31:
334:. The plaintiffs subsequently challenged the District Court's ruling via petition to the Supreme Court on the basis that the dismissal did not properly consider their claims. The Supreme Court agreed, ordering a full three-judge hearing at the District Court.
1008:
976:
605:
1267:
343:, accepted in December 2017 and heard in March 2018, in which the Supreme Court found that the District Court's denial of an injunction was not improper, but otherwise did not weigh in on the merits of the
913:
701:
669:
1331:
303:, the Court ruled that federal district courts are required to refer cases to a three-judge panel when plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts.
306:
The case results from citizens in
Maryland that had challenged the state's redistricting based on the 2010 Census created by Democratic leaders in the state, leading to Republican voters in the
928:
1136:
1104:
653:
1396:
952:
366:
968:
174:
Federal district courts are required to refer cases to a three-judge panel when plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts.
297:
1120:
1096:
330:, the judge denied the request for a full three-judge hearing, considering that the plaintiff's claims were insubstantial; the decision was summarily affirmed in the
1248:
637:
327:
1232:
1064:
920:
1056:
1032:
765:
645:
621:
473:
449:
392:
331:
157:
79:
897:
361:
1112:
881:
1283:
1000:
936:
873:
725:
693:
613:
1299:
1275:
1168:
1024:
992:
808:
685:
661:
323:
1048:
1386:
1192:
741:
733:
709:
889:
315:
532:
1355:
1184:
1391:
356:
307:
1401:
502:
314:
to lose in the 2012 election. The plaintiffs charged that their rights of equal representation and protection under the
1224:
1208:
1016:
289:
271:
35:
905:
525:
293:
749:
518:
510:
54:
Stephen M. Shapiro, et al. v. David J. McManus, Jr., Chairman, Maryland State Board of
Elections, et al.
1347:
629:
1176:
857:
319:
865:
832:
477:
453:
396:
161:
74:
984:
484:
445:
388:
153:
8:
1160:
1152:
1144:
784:
677:
581:
217:
800:
717:
557:
63:
1240:
1128:
1072:
838:
824:
792:
757:
440:
339:
415:
149:
142:
111:
1315:
1200:
944:
816:
589:
275:
1363:
1307:
1216:
960:
573:
311:
296:
judges must refer cases to three-judge panels. In a unanimous opinion written by
233:
209:
205:
1323:
344:
300:
221:
197:
1380:
1291:
597:
565:
542:
1088:
1080:
1040:
229:
189:
540:
1332:
Arizona State
Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
493:
423:
412:
241:
146:
139:
119:
108:
310:
to find their votes diluted and causing ten-term U.S. Representative
86:
427:
123:
337:
The hearing at
District Court led to another Supreme Court case,
419:
115:
30:
367:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
1249:
Alexander v. South
Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
1009:
Houston
Lawyers' Association v. Attorney General of Texas
328:
United States
District Court for the District of Maryland
1233:
Wisconsin
Legislature v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
1397:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
766:
Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
977:
Mississippi Republican Executive Committee v. Brooks
362:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
1169:League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
809:League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
316:Article One, Section Two of the U.S. Constitution
1378:
1193:Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections
734:Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris
606:Lucas v. Forty-Fourth Gen. Assembly of Colorado
288:, 577 U.S. ___ (2015), was a case in which the
1268:Chappelle v. Greater Baton Rouge Airport Dist.
526:
126:2014); cert. granted, 135 S. Ct. 2805 (2015).
1356:Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
1185:Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama
533:
519:
357:List of United States Supreme Court cases
914:East Carroll Parish Sch. Bd. v. Marshall
702:East Carroll Parish Sch. Bd. v. Marshall
670:Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Water District
503:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
1387:United States civil procedure case law
1379:
145:(D. Md. 2017); injunction denied, 266
514:
18:2015 United States Supreme Court case
929:United Jewish Organizations v. Carey
1137:Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board
1105:Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board
13:
543:redistricting in the United States
290:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1413:
1392:United States Supreme Court cases
906:City of Richmond v. United States
654:Hadley v. Junior College District
480:___ (2015) is available from:
462:
29:
1017:Presley v. Etowah County Comm'n
1402:2015 in United States case law
433:
402:
378:
1:
953:City of Rome v. United States
399:___, slip op. at 1, 4 (2015).
372:
152:(D. Md. 2017); affirmed, No.
332:Fourth Circuit Appeals Court
294:United States District Court
7:
1225:North Carolina v. Covington
1209:North Carolina v. Covington
969:Escambia County v. McMillan
750:Tennant v. Jefferson County
350:
103:Motion to dismiss granted,
10:
1418:
494:Oyez (oral argument audio)
326:had been violated. At the
1348:Wittman v. Personhuballah
1259:
849:
776:
549:
270:
265:
254:
249:
183:
178:
173:
168:
130:
99:
94:
69:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
1121:Lopez v. Monterey County
1097:Lopez v. Monterey County
45:Decided December 8, 2015
777:Partisan gerrymandering
638:Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
630:Avery v. Midland County
43:Argued November 4, 2015
1177:Bartlett v. Strickland
858:Gomillion v. Lightfoot
320:freedom of association
1065:United States v. Hays
921:Beer v. United States
866:Wright v. Rockefeller
850:Racial gerrymandering
833:Rucho v. Common Cause
422:2014); affirmed, 584
118:2014); affirmed, 584
1057:Johnson v. De Grandy
1033:Voinovich v. Quilter
985:Thornburg v. Gingles
646:Wells v. Rockefeller
541:Case law related to
85:136 S. Ct. 450; 193
1161:Georgia v. Ashcroft
1153:Easley v. Cromartie
1145:Sinkfield v. Kelley
785:Gaffney v. Cummings
678:Gaffney v. Cummings
622:Burns v. Richardson
582:Wesberry v. Sanders
218:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1340:Shapiro v. McManus
898:Whitcomb v. Chavis
801:Vieth v. Jubelirer
718:Karcher v. Daggett
558:Colegrove v. Green
470:Shapiro v. McManus
385:Shapiro v. McManus
285:Shapiro v. McManus
258:Scalia, joined by
194:Associate Justices
24:Shapiro v. McManus
1374:
1373:
1241:Allen v. Milligan
1129:Hunt v. Cromartie
1113:Abrams v. Johnson
1073:Miller v. Johnson
882:Connor v. Johnson
839:Lamone v. Benisek
825:Benisek v. Lamone
793:Davis v. Bandemer
758:Evenwel v. Abbott
441:Benisek v. Lamone
340:Benisek v. Lamone
281:
280:
136:Benisek v. Lamone
1409:
1316:Lance v. Coffman
1284:Quinn v. Millsap
1201:Cooper v. Harris
1001:Chisom v. Roemer
945:Mobile v. Bolden
937:Wise v. Lipscomb
874:Turner v. Fouche
817:Gill v. Whitford
726:Brown v. Thomson
694:Chapman v. Meier
614:Fortson v. Toomb
590:Reynolds v. Sims
550:Equal population
535:
528:
521:
512:
511:
507:
501:
498:
492:
489:
483:
457:
437:
431:
406:
400:
382:
179:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1370:
1364:Moore v. Harper
1308:Lance v. Dennis
1300:Branch v. Smith
1276:Upham v. Seamon
1255:
1217:Abbott v. Perez
1025:Growe v. Emison
993:Clark v. Roemer
961:Rogers v. Lodge
845:
772:
686:White v. Weiser
662:Mahan v. Howell
574:Gray v. Sanders
545:
539:
505:
499:
496:
490:
487:
481:
465:
460:
456:___ (2018).
438:
434:
409:Benisek v. Mack
407:
403:
383:
379:
375:
353:
324:First Amendment
312:Roscoe Bartlett
292:clarified when
234:Sonia Sotomayor
232:
220:
210:Clarence Thomas
208:
206:Anthony Kennedy
105:Benisek v. Mack
90:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1415:
1405:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1372:
1371:
1369:
1368:
1360:
1352:
1344:
1336:
1328:
1324:Perry v. Perez
1320:
1312:
1304:
1296:
1288:
1280:
1272:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1254:
1253:
1245:
1237:
1229:
1221:
1213:
1205:
1197:
1189:
1181:
1173:
1165:
1157:
1149:
1141:
1133:
1125:
1117:
1109:
1101:
1093:
1085:
1077:
1069:
1061:
1053:
1049:Holder v. Hall
1045:
1037:
1029:
1021:
1013:
1005:
997:
989:
981:
973:
965:
957:
949:
941:
933:
925:
917:
910:
902:
894:
886:
878:
870:
862:
853:
851:
847:
846:
844:
843:
829:
821:
813:
805:
797:
789:
780:
778:
774:
773:
771:
770:
762:
754:
746:
738:
730:
722:
714:
706:
698:
690:
682:
674:
666:
658:
650:
642:
634:
626:
618:
610:
602:
594:
586:
578:
570:
562:
553:
551:
547:
546:
538:
537:
530:
523:
515:
509:
508:
464:
463:External links
461:
459:
458:
432:
401:
376:
374:
371:
370:
369:
364:
359:
352:
349:
345:gerrymandering
301:Antonin Scalia
279:
278:
272:28 U.S.C.
268:
267:
263:
262:
256:
252:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
222:Stephen Breyer
198:Antonin Scalia
195:
192:
187:
181:
180:
176:
175:
171:
170:
166:
165:
164:___ (2018)
132:
128:
127:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
84:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1414:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1382:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1292:Utah v. Evans
1289:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1262:
1258:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1003:
1002:
998:
995:
994:
990:
987:
986:
982:
979:
978:
974:
971:
970:
966:
963:
962:
958:
955:
954:
950:
947:
946:
942:
939:
938:
934:
931:
930:
926:
923:
922:
918:
916:
915:
911:
908:
907:
903:
900:
899:
895:
892:
891:
887:
884:
883:
879:
876:
875:
871:
868:
867:
863:
860:
859:
855:
854:
852:
848:
841:
840:
835:
834:
830:
827:
826:
822:
819:
818:
814:
811:
810:
806:
803:
802:
798:
795:
794:
790:
787:
786:
782:
781:
779:
775:
768:
767:
763:
760:
759:
755:
752:
751:
747:
744:
743:
742:Cox v. Larios
739:
736:
735:
731:
728:
727:
723:
720:
719:
715:
712:
711:
710:Ball v. James
707:
704:
703:
699:
696:
695:
691:
688:
687:
683:
680:
679:
675:
672:
671:
667:
664:
663:
659:
656:
655:
651:
648:
647:
643:
640:
639:
635:
632:
631:
627:
624:
623:
619:
616:
615:
611:
608:
607:
603:
600:
599:
598:Davis v. Mann
595:
592:
591:
587:
584:
583:
579:
576:
575:
571:
568:
567:
566:Baker v. Carr
563:
560:
559:
555:
554:
552:
548:
544:
536:
531:
529:
524:
522:
517:
516:
513:
504:
495:
486:
479:
475:
471:
467:
466:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:
436:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
410:
405:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
377:
368:
365:
363:
360:
358:
355:
354:
348:
346:
342:
341:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
304:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
277:
273:
269:
264:
261:
257:
253:
248:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
191:
188:
186:Chief Justice
185:
184:
182:
177:
172:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
144:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
88:
82:
81:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1362:
1354:
1346:
1339:
1338:
1330:
1322:
1314:
1306:
1298:
1290:
1282:
1274:
1266:
1247:
1239:
1231:
1223:
1215:
1207:
1199:
1191:
1183:
1175:
1167:
1159:
1151:
1143:
1135:
1127:
1119:
1111:
1103:
1095:
1089:Bush v. Vera
1087:
1081:Shaw v. Hunt
1079:
1071:
1063:
1055:
1047:
1041:Shaw v. Reno
1039:
1031:
1023:
1015:
1007:
999:
991:
983:
975:
967:
959:
951:
943:
935:
927:
919:
912:
904:
896:
890:Ely v. Klahr
888:
880:
872:
864:
856:
837:
831:
823:
815:
807:
799:
791:
783:
764:
756:
748:
740:
732:
724:
716:
708:
700:
692:
684:
676:
668:
660:
652:
644:
636:
628:
620:
612:
604:
596:
588:
580:
572:
564:
556:
469:
439:
435:
408:
404:
384:
380:
338:
336:
308:6th district
305:
284:
283:
282:
266:Laws applied
259:
250:Case opinion
237:
230:Samuel Alito
225:
213:
201:
190:John Roberts
135:
104:
95:Case history
78:
53:
15:
413:F. Supp. 3d
276:§ 2284
242:Elena Kagan
147:F. Supp. 3d
140:F. Supp. 3d
134:On remand,
109:F. Supp. 3d
1381:Categories
444:, No.
387:, No.
373:References
131:Subsequent
60:Docket no.
347:aspects.
260:unanimous
87:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
468:Text of
428:4th Cir.
424:F. App'x
351:See also
255:Majority
124:4th Cir.
120:F. App'x
322:of the
298:Justice
169:Holding
1367:(2023)
1359:(2019)
1351:(2016)
1343:(2015)
1335:(2015)
1327:(2012)
1319:(2007)
1311:(2006)
1303:(2003)
1295:(2002)
1287:(1989)
1279:(1982)
1271:(1977)
1252:(2024)
1244:(2023)
1236:(2022)
1228:(2018)
1220:(2018)
1212:(2017)
1204:(2017)
1196:(2017)
1188:(2015)
1180:(2009)
1172:(2006)
1164:(2003)
1156:(2001)
1148:(2000)
1140:(2000)
1132:(1999)
1124:(1999)
1116:(1997)
1108:(1997)
1100:(1996)
1092:(1996)
1084:(1996)
1076:(1995)
1068:(1995)
1060:(1994)
1052:(1994)
1044:(1993)
1036:(1993)
1028:(1993)
1020:(1992)
1012:(1991)
1004:(1991)
996:(1991)
988:(1986)
980:(1984)
972:(1984)
964:(1982)
956:(1980)
948:(1980)
940:(1978)
932:(1977)
924:(1976)
909:(1975)
901:(1971)
893:(1971)
885:(1971)
877:(1970)
869:(1964)
861:(1960)
842:(2019)
828:(2018)
820:(2018)
812:(2006)
804:(2004)
796:(1986)
788:(1973)
769:(2016)
761:(2016)
753:(2012)
745:(2004)
737:(1989)
729:(1983)
721:(1983)
713:(1981)
705:(1976)
697:(1975)
689:(1973)
681:(1973)
673:(1973)
665:(1973)
657:(1970)
649:(1969)
641:(1969)
633:(1968)
625:(1966)
617:(1965)
609:(1964)
601:(1964)
593:(1964)
585:(1964)
577:(1963)
569:(1962)
561:(1946)
506:
500:
497:
491:
488:
485:Justia
482:
448:,
446:17-333
430:2014).
420:D. Md.
391:,
389:14-990
274:
240:
238:·
236:
228:
226:·
224:
216:
214:·
212:
204:
202:·
200:
156:,
154:17-333
138:, 241
116:D. Md.
64:14-990
1260:Other
476:
452:
426:140 (
411:, 11
395:
160:
122:140 (
107:, 11
100:Prior
77:___ (
478:U.S.
454:U.S.
397:U.S.
318:and
162:U.S.
80:more
75:U.S.
73:577
474:577
450:585
416:516
393:577
158:585
150:799
143:566
112:516
89:279
1383::
836:/
472:,
534:e
527:t
520:v
418:(
114:(
83:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.