40:
373:
379:
296:, the Alberta Court of Appeal ruled that a woman who pled guilty to killing her husband after years of abuse had received too high a sentence. Justice Sheila Greckol cited Lavallee in her majority opinion, stating that it is “beyond time for this Court to explicitly recognize that cases of battered women killing abusive partners involve unique circumstances that must be considered by the sentencing judge”.
230:, the verdict was overturned by the Supreme Court of Manitoba in 1988, and a new trial was ordered. The court ruled that the psychiatrist had given inadmissible testimony regarding past abuse that were unsubstantiated by hospital visits or police statements, and that the judge in that case had not properly instructed the jury regarding this.
218:
with Kevin Rust. In the early morning hours of 31 August 1986, during a particularly serious fight Rust threatened to harm her, saying "either you kill me or I'll get you" per her statement to the police. During the altercation Rust slapped her, pushed her and hit her twice on the head. At some point
280:
to include consideration of "the extent to which the use of force was imminent" (section 34) and "the nature, duration and history of any relationship between the parties to the incident, including any prior use or threat of force and the nature of that force or threat" (section 34) in assessment of
267:
added in a concurring opinion that, had there been no evidence supporting the psychiatrist's testimony, it would have been reasonable to discount it. However, sufficient evidence was given to support his expert's statements, and the jury was therefore entitled to rely on his testimony.
223:, and had a psychiatrist testify in her support. He explained the effects of her circumstances on her mental state and that in the state she was in she felt she was going to be killed and had no alternative but to shoot him. Lavallee did not testify. The jury acquitted Lavallee.
219:
during the altercation he handed
Lavallee a gun, which she first fired through a window screen. Lavallee first contemplated shooting herself; however when Rust turned around to leave the room she shot him in the back of the head. At trial, Lavallee argued
256:, writing for the court, held that expert evidence is often needed when stereotypes and stigmatisation are inherent in a person's reasoning. In particular here, the woman's experience and perspective is relevant to the
260:
required for self-defence. Additionally, the justice wrote that sufficient evidence was given for the jury to have potentially reached the same conclusion without the psychiatrist's testimony.
342:
Martha
Shaffer, "The Battered Woman Syndrome Revisited: Some Complicating Thoughts Five Years after R. v. Lavallee" (1997) 47 University of Toronto Law Journal 1
199:, is generally considered one of her most famous. The court held in favour of allowing battered woman syndrome to explain how the mental conditions for
631:
422:
661:
352:- the Supreme Court of Canada denied the appeal of a second-degree murder conviction despite a battered woman syndrome defence.
315:
215:
676:
671:
666:
606:"Bill C-26 (S.C. 2012 c. 9) Reforms to Self-Defence and Defence of Property: Technical Guide for Practitioners"
17:
415:
458:
336:
681:
439:
132:
605:
487:
579:
355:
346:
310:
227:
550:
408:
332:
328:
246:
234:
188:
45:
277:
192:
292:
decision has also been applied to criminal sentencing for women who experienced abuse. in
8:
305:
128:
148:
396:
257:
212:
71:
39:
140:
512:
632:"Choice vs Coercive Control: The Alberta Court of Appeal Decision in R v Naslund"
392:
655:
580:"Citizen's Arrest and Self-defence Act, Revised Statutes of Canada 2012 c. 9"
253:
196:
176:
La Forest and Cory took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
124:
120:
113:
388:
372:
264:
220:
200:
136:
281:
self-defence claims, codifying a portion of
Justice Wilson's opinion in
163:
Wilson, joined by
Dickson, Lamer, L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and McLachlin
144:
551:"Supreme Court Judgments: R. v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852"
341:
233:
Lavallee appealed the decision by the
Manitoba Supreme Court, and the
245:
At issue before the
Supreme Court was whether the expert evidence on
237:
upheld the original acquittal on 5 May 1990 in a unanimous decision.
203:
were present in this case, and
Lavallee's acquittal was restored.
276:
In 2012, Canadian parliament passed reforms to
Section 34 of the
457:
Morris, Christopher and
Marilyn Pilon (5 November 1992).
653:
459:"The Battered Wife Defence: The Lavallee Case"
65:Angelique Lyn Lavallee v Her Majesty The Queen
416:
92:On appeal from Court of Appeal for Manitoba
423:
409:
485:
240:
14:
654:
629:
456:
574:
572:
545:
543:
541:
539:
537:
535:
533:
481:
479:
452:
450:
448:
366:
440:SCC Case Information - Docket 21022
195:. The judgment, written by Justice
24:
630:Koshan, Jennifer (29 April 2022).
211:Angelique Lynn Lavallee was in an
25:
693:
569:
530:
476:
463:Government of Canada Publications
445:
321:
191:case on the legal recognition of
488:"R. v. Lavallee: A Review Essay"
377:
371:
361:- cited in the court's decision.
38:
623:
598:
505:
433:
13:
1:
662:Supreme Court of Canada cases
206:
187:, 1 S.C.R. 852 is a leading
395:. You can help Knowledge by
258:reasonable person's standard
27:Supreme Court of Canada case
7:
299:
10:
698:
677:Canadian evidence case law
672:Canadian criminal case law
365:
54:Hearing: October 31, 1989
667:1990 in Canadian case law
311:Battered husband syndrome
271:
175:
167:
159:
154:
109:
104:
96:
88:
80:
70:
60:
53:
37:
32:
486:Shaffer, Martha (1990).
555:Supreme Court of Canada
442:Supreme Court of Canada
329:Supreme Court of Canada
247:battered woman syndrome
235:Supreme Court of Canada
216:common law relationship
193:battered woman syndrome
189:Supreme Court of Canada
100:Lavallee appeal allowed
46:Supreme Court of Canada
517:The Gruber Foundation
133:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
56:Judgment: May 3, 1990
241:Reasons of the court
387:This article about
306:Angelina Napolitano
682:Canadian law stubs
149:Beverley McLachlin
495:Ottawa Law Review
404:
403:
180:
179:
16:(Redirected from
689:
647:
646:
644:
642:
627:
621:
620:
618:
616:
602:
596:
595:
593:
591:
576:
567:
566:
564:
562:
547:
528:
527:
525:
523:
509:
503:
502:
492:
483:
474:
473:
471:
469:
454:
443:
437:
425:
418:
411:
383:
382:
381:
380:
375:
367:
249:was admissible.
141:Charles Gonthier
129:GĂ©rard La Forest
118:Puisne Justices:
105:Court membership
42:
30:
29:
21:
697:
696:
692:
691:
690:
688:
687:
686:
652:
651:
650:
640:
638:
628:
624:
614:
612:
604:
603:
599:
589:
587:
578:
577:
570:
560:
558:
549:
548:
531:
521:
519:
513:"Bertha Wilson"
511:
510:
506:
490:
484:
477:
467:
465:
455:
446:
438:
434:
430:
429:
378:
376:
370:
362:
350:, 1 S.C.R. 123
324:
302:
274:
243:
209:
116:
55:
49:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
695:
685:
684:
679:
674:
669:
664:
649:
648:
622:
597:
568:
529:
504:
475:
444:
431:
428:
427:
420:
413:
405:
402:
401:
384:
364:
363:
359:, 2 S.C.R. 24
353:
344:
339:
323:
322:External links
320:
319:
318:
313:
308:
301:
298:
273:
270:
242:
239:
208:
205:
178:
177:
173:
172:
169:
165:
164:
161:
157:
156:
152:
151:
111:Chief Justice:
107:
106:
102:
101:
98:
94:
93:
90:
86:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
68:
67:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
51:
50:
43:
35:
34:
26:
18:R. v. Lavallee
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
694:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
659:
657:
637:
633:
626:
611:
610:justice.gc.ca
607:
601:
585:
584:justice.gc.ca
581:
575:
573:
556:
552:
546:
544:
542:
540:
538:
536:
534:
518:
514:
508:
501:(3): 607–624.
500:
496:
489:
482:
480:
464:
460:
453:
451:
449:
441:
436:
432:
426:
421:
419:
414:
412:
407:
406:
400:
398:
394:
390:
385:
374:
369:
368:
360:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
327:Full text of
326:
325:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
303:
297:
295:
291:
286:
284:
279:
278:criminal code
269:
266:
261:
259:
255:
254:Bertha Wilson
250:
248:
238:
236:
231:
229:
226:On appeal by
224:
222:
217:
214:
204:
202:
198:
197:Bertha Wilson
194:
190:
186:
185:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:Reasons given
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:Bertha Wilson
122:
121:Antonio Lamer
119:
115:
114:Brian Dickson
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
89:Prior history
87:
83:
79:
75:
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
52:
48:
47:
41:
36:
31:
19:
639:. Retrieved
635:
625:
613:. Retrieved
609:
600:
588:. Retrieved
583:
559:. Retrieved
557:. 3 May 1990
554:
520:. Retrieved
516:
507:
498:
494:
466:. Retrieved
462:
435:
397:expanding it
389:Canadian law
386:
356:
347:
331:decision at
316:Complex PTSD
293:
289:
287:
282:
275:
265:John Sopinka
262:
251:
244:
232:
225:
221:self-defence
210:
201:self-defence
184:R v Lavallee
183:
182:
181:
137:John Sopinka
117:
110:
76:1 S.C.R. 852
64:
44:
33:R v Lavallee
641:4 September
615:4 September
590:4 September
561:4 September
522:4 September
468:4 September
357:R. v. Abbey
294:R v Naslund
168:Concurrence
656:Categories
636:ablawg.com
348:R v Malott
335: and
207:Background
145:Peter Cory
81:Docket No.
228:the Crown
72:Citations
300:See also
290:Lavallee
283:Lavallee
263:Justice
252:Justice
160:Majority
213:abusive
171:Sopinka
586:. 2012
337:CanLII
272:Legacy
97:Ruling
84:21022
491:(PDF)
391:is a
333:LexUM
643:2024
617:2024
592:2024
563:2024
524:2024
470:2024
393:stub
288:The
285:.
658::
634:.
608:.
582:.
571:^
553:.
532:^
515:.
499:22
497:.
493:.
478:^
461:.
447:^
147:,
143:,
139:,
135:,
131:,
127:,
123:,
645:.
619:.
594:.
565:.
526:.
472:.
424:e
417:t
410:v
399:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
