1122:'11B-3-1369' on his YouTube channel. As a way of proving his identity, he challenged viewers to create an exact duplicate of his plague doctor mask." This passage in the header of the article reads like an advertisement for this guy's claim. Then the entire section about the guy who almost certainly was trying to steal the video's thunder (I was heavily involved in working out the puzzles), when in reality, this guy was less than a footnote in the history of this whole thing. Plus, I think citing the Daily Dot is like citing Upworthy. It's a clickbait site that I think should be up there with Daily Mail.
193:
172:
630:
609:
290:
718:
22:
525:
140:
504:
426:
408:
804:
80:
53:
640:
535:
436:
1305:
1227:
Also the 213 in the second message refers to the death of Zhang Ren (in the year 213) who famously said he would not serve two lords. The author is stating that they are loyal to the person they believe to be president no matter who wins. Kinda “ liberty or death” vibes but more… questionable. But
1160:, perhaps its headlines are clickbait alright but the key thing is, is its content generally seen as making a good-faith effort to report things truthfully, subject to editorial oversight? I think we use it as a source widely enough to say that consensus is that we feel it does. If it reaches the
1256:
That’s the point. If you look up you might see it whizzing overhead. There’s no good place to put theories, even if they are true, due to the fact that none of this can ever be confirmed unless they find the author rendering this entire
Knowledge article purely speculative in every “solution.”
1121:
It absolutely implies it. "Three months after the initial controversy, an individual going by the name of Parker Warner Wright appeared to have established himself as the creator of the video. He explained to The Daily Dot that it was intended as an art project, and released a sequel video,
1085:
The whole article kind of reads like an advertisement. It's not proven that this guy was the creator, even if a couple of influential people believe him to be. It really sounds like this guy wrote all that in the article in order to further his claim. The article needs to be a little less
949:
Thanks (I would also argue for the continuing notability through some of the ciphers not being cracked yet). Based on that, I'm going to take the tag off if that's OK with you (my goal is to nominate this at DYK (where I suppose there might be more feedback about this issue).
1150:
as having been reported in reliable sources (which of course puts on us the responsibility to write these things in such a way as to make certain we are not stating in
Knowledge's voice that this established fact. Unfortunately people don't always realize they have to do
924:
I see your point. Through I am not sure I fully agree with it, I think AfD has many more pressing issues, and the entire topic of notability of urban myths is not one I am willing to pursue now. Maybe in few years :) Cheers,
1262:
1143:
OK, I will soften that language to "claimed to" ... I thought "appeared to" created enough distance from stating it as an indisputable fact, but I see now that some readers may put too much on "established" in that
308:
130:
1281:
This article is looking great but it seems to be more categories it can go under. I was also thinking that this should go under the WikiProject Horror since some have classified it as such.--
1295:
1453:
995:
1258:
1313:
243:
1233:
1216:
1340:
1325:
377:
729:
1448:
1393:
1373:
339:
233:
154:
829:
696:
591:
1021:
1101:
Uh, the article never states conclusively that Wright was the creator. It just says he "appeared to have established himself" as such, and that
1398:
1378:
326:
1363:
353:
322:
120:
1266:
812:
1388:
1368:
1276:
364:
209:
1383:
1290:
1189:
1137:
1116:
1070:
1433:
1418:
1358:
983:
959:
937:
912:
686:
581:
96:
1237:
200:
177:
149:
63:
1056:
1038:
1438:
268:
1423:
278:
273:
263:
1229:
1212:
895:
I don't see this as an event so much as web content (since it's on YouTube and anyone can go view it there), governed by
747:
1408:
1336:
1297:
1220:
1129:
1087:
87:
58:
1428:
1413:
662:
557:
315:
661:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1443:
1251:
462:
1164:'s depths of repeatedly showing reckless disregard for the truth, of repeatedly publishing outright fabrications,
1403:
735:
454:
1095:
845:
1146:
Remember that the important thing here is that where the truth isn't known or we put in articles what can be
863:
466:
458:
1344:
1200:
653:
614:
548:
509:
333:
302:
33:
1000:
1321:
882:
449:
413:
1316:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
844:" mailed to a Swedish tech blogger was found to contain coded messages implying a threat against the
1133:
556:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
208:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
95:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1286:
1317:
1091:
1061:
Actually, it wound being several grafs adding to existing sections. More work than I thought.
866:. Yes, there is coverage - but will it continue for more the the scope of one-two weeks? Ping
1247:
1185:
1112:
1080:
1066:
1052:
1034:
1001:
The Daily Dot – The most disturbing viral video now has a sequel, and we spoke to the creator
955:
908:
822:
39:
862:
I have added a notability tag here, because I am concerned this may not meet notability for
1208:
1125:
717:
8:
787:
1172:
greater than those related to its use in this article, I invite you to bring them up in
780:
1330:
1282:
857:
803:
977:
931:
896:
876:
739:
1242:
All this is only unsourced speculation. Interesting to discuss here, but that's it.
901:
multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
192:
171:
1243:
1181:
1108:
1062:
1048:
1030:
966:
951:
919:
904:
867:
1086:"conclusive" since there is no conclusive evidence that he is the actual creator.
453:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
1009:, and revealed some information behind the video. How are we gonna add that in?
1173:
1017:
346:
1352:
1309:
1156:
1103:
645:
540:
973:
944:
927:
890:
872:
205:
92:
629:
608:
1147:
441:
289:
840:
371:
to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject
Internet culture}}
1013:
1006:
1005:
Apparently, the author himself decided to have an interview with the
816:
1168:
we would discourage its use as a source. If you have concerns about
470:
1314:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 19#Creepy puzzle
524:
503:
425:
407:
368:
139:
658:
553:
1304:
79:
52:
971:
I'll not restore the tag, it's fine to remove it. Cheers. --
1454:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
1308:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
1205:"RedLips" backwards is spilder, Danish for wastes.
657:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
635:
552:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
530:
431:
378:
Category:Internet culture articles needing attention
204:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
91:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1047:interesting. I think this demands a new section.
340:Category:Internet culture articles needing images
1350:
469:. To improve this article, please refer to the
745:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
996:Just a quick note on "Sequel" and Mythbusting
309:View all requested internet culture articles
365:Category:Internet self-classification codes
1029:We look at it and see how we can do this.
899:, specifically the footnotes referencing "
465:. To use this banner, please refer to the
297:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
1449:Social sciences and society good articles
1228:there’s no good place to put this stuff.
730:Social sciences and society good articles
1394:Low-importance Internet culture articles
1374:Low-importance Computer science articles
1351:
1259:2601:1C0:6400:3EB0:6482:5BA0:E993:5053
218:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet culture
1399:WikiProject Internet culture articles
1379:WikiProject Computer science articles
974:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
928:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
873:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
221:Template:WikiProject Internet culture
1364:Low-importance Cryptography articles
651:This article is within the scope of
546:This article is within the scope of
447:This article is within the scope of
198:This article is within the scope of
85:This article is within the scope of
21:
19:
15:
1277:Missing Categories and WikiProjects
1107:accepted his claim, or appears to.
255:WikiProject Internet culture To-do:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
1389:GA-Class Internet culture articles
1369:GA-Class Computer science articles
1318:𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰
138:
105:Knowledge:WikiProject Cryptography
14:
1465:
1384:WikiProject Cryptography articles
738:. If you can improve it further,
108:Template:WikiProject Cryptography
1303:
802:
716:
638:
628:
607:
533:
523:
502:
463:regional and topical task forces
434:
424:
406:
288:
191:
170:
78:
51:
20:
1312:. The discussion will occur at
691:This article has been rated as
586:This article has been rated as
238:This article has been rated as
125:This article has been rated as
1434:Low-importance Sweden articles
1419:Low-importance Poland articles
1359:GA-Class Cryptography articles
846:President of the United States
726:has been listed as one of the
1:
1190:19:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
1138:06:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
1117:20:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
1096:06:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
665:and see a list of open tasks.
560:and see a list of open tasks.
212:and see a list of open tasks.
147:This article is supported by
99:and see a list of open tasks.
1439:All WikiProject Sweden pages
1345:19:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
1221:09:45, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
1154:As to your misgivings about
1071:06:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
1057:19:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
1039:16:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
1022:12:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
984:02:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
960:17:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
938:12:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
913:06:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
883:04:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
671:Knowledge:WikiProject Sweden
566:Knowledge:WikiProject Poland
201:WikiProject Internet culture
150:WikiProject Computer science
7:
1424:WikiProject Poland articles
836:The text of the entry was:
674:Template:WikiProject Sweden
569:Template:WikiProject Poland
10:
1470:
1326:08:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
1296:"Creepy puzzle" listed at
697:project's importance scale
592:project's importance scale
479:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
244:project's importance scale
1409:WikiProject Film articles
1291:23:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
1267:19:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
1252:18:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
1238:04:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
1174:the same forum where the
838:Did you know ... that a "
762:
758:
690:
623:
585:
518:
482:Template:WikiProject Film
419:
250:
237:
224:Internet culture articles
186:
146:
124:
73:
46:
1429:GA-Class Sweden articles
1414:GA-Class Poland articles
1298:Redirects for discussion
815:appeared on Knowledge's
88:WikiProject Cryptography
1444:Knowledge good articles
1404:GA-Class film articles
864:WP:Notability (events)
813:fact from this article
352:All stubs are located
143:
28:This article is rated
736:good article criteria
321:Pick an article from
142:
111:Cryptography articles
1178:'s ban was discussed
788:Good article nominee
1335:Robert C Christain
455:join the discussion
781:September 17, 2017
763:Article milestones
654:WikiProject Sweden
549:WikiProject Poland
144:
34:content assessment
1223:
1211:comment added by
1140:
1128:comment added by
855:
854:
797:
796:
754:
711:
710:
707:
706:
703:
702:
602:
601:
598:
597:
497:
496:
493:
492:
457:and see lists of
401:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
367:(!?); Try to get
165:
164:
161:
160:
1461:
1307:
1206:
1123:
980:
970:
948:
934:
923:
894:
879:
868:User:Daniel Case
830:December 2, 2015
806:
783:
760:
759:
743:
720:
713:
712:
679:
678:
675:
672:
669:
648:
643:
642:
641:
632:
625:
624:
619:
611:
604:
603:
574:
573:
570:
567:
564:
543:
538:
537:
536:
527:
520:
519:
514:
506:
499:
498:
487:
486:
483:
480:
477:
450:WikiProject Film
444:
439:
438:
437:
428:
421:
420:
410:
403:
402:
303:Article requests
292:
285:
284:
252:
251:
226:
225:
222:
219:
216:
215:Internet culture
206:internet culture
195:
188:
187:
182:
178:Internet culture
174:
167:
166:
131:importance scale
113:
112:
109:
106:
103:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
64:Computer science
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1349:
1348:
1333:
1301:
1279:
1203:
1083:
998:
982:
978:
964:
942:
936:
932:
917:
888:
881:
877:
860:
851:
850:
834:
779:
677:Sweden articles
676:
673:
670:
667:
666:
644:
639:
637:
617:
572:Poland articles
571:
568:
565:
562:
561:
539:
534:
532:
512:
484:
481:
478:
475:
474:
440:
435:
433:
385:
283:
223:
220:
217:
214:
213:
180:
110:
107:
104:
101:
100:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1467:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1332:
1329:
1300:
1294:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1041:
997:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
972:
926:
871:
859:
856:
853:
852:
835:
810:
809:
807:
799:
798:
795:
794:
791:
784:
776:
775:
772:
769:
765:
764:
756:
755:
721:
709:
708:
705:
704:
701:
700:
693:Low-importance
689:
683:
682:
680:
663:the discussion
650:
649:
633:
621:
620:
618:Low‑importance
612:
600:
599:
596:
595:
588:Low-importance
584:
578:
577:
575:
558:the discussion
545:
544:
528:
516:
515:
513:Low‑importance
507:
495:
494:
491:
490:
488:
446:
445:
429:
417:
416:
411:
399:
398:
395:
394:
391:
390:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
372:
356:
342:
329:
311:
296:
294:
293:
282:
281:
276:
271:
266:
260:
257:
256:
248:
247:
240:Low-importance
236:
230:
229:
227:
210:the discussion
196:
184:
183:
181:Low‑importance
175:
163:
162:
159:
158:
155:Low-importance
145:
135:
134:
127:Low-importance
123:
117:
116:
114:
97:the discussion
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1466:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1354:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1310:Creepy puzzle
1306:
1299:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:Paleface Jack
1268:
1264:
1260:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:71.63.237.121
1226:
1225:
1224:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1213:79.141.163.74
1210:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:The Daily Dot
1152:
1149:
1142:
1141:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:The Daily Dot
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1081:Parker Wright
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1008:
1003:
1002:
985:
981:
975:
968:
963:
962:
961:
957:
953:
946:
941:
940:
939:
935:
929:
921:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
892:
887:
886:
885:
884:
880:
874:
869:
865:
849:
847:
843:
842:
841:creepy puzzle
832:
831:
826:
824:
823:Did you know?
818:
814:
808:
805:
801:
800:
792:
790:
789:
785:
782:
778:
777:
773:
770:
767:
766:
761:
757:
752:
750:
749:
741:
737:
733:
732:
731:
725:
722:
719:
715:
714:
698:
694:
688:
685:
684:
681:
664:
660:
656:
655:
647:
646:Sweden portal
636:
634:
631:
627:
626:
622:
616:
613:
610:
606:
605:
593:
589:
583:
580:
579:
576:
559:
555:
551:
550:
542:
541:Poland portal
531:
529:
526:
522:
521:
517:
511:
508:
505:
501:
500:
489:
485:film articles
472:
468:
467:documentation
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
443:
432:
430:
427:
423:
422:
418:
415:
412:
409:
405:
404:
380:
379:
374:
373:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
355:
351:
349:
348:
343:
341:
338:
336:
335:
330:
328:
324:
320:
318:
317:
312:
310:
307:
305:
304:
299:
298:
295:
291:
287:
286:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
261:
259:
258:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
235:
232:
231:
228:
211:
207:
203:
202:
197:
194:
190:
189:
185:
179:
176:
173:
169:
168:
156:
153:(assessed as
152:
151:
141:
137:
136:
132:
128:
122:
119:
118:
115:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
1337:196.74.43.47
1334:
1302:
1280:
1207:— Preceding
1204:
1175:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1155:
1153:
1145:
1130:50.113.90.43
1124:— Preceding
1102:
1088:50.113.90.43
1084:
1044:
1011:
1004:
999:
900:
861:
839:
837:
828:
820:
786:
746:
744:
740:please do so
728:
727:
723:
692:
652:
587:
547:
448:
375:
359:
358:
345:
344:
332:
331:
314:
313:
301:
300:
239:
199:
148:
126:
102:Cryptography
93:Cryptography
86:
59:Cryptography
40:WikiProjects
1244:Daniel Case
1182:Daniel Case
1109:Daniel Case
1063:Daniel Case
1049:Daniel Case
1031:Daniel Case
967:Daniel Case
952:Daniel Case
920:Daniel Case
905:Daniel Case
442:Film portal
1353:Categories
1331:02/04/2022
1201:"Red Lips"
979:reply here
933:reply here
897:WP:WEBCRIT
878:reply here
858:Notability
827:column on
734:under the
724:11B-X-1371
471:guidelines
459:open tasks
1144:sentence.
1007:Daily Dot
817:Main Page
376:See also
1322:𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠
1209:unsigned
1148:verified
1126:unsigned
1043:Hmm ...
748:reassess
30:GA-class
945:Piotrus
891:Piotrus
819:in the
771:Process
695:on the
590:on the
369:YouTube
269:history
242:on the
129:on the
793:Listed
774:Result
668:Sweden
659:Sweden
615:Sweden
563:Poland
554:Poland
510:Poland
316:Expand
36:scale.
1151:this.
360:Other
347:Stubs
334:Photo
279:purge
274:watch
1341:talk
1287:talk
1263:talk
1248:talk
1234:talk
1217:talk
1186:talk
1176:Mail
1166:then
1162:Mail
1134:talk
1113:talk
1092:talk
1067:talk
1053:talk
1045:very
1035:talk
1018:talk
1014:Wuzh
956:talk
909:talk
870:. --
768:Date
476:Film
461:and
414:Film
354:here
327:here
323:here
264:edit
1170:TDD
687:Low
582:Low
325:or
234:Low
121:Low
1355::
1343:)
1324:)
1289:)
1265:)
1250:)
1236:)
1219:)
1188:)
1180:.
1136:)
1115:)
1094:)
1069:)
1055:)
1037:)
1020:)
1012:--
958:)
925:--
911:)
903:"
811:A
751:it
742:.
157:).
62::
1339:(
1320:(
1285:(
1261:(
1246:(
1232:(
1215:(
1184:(
1132:(
1111:(
1090:(
1065:(
1051:(
1033:(
1016:(
976:|
969::
965:@
954:(
947::
943:@
930:|
922::
918:@
907:(
893::
889:@
875:|
848:?
833:.
825:"
821:"
753:.
699:.
594:.
473:.
362::
350::
337::
319::
306::
246:.
133:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
