Knowledge

R v Keegstra

Source đź“ť

29: 337:. He asserted that the current historical information being taught in universities and schools is a trap set by the Jews to mislead the public. He claimed that the education system has failed because of their awareness regarding Jewish conspiracy with the Holocaust. Keegstra believed he was one of the few chosen individuals who were aware of the treachery and wanted to put a stop to it. Keegstra would teach his classes concepts that were not a part of the Alberta Social Studies Curriculum. 415:
Dickson CJ then turned to the question of section 1 of the Charter. He found that the violation of freedom of expression was justified under section 1 as the law had a rational connection to its objective, it was not overly limiting and the seriousness of the violation was not severe as the content
504:
formed a council to establish the Alberta Teacher Standards. The council’s main focus was to devise procedures for classroom checkup of teacher proficiency. Keegstra was fined $ 5,000 and his professional teaching certificate was suspended. The guilty verdict in the trial did not necessarily prove
499:
had modified its code of ethics in order to prevent any hate crime against an ethnic group. This included the right to protect the self-respect of any individual or group regardless of any prejudgment to race, religion, age or other physical characteristics. New requests were made to qualify new
450:
In addition to being a public school teacher, Keegstra was also the mayor of Eckville. The town of Eckville was scrutinized by the media due to this case. The residents of the town felt that the ongoing trial tarnished their image. They were called anti-Semites by the media and received negative
436:
When the matter returned to the Alberta Court of Appeal, that Court held that based on the original submissions, it would have also allowed Keegstra's appeal on the basis that the trial judge had not allowed Keegstra to challenge jurors for cause based on pre-trial publicity. The Court therefore
301:
teacher, and in 1974 was acclaimed as mayor of the community, a position he held until 1983. Keegstra's anti-semitic teachings had resulted in complaints in the late-1970s but little action was taken by the school board. Keegstra was warned by the board superintendent in December 1981 to stop
428:. She agreed with Dickson CJ that the provisions infringed section 2(b) of the Charter. However, she would have held that the infringement of freedom of expression could not be justified under section 1. She therefore would have dismissed the appeal. 313:
provision, now section 319(2), makes it a criminal offence to promote hatred: "Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group". During classes, he described
349:, Keegstra applied to the trial judge to have the charge quashed for violation of his freedom of expression; however, this motion was denied. A jury convicted Keegstra in a three and a half month trial, and he was ordered to pay a $ 5,000 fine. 396:. He held that the provisions clearly violated section 2(b) as it was legislation designed to suppress expression. In this, Dickson CJ wrote that freedom of expression within section 2 would not be limited by 437:
allowed Keegstra's appeal and directed a new trial. Keegstra was convicted at the second trial, which resulted in another set of appeals, again ending in the Supreme Court, which affirmed the conviction.
416:
of the hateful expression has little value to protect. He, therefore, allowed the Crown appeal and remitted the case to the Court of Appeal to deal with issues they had not addressed in their decision.
401: 309:
that he "..did unlawfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, to wit: the Jewish people, by communicating statements while teaching to students at Eckville High School." The
397: 302:"teaching these biased and prejudiced views" and stick to teaching the grade 12 social studies curriculum. The school board eventually fired Keegstra in December 1982. 483:
had demonstrated hate speech laws were constitutional. Building on expectations that there must be evidence of promotion of hatred against a group, the Court added in
361: 267: 505:
justice for the offended group. James Keegstra never abandoned his anti-Semitic beliefs, despite the accusations and faults found in his teachings against Jews.
521:
dramatizes a very similar story of a Holocaust-denying high school teacher in small-town Alberta who is prosecuted under section 281.2(2). It was made before
237: 408:. As Dickson CJ explained, using sections 15 and 27 in this way would contradict "the large and liberal interpretation given the freedom of expression in 1213: 534: 1301: 266:
provision prohibiting the wilful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group as constitutional under the freedom of expression provision in
963: 360:. On June 6, 1988, the Court of Appeal of Alberta ruled that section 319(2) did indeed breach section 2(b) and could not be upheld under 219: 384:
and if so, whether they could be upheld under section 1. By a 4–3 decision, the Court upheld the constitutionality of the provisions.
451:
attention. Townsfolk of Eckville declared that this was unfair treatment thrust upon the entire town due to the actions of one man.
1025: 473:
to note that freedom of expression should be interpreted generously and was infringed in that case. In another hate speech case,
272: 1296: 487:
that courts should then consider the "totality of the evidence" to conclude whether a group had fallen victim to hate speech.
1321: 1291: 853: 1311: 1306: 1270: 1223: 356:
on the basis that section 319(2) breached the constitutional right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the
1045: 1040: 346: 956: 496: 1141: 1234: 1085: 1065: 1316: 1254: 1260: 1207: 1146: 1090: 949: 409: 213: 558: 158: 1167: 1080: 1055: 1030: 1020: 902:
Weinrib, Lorraine Eisenstat (1991). "Hate Promotion in a Free and Democratic Society: R. v. Keegstra".
353: 1326: 1249: 1035: 1218: 122:
infringe on section 2(b) rights of freedom on expression, but is justified under section 1 of the
630: 257: 34: 1070: 262: 322:
to gain sympathy". He also tested his students in exams on his theories and opinions of Jews.
253: 1105: 412:" and moreover, "s. 1 of the Charter is especially well suited to the task of balancing". 297:, who began in the position in 1968. He also took on many community roles as a deacon and 8: 1265: 1125: 1050: 972: 154: 1228: 1202: 987: 904: 702: 425: 174: 913: 886: 849: 842: 501: 330: 294: 376:
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the
60: 28: 997: 992: 876: 166: 231: 941: 1239: 1120: 1115: 1095: 1060: 837: 290: 1162: 1285: 917: 890: 475: 393: 298: 150: 146: 139: 454: 202:
Lamer and Cory JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
469:(1992), a case considering laws against obscenity, the Supreme Court cited 334: 326: 162: 1180: 1015: 514: 460: 278: 936: 1244: 1186: 1110: 1100: 465: 170: 881: 864: 319: 225: 1075: 368:. The Crown appealed this decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. 722: 710: 612: 525:
reached its ultimate conclusion in the Supreme Court of Canada.
500:
teachers through constant assessments and Minister of Education
459:
The case provided precedent for other freedom of expression and
638: 600: 588: 576: 564: 490: 189:
Dickson CJ, joined by Wilson, L'Heureux-Dubé, and Gonthier JJ
819: 806: 790: 774: 758: 93: 85: 921: 894: 315: 104:
Crown appeal allowed; constitutionality of s. 319 of the
455:
Implications of the Supreme Court case for similar issues
681: 669: 659: 657: 655: 653: 305:
In 1984, he was charged under section 281.2(2) of the
650: 340: 238:
Rocket v Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario
1214:
Canadian Anti-racism Education and Research Society
865:"Combatting Racist Speech: The Canadian Experience" 535:
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
392:The majority decision was written by Chief Justice 841: 836: 728: 716: 644: 618: 606: 594: 582: 570: 318:as a people of profound evil who had "created the 971: 445: 1283: 371: 293:(1934–2014) was a public high school teacher in 16:1990 Supreme Court of Canada case on hate speech 380:violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the 197:McLachlin J, joined by Sopinka and La Forest JJ 424:The dissenting opinion was written by Justice 957: 491:Action by the Alberta Teachers' Association 964: 950: 333:bent on world domination and annihilating 880: 431: 404:(recognition of multiculturalism) of the 1026:Canadian Association for Free Expression 1302:Canadian freedom of expression case law 901: 687: 675: 352:He then appealed his conviction to the 273:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1284: 750: 748: 54:Her Majesty The Queen v James Keegstra 1235:FAST – Fighting Antisemitism Together 1066:Generation Identity Canada / IDCanada 945: 862: 844:A trust betrayed: the Keegstra affair 700:"Keegstra's Town Tired of Scrutiny". 663: 508: 419: 345:At the beginning of his trial in the 764: 387: 745: 559:SCC Case Information - Docket 21118 13: 1255:Provisional Anti-Fascist Committee 1224:Canadian Race Relations Foundation 14: 1338: 1046:Canadian Nationalist Party (2017) 1041:Canadian Nationalist Party (1933) 930: 341:Proceedings in the Alberta courts 1156:Laws combatting hateful rhetoric 27: 937:IMDB: Evil in Clear River, 1988 812: 796: 780: 693: 1086:National Unity Party of Canada 840:; Wertheimer, Douglas (1985). 729:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 717:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 645:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 624: 619:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 607:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 595:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 583:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 571:Bercuson & Wertheimer 1985 552: 446:Effect on the town of Eckville 347:Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 1: 1297:Supreme Court of Canada cases 848:. Toronto: Doubleday Canada. 540: 497:Alberta Teachers' Association 479:(2005), the Court noted that 372:Decision of the Supreme Court 285: 43:Hearing: December 5, 6, 1989 1322:Education case law in Canada 1292:Section Two Charter case law 1142:École Polytechnique massacre 634:, RSC 1985, c. C-46, s. 319. 440: 276:. It is a companion case to 7: 1208:Battle at Old Market Square 1147:Quebec City mosque shooting 1091:Nationalist Party of Canada 1009:Organizations and movements 528: 260:where the court upheld the 214:Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG) 45:Judgment: December 13, 1990 10: 1343: 1312:Holocaust denial in Canada 1168:Hate speech laws in Canada 1081:National Citizens Alliance 1056:Canadian Union of Fascists 1031:Canadian Heritage Alliance 354:Court of Appeal of Alberta 1307:1990 in Canadian case law 1250:Ottawa Rape Crisis Centre 1195: 1163:Hate crime laws in Canada 1155: 1134: 1036:Canadian League of Rights 1008: 980: 211: 206: 201: 193: 185: 180: 135: 130: 117: 112: 100: 77: 69: 59: 49: 42: 26: 21: 1219:Canadian Arab Federation 863:Elman, Bruce P. (1994). 329:views and believed in a 561:Supreme Court of Canada 258:Supreme Court of Canada 35:Supreme Court of Canada 1071:Ku Klux Klan in Canada 432:Subsequent proceedings 400:(equality rights) and 254:freedom of expression 159:Claire L'Heureux-DubĂ© 1317:Education in Alberta 1266:Roots of Resistance 1126:Western Guard Party 1051:Canadian Nazi Party 973:Far-right extremism 895:1994 CanLIIDocs 188 838:Bercuson, David Jay 519:Evil in Clear River 118:s.319(3)(a) of the 1229:Christie Pits riot 1203:Anti-Racist Action 1106:QuĂ©bec Identitaire 988:Far-right politics 922:1991 CanLIIDocs 52 905:McGill Law Journal 869:Alberta Law Review 703:The Globe and Mail 513:The 1988 American 509:In popular culture 426:Beverley McLachlin 420:Dissenting opinion 252:, 3 SCR 697 is a 175:Beverley McLachlin 1279: 1278: 855:978-0-385-25003-0 502:David Thomas King 388:Majority decision 331:Jewish conspiracy 295:Eckville, Alberta 245: 244: 1334: 1327:Alberta case law 998:Racism in Quebec 993:Racism in Canada 981:General concepts 966: 959: 952: 943: 942: 925: 912:(4): 1416–1449. 898: 884: 882:10.29173/alr1155 859: 847: 823: 818:R. v. Keegstra, 816: 810: 800: 794: 784: 778: 775:1984 CanLII 1313 768: 762: 752: 732: 726: 720: 714: 708: 707: 697: 691: 685: 679: 673: 667: 661: 648: 642: 636: 628: 622: 616: 610: 604: 598: 592: 586: 580: 574: 568: 562: 556: 256:decision of the 167:Charles Gonthier 155:GĂ©rard La Forest 144:Puisne Justices: 131:Court membership 94:1984 CanLII 1313 31: 19: 18: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1275: 1191: 1151: 1130: 1004: 976: 970: 933: 928: 856: 827: 826: 817: 813: 801: 797: 785: 781: 769: 765: 753: 746: 736: 735: 727: 723: 715: 711: 706:. May 21, 1985. 699: 698: 694: 690:, p. 1418. 686: 682: 678:, p. 1417. 674: 670: 662: 651: 643: 639: 629: 625: 617: 613: 605: 601: 593: 589: 581: 577: 569: 565: 557: 553: 543: 531: 511: 493: 457: 448: 443: 434: 422: 390: 374: 343: 288: 232:R v Morgentaler 142: 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1340: 1330: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1294: 1277: 1276: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1263: 1258: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1240:Nizkor Project 1237: 1232: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1205: 1199: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1190: 1189: 1184: 1177: 1170: 1165: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1121:Tri-City Skins 1118: 1116:Storm Alliance 1113: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1096:Northern Order 1093: 1088: 1083: 1078: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1061:Heritage Front 1058: 1053: 1048: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1012: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 990: 984: 982: 978: 977: 969: 968: 961: 954: 946: 940: 939: 932: 931:External links 929: 927: 926: 899: 875:(4): 623–666. 860: 854: 833: 832: 831: 825: 824: 811: 803:R. v. Keegstra 795: 779: 771:R. v. Keegstra 763: 755:R. v. Keegstra 743: 742: 741: 740: 734: 733: 731:, p. 191. 721: 719:, p. 190. 709: 692: 680: 668: 666:, p. 627. 649: 637: 623: 621:, p. 108. 611: 599: 587: 575: 563: 550: 549: 548: 547: 542: 539: 538: 537: 530: 527: 510: 507: 492: 489: 456: 453: 447: 444: 442: 439: 433: 430: 421: 418: 389: 386: 373: 370: 342: 339: 325:Keegstra held 291:James Keegstra 287: 284: 243: 242: 209: 208: 204: 203: 199: 198: 195: 191: 190: 187: 183: 182: 178: 177: 137:Chief Justice: 133: 132: 128: 127: 115: 114: 110: 109: 102: 98: 97: 90:R. v. Keegstra 82:R. v. Keegstra 79: 75: 74: 71: 67: 66: 63: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1339: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1287: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1262: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1194: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1158: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1137: 1133: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1011: 1007: 999: 996: 995: 994: 991: 989: 986: 985: 983: 979: 974: 967: 962: 960: 955: 953: 948: 947: 944: 938: 935: 934: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 906: 900: 896: 892: 888: 883: 878: 874: 870: 866: 861: 857: 851: 846: 845: 839: 835: 834: 829: 828: 821: 815: 808: 804: 799: 792: 788: 783: 776: 772: 767: 760: 759:1988 ABCA 234 756: 751: 749: 744: 738: 737: 730: 725: 718: 713: 705: 704: 696: 689: 684: 677: 672: 665: 660: 658: 656: 654: 647:, p. 44. 646: 641: 635: 633: 632:Criminal Code 627: 620: 615: 609:, p. 90. 608: 603: 597:, p. 88. 596: 591: 585:, p. 18. 584: 579: 573:, p. 17. 572: 567: 560: 555: 551: 545: 544: 536: 533: 532: 526: 524: 520: 516: 506: 503: 498: 488: 486: 482: 478: 477: 476:R v Krymowski 472: 468: 467: 462: 452: 438: 429: 427: 417: 413: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 394:Brian Dickson 385: 383: 379: 378:Criminal Code 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 350: 348: 338: 336: 332: 328: 323: 321: 317: 312: 311:Criminal Code 308: 307:Criminal Code 303: 300: 299:Sunday school 296: 292: 283: 281: 280: 275: 274: 269: 265: 264: 263:Criminal Code 259: 255: 251: 250: 240: 239: 234: 233: 228: 227: 222: 221: 216: 215: 210: 205: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 181:Reasons given 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 151:Bertha Wilson 148: 147:Antonio Lamer 145: 141: 140:Brian Dickson 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 120:Criminal Code 116: 111: 107: 106:Criminal Code 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86:1988 ABCA 234 83: 80: 78:Prior history 76: 72: 68: 64: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 1179: 1174:R v Keegstra 1173: 1172: 909: 903: 872: 868: 843: 814: 807:1991 ABCA 97 802: 798: 787:R v Keegstra 786: 782: 770: 766: 754: 724: 712: 701: 695: 688:Weinrib 1991 683: 676:Weinrib 1991 671: 640: 631: 626: 614: 602: 590: 578: 566: 554: 523:R v Keegstra 522: 518: 512: 494: 484: 480: 474: 470: 464: 458: 449: 435: 423: 414: 405: 391: 381: 377: 375: 365: 357: 351: 344: 335:Christianity 327:anti-Semitic 324: 310: 306: 304: 289: 277: 271: 268:section 2(b) 261: 249:R v Keegstra 248: 247: 246: 236: 230: 224: 218: 212: 207:Laws applied 163:John Sopinka 143: 136: 123: 119: 105: 89: 81: 53: 33: 22:R v Keegstra 1181:R v Andrews 1135:Hate crimes 1016:Aryan Guard 830:Works cited 515:made-for-TV 461:hate speech 279:R v Andrews 1286:Categories 1245:NOWAR-PAIX 1196:Opposition 1187:Motion 103 1111:Rebel News 1101:Proud Boys 664:Elman 1994 541:References 466:R v Butler 463:cases. In 402:section 27 398:section 15 286:Background 171:Peter Cory 70:Docket No. 975:in Canada 918:0024-9041 891:1925-8356 820:1 SCR 458 809:(CanLII). 791:3 SCR 697 761:(CanLII). 546:Citations 485:Krymowski 441:Aftermath 410:Irwin Toy 362:section 1 320:Holocaust 226:R v Oakes 220:R v Whyte 65:3 SCR 697 61:Citations 1076:La Meute 1021:Atalante 529:See also 481:Keegstra 471:Keegstra 235:(1988); 229:(1986); 223:(1988); 217:(1989); 186:Majority 96:(AB KB). 777:(AB QB) 406:Charter 382:Charter 366:Charter 364:of the 358:Charter 270:of the 194:Dissent 124:Charter 113:Holding 108:upheld. 1257:(1938) 1231:(1933) 1210:(1934) 916:  889:  852:  241:(1990) 101:Ruling 73:21118 1271:SHARP 739:Cases 517:film 1261:RASH 914:ISSN 887:ISSN 850:ISBN 495:The 316:Jews 877:doi 1288:: 920:. 910:36 908:. 893:. 885:. 873:32 871:. 867:. 805:, 789:, 773:, 757:, 747:^ 652:^ 282:. 173:, 169:, 165:, 161:, 157:, 153:, 149:, 92:, 88:; 84:, 965:e 958:t 951:v 924:. 897:. 879:: 858:. 822:. 793:. 126:.

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
1988 ABCA 234
1984 CanLII 1313
Brian Dickson
Antonio Lamer
Bertha Wilson
GĂ©rard La Forest
Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
John Sopinka
Charles Gonthier
Peter Cory
Beverley McLachlin
Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG)
R v Whyte
R v Oakes
R v Morgentaler
Rocket v Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario
freedom of expression
Supreme Court of Canada
Criminal Code
section 2(b)
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
R v Andrews
James Keegstra
Eckville, Alberta
Sunday school
Jews
Holocaust

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑