87:
in statements and questions. In fact he claimed "Every statement that anybody ever makes is made in the answer to a question." By way of explanation, he wrote "In proportion as a man is thinking scientifically when he makes a statement, he knows the statement is the answer to a question and he knows
172:
and answers. Embedded questions and situational analysis are noted, as well as specific considerations with regard to science, psychology, and surveys. Concluding chapters consider legal proceedings, philosophical questions, and the history of erotetic study in Poland in the 20th-century.
57:. For example, he noted the ambiguity of the interrogation "Why?" (1) It could be a reason, such as why the angles of a triangle sum to two right angles, or (2) a cause, such as why days are shorter in winter than summer, or (3) a design requirement as in a timepiece.
88:
what the question is." In this sense, when thinking is scientifically ordered, a question is logically prior to its own answer. Collingwood also asserts that "Each question involves a presupposition."
133:
For most of the time, researchers concentrated on the relation between questions and answers. Recently, more attention is given to the way questions come from sentences or other questions, similar to
142:
72:
to write questions symbolically. Recognizing the consequent symbolic calculus, they note that it is insufficient for the logic of interrogatives, which is antisymbolic.
114:
reviewed the works of Harrah and Belnap together: he considered them a launching of erotetics into serious consideration. Later, Nuel Belnap and T. B. Steel Jr. wrote
145:'s inferential erotetic logic (IEL). In the interrogative model, questioning is seen as game played between two parties. One of these parties may be
118:(1976), which came at a watershed moment: while purportedly continuing the philosophical investigation of Harrah, they anticipated
259:
386:
361:
542:
522:
418:
200:
452:
The Theory of
Questions: Erotitics through the Prism of its Philosophical Background and Practical Applications
17:
123:
106:
by David Harrah that focused on questions as pivotal in communication. The same year Belnap published
353:
286:
501:
535:
180:: "To teach someone something is to answer that person’s questions about some subject matter."
411:
313:(1936) "Remarques sur les propositions interrogatives". Projet d'une "logique du problème",
69:
8:
348:
235:
225:
220:
215:
195:
92:
127:
538:
518:
414:
326:
310:
76:
61:
527:
476:
455:
391:
294:
265:
205:
190:
507:
331:
255:
230:
210:
138:
54:
580:
515:
119:
84:
480:
447:
395:
153:
574:
373:
111:
336:
281:
165:
65:
459:
435:
565:
134:
561:
169:
99:
298:
177:
161:
42:
146:
430:
Joke Meheus (2001) "Adaptive Logics for
Question Evocation",
45:. It is sometimes called the logic of questions and answers.
38:
473:
A Logical Theory of
Teaching: Erotetics and Intensionality
315:
168:), then use in human intercourse, with a consideration of
454:, Polish Analytical Philosophy volume 99, Brill/Rodopi,
95:
351:(1966) "Questions, Answers, and Presuppositions",
512:Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientic Discovery
572:
471:C.J.B. MacMillan & James W. Garrison (1988)
126:. The bibliography included 25 references on
68:recalled Whately's suggestion for a variable
364:Eastern Division Sixty-Third Annual Meeting.
108:An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report
137:. Some contributions in this direction are
160:which started with philosophical context (
176:Erotetics has been used for insight into
14:
573:
60:In 1936 Whately's work was revived by
130:and natural language understanding.
53:The idea was originally developed by
406:Nuel Belnap & J.B. Steel (1976)
276:
274:
24:
408:The Logic of Questions and Answers
387:Australasian Journal of Philosophy
362:American Philosophical Association
116:The Logic of Questions and Answers
25:
592:
555:
271:
201:Display and referential questions
41:, devoted to logical analysis of
317:, VII Logique, Paris, pp. 18–28.
549:The Posing of Logical Questions
465:
441:
424:
400:
367:
342:
320:
304:
249:
104:Communication: A Logical Model
27:Logic of questions and answers
13:
1:
242:
124:data base management systems
7:
293:(1) (1955): pp. 43–59
183:
141:'s interrogative model and
48:
10:
597:
547:Andrzej Wiśniewski (1995)
490:
481:10.1007/978-94-009-3067-4
396:10.1080/00048406412341121
354:The Journal of Philosophy
502:Longman, Green & Co.
496:Whately, Richard (1875)
287:The Philosophical Review
551:, Springer Netherlands.
332:An Essay on Metaphysics
158:The Theory of Questions
81:An Essay on Metaphysics
536:Transaction Publishers
504:(9th Edition, London)
460:10.1163/9789401207324
412:Yale University Press
382:Analysis of Questions
83:in which he examined
261:Elements of Rhetoric
349:Nuel D. Belnap, Jr.
236:Suggestive question
226:Scientific question
221:Rhetorical question
216:Open-ended question
196:Contingent question
93:Nuel D. Belnap, Jr.
64:. In 1955 Mary and
432:Logique et Analyse
284:"Erotetic Logic",
143:Andrzej Wiśniewski
128:question answering
498:Elements of Logic
376:(1964) "Reviews:
327:R. G. Collingwood
311:Eugeniu Sperantia
77:R. G. Collingwood
62:Eugeniu Sperantia
16:(Redirected from
588:
532:Inquiry Dynamics
528:Nicholas Rescher
484:
469:
463:
445:
439:
428:
422:
404:
398:
371:
365:
346:
340:
324:
318:
308:
302:
278:
269:
266:Internet Archive
253:
206:Leading question
191:Complex question
21:
596:
595:
591:
590:
589:
587:
586:
585:
571:
570:
558:
508:Jaakko Hintikka
493:
488:
487:
470:
466:
446:
442:
429:
425:
405:
401:
372:
368:
347:
343:
325:
321:
309:
305:
299:10.2307/2182232
280:Mary Prior and
279:
272:
264:, page 58, via
256:Richard Whately
254:
250:
245:
240:
231:Socratic method
211:Loaded question
186:
139:Jaakko Hintikka
120:query languages
85:presuppositions
55:Richard Whately
51:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
594:
584:
583:
569:
568:
557:
556:External links
554:
553:
552:
545:
525:
516:Springer books
505:
492:
489:
486:
485:
464:
440:
434:, pp. 135–164
423:
399:
366:
360:(20): 609–11,
341:
319:
303:
270:
247:
246:
244:
241:
239:
238:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
187:
185:
182:
50:
47:
35:erotetic logic
26:
18:Erotetic logic
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
593:
582:
579:
578:
576:
567:
563:
560:
559:
550:
546:
544:
543:0-7658-0007-1
540:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
523:0-7923-5477-X
520:
517:
513:
509:
506:
503:
499:
495:
494:
482:
478:
474:
468:
461:
457:
453:
449:
444:
437:
433:
427:
420:
419:0-300-01962-9
416:
413:
409:
403:
397:
393:
389:
388:
383:
379:
378:Communication
375:
374:C. L. Hamblin
370:
363:
359:
356:
355:
350:
345:
338:
334:
333:
328:
323:
316:
312:
307:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
283:
277:
275:
267:
263:
262:
257:
252:
248:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
188:
181:
179:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
148:
144:
140:
136:
131:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:C. L. Hamblin
109:
105:
101:
96:
94:
89:
86:
82:
78:
73:
71:
67:
63:
58:
56:
46:
44:
40:
37:is a part of
36:
32:
19:
548:
531:
511:
497:
472:
467:
451:
443:
431:
426:
407:
402:
385:
381:
377:
369:
357:
352:
344:
337:Google Books
330:
322:
314:
306:
290:
285:
282:Arthur Prior
260:
251:
175:
166:epistemology
157:
151:
132:
115:
107:
103:
97:
90:
80:
74:
66:Arthur Prior
59:
52:
34:
30:
29:
448:Anna Brożek
390:42: 146–51
154:Anna Brożek
566:PhilPapers
243:References
156:published
135:entailment
102:published
79:published
562:Erotetics
475:, Kluwer
170:cognition
100:MIT Press
43:questions
31:Erotetics
575:Category
258:(1845),
184:See also
178:teaching
162:ontology
152:In 2011
98:In 1963
91:In 1966
75:In 1940
49:Overview
530:(2000)
510:(1999)
491:Sources
450:(2011)
329:(1940)
147:reality
541:
521:
417:
70:copula
581:Logic
436:Jstor
39:logic
539:ISBN
519:ISBN
415:ISBN
380:and
122:and
564:at
477:doi
456:doi
392:doi
384:",
335:at
295:doi
33:or
577::
534:,
514:,
500:,
421:.
410:,
358:63
291:64
273:^
164:,
149:.
110:.
483:.
479::
462:.
458::
438:.
394::
339:.
301:.
297::
268:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.