Knowledge

Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino

Source 📝

116:. Rena Gottlieb was a member of the casino's "Diamond Club," which requires photo identification and a completed application form for signup. The Diamond Club is free to sign up for, and the casino enters the member's information into their computer database, which is used for advertising purposes. Further, Diamond Club members are given a card, which is swiped every time a member plays one of the Tropicana's casino games. 120:
used her membership card for the free spin. Gottlieb contends that the wheel landed on the $ 1 million prize, but the wheel operator intervened and reactivated the wheel with another member's card, which subsequently landed on a lesser prize of two show tickets. The Tropicana casino claims that the wheel never landed on $ 1 million, and the attendant never reactivated the wheel.
119:
Once inside the Tropicana, Gottlieb waited in line for approximately five minutes to play the casino's Fun House Million Dollar Wheel Promotion, which offers a variety of prizes, including a $ 1 million payout. The Tropicana offers Diamond Club members one free spin on the wheel every day; Gottlieb
133:
The Court affirmed that participation in a contest is considered entering a contract. Since Gottlieb had to drive to the casino, wait in line to spin the wheel, and present her "Diamond Club" card to the casino attendant, she provided consideration to form a contract with the Tropicana Casino.
152:
Since there was no factual evidence, Judge Bartle moved to a jury trial. Two eyewitnesses testified on behalf of Gottlieb claiming they had seen the wheel hit the $ 1 million jackpot. After a three-day trial, an eight-person jury came back ruling in favor of Gottlieb.
471: 236: 97: 28: 554: 464: 308: 355: 710: 170: 388: 369: 478: 210: 866: 658: 301: 561: 814: 113: 960: 839: 294: 184: 965: 769: 443: 436: 651: 485: 450: 220: 194: 547: 510: 362: 134:
Further, participation in the game provided entertainment for those at the casino, which benefited the Tropicana.
585: 665: 526: 492: 613: 703: 108:
Rena and Sheldon Gottlieb, who were residents of Pennsylvania, were vacationing at a rented apartment in
100:, holding that participation in a promotional contest is sufficient consideration for a valid contract. 914: 644: 407: 317: 457: 109: 276: 859: 380: 341: 112:
during the summer of 1999. On July 24, 1999, following dinner with friends, the couple visited the
696: 599: 572: 499: 798: 776: 607: 263: 137:
Precedent for the ruling was also found in both New Jersey and Pennsylvania cases, including
418: 332: 8: 905: 732: 595: 832: 807: 717: 533: 66:
Participation in a promotional contest is sufficient consideration for a valid contract
934: 925: 850: 728: 216: 190: 93: 79: 39:
Rena Gottlieb, et al.v. Tropicana Hotel and Casino v. Redland Insurance Co., et al.
873: 742: 687: 637: 624: 251: 880: 540: 519: 895: 760: 749: 580: 255: 954: 628: 286: 398: 472:
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.
426: 27: 422: 98:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
250:"Litigating Casino Promotion Claims". Gaming Law Review. June 2002. 555:
Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. United States District Court
465:
In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
173:. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 5, 2000. 356:
Kansas City Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Weber Packing Corp.
711:Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America 389:Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States 212:Contracts, Keyed to Calamari, Perillo & Bender 370:Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 952: 867:Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United States 479:Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology 659:G. L. Christian and Associates v. United States 316: 302: 562:Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 186:Emanuel Law Outlines: Contracts 8th Edition 815:Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly 309: 295: 171:"Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino" 26: 215:. Casenote Legal Briefs. March 30, 2005. 840:SCO Group, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. 349:Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino 237:"Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel and Casino" 89:Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino 21:Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino 770:Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. 444:Ticketmaster Corp. v. Tickets.com, Inc. 953: 652:Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. 486:Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc. 290: 128: 13: 451:Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. 14: 977: 586:Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent 548:King v. Trustees of Boston Univ. 363:Ever-Tite Roofing Corp. v. Green 56:Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter 961:United States contract case law 966:2000 in United States case law 666:Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton 527:Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon 493:Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. 243: 229: 203: 177: 163: 1: 614:MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. 156: 147: 103: 96:(2000) was a decision by the 143:Cobaugh v. Klick-Lewis, Inc. 7: 704:Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc. 139:Lucky Calendar Co. v. Cohen 123: 10: 982: 915:Drennan v. Star Paving Co. 735:(unwritten & informal) 645:Seixas and Seixas v. Woods 408:Ellefson v. Megadeth, Inc. 318:United States contract law 256:10.1089/109218802760019600 189:. Aspen Publishers. 2006. 924: 904: 894: 849: 824: 797: 790: 759: 727: 686: 680:Defense against formation 679: 623: 594: 571: 509: 458:ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg 417: 397: 379: 331: 324: 110:Atlantic City, New Jersey 75: 70: 65: 60: 52: 44: 34: 25: 20: 860:United States v. Spearin 381:Implied-in-fact contract 342:Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. 697:Morrison v. Amway Corp. 573:Substantial performance 500:Feldman v. Google, Inc. 271:Cite journal requires 777:Buchwald v. Paramount 608:De Cicco v. Schweizer 53:Counsel for plaintiff 333:Offer and acceptance 906:Promissory estoppel 791:Cancelling Contract 94:109 F. Supp. 2d 324 833:Stoddard v. Martin 808:Sherwood v. Walker 718:McMichael v. Price 534:Kirksey v. Kirksey 437:Specht v. Netscape 325:Contract formation 948: 947: 944: 943: 935:Britton v. Turner 926:Unjust enrichment 890: 889: 851:Misrepresentation 786: 785: 729:Statute of frauds 675: 674: 239:. CaseBriefs.com. 85: 84: 80:Harvey Bartle III 973: 902: 901: 874:Laidlaw v. Organ 795: 794: 743:Buffaloe v. Hart 731:(written) & 688:Illusory promise 684: 683: 638:Hawkins v. McGee 625:Implied warranty 329: 328: 311: 304: 297: 288: 287: 281: 280: 274: 269: 267: 259: 247: 241: 240: 233: 227: 226: 207: 201: 200: 181: 175: 174: 167: 129:Summary Judgment 114:Tropicana Casino 71:Court membership 30: 18: 17: 981: 980: 976: 975: 974: 972: 971: 970: 951: 950: 949: 940: 920: 886: 881:Smith v. Bolles 845: 820: 782: 755: 723: 671: 619: 590: 567: 541:Angel v. Murray 520:Hamer v. Sidway 505: 413: 393: 375: 320: 315: 285: 284: 272: 270: 261: 260: 249: 248: 244: 235: 234: 230: 223: 209: 208: 204: 197: 183: 182: 178: 169: 168: 164: 159: 150: 131: 126: 106: 12: 11: 5: 979: 969: 968: 963: 946: 945: 942: 941: 939: 938: 930: 928: 922: 921: 919: 918: 910: 908: 899: 896:Quasi-contract 892: 891: 888: 887: 885: 884: 877: 870: 863: 855: 853: 847: 846: 844: 843: 836: 828: 826: 822: 821: 819: 818: 811: 803: 801: 792: 788: 787: 784: 783: 781: 780: 773: 765: 763: 761:Unconscionable 757: 756: 754: 753: 750:Foman v. Davis 746: 738: 736: 733:Parol evidence 725: 724: 722: 721: 714: 707: 700: 692: 690: 681: 677: 676: 673: 672: 670: 669: 662: 655: 648: 641: 633: 631: 621: 620: 618: 617: 610: 604: 602: 592: 591: 589: 588: 583: 581:Lucy v. Zehmer 577: 575: 569: 568: 566: 565: 558: 551: 544: 537: 530: 523: 515: 513: 507: 506: 504: 503: 496: 489: 482: 475: 468: 461: 454: 447: 440: 432: 430: 415: 414: 412: 411: 403: 401: 395: 394: 392: 391: 385: 383: 377: 376: 374: 373: 366: 359: 352: 345: 337: 335: 326: 322: 321: 314: 313: 306: 299: 291: 283: 282: 273:|journal= 242: 228: 221: 202: 195: 176: 161: 160: 158: 155: 149: 146: 130: 127: 125: 122: 105: 102: 83: 82: 77: 73: 72: 68: 67: 63: 62: 58: 57: 54: 50: 49: 46: 42: 41: 36: 35:Full case name 32: 31: 23: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 978: 967: 964: 962: 959: 958: 956: 937: 936: 932: 931: 929: 927: 923: 917: 916: 912: 911: 909: 907: 903: 900: 897: 893: 883: 882: 878: 876: 875: 871: 869: 868: 864: 862: 861: 857: 856: 854: 852: 848: 842: 841: 837: 835: 834: 830: 829: 827: 823: 817: 816: 812: 810: 809: 805: 804: 802: 800: 796: 793: 789: 779: 778: 774: 772: 771: 767: 766: 764: 762: 758: 752: 751: 747: 745: 744: 740: 739: 737: 734: 730: 726: 720: 719: 715: 713: 712: 708: 706: 705: 701: 699: 698: 694: 693: 691: 689: 685: 682: 678: 668: 667: 663: 661: 660: 656: 654: 653: 649: 647: 646: 642: 640: 639: 635: 634: 632: 630: 629:caveat emptor 626: 622: 616: 615: 611: 609: 606: 605: 603: 601: 597: 593: 587: 584: 582: 579: 578: 576: 574: 570: 564: 563: 559: 557: 556: 552: 550: 549: 545: 543: 542: 538: 536: 535: 531: 529: 528: 524: 522: 521: 517: 516: 514: 512: 511:Consideration 508: 502: 501: 497: 495: 494: 490: 488: 487: 483: 481: 480: 476: 474: 473: 469: 467: 466: 462: 460: 459: 455: 453: 452: 448: 446: 445: 441: 439: 438: 434: 433: 431: 428: 424: 420: 416: 410: 409: 405: 404: 402: 400: 396: 390: 387: 386: 384: 382: 378: 372: 371: 367: 365: 364: 360: 358: 357: 353: 351: 350: 346: 344: 343: 339: 338: 336: 334: 330: 327: 323: 319: 312: 307: 305: 300: 298: 293: 292: 289: 278: 265: 257: 253: 246: 238: 232: 224: 222:9780735571846 218: 214: 213: 206: 198: 196:9780735558175 192: 188: 187: 180: 172: 166: 162: 154: 145: 144: 140: 135: 121: 117: 115: 111: 101: 99: 95: 91: 90: 81: 78: 76:Judge sitting 74: 69: 64: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 933: 913: 879: 872: 865: 858: 838: 831: 813: 806: 775: 768: 748: 741: 716: 709: 702: 695: 664: 657: 650: 643: 636: 612: 560: 553: 546: 539: 532: 525: 518: 498: 491: 484: 477: 470: 463: 456: 449: 442: 435: 406: 399:Mailbox rule 368: 361: 354: 348: 347: 340: 264:cite journal 245: 231: 211: 205: 185: 179: 165: 151: 142: 138: 136: 132: 118: 107: 88: 87: 86: 48:July 5, 2000 38: 15: 600:3rd parties 955:Categories 898:obligation 825:Illegality 429:agreements 427:Browsewrap 419:Shrinkwrap 157:References 148:Jury Trial 104:Background 423:Clickwrap 124:Decision 799:Mistake 596:Privity 61:Holding 45:Decided 598:& 219:  193:  277:help 217:ISBN 191:ISBN 141:and 252:doi 957:: 627:, 425:, 421:, 268:: 266:}} 262:{{ 92:, 310:e 303:t 296:v 279:) 275:( 258:. 254:: 225:. 199:.

Index


Harvey Bartle III
109 F. Supp. 2d 324
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Atlantic City, New Jersey
Tropicana Casino
"Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino"
Emanuel Law Outlines: Contracts 8th Edition
ISBN
9780735558175
Contracts, Keyed to Calamari, Perillo & Bender
ISBN
9780735571846
"Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel and Casino"
doi
10.1089/109218802760019600
cite journal
help
v
t
e
United States contract law
Offer and acceptance
Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.
Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino
Kansas City Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Weber Packing Corp.
Ever-Tite Roofing Corp. v. Green
Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc
Implied-in-fact contract
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.