Knowledge

Substructural logic

Source 📝

22: 759: 675:
among other properties. In substructural logics, typically premises are not composed into sets, but rather they are composed into more fine-grained structures, such as trees or multisets (sets that distinguish multiple occurrences of elements) or sequences of formulae. For example, in linear logic, since contraction fails, the premises must be composed in something at least as fine-grained as multisets.
674:
There are numerous ways to compose premises (and in the multiple-conclusion case, conclusions as well). One way is to collect them into a set. But since e.g. {a,a} = {a} we have contraction for free if premises are sets. We also have associativity and permutation (or commutativity) for free as well,
683:
Substructural logics are a relatively young field. The first conference on the topic was held in October 1990 in Tübingen, as "Logics with Restricted Structural Rules". During the conference, Kosta Došen proposed the term "substructural logics", which is now in use today.
665:
The above are basic examples of structural rules. It is not that these rules are contentious, when applied in conventional propositional calculus. They occur naturally in proof theory, and were first noticed there (before receiving a name).
645: 474: 579: 526: 399: 349: 224: 161: 287: 594: 423: 51: 810: 175:
of the sequent, denoted Γ, initially conceived of as a string (sequence) of propositions. The standard interpretation of this string is as
538: 485: 360: 310: 185: 266:
style of sequent); but everything applies equally to the general case, since all the manipulations are taking place to the left of the
744: 763: 780: 803: 73: 654:, in which duplicated hypotheses 'count' differently from single occurrences, leaves out both of these rules, while 44: 1096: 1091: 796: 140: 957: 850: 107: 693: 111: 34: 38: 30: 855: 55: 1060: 840: 272: 931: 893: 888: 835: 255: 172: 103: 990: 771: 8: 1070: 819: 176: 1065: 980: 845: 698: 267: 1055: 1020: 1008: 985: 972: 962: 949: 740: 1013: 131: 114:, exchange or associativity. Two of the more significant substructural logics are 640:{\displaystyle \Gamma ,{\mathcal {A}},{\mathcal {B}},\Delta \vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 469:{\displaystyle \Gamma ,{\mathcal {A}},{\mathcal {A}},\Delta \vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 1000: 916: 911: 873: 775: 721: 712: 99: 95: 655: 263: 115: 1085: 735:
Galatos, Nikolaos, Peter Jipsen, Tomasz Kowalski, and Hiroakira Ono (2007),
921: 827: 651: 119: 939: 865: 297: 293: 878: 407: 788: 1032: 883: 413: 300:
operation, the formal setting-up of sequent theory normally includes
168: 574:{\displaystyle \Gamma ,{\mathcal {A}},\Delta \vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 521:{\displaystyle \Gamma ,{\mathcal {A}},\Delta \vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 394:{\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}},{\mathcal {B}}\vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 344:{\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}},{\mathcal {A}}\vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 219:{\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}},{\mathcal {B}}\vdash {\mathcal {C}}} 1025: 737:
Residuated Lattices. An Algebraic Glimpse at Substructural Logics
304:
for rewriting the sequent Γ accordingly—for example for deducing
758: 87: 1037: 405:
There are further structural rules corresponding to the
658:
merely leaves out the latter rule, on the ground that
597: 541: 488: 426: 363: 313: 275: 188: 143: 639: 573: 520: 468: 393: 343: 281: 218: 155: 1083: 43:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 804: 811: 797: 662:is clearly irrelevant to the conclusion. 74:Learn how and when to remove this message 167:Here the structural rules are rules for 818: 722:An Introduction to Substructural Logics 1084: 669: 792: 156:{\displaystyle \Gamma \vdash \Sigma } 134:, one writes each line of a proof as 94:is a logic lacking one of the usual 15: 781:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 769: 13: 729: 632: 624: 616: 606: 598: 566: 558: 550: 542: 513: 505: 497: 489: 461: 453: 445: 435: 427: 386: 376: 366: 336: 326: 316: 211: 201: 191: 150: 144: 14: 1108: 751: 757: 417:properties of conjunction: from 20: 713:Substructural Logics: A Primer 656:relevant (or relevance) logics 1: 704: 258:Σ to be a single proposition 229:as the sequent notation for 7: 958:Ontology (computer science) 687: 125: 10: 1113: 851:Intuitionistic type theory 678: 1048: 999: 971: 948: 930: 902: 864: 826: 694:Substructural type system 584:one can deduce, for any 29:This article includes a 856:Constructive set theory 292:Since conjunction is a 282:{\displaystyle \vdash } 254:Here we are taking the 58:more precise citations. 772:"Substructural logics" 641: 575: 522: 470: 395: 345: 283: 220: 157: 841:Constructive analysis 642: 576: 523: 471: 396: 346: 284: 221: 158: 894:Fuzzy set operations 889:Fuzzy finite element 836:Intuitionistic logic 766:at Wikimedia Commons 595: 539: 486: 424: 361: 311: 273: 186: 179:: we expect to read 141: 104:intuitionistic logic 1097:Non-classical logic 1092:Substructural logic 1071:Non-monotonic logic 820:Non-classical logic 764:Substructural logic 670:Premise composition 92:substructural logic 1066:Intermediate logic 846:Heyting arithmetic 719:G. Restall (2000) 699:Residuated lattice 637: 571: 518: 466: 391: 341: 279: 216: 153: 31:list of references 1079: 1078: 1061:Inquisitive logic 1056:Dynamic semantics 1009:Three-state logic 963:Ontology language 762:Media related to 745:978-0-444-52141-5 710:F. Paoli (2002), 84: 83: 76: 1104: 1014:Tri-state buffer 813: 806: 799: 790: 789: 785: 776:Zalta, Edward N. 761: 646: 644: 643: 638: 636: 635: 620: 619: 610: 609: 580: 578: 577: 572: 570: 569: 554: 553: 527: 525: 524: 519: 517: 516: 501: 500: 475: 473: 472: 467: 465: 464: 449: 448: 439: 438: 400: 398: 397: 392: 390: 389: 380: 379: 370: 369: 350: 348: 347: 342: 340: 339: 330: 329: 320: 319: 302:structural rules 288: 286: 285: 280: 268:turnstile symbol 225: 223: 222: 217: 215: 214: 205: 204: 195: 194: 162: 160: 159: 154: 132:sequent calculus 96:structural rules 79: 72: 68: 65: 59: 54:this article by 45:inline citations 24: 23: 16: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1044: 995: 967: 944: 926: 917:Relevance logic 912:Structural rule 898: 874:Degree of truth 860: 822: 817: 770:Restall, Greg. 754: 732: 730:Further reading 707: 690: 681: 672: 631: 630: 615: 614: 605: 604: 596: 593: 592: 565: 564: 549: 548: 540: 537: 536: 512: 511: 496: 495: 487: 484: 483: 460: 459: 444: 443: 434: 433: 425: 422: 421: 385: 384: 375: 374: 365: 364: 362: 359: 358: 335: 334: 325: 324: 315: 314: 312: 309: 308: 274: 271: 270: 210: 209: 200: 199: 190: 189: 187: 184: 183: 142: 139: 138: 128: 116:relevance logic 80: 69: 63: 60: 49: 35:related reading 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 1110: 1100: 1099: 1094: 1077: 1076: 1074: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1058: 1052: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1005: 1003: 997: 996: 994: 993: 988: 983: 977: 975: 969: 968: 966: 965: 960: 954: 952: 946: 945: 943: 942: 936: 934: 932:Paraconsistent 928: 927: 925: 924: 919: 914: 908: 906: 900: 899: 897: 896: 891: 886: 881: 876: 870: 868: 862: 861: 859: 858: 853: 848: 843: 838: 832: 830: 828:Intuitionistic 824: 823: 816: 815: 808: 801: 793: 787: 786: 767: 753: 752:External links 750: 749: 748: 731: 728: 727: 726: 717: 706: 703: 702: 701: 696: 689: 686: 680: 677: 671: 668: 649: 648: 634: 629: 626: 623: 618: 613: 608: 603: 600: 582: 581: 568: 563: 560: 557: 552: 547: 544: 530: 529: 515: 510: 507: 504: 499: 494: 491: 479:we can deduce 477: 476: 463: 458: 455: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 429: 403: 402: 388: 383: 378: 373: 368: 352: 351: 338: 333: 328: 323: 318: 278: 264:intuitionistic 262:(which is the 252: 251: 227: 226: 213: 208: 203: 198: 193: 165: 164: 152: 149: 146: 127: 124: 82: 81: 39:external links 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1109: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1087: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1004: 1002: 1001:Digital logic 998: 992: 989: 987: 984: 982: 979: 978: 976: 974: 970: 964: 961: 959: 956: 955: 953: 951: 947: 941: 938: 937: 935: 933: 929: 923: 920: 918: 915: 913: 910: 909: 907: 905: 904:Substructural 901: 895: 892: 890: 887: 885: 882: 880: 877: 875: 872: 871: 869: 867: 863: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 844: 842: 839: 837: 834: 833: 831: 829: 825: 821: 814: 809: 807: 802: 800: 795: 794: 791: 783: 782: 777: 773: 768: 765: 760: 756: 755: 746: 742: 738: 734: 733: 724: 723: 718: 715: 714: 709: 708: 700: 697: 695: 692: 691: 685: 676: 667: 663: 661: 657: 653: 627: 621: 611: 601: 591: 590: 589: 587: 561: 555: 545: 535: 534: 533: 508: 502: 492: 482: 481: 480: 456: 450: 440: 430: 420: 419: 418: 416: 415: 410: 409: 381: 371: 357: 356: 355: 331: 321: 307: 306: 305: 303: 299: 295: 290: 276: 269: 265: 261: 257: 249: 246: 242: 239: 236: 232: 231: 230: 206: 196: 182: 181: 180: 178: 174: 170: 147: 137: 136: 135: 133: 123: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 78: 75: 67: 57: 53: 47: 46: 40: 36: 32: 27: 18: 17: 981:Three-valued 922:Linear logic 903: 779: 739:, Elsevier, 736: 725:, Routledge. 720: 711: 682: 673: 664: 659: 652:Linear logic 650: 585: 583: 531: 478: 412: 406: 404: 353: 301: 291: 259: 253: 247: 244: 240: 237: 234: 228: 166: 129: 120:linear logic 91: 85: 70: 61: 50:Please help 42: 1021:Four-valued 991:Łukasiewicz 986:Four-valued 973:Many-valued 950:Description 940:Dialetheism 298:associative 294:commutative 177:conjunction 112:contraction 106:), such as 56:introducing 1086:Categories 879:Fuzzy rule 705:References 532:Also from 408:idempotent 1033:IEEE 1164 884:Fuzzy set 716:, Kluwer. 628:⊢ 625:Δ 599:Γ 562:⊢ 559:Δ 543:Γ 509:⊢ 506:Δ 490:Γ 457:⊢ 454:Δ 428:Γ 414:monotonic 382:⊢ 332:⊢ 277:⊢ 207:⊢ 169:rewriting 151:Σ 148:⊢ 145:Γ 108:weakening 100:classical 98:(e.g. of 64:June 2016 688:See also 126:Examples 1026:Verilog 778:(ed.). 679:History 245:implies 52:improve 1049:Others 743:  866:Fuzzy 774:. In 354:from 130:In a 88:logic 37:, or 1038:VHDL 741:ISBN 411:and 296:and 171:the 118:and 102:and 90:, a 256:RHS 238:and 173:LHS 86:In 1088:: 588:, 289:. 243:) 122:. 110:, 41:, 33:, 812:e 805:t 798:v 784:. 747:. 660:B 647:. 633:C 622:, 617:B 612:, 607:A 602:, 586:B 567:C 556:, 551:A 546:, 528:. 514:C 503:, 498:A 493:, 462:C 451:, 446:A 441:, 436:A 431:, 401:. 387:C 377:B 372:, 367:A 337:C 327:A 322:, 317:B 260:C 250:. 248:C 241:B 235:A 233:( 212:C 202:B 197:, 192:A 163:. 77:) 71:( 66:) 62:( 48:.

Index

list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
logic
structural rules
classical
intuitionistic logic
weakening
contraction
relevance logic
linear logic
sequent calculus
rewriting
LHS
conjunction
RHS
intuitionistic
turnstile symbol
commutative
associative
idempotent
monotonic
Linear logic
relevant (or relevance) logics
Substructural type system
Residuated lattice

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.