138:
the author to fix their mistakes from the original paper, and submit an edited version to take the original paper’s place. The journal can decide to retract the original paper then upload the fixed version online, usually with a notice placed stating “Retraction and
Replacement,” or “Correction,” on the article page. For example,
137:
A low percentage of retracted papers can be due to unintentional error within the author(s) work. Rather than removing the entire article, retraction with replacement has been a new practice to help authors avoid being seen as dishonest for mistakes that were not purposefully done. This method allows
113:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, academia had seen a quick increase in fast-track peer-review articles dealing with SARS-CoV-2 problems. As a result, a number of papers have been retracted made "Retraction
Tsunami" due to quality and/or data issues, leading many experts to ponder not just the quality of
104:
Although the author suggests that his findings may indeed indicate a recent increase in scientific fraud, he also acknowledges other possibilities. For example, increased rates of fraud in recent years may simply indicate that journals are doing a better job of policing the scientific literature than
533:
called for the mass retraction of more than 400 scientific papers on organ transplantation, amid fears the organs were obtained unethically from
Chinese prisoners. Wendy Rogers said the journals, researchers and clinicians who used these studies were complicit in these methods of organ trafficking.
491:
on immunology, which showed unexpected results on how the immune system rearranges its genes to produce antibodies against antigens it encounters for the first time. Margot O'Toole, a postdoctoral researcher for
Imanishi-Kari, claimed that she could not reproduce Imanishi-Kari's results and alleged
165:
have done . Scientists at times have been asked to retract their work even though their work is exact and bold; the root cause of the problem should be looked into to avoid retractions. A system to distinguish papers from "good" and "bad" would be beneficial to researchers. This system may save the
67:
A retraction may be initiated by the editors of a journal, or by the author(s) of the papers (or their institution). Retractions are typically accompanied by a retraction notice written by the editors or authors explaining the reason for the retraction. Such notices may also include a note from the
550:
retracted a
Chinese study of liver transplantation because 564 livers grafted in the course of the research over 4 years could not be traced. The experts pointed out that it was implausible a hospital could have so many freely donated livers for transplantation, given the small number of donors in
158:
Self-retraction is a request from an author and/or co-authors to retract its own work from being published. Self-retraction by an author is recommended because once it gets retracted from the journal, then it can affect the author(s) because investigations can begin which will have an effect the
46:
is flagged for being seriously flawed to the extent that their results and conclusions can no longer be relied upon. Retracted articles are not removed from the published literature but marked as retracted. In some cases it may be necessary to remove an article from publication, such as when the
170:
process. Retraction should not be for simple spelling errors, but for inaccurate, skewed, and fraudulent data. For example, today new technologies are being developed in a culture of transparency to align the opportunity to record false claims. Another solution is for researchers to use a term
534:
According to the study, the transplant research community has failed to live up to the ethical standards for using organs from death row inmates that are still being published. These widespread unethical violations in research will cause many unpredictable consequences for science. In 2019,
373:
and others, which describe genomic signatures of cancer prognosis and predictors of response to cancer treatment, were retracted in 2011 and 2012. The retraction notices generally state that the results of the analyses described in the articles could not be reproduced. In
November 2015, the
95:
over time to determine if the rate was increasing, even while taking into account the increased number of overall publications occurring each year. The author found that the rate of increase in retractions was greater than the rate of increase in publications. Moreover, the author notes the
105:
they have in the past. Furthermore, because retractions occur for a very small percentage of overall publications (fewer than 1 in 1,000 articles), a few scientists who are willing to commit large amounts of fraud can highly impact retraction rates. For example, the author points out that
496:
concluded that data in the 1986 Imanishi-Kari article had been falsified. Five years later, in 1996, an expert panel appointed by the federal government found no evidence of scientific fraud and cleared
Imanishi-Kari of misconduct, although the paper was not
100:"It is particularly striking that the number of papers retracted for fraud increased more than sevenfold in the 6 years between 2004 and 2009. During the same period, the number of papers retracted for a scientific mistake did not even double..." (p. 251).
2090:
Weaver D, Reis MH, Albanese C, Costantini F, Baltimore D, Imanishi-Kari T (April 1986). "Altered repertoire of endogenous immunoglobulin gene expression in transgenic mice containing a rearranged mu heavy chain gene".
338:
launched an investigation, which determined in 2018 that
Wansink had committed academic misconduct. Wansink resigned. Wansink has since had 18 of his research papers retracted as similar issues were found in other
2236:
224:
retracted due to criticism of experimental design. According to the editor of the journal, a "more in-depth look at the raw data revealed that no definitive conclusions can be reached with this small sample
109:
fabricated results in 15 retracted papers in the dataset he reviewed, all of which were retracted in 2002 and 2003, "so he alone was responsible for 56% of papers retracted for fraud in 2002—2003" (p 252).
392:, was retracted because "the claims in the original paper that children were "consecutively referred" and that investigations were "approved" by the local ethics committee have been proven to be false."
117:
Retracted studies may continue to be cited. This may happen in cases where scholars are unaware of the retraction, in particular when the retraction occurs long after the original publication.
2486:
2461:
198:
and widely covered by media was retracted due to unreported non-random assignments. This was part of a larger effort verifying proper randomization in thousands of studies by anesthesiologist
159:
author's reputation. If one retracts their own work on their terms, it would show more integrity and honesty as they are owning up to their own mistakes, just like the authors mentioned in
1494:
171:“self-citation” since citations look identical therefore they are classified in databases. Recommending a same database to evaluate the researchers own work can help lessen retractions.
2180:"Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review"
2153:
199:
875:
1688:
718:"The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019"
68:
authors with apologies for the previous error and/or expressions of gratitude to persons who disclosed the error to the author. Retractions must not be confused with
1965:"Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent: Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this damaging vaccine scare"
334:, came under scrutiny after peers pointed out inconsistencies in the data. Wansink had written a blog post about asking a graduate student to "salvage" conclusions.
1642:
2404:
1263:
Séralini, Gilles-Eric; Clair, Emilie; Mesnage, Robin; Gress, Steeve; Defarge, Nicolas; Malatesta, Manuela; Hennequin, Didier; De Vendômois, Joël
Spiroux (2012).
1856:
The
Editors of The Lancet (2010). "Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children".
120:
The number of journal articles being retracted had risen from about 1,600 in 2013 to 10,000 in 2023. Most of the retractions in 2023 were contributed by
2434:
1813:
1739:
2178:
Rogers, Wendy; Robertson, Matthew P.; Ballantyne, Angela; Blakely, Brette; Catsanos, Ruby; Clay-Williams, Robyn; Singh, Maria Fiatarone (2019-02-01).
1713:
597:, which is founded by one of the authors of the study. The article was formally retracted by 4 June 2020, on request by the lead author Mandeep Mehra.
438:. Fabrications in the field of stem cell research led to 'indictment on embezzlement and bioethics law violations linked to faked stem cell research'.
2476:
2451:
359:, it was retracted later that year. It generated much controversy, and after an institutional investigation, one of the authors committed suicide.
1380:
3216:
1618:
510:
at Harvard in the early 1980s. Initially thought to be brilliant by his boss. He was caught out by fellow researchers in the same laboratory.
3201:
3044:
2693:
1576:
242:
166:
reputation of scientists and researchers. Most researchers publish honest work and sometimes simple mistakes happen to be overlooked by the
263:
259:
633:
was said to have issued a letter of retraction regarding his novels and other published articles against the Roman Catholic Church, see
2367:"RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis"
414:
2237:"Journals have retracted or flagged more than 40 papers from China that appear to have used organ transplants from executed prisoners"
3211:
1593:
1130:
1313:
402:
from 1996 to 2009 were retracted after it was discovered he never actually conducted any of the trials he claimed to have run.
161:
2575:
284:
On January 8, 2020, Russian journals retracted more than 800 articles after a large-scale investigation conducted by the
144:
will post the edited version with a retraction and replacement notice, along with a link to the original article, while
2971:
2591:
2366:
1788:
2686:
2017:
793:
1763:
895:
420:
194:
17:
2260:
Dyer, Owen (2019-08-20). "Journals retract 15 Chinese transplantation studies over executed prisoner concerns".
1156:
Marasović, Tea; Utrobiĉić, Ana; Maruŝić, Ana (2018-03-31). "Transparency of retracting and replacing articles".
3252:
2981:
2016:
Lerner, Jennifer S.; Gonzalez, Roxana M.; Dahl, Ronald E.; Hariri, Ahmad R.; Taylor, Shelley E. (2005-11-01).
3231:
1643:"Cornell finds that food marketing researcher Brian Wansink committed misconduct, as he announces retirement"
493:
3257:
3226:
3196:
2679:
652:
375:
2311:
Dyer, Owen (2017-02-10). "Journal retracts Chinese paper because transplanted livers couldn't be traced".
492:
that Imanishi-Kari had fabricated the data. After a major investigation, the paper was retracted when the
3191:
2744:
1354:
353:, a method of inducing a cell to become a stem cell, was proven to be falsified. Originally published in
285:
1689:"This Ivy League food scientist was a media darling. He just submitted his resignation, the school says"
1265:"RETRACTED: Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize"
150:
will use the term "correction" with a link posted on the updated article, referring to the old article.
3206:
3186:
593:. Medical researchers and newspapers expressed suspicions about the validity of the data, provided by
217:
3221:
2018:"RETRACTED: Facial Expressions of Emotion Reveal Neuroendocrine and Cardiovascular Stress Responses"
634:
1330:
3123:
3067:
1358:
389:
267:
3163:
2879:
2835:
1420:
Kaidi, Abderrahmane; Weinert, Brian T.; Choudhary, Chunaram; Jackson, Stephen P. (2010-09-10).
672:
590:
79:
provides updates on new retractions, and discusses general issues in relation to retractions.
3153:
3128:
2905:
2814:
2726:
657:
647:
480:
299:
2154:"Call for retraction of 400 scientific papers amid fears organs came from Chinese prisoners"
140:
3143:
3108:
3062:
2950:
2910:
2895:
2632:
2520:
2509:"Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living"
1523:
1433:
1219:
1083:
1054:
932:
524:
1667:
818:"Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?"
445:
106:
8:
3262:
2702:
121:
31:
2636:
2524:
1527:
1437:
1223:
1058:
1010:
975:
936:
146:
3113:
2749:
2721:
2655:
2620:
2543:
2508:
2391:
2344:
2293:
2212:
2179:
2116:
2053:
1992:
1940:
1915:
1881:
1544:
1511:
1462:
1421:
1396:
1181:
1111:
1023:
956:
853:
774:
582:
335:
331:
323:
295:
189:
2422:
2381:
1869:
1169:
762:
692:
209:
3169:
3057:
3024:
2845:
2766:
2660:
2567:
2548:
2426:
2396:
2336:
2328:
2297:
2285:
2277:
2217:
2199:
2135:
2131:
2108:
2104:
2072:
2045:
2037:
1984:
1945:
1873:
1568:
1549:
1486:
1467:
1449:
1400:
1305:
1286:
1245:
1237:
1173:
1134:
1115:
1103:
1027:
1015:
997:
960:
948:
845:
837:
766:
565:
450:
319:
233:
2348:
2120:
1996:
1885:
920:
857:
778:
3158:
3072:
2794:
2716:
2650:
2640:
2559:
2538:
2528:
2418:
2386:
2376:
2365:
Mehra, Mandeep R.; Desai, Sapan S.; Ruschitzka, Frank; Patel, Amit N (2020-05-22).
2320:
2269:
2207:
2191:
2127:
2100:
2068:
2064:
2057:
2033:
2029:
1976:
1935:
1927:
1865:
1668:"A Prominent Researcher on Eating Habits Resigned After a Scandal Over His Studies"
1560:
1539:
1531:
1478:
1457:
1441:
1388:
1297:
1276:
1227:
1185:
1165:
1095:
1062:
1005:
987:
940:
829:
758:
729:
507:
456:
385:
355:
308:
271:
76:
52:
43:
3133:
2930:
2920:
2867:
2850:
2776:
2563:
2533:
1894:
484:
409:
388:
proposing that the MMR vaccine might cause autism, which was responsible for the
366:
39:
2195:
1740:"The Joy of Cooking, vindicated: Journal retracts two more Brian Wansink papers"
3267:
3082:
3052:
2988:
2955:
2925:
2874:
2761:
2756:
1381:"Russian journals retract more than 800 papers after 'bombshell' investigation"
1067:
1042:
944:
346:
238:
1564:
1422:"RETRACTED: Human SIRT6 promotes DNA end resection through CtIP deacetylation"
1301:
1281:
1264:
992:
3246:
3138:
2945:
2915:
2799:
2784:
2507:
Liu, Ming-Jin; Xiong, Cai-Hua; Xiong, Le; Huang, Xiao-Lin (January 5, 2016).
2332:
2281:
2203:
2041:
1714:"JAMA journals retract six papers by food marketing researcher Brian Wansink"
1453:
1241:
1107:
1001:
952:
841:
435:
327:
2645:
1964:
1482:
1445:
1392:
833:
817:
2664:
2571:
2552:
2481:
2456:
2430:
2400:
2340:
2289:
2221:
2076:
2049:
1988:
1949:
1877:
1572:
1553:
1512:"KAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation couples chromatin sensing to ATM signalling"
1490:
1471:
1309:
1290:
1249:
1177:
1019:
876:"Errors Trigger Retraction Of Study On Mediterranean Diet's Heart Benefits"
849:
770:
662:
617:
589:
increase the chance of patients dying in hospital as well as the chance of
471:
399:
275:
2139:
2112:
1931:
3118:
2976:
2935:
2789:
1838:
621:
594:
586:
503:
467:
432:
Patient-specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT blastocysts
167:
56:
1535:
1131:"More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record"
616:
about the functioning of the human hand was retracted due to outrage on
75:
There have been numerous examples of retracted scientific publications.
2998:
2900:
2477:"Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials"
2452:"How were medical journals and WHO caught out over hydroxychloroquine?"
2371:
630:
570:
370:
48:
2671:
2273:
1980:
734:
717:
3019:
2862:
2592:"Reviewing #Creatorgate: Is God a Scientific Proposition? - Articles"
2324:
350:
1916:"Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines"
1232:
1207:
3092:
3087:
3014:
2804:
1099:
797:
612:
536:
529:
3029:
2993:
2940:
1619:"Nature and Science Retractions Connected to Research Misconduct"
667:
221:
69:
2177:
278:
with intentional bugs and without obtaining appropriate consent.
3077:
2840:
2830:
980:
Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation in Ophthalmology
466:
Retraction of announced discovery of elements 116 and 118. See
312:
in 2013, were retracted following evidence of data fabrication.
213:
92:
27:
Practice of flagging a published paper as being severely flawed
1789:"Japan researcher agrees to withdraw disputed stem cell paper"
408:
Retraction of several articles written by social psychologist
3148:
2809:
1963:
Godlee, Fiona; Smith, Jane; Marcovitch, Harvey (2011-01-08).
1594:"Articles pulled after data fabrication in Cambridge DNA lab"
59:, or might pose a serious health risk to the general public.
2089:
1419:
506:. Fabricated results in the Cardiac Research Laboratory of
2857:
2443:
1352:
601:
378:(ORI) found that Potti had engaged in research misconduct.
274:
discovered that the researchers submitted patches for the
2364:
2360:
2358:
1855:
1262:
1155:
880:
749:
Kleinert, Sabine (2009). "COPE's retraction guidelines".
2015:
1082:
LaCroix, Travis; Geil, Anders; O'Connor, Cailin (2020).
444:
Numerous articles with questionable data from physicist
114:
peer review but also standards of retraction practices.
1510:
Kaidi, Abderrahmane; Jackson, Stephen P. (2013-06-06).
1081:
574:
which claimed to find evidence, based on a database of
2355:
2468:
1962:
1208:"Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors"
249:
127:
976:"COVID-19 impact on research and publication ethics"
540:
also retracted 21 articles related to this incident.
514:
202:, who found problems in about 2% of those analyzed.
2506:
1361:, Department of Computer Science & Engineering
1084:"The Dynamics of Retraction in Epistemic Networks"
1043:"Reform retractions to make them more transparent"
921:"Reform retractions to make them more transparent"
555:
448:were retracted from many journals, including both
973:
288:(RAS) following claims of unethical publications.
258:An article studying the open source community by
3244:
1913:
620:over a reference to "Creator" inside the paper (
294:On 11 April 2019, two articles on DNA damage by
2625:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2621:"How many scientific papers are not original?"
132:
2687:
2475:Boseley, Sarah; Davey, Melissa (2020-06-04).
742:
243:Retracted article on neurotoxicity of ecstasy
212:- Article suggesting reported an increase in
2474:
1814:"STAP paper co-author Sasai commits suicide"
1509:
1040:
715:
1839:"Misconduct in science: An array of errors"
1786:
1764:"Retraction Watch Database - Brian Wansink"
1353:Mats Heimdahl; Loren Terveen (2021-04-27).
974:Heidary, Fatemeh; Gharebaghi, Reza (2021).
794:"Searching for truth in published research"
2694:
2680:
487:, published a 1986 article in the journal
415:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
91:attempted to quantify retraction rates in
2654:
2644:
2542:
2532:
2390:
2380:
2211:
1939:
1543:
1461:
1357:. Letter to Linux Foundation Leadership.
1280:
1231:
1129:Noorden, Richard Van (12 December 2023).
1066:
1009:
991:
733:
748:
412:and colleagues from journals including
2701:
2449:
2234:
1892:
1806:
1780:
1737:
1205:
1128:
869:
867:
791:
602:Retraction over public relations issues
179:
14:
3245:
1378:
1329:Wu, Qiushi; Lu, Kangjie (2021-04-26).
873:
174:
3202:Academic databases and search engines
2675:
1201:
1199:
1197:
1195:
918:
815:
697:COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics
2618:
2310:
2259:
1920:Canadian Medical Association Journal
1591:
1328:
896:"Two Cheers for the Retraction Boom"
864:
811:
809:
807:
1616:
365:Eight journal articles authored by
24:
2972:Academic journal publishing reform
2612:
1895:"Lancet accepts MMR study 'false'"
1192:
792:Strauss, Stephen (April 7, 2011).
785:
635:José Rizal: Retraction controversy
250:Retraction for fraud or misconduct
153:
128:Alternative versions of retraction
25:
3279:
804:
515:Retraction for ethical violations
2464:from the original on 2020-06-07.
919:Vuong, Quan-Hoang (2020-06-11).
874:McCook, Alison (June 13, 2018).
610:On March 4, 2016, an article in
2584:
2500:
2489:from the original on 2020-06-07
2407:from the original on 2020-06-07
2304:
2253:
2228:
2171:
2146:
2083:
2009:
1956:
1914:Eggerston, Laura (2010-03-09).
1907:
1849:
1831:
1756:
1731:
1706:
1681:
1660:
1635:
1610:
1585:
1503:
1413:
1372:
1346:
1322:
1256:
1206:Fanelli, Daniele (2016-03-22).
1149:
1122:
1075:
1034:
556:Retraction over data provenance
527:, Australia) and colleagues on
195:New England Journal of Medicine
2069:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.002
2034:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.011
967:
912:
888:
816:Steen, R. Grant (April 2011).
709:
685:
568:, an article was published in
318:Five articles in the field of
13:
1:
3232:Category:Scientific documents
2450:Boseley, Sarah (2020-06-04).
2423:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6
2382:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6
1870:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60175-4
1170:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30487-2
763:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62074-2
678:
494:National Institutes of Health
3227:Category:Academic publishing
2564:10.1371/journal.pone.0151685
2534:10.1371/journal.pone.0146193
2235:Oransky, Ivan (2020-04-15).
2132:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90085-D
2105:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90389-2
1969:BMJ: British Medical Journal
1738:Oransky, Ivan (2018-12-05).
1269:Food and Chemical Toxicology
653:Post-publication peer review
523:An article by Wendy Rogers (
376:Office of Research Integrity
62:
7:
2196:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024473
1787:Elaine Lies (4 June 2014).
1617:Hou, Chia-Yi (2019-04-12).
1355:"Response Linux Foundation"
641:
564:On 22 May 2020, during the
398:Numerous papers written by
286:Russian Academy of Sciences
133:Retraction with replacement
10:
3284:
3045:Indexes and search engines
1068:10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x
945:10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x
82:
38:is a mechanism by which a
3179:
3101:
3043:
3007:
2964:
2888:
2823:
2775:
2737:
2709:
1592:Mayo, Nick (2019-04-12).
1565:10.1038/s41586-019-1142-2
1302:10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.047
1282:10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005
993:10.51329/mehdiophthal1414
822:Journal of Medical Ethics
218:genetically modified corn
89:Journal of Medical Ethics
1893:Triggle N (2010-02-02).
1379:Chawla, Dalmeet (2020).
1133:. Nature. Archived from
581:COVID-19 patients, that
270:was withdrawn after the
3222:Style/formatting guides
3124:Scholarly communication
2824:Other publication types
2646:10.1073/pnas.1422282112
1483:10.1126/science.aax4558
1446:10.1126/science.1192049
1393:10.1126/science.aba8099
1359:University of Minnesota
834:10.1136/jme.2010.040923
693:"Retraction guidelines"
390:MMR vaccine controversy
306:in 2010 and another in
268:University of Minnesota
162:The Wall Street Journal
72:in published articles.
3164:Least publishable unit
2836:Collection of articles
2619:Lesk, Michael (2015).
1670:. Time Inc. 2018-09-21
1623:The Scientist Magazine
1598:Times Higher Education
673:Correction (newspaper)
591:ventricular arrhythmia
102:
55:, is the subject of a
3253:Scientific misconduct
3154:Electronic publishing
3129:Scientific literature
2906:Article-level metrics
2558:(Retracted, see
2417:(Retracted, see
2126:(Retracted, see
2063:(Retracted, see
2022:Biological Psychiatry
1932:10.1503/cmaj.109-3179
1559:(Retracted, see
1477:(Retracted, see
1331:"Retraction of paper"
1296:(Retracted, see
1088:Philosophy of Science
1041:Vuong, Q.-H. (2020).
716:Vuong, Q.-H. (2020).
658:Scientific misconduct
648:Fabrication (science)
481:Thereza Imanishi-Kari
421:Biological Psychiatry
300:University of Bristol
98:
3197:Open-access journals
3144:Open scientific data
2951:SCImago Journal Rank
2911:Author-level metrics
2896:Acknowledgment index
1845:. 10 September 2011.
1164:(10127): 1244–1245.
525:Macquarie University
180:Retraction for error
87:A 2011 paper in the
3258:Academic publishing
3192:Scientific journals
2703:Academic publishing
2637:2015PNAS..112....6L
2525:2016PLoSO..1146193L
1693:The Washington Post
1536:10.1038/nature12201
1528:2013Natur.498...70K
1438:2010Sci...329.1348K
1432:(5997): 1348–1353.
1224:2016Natur.531..415F
1137:on 13 December 2023
1059:2020Natur.582..149V
937:2020Natur.582..149V
548:Liver International
302:, one published in
175:Notable retractions
147:Research Evaluation
47:article is clearly
32:academic publishing
3212:Copyright policies
3207:University presses
3114:Scientific writing
2982:Citation advantage
2889:Impact and ranking
2722:Scientific journal
722:Learned Publishing
583:hydroxychloroquine
551:China at the time.
483:, who worked with
369:cancer researcher
336:Cornell University
332:Cornell University
324:marketing research
296:Abderrahmane Kaidi
220:and the herbicide
190:Mediterranean diet
3240:
3239:
3217:Preprint policies
3187:Academic journals
3170:Publish or perish
3025:Version of record
2965:Reform and access
2767:Literature review
2274:10.1136/bmj.l5220
1981:10.1136/bmj.c7452
735:10.1002/leap.1282
566:COVID-19 pandemic
446:Jan Hendrik Schön
320:consumer behavior
107:Jan Hendrik Schön
70:small corrections
16:(Redirected from
3275:
3159:Ingelfinger rule
3073:Semantic Scholar
2795:Technical report
2717:Academic journal
2696:
2689:
2682:
2673:
2672:
2668:
2658:
2648:
2606:
2605:
2603:
2602:
2588:
2582:
2581:
2577:Retraction Watch
2556:
2546:
2536:
2504:
2498:
2497:
2495:
2494:
2472:
2466:
2465:
2447:
2441:
2440:
2436:Retraction Watch
2415:
2413:
2412:
2394:
2384:
2362:
2353:
2352:
2325:10.1136/bmj.j746
2308:
2302:
2301:
2257:
2251:
2250:
2248:
2247:
2241:Retraction Watch
2232:
2226:
2225:
2215:
2175:
2169:
2168:
2166:
2165:
2150:
2144:
2143:
2124:
2087:
2081:
2080:
2061:
2013:
2007:
2006:
2004:
2003:
1960:
1954:
1953:
1943:
1926:(4): E199–E200.
1911:
1905:
1902:
1889:
1853:
1847:
1846:
1835:
1829:
1828:
1826:
1824:
1810:
1804:
1803:
1801:
1799:
1784:
1778:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1768:Retraction Watch
1760:
1754:
1753:
1751:
1750:
1744:Retraction Watch
1735:
1729:
1728:
1726:
1725:
1718:Retraction Watch
1710:
1704:
1703:
1701:
1700:
1685:
1679:
1678:
1676:
1675:
1664:
1658:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1647:Retraction Watch
1639:
1633:
1632:
1630:
1629:
1614:
1608:
1607:
1605:
1604:
1589:
1583:
1582:
1578:Retraction Watch
1557:
1547:
1507:
1501:
1500:
1496:Retraction Watch
1475:
1465:
1417:
1411:
1410:
1408:
1407:
1376:
1370:
1369:
1367:
1366:
1350:
1344:
1343:
1341:
1340:
1335:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1315:Retraction Watch
1294:
1284:
1260:
1254:
1253:
1235:
1203:
1190:
1189:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1144:
1142:
1126:
1120:
1119:
1079:
1073:
1072:
1070:
1038:
1032:
1031:
1013:
995:
971:
965:
964:
916:
910:
909:
907:
906:
900:The New Atlantis
892:
886:
885:
871:
862:
861:
813:
802:
801:
789:
783:
782:
757:(9705): 1876–7.
746:
740:
739:
737:
713:
707:
706:
704:
703:
689:
580:
579:
508:Eugene Braunwald
386:Andrew Wakefield
384:A 1998 paper by
272:Linux Foundation
77:Retraction Watch
53:personal privacy
44:academic journal
21:
3283:
3282:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3236:
3175:
3134:Learned society
3097:
3039:
3003:
2960:
2931:Journal ranking
2921:Citation impact
2884:
2819:
2777:Grey literature
2771:
2733:
2705:
2700:
2615:
2613:Further reading
2610:
2609:
2600:
2598:
2590:
2589:
2585:
2557:
2519:(1): e0146193.
2505:
2501:
2492:
2490:
2473:
2469:
2448:
2444:
2416:
2410:
2408:
2363:
2356:
2309:
2305:
2258:
2254:
2245:
2243:
2233:
2229:
2176:
2172:
2163:
2161:
2152:
2151:
2147:
2125:
2088:
2084:
2062:
2014:
2010:
2001:
1999:
1975:(7788): c7452.
1961:
1957:
1912:
1908:
1854:
1850:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1822:
1820:
1818:The Japan Times
1812:
1811:
1807:
1797:
1795:
1785:
1781:
1772:
1770:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1748:
1746:
1736:
1732:
1723:
1721:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1698:
1696:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1673:
1671:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1652:
1650:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1627:
1625:
1615:
1611:
1602:
1600:
1590:
1586:
1558:
1522:(7452): 70–74.
1508:
1504:
1476:
1418:
1414:
1405:
1403:
1377:
1373:
1364:
1362:
1351:
1347:
1338:
1336:
1333:
1327:
1323:
1295:
1275:(11): 4221–31.
1261:
1257:
1233:10.1038/531415a
1204:
1193:
1154:
1150:
1140:
1138:
1127:
1123:
1080:
1076:
1039:
1035:
972:
968:
917:
913:
904:
902:
894:
893:
889:
872:
865:
814:
805:
790:
786:
747:
743:
714:
710:
701:
699:
691:
690:
686:
681:
644:
604:
577:
575:
558:
517:
485:David Baltimore
410:Jennifer Lerner
367:Duke University
252:
216:among rats fed
210:SĂ©ralini affair
188:- Study on the
182:
177:
156:
154:Self-retraction
135:
130:
85:
65:
40:published paper
28:
23:
22:
18:Retracted paper
15:
12:
11:
5:
3281:
3271:
3270:
3265:
3260:
3255:
3238:
3237:
3235:
3234:
3229:
3224:
3219:
3214:
3209:
3204:
3199:
3194:
3189:
3183:
3181:
3177:
3176:
3174:
3173:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3105:
3103:
3102:Related topics
3099:
3098:
3096:
3095:
3090:
3085:
3083:Web of Science
3080:
3075:
3070:
3065:
3060:
3055:
3053:Google Scholar
3049:
3047:
3041:
3040:
3038:
3037:
3032:
3027:
3022:
3017:
3011:
3009:
3005:
3004:
3002:
3001:
2996:
2991:
2989:Serials crisis
2986:
2985:
2984:
2974:
2968:
2966:
2962:
2961:
2959:
2958:
2956:Scientometrics
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2926:Citation index
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2892:
2890:
2886:
2885:
2883:
2882:
2877:
2875:Poster session
2872:
2871:
2870:
2865:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2848:
2838:
2833:
2827:
2825:
2821:
2820:
2818:
2817:
2812:
2807:
2802:
2797:
2792:
2787:
2781:
2779:
2773:
2772:
2770:
2769:
2764:
2762:Position paper
2759:
2757:Review article
2754:
2753:
2752:
2741:
2739:
2735:
2734:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2719:
2713:
2711:
2707:
2706:
2699:
2698:
2691:
2684:
2676:
2670:
2669:
2614:
2611:
2608:
2607:
2583:
2499:
2467:
2442:
2354:
2303:
2252:
2227:
2190:(2): e024473.
2170:
2145:
2082:
2028:(9): 743–750.
2008:
1955:
1906:
1904:
1903:
1848:
1830:
1805:
1779:
1755:
1730:
1705:
1680:
1659:
1634:
1609:
1584:
1502:
1412:
1371:
1345:
1321:
1255:
1191:
1148:
1121:
1100:10.1086/712817
1094:(3): 415–438.
1074:
1033:
966:
911:
887:
863:
828:(4): 249–253.
803:
784:
741:
728:(2): 119–130.
708:
683:
682:
680:
677:
676:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
643:
640:
639:
638:
625:
603:
600:
599:
598:
557:
554:
553:
552:
541:
516:
513:
512:
511:
498:
475:
461:
439:
430:Retraction of
425:
403:
393:
379:
360:
347:Haruko Obokata
345:An article by
340:
313:
289:
279:
251:
248:
247:
246:
226:
203:
181:
178:
176:
173:
155:
152:
134:
131:
129:
126:
84:
81:
64:
61:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3280:
3269:
3266:
3264:
3261:
3259:
3256:
3254:
3251:
3250:
3248:
3233:
3230:
3228:
3225:
3223:
3220:
3218:
3215:
3213:
3210:
3208:
3205:
3203:
3200:
3198:
3195:
3193:
3190:
3188:
3185:
3184:
3182:
3178:
3171:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3139:Open research
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3106:
3104:
3100:
3094:
3091:
3089:
3086:
3084:
3081:
3079:
3076:
3074:
3071:
3069:
3066:
3064:
3061:
3059:
3056:
3054:
3051:
3050:
3048:
3046:
3042:
3036:
3033:
3031:
3028:
3026:
3023:
3021:
3018:
3016:
3013:
3012:
3010:
3006:
3000:
2997:
2995:
2992:
2990:
2987:
2983:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2975:
2973:
2970:
2969:
2967:
2963:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2946:Impact factor
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2916:Bibliometrics
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2893:
2891:
2887:
2881:
2878:
2876:
2873:
2869:
2866:
2864:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2856:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2828:
2826:
2822:
2816:
2813:
2811:
2808:
2806:
2803:
2801:
2800:Annual report
2798:
2796:
2793:
2791:
2788:
2786:
2785:Working paper
2783:
2782:
2780:
2778:
2774:
2768:
2765:
2763:
2760:
2758:
2755:
2751:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2743:
2742:
2740:
2736:
2728:
2727:Public health
2725:
2724:
2723:
2720:
2718:
2715:
2714:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2697:
2692:
2690:
2685:
2683:
2678:
2677:
2674:
2666:
2662:
2657:
2652:
2647:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2617:
2616:
2597:
2593:
2587:
2579:
2578:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2554:
2550:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2503:
2488:
2484:
2483:
2478:
2471:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2453:
2446:
2438:
2437:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2393:
2388:
2383:
2378:
2374:
2373:
2368:
2361:
2359:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2307:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2256:
2242:
2238:
2231:
2223:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2174:
2159:
2155:
2149:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2099:(2): 247–59.
2098:
2094:
2086:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2012:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1959:
1951:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1910:
1900:
1896:
1891:
1890:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1864:(9713): 445.
1863:
1859:
1852:
1844:
1843:The Economist
1840:
1834:
1819:
1815:
1809:
1794:
1790:
1783:
1769:
1765:
1759:
1745:
1741:
1734:
1719:
1715:
1709:
1694:
1690:
1684:
1669:
1663:
1648:
1644:
1638:
1624:
1620:
1613:
1599:
1595:
1588:
1580:
1579:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1555:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1506:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1473:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1416:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1375:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1332:
1325:
1317:
1316:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1259:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1218:(7595): 415.
1217:
1213:
1209:
1202:
1200:
1198:
1196:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1152:
1136:
1132:
1125:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1078:
1069:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1053:(7811): 149.
1052:
1048:
1044:
1037:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1003:
999:
994:
989:
985:
981:
977:
970:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
931:(7811): 149.
930:
926:
922:
915:
901:
897:
891:
883:
882:
877:
870:
868:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
812:
810:
808:
799:
795:
788:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
745:
736:
731:
727:
723:
719:
712:
698:
694:
688:
684:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
645:
636:
632:
629:
626:
623:
619:
615:
614:
609:
606:
605:
596:
592:
588:
584:
573:
572:
567:
563:
560:
559:
549:
545:
542:
539:
538:
532:
531:
526:
522:
519:
518:
509:
505:
502:
499:
495:
490:
486:
482:
479:
476:
473:
469:
465:
462:
459:
458:
453:
452:
447:
443:
440:
437:
436:Hwang Woo-Suk
434:, written by
433:
429:
426:
423:
422:
417:
416:
411:
407:
404:
401:
397:
394:
391:
387:
383:
380:
377:
372:
368:
364:
361:
358:
357:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:publications.
337:
333:
329:
328:Brian Wansink
325:
321:
317:
314:
311:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
287:
283:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
244:
240:
236:
235:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
200:John Carlisle
197:
196:
192:published in
191:
187:
184:
183:
172:
169:
164:
163:
151:
149:
148:
143:
142:
125:
123:
118:
115:
111:
108:
101:
97:
94:
90:
80:
78:
73:
71:
60:
58:
54:
50:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
3034:
2628:
2624:
2599:. Retrieved
2595:
2586:
2576:
2574:,
2516:
2512:
2502:
2491:. Retrieved
2482:The Guardian
2480:
2470:
2457:The Guardian
2455:
2445:
2435:
2433:,
2409:. Retrieved
2370:
2316:
2312:
2306:
2265:
2261:
2255:
2244:. Retrieved
2240:
2230:
2187:
2183:
2173:
2162:. Retrieved
2160:. 2019-02-05
2158:the Guardian
2157:
2148:
2096:
2092:
2085:
2025:
2021:
2011:
2000:. Retrieved
1972:
1968:
1958:
1923:
1919:
1909:
1898:
1861:
1857:
1851:
1842:
1833:
1821:. Retrieved
1817:
1808:
1796:. Retrieved
1792:
1782:
1771:. Retrieved
1767:
1758:
1747:. Retrieved
1743:
1733:
1722:. Retrieved
1720:. 2018-09-19
1717:
1708:
1697:. Retrieved
1695:. 2018-09-20
1692:
1683:
1672:. Retrieved
1662:
1651:. Retrieved
1649:. 2018-09-20
1646:
1637:
1626:. Retrieved
1622:
1612:
1601:. Retrieved
1597:
1587:
1577:
1575:,
1519:
1515:
1505:
1495:
1493:,
1429:
1425:
1415:
1404:. Retrieved
1384:
1374:
1363:. Retrieved
1348:
1337:. Retrieved
1324:
1314:
1312:,
1272:
1268:
1258:
1215:
1211:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1139:. Retrieved
1135:the original
1124:
1091:
1087:
1077:
1050:
1046:
1036:
983:
979:
969:
928:
924:
914:
903:. Retrieved
899:
890:
879:
825:
821:
787:
754:
750:
744:
725:
721:
711:
700:. Retrieved
696:
687:
663:Sokal affair
627:
622:#CreatorGate
618:social media
611:
607:
569:
561:
547:
546:The journal
543:
535:
528:
520:
500:
488:
477:
472:Victor Ninov
463:
455:
449:
441:
431:
427:
419:
413:
405:
400:Scott Reuben
395:
381:
362:
354:
342:
315:
307:
303:
291:
281:
276:Linux kernel
255:
232:
228:
205:
193:
185:
160:
157:
145:
139:
136:
119:
116:
112:
103:
99:
88:
86:
74:
66:
35:
29:
3119:Peer review
2999:#ICanHazPDF
2977:Open access
2936:Eigenfactor
2880:Proceedings
2790:White paper
1141:15 December
595:Surgisphere
587:chloroquine
504:John Darsee
497:reinstated.
468:Livermorium
237:article on
168:peer review
57:court order
51:, violates
3263:Publishing
3247:Categories
3035:Retraction
3008:Versioning
2901:Altmetrics
2846:Biological
2631:(1): 6–7.
2601:2022-01-03
2493:2020-06-07
2411:2020-06-07
2372:The Lancet
2246:2022-04-15
2164:2022-04-14
2002:2023-10-04
1858:The Lancet
1773:2019-01-22
1749:2018-12-05
1724:2018-09-22
1699:2018-09-22
1674:2018-09-22
1653:2018-09-22
1628:2023-09-19
1603:2023-09-18
1406:2022-04-19
1365:2021-05-02
1339:2021-05-02
1158:The Lancet
986:(1): 1–4.
905:2023-11-01
751:The Lancet
702:2023-05-28
679:References
631:Jose Rizal
571:The Lancet
371:Anil Potti
351:STAP cells
349:et al. on
264:Kangjie Lu
231:Retracted
124:journals.
96:following:
49:defamatory
36:retraction
3020:Postprint
2863:Monograph
2815:Lab notes
2333:0959-8138
2298:201116938
2282:0959-8138
2268:: l5220.
2204:2044-6055
2042:0006-3223
1454:1095-9203
1401:212885229
1242:0028-0836
1116:204791890
1108:0031-8248
1028:236407601
1002:2322-3219
961:219529301
953:0028-0836
842:1473-4257
260:Qiushi Wu
63:Procedure
3093:OpenAlex
3088:Paperity
3015:Preprint
2851:Chemical
2805:Pamphlet
2750:Abstract
2710:Journals
2665:25538304
2596:BioLogos
2572:26943177
2553:26730579
2513:PLOS ONE
2487:Archived
2462:Archived
2431:32511943
2405:Archived
2401:32450107
2349:31293192
2341:28188135
2319:: j746.
2290:31431427
2222:30723071
2184:BMJ Open
2121:26659281
2077:17288013
2050:16256075
1997:43640126
1989:21209060
1950:20142376
1899:BBC News
1886:26364726
1878:20137807
1823:5 August
1573:30976101
1554:23708966
1491:30975768
1472:20829486
1310:24490213
1291:22999595
1250:27008933
1178:29619946
1020:37641621
1011:10460218
858:23257392
850:21186208
798:CBC News
779:22313713
771:19962558
642:See also
613:PLOS ONE
537:PLOS ONE
530:BMJ Open
3109:Imprint
3030:Erratum
2994:Sci-Hub
2941:h-index
2868:Chapter
2656:4291619
2633:Bibcode
2544:4701170
2521:Bibcode
2392:7255293
2213:6377532
2140:2032282
2113:3084104
2058:8012999
1941:2831678
1793:Reuters
1545:3859897
1524:Bibcode
1463:3276839
1434:Bibcode
1426:Science
1385:Science
1220:Bibcode
1186:4608954
1055:Bibcode
933:Bibcode
668:Erratum
451:Science
304:Science
298:of the
266:at the
239:ecstasy
234:Science
222:RoundUp
122:Hindawi
83:History
3078:Scopus
3058:AMiner
2841:Patent
2831:Thesis
2738:Papers
2663:
2653:
2570:
2566:,
2551:
2541:
2429:
2425:,
2399:
2389:
2347:
2339:
2331:
2296:
2288:
2280:
2220:
2210:
2202:
2138:
2134:,
2119:
2111:
2075:
2071:,
2056:
2048:
2040:
1995:
1987:
1948:
1938:
1884:
1876:
1798:4 June
1571:
1567:,
1552:
1542:
1516:Nature
1489:
1485:,
1470:
1460:
1452:
1399:
1308:
1304:,
1289:
1248:
1240:
1212:Nature
1184:
1176:
1114:
1106:
1047:Nature
1026:
1018:
1008:
1000:
959:
951:
925:Nature
856:
848:
840:
777:
769:
457:Nature
356:Nature
309:Nature
241:. See
225:size".
214:tumors
93:PubMed
42:in an
3268:Error
3180:Lists
3149:ORCID
2810:Essay
2745:Paper
2345:S2CID
2294:S2CID
2117:S2CID
2054:S2CID
1993:S2CID
1882:S2CID
1397:S2CID
1334:(PDF)
1182:S2CID
1112:S2CID
1024:S2CID
957:S2CID
854:S2CID
775:S2CID
326:, by
3068:CORE
3063:BASE
2858:Book
2661:PMID
2568:PMID
2549:PMID
2427:PMID
2397:PMID
2337:PMID
2329:ISSN
2286:PMID
2278:ISSN
2218:PMID
2200:ISSN
2136:PMID
2109:PMID
2093:Cell
2073:PMID
2046:PMID
2038:ISSN
1985:PMID
1946:PMID
1874:PMID
1825:2014
1800:2014
1569:PMID
1550:PMID
1487:PMID
1468:PMID
1450:ISSN
1306:PMID
1287:PMID
1246:PMID
1238:ISSN
1174:PMID
1143:2023
1104:ISSN
1016:PMID
998:ISSN
949:ISSN
846:PMID
838:ISSN
767:PMID
628:1896
608:2016
585:and
562:2020
544:2017
521:2019
501:1982
489:Cell
478:1991
464:2002
454:and
442:2003
428:2006
418:and
406:2007
396:2009
382:2010
363:2011
343:2014
322:and
316:2017
292:2018
282:2020
262:and
256:2021
229:2003
206:2012
186:2013
141:JAMA
34:, a
2651:PMC
2641:doi
2629:112
2560:doi
2539:PMC
2529:doi
2419:doi
2387:PMC
2377:doi
2321:doi
2317:356
2313:BMJ
2270:doi
2266:366
2262:BMJ
2208:PMC
2192:doi
2128:doi
2101:doi
2065:doi
2030:doi
1977:doi
1973:342
1936:PMC
1928:doi
1924:182
1866:doi
1862:375
1561:doi
1540:PMC
1532:doi
1520:498
1479:doi
1458:PMC
1442:doi
1430:329
1389:doi
1298:doi
1277:doi
1228:doi
1216:531
1166:doi
1162:391
1096:doi
1063:doi
1051:582
1006:PMC
988:doi
941:doi
929:582
881:NPR
830:doi
759:doi
755:374
730:doi
578:032
330:at
30:In
3249::
2659:.
2649:.
2639:.
2627:.
2623:.
2594:.
2547:.
2537:.
2527:.
2517:11
2515:.
2511:.
2485:.
2479:.
2460:.
2454:.
2403:.
2395:.
2385:.
2375:.
2369:.
2357:^
2343:.
2335:.
2327:.
2315:.
2292:.
2284:.
2276:.
2264:.
2239:.
2216:.
2206:.
2198:.
2186:.
2182:.
2156:.
2115:.
2107:.
2097:45
2095:.
2052:.
2044:.
2036:.
2026:58
2024:.
2020:.
1991:.
1983:.
1971:.
1967:.
1944:.
1934:.
1922:.
1918:.
1897:.
1880:.
1872:.
1860:.
1841:.
1816:.
1791:.
1766:.
1742:.
1716:.
1691:.
1645:.
1621:.
1596:.
1548:.
1538:.
1530:.
1518:.
1514:.
1466:.
1456:.
1448:.
1440:.
1428:.
1424:.
1395:.
1387:.
1383:.
1285:.
1273:50
1271:.
1267:.
1244:.
1236:.
1226:.
1214:.
1210:.
1194:^
1180:.
1172:.
1160:.
1110:.
1102:.
1092:88
1090:.
1086:.
1061:.
1049:.
1045:.
1022:.
1014:.
1004:.
996:.
984:10
982:.
978:.
955:.
947:.
939:.
927:.
923:.
898:.
878:.
866:^
852:.
844:.
836:.
826:37
824:.
820:.
806:^
796:.
773:.
765:.
753:.
726:33
724:.
720:.
695:.
624:).
576:96
470:,
208:-
3172:"
3168:"
2695:e
2688:t
2681:v
2667:.
2643::
2635::
2604:.
2580:)
2562::
2555:.
2531::
2523::
2496:.
2439:)
2421::
2414:.
2379::
2351:.
2323::
2300:.
2272::
2249:.
2224:.
2194::
2188:9
2167:.
2142:)
2130::
2123:.
2103::
2079:)
2067::
2060:.
2032::
2005:.
1979::
1952:.
1930::
1901:.
1888:.
1868::
1827:.
1802:.
1776:.
1752:.
1727:.
1702:.
1677:.
1656:.
1631:.
1606:.
1581:)
1563::
1556:.
1534::
1526::
1499:)
1481::
1474:.
1444::
1436::
1409:.
1391::
1368:.
1342:.
1318:)
1300::
1293:.
1279::
1252:.
1230::
1222::
1188:.
1168::
1145:.
1118:.
1098::
1071:.
1065::
1057::
1030:.
990::
963:.
943::
935::
908:.
884:.
860:.
832::
800:.
781:.
761::
738:.
732::
705:.
637:.
474:.
460:.
424:.
245:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.