Knowledge

Invention Secrecy Act

Source đź“ť

1183: 1002: 1069:
Secrecy Order from 2000 to 2008, for an invention that could have allowed development of "anti-stealth" tracking systems. In 2002, inventor Robert Gold saw his idea for improvements in wireless communications restricted by a Secrecy Order. Some inventors have resisted in public their Secrecy Orders: in 1978, the National Security Agency restricted an invention called the "Phasorphone", which allowed people to digitally alter and obfuscate their voices on telephone calls for privacy from government surveillance. The Phasorphone inventors took their opposition to the media, and months later the NSA ultimately rescinded the order.
948:
for 75% of its value as deemed by the agency restricting it, and the inventor must demonstrate they suffered damages. However, inventors find it difficult if not impossible to prove suffered harm under the Invention Secrecy Act due to their inability to disclose the invention. Disclosure of inventions or ideas restricted by a Secrecy Order can lead to arrest and imprisonment for up to two years in Federal prison. If an inventor attempts to release the ideas in a foreign country without authorization, the invention and idea can be held as legally "abandoned." In the 1958 court case
346: 31: 1133:. Other studies have shown that being forced secret for a scale of months can cause an invention or idea to be 15% less likely to be cited by later research and development, demonstrating that even a limited restriction has negative impacts for inventors and the sciences. Inventions forced into Secrecy Orders even up to just five years will receive on average 45% less future citations. Once an invention has been made secret, it does not recover from this negative impact over time even when the Secrecy Orders are lifted. 695: 1424: 1107:
restrictions at best “err on the side of caution and impose secrecy orders on patents that present even the slightest threats,” and at worst, "bureaucrats mindlessly impose secrecy orders and then forget about them, because that’s simpler than carefully considering the implications of new technologies becoming public."
967:
Through 2012-2020, the United States Patent Office began investigations into expanding application of the Invention Secret Act to have more consideration of economic impacts on American markets from new inventions, if those new ideas may be disruptive to existing industries. Attempts through 2020 to
959:
Each year, tens of thousands of inventions and patent applications are reviewed by hand to decide if they should be allowed to be published or should be hidden from the public. As of 1997, it was reported that five to ten percent of all patents that the American military reviews under the ISA become
947:
A Secrecy Order bars the award of a patent, orders that the invention be kept secret, restricts the filing of foreign patents, and specifies procedures to prevent disclosure of ideas contained in the application. By law, the government is only required to compensate the inventor of a restricted idea
1140:
noted that from 2000 to 2004 alone, only 53% of patents issued by the USPTO were to American residents. This disproportionally penalizes American companies and inventors, who are bound by stricter foreign licensing requirements under the Invention Secrecy Act, while non-resident inventors are not.
1114:
has criticized the Invention Secrecy Act, saying, "The government’s legal basis for keeping private information secret is very vulnerable," and that the government carefully manages Secrecy Orders to avoid the possibility of Federal courts "creating precedent around the core constitutional issue".
984:
Inventions which received any government funding toward their research and development will be reviewed, beyond any military departments or intelligence agencies, by the segment of the United States government that had a funding and research stake in them. The vast majority of patent applications,
980:
The law applies to all inventions created in the United States, regardless of their nature or nationality of the creators, despite that the "vast majority" of inventions have no legal or financial stake from the government. All patents filed within the United States are required to be screened for
888:
Through World War II alone, at least 11,000 inventions were reported for classification review by the United States Government, and other analysis found that in the WWII era at least 8,475 inventions were forcibly classified, accounting for 75% of all new inventions in that time period, where over
1068:
James Constant of California was restricted by Secrecy Order from 1969 to 1971 for his advancements in radar systems to track objects ranging from shipping containers to parts on an industrial assembly line, and later in 1982 was denied any damages by courts. James Greer of Alabama was bound by a
988:
Once the application and screening process begins, there are three possible outcomes. The first outcome is that the patent and an associated foreign patent filing license may simply be granted, and the Invention Secrecy Act would not bind or restrict that given idea. The second option is that the
943:
has played this role. If government officials determine the idea and invention can pose a threat, it can be restricted from the public with a Secrecy Order. Any Federal government agency, not just those associated with the military and intelligence community, may request any patent be restricted
1106:
The Invention Secrecy Act has been criticized for having no defined standards or regulatory framework of what sorts of ideas may be sealed under Secrecy Orders and the lack of any safeguards for privacy or intellectual property rights. The Federation of American Scientists stated that the
1080:
responded with visits to their home, to warn them against any disclosures of the technologies, per their attorney Hattem Beydoun and court filings. Their path through the Invention Secrecy Act appeals process took five years to unsuccessfully resolve the restrictions on them. In 2014, the
848:
has investigated the possibility of restricting new technologies if those new ideas may be disruptive to existing industries. The Invention Secrecy Act has been criticized for lack of oversight and impacts on future scientific research by inventors, industry, attorneys and academics.
910:
provide the patent office with a classified list of sensitive technologies in the form of the "Patent Security Category Review List" (PSCRL). The decision to classify new inventions under this act is made by "defense agencies" as defined by the President, These agencies include the
1017:"the subject matter or any material information relevant to this application, including unpublished details of the invention, shall not be published or disclosed to any person not aware of the invention prior to the date of this order, including any employee of the principals." 1029:, typically are used to restrict ideas or materials derived from government funding which may not be themselves secret or classified prior to receiving a Secrecy Order under the Invention Secrecy Act, but may be already under some manner of restrictions from either or both of 1059:
All "security review" files related to "the security review of patent applications, placing of applications under secrecy, modification of secrecy orders, and withdrawing of applications from secrecy" are required to be destroyed ten years after a Secrecy Order is rescinded.
985:
ideas and inventions have no government affiliation. For those ideas and inventions from the general public, the Commissioner for Patents of the United States Patent and Trademark Office makes any initial decision whether or not the idea will endanger national security.
989:
government may simply do nothing, which allows the creators of the idea and invention to pursue it fully in United States and foreign markets. In either of these first two scenarios, the government has a six-month window from the patent filing to take any or no action.
824:
All patents filed within the United States are required to be reviewed, and thousands of ideas and inventions are manually reviewed every year. Any Federal government agency with "classifying powers" may request any patent be restricted under the Invention Secrecy Act.
960:
subject to Secrecy Orders. In the four-year window of 2013 to 2017, an average of 117 new inventions per year were restricted with Secrecy Orders. In the same 2013-2017 period of time, an average of 25 Secrecy Orders were reportedly rescinded per year. In 2017, the
1055:, are used as a "catch-all" to restrict any ideas, technologies or inventions that would not be covered by the government affiliation involved with Type I and Type II Secrecy Orders. Type III Secrecy Orders would be used toward inventions by the general public. 1121:, argued as the law is written and from the limited legal challenges related to it, that any inventor who shared or disclosed their ideas with the government effectively loses almost all avenues of appeal if their ideas are placed under Secrecy Orders. 992:
The third and last option is that a Secrecy Order is compelled on the idea and invention. The creators are then forbidden from sharing, disclosing, discussing, developing, selling or marketing the ideas within the United States or in foreign nations.
896:...detrimental to the public safety or defense, or may assist the enemy or endanger the successful prosecution of the war, may order that the invention be kept secret and withhold the grant of a patent until the end of the war. (Pub. L. 65-80, 1917) 1172:, lists the categories of all inventions that the United States Patent Office would refer to the Armed Services Patent Advisory Board for consideration of becoming classified under the Invention Secrecy Act. A similar document, 905:
The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 made such patent secrecy permanent, though the order to suppress any invention must be renewed each year, except during periods of declared war or national emergency. Under this Act,
1009:
There are three known types of Secrecy Orders which can be enforced, referred to as Types I, II and III. Violation of United States government Secrecy Orders to reveal your ideas may lead to arrest and imprisonment.
1044:, apply to ideas and inventions that may already be in part composed of classified concepts and technologies, or that can be, and that were submitted for patent review by Americans who already hold some manner of 2131: 881:(PTO) to classify certain defense-related patents. This initial effort lasted only for the duration of that war but was reimposed in October 1941 in anticipation of the entry of the United States into 1668: 2074: 1428: 1179:
The high-level categories of inventions from each year which can be forcibly classified are listed in the following table, and each section includes an expansive spectrum of topics beneath each:
816:, which indefinitely restrict public knowledge of them. The law applies to all inventions in the United States regardless of what the idea or invention is, if a patent is applied for or granted. 2343: 2254: 1745: 956:
ruled inventors could not sue the government to appeal Secrecy Orders until the secrecy itself was rescinded, citing national security concerns; this standing held through at least 1963.
1165:
requests that had become declassified, detailing categories of topics of inventions and concepts which the United States government summarily classify via the Invention Secrecy Act.
1478: 981:
the Invention Secrecy Act. Each year, tens of thousands of new inventions and patent applications are manually reviewed to decide if they should be hidden from the public.
2060: 2172: 1829: 885:. Secrecy Orders were initially intended to remain effective for two years, beginning on July 1, 1940, but were later extended for the duration of the second World War. 2208: 1870: 1072:
Husband and wife inventors Budimir and Desanka Damnjanovic developed a method for "spraying liquid from the back of an airplane", intended to be a patent for an anti-
1536: 2039: 1704: 1994: 1182: 147: 2114: 1129:
Studies have concluded that the Invention Secrecy Act leads to an overall reduction in the number of new inventions being presented, due to the nature of how
953: 2334:"A Proactive Solution to the Inherent Dangers of Biotechnology: Using the Invention Secrecy Act to Restrict Disclosure of Threatening Biotechnology Patents" 2526: 1658: 723: 312: 1659:"The U.S. Government's Secret Inventions: Secrecy orders allow U.S. defense agencies to control patents, including those that are privately developed" 2581: 1086: 1082: 907: 2318: 1141:
There is no known data on the economic impacts of "compulsory secrecy" for new ideas under the Invention Secrecy Act. James W. Parrett Jr. of the
2244: 1795: 281: 1735: 1081:
Damnjanovics filed a lawsuit against the Air Force and the Department of Defense to lift two unique Secrecy Orders, claiming violations of the
1076:
technology system. In 2009, their concept was made classified under Secrecy Orders, and the Damnjanovics began the legal appeals process. The
1396: 2100: 2126: 1616: 1093:. The government ultimately settled and lifted the Secrecy Orders, before the case went to trial and legal precedent could be established. 2293: 1955: 1580: 2463:
77–239: AN ACT To amend the Act relating to preventing the publication of inventions in the national interest, and for other purposes
1391: 1048:
security agreements. Types I and II, therefore, typically apply to ideas and concepts already within the United States government domain.
841: 778: 245: 1468: 2426: 2586: 1905: 1411: 1401: 1034: 878: 845: 230: 58:
An Act to provide for the withholding of certain patents that might be detrimental to the national security, and for other purposes
2551: 716: 1910: 2122: 1531: 276: 2566: 2167: 790: 305: 286: 2383: 2162: 1818: 1473: 964:
reported that 5,784 patents were restricted under Secrecy Orders. 5,792 unique patents were under Secrecy Orders as of 2018.
2198: 1859:
McGovern, Geoffrey; McCollester, Maria; Ligor, Douglas C.; Tao Li, Sheng; Yeung, Douglas; Kupe, Laura (September 19, 2019).
968:
expand the scope of the Invention Secrecy Act in Congress were unsuccessful, attributed to lobbying from groups such as the
2516: 2203: 1699: 265: 2281:"Technology Outpacing The Law: The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 And The Outsourcing of U.S. Patent Application Drafting" 1740: 1406: 1045: 940: 709: 271: 260: 152: 2576: 2531: 928: 817: 766: 680: 674: 668: 662: 656: 650: 644: 638: 632: 626: 620: 614: 608: 602: 596: 590: 584: 578: 572: 566: 560: 554: 548: 542: 536: 530: 524: 518: 512: 506: 500: 494: 488: 482: 476: 470: 464: 458: 452: 446: 440: 434: 428: 422: 416: 240: 157: 1694: 2541: 2421: 2378: 2333: 2288: 1137: 1090: 1030: 961: 837: 410: 404: 398: 392: 386: 380: 374: 368: 362: 298: 132: 1984: 2467: 2199:"Patent Secrecy Orders: The Unconstitutionality of Interference in Civilian Cryptography under Present Procedures" 1001: 2022: 1077: 932: 833: 754: 99: 2521: 874: 235: 2556: 2338: 1142: 1985:"Patents-Procedure-Applicability of Invention Secrecy Act Where Government Use of Invention is Authorized" 2546: 2471: 2561: 2453: 1819:"The Consequences of Invention Secrecy: Evidence from the USPTO Patent Secrecy Program in World War II" 1162: 741: 86: 1775: 844:. Any appeals are limited to the United States Federal agency that itself restricted the ideas. The 774: 944:
under the Invention Secrecy Act if that agency itself has the power to classify data as restricted.
1432: 969: 924: 858: 118: 2096: 2069: 920: 808:
The Invention Secret Act allows the United States government to classify ideas and patents under
2496: 1606: 770: 2571: 2280: 1944: 1736:"The hidden costs of securing innovation: The manifold impacts of compulsory invention secrecy" 1570: 329: 173: 38: 2018:"Protecting the private inventor under the peacetime provisions of the Invention Secrecy Act" 178: 2413: 1073: 699: 1526: 1145:
has argued that the Invention Secrecy Act can have value for certain areas such as around
828:
Ideas restricted by the Invention Secrecy Act's Secrecy Orders can be prohibited from any
8: 2536: 1989: 1860: 1117: 204: 1247:
Explosive Actuating Methods & Means: Fuses, Igniters, Mine Sweeping & Torpedoes
2476: 1900: 916: 912: 866: 862: 794: 355: 337: 1244:
Explosive Actuating Methods & Means: Fuzes, igniton, Mine Sweeping & Torpedoes
2312: 1611: 1130: 829: 798: 345: 137: 30: 2371:"Armed Services Patent Advisory Board - Patent Security Category Review List (1971)" 2462: 2370: 2031: 1901:"United States Patent and Trademark Office, 120 Secrecy Orders [R-07.2022]" 1865: 1791: 1787: 1663: 1575: 1158: 1111: 861:
has long sought to control the release of new technologies that might threaten the
750: 183: 95: 892:
The final version of the 1917 WW1-era law ordered ideas should be restricted if:
821: 209: 188: 1945:"Patent Secrecy Orders: Fairness Issues In Application of Invention Secrecy Act" 2249: 1571:"Government Secrecy Orders on Patents Have Stifled More Than 5,000 Inventions" 2510: 2017: 1146: 802: 255: 250: 214: 1895: 1893: 1891: 1527:"The Invention Secrecy Act: The USPTO as a Gatekeeper of National Security" 1223:
Concealment, Communications, Countermeasures & Counter-Countermeasures
882: 786: 1220:
Concealment, Communications, Countermeasures & Counter-countermeasures
1888: 1774:
de Rassenfosse, Gaétan P.; Pellegrino, Gabriele; Raiteri, Emilio (2024).
1386: 870: 1462: 1776:"Do patents enable disclosure? Evidence from the invention secrecy act" 1460: 1458: 1456: 1454: 1452: 1450: 1448: 1446: 1444: 1442: 49: 1769: 1767: 1765: 1763: 1730: 1728: 1726: 1724: 1722: 2035: 1359:
Unique Materials, Devices, or Performance Data & Characteristics
782: 758: 103: 1439: 1760: 1719: 1063: 2484:
Secret Science: Federal Control of American Science and Technology
2408: 2406: 2404: 2365: 2363: 2361: 1810: 1348:
Unique Materials, Devices, or Performance Data and Characteristics
1124: 1027:"Secrecy Order and Permit for Foreign Filing in Certain Countries" 2238: 2236: 2234: 2232: 2230: 2228: 2226: 1042:"Secrecy Order and Permit for Disclosing Classified Information" 2401: 2358: 2065: 1773: 1149:
patents, due to their novel and often still unexplored nature.
1101: 2009: 1858: 1854: 1852: 1850: 889:
20,000 total patents were reviewed for possible restrictions.
2501: 2497:
https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2010/10/invention_secrecy_2010/
2245:"Government secrecy orders on patents keep lid on inventions" 2223: 2163:"Government secrecy orders on patents keep lid on inventions" 2061:"Do National Security Secrets Hold Back National Innovation?" 1861:"The Role of Intellectual Property in U.S. Homeland Security" 1564: 1562: 1560: 1558: 1556: 1554: 2192: 2190: 2156: 2154: 2152: 2097:"U.S. Patent Activity / Calendar Years 1790 to the Present" 1938: 1936: 1934: 1932: 1930: 1928: 1847: 1652: 1650: 1648: 1646: 1644: 1642: 1640: 1638: 1636: 1634: 936: 2325: 975: 2468:
Title 35, Chapter 17 of the US Code--full text of the Act
1688: 1686: 1551: 762: 107: 2274: 2272: 2187: 2149: 2107: 2089: 1925: 1631: 1607:"Data Privacy: What Washington Doesn't Want You to Know" 1978: 1976: 1207:
Amplifiers, Recorders, Sensors, & Electronic Tubes
1013:
The Secrecy Order notices will command inventors that:
1683: 2269: 1600: 1598: 1520: 1518: 1516: 1469:"Patently Absurd: The Invention Secrecy Order System" 1152: 954:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1973: 1695:"WWII Policy Kept Patents Secret, Slowed Innovation" 1514: 1512: 1510: 1508: 1506: 1504: 1502: 1500: 1498: 1496: 1131:
inventions and sciences build upon prior discoveries
383:- Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States 2054: 2052: 1204:
Amplifiers, Recorders, Sensors and Electronic Tubes
2454: 1595: 1191:Declassified Category Review Lists, 1971 and 2009 742: 87: 2125:, formerly Defense Mapping Agency, hosted at the 1493: 2508: 2099:. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). 2021. 2049: 1780:International Journal of Industrial Organization 1064:Known public examples of restricted technologies 900: 852: 1255:Explosive Device Detection Methods & Means 1125:Impacts on economics and creation of inventions 581:- Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services 1252:Explosive Device Detection Methods & Means 1397:Export of cryptography from the United States 1335:Propulsion Systems, Propellants, & Fuels 1021:The three known types of Secrecy Orders are: 717: 683:- National Park Service and Related Programs 306: 2486:. Westport: Praeger, 1993, pp. 165–172. 2479:, from the Federation of American Scientists 2317:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2127:National Archives and Records Administration 1374:Weapons, Counter-weapons & Fire Control 1324:Propulsion Systems, Propellants, & Fuels 1186:Derivative classification activity 1996–2011 1102:Handling and evaluation of ideas and patents 811: 2527:Classified information in the United States 2414:"DoD PATENT SECURITY REVIEW LIST, May 2009" 2331: 2292:. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal. 1392:Classified information in the United States 1364:Weapons, Counter-weapons & Fire control 1174:"DoD PATENT SECURITY REVIEW LIST, May 2009" 1168:A declassified document from January 1971, 1982: 1303:Missiles, Munitions and Explosive Devices 1157:The Federation of American Scientists and 1005:Timeline of patents issued year over year. 996: 724: 710: 599:- Public Buildings, Properties, and Works 313: 299: 29: 1983:Dignan Jr., Thomas G. (January 1, 1963). 1906:United States Patent and Trademark Office 1412:International Traffic in Arms Regulations 1402:Free energy suppression conspiracy theory 1292:Missiles, Munitions and Explosive Devices 1096: 1035:International Traffic in Arms Regulations 879:United States Patent and Trademark Office 846:United States Patent and Trademark Office 665:- National and Commercial Space Programs 231:United States Patent and Trademark Office 2582:United States federal patent legislation 2489:"Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong," 2242: 2045:from the original on September 10, 2015. 1181: 1000: 389:- Government Organization and Employees 2196: 2175:from the original on September 18, 2015 2123:National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 1952:Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 1876:from the original on September 19, 2019 1748:from the original on September 26, 2022 1656: 1604: 1532:Indiana University Maurer School of Law 1199:2009 declassified Category Review List 976:Invention Secrecy Act screening process 2509: 2389:from the original on September 4, 2021 2332:Parrett Jr., James W. (June 8, 2016). 2168:The Center for Investigative Reporting 2160: 1942: 1474:Texas A&M University School of Law 1196:1971 declassified Category Review List 1170:"PATENT SECURITY CATEGORY REVIEW LIST" 1040:Type II Secrecy Orders, also known as 1025:Type I Secrecy Orders, referred to as 647:- Territories and Insular Possessions 575:- Patriotic Societies and Observances 2299:from the original on January 30, 2024 2077:from the original on January 13, 2020 1997:from the original on October 25, 2020 1913:from the original on January 30, 2024 1816: 1798:from the original on January 31, 2024 1692: 1619:from the original on October 20, 2020 1568: 1524: 1466: 2432:from the original on August 27, 2021 2278: 2204:Santa Clara University School of Law 2103:from the original on April 29, 2023. 2058: 1961:from the original on August 19, 2016 1700:National Bureau of Economic Research 1467:Saltz, Gregory (February 16, 2022). 1319:Object Locating Methods & Means 842:sealed from the public as classified 563:- Crime Control and Law Enforcement 491:- Foreign Relations and Intercourse 266:Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 2346:from the original on March 19, 2020 2211:from the original on March 18, 2020 2197:Sanders, Sylvia (January 1, 1982). 2015: 1817:Gross, Daniel P. (March 13, 2019). 1741:Centre for Economic Policy Research 1605:Sanders, Sylvia (January 1, 1981). 1583:from the original on April 21, 2014 1539:from the original on August 2, 2019 1407:History of United States patent law 1308:Object Locating Methods & Means 1161:obtained Category Review lists via 1046:United States Department of Defense 840:can be prohibited; and can even be 793:, present an alleged threat to the 527:- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure 16:United States national security law 13: 2459:Tooltip Public Law (United States) 2137:from the original on July 20, 2017 2059:Senz, Kristen (January 13, 2020). 1835:from the original on June 28, 2023 1431:from websites or documents of the 1153:Declassified Category Review Lists 1115:Thomas G. Dignan Jr., writing for 1051:Type III Secrecy Orders, called a 747:Tooltip Public Law (United States) 557:- Navigation and Navigable Waters 158:Title 35 of the United States Code 92:Tooltip Public Law (United States) 14: 2598: 2491:Secrecy & Government Bulletin 2447: 2422:Federation of American Scientists 2379:Federation of American Scientists 2289:University of Texas School of Law 2257:from the original on June 9, 2016 2243:Brustein, Joshua (June 8, 2016). 1707:from the original on June 6, 2023 1693:Gross, Daniel P. (July 1, 2019). 1481:from the original on May 19, 2022 1138:University of Texas School of Law 1091:Constitution of the United States 1031:Export Administration Regulations 962:Federation of American Scientists 789:that, in the opinion of selected 133:American Inventors Protection Act 2587:United States government secrecy 2279:Chen, Eric, B. (March 1, 2005). 2115:"DMA RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM" 1671:from the original on May 9, 2018 1427: This article incorporates 1422: 1263:Mapping, Charting & Geodesy 832:; sales to any party except the 693: 623:- Public Printing and Documents 611:- The Public Health and Welfare 467:- Crimes and Criminal Procedure 344: 2161:Schulz, G.W. (April 13, 2013). 2023:Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1657:Dilawar, Arvind (May 9, 2018). 1525:Locke, Scott (April 15, 2019). 1260:Mapping, Charting & Geodesy 1176:, details the list as of 2009. 1078:Federal Bureau of Investigation 933:Department of Homeland Security 834:United States military industry 153:Leahy–Smith America Invents Act 1943:Maunea, Jaime (June 1, 2012). 1792:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.103044 1569:Shulz, G.W. (April 13, 2013). 1239:Explosives & Inflammables 1: 2567:Privacy of telecommunications 2339:William & Mary Law School 1417: 1236:Explosives & Inflammables 1143:William & Mary Law School 901:Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 853:World War I and II background 738:Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 236:Patent Trial and Appeal Board 24:Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 7: 2552:Military–industrial complex 2517:82nd United States Congress 2472:Legal Information Institute 1380: 659:- War and National Defense 539:- Mineral Lands and Mining 10: 2603: 2502:http://www.freethetech.org 1163:Freedom of Information Act 2577:United States federal law 2532:Export and import control 950:Robinson vs United States 775:United States federal law 407:- Aliens and Nationality 82: 74: 66: 44: 37: 28: 23: 2542:Law of the United States 1433:United States Government 970:American Bar Association 925:National Security Agency 859:United States government 838:exports to other nations 700:United States portal 515:- Internal Revenue Code 503:- Hospitals and Asylums 328:This article is part of 287:List of patent law cases 119:United States patent law 2070:Harvard Business School 2016:Lee, Sabing H. (1997). 1053:"General Secrecy Order" 997:Types of Secrecy Orders 869:of the country. During 671:- Voting and Elections 521:- Intoxicating Liquors 2493:, May 1993, p. 2. 2482:Foerstel, Herbert N., 1429:public domain material 1187: 1097:Criticism and concerns 1019: 1006: 898: 174:Article of manufacture 166:Types of patent claims 39:United States Congress 1909:. February 16, 2023. 1826:HBS Working Knowledge 1311:Navigation Equipment 1287:Military Photography 1185: 1015: 1004: 894: 641:- Telecommunications 587:- Veterans' Benefits 449:- Commerce and Trade 365:- General Provisions 179:Composition of matter 143:Invention Secrecy Act 2522:1951 in American law 1343:Protective Measures 1300:Navigation Equipment 1284:Military Photography 1136:Eric B. Chen of the 1074:heat-seeking missile 929:Department of Energy 545:- Money and Finance 431:- Banks and Banking 395:- Domestic Security 2557:Military technology 1990:Michigan Law Review 1332:Protective Measures 1192: 1118:Michigan Law Review 605:- Public Contracts 205:Inter partes review 2547:Military economics 2130:. April 21, 1982. 1744:. April 19, 2022. 1190: 1188: 1007: 941:Justice Department 867:economic stability 795:economic stability 779:prevent disclosure 356:United States Code 338:United States Code 277:Biological patents 2562:National security 2477:Invention Secrecy 1378: 1377: 830:public disclosure 799:national security 734: 733: 653:- Transportation 593:- Postal Service 551:- National Guard 485:- Food and Drugs 473:- Customs Duties 323: 322: 113: 112: 2594: 2460: 2456: 2442: 2441: 2439: 2437: 2431: 2425:. January 1971. 2418: 2410: 2399: 2398: 2396: 2394: 2388: 2382:. January 1971. 2375: 2367: 2356: 2355: 2353: 2351: 2329: 2323: 2322: 2316: 2308: 2306: 2304: 2298: 2285: 2276: 2267: 2266: 2264: 2262: 2240: 2221: 2220: 2218: 2216: 2194: 2185: 2184: 2182: 2180: 2158: 2147: 2146: 2144: 2142: 2136: 2119: 2111: 2105: 2104: 2093: 2087: 2086: 2084: 2082: 2056: 2047: 2046: 2044: 2036:10.15779/Z38RQ3T 2013: 2007: 2006: 2004: 2002: 1980: 1971: 1970: 1968: 1966: 1960: 1949: 1940: 1923: 1922: 1920: 1918: 1897: 1886: 1885: 1883: 1881: 1875: 1866:RAND Corporation 1856: 1845: 1844: 1842: 1840: 1834: 1823: 1814: 1808: 1807: 1805: 1803: 1771: 1758: 1757: 1755: 1753: 1732: 1717: 1716: 1714: 1712: 1690: 1681: 1680: 1678: 1676: 1654: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1624: 1602: 1593: 1592: 1590: 1588: 1566: 1549: 1548: 1546: 1544: 1522: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1464: 1426: 1425: 1193: 1189: 1159:Steven Aftergood 1112:Alex Wellerstein 1087:Fifth Amendments 908:defense agencies 863:national defense 791:federal agencies 764: 763:February 1, 1952 748: 744: 726: 719: 712: 698: 697: 696: 377:- The President 348: 325: 324: 315: 308: 301: 282:Software patents 148:Hatch-Waxman Act 115: 114: 109: 108:February 1, 1952 93: 89: 78:February 1, 1952 33: 21: 20: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2507: 2506: 2458: 2450: 2445: 2435: 2433: 2429: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2402: 2392: 2390: 2386: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2359: 2349: 2347: 2330: 2326: 2310: 2309: 2302: 2300: 2296: 2283: 2277: 2270: 2260: 2258: 2241: 2224: 2214: 2212: 2195: 2188: 2178: 2176: 2159: 2150: 2140: 2138: 2134: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2108: 2095: 2094: 2090: 2080: 2078: 2057: 2050: 2042: 2014: 2010: 2000: 1998: 1981: 1974: 1964: 1962: 1958: 1947: 1941: 1926: 1916: 1914: 1899: 1898: 1889: 1879: 1877: 1873: 1857: 1848: 1838: 1836: 1832: 1821: 1815: 1811: 1801: 1799: 1772: 1761: 1751: 1749: 1734: 1733: 1720: 1710: 1708: 1691: 1684: 1674: 1672: 1655: 1632: 1622: 1620: 1603: 1596: 1586: 1584: 1567: 1552: 1542: 1540: 1523: 1494: 1484: 1482: 1465: 1440: 1423: 1420: 1383: 1155: 1127: 1104: 1099: 1066: 999: 978: 939:, but even the 903: 877:authorized the 855: 773:) is a body of 746: 730: 694: 692: 687: 686: 617:- Public Lands 455:- Conservation 419:- Armed Forces 371:- The Congress 358: 319: 210:Markman hearing 91: 62: 59: 54: 53: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2600: 2590: 2589: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2559: 2554: 2549: 2544: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2524: 2519: 2505: 2504: 2499: 2494: 2487: 2480: 2474: 2465: 2449: 2448:External links 2446: 2444: 2443: 2400: 2357: 2324: 2268: 2250:Bloomberg News 2222: 2186: 2148: 2106: 2088: 2048: 2030:(2): 345–411. 2008: 1972: 1924: 1887: 1846: 1809: 1759: 1718: 1682: 1630: 1594: 1550: 1492: 1437: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1295:Miscellaneous 1293: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1154: 1151: 1126: 1123: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1065: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1049: 1038: 998: 995: 977: 974: 902: 899: 854: 851: 818:35 U.S.C. 812:Secrecy Orders 765:, codified at 732: 731: 729: 728: 721: 714: 706: 703: 702: 689: 688: 685: 684: 678: 672: 666: 660: 654: 648: 642: 636: 630: 624: 618: 612: 606: 600: 594: 588: 582: 576: 570: 564: 558: 552: 546: 540: 534: 528: 522: 516: 510: 504: 498: 492: 486: 480: 474: 468: 462: 456: 450: 444: 443:- Coast Guard 438: 432: 426: 420: 414: 413:- Arbitration 408: 402: 401:- Agriculture 396: 390: 384: 378: 372: 366: 359: 354: 353: 350: 349: 341: 340: 334: 333: 321: 320: 318: 317: 310: 303: 295: 292: 291: 290: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 263: 261:Term of patent 258: 253: 248: 243: 238: 233: 225: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 212: 207: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 186: 181: 176: 168: 167: 163: 162: 161: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 127: 126: 122: 121: 111: 110: 84: 80: 79: 76: 72: 71: 68: 64: 63: 61: 60: 57: 47: 46: 45: 42: 41: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2599: 2588: 2585: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2572:Public sphere 2570: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2560: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2548: 2545: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2528: 2525: 2523: 2520: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2512: 2503: 2500: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2488: 2485: 2481: 2478: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2457: 2452: 2451: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2415: 2409: 2407: 2405: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2372: 2366: 2364: 2362: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2335: 2328: 2320: 2314: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2282: 2275: 2273: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2246: 2239: 2237: 2235: 2233: 2231: 2229: 2227: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2200: 2193: 2191: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2164: 2157: 2155: 2153: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2116: 2110: 2102: 2098: 2092: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2055: 2053: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2019: 2012: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1979: 1977: 1957: 1953: 1946: 1939: 1937: 1935: 1933: 1931: 1929: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1902: 1896: 1894: 1892: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1862: 1855: 1853: 1851: 1831: 1827: 1820: 1813: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1770: 1768: 1766: 1764: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1731: 1729: 1727: 1725: 1723: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1696: 1689: 1687: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1660: 1653: 1651: 1649: 1647: 1645: 1643: 1641: 1639: 1637: 1635: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1608: 1601: 1599: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1565: 1563: 1561: 1559: 1557: 1555: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1528: 1521: 1519: 1517: 1515: 1513: 1511: 1509: 1507: 1505: 1503: 1501: 1499: 1497: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1463: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1455: 1453: 1451: 1449: 1447: 1445: 1443: 1438: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1373: 1371: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1327:Power Supply 1326: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1171: 1166: 1164: 1160: 1150: 1148: 1147:biotechnology 1144: 1139: 1134: 1132: 1122: 1120: 1119: 1113: 1108: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1061: 1054: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1003: 994: 990: 986: 982: 973: 971: 965: 963: 957: 955: 951: 945: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 909: 897: 893: 890: 886: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 850: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 826: 823: 819: 815: 813: 806: 804: 803:United States 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 760: 756: 752: 745: 739: 727: 722: 720: 715: 713: 708: 707: 705: 704: 701: 691: 690: 682: 679: 676: 673: 670: 667: 664: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 646: 643: 640: 637: 634: 631: 628: 625: 622: 619: 616: 613: 610: 607: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 553: 550: 547: 544: 541: 538: 535: 532: 529: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 508: 505: 502: 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 484: 481: 478: 475: 472: 469: 466: 463: 461:- Copyrights 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 425:- Bankruptcy 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 364: 361: 360: 357: 352: 351: 347: 343: 342: 339: 336: 335: 331: 327: 326: 316: 311: 309: 304: 302: 297: 296: 294: 293: 288: 285: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 267: 264: 262: 259: 257: 254: 252: 249: 247: 244: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 228: 227: 226: 222: 221: 216: 215:Reexamination 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 202: 201: 200: 196: 195: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 165: 164: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 138:Bayh–Dole Act 136: 134: 131: 130: 129: 128: 124: 123: 120: 117: 116: 105: 101: 97: 90: 85: 83:Bill citation 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 56: 55: 52: 51: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 2490: 2483: 2434:. Retrieved 2420: 2391:. Retrieved 2377: 2350:February 20, 2348:. Retrieved 2337: 2327: 2301:. Retrieved 2287: 2261:February 20, 2259:. Retrieved 2248: 2215:February 20, 2213:. Retrieved 2202: 2179:February 20, 2177:. Retrieved 2166: 2139:. Retrieved 2121: 2109: 2091: 2081:February 19, 2079:. Retrieved 2064: 2027: 2021: 2011: 2001:February 20, 1999:. Retrieved 1988: 1963:. Retrieved 1951: 1915:. Retrieved 1904: 1878:. Retrieved 1864: 1837:. Retrieved 1825: 1812: 1800:. Retrieved 1783: 1779: 1750:. Retrieved 1739: 1709:. Retrieved 1698: 1673:. Retrieved 1662: 1623:February 19, 1621:. Retrieved 1610: 1585:. Retrieved 1574: 1541:. Retrieved 1530: 1483:. Retrieved 1472: 1421: 1316:Power Supply 1279:Meteorology 1178: 1173: 1169: 1167: 1156: 1135: 1128: 1116: 1109: 1105: 1071: 1067: 1058: 1052: 1041: 1026: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 991: 987: 983: 979: 966: 958: 949: 946: 904: 895: 891: 887: 883:World War II 856: 827: 809: 807: 787:technologies 777:designed to 737: 735: 629:- Railroads 479:- Education 246:Infringement 223:Other topics 142: 48: 18: 2393:January 30, 2141:February 8, 1965:February 6, 1917:January 31, 1880:February 5, 1839:January 31, 1802:January 31, 1752:January 31, 1711:January 30, 1675:January 31, 1587:January 30, 1543:February 7, 1485:January 31, 1387:Born secret 1276:Meteorology 871:World War I 635:- Shipping 497:- Highways 125:Legislation 2537:Inventions 2511:Categories 2436:August 30, 2303:August 27, 1418:References 1351:Radiology 1271:Materials 1231:Contracts 1215:Computers 1110:Historian 822:§ 181 783:inventions 761:, enacted 753:, 66  569:- Patents 509:- Indians 241:Exhaustion 197:Procedures 106:, enacted 98:, 66  70:66 Stat. 3 50:Long title 2470:from the 1367:Vehicles 1340:Radiology 1268:Materials 1228:Contracts 1212:Computers 921:Air Force 767:35 U.S.C. 437:- Census 2427:Archived 2384:Archived 2344:Archived 2313:cite web 2294:Archived 2255:Archived 2209:Archived 2173:Archived 2132:Archived 2101:Archived 2075:Archived 2040:Archived 1995:Archived 1956:Archived 1911:Archived 1871:Archived 1830:Archived 1796:Archived 1746:Archived 1705:Archived 1669:Archived 1617:Archived 1581:Archived 1537:Archived 1479:Archived 1381:See also 1356:Vehicles 1085:and the 875:Congress 681:Title 54 675:Title 53 669:Title 52 663:Title 51 657:Title 50 651:Title 49 645:Title 48 639:Title 47 633:Title 46 627:Title 45 621:Title 44 615:Title 43 609:Title 42 603:Title 41 597:Title 40 591:Title 39 585:Title 38 579:Title 37 573:Title 36 567:Title 35 561:Title 34 555:Title 33 549:Title 32 543:Title 31 537:Title 30 533:- Labor 531:Title 29 525:Title 28 519:Title 27 513:Title 26 507:Title 25 501:Title 24 495:Title 23 489:Title 22 483:Title 21 477:Title 20 471:Title 19 465:Title 18 459:Title 17 453:Title 16 447:Title 15 441:Title 14 435:Title 13 429:Title 12 423:Title 11 417:Title 10 330:a series 67:Citation 2455:Pub. L. 1089:of the 801:of the 781:of new 743:Pub. L. 411:Title 9 405:Title 8 399:Title 7 393:Title 6 387:Title 5 381:Title 4 375:Title 3 369:Title 2 363:Title 1 272:History 184:Machine 88:Pub. L. 75:Enacted 2461:  2066:Forbes 1612:Reason 952:, the 820:  771:ch. 17 757:  751:82–256 749:  332:on the 268:(MPEP) 256:Racism 251:Misuse 189:Method 102:  96:82–256 94:  2430:(PDF) 2417:(PDF) 2387:(PDF) 2374:(PDF) 2297:(PDF) 2284:(PDF) 2135:(PDF) 2118:(PDF) 2043:(PDF) 1959:(PDF) 1948:(PDF) 1874:(PDF) 1833:(PDF) 1822:(PDF) 1664:Slate 1576:Wired 1083:First 769: 755:Stat. 100:Stat. 2438:2024 2395:2024 2352:2024 2319:link 2305:2024 2263:2024 2217:2024 2181:2024 2143:2024 2083:2024 2003:2024 1967:2024 1919:2024 1882:2024 1841:2024 1804:2024 1754:2024 1713:2024 1677:2024 1625:2024 1589:2024 1545:2024 1487:2024 1033:and 937:NASA 917:Navy 913:Army 865:and 857:The 785:and 736:The 2032:doi 1788:doi 836:or 797:or 677:- 2513:: 2419:. 2403:^ 2376:. 2360:^ 2342:. 2336:. 2315:}} 2311:{{ 2286:. 2271:^ 2253:. 2247:. 2225:^ 2207:. 2201:. 2189:^ 2171:. 2165:. 2151:^ 2120:. 2073:. 2068:, 2063:. 2051:^ 2038:. 2028:12 2026:. 2020:. 1993:. 1987:. 1975:^ 1954:. 1950:. 1927:^ 1903:. 1890:^ 1869:. 1863:. 1849:^ 1828:. 1824:. 1794:. 1786:. 1784:92 1782:. 1778:. 1762:^ 1738:. 1721:^ 1703:. 1697:. 1685:^ 1667:. 1661:. 1633:^ 1615:. 1609:. 1597:^ 1579:. 1573:. 1553:^ 1535:. 1529:. 1495:^ 1477:. 1471:. 1441:^ 1435:. 972:. 935:, 931:, 927:, 923:, 919:, 915:, 873:, 805:. 2440:. 2397:. 2354:. 2321:) 2307:. 2265:. 2219:. 2183:. 2145:. 2085:. 2034:: 2005:. 1969:. 1921:. 1884:. 1843:. 1806:. 1790:: 1756:. 1715:. 1679:. 1627:. 1591:. 1547:. 1489:. 1037:. 814:" 810:" 759:3 740:( 725:e 718:t 711:v 314:e 307:t 300:v 104:3

Index


United States Congress
Long title
Pub. L.
82–256
Stat.
3
United States patent law
American Inventors Protection Act
Bayh–Dole Act
Invention Secrecy Act
Hatch-Waxman Act
Leahy–Smith America Invents Act
Title 35 of the United States Code
Article of manufacture
Composition of matter
Machine
Method
Inter partes review
Markman hearing
Reexamination
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Exhaustion
Infringement
Misuse
Racism
Term of patent
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure
History

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑