Knowledge

First Amendment audit

Source πŸ“

104:
photographing or recording for a story, they are photographing or recording for their "personal use", or sometimes auditors do not answer questions. Frequently, local law enforcement is called and the auditor is sometimes reported as a suspicious person and are often also identified as having been on private property. Some officers will approach the auditors and request their identification and an explanation of their conduct. Auditors refusing to identify sometimes results in officers arresting auditors for obstruction of justice, disorderly conduct, or other potential or
20: 253:, "he act of making an audio or audiovisual recording is necessarily included within the First Amendment's guarantee of speech and press rights as a corollary of the right to disseminate the resulting recording. The right to publish or broadcast an audio or audiovisual recording would be insecure, or largely ineffective, if the antecedent act of making the recording is wholly unprotected." 328:, have also ruled that filming protections are subject to time, place, and manner restrictions, including in the majority of public buildings. Limitations include trespassing on private property, entering a marked crime scene, or materially interfering with police activities. The United States Supreme Court case of 103:
authority to "audit" anything, but do have theoretical constitutional rights to record from open public spaces. The laws regarding public forums come into play in these situations, and are often the flashpoint of contention. Sometimes, auditors will tell property owners upon questioning that they are
311:
Specifically, Mr. Cordova was convicted of "failure to comply with official signs and lawful directions (in violation of Case No. 1:22-po-07015-MEH Document 23 filed 07/07/23 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 11 2 41 C.F.R. Β§ 102.74-385) and unlawful photography (in violation of 41 C.F.R. Β§ 102.74-420)." He was
124:
article, one auditor stated that the goal of an audit is to "put yourself in places where you know chances are the cops are going to be called. Are they going to uphold the constitution, uphold the law ... or break the law?" Auditors state that they seek to educate the public that photography is not
282:
wrote a federal appeals decision in favor of an auditor who was detained for filming police officers; "Filming the police contributes to the public's ability to hold the police accountable, ensure that police officers are not abusing their power, and make informed decisions about police policy." In
347:
An auditor in San Antonio was prosecuted and convicted of disorderly conduct after an audit where he "chased, jostled and shouted insults at three officers on duty". After the trial, the Chief of Police for the City of San Antonio stated " puts a dagger in the heart of their First Amendment excuse
343:
Insulting the police is consistently treated as constitutionally protected speech. According to a guide published by the IACP, "verbal criticism and derisive comments made by recording parties or others from a location that has no direct impact on police operations or safety are not actionable by
315:
Mr. Cordova appealed the verdict and sentence, and the appeal was heard on June 7, 2024. The appeals court's decision is - as of September 13, 2024 - still pending. This proceeding and conviction established case law that in the view of many makes virtually all first amendment auditing on federal
256:
Bystanders may object to being filmed in public, but courts have generally held that when people are in public spaces they do not have a reasonable expectation that they will not be recorded on video. There are, however, some limitations to this such as mental health, correctional and juvenile
291:
that "Based on First Amendment principles and relevant precedents, we conclude there is a First Amendment right to film the police performing their duties in public." Following this ruling, the right to film police performing their duties in public is now expressly recognized under the First
248:
amendment rights. Though the Supreme Court has yet to affirm a right to record government employees, it has stated that there is a "paramount public interest in a free flow of information to the people concerning public officials." As the 7th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals explained in
173:
Auditing has been controversial due to the tactics auditors have used in attempting to elicit potential reactions from police officers and private citizens alike. Many of these tactics have been criticized as they include the use of intimidation, harassment and even criminal instigation.
177:
Critics argue that audits are often confrontational in nature, as auditors often refuse to self-identify or explain their activities. Some auditors yell insults, derogatory language, and vulgarities at police officers who attempt to stop them from recording and insist on identification.
334:
clarifies and defines the parameters of time, place, and manner restrictions and is often cited when removing First Amendment auditors who are in violation of its guidelines. Conversely, it is also cited when protecting First Amendment auditors who are acting within its parameters.
111:
An auditor selects a public facility and then films the entire encounter with staff and customers alike. If no confrontation or attempt to stop the filming occurs, then the facility "passes" the audit; if an employee attempts to stop a filming event, it "fails" the audit.
273:
has yet to decide on a case regarding a right to film government officials engaged in public duties, several of the U.S. Courts of Appeals have ruled that the recording of public officials, including the police, is protected under the First Amendment. In 2017, Judge
308:", was convicted on two counts in the Denver Division of the Federal District of Colorado. The case was heard by the Honorable Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, Chief Magistrate Judge of the Federal District of Colorado. 145:, and have been shot while video recording in a public place. Such events have prompted police officials to release information on the proper methods of handling such an activity. For example, a document sponsored by the 312:
sentenced to 15 days in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2 years probation, and a $ 3,000.00 fine. He was also required to obtain and maintain full time employment and refrain from any recording.
1550: 316:
property, and by extension state government property, illegal per se. The appellate decision of Mr. Cordova's federal appeal will influence the effect of this case law on auditing's legality in the future.
465: 806: 185:
firearms (a right covered by the Second Amendment, not the First), leading to accusations that auditors are engaged in intimidation, harassment and domestic terrorism. While not all are members of the
64:
The practice is predominantly a US concept (since the First Amendment is a part of US law), but it has also been seen in other countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Russia.
99:
In the case of sidewalk or easement audits, the conflict arises when a property owner or manager states, in substance, that photography of their property is not allowed. Auditors of course have no
703: 329: 1142: 542: 1363: 490: 1565:"epeated verbal attacks against us simply for wearing a uniform and performing our duties does not represent the spirit of the law," San Antonio Police Chief William McManus 198:, the growing popularity of auditing videos online has led to "ruthless competition" between auditors, which incentivizes more dramatic, confrontational and abusive videos. 1012: 1166: 967: 854: 727: 1630: 261:
to record people and use their name, likeness or image without written permission from each person in the video if that video is used to produce profit of any kind.
753: 1104: 1389: 814: 788: 284: 279: 1625: 34:
social movement that usually involves photographing or filming from a public space. It is often categorized by its practitioners, known as auditors, as
1311: 245: 215: 241: 223: 43: 1578: 774: 1041: 146: 1069: 925: 46:). Auditors have tended to film or photograph government buildings, equipment, and access control points, as well as any personnel present. 42:
that tests constitutional rights, in particular the right to photograph and video record in a public space (a right normally covered by the
1525: 835: 599: 192:
Critics have also noted that many auditors profit from the videos they publish on YouTube and other platforms. According to a report by
1237: 627: 516: 211: 1412: 494: 141:
Auditors have been detained, arrested, assaulted, had camera equipment confiscated, weapons aimed at them, their homes raided by a
1020: 1105:
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2021/11/09/michigan-first-amendment-auditors-video-public-buildings/6350167001/
234:
The legality of recording police in public was first clearly established in a United States jurisdiction following the case of
207: 1595: 1645: 1216: 731: 444: 292:
Amendment in at least the 32 states covered by the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 10th, and 11th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals.
1501: 949: 653: 382: 270: 1459: 985: 873: 1092: 1339:"There Is a Constitutional Right of the Public to Film the Official Activities of Police Officers in a Public Place" 1640: 81: 149:(IACP) states that the use of a recording device alone is not grounds for arrest, unless other laws are violated. 19: 182: 96:
or other government buildings, and visibly and openly photograph and record buildings and persons in their view.
240:
in the First Circuit, which confirmed that restricting a person's right to film in public would violate their
1551:"City of San Antonio Successfully Prosecutes Individual for Disrupting Police Officers during Course of Duty" 677: 560: 53:, while critics have argued that audits are typically confrontational, criticizing some tactics as forms of 1338: 1635: 1435: 1423: 411: 128:
Online videos of audits can also generate income for auditors through advertising revenue and donations.
1364:"Right to Videorecord Police Clearly Established, Violated by Blocking Camera and Shining Light Into It" 189:, a number are either members or express certain philosophies shared by these anarchic oriented groups. 357: 186: 181:
Some auditors have also been known to enter public buildings asserting that they have a legal right to
807:""First Amendment auditor" claims sheriff deputy attacked him at Lebanon County courthouse - witf.org" 61:. Many opponents of the tactics and legal theories of auditors refer to auditors as "frauditors". 125:
a crime by publicizing cases where officers illegally stop what is perceived as illegal conduct.
1413:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.219724/gov.uscourts.cod.219724.23.0.pdf
1143:"Documents Show 100 Officers From 28 Law Enforcement Agencies Accessed A Photographer's Records" 950:"First Amendment Audits and How to Respond β€’ California Association of Labor Relations Officers" 383:"First Amendment Audits and How to Respond β€’ California Association of Labor Relations Officers" 165:
and pressures government agencies to train their employees to respect First Amendment rights.
275: 1283: 8: 1579:"McManus: YouTubers confronting officers use first amendment as 'guise' to attack police" 704:"Online group gives Foxboro Police Dept. high marks on preserving First Amendment rights" 304:
first amendment auditor Christopher J. Cordova, operating under the YouTube channel of "
1486: 1118:"They roam public buildings, making videos. Terrorism experts say they may be dangerous" 1117: 899: 789:"Lawmaker Who Pushed Bill to Protect People Filming Police Arrested for Filming Police" 287:
delivered a decision in favor of an auditor on similar grounds, holding in the case of
219: 39: 878: 554: 162: 1312:"Responding to First Amendment Audits: Is Filming Protected by the First Amendment?" 325: 258: 236: 1258: 1093:
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/2-men-entered-police-station-rifle-audit-response/
574: 1190: 521: 194: 158: 105: 73: 50: 491:"Filming in Public: How should the police respond to UK Auditors? β€” Police Hour" 93: 89: 517:"YouTuber gets police payout after stop and search for filming police station" 1619: 1042:"Courting arrest for online clicks and the First Amendment - ExpressNews.com" 872:
Panzar, Javier; Reyes-Velarde, Alejandra; Queally, James (15 February 2019).
31: 953: 874:"YouTube personality 'Furry Potato' shot and wounded outside L.A. synagogue" 775:"Blind Justice escorted out of meeting by police in latest free speech test" 390: 628:"Cop-watchers are now YouTube celebrities. They've changed how police work" 54: 1390:"First Amendment Protects The Right To Film Cops, Federal Court Reaffirms" 968:"You're on camera: How police should respond to a 'First Amendment audit'" 754:"Online activists' 'First Amendment audits' -- patriotism or provocation?" 1095:
Story about second amendment auditors who behaved the same essential way.
85: 1217:"Responding to First Amendment "Audits" in the Local Government Context" 730:. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. 2019-01-09. Archived from 58: 1436:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66664962/united-states-v-cordova/
1424:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66664962/united-states-v-cordova/
35: 926:"See Boulder Jail Cops Bust Men for Taking Video on Public Sidewalk" 1070:"What is 'auditing,' and why did a YouTuber get shot for doing it?" 1013:"First Amendment videotaped audit of police leads to investigation" 543:"Π‘Π»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Ρ€ MrRissso снял ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎ с рязанскими гаишниками" 362: 121: 77: 549:. October 14, 2019. Archived from the original on August 15, 2020. 466:"A group who claims to care about free speech harasses the Weekly" 600:"Earl David Worden: Another Case of Videographers vs. the Police" 1167:"Alabama Cop Snatches Camera from Man Recording Police Station" 900:"How a team of YouTubers went to war with a Texas police chief" 836:"Viral video of Ohio police causes outrage, crashes phone line" 855:"Man Recording Police Files Complaint After Officer Draws Gun" 295: 1238:"American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. Anita Alvarez" 445:"The Insane New Path to YouTube Fame: Taunt Cops and Film It" 157:
Auditors believe that the movement promotes transparency and
49:
Auditors believe that the movement promotes transparency and
1460:"Public Recording of Police Activities; Instructor's Guide" 728:"Candid Cameras: How to Respond to a First Amendment Audit" 142: 72:
Self-styled Auditors typically travel to places considered
1526:"Court: First Amendment protects profanity against police" 871: 1215:
Nickodem, Kristi; Wilson, Kristina (November 9, 2022).
319: 678:"It didn't have to be this way - The Wetumpka Herald" 23:
Thumbnail of a First Amendment audit video on YouTube
201: 387:California Association of Labor Relations Officers 1631:First Amendment to the United States Constitution 1487:"Richard GRAYNED, Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCKFORD" 257:probation facilities. It is a violation of one's 1617: 654:"GPD sergeant indicted in videographer's arrest" 1555:The City of San Antonio - Official City Website 412:""First Amendment Audits" Coming to Your Town?" 324:Numerous court cases, most notably the case of 161:. They argue that auditing raises awareness of 1214: 1502:"Everyone Has the Right to Mouth Off to Cops" 1467:International Association of Chiefs of Police 1446:Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) 147:International Association of Chiefs of Police 1596:"Local YouTuber speaks out after conviction" 296:The United States v. Christopher J. Cordova 1626:Freedom of expression in the United States 1593: 751: 514: 285:U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 348:and verbally attacking police officers". 280:U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 206:The rights cited typically in audits are 1309: 701: 651: 488: 84:, or places open to the public, such as 18: 1576: 1140: 1064: 1062: 923: 652:WILLIAMS, SCOTT E. (13 February 2016). 1618: 1499: 1316:Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law 442: 136: 1454: 1452: 1333: 1331: 1305: 1303: 852: 702:Peterson, Stephen (20 October 2019). 622: 620: 463: 214:in the First Amendment, freedom from 1059: 438: 436: 434: 432: 1387: 320:Time, place and manner restrictions 229: 226:of the United States Constitution. 13: 1449: 1328: 1300: 617: 575:"Uptick in First Amendment Audits" 331:Grayned v. City of Rockford (1972) 216:unreasonable searches and seizures 14: 1657: 515:Brinkworth, Alison (2021-08-16). 429: 218:in the Fourth Amendment, and the 202:Legal status in the United States 1594:Caltabiano, David (2019-03-10). 952:. 24 August 2017. Archived from 853:Heinz, Frank (6 February 2018). 752:Mikelionis, Lukas (2019-02-16). 16:Largely American social movement 1570: 1543: 1518: 1500:Denvir, Daniel (24 July 2015). 1493: 1479: 1440: 1429: 1417: 1406: 1381: 1356: 1310:Nickodem, Kristi (2022-11-14). 1276: 1251: 1230: 1208: 1183: 1159: 1141:Cushing, Tim (August 5, 2014). 1134: 1110: 1098: 1086: 1034: 1005: 978: 960: 942: 924:Roberts, Michael (2019-02-05). 917: 892: 865: 846: 828: 799: 781: 767: 745: 720: 695: 670: 645: 489:Sherwood, Trevor (2021-02-17). 1577:Ramirez, Quixem (2019-03-06). 1245:United States Court of Appeals 592: 567: 535: 508: 482: 457: 404: 375: 264: 1: 1224:Local Government Law Bulletin 368: 1646:Criticism of law enforcement 1019:. 2015-03-26. Archived from 813:. 2018-04-10. Archived from 389:. 2017-08-24. Archived from 168: 131: 67: 7: 579:American Libraries Magazine 443:Sommer, Will (2019-01-24). 351: 10: 1662: 1171:Photography is Not a Crime 464:Rubin, Sara (2023-05-18). 358:Photography Is Not a Crime 338: 187:sovereign citizen movement 152: 115: 1107:Fifth paragraph of story. 986:"PROP Instructor's Guide" 559:: CS1 maint: unfit URL ( 302:United States vs. Cordova 1641:Internet-based activism 859:NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth 1288:The Free Speech Center 470:Monterey County Weekly 220:right to remain silent 28:First Amendment audits 24: 22: 300:In the 2022 case of 212:freedom of the press 82:public right-of-ways 682:The Wetumpka Herald 306:Denver Metro Audits 137:Government response 1636:Citizen journalism 1284:"Misappropriation" 1195:ACLU Massachusetts 1191:"Glik v. Cunniffe" 271:U.S. Supreme Court 40:citizen journalism 25: 1530:The Seattle Times 1259:"ACLU v. Alvarez" 879:Los Angeles Times 708:The Sun Chronicle 208:freedom of speech 163:police misconduct 1653: 1610: 1609: 1607: 1606: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1574: 1568: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1547: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1537: 1522: 1516: 1515: 1513: 1512: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1483: 1477: 1476: 1474: 1473: 1464: 1456: 1447: 1444: 1438: 1433: 1427: 1421: 1415: 1410: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1400: 1385: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1360: 1354: 1353: 1351: 1350: 1335: 1326: 1325: 1323: 1322: 1307: 1298: 1297: 1295: 1294: 1280: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1270: 1263:ACLU of Illinois 1255: 1249: 1248: 1242: 1234: 1228: 1227: 1221: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1187: 1181: 1180: 1178: 1177: 1163: 1157: 1156: 1154: 1153: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1114: 1108: 1102: 1096: 1090: 1084: 1083: 1081: 1080: 1066: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1053: 1038: 1032: 1031: 1029: 1028: 1009: 1003: 1002: 1000: 999: 990: 982: 976: 975: 964: 958: 957: 946: 940: 939: 937: 936: 921: 915: 914: 912: 911: 896: 890: 889: 887: 886: 869: 863: 862: 850: 844: 843: 842:. 14 March 2018. 832: 826: 825: 823: 822: 803: 797: 796: 785: 779: 778: 771: 765: 764: 762: 761: 749: 743: 742: 740: 739: 724: 718: 717: 715: 714: 699: 693: 692: 690: 689: 674: 668: 667: 665: 664: 649: 643: 642: 640: 639: 624: 615: 614: 612: 611: 596: 590: 589: 587: 586: 571: 565: 564: 558: 550: 539: 533: 532: 530: 529: 512: 506: 505: 503: 502: 493:. Archived from 486: 480: 479: 477: 476: 461: 455: 454: 452: 451: 440: 427: 426: 424: 423: 408: 402: 401: 399: 398: 379: 326:Glik v. Cunniffe 289:Irizarry v Yehia 259:publicity rights 237:Glik v. Cunniffe 230:Public recording 106:perceived crimes 94:public libraries 1661: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1604: 1602: 1587: 1585: 1575: 1571: 1559: 1557: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1535: 1533: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1510: 1508: 1498: 1494: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1471: 1469: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1450: 1445: 1441: 1434: 1430: 1422: 1418: 1411: 1407: 1398: 1396: 1388:Sibilla, Nick. 1386: 1382: 1373: 1371: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1348: 1346: 1337: 1336: 1329: 1320: 1318: 1308: 1301: 1292: 1290: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1268: 1266: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1240: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1219: 1213: 1209: 1200: 1198: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1175: 1173: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1151: 1149: 1139: 1135: 1126: 1124: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1103: 1099: 1091: 1087: 1078: 1076: 1074:Washington Post 1068: 1067: 1060: 1051: 1049: 1046:expressnews.com 1040: 1039: 1035: 1026: 1024: 1011: 1010: 1006: 997: 995: 988: 984: 983: 979: 966: 965: 961: 948: 947: 943: 934: 932: 922: 918: 909: 907: 898: 897: 893: 884: 882: 870: 866: 851: 847: 834: 833: 829: 820: 818: 805: 804: 800: 787: 786: 782: 773: 772: 768: 759: 757: 750: 746: 737: 735: 726: 725: 721: 712: 710: 700: 696: 687: 685: 676: 675: 671: 662: 660: 650: 646: 637: 635: 632:Washington Post 626: 625: 618: 609: 607: 598: 597: 593: 584: 582: 573: 572: 568: 552: 551: 541: 540: 536: 527: 525: 522:Birmingham Live 513: 509: 500: 498: 487: 483: 474: 472: 462: 458: 449: 447: 441: 430: 421: 419: 410: 409: 405: 396: 394: 381: 380: 376: 371: 354: 341: 322: 298: 267: 251:ACLU v. Alvarez 232: 224:Fifth Amendment 204: 195:The Daily Beast 171: 159:open government 155: 139: 134: 118: 90:police stations 74:public property 70: 51:open government 44:First Amendment 17: 12: 11: 5: 1659: 1649: 1648: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1612: 1611: 1569: 1542: 1517: 1492: 1478: 1448: 1439: 1428: 1416: 1405: 1380: 1355: 1327: 1299: 1275: 1250: 1229: 1207: 1182: 1158: 1133: 1109: 1097: 1085: 1058: 1033: 1004: 977: 959: 956:on 2020-02-06. 941: 916: 891: 864: 845: 827: 798: 780: 766: 744: 719: 694: 669: 658:The Daily News 644: 616: 591: 566: 534: 507: 481: 456: 428: 403: 373: 372: 370: 367: 366: 365: 360: 353: 350: 340: 337: 321: 318: 297: 294: 276:Jacques Wiener 266: 263: 231: 228: 203: 200: 170: 167: 154: 151: 138: 135: 133: 130: 117: 114: 69: 66: 30:are a largely 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1658: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1621: 1601: 1597: 1584: 1580: 1573: 1566: 1556: 1552: 1546: 1531: 1527: 1521: 1507: 1503: 1496: 1488: 1482: 1468: 1461: 1455: 1453: 1443: 1437: 1432: 1425: 1420: 1414: 1409: 1395: 1391: 1384: 1369: 1365: 1359: 1344: 1340: 1334: 1332: 1317: 1313: 1306: 1304: 1289: 1285: 1279: 1264: 1260: 1254: 1247:. 8 May 2012. 1246: 1239: 1233: 1225: 1218: 1211: 1196: 1192: 1186: 1172: 1168: 1162: 1148: 1144: 1137: 1123: 1119: 1113: 1106: 1101: 1094: 1089: 1075: 1071: 1065: 1063: 1047: 1043: 1037: 1023:on 2019-01-16 1022: 1018: 1014: 1008: 994: 987: 981: 974:. 2 May 2018. 973: 969: 963: 955: 951: 945: 931: 927: 920: 905: 904:The Daily Dot 901: 895: 881: 880: 875: 868: 860: 856: 849: 841: 837: 831: 817:on 2018-09-13 816: 812: 808: 802: 795:. 2016-09-30. 794: 793:The Intercept 790: 784: 777:. 2019-02-05. 776: 770: 755: 748: 734:on 2019-07-09 733: 729: 723: 709: 705: 698: 683: 679: 673: 659: 655: 648: 633: 629: 623: 621: 605: 601: 595: 580: 576: 570: 562: 556: 548: 544: 538: 524: 523: 518: 511: 497:on 2021-11-17 496: 492: 485: 471: 467: 460: 446: 439: 437: 435: 433: 417: 413: 407: 393:on 2019-01-24 392: 388: 384: 378: 374: 364: 361: 359: 356: 355: 349: 345: 344:themselves." 336: 333: 332: 327: 317: 313: 309: 307: 303: 293: 290: 286: 281: 277: 272: 262: 260: 254: 252: 247: 243: 239: 238: 227: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 199: 197: 196: 190: 188: 184: 179: 175: 166: 164: 160: 150: 148: 144: 129: 126: 123: 113: 109: 107: 102: 97: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 65: 62: 60: 56: 52: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 21: 1603:. Retrieved 1599: 1586:. Retrieved 1582: 1572: 1564: 1558:. Retrieved 1554: 1545: 1534:. Retrieved 1532:. 2015-06-25 1529: 1520: 1509:. Retrieved 1505: 1495: 1481: 1470:. Retrieved 1466: 1442: 1431: 1419: 1408: 1397:. Retrieved 1393: 1383: 1372:. Retrieved 1370:. 2022-07-11 1367: 1358: 1347:. Retrieved 1345:. 2017-12-17 1342: 1319:. Retrieved 1315: 1291:. Retrieved 1287: 1278: 1267:. Retrieved 1265:. 2011-01-05 1262: 1253: 1244: 1232: 1223: 1210: 1199:. Retrieved 1197:. 2015-06-21 1194: 1185: 1174:. Retrieved 1170: 1161: 1150:. Retrieved 1146: 1136: 1125:. Retrieved 1121: 1112: 1100: 1088: 1077:. Retrieved 1073: 1050:. Retrieved 1048:. 2018-07-10 1045: 1036: 1025:. Retrieved 1021:the original 1017:WS Chronicle 1016: 1007: 996:. Retrieved 992: 980: 971: 962: 954:the original 944: 933:. Retrieved 929: 919: 908:. Retrieved 906:. 2018-12-31 903: 894: 883:. Retrieved 877: 867: 858: 848: 839: 830: 819:. Retrieved 815:the original 810: 801: 792: 783: 769: 758:. Retrieved 747: 736:. Retrieved 732:the original 722: 711:. Retrieved 707: 697: 686:. Retrieved 684:. 2016-06-12 681: 672: 661:. Retrieved 657: 647: 636:. Retrieved 634:. 2023-08-07 631: 608:. Retrieved 606:. 2017-02-21 603: 594: 583:. Retrieved 581:. 2022-01-03 578: 569: 546: 537: 526:. Retrieved 520: 510: 499:. Retrieved 495:the original 484: 473:. Retrieved 469: 459: 448:. Retrieved 420:. Retrieved 418:. 2018-06-18 415: 406: 395:. Retrieved 391:the original 386: 377: 346: 342: 330: 323: 314: 310: 305: 301: 299: 288: 268: 255: 250: 235: 233: 205: 193: 191: 183:openly carry 180: 176: 172: 156: 140: 127: 119: 110: 100: 98: 86:post offices 71: 63: 55:intimidation 48: 27: 26: 993:theiacp.org 604:Mimesis Law 265:Legal cases 1620:Categories 1605:2019-03-11 1588:2019-03-11 1560:2019-03-11 1536:2019-03-11 1511:2019-03-11 1472:2019-02-16 1399:2023-09-25 1374:2023-09-25 1368:Reason.com 1349:2019-06-20 1343:Reason.com 1321:2023-12-10 1293:2023-12-10 1269:2019-02-19 1201:2020-04-19 1176:2019-03-19 1152:2019-03-19 1127:2019-01-22 1122:kansascity 1079:2019-02-16 1052:2019-01-22 1027:2019-02-19 998:2019-02-16 935:2019-02-21 910:2019-02-16 885:2019-02-17 821:2018-09-12 760:2019-02-19 756:. Fox News 738:2019-02-19 713:2019-11-14 688:2019-02-19 663:2019-02-19 638:2023-12-10 610:2019-02-19 585:2023-01-08 528:2021-11-17 501:2021-11-17 475:2023-12-10 450:2019-03-11 422:2019-02-19 397:2019-02-19 369:References 283:2022, the 269:While the 120:In a 2019 76:, such as 59:harassment 1506:Bloomberg 1226:(141): 4. 972:PoliceOne 169:Criticism 143:SWAT team 132:Reactions 78:sidewalks 68:Procedure 1147:Techdirt 930:Westword 811:witf.org 555:cite web 363:Copwatch 352:See also 122:Fox News 101:official 36:activism 32:American 1426:Part 31 547:YA62.RU 339:Insults 278:of the 222:in the 153:Support 116:Purpose 1394:Forbes 246:Fourth 1463:(PDF) 1241:(PDF) 1220:(PDF) 989:(PDF) 416:CIRSA 242:First 1600:WOAI 1583:KTXS 840:WKBN 561:link 244:and 210:and 57:and 38:and 80:or 1622:: 1598:. 1581:. 1563:. 1553:. 1528:. 1504:. 1465:. 1451:^ 1392:. 1366:. 1341:. 1330:^ 1314:. 1302:^ 1286:. 1261:. 1243:. 1222:. 1193:. 1169:. 1145:. 1120:. 1072:. 1061:^ 1044:. 1015:. 991:. 970:. 928:. 902:. 876:. 857:. 838:. 809:. 791:. 706:. 680:. 656:. 630:. 619:^ 602:. 577:. 557:}} 553:{{ 545:. 519:. 468:. 431:^ 414:. 385:. 108:. 92:, 88:, 1608:. 1591:. 1539:. 1514:. 1489:. 1475:. 1402:. 1377:. 1352:. 1324:. 1296:. 1272:. 1204:. 1179:. 1155:. 1130:. 1082:. 1055:. 1030:. 1001:. 938:. 913:. 888:. 861:. 824:. 763:. 741:. 716:. 691:. 666:. 641:. 613:. 588:. 563:) 531:. 504:. 478:. 453:. 425:. 400:.

Index


American
activism
citizen journalism
First Amendment
open government
intimidation
harassment
public property
sidewalks
public right-of-ways
post offices
police stations
public libraries
perceived crimes
Fox News
SWAT team
International Association of Chiefs of Police
open government
police misconduct
openly carry
sovereign citizen movement
The Daily Beast
freedom of speech
freedom of the press
unreasonable searches and seizures
right to remain silent
Fifth Amendment
Glik v. Cunniffe
First

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑