258:, at para 120, "No doubt, where it is clear that the act or omission under challenge resulted in substantial detriment to the company, the director will have a harder task persuading the court that he honestly believed it to be in the company's interest; but that does not detract from the subjective nature of the test." But also, at para 153, "Thus, the need to avoid litigation against two of Regentcrest's directors was, I find, a weighty consideration, and one which could reasonably have led a businessman in the position of the Richardson brothers on 5 September 1990 to conclude that the waiver of the claim on the terms proposed was in the interests of Regentcrest, notwithstanding that the information before the board as to the vendors' ability to meet any judgment was far from complete. As to that, it is in my judgment wholly unrealistic to have expected Mr Roy Richardson at that stage to have initiated a detailed investigation into the personal financial circumstances of the vendors."
131:
company should be dissolved except for the purpose of regulating their internal affairs and winding up the same and of dividing the purchase-money. The purchase-money was to be applied in paying the costs of the arbitration and in paying off any revenue debts or charges of the company, and the residue was to be divided among the debenture holders and shareholders. After the completion of the transfer a general meeting of the company was held at which a resolution was passed to apply £1050 of the purchase-money in compensating the paid officials of the company for their loss of employment, although they had no legal claim for any compensation, and £1500 in remuneration to the directors for their past services.
415:
31:
168:
company, and paying away its money with both hands in a manner perfectly bona fide yet perfectly irrational… It is for the directors to judge, provided it is a matter which is reasonably incidental to the carrying on of the business of the company… The law does not say that there are to be no cakes and ale, but there are to be no cakes and ale except such as are required for the benefit of the company.
167:
money which is not theirs but the company’s, if they are spending it for the purposes which are reasonably incidental to the carrying on of the business of the company. That is the general doctrine. Bona fides cannot be the sole test, otherwise you might have a lunatic conducting the affairs of the
130:
A railway company which had no provision in its articles for paying remuneration to directors, and had never paid any, sold its undertaking to another company at a price to be determined by an arbitrator. By the Act authorizing the transfer it was provided that on the completion of the transfer the
172:
The upshot for a company in insolvency was that directors were not free to make payments to employees, because payments could only be made which were incidental to the business, and an insolvent business had no further business. In
English law, the position has been altered by the Insolvency Act
159:...a kind of charitable dealing which is for the interest of those who practise it, and to that extent and in that garb (I admit not a very philanthropic garb) charity may sit at the board, but for no other purpose.
222:
110:
181:
The value of the judgment today lies in the general doctrine that during the life of the company, it may conduct itself in a way which benefits stakeholders other than
250:
603:
101:
discretion to spend company funds for the benefit of non-shareholders. It was decided in relation to employees in the context of a company's
173:
1986, s.187 and the
Companies Act 2006, s.247, which allow directors to consider employees directly when a company has gone insolvent.
234:. A shareholder challenged the resolution. He argued any benefit (a better pool of potential employees) was too remote. But he lost.
118:, section 172 which entitles and obliges directors to regard interests other than shareholders as a proper exercise of their power.
608:
246:
as ‘long visioned… action in recognising and voluntarily discharging its high obligations as a constituent of our modern society.’
304:
336:
199:
449:
41:
359:
238:
185:, but only insofar as that will in the end, albeit indirectly, be in the shareholders' interest. See now, section 172
500:
364:
618:
434:
114:
Ch 442 where the Court of Appeal held that a company's substantive object may include making gifts, and under
444:
218:, (1913) 17 CLR 639) held that a company could be run with strict adherence to serving only the shareholders.
613:
459:
429:
623:
598:
475:
439:
404:
329:
530:
480:
384:
242:, 39 ALR 2d 1179 (1953) (appeal dismissed 346 U.S.C. 861 (1953)) the court applauded a gift to
569:
389:
374:
369:
322:
243:
204:
140:
8:
520:
454:
209:
186:
115:
98:
394:
215:
525:
510:
495:
379:
230:
company’s general meeting approved directors donating £100,000 to universities for
535:
399:
255:
268:
94:
592:
505:
545:
515:
148:
69:
555:
550:
345:
182:
108:
The case's practical significance was limited by cases and statute as in
576:
540:
102:
490:
485:
414:
65:
227:
144:
61:
30:
231:
314:
212:
v The Sydney Meat
Preserving Company Limited and others
163:
So according to Bowen LJ, directors can only spend,
207:, (1912) 16 CLR 50 (affirmed on other grounds in
590:
330:
337:
323:
308:,Caroline Madden, Irish times, 2 July 2012
29:
604:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
147:held that the money payment was invalid.
591:
306:Cork Rail Case Clever and Progressive
192:
318:
200:Miles v Sydney Meat-Preserving Co Ltd
97:case, which concerns the limits of a
82:Insolvency, provision for employees
13:
239:AP Smith Manufacturing Co v Barlow
14:
635:
413:
223:Evans v Brunner, Mond and Co Ltd
155:, Bowen LJ held that there is..
151:dissented. In the course of his
609:United Kingdom company case law
344:
176:
298:
289:
280:
1:
126:According to the law report,
90:Hutton v West Cork Railway Co
24:Hutton v West Cork Railway Co
7:
460:Courts of England and Wales
262:
135:
111:Re Horsley & Weight Ltd
10:
640:
564:
468:
422:
411:
352:
81:
76:
60:
55:
47:
37:
28:
23:
274:
121:
93:(1883) 23 Ch D 654 is a
251:Regentcrest plc v Cohen
619:1883 in rail transport
501:British Virgin Islands
216:[1913] UKPC 74
205:[1912] HCA 87
170:
161:
133:
295:(1883) LR 23 Ch D 654
286:(1883) LR 23 Ch D 654
165:
157:
128:
244:Princeton University
614:1883 in British law
193:Subsequent case law
365:Administrative law
256:Jonathan Parker LJ
210:William John Miles
187:Companies Act 2006
116:Companies Act 2006
51:(1883) 23 Ch D 654
586:
585:
86:
85:
16:West Cork Railway
631:
624:Railway case law
599:1883 in case law
481:Northern Ireland
423:Further subjects
417:
339:
332:
325:
316:
315:
310:
302:
296:
293:
287:
284:
33:
21:
20:
639:
638:
634:
633:
632:
630:
629:
628:
589:
588:
587:
582:
560:
536:Anglo-Saxon law
469:Related systems
464:
450:Civil procedure
435:Competition law
418:
409:
400:Retained EU law
360:UK Constitution
348:
343:
313:
303:
299:
294:
290:
285:
281:
277:
265:
254:2 BCLC 80, per
195:
179:
138:
124:
42:Court of Appeal
17:
12:
11:
5:
637:
627:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
584:
583:
581:
580:
573:
565:
562:
561:
559:
558:
553:
548:
543:
538:
533:
528:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
493:
488:
483:
478:
472:
470:
466:
465:
463:
462:
457:
452:
447:
445:Commercial law
442:
437:
432:
426:
424:
420:
419:
412:
410:
408:
407:
402:
397:
392:
387:
382:
377:
372:
367:
362:
356:
354:
350:
349:
342:
341:
334:
327:
319:
312:
311:
297:
288:
278:
276:
273:
272:
271:
269:UK company law
264:
261:
260:
259:
247:
235:
219:
194:
191:
178:
175:
137:
134:
123:
120:
95:UK company law
84:
83:
79:
78:
74:
73:
58:
57:
53:
52:
49:
45:
44:
39:
35:
34:
26:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
636:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
596:
594:
579:
578:
574:
572:
571:
567:
566:
563:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
532:
531:United States
529:
527:
524:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
487:
484:
482:
479:
477:
474:
473:
471:
467:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
427:
425:
421:
416:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
357:
355:
353:Core subjects
351:
347:
340:
335:
333:
328:
326:
321:
320:
317:
309:
307:
301:
292:
283:
279:
270:
267:
266:
257:
253:
252:
248:
245:
241:
240:
236:
233:
229:
225:
224:
220:
217:
213:
211:
206:
202:
201:
197:
196:
190:
188:
184:
174:
169:
164:
160:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
132:
127:
119:
117:
113:
112:
106:
105:proceedings.
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
80:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:Case opinions
54:
50:
46:
43:
40:
36:
32:
27:
22:
19:
575:
568:
390:Property law
375:Contract law
370:Criminal law
305:
300:
291:
282:
249:
237:
226:1 Ch 359, a
221:
208:
198:
183:shareholders
180:
177:Significance
171:
166:
162:
158:
152:
149:Baggallay LJ
139:
129:
125:
109:
107:
89:
88:
87:
72:(dissenting)
70:Baggallay LJ
18:
556:Hue and cry
551:Bloody Code
521:New Zealand
430:Company law
346:English law
593:Categories
541:Common law
455:Family law
440:Labour law
103:insolvency
99:director's
526:Singapore
511:Hong Kong
496:Australia
395:Trust law
141:Cotton LJ
66:Cotton LJ
570:Category
486:Scotland
405:Case law
380:Tort law
263:See also
228:chemical
145:Bowen LJ
136:Judgment
77:Keywords
62:Bowen LJ
48:Citation
476:UK-wide
385:Privacy
232:science
577:Portal
546:Equity
506:Canada
516:India
491:Wales
275:Notes
214:
203:
153:dicta
122:Facts
38:Court
143:and
68:and
595::
189:.
64:,
338:e
331:t
324:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
