Knowledge

Talk:DICT

Source đź“ť

510:
format does not require the integration of parsable microformats in wiki pages), and "Accept-Encoding:" (the returned responses should be compressible in gzip or deflate formats, just like with out current HTML output). For using the "raw" wiki format (visible in wii code editors), the best option is to use a query parameter within "DICT words", such that a DICT query of the "article-name" (may be quoted) will return the definitions of "article-name", rendered as HTML by default, the query of the quoted "article-name?format=raw" would return the wiki code without rendering the wiki page...
71: 168: 143: 53: 22: 513:
With this extension of MediaWiki, we could then register all linguisitic editions Wiktionnarywithin dict.org and allow easier interchanges (and integration in softwares that already use DICT to look for various databases, to querty definitions, lookup orthographies in correctors, suggest replacement
509:
An interesting option to consider in the implementation is to include MIME support since the begining, to allow "Accept:" headers in queries (so it could return data in JSON or XML format, or in HTML format matching what is already generated in rendered Wiki pages, or plain text format; only the HTML
495:
conventions to give parsable conventions for what can fit in a "DICT word". Thus these characters allow easy derivation creation of microformats, using templates already used in Wikitionnary to format the language sections, and their subsections and lems or to access to examples, external references.
527:
for such attempt to use the DICT protocol on Wikimedia projects and more generally on any Mediawiki server. It failed because its only goal was to convert static dumps of Mediawiki databases to giant static DICT files (to be used then on a separate DICT server). My opinion is that this would have
494:
In MediaWikis, the "DICT words" are exactly what can fit within a full Wiki page name. As these names use the colon (:) as prefixes for namespaces (or interwikis) and slash (/) to index subpages, but also reserve the question mark (?) and hash (#), these could be used under all existing MediaWiki
505:
As the Lua module would perform external requests, this could add delay to the delivery of pages, so its effect should be to perform requests on demand, possibly using a local cache for remote DICT servers It would most probably need jQuery to modufy the content of
517:
Another option would be to have a separate DICT server (hosted in Wikimedia Labs) querying the normal Wiktionnary server (but parsing the microformats inserted in rendered wiki page), if it's not hosted simply in a "Special:DICT" page of the wiki
401:
Added one client and a link for the GNU server. Rearranged the dictionary lists and divided them into (monolingual) dictionaries of English and bilingual dictionaries. Rearranged external links to push the protocol's RFC to the top.
483:
Wiktionnary (requires specific microformats to allow complete processing ans separation of definitions by languages and lems), Wikispecies (the "DICT definitions" could a a list of subtaxons used to define a taxon "DICT
490:
We could as well enumerate other things than just the main namespace of wikis; notably we could the contents enumerate categories as if they were "DICT definitions", given their parent category name used as a "DICT
333:
Though the question remains: Why doesn't Knowledge support the dict protocol? Wouldn't it be great (and faster) if Knowledge, Wiktionary etc. would be available through dictionary applications?
354:
The "webster protocol" was implemented by client/server software running on the NeXT machine. In the late 1990's, some NeXT owners put their server on the public internet. For example:
498:
Wiktionnary could also be able to transclude, via a Lua module and a formatting template inserted in articles, the contents of some other free DICT databases (such as those listed in "
578: 368: 344: 442: 559: 312: 253:
a file format, as it is implied in the rest of the article. The article is for the most part incorrect and confuses readers. See comments down this page.
267: 452: 125: 601: 263: 119: 409:
Lingvo English-Russian and Russian-English dictionaries are not free, but when purchased, can easily be converted into DICT format
596: 487:
Even Knowledge (article contents can be seen as "definitions" of the article name) could be available under the DICT protocol.
474: 174: 148: 574: 95: 364: 340: 539: 438: 606: 545: 78: 58: 563: 457:
Yeah, why, truly?! Because it suffers from not sufficiently documented. WWW.dict.org provides one rfc, and
33: 446: 372: 315: 348: 271: 328: 238: 582: 94:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
21: 301: 213: 91: 528:
succeeded if if was a true DICT server performing conversions on demand (with a local cache).
378: 39: 434: 360: 336: 179: 153: 8: 568: 355: 535: 276: 466: 325: 293: 230: 514:
terms, control text style and prefered terminologies in some categorized domains).
422:
There are also programs that read the DICT file format directly. For example (...)
391: 461:
aren't served by rfcs. I have a hard time finding and setting up database urls.
590: 555: 531: 260:) correctly describes Dict protocol and should be translated into English. 462: 289: 226: 573:
xdxf does not convert as stated in the article. pyglossary converts.
87: 167: 142: 83: 70: 52: 554:
is completely useless if it contains only titles and no links.
249:
a network protocol, as stated right on the first line, and
480:
It could hit the world, if our Wikimedia projects used it
428: 431:
now, but I'm not sure it's worth a separate link. HTH!
499: 387: 321: 523: 82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 356:
https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/project/NeXT/Webster
424:Well, don't the other clients read DICT directly? 124:This article has not yet received a rating on the 257: 588: 177:, a project which is currently considered to be 19: 453:Why doesn't this protocol hit the world? 589: 602:Unknown-importance Computing articles 417:dictionaries, it sounds like a plug. 311:Why doesn't Knowledge support DICT?-- 189:Knowledge:WikiProject Reference works 256:The Spanish version of the article ( 192:Template:WikiProject Reference works 173:This article is within the scope of 76:This article is within the scope of 15: 392:free ready to use DICT dictionaries 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 14: 618: 420:I don't understand the fragment: 166: 141: 69: 51: 20: 104:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 597:Start-Class Computing articles 540:19:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC) 349:06:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 107:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 447:17:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 98:and see a list of open tasks. 390:hosts a large collection of 308:What is "webster protocol"? 258:http://es.wikipedia.org/DICT 7: 405:I'm not sure whether this: 373:01:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC) 329:19:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 175:WikiProject Reference works 10: 623: 320:You can do so offline via 126:project's importance scale 583:11:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 475:08:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 316:17:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 302:07:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 284:(Comments to be added at 239:07:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 221:(Comments to be added at 161: 123: 64: 46: 272:20:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC) 195:Reference works articles 564:12:41, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 546:Resources without links 427:DICT appears to have a 413:should be listed among 398:because it seems dead. 607:All Computing articles 552:Bilingual dictionaries 394:and a free DICT server 92:information technology 28:This article is rated 79:WikiProject Computing 500:http://www.dict.org/ 288:of the edit window. 225:of the edit window. 110:Computing articles 34:content assessment 437:comment added by 375: 363:comment added by 339:comment added by 211: 210: 207: 206: 203: 202: 136: 135: 132: 131: 614: 471: 449: 358: 351: 298: 235: 197: 196: 193: 190: 187: 170: 163: 162: 157: 145: 138: 137: 112: 111: 108: 105: 102: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 622: 621: 617: 616: 615: 613: 612: 611: 587: 586: 571: 569:xdxf inaccuracy 548: 467: 455: 432: 381: 334: 294: 281: 231: 218: 194: 191: 188: 186:Reference works 185: 184: 151: 149:Reference works 109: 106: 103: 100: 99: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 620: 610: 609: 604: 599: 575:160.154.248.16 570: 567: 547: 544: 543: 542: 529: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 496: 492: 488: 485: 481: 454: 451: 411: 410: 396: 395: 380: 377: 280: 275: 217: 215:(top scribble) 212: 209: 208: 205: 204: 201: 200: 198: 171: 159: 158: 146: 134: 133: 130: 129: 122: 116: 115: 113: 96:the discussion 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 619: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 594: 592: 585: 584: 580: 576: 566: 565: 561: 557: 553: 541: 537: 533: 530: 526: 525: 521:Also look at 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 501: 497: 493: 489: 486: 482: 479: 478: 477: 476: 472: 470: 464: 460: 450: 448: 444: 440: 436: 430: 425: 423: 418: 416: 408: 407: 406: 403: 399: 393: 389: 386: 385: 384: 379:modifications 376: 374: 370: 366: 365:67.235.35.249 362: 357: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 331: 330: 327: 323: 318: 317: 314: 313:69.150.136.26 309: 306: 305: 303: 299: 297: 291: 287: 279: 274: 273: 269: 265: 261: 259: 254: 252: 248: 243: 242: 240: 236: 234: 228: 224: 216: 199: 182: 181: 176: 172: 169: 165: 164: 160: 155: 150: 147: 144: 140: 139: 127: 121: 118: 117: 114: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 572: 551: 549: 522: 468: 458: 456: 426: 421: 419: 414: 412: 404: 400: 397: 382: 359:— Preceding 353: 341:62.226.17.67 332: 319: 310: 307: 295: 285: 283: 282: 277: 262: 255: 250: 246: 244: 232: 222: 220: 219: 214: 178: 77: 40:WikiProjects 433:—Preceding 335:—Preceding 326:JeffBurdges 30:Start-class 591:Categories 439:83.6.56.63 550:The list 278:(webster) 101:Computing 88:computing 84:computers 59:Computing 556:OhReally 524:Wik2dict 465:dixit. ( 435:unsigned 388:Aioe.org 383:Removed 361:unsigned 337:unsigned 322:wik2dict 292:dixit. ( 229:dixit. ( 180:inactive 154:inactive 532:verdy_p 518:server. 484:word"). 286:the end 264:RFC2229 223:the end 506:pages. 463:Rursus 290:Rursus 227:Rursus 90:, and 36:scale. 491:word" 459:users 245:Dict 579:talk 560:talk 536:talk 469:bork 443:talk 429:wiki 415:free 369:talk 345:talk 296:bork 268:talk 233:bork 473:!) 324:. 300:!) 251:NOT 237:!) 120:??? 593:: 581:) 562:) 538:) 502:") 445:) 371:) 347:) 270:) 247:IS 86:, 577:( 558:( 534:( 441:( 367:( 343:( 304:) 266:( 241:) 183:. 156:) 152:( 128:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Computing
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Computing
computers
computing
information technology
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Reference works
inactive
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Reference works
inactive
Rursus
bork
07:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
http://es.wikipedia.org/DICT
RFC2229
talk
20:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Rursus
bork
07:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
69.150.136.26

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑