120:. NDAs are commonly signed when two companies, individuals, or other entities (such as partnerships, societies, etc.) are considering doing business and need to understand the processes used in each other's business for the purpose of evaluating the potential business relationship. NDAs can be "mutual", meaning both parties are restricted in their use of the materials provided, or they can restrict the use of material by a single party. An employee can be required to sign an NDA or NDA-like agreement with an employer, protecting trade secrets. In fact, some employment agreements include a clause restricting employees' use and dissemination of company-owned confidential information. In legal disputes resolved by
22:
167:
reason (e.g., maintaining the secrecy necessary to satisfy patent laws or legal protection for trade secrets, limiting disclosure of information prior to issuing a press release for a major announcement, or simply ensuring that a receiving party does not use or disclose information without compensating the disclosing party).
188:
A multilateral NDA involves three or more parties where at least one of the parties anticipates disclosing information to the other parties and requires that the information be protected from further disclosure. This type of NDA eliminates the need for separate unilateral or bilateral NDAs between
166:
A unilateral NDA (sometimes referred to as a one-way NDA) involves two parties where only one party (i.e., the disclosing party) anticipates disclosing certain information to the other party (i.e., the receiving party) and requires that the information be protected from further disclosure for some
201:
A NDA can protect any type of information that is not generally known. They may also contain clauses that will protect the person receiving the information so that if they lawfully obtained the information through other sources they would not be obligated to keep the information secret. In other
179:
When presented with a unilateral NDA, some parties may insist upon a bilateral NDA, even though they anticipate that only one of the parties will disclose information under the NDA. This approach is intended to incentivize the drafter to make the provisions in the NDA more "fair and balanced" by
175:
A bilateral NDA (sometimes referred to as a mutual NDA, MNDA, or a two-way NDA) involves two parties where both parties anticipate disclosing information to one another that each intends to protect from further disclosure. This type of NDA is common for businesses considering some kind of joint
603:
If you've ever signed a settlement agreement resolving some dispute, chances are pretty good it contained a confidentiality provision. In many cases, one side or both wish to keep the terms of a settlement to themselves – whether to avoid disclosure of amounts paid to settle or for some other
288:
to use appropriate efforts (not less than reasonable efforts) to keep the information secure. Reasonable efforts is often defined as a standard of care relating to confidential information that is no less rigorous than that which the recipient uses to keep its own similar information secure;
189:
only two parties. E.g., a single multiparty NDA entered into by three parties who each intend to disclose information to the other two parties could be used in place of three separate bilateral NDAs between the first and second parties, second and third parties, and third and first parties.
192:
A multilateral NDA can be advantageous because the parties involved review, execute, and implement just one agreement. This advantage can be offset by more complex negotiations that may be required for the parties involved to reach a unanimous consensus on a multilateral agreement.
143:), or discrimination against and harassment of themselves, may be paid compensation subject to an NDA forbidding them from disclosing the events complained about. Such conditions in an NDA may not be enforceable in law, although they may intimidate the former employee into silence.
308:(many NDAs require the receiving party to give the disclosing party prompt notice of any efforts to obtain such disclosure, and possibly to cooperate with any attempt by the disclosing party to seek judicial protection for the relevant confidential information).
584:
ost landlords and tenants are united in interest in not wanting the terms of their settlement publicized in a public forum where they may be misunderstood or misinterpreted as being weak, scared or simply not feeling strongly about their business and their
111:
It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose any information covered by the agreement. An NDA creates a confidential relationship between the parties, typically to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or
394:, the term "back-to-back agreement" refers to an NDA entered into with a third party who legitimately receives confidential information, putting them under similar non-disclosure obligations as the initial party granted the information.
1044:
427:
based on an account of the commercial profits which might have been earned if the agreement had been honoured, or damages based on the price of releasing the other party from its obligations under the agreement.
567:
431:
Commercial entities entering into confidentiality agreements need to ensure that the scope of their agreement does not go beyond what is necessary to protect commercial information. In the case of
292:
to ensure that anyone to whom the information is disclosed further abides by obligations restricting use, restricting disclosure, and ensuring security at least as protective as the agreement; and
685:
416:
NDAs are often used as a condition of a financial settlement in an attempt to silence whistleblowing employees from making public the misdeeds of their former employers. There is law, the
452:
1062:
619:
451:, and the court agreed that the relevant wording "went further than could reasonably be required" to protect commercial information. The agreement was held to be in breach of
202:
words, the NDA typically only requires the receiving party to maintain information in confidence when that information has been directly supplied by the disclosing party
571:
92:
that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to.
628:
378:, NDAs "are crucial". "Non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements ... are ... generally enforceable as long as they are reasonable." Sometimes NDAs have been
124:, the parties often sign a confidentiality agreement relating to the terms of the settlement. Examples of such agreements are The Dolby Trademark Agreement with
420:, which allows "protected disclosure" despite the existence of an NDA, although employers sometimes intimidate the former employee into silence despite this.
689:
180:
introducing the possibility that a receiving party could later become a disclosing party or vice versa, which is not an entirely uncommon occurrence.
230:
the disclosure period – information not disclosed during the disclosure period (e.g., one year after the date of the NDA) is not deemed confidential;
1031:
993:
233:
the exclusions from what must be kept confidential. Typically, the restrictions on the disclosure or use of confidential data will be invalid if
1045:
UK: Too Wide a
Restriction on Contractual Non-Compete Clause Between Non-Competitors Breached EU Competition Law – Jones v Ricoh, High Court
668:
1088:
502:
have signaled that they generally value an employee's mobility and entrepreneurship more highly than they do protectionist doctrine.
423:
In some legal cases where the conditions of a confidentiality agreement have been breached, the successful party may choose between
1173:
643:
970:
936:
902:
868:
834:
800:
766:
732:
410:
342:
of confidentiality and fidelity (also referred to as deeds of confidentiality or confidentiality deeds) are commonly used in
215:
the definition of what is confidential, i.e. the information to be held confidential. Modern NDAs will typically include a
1159:
279:
the obligations of the recipient regarding the confidential information, typically including some version of obligations:
146:
A similar concept is expressed in the term "non-disparagement agreement", which prevents one party from stating anything '
417:
399:
455:, which prohibits agreements which had the object or effect of distorting competition, and was therefore unenforceable.
447:
for a contract with a third party. Ricoh sought release from its obligations under the agreement via an application for
1202:
362:
knowledge through employee turnover in Indian IT firms". They are often used by companies from other countries who are
1197:
439:
in 2010, Jones brought an action against the photocopier Ricoh for breach of their confidentiality agreement when
1177:
1163:
541:
93:
116:. As such, an NDA protects non-public business information. Like all contracts, they cannot be enforced if the
1127:
598:
463:
NDAs are very common in the United States, with more than one-third of jobs in
America containing an NDA. The
516:
346:. These documents generally serve the same purpose as and contain provisions similar to NDAs used elsewhere.
101:
97:
30:
1063:"Biden signs law curbing nondisclosure agreements that block victims of sexual harassment from speaking out"
931:. Elgar Intellectual Property Law and Practice series. Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated. p. 198.
499:
273:
description of the actions that need to be done with the confidential materials upon the agreement ending;
108:
agreements are examples of NDAs, which are often not enshrined in a written contract between the parties.
379:
227:
information, verbal representations, customer lists, vendor lists, business practices/strategies, etc.;
511:
139:
In some cases, employees who are dismissed following their complaints about unacceptable practices (
1207:
704:
359:
260:
the term and conditions (in years) of the confidentiality, i.e. the time period of confidentiality;
673:
Second, the use of confidentiality agreements can prevent the forfeiture of valuable patent rights
858:
660:
121:
21:
374:
to India use them, and Indian companies in pharmaceuticals are "competent" in their use. In the
1222:
464:
926:
892:
790:
568:"Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Clauses in Commercial Contracts – Is it worth the Effort?"
409:) confirmed that a confidentiality agreement will be interpreted as a contract subject to the
253:
provisions restricting the transfer of data in violation of laws governing export control and
158:
A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) may be classified as unilateral, bilateral, or multilateral:
960:
824:
756:
436:
26:
444:
1107:
1092:
8:
1212:
1132:
860:
Competitive
Conditions for Foreign Direct Investment in India, Staff Research Study #30
536:
491:
220:
125:
761:. World Scientific series on 21st century business. World Scientific Pub. p. 46.
358:. They have been described as "an increasingly popular way of restricting the loss of
285:
to disclose it only to persons with a need to know the information for those purposes;
966:
932:
898:
864:
830:
796:
762:
728:
546:
495:
472:
371:
315:
governing the parties. The parties may choose exclusive jurisdiction of a court of a
254:
117:
216:
1217:
448:
129:
1089:"The Impact of the Mark Hurd Saga on California's Ban on Covenants Not to Compete"
722:
1013:
998:
644:
Director Paul
Schrader Says His New Nicolas Cage Movie "Was Taken Away From Me"
476:
391:
375:
239:
the recipient gained subsequent knowledge of the materials from another source;
370:
work to companies in India. Companies outsourcing research and development of
1191:
526:
468:
140:
829:. Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomedicine. Elsevier Science. p. 13.
521:
312:
113:
105:
34:
29:
maintain client privacy through confidentiality agreements. Some, akin to
405:
363:
305:
89:
897:. Management for Professionals. Springer Nature Singapore. p. 107.
1032:
VC firm accused of stealing business plan must pay damages, not profits
487:
367:
267:
147:
1137:
531:
480:
343:
133:
395:
246:
85:
952:
453:
Article 101 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union
424:
316:
224:
212:
whether confidential information must be labeled as confidential
928:
Trade
Secrecy and International Transactions: Law and Practice
440:
355:
1160:
Confidentiality and
Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDA)
1128:"How the NDA became the defining legal document of our time"
300:
types of permissible disclosure – such as those required by
339:
16:
Contractual agreement not to disclose specified information
219:
of types of items that are covered, including unpublished
686:"Intellectual Property: Using Confidentiality Agreements"
629:
Department for
Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
301:
82:
918:
703:
Hanson, by Mark J.; Thompson, Joe R.; Dahlgren, Joel J.
242:
the materials are generally available to the public; or
958:
748:
599:"Confidentiality Provisions in Settlement Agreements"
850:
816:
282:
to use the information only for enumerated purposes;
1034:, published 29 March 2010, accessed 6 November 2023
884:
782:
329:
236:
the recipient had prior knowledge of the materials;
1174:Information about non-disclosure-agreements (NDAs)
716:
714:
702:
490:, have special circumstances relating to NDAs and
1051:, published 27 July 2010, accessed 5 October 2023
648:, published 16 October 2014, accessed 6 July 2023
1189:
1014:"UK universities face 'gagging order' criticism"
1002:, published 19 April 2013, accessed 27 July 2023
959:Bharadwaj, A.; Devaiah, V.H.; Gupta, I. (2022).
479:, and the bill was signed into law by President
205:Some common issues addressed in an NDA include:
1011:
711:
707:. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.
565:
758:Indian Economic Superpower: Fiction Or Future?
894:Doing Business in India: The PESTEL Framework
413:which generally apply in the English courts.
263:the term (in years) the agreement is binding;
962:Locating Legal Certainty in Patent Licensing
669:The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society
924:
795:. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 120.
754:
471:in 2022, which prohibits them in regard to
325:who owns or has rights over the information
88:or part of a contract between at least two
724:The Oxford Companion to Economics in India
661:"Understanding Confidentiality Agreements"
596:
322:whether or not juries, arbitration allowed
965:. Springer Nature Singapore. p. 91.
822:
620:"Consultation on Confidentiality Clauses"
614:
612:
128:, the Windows Insider Agreement, and the
1125:
727:. Oxford University Press. p. 327.
705:"Overview of Confidentiality Agreements"
570:. Real Estate Drill Down. Archived from
20:
1086:
994:Back-to-back confidentiality agreements
890:
792:Outsourcing to India - A Legal Handbook
788:
688:. Yahoo! Small Business. Archived from
276:what/when it can be modified by a court
209:outlining the parties to the agreement;
1190:
1105:
1061:Price, Michelle L. (7 December 2022).
856:
826:Outsourcing Biopharma R&D to India
658:
609:
382:and this has led to legal challenges.
132:CFP (Community Feedback Program) with
1099:
1080:
1060:
1108:"NDA Experiment Set up by Mark Hurd"
863:. DIANE Publishing. p. 8-PA14.
720:
418:Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
411:rules of contractual interpretation
13:
1118:
925:Rowe, E.A.; Sandeen, S.K. (2015).
295:destruction or return upon request
14:
1234:
1153:
1012:Rianna Croxford (17 April 2019).
566:Henry Pharr III (17 March 2016).
385:
118:contracted activities are illegal
67:proprietary information agreement
59:confidential disclosure agreement
1126:Wiedeman, Reeves (1 July 2024).
1106:Gromov, Gregory (October 2010).
1087:Chapman, Lisa (September 2010).
458:
404:Dorchester Project Management v
330:Law and practice by jurisdiction
153:
1178:UK Intellectual Property Office
1164:UK Intellectual Property Office
1054:
1037:
1024:
1005:
986:
245:the materials are subject to a
183:
96:(physician–patient privilege),
696:
678:
652:
636:
590:
559:
94:Doctor–patient confidentiality
1:
552:
161:
334:
170:
7:
542:Physician–patient privilege
522:Bank–client confidentiality
505:
106:bank–client confidentiality
10:
1239:
755:Swaminathan, J.M. (2009).
268:ex-parte injunctive relief
196:
1203:Intellectual property law
659:Radack, David V. (1994).
517:Attorney–client privilege
512:Arrow information paradox
150:' about the other party.
102:priest–penitent privilege
98:attorney–client privilege
51:confidentiality agreement
31:attorney–client privilege
823:Chowdhury, P.R. (2011).
646:, The Hollywood Reporter
349:
43:non-disclosure agreement
1198:Information sensitivity
486:Some states, including
35:banker–client privilege
1162:booklet edited by the
891:Agarwal, A.K. (2022).
465:United States Congress
38:
857:Commission, U.S.I.T.
483:on December 7, 2022.
266:permission to obtain
24:
1095:on 14 February 2017.
789:Vagadia, B. (2007).
223:, know-how, schema,
27:banking institutions
597:Joe Davies (2014).
496:California's courts
492:non-compete clauses
221:patent applications
176:venture or merger.
49:), also known as a
601:. Vann Attorneys.
537:Non-compete clause
126:Dolby Laboratories
39:
1176:published by the
1136:. New York City:
972:978-981-15-0181-4
938:978-1-78254-078-6
904:978-981-16-9045-7
870:978-1-4578-1829-5
836:978-1-908818-01-0
802:978-3-540-72220-5
768:978-981-281-465-4
734:978-0-19-566984-8
721:Basu, K. (2007).
692:on 23 March 2009.
574:on 26 August 2018
547:Severance package
473:sexual harassment
354:NDAs are used in
255:national security
75:secrecy agreement
1230:
1148:
1146:
1144:
1112:
1111:
1103:
1097:
1096:
1091:. Archived from
1084:
1078:
1077:
1075:
1073:
1058:
1052:
1043:Gerschlick, P.,
1041:
1035:
1030:Pinsent Masons,
1028:
1022:
1021:
1009:
1003:
990:
984:
983:
981:
979:
956:
950:
949:
947:
945:
922:
916:
915:
913:
911:
888:
882:
881:
879:
877:
854:
848:
847:
845:
843:
820:
814:
813:
811:
809:
786:
780:
779:
777:
775:
752:
746:
745:
743:
741:
718:
709:
708:
700:
694:
693:
682:
676:
675:
656:
650:
640:
634:
633:
624:
616:
607:
606:
594:
588:
587:
581:
579:
563:
449:summary judgment
380:anti-competitive
1238:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1208:Legal documents
1188:
1187:
1156:
1151:
1142:
1140:
1121:
1119:Further reading
1116:
1115:
1104:
1100:
1085:
1081:
1071:
1069:
1059:
1055:
1042:
1038:
1029:
1025:
1010:
1006:
991:
987:
977:
975:
973:
957:
953:
943:
941:
939:
923:
919:
909:
907:
905:
889:
885:
875:
873:
871:
855:
851:
841:
839:
837:
821:
817:
807:
805:
803:
787:
783:
773:
771:
769:
753:
749:
739:
737:
735:
719:
712:
701:
697:
684:
683:
679:
657:
653:
641:
637:
622:
618:
617:
610:
595:
591:
577:
575:
564:
560:
555:
508:
461:
435:, heard by the
400:Court of Appeal
388:
352:
337:
332:
199:
186:
173:
164:
156:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1236:
1226:
1225:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1186:
1185:
1171:
1155:
1154:External links
1152:
1150:
1149:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1098:
1079:
1053:
1036:
1023:
1004:
999:Taylor Wessing
985:
971:
951:
937:
917:
903:
883:
869:
849:
835:
815:
801:
781:
767:
747:
733:
710:
695:
677:
651:
635:
608:
589:
557:
556:
554:
551:
550:
549:
544:
539:
534:
529:
524:
519:
514:
507:
504:
477:sexual assault
460:
457:
392:United Kingdom
387:
386:United Kingdom
384:
376:space industry
351:
348:
336:
333:
331:
328:
327:
326:
323:
320:
309:
298:
297:
296:
293:
290:
286:
283:
277:
274:
271:
264:
261:
258:
251:
250:
249:
243:
240:
237:
231:
228:
213:
210:
198:
195:
185:
182:
172:
169:
163:
160:
155:
152:
141:whistleblowers
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1235:
1224:
1223:Trade secrets
1221:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1193:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1109:
1102:
1094:
1090:
1083:
1068:
1064:
1057:
1050:
1046:
1040:
1033:
1027:
1019:
1015:
1008:
1001:
1000:
995:
989:
974:
968:
964:
963:
955:
940:
934:
930:
929:
921:
906:
900:
896:
895:
887:
872:
866:
862:
861:
853:
838:
832:
828:
827:
819:
804:
798:
794:
793:
785:
770:
764:
760:
759:
751:
736:
730:
726:
725:
717:
715:
706:
699:
691:
687:
681:
674:
670:
666:
662:
655:
649:
645:
639:
632:. March 2019.
631:
630:
621:
615:
613:
605:
600:
593:
586:
573:
569:
562:
558:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
528:
527:Due diligence
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
509:
503:
501:
497:
493:
489:
484:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:Speak Out Act
466:
459:United States
456:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:Jones v Ricoh
429:
426:
421:
419:
414:
412:
408:
407:
401:
397:
393:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
347:
345:
341:
324:
321:
318:
314:
310:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
287:
284:
281:
280:
278:
275:
272:
269:
265:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
238:
235:
234:
232:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
208:
207:
206:
203:
194:
190:
181:
177:
168:
159:
154:General types
151:
149:
144:
142:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:trade secrets
109:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
36:
32:
28:
23:
19:
1181:
1167:
1141:. Retrieved
1131:
1110:. NetValley.
1101:
1093:the original
1082:
1070:. Retrieved
1066:
1056:
1048:
1039:
1026:
1017:
1007:
997:
992:Howell, A.,
988:
976:. Retrieved
961:
954:
942:. Retrieved
927:
920:
908:. Retrieved
893:
886:
874:. Retrieved
859:
852:
840:. Retrieved
825:
818:
806:. Retrieved
791:
784:
772:. Retrieved
757:
750:
738:. Retrieved
723:
698:
690:the original
680:
672:
664:
654:
647:
642:Kilday, G.,
638:
626:
602:
592:
583:
576:. Retrieved
572:the original
561:
485:
462:
443:submitted a
432:
430:
422:
415:
403:
389:
353:
338:
313:jurisdiction
311:the law and
217:laundry list
204:
200:
191:
187:
184:Multilateral
178:
174:
165:
157:
145:
138:
110:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
40:
18:
500:legislature
467:passed the
406:BNP Paribas
364:outsourcing
306:court order
1213:Labour law
1192:Categories
1182:2018-01-15
1072:7 December
578:8 February
553:References
488:California
437:High Court
402:decision (
398:in a 2013
368:offshoring
162:Unilateral
148:derogatory
122:settlement
1138:Vox Media
532:Gag order
481:Joe Biden
372:biopharma
344:Australia
335:Australia
225:financial
171:Bilateral
134:Microsoft
1018:BBC News
585:actions.
506:See also
396:Case law
247:subpoena
86:contract
81:), is a
33:, offer
1218:Secrecy
1168:2005-01
1133:The Cut
604:reason.
425:damages
390:In the
360:R&D
317:country
197:Content
90:parties
1143:2 July
1049:Mondaq
978:2 July
969:
944:2 July
935:
910:2 July
901:
876:2 July
867:
842:2 July
833:
808:2 July
799:
774:2 July
765:
740:2 July
731:
445:tender
73:), or
623:(PDF)
441:Ricoh
356:India
350:India
340:Deeds
83:legal
25:Many
1145:2024
1074:2022
980:2023
967:ISBN
946:2023
933:ISBN
912:2023
899:ISBN
878:2023
865:ISBN
844:2023
831:ISBN
810:2023
797:ISBN
776:2023
763:ISBN
742:2023
729:ISBN
580:2018
498:and
475:and
130:Halo
104:and
1180:- (
1166:- (
1067:PBS
665:JOM
627:UK
366:or
304:or
302:law
289:and
71:PIA
65:),
63:CDA
57:),
47:NDA
1194::
1130:.
1065:.
1047:,
1016:.
996:,
713:^
671:.
667:.
663:.
625:.
611:^
582:.
494:.
136:.
100:,
79:SA
55:CA
41:A
1184:)
1170:)
1147:.
1076:.
1020:.
982:.
948:.
914:.
880:.
846:.
812:.
778:.
744:.
319:.
270:;
257:;
77:(
69:(
61:(
53:(
45:(
37:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
