Knowledge

Fernandez v. California

Source đź“ť

301:
Believing that Fernandez may have assaulted his girlfriend, police attempted to separate the two. Fernandez refused to follow the police's directive to step away from his girlfriend and yelled "You don't have a right to come in here. I know my rights." The officers soon realized that Fernandez was the suspect in the gang-related assault and arrested him for that crime. About an hour later the police came back to ask Fernandez's girlfriend for consent to search the apartment, which she gave. Fernandez later challenged the lawfulness of this third-party consent. Counsel to Fernandez were attorneys
31: 279:
control for most purposes, so that it is reasonable to recognize that any of the co-inhabitants has the right to permit the inspection in his own right and that the others have assumed the risk that one of their number might permit the common area to be searched. Then they arrested him.” In essence the court decided that any one person who is a “joint occupant” can consent to a police search of the shared residence, without a search warrant. In
278:
the U.S. Supreme Court laid out the so-called "co-occupant consent rule". This rule means that anyone who has "common authority" over the home can consent to a search of the home. The Supreme Court defined "common authority" as “mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or
313:
By a vote of six to three, the Court ruled that the search which followed the arrest of defendant Fernandez did not violate the Constitution, because Fernandez was no longer physically there and had been removed for fair reasons. Respect for the girlfriend's independent voluntary consent requires
300:
When police arrived at Fernandez's apartment, they believed a suspect in a gang-related assault had just entered. While approaching the apartment they heard screaming and fighting occurring inside. Police knocked on the apartment's door, which was answered by Fernandez's bloodied girlfriend.
1294: 314:
that it be honored. The three dissenting judges argued that the girlfriend had been pressured into consenting, and that police should have gotten a search warrant once they knew Fernandez objected to the search.
291:
the court decided that when co-occupants who are disagreeing whether to let the police search their dwelling the police can't conduct a search, if a "physically present" co-occupant objects that search.
391: 100:
When a resident who objects to the search of his dwelling is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.
2849: 245:
however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.
2120: 2705: 1254: 420: 79: 512: 218: 1188: 867: 2854: 2026: 2018: 623: 1967: 2844: 2066: 1415: 2473: 503: 338: 2839: 2163: 2034: 1938: 467: 1699: 392:"Opinion analysis: The Court narrowly limits a precedent allowing co-occupant objections to warrantless consent searches" 2679: 2630: 35: 2206: 751: 631: 1922: 1906: 241:, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. 1946: 1100: 2334: 2050: 1975: 1930: 788: 2531: 2214: 1051: 663: 361: 2128: 639: 496: 2058: 1716: 851: 551: 2361: 1831: 804: 575: 2590: 1764: 1740: 1732: 1708: 1570: 1517: 1442: 1369: 1350: 995: 979: 559: 475: 440: 2523: 1885: 1615: 1525: 1011: 899: 263: 2773: 2550: 2182: 2074: 1897: 1799: 1606: 1286: 1212: 1204: 1180: 1132: 875: 827: 716: 708: 615: 591: 489: 2465: 2280: 2002: 1914: 1594: 1466: 1156: 1140: 1019: 907: 780: 647: 599: 2649: 2515: 2353: 2010: 1839: 1663: 1639: 1533: 1315: 942: 891: 743: 724: 607: 583: 567: 543: 424: 74: 2765: 2562: 2506: 2299: 2093: 1724: 1647: 1586: 1509: 1278: 1072: 771: 699: 655: 481: 8: 2485: 2406: 2382: 2373: 2318: 2264: 1983: 1815: 1780: 1687: 1671: 1631: 1623: 1561: 1541: 1490: 1164: 1035: 1027: 671: 269: 237: 143: 431: 2617: 2198: 2190: 2042: 1877: 1748: 1458: 1450: 1390: 1381: 1306: 1270: 1262: 1196: 1124: 1108: 883: 449: 232: 63: 2800: 2494: 2449: 2222: 2112: 1958: 1655: 1482: 1043: 1003: 934: 796: 302: 2808: 2757: 2414: 2390: 2272: 2155: 1858: 1823: 1679: 1578: 1474: 1434: 1331: 1220: 1172: 1148: 987: 915: 859: 759: 679: 2687: 2641: 2598: 2571: 2398: 2326: 2147: 1772: 1756: 687: 159: 135: 131: 2711: 1807: 1323: 1116: 967: 835: 147: 123: 2833: 1241: 1092: 1071: 843: 2781: 155: 115: 458: 167: 1076: 86: 1080: 339:"Fernandez v. California and the problem of third-party consent" 30: 511: 184:
Alito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer
2850:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
1414: 476:
SCOTUSblog Coverage of Fernandez v. California (2014)
385: 383: 381: 379: 253: 1189:Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada 525: 376: 2831: 2739: 332: 330: 328: 326: 2027:National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab 497: 1968:Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz 323: 2067:Safford Unified School District v. Redding 504: 490: 362:"Five thoughts on Fernandez v. California" 54:Walter Fernandez, Petitioner v. California 2019:Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Ass'n 624:Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Ass'n 308: 261:is governed by two cases: The 1974 case 2474:Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States 2855:United States Fourth Amendment case law 2164:Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders 1240: 468:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived) 2832: 2457: 389: 2738: 2437: 2245: 2086:Property of probationers and parolees 2035:Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton 1939:United States v. Montoya De Hernandez 1413: 1239: 1070: 965: 524: 485: 18:2014 United States Supreme Court case 2292:Seizure of premises awaiting warrant 359: 336: 208:Ginsburg, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan 13: 2680:Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents 1362:Warrants directed at third parties 966: 390:Little, Rory (February 25, 2014). 295: 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2866: 2845:United States Supreme Court cases 2207:County of Riverside v. McLaughlin 1995:Students, employees, and patients 1792:Breathalyzers, blood samples, DNA 1416:Exceptions to warrant requirement 752:Dow Chemical Co. v. United States 632:United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 427:292 (2014) is available from: 409: 283:the Court limited the holding of 235:case that explored the limits of 2257:Distinguishing stops and arrests 1923:United States v. Martinez-Fuerte 1907:Almeida-Sanchez v. United States 360:Kerr, Orin (February 26, 2014). 254:Supreme Court Case law precedent 29: 2750:Unreasonable search and seizure 1947:United States v. Flores-Montano 1343:Neutral and detached magistrate 1101:United States v. Brignoni-Ponce 337:Kerr, Orin (November 6, 2013). 248: 2840:2013 in United States case law 2051:Ferguson v. City of Charleston 1976:City of Indianapolis v. Edmond 1295:Los Angeles County v. Rettelle 513:United States Fourth Amendment 353: 1: 2346:Detention during vehicle stop 2215:Atwater v. City of Lago Vista 2140:Searches in jails and prisons 1052:District of Columbia v. Wesby 526:Scope of the Fourth Amendment 317: 231:, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), was a 2740:Incorporation against States 2438: 2311:Detention incident to search 2246: 2129:City of Los Angeles v. Patel 7: 2059:Board of Education v. Earls 1717:United States v. Rabinowitz 1700:Searches incident to arrest 852:United States v. Mendenhall 10: 2871: 2362:Rodriguez v. United States 2105:Administrative inspections 1832:Birchfield v. North Dakota 805:Carpenter v. United States 576:Silverman v. United States 459:Oyez (oral argument audio) 2792: 2749: 2745: 2734: 2698: 2671: 2664: 2628: 2609: 2591:Wong Sun v. United States 2582: 2561: 2542: 2505: 2484: 2448: 2444: 2433: 2372: 2345: 2310: 2291: 2256: 2252: 2241: 2174: 2139: 2121:Camara v. Municipal Court 2104: 2085: 1994: 1957: 1896: 1869: 1850: 1791: 1765:Thornton v. United States 1741:United States v. Chadwick 1733:United States v. Robinson 1709:Trupiano v. United States 1698: 1605: 1571:Coolidge v. New Hampshire 1560: 1518:Schneckloth v. Bustamonte 1501: 1443:United States v. Chadwick 1426: 1422: 1409: 1380: 1370:Zurcher v. Stanford Daily 1361: 1351:Coolidge v. New Hampshire 1342: 1305: 1249: 1235: 1087: 1066: 996:Spinelli v. United States 980:Brinegar v. United States 974: 961: 927:Fourth Amendment standing 926: 819: 770: 735: 698: 560:Olmstead v. United States 535: 531: 520: 217: 212: 204: 196: 188: 180: 175: 109: 104: 99: 94: 69: 59: 49: 45:Decided February 25, 2014 42: 28: 23: 2524:Herring v. United States 1886:South Dakota v. Opperman 1616:Carroll v. United States 1526:United States v. Matlock 1255:Johnson v. United States 1077:Investigative detentions 1012:Ornelas v. United States 900:United States v. Drayton 264:United States v. Matlock 43:Argued November 13, 2013 2774:Elkins v. United States 2551:Murray v. United States 2335:Bailey v. United States 2183:United States v. Watson 2075:City of Ontario v. Quon 1931:United States v. Ramsey 1800:Schmerber v. California 1550:Fernandez v. California 1287:United States v. Grubbs 1213:Heien v. North Carolina 1205:Navarette v. California 1181:United States v. Arvizu 1133:United States v. Cortez 876:California v. Hodari D. 828:Counselman v. Hitchcock 789:United States v. Miller 717:Oliver v. United States 709:Hester v. United States 616:California v. Greenwood 592:United States v. Knotts 417:Fernandez v. California 259:Fernandez v. California 228:Fernandez v. California 24:Fernandez v. California 2532:Davis v. United States 2466:Weeks v. United States 2281:United States v. Place 2003:New Jersey v. T. L. O. 1915:United States v. Ortiz 1595:Minnesota v. Dickerson 1467:Brigham City v. Stuart 1157:Minnesota v. Dickerson 1141:United States v. Place 1020:Whren v. United States 908:Brendlin v. California 781:United States v. White 664:United States v. Jones 648:Kyllo v. United States 600:United States v. Place 309:Supreme Court decision 2650:Kimmelman v. Morrison 2516:United States v. Leon 2486:Impeachment exception 2354:Pennsylvania v. Mimms 1840:Mitchell v. Wisconsin 1664:California v. Acevedo 1640:United States v. Ross 1534:Illinois v. Rodriguez 1427:Exigent circumstances 1316:Boyd v. United States 943:Byrd v. United States 892:Soldal v. Cook County 820:Definition of seizure 744:California v. Ciraolo 725:United States v. Dunn 640:Bond v. United States 608:United States v. Karo 584:Katz v. United States 568:Abel v. United States 544:Boyd v. United States 219:U.S. Const. amend. IV 85:134 S. Ct. 1126, 188 2793:Warrant requirements 2766:Rochin v. California 2563:Inevitable discovery 2507:Good-faith exception 2300:Illinois v. McArthur 2094:Samson v. California 1725:Chimel v. California 1648:California v. Carney 1587:Horton v. California 1510:Stoner v. California 1279:Maryland v. Garrison 1073:Reasonable suspicion 772:Third-party doctrine 700:Open-fields doctrine 656:Illinois v. Caballes 552:United States v. Lee 536:Definition of search 89:25, 82 U.S.L.W. 4102 2407:Plumhoff v. Rickard 2383:Tennessee v. Garner 2319:Michigan v. Summers 2265:Dunaway v. New York 2175:Warrantless arrests 1984:Illinois v. Lidster 1816:Missouri v. McNeely 1781:Riley v. California 1688:Collins v. Virginia 1672:Wyoming v. Houghton 1632:Arkansas v. Sanders 1624:Chambers v. Maroney 1542:Georgia v. Randolph 1491:Lange v. California 1165:Illinois v. Wardlow 1036:Devenpeck v. Alford 1028:Maryland v. Pringle 736:Aerial surveillance 672:Florida v. Jardines 305:and Gerald Peters. 281:Georgia v. Randolph 270:Georgia v. Randolph 238:Georgia v. Randolph 144:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2618:Hudson v. Michigan 2543:Independent source 2199:Welsh v. Wisconsin 2191:Payton v. New York 2043:Chandler v. Miller 2011:O'Connor v. Ortega 1878:Cady v. Dombrowski 1870:Inventory searches 1749:New York v. Belton 1459:Welsh v. Wisconsin 1451:Payton v. New York 1391:Wilson v. Arkansas 1382:Knock-and-announce 1307:Mere evidence rule 1271:Ybarra v. Illinois 1263:Franks v. Delaware 1197:Arizona v. Johnson 1125:Ybarra v. Illinois 1109:Delaware v. Prouse 884:Florida v. Bostick 267:and the 2005 case 233:U.S. Supreme Court 120:Associate Justices 2827: 2826: 2823: 2822: 2819: 2818: 2801:Ker v. California 2730: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2660: 2659: 2610:No-knock searches 2495:James v. Illinois 2450:Exclusionary rule 2429: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2237: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2223:Virginia v. Moore 2113:Frank v. Maryland 1851:Protective sweeps 1656:Florida v. Jimeno 1483:Caniglia v. Strom 1405: 1404: 1401: 1400: 1231: 1230: 1062: 1061: 1044:Florida v. Harris 1004:Illinois v. Gates 957: 956: 953: 952: 935:Rakas v. Illinois 815: 814: 797:Smith v. Maryland 224: 223: 2862: 2809:Aguilar v. Texas 2758:Wolf v. Colorado 2747: 2746: 2736: 2735: 2706:42 U.S.C. § 1983 2669: 2668: 2455: 2454: 2446: 2445: 2435: 2434: 2415:Mullenix v. Luna 2391:Graham v. Connor 2273:Florida v. Royer 2254: 2253: 2243: 2242: 2156:Hudson v. Palmer 1859:Maryland v. Buie 1824:Maryland v. King 1680:Florida v. White 1607:Vehicle searches 1579:Arizona v. Hicks 1502:Consent searches 1475:Kentucky v. King 1435:Warden v. Hayden 1424: 1423: 1411: 1410: 1332:Warden v. Hayden 1303: 1302: 1237: 1236: 1221:Kansas v. Glover 1173:Florida v. J. L. 1149:Michigan v. Long 1068: 1067: 988:Aguilar v. Texas 963: 962: 916:Torres v. Madrid 860:Florida v. Royer 760:Florida v. Riley 696: 695: 680:Klayman v. Obama 533: 532: 522: 521: 506: 499: 492: 483: 482: 472: 466: 463: 457: 454: 448: 445: 439: 436: 430: 404: 403: 401: 399: 387: 374: 373: 371: 369: 357: 351: 350: 348: 346: 334: 272:(GA v. Randolph) 105:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 20: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2815: 2788: 2741: 2718: 2694: 2688:Egbert v. Boule 2656: 2642:Stone v. Powell 2624: 2605: 2599:Utah v. Strieff 2578: 2572:Nix v. Williams 2557: 2538: 2501: 2480: 2440: 2421: 2399:Scott v. Harris 2374:Excessive force 2368: 2341: 2327:Muehler v. Mena 2306: 2287: 2248: 2229: 2170: 2148:Bell v. Wolfish 2135: 2100: 2081: 1990: 1953: 1898:Border searches 1892: 1865: 1846: 1787: 1773:Arizona v. Gant 1757:Knowles v. Iowa 1694: 1601: 1556: 1497: 1418: 1397: 1376: 1357: 1338: 1301: 1245: 1227: 1083: 1058: 970: 949: 922: 811: 766: 731: 694: 688:ACLU v. Clapper 527: 516: 510: 470: 464: 461: 455: 452: 446: 443: 437: 434: 428: 412: 407: 397: 395: 388: 377: 367: 365: 358: 354: 344: 342: 335: 324: 320: 311: 298: 296:Case background 256: 251: 160:Sonia Sotomayor 158: 146: 136:Clarence Thomas 134: 132:Anthony Kennedy 90: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2868: 2858: 2857: 2852: 2847: 2842: 2825: 2824: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2816: 2814: 2813: 2805: 2796: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2787: 2786: 2778: 2770: 2762: 2753: 2751: 2743: 2742: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2717: 2716: 2712:Monroe v. Pape 2708: 2702: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2693: 2692: 2684: 2675: 2673: 2666: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2655: 2654: 2646: 2637: 2635: 2626: 2625: 2623: 2622: 2613: 2611: 2607: 2606: 2604: 2603: 2595: 2586: 2584: 2580: 2579: 2577: 2576: 2567: 2565: 2559: 2558: 2556: 2555: 2546: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2537: 2536: 2528: 2520: 2511: 2509: 2503: 2502: 2500: 2499: 2490: 2488: 2482: 2481: 2479: 2478: 2470: 2461: 2459: 2452: 2442: 2441: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2420: 2419: 2411: 2403: 2395: 2387: 2378: 2376: 2370: 2369: 2367: 2366: 2358: 2349: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2340: 2339: 2331: 2323: 2314: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2305: 2304: 2295: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2286: 2285: 2277: 2269: 2260: 2258: 2250: 2249: 2239: 2238: 2235: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2228: 2227: 2219: 2211: 2203: 2195: 2187: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2169: 2168: 2160: 2152: 2143: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2134: 2133: 2125: 2117: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2098: 2089: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2080: 2079: 2071: 2063: 2055: 2047: 2039: 2031: 2023: 2015: 2007: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1989: 1988: 1980: 1972: 1963: 1961: 1955: 1954: 1952: 1951: 1943: 1935: 1927: 1919: 1911: 1902: 1900: 1894: 1893: 1891: 1890: 1882: 1873: 1871: 1867: 1866: 1864: 1863: 1854: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1845: 1844: 1836: 1828: 1820: 1812: 1808:Cupp v. Murphy 1804: 1795: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1786: 1785: 1777: 1769: 1761: 1753: 1745: 1737: 1729: 1721: 1713: 1704: 1702: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1692: 1684: 1676: 1668: 1660: 1652: 1644: 1636: 1628: 1620: 1611: 1609: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1591: 1583: 1575: 1566: 1564: 1558: 1557: 1555: 1554: 1546: 1538: 1530: 1522: 1514: 1505: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1496: 1495: 1487: 1479: 1471: 1463: 1455: 1447: 1439: 1430: 1428: 1420: 1419: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1395: 1386: 1384: 1378: 1377: 1375: 1374: 1365: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1355: 1346: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1337: 1336: 1328: 1324:Hale v. Henkel 1320: 1311: 1309: 1300: 1299: 1291: 1283: 1275: 1267: 1259: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1228: 1226: 1225: 1217: 1209: 1201: 1193: 1185: 1177: 1169: 1161: 1153: 1145: 1137: 1129: 1121: 1117:Brown v. Texas 1113: 1105: 1097: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1048: 1040: 1032: 1024: 1016: 1008: 1000: 992: 984: 975: 972: 971: 968:Probable cause 959: 958: 955: 954: 951: 950: 948: 947: 939: 930: 928: 924: 923: 921: 920: 912: 904: 896: 888: 880: 872: 868:INS v. Delgado 864: 856: 848: 840: 836:Hale v. Henkel 832: 823: 821: 817: 816: 813: 812: 810: 809: 801: 793: 785: 776: 774: 768: 767: 765: 764: 756: 748: 739: 737: 733: 732: 730: 729: 721: 713: 704: 702: 693: 692: 684: 676: 668: 660: 652: 644: 636: 628: 620: 612: 604: 596: 588: 580: 572: 564: 556: 548: 539: 537: 529: 528: 518: 517: 509: 508: 501: 494: 486: 480: 479: 473: 441:Google Scholar 411: 410:External links 408: 406: 405: 375: 352: 321: 319: 316: 310: 307: 297: 294: 255: 252: 250: 247: 222: 221: 215: 214: 210: 209: 206: 202: 201: 198: 194: 193: 190: 186: 185: 182: 178: 177: 173: 172: 171: 170: 148:Stephen Breyer 124:Antonin Scalia 121: 118: 113: 107: 106: 102: 101: 97: 96: 92: 91: 84: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2867: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2848: 2846: 2843: 2841: 2838: 2837: 2835: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2795: 2791: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2776: 2775: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2754: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2737: 2733: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2707: 2704: 2703: 2701: 2697: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2676: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631:Habeas corpus 2627: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2612: 2608: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2593: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2585: 2581: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2566: 2564: 2560: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2545: 2541: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2510: 2508: 2504: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2487: 2483: 2476: 2475: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2460: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2436: 2432: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2409: 2408: 2404: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2385: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2377: 2375: 2371: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2348: 2344: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2313: 2309: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2294: 2290: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2244: 2240: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2196: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2177: 2173: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2142: 2138: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2107: 2103: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2090: 2088: 2084: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2021: 2020: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1962: 1960: 1956: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1901: 1899: 1895: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1868: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1849: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1705: 1703: 1701: 1697: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1612: 1610: 1608: 1604: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1563: 1559: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1412: 1408: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1364: 1360: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1341: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1243: 1238: 1234: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1093:Terry v. Ohio 1090: 1089: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1065: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1001: 998: 997: 993: 990: 989: 985: 982: 981: 977: 976: 973: 969: 964: 960: 945: 944: 940: 937: 936: 932: 931: 929: 925: 918: 917: 913: 910: 909: 905: 902: 901: 897: 894: 893: 889: 886: 885: 881: 878: 877: 873: 870: 869: 865: 862: 861: 857: 854: 853: 849: 846: 845: 844:Terry v. Ohio 841: 838: 837: 833: 830: 829: 825: 824: 822: 818: 807: 806: 802: 799: 798: 794: 791: 790: 786: 783: 782: 778: 777: 775: 773: 769: 762: 761: 757: 754: 753: 749: 746: 745: 741: 740: 738: 734: 727: 726: 722: 719: 718: 714: 711: 710: 706: 705: 703: 701: 697: 691:(D.D.C. 2013) 690: 689: 685: 683:(D.D.C. 2013) 682: 681: 677: 674: 673: 669: 666: 665: 661: 658: 657: 653: 650: 649: 645: 642: 641: 637: 634: 633: 629: 626: 625: 621: 618: 617: 613: 610: 609: 605: 602: 601: 597: 594: 593: 589: 586: 585: 581: 578: 577: 573: 570: 569: 565: 562: 561: 557: 554: 553: 549: 546: 545: 541: 540: 538: 534: 530: 523: 519: 514: 507: 502: 500: 495: 493: 488: 487: 484: 477: 474: 469: 460: 451: 442: 433: 426: 422: 418: 414: 413: 393: 386: 384: 382: 380: 363: 356: 340: 333: 331: 329: 327: 322: 315: 306: 304: 293: 290: 286: 282: 277: 273: 271: 266: 265: 260: 246: 244: 240: 239: 234: 230: 229: 220: 216: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 176:Case opinions 174: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112:Chief Justice 111: 110: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 82: 81: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 2807: 2799: 2782:Mapp v. Ohio 2780: 2772: 2764: 2756: 2710: 2686: 2678: 2648: 2640: 2629: 2616: 2597: 2589: 2570: 2549: 2530: 2522: 2514: 2493: 2472: 2464: 2413: 2405: 2397: 2389: 2381: 2360: 2352: 2333: 2325: 2317: 2298: 2279: 2271: 2263: 2221: 2213: 2205: 2197: 2189: 2181: 2162: 2154: 2146: 2127: 2119: 2111: 2092: 2073: 2065: 2057: 2049: 2041: 2033: 2025: 2017: 2009: 2001: 1982: 1974: 1966: 1945: 1937: 1929: 1921: 1913: 1905: 1884: 1876: 1857: 1838: 1830: 1822: 1814: 1806: 1798: 1779: 1771: 1763: 1755: 1747: 1739: 1731: 1723: 1715: 1707: 1686: 1678: 1670: 1662: 1654: 1646: 1638: 1630: 1622: 1614: 1593: 1585: 1577: 1569: 1549: 1548: 1540: 1532: 1524: 1516: 1508: 1489: 1481: 1473: 1465: 1457: 1449: 1441: 1433: 1389: 1368: 1349: 1330: 1322: 1314: 1293: 1285: 1277: 1269: 1261: 1253: 1219: 1211: 1203: 1195: 1187: 1179: 1171: 1163: 1155: 1147: 1139: 1131: 1123: 1115: 1107: 1099: 1091: 1050: 1042: 1034: 1026: 1018: 1010: 1002: 994: 986: 978: 941: 933: 914: 906: 898: 890: 882: 874: 866: 858: 850: 842: 834: 826: 803: 795: 787: 779: 758: 750: 742: 723: 715: 707: 686: 678: 670: 662: 654: 646: 638: 630: 622: 614: 606: 598: 590: 582: 574: 566: 558: 550: 542: 416: 396:. Retrieved 394:. SCOTUSblog 366:. Retrieved 364:. SCOTUSblog 355: 343:. Retrieved 341:. SCOTUSblog 312: 299: 288: 284: 280: 275: 268: 262: 258: 257: 249:Case aspects 242: 236: 227: 226: 225: 213:Laws applied 163: 156:Samuel Alito 151: 139: 127: 116:John Roberts 78: 53: 15: 2583:Attenuation 1959:Checkpoints 1244:requirement 303:Jeff Fisher 197:Concurrence 189:Concurrence 168:Elena Kagan 2834:Categories 2665:Civil suit 1562:Plain view 318:References 243:Fernandez, 60:Docket no. 87:L. Ed. 2d 70:Citations 2439:Remedies 2247:Seizures 515:case law 415:Text of 398:June 23, 368:June 23, 345:June 23, 289:Randolph 181:Majority 2672:Federal 2458:Origins 1242:Warrant 432:Cornell 285:Matlock 276:Matlock 205:Dissent 95:Holding 64:12-7822 2812:(1964) 2804:(1963) 2785:(1961) 2777:(1960) 2769:(1952) 2761:(1949) 2715:(1961) 2691:(2022) 2683:(1971) 2653:(1986) 2645:(1976) 2634:review 2621:(2006) 2602:(2016) 2594:(1963) 2575:(1984) 2554:(1988) 2535:(2011) 2527:(2009) 2519:(1984) 2498:(1990) 2477:(1920) 2469:(1914) 2418:(2015) 2410:(2014) 2402:(2007) 2394:(1989) 2386:(1985) 2365:(2015) 2357:(1977) 2338:(2013) 2330:(2005) 2322:(1981) 2303:(2001) 2284:(1983) 2276:(1983) 2268:(1979) 2226:(2008) 2218:(2001) 2210:(1991) 2202:(1983) 2194:(1980) 2186:(1976) 2167:(2012) 2159:(1984) 2151:(1979) 2132:(2015) 2124:(1967) 2116:(1959) 2097:(2006) 2078:(2010) 2070:(2009) 2062:(2002) 2054:(2001) 2046:(1997) 2038:(1995) 2030:(1989) 2022:(1989) 2014:(1987) 2006:(1985) 1987:(2004) 1979:(2000) 1971:(1990) 1950:(2004) 1942:(1985) 1934:(1977) 1926:(1976) 1918:(1975) 1910:(1973) 1889:(1976) 1881:(1973) 1862:(1990) 1843:(2019) 1835:(2016) 1827:(2013) 1819:(2013) 1811:(1973) 1803:(1966) 1784:(2014) 1776:(2009) 1768:(2004) 1760:(1998) 1752:(1981) 1744:(1977) 1736:(1973) 1728:(1969) 1720:(1950) 1712:(1948) 1691:(2018) 1683:(1999) 1675:(1999) 1667:(1991) 1659:(1991) 1651:(1985) 1643:(1982) 1635:(1979) 1627:(1970) 1619:(1925) 1598:(1993) 1590:(1990) 1582:(1987) 1574:(1971) 1553:(2014) 1545:(2006) 1537:(1990) 1529:(1974) 1521:(1973) 1513:(1968) 1494:(2021) 1486:(2021) 1478:(2011) 1470:(2006) 1462:(1986) 1454:(1980) 1446:(1977) 1438:(1967) 1394:(1995) 1373:(1978) 1354:(1971) 1335:(1967) 1327:(1906) 1319:(1886) 1298:(2006) 1290:(2006) 1282:(1987) 1274:(1979) 1266:(1978) 1258:(1948) 1224:(2020) 1216:(2014) 1208:(2014) 1200:(2009) 1192:(2004) 1184:(2002) 1176:(2000) 1168:(2000) 1160:(1996) 1152:(1983) 1144:(1983) 1136:(1981) 1128:(1979) 1120:(1979) 1112:(1979) 1104:(1975) 1096:(1968) 1081:frisks 1055:(2018) 1047:(2013) 1039:(2004) 1031:(2003) 1023:(1996) 1015:(1996) 1007:(1983) 999:(1969) 991:(1964) 983:(1949) 946:(2018) 938:(1978) 919:(2021) 911:(2007) 903:(2002) 895:(1992) 887:(1991) 879:(1991) 871:(1984) 863:(1983) 855:(1980) 847:(1968) 839:(1906) 831:(1892) 808:(2018) 800:(1979) 792:(1976) 784:(1971) 763:(1989) 755:(1986) 747:(1986) 728:(1987) 720:(1984) 712:(1924) 675:(2013) 667:(2012) 659:(2005) 651:(2001) 643:(2000) 635:(1990) 627:(1989) 619:(1988) 611:(1984) 603:(1983) 595:(1983) 587:(1967) 579:(1961) 571:(1960) 563:(1928) 555:(1927) 547:(1886) 471:  465:  462:  456:  453:  450:Justia 447:  444:  438:  435:  429:  200:Thomas 192:Scalia 166: 164:· 162:  154: 152:· 150:  142: 140:· 138:  130: 128:· 126:  2699:State 423: 287:. In 274:. In 77:292 ( 1079:and 425:U.S. 400:2014 370:2014 347:2014 80:more 75:U.S. 73:571 421:571 2836:: 1075:: 419:, 378:^ 325:^ 505:e 498:t 491:v 478:- 402:. 372:. 349:. 83:)

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
12-7822
U.S.
more
L. Ed. 2d
John Roberts
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
U.S. Const. amend. IV
U.S. Supreme Court
Georgia v. Randolph
United States v. Matlock
Georgia v. Randolph
Jeff Fisher




"Fernandez v. California and the problem of third-party consent"
"Five thoughts on Fernandez v. California"



Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑