2456:, Australia needed to beat West Indies to progress to the Super Six stage, but wanted to carry West Indies through with them to the Super Six, rather than New Zealand. This is because Australia would then have the additional points in the Super Six stage from beating West Indies in the group stage, whereas they had lost to New Zealand in the group stage. It was therefore to Australia's advantage to reduce their scoring rate and reduce their margin of victory, as measured by NRR, to minimise the negative impact of the match on West Indies' NRR, and therefore maximise West Indies' chance of going through with them.
2540:
record will have a worse record against other teams. Also, the head-to-head record will not decide it if the game between them was a No result, or if they played each other twice, and won one game each. An example of where a team progressed further because of a head-to-head result taken into account, was in the 1999 World Cup semi-finals when South Africa vs
Australia played to a tie but Australia progressed due to them beating South Africa in the group stages, even though South Africa won more matches.
2214:
2007:
1699:
338:
1997:
2209:{\displaystyle \left(5.37\times {\frac {\mbox{47.33}}{\mbox{147.33}}}\right)+\left(3.98\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{147.33}}}\right)+\left(4.50\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{147.33}}}\right)-\left(5.06\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{150}}}\right)-\left(2.20\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{150}}}\right)-\left(2.06\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{150}}}\right)}
2385:
2508:
weighting). This would remove the criticisms under the 'Tournament NRR calculation' subheading above. For example, the different teams' tournament NRRs would always sum to zero if the total of the individual match NRRs were used, or if the average of the individual match NRRs were used and all teams had played the same number of games.
1405:
1558:
273:
295:
361:
revised targets are set, and a result is subsequently achieved, the revised targets and revised overs are used for Team 1's innings (i.e. 1 run less than the final Target Score for Team 2, off the total number of overs allocated to Team 2), and the actual runs scored and overs used by Team 2 are used
2398:
of the run rates scored in each match (weighted by the lengths of the innings batted compared to the other innings batted), minus the weighted average of the run rates conceded in each match (weighted by the lengths of the innings bowled compared to the other innings bowled). Each time another match
1131:
Most of the time, in limited overs cricket tournaments, there are round-robin groups among several teams, where each team plays all of the others. Just as explained in the scenarios above, the NRR is not the average of the NRRs of all the matches played, it is calculated considering the overall rate
1271:
As Run Rate = Runs scored/Overs faced, the runs scored by and against South Africa in each innings can be replaced in this formula by Run Rate x Overs faced. They scored 254 runs from 47.33 overs, a rate of 5.37 runs per over. Therefore, the total of 254 runs can be replaced by 5.37 runs per over x
2498:
innings less than this, even, for example, if a match is reduced to 40 overs each, and a side completes their 40 overs. This would make every innings in the tournament the same length, so would remove all the criticisms above. However, a side will bat differently (less conservatively) in a 40-over
376:
by retrospectively applying
Duckworth-Lewis, the number of overs assigned to each team for this calculation is the number of overs actually faced by Team 2. Team 1 is credited with Team 2's Par Score (the number of runs they would need to have reached from this number of overs and wickets lost if
1167:
In the case of
Zimbabwe, because South Africa were all out before their allotted 50 overs expired, the run rate is calculated as if they had scored their runs over the full 50 overs. Therefore, across the five games, South Africa scored 1016 runs in a total of 238 overs and 2 balls (i.e. 238.333
2543:
Alternatively, stage a play-off match between the teams level on points. However, organising this at very short notice may be difficult, or the teams may be in the middle of a league table with no promotion or relegation or progression at stake, so there may be no appetite for a play-off match.
2539:
Split teams level on points using the results from the matches between them. However, this unfairly increases the importance of that one match and reduces the importance of other matches in the league, when all matches in a league should be of equal value − the team with the better head-to-head
2490:
to predict how many runs they would have scored with a full innings. This means the calculation would be done on the basis of all innings being complete, and so would remove the criticisms of NRR penalising teams which bat second, and NRR not taking into account wickets lost. However, this does
1548:
55:
that team scores, minus the average runs per over that is scored against them. The NRR in a tournament is the average runs per over that a team scores across the whole tournament, minus the average runs per over that is scored against them across the whole tournament. This is the same as the
1883:
716:
Team A bat first and are bowled out for 108 off 19.2 overs. Despite their run rate for the balls they faced being 127 / 25.667 = 4.95, because they were bowled out the entire 20 overs are added to their total overs faced tally for the tournament, and Team B are credited with having bowled 20
2507:
Calculate tournament NRR as the total or average of the individual match NRRs. This would mean all matches have equal weighting, no matter how long they were, (rather than all batted overs across the tournament having equal weighting, and all bowled overs across the tournament having equal
704:
60:
of the run rates scored in each match (weighted by the lengths of the innings batted compared to the other innings batted), minus the weighted average of the run rates conceded in each match (weighted by the lengths of the innings bowled compared to the other innings bowled). This is
1820:
2419:, teams have two resources with which to score runs − overs and wickets. However, NRR takes into account only one of these − overs faced; it takes no account of wickets lost. Therefore, a narrow victory can produce a higher NRR than a comfortable victory. For example, in the
2220:
1878:
1277:
1196:
Again, with Sri Lanka, England and Kenya counting as the full 50 overs as they were all out, the run rate scored against South Africa across the five games is calculated on the basis of 851 runs in a total of 250 overs, an average run rate of 851/250 = 3.404.
1115:
1063:
1463:
1694:{\displaystyle \left(5.37\times {\frac {\mbox{47.33}}{\mbox{97.33}}}\right)+\left(3.98\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{97.33}}}\right)-\left(5.06\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{100}}}\right)-\left(2.20\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{100}}}\right)}
863:
Team A bat first and set a formidable 295–5 off their complement of 50 overs. Therefore, for the tournament NRR calculations, 295 runs and 50 overs are added to Team A's runs scored/overs faced tally and Team B's runs conceded/overs bowled
230:
2491:
nothing to alter the fact that when matches are rain-affected, different matches and even two complete innings in one match, can be different lengths long (in terms of overs), and so does nothing about some of the other criticisms above.
2442:
This fact can encourage a team to play in an overly aggressive manner, to maximise NRR by batting with next to no regard for preserving wickets, when the required run rate alone seems low, which can then put the team in danger of losing.
137:
2001:
Making the same replacements for 254, 253, 199 and 110 as before, and replacing 225 runs scored in match three with 4.50 runs per over x 50 overs, and 103 runs conceded in match three with 2.06 runs per over x 50 overs, this becomes:
333:{\displaystyle {\text{tournament net run rate }}={\frac {\text{total runs scored in all matches}}{\text{total overs faced in all matches}}}-{\frac {\text{total runs conceded in all matches}}{\text{total overs bowled in all matches}}}}
77:), and so ranking sides by NRR does not rank them by size of victory. This means a team which progresses in a tournament at the expense of another team, due to a higher NRR, may not have truly performed better than their opponents.
68:
A positive NRR means a team is scoring faster than its opposition overall, while a negative NRR means a team is scoring slower than the teams it has come up against. It is therefore desirable for the NRR to be as high as possible.
720:
Team B reach the target off 14.1 overs, ending with 109–3. Team B actually scored at a slower pace (128/30.833 = 4.15), however they managed to protect their wickets and win. Thus, only the 30.833 overs are added to the seasonal
1267:
289:
Usually, runs and overs are summed together throughout a season to compare teams in a league table. A team's overall NRR for a tournament is not defined as the sum or average of the NRR's from the individual matches, but as:
1992:{\displaystyle {\frac {\mbox{254}}{\mbox{147.33}}}+{\frac {\mbox{199}}{\mbox{147.33}}}+{\frac {\mbox{225}}{\mbox{147.33}}}-{\frac {\mbox{253}}{\mbox{150}}}-{\frac {\mbox{110}}{\mbox{150}}}-{\frac {\mbox{103}}{\mbox{150}}}.}
1468:
852:
If 25.667 had been used for Team A's overs total rather than 50, Team A would have finished the match with a positive match NRR, and improved tournament NRR, despite losing. (Similarly Team B with a worsened NRR, despite
1552:
Making the same replacements for 254 and 253 as before, and replacing 199 runs scored in match two with 3.98 runs per over x 50 overs, and 110 runs conceded in match two with 2.20 runs per over x 50 overs, this becomes:
2451:
A team may choose to artificially reduce their margin of victory, as measured by NRR, to gain an additional advantage by not disadvantaging their opponent too much. For example, in the final round of matches in the
867:
Team B never get close, being bowled out for 116 off 35.4 overs. Therefore, as they were bowled out, 116 runs and 50 overs are added to Team A's runs conceded/overs bowled tally and Team B's runs scored/overs faced
571:
847:
783:
1013:, 6 wickets and 20 overs in hand equates to 44.6% of resources, so Team B has used 55.4% of its resources, so their Par Score is 254 x 55.4% = 140.716 runs. As they are ahead of this, they are declared the winner.
175:. Note that as an over is made up of six balls, each ball is 1/6 of an over, despite being normally written in cricket's notation as .1 of an over. So if they got that same score off 48.1 overs, their RR would be
72:
NRR has been criticised as hard to understand. Also, while it measures how quickly teams score and concede runs, this is not at all the same as how big the teams' margins of victory or defeat are (as it ignores
2523:. Therefore, New Zealand progressed to the Super Six stage and West Indies were eliminated. However, with individual match NRRs of −0.540, 0.295, 0.444, 5.525 and −0.530, the West Indies' average match NRR was
2515:. New Zealand and West Indies finished level on points. Having scored a total of 723 runs from 201 overs, and conceded 746 runs from 240.4 overs, West Indies' tournament NRR was (723/201) − (746/240.6667) =
1705:
350:, the calculations don't use the number of overs actually bowled, but the full quota of overs to which the team was entitled (e.g. 50 overs for a One Day International, and 20 overs for a Twenty20 match).
2380:{\displaystyle =\left(5.37\times 32.1\%\right)+\left(3.98\times 33.9\%\right)+\left(4.50\times 33.9\%\right)-\left(5.06\times 33.3\%\right)-\left(2.20\times 33.3\%\right)-\left(2.06\times 33.3\%\right).}
1832:
218:
563:
1400:{\displaystyle \left(5.37\times {\frac {\mbox{47.33}}{\mbox{47.33}}}\right)-\left(5.06\times {\frac {\mbox{50}}{\mbox{50}}}\right)=\left(5.37\times 100\%\right)-\left(5.06\times 100\%\right).}
981:
948:
1071:
1019:
515:
466:
430:
173:
286:, summing to zero). A single match's NRR is used very rarely, perhaps only after a team has played one match in a tournament, so their tournament NRR is the same as the match NRR.
1417:
891:
Runs and overs are added as in the examples above, with teams bowled out being credited with their full quota of overs. Thus, the match NRR will always be zero for both teams.
905:
revised targets are set due to interruptions which reduce the number of overs bowled, those revised targets and revised overs are used to calculate the NRR for both teams.
520:
Team B successfully chase, getting their winning runs with a four with 2.4 of the 50 overs remaining, leaving them on 267–5. Team B faced 47.2 overs, so their Run Rate is
268:{\displaystyle {\text{match net run rate }}={\frac {\text{total runs scored}}{\text{total overs faced}}}-{\frac {\text{total runs conceded }}{\text{total overs bowled}}}}
2434:
Sri Lanka comfortably beat
England by restricting them to 293–7 from 50 overs, then reaching 297–3 from 47.1 overs, giving them match NRR = (297/47.167) − (293/50) =
107:
2519:. However, New Zealand had scored 817 runs from 196.1 overs, and conceded 877 runs from 244.2 overs, so their tournament NRR was (817/196.167) − (877/244.333) =
2402:
For example, the 5.37 run rate achieved in match one had 100% weighting after match one, 48.6% weighting after match two, and 32.1% weighting after match three.
2499:
innings compared to a 50-over innings, and so it is quite unfair to use their 40-over total to predict how many runs they could have scored in 50 overs.
1221:
1543:{\displaystyle {\frac {\mbox{254}}{\mbox{97.33}}}+{\frac {\mbox{199}}{\mbox{97.33}}}-{\frac {\mbox{253}}{\mbox{100}}}-{\frac {\mbox{110}}{\mbox{100}}}.}
2467:
996:
Abandoned games are not considered, whatever the stage of the game at stoppage may be, and the scores in such games are immaterial to NRR calculations.
104:(RR), or runs per over (RPO), is the average number of runs scored per over by the whole team in the whole innings (or the whole innings so far), i.e.
2427:
New
Zealand narrowly beat Sri Lanka by bowling them out for 138, then reaching 139–9 from 36.3 overs, giving them match NRR = (139/36.5) − (138/50) =
2840:
699:{\displaystyle {\frac {287+265}{50+50}}-{\frac {243+267}{50+47{\frac {2}{6}}}}={\frac {552}{100}}-{\frac {510}{97{\frac {2}{6}}}}=5.52-5.24=0.28}
2486:
Duckworth Lewis Stern method in used
Tournament NRR as present, but when a side batting second successfully completes the run chase, use the
791:
727:
2909:
878:
Team A bat first, and manage 108 off 19.2 overs on a difficult playing surface. Team B fall agonizingly short, reaching 105 off 14.1 overs.
474:
Team B's NRR for this game is 4.86 − 5.74 = −0.88. If this was the first game of the season, their NRR for the league table would be −0.88.
471:
Team A's NRR for this game is 5.74 − 4.86 = 0.88. If this was the first game of the season, their NRR for the league table would be +0.88.
1815:{\displaystyle =\left(5.37\times 48.6\%\right)+\left(3.98\times 51.4\%\right)-\left(5.06\times 50\%\right)-\left(2.20\times 50\%\right).}
3134:
908:
For example, Team A are dismissed for 165 in 33.5 overs. Team B progresses to 120–0, but play is halted after 18 overs due to rain.
568:
Assuming that Team A and Team B had previously played as in the game in scenario one, the new tournament NRR for Team A would be:
2714:
2691:
2399:
is played, the weights of the previous innings reduce, and so the contributions of the previous innings to overall NRR reduce.
1873:{\displaystyle {\frac {\mbox{254 + 199 + 225}}{\mbox{47.33 + 50 + 50}}}-{\frac {\mbox{253 + 110 + 103}}{\mbox{50 + 50 + 50}}},}
2585:
2416:
178:
523:
278:
For two teams which have just played, the winning side will have a positive Match NRR, and the losing side will have the
2664:
953:
914:
Because the target was revised to 150 runs from 44 overs, Team A's total is reset to 149 from 44 overs, thus their RR
2789:
881:
In this case, both teams get 50 overs both faced and bowled in the overs column for the season, just as in example 1.
917:
2902:
2762:
1110:{\displaystyle ={\frac {\text{Runs scored by Team B}}{\text{Overs faced by Team B}}}={\frac {172}{30}}\approx 5.73}
2736:
1058:{\displaystyle ={\frac {\text{Par Score for Team B}}{\text{Overs faced by Team B}}}={\frac {140}{30}}\approx 4.67}
911:
Six overs are lost, and the target is reset to 150 from 44 overs, which Team B reach comfortably after 26.2 overs.
2814:
2527:, and with individual match NRRs of 1.225, 0.461, −0.444, −1.240 and 4.477, New Zealand's average match NRR was
1006:
Team A score 254 runs from their 50 overs. Team B have scored 172–4 from 30 overs when the match is abandoned.
2420:
2410:
1218:
In the above example of South Africa at the 1999 World Cup, after their first match their tournament NRR was
1136:
377:
they were going to match Team 1's score), and the actual runs scored are used by Team 2 for Team 2's innings.
487:
438:
402:
145:
3129:
2512:
2453:
2895:
1458:{\displaystyle {\frac {\mbox{254 + 199}}{\mbox{47.33 + 50}}}-{\frac {\mbox{253 + 110}}{\mbox{50 + 50}}},}
1272:
47.33 overs. Similarly, the total of 253 runs conceded can be replaced by 5.06 runs per over x 50 overs:
986:
Computing the match NRR for Team A gives us 3.39 – 5.70 = –2.31. Team B's NRR is: 5.70 – 3.39 = +2.31.
2944:
65:
usually the same as the total or average of the NRRs from the individual matches in the tournament.
2395:
57:
2865:
2547:
These two methods both also run into difficulties when three or more teams are level on points.
2487:
132:{\displaystyle {\text{run rate }}={\frac {\text{total runs scored}}{\text{total overs faced}}}}
85:
2563:
2984:
387:
33:
857:
2463:
41:
2613:
2411:
NRR does not accurately reflect margins of victory, as it takes no account of wickets lost
8:
3057:
74:
2478:
A number of alternatives or modifications done to NRR is suggested below as following -
484:
Team A bat first and score 265–8 off their full quota of 50 overs. Team A's Run Rate is
399:
Team A bat first and score 287–6 off their full quota of 50 overs. Team A's Run Rate is
3077:
2969:
2918:
435:
Team B fail in their run chase, scoring 243–8 in their 50 overs. Team B's Run Rate is
2999:
2979:
2949:
2926:
2494:
Therefore, alternatively, use
Duckworth–Lewis–Stern to predict the 50-over total for
81:
2639:
3037:
2954:
1262:{\displaystyle {\frac {\mbox{254}}{\mbox{47.33}}}-{\frac {\mbox{253}}{\mbox{50}}}.}
283:
872:
710:
3047:
3042:
1010:
902:
358:
279:
48:
37:
3022:
3007:
52:
3123:
3100:
3032:
2939:
32:. It is the most commonly used method of ranking teams with equal points in
3052:
2459:
However, this is also likely to be a possibility with alternatives to NRR.
28:) is a statistical method used in analysing teamwork and/or performance in
2959:
1205:
South Africa's final tournament NRR is therefore 4.263 − 3.404 = +0.859.
858:
4. Side that bats second is bowled out, side batting first therefore wins
369:, none of the runs scored or overs bowled count towards this calculation.
224:
3067:
2989:
842:{\displaystyle {\frac {128}{30{\frac {5}{6}}}}-{\frac {127}{50}}=+1.61}
778:{\displaystyle {\frac {127}{50}}-{\frac {128}{30{\frac {5}{6}}}}=-1.61}
2462:
This is similar to the way a narrow victory for one side in a game of
3062:
2887:
2531:. Therefore, West Indies' average NRR was better than New Zealand's.
2511:
An example of when using this would have made a difference was the
101:
89:
1132:
at which runs are scored for and against, within the whole group.
1000:
3108:
3090:
3027:
3017:
2964:
2934:
2394:
Therefore, tournament NRR can alternatively be thought of as the
29:
2534:
3085:
3012:
873:
5. Both sides are bowled out, side batting first therefore wins
711:
3. Side that bats first is bowled out, side batting second wins
2566:
Social
Science Research Network (SSRN). Accessed June 7, 2019.
895:
142:
So if a team scores 481 runs off 50 overs then their RR is
2466:
may enable both sides to progress to the next stage, e.g.
990:
1154:
Against Sri Lanka, 199 runs (for 9 wkts) from 50 overs.
227:
the opponents' run rate from the team's run rate, i.e.
2194:
2189:
2161:
2156:
2128:
2123:
2095:
2090:
2062:
2057:
2029:
2024:
1979:
1974:
1962:
1957:
1945:
1940:
1928:
1923:
1911:
1906:
1894:
1889:
1860:
1855:
1843:
1838:
1679:
1674:
1646:
1641:
1613:
1608:
1580:
1575:
1530:
1525:
1513:
1508:
1496:
1491:
1479:
1474:
1445:
1440:
1428:
1423:
1332:
1327:
1299:
1294:
1249:
1244:
1232:
1227:
1135:
Here is an example South Africa's net run rate in the
2223:
2010:
1886:
1835:
1708:
1561:
1471:
1420:
1280:
1224:
1208:
1168:
overs), an average run rate of 1016/238.333 = 4.263.
1163:
Against
Zimbabwe, 185 runs (all out) from 47.2 overs.
1157:
Against
England, 225 runs (for 7 wkts) from 50 overs.
1151:
Against India, 254 runs (for 6 wkts) from 47.2 overs.
1074:
1022:
956:
920:
794:
730:
574:
526:
490:
441:
405:
298:
233:
213:{\displaystyle {\frac {481}{48{\frac {1}{6}}}}=9.986}
181:
148:
110:
558:{\displaystyle {\frac {267}{47{\frac {2}{6}}}}=5.64}
1160:
Against Kenya, 153 runs (for 3 wkts) from 41 overs.
1121:
2637:
2379:
2208:
1991:
1872:
1814:
1693:
1542:
1457:
1399:
1261:
1109:
1057:
975:
942:
841:
777:
698:
557:
509:
460:
424:
332:
267:
212:
167:
131:
3121:
2866:"IPL 2019: How Net Run Rate (NRR) is calculated"
976:{\displaystyle {\frac {150}{26.33}}\approx 5.70}
478:
2586:"ICC Playing Handbook 2013/14 Paragraph 21.9.2"
2564:The Net Run Rate System: Calculus and Critique.
1001:9. Abandoned game with retrospective D/L result
950:. Team B's RR, however, is computed as normal:
393:
943:{\displaystyle ={\frac {149}{44}}\approx 3.39}
2903:
2535:Head-to-head record or stage a play-off match
1414:After their second match, tournament NRR was
16:Tie-breaking formula in limited overs Cricket
2502:
2468:West Germany v Austria in the 1982 World Cup
1829:After their third match, tournament NRR was
885:
896:7. Interrupted game with revised D/L target
95:
2910:
2896:
2763:"NZ stutter to win after dominant bowling"
2640:"How To Calculate Net Run Rate in Cricket"
2689:
2446:
1192:Zimbabwe, 233 (for 6 wkts) from 50 overs.
1183:Sri Lanka, 110 (all out) from 35.2 overs.
2838:
2715:"Border's men face a daunting semi task"
2481:
2841:"How Net Run Rate is calculated in IPL"
2665:"How is Net Run Rate (NRR) Calculated?"
2580:
2578:
2576:
2574:
2572:
991:8. Abandoned game recorded as No Result
3122:
2917:
2790:"Australia pull fast one with go-slow"
2473:
1180:India, 253 (for 5 wkts) from 50 overs.
510:{\displaystyle {\frac {265}{50}}=5.30}
461:{\displaystyle {\frac {243}{50}}=4.86}
425:{\displaystyle {\frac {287}{50}}=5.74}
168:{\displaystyle {\frac {481}{50}}=9.62}
2891:
2787:
2712:
1189:Kenya, 152 (all out) from 44.3 overs.
1186:England, 103 (all out) from 41 overs.
1176:Teams opposing South Africa scored:
282:of this (i.e. the Match NRRs will be
223:The concept of net run rate involves
2606:
2569:
2390:Tournament NRR as a weighted average
13:
2366:
2341:
2316:
2291:
2266:
2241:
1801:
1776:
1751:
1726:
1386:
1361:
1209:Change in NRR through a tournament
323:total runs conceded in all matches
84:, the first use of NRR was in the
14:
3146:
3135:Tie-breaking in group tournaments
2713:Blake, Martin (2 November 1987).
362:for Team 2's innings (as normal).
326:total overs bowled in all matches
2694:. The Indian Express. p. 15
1126:
1122:Net Run Rate within a tournament
313:total overs faced in all matches
310:total runs scored in all matches
47:The NRR in a single game is the
36:league competitions, similar to
2858:
2839:Madhavan, M. J. (20 May 2018).
2832:
2807:
2781:
2737:"Why net run rate doesn't work"
2690:Natarajan, H. (19 March 1992).
381:
2788:Engel, Matthew (31 May 1999).
2755:
2729:
2706:
2683:
2657:
2631:
2557:
2513:1999 Cricket World Cup Group B
788:Team B's NRR for this game is
724:Team A's NRR for this game is
390:rules with 50 overs per side.
374:abandoned but a result decided
1:
2550:
2421:2013 Champions Trophy Group A
2405:
479:2. Side that bats second wins
301:tournament net run rate
394:1. Side that bats first wins
342:The exceptions to this are:
92:instead as the tie-breaker.
7:
88:. Earlier tournaments used
10:
3151:
2815:"Net Run Rate alternative"
3099:
3076:
2998:
2925:
2692:"Leander fires out Malik"
2593:Icc-live.s3.amazonaws.com
2503:Average of the match NRRs
886:6. The game ends in a tie
258:total runs conceded
2638:Barnaby Haszard Morris.
2614:"Net Run Rate explained"
367:abandoned as a No Result
236:match net run rate
96:Step by step explanation
2488:Duckworth-Lewis method
2454:1999 World Cup Group B
2447:NRR may be manipulated
2381:
2210:
1993:
1874:
1816:
1695:
1544:
1459:
1401:
1263:
1147:South Africa scored:
1111:
1059:
977:
944:
843:
779:
700:
559:
511:
462:
426:
334:
269:
214:
169:
133:
2985:Runs Per Wicket Ratio
2482:Duckworth–Lewis–Stern
2417:Duckworth-Lewis-Stern
2382:
2211:
1994:
1875:
1817:
1696:
1545:
1465:which is the same as
1460:
1402:
1264:
1112:
1084:Overs faced by Team B
1081:Runs scored by Team B
1060:
1032:Overs faced by Team B
978:
945:
844:
780:
701:
560:
512:
463:
427:
388:One Day International
386:All scenarios assume
335:
270:
215:
170:
134:
2221:
2008:
1884:
1833:
1706:
1559:
1469:
1418:
1278:
1222:
1072:
1029:Par Score for Team B
1020:
954:
918:
792:
728:
572:
524:
488:
439:
403:
296:
231:
179:
146:
108:
3130:Cricket terminology
2669:www.sportskeeda.com
2474:Alternatives to NRR
2415:In the language of
2919:Cricket statistics
2769:. 16 February 2015
2377:
2206:
2198:
2193:
2165:
2160:
2132:
2127:
2099:
2094:
2066:
2061:
2033:
2028:
1989:
1983:
1978:
1966:
1961:
1949:
1944:
1932:
1927:
1915:
1910:
1898:
1893:
1870:
1864:
1859:
1847:
1842:
1812:
1691:
1683:
1678:
1650:
1645:
1617:
1612:
1584:
1579:
1540:
1534:
1529:
1517:
1512:
1500:
1495:
1483:
1478:
1455:
1449:
1444:
1432:
1427:
1397:
1336:
1331:
1303:
1298:
1259:
1253:
1248:
1236:
1231:
1107:
1055:
973:
940:
839:
775:
696:
555:
507:
458:
422:
330:
265:
261:total overs bowled
210:
165:
129:
3117:
3116:
2980:Required run rate
2199:
2197:
2192:
2166:
2164:
2159:
2133:
2131:
2126:
2100:
2098:
2093:
2067:
2065:
2060:
2034:
2032:
2027:
1984:
1982:
1977:
1967:
1965:
1960:
1950:
1948:
1943:
1933:
1931:
1926:
1916:
1914:
1909:
1899:
1897:
1892:
1865:
1863:
1858:
1848:
1846:
1841:
1825:After match three
1684:
1682:
1677:
1651:
1649:
1644:
1618:
1616:
1611:
1585:
1583:
1578:
1535:
1533:
1528:
1518:
1516:
1511:
1501:
1499:
1494:
1484:
1482:
1477:
1450:
1448:
1443:
1433:
1431:
1426:
1337:
1335:
1330:
1304:
1302:
1297:
1254:
1252:
1247:
1237:
1235:
1230:
1099:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1047:
1034:
1033:
1030:
965:
932:
901:In matches where
828:
815:
812:
764:
761:
739:
676:
673:
651:
638:
635:
599:
547:
544:
499:
450:
414:
328:
327:
324:
315:
314:
311:
302:
284:additive inverses
263:
262:
259:
250:
249:
248:total overs faced
246:
245:total runs scored
237:
202:
199:
157:
127:
126:
125:total overs faced
123:
122:total runs scored
114:
82:Cricket World Cup
3142:
3038:Five-wicket haul
2955:Nervous nineties
2912:
2905:
2898:
2889:
2888:
2882:
2881:
2879:
2877:
2862:
2856:
2855:
2853:
2851:
2836:
2830:
2829:
2827:
2825:
2811:
2805:
2804:
2802:
2800:
2785:
2779:
2778:
2776:
2774:
2767:Espncricinfo.com
2759:
2753:
2752:
2750:
2748:
2741:Espncricinfo.com
2733:
2727:
2726:
2724:
2722:
2710:
2704:
2703:
2701:
2699:
2687:
2681:
2680:
2678:
2676:
2661:
2655:
2654:
2652:
2650:
2635:
2629:
2628:
2626:
2624:
2618:Espncricinfo.com
2610:
2604:
2603:
2601:
2599:
2590:
2582:
2567:
2561:
2396:weighted average
2386:
2384:
2383:
2378:
2373:
2369:
2348:
2344:
2323:
2319:
2298:
2294:
2273:
2269:
2248:
2244:
2215:
2213:
2212:
2207:
2205:
2201:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2188:
2172:
2168:
2167:
2162:
2157:
2155:
2139:
2135:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2122:
2106:
2102:
2101:
2096:
2091:
2089:
2073:
2069:
2068:
2063:
2058:
2056:
2040:
2036:
2035:
2030:
2025:
2023:
1998:
1996:
1995:
1990:
1985:
1980:
1975:
1973:
1968:
1963:
1958:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1905:
1900:
1895:
1890:
1888:
1879:
1877:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1839:
1837:
1821:
1819:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1804:
1783:
1779:
1758:
1754:
1733:
1729:
1700:
1698:
1697:
1692:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1673:
1657:
1653:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1640:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1607:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1574:
1549:
1547:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1492:
1490:
1485:
1480:
1475:
1473:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1424:
1422:
1406:
1404:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1389:
1368:
1364:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1326:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1293:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1226:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1100:
1092:
1087:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1048:
1040:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1027:
982:
980:
979:
974:
966:
958:
949:
947:
946:
941:
933:
925:
848:
846:
845:
840:
829:
821:
816:
814:
813:
805:
796:
784:
782:
781:
776:
765:
763:
762:
754:
745:
740:
732:
705:
703:
702:
697:
677:
675:
674:
666:
657:
652:
644:
639:
637:
636:
628:
616:
605:
600:
598:
587:
576:
564:
562:
561:
556:
548:
546:
545:
537:
528:
516:
514:
513:
508:
500:
492:
467:
465:
464:
459:
451:
443:
431:
429:
428:
423:
415:
407:
339:
337:
336:
331:
329:
325:
322:
321:
316:
312:
309:
308:
303:
300:
274:
272:
271:
266:
264:
260:
257:
256:
251:
247:
244:
243:
238:
235:
219:
217:
216:
211:
203:
201:
200:
192:
183:
174:
172:
171:
166:
158:
150:
138:
136:
135:
130:
128:
124:
121:
120:
115:
112:
58:weighted average
3150:
3149:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3113:
3095:
3072:
3048:Bowling average
3043:Ten-wicket haul
2994:
2945:Batting average
2921:
2916:
2886:
2885:
2875:
2873:
2872:. 26 March 2019
2864:
2863:
2859:
2849:
2847:
2837:
2833:
2823:
2821:
2813:
2812:
2808:
2798:
2796:
2794:Theguardian.com
2786:
2782:
2772:
2770:
2761:
2760:
2756:
2746:
2744:
2735:
2734:
2730:
2720:
2718:
2711:
2707:
2697:
2695:
2688:
2684:
2674:
2672:
2671:. 22 March 2016
2663:
2662:
2658:
2648:
2646:
2636:
2632:
2622:
2620:
2612:
2611:
2607:
2597:
2595:
2588:
2584:
2583:
2570:
2562:
2558:
2553:
2537:
2505:
2484:
2476:
2449:
2413:
2408:
2356:
2352:
2331:
2327:
2306:
2302:
2281:
2277:
2256:
2252:
2231:
2227:
2222:
2219:
2218:
2187:
2180:
2176:
2154:
2147:
2143:
2121:
2114:
2110:
2088:
2081:
2077:
2055:
2048:
2044:
2022:
2015:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2005:
1972:
1955:
1938:
1921:
1904:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1857:253 + 110 + 103
1853:
1845:47.33 + 50 + 50
1840:254 + 199 + 225
1836:
1834:
1831:
1830:
1791:
1787:
1766:
1762:
1741:
1737:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1672:
1665:
1661:
1639:
1632:
1628:
1606:
1599:
1595:
1573:
1566:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1556:
1523:
1506:
1489:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1438:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1410:After match two
1376:
1372:
1351:
1347:
1325:
1318:
1314:
1292:
1285:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1242:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1214:After match one
1211:
1129:
1124:
1091:
1078:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1039:
1026:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1011:Duckworth-Lewis
1003:
993:
957:
955:
952:
951:
924:
919:
916:
915:
903:Duckworth-Lewis
898:
888:
875:
860:
820:
804:
800:
795:
793:
790:
789:
753:
749:
744:
731:
729:
726:
725:
713:
665:
661:
656:
643:
627:
617:
606:
604:
588:
577:
575:
573:
570:
569:
536:
532:
527:
525:
522:
521:
491:
489:
486:
485:
481:
442:
440:
437:
436:
406:
404:
401:
400:
396:
384:
359:Duckworth-Lewis
320:
307:
299:
297:
294:
293:
255:
242:
234:
232:
229:
228:
191:
187:
182:
180:
177:
176:
149:
147:
144:
143:
119:
111:
109:
106:
105:
98:
86:1992 tournament
38:goal difference
17:
12:
11:
5:
3148:
3138:
3137:
3132:
3115:
3114:
3112:
3111:
3105:
3103:
3097:
3096:
3094:
3093:
3088:
3082:
3080:
3074:
3073:
3071:
3070:
3065:
3060:
3055:
3050:
3045:
3040:
3035:
3030:
3025:
3020:
3015:
3010:
3004:
3002:
2996:
2995:
2993:
2992:
2987:
2982:
2977:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2952:
2947:
2942:
2937:
2931:
2929:
2923:
2922:
2915:
2914:
2907:
2900:
2892:
2884:
2883:
2857:
2831:
2806:
2780:
2754:
2743:. 10 June 2013
2728:
2705:
2682:
2656:
2630:
2605:
2568:
2555:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2536:
2533:
2504:
2501:
2483:
2480:
2475:
2472:
2448:
2445:
2440:
2439:
2432:
2412:
2409:
2407:
2404:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2365:
2362:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2340:
2337:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2315:
2312:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2290:
2287:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2265:
2262:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2240:
2237:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2204:
2186:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2153:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2120:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2087:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2054:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2021:
2018:
2014:
1988:
1971:
1954:
1937:
1920:
1903:
1869:
1852:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1775:
1772:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1689:
1671:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1572:
1569:
1565:
1539:
1522:
1505:
1488:
1454:
1437:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1360:
1357:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1291:
1288:
1284:
1258:
1241:
1210:
1207:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1184:
1181:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1137:1999 World Cup
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1106:
1103:
1098:
1095:
1090:
1077:
1066:
1054:
1051:
1046:
1043:
1038:
1025:
1014:
1007:
1002:
999:
998:
997:
992:
989:
988:
987:
984:
972:
969:
964:
961:
939:
936:
931:
928:
923:
912:
909:
906:
897:
894:
893:
892:
887:
884:
883:
882:
879:
874:
871:
870:
869:
865:
859:
856:
855:
854:
850:
838:
835:
832:
827:
824:
819:
811:
808:
803:
799:
786:
774:
771:
768:
760:
757:
752:
748:
743:
738:
735:
722:
718:
712:
709:
708:
707:
695:
692:
689:
686:
683:
680:
672:
669:
664:
660:
655:
650:
647:
642:
634:
631:
626:
623:
620:
615:
612:
609:
603:
597:
594:
591:
586:
583:
580:
566:
554:
551:
543:
540:
535:
531:
518:
506:
503:
498:
495:
480:
477:
476:
475:
472:
469:
457:
454:
449:
446:
433:
421:
418:
413:
410:
395:
392:
383:
380:
379:
378:
372:If a match is
370:
365:If a match is
363:
353:If a match is
351:
319:
306:
254:
241:
209:
206:
198:
195:
190:
186:
164:
161:
156:
153:
118:
113:run rate
97:
94:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3147:
3136:
3133:
3131:
3128:
3127:
3125:
3110:
3107:
3106:
3104:
3102:
3101:Wicket-keeper
3098:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3083:
3081:
3079:
3075:
3069:
3066:
3064:
3061:
3059:
3056:
3054:
3051:
3049:
3046:
3044:
3041:
3039:
3036:
3034:
3031:
3029:
3026:
3024:
3021:
3019:
3016:
3014:
3011:
3009:
3006:
3005:
3003:
3001:
2997:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2981:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2938:
2936:
2933:
2932:
2930:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2913:
2908:
2906:
2901:
2899:
2894:
2893:
2890:
2871:
2870:Yahoo Cricket
2867:
2861:
2846:
2842:
2835:
2820:
2819:Sporttaco.com
2816:
2810:
2795:
2791:
2784:
2768:
2764:
2758:
2742:
2738:
2732:
2716:
2709:
2693:
2686:
2670:
2666:
2660:
2645:
2644:Thoughtco.com
2641:
2634:
2619:
2615:
2609:
2594:
2587:
2581:
2579:
2577:
2575:
2573:
2565:
2560:
2556:
2548:
2545:
2541:
2532:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2509:
2500:
2497:
2492:
2489:
2479:
2471:
2469:
2465:
2460:
2457:
2455:
2444:
2437:
2433:
2430:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2422:
2418:
2403:
2400:
2397:
2392:
2391:
2387:
2374:
2370:
2363:
2360:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2338:
2335:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2313:
2310:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2288:
2285:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2263:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2238:
2235:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2216:
2202:
2184:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2151:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2118:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2085:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2052:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2019:
2016:
2012:
2003:
1999:
1986:
1969:
1952:
1935:
1918:
1901:
1867:
1850:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1809:
1805:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1773:
1770:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1748:
1745:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1701:
1687:
1669:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1636:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1570:
1567:
1563:
1554:
1550:
1537:
1520:
1503:
1486:
1452:
1435:
1412:
1411:
1407:
1394:
1390:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1273:
1269:
1256:
1239:
1216:
1215:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1138:
1133:
1127:Basic example
1104:
1101:
1096:
1093:
1088:
1075:
1067:
1052:
1049:
1044:
1041:
1036:
1023:
1015:
1012:
1009:According to
1008:
1005:
1004:
995:
994:
985:
970:
967:
962:
959:
937:
934:
929:
926:
921:
913:
910:
907:
904:
900:
899:
890:
889:
880:
877:
876:
866:
862:
861:
851:
836:
833:
830:
825:
822:
817:
809:
806:
801:
797:
787:
772:
769:
766:
758:
755:
750:
746:
741:
736:
733:
723:
719:
715:
714:
693:
690:
687:
684:
681:
678:
670:
667:
662:
658:
653:
648:
645:
640:
632:
629:
624:
621:
618:
613:
610:
607:
601:
595:
592:
589:
584:
581:
578:
567:
552:
549:
541:
538:
533:
529:
519:
504:
501:
496:
493:
483:
482:
473:
470:
455:
452:
447:
444:
434:
419:
416:
411:
408:
398:
397:
391:
389:
375:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
346:If a team is
345:
344:
343:
340:
317:
304:
291:
287:
285:
281:
276:
252:
239:
226:
221:
207:
204:
196:
193:
188:
184:
162:
159:
154:
151:
140:
116:
103:
93:
91:
87:
83:
78:
76:
70:
66:
64:
59:
54:
50:
45:
43:
39:
35:
34:limited overs
31:
27:
23:
19:
3053:Economy rate
2975:Net run rate
2974:
2970:Four and Six
2874:. Retrieved
2869:
2860:
2848:. Retrieved
2845:businessline
2844:
2834:
2822:. Retrieved
2818:
2809:
2797:. Retrieved
2793:
2783:
2771:. Retrieved
2766:
2757:
2745:. Retrieved
2740:
2731:
2719:. Retrieved
2708:
2696:. Retrieved
2685:
2673:. Retrieved
2668:
2659:
2647:. Retrieved
2643:
2633:
2621:. Retrieved
2617:
2608:
2596:. Retrieved
2592:
2559:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2510:
2506:
2495:
2493:
2485:
2477:
2461:
2458:
2450:
2441:
2435:
2428:
2414:
2401:
2393:
2389:
2388:
2217:
2004:
2000:
1862:50 + 50 + 50
1828:
1824:
1823:
1702:
1555:
1551:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1274:
1270:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1204:
1201:NET RUN RATE
1200:
1199:
1195:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1134:
1130:
1068:Team B's RR
1016:Team A's RR
385:
382:Permutations
373:
366:
354:
347:
341:
292:
288:
277:
222:
141:
99:
79:
75:wickets lost
71:
67:
62:
46:
25:
22:Net run rate
21:
20:
18:
2960:Strike rate
2721:15 November
2698:15 November
355:interrupted
225:subtracting
3124:Categories
3068:Super Over
2990:Hit wicket
2551:References
2406:Criticisms
1430:47.33 + 50
348:bowled out
3063:Over rate
3058:Hat-trick
2717:. The Age
2367:%
2361:×
2350:−
2342:%
2336:×
2325:−
2317:%
2311:×
2300:−
2292:%
2286:×
2267:%
2261:×
2242:%
2236:×
2185:×
2174:−
2152:×
2141:−
2119:×
2108:−
2086:×
2053:×
2020:×
1970:−
1953:−
1936:−
1851:−
1802:%
1796:×
1785:−
1777:%
1771:×
1760:−
1752:%
1746:×
1727:%
1721:×
1670:×
1659:−
1637:×
1626:−
1604:×
1571:×
1521:−
1504:−
1442:253 + 110
1436:−
1425:254 + 199
1387:%
1381:×
1370:−
1362:%
1356:×
1323:×
1312:−
1290:×
1240:−
1102:≈
1050:≈
968:≈
935:≈
853:winning.)
818:−
770:−
742:−
685:−
654:−
602:−
318:−
253:−
100:A team's
51:runs per
3109:Stumping
3078:Fielding
2824:30 April
2799:30 April
2773:30 April
2747:30 April
2649:30 April
2623:30 April
2598:30 April
2464:football
280:negative
102:run rate
90:run rate
42:football
3091:Run out
3028:Leg bye
3018:No-ball
3000:Bowling
2965:Not out
2950:Century
2935:Innings
2927:Batting
2876:22 June
2850:22 June
2675:22 June
1447:50 + 50
1172:AGAINST
80:In the
49:average
30:cricket
3013:Wicket
2097:147.33
2064:147.33
2031:147.33
1930:147.33
1913:147.33
1896:147.33
868:tally.
864:tally.
721:tally.
717:overs.
3086:Catch
3008:Overs
2589:(PDF)
2496:every
2026:47.33
1880:i.e.
1615:97.33
1582:97.33
1577:47.33
1498:97.33
1481:97.33
1301:47.33
1296:47.33
1234:47.33
963:26.33
208:9.986
3023:Wide
2878:2019
2852:2019
2826:2019
2801:2019
2775:2019
2749:2019
2723:2020
2700:2020
2677:2019
2651:2019
2625:2019
2600:2019
2529:0.90
2525:1.04
2521:0.58
2517:0.50
2436:0.44
2429:1.05
2364:33.3
2358:2.06
2339:33.3
2333:2.20
2314:33.3
2308:5.06
2289:33.9
2283:4.50
2264:33.9
2258:3.98
2239:32.1
2233:5.37
2182:2.06
2149:2.20
2116:5.06
2083:4.50
2050:3.98
2017:5.37
1793:2.20
1768:5.06
1749:51.4
1743:3.98
1724:48.6
1718:5.37
1667:2.20
1634:5.06
1601:3.98
1568:5.37
1378:5.06
1353:5.37
1320:5.06
1287:5.37
1105:5.73
1053:4.67
971:5.70
938:3.39
837:1.61
773:1.61
694:0.28
688:5.24
682:5.52
553:5.64
505:5.30
456:4.86
420:5.74
163:9.62
53:over
3033:Bye
2940:Run
2196:150
2163:150
2130:150
1981:150
1976:103
1964:150
1959:110
1947:150
1942:253
1925:225
1908:199
1891:254
1681:100
1648:100
1532:100
1527:110
1515:100
1510:253
1493:199
1476:254
1384:100
1359:100
1246:253
1229:254
1143:FOR
1094:172
1042:140
960:150
927:149
823:127
798:128
747:128
734:127
659:510
649:100
646:552
614:267
608:243
585:265
579:287
530:267
494:265
445:243
409:287
185:481
152:481
63:not
40:in
26:NRR
3126::
2868:.
2843:.
2817:.
2792:.
2765:.
2739:.
2667:.
2642:.
2616:.
2591:.
2571:^
2470:.
2423::
2191:50
2158:50
2125:50
2092:50
2059:50
1799:50
1774:50
1676:50
1643:50
1610:50
1334:50
1329:50
1251:50
1139:.
1097:30
1045:30
930:44
826:50
802:30
751:30
737:50
663:97
625:47
619:50
596:50
590:50
534:47
497:50
448:50
412:50
357:,
275:.
220:.
189:48
155:50
139:.
44:.
2911:e
2904:t
2897:v
2880:.
2854:.
2828:.
2803:.
2777:.
2751:.
2725:.
2702:.
2679:.
2653:.
2627:.
2602:.
2438:.
2431:.
2375:.
2371:)
2354:(
2346:)
2329:(
2321:)
2304:(
2296:)
2279:(
2275:+
2271:)
2254:(
2250:+
2246:)
2229:(
2225:=
2203:)
2178:(
2170:)
2145:(
2137:)
2112:(
2104:)
2079:(
2075:+
2071:)
2046:(
2042:+
2038:)
2013:(
1987:.
1919:+
1902:+
1868:,
1810:.
1806:)
1789:(
1781:)
1764:(
1756:)
1739:(
1735:+
1731:)
1714:(
1710:=
1688:)
1663:(
1655:)
1630:(
1622:)
1597:(
1593:+
1589:)
1564:(
1538:.
1487:+
1453:,
1395:.
1391:)
1374:(
1366:)
1349:(
1345:=
1341:)
1316:(
1308:)
1283:(
1257:.
1117:.
1089:=
1076:=
1065:.
1037:=
1024:=
983:.
922:=
849:.
834:+
831:=
810:6
807:5
785:.
767:=
759:6
756:5
706:.
691:=
679:=
671:6
668:2
641:=
633:6
630:2
622:+
611:+
593:+
582:+
565:.
550:=
542:6
539:2
517:.
502:=
468:.
453:=
432:.
417:=
305:=
240:=
205:=
197:6
194:1
160:=
117:=
24:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.