370:
184:- The 'traditional' de-briefing requirement (within 15 days of receiving a written request) remains where a tenderer does not seek an additional de-briefing within the first 2 working days of the standstill period. In any case, all tenderers can make formal complaints in Court within the standstill period regardless of having requested or received debriefing within the standstill period and Courts can agree to grant interim measures preventing contract award.
364:
22:
160:
The timelines given below are the minimum (of at least 10 days) under the 'Alcatel' mandatory standstill period and show the days by which specific actions by the contracting authority (ie notify all tenderers of the award decision and the completion of any requested additional de-briefing) and by
180:
Notes: - Depending on the day of the initial notification of the intention of the contract award decision, given the very tight timescales for the additional debriefing, it may be more practical to extend the end-date of the standstill period beyond the minimum of 10 calendar days.
233:* If there is a delay in completing the requested additional de-briefings, the end-date of the standstill period must be extended to ensure 3 full working days between the last de-brief and the end of the standstill period remembering that the last day must be a working day.
261:
Directive 2007/66/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public
161:
the tenderer (ie a request for additional de-briefing within the standstill period), and in order to comply with the minimum period before entering into a contract (assuming no legal challenges are formally notified).
176:
are resolved or the court lifts the suspension. Regulation 96(5) in the UK regulations also stipulates that the court cannot issue an order lifting or modifying the suspension until the standstill period has ended.
341:
Directive 2004/18/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service
135:, before the contract is signed with the successful supplier(s). Its purpose is to allow unsuccessful bidders to challenge the decision before the contract is signed. It is named after a pair of linked
303:
145:
case (Case C-81/98). Under EU law a statutory "standstill period" was introduced by the
Remedies Directive as amended in 2007. Within the UK, it was introduced by the
153:
under regulation 87 of the Public
Contracts Regulations 2015 and regulation 86 of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015, even though the UK has now
347:
332:
172:
in
Scotland), the starting of those proceedings "automatically" requires the contracting authority to refrain from entering into a contract until the
150:
335:
Alcatel
Austria AG and Others, Siemens AG Österreich and Sag-Schrack Anlagentechnik AG v Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr
86:
131:
58:
413:
237:
65:
39:
105:
72:
442:
340:
43:
54:
146:
260:
437:
125:
is a period of at least ten calendar days following the notification of an award decision in a contract
202:
Day 2 Tenderers must request additional debriefing (by phone, email, fax) before end of day (midnight)
406:
274:
136:
299:
316:
287:
32:
79:
432:
399:
387:
126:
8:
379:
196:
Day 0 Notify tenderers of decision and intention to award contract on or after 'date'
173:
165:
383:
141:
217:
Day 7 Additional de-briefings must be completed before end of day (midnight) *
426:
169:
230:
The contract may be concluded if no legal challenge has been notified.
21:
363:
256:
154:
164:
Where a legal challenge has been filed in the High Court (
240:
or at the weekend. Day 10 ends at midnight on that day.
236:** The end of a standstill period must not fall on a
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
424:
317:Public Contracts Regulations 2015: Regulation 96
306:, updated October 2016, accessed 14 August 2023
407:
288:Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015
414:
400:
226:Day 10 End of minimum standstill period **
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
290:, regulation 86, accessed 3 October 2021
277:, Regulation 87, accessed 3 October 2021
425:
132:Official Journal of the European Union
139:cases which are jointly known as the
357:
44:adding citations to reliable sources
15:
13:
348:10-day Mandatory Standstill Period
264:, recital 4, accessed 25 July 2023
14:
454:
326:
304:Guidance on the Standstill Period
275:Public Contracts Regulations 2015
155:withdrawn from the European Union
368:
362:
20:
346:Office of Government Commerce,
31:needs additional citations for
309:
293:
280:
267:
250:
1:
243:
151:UK contract award legislation
147:Office of Government Commerce
386:. You can help Knowledge by
7:
187:
149:in 2005 and remains within
123:mandatory standstill period
10:
459:
356:
378:This article relating to
319:, accessed 14 August 2023
137:European Court of Justice
300:Crown Commercial Service
443:Government procurement
350:, updated January 2008
40:improve this article
55:"Standstill period"
438:European Union law
380:European Union law
395:
394:
116:
115:
108:
90:
450:
416:
409:
402:
374:
373:
372:
371:
366:
358:
320:
315:UK Legislation,
313:
307:
297:
291:
286:UK Legislation,
284:
278:
273:UK Legislation,
271:
265:
254:
166:Court of Session
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
423:
422:
421:
420:
369:
367:
361:
354:
329:
324:
323:
314:
310:
298:
294:
285:
281:
272:
268:
255:
251:
246:
190:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
456:
446:
445:
440:
435:
419:
418:
411:
404:
396:
393:
392:
375:
352:
351:
344:
338:
328:
327:External links
325:
322:
321:
308:
292:
279:
266:
248:
247:
245:
242:
238:public holiday
228:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
189:
186:
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
428:
417:
412:
410:
405:
403:
398:
397:
391:
389:
385:
381:
376:
365:
360:
359:
355:
349:
345:
343:
339:
337:
336:
333:Case C-81/98
331:
330:
318:
312:
305:
301:
296:
289:
283:
276:
270:
263:
258:
253:
249:
241:
239:
234:
231:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
194:
193:
185:
182:
178:
175:
171:
170:Sheriff Court
167:
162:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
138:
134:
133:
128:
124:
122:
110:
107:
99:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
433:EU law stubs
388:expanding it
377:
353:
334:
311:
295:
282:
269:
252:
235:
232:
229:
191:
183:
179:
163:
159:
140:
130:
120:
119:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
174:proceedings
427:Categories
244:References
96:March 2016
66:newspapers
342:contracts
262:contracts
188:Timeline
129:via the
127:tendered
257:EUR-Lex
192:Action
142:Alcatel
121:Alcatel
80:scholar
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
382:is a
223:Day 9
220:Day 8
214:Day 6
211:Day 5
208:Day 4
205:Day 3
199:Day 1
87:JSTOR
73:books
384:stub
118:The
59:news
168:or
42:by
429::
302:,
259:,
157:.
415:e
408:t
401:v
390:.
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
