Knowledge

Enterprise architecture

Source đź“ť

276:
the purpose of EA is to create a greater coherency between the various concerns of an enterprise (HR, IT, Operations, etc.), including the link between strategy formulation and execution. Architecture proposals and decisions here encompass all aspects of the enterprise. The Enterprise Ecosystem Adaption school states that the purpose of EA is to foster and maintain the learning capabilities of enterprises so they may be sustainable. Consequently, a great deal of emphasis is put on improving the capabilities of the enterprise to improve itself, to innovate, and to coevolve with its environment. Typically, proposals and decisions encompass both the enterprise and its environment.
99:
architects focus on solutions for and the impact on the whole organization. Enterprise architects oversee many solution architects and business functions. As practitioners of EA, enterprise architects support an organization's strategic vision by acting to align people, process, and technology decisions with actionable goals and objectives that result in quantifiable improvements toward achieving that vision. The practice of EA "analyzes areas of common activity within or between organizations, where information and other resources are exchanged to guide future states from an integrated viewpoint of strategy, business, and technology."
542: 2169: 530: 2159: 518: 158:, strategy, and the governance framework define all roles, responsibilities, and relationships involved in the anticipated transformation. Changes considered by enterprise architects typically include innovations in the structure or processes of an organization; innovations in the use of information systems or technologies; the integration and/or 119:, or collection of organizations that share a set of common goals and collaborate to provide specific products or services to customers. In that sense, the term enterprise covers various types of organizations, regardless of their size, ownership model, operational model, or geographical distribution. It includes those organizations' complete 95:'s EA best practice guidance states that an EA typically "takes the form of a comprehensive set of cohesive models that describe the structure and functions of an enterprise. The individual models in an EA are arranged in a logical manner that provides an ever-increasing level of detail about the enterprise." 275:
capabilities to meet the desired organizational objectives, often by greater alignment between IT/IS and business concerns. Architecture proposals and decisions are limited to the IT/IS aspects of the enterprise and other aspects service only as inputs. The Enterprise Integrating school believes that
333:
from system failures and security breaches. EA also helps reduce risks of project delivery. Establishing EA as an accepted, recognized, functionally integrated and fully involved concept at operational and tactical levels is one of the biggest challenges facing Enterprise Architects today and one of
242:
The main difference between these two definitions is that Zachman's concept was the creation of individual information systems optimized for business, while NIST's described the management of all information systems within a business unit. The definitions in both publications, however, agreed that
98:
Important players within EA include enterprise architects and solutions architects. Enterprise architects are at the top level of the architect hierarchy, meaning they have more responsibilities than solutions architects. While solutions architects focus on their own relevant solutions, enterprise
86:
As a discipline, EA "proactively and holistically lead enterprise responses to disruptive forces by identifying and analyzing the execution of change" towards organizational goals. EA gives business and IT leaders recommendations for policy adjustments and provides best strategies to support and
263:
Within the field of enterprise architecture, there are three overarching schools: Enterprise IT Design, Enterprise Integrating, and Enterprise Ecosystem Adaption. Which school one subscribes to will impact how they see the EA's purpose and scope, as well as the means of achieving it, the skills
1177:
Engelsman, W.; Iacob, M.E.; Franken, H.M.; Jonkers, J. (2009). "Architecture-driven requirements engineering". Advances in Enterprise Engineering II (Report). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Vol. 28. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Symposium on Applied
312:
and efficient resource allocation during system development and testing; enforcement of discipline and standardization of IT planning activities and contribution to a reduction in time for technology-related decision making; reduction of the system's implementation and operational costs, and
284:
The benefits of EA are achieved through its direct and indirect contributions to organizational goals. Notable benefits include support in the areas related to design and re-design of the organizational structures during mergers, acquisitions, or general organizational change; enforcement of
34:
analysis, design, planning, and implementation, using a comprehensive approach at all times, for the successful development and execution of strategy. Enterprise architecture applies architecture principles and practices to guide organizations through the business, information, process, and
243:
due to the "increasing size and complexity of the mplementations of nformation systems... logical construct (or architecture) for defining and controlling the interfaces and... ntegration of all the components of a system" is necessary. Zachman in particular urged for a "
433:
techniques provide a way to explore and analyze these hidden, tacit, or implicit areas. In return, EA provides a way of documenting the components of an organization and their interaction in a systemic and holistic way that complements knowledge management.
214:
is the top level and might be a total corporate entity or a sub-unit. It establishes for the whole organization necessary frameworks for "satisfying both internal information needs" as well as the needs of external entities, which include
130:
refers to fundamental concepts or properties of a system in its environment; and embodied in its elements, relationships, and in the principles of its design and evolution. A methodology for developing and using architecture to guide the
1367: 441:(SOA), a particular style of application integration. Research points to EA promoting the use of SOA as an enterprise-wide integration pattern. The broad reach of EA has resulted in this business role being included in the 1059:
Nilsson, Andreas (2008). Management of technochange in an interorganizational E-government project (Report). Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. p. 209.
1225:
Pulkkinen, M.; Luostarinen, K.; Naumenko, A. (2007). "Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - Enterprise architecture as a coordination tool".
227:. The lower levels of the EA that provide information to higher levels are more attentive to detail on behalf of their superiors. In addition to this structure, business unit architecture establishes 1371: 373:
According to the Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations (FEAPO), EA interacts with a wide array of other disciplines commonly found in business settings such as
1472: 1405: 1430: 641: 1252:
Obitz, T.; Babu, M.K. (2009). Enterprise architecture expands its role in strategic business transformation: Infosys enterprise architecture survey 2008/2009 (Report). Infosys.
957:
The Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Achievement of Organizational Goals: Establishing the Enterprise Architecture Benefits Framework, Technical Report
313:
minimization of replicate infrastructure services across business units; reduction in IT complexity, consolidation of data and applications, and improvement of
1561: 1386: 510: 30:. The international definition according to the Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations is "a well-defined practice for conducting 26:) is a business function concerned with the structures and behaviours of a business, especially business roles and processes that create and use business 996:(2005). "Effects of an architectural approach to the implementation of shared service centers". In Fethi Rabhi; Daniel Veit; Christof Weinhardt (eds.). 39:
necessary to execute their strategies. These practices utilize the various aspects of an enterprise to identify, motivate, and achieve these changes."
358: 1449: 482: 362: 341:
because of the broad-brush and often opaque nature of EA projects. Additionally, there have been a number of reports, including those written by
365:, that argue that the frequent failure of EA initiatives makes the concept not worth the effort and that the methodology will fade out quickly. 1645: 1580: 1263:
Dedic, N. (2020). "FEAMI: A Methodology to include and to integrate Enterprise Architecture Processes into Existing Organizational Processes".
477: 210:(NIST) Special Publication on the challenges of information system integration. The NIST article describes EA as consisting of several levels. 207: 571: 546: 1476: 1412: 956: 702: 534: 1348: 1076: 498: 398: 648: 1434: 1519: 1111:
Ross, J.W.; Weill, P. (2005). Understanding the benefits of enterprise architecture (Report). Vol. V. CISR Research Briefings.
522: 472: 608: 386: 47: 1083: 1045:(2006). Enterprise architecture analysis and application: An exploratory study (Report). Hong Kong, China: EDOC Workshop TEAR. 2162: 2028: 1957: 1503: 1330: 1299: 1191: 123:, including people, information, processes, and technologies. Enterprise as a sociotechnical system defines the scope of EA. 1851: 1754: 962:(Report). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Information and Computing Sciences at Utrecht University. Archived from 173:. In practice, an architectural description contains a variety of lists, tables, and diagrams. These are models known as 289:; support for investment decision-making and work prioritization; enhancement of collaboration and communication between 1606: 1638: 453:
are "two sides to the same coin." The Cutter Consortium described EA as an information and knowledge-based discipline.
87:
enable business development and change within the information systems the business depends on. EA provides a guide for
1831: 1698: 1683: 1042: 467: 462: 442: 267:
Under Enterprise IT Design, the main purpose of EA is to guide the process of planning and designing an enterprise's
140: 136: 2193: 1565: 1390: 732: 75: 143:, reference models, and guidance for the production and use of an enterprise-specific architecture description. 1987: 1914: 1904: 1749: 1678: 1124:"Application and project portfolio valuation using enterprise architecture and business requirements modelling" 2172: 2038: 1967: 1909: 1631: 438: 394: 135:
from a baseline state to a target state, sometimes through several transition states, is usually known as an
63: 998:
Financecom05: Second international workshop on Enterprise, applications and services in the finance industry
2203: 2198: 1977: 1836: 1703: 689:
Enterprise Architecture: Understanding the Bigger Picture – A Best Practice Guide for Decision Makers in IT
350: 1899: 1894: 1708: 2094: 1942: 1937: 1889: 1866: 1846: 792:"The theoretical basis of enterprise architecture: A critical review and taxonomy of relevant theories" 294: 1546: 2099: 2089: 1349:"Gartner Enterprise Architecture Summit: Architecting the Agile Organization, 26 – 27 September 2007" 285:
discipline and business process standardization, and enablement of process consolidation, reuse, and
92: 2002: 1801: 1784: 1693: 954: 414: 302: 43: 963: 1952: 710: 665: 604: 390: 374: 132: 51: 1352: 2007: 1764: 1759: 1020: 879: 426: 406: 378: 268: 31: 162:
of business processes; and improvement of the quality and timeliness of business information.
1826: 1779: 1496:
Information First - Integrating Knowledge and Information Architecture for Business Advantage
338: 326: 318: 211: 120: 179:. In the case of EA, these models describe the logical business functions or capabilities, 2124: 1962: 1821: 1811: 1723: 1668: 1654: 1387:"Fixing Enterprise Architecture: Balancing the Forces of Change in the Modern Organization" 1135: 989: 430: 236: 192: 1523: 8: 2144: 2129: 1997: 1861: 1769: 1713: 487: 429:. The EA of an organization is too complex and extensive to document in its entirety, so 410: 382: 290: 286: 272: 112: 67: 1139: 305:
and the accuracy of requirement definitions through publishing of the EA documentation.
2134: 1774: 1450:"Gartner urges more 'design thinking' to break enterprise architecture out of its silo" 1280: 1159: 937: 902: 857: 819: 244: 228: 198:
The first use of the term "enterprise architecture" is often incorrectly attributed to
1301:
Measuring Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness: A Focus on Key Performance Indicators
769:"ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011: Systems and software engineering — Architecture description" 2048: 1806: 1499: 1284: 1187: 1151: 941: 823: 811: 642:"FEA Practice Guidance Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office OMB" 623: 450: 224: 155: 36: 1163: 920:
Lapalme, J. (November 2012). "Three Schools of Thought on Enterprise Architecture".
906: 861: 78:'s reference guide aids federal agencies in the development of their architectures. 2119: 2063: 1841: 1733: 1728: 1547:
The Role of Service Oriented Architecture as an enabler for Enterprise Architecture
1272: 1234: 1179: 1143: 1016: 929: 894: 849: 803: 691:. Manchester, England, United Kingdom: The UK National Computing Centre. p. 9. 446: 422: 314: 180: 1334: 2139: 1992: 1972: 1856: 1718: 1147: 418: 159: 88: 1183: 2043: 1947: 1688: 1602: 1491: 1123: 1082:(Report). 23rd Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference. Archived from 955:
Vasilis Boucharas; Marlies van Steenbergen; Slinger Jansen; Sjaak Brinkkemper.
330: 322: 309: 1238: 2187: 2023: 1791: 1326: 1276: 1155: 840:
Zachman, John A. (1999). "A framework for information systems architecture".
815: 807: 402: 342: 166: 59: 2058: 2053: 1982: 791: 492: 329:, and increased transparency of infrastructure changes; and a reduction of 298: 199: 116: 71: 1211: 1021:
Trends in enterprise architecture 2005: How are organizations progressing?
933: 768: 151: 66:
also use EA to improve their business architectures as well as to improve
46:
is an example of an organization that practices EA, in this case with its
1581:"Digital workplace and enterprise architecture -- two sides to same coin" 1023:(Report). Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments. p. 33. 1000:. Regensburg, Germany: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 987: 622:
Austin, Robert D.; Ritchie, Warren; Garrett, Greggory (October 5, 2005).
264:
needed to conduct it, and the locus of responsibility for conducting it.
247: 169:, the product used to describe the architecture of a system is called an 139:. A framework provides a structured collection of processes, techniques, 1545:
Kistasamy, Christopher; van der Merwe, Alta; de la Harpe, Andre (2012).
898: 853: 541: 195:
and platform applications, hardware, and communications infrastructure.
2068: 2033: 1623: 736: 437:
In various venues, EA has been discussed as having a relationship with
354: 188: 175: 1520:"Service Oriented Architecture : SOA and Enterprise Architecture" 1210:
Kappelman, Leon; McGinnis, Tom; Pettite, Alex; Sidorova, Anna (2008).
1122:
Quartel, Dick; Steen, Maarten W.A.; Lankhorst, Marc M. (May 1, 2012).
1212:
Enterprise Architecture: Charting the Territory for Academic Research
993: 220: 216: 184: 1816: 771:. International Organization for Standardization. November 24, 2011 232: 1544: 529: 346: 1209: 1673: 752:
Design of Enterprise Systems, Theory, Architecture, and Methods
517: 183:, human roles and actors, the physical organization structure, 1607:"Dealing with Too Much Data from an Architectural Perspective" 880:"Information management directions: the integration challenge" 735:. International Institute of Business Analysis. Archived from 337:
A key concern about EA has been the difficulty in arriving at
1873: 1040: 55: 1224: 1176: 325:
IT as reflected through increased accessibility of data for
2084: 1549:(Report). Seattle, Washington, USA: AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. 27: 1560:
Rosa, Manuel; de Oliveira Sampaio, André (December 2013).
239:
that either enhance or stymie the organization's mission.
790:
Kotusev, Svyatoslav; Kurnia, Sherah (September 1, 2021).
1559: 1368:
Why Two Thirds of Enterprise Architecture Projects Fail
279: 1121: 297:
and to defining more complete and consistent project
621: 511:
United States Department of Defense definition of EA
368: 1431:"Design Thinking Reshapes EA For Dynamic Business" 877: 873: 871: 449:suggested that EA and the emerging concept of the 1411:(Report). Technology Matters, Inc. Archived from 499:Enterprise Architecture Service Life Cycle - SOMF 483:Architecture of Interoperable Information Systems 2185: 1562:"SOA Governance Through Enterprise Architecture" 1489: 647:. The White House. November 2007. Archived from 572:"Common Perspectives on Enterprise Architecture" 334:the main reasons why many EA initiatives fail. 206:. The first publication to use it was instead a 204:A framework for information systems architecture 868: 624:"Volkswagen of America: Managing IT Priorities" 1498:. Oxford, England, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. 1473:"Who Owns Information Architecture? All Of Us" 1077:TOGAF 9 enterprise architecture survey results 1011: 1009: 1007: 478:Architecture of Integrated Information Systems 445:processes of many organizations. Analyst firm 1639: 1365: 1074: 878:Fong, E. N.; Goldfine, E.H. (December 1989). 789: 1205: 1203: 1106: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1098: 1096: 1384: 1004: 763: 761: 1646: 1632: 1447: 1428: 1054: 1052: 835: 833: 1251: 1200: 1110: 1093: 1075:Varnus, J.; Panaich, N. (July 20, 2009). 1070: 1068: 1066: 1041:Bucher, T.; Fischer, R.; Kurpjuweit, S.; 1036: 1034: 1032: 1030: 707:Enterprise Architecture Book of Knowledge 1837:Software development process/methodology 1653: 1601: 1325: 758: 749: 743: 473:Architectural pattern (computer science) 1385:Hinchcliffe, Dion (September 3, 2009). 1297: 1058: 1049: 1015: 919: 913: 839: 830: 566: 564: 308:Other benefits include contribution to 301:; and an increase in the timeliness of 48:Capital Planning and Investment Control 2186: 1307:(Master's thesis). Universiteit Leiden 1298:GĂĽnther, Wendy Arianne (August 2014). 1063: 1027: 754:. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. 686: 1627: 1578: 1470: 1403: 1262: 733:"Business Analysis Body of Knowledge" 495:, promoter of enterprise architecture 258: 2158: 1852:Software verification and validation 1755:Component-based software engineering 611:from the original on April 30, 2010. 579:Architecture and Governance Magazine 561: 280:Benefits, challenges, and criticisms 1429:Richardson, Clay (April 12, 2013). 848:(2/3) (reprint ed.): 454–470. 709:. Mitre Corporation. Archived from 13: 1471:Owens, Leslie (February 2, 2010). 1265:IEEE Engineering Management Review 150:the EA is the identification of a 14: 2215: 1832:Software configuration management 1699:Search-based software engineering 1684:Experimental software engineering 1214:(Report). AMCIS 2008 Proceedings. 796:Journal of Information Technology 504: 468:Enterprise architecture framework 463:Enterprise architecture artifacts 443:information technology governance 369:Relationship to other disciplines 137:enterprise architecture framework 2168: 2167: 2157: 1522:. The Open Group. Archived from 1448:McKendrick, Joe (May 19, 2010). 1366:Roeleven, S.; Broer, J. (2010). 540: 528: 516: 44:United States Federal Government 1595: 1572: 1553: 1538: 1512: 1483: 1464: 1441: 1422: 1397: 1378: 1359: 1351:. Gartner. 2007. Archived from 1341: 1319: 1291: 1256: 1245: 1227:Journal of Systems and Software 1218: 1170: 1115: 981: 948: 783: 395:enterprise portfolio management 208:National Institute of Standards 81: 76:Federal Enterprise Architecture 1679:Empirical software engineering 1579:Byrne, Tony (March 19, 2012). 1370:(Report). ARIS. Archived from 1128:Enterprise Information Systems 725: 695: 680: 666:"Enterprise Architecture (EA)" 658: 634: 615: 597: 293:and contribution to efficient 102: 91:towards these objectives. The 1: 1178:Computing. pp. 285–286. 555: 545:The dictionary definition of 439:Service Oriented Architecture 64:InterContinental Hotels Group 50:processes. Companies such as 16:Business function methodology 1704:Site reliability engineering 1148:10.1080/17517575.2011.625571 351:Erasmus University Rotterdam 133:transformation of a business 7: 1709:Social software engineering 1475:. Forrester. Archived from 1433:. Forrester. Archived from 1184:10.1007/978-3-642-01859-6_8 456: 253: 10: 2222: 1847:Software quality assurance 703:"Planning an EA – Purpose" 212:Business unit architecture 165:According to the standard 2153: 2112: 2077: 2016: 1930: 1923: 1882: 1742: 1661: 1406:Why Doesn't the FEA Work? 1239:10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.044 607:. The White House. 2010. 401:, IT strategic planning, 399:governance and compliance 217:cooperating organizations 171:architectural description 93:National Computing Centre 2003:Model-driven engineering 1802:Functional specification 1785:Software incompatibility 1694:Requirements engineering 1564:. Oracle. Archived from 1277:10.1109/EMR.2020.3031968 808:10.1177/0268396220977873 415:organization development 303:requirements elicitation 2194:Enterprise architecture 1797:Enterprise architecture 1404:Gaver, Stanley (2010). 750:Giachett, R.E. (2010). 628:Harvard Business Review 548:enterprise architecture 535:Enterprise architecture 523:Enterprise architecture 375:performance engineering 52:Independence Blue Cross 20:Enterprise architecture 2008:Round-trip engineering 1765:Backward compatibility 1760:Software compatibility 1389:. ebiz. Archived from 533:Quotations related to 427:user experience design 407:information management 310:optimal system designs 1827:Software architecture 1780:Forward compatibility 1605:(November 13, 2012). 1568:on December 19, 2013. 1393:on September 6, 2009. 1374:on November 13, 2013. 934:10.1109/MITP.2011.109 585:(4): 1. November 2013 327:regulatory compliance 317:of the systems; more 193:business applications 141:artifact descriptions 121:sociotechnical system 111:can be defined as an 2125:Computer engineering 1822:Software archaeology 1812:Programming paradigm 1724:Software maintenance 1669:Computer programming 1655:Software engineering 1479:on February 5, 2010. 1331:"EA Failed Big Way!" 1329:(October 18, 2007). 687:Jarvis, Bob (2003). 654:on October 16, 2010. 525:at Wikimedia Commons 431:knowledge management 291:project stakeholders 74:. Additionally, the 68:business performance 2204:Systems engineering 2199:Information science 2145:Systems engineering 2130:Information science 1910:Service orientation 1862:Structured analysis 1770:Compatibility layer 1714:Software deployment 1526:on January 10, 2015 1140:2012EntIS...6..189Q 899:10.1145/74120.74125 854:10.1147/sj.382.0454 842:IBM Systems Journal 488:Architecture domain 411:metadata management 383:process engineering 113:organizational unit 2135:Project management 1900:Object orientation 1867:Essential analysis 1775:Compatibility mode 1583:. Real Story Group 1490:Evernden, Elaine; 1437:on April 19, 2013. 1355:on August 6, 2007. 713:on October 1, 2013 339:metrics of success 259:Schools of thought 245:strategic planning 181:business processes 167:ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 37:technology changes 2181: 2180: 2108: 2107: 2049:Information model 1953:Incremental model 1807:Modeling language 1505:978-0-7506-5858-4 1418:on June 11, 2016. 1337:on April 1, 2016. 1233:(10): 1607–1620. 1193:978-3-642-01858-9 1089:on July 20, 2009. 1017:Schekkerman, Jaap 990:Martin Op 't Land 739:on June 24, 2017. 521:Media related to 451:digital workplace 154:. Their mission, 2211: 2171: 2170: 2161: 2160: 2120:Computer science 1928: 1927: 1842:Software quality 1734:Systems analysis 1729:Software testing 1648: 1641: 1634: 1625: 1624: 1619: 1618: 1616: 1614: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1590: 1588: 1576: 1570: 1569: 1557: 1551: 1550: 1542: 1536: 1535: 1533: 1531: 1516: 1510: 1509: 1487: 1481: 1480: 1468: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1445: 1439: 1438: 1426: 1420: 1419: 1417: 1410: 1401: 1395: 1394: 1382: 1376: 1375: 1363: 1357: 1356: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1333:. Archived from 1323: 1317: 1316: 1314: 1312: 1306: 1295: 1289: 1288: 1260: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1243: 1242: 1222: 1216: 1215: 1207: 1198: 1197: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1091: 1090: 1088: 1081: 1072: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1047: 1046: 1038: 1025: 1024: 1013: 1002: 1001: 985: 979: 978: 976: 974: 968: 961: 952: 946: 945: 917: 911: 910: 884: 875: 866: 865: 837: 828: 827: 787: 781: 780: 778: 776: 765: 756: 755: 747: 741: 740: 729: 723: 722: 720: 718: 699: 693: 692: 684: 678: 677: 675: 673: 662: 656: 655: 653: 646: 638: 632: 631: 619: 613: 612: 601: 595: 594: 592: 590: 576: 568: 544: 532: 520: 447:Real Story Group 423:systems thinking 359:Dion Hinchcliffe 315:interoperability 225:federal agencies 2221: 2220: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2177: 2149: 2140:Risk management 2104: 2073: 2012: 1993:Waterfall model 1963:Prototype model 1958:Iterative model 1919: 1895:Aspect-oriented 1878: 1857:Software system 1738: 1719:Software design 1657: 1652: 1622: 1612: 1610: 1603:Evernden, Roger 1600: 1596: 1586: 1584: 1577: 1573: 1558: 1554: 1543: 1539: 1529: 1527: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1506: 1492:Evernden, Roger 1488: 1484: 1469: 1465: 1455: 1453: 1446: 1442: 1427: 1423: 1415: 1408: 1402: 1398: 1383: 1379: 1364: 1360: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1324: 1320: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1296: 1292: 1261: 1257: 1250: 1246: 1223: 1219: 1208: 1201: 1194: 1175: 1171: 1120: 1116: 1109: 1094: 1086: 1079: 1073: 1064: 1057: 1050: 1039: 1028: 1014: 1005: 986: 982: 972: 970: 969:on July 4, 2022 966: 959: 953: 949: 922:IT Professional 918: 914: 882: 876: 869: 838: 831: 788: 784: 774: 772: 767: 766: 759: 748: 744: 731: 730: 726: 716: 714: 701: 700: 696: 685: 681: 671: 669: 664: 663: 659: 651: 644: 640: 639: 635: 620: 616: 603: 602: 598: 588: 586: 574: 570: 569: 562: 558: 507: 459: 419:design thinking 371: 295:project scoping 282: 261: 256: 160:standardization 105: 89:decision making 84: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2219: 2218: 2207: 2206: 2201: 2196: 2179: 2178: 2176: 2175: 2165: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2148: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2116: 2114: 2113:Related fields 2110: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2103: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2061: 2056: 2051: 2046: 2044:Function model 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2020: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2011: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1948:Executable UML 1945: 1940: 1934: 1932: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1918: 1917: 1912: 1907: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1886: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1877: 1876: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1859: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1824: 1819: 1814: 1809: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1757: 1752: 1746: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1696: 1691: 1689:Formal methods 1686: 1681: 1676: 1671: 1665: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1651: 1650: 1643: 1636: 1628: 1621: 1620: 1594: 1571: 1552: 1537: 1511: 1504: 1482: 1463: 1440: 1421: 1396: 1377: 1358: 1340: 1327:Jacobson, Ivar 1318: 1290: 1271:(4): 160–166. 1255: 1244: 1217: 1199: 1192: 1169: 1134:(2): 189–213. 1114: 1092: 1062: 1048: 1043:Winter, Robert 1026: 1003: 980: 947: 912: 867: 829: 802:(3): 275–315. 782: 757: 742: 724: 694: 679: 657: 633: 614: 596: 559: 557: 554: 553: 552: 538: 526: 514: 506: 505:External links 503: 502: 501: 496: 490: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 458: 455: 370: 367: 331:business risks 281: 278: 260: 257: 255: 252: 104: 101: 83: 80: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2217: 2216: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2189: 2174: 2166: 2164: 2156: 2155: 2152: 2146: 2143: 2141: 2138: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2115: 2111: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2080: 2076: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2064:Systems model 2062: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2019: 2015: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1933: 1931:Developmental 1929: 1926: 1922: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1908: 1906: 1903: 1901: 1898: 1896: 1893: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1881: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1818: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1792:Data modeling 1790: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1745: 1741: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1687: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1649: 1644: 1642: 1637: 1635: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1608: 1604: 1598: 1582: 1575: 1567: 1563: 1556: 1548: 1541: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1507: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1486: 1478: 1474: 1467: 1451: 1444: 1436: 1432: 1425: 1414: 1407: 1400: 1392: 1388: 1381: 1373: 1369: 1362: 1354: 1350: 1344: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1322: 1303: 1302: 1294: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1259: 1248: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1221: 1213: 1206: 1204: 1195: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1173: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1118: 1107: 1105: 1103: 1101: 1099: 1097: 1085: 1078: 1071: 1069: 1067: 1055: 1053: 1044: 1037: 1035: 1033: 1031: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1010: 1008: 999: 995: 991: 988:Bert Arnold; 984: 965: 958: 951: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 916: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887:SIGMOD Record 881: 874: 872: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 836: 834: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 786: 770: 764: 762: 753: 746: 738: 734: 728: 712: 708: 704: 698: 690: 683: 667: 661: 650: 643: 637: 629: 625: 618: 610: 606: 600: 584: 580: 573: 567: 565: 560: 551:at Wiktionary 550: 549: 543: 539: 536: 531: 527: 524: 519: 515: 512: 509: 508: 500: 497: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 460: 454: 452: 448: 444: 440: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 403:risk analysis 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 366: 364: 363:Stanley Gaver 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 343:Ivar Jacobson 340: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 311: 306: 304: 300: 299:deliverabless 296: 292: 288: 277: 274: 270: 265: 251: 249: 246: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 213: 209: 205: 201: 196: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177: 172: 168: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146:Paramount to 144: 142: 138: 134: 129: 124: 122: 118: 114: 110: 100: 96: 94: 90: 79: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 60:Volkswagen AG 57: 53: 49: 45: 40: 38: 33: 29: 25: 21: 2059:Object model 2054:Metamodeling 1983:Spiral model 1883:Orientations 1796: 1611:. Retrieved 1597: 1585:. Retrieved 1574: 1566:the original 1555: 1540: 1530:December 18, 1528:. Retrieved 1524:the original 1514: 1495: 1485: 1477:the original 1466: 1454:. Retrieved 1443: 1435:the original 1424: 1413:the original 1399: 1391:the original 1380: 1372:the original 1361: 1353:the original 1343: 1335:the original 1321: 1309:. Retrieved 1300: 1293: 1268: 1264: 1258: 1247: 1230: 1226: 1220: 1172: 1131: 1127: 1117: 1084:the original 997: 983: 973:November 29, 971:. Retrieved 964:the original 950: 928:(6): 37–43. 925: 921: 915: 893:(4): 40–43. 890: 886: 845: 841: 799: 795: 785: 773:. Retrieved 751: 745: 737:the original 727: 715:. Retrieved 711:the original 706: 697: 688: 682: 670:. Retrieved 660: 649:the original 636: 627: 617: 605:"EA-Success" 599: 587:. Retrieved 582: 578: 547: 537:at Wikiquote 493:John Zachman 436: 372: 336: 307: 283: 266: 262: 241: 203: 200:John Zachman 197: 174: 170: 164: 147: 145: 128:architecture 127: 125: 117:organization 108: 106: 97: 85: 82:Introduction 72:productivity 41: 23: 19: 18: 1750:Abstraction 287:integration 248:methodology 189:data stores 103:Definitions 2188:Categories 2069:View model 2034:Data model 717:October 3, 556:References 387:management 379:management 355:IDS Scheer 323:responsive 237:procedures 185:data flows 109:enterprise 32:enterprise 2078:Languages 1285:226351029 1156:1751-7575 994:Jan Dietz 942:206469705 824:230545944 816:0268-3962 668:. Gartner 513:(archive) 229:standards 221:customers 126:The term 107:The term 2173:Category 2039:ER model 1905:Ontology 1817:Software 1743:Concepts 1613:March 4, 1609:. Cutter 1587:March 4, 1494:(2003). 1456:March 4, 1311:March 4, 1164:28199240 907:23939840 862:12191060 775:March 4, 672:July 29, 609:Archived 589:March 4, 457:See also 254:Overview 233:policies 202:'s 1987 148:changing 2163:Commons 1988:V-model 1452:. ZDNet 1136:Bibcode 347:Gartner 152:sponsor 1924:Models 1674:DevOps 1662:Fields 1502:  1283:  1190:  1162:  1154:  940:  905:  860:  822:  814:  425:, and 361:, and 235:, and 223:, and 156:vision 62:, and 2100:SysML 2024:SPICE 2017:Other 1978:Scrum 1938:Agile 1890:Agile 1874:CI/CD 1416:(PDF) 1409:(PDF) 1305:(PDF) 1281:S2CID 1160:S2CID 1087:(PDF) 1080:(PDF) 967:(PDF) 960:(PDF) 938:S2CID 903:S2CID 883:(PDF) 858:S2CID 820:S2CID 652:(PDF) 645:(PDF) 575:(PDF) 176:views 56:Intel 2085:IDEF 2029:CMMI 1915:SDLC 1615:2023 1589:2023 1532:2014 1500:ISBN 1458:2023 1313:2023 1188:ISBN 1152:ISSN 975:2014 812:ISSN 777:2023 719:2014 674:2013 591:2023 393:and 385:and 377:and 353:and 321:and 319:open 187:and 70:and 42:The 28:data 2095:USL 2090:UML 1968:RAD 1943:EUP 1273:doi 1235:doi 1180:doi 1144:doi 930:doi 895:doi 850:doi 804:doi 250:." 2190:: 1998:XP 1973:UP 1279:. 1269:48 1267:. 1231:80 1229:. 1202:^ 1186:. 1158:. 1150:. 1142:. 1130:. 1126:. 1095:^ 1065:^ 1051:^ 1029:^ 1019:. 1006:^ 992:; 936:. 926:14 924:. 901:. 891:18 889:. 885:. 870:^ 856:. 846:38 844:. 832:^ 818:. 810:. 800:36 798:. 794:. 760:^ 705:. 626:. 581:. 577:. 563:^ 421:, 417:, 413:, 409:, 405:, 397:, 391:IT 389:, 381:, 357:, 349:, 345:, 273:IS 269:IT 231:, 219:, 191:, 115:, 58:, 54:, 24:EA 1647:e 1640:t 1633:v 1617:. 1591:. 1534:. 1508:. 1460:. 1315:. 1287:. 1275:: 1241:. 1237:: 1196:. 1182:: 1166:. 1146:: 1138:: 1132:6 977:. 944:. 932:: 909:. 897:: 864:. 852:: 826:. 806:: 779:. 721:. 676:. 630:. 593:. 583:9 271:/ 22:(

Index

data
enterprise
technology changes
United States Federal Government
Capital Planning and Investment Control
Independence Blue Cross
Intel
Volkswagen AG
InterContinental Hotels Group
business performance
productivity
Federal Enterprise Architecture
decision making
National Computing Centre
organizational unit
organization
sociotechnical system
transformation of a business
enterprise architecture framework
artifact descriptions
sponsor
vision
standardization
ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010
views
business processes
data flows
data stores
business applications
John Zachman

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑