Knowledge

Region connection calculus

Source 📝

564: 22: 528:. So, the path-consistency algorithm leaves multiple possible constraints on 5 of the edges in the constraint network. Since each of the multiple constraints involves 2 constraints, we can reduce the network to 32 (2^5) possible unique constraint networks, each containing only single labels on each edge ( 459:
house1 DC house2 house1 {TPP, NTPP} property1 house1 {DC, EC} property2 house1 EC road house2 { DC, EC } property1 house2 NTPP property2 house2 EC road property1 { DC, EC } property2 road { DC, EC, TPP, TPPi, PO, EQ, NTPP, NTPPi } property1 road { DC, EC, TPP, TPPi, PO, EQ, NTPP, NTPPi } property2
448:
The RCC8 calculus is intended for reasoning about spatial configurations. Consider the following example: two houses are connected via a road. Each house is located on an own property. The first house possibly touches the boundary of the property; the second one surely does not. What can we infer
156:
The two axioms describe two features of the connection relation, but not the characteristic feature of the connect relation. For example, we can say that an object is less than 10 meters away from itself and that if object A is less than 10 meters away from object B, object B will be less than 10
547:
Other versions of the region connection calculus include RCC5 (with only five basic relations - the distinction whether two regions touch each other are ignored) and RCC23 (which allows reasoning about convexity).
567:
A graphical representation of Region Connection Calculus (RCC: Randell, Cui and Cohn, 1992) and the links to the equivalent naming by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) with their equivalent URIs.
509:. This fact is not obvious, but can be deduced once we examine the consistent "singleton-labelings" of the constraint network. The following paragraph briefly describes singleton-labelings. 157:
meters away from object A. So, the relation 'less-than-10-meters' also satisfies the above two axioms, but does not talk about the connection relation in the intended sense of RCC.
468: 130: 654:
Anthony G. Cohn; Brandon Bennett; John Gooday; Micholas Mark Gotts (1997). "Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning with the Region Connection Calculus".
453: 464: 586:
is a Python framework for qualitative reasoning over networks of relation algebras, such as RCC-8, Allen's interval algebra and more.
563: 701: 98:) by their possible relations to each other. RCC8 consists of 8 basic relations that are possible between two regions: 771: 65: 43: 36: 127:
From these basic relations, combinations can be built. For example, proper part (PP) is the union of TPP and NTPP.
781: 776: 580:
is a reasoner for RCC-5, RCC-8, and RCC-23 (as well as other calculi for spatial and temporal reasoning)
87: 512:
First, we note that the path-consistency algorithm will also reduce the possible properties between
786: 30: 440:
Usage example: if a TPP b and b EC c, (row 4, column 2) of the table says that a DC c or a EC c.
47: 645:
Randell, D.A.; Cui, Z; Cohn, A.G. (1992). "A spatial logic based on regions and connection".
8: 766: 744: 736: 707: 671: 697: 95: 675: 748: 728: 711: 689: 663: 596: 532:"). However, of the 32 possible singleton labelings, only 9 are consistent. (See 91: 533: 732: 667: 760: 536:
for details.) Only one of the consistent singleton labelings has the edge
693: 740: 688:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2293. Springer Verlag. 583: 557: 452:
The spatial configuration can be formalized in RCC8 as the following
577: 86:) is intended to serve for qualitative spatial representation and 436:"*" denotes the universal relation, no relation can be discarded. 147:
for any region x, y, if x connects with y, y will connect with x
601: 719:
Dong, Tiansi (2008). "A Comment on RCC: From RCC to RCC⁺⁺".
686:
Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Topological Information
647:
3rd Int. Conf. on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
449:
about the relation of the second property to the road?
129: 485:, or is a tangential proper part of it. But, if the 474:
road { PO, EC } property1 road { PO, TPP } property2
471:, we can refine the network in the following way: 758: 165:The composition table of RCC8 are as follows: 123:non-tangential proper part inverse (NTPPi) 497:can only be externally connected (EC) to 66:Learn how and when to remove this message 562: 551: 144:for any region x, x connects with itself 29:This article includes a list of general 556:RCC8 has been partially implemented in 151: 90:. RCC abstractly describes regions (in 759: 117:tangential proper part inverse (TPPi) 649:. Morgan Kaufmann. pp. 165–176. 160: 15: 13: 571: 35:it lacks sufficient corresponding 14: 798: 120:non-tangential proper part (NTPP) 128: 20: 638: 540:and the same labeling includes 489:is a tangential proper part of 140:RCC is governed by two axioms. 721:Journal of Philosophical Logic 644: 625: 616: 391:PO, TPP, NTPP, TPPi, NTPPi, EQ 1: 609: 114:tangential proper part (TPP) 7: 590: 443: 167: 10: 803: 718: 653: 469:path-consistency algorithm 111:partially overlapping (PO) 80:region connection calculus 733:10.1007/s10992-007-9074-y 683: 307:DC, EC, PO, TPP, TPPi, EQ 237:DC, EC, PO, TPP, TPPi, EQ 135: 105:externally connected (EC) 772:Knowledge representation 668:10.1023/A:1009712514511 379:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 350:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 310:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 281:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 278:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 266:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 263:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 234:DC, EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 50:more precise citations. 782:Computational topology 777:Constraint programming 568: 694:10.1007/3-540-70736-0 566: 552:RCC8 use in GeoSPARQL 505:is not possible when 481:either overlaps (PO) 336:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 327:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 298:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 240:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 217:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 214:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 211:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 208:DC, EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 560:as described below: 530:"singleton labelings 152:Remark on the axioms 622:Randell et al. 1992 353:EC, PO, TPPi, NTPPi 569: 538:road TPP property2 507:road TPP property2 454:constraint network 703:978-3-540-43346-0 684:Renz, J. (2002). 542:road EC property1 503:road PO property1 465:composition table 433: 432: 359:PO, TPP, TPPi, EQ 243:EC, PO, TPP, NTPP 161:Composition table 102:disconnected (DC) 96:topological space 76: 75: 68: 794: 752: 715: 679: 650: 632: 629: 623: 620: 597:Spatial relation 168: 132: 71: 64: 60: 57: 51: 46:this article by 37:inline citations 24: 23: 16: 802: 801: 797: 796: 795: 793: 792: 791: 787:Logical calculi 757: 756: 704: 641: 636: 635: 630: 626: 621: 617: 612: 593: 574: 572:Implementations 554: 475: 463:Using the RCC8 461: 446: 388:PO, TPPi, NTPPi 385:PO, TPPi, NTPPi 382:PO, TPPi, NTPPi 356:PO, TPPi, NTPPi 172: 163: 154: 138: 92:Euclidean space 72: 61: 55: 52: 42:Please help to 41: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 800: 790: 789: 784: 779: 774: 769: 755: 754: 727:(2): 319–352. 716: 702: 681: 662:(3): 275–316. 656:GeoInformatica 651: 640: 637: 634: 633: 624: 614: 613: 611: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 592: 589: 588: 587: 581: 573: 570: 553: 550: 473: 458: 445: 442: 438: 437: 431: 430: 427: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 402: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 383: 380: 377: 373: 372: 369: 366: 363: 360: 357: 354: 351: 348: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 331: 328: 325: 322: 319: 315: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 286: 285: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 264: 261: 257: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 241: 238: 235: 232: 228: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 199: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 162: 159: 153: 150: 149: 148: 145: 137: 134: 125: 124: 121: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 103: 74: 73: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 799: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 773: 770: 768: 765: 764: 762: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 717: 713: 709: 705: 699: 695: 691: 687: 682: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 652: 648: 643: 642: 628: 619: 615: 603: 600: 599: 598: 595: 594: 585: 582: 579: 576: 575: 565: 561: 559: 549: 545: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 510: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 477:That is, the 472: 470: 466: 457: 455: 450: 441: 435: 434: 428: 425: 422: 419: 416: 413: 410: 407: 404: 403: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 381: 378: 375: 374: 370: 367: 364: 362:PO, TPP, NTPP 361: 358: 355: 352: 349: 346: 345: 341: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 317: 316: 312: 309: 306: 303: 300: 297: 294: 291: 288: 287: 283: 280: 277: 275:PO, TPP, NTPP 274: 272:PO, TPP, NTPP 271: 268: 265: 262: 259: 258: 254: 251: 248: 246:PO, TPP, NTPP 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230: 229: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 200: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 170: 169: 166: 158: 146: 143: 142: 141: 133: 131: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 100: 99: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 70: 67: 59: 56:November 2016 49: 45: 39: 38: 32: 27: 18: 17: 724: 720: 685: 659: 655: 646: 639:Bibliography 627: 618: 555: 546: 541: 537: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 511: 506: 502: 501:. That is, 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 476: 462: 451: 447: 439: 164: 155: 139: 126: 83: 79: 77: 62: 53: 34: 493:, then the 365:TPPi, NTPPi 48:introducing 761:Categories 610:References 522:{ DC, EC } 173:R1(a, b)↓ 171:R2(b, c)→ 108:equal (EQ) 94:, or in a 31:references 767:Reasoning 631:Dong 2008 558:GeoSPARQL 518:property1 499:property1 491:property2 483:property2 301:TPP, NTPP 88:reasoning 741:41217909 676:14841370 591:See also 584:qualreas 534:qualreas 524:to just 467:and the 444:Examples 749:6243376 712:8236425 44:improve 747:  739:  710:  700:  674:  602:DE-9IM 514:house2 400:NTPPi 376:NTPPi 295:DC, EC 249:DC, EC 136:Axioms 33:, but 745:S2CID 737:JSTOR 708:S2CID 672:S2CID 520:from 426:NTPPi 397:NTPPi 394:NTPPi 371:TPPi 368:NTPPi 347:TPPi 342:NTPP 318:NTPP 194:NTPPi 698:ISBN 516:and 495:road 487:road 479:road 423:TPPi 420:NTPP 333:NTPP 330:NTPP 313:TPP 304:NTPP 289:TPP 191:TPPi 188:NTPP 78:The 729:doi 690:doi 664:doi 578:GQR 429:EQ 417:TPP 405:EQ 284:PO 260:PO 255:EC 231:EC 226:DC 202:DC 197:EQ 185:TPP 84:RCC 763:: 743:. 735:. 725:34 723:. 706:. 696:. 670:. 658:. 544:. 526:DC 456:: 414:PO 411:EC 408:DC 324:DC 321:DC 292:DC 252:DC 223:DC 220:DC 182:PO 179:EC 176:DC 753:. 751:. 731:: 714:. 692:: 680:. 678:. 666:: 660:1 339:* 269:* 205:* 82:( 69:) 63:( 58:) 54:( 40:.

Index

references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
reasoning
Euclidean space
topological space

constraint network
composition table
path-consistency algorithm
qualreas
GeoSPARQL
A graphical representation of Region Connection Calculus (RCC: Randell, Cui and Cohn, 1992) and the links to the equivalent naming by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) with their equivalent URIs.
GQR
qualreas
Spatial relation
DE-9IM
doi
10.1023/A:1009712514511
S2CID
14841370
doi
10.1007/3-540-70736-0
ISBN
978-3-540-43346-0
S2CID
8236425
doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.