

For a "newbie", you certainly seem to know a lot about wikipedia policy. --

4351: 4338: 4325: 4274: 3823: 3719: 3684: 3614: 3595: 3552: 3452: 3401: 3137: 3093: 2983: 2718: 2578: 2526: 2466: 1907: 1897: 1110: 706: 588: 502: 464: 402: 9521: 6687:

To obtain a videotape copy of a program please provide the following info:

6407:

I did state "could" rather than "should". Yes, the outcome is important.--

4346:

Also, it seems to me that at least two of the books referenced qualify as

159:, 2) remember that your audience does not all come to the article already 13262: 11324:

I've gone ahead and incorporated a bit about the Time magazine article.

11197: 11171: 11129:

is not mentioned on this biog as a result of this passage being removed.

11085: 10471: 10128: 10068: 10056: 10022: 9997: 9966: 9929: 9552: 9183: 8197:

Maybe the so-called "SP Hall" in Hemet, CA is what you are looking for.

7589: 7422: 7294: 6984: 6917: 6667: 6564: 5667: 4743: 4709: 4696: 4688: 4633: 4609: 4567: 4532: 4509: 4500: 4475: 4453: 4449: 4440: 4430: 4429:

instead of using policy names as joker to delete stuff you don't like. --

4411: 4403: 4390: 4370: 4361: 4299: 4241: 4206: 4042: 3941: 3869: 3800: 3780: 3770: 3757: 3744: 3734: 3642: 3623: 3605: 3535: 3502: 3470: 3431: 3397: 3372: 3325: 3308: 3192: 3116: 3036: 3009: 2897: 2874: 2849: 2827: 2805: 2749: 2708: 2669: 2638: 2623: 2605: 2592: 2561: 2553: 2536: 2509: 2493: 2486:

Although it is not my job to show why I revert, I'll show some examples:

2477: 2462: 2427: 2405: 2335: 2291: 2237: 2165: 2130: 2105: 2001: 1952: 1922: 1903: 1777: 1380: 1364: 1079: 1022: 531: 423:

who got out. If there is some rule against this text, please advise me.

213: 11829:

How can Knowledge tolerate such a gross insult twords David Miscavige.

7645:

In other words, this is about as much a discerning "reliable source" as

6207:

charge Miscavige with a crime we can mention it in the article. Thanks.

1344:

At the very least, worth mentioning in the mainspace of the article...

808:

Sorry. I still think the photo is inappropriate, and is poor quality.

607:

The date is wrong, the IRS commissioner involved was gone by 1993. See

136:

summary and a link that can be followed by those who need more details.

13483: 13085: 13041: 12996: 12803:

The sources for this should not be blogs or tabloids, for example this

12797: 12670:

The sources for this should not be blogs or tabloids, for example this

12664: 11032: 10911: 10205: 9900: 9068: 9051: 6805: 6710: 6646: 6467: 5361: 5230: 5200: 5174: 5134: 5125: 5080: 5064: 4823: 4290: 4164: 4104: 4001: 3903: 3852: 3809: 3791: 3632: 3571: 2937:

Knowledge:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources

1973: 1911: 1543: 1451: 653: 12191:

Cirt, I find your manner here patronizing, hostile and a violation of

10040:. The agnostic Mormon is in league with the crazy cultists, I get it. 9555:. Any freely licensed image is preferable to a copyrighted image (Per 8870: 8072:

RFC closed after over a month and a half. There was opposition to use

6930:

Web Scout: Spinning through online entertainment and connected culture

6905:

Jenna Miscavige Hill and two friends start website against Scientology

13081: 13044:'s Auditing sessions that Mark Rathbun secretly videotaped." Better? 13015: 12973: 12938: 12890: 12599: 12564: 12497: 12446: 12280: 12250: 12215: 12177: 12167:. The info you added was unsourced, and we should discuss individual 12130: 12098: 12053: 12025: 12001: 11949: 11905: 11880: 11853: 11810: 11764: 11733: 11669: 11638: 11363: 10858: 10614: 10572: 10544: 10513: 10476: 10366: 10350: 10173: 9870: 9842: 9807: 9567: 9452: 9401: 9357: 9204: 9138:

Very rarely would it be important to point out that a third party is

9078: 9030: 8998: 8843: 8812: 8787: 8763: 8724: 8360: 8277: 8079: 8053: 7968: 7594: 7513: 7489: 7469: 7426: 7298: 7266: 7194: 7119: 7047: 6969: 6891: 6782: 6690: 6671: 6616: 6530: 6039: 5997:

Trixi, if you cannot participate in a civil discussion, then don't.--

5738: 4519: 3711: 2955: 2690: 2565: 2366: 2226:

First, you disrupted wikipedia ("I am trying to point out"), despite

2115: 2088: 2042: 1861: 1824: 1799: 1529: 1493: 11028:"Diana author names Tom Cruise as 'World Number Two in Scientology'" 6813: 4809:

I have noticed that a few editors are engaged in a petty revert war

4324:

If I may throw my 2 bits in, this might be a good time for a little

1951:

I don't mind linking to both, and having the official sites first.--

12999:'s Auditing sessions be secretly videotaped.". Any other thoughts? 11928:"The Rundown Truth: Scientology Changes Strategy in War with Media" 11769: 10201: 8885:

which is more convenient for most of my listeners. (emphasis added)

8519: 7468:

Haven't had a chance to check this out yet, could be interesting.

7383: 7370: 7214: 7144: 6874: 6818: 6796: 5573:

Only slightly different, but what difference a few key words make.

4784:

Can someone tell me why on Earth this would be in an encyclopedia?

2982:

Hardly a stretch. In fact what is being done there is exactly what

2233:

Second, you didn't even make research. Denise Miscavige is notable.

9725:. These look like joke/throwaway accounts of an established user. 9636:

FWIW, here's some background on the original uploader, Wen Hsing:

9116:

In fact, a denial is barely a relevant statement for inclusion in

7570:"Church of Scientology, David Miscavige, Marc Headley, Tom Cruise" 7449:"Church of Scientology, David Miscavige, Marc Headley, Tom Cruise" 6529:

Someone should incorporate this source into the article. Cheers,

5397:". Complementing D. Miscavige's claim with P. Cooper's passage is 4448:. I am required by that policy to delete sections of the article 4205:

could be proud of it. Or see it as a dark spot on a white suit. --

3131:

a larger work, but nonetheless it is poorly researched. There is

611:. There is a lot about this in the NYT article by Douglas Franz, 13228:

information into a new section? Is this information irrelevant?

11920:

The Rundown Truth: Scientology Changes Strategy in War with Media

10873:

in greater detail. I'll give it a shot if no one else steps up.

10032:

Oh, I get it, I'm a Mormon, contributing my Mormon pictures like

9431: 9427:"Former Scientologist Recounts Imprisoning Atmosphere at IntBase" 9292:

Perhaps quotations marks and applying attribution appropriately.

7650: 7646: 7319: 7068: 6998: 6197:??? The Prince affidavit is part of the article. Please explain. 5453:"Noting a similar event" which "could be associated" is the very 3671:

statement to this effect is highly suspect. But if some editors

3530:

Two recent edits relying upon affidavits of Jesse Prince violate

10707:

I would strongly encourage IP editors to participate here too.

6635: 5256:

Agreed. Not to mention Judge Schaeffer stated that Jesse Prince

5050:*sigh* "Misunderstandings" might might have been more polite... 1664:

In any case, even long before 1988, there was no requirement to

8296:

David Miscavige's Nightline interview: extraterrestrial beliefs

5422:, and encyclopedias don't deal in "probably"s and "possibly"s. 3847:

as a reliable source (or would we?), except for the article on

1450:

documents themselves? They seem like the most reliable source.

10906:

On January 25, 2008, Miscavige's niece and Scientology critic

9202:

to get some thoughts from fresh eyes on using it as a source.

9136:

are supposed to cover the most important facts of the article.

6685:

Found it, looks like videos are available upon request, here:

5028:, who had previously been a copyright lawyer for Scientology. 4289:

and if pissed off ex-members of whatever group are RS or not.

3017:

Even his wife Shelley has been in the RPF for almost a year.--

2681:

Yes, that is a very strange statement, especially in light of

1906:, you reverted two changes from POV-sites to the actual cited 13438: 12535: 12323: 11590:

you have my apologies, I appeared to have misread your edits.

5789:

I also doubt that Scientology have suddenly settled the suit.

1472: 10466:, as well as corroborate statements made by others in other 9559:, Images: 12). This image survived a deletion discussion at 8316:"that forms no part of current Scientology, none whatsoever" 1724:

I'm well aware of that chart -- I refer to it a lot over on

13221: 13209: 12163:, and should be discussed as to why they were removed with 9050:

In January 2008, when questioned about the allegation that

8951: 7374: 7323: 7218: 7148: 7072: 7002: 6921: 6809: 6714: 6650: 6471: 4456:'s attempted threats at applying the 3 Revert Rule despite 3512:

is a science fiction novel of the 70s. - Robert Livingston

1753:

already in the PD); or 3) have been improper but effective

9690:

another ten minutes later was to reply to Humanproject at

9581:

The people who commented at that deletion discussion were

7689:

that wants to be an internet radio host." (emphasis added)

6236:

Knowledge:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-08-31_David_Miscavige

2707:

The least I'd say is that its a single purpose account. --

173:

It surely must appear to everyone, as it does to me, that

142:

has no idea what "Chinese school" is supposed to refer to.

12531: 11986: 10999:

United States District Court for the District of Colorado

9741:

The image was taken from the OT Summit 2007 video, which

7789:

actions and influence Knowledge in an attempt to do so.--

5258:"has extreme bias and, in her opinion, lacks credibility" 4713: 3940:

a reliable source on psychiatry either, don't you? :-) --

3860:

You are libeling Jon Atack by comparing his book to the "

1632:

9950:

to be a screenshot? I'm not much of a Commonist myself.

8222:

There seems to be an error in the Nightline interview...

6298:

Informal mediation on this article should be imminent.--

5689:

Knowledge:Images and media for deletion/2007 September 2

3588:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/atack/bs6-3.htm

2896:

My watchlist has 356 entries. Hardly a "small range". --

2774:"The least I'd say is that its a single purpose account" 9586:

background colour looks like a paint-bucket job to me.

8275:

This information is sourced and should not be removed.

7077:"Scientologists Not As Litigious as Previously Thought" 6822:. Newsweek, Inc. pp. Technology: Newsweek Web Exclusive 5495:

What you suggest here is actually pretty much what you

1078:

So either delete it, or add that it has been denied. --

12041:

Removal of sources, and addition of unsourced material

11076:"Niece of Scientology's leader backs Cruise biography" 6555:"Niece of Scientology's leader backs Cruise biography" 6476:"Niece of Scientology's leader backs Cruise biography" 1363:) where ordinary people could "overhear" something. -- 208:

I see you have asked around about my above statement,

9940:

Is it normal keep an image on Wikimedia Commons that

9865:. I then went ahead and removed it from this article 9710:. Humanproject and Wen Hsing shared an "interest" in 5063:

I call it as I see it. And isn't it interesting that

5020:

So, no, FactNet and Jesse Prince are not unreliable.

3526:

Jesse Prince affidavits are "high quality references"

2404:

which claims that Behar recommended deprogramming. --

463:

That's essentially what was done with the page about

112:

article is the fact that Miscavige instituted 'em, a

12051:

page, and especially one within this topic area. --

11482:and was promptly banned from Scientology articles. 9353:

Knowledge:Graphic_Lab/Image_workshop#David_Miscavige

7987:

article should not be "back-doored" in by mean of a

6460:

Niece of Scientology's leader backs Cruise biography

6183:

Space for RfC comments on Prince affidavit inclusion

6042:. Am adding the prince affidavit reference again.-- 5745:

Steve Dufour's recent edit is factual, but violates

5648:

Nonfree images not allowed in living person articles

5276:

And Judge Schaeffer was making a narrow ruling in a

2290:

Your argument has nothing to do with my argument. --

11901:

Scientology Charged With Slavery, Human Trafficking

11421:

Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

11353:, and should not be used as a source on Knowledge, 8408:"Scientology church faces new claims of harassment" 7153:"Internet unites, emboldens critics of Scientology" 6320:"Scientology church faces new claims of harassment" 3902:and - surprise! - it IS what it is being used for. 2884:". . . or a small range of often-related articles." 2504:That is original research. You could as well write 2502:

Mrs. Hubbard never made such an allegation herself.

2360:

This article needs expansion from more citations...

1492:Restored material backed up by sourced citations. 1399:

Uncited negative information about a living person?

9450:Possible source for use in the article. Thoughts? 8510:"Scientology Leader Gave ABC First-Ever Interview" 7685:"Our streaming and archived shows are produced by 7441:Source, interview discussion about David Miscavige 7193:Good source that should be used in this article. 5986:I don't think you know what you're talking about. 4953:Go, Trixi, take it where your impulses tell you.-- 3333:person. Can't say that I understand that logic.... 2687:Knowledge:Community_sanction_noticeboard#User:COFS 1433:http://www.xenu-directory.net/critics/prince1.html 583:PS. Could someone archive the bulk of this page? 12932:) is patently factually inaccurate. According to 11995:starting March 29, 2010 will have a good deal of 11808:Source for material for addition to the article. 9754:Miscavige wears the same tie, shirt and hairstyle 7668:highly controlled with restrictions and duress.-- 7133:Internet unites, emboldens critics of Scientology 6653:will have a program called "Inside Scientology": 5674:tighter now—especially because of this incident. 220:directs us, a neutral tone, an infomative style. 13185:brings some light onto this entire conversation. 13107:says? I am reading the very good guidelines for 12159:The sources (multiple sources) you removed were 12082:Please make sure to back up newly added info to 8869:), the host of the podcast has the below on his 8319:"he's talking about the origins of the universe" 8242:incorporated into the Max Planck Society in 1954 3683:tricked her. Just that she "had been tricked." 3166:standard of "high-quality" and must come out. -- 2745:In your 5th edit, you already knew about "ref": 10098:Funny, now word on that in the whole article. 8988:Update: I posted notices at the talk pages for 8877:I am Tom Smith, producer and host of The Edge, 7312:First Celebrity Defector Reveals Church Secrets 3484:I notice that there's a lot of use of the word 163:what "Chinese school" means in the context. -- 108:and the controversy over them. All we need in 13352: 13350: 13348: 13346: 12322:How come there is no mention of the week-long 12318:No mention of Anderson Cooper reports or wife? 11754: 8305:to qualify L. Ron Hubbard's "Van Allen Belt": 6248:Very good. You might summon some people then. 2506:Mrs. Hubbard has no history of being a lesbian 1224:'Make-believers' find a new 'Christ' in Cruise 1138:I don't think the issue is relevant enough to 883:Thanks, I think I will indulge myself today!-- 13451: 13408:Joe Childs, Thomas C. Tobin (June 23, 2009). 13382:Joe Childs, Thomas C. Tobin (June 23, 2009). 13357:Joe Childs, Thomas C. Tobin (June 23, 2009). 12800:'s Auditing sessions be secretly videotaped." 12667:'s Auditing sessions be secretly videotaped." 12372:Scientologists Report Assets of $ 400 Million 12248:page. That is indeed quite inappropriate. -- 8226:On one paragraph of the Nightline interview: 4888:There is a St. Petersburg Times editorial of 2935:The references conform to primary sources as 6544:It is already in the article in two places: 6109:Maybe the part in question should not refer 5943:It "shows" no such thing, merely alleges it. 5654:Knowledge:Non-free_content#Unacceptable_uses 5152:Misou, it sure looks like you are violating 1628:WP:Public domain#When does copyright expire? 1263:Tom Cruise hailed as 'Christ' of Scientology 13343: 11874:Celebrities lead charge against Scientology 11869:Celebrities lead charge against Scientology 11629:Not sure about appropriateness of this new 11478:It looks as if the IP editor took the name 10947: 10945: 10910:claimed in a letter to Church spokesperson 9196:is currently used as a source. I posted to 8534:"Scientologists sue church for $ 1-billion" 4552:The David Miscavige blog is a violation of 3342:(The 205.227.165.14 IP seems to be used by 925:Does anyone know this guy's actual height? 616:I don't want to fix it without consensus. 13407: 13381: 13356: 12663:from 1978 to 2004, Miscavige ordered that 9862:. Another Commons admin deleted the image 9325:That image can be cleaned up a bit at the 7550:The following discussion has been closed. 7488:article. Please let's not try to have the 5199:Yep, but Jesse is not mentioned in there. 4975:I recommend you start behaving like one.-- 3733:does apply, and so do the consequences. -- 3084:removed immediately and without discussion 2683:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/COFS 1313:Tom Cruise is the 'Christ' of Scientology. 1269:(Subscription), New Zealand - Jan 24, 2007 13261:I realize Scientology has involvement in 10296:Overall report page for multiple articles 8721:"‘Church’ that yearns for respectability" 7811:articles provides. Makes me wonder where 6968:A very interesting development, indeed. 4439:Although I do not, at this point, expect 12646:very same ones he criticizes in his blog 11196:reported that top former Scientologists 11170:reported that top former Scientologists 11073: 10942: 10348:Sources to be included in this article. 10171:Possible source for use in the article. 10038:Commons:File:Gallivan Center skating.jpg 10034:Commons:File:Cathedral Madeline 1908.jpg 6187:Please place comments in this section.-- 13036:who served as Inspector General of the 12991:who served as Inspector General of the 12792:who served as Inspector General of the 12659:who served as Inspector General of the 11285:Critical info in lede--how to handle it 10958:was invoked but never defined (see the 6910:Good source, should be added to article 5670:in 1993, and I expect that security is 4700:David Miscavige page is a violation of 4460:clearly stating it does not apply here. 3808:You can't answer the question or what? 3570:F451, do you know how you come across? 3240:F451, you need to be more sensitive to 1213:Scientologists equate Cruise w/ Christ? 100:remember two things: first of all, we 14: 12171:suggested sources, not vague ideas of 11224:most sensitive subjects on Knowledge. 11025: 10801: 10301: 10248: 10144: 8507: 7379:"Actor: Scientology Is 'Brainwashing'" 4917:Jesse Prince and FACTNet not reliable? 965:Do not edit the contents of this page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 13497:"Scientology run-ins bring warnings‎" 13459:"Scientology run-ins bring warnings‎" 13427: 13410:"Scientology: Ecclesiastical justice" 13384:"Scientology: Ecclesiastical justice" 11925: 10987:The Scandal of Scientology, Chapter 2 10975:The Scandal of Scientology, Chapter 2 10924:Tom Cruise: An Unauthorized Biography 9142:something in relation to the subject. 9054:was second in command of the Church, 8114:Oh? Which news websites? If they are 7983:Material that is inappropriate for a 6269:The only edit warrior around here is 5391:mentions a murder in the Seattle Org 5377:'s "major claims require major proof" 3753:And here's another reputable source: 3052:There is inadequate documentation in 2023:What is the purpose of this section? 1333:Tom Cruise dubbed Scientology's Jesus 1323:Tom Cruise, Scientology’s New Messiah 13435:"Scientology: A History of Violence" 12434:) has helpfully suggested some good 12376:Scientology's Record on Human Rights 11074:Jacobsen, Jonny (January 28, 2008). 11067: 9756:, and yes, the background was blue. 9424: 7368: 7208:New source of info to add to article 6548: 6152:I have made a request for comment.-- 5687:Could someone else comment here (or 5602:I'm sick of this! I've reported you 5552:Miscavige also said that the "APA , 5530:Miscavige also said that the "APA , 5280:than Judge Kane. What's your point? 3126:Streissguth's "Scientology Teachers" 2401:I found a scientology black PR pack 1676:a copyright is quite different from 1244:It's official - Tom Cruise is divine 946: 25: 13482:"World Number Two in Scientology," 12068:Gee, thanks for all of your help. 11054:"Cruise and Holmes go on honeymoon" 10950: 9678:fifteen minutes after HumanProject 9557:Knowledge:Non-free_content#Images_2 8714: 8445: 6803: 6708: 1930:There's no reason we can't link to 1580:Misou, the affidavit quite clearly 636:Where is Miscavige on "the Bridge"? 328:"how DB it was?" Please translate! 23: 12918:Check again. The proposed text by 12495:Very good suggestions, agreed. -- 11965:Scientology: A History of Violence 11016:, Civil Action No. 95-K-2143, 1998 8622: 8389:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 8353: 7724:I think BlogTalkRadio falls under 7317: 6854:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 6515:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 3586:book referred to? It's online at 3274:Small point: The judge ruled that 1303:Tom Cruise is Scientology 'Christ' 24: 13523: 13208:. My information was removed by 11926:Urban, Hugh B. (March 17, 2010). 10007:You think I'm an SPA at commons? 9720:. Scientology edits by Tazchook: 8670: 8358:). "Sinking the Master Mariner". 7567: 7446: 7138: 6996: 6915: 6689:. So that would be verifiable. 6465: 5758:Here is the section in question: 4847:I'll take the silence as consent. 4708:. Let's get something straight, 2653:"Knowledge doesn't require login" 2101:this was reported by the press. 1600:Here is the section is question: 13216:citation. As you can see in my 12378:" (newsblaze.com Mar 2, 2007). 11717:The information is supported by 10127:Quote from former Scientologist 8401: 7872:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 7535:Is an audio interview hosted on 7265:See in particular page 3 of 4. 7212: 7066: 6631:Inside Edition, February 5, 2008 6313: 5762:"*In 1983, former Scientologist 5395:major claims require major proof 4777:Knowledge is not a gossip column 4332:. I agree per what I've read on 4103:That's wikipediatrix to answer. 2717:quite incensed by these remarks. 1844:Second-generation Scientologist? 1317:PR-Inside.com (Pressemitteilung) 950: 587:Yes I can, you lazy bastard! :) 29: 13489: 13476: 13401: 12711:which you feel bears inclusion? 9425:Baca, Nathan (March 18, 2009). 9114:It is not even about Miscavige. 6230:Informal mediation case created 4760:about being fair and following 4508:3RR report filed on Su-Jada. -- 3675:fail to see that this violates 3604:What, exactly is your point? -- 2125:Steve, you should also mention 13375: 12880:) is incorrect. Per the cited 11743:12:50, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 11383:take it straight to an admin. 11046: 11019: 10991: 10979: 10967: 10802:Childs, Joe (August 2, 2009). 8452:"The Mind Behind the Religion" 8089:03:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 6303:05:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 6173:I have no objection to that.-- 4805:Stop the petty revert warring! 3328:said, in this same talk page: 2848:. That tells what it means. -- 2349:That is Ron Sr., his father.-- 104:an article now for describing 13: 1: 13212:, at first, as a result of a 12555:Tom Cruise confessional files 11890:00:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 11878:talks about David Miscavige. 10302:Childs, Joe (June 21, 2009). 10249:Childs, Joe (June 21, 2009). 10145:Atkins, Ross (May 26, 2009). 10131:as guest of radio program on 9066:Removed this info sourced to 8990:Knowledge:WikiProject Florida 8964:Knowledge:WikiProject Florida 8287:20:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 8120:biographies of living persons 8063:05:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 8026:18:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 8010:14:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 7978:01:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 7951:00:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 7934:09:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 7913:21:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 7897:02:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 7880:20:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 7863:07:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 7846:22:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 7825:05:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 7799:00:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 7771:00:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 7752:13:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 7738:05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 7718:00:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 7702:00:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 7678:22:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 7663:02:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 6978:21:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 6719:"Family Feud In Tom's Church" 6636:http://www.insideedition.com/ 6421:05:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 6222:23:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 6212:01:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 6178:00:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 6168:21:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 6114:more relevant to the reader. 5732:02:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 5721:00:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 5710:23:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 5697:07:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 5592:03:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 5468:agreement, can we agree on a 3667:wrote or recorded in any way 3176:On the credibility of Prince 2826:I welcome any suggestions. -- 2550:In 1991 Miscavige went to.... 1896:POV-sites more valuable than 1293:Tom Cruise compared to Christ 1283:Tom Cruise compared to Christ 1169:03:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 719:18:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 710:02:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 671:23:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 657:16:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 646:17:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 279:What is the source of that? 11999:source material. Cheers, -- 11934:. www.religiondispatches.org 11915:03:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 11863:14:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC) 11845:06:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC) 11820:20:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 11026:Tapper, James (2008-01-07). 10852:, as well as multiple other 10067:within the last six months. 9743:is partially on video google 9385:) for the suggestion and to 8994:Knowledge:WikiProject Oregon 8970:could do the same about the 8968:Knowledge:WikiProject Oregon 8946:19:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 8932:19:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 8917:19:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 8900:19:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 8677:"The man behind Scientology" 8337:18:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 8213:22:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 8177:Rehabilitation Project Force 6900:11:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 6791:11:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 6699:17:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 6680:17:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 6625:19:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 6605:19:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 6539:22:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 6455:02:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 5775:the article should be fair. 5625:exactly what the source says 5558:Food and Drug Administration 5536:Food and Drug Administration 5525:No. This is what I removed: 4706:biography of a living person 4273:Not the issue. The issue is 3661:biography of a living person 3545:biography of a living person 1368:16:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1349:08:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1122:14:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1097:10:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1083:09:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1068:07:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1055:09:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1039:06:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1034:I fully concur with Tilman. 1026:20:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 1015:20:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 941:02:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 630:05:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 7: 13337:00:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC) 13313:22:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 13294:21:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 13278:18:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC) 13038:Religious Technology Center 12993:Religious Technology Center 12794:Religious Technology Center 12661:Religious Technology Center 11679:22:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 11663:04:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 11648:02:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 11620:04:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 11600:04:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 11580:00:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 11570:corporate structure, etc. 11378:Reverting to Aug. 5 version 8808:Religious Technology Center 8189:05:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 7629:21:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 7604:11:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 7523:11:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 7506:05:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 6412:14:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6397:14:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6380:14:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6368:14:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6291:05:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6278:05:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6264:05:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6253:05:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6243:04:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6202:09:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6192:01:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6157:01:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6148:01:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6136:09:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6119:01:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6101:01:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6092:00:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6082:00:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6073:00:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6064:00:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 6047:22:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 6028:17:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 6011:17:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 6002:17:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5991:16:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5982:14:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5965:04:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5948:04:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5933:04:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5915:04:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5897:03:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5878:02:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5857:02:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5840:02:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5827:02:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 5810:13:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 5797:13:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 5780:11:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 5754:05:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 5679:04:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5661:04:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5643:23:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5633:23:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5618:23:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5609:01:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5578:19:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5504:19:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5491:13:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5477:12:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5463:01:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5448:01:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5437:22:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5427:22:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5411:20:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5369:17:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5351:22:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5338:20:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5329:18:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5318:18:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5299:14:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5285:14:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5272:12:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5249:14:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5234:07:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5220:06:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5204:05:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5195:05:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5178:05:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5161:05:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5138:05:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5129:04:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5109:04:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5094:04:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5084:04:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5072:04:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5055:04:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5046:04:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5033:04:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 5001:was not a reliable hostile 4992:02:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4980:01:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4967:01:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4958:01:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4949:01:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4936:01:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4926:17:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4909:18:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 4900:04:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 4882:03:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 4871:22:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 4852:21:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 4843:05:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 4827:23:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 4817:07:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 3396:Your logic is interesting, 3278:was not a reliable hostile 3072:Biography of living persons 3035:. That is hardly "full". -- 2456:Recent Edits and Reversions 912:07:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 899:07:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 888:01:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 873:01:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 863:01:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 849:01:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 835:00:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 824:07:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 813:07:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 800:06:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 788:12:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 777:05:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 766:02:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 757:02:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 748:00:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 738:23:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 728:23:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 621:13:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 597:23:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 579:00:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 557:13:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 539:03:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 511:23:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 485:13:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 433:01:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 411:23:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 385:13:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 368:03:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 348:13:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 316:02:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 297:02:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 284:01:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 251:01:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 225:01:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 196:01:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 183:18:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 13528: 13263:Knowledge and the Internet 12579:The entire subsection was 12035:17:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 12011:15:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 11959:19:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 11851:Can you be more specific? 11729:Knowledge:No legal threats 11564:23:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11546:19:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11528:19:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11512:19:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11492:19:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11473:18:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11453:17:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11437:16:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11405:15:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11393:08:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11373:06:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11334:19:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11316:08:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11300:00:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 11279:06:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 11264:08:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 11249:07:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 11234:04:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 11154:07:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10897:14:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10883:06:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 10868:06:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 10788:00:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 10778:That is exactly correct. 10770:23:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10752:22:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10717:22:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10697:17:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10682:16:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10667:08:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10652:08:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 10379:Good point, here are some: 10114:23:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 10074:21:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 10062:20:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 10050:20:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 10028:20:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 10017:20:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 10003:20:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9991:20:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9972:19:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9960:18:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9935:18:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9920:06:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 9880:20:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9852:19:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9835:19:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9817:18:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9788:17:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9768:16:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9737:16:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9670:15:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9656:15:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9632:15:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9598:12:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 9577:03:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 9535:03:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 9515:01:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 9486:10:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 9462:17:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9411:07:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 9367:17:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9346:10:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9309:03:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 9276:17:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9254:12:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9229:11:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9214:20:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 9176:10:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9157:17:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 9088:05:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 9058:, general counsel for the 9040:05:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 9008:21:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8984:21:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8853:20:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8837:20:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8822:20:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8797:20:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8773:19:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 8508:Koppel, Ted (1992-02-14). 8175:you might be referring to 7779:Statement by Fahrenheit451 7742:Fair enough. Good call. -- 7609:Statement by Justallofthem 7478:09:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 7435:08:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 7275:11:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 7203:10:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 7158:Fort Wayne Journal Gazette 6926:"Kids against Scientology" 6781:It goes on from there... 6308:Accusation by Joseph Yanny 5562:The Scandal of Scientology 4812:. Time to knock it off.-- 3822:article doesn't depend on 1839:20:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 1828:02:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1813:01:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1803:22:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1791:22:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1279:, Australia - Jan 24, 2007 1253:Tom Cruise a False Christ? 1006:Reverted deleted paragraph 13322:necessary while avoiding 12507:17:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 12489:15:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 12456:04:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 12417:00:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 12399:21:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12290:16:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12274:16:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12260:16:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12240:16:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12225:16:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12205:16:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12187:10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12155:05:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12140:05:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12123:05:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12108:04:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12078:04:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 12063:03:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 11825:insulting David Miscavige 10624:09:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 10594:16:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 10554:22:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 10538:10:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 10523:04:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 10502:01:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 10486:17:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 10375:15:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 10360:06:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 10021:Do you think you aren't? 9776:as a copyvio at Commons. 9774:nominated it for deletion 9612:04:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8048:) removed the RFC notice 7307:21:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 7128:18:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 7056:05:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 6983:Update, now mentioned in 6611:I see. The look of that 5278:completely different case 4799:21:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 4789:20:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 4769:20:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4747:18:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4734:17:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4721:17:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4692:15:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4678:02:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4665:02:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4650:00:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4637:19:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 4626:17:04, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 4613:10:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 4600:10:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 4571:19:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4561:00:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 4548:Suggestions during hiatus 4536:19:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4527:18:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4513:17:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4504:12:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4488:05:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4479:05:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 4465:22:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4434:22:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4420:22:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4394:22:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4384:22:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4374:21:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4365:21:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4355:18:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4342:18:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4303:05:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4294:20:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 4245:20:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 4210:05:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4168:20:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 4108:20:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 4046:05:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 4005:20:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3945:05:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 3907:20:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3873:20:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3856:20:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3835:19:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3813:19:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3804:17:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3795:15:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3784:05:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3774:17:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 3761:05:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3748:05:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3738:05:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 3723:22:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 3688:23:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 3646:19:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 3636:18:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 3627:04:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 3618:18:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 3609:18:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 3599:18:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 3575:17:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 3521:19:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 3506:04:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3496:04:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3474:15:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 3456:03:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 3435:20:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3405:19:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3376:18:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3351:21:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3338:17:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3312:04:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3297:02:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3266:22:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3249:19:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3229:18:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3220:18:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3205:19:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3196:18:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3184:18:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3171:18:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3151:06:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3141:06:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3120:16:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3108:06:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3097:06:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3040:09:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 3022:06:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 3013:08:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2997:05:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 2978:05:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 2969:18:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2959:15:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2949:05:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2901:19:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2892:18:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2878:15:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2869:15:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2853:14:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2844:I pointed to the policy: 2840:14:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2831:12:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2822:12:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2809:08:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2781:18:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2753:09:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2722:19:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2712:10:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2694:08:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2673:09:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2660:18:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2642:06:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2627:09:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 2609:10:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2596:06:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2582:21:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2557:19:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2540:06:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2530:21:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2513:19:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2497:19:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2481:19:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2470:18:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2019:Why mention his siblings? 1879:01:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1865:22:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1854:04:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1781:23:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 1765:17:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1739:21:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1720:21:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1700:21:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1688:21:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1652:20:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1638:20:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1621:19:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1589:18:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1564:14:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1547:05:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1533:05:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1523:04:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1511:04:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1497:04:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1482:21:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1467:03:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1455:13:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1422:04:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1197:14:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 840:Very interesting indeed, 168:14:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 13195:21:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 13164:21:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 13121:18:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 13098:18:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 13054:18:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 13025:18:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 13009:18:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12983:18:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12962:18:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12948:18:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12914:18:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12900:03:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12858:18:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12839:18:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12819:18:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12775:03:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12752:01:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 12721:22:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC) 12686:20:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC) 12623:20:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC) 12609:01:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC) 12574:14:00, 10 May 2010 (UTC) 12335:and many other articles. 12329:? It was covered by the 12016:Update, a post from Mr. 10997:Jesse Prince affidavit, 10632:Semiprotected for 24 hrs 10566:Is this quibble notable? 10229:03:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 10183:02:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 9107:The claim is misleading. 8883:reincarnate as a podcast 8167:18:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 8149:16:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 8132:06:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 8109:03:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC) 7553:Please do not modify it. 5741:is not legal in the U.S. 3565:20:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 3556:05:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 2986:was designed to prevent: 2444:13:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 2431:11:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 2422:18:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 2409:18:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 2390:22:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 2370:14:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2354:03:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 2339:05:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 2318:04:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 2295:04:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 2266:00:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 2241:19:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2210:19:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2188:19:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2169:19:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2153:19:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2143:18:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2134:18:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2119:18:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2109:18:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2092:15:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2077:15:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2060:13:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2046:13:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 2036:13:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1726:Distributed Proofreaders 1319:, Austria - Jan 23, 2007 1273:Tom Cruise is 'a Christ' 235:Corrections and New Data 12365:discussed the AC report 11415:afterwards, the editor 11004:Bridge Publications Inc 10902:Allegations of violence 10449:San Francisco Chronicle 10243:First article in series 8303:more than one statement 8247:Look at the bold text. 8234:only existed since 1966 7576:. www.blogtalkradio.com 7455:. www.blogtalkradio.com 5156:again. Knock it off.-- 4833:Jesse Prince Allegation 3693:Mission Holders Section 2564:. After insisting that 2005:18:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 1977:17:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 1956:16:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1939:05:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1926:05:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1915:01:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1891:02:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 1228:Florida Baptist Witness 12559:Added new subsection, 12552: 12540: 12534:'s Anderson Cooper on 11983: 11975:www.newsonnews.net/cnn 11056:. BBC News. 2006-11-19 10188:Inaccuracy (corrected) 10169: 10147:"What is scientology?" 9193:, namely this article 9064: 8887: 8746:Check date values in: 8702:Check date values in: 8658:Check date values in: 8610:Check date values in: 8577:"Intimidating the IRS" 8563:Check date values in: 8479:Check date values in: 8433:Check date values in: 8377:Check date values in: 8322:"I'd never heard that" 7999: 7691: 7644: 7635:What Is BlogTalkRadio? 7407:Check date values in: 7356:Check date values in: 7336:. www.villagevoice.com 7252:Check date values in: 7180:Check date values in: 7106:Check date values in: 7034:Check date values in: 6955:Check date values in: 6871: 6842:Check date values in: 6779: 6747:Check date values in: 6586:Check date values in: 6503:Check date values in: 6361: 6345:Check date values in: 5598:3RR Report on RookZERO 5571: 5545: 2991: 1327:Bodog Beat, Costa Rica 1257:The Conservative Voice 124:article. There, it's 12548:Church of Scientology 12544: 12520: 11978: 11121:) 2009-08-05T17:57:32 10137: 10094:hitting staff members 9714:in early April 2007: 9445:Video at www.kesq.com 9321:Lede image in infobox 9060:Church of Scientology 9048: 8936:Clear ID at 35:30. -- 8875: 8361:Sunday Times Magazine 7992: 7683: 7638: 6866: 6775: 6357: 5768:U.S. Copyright Office 5549: 5527: 5009:), but about what he 3287:), but about what he 2987: 2931:DM's sole RTC listing 2183:to get a normal bio. 1409:U.S. Copyright Office 1379:comment was added by 963:of past discussions. 931:comment was added by 609:Fred T. Goldberg, Jr. 42:of past discussions. 13463:St. Petersburg Times 13359:"The Truth Run Down" 11758:(October 23, 2009). 11687:Accused of vandalism 11349:- this source fails 11143:Jenna Miscavige Hill 11127:Jenna Miscavige Hill 11012:Lawrence Wollersheim 10954:The named reference 10908:Jenna Miscavige Hill 10809:St. Petersburg Times 10780:Georgewilliamherbert 10709:Georgewilliamherbert 10644:Georgewilliamherbert 10309:St. Petersburg Times 10256:St. Petersburg Times 10200:Miscavige served as 10152:World: Have Your Say 9979:m:Copyright paranoia 9541:Sinbad (entertainer) 9190:The Portland Mercury 8950:Have to assume that 8802:Additional sources ? 8681:St. Petersburg Times 8637:St. Petersburg Times 8585:St. Petersburg Times 8538:St. Petersburg Times 8412:St. Petersburg Times 6659:Does anyone know if 6481:Agence France-Presse 6324:St. Petersburg Times 3729:all about. And yes, 3480:That vandalism thing 1277:Melbourne Herald Sun 1246:, January 26, 2007, 18:Talk:David Miscavige 13414:St Petersburg Times 13388:St Petersburg Times 13363:St Petersburg Times 12884:secondary sources, 12362:St Petersburg Times 11992:Anderson Cooper 360 11985:This series on the 11932:Religion Dispatches 11193:St Petersburg Times 11167:St Petersburg Times 10856:secondary sources. 10208:'s 2006 wedding to 9712:Lost, Aberdeenshire 9583:Cirt and AndroidCat 9399:) for helping out. 7833:Please remember to 7531:Request for Comment 6727:. NYP Holdings, Inc 4857:Problem with a link 3699:young readers' book 2377:Nightline Interview 1309:, UK - Jan 23, 2007 1307:Now Magazine Online 1299:, UK - Jan 24, 2007 1259:, NC - Jan 29, 2007 1240:, CA - Jan 28, 2007 13503:. October 24, 1993 11791:Unknown parameter 11749:ABC News Nightline 11727:. And please read 10832:Unknown parameter 10812:. www.tampabay.com 10388:Philadelphia Metro 10331:Unknown parameter 10278:Unknown parameter 10120:Possible source - 9351:Thanks, posted to 8715:Kennedy, Dominic ( 8671:Tobin, Thomas C. ( 8491:Unknown parameter 7815:priorities lie. -- 6759:Unknown parameter 6709:Johnson, Richard ( 6127:I understand that 5652:Reading guideline 5375:User:Wikipediatrix 3490:Knowledge:Civility 3158:25 June 2007 (UTC) 1287:China Daily, China 1267:New Zealand Herald 1230:, FL - Feb 7, 2007 1113:, especially with 210:User:Fahrenheit451 175:User:Fahrenheit451 13318:come up with the 12806:seems sufficient. 12673:seems sufficient. 12492: 12475:comment added by 12442:secondary sources 12402: 12385:comment added by 12090:secondary sources 11835:comment added by 11725:secondary sources 11713: 11699:comment added by 11111:Michaeljefferson 11109:comment added by 10985:Paulette Cooper: 10973:Paulette Cooper: 10755: 10738:comment added by 10456:Houston Chronicle 10435:Los Angeles Times 10217:Shelley Miscavige 10157:BBC World Service 10133:BBC World Service 10122:BBC World Service 10104:comment added by 9686:, and Tazchook's 9620:Christopher Guest 9561:Wikimedia Commons 9549:Christopher Guest 9500:Margaret Thatcher 8782:I posted to BLPN 8457:Los Angeles Times 8271: 8257:comment added by 8203:comment added by 8070: 8069: 7562:Statement by Cirt 7387:. www.foxnews.com 7369:Friedman, Roger ( 7141:Los Angeles Times 7012:Los Angeles Times 6934:Los Angeles Times 6549:Jacobsen, Jonny ( 6429:a deletable image 5569: 5543: 5344:summary judgement 4597: 3866:National Enquirer 3862:Weekly World News 3845:National Enquirer 3841:Weekly World News 3076:Piece of Blue Sky 3054:Piece of Blue Sky 3046:Piece of Blue Sky 2127:Pope Benedict XVI 1392: 1003: 1002: 975: 974: 969:current talk page 944: 730:Boredwiththehype 702: 688:comment added by 85:Arbitrary section 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 13519: 13512: 13511: 13509: 13508: 13493: 13487: 13480: 13474: 13473: 13471: 13470: 13465:. April 28, 2010 13455: 13449: 13448: 13446: 13445: 13431: 13425: 13424: 13422: 13420: 13405: 13399: 13398: 13396: 13394: 13379: 13373: 13372: 13370: 13369: 13354: 13305:AlexJohnTorres12 13270:AlexJohnTorres12 12597:). Thoughts? -- 12491: 12469: 12401: 12379: 12331:Associated Press 11969:See postings at 11942: 11940: 11939: 11847: 11804: 11798: 11794: 11789: 11787: 11779: 11777: 11776: 11712: 11693: 11152: 11122: 11097: 11096: 11094: 11092: 11071: 11065: 11064: 11062: 11061: 11050: 11044: 11043: 11041: 11040: 11023: 11017: 10995: 10989: 10983: 10977: 10971: 10965: 10964: 10963: 10957: 10949: 10845: 10839: 10835: 10830: 10828: 10820: 10818: 10817: 10754: 10732: 10394:Associated Press 10344: 10338: 10334: 10329: 10327: 10319: 10317: 10316: 10291: 10285: 10281: 10276: 10274: 10266: 10264: 10263: 10166: 10164: 10163: 10116: 10071: 10059: 10025: 10000: 9969: 9932: 9916: 9910: 9780: 9760: 9729: 9648: 9590: 9507: 9478: 9474:secondary ref. 9443: 9441: 9440: 9342: 9336: 9305: 9299: 9250: 9244: 9125:of RNC Chairman 8972:Portland Mercury 8755: 8749: 8744: 8742: 8734: 8732: 8731: 8711: 8705: 8700: 8698: 8690: 8688: 8687: 8667: 8661: 8656: 8654: 8646: 8644: 8643: 8619: 8613: 8608: 8606: 8598: 8596: 8595: 8572: 8566: 8561: 8559: 8551: 8549: 8548: 8529: 8527: 8526: 8504: 8498: 8494: 8488: 8482: 8477: 8475: 8467: 8465: 8464: 8442: 8436: 8431: 8429: 8421: 8419: 8418: 8398: 8392: 8386: 8380: 8375: 8373: 8365: 8313:catholic belief) 8270: 8251: 8215: 8143: 8116:reliable sources 7584: 7582: 7581: 7555: 7542: 7541: 7463: 7461: 7460: 7416: 7410: 7405: 7403: 7395: 7393: 7392: 7365: 7359: 7354: 7352: 7344: 7342: 7341: 7261: 7255: 7250: 7248: 7240: 7238: 7237: 7189: 7183: 7178: 7176: 7168: 7166: 7165: 7115: 7109: 7104: 7102: 7094: 7092: 7091: 7043: 7037: 7032: 7030: 7022: 7020: 7019: 6991:secondary source 6964: 6958: 6953: 6951: 6943: 6941: 6940: 6863: 6857: 6851: 6845: 6840: 6838: 6830: 6828: 6827: 6804:Braiker, Brian ( 6772: 6766: 6762: 6756: 6750: 6745: 6743: 6735: 6733: 6732: 6595: 6589: 6584: 6582: 6574: 6572: 6571: 6524: 6518: 6512: 6506: 6501: 6499: 6491: 6489: 6488: 6354: 6348: 6343: 6341: 6333: 6331: 6330: 6096:Still uncivil.-- 5666:An account of a 5551: 5529: 4585: 4583:Duae Quartunciae 3581:Mary Sue Hubbard 3089:Knowledge policy 3080:Knowledge policy 2437:what you believe 1374: 1234:Cruise v. Christ 1166:Antaeus Feldspar 1065:Big Brother 1984 989: 977: 976: 954: 953: 947: 926: 725:Boredwiththehype 701: 682: 165:Antaeus Feldspar 93:"Chinese School" 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 13527: 13526: 13522: 13521: 13520: 13518: 13517: 13516: 13515: 13506: 13504: 13495: 13494: 13490: 13481: 13477: 13468: 13466: 13457: 13456: 13452: 13443: 13441: 13433: 13432: 13428: 13418: 13416: 13406: 13402: 13392: 13390: 13380: 13376: 13367: 13365: 13355: 13344: 13202: 13113:Wobblegenerator 13046:Wobblegenerator 13001:Wobblegenerator 12954:Wobblegenerator 12920:Wobblegenerator 12906:Wobblegenerator 12868:Wobblegenerator 12850:Wobblegenerator 12831:Wobblegenerator 12811:Wobblegenerator 12744:Wobblegenerator 12678:Wobblegenerator 12615:Wobblegenerator 12585:Wobblegenerator 12557: 12522:In March 2010, 12470: 12380: 12320: 12043: 12018:Anderson Cooper 11971:news.turner.com 11967: 11937: 11935: 11922: 11897: 11871: 11830: 11827: 11796: 11792: 11790: 11781: 11780: 11774: 11772: 11751: 11694: 11689: 11633:added by an IP 11627: 11380: 11344: 11342:Source fails RS 11287: 11214: 11150:John Vandenberg 11148: 11104: 11100: 11090: 11088: 11072: 11068: 11059: 11057: 11052: 11051: 11047: 11038: 11036: 11024: 11020: 10996: 10992: 10984: 10980: 10972: 10968: 10955: 10953: 10951: 10943: 10904: 10837: 10833: 10831: 10822: 10821: 10815: 10813: 10798: 10733: 10634: 10568: 10336: 10332: 10330: 10321: 10320: 10314: 10312: 10283: 10279: 10277: 10268: 10267: 10261: 10259: 10240: 10198: 10190: 10161: 10159: 10125: 10099: 10096: 10069: 10057: 10023: 9998: 9967: 9930: 9914: 9908: 9778: 9758: 9727: 9646: 9588: 9522:David Miscavige 9505: 9496: 9476: 9438: 9436: 9421: 9340: 9334: 9323: 9303: 9297: 9248: 9242: 9186: 9097:Dubious source. 9047: 8863: 8804: 8780: 8758: 8747: 8745: 8736: 8735: 8729: 8727: 8703: 8701: 8692: 8691: 8685: 8683: 8659: 8657: 8648: 8647: 8641: 8639: 8611: 8609: 8600: 8599: 8593: 8591: 8575: 8564: 8562: 8553: 8552: 8546: 8544: 8532: 8524: 8522: 8496: 8492: 8490: 8480: 8478: 8469: 8468: 8462: 8460: 8446:Sappell, Joel ( 8434: 8432: 8423: 8422: 8416: 8414: 8402:Koff, Stephen ( 8390: 8388: 8378: 8376: 8367: 8366: 8344: 8298: 8252: 8224: 8198: 8141: 8096: 7579: 7577: 7551: 7533: 7458: 7456: 7443: 7408: 7406: 7397: 7396: 7390: 7388: 7357: 7355: 7346: 7345: 7339: 7337: 7314: 7283: 7281:Primary sources 7253: 7251: 7242: 7241: 7235: 7233: 7210: 7181: 7179: 7170: 7169: 7163: 7161: 7107: 7105: 7096: 7095: 7089: 7087: 7035: 7033: 7024: 7023: 7017: 7015: 6956: 6954: 6945: 6944: 6938: 6936: 6907: 6855: 6853: 6843: 6841: 6832: 6831: 6825: 6823: 6764: 6760: 6758: 6748: 6746: 6737: 6736: 6730: 6728: 6633: 6587: 6585: 6576: 6575: 6569: 6567: 6516: 6514: 6504: 6502: 6493: 6492: 6486: 6484: 6462: 6437:change because 6431: 6346: 6344: 6335: 6334: 6328: 6326: 6314:Koff, Stephen ( 6310: 6232: 6185: 6057: 5743: 5650: 5600: 5566:Paulette Cooper 5540:Paulette Cooper 5389:Paulette Cooper 5381:Concerning the 5379: 4919: 4859: 4835: 4807: 4779: 4550: 4348:primary sources 3849:Elvis sightings 3695: 3583: 3528: 3482: 3128: 3067:fly on the wall 3050: 3029: 2933: 2458: 2379: 2362: 2021: 1901: 1846: 1401: 1375:—The preceding 1215: 1154:nine days later 1140:David Miscavige 1008: 985: 951: 927:—The preceding 923: 683: 678: 664: 638: 633: 605: 237: 157:David Miscavige 95: 87: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 13525: 13514: 13513: 13501:New York Times 13488: 13475: 13450: 13426: 13400: 13374: 13341: 13340: 13339: 13297: 13296: 13201: 13198: 13179: 13178: 13177: 13176: 13175: 13174: 13173: 13172: 13171: 13170: 13169: 13168: 13167: 13166: 13134: 13133: 13132: 13131: 13130: 13129: 13128: 13127: 13126: 13125: 13124: 13123: 13069: 13068: 13067: 13066: 13065: 13064: 13063: 13062: 13061: 13060: 13059: 13058: 13057: 13056: 13030: 12985: 12863: 12861: 12860: 12846: 12845:confessions."" 12828: 12827: 12824: 12821: 12807: 12801: 12786: 12763: 12762: 12761: 12760: 12759: 12758: 12757: 12756: 12755: 12754: 12730: 12729: 12728: 12727: 12726: 12725: 12724: 12723: 12693: 12692: 12691: 12690: 12689: 12688: 12674: 12668: 12653: 12650: 12643: 12638: 12635: 12628: 12556: 12553: 12516: 12515: 12514: 12513: 12512: 12511: 12510: 12509: 12461: 12460: 12459: 12458: 12319: 12316: 12315: 12314: 12313: 12312: 12311: 12310: 12309: 12308: 12307: 12306: 12305: 12304: 12303: 12302: 12301: 12300: 12299: 12298: 12297: 12296: 12295: 12294: 12293: 12292: 12042: 12039: 12038: 12037: 11966: 11963: 11962: 11961: 11944: 11943: 11921: 11918: 11896: 11893: 11870: 11867: 11866: 11865: 11826: 11823: 11806: 11805: 11756:Bashir, Martin 11750: 11747: 11746: 11745: 11688: 11685: 11684: 11683: 11682: 11681: 11626: 11623: 11607: 11606: 11605: 11604: 11603: 11602: 11583: 11582: 11551: 11550: 11549: 11548: 11531: 11530: 11495: 11494: 11456: 11455: 11417:170.206.224.50 11408: 11407: 11379: 11376: 11343: 11340: 11339: 11338: 11337: 11336: 11319: 11318: 11286: 11283: 11282: 11281: 11252: 11251: 11218:170.206.224.50 11213: 11210: 11190:In June 2009, 11185: 11164:In June 2009, 11159: 11157: 11156: 11146: 11134: 11130: 11099: 11098: 11066: 11045: 11018: 11014:; Robert Penny 10990: 10978: 10966: 10940: 10939: 10938: 10937: 10936: 10935: 10934: 10903: 10900: 10847: 10846: 10797: 10794: 10793: 10792: 10791: 10790: 10773: 10772: 10722: 10721: 10720: 10719: 10705: 10685: 10684: 10633: 10630: 10629: 10628: 10627: 10626: 10567: 10564: 10563: 10562: 10561: 10560: 10559: 10558: 10557: 10556: 10460: 10459: 10452: 10445: 10438: 10431: 10424: 10417: 10410: 10403: 10396: 10391: 10383: 10382: 10381: 10380: 10346: 10345: 10298: 10297: 10293: 10292: 10245: 10244: 10239: 10236: 10233: 10204:in his friend 10197: 10194: 10189: 10186: 10168: 10167: 10124: 10118: 10106:92.105.132.232 10095: 10092: 10091: 10090: 10089: 10088: 10087: 10086: 10085: 10084: 10083: 10082: 10081: 10080: 10079: 10078: 10077: 10076: 10030: 9925: 9924: 9923: 9922: 9898: 9897: 9896: 9895: 9894: 9893: 9892: 9891: 9890: 9889: 9888: 9887: 9886: 9885: 9884: 9883: 9882: 9823:inappropriate. 9770: 9739: 9616: 9615: 9614: 9495: 9492: 9491: 9490: 9489: 9488: 9448: 9447: 9435:. www.kesq.com 9420: 9417: 9416: 9415: 9414: 9413: 9322: 9319: 9318: 9317: 9316: 9315: 9314: 9313: 9312: 9311: 9283: 9282: 9281: 9280: 9279: 9278: 9259: 9258: 9257: 9256: 9232: 9231: 9185: 9182: 9181: 9180: 9179: 9178: 9160: 9159: 9145: 9144: 9143: 9130: 9111: 9104: 9056:Elliot Abelson 9046: 9043: 9019: 9018: 9017: 9016: 9015: 9014: 9013: 9012: 9011: 9010: 8948: 8862: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8856: 8855: 8803: 8800: 8779: 8776: 8759: 8757: 8756: 8712: 8668: 8633:Special Report 8623:Morgan, Lucy ( 8620: 8573: 8530: 8505: 8443: 8399: 8354:Barnes, John ( 8350: 8349: 8348: 8343: 8340: 8324: 8323: 8320: 8317: 8314: 8297: 8294: 8290: 8289: 8223: 8220: 8219: 8218: 8217: 8216: 8192: 8191: 8172: 8171: 8170: 8169: 8152: 8151: 8135: 8134: 8095: 8092: 8068: 8067: 8066: 8065: 8013: 8012: 7959: 7958: 7954: 7953: 7937: 7936: 7928:Metropolitan90 7922: 7921: 7920: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7916: 7915: 7901: 7900: 7899: 7866: 7865: 7849: 7848: 7828: 7827: 7786: 7785: 7781: 7780: 7776: 7775: 7774: 7773: 7758: 7757: 7756: 7755: 7754: 7722: 7721: 7720: 7637: 7636: 7632: 7631: 7611: 7610: 7586: 7585: 7564: 7563: 7557: 7556: 7547: 7546: 7532: 7529: 7528: 7527: 7526: 7525: 7481: 7480: 7465: 7464: 7442: 7439: 7438: 7437: 7418: 7417: 7366: 7318:Ortega, Tony ( 7313: 7310: 7282: 7279: 7278: 7277: 7231:Radar Magazine 7209: 7206: 7191: 7190: 7139:Sarno, David ( 7135: 7134: 7117: 7116: 7085:Radar Magazine 7063: 7062: 7061:Another source 7045: 7044: 6997:Sarno, David ( 6993: 6992: 6966: 6965: 6912: 6911: 6906: 6903: 6887:Inside Edition 6865: 6864: 6800: 6799: 6774: 6773: 6705: 6704: 6703:Another source 6701: 6662:Inside Edition 6642:Inside Edition 6632: 6629: 6628: 6627: 6608: 6607: 6542: 6541: 6526: 6525: 6461: 6458: 6430: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6423: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6385: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6356: 6355: 6309: 6306: 6296: 6295: 6294: 6293: 6281: 6280: 6256: 6255: 6231: 6228: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6204: 6184: 6181: 6171: 6170: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6122: 6121: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6103: 6056: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6033: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6018: 6017: 6016: 6015: 6014: 6013: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5969: 5968: 5967: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5928:scriptures".-- 5922: 5921: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5917: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5884: 5883: 5882: 5881: 5880: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5845: 5844: 5843: 5842: 5830: 5829: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5800: 5799: 5772: 5771: 5742: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5715: 5713: 5712: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5682: 5681: 5668:process server 5649: 5646: 5599: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5378: 5372: 5364:last night. -- 5358: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5223: 5222: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5131: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5075: 5074: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5036: 5035: 5007:Lisa McPherson 5003:expert witness 4985: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4918: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4885: 4884: 4861:I checked out 4858: 4855: 4834: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4806: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4778: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4736: 4685: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4667: 4655: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4640: 4639: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4603: 4602: 4580:exception. -- 4549: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4515: 4506: 4497: 4471: 4437: 4436: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4367: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4285:, a little of 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3777: 3776: 3751: 3750: 3740: 3697:Streissguth's 3694: 3691: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3582: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3527: 3524: 3509: 3508: 3481: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3466: 3462: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3335:205.227.165.14 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3285:Lisa McPherson 3269: 3268: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3189: 3160: 3159: 3154: 3153: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3111: 3110: 3049: 3043: 3028: 3025: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2817:to Su-Jada? -- 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2645: 2644: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2599: 2598: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2525:clarification. 2484: 2483: 2457: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2399: 2396: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2234: 2231: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2162: 2156: 2155: 2123: 2122: 2096: 2095: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2050: 2049: 2029: 2028: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 1998: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1900: 1894: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1868: 1867: 1845: 1842: 1831: 1830: 1784: 1783: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1755:if and only if 1741: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1690: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1641: 1640: 1613: 1612: 1607: 1606: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1537: 1536: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1501: 1500: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1430: 1415: 1414: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1341: 1340: 1330: 1329:- Jan 23, 2007 1320: 1310: 1300: 1297:Hollywood News 1290: 1289:- Jan 23, 2007 1280: 1270: 1260: 1250: 1241: 1231: 1220: 1219: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1157: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1086: 1085: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1029: 1028: 1007: 1004: 1001: 1000: 995: 990: 983: 973: 972: 955: 922: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 853: 852: 828: 827: 806: 805: 804: 803: 793: 792: 791: 677: 674: 663: 662:Replaced image 660: 650: 637: 634: 627:70.100.138.217 624: 604: 601: 600: 599: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 544: 543: 542: 541: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 456: 455: 454: 453: 446: 445: 444: 443: 436: 435: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 373: 372: 371: 370: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 321: 320: 319: 318: 302: 301: 300: 299: 287: 286: 263: 262: 261: 260: 254: 253: 236: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 201: 200: 199: 198: 186: 185: 146:Chinese school 94: 91: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 13524: 13502: 13498: 13492: 13486:, Jan 7, 2008 13485: 13479: 13464: 13460: 13454: 13440: 13436: 13430: 13415: 13411: 13404: 13389: 13385: 13378: 13364: 13360: 13353: 13351: 13349: 13347: 13342: 13338: 13334: 13330: 13325: 13321: 13317: 13316: 13315: 13314: 13310: 13306: 13302: 13295: 13291: 13287: 13282: 13281: 13280: 13279: 13275: 13271: 13266: 13264: 13259: 13257: 13252: 13250: 13246: 13240: 13237: 13233: 13229: 13225: 13223: 13219: 13215: 13211: 13207: 13197: 13196: 13192: 13188: 13184: 13165: 13161: 13157: 13153: 13148: 13147: 13146: 13145: 13144: 13143: 13142: 13141: 13140: 13139: 13138: 13137: 13136: 13135: 13122: 13118: 13114: 13110: 13106: 13101: 13100: 13099: 13095: 13091: 13087: 13083: 13079: 13078: 13077: 13076: 13075: 13074: 13073: 13072: 13071: 13070: 13055: 13051: 13047: 13043: 13039: 13035: 13031: 13028: 13027: 13026: 13022: 13018: 13017: 13012: 13011: 13010: 13006: 13002: 12998: 12994: 12990: 12986: 12984: 12980: 12976: 12975: 12970: 12969: 12965: 12964: 12963: 12959: 12955: 12951: 12950: 12949: 12945: 12941: 12940: 12935: 12931: 12928: 12925: 12921: 12917: 12916: 12915: 12911: 12907: 12903: 12902: 12901: 12897: 12893: 12892: 12887: 12883: 12879: 12876: 12873: 12869: 12866: 12865: 12864: 12859: 12855: 12851: 12847: 12843: 12842: 12841: 12840: 12836: 12832: 12825: 12822: 12820: 12816: 12812: 12808: 12805: 12802: 12799: 12795: 12791: 12787: 12784: 12779: 12778: 12777: 12776: 12772: 12768: 12753: 12749: 12745: 12740: 12739: 12738: 12737: 12736: 12735: 12734: 12733: 12732: 12731: 12722: 12718: 12714: 12710: 12705: 12702:I counted 11 12701: 12700: 12699: 12698: 12697: 12696: 12695: 12694: 12687: 12683: 12679: 12675: 12672: 12669: 12666: 12662: 12658: 12654: 12651: 12648: 12644: 12641: 12639: 12636: 12633: 12629: 12626: 12625: 12624: 12620: 12616: 12612: 12611: 12610: 12606: 12602: 12601: 12596: 12593: 12590: 12586: 12582: 12578: 12577: 12576: 12575: 12571: 12567: 12566: 12561: 12551: 12549: 12543: 12539: 12537: 12533: 12529: 12525: 12524:Marty Rathbun 12519: 12508: 12504: 12500: 12499: 12494: 12493: 12490: 12486: 12482: 12478: 12474: 12467: 12466: 12465: 12464: 12463: 12462: 12457: 12453: 12449: 12448: 12443: 12440: 12437: 12433: 12430: 12427: 12423: 12420: 12419: 12418: 12414: 12410: 12405: 12404: 12403: 12400: 12396: 12392: 12388: 12384: 12377: 12373: 12368: 12366: 12363: 12359: 12357: 12355: 12353: 12351: 12349: 12347: 12345: 12343: 12341: 12339: 12337: 12334: 12332: 12328: 12325: 12291: 12287: 12283: 12282: 12277: 12276: 12275: 12271: 12267: 12263: 12262: 12261: 12257: 12253: 12252: 12247: 12243: 12242: 12241: 12237: 12233: 12228: 12227: 12226: 12222: 12218: 12217: 12212: 12208: 12207: 12206: 12202: 12198: 12194: 12190: 12189: 12188: 12184: 12180: 12179: 12174: 12170: 12166: 12165:no discussion 12162: 12158: 12157: 12156: 12152: 12148: 12143: 12142: 12141: 12137: 12133: 12132: 12126: 12125: 12124: 12120: 12116: 12111: 12110: 12109: 12105: 12101: 12100: 12095: 12091: 12088: 12085: 12081: 12080: 12079: 12075: 12071: 12067: 12066: 12065: 12064: 12060: 12056: 12055: 12050: 12046: 12036: 12032: 12028: 12027: 12022: 12019: 12015: 12014: 12013: 12012: 12008: 12004: 12003: 11998: 11994: 11993: 11988: 11982: 11977: 11976: 11972: 11960: 11956: 11952: 11951: 11946: 11945: 11933: 11929: 11924: 11923: 11917: 11916: 11912: 11908: 11907: 11902: 11892: 11891: 11887: 11883: 11882: 11876: 11875: 11864: 11860: 11856: 11855: 11850: 11849: 11848: 11846: 11842: 11838: 11837:92.251.255.12 11834: 11822: 11821: 11817: 11813: 11812: 11802: 11785: 11771: 11767: 11766: 11761: 11757: 11753: 11752: 11744: 11740: 11736: 11735: 11730: 11726: 11723: 11720: 11716: 11715: 11714: 11710: 11706: 11702: 11698: 11680: 11676: 11672: 11671: 11666: 11665: 11664: 11660: 11656: 11652: 11651: 11650: 11649: 11645: 11641: 11640: 11635: 11632: 11622: 11621: 11617: 11613: 11601: 11597: 11593: 11589: 11588: 11587: 11586: 11585: 11584: 11581: 11577: 11573: 11568: 11567: 11566: 11565: 11561: 11557: 11547: 11543: 11539: 11535: 11534: 11533: 11532: 11529: 11525: 11521: 11516: 11515: 11514: 11513: 11509: 11505: 11501: 11500:Time Magazine 11493: 11489: 11485: 11481: 11477: 11476: 11475: 11474: 11470: 11466: 11460: 11454: 11450: 11446: 11441: 11440: 11439: 11438: 11434: 11430: 11424: 11422: 11418: 11414: 11406: 11402: 11397: 11396: 11395: 11394: 11390: 11386: 11375: 11374: 11370: 11366: 11365: 11360: 11356: 11352: 11348: 11335: 11331: 11327: 11323: 11322: 11321: 11320: 11317: 11313: 11309: 11304: 11303: 11302: 11301: 11297: 11293: 11280: 11276: 11272: 11268: 11267: 11266: 11265: 11261: 11257: 11250: 11246: 11242: 11238: 11237: 11236: 11235: 11231: 11227: 11221: 11219: 11209: 11207: 11203: 11199: 11195: 11194: 11188: 11183: 11181: 11177: 11173: 11169: 11168: 11162: 11155: 11151: 11147: 11144: 11140: 11139:Disconnection 11135: 11131: 11128: 11125: 11124: 11123: 11120: 11116: 11112: 11108: 11087: 11083: 11082: 11077: 11070: 11055: 11049: 11035: 11034: 11029: 11022: 11015: 11013: 11009: 11005: 11000: 10994: 10988: 10982: 10976: 10970: 10961: 10948: 10946: 10941: 10933: 10932: 10931: 10930: 10929: 10928: 10927: 10925: 10921: 10920:Andrew Morton 10917: 10916:disconnection 10913: 10909: 10899: 10898: 10894: 10890: 10885: 10884: 10880: 10876: 10870: 10869: 10865: 10861: 10860: 10855: 10851: 10843: 10826: 10811: 10810: 10805: 10800: 10799: 10789: 10785: 10781: 10777: 10776: 10775: 10774: 10771: 10767: 10763: 10758: 10757: 10756: 10753: 10749: 10745: 10741: 10737: 10730: 10725: 10718: 10714: 10710: 10706: 10703: 10702: 10701: 10700: 10699: 10698: 10694: 10690: 10683: 10679: 10675: 10671: 10670: 10669: 10668: 10664: 10660: 10654: 10653: 10649: 10645: 10640: 10637: 10625: 10621: 10617: 10616: 10611: 10608: 10605: 10601: 10597: 10596: 10595: 10591: 10587: 10582: 10581: 10580: 10578: 10574: 10555: 10551: 10547: 10546: 10541: 10540: 10539: 10535: 10531: 10526: 10525: 10524: 10520: 10516: 10515: 10510: 10505: 10504: 10503: 10499: 10495: 10490: 10489: 10488: 10487: 10483: 10479: 10478: 10473: 10469: 10465: 10458: 10457: 10453: 10451: 10450: 10446: 10444: 10443: 10439: 10437: 10436: 10432: 10430: 10429: 10425: 10423: 10422: 10418: 10416: 10415: 10411: 10409: 10408: 10404: 10402: 10401: 10397: 10395: 10392: 10390: 10389: 10385: 10384: 10378: 10377: 10376: 10372: 10368: 10364: 10363: 10362: 10361: 10357: 10353: 10352: 10342: 10325: 10311: 10310: 10305: 10300: 10299: 10295: 10294: 10289: 10272: 10258: 10257: 10252: 10247: 10246: 10242: 10241: 10235: 10231: 10230: 10226: 10222: 10218: 10213: 10211: 10207: 10203: 10196:Personal life 10193: 10185: 10184: 10180: 10176: 10175: 10158: 10154: 10153: 10148: 10143: 10142: 10141: 10136: 10134: 10130: 10123: 10117: 10115: 10111: 10107: 10103: 10075: 10072: 10065: 10064: 10063: 10060: 10053: 10052: 10051: 10048: 10047: 10043: 10039: 10035: 10031: 10029: 10026: 10020: 10019: 10018: 10015: 10014: 10010: 10006: 10005: 10004: 10001: 9994: 9993: 9992: 9989: 9988: 9984: 9980: 9975: 9974: 9973: 9970: 9963: 9962: 9961: 9958: 9957: 9953: 9949: 9945: 9944: 9939: 9938: 9937: 9936: 9933: 9921: 9918: 9917: 9911: 9902: 9899: 9881: 9877: 9873: 9872: 9867: 9864: 9861: 9858: 9855: 9854: 9853: 9849: 9845: 9844: 9838: 9837: 9836: 9833: 9832: 9828: 9824: 9820: 9819: 9818: 9814: 9810: 9809: 9804: 9801: 9798: 9794: 9791: 9790: 9789: 9786: 9785: 9781: 9775: 9771: 9769: 9766: 9765: 9761: 9755: 9752:a while ago. 9751: 9748: 9745:and was also 9744: 9740: 9738: 9735: 9734: 9730: 9724: 9722: 9719: 9716: 9713: 9709: 9705: 9701: 9697: 9696:United States 9693: 9692:Talk:Tasmania 9689: 9685: 9684:Talk:Tasmania 9681: 9677: 9673: 9672: 9671: 9668: 9667: 9663: 9659: 9658: 9657: 9654: 9653: 9649: 9643: 9640: 9638: 9635: 9634: 9633: 9630: 9629: 9625: 9621: 9617: 9613: 9609: 9605: 9601: 9600: 9599: 9596: 9595: 9591: 9584: 9580: 9579: 9578: 9574: 9570: 9569: 9564: 9562: 9558: 9554: 9550: 9546: 9545:Dennis Miller 9542: 9538: 9537: 9536: 9533: 9532: 9528: 9523: 9519: 9518: 9517: 9516: 9513: 9512: 9508: 9501: 9487: 9484: 9483: 9479: 9472: 9468: 9467: 9466: 9465: 9464: 9463: 9459: 9455: 9454: 9446: 9434: 9433: 9428: 9423: 9422: 9412: 9408: 9404: 9403: 9398: 9395: 9392: 9388: 9384: 9381: 9378: 9374: 9370: 9369: 9368: 9364: 9360: 9359: 9354: 9350: 9349: 9348: 9347: 9344: 9343: 9337: 9328: 9310: 9307: 9306: 9300: 9291: 9290: 9289: 9288: 9287: 9286: 9285: 9284: 9277: 9273: 9269: 9265: 9264: 9263: 9262: 9261: 9260: 9255: 9252: 9251: 9245: 9236: 9235: 9234: 9233: 9230: 9226: 9222: 9218: 9217: 9216: 9215: 9211: 9207: 9206: 9201: 9199: 9195: 9192: 9191: 9177: 9173: 9169: 9164: 9163: 9162: 9161: 9158: 9155: 9154: 9150: 9146: 9141: 9137: 9135: 9131: 9128: 9127:Michael Steel 9124: 9119: 9115: 9112: 9108: 9105: 9102: 9098: 9095: 9094: 9092: 9091: 9090: 9089: 9085: 9081: 9080: 9075: 9071: 9070: 9063: 9061: 9057: 9053: 9042: 9041: 9037: 9033: 9032: 9027: 9024: 9021:Consensus at 9009: 9005: 9001: 9000: 8995: 8991: 8987: 8986: 8985: 8981: 8977: 8973: 8969: 8965: 8960: 8959: 8953: 8949: 8947: 8943: 8939: 8938:Justallofthem 8935: 8934: 8933: 8929: 8925: 8924:Justallofthem 8920: 8919: 8918: 8914: 8910: 8906: 8905: 8904: 8903: 8902: 8901: 8897: 8893: 8892:Justallofthem 8886: 8884: 8880: 8874: 8872: 8868: 8854: 8850: 8846: 8845: 8840: 8839: 8838: 8834: 8830: 8826: 8825: 8824: 8823: 8819: 8815: 8814: 8809: 8799: 8798: 8794: 8790: 8789: 8784: 8775: 8774: 8770: 8766: 8765: 8753: 8740: 8726: 8722: 8718: 8713: 8709: 8696: 8682: 8678: 8674: 8669: 8665: 8652: 8638: 8634: 8630: 8626: 8621: 8617: 8604: 8590: 8586: 8582: 8578: 8574: 8570: 8557: 8543: 8539: 8535: 8531: 8521: 8517: 8516: 8511: 8506: 8502: 8486: 8473: 8459: 8458: 8453: 8449: 8444: 8440: 8427: 8413: 8409: 8405: 8400: 8396: 8384: 8371: 8363: 8362: 8357: 8352: 8351: 8346: 8345: 8339: 8338: 8334: 8330: 8321: 8318: 8315: 8312: 8308: 8307: 8306: 8304: 8293: 8288: 8284: 8280: 8279: 8274: 8273: 8272: 8268: 8264: 8260: 8256: 8248: 8245: 8243: 8237: 8235: 8230: 8227: 8214: 8210: 8206: 8202: 8196: 8195: 8194: 8193: 8190: 8186: 8182: 8178: 8174: 8173: 8168: 8164: 8160: 8156: 8155: 8154: 8153: 8150: 8147: 8144: 8137: 8136: 8133: 8129: 8125: 8121: 8117: 8113: 8112: 8111: 8110: 8106: 8102: 8101:122.107.56.47 8091: 8090: 8086: 8082: 8081: 8075: 8074:BlogTalkRadio 8064: 8060: 8056: 8055: 8050: 8047: 8044: 8041: 8037: 8033: 8030: 8029: 8028: 8027: 8023: 8019: 8018:Fahrenheit451 8011: 8007: 8003: 8002:Justallofthem 7998: 7997: 7990: 7986: 7982: 7981: 7980: 7979: 7975: 7971: 7970: 7965: 7956: 7955: 7952: 7948: 7944: 7943:Fahrenheit451 7939: 7938: 7935: 7932: 7929: 7924: 7923: 7914: 7910: 7906: 7902: 7898: 7894: 7890: 7889:Justallofthem 7885: 7884: 7883: 7882: 7881: 7877: 7873: 7868: 7867: 7864: 7860: 7856: 7851: 7850: 7847: 7843: 7839: 7836: 7832: 7831: 7830: 7829: 7826: 7822: 7818: 7817:Justallofthem 7814: 7810: 7805: 7804: 7803: 7802: 7801: 7800: 7796: 7792: 7791:Fahrenheit451 7783: 7782: 7778: 7777: 7772: 7768: 7764: 7763:Fahrenheit451 7759: 7753: 7749: 7745: 7744:Justallofthem 7741: 7740: 7739: 7735: 7731: 7727: 7723: 7719: 7715: 7711: 7710:Fahrenheit451 7707: 7706: 7705: 7704: 7703: 7699: 7695: 7694:Justallofthem 7690: 7688: 7681: 7680: 7679: 7675: 7671: 7670:Fahrenheit451 7666: 7665: 7664: 7660: 7656: 7655:Justallofthem 7652: 7648: 7643: 7642: 7634: 7633: 7630: 7626: 7622: 7621:Justallofthem 7618: 7613: 7612: 7608: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7601: 7597: 7596: 7591: 7575: 7574:BlogTalkRadio 7571: 7568:Olsen, Dawn. 7566: 7565: 7561: 7560: 7559: 7558: 7554: 7549: 7548: 7544: 7543: 7540: 7538: 7537:BlogTalkRadio 7524: 7520: 7516: 7515: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7503: 7499: 7498:Justallofthem 7495: 7491: 7487: 7483: 7482: 7479: 7475: 7471: 7467: 7466: 7454: 7453:BlogTalkRadio 7450: 7447:Olsen, Dawn. 7445: 7444: 7436: 7432: 7428: 7424: 7420: 7419: 7414: 7401: 7386: 7385: 7380: 7376: 7372: 7367: 7363: 7350: 7335: 7334: 7333:Village Voice 7329: 7325: 7321: 7316: 7315: 7309: 7308: 7304: 7300: 7296: 7292: 7288: 7276: 7272: 7268: 7264: 7263: 7262: 7259: 7246: 7232: 7228: 7224: 7220: 7216: 7205: 7204: 7200: 7196: 7187: 7174: 7160: 7159: 7154: 7150: 7146: 7142: 7137: 7136: 7132: 7131: 7130: 7129: 7125: 7121: 7113: 7100: 7086: 7082: 7078: 7074: 7070: 7065: 7064: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7057: 7053: 7049: 7041: 7028: 7014: 7013: 7008: 7004: 7000: 6995: 6994: 6990: 6986: 6982: 6981: 6980: 6979: 6975: 6971: 6962: 6949: 6935: 6931: 6927: 6923: 6919: 6914: 6913: 6909: 6908: 6902: 6901: 6897: 6893: 6889: 6888: 6883: 6882: 6881:New York Post 6877: 6876: 6870: 6861: 6849: 6836: 6821: 6820: 6815: 6811: 6807: 6802: 6801: 6798: 6795: 6794: 6793: 6792: 6788: 6784: 6778: 6770: 6754: 6741: 6726: 6725: 6724:New York Post 6720: 6716: 6712: 6707: 6706: 6702: 6700: 6696: 6692: 6688: 6684: 6683: 6682: 6681: 6677: 6673: 6669: 6664: 6663: 6657: 6656: 6652: 6648: 6644: 6643: 6638: 6637: 6626: 6622: 6618: 6614: 6613:Other matters 6610: 6609: 6606: 6602: 6598: 6593: 6580: 6566: 6562: 6561: 6556: 6552: 6547: 6546: 6545: 6540: 6536: 6532: 6528: 6527: 6522: 6510: 6497: 6483: 6482: 6477: 6473: 6469: 6464: 6463: 6457: 6456: 6452: 6448: 6444: 6440: 6439:Image:Dm0.jpg 6436: 6422: 6419: 6415: 6414: 6413: 6410: 6409:Fahrenheit451 6406: 6405: 6398: 6395: 6391: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6381: 6378: 6377:Fahrenheit451 6374: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6366: 6360: 6352: 6339: 6325: 6321: 6317: 6312: 6311: 6305: 6304: 6301: 6300:Fahrenheit451 6292: 6289: 6288:Fahrenheit451 6285: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6279: 6276: 6272: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6265: 6262: 6261:Fahrenheit451 6254: 6251: 6247: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6241: 6240:Fahrenheit451 6237: 6223: 6220: 6219:Fahrenheit451 6215: 6214: 6213: 6210: 6205: 6203: 6200: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6190: 6189:Fahrenheit451 6180: 6179: 6176: 6175:Fahrenheit451 6169: 6166: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6155: 6154:Fahrenheit451 6150: 6149: 6146: 6145:Fahrenheit451 6137: 6134: 6130: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6120: 6117: 6112: 6108: 6107: 6102: 6099: 6098:Fahrenheit451 6095: 6094: 6093: 6090: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6080: 6079:Fahrenheit451 6075: 6074: 6071: 6066: 6065: 6062: 6061:Fahrenheit451 6048: 6045: 6044:Fahrenheit451 6041: 6037: 6036: 6035: 6034: 6029: 6026: 6025:Fahrenheit451 6022: 6021: 6020: 6019: 6012: 6009: 6008:wikipediatrix 6005: 6004: 6003: 6000: 5999:Fahrenheit451 5996: 5992: 5989: 5988:wikipediatrix 5985: 5984: 5983: 5980: 5979:Fahrenheit451 5976: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5966: 5963: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5949: 5946: 5942: 5941: 5940: 5939: 5934: 5931: 5930:Fahrenheit451 5926: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5916: 5913: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5898: 5895: 5894:Fahrenheit451 5891: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5879: 5876: 5872: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5858: 5855: 5854:Fahrenheit451 5851: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5846: 5841: 5838: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5828: 5825: 5824:Fahrenheit451 5821: 5817: 5816: 5811: 5808: 5804: 5803: 5802: 5801: 5798: 5795: 5791: 5788: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5778: 5769: 5765: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5756: 5755: 5752: 5751:Fahrenheit451 5748: 5740: 5733: 5730: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5719: 5718:wikipediatrix 5711: 5708: 5707:Fahrenheit451 5704: 5703: 5698: 5695: 5690: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5680: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5659: 5655: 5645: 5644: 5641: 5640:Fahrenheit451 5635: 5634: 5631: 5627: 5626: 5620: 5619: 5616: 5615:Fahrenheit451 5611: 5610: 5607: 5604: 5593: 5590: 5586: 5584:authorities." 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5576: 5575:wikipediatrix 5570: 5567: 5563: 5559: 5555: 5548: 5544: 5541: 5537: 5533: 5526: 5505: 5502: 5498: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5489: 5488:wikipediatrix 5484: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5475: 5471: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5461: 5460:wikipediatrix 5456: 5452: 5451: 5449: 5446: 5442: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5435: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5425: 5424:wikipediatrix 5421: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5409: 5405: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5390: 5384: 5376: 5371: 5370: 5367: 5366:Fahrenheit451 5363: 5352: 5349: 5345: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5336: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5327: 5322: 5321: 5320: 5319: 5316: 5315:Fahrenheit451 5300: 5297: 5296:wikipediatrix 5293: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5283: 5279: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5270: 5269:wikipediatrix 5266: 5262: 5259: 5255: 5250: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5232: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5221: 5218: 5213: 5212: 5205: 5202: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5193: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5186: 5179: 5176: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5162: 5159: 5158:Fahrenheit451 5155: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5139: 5136: 5132: 5130: 5127: 5122: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5110: 5107: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5095: 5092: 5091:Fahrenheit451 5087: 5086: 5085: 5082: 5077: 5076: 5073: 5070: 5069:Fahrenheit451 5066: 5062: 5056: 5053: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5044: 5043:Fahrenheit451 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5034: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5019: 5016: 5012: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4990: 4989:Fahrenheit451 4981: 4978: 4977:Fahrenheit451 4974: 4968: 4965: 4964:wikipediatrix 4961: 4960: 4959: 4956: 4955:Fahrenheit451 4952: 4951: 4950: 4947: 4946:wikipediatrix 4943: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4934: 4933:Fahrenheit451 4930: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4924: 4910: 4907: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4898: 4894: 4891: 4887: 4886: 4883: 4880: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4869: 4864: 4854: 4853: 4850: 4845: 4844: 4841: 4828: 4825: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4815: 4814:Fahrenheit451 4811: 4800: 4797: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4787: 4786:wikipediatrix 4782: 4770: 4767: 4766:wikipediatrix 4763: 4758: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4745: 4735: 4732: 4731:wikipediatrix 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4707: 4703: 4698: 4694: 4693: 4690: 4679: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4666: 4663: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4651: 4648: 4647:Fahrenheit451 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4638: 4635: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4624: 4614: 4611: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4601: 4598: 4595: 4592: 4589: 4584: 4579: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4569: 4563: 4562: 4559: 4558:Fahrenheit451 4555: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4525: 4521: 4516: 4514: 4511: 4507: 4505: 4502: 4498: 4495: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4486: 4485:Fahrenheit451 4482: 4481: 4480: 4477: 4472: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4451: 4447: 4442: 4435: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4418: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4395: 4392: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4382: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4372: 4368: 4366: 4363: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4353: 4349: 4344: 4343: 4340: 4335: 4331: 4327: 4304: 4301: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4246: 4243: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4211: 4208: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4169: 4166: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4109: 4106: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4047: 4044: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4006: 4003: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3946: 3943: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3908: 3905: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3874: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3833: 3832:wikipediatrix 3829: 3825: 3821: 3820:Frank Sinatra 3816: 3815: 3814: 3811: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3793: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3782: 3775: 3772: 3768: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3759: 3755: 3749: 3746: 3741: 3739: 3736: 3732: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3690: 3689: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3647: 3644: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3625: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3616: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3576: 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3563: 3562:Fahrenheit451 3558: 3557: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3541: 3540:Fahrenheit451 3537: 3533: 3523: 3522: 3519: 3518:Fahrenheit451 3513: 3507: 3504: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3491: 3487: 3475: 3472: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3454: 3436: 3433: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3406: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3377: 3374: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3336: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3313: 3310: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3298: 3295: 3290: 3286: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3263:Fahrenheit451 3260: 3259: 3250: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3227: 3226:Fahrenheit451 3222: 3221: 3218: 3217:Fahrenheit451 3206: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3194: 3190: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3182: 3178: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3169: 3165: 3156: 3155: 3152: 3149: 3148:Fahrenheit451 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3139: 3134: 3121: 3118: 3113: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3105:Fahrenheit451 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3095: 3090: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3068: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3047: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3034: 3024: 3023: 3020: 3019:Fahrenheit451 3015: 3014: 3011: 2998: 2995: 2990: 2985: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2976: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2902: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2867: 2863: 2862:Herr Hausherr 2859: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2807: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2782: 2779: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2723: 2720: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2695: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2674: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2628: 2625: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2610: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2555: 2551: 2541: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2528: 2523: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2482: 2479: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2445: 2442: 2441:wikipediatrix 2438: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2420: 2419:wikipediatrix 2416: 2415:still be fair 2412: 2411: 2410: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2395:I don't know. 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2388: 2383: 2371: 2368: 2364: 2363: 2355: 2352: 2351:Fahrenheit451 2348: 2347: 2340: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2319: 2316: 2315:Fahrenheit451 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2296: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2267: 2264: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2211: 2208: 2204: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2189: 2186: 2185:wikipediatrix 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2170: 2167: 2163: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2154: 2151: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2140:wikipediatrix 2136: 2135: 2132: 2128: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2102: 2100: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2078: 2075: 2074:Sam Blacketer 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2034: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2006: 2003: 1999: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1940: 1937: 1936:wikipediatrix 1933: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1924: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1899: 1893: 1892: 1889: 1888:Fahrenheit451 1880: 1877: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1836:Fahrenheit451 1829: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1810:Fahrenheit451 1805: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1788:Fahrenheit451 1782: 1779: 1774: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1756: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1740: 1737: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1670:public domain 1667: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1619: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1590: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1490: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1447: 1443: 1441: 1436: 1434: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1413: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1198: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1158: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1098: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1056: 1053: 1052:Slightlyright 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1012:Fahrenheit451 999: 996: 994: 991: 988: 984: 982: 979: 978: 970: 966: 962: 961: 956: 949: 948: 945: 942: 938: 934: 933:66.58.190.177 930: 913: 910: 906: 902: 901: 900: 897: 892: 891: 890: 889: 886: 885:Fahrenheit451 874: 871: 866: 865: 864: 861: 860:Fahrenheit451 857: 856: 855: 854: 850: 847: 843: 842:Fahrenheit451 839: 838: 837: 836: 833: 832:Fahrenheit451 825: 822: 817: 816: 815: 814: 811: 801: 798: 794: 789: 786: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 775: 770: 769: 768: 767: 764: 763:Hypermellow12 759: 758: 755: 750: 749: 746: 741: 739: 736: 731: 729: 726: 721: 720: 717: 716:Fahrenheit451 712: 711: 708: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 673: 672: 669: 668:Fahrenheit451 659: 658: 655: 648: 647: 644: 631: 628: 623: 622: 619: 614: 613: 610: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 584: 581: 580: 577: 573: 571: 568: 558: 555: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 540: 537: 533: 529: 524: 523: 522: 521: 512: 508: 504: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 486: 483: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 466: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 450: 449: 448: 447: 440: 439: 438: 437: 434: 431: 426: 425: 424: 412: 408: 404: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 386: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 369: 366: 361: 360: 359: 358: 349: 346: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 317: 314: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 298: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 285: 282: 278: 277: 276: 273: 270: 266: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 249: 245: 244: 243: 240: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 197: 194: 193:Fahrenheit451 190: 189: 188: 187: 184: 181: 176: 172: 171: 170: 169: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 147: 143: 137: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106:patter drills 103: 99: 90: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 13505:. Retrieved 13491: 13478: 13467:. Retrieved 13453: 13442:. Retrieved 13429: 13417:. Retrieved 13403: 13391:. Retrieved 13377: 13366:. Retrieved 13329:Coffeepusher 13301:Coffeepusher 13298: 13286:Coffeepusher 13267: 13260: 13253: 13241: 13234: 13230: 13226: 13203: 13187:Coffeepusher 13180: 13156:Coffeepusher 13090:Coffeepusher 13034:Mark Rathbun 13014: 12989:Mark Rathbun 12972: 12966: 12937: 12934:Mark Rathbun 12926: 12889: 12886:Mark Rathbun 12874: 12862: 12829: 12790:Mark Rathbun 12783:Mark Rathbun 12767:Coffeepusher 12764: 12713:Coffeepusher 12657:Mark Rathbun 12598: 12591: 12563: 12558: 12545: 12541: 12528:Jeff Hawkins 12521: 12517: 12496: 12445: 12428: 12369: 12361: 12321: 12279: 12249: 12214: 12176: 12175:sources. -- 12172: 12168: 12164: 12129: 12097: 12052: 12044: 12024: 12000: 11990: 11984: 11979: 11968: 11948: 11936:. Retrieved 11931: 11904: 11898: 11879: 11877: 11872: 11852: 11828: 11809: 11807: 11799:suggested) ( 11773:. Retrieved 11763: 11732: 11701:68.23.166.79 11690: 11668: 11655:Coffeepusher 11637: 11636:. Thoughts? 11628: 11625:New EL added 11608: 11592:Coffeepusher 11552: 11496: 11461: 11457: 11425: 11412: 11409: 11381: 11362: 11354: 11345: 11288: 11253: 11241:Coffeepusher 11222: 11215: 11212:Undoing edit 11202:Mark Rathbun 11191: 11189: 11184: 11176:Mark Rathbun 11165: 11163: 11158: 11101: 11089:. Retrieved 11079: 11069: 11058:. Retrieved 11048: 11037:. Retrieved 11031: 11021: 11002: 10993: 10981: 10969: 10952:Cite error: 10905: 10886: 10871: 10857: 10848: 10840:suggested) ( 10814:. Retrieved 10807: 10728: 10726: 10723: 10686: 10674:Coffeepusher 10655: 10642:Thank you. 10641: 10638: 10635: 10613: 10606: 10569: 10543: 10512: 10475: 10461: 10455: 10448: 10442:Miami Herald 10441: 10434: 10427: 10420: 10413: 10407:The Guardian 10406: 10399: 10386: 10349: 10347: 10339:suggested) ( 10313:. Retrieved 10307: 10286:suggested) ( 10260:. Retrieved 10254: 10232: 10214: 10210:Katie Holmes 10199: 10191: 10172: 10170: 10160:. Retrieved 10150: 10138: 10126: 10097: 10044: 10011: 9985: 9954: 9947: 9942: 9941: 9926: 9912: 9906: 9869: 9856: 9841: 9829: 9806: 9799: 9783: 9763: 9750:to Piratebay 9732: 9704:Humanproject 9664: 9651: 9626: 9593: 9566: 9529: 9510: 9497: 9481: 9451: 9449: 9437:. Retrieved 9430: 9400: 9393: 9379: 9356: 9338: 9332: 9327:WP:Image Lab 9324: 9301: 9295: 9246: 9240: 9203: 9188: 9187: 9151: 9139: 9132: 9126: 9122: 9117: 9113: 9110:might be #2! 9106: 9100: 9096: 9077: 9067: 9065: 9049: 9029: 9020: 8997: 8971: 8958:Daily Illini 8956: 8909:Raymond Hill 8888: 8882: 8878: 8876: 8864: 8842: 8811: 8805: 8786: 8781: 8762: 8760: 8728:. Retrieved 8684:. Retrieved 8640:. Retrieved 8632: 8592:. Retrieved 8580: 8545:. Retrieved 8523:. Retrieved 8513: 8499:suggested) ( 8461:. Retrieved 8455: 8415:. Retrieved 8370:cite journal 8359: 8329:Raymond Hill 8325: 8310: 8302: 8299: 8291: 8276: 8249: 8246: 8241: 8238: 8233: 8231: 8228: 8225: 8097: 8078: 8073: 8071: 8052: 8042: 8031: 8014: 7993: 7967: 7960: 7905:Felixmeister 7838:Felixmeister 7812: 7787: 7730:Felixmeister 7686: 7684: 7639: 7593: 7587: 7578:. Retrieved 7573: 7552: 7536: 7534: 7512: 7457:. Retrieved 7452: 7389:. Retrieved 7382: 7338:. Retrieved 7331: 7286: 7284: 7234:. Retrieved 7227:Radar Online 7226: 7213:Cook, John ( 7211: 7192: 7162:. Retrieved 7156: 7118: 7088:. Retrieved 7081:Radar Online 7080: 7067:Shah, Neel ( 7046: 7016:. Retrieved 7010: 6967: 6937:. Retrieved 6929: 6885: 6879: 6873: 6872: 6867: 6824:. Retrieved 6817: 6780: 6776: 6767:suggested) ( 6729:. Retrieved 6722: 6660: 6658: 6654: 6640: 6639: 6634: 6612: 6568:. Retrieved 6558: 6543: 6485:. Retrieved 6479: 6432: 6362: 6358: 6327:. Retrieved 6297: 6257: 6233: 6209:Steve Dufour 6186: 6172: 6165:Raymond Hill 6151: 6142: 6116:Raymond Hill 6110: 6076: 6067: 6058: 5962:Steve Dufour 5912:Steve Dufour 5875:Steve Dufour 5837:Steve Dufour 5807:Steve Dufour 5777:Steve Dufour 5773: 5764:Jesse Prince 5757: 5744: 5714: 5671: 5651: 5636: 5624: 5623: 5621: 5612: 5601: 5572: 5550: 5546: 5528: 5524: 5501:Raymond Hill 5482: 5474:Raymond Hill 5454: 5434:Raymond Hill 5419: 5408:Raymond Hill 5403: 5398: 5394: 5386: 5380: 5359: 5311: 5277: 5257: 5241: 5217:Raymond Hill 5026:Joseph Yanny 5025: 5014: 5010: 5002: 4999:Jesse Prince 4986: 4941: 4920: 4860: 4846: 4836: 4808: 4783: 4780: 4756: 4740: 4695: 4684: 4619: 4590: 4581: 4564: 4551: 4531:Whatever. -- 4438: 4402: 4345: 4323: 3827: 3824:Kitty Kelley 3778: 3752: 3706: 3702: 3696: 3680: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3658: 3584: 3559: 3548: 3529: 3514: 3510: 3501:Will try. -- 3483: 3449: 3343: 3329: 3288: 3279: 3276:Jesse Prince 3223: 3213: 3161: 3132: 3129: 3083: 3075: 3066: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3051: 3045: 3032: 3030: 3016: 3007: 2988: 2940: 2934: 2882: 2773: 2652: 2560: 2549: 2548: 2505: 2501: 2500: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2459: 2436: 2414: 2384: 2380: 2263:Steve Dufour 2207:Steve Dufour 2202: 2180: 2150:Steve Dufour 2137: 2124: 2103: 2097: 2057:Steve Dufour 2033:Steve Dufour 2030: 2022: 1931: 1902: 1885: 1876:Steve Dufour 1851:Steve Dufour 1847: 1832: 1806: 1795: 1794: 1785: 1754: 1750: 1745: 1729: 1677: 1673: 1665: 1649:Steve Dufour 1618:Steve Dufour 1614: 1599: 1581: 1561:Steve Dufour 1520:Steve Dufour 1517: 1508:Steve Dufour 1464:Steve Dufour 1448: 1444: 1437: 1429: 1425: 1419:Steve Dufour 1416: 1402: 1336: 1326: 1316: 1306: 1296: 1286: 1276: 1266: 1256: 1248:The Guardian 1247: 1237: 1227: 1194:Steve Dufour 1161: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1061: 1009: 986: 964: 958: 924: 903:Well then. 882: 829: 807: 760: 751: 742: 740:Joel Morris 732: 722: 713: 704: 679: 676:Revert image 665: 649: 639: 618:Keith Henson 615: 606: 582: 576:Keith Henson 574: 565: 554:Keith Henson 482:Keith Henson 465:Mark Rathbun 452:reliability? 421: 382:Keith Henson 345:Keith Henson 313:Keith Henson 303: 294:Keith Henson 274: 271: 267: 264: 241: 238: 160: 153:Patter drill 150: 141: 138: 133: 129: 125: 122:patter drill 117: 113: 109: 101: 97: 96: 88: 65: 43: 37: 12471:—Preceding 12436:independent 12381:—Preceding 12145:question? 12084:independent 11831:—Preceding 11793:|coauthors= 11719:independent 11695:—Preceding 11413:ten minutes 11206:Tommy Davis 11198:Mike Rinder 11180:Tommy Davis 11172:Mike Rinder 11105:—Preceding 11086:Google News 11008:Factnet Inc 10834:|coauthors= 10734:—Preceding 10598:Agree with 10571:mention. __ 10542:Thank you. 10333:|coauthors= 10280:|coauthors= 10129:Jason Beghe 10100:—Preceding 9676:was created 9553:Chevy Chase 9471:pointed out 8976:John Carter 8861:Hawk Radio? 8841:Thank you. 8829:John Carter 8493:|coauthors= 8253:—Preceding 8199:—Preceding 7619:article. -- 7423:Jason Beghe 6918:February 29 6856:|coauthors= 6761:|coauthors= 6565:Yahoo! News 6517:|coauthors= 6433:Hi. I did 5089:reliable.-- 4863:a reference 4669:Or violate 3324:On 21 June 3246:Justanother 3202:Justanother 3181:Justanother 3168:Justanother 2994:Justanother 2966:Justanother 2889:Justanother 2866:Justanother 2837:Justanother 2819:Justanother 2778:Justanother 2657:Justanother 2387:Gloriamarie 1776:Miscavige. 1674:registering 957:This is an 735:Joel-morris 684:—Preceding 632:somechooch 36:This is an 13507:2010-04-30 13484:Daily Mail 13469:2010-04-30 13444:2010-04-28 13368:2009-06-23 13086:Ad hominim 13042:Tom Cruise 12997:Tom Cruise 12798:Tom Cruise 12676:Thoughts? 12665:Tom Cruise 11938:2010-03-18 11899:Heads up: 11775:2009-10-25 11355:especially 11346:Regarding 11060:2007-02-10 11039:2008-11-15 11033:Daily Mail 10912:Karin Pouw 10816:2009-08-02 10315:2009-06-21 10262:2009-06-21 10221:Shutterbug 10206:Tom Cruise 10162:2009-05-26 9901:Tyra Banks 9688:first post 9604:AndroidCat 9439:2009-03-25 9387:Goldsztajn 9371:Thanks to 9101:Daily Mail 9069:Daily Mail 9052:Tom Cruise 9045:Daily Mail 8730:2007-10-19 8717:2007-06-23 8686:2007-08-31 8673:1998-10-25 8642:2007-10-19 8629:"Hardball" 8625:1998-01-28 8594:2007-10-19 8589:1997-03-11 8547:2007-10-19 8542:1987-01-01 8525:2007-08-31 8463:2007-08-10 8448:1990-06-24 8417:2007-10-19 8404:1988-12-22 8356:1984-10-28 8259:Gabebrooks 8205:65.49.2.93 8159:AndroidCat 8124:AndroidCat 7580:2008-08-30 7459:2008-04-26 7391:2008-04-16 7340:2008-04-16 7297:sources. 7236:2008-03-20 7164:2008-03-15 7090:2008-03-03 7018:2008-03-03 6939:2008-02-29 6826:2008-02-09 6806:February 8 6731:2008-02-06 6711:February 6 6647:February 5 6597:AndroidCat 6570:2008-01-28 6551:2008-01-28 6487:2008-01-28 6468:January 28 6418:AndroidCat 6394:AndroidCat 6365:AndroidCat 6329:2007-08-31 6316:1998-12-22 6275:Shutterbug 6250:Shutterbug 6199:Shutterbug 6133:Shutterbug 5794:AndroidCat 5729:AndroidCat 5694:AndroidCat 5676:AndroidCat 5658:AndroidCat 5589:Shutterbug 5455:definition 5362:User:Misou 5335:AndroidCat 5282:AndroidCat 5246:AndroidCat 5244:evidence. 5192:AndroidCat 5173:Ok, cool. 5106:AndroidCat 5065:User:Misou 5052:AndroidCat 5030:AndroidCat 5022:AndroidCat 4923:AndroidCat 4897:AndroidCat 4890:1997-03-11 4879:AndroidCat 4796:AndroidCat 4578:WP:SELFPUB 4554:WP:SELFPUB 4328:, perhaps 3493:AndroidCat 3348:AndroidCat 3294:AndroidCat 3060:statement 2975:AndroidCat 2946:AndroidCat 2575:Harassment 1717:AndroidCat 1635:AndroidCat 1586:AndroidCat 1357:hilarious. 1339:, 23/01/07 1145:The Thetan 1119:AndroidCat 785:AndroidCat 774:AndroidCat 745:AndroidCat 132:here is a 13327:provided. 13256:WP:TRIVIA 13236:WP:TRIVIA 13214:WP:TRIVIA 13200:WP:TRIVIA 13082:enthymeme 12477:BlacjinDH 12422:BlacjinDH 12387:BlacjinDH 12360:Even the 12213:page. -- 12094:citations 11795:ignored ( 11784:cite news 11765:Nightline 11480:DoingWell 11361:article. 11357:not in a 11271:DoingWell 11091:March 11, 10960:help page 10956:Nightline 10836:ignored ( 10825:cite news 10511:sources. 10474:sources. 10421:LA Weekly 10414:USA Today 10335:ignored ( 10324:cite news 10282:ignored ( 10271:cite news 10042:Cool Hand 10009:Cool Hand 9983:Cool Hand 9952:Cool Hand 9827:Cool Hand 9708:Wen Hsing 9662:Cool Hand 9624:Cool Hand 9527:Cool Hand 9149:Cool Hand 8725:The Times 8695:cite news 8581:Editorial 8515:Nightline 8495:ignored ( 8181:Kurtilein 8094:Hostages? 7287:secondary 7245:cite news 7173:cite news 7099:cite news 7027:cite news 6948:cite news 6835:cite news 6763:ignored ( 6740:cite news 6496:cite news 6338:cite news 6040:copyfraud 5739:Copyfraud 4520:User:COFS 4287:WP:BATTLE 4283:WP:VERIFY 3681:Miscavige 3486:vandalism 3027:bona fide 2858:WP:KETTLE 1337:LondonNet 1094:CyberAnth 1036:CyberAnth 998:Archive 4 993:Archive 3 987:Archive 2 981:Archive 1 921:How Tall? 909:Smeelgova 870:Smeelgova 846:Smeelgova 821:Smeelgova 797:Smeelgova 442:beatings. 216:at all. 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 13419:June 23, 13393:June 23, 13324:WP:SYNTH 13181:I think 12930:contribs 12878:contribs 12595:contribs 12550:in 1991. 12485:contribs 12473:unsigned 12439:reliable 12432:contribs 12409:BTfromLA 12395:contribs 12383:unsigned 12266:BTfromLA 12232:BTfromLA 12197:BTfromLA 12173:possible 12147:BTfromLA 12115:BTfromLA 12092:, using 12087:reliable 12070:BTfromLA 11989:program 11895:Slashdot 11833:unsigned 11797:|author= 11770:ABC News 11722:reliable 11709:contribs 11697:unsigned 11612:Jusdafax 11572:BTfromLA 11556:Jusdafax 11538:BTfromLA 11520:BTfromLA 11504:Jusdafax 11484:BTfromLA 11465:Jusdafax 11445:BTfromLA 11429:Jusdafax 11385:Jusdafax 11326:BTfromLA 11308:Jusdafax 11292:BTfromLA 11256:Jusdafax 11226:Jusdafax 11133:section. 11119:contribs 11107:unsigned 10889:Jusdafax 10875:Jusdafax 10838:|author= 10762:BTfromLA 10748:contribs 10740:Jusdafax 10736:unsigned 10689:Jusdafax 10659:Jusdafax 10610:contribs 10600:Jusdafax 10586:Jusdafax 10530:Jusdafax 10494:Jusdafax 10428:FOX News 10400:LiveNews 10337:|author= 10284:|author= 10219:at all. 10202:best man 10102:unsigned 9803:contribs 9793:Jayen466 9700:Tazchook 9397:contribs 9383:contribs 9373:Benjiboi 9134:WP:LEADs 8879:formerly 8739:cite web 8651:cite web 8603:cite web 8556:cite web 8520:ABC News 8497:|author= 8472:cite web 8426:cite web 8267:contribs 8255:unsigned 8201:unsigned 8046:contribs 7855:BTfromLA 7492:wag the 7400:cite web 7384:FOX News 7371:April 16 7349:cite web 7215:March 17 7145:March 15 6890:...... 6875:Newsweek 6819:Newsweek 6797:Newsweek 6765:|author= 6579:cite web 6447:Rockfang 6271:RookZERO 5445:RookZERO 5402:saying " 5324:account. 5313:cofs. -- 4940:That is 3766:Another 3549:requires 3048:citation 2228:WP:POINT 1808:forum.-- 1678:renewing 1666:register 1417:Thanks. 1389:contribs 1377:unsigned 929:unsigned 905:Grrrilla 896:Grrrilla 810:Grrrilla 754:Grrrilla 698:contribs 686:unsigned 643:BTfromLA 603:IRS deal 536:BTfromLA 430:BTfromLA 365:BTfromLA 281:BTfromLA 248:BTfromLA 13320:sources 13299:Thanks 13206:article 12581:removed 12327:reports 12169:specifc 11141:" and " 10192:This: 9857:Update: 9432:KESQ-TV 9419:KESQ-TV 9268:Collect 9221:Collect 9168:Collect 8871:website 8036:RFC bot 8032:Update: 7651:MySpace 7647:YouTube 7320:April 8 7069:March 3 6999:March 3 6916:Staff ( 6466:Staff ( 6089:HubcapD 6070:HubcapD 5945:HubcapD 5786:issues. 5638:ends.-- 5630:HubcapD 5606:HubcapD 5497:removed 5387:Author 5383:removal 5348:HubcapD 5326:HubcapD 5015:However 5011:thought 4906:HubcapD 4868:HubcapD 4849:HubcapD 4840:HubcapD 4757:prevent 4718:Su-Jada 4675:HubcapD 4662:HubcapD 4623:Kafziel 4524:HubcapD 4462:Su-Jada 4417:Su-Jada 4381:HubcapD 4379:source. 4352:HubcapD 4339:HubcapD 4279:WP:BIAS 3720:Su-Jada 3685:Su-Jada 3615:Su-Jada 3596:Su-Jada 3553:Su-Jada 3453:Su-Jada 3402:Su-Jada 3289:thought 3138:Su-Jada 3094:Su-Jada 2719:Su-Jada 2666:WP:MEAT 2579:Su-Jada 2527:Su-Jada 2467:Su-Jada 1162:so much 960:archive 707:Entheta 652:recall? 589:Vivaldi 503:Vivaldi 403:Vivaldi 222:Terryeo 218:WP:NPOV 180:Terryeo 161:knowing 39:archive 13109:WP:BLP 12632:WP:BLP 12246:WP:BLP 12211:WP:BLP 12193:WP:OWN 12049:WP:BLP 12020:, see 11359:WP:BLP 10070:Durova 10058:Durova 10024:Durova 9999:Durova 9968:Durova 9948:proven 9931:Durova 9747:leaked 9680:posted 9198:WP:RSN 9074:WP:RSN 9023:WP:RSN 8748:|date= 8704:|date= 8660:|date= 8612:|date= 8565:|date= 8481:|date= 8435:|date= 8379:|date= 8034:FWIW, 7985:WP:BLP 7964:WP:SPS 7931:(talk) 7835:WP:AGF 7809:WP:BLP 7726:WP:SPS 7687:anyone 7617:WP:BLP 7486:WP:BLP 7409:|date= 7358:|date= 7254:|date= 7182:|date= 7108:|date= 7036:|date= 6957:|date= 6844:|date= 6749:|date= 6588:|date= 6505:|date= 6347:|date= 5483:assume 5470:WP:RFC 5292:WP:BLP 5265:WP:BLP 5154:WP:NPA 4762:WP:BLP 4744:Tilman 4710:Tilman 4702:WP:BLP 4697:Tilman 4689:Tilman 4673:policy 4671:WP:BLP 4634:Tilman 4610:Tilman 4568:Tilman 4533:Tilman 4510:Tilman 4501:Tilman 4494:WP:BLP 4476:Tilman 4458:WP:BLP 4454:Tilman 4450:Tilman 4446:WP:BPL 4441:Tilman 4431:Tilman 4427:WP:BLP 4415:here.) 4412:Tilman 4408:WP:BLP 4404:Tilman 4391:Tilman 4371:Tilman 4362:Tilman 4334:WP:BLP 4330:WP:RFC 4300:Tilman 4242:Tilman 4207:Tilman 4043:Tilman 3942:Tilman 3870:Tilman 3801:Tilman 3781:Tilman 3771:Tilman 3758:Tilman 3745:Tilman 3735:Tilman 3731:WP:3RR 3716:WP:BLP 3677:WP:BLP 3643:Tilman 3624:Tilman 3606:Tilman 3592:WP:BLP 3536:Tilman 3532:WP:BLP 3503:Tilman 3471:Tilman 3432:Tilman 3398:Tilman 3373:Tilman 3326:Tilman 3309:Tilman 3280:expert 3242:WP:BLP 3193:Tilman 3164:WP:BLP 3117:Tilman 3062:itself 3037:Tilman 3010:Tilman 2898:Tilman 2875:Tilman 2850:Tilman 2846:WP:SPA 2828:Tilman 2815:WP:SPA 2806:Tilman 2802:WP:SPA 2750:Tilman 2709:Tilman 2670:Tilman 2639:Tilman 2624:Tilman 2606:Tilman 2593:Tilman 2562:Tilman 2554:Tilman 2537:Tilman 2510:Tilman 2494:Tilman 2478:Tilman 2463:Tilman 2428:Tilman 2406:Tilman 2336:Tilman 2292:Tilman 2238:Tilman 2181:enough 2166:Tilman 2131:Tilman 2106:Tilman 2002:Tilman 1953:Tilman 1923:Tilman 1904:Tilman 1821:WP:BLP 1796:Oppose 1778:CSI LA 1381:Mathmo 1365:Tilman 1115:WP:BLP 1080:Tilman 1023:Tilman 528:WP:NOR 155:, not 134:simple 118:simple 114:simple 98:Please 13439:AC360 13152:WP:RS 13105:WP:RS 12882:WP:RS 12709:WP:RS 12704:WP:RS 12583:, by 12562:. -- 12536:AC360 12324:AC360 12161:WP:RS 12096:. -- 12023:. -- 11997:WP:RS 11631:WP:EL 11351:WP:RS 10914:that 10854:WP:RS 10509:WP:RS 10468:WP:RS 10464:WP:RS 9943:looks 9779:Jayen 9772:I've 9759:Jayen 9728:Jayen 9647:Jayen 9589:Jayen 9506:Jayen 9494:Image 9477:Jayen 8347:Media 8342:Media 8146:Damon 7996:WP:EL 7989:WP:EL 7957:Recap 7813:their 7291:WP:RS 6989:WP:RS 5820:WP:OR 5747:WP:OR 5564:" by 5242:plant 5231:Misou 5201:Misou 5175:Misou 5135:Misou 5126:Misou 5081:Misou 4824:Misou 4337:some. 4326:WP:DR 4291:Misou 4275:WP:RS 4165:Misou 4105:Misou 4002:Misou 3904:Misou 3864:" or 3853:Misou 3843:" or 3810:Misou 3792:Misou 3673:still 3665:never 3633:Misou 3572:Misou 2984:WP:OR 2864:?) -- 2689:... 1974:Misou 1912:Misou 1908:WP:RS 1898:WP:RS 1730:early 1544:Misou 1473:fraud 1452:Raeft 1238:LAist 1111:WP:RS 690:Borbo 654:Obbop 16:< 13421:2009 13395:2009 13333:talk 13309:talk 13290:talk 13274:talk 13254:Per 13249:page 13245:page 13222:Cirt 13218:TALK 13210:Cirt 13191:talk 13183:this 13160:talk 13117:talk 13094:talk 13084:and 13050:talk 13021:talk 13016:Cirt 13005:talk 12979:talk 12974:Cirt 12958:talk 12944:talk 12939:Cirt 12924:talk 12910:talk 12896:talk 12891:Cirt 12872:talk 12854:talk 12835:talk 12815:talk 12771:talk 12748:talk 12717:talk 12682:talk 12619:talk 12605:talk 12600:Cirt 12589:talk 12570:talk 12565:Cirt 12542:and 12503:talk 12498:Cirt 12481:talk 12452:talk 12447:Cirt 12426:talk 12413:talk 12391:talk 12286:talk 12281:Cirt 12270:talk 12256:talk 12251:Cirt 12236:talk 12221:talk 12216:Cirt 12201:talk 12183:talk 12178:Cirt 12151:talk 12136:talk 12131:Cirt 12119:talk 12104:talk 12099:Cirt 12074:talk 12059:talk 12054:Cirt 12031:talk 12026:Cirt 12007:talk 12002:Cirt 11973:and 11955:talk 11950:Cirt 11911:talk 11906:Cirt 11886:talk 11881:Cirt 11859:talk 11854:Cirt 11841:talk 11816:talk 11811:Cirt 11801:help 11739:talk 11734:Cirt 11705:talk 11675:talk 11670:Cirt 11659:talk 11644:talk 11639:Cirt 11616:talk 11596:talk 11576:talk 11560:talk 11542:talk 11524:talk 11508:talk 11488:talk 11469:talk 11449:talk 11433:talk 11401:talk 11389:talk 11369:talk 11364:Cirt 11330:talk 11312:talk 11296:talk 11275:talk 11260:talk 11245:talk 11230:talk 11115:talk 11093:2008 10893:talk 10879:talk 10864:talk 10859:Cirt 10842:help 10784:talk 10766:talk 10744:talk 10713:talk 10693:talk 10678:talk 10663:talk 10648:talk 10620:talk 10615:Cirt 10604:talk 10590:talk 10577:talk 10573:meco 10550:talk 10545:Cirt 10534:talk 10519:talk 10514:Cirt 10498:talk 10482:talk 10477:Cirt 10472:WP:V 10371:talk 10367:Z00r 10356:talk 10351:Cirt 10341:help 10288:help 10225:talk 10179:talk 10174:Cirt 10110:talk 10046:Luke 10036:and 10013:Luke 9987:Luke 9956:Luke 9907:Banj 9876:talk 9871:Cirt 9848:talk 9843:Cirt 9831:Luke 9813:talk 9808:Cirt 9797:talk 9666:Luke 9628:Luke 9608:talk 9573:talk 9568:Cirt 9531:Luke 9458:talk 9453:Cirt 9407:talk 9402:Cirt 9391:talk 9377:talk 9363:talk 9358:Cirt 9333:Banj 9296:Banj 9272:talk 9241:Banj 9225:talk 9210:talk 9205:Cirt 9172:talk 9153:Luke 9123:lead 9099:The 9084:talk 9079:Cirt 9036:talk 9031:Cirt 9004:talk 8999:Cirt 8992:and 8980:talk 8952:WXYB 8942:talk 8928:talk 8913:talk 8896:talk 8867:site 8849:talk 8844:Cirt 8833:talk 8818:talk 8813:Cirt 8793:talk 8788:Cirt 8778:BLPN 8769:talk 8764:Cirt 8752:help 8708:help 8664:help 8616:help 8569:help 8501:help 8485:help 8439:help 8395:help 8383:help 8333:talk 8311:core 8283:talk 8278:Cirt 8263:talk 8209:talk 8185:talk 8163:talk 8142:Good 8128:talk 8105:talk 8085:talk 8080:Cirt 8059:talk 8054:Cirt 8040:talk 8022:talk 8006:talk 7974:talk 7969:Cirt 7947:talk 7909:talk 7893:talk 7876:talk 7859:talk 7842:talk 7821:talk 7795:talk 7767:talk 7748:talk 7734:talk 7714:talk 7698:talk 7674:talk 7659:talk 7653:. -- 7625:talk 7600:talk 7595:Cirt 7590:WP:V 7519:talk 7514:Cirt 7502:talk 7496:. -- 7490:tail 7474:talk 7470:Cirt 7431:talk 7427:Cirt 7413:help 7375:2008 7362:help 7324:2008 7303:talk 7299:Cirt 7295:WP:V 7271:talk 7267:Cirt 7258:help 7219:2008 7199:talk 7195:Cirt 7186:help 7149:2008 7124:talk 7120:Cirt 7112:help 7073:2008 7052:talk 7048:Cirt 7040:help 7003:2008 6985:WP:V 6974:talk 6970:Cirt 6961:help 6922:2008 6896:talk 6892:Cirt 6860:help 6848:help 6810:2008 6787:talk 6783:Cirt 6769:help 6753:help 6715:2008 6695:talk 6691:Cirt 6676:talk 6672:Cirt 6668:WP:V 6651:2008 6621:talk 6617:Cirt 6601:talk 6592:help 6535:talk 6531:Cirt 6521:help 6509:help 6472:2008 6451:talk 6443:here 6435:this 6351:help 6129:this 6111:only 5672:much 5420:fact 5385:of " 4942:your 4594:cont 4588:talk 4281:and 3828:true 3818:the 3712:Smee 3344:many 3244:. -- 3058:this 2956:COFS 2691:Smee 2685:and 2668:. -- 2573:and 2566:COFS 2522:rude 2520:The 2508:. -- 2367:Smee 2203:some 2116:Smee 2089:Smee 2043:Smee 1932:both 1862:COFS 1825:COFS 1800:COFS 1746:with 1630:and 1582:does 1530:Smee 1494:Smee 1385:talk 1346:Smee 1149:late 937:talk 694:talk 593:talk 532:WP:V 530:and 507:talk 407:talk 214:WP:V 130:need 126:good 110:this 102:have 12971:-- 12532:CNN 12367:. 11987:CNN 11081:AFP 11006:v. 10922:'s 10612:). 9905:-- 9784:466 9764:466 9733:466 9682:at 9652:466 9644:). 9594:466 9511:466 9482:466 9331:-- 9294:-- 9239:-- 9184:RSN 9140:not 9118:any 8719:). 8675:). 8627:). 8450:). 8406:). 8391:|1= 8244:.” 7649:or 7494:dog 7425:. 7377:). 7326:). 7221:). 7151:). 7143:) ( 7075:). 7005:). 6924:). 6812:). 6717:). 6670:. 6560:AFP 6553:). 6474:). 6318:). 5822:.-- 5554:AMA 5532:AMA 5399:not 5294:." 4838:it. 4764:. 4714:POV 3707:his 3703:any 3669:any 3074:. 2589:AGF 2571:AGF 1934:. 1760:DES 1751:NOT 1734:DES 1695:DES 1683:DES 1477:DES 534:. 13499:. 13461:. 13437:. 13412:. 13386:. 13361:. 13345:^ 13335:) 13311:) 13292:) 13276:) 13193:) 13162:) 13119:) 13096:) 13052:) 13023:) 13007:) 12981:) 12960:) 12946:) 12912:) 12898:) 12856:) 12837:) 12817:) 12773:) 12750:) 12719:) 12684:) 12634:). 12621:) 12607:) 12572:) 12526:, 12505:) 12487:) 12483:• 12454:) 12415:) 12407:-- 12397:) 12393:• 12288:) 12272:) 12258:) 12238:) 12223:) 12203:) 12185:) 12153:) 12138:) 12121:) 12106:) 12076:) 12061:) 12033:) 12009:) 11957:) 11930:. 11913:) 11903:. 11888:) 11861:) 11843:) 11818:) 11788:: 11786:}} 11782:{{ 11768:. 11762:. 11741:) 11731:. 11711:) 11707:• 11677:) 11661:) 11646:) 11618:) 11598:) 11578:) 11562:) 11544:) 11526:) 11510:) 11490:) 11471:) 11451:) 11435:) 11403:) 11391:) 11371:) 11332:) 11314:) 11298:) 11277:) 11262:) 11247:) 11232:) 11200:, 11174:, 11145:". 11117:• 11084:. 11078:. 11030:. 11010:; 11001:, 10962:). 10944:^ 10926:. 10895:) 10881:) 10866:) 10829:: 10827:}} 10823:{{ 10806:. 10786:) 10768:) 10750:) 10746:• 10715:) 10695:) 10680:) 10665:) 10650:) 10622:) 10592:) 10579:) 10552:) 10536:) 10521:) 10500:) 10484:) 10373:) 10358:) 10328:: 10326:}} 10322:{{ 10306:. 10275:: 10273:}} 10269:{{ 10253:. 10227:) 10181:) 10155:. 10149:. 10135:: 10112:) 9915:oi 9878:) 9868:. 9850:) 9815:) 9717:, 9706:, 9702:, 9698:: 9610:) 9575:) 9551:, 9547:, 9543:, 9469:I 9460:) 9429:. 9409:) 9365:) 9355:. 9341:oi 9329:. 9304:oi 9274:) 9249:oi 9227:) 9212:) 9174:) 9086:) 9076:. 9038:) 9028:. 9006:) 8996:. 8982:) 8974:. 8944:) 8930:) 8922:-- 8915:) 8898:) 8851:) 8835:) 8820:) 8795:) 8771:) 8743:: 8741:}} 8737:{{ 8723:. 8699:: 8697:}} 8693:{{ 8679:. 8655:: 8653:}} 8649:{{ 8635:. 8631:. 8607:: 8605:}} 8601:{{ 8587:. 8583:. 8579:. 8560:: 8558:}} 8554:{{ 8540:. 8536:. 8518:. 8512:. 8489:; 8476:: 8474:}} 8470:{{ 8454:. 8430:: 8428:}} 8424:{{ 8410:. 8387:; 8374:: 8372:}} 8368:{{ 8335:) 8327:-- 8285:) 8269:) 8265:• 8236:” 8211:) 8187:) 8165:) 8139:-- 8130:) 8122:. 8107:) 8087:) 8061:) 8024:) 8008:) 8000:-- 7976:) 7949:) 7911:) 7895:) 7878:) 7861:) 7844:) 7823:) 7797:) 7769:) 7750:) 7736:) 7716:) 7700:) 7676:) 7661:) 7627:) 7602:) 7572:. 7521:) 7504:) 7476:) 7451:. 7433:) 7404:: 7402:}} 7398:{{ 7381:. 7373:, 7353:: 7351:}} 7347:{{ 7330:. 7322:, 7305:) 7289:, 7273:) 7249:: 7247:}} 7243:{{ 7229:. 7225:. 7217:, 7201:) 7177:: 7175:}} 7171:{{ 7155:. 7147:, 7126:) 7103:: 7101:}} 7097:{{ 7083:. 7079:. 7071:, 7054:) 7031:: 7029:}} 7025:{{ 7009:. 7001:, 6976:) 6952:: 6950:}} 6946:{{ 6932:. 6928:. 6920:, 6898:) 6884:, 6878:, 6852:; 6839:: 6837:}} 6833:{{ 6816:. 6808:, 6789:) 6757:; 6744:: 6742:}} 6738:{{ 6721:. 6713:, 6697:) 6678:) 6649:, 6645:, 6623:) 6603:) 6583:: 6581:}} 6577:{{ 6563:. 6557:. 6537:) 6513:; 6500:: 6498:}} 6494:{{ 6478:. 6470:, 6453:) 6342:: 6340:}} 6336:{{ 6322:. 6238:-- 6217:-- 5556:, 5534:, 5499:. 5472:? 5450:) 5267:. 5260:. 4742:-- 4632:-- 4474:-- 4389:-- 4277:, 3851:. 3769:-- 3743:-- 3641:-- 3516:-- 3469:-- 3430:-- 3371:-- 3133:no 3115:-- 3103:-- 2964:-- 2941:is 2887:-- 2804:-- 2622:-- 2577:. 2535:-- 2439:. 2417:. 2334:-- 1442:" 1435:" 1391:). 1387:• 1335:, 1325:, 1315:, 1305:, 1295:, 1285:, 1275:, 1265:, 1255:, 1236:, 1226:, 1156:?? 1117:. 1021:-- 939:) 700:) 696:• 595:) 572:" 569:, 509:) 409:) 13510:. 13472:. 13447:. 13423:. 13397:. 13371:. 13331:( 13307:( 13288:( 13272:( 13189:( 13158:( 13115:( 13092:( 13048:( 13019:( 13003:( 12977:( 12956:( 12942:( 12927:· 12922:( 12908:( 12894:( 12875:· 12870:( 12852:( 12833:( 12813:( 12769:( 12746:( 12715:( 12680:( 12642:] 12617:( 12603:( 12592:· 12587:( 12568:( 12501:( 12479:( 12450:( 12429:· 12424:( 12411:( 12389:( 12284:( 12268:( 12254:( 12234:( 12219:( 12199:( 12181:( 12149:( 12134:( 12117:( 12102:( 12072:( 12057:( 12029:( 12005:( 11953:( 11941:. 11909:( 11884:( 11857:( 11839:( 11814:( 11803:) 11778:. 11737:( 11703:( 11673:( 11657:( 11642:( 11614:( 11594:( 11574:( 11558:( 11540:( 11522:( 11506:( 11486:( 11467:( 11447:( 11431:( 11387:( 11367:( 11328:( 11310:( 11294:( 11273:( 11258:( 11243:( 11228:( 11137:" 11113:( 11095:. 11063:. 11042:. 10891:( 10877:( 10862:( 10844:) 10819:. 10782:( 10764:( 10742:( 10711:( 10691:( 10676:( 10661:( 10646:( 10618:( 10607:· 10602:( 10588:( 10575:( 10548:( 10532:( 10517:( 10496:( 10480:( 10470:/ 10369:( 10354:( 10343:) 10318:. 10290:) 10265:. 10223:( 10177:( 10165:. 10108:( 9913:b 9909:e 9874:( 9846:( 9811:( 9800:· 9795:( 9641:( 9606:( 9571:( 9456:( 9442:. 9405:( 9394:· 9389:( 9380:· 9375:( 9361:( 9339:b 9335:e 9302:b 9298:e 9270:( 9247:b 9243:e 9223:( 9208:( 9170:( 9082:( 9034:( 9002:( 8978:( 8940:( 8926:( 8911:( 8894:( 8873:: 8847:( 8831:( 8816:( 8791:( 8767:( 8754:) 8750:( 8733:. 8710:) 8706:( 8689:. 8666:) 8662:( 8645:. 8618:) 8614:( 8597:. 8571:) 8567:( 8550:. 8528:. 8503:) 8487:) 8483:( 8466:. 8441:) 8437:( 8420:. 8397:) 8393:( 8385:) 8381:( 8364:. 8331:( 8281:( 8261:( 8207:( 8183:( 8161:( 8126:( 8103:( 8083:( 8057:( 8043:· 8038:( 8020:( 8004:( 7991:: 7972:( 7945:( 7907:( 7891:( 7874:( 7857:( 7840:( 7819:( 7793:( 7765:( 7746:( 7732:( 7712:( 7696:( 7672:( 7657:( 7623:( 7598:( 7583:. 7517:( 7500:( 7472:( 7462:. 7429:( 7415:) 7411:( 7394:. 7364:) 7360:( 7343:. 7301:( 7293:/ 7269:( 7260:) 7256:( 7239:. 7197:( 7188:) 7184:( 7167:. 7122:( 7114:) 7110:( 7093:. 7050:( 7042:) 7038:( 7021:. 6987:/ 6972:( 6963:) 6959:( 6942:. 6894:( 6862:) 6858:( 6850:) 6846:( 6829:. 6785:( 6771:) 6755:) 6751:( 6734:. 6693:( 6674:( 6619:( 6599:( 6594:) 6590:( 6573:. 6533:( 6523:) 6519:( 6511:) 6507:( 6490:. 6449:( 6353:) 6349:( 6332:. 5251:) 4596:) 4591:· 4586:( 4350:. 3353:) 2696:. 2372:. 2230:. 2121:. 2094:. 2048:. 1819:( 1535:. 1499:. 1438:" 1431:" 1383:( 1351:. 971:. 943:. 935:( 914:. 875:. 851:. 826:. 802:. 790:) 692:( 591:( 505:( 405:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index