Para-Nordic skiing classification

63:, organisers wanted to get away from a medical classification system and use a functional system, but they ended up with a system based on equipment utilised by the skier instead. As the 1970s progressed, equipment improvements made it possible for skiers with spinal cord injuries to participate and a classification system developed for these skiers. By the 1990s, there were over ten Nordic skiing classes and a percentage system was developed to allow skiers with different disabilities inside one of three groups to compete against each other. The skiers time at the end of the race would be multiplied against a percentage to determine a time that allowed for fair cross classification comparisons. While the actual percentages change from time to time, this system to calculate a winner is still in use. Despite repeated efforts to move to a true functional mobility based classification dating back to the 1970s, medical assessment still took place during the classification process in the 2010s. 153:(ISOD), founded in 1964, governed the sport. In 1980, there were two governing bodies handling classification, ISOD and the International Stoke Mandeville Games Committee (ISMGC), which later became the International Stoke Mandeville Games Federation (ISMGF), and still later the International Stoke Mandeville Wheelchair Sports Federation (ISMWSF). ISMGC was in charge of classification for athletes with spinal cord related disabilities. In 1981, the International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA) was created, and took over governance for skiers with visual impairments. In 2003, ISMWSF merged with ISOD, and changed its name to the International Wheelchair and Amputee Sports Federation (IWAS) in 2004. While the 2421: 572: 530:, the men's relay, named the 1 x 4 km + 2 x 5 km relay, a sit skier led off with a 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) leg, with the standing skier going second on a 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) leg and the vision impaired skier going last on a 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) leg. On the women's side, the event is called the 3 x 2.5 km event. Skiing in the same order, all three skiers ski 2.5 kilometres (1.6 mi). Sit skiers sit in a chair with two skis attached to it. Classification percentages for national competitions are not necessarily the same ones used for international competitions. 534:

shooting portions in the biathlon. The guide for B1 skiers generally skis behind the skier in order to maximize the ability of the skier to hear the guide. The guide tells the skier things like when weight should be shifted, elements coming up on the course, and how to position themselves to maximize the diagonal run of the course. Guides for B2 and B3 skiers often position themselves differently as the skiers have some vision, which means the things a guide assists with will be different from what is required of a skier who has almost no sight.

555:. There are three types of classification available for Australian competitors: Provisional, national and international. The first is for club level competitions, the second for state and national competitions, and the third for international competitions. While a skier is first classified by their national Paralympic committee, their international classification may take place during their first World Cup event. A competitor may challenge their own classification or that of their fellow competitors. 638:, the cross country event had three groups of skiers: vision impaired, standing and sitting. In 2002, for the Winter Paralympics, the Games Classifiers were Birgitta Blomquist, Anne Lannem and Ted Fay. The Games Classifiers for vision impairment classifications were Roman Tolmatschev, Johan Wirsching and Axel Bolsinger. Classifications for skiers with intellectual disabilities were not included at these Games because of cheating that took place at the Sydney Summer Paralympics two years earlier. 222: 17: 2015: 308: 595:, skiers with intellectual disabilities were eligible to compete as full medal participants in the cross country event despite early initial opposition by the Nagano Organising Committee. The local organizers believed it would be too difficult to separate intellectual disability skiers into different classes. At the same time, there were few eligible skiers from Japan who would have been eligible to compete in these events. 602:, all disability types were eligible to participate, with classification being run through the International Paralympic Committee, with classification being done based on blind, amputee and sitting disability type. The biathlon was open to men with vision impairment classifications for the first time at the 1992 Games. At the 1992 Games, intellectual disability skiers competed in a demonstration event. At the 1992 Games, 117:

into LW10 and LW10.5, and LW11 being divided into LW11 and LW11.5. The sport also has three classifications for blind skiers, B1, B2, and B3. These are based solely on medical classification. Research done at the Central Institute on Employment Abilities of the Handicapped in Moscow has found differences in functional capabilities based on differences in visual acuity. This plays a significant role in skiing.

662: 500:

competitors. At the same time, there were people including IPC first vice president Jens Bromann who entertained discussions about whether or not blind classifications should be combined into a single class like is done in some other disabilities sports. The debate about inclusion of competitors into able-bodied competitions was seen by some disability sport advocates like

259:. The classification used the classification system designed for track events. In 1983, there were five cerebral palsy classifications. During the 1980s, there were three sit-ski classes and seven other classes. During the 1980s, while not formally part of the para-skiing classification system, intellectual disability Nordic skiing classes did exist as part of the 173:. They defined cerebral palsy as a non-progressive brain legion that results in impairment. People with cerebral palsy or non-progressive brain damage were eligible for classification by them. The organisation also dealt with classification for people with similar impairments. For their classification system, people with 157:(CP-ISRA) has an interest in the sport because it is open to people with cerebral palsy, it is not governed by them. In 1983, both the rules for this sport, and classification, was done by the CP-ISRA. By 1984, there were four organisations governing classification for the sport: ISOD, ISMGF, IBSA and CP-ISRA. 279:. The tests included hand, arm and shoulder coordination, a sitting balance in the sagittal plane test, a stability sagittal plane test, a sitting balance test in the frontal planes, and a functional sitting ability test of the frontal and sagittal planes with an examination of sideways displacement. 542:

For skiers with a visual impairment, their classification is handled by the International Blind Sports Association. They are tested based on medical classification by an Ophthalmologist. In the 1990s, the classification assessment process for Nordic skiing had several components. One component was a

116:

in classifications from CP1 to CP8 are covered by skiing classifications. Skiers from CP5 to CP8 compete standing up with the use of equipment. Since 1995, the classes area LW2, LW3, LW4, LW5/7, LW6, LW8, and LW9. There are three sit-ski classifications: LW10, LW11 and LW12, with LW10 being divided

563:

The 1976 Winter Paralympics were the first time classifications other than spinal cord injury classifications competed at the Paralympic Games. At these Games, there were only two classifications for this sport. The 1976 Winter Paralympics were the first time classifications other than spinal cord

303:

explains how this works with the following example: "Athlete A is classified as LW6 with a factor of 91% finishes the race in 1 minute, their final race time is 54.6 seconds. Athlete B is classified as LW5 with a factor of 79% finishes the race in 1 minute and 2 seconds, their final race time is

217:

Classification for winter sport started out as a medical one before moving to a functional system. The earliest classification systems for the sport were developed in Scandinavia. The original classification system was for people with amputations, with classification based on the type of amputation

282:

By the 1990s, an integrated classification approach was tried in Nordic skiing had been developed using a percentage system that would allow for multiple classes to compete against each other in the same event using a formula to create a time finish that would enable fair comparisons for skiers of

66:

There are different events and equipment for different Para-Nordic skiing classes. For sit-skiers, they use sit-skis with two skis, unlike Para-Alpine Skiing where sit skiers use one ski. Blind skiers use a guide, with the position of the guide relative to the skier depending on the class of the

54:

with some exceptions. A functional mobility and medical classification is in use, with skiers being divided into three groups: standing skiers, sit skiers and visually impaired skiers. International classification is governed by International Paralympic Committee, Nordic Skiing (IPC-NS). Other

610:

competed in the short distances in a combined event, with LW 10 and 11 competing in their own short-distance event. Blind skiers all skied the short distances in a combined event. The 10 km event was open to LW1 to LW9, and H to D. The relay event was open to LW1 to LW9 in one event, and

533:

In the biathlon, sit skiers and standing skiers shot at a target that had a bullseye 1.5 centimetres (0.59 in) large while vision impairment classifications shot at a bullseye that was 2.8 centimetres (1.1 in) large. Vision impaired skiers have a sound system that helps them sight for

252:, Sweden, that ended up being used was based on equipment utilised by the skier instead of a true functional classification system. During the 1970s, equipment was first being developed for skiers with spinal injuries and a classification system had yet to become fully developed for the sport. 499:

The move from a medical classification to a functional classification system continued during the 1990s. There were conversations about whether or not less-disabled wintersport athletes should be competing in disability winter sport and if they should instead be competing against able bodied

266:

Prior to 1988, the classification assessment process generally involved a medical exam to determine the classification. The change in winter disability sport classification towards a more formal functional classification system happened more quickly as a result of changes being made in

512:

The International Sports Federation for Persons with Intellectual Disability was given the task of re-evaluating the classification system for skiers with intellectual disabilities to prevent future abuses following the Spanish basketball team cheating scandal at the

145:

that is not used internationally. They use a three group classification system, with Group 1 skiers including T5 to T10 spinal cord injuries, Group 2 including all other skiers with disabilities below T10 and Group 3 including all spinal cord disabilities above T10.

525:

Skiers with physical disabilities may compete on the same team as people with vision impairment in team events. This is the case in cross country relay events, where there needs to be one sit skier, one standing skier and one vision impaired skier. At the

58:

The first classification system for the sport was developed in Scandinavia and was a medical system for skiers with amputations. At the time, other types of disability were not eligible for classification. In developing a system for use at the first

1614: 650:, is working on improving classification to be more of an evidence-based system as opposed to a performance-based system so as not to punish elite athletes whose performance makes them appear in a higher class alongside competitors who train less. 75:

and is a medical assessment. While National Paralympic Committees can classify their skiers for national competitions, this classification is subject to change at international competitions. These classifications have been used at the

508:

tried to carve out its own identity and largely ceased efforts for inclusion of disability sport on the Olympic programme. Nonetheless, in 2006, skiers with amputation still had a medical component to their classification assessment.

1801: 126: 1618: 1487:

Doll-Tepper, Gudrun; Kröner, Michael; Sonnenschein, Werner; International Paralympic Committee, Sport Science Committee (2001). "Organisation and Administration of the Classification Process for the Paralympics".

1148:

Kahrs, Nina; Kroken, Anne Ragnhild (1998). "Classifying Tests in Nordic Cross-Country Sit-Skiing — A Discussion of the %-System in Relation to the Concept of "Fair Player"". In Yabe, Kyonosuke (ed.).

271:

that started in 1983. Prior to the 1988 Games, sit skiing was not included on the Paralympic programme. Norway worked to change this by added sit skiing classifications to the World Championships in 1986.

304:

48.98 seconds. Athlete B wins. Therefore, the athlete who completed the race fastest may not be the winner and gold medalist." For the 2008 to 2010 ski seasons, the following percentages were used:

1455: 1711:

Trends and issues in Winter Paralympic sport : proceedings of Winter Paralympic Experts Congress −4th Paralympic Congress — organized by the IPC and NAPOC March 7–8, 1998 Nagano, Japan

1191:

Trends and issues in Winter Paralympic sport : proceedings of Winter Paralympic Experts Congress −4th Paralympic Congress — organized by the IPC and NAPOC March 7–8, 1998 Nagano, Japan

1151:

Trends and issues in Winter Paralympic sport : proceedings of Winter Paralympic Experts Congress −4th Paralympic Congress — organized by the IPC and NAPOC March 7–8, 1998 Nagano, Japan

995:

Trends and issues in Winter Paralympic sport : proceedings of Winter Paralympic Experts Congress −4th Paralympic Congress — organized by the IPC and NAPOC March 7–8, 1998 Nagano, Japan

1808: 189:

were eligible provided the condition did not interfere with their ability to compete. People who had strokes were eligible for classification following medical clearance. Competitors with

544: 1930: 1681: 256: 154: 2401: 55:

classification is handled by national bodies. Before the IPC-NS took over classification, a number of organizations handled classification based on the type of disability.

108:. Classifications are based on functional mobility. For amputees, this is based on their mobility with the use of an assistive device. Classification for competitors with 248:, because they wanted a functional classification, not medical classification system, from the onset. They largely succeeded, although the system that was developed in 2137: 543:

test that looked at the ability of the skier to go up and down a hill. Another was a neurological test. In Canada, classification for blind skiers is handled by

885: 815:

Vernon Lin; Christopher Bono; Diana Cardenas; Frederick Frost; Laurie Lindblom; Margaret Hammond; Inder Parkash; Stevens Stiens; Robert Woolsey (19 March 2010).

788:

Vernon Lin; Christopher Bono; Diana Cardenas; Frederick Frost; Laurie Lindblom; Margaret Hammond; Inder Parkash; Stevens Stiens; Robert Woolsey (19 March 2010).

2717: 2712: 2707: 2702: 2542: 1490:

New Horizons in sport for athletes with a disability : proceedings of the International VISTA '99 Conference, Cologne, Germany, 28 August-1 September 1999

626:

Historically, Nordic skiing was the only skiing discipline open to competitors with intellectual disabilities, but their inclusion was suspended following the

548: 295:. Their finishing time would then be multiplied against this percentage to determine where they finished. A variant of this system was still in place for the 1997: 206: 504:

as a hindrance to the development of an independent classification system not based on the rules for able-bodied sport. These efforts ended by 1993 as the

1462: 501: 202: 150: 2394: 575:

Women's 2.4km Pursuit Sitting Biathlon ceremony on Day 2 of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Paralympics at Whistler Paralympic Park on 13 March 2010, with

1424: 547:. Canadians seeking classification start the process by getting in touch with the organisation. Para-Nordic skiing classification is handled by 141:

governs the sport and classification for people with intellectual disabilities. Disabled Sports USA developed its own classification system for

2130: 1072: 218:

as determined by a medical expert. Other classes of disability were not eligible to be classified and compete early in the sport's history.

2387: 2358: 1936: 1687: 142: 564:

injury classifications competed at the Paralympic Games. The only event open to a classification for people with spinal paralysis at the

134: 551:. For Australian competitors in this sport, the sport and classification is managed the national sport federation with support from the 314:

of Russia celebrating winning the gold medal during the Women's 3km Pursuit Standing Biathlon at the 2010 Vancouver Winter Paralympics

2240: 2123: 1990: 2327: 2170: 993:

Tolmatchev, Roman (1998). "On the Issue of Sports Classification of the Blind and Partially Sighted". In Yabe, Kyonosuke (ed.).

2225: 619:

in another event, and blind skiing in a third event. The biathlon was open to women in blind classes for the first time at the

616: 72: 2230: 1553: 1363: 1024: 970: 826: 799: 765: 731: 612: 275:

Functional classification testing was developed in 1989 for Nordic sit skiing, with the same system still being used for the

2286: 2235: 1983: 268: 129:

is in charge of deaf classification for competitors in the United States. In the United States, the sport is governed by

2858: 2431: 2410: 2353: 67:

skier. In the United States, Para-Nordic skiing has events for people with intellectual disability that are run through

1486: 647: 505: 1879:. Winter Olympic sports; Winter Olympic sports (Crabtree Publishing Company). New York: Crabtree Pub. Co. p. 21. 1647:. Winter Olympic sports; Winter Olympic sports (Crabtree Publishing Company). New York: Crabtree Pub. Co. p. 23. 1580:. Winter Olympic sports; Winter Olympic sports (Crabtree Publishing Company). New York: Crabtree Pub. Co. p. 19. 1395:. Winter Olympic sports; Winter Olympic sports (Crabtree Publishing Company). New York: Crabtree Pub. Co. p. 15. 892: 686:. Winter Olympic sports; Winter Olympic sports (Crabtree Publishing Company). New York: Crabtree Pub. Co. p. 14. 2486: 2332: 2312: 2307: 2245: 2180: 2175: 2024: 1884: 1733: 1652: 1585: 1400: 691: 105: 51: 2696: 2317: 2271: 2266: 2250: 2368: 2363: 2291: 2146: 568:

was the cross country event . It was one of only two events in the whole Games for people with spinal paralysis.

552: 47: 2205: 2160: 1848: 1497: 1328: 1305: 935: 858: 757:

The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress proceedings: Eugene, Ore., 19–26 July 1984 : (also: OSC proceedings)

2536: 2348: 2281: 2190: 300: 165:

Currently, people with physical disabilities and vision impairment are eligible for classification. In 1983,

2786: 2322: 2220: 2215: 2210: 101: 2656: 2200: 2185: 178: 1189:

Blomqwist, Birgitta; Kipfer, Mirre (1998). "Invited Experts: Classification". In Yabe, Kyonosuke (ed.).

1615:"Canadian Para-Nordic Classification Percentages for National Competitions (effective April 1st, 2012)" 263:

movement. The sport was one sports people with disabilities were more likely to play during the 1990s.

1428: 2195: 39: 2276: 635: 631: 627: 620: 599: 592: 571: 565: 527: 514: 296: 276: 241: 233: 81: 28: 2863: 1840: 1834: 1297: 1291: 927: 921: 816: 1757: 1353: 1266: 1243: 1220: 1119: 1096: 1014: 789: 721: 2621: 2165: 125:

Para-Nordic skiing is governed by the International Paralympic Committee, Nordic Skiing. The

112:

is difficult because the levels of spasticity can change as the race progresses. People with

2420: 71:. The classification process for blind Para-Nordic skiing is handled internationally by the 2837: 2747: 2742: 2737: 2632: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2592: 2587: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2547: 2497: 2492: 2472: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2447: 2442: 2437: 2057: 2052: 2047: 2042: 1331:

The development of a policy : Integration Conference 1990 Adelaide, December 3–5, 1990

603: 85: 1329:

Australian Sports Commission; Australian Confederation of Sports for the Disabled (1990).

8: 2832: 2827: 2822: 2817: 2812: 2807: 2802: 2797: 2792: 2682: 2677: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2104: 2099: 2094: 1683:

Australian team media guide : 2002 Salt Lake City Paralympic Games, March 7–16, 2002

201:

were not eligible for classification by CP-ISRA, but were eligible for classification by

130: 43: 1935:. Salt Lake City, Utah: Salt Lake Organizing Committee. 2002. p. 21. Archived from 1461:. Germany: IPC Nordic Skiing Sport Technical Committee. 11 December 2009. Archived from 1948:

This is included as an appendix in the media guide, but it is not published by the APC.

814: 787: 194: 190: 77: 60: 2379: 1912: 1890: 1880: 1854: 1844: 1739: 1729: 1658: 1648: 1591: 1581: 1549: 1503: 1493: 1406: 1396: 1359: 1334: 1311: 1301: 1272: 1249: 1226: 1125: 1102: 1020: 966: 941: 931: 864: 854: 822: 795: 761: 727: 697: 687: 584: 255:

In 1983, classification for cerebral palsy competitors in this sport was done by the

249: 80:. Intellectual disability skiers were allowed to compete in full medal events at the 1958: 311: 260: 138: 68: 2115: 1543: 960: 755: 576: 245: 225: 198: 170: 113: 109: 1779: 2852: 1975: 1916: 1894: 1743: 1662: 1595: 1410: 1338: 1276: 1253: 1230: 1129: 1106: 868: 701: 667: 580: 182: 20: 1858: 1531:. Bon, Germany: International Paralympic Committee. 2006. p. 80. 62307. 1507: 1315: 1210:. Bon, Germany: International Paralympic Committee. 2006. p. 28. 62307. 1178:. Bon, Germany: International Paralympic Committee. 2006. p. 82. 62307. 1061:. Bon, Germany: International Paralympic Committee. 2006. p. 78. 62307. 945: 221: 169:

set the eligibility rules for classification for this sport for people with

16: 1709:

i Marcet, Pau Serracanta (1998). "Blind Skiing". In Yabe, Kyonosuke (ed.).

1333:. Willoughby, N.S.W.: Australian Confederation of Sports for the Disabled. 517:

using a more reliable system that can be verified to classify competitors.

244:, the organisers had a difference of opinion with Paralympic Games founder 174: 2014: 1686:. Australia: Australian Paralympic Committee. 2002. 27972. Archived from 283:

different functional ability. In 1997/1998, this was defined as 84% for

1713:. Nagano, Japan: Nagano Paralympic Organizing Committee. pp. 19–22. 1193:. Nagano, Japan: Nagano Paralympic Organizing Committee. pp. 63–66. 1153:. Nagano, Japan: Nagano Paralympic Organizing Committee. pp. 67–69. 997:. Nagano, Japan: Nagano Paralympic Organizing Committee. pp. 71–72. 167:

Cerebral Palsy-International Sports and Recreation Association (CP-ISRA)

1267: