Knowledge

Matrix management

Source đź“ť

20: 174: 80:
Often senior employees, these employees are part of a product-oriented project manager's team but also report to another boss in a functional department. A senior employee who may have worked previously for an advertising agency, designing ads for computers, may now be part of a marketing department
145:
praised "consensus building that may have once helped Digital become the nation's second-largest computer maker" (after IBM). The same article noted the cutting of 20,000 jobs, and that what worked with the PC market didn't work as well with larger systems, such as
72:
For example, by having staff in an engineering group who have marketing skills and who report to both the engineering and the marketing hierarchy, an engineering-oriented company produced "many ground-breaking computer systems." This is an example of
193:
says “Organization structures do not fail, but management fails at implementing them successfully.” He argues that strategy, structure, processes, rewards and people all need to be aligned in a successful matrix
116:, formed from a 1988 merger and followed by "an ambitious acquisition program." Guiding this was a corporate structure whereby "local operations were organized within the framework of a two-dimensional matrix." 120:
As for why the term is not publicly and formally affiliated with large numbers of corporations, a 2007 book about how "matrix management made a big splash in the 1970s" said that, "for the most part
153:
This does not take away from what, a week earlier, the same author wrote: "It fostered internal competition and resulted in many ground-breaking computer systems like the PDP and VAX lines."
165:
made an attempt at using a form of it, later described as "matrix management 2.0". The focus is intended to be "leading without authority" so that "no one functional leader is in charge."
201:
identifies a number of specific matrix management challenges in an environment where accountability without control, and influence without authority, become the norm:
186:, quoted a line manager saying “The challenge is not so much to build a matrix structure as it is to create a matrix in the minds of our managers”. 527: 84:
Companies that have multiple business units and international operations, upon closer inspection may apply matrix structures in different ways.
359: 507: 580: 638: 319: 542: 378: 486: 81:
at a computer company, but be working with an engineering group. This is often called cross-functional matrix management.
42:
of cross-functional, cross-business groups and other work models that do not maintain strict vertical business units or
612: 552: 424: 271: 395: 287: 653: 567: 684: 679: 647: 604: 596: 469: 77:
matrix management, and is not the same as when, in the 1980s, a department acquired PCs and hired programmers.
237: 133: 103: 674: 136:
backed out, citing it as a source of "sapped energy and efficiency from product-development efforts."
301: 232: 49:
Matrix management, developed in U.S. aerospace in the 1950s, achieved wider adoption in the 1970s.
31: 34:
in which some individuals report to more than one supervisor or leader—relationships described as
210:– improve cooperation across the silos, but avoid bureaucracy and having too many people involved 183: 88: 628: 487:"Leveraging Information Locally and Globally: The Right Mix of Flexibility and Standardization" 69:, and there are hybrids between functional grouping and divisional or product structuring. 35: 8: 346:.. the explosion of stand-alone PCs in the '80s .. ensuing rise of departmental computing 197:“Making the Matrix Work: How Matrix Managers Engage People and Cut through Complexity”, 512: 141: 597:“Making the Matrix Work: How Matrix Managers Engage People and Cut Through Complexity” 658: 643: 608: 600: 548: 465: 458: 420: 267: 460:
The Ultimate Entrepreneur: The Story of Ken Olsen and Digital Equipment Corporation
190: 43: 442: 414: 337: 261: 182:
Christopher A. Bartlett and Sumantra Ghoshal writing on matrix management in the
416:
DEC Is Dead, Long Live DEC: The Lasting Legacy of Digital Equipment Corporation
668: 19: 173: 581:"Matrix Organization Designs: How to combine functional and project forms". 263:
The Matrix Organization Reloaded: Adventures in Team and Project Management
207: 204:
Context – ensure that people understand the reasoning behind the matrix
198: 39: 91:-based organizations may apply this arrangement for limited projects. 147: 107: 642:, Paula K. Martin, 2015, International Matrix Management Institute, 396:"Power: The Functional Manager’s Meat and Project Manager’s Poison?" 216:
Community – focus on the "soft structure" of networks, communities,
124:... companies using matrix structures tend to keep quiet about it." 528:"The Demise of Nokia—A Cautionary Tale of Restructuring Gone Wrong" 38:
or dotted line reporting. More broadly, it may also describe the
162: 161:
In 2004, despite matrix management having become disfavored,
485:
Kettinger, William J.; Marchand, Donald A. (February 2002).
217: 213:
Control – avoid centralization, build trust, empower people
544:
9780988334205: Matrix Management 2.0(TM) Body of Knowledge
57:
There are different types of matrix management, including
440: 113: 379:"REDEFINING PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN A MATRIX ENVIRONMENT" 508:"BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY: Digital Shows Doctrine the Door" 360:"Microsoft Enters the High-Performance Computing Fray" 568:
Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind.
302:"What are the 4 Types of Organizational Structures?" 189:“Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work” 639:
Matrix Management Reinvented – The New Game in Town
132:Two decades after pioneering in matrix management, 457: 439:gives MM components without using the term itself. 259: 484: 320:"COMPANY NEWS: Big Charge To Be Taken By Digital" 666: 570:Barlett CA, Ghoshal S, Harvard Business Review 412: 402:, February 6, 2009. Retrieved on March 2, 2010. 505: 455: 357: 317: 313: 311: 288:"Types of Matrix Organizational Structure" 110:spawned and popularized Matrix Management. 501: 499: 255: 253: 139:Regarding earlier years, when it worked, 308: 172: 156: 18: 667: 540: 496: 250: 376: 99:Examples of using matrix management: 168: 654:Successful Organizational Structure 46:grouped by function and geography. 13: 441:Win Hindle, DEC senior VP (2008). 377:Neff, Kristin M.; White, Ralph D. 358:John Markoff (November 15, 2005). 14: 696: 622: 411:"early use of matrix management" 629:Understanding Matrix Management 590: 573: 561: 534: 520: 478: 449: 433: 127: 541:Martin, Paula K. (June 2013). 506:Glenn Rifkin (July 20, 1994). 405: 388: 370: 351: 330: 318:Glenn Rifkin (July 15, 1994). 294: 280: 94: 1: 243: 238:Colocation project management 134:Digital Equipment Corporation 104:Digital Equipment Corporation 7: 260:Marvin R. Gottlieb (2007). 226: 52: 10: 701: 344:. April 1991. p. 66. 177:Matrix management diagram 579:Galbraith, J.R. (1971). 413:Edgar H. Schein (2010). 233:Organization development 32:organizational structure 16:Organizational structure 587:, February 1971, 29-40. 184:Harvard Business Review 178: 24: 685:Types of organization 680:Organizational theory 456:Glenn Rifkin (1988). 176: 157:Matrix Management 2.0 23:A matrix organization 22: 631:, John Wiley, CBS 513:The New York Times 443:"Ken's Leadership" 179: 142:The New York Times 25: 675:Management theory 659:Houston Chronicle 585:Business Horizons 169:Academic overview 28:Matrix management 692: 656:", Tara Duggan, 616: 599:, by Kevan Hall 594: 588: 577: 571: 565: 559: 558: 538: 532: 531: 524: 518: 517: 503: 494: 493: 491: 482: 476: 475: 463: 453: 447: 446: 437: 431: 430: 409: 403: 392: 386: 385: 383: 374: 368: 367: 355: 349: 348: 334: 328: 327: 315: 306: 305: 298: 292: 291: 284: 278: 277: 257: 191:Jay R. Galbraith 123: 75:cross-functional 700: 699: 695: 694: 693: 691: 690: 689: 665: 664: 625: 620: 619: 595: 591: 578: 574: 566: 562: 555: 539: 535: 526: 525: 521: 504: 497: 489: 483: 479: 472: 454: 450: 438: 434: 427: 410: 406: 393: 389: 381: 375: 371: 356: 352: 336: 335: 331: 316: 309: 300: 299: 295: 286: 285: 281: 274: 258: 251: 246: 229: 194:implementation. 171: 159: 130: 121: 97: 55: 17: 12: 11: 5: 698: 688: 687: 682: 677: 663: 662: 650: 635: 624: 623:External links 621: 618: 617: 613:978-1904838425 589: 572: 560: 554:978-0988334205 553: 533: 519: 495: 477: 470: 448: 432: 426:978-1458777676 425: 404: 394:Seet, Daniel. 387: 369: 350: 329: 307: 293: 279: 273:978-0275991333 272: 248: 247: 245: 242: 241: 240: 235: 228: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 214: 211: 205: 195: 187: 170: 167: 158: 155: 129: 126: 118: 117: 111: 96: 93: 54: 51: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 697: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 672: 670: 661: 660: 655: 651: 649: 645: 641: 640: 636: 634: 630: 627: 626: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 593: 586: 582: 576: 569: 564: 556: 550: 546: 545: 537: 529: 523: 515: 514: 509: 502: 500: 488: 481: 473: 467: 462: 461: 452: 444: 436: 428: 422: 418: 417: 408: 401: 397: 391: 380: 373: 365: 361: 354: 347: 343: 339: 333: 325: 321: 314: 312: 303: 297: 289: 283: 275: 269: 265: 264: 256: 254: 249: 239: 236: 234: 231: 230: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 202: 200: 196: 192: 188: 185: 181: 180: 175: 166: 164: 154: 151: 149: 144: 143: 137: 135: 125: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 101: 100: 92: 90: 85: 82: 78: 76: 70: 68: 64: 60: 50: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 21: 657: 637: 632: 592: 584: 575: 563: 543: 536: 522: 511: 480: 459: 451: 435: 415: 407: 399: 390: 372: 363: 353: 345: 341: 332: 323: 296: 282: 262: 160: 152: 140: 138: 131: 128:Scaling back 119: 98: 86: 83: 79: 74: 71: 66: 62: 58: 56: 48: 27: 26: 364:NYTimes.com 324:NYTimes.com 208:Cooperation 95:In practice 669:Categories 648:0988334216 633:MoneyWatch 605:1904838421 471:0809245590 244:References 220:and groups 199:Kevan Hall 40:management 36:solid line 148:DEC Alpha 108:Ken Olsen 227:See also 106:founder 89:function 67:balanced 53:Overview 646:  611:  603:  551:  468:  423:  400:PM Hut 270:  122:  65:, and 59:strong 30:is an 490:(PDF) 382:(PDF) 338:"CIO" 218:teams 163:Nokia 87:Even 44:silos 644:ISBN 609:ISBN 601:ISBN 583:In: 549:ISBN 466:ISBN 421:ISBN 268:ISBN 63:weak 342:CIO 114:ABB 671:: 607:| 547:. 510:. 498:^ 464:. 419:. 398:, 362:. 340:. 322:. 310:^ 266:. 252:^ 150:. 61:, 652:" 615:| 557:. 530:. 516:. 492:. 474:. 445:. 429:. 384:. 366:. 326:. 304:. 290:. 276:.

Index


organizational structure
solid line
management
silos
function
Digital Equipment Corporation
Ken Olsen
ABB
Digital Equipment Corporation
The New York Times
DEC Alpha
Nokia

Harvard Business Review
Jay R. Galbraith
Kevan Hall
Cooperation
teams
Organization development
Colocation project management


The Matrix Organization Reloaded: Adventures in Team and Project Management
ISBN
978-0275991333
"Types of Matrix Organizational Structure"
"What are the 4 Types of Organizational Structures?"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑